
►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting - 10-08-2020
Description
Board of Adjustment Meeting - 10-08-2020
A
B
B
A
A
A
Thank
you
move
on
to
item
four
on
the
agenda's.
Regular
agenda
item.
A
is
a
conditional
use
conditional
use
in
the
c3
highway
commercial
district.
You
want
to
take
us
through
that
stacy.
C
C
C
As
you
can
see
from
the
aerial,
the
property
is
predominantly
green
space,
but
there
is
a
portion
of
a
parking
lot
that
was
there
with
the
existing
apartment
building.
That
was
that
burned
down
a
number
of
years
ago,
and
as
you
can
see,
it's
a
general
mix
of
commercial
and
residential
in
the
neighborhood
with
apartment
buildings
that
are
already
in
place
to
the
west
and
to
the
north
and
the
applicant
is
proposing
a
12
unit.
Infill
apartment
complex
on
the
site,
and
with
that
I'd,
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
A
A
A
C
Oh
okay,
the
applicant
has,
let
me
know,
it'll
be
two
12
plexes
on
that
particular
lot.
B
B
D
F
G
D
H
A
Yes,
yeah
important
consideration
here
is
what
we're
talking
about
is
whether
the
the
lot
is
appropriate
from
a
conditional
use
aspect.
Of
course,
it's
still
going
to
have
to
go
through
the
normal
building
permit
process
and
meet
the
regulations
regarding
the
actual
structure
that
gets
put
on
it.
Mr
case,
I
believe
you
had
a
question.
You
had
a.
E
C
B
E
C
I
believe
there's
a
combination.
It
looks
like
we
have
some
one
bedrooms
and
some
two
bedrooms
and
a
studio,
but
I
will
we
will
double
check
that
before
a
permit
is
given
to
make
sure
the
parking
is
adequate.
D
C
E
Mr
trad
motion
to
approve
the
request
as
applied
for
and
then
citing
the
letter
b
off
street
parking
loading
areas
to
be
to
meet
the
minimum
requirements.
As
long
as
the
can
meet
the
the
required
number
of
spaces.
E
C
You
know
I'm
not
sure
on
that,
but
we
will
check
that
before
time
of
permit.
We
haven't
done
a
full
site
plan
review
at
this
point
in
time
yet,
but
we
will
make
a
note
to
check
that
as
well.
E
Pardon,
I
guess
I
guess
my
my
motion
would
be
then
and
to
also
conform
to
any
landscape
requirements
as
well.
C
A
C
B
C
E
C
B
C
Sure,
thank
you,
mr
chair.
This
is
a
conditional
use
request.
It
is
at
722,
west,
kemp
avenue
and
the
applicant
is
josh
y,
the
correct
okay.
Thank
you.
C
The
board
of
adjustment
did
approve
a
conditional
use
back
on
august,
8th
of
2012
for
john
and
paula
maloney,
and
at
that
time
it
was
for
iron
range
smokehouse,
with
the
stipulation
if
the
restaurant
service
ownership
changes
or
if
the
restaurant
service
is
ever
to
be
dropped,
the
conditional
use
will
be
revoked
and
a
new
application
shall
be
required
and
there
was
some
previous
minutes
attached
in
the
packet
for
reference.
A
I
I
So
the
hours
of
operation
are
yet
to
be
established,
but
right
now
we'll
be
looking
at
tuesday,
wednesday,
thursday
4-9
friday,
11
to
approximately
11
a
saturday
11
to
approximately
11
sunday
11
to
9,
but
those
hours
could
vary,
should
never
go
past
midnight
in
a
that
type
of
establishment.
A
restaurant
so
friday
and
saturday
may
be
later
hours,
but
I
don't.
I
Nobody
else
is
open
past
11
o'clock
midnight
now
and-
and
I
wouldn't
see
any
reason
that
I
would
be
but
yeah
I'm
not
going
to
be
open
until
2
30
or
I
guess
I
can't.
I
won't
be
open
till
two
in
the
morning.
I
guess.
I
I'm
not
sure
what
the
ruling
is
on
carryout,
but
I
so
no,
I
I
don't
think
off
sale.
