►
From YouTube: Plan Commission Meeting - 04-23-2020
Description
Plan Commission Meeting - 04-23-2020
C
A
A
B
Thank
You
Blake,
so
this
is
the
Commission
approval
of
resolution,
number
20
2017,
approving
the
vacation
of
a
portion
of
public
right-of-way
for
14th
Avenue,
actually
14th,
Street,
Southwest
or
also
known
as
Oakwood
Road
I'll
pull
up
here
on
G.
Is
that
so
you
can
get
your
bearings
of
where
this
is
it
also?
B
So
the
reason
for
doing
that
is
just
that.
There's
an
excessive
amount
of
right-of-way
there's
about
a
hundred
feet
there
today
and
for
a
street
of
this
capacity,
which
is
a
local
street.
It
would
typically
just
be
66
feet
so
now
that
this
property
is
owned
by
a
different
owner.
There
have
different
intentions
for
it,
they're
hoping
to
maybe
get
some
more
buildable
space,
because
otherwise
it
is
pretty
narrow
and
with
the
setbacks,
you
don't
really
have
a
lot
of
use
for
that,
so
it
also.
E
B
C
C
G
C
D
B
C
Excuse
me,
mr.
chairman,
yes,
I
was
fumbling
for
my
mute
button.
This
is
Mayor
Sarah,
Karen
and
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
if
this
property
is
plaited,
the
road
requirements
can
be
a
condition
of
plaiting
and
I
was
I'm,
not
sure
if
they
were
planning
to
plat
but
I,
that
that
is
in
a
condition
that
the
city
can
add
for
development
of
this
land.
D
D
Because
I
mean
well,
mr.
Dahle
works
there,
but
I
mean
I've
traveled
that
road,
that
little
oak
and
it's
it's
narrow
and
it's
not
Mart
I
mean
it's
it's
an
accident
waiting
to
happen
with
that
little
loop
to
do
curve
there,
and
so,
if
we're
going
to
increase
traffic
on
that
I
guess
I'm.
My
concern
will
be
that
that
needs
to
be
wider,
whether
it's
a
city,
expense
or
this
developers
expense.
So
I'm,
guess
I'm
kind
of
following
the
mayor's
train
of
thought.
There
is
that
that
will
be
something
that
I
guess.
D
I
think
we
need
to
take
into
consideration
on
that
street
because
it
seems
narrow
it
might
be
wide,
but
it
just
with
those
ditches,
if
you
will
it
kind
of,
seems
like
there's
a
ditch
to
the
one
side,
so
you
always
kind
of
curve.
You
know
you
hug
to
the
centerline
and
I'm
surprised.
We
don't
have
more
accidents
there
with
the
amount
of
you
know
what
Eric's
I
know
they're
moving,
but
it
is
a
highly
traveled
road
at
this
moment
with
even
with
persona
and
the
other.
You
know
companies
down
there,
yeah.
A
B
Might
just
add
to
that
I:
don't
think
that
putting
a
condition
on
this
vacation
for
looking
at
the
street
improvements,
or
any
of
that
would
be
appropriate.
I
think
that
that
will
come
when
the
plat
comes
forward
and
then
also
we
have
to
look
into
our
ordinance
and
if
we
accepted
this
street
at
one
time
as
city
standards,
I
think
that
makes
it
really
hard
for
developers
to
really
know
what
will
be
expected.
B
F
I
would
like
to
piggyback
on
Brandis
comments.
There
I
think
that
well,
a
few
different
thoughts
come
to
mind
here.
One
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
looking
at
this
objectively
as
far
as
the
right
away,
vacate
request,
I
know
that
it's
easy
to,
and
it's
good
to
have
the
background
discussion
of,
what's
going
to
happen
with
this
property,
but
I
think
the
action
should
be
objective
to.
Is
it
appropriate
to
vacate
this
portion
of
right
away
to
expand
the
private
lot
owners
lot
area
from
the
city's
perspective?
F
I
would
agree,
yes,
that
that
that
amount
of
right
away
that
we've
got
there
is
egregious
it's
excessive.
It's
not
needed.
