![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/6tLHtyk7Ww8/mqdefault.webp)
►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting - 4-18-2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Our
heavenly
father,
as
we
gather
here
this
evening,
we're
so
thankful
for
such
a
great
group
here
that
have
concern
and
love
for
our
community.
Lord,
thank
you
for
these
leaders
here
so
much.
They
do
so
much
time
their
talent,
so
much
is
given
that
people
don't
realize
and
we're
thankful
for
them
today.
We're
also
thankful
for
our
law
enforcement,
our
firefighters,
the
paramedics,
our
sheriff's
department,
who
each
one
works
and
gives
their
best
to
make
sure
that
we
rest
safely
god.
B
We
ask
your
blessing
on
this
evening
today
and
we
pray
should
give
us
wisdom
and
that
you'd
give
us
understanding
and
we
consider
others
more
important
than
ourselves
and
god
we
thank
you
for
this
great
community
of
watertown.
We
don't
take
it
for
granted
for
this
great
place,
we
live,
and
we
thank
you
in
jesus
name,.
A
A
E
A
A
F
I
I'm
not
opposed
to,
but
I
I'm
concerned
about
the
high
dollar
amounts
being
at
the
consensus.
I'd
suggest,
moving
e
and
j
have
a
brief
discussion
as
part
of
the
regular
agenda.
G
A
Is
h
we
will
we
will
pull
that
and
add
it
to
the
end
as
well.
I
just
there's
some
questions
I
would
like
to
have
on
it.
No
I
please
do
I
mean
the
last
thing.
A
All
right,
all
those
in
favor
of
approving
the
consent
agenda,
please
say:
aye
aye,.
I
A
G
Yeah
I
just
I
just
would
like
to
say
in
the
open
that
here
within
the
last
couple
of
weeks,
we
we
lost
an
individual
in
our
community,
karen
brandwright
and
karen.
I
got
to
know
karen
for
in
working
with
her
for
many
years
on
our
plan,
commission
and
board
of
adjustments,
and
she
was
always
a
very
loyal,
well-prepared
individual
for
that
and
she
did
a
great
job
and
she
was
a
really
a
great
person
to
get
to
know
and
to
call
a
friend.
G
A
Seeing
none
chair
will
entertain
a
motion
to
approve
the
regular
agenda
with
one
alter,
with
obviously
we're
adding
e
h
or
e
h
and
j
on
to
the
end
and
in
the
sake
of
respect
for
everyone's
time.
I
am
moving
item
f,
which
is
the
discussion
on
cac's
fourth
edition
to
the
first
item
on
tonight's
agenda.
A
A
G
Yeah
there
are
certain
times
when
we
have
instances
where
we
feel
there's
a
conflict
of
interest
and
in
in
doing
that,
if
it,
if
it
impedes
our
ability,
either
by
state
law
or
our
ability
personally
to
to
not
make
a
an
unbiased
decision
or
action,
then
we
should
recuse
ourselves
and
in
the
first
item
that
we're
going
to
be
talking
about,
I
just
want
to
disclose
to
the
public
that
I
have
a
son
that
lives
out
in
cax
has
for
several
years
that
his
concerns
he
has
expressed
to
me
and
expressed
to
the
planned
commission
solely
deal
with
33rd
street
and
and
so
I'm
not
recusing
myself.
G
For
that
reason,
I
have
no
financial
interest
in
his
in
his
home.
I
I
believe
that
my
history,
longevity
on
the
planned
commission
board
of
adjustments
and
understanding
what
we've
done
historically
for
development
purposes
and
how
we've
done
those
things
are
reasons
why
I
feel
my
input-
and
my
vote
is
important
to
this
item.
So
I
will
not
be
recusing
myself.
C
Mayor
similarly,
I
am
employed
by
a
partner
in
this,
but
not
on
this
land
sale
side.
So
I
do
not
have
a
direct
financial
interest
in
this
development
and
for
that
reason
I
will
not
be
recusing
myself
either.
A
And
just
want
to
state
that
by
law
we
have
consulted
our
city
attorney
matt
roby,
and
he
concurs
with
that
decision
that,
as
long
as
there
is
no
direct
monetary
gain,
that
is
perfectly
legal,
correct,
matt,
all
right
before
we
go
to
our
public
works
director.
I
want
to
say
a
few
things
in
to
preface
this
conversation
tonight
again
for
the
public
or
anyone
who
is
new
to
this.
There
is
no
decision
made
tonight.
We
are
not
taking
a
vote
on
this.
A
This
is
just
a
first
reading
and
normally
that
is
only
for
council
discussion
and
questions.
We
have
already
had
an
hour
and
a
half
of
questions
from
the
council
at
the
work
session,
so
tonight
we'll
focus
more
on
discussion,
but
we
definitely
want
to
foster
questions
at
a
first
reading.
It
is
not
required
that
the
chair
allow
public
comment,
but
I
will
because
I
respect
that
everyone
who
showed
up
here
tonight
wants
to
be
heard
with.
A
A
I
also
would
like
to
say
that
the
public
hearing
is
actually
going
to
be
at
the
second
reading,
which
is
going
to
be
the
first
meeting
in
may
or
at
may
2nd,
and
at
that
point,
then
that
is
a
public
hearing.
Anyone
who
wants
to
speak
has
that
right
to
do
so.
A
I
want
to
also
put
some
things
in
the
public
record
that
a
lot
of
the
council,
I
think
all
of
the
council,
has
been
notified
of
several
emails
if
it
has
been
sent
to
every
council
member,
which
I
know
several
of
them
have
then
by
law
that
is
entered
into.
That
is,
that
is
an
open
meeting
record
so
that
has
that
will
be
stipulated.
The
council
recognizes
that
also
we
have
been
placed
into
our
hands
a
petition
with
at
least
155
residents
who
wanted
to
voice
their
opposition
to
this
as
well.
A
So
I'm
reading
that
into
public
record
and
some
of
those
questions
regarded
traffic
traffic
flow.
Can
the
road
handle
the
traffic
safety
on
the
roads
who
wants
or
even
needs
the
apartments?
The
covenant
concerns
the
commercial
use
of
the
proposed
property
processing
on
permitting
timing
of
the
change
of
the
plans,
and
just
there
were
a
lot
of
people
who
didn't
even
cite
a
reason
they
just
didn't
like
it
and
that's
valid.
J
J
The
owner
of
the
land,
steve
horning,
is
the
acting
agent
for
the
cacs
lakeside
edition
has
submitted
a
petition
to
rezone
lots,
17-22
block
three
of
cac's
fourth
edition
from
pud
planned
unit
development
of
kak's
fourth
edition
to
another
revised
pud
plant
unit
development,
pelican
lake
apartments
mike
lawrence
is
the
applicant
and
developer
of
the
rezone
and
pud
plan
proposal
for
pelican
lake
apartments.
J
This
pud
proposal
this
before
you
tonight
and
at
second
reading
and
first
meeting
in
may
includes
six
lots
that
are
adjacent
to
lake
pelican
and
to
develop
the
lakefront
with
mixed
uses,
including
commercial
residential
and
recreational
uses.
The
developers
vision
is
to
provide
affordable
apartments
with
access
to
lake
pelican
on-site
recreational
uses
and
a
local
restaurant.
J
Islands
shall
be
installed
within
the
parking
lot
to
provide
areas
for
internal
landscaping
and
tree
plantings.
The
setbacks
for
the
pud
will
meet
the
minimum
requirements
of
the
r3
multifamily
residential
district,
those
setbacks
being
the
front
yard
of
30
feet.
Side
yards
of
20
feet,
rear
yard
of
25
feet
with
a
maximum
overall
allowable
height
of
55
feet
for
the
structures.
J
J
This
pud
does
not
approve
such
dedication
and
further
will
continue
to
be
discussed
with
the
pertinent
parties
and
the
subsequent
approvals
that
would
be
required.
J
The
development
does
not
require
park
dedication,
however,
because
kak's
fourth
edition
has
already
met
those
requirements.
Something
was
talked
about
in
the
work
session
previously,
where
the
cac's
fourth
edition
has
committed
land
for
a
bike
path.
Extension
as
part
of
our
master
plan
for
the
rec
trail
system
throughout
watertown
in
lieu
of
a
park
place
if
you
will
or
a
park
improvement
place
within
the
development.
J
J
J
J
J
A
K
Considering
all
the
conversation
during
the
work
session
in
in
february,
we
sat
down
with
mr
steve
horning
and
there
were
a
couple
of
critical
documents
whether
we
looked
at
when
we
were
considering
the
purchase
of
a
lot
now,
there
were
no
single
fan
single
family
homes
along
what's
known
as
north
pelican
lane
at
that
time,
so
we
were
looking
at
buying
the
first
one
and
and
so
we
asked
some
questions
like
you
know
why.
Why
isn't
that
developed
yet,
and
he
says
well,
sometimes
it
just
takes
someone
who
has
the
courage.
K
You
know
to
light
the
spark
and
get
that
going,
and
so
we
reviewed
the
covenants
and
we
reviewed
the
master
plan
for
this
development
and
it
did
extend
all
the
way
from
33rd
to
40
seconds.
So
it
was
the
full
development
that
we
were
viewing
at
that
time,
even
though
the
first
edition
was
the
only
one
that
was
developed
at
that
moment,
but
I
just
want
to
go
on
talking
about
the
relevance
of
the
covenant.
K
I
know
that
there's
discussion
about
the
new
addition
not
having
that,
and
so
the
topic
I
want
to
bring
up
that,
I
believe
is,
is
kind
of
new
is.
Is
that
I
believe
that
the
city
council
earnestly
desires
to
do
what
is
best
for
watertown
and
when
I
think
of
a
development
going
in
they're
extensive,
there's
a
lot
of
land,
and
so
they
tackle
it
in
chunks
at
a
time,
and
so
there
is
just
a
piece
here
and
then
a
piece
added
on
when
those
properties
are
sold
and
you
need
to
make
room
for
more.
K
I
think
of
dakota
commons,
river
ridge
and
texas,
no
difference
on
may
2nd.
This
council
is
going
to
vote
to
either
approve
the
rezoning
of
these
lots,
which
opens
the
door
for
development
of
pelican
lake
apartments,
a
marina
restaurant
and
public
access,
or
vote
no
to
reaffirm
the
pewdie
zoning
and
r1
to
be
used
in
corporate
single-family
homes.
But
I
think
that
either
decision
is
going
to
set
a
new
precedent
for
all
of
watertown
south
dakota
voting,
no
means
that
cax
would
remain
single-family
homes.
K
It
affirms
the
people
of
watertown
and
future
lot
buyers
that
their
investments
could
be
safe
within
the
master
plan
of
any
growing
development.
It
gives
them
confidence
that
developers
are
held
accountable
to
their
word,
that
a
master
plan
holds
some
merit
in
deciding
whether
later
phases
can
deviate
from
the
initial
purpose.
K
But
voting
yes,
however,
means
that
these
lots
would
be
rezoned
to
allow
structures
that
violate
the
initial
purpose
of
our
development.
It
would
open
the
door
for
additional
rezoning
on
potentially
more
lots
in
the
future
to
other
buyers
who
are
looking
to
use
this
space
on
cacs
for
some
other
use
other
than
what
was
intended.
K
K
Voting
yes,
would
tell
the
people
of
watertown
the
people
who
are
considering
moving
to
watertown
and
to
anyone
else
who
plans
to
build
a
new
home
that
their
property
purchased
within
a
growing
development
may
not
be
safe
or
protected
from
similar
rezoning
decisions
to
come.
Voting,
yes,
sets
a
new
precedent,
one
of
insecurity
and
a
lack
of
trust
that
actually
brings
harm
to
watertown.
In
my
opinion,
was
all
of
this,
a
ruse
where
we
swindled
under
false
pretense
of
cax
likes
that
edition
being
for
single-family
homes.