I
don't
have
any
plans
for
off
sale.
It
would
just
be
on
sale
in
in
the
establishment.
C
I
believe
it
would,
but
I'm
going
to
let
director
vaughn
high
answer
that.
K
My
understanding
is
the
license.
Licenses
have
changed
recently,
and
so
I
believe
what
you
probably
are
getting
is
an
on
off
sale
license
that
would
allow
you
to
allow
folks
to
come
in
and
get
a.
You
could
sell
a
six
pack
of
beer
to
go
that
sort
of
thing
so
that
that's
my
understanding
now
is
that
those
licenses
are
combined.
I
A
I
I
believe
that
I'll
have
only
inside
seating
brandy
and
I
discussed
the
possibility
of
outside
seating,
but
I
believe
with
the
setbacks
and
the
requirements,
I
I
think
it
was
discussed
that
it
will
not
allow
for
that
just
because
of
the
setbacks,
and
maybe
brandi
could
touch
on
that
more.
If
she's
available.
L
I
was
obviously
sleeping
too,
but
except
my
screen
was
hidden.
Can
you
guys
hear
me?
Yes,
okay,
so
the
reason
with
the
outdoor
seating
that
josh
and
I
had
discussed
is
that
it
will
actually
be
within
the
public
right-of-way.
B
L
I
wonder
if
he
could
apply
for
like
downtown.
We
do
cafe
permits
where
we
allow
restaurants
and
bars
to
utilize
the
public
right-of-way
for
outdoor
patio
area.
If
that
would
be
a
possibility.
L
Yeah-
and
that
is
done-
just
administrative.
E
I
would
I
would
support
that.
I
think
god
hope
that
kobud's
still
not
here
next
summer,
but
I
really
think
we
as
a
community
need
to
be
looking
at
offering
as
many
opportunities
for
outdoor
dining
and
you
know,
pick
up
drop
off
those
types
of
things
that
we
can
help
our
our
restaurant
business
clientele
in
the
city.
So
I
think
whatever
we
can
do
to
help
that
we
should
be
looking
into.
A
C
C
A
Yeah
now
this
has
been
a
topic
of
conversation
in
both
this
property
in
the
past
and
the
one
across
the
street.
There
we
do
have
a
fairly
wide
right-of-way
for
that
road.
That's
adjacent
and
some
of
those
parking
spots
that
are
called
out
on
the
map
actually
extend
within
that
public
right
away,
but
because
these
have
been,
you
know
grandfathered
in
and
had
this,
this
use
over
the
the
lifespan
of
the
building
we
have
included
those
typically
and
in
the
account
of
the
the
parking
spaces.
F
B
A
It
looks
like
we
have
30
parking
places
called
out
on
the
the
overhead
there.
So
that's
ample.
A
Yeah,
if
we're
at,
if
we're
at
one
parking
spot
per
three
seats,
30
spaces,
you
could
have
90
seats
if
I'm
doing
that,
math
right.
C
J
Mr
chairman,
yes,
sir
director
van,
I
here
had
a
quick
question
also
for
josh
related
the
parking,
and
I
should
know
this,
and
maybe
staff
does,
but
is
there
some
kind
of
a
cross-parking
agreement
with
the
property
to
the
east,
or
is
that
also
owned?
Is
it
under
the
same
ownership?
I
guess
I'm
not
familiar
with
how
that's
situated.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
you
were
protected
in
the
availability
to
use
everything
shown
on
your
proposed
map,
which
looks
like
it's
all
under
the
same
ownership
as
your
property.
Is
that
correct.
I
A
Board
all
right,
thank
you,
mr
y
I'll,
close
the
public
hearing
at
this
time
and
look
for
a
motion.
A
A
A
C
Proper
thing
up
on
the
screen
here,
so
this
is
actually
a
variance
request.
It's
from
randy
gruenwald,
it's
at
100,
north
lake
drive
and
application
has
been
submitted
to
construct
an
addition
onto
an
existing
structure
that
is
located
two
feet
from
the
side:
property
line
to
the
east
and
I'll
try
to
bring
that
up
on
the
map
here.
