
►
From YouTube: Public Works, Finance & Safety Meeting - 03-01-2021
Description
Public Works, Finance & Safety Meeting - 03-01-2021
C
A
B
B
B
D
A
The
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
public
input
period.
This
is
time
reserved
for
anyone
who
would
like
to
make
a
public
comment
to
step
forward
and
do
so.
We
do
have
a
sign
in
sheet.
I'm
not
sure
how
we'll
do
that
online,
but
this
is
our
first
meeting
using
it.
So
I
don't
see
anyone
in
the
audience.
If
there's
anyone
online
that
would
like
to
speak.
Please
know
that
we
do
have
a
policy
on
decorum
and
you'll
be
limited
to
five
minutes.
Is
there
anyone
online
that
would
like
to
speak
hearing?
A
I
have
a
motion
by
holine
and
the
second
by
hoyer
any
discussion.
Oh,
I
need
to
add
heath,
we're
going
to
add
the
mayor.
Yes,.
E
A
D
A
A
F
Yes,
thank
you,
madam
mayor.
This
is
in
relation
to
the
bid
award
for
10th
avenue
the
reconstruction
project
that
is
moving
along
for
construction
this
summer.
This
will
be
for
the
total
reconstructive
10th
ave
from
4th
avenue
west
to
or
excuse
me
4th
street
west
to
4th
street
east
all
along
10th
avenue.
We
did
recently
go
out
for
bids
on
february.
19Th
seven
bids
were
received
and
they've
been
closely
analyzed
in
a
level
of
detail
through
our
consultant
and
city
engineering
staff
in
the
bidding
process.
F
We,
the
city
staff
and
the
consultant,
put
a
couple
of
options
forth
in
the
bidding
packet
for
the
contractors
to
consider
and
one
of
the
main
ones
I
wanted
to
touch
on
this
evening
with
the
public
works
committee.
Is
the
option
between
the
concrete,
paving
and
asphalt
paving.
F
The
recommendation
before
the
council
tonight
is
to
timmins
construction
for
their
bid.
That
would
be
in
the
total
of
two
million
forty
thousand
five,
fifty
six
and
forty
six
cents
for
concrete,
paving
the
analysis
that
we
performed
against
the
asphalt
option.
That
I'll
briefly
cite
here
as
well.
The
asphalt
price
for
the
lowest
bidder
of
asphalt
would
have
been
to
dunnock,
incorporated
for
a
total
contract
price
of
1
million
776
617.
F
So
anytime,
you
have
a
concrete
and
asphalt
alternate
bid.
It's
important
to
analyze,
not
only
the
upfront
costs,
but
also
the
life
cycle,
costs
of
those
two
different
types
of
pavement
and
that's
exactly
what
we
had
our
consultant
assist
us
with,
and
they
walked
through
the
criteria
that
we
would
consider
for
life
cycle
analysis
I'll
share
those
with
you
here
briefly.
F
The
total
cost
for
these
maintenance
efforts
are
then
accumulated
along
with
the
initial
cost
of
construction
and
then
compared
to
the
concrete
option.
Now
you
can
see
on
the
concrete
option.
Generally
speaking,
you
have
a
lot
less
maintenance
type
rehab
projects
on
a
concrete
street
than
you
do
see
on
an
asphalt
street.
That's
why
you
see
our
list
of
projects
here
is
quite
a
bit
shorter
than
the
list
above
it
was
for
the
asphalt
option,
with
that.
F
On
this
example,
now
I'd
also
like
to
point
out,
there
are
a
lot
of
things
we
could
include
in
these
analysis
that
are
not
in
here,
like
the
cost
of
time,
delay
and
interruption
of
a
street
during
its
closure.
For
any
of
these
maintenance
purposes
on
asphalt
streets,
you
know
we
have
to
close
them
for
crack
ceiling
chip
ceiling.
Things
of
that
nature,
concrete
the
same
when
you
have
to
do
patchwork
on
concrete,
you
have
to
close
portions
of
the
street.
F
So,
there's
a
lot
to
consider
here
a
lot
to
talk
about.
In
our
mind,
it
was
fairly
straightforward
and
to
make
the
recommendation
that
we
have.
We
do
have
our
consultant
jason
with
cdi
online
with
us
today,
along
with
marcy.
A
D
It's
just
for
general
public.
Can
you
give
some
examples
of
where
we
have
concrete
in
town
versus
asphalt
just
so
they
can
maybe
get
a
sense
of
comparison.
F
A
D
F
To
that
point,
councilman
hoyer,
thank
you
for
mentioning
that
they
I
wanted
to
mention
too.
These
are
all
very
competitive
bids,
whether
you're
looking
at
the
asphalt
or
the
concrete
side,
they
were
all
very
competitive.
The
the
bid
we're
proposing
to
accept
was
eleven
and
a
half
percent
lower
than
the
engineer's
estimate.
F
Not
on
a
major
project
that
I
can
think
of
at
least
not
in
my
time
here.
I
know
that
they,
I
believe,
were
the
contractor
on
22nd
avenue
in
brookings
two
summers
ago.
I
believe,
and
actually
our
consultant
jason
cdi
got
to
work
with
them
on
that
that
project
and
had,
as
far
as
having
any
concern
for
being
a
non-performing
contractor.
Anything
like
that,
we
don't
have
any.
Thank
you.
C
The
follow-up
to
your
question,
michael,
I
remember
I
was
on
the
losing
side
of
this
discussion.
I
think
it
was
the
stretch
from
212
down
past.
C
Walmart,
a
few
years
ago,
we
had
the
same
conversation
concerning
asphalt
versus
concrete,
and
I
vote
against
the
the
concrete
and
I'm
looking
at
these
numbers
again
and
I've
obviously
was
voted
on
that
one.