K
If
you
put
yourself
in
our
shoes
for
a
moment,
would
any
of
you
spend
half
a
million
on
your
forever
home
near
this
high
density
residential,
complex,
that's
being
proposed?
Neither
would
we
well
what
if
you
were
told
it
would
all
be
single
family,
and
then
you
built
your
home.
Would
you
be
okay
with
the
developer
to
reneg
on
the
promise
halfway
through
the
project
and
zone
it
differently
than
promised?
K
In
my
opinion,
it
lacks
honesty.
It
lacks
integrity
and
it
lacks
transparency
simply
knowing
that
60
or
more
homes
have
been
sold
or
excuse
me,
60
or
more
lots
have
been
sold
under
the
guise
of
single
family
development,
then
find
out
the
developer
proposed
this
deviation
and
then
to
watch
the
city
possibly
allow
this
to
happen.
I
know
this
isn't
right.
The
residents
in
this
room
know
it's
not
right
and
every
single
person
that
we
visited
in
a
neighborhood
just
canvassing
for
the
petition.
K
I
believe,
if
you
take
a
step
back
and
see
for
yourselves,
you'll
also
see
that
this
is
not
right.
The
majority
of
us
would
agree
that
it
should
not
have
even
come
to
this
point.
So
I'm
sorry
that
this
decision
has
landed
on
your
desk.
We
never
dreamed
that
one
day
we'd
have
to
plead
with
the
city
council.
To
take
the
stand,
I
realize
that
it's
not
your
job
to
tell
people
who
they
can
do
business
with
or
not.
K
L
You
know
the
the
cac's
fourth
edition
is
the
one
I
want
to
see
yeah
with
the
roads
there.
Okay,
now
about
a
year
and
a
half
ago,
I
come
to
the
city,
heath,
brandy
and
amanda,
and
the
fire
department,
the
police
department
and
I
believe
the
park
board
was
representative.
There
were
two
and
could
I
come
over
to
the
map
and
show
you
what
I'm
trying
to
trying
to
say.
L
L
So
right
right
here,
what
I
wanted
to
do
is
do
this
portion
of
the
development
first,
okay,
that'll
be
the
first
phase,
the
fourth
the
fire
department
said.
No,
we've
only
got
one
road
out,
that's
not
acceptable.
We
have
a
fire
danger.
We
need
two
roads,
so
they
said
the
only
way
we
can
approve.
This.
Are
you
able
to
hear
me?
Am.
B
L
Okay
prove
this
is,
if
you
would
do
everything
we
need
two
ways
to
come
into
this
for
fire
protection
you
gotta,
we
can
come
in
this
way
and
we
can
come
in
this
way.
So
I
already
didn't
want
to
swallow
that,
but
I
agreed
to
it
so
I
agreed
to
swallow
this
here.
Okay,
now,
can
you
go
to
the
this?
The
six,
the
six
lots
we
just
add
up
there.
L
Okay,
so
then,
at
the
planning
commission,
this
was
brought
up.
L
The
fire
department
approved
this.
They
got
one
way
in
no
way
out.
I
needed
two
places
to
come
in
and
out.
They
got
one
dead
end
and
then
they're
talking
about
a
three-story
55
feet
high.
You
need
a
snorkel
and
stuff
like
that.
If
you
got
a
fire
how
they
gonna
turn
around
in
here,
I
just
I
was
really
disappointed
in
the
in
inconsistent
treatment
by
the
fire
department
on
this
regard.
I
didn't
call
anybody
ahead
of
time.
I've
never
called
any
one
of
you
people
ahead
of
time
in
this.
L
A
A
L
Yeah:
well:
okay,
matt,
okay,
okay,
so
when
the
developer
approached
me
to
buy
the
six
slots-
and
he
told
me
that
I
want
to
put
a
slip
in
like
they
have
at
stony
point-
I
said
fine,
I
didn't
imagine
this
changed
development.
L
A
Seeing
no
one
else
in
opposition
close
the
for
better
lack
of
a
term
of
the
public
public
comment
portion
of
it.
Public
works
director
heath
on
eye.
Did
you
have
a
comment.
J
A
J
So,
with
with
this
subdivision,
kak's
fourth
edition
is
looked
at
holistically.
We
have
a
development
agreement
in
place
with
mr
horning
to
build
out
those
streets
which
would
include
17th
avenue
running
west
to
42nd
street.
J
All
those
regulations
remain
in
place
if
this
were
to
pass
so
there's
a
two-year
time
window
for
those
development
improvements
to
be
constructed
by
the
developer.
That's
why
the
planning
commission
didn't
speak
to
those
components
when
it
came
to
this
particular
rezoning.
I
just
want
to
make
that
point
of
clarity.
A
A
M
Thank
you
mayor,
thank
you
all
for
are
here
tonight
and
just
as
I'm
working
through
this
the
last
week
couple
weeks
here,
working
through
the
process
meeting
with
with
the
developer,
even
back
in
the
day
with
the
you
know,
with
the
vision
he
had.
Development
like
this
is
is
always
an
asset
to
the
community,
whatever
that
may
look
like
around
the
community
having
developers
that
want
to
develop
land
within
the
scope
of
what
we've
established
for
our
city
now.
The
other
thing
too,
though,
is
this
land
in
this
particular
neighborhood,
the
cax
division.
M
The
original
vision
goes
back.
If
I
remember
during
the
work
session,
roughly
12
13
plus
years
ago,
is
when
it
originated
roughly,
and
with
that
there's
been
now,
land
has
been
purchased,
homes
have
been
built,
and
there
were,
I
guess
it-
for
lack
of
a
better
term
of
first
generation
owned
land
owners
in
that
neighborhood,
and
so
sometimes
in
the
city.
I
can
see
how
50
years
removed
60
70
years
things
can
change.
You
know
the
world
changes
amenities
change.
You
know.
Now
we
have
pickleball
courts
in
town.
M
M
I
could
see
it
potentially
working,
maybe
theoretically,
but
based
off
the
zoning
that
we
set
as
a
city
in
partnering,
with
the
developer
of
the
original
land
developer
for
cax,
we're
again
we're
in
the
first
generation
we're
we're
talking
in
the
first
decade
or
two
of
just
getting
started,
and
it's
proving
to
move
in
the
right
direction,
because
it's
already
sold
50
plus
lots.
M
So
it's
it's
proving
to
to
work
and
the
vision
is
going
forward
and
so
for
me
personally
be
hard
to
get
past
just
that
initial
foundational
premise
for
for
moving
forward
with
rezoning,
just
because
of
currently
where
it's
at
and
in
the
early
phases
of
this
new
development
in
the
last
10
12
15
years.
So
I
just
wanted
to
share
that
thought.
If
you
will
for
the
for
the
council.
G
Thank
you
mayor.
First
of
all,
can
I
ask
mr
horning
a
clarification
question?
Yes,
steve
your
purchase
agreement
that
you
have
with
a
developer
that
conditional
on
this
body's
approval,
or
are
they
sold
no
matter?
What
is
your
purchase
agreement
that
you
have
with
the
developer?
Is
it
conditional
on
approval
of
by
this
body
for
this
use,
or
is
it
sold
no
matter?
What.
L
G
G
I
I
spent
10
11
12
years,
whatever
it
was
on
the
planned
commission
board
of
adjustments
and
during
that
time,
learned
a
lot
about
development
in
regards
to
from
the
city's
perspective
of
what
what
is
good
ways
to
develop,
and
why
why
they're,
good
ways
to
develop-
and
my
I
look
at
this-
and
and
I
don't
fault,
mr
horning
or
the
developer
in
any
manner
coming
to
us
and
asking
for
this-
it
comes
down
to
the
shoulders
on
this
side
of
what
what
is
allowable
and
our
decision
really
needs
to
be
is
is
does
this
development
in
my
mind?
G
So
it's
a
it's
a
hard
decision
because
there's
a
lot
of
things
within
it
that
that
we
need
to
try
to
work
through,
but
but
when
it's
all
said
and
done,
our
job
here
is
to
go
to
the
ordinance
requirements
and
our
planning
documents
and
and
processes
and
see
if
it's
justified
to
make
this
decision
and
there's
a
lot
of
things
there.
But
I
do
have
one
question
and
this
is
probably
of
matt
or
the
mayor
or
someone
if
this
gets
approved
with
what's
within
the
document,
the
proposed
pud,
which
includes
the
boat
ramp.
G
E
I
honestly
don't
know
the
answer
to
that.
I
think
that
that
is.
I
would
assume
that
would
require
a
separate
action,
first
of
all
for
us
to
accept
any
public
infrastructure,
but
I'd
have
to
look
specifically
at
the
at
the
language
of
the
zoning
to
to
answer
that
accurately,
but
I
would
suspect
that
that
would
require
a
different,
a
separate
action.
Okay,.
G
C
I
do
want
to
state
that
I
have
a
history
of
being
pro-development
and
you
know
it
has
to
make
sense
for
the
entire
community
that
not
just
one
section
of
it
not
just
a
few
people,
and
that's
how
I
I
decided
to
make
this
or
my
my
decisions
are
made-
is
a
community
as
a
whole,
and
I
look
at
this
this
development
as
if
it
came
to
us
as
a
cl
right
now.
C
If
it
was
just
a
rezone
to
a
cl,
I
would
venture
to
guess
that
most
of
you
would
not
be
here.
Most
of
us.
We
wouldn't
have
gotten
the
feedback
we've
gotten,
because
the
plan
would
not
be
laid
out.
You
would
not
see
the
buildings,
you
didn't
see
the
marina,
you
would
just
see
a
rezone
to
a
cl
and
that
cl
district
was
created
for
a
reason,
and
that's
because
there
was
a
big
public
outcry
that
we
wanted
to
commercialize
lakes.
C
We
have
one
last
opportunity
with
our
lakes:
there's
not
another
opportunity
around
lake
pelican
that
has
public
infrastructure
to
it
already
that
can
support
a
marina
or
a
restaurant,
and
I
I
do
take
every
every
comment
that
we've
gotten
very
seriously,
because
you
know
if
I
bought
lot
43,
I
wouldn't
be
happy
either
and
built,
but
I
keep
going
back
to
if
anyone
else
bought
this
and
just
brought
it
as
a
cl.
C
That's
where
I
keep
kind
of
this
is
it's
it's
very
hard,
but
we
also
need
housing
in
this
community
and
that's
been
the
biggest
cry
for
help
really
in
this
community.
Is
we
don't
have
enough
housing
to
support
the
jobs
and
we
won't
grow
as
a
community
without
housing,
and
this
creates
almost
200
additional
units
in
the
city.
C
C
But
you
know,
that's
that's
my
biggest
point
is,
is
I
guess
if,
if
this
was
pulled
today
and
it
was
brought
back
as
cl,
they
could
almost
do
the
same
thing
with
very
little
input
from
our
city
council
or
very
little
input
from
the
community
because
they
wouldn't
know
what
was
going
on,
and
I
do
think
that
you
know
there
are
other
r2
and
r3
areas
or
zoning
within
the
cax
development.
This
wouldn't
be
unique
to
the
development,
so
you
know
I
keep
going
back
to.
C
C
I
know
that
that's
tedious
work
and
it
means
something
to
to
sign
that,
but
we
also
had
almost
300
signatures
just
on
a
quick
petition
that
commer
wanted
commercialized
lake
districts-
and
you
know
the
lots
were
changed
and
in
the
in
the
work
session
it
was.
It
was
pointed
out
that
the
original
plan
for
this
had
almost
three
times
the
lots
that
are
currently
shown.
C
The
density
in
the
new
plot
here
or
plan
is
significantly
reduced
by
those
lots,
and
then
this
creates
more
so
I
you
know
to
me:
you
have
to
look
at
it
as
a
whole,
and
that's
where
I
keep
coming
back
to
is
is
if
this
came
back
as
a
cl.