C
B
D
C
C
A
H
Fire
marshall
primus.
What
what
I
understand
is
it
just
there's
not
going
to
be
any
additional
pumps
or
anything
from
what
I've
seen
it's.
The
tanks
are
there
already
for
the
bolt
fill
and
this
little
accessory
building
was
for
the
selling
convenience
for
the
people
coming
off
the
boat
ramp
or
the
dock.
D
H
E
E
Quick
question
from
staff:
this
original
structure
was
constructed
at
some
point
in
time
in
the
in
the
past.
Was
there
a
variance
granted
to
that
individual
structure
years
ago,
when
that
was
originally
placed
there
and
then
the
other
quick
question
I
had
has
any
received
any
correspondence
or
phone
calls
from
the
adjoining
property
owners.
C
Thanks,
mr
case,
I
have
not
received
any
phone
calls
from
any
of
the
adjacent
neighbors
and
I
did
not
find
anything
in
our
records
to
indicate
that
there
was
a
variance
given
at
one
point
in
time.
A
I
see
in
the
the
letter
from
the
applicant
to
that
there
is
a
note
that
they've
worked
with
their
neighbor
to
the
east
and
and
that
there
was
no
concern.
So
that
could
be
why
we
haven't
had
a
anybody
reach
out
to
staff.
A
E
Other
quick
question
would
be
I'm
going
to
guess
that
this
this
building
or
the
structure
this
use
would
be
an
accessory
used
to
the
principal
facility.
Is
that
how
we're
looking
at
it
or
or
if
somewhere
down
the
road,
mr
gruenwald,
wanted
to
split
that
lot
off
and
sell
that
business?
Could
he
do
that.
C
I
actually
looked
at
it
as
the
main
use
because
it
is
a
convenience
store,
so
it
wasn't
necessarily
incidental
to
the
restaurant
business,
but
the
side
yard
is
the
same
either
way
we
look
at
it.
D
L
B
A
F
A
L
So
it
would
be
five
per
1000
square
feet
for
a
community
commercial
building.
Like
this,
I
believe
and
so,
and
I
think
that
the
intention
of
this
is
to
serve
the
people
coming
off
of
the
lake,
not
necessarily
because
everything
to
the
north
and
the
east
there
won't
be.
I
don't
think
like.
Basically,
the
the
building
is
oriented
towards
the
lake
and
the
east
and
the
north
will
be.
L
I
mean,
I
don't
think
that
the
intention
is
to
draw
in
people
now
it
might
that
might
happen
here
and
there,
but
I
don't
think
that
that
is
the
intent.
E
That
would
be
my
question
I
mean
is:
is
the
existing
building
banquet
facility
have
adequate
parking
already
or
do
they
have
dovers?
That
should
be
applied
to
this,
because
if,
as
stacy
was
saying,
this
is
being
treated
as
a
stand-alone
use,
wouldn't
it
we
also
require
stand-alone
parking
requirements
regardless,
if
it's
beach
users,
using
it
predominantly
or
not,.
C
F
C
C
That's
definitely
a
could
be
a
concern
then,
but
we'll
I'm
not
sure,
brandi
or
heath
if
you've
came
up
with
any
parking
numbers
on
this
one.
A
C
Yeah,
it's
hard
it's
hard
to
tell
off
of
this,
but
I
mean
it
looks
like
it's
nine
by
18
that
looks
sufficient
and
then
it's
hard
to
tell
with
the
the
dry
vials,
but
they
do
look
sufficient,
but
we
would
check
into
that
a
little
bit
more.
J
So,
with
the
total
square
footage
of
the
existing
building
in
the
proposed
edition,
we're
looking
at
1248
square
feet
and
there's
five
stalls
per
thousand
square
feet,
so
that
equates
to
six
and
a
quarter
stalls.
We
would
round
that
up
to
seven,
it
requires
seven
parking
stalls.
B
L
And
then
that's
where
the
existing
building
gets
a
little
complex
because
you
have
the
restaurant
and
then
the
banquet
hall
facility.
