![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/kNSpFZ1ewLQ/mqdefault.webp)
►
From YouTube: Public Works, Finance, and Safety Meeting 04-05-2021
Description
Public Works, Finance, and Safety Meeting 04-05-2021
A
Good
afternoon,
I'd
like
to
call
to
order
the
public
works,
finance
and
safety
committee
meeting
of
monday
april
5th
2021
and
we're
having
a
little
bit
of
technical
issues
right
now,
so
this
will
be
put
on
gov
tv
and
youtube
later.
I
just
aren't
able
to
get
it
live
stream
at
this
time.
So
roll
call
please
kristin.
C
B
C
A
A
A
Anyone
a
post
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion,
carries
item.
Six
is
the
regular
agenda
and
item
a
is
approval
to
advertise
and
hire
for
the
position
of
facilities
operations
supervisor
with
within
the
parks,
recreation
and
forestry
department,
with
a
starting
salary
of
fifty
seven
thousand
nine
hundred
sixty
nine
dollars
sixty
cents-
and
I
I
see
our
park
director
terry
kelly-
is
on
line
terry.
Would
you
like
to
introduce
this
for
us?
Please.
E
Yes,
thank
you
main
mayor
members
of
the
council.
What
you
have
before
you
is
one
of
two
agenda
items
pertaining
to
the
reorganization
structure.
We
did
within
the
department
that
took
effect
of
january
1
2020.
After
one
year
of
operations,
we
did
take
a
look
back
as
a
committee
to
see
how
that
was
going.
Within
those
conversations.
E
We
then
identify
two
positions
that
we
felt
were
needed
to
kind
of
restructure
within
the
organization
to
fill
in
a
few
gaps
that
we
found
that
didn't
have
the
the
100
total
supervision
of
facilities
or
extra
help
in
in
areas
that
are
are
truly
needed.
So
this
one
is
one
of
two
positions
before
you.
This
one
is
the
facility
operations
supervisor.
E
E
This
does
come
with
a
recommendation
for
approval
from
the
facilities
committee
within
the
park
and
rec
board.
It
also
does
not
require
any
additional
funding
or
transfers
from
the
general
fund.
It
is
capable
of
being
funded
all
within
the
park
and
recreation
budget.
So
I
will
answer
any
questions
or
again.
Jeremy
herbolt
is
here
with
me
who
would
supervise
the
position.
A
E
Thanks
again
mayor,
I
hope
you
can
hear
me.
My
screen
looks
like
the
conference.
Camera
went
went
black
here.
So
are
you
able
to
hear
me
over.
E
Okay
again,
I
won't
repeat
the
justification
it.
It's
really
reflective
of
the
last
agenda
item
again,
I
do
have
matt
branson
with
me
on
this
one
who
is
supervised
position,
but
again
it's
to
identify
needs
within
the
department,
especially
the
forestry
aspect.
We
have
found
that
we
are
seeing
some
we're,
basically
getting
quite
behind
in
in
all
the
aspects
of
forestry
and
with
emerald
ash
bore
the
new
equipment
on
its
way,
definitely
an
essential
essential,
add
to
our
to
our
organizational
structure.
B
Yes,
it
should,
I
think,
too,
when
we
talk
about
the
budget.
As
terry
stated,
a
lot
of
this
is
due
to
the
reason
we
say
it's
in
the
budget
is
these
amounts
were
not
actually
budgeted,
but
there
will
be
some
there's
been
a
few
retirements
and
some
other
structural
changes
that
will
make
it
fall
within
the
budget
for
2021..
F
A
D
Yes,
thank
you
mayor
if
the
council
could
recall
a
while
back
here
recently,
we've
awarded
the
construction
contract
for
10th
avenue
north,
along
with
a
construction
administration
contract
to
our
consultant
cdi
and
at
that
last
meeting,
where
we
had
a
contract
brought
forward.
I'd
briefly
mentioned
the
need
for
a
testing
contract
that
we
would
be
bringing
forward
and
essentially
what
that's
for
is
to
cover
all
of
the
testing
needs
on
the
10th
avenue
north
reconstruction
project.
That
would
include
any
subgrade
base
course
concrete.
