►
From YouTube: CDF TOC Meeting, Jan 17, 2023
Description
For more Continuous Delivery Foundation content, check out our blog: https://cd.foundation/blog/
D
B
D
A
All
right
welcome
everyone
to
the
CDF
Toc
meeting.
My
name
is
Andrea
frichtel
I
work
for
IBM
I'm
in
UTC
and
yeah.
So
free,
please
to
sign
yourself
into
the
attendees
list.
A
D
A
Well,
we
have
a
few
items
on
the
agenda
for
today.
The
first
item
is
TSC
chair
election
I.
Don't
know
if
Fati
wanted
to
introduce
this.
A
I'll
just
say
a
couple
of
words
and,
as
you
may
have
seen,
the
result
of
the
DLC
chair
election
are
out
and
have
been
elected.
That's
why
I'm
chairing
the
meeting
today
and
yeah
just
wanted
to
say
thanks
a
lot
for
for
the
great
work
that
you've
done.
A
I'll
look
as
chair
of
this
Team
for
bringing
this
forward
the
team
until
now
and
yeah
thanks
also
Melissa
for
putting
your
name
out
as
well
for
as
a
candidate
for
the
of
this
so
I'm
and
thanks
everyone
for
the
trust
and
and
electing
me
on
this
position.
C
A
D
A
All
right
on
to
the
next
item,
we've
created
a
few
things
on
the
agenda:
silicon
github's,
con
2023,
Vancouver,
Canada,
I,
don't
know
who
added
this
to
the
agenda,
but
the
cfp
is
open.
There
is
an
early
bird.
There
is
actually
until
today
and
then
the
cfp
will
be
open
until
February,
10th
I,
don't
know.
If
anyone
want
to
do
anything
else
about
this.
A
Or
keep
so,
please
certainly
give
dogs
and
thanks
everyone
who
joined
also
the
committee
for
that
all.
D
A
Added
a
few
proposals
that
I
wanted
to
introduce
today
for
the
TOC,
the
first
one
about
okr,
no
fatty
your
skin,
on
discussing
this
so
I'll,
just
from
plus
upon
it
oh
yeah
and
share
it
in
your
channels,
thanks
I'll,
just
yeah
leave
it
for
later.
A
We
had
a
couple
of
meetings
in
the
governing
board.
We
created
the
governing
board
strategy
subcommittee
and
we
had
a
couple
of
meeting
and
we
discussed
a
few
things
there
and
a
couple
of
them
at
least
there
are
relevant
to
to
the
TOC
I
think
so
I
wanted
to
bring
them
here
to
this
meeting
and
the
first
is
about
the
project
benefits
document.
A
So
we
have
today
a
member
member
benefits
document,
which
is
this
PDF
to
Mas
state,
where
we
highlight
the
benefits
of
becoming
LCD
Foundation
member,
and
the
idea
is
that
yeah
it
could
be
useful
to
have
something
similar,
but
for
project
so
project
member
as
a
project
benefits
document,
and
that
could
be
useful
to
share
with
a
prospective
projects
so
to
help
us
build
the
project
pipeline
for
project.
We
want
to
attract
to
the
CDF,
as
well
as
for
existing
projects,
to
help
getting
them
more
engaged
with
the
TOC
and
and
collaborating
together.
A
And
the
project
benefits
draft
could
include
benefit
access
today,
of
course,
and
as
we
write
such
a
documents
I
think
houses
at
UC.
We
could
also
propose
additional
benefits
that
we
think
might
be
relevant
and
because,
as
part
of
the
TSC,
we're
also
linked
here
is
to
make
recommendation
to
the
budget
Committee
in
terms
of
resource
priorities
for
technical
projects.
So
if
we
think
that
there
are
certain
resources
for
the
cdfs
should
be
allocated
to
services
to
the
project,
we
can
make
such
recommendation
I
believe.
C
Yeah,
this
is
a
great
idea.
I
have
some
projects
I'm
pursuing
to
try
to
get
involved,
so
it'd
be
nice
to
get
started
on
a
document
like
this
to
convince
more
to
come
on
board.
C
A
Tracy
Steve,
who
are
not
here
today
and
I,
think
there.
D
A
Also
interested
okay.
A
D
C
A
All
right,
the
next
idea
I
had
on
my
mind
and
that
we
were
discussing
about
also
in
the
GB
strategy
meeting
as
that
it
would
be
good
similar
to
what
lawyer's
done
on
the
Outreach
committee
to
have
project
representative
joining
this
meeting.
A
F
D
F
Also
had
a
declaration
of,
and
then
from
Spinnaker
in
December,
though
every
time
we
talk
about
Spinnaker
I'm,
afraid
we
need
two
Representatives,
but
it's
a
simple
story.
F
Yeah,
so
for
peers,
if
you
also
have
just
second
time
opening
the
page,
but
when
we
were
accepting
PC,
we
had
greeting
principle
that.
F
Sorry
so
Mr
camera
would
be
a
contact
person
for
person
contributors
list
right
now.
F
Right
and
for
the
income
sex
yeah
we
had
on
kit
yeah
I
can
put
it
to
the
document.
A
Right
and
Emil
I
say
you
volunteer
for
City
events.
Thank
you
for
that
cool.
So
we
only
we
need
someone
from
shipwright,
okay,
yeah
I
can
reach
out
to
the
Shipwreck
community
and
see
if
we
can
get
someone-
and
maybe
I
can
extend
this
DLC
contributor
table
to
to
Mark
the
project
affiliation
explicitly
or
maybe
we
could
even
include
in
the
TLC
page.