So
then
it's
one
parking
spot
perth
that
will
cover
three
seats
for
the
restaurant
and
then
the
banquet
hall.
We
would
probably
treat
as
the
I
don't
think
that
we
specifically
call
out
a
banquet
hall
facility,
or
we
would
just
treat
that
as
the
community
commercial,
but
even
if
say
that
we
did
treat
it
all
as
community
commercial
which
I'm
not
sure
which
one
would
be
more
conservative,
they
would
need
44.
L
If
the
whole
building
was
community
commercial,
they
would
need
44
parking
spots
for
the
square
footage
of
the
existing
north
shore
building.
So
then
they
are,
they
do
they
are
showing
that
they
have
more
than
sufficient
space.
The
hard
thing
is
that
just
not
having
the
numbers
of
the
seats
to
break
it
out.
A
F
A
J
Mr
chairman
he's
here,
if
I
believe
stacey
made
this
point
earlier,
yeah,
I'm
not
certain
the
extent
these
stalls
are
striped
on
this
property.
I
know
that
I've
seen
other
communities
make
it
a
request
to
properly
stripe
the
parking
lots
according
to
their
their
plans.
I
don't
know
if
that's
been
done.
I
haven't
been
by
here
recently,
but
that
could
be
something
that
would
make
a
level
of
improvement
in
the
right
direction
here
to
formally
substantiate
the
appropriate
parking
stalls,
because
I
think,
on
this
easterly
side
of
the
parking
lot.
J
Just
from
my
personal
experience,
it
tends
to
kind
of
be
no
man's
land
and
people
kind
of
parking
wherever
they
want
to
which
can
obviously
diminish
the
effect
of
the
number
of
stalls
available
for
the
users.
A
C
And
that
is
something
if
the
board
so
desired
could
could
add
that
I
believe.
D
H
Basically,
what
brandy's
chip
famous
fire
marshal?
Basically,
what
brand
he
was
saying.
We
do
have
an
occupancy
calculation,
you
know
for
the
building,
but
we
look
at
it
as
people
will
park
where
they'll
park
and
if,
if
they
don't
like
the
you
know,
they're
going
to
carpool
they're
going
to
make
the
decision.
H
I
just
think
this
applicant
is,
is
looking
for
and
it's
more
of
an
accessory
used
to
the
the
boat
landing
that
he
has
going
on
there,
where
people
buy
gas,
they'll,
go,
buy
chips
and
and
whatever
convenient
food
so
and
if
and
if
the
parking
lot's
full,
I'm
not
going
to
pull
off
the
highway
and
and
go
try
to
get
to
that
convenience
store
I'll
drive
two
more
miles
down
the
road
to
the
other
convenience
store.
So
I
think
that
the
applicant
was
just
looking
for
another
convenience
for
the
people
out
on
the
lake.
G
Here
is
the
fact
that
we
don't
have
any
record
of
how
that
building
even
got
put
where
it
is
because
it
probably
wouldn't
have
been
allowed
and
now
we're
taking
a
non-conforming
structure
and
expanding
upon
it.
I
guess-
and
I
understand
his
need
for
that-
I
get
that
so
with
that
being
said,
if
this
were
to
be
approved,
I
think
that
the
parking
lot
striping
is
a
necessity,
and
I
also
believe
that
the
privacy
fence
other
than
a
chain
link
along
that
east
edge
should
be
implemented
at
this
time.
G
A
A
Any
additional
discussion
by
board
do
we
have
a
motion.
H
C
And
we
could
certainly
do
a
more
thorough
look
through
our
records.
L
Well,
and
even
so,
the
building
would
still
be
considered
non-conforming,
even
if
it
was
permitted
and
had
a
variance
at
the
time.
So
really
just
looking
at
it
today
and
then,
knowing
that
they're,
adding
on
to
a
non-conforming
structure
should
be
you
guys
should
be
able
to
make
a
determination
well
enough,
just
of
if
it's
okay
to
enlarge
the
non-conforming
structure,
because
it's
420
square
feet
how
it
exists
today.