I'm
looking
at
these
numbers
again
and
I
like
the
analysis
that
that
was
done
for
us,
but
again
I've
got
a
hard
time
justifying
spending
without
a
clear-cut
dollar
amount
over
that
life
or
the
life
of
that
road.
I've
got
a
hard
time
justifying
spending
over
300
000
more
up
front,
and
I
understand
the
disruption
of
traffic.
C
I
mean
all
the
points
laid
out
are
good
points,
but
I
just
have
a
hard
time
justifying
the
extra
cost
up
front.
So
I'm
I'm
going
to
be
voting
against
the
the
concrete
option
when
it
comes
to
voting.
I
just
want
to
express
that
because,
like
this
isn't
the
first
time
I've
had
these
concerns
and
probably
the
last
time
either,
but
I'll
probably
vote
it
down,
but
I
had
expressed
the.
A
Concern
all
right,
thank
you
and
it's
it's
not
an
overwhelming
savings
to
go
with
concrete,
but
concrete.
Does
it's
considered
a
rigid
pavement
and
it
stays
flat
longer
than
concrete?
You
don't
get
the
ruts,
you
don't
get
the
the
sinking,
you
don't
get
the
mis-shaping
that
you
get
with
concrete
and
potholes
that
you
get
with
asphalt.
Excuse
me
so
there's
that
and
that's
not
that's
kind
of
hard
to
quantify
that
benefit
of
having
a
concrete
road.
D
I
guess
for
me,
what
makes
me
lean
towards
it
is
just
looking
at.
I
know,
they're
not
exactly
the
same.
There
is
some
difference
here.
Definitely,
but
looking
at
like
a
wpa,
concrete,
sidewalk
versus
an
asphalt
trail,
even
just
looking
at
it
in
that
context,
which
one
tends
to
last
longer,
I
guess
that's
kind
of
what
pushes
me
towards
that
excitement,
but
we've
got
plenty
to
look
at
in
town
too.
A
G
D
B
D
A
Motion
carried
all
right.
Thank
you.
Item
b
is
approval
of
the
professional
services
agreement
for
construction
administration
services
associated
with
the
2021
tenth
avenue
north
reconstruction
project
number
two:
zero
zero,
seven
with
civil
design
inc
in
the
not
to
exceed
amount
of
two
hundred.
Sixty
two
thousand
nine
hundred
eighty
dollars
authorizing
the
mayor
to
sign
all
necessary
documents
motion
by
helene
seck,
my
lollam
and
heath
won't
tell
us
about
this.
Please
thank.
F
You,
madam
mayor,
so
this
is
a
a
related
item,
obviously
to
the
previous
action
item.
When
it
comes
to
the
construction
of
10th
avenue.
North
we've
had
a
design
contract
with
civil
design,
incorporated
they've
helped
with
all
the
preliminary
scoping
and
surveying
and
design
and
put
the
plans
together
for
that
project,
and
this
particular
contract
before
us
tonight
would
carry
through
their
work
all
the
way
through
the
construction
phase
of
10th
avenue
reconstruct
project.
F
F
It
is
a
260
980
contract
at
not
to
exceed
amount
of
that
some
of
the
services
that
they
would
be
providing
include
full-time
inspection,
which
would
include
looking
over
not
only
a
general
contractor,
but
all
their
subcontractors
and
the
work
that
they're
performing
on
the
project.
F
Checking
those
sorts
of
things
off
to
that
degree
and
then
all
other
you
know
pertinent
items
that
the
ej
cdc
the
contract
documents
outline
for
the
engineer's
role
in
a
project
which
I
think
is
also
important
for
us
to
have
a
third
party
objective
engineer
on
hand
for
for
a
project
of
this
magnitude,
that
the
contract
itself
outlines
contractors,
responsibilities,
the
owner's
responsibilities
and
the
engineers
responsibilities,
and
in
that
it
helps
keep
a
third
party
objective.
Look
on
things
so
that
it's
it's
not
engineering
staff
beating
up
on
the
contractor.
F
It's
not
the
contractor,
taking
advantage
of
the
owner.
You
got
this
third
party
engineer
in
there
to
make
sure
those
things
don't
happen
as
well.
With
all
that
being
said
again,
I
believe
jason's
online
with
us
here
this
evening
and
he
could
help
discuss
any
questions
we
might
have
as
well
as
myself
or
marcy
or
justin.
C
F
B
Yeah,
this
is
jason
from
civil
design.
Can
you
guys
hear
me
yep
yeah,
so
the
original
fee
is
what
was
right
around
that
number
that
you're
talking
about
was
80
000.
Then
we
had
some
additions
to
kind
of
revamp
the
design.
Add
some
storms
who
are
in
sanitary
sewers,
so
the
total
fees
that
we
had
was
a
little
over
104
000
for
the
design
phase.
F
You,
I
think
it's
another
point
I
would
make
you
know
when
you
talk
about
percentages.
That's
oftentimes
looked
at
in
that
perspective
too,
where
the
professional
services
percentages
typically
weigh
anywhere
from
10
to
15
percent.
Of
course
that
depends
on
whether
you're
talking
vertical
construction,
like
we
are
here
with
a
roadway,
horizontal
construction.
A
D
C
Can
I
ask
one
question
we
were
going
to
be
having
some
ongoing
or
some
upcoming
public
update
sessions.
I
don't
want
to
call
them
input
sessions
necessarily,
but
updates
have
those
been
scheduled
or
is
there
one
scheduled
or
where
are
we
at
with
that.
F
Yeah
great
question
councilman
bill
howard.