D
We
did
ask
cdi's
assistants
to
go
ahead
and
send
a
proposal
out
for
the
testing
component
and
we've
gotten
two
prices
back
from
two
different
testing
companies
and
the
the
apparent
low
bidder
that
we
analyzed
their
numbers
on
was
forester
testing
in
the
amount
of
nineteen
thousand
five
hundred
eighty
dollars,
and
so
that's
what's
being
recommended
to
the
council
for
approval
and
have
the
mayor
execute
that
contract
justin's
online,
and
here
I
can
help
answer
any
questions
on
this.
A
C
Would
like
to
to
commend
and
compliment
heath
and
their
staff
for
the
presentation
at
the
wellness
center
last
week
for
the
10th
avenue
project
went
very
well.
I
thought
from
my
perspective
and
didn't
hear
a
lot
a
whole
lot
of
grumbling
from
those
in
the
audience
either.
So
compliments.
A
Yeah
I'll
second,
that
thank
you
that
motion
carried
so
we'll
move
on
to
item
d,
approval
of
a
bid
award
for
the
asphalt
pavement
project
number
2115
to
dunk
inc
in
the
amount
of
one
hundred
forty
one
thousand
one
hundred
fifty
three
dollars
authorizing
the
mayor
to
sign
all
necessary
documents
motioned
by
bill
howard
in
a
second
by
lawlum
and
I'll.
Ask
public
works
director
heath
on
eye
to
explain.
D
Thank
you
again
mayor
this
one
is
it's
generally
labeled
and
there's
a
reason
behind
that
we
simply
called
it
the
asphalt
pavement
project.
The
reason
for
that
is,
we've
got
three
different
departments
here,
working
together
that
need
asphalt,
work
done
this
summer,
one
of
them,
of
course,
being
engineering
department
working
with
the
streets
streets
department,
all
of
public
works,
looking
at
getting
our
large
patch
project
awarded.
D
That's
where
we
had
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
the
budget
to
go
around
in
miscellaneous
locations
throughout
town
and
address
some
large
asphalt
patching
needs
on
our
city
streets.
Second,
one
being
the
fire
department.
We
worked
with
chief
crans,
where
they've
got
some
parking
lot
patching
needs
that
they
needed
addressed.
They've
got
some
areas
that
have
blown
out
and
really
aren't
conducive
to
going
much
longer
as
far
as
running
fire
truck
traffic
over
them.
So
we
wanted
to
make
sure
we
incorporated
those
into
this.
D
That
was
budgeted
for
twenty
five
thousand
dollars,
and
then
we
also
have
the
park
and
rec
department
working
on,
as
we
have
been
the
last
couple
few
years
now.
Another
phase
of
mount
mount
hope,
cemetery,
road
improvements,
and
so
the
three
of
those
combined
is
what
this
bid
award
is
is
helping
to
address.
D
We
did
only
receive
one
bid
and
that
was
from
donek
incorporated
in
the
amount
of
141
153,
and
the
bids
came
in
very
favorably
in
relation
to
the
overall
budget
amount,
which
was
175
000
when
you
combine
those
three
department's
budgets,
so
we're
well
within
the
the
budget
amounts
with.
That
being
said,
I
also
wanted
to
note
that
we
work
closely
with
rob
and
the
street
component
alone
came
in
about
thirty
eight
thousand
under
budget
we're
hoping
to
incorporate
some
additional
patching
into
the
project
to
maximize
the
budget
amount
that
we
have
in
place.
D
As
we
all
know,
there's
several
street
patches
that
are
worthy
of
including
in
this
so
we'd
like
to
maximize
that.
But
that'll
come
forward
later,
when
we
close
out
the
project
and
process
any
necessary
change
order,
requirements
or
things
like
that.
So
as
of
right
now,
that's
what
the
project's
for
and
we
recommend
approval,
and
we
stand
by
for
questions.
C
I
I
support
this
project,
but
I
do
have
a
question
whether
it's
for
heath
or
for
for
terry
kelly,
if
you're
on
the
line,
yet
what's
the
status
or
where
are
we
at
with
the
the
parking
lot
out
the
boat
ramp
at
city
park?
I've
had
some
inquiries.
I
know
that
was
scheduled.
What
the
last
couple
years
we've
talked
about
that
and
I
drove
out
there
last
night
and
it
is
it's
getting
worse
all
the
time
so,
where
where's
that
in
the
pecking
order.
D
Yeah,
that's
you're
right,
councilman
vilhar
was
about
two
years
ago.