So
it
wouldn't
have
met
the
it
wasn't
less
than
200
square
feet
where
it
could
be
four
foot
off
the
property
line.
E
E
Matt,
I'm
curious.
Is
there
because
we're
acting
as
the
board
of
adjustment?
We
have
it's
a
conditional,
it's
a
variance.
K
E
Yeah,
even
even
if,
even
though
I
I
believe,
staff
saying
that
you
know
we,
we
wouldn't
allow
that,
but
a
subsequent
board
could
always
grant
a
variance
and
then
you'd
have
two
uses
who
are
currently
sharing
parking
spaces,
and
it
would
avoid
that
potential
pitfall
down
the
road,
and
I
was
just
curious
if
that
would,
if
that's
something
you
think
that's
within
our
purview
to
do.
E
Maybe
it's
not
a
big
deal
and,
and
I
mean
I
would
I
would
support
the
motion
as
it
is,
but
if
this
was
something
that
we
could
do,
it
would
have
sloshed
some
of
those
fears
of
mine,
but.
K
E
That's
fine
without
without
solid
recommendation.
I
I
would
draw
that
that
that
idea.
C
C
L
G
G
B
G
L
F
C
J
Mr
chair,
if
I
may
yes,
sir,
I
would
just
emphasize
too
that,
while
these
are
all
very
good
questions
and
some
may
be
appropriate
and
applicable
to
the
determination
of
a
variance
approval,
I
would
also
like
to
assure
the
board
that
things
like
restroom
requirements
and
things
of
that
nature
would
would
absolutely
be
checked
off
at
the
building
permit
level
and
maybe
a
less
pertinent
to
the
variance
request,
that's
at
hand
before
the
board
this
evening.
G
So
the
kayak
storage
would
be.
I
mean
something
that
you
know
so
down
the
road
next
summer
he's
he
brings
in
the
kayak
stack
and
and
has
that
sitting
outside,
which
is
taking
up
a
couple
of
parking
spots.
Now
we've
just
lost
some
parking,
you
know
and
again
I
I
I'm
not
trying
to
feel
negative
about
the
idea.
G
When
he
comes,
he
doesn't
have
to
apply
for
a
different
operating
license
for
this
correct.
I
mean
it's,
it's
it's
just
okay,
okay,
so
we
really
don't
have
any
control
on
what
he
does
do
for
you
know
whether
it's
canoes
or
kayaks
or
whatever's,
stored
outside.
J
From
from
a
building
permit
standpoint,
we
would
now
a
kayak
rack
whether
that
would
even
require
a
building
permit.
I'd
have
to
look
into
our
codes
to
see.
There
are
certain
minor
structures
like
that
that
may
not
even
require
building
permit
if
there
were
things
getting
built
or
erected
on
the
site.
That
would
compromise
the
parking
requirements
from
being
met.
J
That
is
something
that
that
we
would
we
don't
proactively
inspect
for
those
kind
of
things,
but
if,
if
we
were
to
observe
them
going
on,
we'd
definitely
call
it
to
the
owner's
attention
or
it
would
be
on
a
complaint
basis
for
us
to
follow
up
on
it.
If
all
of
a
sudden,
those
seven
stalls
are
half
filled
with
with
kayaks
and
racks
or
something
like
that
were
to
happen.
J
J
If
it's
not
required
to
be
permitted,
then
it
does
just
just
like
with
any
other
land
use
in
the
city.
It
opens
it
up
for
the
flexibility
of
the
owner
to
do
certain
things
with
their
land
within
reason
that
are
yeah,
not
that
doesn't
necessarily
trigger
the
requirements
of
a
building
permit
or
other
regulations.
Yeah.
C
Any
of
the
c3
uses
would
be
allowable,
but
we
would
look
at
you
know
any
kind
of
like
outdoor
storage
to
make
sure
that
it
wouldn't
interfere
with
things
such
as
parking
spaces
that
are
required
met.
Screening
requirements
of
the
district,
also
weren't
in
the
way
of
any
fire
hydrants
things
of
that
nature.