The
utilities
would
be
protected
appropriately,
as
we've
indicated
with
the
required
easements
for
that
sewer
line.
So
I
think
that
all
of
our
boxes
are
checked
there
from
a
staffing
standpoint
and
we'll
leave
it
up
to
the
board
to
decide
the
appropriateness
of
the
vacate
from
there
based
on
those
criteria
that
we
look
at
that
Brandi
cited
earlier.
F
As
far
as
the
roadway
improvements,
I,
don't
know,
Brandi
we
haven't
looked
far
enough
ahead
on
this,
but
this
may
even
qualify
for
an
administrative
plat
which
would
mean
that
it
wouldn't
even
be
come
before
the
board
subsequent
to
this
action.
If
that
were
the
case,
and
if
that
were
what
the
applicant
applied
for,
what
we
would
do
is
look
at
these
street
configurations
in
comparison
to
our
new
engineering
design
standards,
see
if
it
does
meet
any
of
the
minimum
width
criteria
and
things
of
that
nature.
F
We
do
allow
rural
street
sections
roadways
without
curb
and
gutter
that
is
in
areas
of
town,
but
those
criteria
would
be
looked
at,
checked
off
at
the
time
of
receipt
of
that
that
plat,
whether
it's
an
admin,
plat
or
a
standard
plat
I,
don't
know
just
again,
because
we
haven't
looked
up
for
ahead
on
this
I
just
wanted
to
make
those
couple
point.
Yeah.
B
That's
a
good
point
Heath
they
it
looks
like
it
can
be
administrative
because
it
does
not
require
the
dedication
of
right-of-way
or
construction
of
new
street,
except
that
arterial
roadways
identified
on
a
major
street
plan
will
be
required
to
be
dedicated
to
dedicate
the
necessary
right-of-way
yeah.
So
that's
enough!
That
is
a
good
point
where
you
that
it
might
not
have
to
come
before
the
board.
Even
but
we
would
look
at
like
Heath
said
we
would
look
at
our
engineering
design
standards
and
make
sure
that
everything
was
taken.
B
A
F
F
B
Right
away,
that's
when
the
street
requirements
for
how
it
would
be
installed
are
taken
care
of
so
before
the
city
would
have
accepted
it,
which
I'm
sure
back
when
this
was.
There
was
probably
not
a
formal
acceptance,
which
is
what
we're
trying
to
implement
now,
but
it
makes
it
you
know
this
was.
This
should
have
been
developed
to
city
standards
at
the
time
that
it
was
first
plaited
and
the
day
and
the
right-of-way
was
dedicated.
D
Well
again,
I'm
no
engineer
I'm
just
looking
at
this
as
safety
and
that's
that's
and
again,
I'm
not
saying
that
we
shouldn't
shouldn't,
approve
this
I
I
guess
maybe
I'm
putting
the
horse
or
the
cart
before
the
horse
here.
But
I
see
the
access
points
on
there
and,
if
that's
I
mean
I,
know
that
that's
not
set
stone.
B
D
D
B
F
F
B
B
B
So
you'll
see
here
so
the
property
owner
is
Paul
Carlson
and
he
recently
acquired
the
property
which
is
plaited
as
lot
a
of
compacity
and
seconded
subdivision.
So
this
now
he's
coming
forward
and
would
like
to
develop
this
property
and
you'll
see
that
right
now
it
is
also
it's
currently
zoned
r1
single-family
residential
and
he
is
proposing
some
variations
in
the
zoning
district.
So
he
would
do
r1,
r2
and
r3
r3
being
multi-family
residential
are
to
being
single-family
attached
and
then
obviously
our
one
is
single-family
attached.
B
So
you'll
see
what
he's
laying
out
here
some
implementations
of
new
streets
and
then
he
will
be
expanding
the
current
detention
pond
a
little
bit
onto
his
property,
expanding
it
there,
but
then
also
we'll
be
working
with
the
current
owners
of
this
pond.