We
are
looking
to
schedule
those
as
soon
as
we
have
these
action
items
tonight
now
that
we
know
we'll
be
moving
forward
with
timmins
we'd
like
to
have
them
involved
in
that.
In
that
public
meeting
we
do
have
a
detour
route
planned
for
for
their
use
that
they
would.
We
would
anticipate
they
would
follow,
but
they
can
plug
in
at
that
meeting
too
from
their
timeline
and
schedule
of
things
as
well,
and
I
think
that'd
be
a
value
to
the
residents
along
there.
A
That
right,
thank
you.
Item
c,
is
approval
of
a
bid
award
for
the
boys
and
girls
club
roof
improvements;
project
number
2033
to
protect
roofing
in
the
amount
of
hundred
187
dollars
for
the
base
bid
and
alternate
three
authorizing
the
mayor
to
sign
all
necessary
documents,
a
motion
by
vilhauer
in
a
second
by
holine
and
again
I'll.
Ask
the
public
works
director
city,
engineer,
heath
von
nai
to
tell
us
about
it.
F
F
Hardware
replacement,
as
well
so
with
that
city
engineering
office
I'll
give
justin.
The
credit
here
he's
gone
to
work
at
putting
a
a
bid
out
for
re-roofing
the
structure
and
we've
gotten.
Just
one
bid
was
received
back
from
that
solicitation
and
that
was
from
pro
tech.
Roofing
we've
checked
their
bid
off.
It
does
look
to
be
within
reason.
F
A
All
right,
yes,
that's
a
good
point.
The
city
of
watertown
owns
the
building
which
the
boys
and
girls
club
occupies,
and
that's
why
we're
replacing
the
roof,
but
with
negotiations
that
we've
had
with
the
boys
and
girls
club
over
the
years,
it
is
assume
that
this
is
a
one-time
event
that
we
would
replace
the
roof.
We
used
to
share
the
building
with
them,
but
we
don't
anymore
and
there
a
couple
other
big
ticket
items
that
we
have
in
intended
to
replace
if
they
come
necessary,
but
we
don't
want
to
keep
doing
that
forever.
E
Actually,
you
basically
just
stated
what
I
was
going
to
reiterate.
Was
you
know
I
I
we
would
probably
want
it
just
on
the
record
that
you
know
as
part
of
our
the
recent
extensive
negotiations
that
took
place
with
the
boys
and
girls
club.
I
routinely.
B
B
E
As
far
as
what
any
future
arrangement
would
look
like,
it
was
always
discussed
that
there
would
be
a
one-time
replacement
of
some
of
these,
the
capital
projects,
including
the
roof
and,
of
course,
after
all,
those
extensive
negotiations.
E
We
sit
here
today
with
the
1984
lease
being
the
only
colorable
legal
document
that
governs
the
relationship,
and
that
document,
of
course
calls
for
the
city
to
maintain
its
building,
and
so
the
intention
is
to
you
know,
get
this
on
the
record
that
the
the
city,
this
council's
intention,
unless,
unless
it's
stated
otherwise
tonight,
is
to
do
this
as
a
one-time,
replacement
and
there'll
also
be
a.
You
know,
note
in
the
file
to
future
future
christians
and
others
to
to
see
20
30
years
down
the
road.
F
That's
yes,
councilman
vilhauer,
that
that
would
include,
I
don't
want
to
call
them
foam,
but
they're,
essentially
a
pad
that
that
allows
for
foot
traffic
for
maintenance
purposes
up
on
the
roof.
So
when
you
have
a
flat
roof
top
like
that,
you
have
the
the
rtus,
the
rooftop
units
and
things
of
that
nature
that
need
the
condensers
and
with
the
hvac
system
that
often
need
maintenance,
so
that
just
helps
prevent
people
from
punching
holes
in
the
new
membrane
roof.
Essentially.
A
A
Anyone
a
post
signify
by
saying
nay
motion,
carries
item
d
is
approval
of
the
right-of-way
and
easement
agreements
associated
with
the
highway
212
phase
ii
project
project
number
1802,
with
the
south
dakota
department
of
transportation,
transferring
property
for
one
dollar
and
authorizing
the
mayor
to
sign
all
necessary
documents
motion
by
holine
second
by
hoyer
and
heath.
Tell
us
about
this
one.
Please.
F
The
introductory
is
obviously
pretty
self-explanatory,
but
this
is
one
of
the
loose
strings
needing
to
be
tied
up
by
the
d.o.t
in
preparation
for
phase
two,
the
highway
212
project
they
needed
to
work
with
the
city
on
a
on
some
of
our
adjacent
property
that
they
needed
to
procure
some
easements
and
some
some
actual
h-slots
that
they're
going
to
create
primarily
related
to
the
11th
street
intersection
and
there's
three
slivers
here:
three
components
to
this
that
relate
to
that
11th
street
construction
and
the
amount
of
space
that
they
need
to
build.
F
That
fourth
leg
of
that
intersection
out.
If
you
recall
the
intent
is
to
for
the
dot
to
put
in
a
traffic
signal
at
that
intersection
and
then
stub
out
the
fourth
leg
going
to
the
south
there
in
front
of
what's
currently
the
montgomery's
property.
F
The
future
extension
of
11th
would
be
development
driven
at
this
point
in
time,
and
any
connectivity
to
that,
of
course,
would
be
driven
by
any
development
that
would
occur
in
that
area.
But
until
then
the
dot
needs
their
space.
In
order
to
build
that
portion,
intersection
out
and
install
the
traffic
signals
appropriately,
so
this
is
the
area
that
they
needed
to
recommend
from
or
request
from
us.
F
I
would
note
that
you
know
there's
a
valuation
of
this
property,
I
believe
to
the
tune
of
just
over
nine
thousand
dollars,
but
it's.