H
Thank
you
mayor.
I
would
like
to
just
premise
this
with
telling
you
that
I
was
also
on
the
plane
commission
for
a
number
of
years,
along
with
mike,
I
think
it
was
in
the
neighborhood
of
20
years.
I
think
I
spent
in
the
planning
on
the
planning
commission.
H
H
You
know
if
somebody
comes
to
us
and
I
I
really
appreciate
the
fact
that
we
have
people
out
there
that
are
willing
to
do
this,
to
take
the
risk
to
do
these
kinds
of
things,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day
it
comes
down
to
us.
We
have
to
make
a
decision
on
if
it's
the
right
thing
to
do.
If
it
follows
our
procedures,
if
it
follows
our
ordinances,
there
are,
there
are
several
issues
with
this
development.
One
is
the
road
itself,
I
mean
the
infrastructure
for
this.
H
You
know
chances
are
that
we
have
to
be
modified.
If
that's
the
case,
who's
going
to
pay
for
that,
well,
more
likely,
the
city
would
bear
the
brunt
of
the
costs.
In
order
to
do
that,
I
appreciate
a
lot
of
colin's
comments.
I
I
do.
I
think
we
we
always
need
to
be
open-minded,
but
in
this
case
it
is,
in
my
opinion,
this
is
just
not
the
right
place.
It's
not
the
right
place
for
this,
and
you
know
a
pud
and
puds
are
great
and-
and
I
always
say,
pud
actually
actually
means.
H
Please
use
discretion.
You
know,
because
puds
are
typically
put
in
place
where
somebody
wants
to
modify
the
application
for
that
zoning
outside
of
standard
zoning
applications
and
that's
what
this
is
and
in
mr
horning's
development.
It
made
all
kinds
of
sense,
because
we
went
to
these
larger
lots
to
allow
that
type
of
of
residence,
which
is
great
and
we've
had
puds
where
people
wanted
to
put
little
tiny
places
in,
but
we
have
to
use
our
discretion.
A
I
just
want
to
say
I
made
it
a
rule
that
I
know
that
that
you've
already
expressed
your
your
stance
on
this
and,
if
I
allow
clapping,
then
I
have
to
allow
jeering
and
yelling,
and
you
know,
comments
people
yelling
at
me.
It's
nothing
against
it.
I
apologize,
but
imagine
like
as
as
has
been
said
here,
oftentimes.
A
F
You
mayor
first
of
all,
I
want
to
clarify
make
sure
we
all
understand
what
council
councilman
paulson
was
referring
to.
As
far
as
cl
district
commercial
lake
district,
I
mean
that
that
is
a
zoning
check
and
I
guess
it's
I'm
going
to
phrase.
That's
a
question
direct
to
our
city
attorney
that
that
is
a
zoning
change
that
if
that
were
to
be
pro
because
proposed
that
would
need
to
come
before.
F
E
Thank
you
mayor.
Yes,
a
rezone
just
like
it'd,
be
the
exact
same
action.
We're
considering
here
be
a
rezone
of
a
currently
zoned
property.
The
difference
being
is
that
a
zone
take
the
r1
zone.
For
example,
you
don't
have
to
specify
you
know
the
design
of
your
homes
in
that
zone.
You
just
zone
it
that
way,
and
then
you
can
proceed
to
use
the
land
under
the
permitted
uses
of
that
zone.
F
Okay,
so
thank
you,
follow-up.
Thank
you
matt.
So
what
councilman
paulson
said
as
far
as
this
being
happening
without
any
kind
of
public
awareness
or
input
is
not
really
a
fair
statement,
then,
is
that
I
guess
I'll
ask
that
question
of
you
again.
Matt.
E
So
again,
the
the
rezoning
process
would
be
identical,
but
the
level
of
detail
would
not
necessarily
be
there.
F
I
understand
that,
and
I
agree
with
the
seal
lake
I
mean
there.
There
are
any
number
of
permitted
and
conditional
uses
that
that
could
be,
you
know,
could
result
in
if
that
were
to
be
rezoned
as
commercial
lake.
So
I
just
want
to
clarify
that.
I'm
not
disagreeing
with
your
column.
F
I
just
want
to
make
sure
the
public
understands
what
the
process
would
be
if
we
were
to
look
at
changing
the
zoning
now
I
guess
just
a
you
know,
just
an
editorial
from
my
perspective,
those
you
that
know
me
on
the
council
and
know
my
my
history,
I'm
about
as
pro
business
and
pro
development
as
they
come
some
of
the
very
changes
that
we've
made
in
recent
years.
F
I
was
part
of
committees
that
worked
on
trying
to
simplify
and
streamline
things
for
developers
in
the
community,
and
I
think,
we've
I
think,
we've
we've
reached
some
some
level
success
on
that
that
I
think
we
can
take
some
some
pride
in
that
we
have
facilitated
things
to
some
extent
for
our
developers.
F
However,
I
have
to
keep
in
mind
that
my
ultimate
responsibility
is
for
what
is,
and
I'm
probably
repeating
part
of
what
councilman
buehler
just
said.
My
ultimate
responsibility
is
to
look
out
for
what
is
best
for
the
community
or
the
citizens
of
this
community,
and
this
is
one
where,
as
much
as
I
admire
what
the
developer
wants
to
do
and
what
he
has
done
in
the
past.
F
I
applaud
him
tremendously
for
that,
but
this
is
a
case
where,
looking
out
what
I
feel
is
in
the
best
interest
of
the
community,
I'm
having
a
very
hard
time
supporting
this.
E
E
Thank
you.
I
thought
I'd
just
provide
a
better
answer,
maybe
a
more
specific
answer
to
councilman
danforth's
question
earlier.
So
to
answer
the
question
directly:
no,
the
boat
ramp
is
not
being
dedicated
with
this
action.
That
would
be
an
additional
action
that
would
have
to
occur
in
the
future,
but
it
is
part
of
the
proposal,
and
so
if,
for
whatever
reason,
the
council
were
to
approve
this
and
then
and
then
decide
a
later
date,
they
don't
want
the
boat
ramp.
It
would
likely
have
to
come
back
through
the
pud
process.
A
Thank
you,
councilman
danforth.
Are
you
satisfied
with
that?
Any
further
comments
or
questions
chair
would
like
to
say
something.
I
first
off
would
like
to
say
one
of
my
major
concerns
with
the
development.
I
I
like
a
lot
of
the
aspects
of
the
development,
but
one
thing
that
does
concern
me
is
something
that
is
out
of
our
control
as
a
city
which
is
I
even
before
becoming
mayor.
When
I
was
on
city
council,
there
was
a
lot
of
people
who
expressed
concern
who
lived
out
by
pelican,
who
would
drive
west
on
212.
A
They
would
exit
the
city
limits
and
now
that
there
is
a
lot
more
development
out
there.
There
are
a
lot
more
people,
turning,
let's
say,
if
you're
heading
out
of
town,
heading
west,
there's
a
lot
more
development
and
a
lot
of
people.
Turning
left,
and
I
know
one
time
I
came
within
a
hair
breath
of
hitting
the
car
in
front
of
me
that
slammed
on
its
brakes
because
they
wanted
to
go
to
a
store
that
was
out
there,
and
I
know
that
other
people
have
had
that
happen
as
well.
A
I
have
contacted
south
the
south
dakota
department
of
transportation.
They
do
say
that
they
that
it
is
on
their
study
to
look
at,
but
to
increase
the
traffic
out
there,
which
this
will
do,
but
also
the
single
family
housing
will
do
as
well.
So
this
is
an
issue
that
is
not
just
about
the
development.
This
is
about
all
of
that,
and
I
want
to
say
that
that's
something
that's
on
my
radar,
because
you
are
talking,
I
think,
if
nothing
is
done,
there
is
going
to
be
a
very
serious
accident
if
not
multiple
out
there.
A
It
is
a
concern
of
mine
with
that
said.
I
do
want
to
also
say
thanks
to
everyone
who
showed
up
here
tonight.
It
has
been
my
pleasure
to
work
with
a
lot
of
the
homeowners
out
at
cac
previously
back
last
fall,
and
I
appreciate
how
passionate
you
are
about
it,
but
also
how
respectful-
and
I
hope
you
respect-
also
the
position
that
I
am
in
as
chair
trying
to
run
the
meeting
and
forcing
you
know,
that's
why
I
interrupted
council
during
the
work
session
and
also
interrupted
people
here.
A
It's
just
out
of
respect
for
both
sides,
because
eventually
you're
going
to
be
on
the
other
side
of
an
issue
where
everyone
is
against
you
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
you
feel
respected
as
well,
and
that
goes
with
all
of
our
votes
up
here
too.
So
I
want
to
thank
you
for
that.
With
that
said,
probably
see
a
lot
of
you
back
here
on
may
2nd,
so
I
will
close
this
first
reading
and
you
may
stay
if
you
want
to,
but
I'm
guessing.
A
A
A
D
A
A
F
Seriously
I
drive
around
the
lake
at
least
once
a
week,
and
I
had
to
check
myself.
78Th
street
is
actually
old,
highway
139.
and
I'm
assuming.
Maybe
I
should
make
that
assumption
that
it's
in
the
one
of
the
buildings
out
there
where
scott
monger
has
built.
So
I
guess
that's
my
question
then,
is
I'm
assuming
the
zoning
is
appropriate
for
that
area
for
a
for
a
casino,
because
that's
where
78th
street
is.
D
F
No,
I
mean
78th
is:
is
old,
highway
139,
it's
right
out
there.
You
know
this
very
clearly
marked
when
you
get
to
the
stop
sign
on
old
highway,
139
78th
street
and
the
78th
street.
Just
all
of
a
sudden
disappears,
as
you
start
to
go
head
up
north
on
on
that
stretch.
So
I
guess
that's
what's
why
I'm
asking
I
was
asking
a
question
from
a
zoning
perspective.
A
A
A
N
A
A
D
Thank
you
mayor.
This
one
has
the
correct
location
so
we're
clear.
This
is
a
special
event
one
this
will
be
held
at
the
expo.
It
is
for
the
boys
and
girls
club
camel
races.
All
notices
were
published,
fees
have
been
paid
everything's
in
order,
so
there's
any
questions
other
than
the
location.
I
can
help
thanks.
A
I
think
we
it
helps
to
have
the
codington
county
expo
written
out,
open
it
up
for
a
public
hearing.
I
see
a
few
people
who
are
here
who
would
like
to
speak
on
this
item.
So
just
please
introduce
yourself
and
tell
us
what
your
viewpoint
is.
B
Lisa
carrico,
I'm
currently
on
the
board
of
trustees
of
the
boys
and
girls
club.
Now
I
graduated
from
the
board
and
obviously
a
lot
of
you.
Council
people
have
been
to
our
camel
races.
So
it's
that
time
of
year
again
it's
always
a
fun
safe,
responsible
event
adult
only.
A
B
Going
to
try
to
sell
tickets
no,
but
because
I
know
that
council's
busy
with
their
everyday
lives
and
all
the
committees
that
you
serve
on
and
the
stuff
that
you're
doing
so.
I
would
just
like
to
highlight
a
little
bit
that
you
may
not
know,
but
at
the
boys
and
girls
club
this
year
we
recently
engaged
a
behavioral
health
social
worker
to
help
with
the
children
on
site.
B
We've
also
been
working
with
the
watertown
development
company
on
attending
their
workforce
development
committee
meetings
to
kind
of
get
engaged
with
our
youth
on
that
and
then.
Finally,
as
we
all
know-
and
I'm
sure,
you've
heard
many
different
things
over
the
past
couple
months
with
the
economy,
you
know
people
are
having
to
pay
more
for
gas.