I
think
20
was
it
18
or
maybe
it
might
have
been
18
three
seasons
ago.
We
originally
bid
that
work
might
have
been
19..
Justin
has
been
working
closely
with
tk
on
that
and
the
contractor.
D
And
I
will
have
to
pass
that
question
off
to
them,
because
I
don't
know
exactly
where
we're
at
the
details
on
getting
that
work.
Additional
work
done,
but
I
believe
they
wanted
to
revamp
the
scope
of
work
and
address
a
few
other
issues
with
some
drainage
and
some
camps
pads
and
things
like
that
that
were
on
the
site
too
tk
or
justin.
If
you
could
chime
in.
E
Yeah,
I'm
sure
justin
will
probably
take
that
technicality.
Heath
reminder
why
it
wasn't
done
in
the
first
two
was
for
water
levels.
At
the
lake
we
just
we
just
held
off,
we
were
able
to
do
jackson
last
year.
We
still
have
the
money
in
the
budget
waiting
in
that
project
with
that
justin,
probably
filling
the
rest
of
the
details.
B
Yeah,
the
we're
doing
a
little
extra
work
adjusting
some
of
the
the
areas
in
city
park,
we're
talking
to
donek
who's,
the
contractor
and
waiting
to
hear
back
if
they
maintain
the
prices
and
and
if
it's
gonna
stay
within
budget.
A
A
D
As
far
as
work,
yes,
I
believe
we're
set
up
contractually
to
go
ahead
with
the
work
with
donek
we're
just
ironing
out
the
details
on
the
numbers
and
the
overall
budget
amount
we
may
or
may
not
need
to
bring
a
change
order
forward.
I
guess
is
what
I'm
saying
so
you
may
not
see
anything
for
action,
but
you
may
just
see
the
work
getting
done.
Okay,.
A
I'll
take
that
as
a
no
all
right,
then
there
are
no
further
questions.
Look
for
action,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye.
A
Anyone
post
signify
by
saying
nay
motion
carries
item
e.
Is
approval
of
the
neup
national
emergency
use
provision,
release
for
the
watertown
regional
airport
and
surrounding
properties
authorizing
the
mayor
to
sign
all
applicable
documents,
have
a
motion
by
lollum
and
a
second
by
elberson,
and
I
will
ask
the
public
works
director
heath
to
tell
us
about
this.
Please.
D
D
But,
generally
speaking,
what
this
item
is:
is
this
one
of
the
many
phases
or
components
of
the
process
we've
been
working
throughout
at
the
airport
over
the
last
handful
of
years
now,
really
on
cleaning
up
and
substantiating
the
airport,
boundaries
and
solidifying?
D
What
is
formal
city
airport
property
and
what
is
not,
and
this
any
up
release
is
one
of
the
next
steps
in
that
process.
D
What
exactly
this
means
for
us
as
a
community
and
what
it's
helping
to
accomplish,
but
I
do
know
it's
it's
the
next
logical
step
in
that
process
and
cleaning
things
up
on
the
airport
property,
so
todd.
If
you
want
to
take
it
from
there
and
provide
a
little
background
or
pass
it
off
to
mike
I'd
appreciate
that.
B
Thank
you,
and
actually
I
will
turn
to
brook
edgar
from
helsin
associates
on
this
to
to
give
a
little
more
background.
B
This
was
started
back
in,
I
want
to
say
2014,
late,
13
or
2014,
so
it's
been
a
long
road
to
get
to
where
we
are,
but
this
is
in
the
final
stages
of
getting
a
new
plat
for
the
airport
and
taking
out
some
of
the
areas
that
we
didn't
need
that
we
could
utilize
for
some
development,
so
brooke
edgar.
Please.
G
Thanks
todd,
so
in
a
nutshell,
the
neup
is
the
national
emergency
use
provision
back
in
the
40s.
When
the
government
took
control
of
the
airport
during
world
war
ii,
they
upgraded
it
and
created
the
army
base
and
then,
after
the
war
was
done,
they
used
a
using
a
quick
claim,
deed
deeded
it
back
to
the
city,
but
in
that
deed
they
had
this
neup.
G
For
to
have
full
unrestricted
use
of
the
airport,
if
and
when
it
needs
to
so
basically
what
this
this
letter
is
is
just
asking
the
federal
government
to
release
the
airport
from
that
provision.