I
would
also
note
that
it's
fairly
customary
for
public
agencies
to
give
the
land
away
for
much
less
than
that.
So
this
this
consideration
is
for
a
dollar
for
this
transaction,
not
for
the
94,
100,
assessed
or
appraised
value
and
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
was
clear
and
known
to
everybody
as
well.
I
would
stand
by
for
any
questions.
F
A
All
those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay,
motion
carries
item
e,
is
presentation
of
findings
from
the
feasibility
of
design
agreement
with
clear,
ass
water
recovery
for
services
associated
with
the
potential
advanced
biological
nutrient
recovery
technology
to
be
installed
as
part
of
a
phosphorus
removal
facility
and
heath.
I
know
you
got
roger
lined
up
to
help
with
this,
but
I'll.
Let
you
introduce
it.
F
Yes,
thank
you
mayor,
so
roger
has
been
working
diligently
with
clear
as
our
consultant
that
we
hired
excuse
me
a
handful
of
months
back
to
do
a
feasibility
study
for
a
phosphorus
removal
plants
out
nearby
the
lake.
If
you
recall,
you
know
some
of
the
lake
clarity
and
phosphorus
concerns
are
all
mentioned
in
part
of
the
lake
kopeska
master
plan.
F
This
is
one
way
to
look
at
addressing
some
of
those
concerns
and
our
consultant,
I
think's
done
a
pretty
thorough
job
in
looking
at
some
proprietary
mechanics
that
would
could
be
plugged
in
out
of
the
lake.
With
that
I'll
hand,
it
off
over
to
roger
who's,
awful
also
presented
this
to
the
upper
big
sioux
river
watershed
board
as
well,
I
believe,
just
a
week
ago,
a
week
and
a
half
ago,
so
he
can
share
the
same
information
here
to
council
tonight.
H
Yep,
thank
you
heath
before
we
jump
right
into
the
into
the
presentation
from
clear
as
one
of
the
things
that
has
popped
up
quite
numerous
over
the
last
over
this
winter
is
the
zebra
mussel
issue
in
lake
compesca.
H
Some
of
the
questions
I
get
was:
will
it
clear
up
the
lake
so
much
that
our
project
won't
be
necessary?
Well
well,
the
short
answer
to
that
is:
no,
because
the
zebra
mussels
do
not
remove
the
nutrients
from
the
cycle.
Please
keep
in
mind
that
I'm
learning
this
as
quickly
as
I
can.
H
I'm
working
with
department
of
game,
fish
and
parks,
brian
blackwell,
the
the
area
biologist
and
working
with
some
people
from
the
minnesota
aquatic
species,
people
invasive
aquatic
species
group
to
to
try
and
figure
out
what
kind
of
an
impact
this
will
have
on
lake
compasca.
H
Unfortunately,
you
know,
even
though
zebra
mussels
are
filter
feeders,
they
will
not
eat
the
cyanobacteria,
the
toxic
ones
that
we
are
monitoring
for
anyway.
You
know
if
they
would
take
those
out.
That
would
be
a
great
benefit,
but
apparently
they
eat
the
good
stuff
and
leaves
the
bad
stuff
for
the
rest
of
us.
I
All
right,
thanks
roger
so
my
name
is
autumn
fisher.
I'm
the
vp
of
project
delivery
with
clearest
water
recovery.
There's
a
couple
other
people
from
our
team
on
the
last
this
afternoon
as
well.
We've
got
pat
kelly,
our
senior
application
engineer,
as
well
as
joe
ruiz
and
ed
coggin,
from
weston
solutions.
I
So
weston
solution
is
a
third-party
engineer
that
clears
leveraged
as
a
consultant
on
this
as
a
sub-consultant
for
the
overall
feasibility
study
and
westin
has
partnered
with
us
on
some
of
our
other
design
and
engineering
efforts
and
projects
that
we
have
currently
going
on.
So
that
is
our
team
that
we
have
with
us
this
afternoon
and
just
want
to
walk
through
some
of
our
findings
and
the
approach
that
we
took
to
the
overall
feasibility
study.
I
So
you
know
a
high
level,
we'll
we'll
walk
through
the
background.
I
I
think
you
guys
are
probably
all
really
familiar
with
what's
going
on
in
link
camp
lake
campesca,
the
reason
that
we
were
tasked
with
this.
This
study,
we'll
walk
through
some
of
the
overall
study
objectives,
the
technology
itself.
So
what
is
advanced
biological
neutral
recovery?
I
So
the
main
reason
that
clearas
was
engaged
as
part
of
this
evaluation
was
to
evaluate
using
our
technology,
which
uses
algae
for
nutrient
removal
and
recovery,
typically
from
waste
water.
But
we
have
done
some
some
pilots
and
some
other
studies
on
treating
lake
water
as
well,
but
again,
primarily
just
because
of
the
hyper
eutrophic
state
of
lake
kampesca,
I'm
starting
to
see
declining
water
quality,
less
recreational
activity
being
able
to
take
place
during
certain
times
of
the
year.
I
So
what
we
did
throughout
the
study
is
we
took
an
approach
where
we
evaluated
the
existing
infrastructure.
So
how
could
we
use
the
infrastructure
that
is
located
on
site
for
integration
into
abnr
and
hopefully
realize
some
cost
savings
as
a
result
of
that
look
at
what
the
current
requirements
are,
but
also
what
some
future
requirements
may
be.
I
We
developed
our
opinion
of
probable
costs
and
then
we'll
we'll
talk
about
the
next
steps
and
timings
that
we
came
up
with
so
just
starting
with
the
technology
as
a
whole.
Advanced
biological
nutrient
recovery,
avnr
was
founded
in
2008.