Potentially-
and
this
does
this-
this
will
be
worked
out
when
the
plat
and
everything
comes
forward
to
it,
doesn't
really
impact
the
preliminary
plan
but
they're
hoping
to
be
able
to
work
with
them
and
then
be
able
to
get
this
pond
dedicated
to
the
city,
as
the
city
does.
B
As
long
as
it's
built
to
to
the
city's
acceptance
or
it's
it's
able
to
be
accepted
by
the
city,
and
it
was
built
to
our
required
improvements,
then
the
city
does
maintain
the
residential
detention
ponds
or
regional
detention
ponds
that
are
required
now.
That's
not
typical
for
commercial
or
industrial
or
igus
non-residential
development.
C
B
F
One
component
that
we
talked
at
extent
with
with
the
applicants
along
with
the
street
configuration
we
were
able
to
work
with
them
and
they
were
more
than
willing
to
accommodate
our
request
to
minimize
and
they
actually
ended
up
removing
all
the
cul-de-sacs
that
were
originally
proposed,
not
to
call
the
sacs
aren't
allowed,
but
anytime
we
could
prevent
them
from
being
installed.
It's
most
ideal
from
a
street
maintenance
standpoint
from
garbage
service
to
snow
plowing
and
all
the
things
of
that
nature
when
it
comes
to
maintenance
and
perpetuity
of
the
city's
ownership
of
those
streets.
F
B
B
A
D
B
A
B
A
E
B
Will
have
to
come
back
to
the
Board
of
Adjustment
to
get
the
conditional
use
for
storage
units
in
the
our
three
district?
So
not
only
will
they
have
to
rezone
that
property.
That's
our
that's
our
one!
Today!
That's
a
rezone
to
the
our
three
and
then
also
come
to
the
Board
of
Adjustment
for
the
conditional
use
of
storage
units.
So.
G
The
at
this
time,
I
am
NOT
going
to
be
actively
pursuing.
You
know
developing
the
entire
property,
the
first
phase,
if
I'm
understanding
things
right,
is
that
I'm
looking
at
the
storage
facility,
and
then
you
know
down
the
road
possibly
looking
at
either
spelling
or
you
know,
partnering
to
be
able
to
develop
the
remaining
development.
You
know
in
a
much
future
date
and.
A
B
He
what
he
is
phase
one
actually
would
not
trigger
that
he
would
need
detention,
but
it's
going
to
work
out
where
he's
going
to
utilize.
Some
of
this
fill
you
guys
all
know
that
this
is
really
low
area,
so
our
low
land
and
a
high
water
table
so
he'll
use
some
of
that
fill
as
he
improves
that
pond.
To
start
this,
this
development,
okay,.
F
C
B
Know
I'm,
assuming
that
I
mean
that
would
all
just
be
just
hypothetical,
and
he
probably
just
the
engineer,
probably
included
that,
just
if
it's
a
low
area,
but
nothing
would
happen
to
your
property.
Unless
you
would,
you
would
move
forward
with
developing
it,
so
you
wouldn't
have
to
put
a
pond
there.
Yeah.
A
It
looked
like
because
of
the
way
that
it's
marked
as
a
conceptual
that
if
you
did
develop
that
land
into
your
own,
you
know
residential
development
area,
because
it
is
a
natural
low
spot
that
that
would
be
a
good
location
for
a
retention
pond,
and
that
was
the
the
clarity
point
that
I
had
asked.
Brandy
previously
was
that
the
the
on-site
detention
ponds
are
actually
covering.
This
proposed
development
completely
at
it.
Yeah.
F
Yeah
administered
here,
I
was
just
going
to
state.
Now
reiterate:
there
reinforce
what
you
just
said
that
that
is
correct.
It
is
not
anticipated
at
any
off-site
tension.
Is
requirements
are
necessary
for
this
development.
I
think
that
might
have
just
been
a
conceptual
thing
from
the
developers
engineer
on
I
guess:
I
can
only
speculate.
Why
it's
there,
but
it's
not
absolutely
not
a
requirement
for
this
development.
I
can
sit
back
and
state
that,
with
confidence
all.
C
A
C
A
C
B
The
are
three
multi-family
residential
district
allows
for
typically
apartments
apartment
units.