G
Most
airports
have
slowly
gone
through
this
process
in
the
past
and
when
we
went
through
this
with
the
faa,
the
replanting
with
todd
and
heath
and
everybody,
this
came
up
that
there's
no
record
that
that
it's
ever
been
done
so
just
kind
of
a
formality
to
try
and
get
that
little
provision
out
of
there,
so
that
it
covers
the
city
a
little
bit
and
we
don't
have
any
big
surprises.
D
And
brooke,
if
I
could
expand
on
that
a
little
bit
just
for
clarity's
sake,
and
I
guess
in
my
mind
one
way
to
think
of
this-
that
helps
solidify
the
need,
for
it
is
it's
not
only
including
the
proper
city
airport
property,
but
also
those
areas
of
land
adjacent
to
the
airport.
That
used
to
be
considered
part
of
the
airport
property
that
have
now
since
been
developed
on
in
our
own
privately
by
other
companies,
and
there
are
a
handful
of
those
locations
too.
That
are
being
requested
in
this
release.
Requests
correct
brook.
C
As
I
understand,
a
lot
of
this
should
have
been
taken
care
of
as
it
took
place
in
years
past.
So
what
I
mean,
hopefully
this
clears
up
what's
taken
place
in
the
past,
so
I
hope
we
have
some
controls
in
place
that
as
we
go
forward
and
something
you
know
takes
place
out
there
that
we
act
on
it
promptly
and
correctly.
It
is
my
question
making
sense.
I
I
guess
I'm
looking,
probably
at
heather
or
matt
from
your
perspective
on
this
or
or
todd
whoever
you
know
be
the
most
logical.
F
Yeah,
I
think
that,
as
long
as
as
a
community
as
people
come
and
go,
of
course,
as
long
as
the
institutional
knowledge
remains
that
any
land
out
there,
we
can't
just
the
airport
land
isn't
just
freely
negotiable
away.
D
Mayor,
I
forgot
to
mention,
but
we'll
add
just
for
the
record.
The
airport
board
did
review
and
also
recommend
this
for
approval
at
their
last
airport
board
meeting.
A
A
D
Thank
you
mayor.
This
has
been
an
ongoing
project
now.
Over
the
past
year,
we
entered
into
a
contract
with
hdr
engineering
and
todd
yearden
is
here
this
evening.
He's
the
project
engineer
that's
been
assigned
to
us
on
this
project
and
has
been
working
with
marcy
and
justin,
and
myself
on
the
details
of
the
highland
drainage
needs
some
of
the
concerns
that
we've
known
in
the
over
the
years
that
have
come
up
in
this
area.
D
I'm
going
to
share
my
screen
here,
very
quick
and
briefly,
and
then
I'll
pass
it
off
to
todd
for
his
presentation
just
to
give
some
context
on
the
area
we're
talking
about
most
specifically,
of
course,
this
is
a
highland
park
area.
D
You
have
the
hospital
here,
that's
along
10th
avenue
and
you
have
highway
81
here
running
north
and
south
and
then
of
course,
14th
on
the
north
side
of
the
screen.
D
But,
generally
speaking,
everything
within
here
is
really
and
even
beyond.
In
some
areas
is
the
area
that
hdr
did
an
analysis
on
they've
done
a
hydraulic
analysis
and
have
come
forward
with
some
recommendations,
some
phased-in
recommendations
for
construction
improvements
to
help
alleviate
some
of
the
drainage
concerns
that
happen
throughout
this
basin,
and
with
that,
I
guess
I'll.
Let
todd
tj
he's
otherwise
known
as
I'll.
Let
him
present
his
information
and
the
phase
in
recommendations
we'd
be
glad
to
help
answer
any
questions
at
the
end
of
the
presentation
or
even
during.
H
All
right,
thank
you,
heath.
As
he's
as
he
mentioned,
I
go
by
tj
in
our
office.
We
have
another
todd,
so
I'm
todd
yearden
I've
been
with
hdr
for
18
years
now,
primarily
doing
storm
water
type
work,
and
so
this
is
something
I
really
enjoy
doing
and,
and
it's
been
a
fun
project
to
learn
a
little
bit
more
about
this
neighborhood
here
in
watertown.
H
So
as
heath
mentioned,
it's
the
highland
park,
watershed
drainage
analysis.
He
gave
you
a
little
bit
of
a
background
as
far
as
where
this
is
located,
but
the
basin
that's
outlined
in
red.