Our
headquarters
is
actually
based
out
of
missoula
montana,
and
it
is
focused
on
nutrient
removal
and
recovery
from
from
either
wastewater
sources
or
other
sources
of
water
and,
as
you
can
see
from
the
map
here,
we've
got
a
wide
range
of
experience
throughout
the
united
states.
I
The
technology
itself
operates
very
similar
to
wastewater
activated
sludge
for
those
of
you
that
may
be
familiar
with
the
wastewater
process,
but
essentially
what
we're
proposing
is
that
you
have
your
feed
water
source
coming
in,
which
is
the
lake
campesco
water
that
is
mixed
within
what
we
refer
to
as
our
mix
tank
that
mixture
flows.
So
the
combination
of
the
waste,
the
water
coming
in
from
the
lake,
combined
with
the
return
algae,
is
moved
into
our
photobioreactors,
where
the
algae
gets.
I
The
light
that
it
needs
to
go
through
photosynthesis
and
really
all
we're
doing
is
what
you
are
experiencing
in
your
local
lake,
where
you
get
algae
blooms.
The
algae
blooms
are
a
result
of
the
nutrients
that
are
in
the
lake,
we're
just
taking
that
process
and
we
are
controlling
it,
we're
keeping
it
within
this
closed
reaction
system
and
then
on
the
back
end
of
the
process.
After
the
algae
has
taken
the
nutrients
out
of
the
water.
We
separate
the
algae
from
the
water.
I
I
So
primary
benefits
of
the
abnr
system.
You
get
total
phosphorus
recovery,
total
nitrogen
recovery,
you'll
get
a
reduction
of
total,
suspended
solids,
biochemical
oxygen
demand.
You
have
the
ability
to
recycle
and
sequester
carbon
dioxide,
and
then
you
also
see
an
increase
in
dissolved
oxygen
through
our
process
as
well.
I
I
I
So
if
we
talk
about
some
of
our
our
current
experience
and
projects
that
we
have
going
on
specifically,
this
features
the
village
of
roberts
in
roberts
wisconsin.
I
They
have
a
wastewater
discharge,
permit
limit
of
0.04
milligrams
per
liter,
so
that
is
what
our
treatment
requirement
is
in
their
particular
case,
and
this
facility
will
generate
about
400
dry
pounds
of
algae
per
day,
so
I
I
touched
very
briefly
on
on
the
algae
itself,
but
generally,
what
clearest
does
is
we
engage
with
the
cities
or
the
municipalities
to
actually
enter
into
a
purchase
agreement
where
we
purchase
the
algae
that
is
generated
off
of
the
treatment
process
back
from
the
cities,
and
it
does
act
as
a
source
of
residual
income
back
to
the
community.
I
I
So
this
company,
that
goes
by
the
name
of
algix
works
with
23
of
the
25
largest
shoe
manufacturers
in
the
world
and
their
ultimate
goal
and
objective
is
to
replace
all
of
the
petro-based
plastics
that
you
see
in
your
foam
products
with
a
bio-based
algae
based,
plastic
and
foam.
I
So
moving
into
the
specific
work
that
we
did
in
working
with
roger
and
his
team,
we
first
started
the
process
out
by
doing
an
evaluation
of
the
current
site
conditions.
So
ed
coggin
from
westin
solution
took
a
trip
down
to
see
roger
check
out
the
water
treatment
plant,
evaluate
the
current
infrastructure
and
really
the
ultimate
goal
of
that
site
visit,
and
the
overall
process
was
to
optimize
the
abn
r
costs
with
infrastructure
reuse.
I
The
next
step
in
the
evaluation
process
was
to
review
the
layout
options.
So
the
first
option
that
we
looked
at
was
to
actually
locate
the
greenhouse
structure
in
the
nearby
park
and
we
would
pump
the
water
from
the
existing
water
plant
to
the
greenhouse
structure
and
have
the
the
algae
be
processed
right
there
at
this
location.
I
So
this
utilized
both
the
existing
water
treatment
plant
and
the
nearby
park
we
felt
this
was
probably
going
to
have
less
disruption
on
the
neighbors
and
local
homes,
but
it
did
represent
a
higher
capital
costs
option.
Two
that
we
evaluated
was
actually
to
locate
the
greenhouse
right
near
the
water
treatment
plant
site.
I
I
We
did
have
concerns
that
this
location
could
be
subject
to
neighbor
complaints,
but
we
worked
with
our
greenhouse
vendor
to
provide
a
light
shading
system
and
the
reason
that
we
thought
the
light
shading
system
would
be
a
good
idea.
Is
that
because
algae
and
what
we're
doing
in
our
system
is
just
promoting
photosynthesis.
I
So
we
have
an
led
lighting
system
that
provides
that
supplemental
light
to
the
algae,
but
in
this
particular
circumstance
we
would
use
a
shading
system
that
would
shade
that
greenhouse
and
limit
the
exposure
and
the
noise
pollution
for
the
the
neighbors
nearby.
F
Okay
autumn,
yes,
heath
here,
just
maybe
I'm
jumping
ahead
of
you,
but
did
you
happen
to
have
pictures
in
the
slideshow
that
demonstrate
what
lights
we're
talking
about
and
what
that
might
look
like
with
without
being
shaded.
I
F
I
know
that'd
be
helpful
and
show
the
reason
why
we
would
want
to
shade
it.
It
was
pretty
obvious
to
us
when
you
showed
us
those
examples.
I
I
I
In
terms
of
the
current
water
quality,
we
determined
that
we
would
need
to
treat
approximately
600
000
gallons
of
lake
water
per
day,
and
we
estimate
that
the
total
phosphorus
in
that
water
would
be
about
0.6
milligrams
per
liter
phosphorus
and
the
reason
that's
important
is
it
actually
helps
us
with
all
of
our
sizing
of
our
infrastructure
and
the
overall
system?