To
make
sure
that
this
site
was
compliant
with
the
rules.
A
I
don't
see
him
on
the
meeting
here
from
a
standpoint
of
you
know:
could
could
he
effectively
rent
kayaks
and
operate
the
the
sale
and
rental
out
of
his
primary
facility?
Is
there
any
substantial
difference
between
doing
that
and
having
a
a
cashier
in
a
secondary
building.
J
Mr
chairman,
if
I
understand
your
question
right,
you're
more
or
less
asking,
is
there
a
substantial
difference
between
the
use
of
a
convenience
store
versus
kayak
sales
out
of
the
same
building.
C
Yes,
yes,
he
would
be
able
to
do
that,
because
that
use
would
fall
in
line
with
the
c3
under
the
permitted
uses.
A
And
so
so,
the
difference
really
here
is
where's
the
cashier.
From
a
standpoint
of
outside
storage.
I
think
the
the
issue
remains,
regardless
of
which
building
that
the
cashier
is
based
out
of.
M
C
D
D
So
randy
in
this,
in
your
convenience
store,
are
you
planning
on
having
the
boat,
rental
and
stuff
the
kayak,
rentals
and
stuff?
Are
they
going
to
be
right
there
on
site
or
off
site.
A
I
think
the
question
randy
is:
where
would
you
be
storing
the
kayaks
that
you
would
rent.
M
Oh,
there
there's
a
fenced
in
area
right
by
the
gas
pumps
that
they
already
put
a
fence
around.
G
Randy
are
you
planning
to
have
bathroom
facilities
in
the
convenience
store.
M
Not
yet
the
lines
and
everything
are
there,
but
I
haven't
made
it
yet.
M
I
made
it
a
little
bigger
than
what
first
came
out,
because
we
don't
have
any
room
for
all
the
chairs
and
tables
we've.
M
First
of
all,
since
the
cove
had
hit,
we've
had
to
pull
a
lot
of
chairs
and
tables
out
of
the
main
area
and
we're
kind
of
separating
the
distancing
tables
and
business
kind
of
warrants
that
now
anyway,
but
a
lot
of
the
tables
and
chairs
that
we
have
we're
gonna
put
into
the
storage,
which
will
be
a
part
of
that
plan
that
you
that's
ahead
of
you
in
front
of
you.
M
I
want
to
apologize,
I
don't
have
it
right
in
front
of
me,
but
it's
a
little
more
than
double
the
size
of
the
current
building.
There.
D
D
C
Right,
we
would
take
a
look
at
that.
If
this
were
to
be
granted,
it
would
only
be
allowable
for
that
size
come
the
time
of
building
permit.
We
wouldn't
allow
a
larger
structure
to
be
built
without
coming
back
in
front
of
the
board.
L
A
Mr
grunwald,
in
your
letter
you
had
noted
that
you
would
have
a
privacy
fence
separating
the
properties
that
was
included
in
the
motion
that
we
have
on
the
table.
We've
not
yet
voted
on
this
action.
Your
intention
was
to
install
a
privacy
offense
between
your
property
and
the
neighbor.
M
A
A
So
you're,
okay
with
that
intention,
yeah,
absolutely
okay,
and
the
other
thing
that
we
discussed
here
as
a
board
earlier
was
the
parking
available
on
this
property
really
holistically,
not
just
in
relation
to
this,
but
looking
at
the
the
total
required
parking
for
both
facilities,
we
have
a
count
of
89
parking
places
shown
on
the
site.
Plan
looks
like
one
of
those
would
be
consumed
by
the
proposed
edition,
so
we
have
88
places.
I
know
parking
has
been
a
challenge
on
this
property
in
the
past.
A
So
one
of
the
things
that
we
would
like
to
to
include
into
the
motion,
if
we
approve
it
today,
is
the
requirement
to
to
stripe
the
legal
parking
places
as
noted
to
optimize
the
available
parking
there.
How
much
time
do.
D
M
L
And
it
could
be
the
so
this
could
be
a
part
of
the
building
permit,
which
then
is
good
for
a
year,
so
he
would
he
could
have
a
year
and
then,
if
it
was
something
where
it
needed
an
extension
you.