People
are
having
to
pay
more
for
groceries.
B
The
boys
and
girls
club
doesn't
want
to
be
that
burden,
we're
not
in
the
business
of
private
cost.
You
know
child
care
and
after
school
programs,
so
the
boys
and
girls
club
and
the
board
decided
not
to
increase
their
fees
this
year,
so
they
will
remain
the
same,
which
is
very
economical,
and
I
would
just
like
the
council
to
know
that,
even
though
they
are
very
reasonable,
we
still
grant
what
how
many?
B
What's
the
percentage
of
scholarships
we
still
grant
a
year
yeah,
we
live
liz,
christensen,
executive
director
at
the
boys
and
girls
club.
We
do
a
lot
of
scholarships
for
for
community
parents
and
usually
it's
about
100
per
year
that
they
have
to
apply
for
and
explain
their
hardship
and
then
we
grant
them
a
free
membership.
B
So
just
wanted
you
guys
to
get
a
little
update,
as
we
also
say
yes
come
to
the
camel
races
last
year.
My
camel
was
mr
t
this
year,
though.
Actually
it's
a
surprise,
so
you
have
to
come
so
anyway,
and
we
hope
you
approve
our
license.
Would.
A
O
Tupper
I've
been
involved
with
the
boys
and
girls
club
for
many
many
years.
I
don't
guarantee
it's
it's
one
of
the
greatest
organizations
in
the
community
and
and
but
just
like
the
girl
said
there
it's
it's,
we
keep
our
fees
very,
very
low
and
it
takes
fundraisers
like
this
to
be
able
to
do
that,
and
although
I
missed
last
year's
camel
race,
I've
worked
all
the
other
ones
and
it
is
a
blast.
O
A
J
Thank
you
mayor.
Yes,
this
is
the
second
reading
of
this
proposed
planned
unit
development.
Applicant
clark
sinclair
is
the
acting
agent
for
the
sinclair
land
and
cattle
llc
company
that
has
submitted
a
petition
to
rezone
their
property.
J
The
current
zoning
designation
is
a
c3
highway
commercial
district
and
they're
proposing
to
do
a
planned
unit.
Development
for
this
area,
the
goal
and
the
intent
of
the
planned
unit
development
is
to
utilize
the
the
large
parking
lot
area
for
subsequent
development
for
multiple
businesses,
retail
and
office
space
type
of
facilities,
the
planned
unit
development,
the
the
plan
as
part
of
the
plan
unit
development
zoning
includes
language
for
setbacks
and
rights
away
to
be
dedicated
and
some
of
the
internal
happenings
for
the
for
the
pud
area.
J
I'll
touch
on
a
few
of
those
or
highlight
a
few
of
those.
As
far
as
the
setbacks
are
concerned,
the
perimeter
setbacks
adjacent
to
rights
away
would
be
set
at
a
minimum
of
10
feet,
along
with
a
25
foot,
clear
view
triangle
being
maintained
at
all
access
points,
perimeter,
setbacks
adjacent
to
the
neighboring
properties
would
be
set
at
20
feet.
Matching
the
side
yard
setbacks
for
a
c3
zoning
district.
J
The
utilities,
utility
and
ingress
and
egress
easements
will
be
provided
overall
and
across
the
internal
parking
areas
and
green
spaces
so
that
you
have
that
connectivity
for
the
traffic
can
move
amongst
the
pud
without
worrying
about
trespassing
on
a
private
property
and
things
of
that
nature.
The
tenants
would
share
the
monetary
responsibility
for
maintenance
and
operation
of
those
parking
areas.
J
The
sanitary
sewer
and
water
mains,
if
not
already
installed,
would
be
installed.
Underneath
the
proposed
11th
street
southeast
extension
that
11th
street
southeast
extension
is
being
proposed
from
highway,
212
south
to
jensen
avenue
that
is
identified
in
our
transportation
master
plan
as
a
point
of
connectivity
and
a
logical
street
extension
that
was
required
of
the
developer
and
moving
forward
through
the
review
process
of
this
pud.
A
A
G
Thank
you
I'd
like
to
refer
to
this,
I'm
trying
to
get
a
feel
for
what
this
is
gonna.
What
this
is
gonna
look
like
and
act
like,
because
I
I
believe
in
discussions
prior
to
this
coming
to
us
was
a
city
street
extension
from
highway
212
to
the
south
to
jenkins
avenue
right.
So
my
question
is,
as
we
look
at
this,
is
this
going
to?
G
G
So
is
this
going
to
have
the
look
and
the
feel
of
a
street,
or
is
this
going
to
feel
more
like
when
I
drive
in
the
to
the
walmart
area
and
there's
really
not
a
street
there,
but
there's
a
area
that
gets
me
from
point
a
to
point
b
and
I
might
go
get
some
coffee
or
I
might
go
to
walmart
or
the
dollar
store?
Stop
it.
G
What's
this
feel
going
to
be,
and
then
the
second
question
I
have
is:
what
is
the
liability
from
the
city
standpoint
if
we're
pushing
a
lot
of
public
or
public
transportation
street
users
through
a
pud?
And
if
something
happens
there?
What's
our
liability
on
that,
because,
typically
we
don't
push
public
traffic
through
a
pud.
J
So
to
the,
if
I'm
a
mayor.
J
To
the
question
as
to
what
this
looks
like,
if
you
can
visualize
by
the
line
work
as
I
walk
through
it
here
on
the
drawing,
I
believe
my
maps
up
on
the
screen
there,
I've
shared
it
to
teams,
but
these
these
double
lines
represent
curb
and
gutter.
So
this
would
look
and
feel
a
lot
like
any
regular
street.
That's
got
curb
and
gutter
along
both
sides
with
defined
access
points
with
those
radii
built
out
to
accommodate
the
ingress
and
aggressive
traffic
in
those
parking
areas.
J
So,
as
you
come
south
here
again
that
curb
and
gutter
continues
and
you've
got
another
couple,
access
points
and
again
that
curb
and
gutter
continues
into
the
tie-in
with
jensen
avenue.
So
my
short
answer,
your
question:
councilman
danforth
is
yes.
This
would
look
and
feel
like
a
regular
street
section,
because
it's
got
the
curve
and
gutter
identifying
the
edges
of
the
roadway.
J
The
other
part
that
I'll
address
not
as
an
attorney
but
as
a
right-of-way
manager.
As
a
city
engineer,
this
will
be
plotted
right
away,
so
this
segment
of
roadway
of
11th
will
be
in
platted
right
away.
Now,
the
fact
it's
going
through
pud
zoning
district
from
a
planning
and
zoning
use
standpoint.
I
don't
see
any
conflict
with
that
because
we
have
the
planet
right
away.
If
we
didn't
have
the
plot.
J
A
E
I
would
just
agree
with
that.
I
mean
it's.
I
would
compare
it
to
the
tax
edition,
for
example,
is
a
pud,
but
there's
public
right-of-way
in
it.
So
the
fact
that
it's
pud
zoned
doesn't
change
the
fact
that
it's
public
right
away,
so
the
liabilities
are
the
same
as
they
are
in
any
public
street.
Okay,
you
think.
G
If
I'm
a
man,
just
the
one
follow-up,
then
to
it,
is
with
our
acceptance
of
that
right
away,
we're
not
the
owners,
we
just
have
the
right
to
use
it
correct
per
se.
J
G
F
Thank
you
mayor,
a
good
question
and
a
comment
just
to
follow
to
what
what
mike
just
asked.
Okay,
just
the
public
is
aware.
The
developer
or
the
owner
is
responsible
for
building
the
road.
B
F
F
Now
I'm
excited
about
what
what
this
is
going
to
look
like,
I
think,
back
to
days
when
was
it
econo
foods
that
building
sat
there
empty
for
years
and
years,
and
it's
kind
of
an
embarrassment
actually
and
I'm
excited
to
see
what
you
know
what
montgomery's
has
done
and
what
they're
planning
to
do,
and
I
gotta
com
gotta
commend
mr
sinclair
for
the
diligence
that
he
has
extended
through
what
four
or
five
different
mayors
to
try
to
get
this
project.
Finally
done.
O
O
Just
if
I
remember
right
here,
this
did
come
with
a
unanimous
vote
from
the
plan.
Commission.
J
Add
one
follow-up
point
follow-up
point
mayor:
please
there's
a
portion
of
this
plan
unit
development,
what
I'd
call
a
driveway
or
an
access
area
for
one
of
the
proposed
buildings
that
is
currently
as
designed
would
be
encroaching
onto
city
property.
Now
part
of
this
plan
is
that
that
would
be
taken
care
of
through
a
land
swap
where
the
city
would
transfer
this
portion
of
property
to
the
developer.
J
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out.
I
don't
know
if
it
should
be
a
if
the
council
is
entertaining
approval
tonight,
if
that
should
be
just
a
contingency
note
that
that
step
has
to
happen.
Yet
we
haven't
gone
through
that
process.
Yet
we've
been
in
discussion
with
the
dot,
who
are
also
utilizing
this
this
land
as
their
portion
of
their
detour
for
the
highway
212
project.
So
we
have
some
logistics
to
work
through
there,
but
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
was
noted
upon
approval
of
this
beauty
tonight.
If
it
were
to
be
approved.
A
Thank
you
any
further
comments
or
questions
hearing
none.
The
motion
is
to
approve
the
amendment
to
the
zoning
map.
All
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye
hi
any
opposed
a
motion
carries
item
d
is
the
second
reading
of
ordinance
22-11
amending
the
zoning
map
of
the
city
from
i2
to
i1
at
an
area
to
be
known
as
grand
guard
edition
open
it
up
for
a
public
hearing
started
by
going
to
our
public
works
director,
heath
von
ai.
J
Thank
you,
mayor
I'll,
go
straight
to
a
map
here
on
this
one
fairly,
straightforward,
rezone
request
again,
this
is
second
reading,
but
this
addition
is
down
off
the
east
side
of
lake
pelican
and
this
area
is
currently
zoned
i2
and
the
application
is
to
rezone
to
an
i1.
J
The
intent
behind
the
zoning
is
to
accommodate
caretakers
residents
within
the
property.
That's
a
use!
It's
not
allowed
under
the
high
two
heavy
industrial
district,
but
it
is
allowed
under
the
i1
light
industrial
district,
and
so
this
too
has
gone
through
the
planning
commission
and
they
did
have
a
split
vote
on
this.
One
recommending
approval
at
a
vote
from
by
four
to
one
and
with
that
I'll
stand
by
for
questions
and
senior
planning
senior
planner
brandy.
Hampton
is
here
with
me
tonight
too,
for
any
questions.
A
Thank
you
open
it
up
for
a
public
hearing.
Is
anyone
here
who
would
like
to
speak
on
this
see
no
one
come
forward.
I
will
close
the
public
hearing
open
it
up
for
council
action
to
approve
the
amendment
to
the
zoning
map
made
by
councilman
shutty
seconded
by
councilman
buehler,
open
it
up
for
com
comments
or
questions
from
the
council
councilman
vilhauer.
Thank
you,
mayor.
F
J
P
Thank
you.
So
it
was
really
the
basis
of
the
caretaker's
residence
being
in
an
industrial
area
that
the
children's
safety
and
whatnot
was
the
main
concern
with
the
the
board
of
or
the
plan
commission
when
they
no
sorry
the
board
of
adjustment
when
they
approved
the
conditional
use
for
a
caretaker's
residence.
C
J
I
think
a
common
idea
one
might
have
is,
if
you
think,
back
to
the
day
where
junkyards
and
you
had
a
somebody
resident
full-time
managing
the
junkyard,
you
know
with
their
bulldog
and
everything
to
defend
the
the
property.
J
Thinking
of
the
the
I
forget
the
movie
now
the
sand
lot
there
you
go,
but
that's
that's
the
general
intent
behind
that.