There
basically
shows
the
the
entire
basin
it
generally
speaking,
it's
north
of
10th
avenue
south
of
16th
avenue,
the
far
west
edge
is
skyline
drive
and
and
highway.
81
is
primarily
the
the
east
boundary
for
this
basin.
H
The
basin
actually
outlets
on
10th
avenue,
just
east
of
highway
81.,
and
I
did
highlight
where
the
highland
park
is
just
because
we'll
be
referencing
that
throughout
the
the
presentation.
H
So
as
far
as
back
background
of
the
project,
the
engineering
department
identified
the
need
to
better
understand
the
drainage
within
this.
Within
this
watershed
and
the
street
department
has
expressed
concerns
as
far
as
poor
drainage
in
the
area,
but
along
with
poor
drainage
during
the
winter
months,
where
water
will
will
melt
pound
up
in
the
roadways
and
then
freeze
back
up
again
an
example
to
help
you
kind
of
understand.
I
don't
know
if
this
smells
yeah
there
we
go
this
picture
in
the
upper
right
hand.
H
Corner
is
at
seconds
at
second
in
highland,
and
so
all
the
drainage
comes
to
this
low
point
in
the
roadway
and
then
has
to
come
through
this
valley.
Gutter
go
through
a
curb
opening
into
a
grassed
area
as
part
of
the
park
system,
and
that
becomes
really
difficult
to
get
water
through
there.
You
can
see
in
the
picture
that
some
sediments
already
built
up
in
that
area,
and
so
during
the
summer
months,
water
struggles
to
get
through
that
opening
starts
to
pond
in
the
roadway
during
larger
storm
events.
H
But
in
the
winter
months
the
snowplows
push
snow
into
that
area.
It
melts
and
freezes
and
then
begins
to
pond
and
freezing
the
roadway,
which
becomes
a
difficult
thing
for
the
street
street
department
to
try
to
manage
and
then
also
some
local
residents
in
the
area
have
expressed
some
concerns
throughout
the
base
and
as
far
as
poor
drainage
in
the
area.
H
We
have
one
component
that
is
underground
underground
pipes
that
get
the
water
away,
and
then
we
also
have
an
area
where
it's
overland
flow,
that's
going
through
curb
cuts
and
and
trying
to
make
its
way
through
the
system,
and
when
we
evaluated
this,
we
looked
at
the
5
and
100
year.
Storm
events.
H
So,
starting
with
the
areas
of
non-compliance
on
here,
you
can
see
some
of
the
purple
lines
and
that
represents
the
underground
storm
water
pipe
system,
that's
within
the
basin,
and
so
you
can
kind
of
see
that
when
I
said
it's
broken
to
two
components,
you
have
an
area
over
here
that
has
underground.
H
You
have
an
area
over
here
that
does
not
have
underground,
so
I
kind
of
broke
it
up
into
two
areas
of
non-compliance,
so
the
first
area
I
refer
to
as
highland
park
to
cairns
street
and
really
how
this
water
flows
it
flows
from
west
to
the
east
through
the
park
area
and
really
there
there's
no
underground
storm
water
system.
In
that
area.
There
is
a
pipe
coming
out
of
cairns
street.
It's
actually
more
like
a
culvert
than
an
actual
underground
pipe.
H
H
Those
are
all
areas
where
water
has
to
work
its
way
through
curb
cuts
there.
A
couple
of
them
have
small
culverts
but
they're,
extremely
small,
not
effective
during
large
storm
events.
So
that's
the
first
area
and
then
the
second
area
of
concern
was
within
the
stormwater
network,
and
so
we
identified
that
the
existing
system
is
undersized
throughout
the
basin
in
the
lower
portions
of
that
basin.
H
And
then
the
actual
three
areas
that
we
identified
as
areas
of
concerns
are
low
points
within
the
street
system
and
low
points
are
really
difficult
to
deal
with
because
water
comes
into
them
and
if
there's
no
way
to
get
the
water
out,
it
has
to
get
through
the
pipe.
And
so
we
identified
those
as
areas
not
meeting
design
standards,
because
the
water
couldn't
get
out
of
there
in
time.
H
So
keeping
those
areas
of
non-compliance
on
there,
we
started
trying
to
develop
recommendations
for
improvements
and
trying
to
phase
those
out.
So
we
identified
some
alternatives
in
the
report.