That's
needed
to
hit
the
targets
that
we
wanted
to
hit
for
nutrient
reduction
of
the
lake
water.
I
So
what
this
system
would
result
in
is
we
would
have
total
phosphorus
going
back
into
the
lake
at
point:
zero,
four
milligrams
per
liter
that
would
equate
to
about
three
pounds
per
day
of
phosphorus
being
removed
and
over
the
period
of
the
13
years
that
we
looked
at.
That
would
be
roughly
4
14
000
pounds
of
phosphorus
that
would
get
removed.
I
So
again,
this
was
the
design
basis
that
we
made
the
decision
to
proceed
with
it
accomplishes
what
the
key
objective
was
or
is
for
the
overall
project
and
that's
to
take
out
that
13
000
pounds
of
phosphorus
over
10
years
and
convert
the
lake
from
hypereutrophic
to
eutrophic.
I
I
I
I
So
how
big
did
our
membrane
system
have
to
be
pump
size
and
how
many
pumps
we
would
need-
and
all
of
that
was
done
again
with
optimizing
for
cost
and
efficiency,
eliminating
redundancy
where
it
wasn't
necessarily
required,
and
all
of
these
all
of
these
individual
steps
and
processes
were
blown
out
into
additional
detail
and
drawings
as
well.
But
I'm
I'm
not
going
to
cover
each
each
step
in
detail
here.
I
So
beyond
the
overall
abn
r
configuration
again
looking
at
the
water
treatment
plant
and
our
ability
to
reuse
the
existing
infrastructure,
looking
at
drawings
that
existed
and
working
with
roger
and
his
team
to
to
utilize
those
drawings
to
develop
what
the
overall
system
would
look
like
within
the
water
treatment
plant,
so
here's
a
high-level
site
layout
where
we
show
the
proposed
co2
tank
for
the
carbon
that
is
fed
to
the
algae.
I
What
the
size
of
the
greenhouse
would
look
like
in
relationship
to
the
water
treatment
facility,
but
then
getting
into
more
detail
actually
inside
of
the
building.
So
looking
at
pump
placement
where
we
would
propose
the
membrane
modules
could
be
placed
the
proposed
inlet
pumps.
So
what
would
pump
the
water
into
the
abn
r
system
on
the
lower
floor
plan
and
then
moving
on
to
the
main
floor
plan
and
looking
at
the
layout
of
equipment
within
the
existing
building?
I
So
a
couple
key
things
we're
proposing.
You
know
you
can
have
the
the
centrifuge
stored
within
the
existing
chemical
feed
room,
there's
chemical
storage
right
next
door
and
then
we've
got
a
cooler
for
storing
the
algae
paste
before
it's
shipped
off
for
for
additional
processing.
I
So
in
terms
of
next
steps
and
things
that
we've
talked
about
that
the
city
may
want
to
consider,
I
know
you
guys
are
still
in
the
process
of
evaluating
what
the
best
step
is
going
to
be
moving
forward
to
reach
the
objectives
of
the
lake.
I
If
we
wanted
to
take
this
to
another
level
level
of
detail
and
and
continue
to
develop
this
plan
and
finalize
the
abn
r
design,
the
city
may
consider
selecting
a
third
party
engineer
to
review
and
deliver
the
final
plan.
We
could
also
leverage
the
work,
that's
already
been
completed
by
clarisse
and
weston.
Weston
again
is
a
licensed
engineer.
We
do
feel
that
this
is
probably
going
to
be
the
more
cost
effective
solution
for
the
city
moving
forward.
I
But
again
that,
ultimately,
is
is
up
to
to
your
team
to
make
a
choice
over
and
then
another
thing
that
came
up
too.
Was
you
know
what
is
the
the
best
procurement
method
to
move
forward
so
within
it?
We
within
the
process
in
other
projects.
Historically,
we
have
seen
the
ability
to
either
sole
source
or
pre-select
the
abnr
technology
again,
because
abnr
is
a
propriety
technology.
I
It's
unique
within
the
industry
and
there's
there's
nobody
else
out
there
that
can
do
it
so
they're
generally
procurement
procurement
language
around
having
the
ability
to
actually
pre-select
or
sole
source,
the
abnr
technology
for
projects
like
this,
and
we
do
have
some
examples
of
other
projects
that
we've
done,
that
on
that,
we
would
be
happy
to
to
share
how
we
worked
through
that
process.
I
In
terms
of
next
steps
and
timing
as
well,
if
we,
if
we
chose
to
proceed
and
and
continue
with
the
momentum
that
we
currently
have,
you
know
again,
the
city
can
evaluate
what
their
preferred
engineering
approach
is.
Moving
forward
determine
what
the
public
procurement
methodology
would
be.
I
Ultimately,
this
entire
schedule
is
built
around
initiating
construction
sometime
in
2022
and
wrapping
that
up
in
in
2023,
initially
roger
and
his
team
had
indicated
that
you
know
trying
to
target
a
two-year
construction
time
period
for
the
project
and
to
allocate
those
costs
of
construction
over
that
time
period
would
be
best,
and
we
generally
see
projects
of
this
size
span
that
that
amount
of
time
anyways.
So.
I
I
would
welcome
any
questions
and
maybe,
while
we
gear
up
for
questions
I'll
I'll,
pull
up,
pull
up
a
picture
for
you
guys
really
quick
here
too.
A
I
So
after
10
years
we
would
just
keep
treating
water.