There
are
extension
options
too,
in
the
ordinance
for
commercial
projects.
So.
M
M
For
for
the
you
know,
the
gasoline
has
been
going
really
well,
I'm
gonna
have
to
I'm
gonna
have
to
pull
the
you
guys,
you're
familiar
with
the
area,
I'm
almost
sure
it
gets
a
little
shallow
in
front
of
that
gas
tank,
that's
a
and
they
spent
70
or
80
thousand
dollars
on
that,
and
I
spent
about
well
forty
thousand
on
concrete
over
well
more
than
that.
Fifty
some
thousand
on
concrete
already
in
front
of
that
to
raise
that
level
up.
M
M
So
if
ice
hits
it
or
something
it's
going
to
be
really
hard
for
it
to
you
know
bust
open
and
then
what
I
was
gonna
do
out
next
or
this
winter.
I
was
gonna
dig
out
in
front
of
that
in
front
of
that
gas
tank.
So
it
has
a
long
hose
on
the
gas
tank.
Right
now
goes
to
the
end
of
the
dock,
which
is
about,
I
don't
know
60
or
80
feet
long.
M
I
can't
remember
the
number,
but
it
goes
out
there
quite
a
bit,
but
it's
if
you're
a
man
a
weak
guy
like
me
or
or
an
elder
elder
person,
that's
quite
a
haul
to
haul
that
out
to
the
end
of
the
dock.
So
what
I'm
going
to
do
is
to
remove
some
of
that
rock
and
sediment
a
little
closer
to
the
to
the
shore,
so
they'll
be
able
to
park
closer
for
the
use
of
that
gas
tank.
M
I
don't
know
why
I
told
you
that,
but
that's
part
of
the
and
then
we're
going
to
go
out
with
floating
docks
this
next
year,
instead
of
instead
of
and
maybe
that
isn't
even
important
to
this
committee,
but
I
was
just
telling
you
where
the
more
of
my
funds
are
going
to
be
going
for
uses
for
the
next
year.
M
So
what
I'm
saying
is
striping
that
parking
lot.
It
might
be
a
at
least
a
year,
if
not
a
little
longer.
If
I
I
need
to
extend
it,
I'm
just
being
realistic.
D
Can
I
make
an
amendment
to
give
him
two
years
to
stripe
the
parking
lot.
D
Amend
my
emotion
to
include
giving
randy
two
years
to
mark
the
parking
lot.
M
A
B
A
That
was
the
crux
of
the
conversation
that
we're
having
here.
We
don't
want
to
exacerbate
the
issue
so
bonnie
you
you've
made
an
amendment
to
your
motion
rhonda.
I
think
you
had
offered
to
second
on
that.
Do
you
second,
the
amended
motion.
A
Is
there
any
additional
questions
for
mr
grunwalt.
J
If
I
could
ask
mr
gruenwald
you
mentioned
again
just
for
the
sake
of
everybody's
sanity
and
using
this
facility
in
the
parking
and
how
sometimes
it
can
get
a
little
haywire,
would
you
object
to
striping
what
you
know
you
can
as
far
as
existing
pavement,
that's
out
there
that
won't
be
disturbed.
M
Well,
I
certainly
can,
but
it
will
be,
it
will
be
all
disturbed
because
to
be
quite
honest
with
you
right
now,
it's
blacktop,
so
I
probably,
I
think,
I'm
probably
gonna
do
concrete
over
everything.
Blacktop
and
concrete
aren't
too
much
of
a
part.
Now
it
doesn't
seem
like
you
know,
I've
had
some
quick
conversations.
I
haven't
had
any
bids
or
anything
come
out,
but
I've
had
some
quick
conversations
on.
You
know
prefer
you
know
for
foot
and
everything.
M
So
you
know
I'm
almost
thinking
if
I
do
replace
the
start
start
replacing
the
the
driveway
or
the
parking
lot.
It's
going
to
be
all
concrete.
So
all
of
the
pavement
there
that's
currently
there,
the
black
top,
is
going
to
get
all
removed.