There's
some
alternatives
that
I'm
not
bringing
forward
today,
but
we
looked
at
more
than
just
what
we
presented
here
with
that.
We
also
developed
a
construction
cost
to
better
identify
how
much
it
costs
to
try
to
implement
the
the
alternative
and
then
try
to
help
heath
and
his
staff
prioritize
each
of
these
improvements,
which
one
would
be
best
to
implement
first
and
so
on.
H
So
the
first
recommendation
that
we
had
was
implementing
an
underground
stormwater
network,
and
so
in
the
report
we
called
it
alternative
one
segment,
a
and
so
looking
at
that
are
basically
going
from
maple
all
the
way
up
to
2nd
street
through
the
park
system
in
there,
and
the
goal
of
this
of
this
stretch
of
project
is
to
try
to
get
an
underground
storm
water
system
that
the
water
can
get
into
a
pipe.
So
when
it
melts
in
the
winter,
it's
not
freezing
in
the
roads.
It
has
a
place
to
go
and
get
out.
H
That
would
connect
into
the
existing
underground
system
downstream
and
then
it
would
also
have
inlets
within
the
streets
to
help
pick
that
water
up.
So
this
stretch,
a
storm
sewer,
like
I
said,
goes
from
maple
street
all
the
way
over
to
second
street
construction
cost.
For
that
685
thousand
dollars
was
what
was
estimated
for
that
construction
cost.
H
The
second
priority
of
the
second
project
we
looked
at
is
basically
a
continuation
of
this
first
phase.
We
tried
to
break
it
up
a
little
bit
to
help
it
be
in
more
manageable
chunks
for
the
city
to
to
work
with,
and
so
that's
carry
on
the
same
project
from
2nd
street
all
the
way
up.
It
goes
up
down
highland
up
to
4th
and
then
over
to
karen,
and
so
it's
hard
to
to
help
out
the
cairns
street
area
without
having
underground
pipes.
H
So
we
had
we
had
to
have
priority
one
first
and
then
this
one
same
thing
of
underground
storm
water
network
that
connects
in
ends
up
going
down
highland
boulevard,
and
so
basically,
this
alternative
helps
alleviate
the
low
point
at
cairns
street.
The
estimated
construction
cost
for
that
is
962
thousand
dollars
to
implement
that
underground
network.
H
Priority
three:
we
put
this
as
a
third
priority,
but
this
is
something
that
could
be
implemented
work
with
priority
one
if
funds
are
available
and
the
parks
department
is
willing
to
to
work
with
it.
But
we
know
that
that
there's,
probably
some
some
works
between
public
works
and
parks,
trying
to
try
to
help
develop
this
option
but
alternative
priority.
H
Three
alternative
two
in
in
the
study
is
creating
some
surface
detention
within
highland
park,
and
so
when
we
looked
at
the
at
the
basin
as
a
big
picture,
we
looked
at
areas
of
where
is
it
green
that
we
could
potentially
put
some
storage
to
help
to
help
the
system
out
and
what
detention
does
is.
It
helps
reduce
the
peak
flows
so
that
way
water
can
get
in
the
system
better
and
not
have
to
upgrade
or
upsize
as
big
as
is
potentially
needed,
and
so
we
identified
these
areas
of
green
space
that
are
out
there.
H
We
also
do
recognize
that
they're
within
the
park
system,
but
it's
a
it's
each
of
these
green
areas
between
second
and
mayfair
mayfirm,
first
first
in
park
and
then
also
within
the
highland
park,
the
actual
park
area,
and
so
basically
it's
it's
a
above
ground
storage,
but
that
that
underground
pipe
would
be
underneath
of
that.
So
the
water
would
get
out
of
there.
H
H
H
This
also
helps
out
with
the
low
point
on
highland
boulevard,
which
is,
in
the
middle
point,
the
the
red
dot
here.
So
there's
a
low
point
here
with
this
alternative.
What
we
recommended
within
the
report
was
that
that
stretch
of
highland
boulevard
potentially
be
abandoned
from
the
the
street
network.
When
we
looked
at
it,
there's
a
few
things
that
we
noticed.
H
11Th
avenue
already
has
a
connection
into
highway.
81
on
the
proximity
of
of
highland
boulevard
to
10th
avenue
on
highway
and
81
is
fairly
close
and
it
seemed
like
it.