So
in
this
particular
case
there
are
my
understanding.
Is
there
are
structures
or
facilities
on
here
that
the
owner
of
the
property
felt
was
better
suited
if
they
were
there
on
a
more
regular
basis,
to
help
tend
to
the
property
and
care
for
and
watch
over
the
property.
J
O
A
number
of
years
ago,
when
that
was
the
rendering
company
there
was
always
a
house
on
that
property
that
was
used
as
a
caretaker's
property,
so
into
the
entrance
of
that
there
always
has
been
a
resident.
I
don't
know
if
that
building
still
exists
or
not,
but
it
has
been
used
in
that
form
before.
G
P
P
They
have
split
that
up
and
then
have
multiple
contractor
shops
out
there,
so
they're
doing
they're,
storing
materials
inside
I
actually,
when
I
was
working
with
the
applicants
during
the
board
of
adjustment
hearing,
they
did
express
that
the
property's
been
cleaned
up
a
lot
since
this
picture
was
taken,
and
I
think
that
would
have
been
helpful
because
it
does
look
like
there's
a
lot
going
on
out
there.
But
that
was
really
their
reasoning
for
asking
for
the
caretakers
residents
is
to
be
able
to
oversee
the
operations
and
manage
all
the
contractor
shops.
G
E
J
J
I
guess
I
would
ask
the
applicant
what
the
intent
of
the
use
is
before
trying
to
define
what
the
intent
of
the
caretaker
would
be.
I
I
think
it's
it
says
single
family
dwelling
unit,
so
you
can
apply.
A
single
family
could
live
there,
but
then
further
it
says
the
individual
residing
at
the
res
residence.
F
P
And
if,
if
I
can
expand
on
that
it
actually
so
the
board
of
adjustment
is
the
one,
is
the
board
that
acts
on
the
conditional
uses
and
then
that's
where
they
ask
for
the
caretaker's
residence?
It's
a
conditional
use,
that's
in
the
i1
light
industrial
or
the
c3
highway
commercial
district.
So
it's
just
usually
the
property
is
zoned
that
already
either
i1
or
c3,
and
then
they're
asking
the
board
for
the
conditional
use,
and
we
have
I
I
would
say
we
have
probably
three
applications
for
a
caretaker's
residence
a
year.
C
Thank
you
mayor.
Do
you
know
if
there
are
children
going
to
be
living
on
the
premises.
P
I
am
not
am
I
okay,
please,
I
don't
believe
the
the
couple
that
would
that
own
it
currently
would.
But
I
think
it's
something
that
when,
when
dealing
with
the
board
of
adjustment
that
we
should
look
at
it
holistically
of
what
it
could
be
in
the
future
that
there
could
potentially
like
if
there
were
children
living
there,
okay.
C
I
guess
not
just
children,
I'm
just
kind
of
my
thoughts
on
this
is
I
do.
I
do
think
that
living
quarters
aren't
weren't
intended
to
be
on
iu's,
and
that
was
the
intent
of
I.
Otherwise.
Why
would
we
have
an
eye
zoning
if
we
allow
residents
all
over,
especially
children
and
not
knowing
the
exact
use
of
the
property?
C
You
know
if
there
is,
if
there's
chemicals,
if
there's
welding,
if
there's
burning,
I
don't-
I
couldn't
tell
you,
but
I
I
do
have
a
concern.
If,
especially,
if
there's
children
involved.
A
G
Ask
brandon
this
question:
brandi.
Can
you
give
us
some
examples
of
where
we
are
allowing
this
today?
I
could
in
my
years
this
is
the
only
time
I've
ever
recall
this
coming
before
the
council,
that
whenever
I
was
on
the
council
so
actually
or
even
on
the
plan
commission,
so
I
I'm
it's
new
to
me.
Where
have
we
done
this.
P
Right
and
I
can
pull
up
the
map
and
show
some
of
the
examples.
Typically,
it's
not
so
you
would
tip
the
council
would
typically
be
looking
at
the
rezone
application
without
knowing
that
a
conditional
use
has
already
been
conditionally
granted
for
the
property
that
they
were
wanting
to
do
a
caretaker's
residence.
So
that's,
maybe
why
it
seems
a
little
unusual
or
just
it's
not
typical
practice
to
be
knowing
exactly
what
the
property
is
being
rezoned
for
the
purpose
of
so
and
then
just
for
a
little
more
context
to
on
the
caretakers
residences.
P
They
used
to
just
be
a
permitted
use
in
the
i1
and
the
i2
district.
So
then
they
never
were
heard
by
the
board
of
adjustment.
We
made
an
amendment
to
that.
I,
I
would
say
20
in
2018,
and
that
was
more
so
just
for
the
safety
aspect
so
that
the
fire
department
was
aware
of
when
these
types
of
caretakers
residences
were
going
in
in
industrial
areas.
P
G
J
Well,
if
I'm
a
mayor,
please,
if
you
want
to
pull
this
up
randy,
if
you
got
time
while
she's
doing
that,
I'm
was
going
to
expand
a
little
bit
on
her
comments.
Where
that's
a
good
point
of
clarification
there
that
the
planning
commission
has
entertained
the
rezone,
not
only
the
reason,
but
also
the
board
of
adjustment
has
entertained
the
conditional
use.
J
I
believe
the
conditional
use
is
brought
forth
initially,
if
I
remember
right,
brandi,
under
the
i2
zoning
and
and
the
board
acknowledged
that
that's
not
a
conditional
use
of
the
i2
zoning
district,
you
need
to
rezone
your
property
to
i1,
so
they
directed
the
applicant
to
go
through
the
rezone
process,
so
they've
already
blessed
the
conditional
use,
if
you
will,
as
the
board
of
adjustment,
has
authority
to
do.
But
it's
contingent
on
getting
this
rezoned
to
the
appropriate
zoning
district
from
i2
to
i1.
P
P
P
P
I
don't
remember
it
was
a
garage
formerly,
but
it's
yes,
yep
back
to
wise
pizza
that
shop
there
it
there
they
sell
vehicles
out
front,
there's
a
caretaker's
residence
there.
P
P
A
C
Can
I
councilman
paul,
I
mean
not,
I
think,
we're
beating
this
one
a
little
bit
too
much,
but
can
can
I
just
ask
our
fire
and
and
police
what
their
thoughts
are
on
something
like
this,
because
maybe
it's
something
we
just
need
to
look
at
going
forward
right
or
wrong.
I
don't
know,
but
I
want
to
hear
what
their
thoughts
are
on
on
something
like
this,
because
it
does
come
down
to
the
safety
aspect.
I
I
I
appreciate
that
question
councilman
paulson
we
had
a
fire
south
of
of
john
deere
implement
dealer,
and
I
was
just
visiting
with
captain
stahl
here
and
we
talked
about.
I
can't
remember
how
long
it
was
like
two
three
years
ago
we
had
that
fire
there
in
the
middle
of
night.
It
was
a
caretaker
that
was
there.
We
knew
about
it
because
we
were
told
in
the
the
pre-plan
inspection
that
he
was
living
in
it.
So
as
long
as
we
know
that
that
person's
in
there
we're
okay
with
it.
F
Q
Historically,
the
the
plot
or
the
area
you're,
looking
at
now
back
in
the
turkey
plant
days,
there
was
actually
a
house
and
a
quonset,
and
that
was
set
up
out
there
for
workers
that
lived
there.
There
were
families
that
lived
in
the
house
that
did
have
children
there
and
then
in
the
quonset
it
was
set
up
in
apartment-style
living.
There
were
quite
a
few
tenants
that
lived
on
site
out
there
for
a
long
time,
while
the
plant
was
up
and
going.
G
So
any
one
of
those
that
we
were
given
a
an
example
of
here
or
any
of
them.
Are
they
built
a
hundred
percent
to
all
the
building
codes
that
for
a
home
that
anybody
else
if
they're
gonna
build
a
home,
an
apartment
or
whatever
that
that
they
are
built
to
that
standard?
And
then
my
concern
is
that
we
have
residential
uses.
I
Tell
me
to
just
respond
to
the
fire
code
aspect
of
it
councilman
danforth.
Yes,
they
have
to
meet
the
fire
rated
wall
per
se
and
I
can
speak
specific
to
that.
Obviously,
heath
could
as
well
as
brandy
or
as
well
as
our
building
inspector
back
there
jason.
So
I
could
tell
you
that
when
that
happens,
we
are
part
of
the
the
planning
of
the
through
the
drt
aspect
of
it
to
make
sure
that
they
meet
meet
code.
A
E
Thank
you
mayor.
It's
my
fervent
hope
that
that
the
language
presented
tonight
will
meet
the
council's
approval.
So
just
a
quick
recap
of
the
changes
being
proposed
that
haven't
changed
since
the
last
couple
of
times.
We
talked
about
this.
It
would
one
it
would
remove
the
proposed
changes,
but
remove
the
proof
of
necessity
requirement.
That's
historically
been
in
our
ordinance
related
to
taxi
cabs.
It
would
remove
the
24-hour
operation
requirement.
E
Cab
driver
prohibit
alcohol
and
drug
use
by
drivers
and
passengers
in
taxi
cabs
and
it
clarifies
and
matches
up
with
state
law
the
offenses
that
might
appear
in
a
background
check
that
would
be
disqualifying
for
a
tax
cab
driver.
So,
since
the
last
meeting,
the
issue
at
the
last
meeting
that
was
discussed
was
the
the
definition
of
engaging
in
the
business
of
taxi
cab
attacking
the
taxicab
business,
and
so
you
know
the
concerns
I
was
trying
to
address
with
this
language
was
one
we
didn't.
E
We
wanted
this
not
to
apply
to,
or
the
sense
that
I,
the
direction
I
took
from
the
council
was
for
this
not
to
apply
to
those
maybe
shuttle
buses
that
are
provided
in
conjunction
with
bars
and
hotels,
and
that
sort
of
thing
as
a
courtesy
and
or
a
paid
paid
service
for
their
patrons,
and
we
didn't
want
to
have
the
language
apply
to
vehicles
that
may
come
into
town
on
an
occasional
basis
and
pick
up
folks
for
a
wedding
or
a
limo
ride.
Or
what
have
you
so
so?
E
I
added
the
word
that
they
hold
themselves
out
for
the
immediate,
carrying
or
accepting
of
passengers,
and
so
I
think
the
language
I
have
here
hopefully
is
is
narrowed.
In
on
what
we're
trying
to
accomplish
to
be
applied
to
traditional
taxi
cabs,
I
removed
that
seven
or
less
aspect.
If
somebody
wanted
a
15
passenger
van
to
be
a
taxi
cab,
this
language
would
would
you
know
catch
that
individual
so
and
and
require
them
to
license
their
vehicle.
So
that's
where
I
landed
any
questions.
I'd
be
happy
to
answer.
H
O
O
Our
biggest
concern
throughout
the
whole
thing
was
the
safety
of
the
residents
of
the
city
of
watertown
and
and
make
sure
that
you
know
we're
we're,
making
making
sure
that
they're,
safe
and
being
sent
out
with
proper
people
proper,
licensed
people
and
and
not
try
to
control
who
runs
a
taxi
cab,
but
just
basically
the
safety
of
it.
So
thank
you.
A
Thank
you
any
further
comments
or
questions
hearing
down
the
motion
is
to
approve
the
ordinance
amendment,
all
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye
aye
any
opposed.
A
motion
carries
item
g
item
g
is
a
first
reading
of
an
ordinance
amending
the
zoning
map
of
the
city
of
watertown
for
a
portion
of
compescu
dune's.
Second
division,
known
as
outlook
out
lot
x
from
r1
to
r2
for
more
information
we'll
go
to
our
public
works
director,
director,
heath
von
ai.
J
Yes,
thank
you
mayor.