It
would
allow
for
single-family
homes
or
duplexes
townhomes,
anything
that
would
have
multi
families
inhabiting
and
then
also
we
do
have
conditional
uses,
which
is
where
the
storage
units
comes
in
and
so
I'll
read,
find
those
and
I'll
read
those
off
to
you.
What
the
conditional
uses
can
be
now
that
has
to
be
granted
by
the
Board
of
Adjustment,
but
you
could
have
storage
units,
clubs,
lodges
and
community
centers
clinics
and
hospitals
license
residential
treatment
or
group
homes
or
specific
use
office
buildings.
A
And
so
just
just
clarify
that
process,
then
the
preliminary
plan
wouldn't
necessarily
approve
the
the
storage
units.
The
applicant
would
then
have
to
come
back
before
the
board,
not
sure
if
you
listened
in
to
the
the
Board
of
Adjustment,
proceeding
at
the
Planning
Commission
meeting
here,
but
going
very
much
through
that
same
process
of
vetting
things
out
prior
to
any
potential
approval
of
a
conditional
use.
C
C
B
He
were
to
right
now
it's
all
single-family
residential,
but
if
he
were
to
get
the
rezone,
which
also
has
to
go
through
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
City
Council,
but
typically,
if
it's
approved
in
the
preliminary
plan,
we
do
like
to
follow
through
with
those
and
it's.
But
you
still
have
to
go
through
with
the
formal
process
of
a
rezone.
So
then,
if
Howard
did
you
catch
that?
B
H
H
I,
when
I
look
at
the
when
I
look
at
the
plan
Paul
when
I
look
to
the
straight
south,
where
we're
at
there's
an
arrow,
pointing
into
a
10-foot
drainage,
ditch
that
drainage
area
that
basically
what
it
looks
like
it
runs
the
whole
length
of
the
south
side
of
the
current
property.
And
then
it
comes
down
into
the
retention
pond.
So
how
far
off
of
our
property
lines
will
that
be.
G
H
B
A
Now,
if,
if
a
new
development
you
know,
went
across
the
street
and
and
we're
annexing
into
the
city
and
going
through
that
that
plan,
they
would
also
have
to
be
subject
to
the
same
Park
dedication
requirements
and
that
gets
approved
through
the
process
in
front
of
the
Parks
and
Recreation
Board.
And
there
are
you
know,
options
depending
on
you
know
the
situation,
but
this
is
not
another
trigger
for
that,
since
it
was
already
previously
addressed
and
approved.
Okay,
all.
H
H
B
B
I
mean
there's
a
lot
there,
the
as
very
as
very
thorough,
and
then
they
also
submit
a
hydraulic
analysis
to
say
that
that
the
capacity
of
the
pond
they're
proposing
will
detain
the
all
of
the
runoff
coming
from
the
development
and
that
it
will
be
out
that
it'll
be
outlet
outlet
it
it
for
the
pre
pre
existing
pre
development.
Oh
my
gosh
I'm
really
struggling
there.
The
pre-development
raids.
A
H
H
That
that's
my
main
concern.
If
I
mean
you
said
it
yourself
that
it's
it's
a
low-lying
area,
the
water
table
is
fairly
high.
You
get
a
good
rain
in
in
june/july.
It
doesn't
take
very
long
for
the
streets
fill
up
and
I'm
worried.
That
was
my
one
worry
and
if
you're
saying
the
engineers
did
their
due
diligence
on
the
survey,
I
I
believe
you
on
that.
So
thank
you
for
clarifying
the
last
piece
that
I
have
is.
It
looks
like
the
Lots
directly
behind
myself,
mr.
H
H
B
B
Might
be
able
to
answer
that
where
you
were
getting
at
with
so
he
is
asking
why
these
are
zoned
are
two
verses
are
one
and
that
was
probably
to
accomplish
transition
zoning
so
where
the
are
three
is
then
adjacent
to
them.
There
would
be
some
are
two,
but
you
know
there
is
our
one
then
adjacent
like,
and
you
guys
are
in
your
backyards
as
well,
but
maybe
Paul
can
speak
to
speak
to
that.