It
made
sense
that
potentially,
that
stretch
of
road
I
mean
the
purpose
it
served.
If
you're
trying
to
get
traffic
in
and
out
of
the
area,
you
still
have
a
a
place
for
traffic
to
come
and
go
so
the
maintenance
of
the
extra
road
plus
we
have
a
low
point.
H
That's
that's
struggling
to
get
water
out
of
there,
so
we
did
recommend
the
trying
to
abandon
that
stretch
of
road.
H
F
F
H
So
that
was
part
of
trying
to
abandon
highland
boulevard
through
there
you
get
to
the
intersection,
we'll
call
it
third,
highland
and
11th.
It
ends
up
coming
at
different
angles
that
are
less
than
ideal
engineering,
wise,
and
so
that
was
part
of
that
recommendation.
Was
you
eliminate
highland
boulevard?
So
now
you
have
11th
coming
in
from
the
east,
you
have
highland
over
on
the
west,
still
and
then
third
going
straight,
north
and
south,
so
you
eliminated
a
fifth
leg
out
of
that
out
of
that
intersection.
H
H
So,
as
far
as
drainage,
drainage
would
still
go
where
it
goes
right.
Now
the
the
existing
pipe
is
on
highland
boulevard,
so
it
travels
down
highland
boulevard
over
to
highway
81
and
then
down
to
10th
avenue,
and
so
really
what
it
does
is
eliminates
a
spot
where
water,
so
the
design
standards
say
you
can't
have
more
than
a
foot
a
foot
and
a
half
of
water
during
the
100
year
event.
H
H
H
Is
an
arch
I'm
trying
to
remember
if
it's
60
inch
arch
pipe
and
it's
basically
at
the
point
where
the
pipe
size
got
us
into
having
to
have
boxed
culverts
to
get
the
water
out
of
there,
and
so
that
starts
adding
up
in
cost,
and
so
that
was
part
of
the
reason
why
this
was
pushed
back
to
priority
four
recognizing
there's
a
substantial
cost
there
and
trying
to
plan
for
that
cost,
pushing
it
back
into
the
the
group
of
priorities.
H
H
And
so
we
we
analyzed
that
determined
pipe
size
and
the
estimated
construction
cost
for
that
was
about
3.3
million
dollars
and
again
recognizing
that
it's
a
long
range
plan
that
there's
there's
plenty
of
other
things
to
do
within
this
basin.
Before
you
got
to
this
point,
but
also
recognizing
that
at
any
point
there
may
be
a
street
project
in
the
area
or
utility
project
in
the
area.
Recognizing
that
and
going
okay.
H
So
that's
that's
a
map
kind
of
showing
all
the
improvements
all
together
and
summarizing
them.
I
know
you're
giving
the
executive
summary
within
your
packets,
and
so
I
open
it
up
to
questions
as
far
as
this
project
and.
D
This
is
obviously
a
great
road
map,
and
that
was
really
the
intent
behind
this
this
project,
this
design,
effort
with
hdr,
is
to
give
us
a
good
road
map
to
move
forward
with
something
that
justin
and
I
and
rob
will
continue
to
work
on
with
kristin
through
the
budgeting
processes
is
how
to
phase
this
in,
and
you
know
likely
going
on
for
the
recommendations
of
the
consultant,
obviously,
but
coordinating
it
with
other
projects
and
looking
at
the
other
needs
in
this
in
this
basin,
whether
they
be
street
needs
utility
needs
whatever
that
might
be,
but
there's
a
lot
of
leg
work
left
to
do.
D
I
guess
I'll
say
aside
from
just
plugging
these
in
and
asking
for
those
funds
on
a
per
project
basis,
but
that's
something
we'll
continue
to
do
as
staff
and
and,
of
course,
as
a
community,
the
council
will
ultimately
decide
where
we
put
our
focus
in
this
in
this
basin.
I
just
wanted
to
provide
a
little
bit
more
context
too.
D
When
it
can't
be
conveyed
through
those
mechanisms.
It
then
obviously
has
to
go
somewhere.
So
it
starts
running
off
into
private
property
and
through
people's
garages
and
things
of
that
nature,
and
those
are
some
of
the
complaints
that
we've
received
in
the
recent
past
and
for
certain
storm
events
that
these
efforts
would
then
start
to
address
and
help
mitigate.