The
owner.
Jamie
andrews
is
the
acting
agent
of
j
j
land
sales.
He
has
petitioned
for
a
re-zone
of
a
portion
of
outlaw
x
and
kopeska
dunes.
Second
subdivision
within
the
city
watertown
from
its
current
designation
of
r1
single-family
residential
to
r2
single-family
attached
residential.
J
J
So
in
the
vicinity
map
here
we're
on
kopeska
dune
subdivision
at
the
corner
of
33rd
and
golf
course
road,
and
you
see
this
highlighted
area
that
is
being
petitioned
to
be
rezoned
from
r1
to
r2.
J
There's
another
diagram
that
expresses
that,
with
the
lot
configuration
shown
for
reference
as
well,
this
polka
dotted
area-
if
you
will
in
this
overlay,
is
what
would
be
rezoned
from
r1
to
r2.
C
G
J
Yes,
this
is
this:
hatched
area
is
identified
as
r3
and
you're
correct.
It
has
existing
recently
constructed
storage
units
in
this
area.
A
J
Thank
you
mayor.
I'm
again,
my
hands
aren't
keeping
up
with
the
discussion,
so
I
apologize
as
I
scroll
through
here
so
yeah.
The
owners
of
this
particular
property
melissa
anderson.
She
has
petitioned
to
rezone
a
portion
of
outlaw
a
not
the
entire
lot,
but
a
portion
of
it.
That's
in
the
prairie
hills,
development
second
edition-
and
it's
currently
designated
as
an
a1
agricultural
district,
and
they
wish
for
the
portion
to
be
rezoned,
r1,
single-family,
residential,
the
intent
of
course
for
the
rezone
is
to
construct
a
single-family
home
on
the
property.
J
J
Here's
a
vicinity
map
of
this
area
here,
you're
out
on
prairie
hills,
avenue
and
then
pompesca
drive
on
the
runs
north
and
south
here
on
the
left
side
of
the
diagram.
J
So
this
whole
property
is
currently
zoned
ag
and
there
this
is
the
area
that's
proposing
to
be
rezoned
from
a1
to
r1
for
the
construction
of
single-family
residents.
The
planning
commission,
I
believe,
voted
unanimously.
Let
me
double
check
the
notes
here:
yeah,
seven
to
zero.
They
voted
unanimously
to
recommend
approval
to
the
city
council.
J
One
of
the
requirements
through
the
building
permit
phase
would
be
that
they
preserve
the
conveyance
of
that
drainage
from
the
streets
through
that
property
into
that
wetland.
If
there's
not
a
current
drainage
easement
there,
for
example,
they'd
be
required
to
obtain
one
there's
any
modifications
to
that
storm
sewer
that
they
would
need
to
do.
That
would
be
part
of
the
requirements
with
the
building
permit.
J
Other
than
that,
I
think
that
highlights
the
discussions
from
the
planning
commission.
F
B
F
And
the
citizens
concern
was:
is
that
with
the
the
development
out
there
and
potentially
you
know
with
with
some
fill
in
where
they're
going
to
build,
was
concerned
about
water
backing
up
the
the
drainage
not
being
able
to
handle
it
and
the
water
backing
up
onto
their
property
in
the
south
side
of
that
can
can
you
can?
Has
that
been
looked
at?
Or
can
you
make
any
comments
about
that
heath,
or
I
see
our
city
engineer,
is
in
the
audience
as
well
about
those
concerns.
J
Yeah,
I
would
echo
the
discussion
at
the
planning
commission
level
where
we
addressed
that
concern.
If
this
current
alignment
and
grade
it
does
not
accommodate
the
construction
of
this
single
family
house,
what
we
would
do
at
the
owner's
expense
they
would
have
to
make
those
modifications
but
preserve
that
drainage
way,
so
that
the
historic
drainage
patterns
could
be
preserved.
J
So
through
the
building
permit
process,
the
building
official
would
work
with
engineering
in
reviewing
how
the
slots
being
proposed
to
be
regraded.
You
know
this
pipe.
My
understanding
is,
it
extends
quite
a
ways
out
beyond
the
roadway
and
then
discharges
there's
a
you
know
that
may
there's
a
chance
that
could
be
shortened
and
the
conveyance
could
be
shifted
a
little
bit.
There's
there's
different
ways
we
can
accomplish
that,
but
we
just
make
sure
to
do
so
at
the
time
of
building
permit
phase
and
and
the
planning
for
that
matter
is.
B
A
J
I
forgot
to
implement
a
quota
for
brandy
on
rezones,
while
I
had
a
long
weekend
so
I'll
have
to
remember
that
next
time,
so
this
this
particular
rezone
is
an
application
by
the
owner.
Don
indries
he's
the
president
of
will
creek
development,
as
cited
in
the
title.
A
portion
of
outlot
a
and
block
two
willow,
creek
village.
Fourth
edition
is
being
proposed
to
be
rezoned
is
currently
r3.
Multi-Family
residential
and
the
proposed
zoning
is
r1
single-family,
residential
and
r2
single-family
attached
residential
again.
J
So
here
is
an
outline
and
a
vicinity
map.
This
property
is
on
the
south
side
of
willow,
creek
drive
just
east
of
19th
street
and
it's
currently
zoned
r3.
This
whole
parcel-
and
this
is
a
representation
of
what's
being
proposed
again
mixed
zoning
of
r1
and
r2
to
accommodate
their
their
development
plans
for
that
area.
With
that
I'll
stand
by
for
any
questions.
A
D
Thank
you
mayor.
This
is
the
time
of
year,
where
I
reach
out
to
all
the
different
departments
that
have
capital
budgets
from
20
previous
year
2021
and
ask
if
they
need
those
to
be
carried
over
into
the
2022
calendar
year.
So
attached
is
resolution
2220,
which
outlines
those
carryovers
that
are
needed
for
the
department's
requests.
If
there's
any
specific
questions,
I
can
try
to
answer
them.
Otherwise,
what
this
does
is
it
pulls
that
budget
from
2021
carries
it
into
2022
to
allow
either
the
equipment
to
be
purchased
or
the
projects
to
be
completed?
D
F
D
D
O
It's
just
been
interesting.
Maybe
that's
what
it
is
is
under
budget
but
under
sewer
funds
the
100
000
administration
building.
Can
you
give
me
an
explanation
on
that.
D
A
Motion
is
to
approve
the
resolution,
all
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye
aye
any
opposed
a
motion
carries
item
k
is
an
approval
of
resolution,
22-21
adopting
the
boundaries
and
approving
the
project
plan
for
tax
increment
district
number
19.
for
more
information.
We
will
start
with
either
city
attorney,
matt,
roby
or
public
works,
we'll
start
with
city
attorney,
matt
roby.
E
E
It's
expected
to
result
in
approximately
30
million
dollars
of
investment
over
a
four-year
time
frame,
and
it
is
expected
to
produce
8.8.3
million
dollars
of
increment
value
increment
revenue
over
the
life
of
of
the
tif.
As
a
reminder,
this
is
the
the
unique
na
the
unique
aspect.
One
of
the
unique
aspects
I
should
say
of
this
tiff
is
that
it
overlays
tiff
district
number,
five
and
what
what's
been
discussed
and
what
was
presented
to
the
planning
commission
as
well
is
the
portion
where
the
tif
districts
overlap
for
the
next
eight
years.
E
The
expiration
of
tif
district
number
five
will
come
in
2030.
for
the
next
eight
years.
The
development
that
occurs
in
that
in
that
overlapping
portion
will
will
result
in
revenue,
of
course,
and
the
city
and
the
developer
for
the
next
eight
years
will
split
that
revenue.
50
percent
50
50.
E
after
the
expiration
of
our
tif,
then
the
developer
amanda's
laughing
at
me,
I'm
just
confusing
people
and
after
the
expiration
of
that
tiff,
then
the
developer
will
will
receive
the
100
of
the
increment
revenue
for
the
remainder
of
the
life
of
the
tiff.
A
M
All
right,
so
I
have
a
question
on
probably
for
for
city
attorney
roby.
This
is
for
well
potentially
for
mr
von.
I
I
suppose,
for
the
infrastructure
of
the
roads
to
be
built
in
the
in
the
newer
areas
and
the
rezoned
areas
here
for
the
tiff
there
there's
the
northern
section,
that's
north
of
willow,
creek
drive
doesn't
appear,
there's
any
doesn't
need
any
infrastructure
for
that
northern
zone
there.
M
B
The
northern
portion
was
only
to
include
and
capture
all
the
revenues
that
we
could,
because
we
are
losing
half
of
those
revenues
to
the
city
to
pay
back
on
tip
five
and
we're
not
quite
sure
which
properties
will
be
built
up
first
to
start
getting
those
revenues.
So
I
just
wanted
to
be
able
to
capture
all
of
willow,
creek
development's
properties
that
we're
going
to
be
involved
in
that
development.
M
Okay,
so
yeah,
so
just
to
make
sure
I
clarify
correctly.
We
agreed
with
the
developers
to
have
a
50-50
share
for
the
last
remaining
nine
years,
but
because
of
that,
they
want
to
add
some
more
land
to
recoup
their
50
percent
just
want
to
make
sure.
I
heard
that
correctly.
C
Thank
you
mayor.
I
guess
I'm
just
going
to
start
by
saying
that
the
city
really
took
a
leap
of
faith
back
in.
I
think
it
was
2008
roughly
when
this
was
originally
built
and
the
tiff
was
put
in
place
and
I
would
say,
we're
still
taking
another
leap
of
faith
redoing.
C
This
there's
still
not
a
guarantee
and
I
hope
the
developers
understand
that
that
if
they
hold
out
for
another
eight
years,
the
city's
really
stuck-
and
I
hope
that
that's
not
the
case-
and
you
know
we
took
a
a
leap
of
faith
again
redoing
this
and
including
this
in
there.
So
I
I
really
hope
that
this
land
sells
within
eight
years
and
then
we
actually
do
recover.
That
cost,
because
I
think
that
that
is
it.
We
mean
a
lot
of
costs
on
this
road
and
you
know
it
was.
A
B
I
just
want
to
make
it
clear
that
there
are
no
monies
being
borrowed
from
the
city
of
watertown,
for
this
project.
It'll
be
strictly
up
to
the
developer,
to
get
those
funds
and
the
revenues
are
just
to
assist
in
helping
them
pay
that
back.
F
I
guess
I
would
just
probably
echo
somewhat
with
what
colin
is
saying
when
I,
when
we
first
had
this
proposed
to
us.
I
was
not
crazy
about
it,
but
as
I
look
at
it,
I'm
thinking
that
okay,
probably
leap
of
faith,
but
to
me
that
that
tif
so
far
is
not
performed
anywhere
is
near
like
we
were
hoping
it
would
so
to
me
if
this
can
spur
something.
I'm
thinking.
50
of
something
is
better,
is
greater
than
100
of.
M
Thank
you,
mayor,
yeah,
again,
I'm
just
trying
to
get
clarification
for
myself.
So
just
you
know
the
there's
already
been
some
property
developed
to
the
west
of
that
northern
there's
the
with
the
car
wash
in
the
corner
and
whatever
other
properties
there.
So
those
have
already
been
developed
again.
Does
this
hit
the
does
this
mark
the
butt
four
box?
That's
in
the
tiff,
you
know
when
they
have
those
requirements.
Does
this
does
this
legally?
I
guess
would
this
be
for
for
attorney
roby.
E
Thank
you,
mayor,
councilman,
shutty,
so
there's
no
clear
legal
definition
of
the
but
four
tests
that
you
know
we're.
You
know
we're
supposed
to
analyze,
tiff
districts
under
there's
a
bit
of
an
art
to
it
and
some,
of
course,
some
number
crunching.