If
that,
if
there
was
a
different
reason
for
that,
but
that's
my
assumption
and
in
typical
zoning
practice
would
be
transitions
owning.
G
G
B
Lots
and
I
feel
that
so
this
street
had
to
curve
to
accommodate
for
the
detention
pond,
because
at
first
they
had
it
shown
that
it
would
be
parallel,
but
then
we
requested
that
they
that
they
put
the
pond
together.
So
we
don't
have
ponds
on
each
side
of
the
street,
so
that
would
have
been
to
where
I
mean
it's
a
large
lot.
So
at
least
it
gives
you
options.
A
B
That
drainage
swell
that
that
the
neighbor
was
asking
about
so
on
other
areas,
they're
accommodating
for
their
drainage,
with
a
sump
pump
collection
system,
so
they'll
be
running
pipe,
and
that
could
be
an
option
here
to
that.
Those
systems
are
private,
so
the
city
would
not
be
taking
over
the
maintenance
or
accepting
them
in
any
way.
But
that
would
be
an
option
that
that
they
could
do
over
here
too,
but
I
think
as
well.
They
have
more
space,
so
they
could
do
open
drainage.
That.
H
A
A
A
B
A
B
B
So
it
is
it's
in
staff
files,
but
also,
then
they
would
know
if
they.
If
they
were
going
back
in
the
archive
of
what
has
been
posted
on
the
agenda
for
the
meetings,
then
they
could
reach
out
and
if
they
were
wanting
an
approved
plan,
because
they
would
know
that
what
was
submitted
was
amended
slightly
with
the
with
the
zoning
and.
A
A
F
E
B
F
E
F
D
D
D
So
I
appreciate
what
was
done
in
the
future,
but
I
think
in
retrospect
we
missed
it.
If
we're
gonna
bring
this
in
as
residential,
there
is
no
place
for
kids
to
play
and
then
what,
if
we're
talking,
multi-family
homes,
apartment
buildings,
you're
gonna
have
children.
So
my
question
since
it's
the
that
boat
has
sailed
that
little
green
spot
is
there
any
play?
Is
that
going
to
be
too
sloped
that
it
is
okay?
That
was
my
question.
A
B
Probably
has
a
fence
over
it
or
something
no
I
think
actually
the
this
subdivision.
That
is
that's
another
thing,
actually
that
this
developer
has
talked
about
that
they
would
like
to
make
that
more
of
a
known
pathway
and
potentially
increased
that
5-foot.
So
it
could
be
a
golf
cart.
A
golf
cart
path.
D
Okay
and
and
I
have
one
of
those
in
my
own
neighborhood
that
this
sidewalk
goes
right
between
residential
two
homes
that
connects
it's
a
walk
path
for
children
to
get
home
from
school
from
Lincoln.
So
if
that
were,
you
know
put
in
as
a
you
know,
well
on
Crete
sidewalk
at
least
they
would
feel
comfortable
because
yeah.
B
And
I
think
they
had
I
think
that
there
was
an
issue
now
I
wasn't
obviously
here
for
the
for
that,
but
I
think
that
they
had
an
issue
that
they
didn't
want.
People
driving
the
golf
carts
on
the
street,
so
they
didn't
want
that
paid.
I
think
is
any
history
that
that
I've
been
told
Paul
might
have
more
history
on
it,
but
I
know
that
he
wants
to
work
with
the
previous
developer
on
getting
a
path
put
in
there,
but
that
will
be
all.
A
A
B
E
B
So
this
is
Commission
approval
of
resolution,
number
20,
2019,
initiating
annexation
of
attractive
land
contiguous
to
the
city
of
Watertown,
to
be
known
as
Alamo
first
edition
and
then
as
it
states
on
the
agenda.
This
is
contingent
to
item
D
resolution
number
2020,
which
is
establishing
the
zoning
designation
of
i1
light
industrial
district
for
the
area
to
land
to
be
known
as
the
Alamo
first
edition
upon
annexation.