M
Then
I'll,
have
it
sloped
a
little
better
right
now
it
kind
of
slopes
towards
the
building
a
little
too
much.
Maybe
I
can
make
them
either
way
I'll
have
them
slope
it
a
little
different
and
I
have
it
set
up
for
that.
I
don't
know
if
you
noticed
I
put
drain,
I
put
drains
where
I
raised
that
concrete
up
to
the
foot
or
whatever
it
was.
I
put
drains
going
out
of
the
parking
lot
underneath
the
pavement,
so
the
water
runoff
would
go.
M
It
wouldn't
build
up
in
the
parking
lot.
It
would
go
through
the
parking
lot,
so
I
had
them
angle
it
so
it
would
work.
Had
I
put
concrete
in
there
trying
to
get
it
off
the
neighbors.
My
goal
was
to
so
it
didn't
run
into
the
neighbor's
yard
so
just
run
through
on
our
our
area.
M
The
neighbor's
been
really
good
about
that.
I
don't
know
if
she's
been
approached
or
not,
but
she's,
I'm
not
having
any
windows
on
her
side
of
the
building
on
on
that
side
of
the
building
front
or
the
east
side,
and
then
we're
going
to
put
the
fence
we're
going
to
have
a
privacy
last
going
through
the
fence.
That's
right!
Now
it's
called
chain
length
and
I've
ordered
some
privacy
things
to
go
in
the
in
the
chain
like
so
you
know
it's
harder
to
see
through.
M
Yeah
yep
those
privacy
strips
going
in
there
and
that's
not
really
what
bothers
her
so
much.
I
think
where
you
can
see
where
the
most
of
the
people
that
probably
in
the
lawyer,
I
would
say,
would
be
where
I'm
building
the
building
so
that'll
that
privacy
there,
where
the
building
goes
out,
that's
going
to
cover
that'll,
be
take
the
place
of
the
fence.
M
So
you
know
I
never.
I
knew
it's
never
been
an
issue
in
the
past
for
the
neighbors,
but
I'm
hopefully
the
the
business
will
get
better
in
the
summer
there,
so
hopefully,
privacy,
she'll
she'll,
like
that
extra
privacy.
From
that
larger
building,
you
know
and
then
that'll
be
it'll
help
the
quiet
too.
M
M
What
I've
been
what
I've
been
trying
to
think
of
is
all
these
other
lakes
around
have,
and
I've
talked
to
the
guy
that
well,
I
haven't
talked
to
him
personally,
but
I'm
interested
the
the
one
that
worked
out
a
city
park,
there's
some
with
canoes
and
paddles
and
stuff,
I'm
not
sure
the
name
of
the
gentleman,
but
I'm
thinking
about
just
taking
over
his
business
and
moving
it
to
the
north
shore
place
and
just
buying
his
canoes
and
our
kayaks
and
floatables
or
whatever
he
has.
M
Like
what
I'm
finding
out
is
when
you
get
so
many
people
on
your
boat,
your
short
short
safety
vests,
so
I
was
gonna
rent
out
safety
vests
I
was
gonna.
I
was
gonna,
do
the
whole
deal
so
if,
if
you're
short
on
a
safety
vest,
you
can
fly
over
there
on
your
boat
and
and
get
more,
you
know
rent
either
rent
buy
cheaper
ones,
so
you
have
them
available
on
the
lake.
B
A
All
right:
well,
then,
we
do
have
a
motion
on
the
table.
The
motion
includes
a
requirement
for
the
the
parking
lot
striping
within
a
two-year
time
frame
and
the
privacy
fence
to
separate
the
the
east
property
there.
Any
additional
discussion.
L
Just
for
clarification,
you
guys
are
okay
with
doing
the
the
opaque
screenings
instead
of
for
the
for
the
fence.
Okay,.
A
Okay,
we'll
go
ahead
and
proceed
with
a
roll
call
vote.
E
D
B
A
It
carries
with
the
conditions
that
were
noted
about
the
parking
lot
striping
and
the
privacy
fence,
so,
okay,
well
very
good.