E
I
know
other
other
communities
will
employ
outside
firms
to
kind
of
come
up
with
a
rate
of
return
that
developers
should
expect
and
if
they
can't
get
that
ready
to
return
because
of
something
unique
about
the
land,
then
a
tif
is
appropriate,
etc.
So,
as
a
community,
the
way
we've
been
operating
the
last
few
years
with
these
tif
applications
is
we.
We
trust
the
development
company
to
to
vet
those
vet.
E
Those
issues
to
to
basically
make
a
judgment,
call
and
propose
tips
to
the
city
that,
but
for
the
proposed
tiff,
the
development
that's
being
proposed,
won't
occur
or
perhaps
maybe
just
want
to
curve
to
the
extent
that
they're
proposing
to
develop,
and
so
that's
you
know
so
in
that.
In
that
vein
here
I
believe
that
the
wwdc
would
attest
that
this
meets
the
butt
for
test
and-
and
I
believe,
there's
a
representative
from
the
developer
in
the
audience
too.
If,
if
you
wanted
to,
you
know,
speak
to
them
directly
about
that
aspect,.
O
More
of
a
comment-
and
it
is
a
question
first
off
hats-
off
to
all
the
developers
that
have
came
forward
and
and
worked
with
the
city
of
watertown
and
waterton
development
company.
But
you've
been
a
lot
of
tiffs
in
the
last
few
years
and
I'm
just
going
to
say
every
one
of
them
is
a
leap
of
faith
which
they
are.
So
we
got
a
lot
of
faith
in
our
developers
that
are
coming
to
the
town,
a
lot
of
faith
in
the
watertown
development
company
and
a
lot
of
faith
in
the
city
of
watertown.
G
G
I
do
have
concerns
with
re-tifting
properties,
and
so
because
first
thing
I
got
to
ask
myself
is
why
didn't
it
sell?
Why
didn't
it
develop
and
there's
a
lot
of?
G
That
number
is
and
the
reason
why
we're
not
seeing
it
is
because
of
their
land
price
that
they
that
they're
trying
to
get
for
it.
So
I'm
just
saying
I
I
I'm
concerned,
I
like
the
use
of
the
tips,
but
I'm
concerned
that
we
don't
have
a
good
enough
definition
of
what
how
we're
going
to
apply
them
within
the
city
and
I'm
not
talking
about
laws
or
anything.
That's
a
whole
separate
issue.
G
What
governs
them
talking
about
how
we
use
them-
and
I
think
that
needs
to
get
looked
at
by
us
and
I
think
we
need
to
try
to
figure
out.
How
do
we
work
with
developers?
Get
this
to
be
a
useful
tool,
but
it's
it's
got
to
be.
There's
got
to
be
some
skin
in
the
game
that
really
requires
them
to
get
something
out
of
the
property
so
that
we
do
get
benefit
to
this
thing
and
at
the
end
of
10
or
20
years
or
whatever
it
is
we're
not
sitting
here,
holding
a
bag.
G
So
I'm
willing
to
support
this,
but
as
a
council
and
as
staff,
I
think
we've
got
some
homework
to
do.
In
my
opinion-
and
I
know
we
had
an
educational
thing
here
a
little
while
ago
with
a
gentleman
that
tried
to
teach
us
some
stuff
about
tiffs,
but
I
think
we've
got
some
work
to
do
on
it.
I've
got
some
concerns
about
the
practicality
of
it
and
the
consistency.
M
Yeah,
thank
you
mayor
yeah,
just
so
my
final
thought
on
agreeing
with
councilman
danforth
that
to
continue
to
educate
us
and
grow
in
the
understanding
of
tiffs
for
on
this
particular
one.
Just
for
me
personally
would
be
to
I
not
gonna.
However,
we
go
by
doing
that,
but
to
withhold
at
that
northern
northern
portion
of
willow
creek
drive
just
for
me,
that's
just
my
own
personal
thought
there
in
rewriting
it,
but
that's
just
where
I'm
at
so.
A
A
J
Thank
you
mayor
if
I
could
use
some
latitude
and
call
on
our
assistant
city
engineer
to
help
with
this
one
he's
a
lot
more
intimately
familiar
with
it,
and
while
I
was
looking
on
the
crowd,
I
just
quick,
also
recognized.
I
got
a
lot
of
support
staff
here
from
public
works
tonight.
J
I
get
the
honor
to
sit
up
here
and
talk
about
a
lot
of
things,
but
I
guarantee
all
these
things
that
we
talk
about.
Public
works
would
not
happen
if
it
weren't
for
brandy,
hampton
their
senior
planner,
jason
spurgeon,
our
billing
official
rob
bain
and
our
street
superintendent
mike
berger,
the
wastewater,
solid
waste,
superintendent
and,
of
course,
justin
the
assistant
city
engineer.
So
I
just
thank
you
all
for
being
here
tonight
and
and
steve.
J
N
N
And
this
the
dot
funding
for
this
is
67.6
of
the
cost
of
the
project,
and
then
the
city
would
be
responsible
for
32.4,
which
is
roughly
192
000.
Based
on
the
estimates
of
the
engineer.
N
This
is
just
a
map
of
the
the
bike.
Pet
bike
trail
mentioned
phase
one
that
was
completed
last
year
and
then
phase
four
was
completed
prior
to
that,
and
that
was,
I
believe,
done
by
city
city
funding
and
then
this
phase
3a
we,
the
city,
also
has
a
grant
for
that
one
and
and
now
of
course,
this
is
phase
3b
and
we
plan
on
bidding
and
construction
phase.
Three
a
and
three
b
together
to
hopefully
get
economies
of
scale
so
for
pricing
wise
and
then
at
the
bottom.
N
I'll
just
mention
phase
two,
a
and
2
phase
2a
was
planned
to
be
designed
by
the
game.
Fish
and
parks
and
phase
2
would
be
the
city,
and
that
would
be
the
last
part
of
the
bike
trail
to
be
completed.
N
But
the
the
agreement
in
front
of
the
council
tonight
is
for
phase
3b
and
accepting
the
funding.
A
J
Unless
park,
rec
director,
terry
kelly,
would
like
to
chime
in
again,
we
work
closely
with
him
on
these
projects
and
tk,
I
believe,
is
online.
O
For
the
record,
terry
kelly
park
and
rec
director,
just
I
know
councilman
bill
howard
did
reach
out
as
well
just
an
update
just
so
I
don't
think
he
touched
on
it,
but
I
didn't
speak
with
idg
our
consulting
engineer
and
the
dot
is
kind
of
backlogged
on
their
plan
reviews.
So
3a3b
does
look
like
a
2023
project
just
to
give
the
public
a
time
frame
on
where
we're
at
with
with
the
trail,
then
our
our
hopes
would
be
phase
two
and
our
end
of
2024,
which
would
complete
the
the
link.
O
O
This
question's
for
director
kelly
doesn't
really
well.
It
does
have
something
to
do
with
this.
Is
there
I
know
myself
and.
O
Councilman
bill,
however,
been
asked
many
times
about
some
repair
on
some
of
the
existing.
Is
there
any
plans
for
that
this
year?
Yes,
we
do.
We
will
be
looking
at
north
lake
drive
kind
of
adjacent
to
compescal
lodge
running
out
to
the
county.
Road
we've
got
some
severe
damage
out
there
in
the
wetland
area.
Also
highway,
20.
kind
of
the
wetland
area
midway
between
oh
14th
avenue
and
oh
south
lake
drive
at
the
city
park,
turn
off
so
yeah
they
they
are.
I
will
also
work
with
he's
team
justin
in
particular.
I
know.
O
Marcy
luno
has
also
looked
at
that
area,
but
the
funds
that
we
did
put
this
year.
We
budgeted
the
standard
175
an
additional
75
000
for
maintenance
to
those
areas.
So,
but
it's
ongoing,
that's
our
hope,
also
councilman
to
get
this
lake
loop
or
wrapped
up,
and
then
we
really
want
to
go
back
to
our
existing
system
in
the
near
future.
O
I
know
we've
got
quite
a
few
areas
we
need
to
identify,
but
the
two
that
we
get
the
most
comments
on
are
definitely
north
lake
drive
by
compass,
collage
and
again
highway
20..
If
that
answers
the
councilman
tupper-
yes,
it
doesn't.
Thank
you.
That's
definitely
the
ones
that
we've
been
getting
a
lot
of
questions
on
and
thank
you
for
your
hard
work
on
that.
Thank
you.
F
A
O
H
J
O
Yes,
please
and
and
city
engineer
peterson,
and
I
actually
met
on
this.
I
would
say
a
couple
weeks
ago
and
the
developer
is
well
aware
of
the
need
to
to
feather
that
back
in
and
it
sounds
like
the
delay
will
be
the
hot
mix
plant
opening.
So
we
are
asking
at
this
point
for
a
gravel,
a
gravel
approach
on
both
both
sides,
both
east
and
west,
and
engineer
peterson.
You
could
probably
maybe,
if
you've
talked
to
the
developer,
with
any
more
information
than
what
I
have.
N
That's
that's
correct,
tk,
the
just
the
last
I
heard
the
asphalt
plant
would
be
opening
up
the
end
of
may
after
memorial
day,
so
it'll
be
sometime
after
that
point.
H
N
N
A
Thank
you
any
further
comments
or
questions
hearing
none.
The
motion
is
to
approve
the
joint
powers
agreement
and
allow
the
city
manager
to
sign
the
documents.
All
those
in
favor,
please
say:
aye
aye,
any
opposed,
say,
nay,
motion,
carries
item
m
is
an
award
of
a
bid
for
pavement
rehabilitation,
large
projects
to
dunk,
incorporated
in
the
amount
of
two
roughly
two
hundred
and
seventy
seven
thousand
dollars
for
more
information,
we'll
go
to
our
public
works
director,
heath
von
nai.
J
I
thank
you
mayor.
This
is
one
of
our
payment
management
project
bid
awards
where
we
designate
several
patch
areas
throughout
the
town
that
need
just
some
simple
asphalt,
patching
but
they're
a
larger
scale
that
we
can't
do
with
internal
forces,
and
so
we
we
bid
this
out
and
try
to
gain
some
economy
of
scale
with
including
several
locations
in
one
project.
J
With
that
this
did
come
in
a
little
over
budget.
The
combined
budget
for
the
the
two
bid
schedules
here
is
250
000.
You
can
see
the
bid
wars
for
277
thousand
dollars.
J
This
is
one
of
those
areas
where,
in
the
whole,
pavement
management
program,
we've
got
a
little
bit
of
give
and
take
on
each
individual
project
where
we
can
shift
money
in
the
cip
between
these
projects
as
needed,
not
knowing
where
they're
going
to
come
in
bid
wise.
So
that's
what
we
recommend
doing
is
taking
this
27
000
out
of
what's
left
of
the
mill
and
overlay.
J
As
a
separate
note,
we've
also
discussed
with
the
contractor
of
expanding
that
milling
overlay
project
to
use
up
more
of
that
budget
under
a
change
order.
So
you'll
likely
be
seeing
a
change
order
coming
forth
for
that,
as
well
with
that
I'll
stand
by
for
questions
and
justin's,
of
course,
available
too.
C
I'm
just
going
to
reiterate
why
I
I
brought
up
a
comment
last
meeting
about
trying
to
use
that
budget
up
on
the
millin
overlay,
because,
as
you
see
on
this
one,
the
per
ton
cost
is
160
dollars
per
ton
and
obviously
this
is
a
lot
less
quantity.
But
you
know
in
in
the
future.
C
I
would
hope
that
watertown
gets
more
competitive
pricing
instead
of
just
one
bidder
that
definitely
plays
into
the
cost
of
this.
But
this
is
what
we
see
when,
when
we
do
less
quantity,
when
you
usually
get
more
quantity,
you
get
a
better
pricing,
but
you
know
that's
why
I
would.