So
what
we
might
see
is
that,
because
in
that
10-year
time
period,
we've
done
such
a
great
job
of
removing
the
nutrients
and
reducing
the
nutrients
in
the
lake
that,
ultimately,
what
would
happen
is
you
would
start
to
produce
less
algae
off
of
our
system,
but
we're
still
going
to
continue
to
treat
the
water
and
we're
still
going
to
generate
algae.
A
I
H
H
Now,
if
you'll
recall
on
2016,
there
was
lots
of
news
in
the
papers.
I've
got
was
getting
phone
calls
every
day
that
delays
clearer
than
anyone
has
ever
seen
it
in
living
memory.
That
is
our
goal.
That
is
what
we
want
to
do,
and
I
feel
that
by
removing
that
13
000
pounds
will
take
us
a
long
way
towards
that.
The
reason
that
we
were
close
to
it
in
in
16
was
because
of
the
the
nitrogen
deficiency
that
the
lake
had
and
we
were
at
the
third
year
of
a
three-year
drought
cycle.
B
Thank
you.
You
talked
about
removing
three
pounds
per
day,
1096
pounds
per
year,
so
that's
obviously
a
year-round
operation
regarding
phosphorus
coming
into
the
lake.
That's.
B
H
Yes-
and
I
don't
have
that
number
in
front
of
me-
we
take
samples
every
year
during
flood
stage
to
see
what's
coming
in
the
the
trick
here
is
that
the
weather
cycles,
as
we
get
at
a
period
of
drought,
we
have
less
water
coming
in,
as
we
have
flood
period,
we
get
a
lot
all
at
once.
The
trick
is
to
balance
it
out
over
this
13-year
period
and
that
plays
into
the
the
whole
scenario
here.
I
do
have
the
annual
loading
numbers
here.
Someplace.
If
you
give
me
a
few
minutes
I'll,
try
and
find
him.
I
And
I
think
just
to
piggyback
off
of
that,
just
a
little
bit
too
in
terms
of
flexibility
of
operation
for
the
abnr
system,
we
do
have
the
ability
so
that
the
design
basis
for
the
the
system
is
600,
000
gallons
per
day
at
0.6
milligrams
per
liter,
but
as
you
see,
seasonal
fluctuations
and
variations
in
the
water
and
the
water
quality,
so
maybe
your
total
phosphorus
goes
up
or
it
even
goes
down.
I
G
Thank
you
mayor.
I
do
have
a
few
questions,
I'd
like
to
run
by
roger,
if
I
could
the
what
are
we
looking
at
roger
for,
like
a
o
m
for
this
facility?
Are
we
going
to
require
additional
personnel
that
we'd
have
to
hire
to
run
this,
and-
and
I
guess
I'd-
be
interested
in
what
kind
of
maintenance
costs
and
you
know
what
kind
of
consumable
issues
there
might
be
things
that
have
to
be
replaced
I'll?
Let
you
start
with
that.
I
I
was
just
looking
at
my
list,
and
so
we
do
still
owe
roger
some
of
that
follow-up
information
around
the
opex.
I
can
talk
just
a
little
bit
in
terms
of
what
some
of
the
typical
consumables
are
and
what
the
estimated
personnel
are,
but
we
we
are
going
to
pull
together
a
more
formal
kind
of
table
that
outlines
that
information.
I
So
we
generally
estimate
one
half
full-time
employee,
so
essentially
20
hours
per
week,
and
then
part
of
that
oversight
would
be
just
a
general
walk-through
of
the
facility
on
a
daily
basis.
It
does
not
require
24
7,
365
oversight.
I
We
do
have
a
fully
integrated
scada
system,
so
you
have
the
ability
to
monitor
and
control
the
system
remotely
and
and
check
in
on
how
things
are
going
that
way
as
well,
so
that
helps
to
save
on
some
of
the
oversight
in
terms
of
typical
consumables,
the
membranes
so
the
filtration
process.
They
do
require
a
in
place
or
a
cip
cycle
that
we
actually
use
it's
a
bleach
solution
to
soak
those
membranes
periodically.
I
There
are
there's
the
co2,
so
feeding
the
carbon
to
the
algae,
so
it
will
go
through.
Photosynthesis.
Is
considered
a
consumable
and
then
also
factored
into
our
our
general
opex
calculations
would
be
the
power
estimates
as
well.
So
I
will.
I
will
follow
up
and
and
we'll
get
that
information
pulled
together
for
roger,
because
I
know
that
was
something
that
came
up
with
the
watershed
committee
as
well.
G
I
Yep
so
we
harvest
the
algae,
24
7
365,
so
that
is
done
automatically
via
just
a
small
inline
pump
and
that
pump
will
pump
it
to
the
centrifuge.
I
So
within
I'm
gonna
sorry
switchback
presentations
here
and
go
to
the
equipment
layout.
So
within
the
abnr
process
we
actually
have
coming
off
of
the
centrifuge
scales,
so
the
centrifuge
would
fill
up
a
tote.
So
you've
got
these.
These
squares
right
here
represent
totes
storage
totes
that
would
be
on
a
scale
and
that
scale
would
indicate
when
that
tote
is
full
of
algae,
and
it
would
actually
divert
the
algae
to
start
filling
the
empty
tote
once
those
totes
are
full.
I
You
can
just
use
a
pallet
jack
and
you
store
it
within
the
the
cooler
that
we're
proposing
here
and
that
algae
is
picked
up
generally
every
one
to
two
weeks
and
all
of
those
logistics
and
that
coordination
are
managed
by
clearas,
so
the
the
pickup
frequency
of
the
algae,
where
it's
going
to
who
who's
buying
it,
that
is
all
managed
by
clearas.
G
Okay,
so
you
would
be
responsible
for
the
transportation
for
taking
that
away,
correct.