B
So
this
is
here,
but
if
you
guys
are
familiar
with
big
shots,
fireworks
over
on
the
east
side
of
town,
just
west
of
lose
fire
fireworks,
they
currently
remain
in
the
county,
and
so
they
do
have
water
tongue.
Pull
utilities
made
an
agreement
with
them
that
said
that
they
could
have
city
services
as
long
as
they
annexed
within
five
years.
Well,
the
issue
with
that
was,
we
didn't,
allow
it
in
city
ordinance.
B
So
then,
if
you
remember
just
recently,
we've
passed
ordinance
amendments
to
allow
the
use
the
where
the
warehousing
and
sales
of
fireworks
within
the
I
1
and
the
I,
to
which
I
one
is
light.
Industrial
I
to
is
heavy
industrial
zoning
districts,
and
so
we
also-
and
we
created
a
new
ordinance
that
outlined
the
design
standards
for
firework
uses,
so
that
will
all
have
to
be
adhered
to
and
his
property
does
meet
all
of
the
stipulations
outlined
in
that
chapter,
which
is
chapter
20
181,
and
so
this
all
falls
into.
B
B
I
believe
I
find
that
date,
yeah
Oh
June
29th
of
2020,
so
that
this
is
memorializing
that
and
then
also
that
he
will
be
now
he'll,
be
proposing
to
annex
and
zone
into
the
city
as
i1
light
industrial
which
will
allow
him
to
sell
the
class
want,
sell
or
warehouse
class
1/4
G
fireworks,
and
he
is
going
with
I
1
because
he
would
not
meet
the
minimum
lot
size
requirement
for
I
to
of
heavy
industrial.
You
have
to
have
220
thousand
square
feet
to
be
zoned
I
to
which
is
what
lose.
Fireworks
is
zoned.
B
The
only
thing
the
difference
about
that
is
that
Lou
can
warehouse
or
sell
I,
don't
even
know
the
word
just
Marx,
more
extreme
fireworks,
I
guess
the
class
1
3
G
more
dangerous.
Maybe
that's
the
better
work,
but
so
that's
the
reason
why
he's
going
with
I
one
and
I,
don't
think
I
have
any
other
comments
for
that.
One.
A
E
Mr.
chair,
this
is
just
a
Tod
and
been
around
this
situation
for
more
than
five
or
six
years
mr.
Lama
had
come
to
the
county
and
and,
as
you
know,
Luke
Molitor
zoning
officer
worked
with
him
to
establish
his
ability
to
sell
fireworks
in
the
county,
because
at
the
time
the
city
didn't
have
the
ability
to
allow
mr.
E
Lama
to
sell
fireworks
within
the
city
limits
which
I
think
he
wanted
to
do
it
from
the
very
GetGo
his
building
is,
does
have
fire
suppression
to
my
understanding
and,
and
it
makes
perfect
sense
that
the
city
can
bring
him
in
and
start
collecting
sales
tax
for
mr.
allama,
so
I
wholeheartedly
approve
this
idea.
Moving
forward.
A
And
as
brandied
alluded
to
this
is
a
this
is
a
path.
That's
that's
been
kind
of
laid
out
and
we've
been
working
towards
for
a
number
of
years.
Here
you
know
five
years
was
the
expiration
period.
That's
set
to
expire
this
year
right
and
we've
been
working
on
it
prior
to
that
even
question
in
regards
to
so
the
ordinance
is
passed
now
it
passed
through
the
board,
a
pastor,
City
Council,
it's
in
codified
law
right
for
the
city.
It
makes
it
a
conditional
use
for
i1.
Is
that
correct?
Yes,.
B
B
So
here
it'll
be
approved.
The
Board
of
Adjustment
will
know
if
council
approved
the
annexation
and
Zoning
and
then
but
also
protects
mr.
Alama
that
he
has
25
days
then
after
that
is
approved
till
until
it
would
become
effective.
So
he
would
have
that
time
to
then
go
to
the
board
and
make
sure
that
his
business
and
what
his
existing
is
able
to
be
used
in
the
city
before
it
would
actually
before
the
annexation
and
zoning
would
actually
be
effective.