C
I
would
continue
to
push
that
we
do
more
milling
overlay
this
year
with
with
the
current
price
that
we
got
on
that,
because
this
is
it,
it
gets
to
be
really
expensive
for
the
little
bit
of
work
that
we
actually
do,
and
but
I
do
want
to
reiterate
too,
like
what
amanda
said
last
time.
I
understand
completely
that
we're
still
putting
it
into
roads,
but
it
depends
on
how
much
we
get
out
of
that,
and
you
know
on
a
big
reconstruct
project.
C
We're
definitely
not
getting
we're
not
showing
the
public
miles
of
road
we're
showing
a
small
section
of
road,
whereas
a
milling
overlay.
Usually,
we
can
show
a
little
bit
more
to
the
extent
that
we're
doing
so
large
patches
are
definitely
needed,
but
I
would
continue
to
push
on
more
milling
overlay
in
general.
F
I
just
want
to
probably
repeat
what
what
you
said
he
so,
if
the
public's
watching
this
I
mean
there
are
some
areas,
I
mean
smaller
areas
where
our
own
internal
staff
will
be
taking
care
of
repat.
You
know
repairing
or
patching
we're,
not
just
relying
upon
donek
for
repairs
around
town.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Any
other
comments
or
questions
hearing
none.
The
motion
is
to
award
the
bid.
All
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye
aye,
any
opposed,
say,
nay.
Motion
carries
we're
going
back
to
item
e
from
the
con
that
used
to
be
on
the
consent
agenda,
which
is
an
authorization
for
the
finance
officer
to
issue
a
special
check
to
great
construction
company
for
construction
activities
at
the
new
airport
terminal
building
our
finance
officer
kristen
bobzine.
Do
you
want
to.
J
Yes,
thank
you
mayor.
So,
as
you
recall,
perhaps
you
do,
but
last
I
think
was
the
last
meeting.
We
had
something
similar
on
the
agenda.
This
is
simple,
simply
an
issue
of
processing
and
it
not
making
our
our
timely
cut
offs.
J
So
in
lieu
of
holding
out
almost
three
quarters
of
a
million
dollar
payment
to
our
contractor
as
a
progress
payment
on
the
airport
till
the
next
round
of
checks
go
out
in
may
we
wanted
to
process
a
special
check.
What
happened
was
is
between
the
contractor,
our
consultant,
getting
the
proper
paperwork
into
our
staff.
It
just
didn't
happen
and
it
didn't
make
the
cut
off
so
now
we're
having
to
issue
a
special
check
that
the
finance
office
needs
authorization
for
before
they
can
submit
that
for
payment
to
the
contractor.
J
We
have
addressed
this
issue
with
both
the
contractor
and
the
consultant,
and
we
hope
that
it
does
not
happen
again.
That's
that's
my
dire
hope
and
hope
to
correct
the
situation
and
not
see
this
come
through
as
a
special
check
again.
A
A
See
none.
The
motion
is
to
authorize
the
special
check.
All
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye
aye.
Any
opposed
a
motion
carries
item.
H
is
an
approval
of
the
prof
of
the
professional
services
agreement
for
surveying
systems
associated
with
the
new
street
facility
for
more
information.
I
believe
we
will
go
to
our
public
works
director,
heath
von
ai.
J
Thank
you
mayor
this.
This
is
an
item
that
pertains
to
the
design
of
the
new
street
facility.
Jlg
architects,
who
we
recently
entered
into
a
contract
for
for
the
design
of
that
facility,
has
a
sub
consultant
that
they
work
for
with
the
civil
site
improvement
end
of
things
that
sub
consultant
is
stockwell
engineers.
J
This
this
survey
would
cover
the
entire
27
acres
so
that
we
have
some
good
information
for
the
entire
property,
not
just
a
portion
of
it
that
the
street
facility
would
be
located
on,
but
we
wanted
to
get
a
survey
over
everything.
So
that's
what
this
contract
is
for
and
it
falls
within
a
reasonable
cost.
As
far
as
the
engineering
staff
and
the
street
superintendent
we're
concerned,.
A
Thank
you,
chair,
wanted
to
specify
something.
The
motion
that
I
will
be
requesting
is
to
approve
the
agreement
and
authorize
the
city
manager
to
sign
all
necessary
documents,
so
two
part,
but
I
will
entertain
that
motion
now
made
by
councilman
tupper
seconded
by
councilman
buehler
any
comments
or
questions.
Councilman
danforth,
yeah.
G
But
as
the
person
that
requested
this
to
be
removed
from
the
consent
and
put
onto
here,
the
questions
I
had
were
mostly
answered
by
by
heath
now
as
far
as
what
the
scope
of
this
was,
what
its
purpose
was.
I
I
didn't
know
if
this
was
site,
specific
meaning,
okay,
we're
going
to
put
it
here
and
now,
let's
go
through
survey
this
because
we
you
know,
we
at
this
point,
still
are
assuming
we're
going
to
build.
G
A
A
J
J
I
would
note
you
know
the
reason
we
had
this
on
consent
was
just
because
of
the
simplicity
from
staff
side
of
it
that
it
was
within
budget
and
being
procured
from
the
approved
source,
well
bid
process.
So
I
apologize
that
you
know
there
was
nothing
covert
intended
there,
but
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
that
was.
That
was
a
share
that
is
within
budget
and
superintendent.
Berger
is
here
as
well.
If
you
got
any
questions
here,
I'd
be
glad
to
help
answer
them.
Q
I
was
here
for
questions,
I
would
just
say
yeah
it's
within
budget,
and
we
only
have
one
dozer
and
it's
an
essential
piece
of
equipment
and
we've
been
out
without
one
for
a
couple
weeks
now,
because
the
differential
has
failed
on
the
existing
dozer
parts
are
not
available
to
rebuild
that
differential
they're,
not
even
having
they
don't
even
build
data
on
the
parts
and
that
dozer
has
been
discontinued.
Q
H
H
Q
Well,
actually,
well,
actually,
when
we
go
to
source
well,
we
usually
request
more
than
one
agreement
to
consider-
and
we
did
in
this
case
as
well,
but
we
have
kind
of
went
more
towards
source
well
than
the
seal
bid
process,
because
it's
it's
it's
efficient
and
you
know
you
you
can
you
can
pick
the
equipment
that
you
you
have
support
for
you
know
just
mechanical
support
in
your
area,
so.
H
Q
Yeah,
I
think
this
this
particular
unit
had
a
28
reduction
off
of
the
retail
price.
F
You
mayor,
I
just
want
to
follow,
because
I
was
one
of
the
poll
suggested
pulling
these
two,
this
one
and
the
airport
terminal
project
or
payment
off
the
consent
agenda.
I
was
not
opposed
to
either
one
of
these,
but
we
are
looking
at
spending
over
a
million
dollars,
the
taxpayer
money
that
I
thought
it.
It's
worth
a
couple
minutes.
This
discussion
just
make
sure
that
we're
open
and
transparent
about
what
we're
doing-
and
I
have
no
objections
to
either
one
of
these.
But
that's
why
I
did
what
I
did
earlier
on
the
meeting.
A
A
See
no
old
business,
we
do
have
one
thing
under
new
business
and
that
is
an
approval
of
a
pyrotechnics
or
open
flame
permit
for
fight
for
a
fireworks
display
at
anza
soccer
complex
on
april
30th
of
2022,
and
this
is
a
special
it
just
didn't
get
on
the
agenda
prior
we've
done
this
before
multiple
times
and
to
discuss
this.
I
think
that
we
will
have
our
watertown
fire
department
chief
don
roland.
I
This
came
in
late,
like
mayor
elaine,
said
last
thursday
or
friday
night.
It
got
here
and
I
wasn't
able
to
get
in
on
consent
agenda,
but
this
show
is
going
to
happen
on
april
30th.
This
is
a
vendor
demonstration
show
for
loose
fireworks.
They
did
it
last
year
as
well.
The
great
thing
about
it
is
it's
open
to
the
public
everybody,
so
it
should
be
kind
of
fun.
I
A
F
A
I
Chair
that
louis
is
gonna
be
doing
some
advertisement
over
the
next
few
days
too.
So
thank
you.
H
Were
thinking
oh
and
that's
probably
why
I
didn't
hear
it,
but
no
I
I
the
the
question
I
have
is
in
regards
to
the
sand
pile
on
willow.
Creek
drive.
I
don't
know
where
that
sits.
J
J
C
Thank
you
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
contractor.
We
are
not
the
owner
of
that
pile.
We
did
have
an
agreement
to
move
some
of
it.
We
were
trying
to
get
it
all
moved.
There
were
some
disagreements
for
different
reasons,
so
it
didn't
all
get
moved
this
year.
I
agree.
It
looks
like
not
not
good
out
there,
but
I
you
know
we're
not
the
only
contractor
in
town
too,
so
it
I
don't
know
what
the
owner's
intent
is.
C
H
Yeah
thanks,
I
think
just
my
opinion.
I
think
it
would
be.
H
It
would
be
nice
if
we
could
remove
that
plastic
and
what's
holding
it
down,
I
mean
that
looks
terrible,
and
if
you
look
out
there
right
off
the
road,
there's
a
tipped
over
development
wooden
sign
laying
there
it
looks
really
bad
on
on
willow
creek
drive.
So
if
we
could
just
clean
that
up
for
now,
I'm
not
challenging
the
the
removal
of
the
pile,
because
it
doesn't
do
us
any
good
if
the
whole
pile
isn't
covered
up
according
to
ordinance,
so
that
that's
what
I'd
like
to
see,
if
that's
feasible,.
O
And
then,
at
one
time
that
I'll
agree
with
with
councilman
buehler
at
one
time
that
that
pile
was
covered
with
plastic
and
the
plastic
was
covered
with
tires
now,
half
the
or
all
those
tires
been
removed,
or
a
good
share
of
them
and
put
into
a
stack
and
they're
just
laying
there.
So
I
mean
that
should
also
be
addressed
so.
G
That's
what
the
agreement
was
and
as
far
bruce,
I
believe
one
of
our
requirements
was
there
had
to
be
some
kind
of
coverage
on
there
and
that's
why
the
plastic
came
and
the
tires
came
and
that's
kind
of
went
by
the
wayside.
So
you
know
our
our
agreement
with
them
hasn't
changed
and
calling
you
guys
that's
a
contract
from
you
and
them
to
the
movement
of
it.
That's
their
issue,
not
yours,
and-
and
so
we
just
need
to
hold
their
feet
to
that
fire.
G
That
took
a
long
time
for
us
to
get
that
issue
addressed,
and
we
just
need
to
keep
our
our
thumb
on
that
one
and
and
hold
those
individuals
accountable
for
what
they've
already
agreed
to
so
I
agree
with
them.
I've
actually
had
a
couple.
People
talk
to
me,
probably
within
about
two
three
weeks
ago
about
that,
so
people
are
seeing
it.
O
E
Oh
no,
I
would
just
go.
Why
would
I
clarify
one
thing
that
that
mr
danforth
had
mentioned
that
you
know
as
far
as
them,
not
using
the
the
pile
anywhere
other
than
their
own
property,
so
that
it
may
have
happened
when
you
were
during
your
sabbatical
from
the
council?
Perhaps,
but
there
was
a
hall
road
agreement
in
effect
now
that
that
allows
the
dirt
to
be
moved
by
j
j,
so
on
a
prescribed
on
a
prescribed
route.
E
I
don't
the
contract
doesn't
contemplate
the
use
of
it.
I
I
I
believe-
and
he
can
certainly
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong-
that
we
got
to
the
point
that
that
had
happened
and
the
larger
city
concern
was
cleaning
up
that
area,
and
so
we
entered
into
the
agreement
for
them
to
do
with
it,
as
they
will
just
to
get
it
off
there.