I
C
I
guess,
as
a
follow-up
to
what
what
you
just
asked
bruce,
what
kind,
what
kind
of
revenue
generation
how
much
revenue
would,
would
we
or
could
we
generate
from
from
this?
You
know
we're
talking
about
the
o
m
cost,
but
how
about
the
revenue
side.
I
Yeah
absolutely
so,
we
estimate
that
the
gross
value
of
the
algae
is
anywhere
between
50
cents
to
a
dollar
and
those
are
those
are
real
numbers.
We've
got
contracts,
letters
of
intent
in
place
with
existing
off
takers
at
that
dollar
amount.
I
That
does
not
take
into
consideration
what
the
opex
is
associated
with
running
the
system.
So
that
is
the
gross
value
at
the
loading
rates
that
we
talked
about
so
600,
000
gallons
per
day
at
0.6
milligrams
per
liter
phosphorus
coming
in
the
watertown
facility
would
generate
about
73
000
pounds
of
algae
a
year.
B
C
I
I
got
a
question
for
mayor.
I
know
you
you're
at
the
lake
and
pesca
water
project
district
is
meeting
here
very
soon.
I
saw
a
notice
in
the
paper.
Has
this
been?
Have
they
seen
this
presentation
or
what's
their
what's
their
thoughts
on
this.
H
I
invited
them
to
the
at
a
joint
board
meeting
between
the
lake
pesca
water
project
district
and
the
upper
big
sioux
river
watershed
project.
It
was
very
positive
the
comments
that
I
received
after
the
meeting
they
seem
to
be
on
board
with
it.
It's
kind
of
we're
kind
of
looking
at
taking
next
steps.
Now.
C
A
C
Just
just
for
what
it's
worth
I
went,
went
and
checked
our
our
cr,
our
cip
budget.
We
did
have
2
million
just
as
a
ballpark
number
plugged
in
both
for
2023
and
2024
for
this
product,
so
so
it
is
something
we
have
been
thinking
about.
Obviously,
and
that's
what
prompted
this
study
that
we
approved
that
we're
finishing
up
now
so
just
want
to
throw
that
out
for
consideration.
G
Mayor,
if
I
could
sure
council
bruce
again,
thank
you.
Thank
you
just
another
question
and
I
think
this
is
going
to
be.
I
I
think
one
of
the
more
important
issues
is
the
inlet
and
I
I
don't
know
autumn.
If
you
have
worked
with
a
lake,
that's
very
similar
to
what
we've
got
right
now
in
size
and
as
well
as
the
inlet
issues
that
we
might
encounter
because
many
many
years
we
have
water
that
comes
into
that
lake.
G
Through
that
inlet
and
in
issue
you
know
flood
times
as
well,
what
kind
of
damage
and
how
long
it
would
take
to
recover
if
we
had
a
100
year
flood
or
you
know,
or
something
of
that
nature.
I
think
that's
going
to
be
an
important
issue
for
us
to
understand
when
we're
taking
this
algae
out.
If
the
benefits
are
going
to
be
there
long-term,
I
know
if
we
didn't
have
any
flooding
over
a
period
of
time.
G
I
would
imagine
that
that
lake
would
clear
up
and-
and
I
know
that
when
we
did
have
that
clearing
for
that
short
period
of
time
that
was
like
roger
had
said,
was
at
the
end
of
a
flood
cycle.
I
mean
we'd
gone
three
years
with
more
drought-like
conditions
was
my
understanding
and
that's
why
we
had
that
because
we
did
not
have
that
inflow
of
phosphorus
into
the
lake.
I
Yeah
absolutely-
and
I
would
say
during
those
times
what
we
would
have,
the
ability
to
do
is
actually
to
treat
more
of
the
water
out
of
the
lake.
So
I
think
number
one.
You
know
we're
we're
not
taking
the
algae
out
of
the
lake,
we're
only
taking
the
water
out
by
by
nature
of
taking
the
water
out.
We
will,
you
know,
collect
some
algae
going
into
our
system,
but
the
algae
that's
contained
within
our
system
is
essentially
completely
self-contained.
G
H
If
I
could
add
just
one
one
little
comment,
this
is
not
the
silver
bullet
to
save
the
lake.
This
is
part
of
one
part
of
the
master
plan
that
will
incorporate
many
different
practices
to
improve
the
well-being
and
the
livability
and
recreation
all
around
the
lake
itself.
So
this
is
not
the
whole
thing.
This
is
a
part
of
the
whole
thing,
and
I
I
want
to
make
that
clear
that
I'm
not
pretending
to
save
the
world
here
with
the
silver
bullet.
We've
got
a
long
ways
to
go
and
a
lot
of
work
to
do.
J
I
wanted
to
address
that
as
well,
that
it
we're
going
to
have
to
have
a
holistic
approach
to
getting
the
lake
in
good
shape,
but
one
of
the
things
I
want
to
just
put
out
there
as
we're
considering
all
of
this
is
that
we
do
have
some
people
who
are
putting
a
tremendous
amount
of
financial
investment
into
housing
and
recreation
and
some
of
those
things
that
we've
wanted
at
the
lake
for
so
long,
and
I
think
that
all
these
things
kind
of
fit
together.
J
Do
we
want
to
not
only
make
sure
our
lake
is
good
quality
that
you
know
this
is
watertown,
and
then
we
do
have
a
lot
of
people
who
are
investing
a
tremendous
amount
of
money,
and
I
think
that
to
have
a
successful
lake
and
a
successful
environmentally
you
know
or
eutrophic
as
it
were,
but
I
think
we
need
to
look
at
that
whole
picture
because
we
can't
take
them
separately.
You
know
you
can't
ignore
the
lake
and
put
a
tremendous
amount
of
money
into
development.
J
A
G
No
sorry
about
that.
Oh.