So
with
that
yeah,
we
entertain
any
questions
that
the
public
works
committee
might
have.
F
What
kind
of
time
frame
on
this
if
we
decided
to
start
taking
some
of
these
projects
on,
I
mean
it's
a
3.3
million
dollar
budget
item,
but
if
we
break
that
out
into
a
couple
different
ones,
you
know
to
be
able
to
go
through
the
parks
and
where
those
locations
are
at
the
end
of,
I
believe
it's
mayfair
and
third
and
first
I
believe
as
well.
You
know
those
are
open
for
the
most
part
they're
open
at
the
end
of
those
blocks,
so
I
mean
we're
not
tearing
out
private
property.
F
Obviously
you
know
what
kind
of
time
frame
are
we
looking
on
something
like
that.
D
Yeah,
I
think
the
time
frame
councilman
lalalam
would
be
to
see
how
these
needs
fit
into
the
rest
of
the
cip
needs.
That's
one
component
to
it.
So
you
know
we
obviously
have
a
lot
of
street
construction
needs,
and
all
these
other
cip
needs
our
capital
improvement
plan
so
where
to
plug
these
drainage
components
into
that
on
a
priority
basis
and,
of
course,
again,
the
council
council
making
that
ultimate
decision,
where
those
needs
should
be
focused
where
those
funds
should
be
focused
will
be
a
continued
discussion.
D
We'll
have
to
have
the
other
component
to
this
too,
of
course,
is
our
stormwater
utility
projects
like
this
are
prime
candidates
for
what
those
storm
water
utility
funds
would
be
used
towards.
So
the
timeline
on
the
implementation
of
that
could
be
key
to
when
these
start
getting
executed
for
actual
projects
on
the
field,
but
we
would
anticipate
approaching
it
on
a
per
phase
basis.
F
A
H
A
I
Mayor
just
to
note,
I
guess
I
think
it'd
be
interesting
to
know
as
we
phase
through
these.
If
we
use
the
number
one
priority,
what
effect
that
would
have
on
the
overall
flood
issue
as
these
things
as
we
knock
them
down,
you
know
if
we
got
alternative
one
done
segment
a
I
should
say
what
that
would
do
to
the
overall
effect
of
the
rest
of
the
right
potential
project
and.
H
Within
the
full
study
we
broke
it
up
so
phase
a
was
broke
up
and
analyzed
first
then
added
phase
b
and
so
or
segment
a
and
b,
as
we
called
it,
and
so
within
the
report
we
looked
at.
How
much
does
it
help
and
has
it
fixed?
You
know
we
started
looking
at
these
outlying
areas
at
karen
street
up
here
on
maple
and
over
by
broadway.
H
I
The
other
I
just
have
a
question
as
well.
The
you
had
mentioned
the
alternative
to
you
know,
which
would
would
be
the
retention
I
believe
for
for
the
priority
one.
What
exactly
would
that?
What
would
be
the
benefit
of
that.
H
I
H
Yeah,
so
the
plan
again
with
that
priority
one
is
to
put
in
an
underground
system
that
goes
all
the
way
through
that
park
within
the
study
has
determined
a
48
inch
pipe
through
there.
So
it's
a
sizable
pipe,
that's
underground
and
then,
as
the
system
backs
up,
it
starts
backing
up
into.
You
could
call
it
bulls
within
the
within
the
park
area.
D
Tj,
I
don't
believe,
is
in
the
scope
of
your
work
to
do
much
if
any
modeling
east
of
highway
81,
but
you
know
that's
another
thing
that
the
the
detention
would
help
with
too.
Is
you
know
the
eventual
outfall
of
this
system
is
right
there
at
10th
and
81.,
and
you
know
what
the
depending
on
the
storm
event,
what
kind
of
an
impact
impact
it
might
have
in
that
area
as
well
right.
H
And
so,
within
the
study
we
just
looked
at
what
was
the
peak
flow,
leaving
the
system
existing
as
it
sits
today,
then
peak
flow
as
it
leaves
the
system
after
implementing
these
items
and
so
adding
that
detention
within
the
system
helps
re,
reduce
that
peak
flow
some.
So
it's
that
trade-off
of
first,
you
say:
well,
if
we
put
in
underground
pipe
it's
going
to
get
more
water
out
of
there,
but
yet
the
detention
helps
keep
it
back
as
well.
So
it's
it's
kind
of
a
trade-off.