A
A
Yeah
like
here
and
having
like
members
and
then
project
representative
at
the
list
of
the
representative
here
so
at
least
we
have
one
one
neighbor
project
and
yeah
I,
wouldn't
say
that
the
expectation
is
to
depend
all
meetings,
but
I
think
it
would
be
nice
to
have
a
like
a
regular
attendance
from
from
the
budget
representative
so
that
you're
Desiring
the
loop
with
initiatives
and
updates
and.
A
I
see
you
joined,
so
we
discussed
until
now.
The
project
benefits
document
and
yeah
I
think
there
was
no
position
and
positive
comment
and
Melissa
kindly
volunteer
to
help
with
that.
Just
keep
me.
E
A
G
Andrea
so,
as
you
may
have
seen,
CDF
boards
finds
the
strategy
for
CDF
on
a
yearly
basis
and
we
have
been
working
with
today's
world
2023
for
a
while
as
part
of
our
Port
Street
discussions,
and
we
are
coming
closer
to
defining
strategy
for
2023
to
give
it
to
all
carers.
And
while
we
were
working
with
this
topic
on
the
strategy
subcommittee,
there
were
few
key
results
within
the
board
documents.
G
Some
of
those
items
are
highly
relevant
to
take
more
side
committee
as
well,
because
they
talk
about
projects,
initiatives
or
the
institutes.
We
that
our
community
Works
under
the
Sixth.
So
it
could
make
sense,
at
least
to
few
of
us
that
those
things
are
actually
worked
on
by
technological,
their
technical
initiatives
and
then
they
can
be
mapped
back
to
a
high
level
board
strategy.
But
that
is
the
idea
to
actually
look
at
those
or
cares
and
see
how
much
they
make
sense
and
then
find
some
people
to
drive
those
topics
within
two
or
C.
G
F
G
Yeah
and
have
some
people
to
actually
you
know,
keep
track
of
those
things
and
also
lack
things
if,
like
certain
things,
require
some
help
with
you
know,
budget,
for
example,
technology
Community
has
budget
for
this
year
as
well.
Maybe
some
of
those
things
could
be
supported
that
way,
but
we
need
those
things
to
be
highlighted
by
the
actually
people
who
are
involved
in
those
initiatives.
A
A
Yeah
I
think
it
will
be
nice
to
have
okay
hours
for
the
TFC,
so
it
leads
to
have
like
it
means
we
would
have
like
a
set
of
objectives
for
for
the
team
and
then
some
key
results
to
track
them.
And
then
those
results
could
be
owned
by
different
members
of
subgroups
within
the
TOC.
That
would
drive
them
forward
yeah,
but.
G
Example
could
be,
for
example,
this
we
talked
about
LFX
security,
I
think
it
was
end
of
last
year
and
even
though
LFX
Securities,
it's
you
know
it
can
be
improved.
We
don't
have
all
our
projects
on
board
to
LFX
that
could
partly
room
by
20c
because
they're
the
representatives
from
projects
within
QRC
and
then
we
can
say
by
June.
All
our
projects
are
on
board
to
LFX
security.
So
we
get
some
scams
for
projects
or
another
care
could
be.
G
We
aim
to
have
two
new
projects
in
CDF,
for
example,
just
making
this
up
and
then,
if
PLC
members
have
interested
projects,
then
we
can
work
with
those
projects
with
help
of
this
project
benefits
guide
and
how.
D
F
Yeah
for
me
so
generally
I'm
fine,
with
podcasts
for
items
that
are
within
our
control,
for
example,
documentation
whatever
this
kind
of
onboarding
materials
processes
but
yeah
to
be
honest,
I
would
rather
push
back
on
the
example
with
LFX
security.
F
One
of
the
reasons
for
that
is
that
I'm
not
sure
how
other
projects,
but
the
Jenkins,
for
example,
specifically
says
that
we
make
no
time
commitment
on
any
item
we
took
in
our
route
map
and
if
the
CDF
comes
to
us
and
says
that
you
need
to
adopt
LFX
security
until
June.
Firstly,
we
cannot
because
we
are
still
waiting
for
the
Linux
foundation
for
some
items
and,
secondly,
the
project
just
doesn't
appear
this
way.
G
D
G
To
improve
at
least
you
can
say
projects
this
thing
is
available.
Are
you
interested
giving
this
a
try
and
onboarding
projects
to
LFX
security?
Wasn't
that
difficulty
at
least
two
projects
I
tried
and
if
projects
say
no,
we
don't
want
this.
Then
we
know
projects
has
yeah
not
to
want
that,
and
the
other
one
could
be
we're
on
board.
What
now
we
don't
get
anything
useful
for
back
from
FX
security,
and
then
that
would
be
a
good
feedback
back
to
nfx
team.
Saying
oh
project
doesn't
get
what
they
need.
G
When
do
you
plan
to
introduce
these
new
features
like
PR
verification,
for
example?
That
was
an
example
I
think
Andrea
you
provided
when
we
tried
for
cdos
and
that
again
that
key
result
we
may
feel
hitting
that.
But
at
the
same
time
we
have
some
learnings
from
that
to
make
sure
we
can
improve.
What
is
there.
A
Yeah
I
think
goals
can
I
I
well.
I
I
had
to
read
a
bit
about
the
KRS
for
to
learn
more
into
this,
what
they
are,
but
they
are
different
type
of
objectives.
From
what
I
read
so
they're
like
some,
that
are
things
that
you
expect
to
have
and
others
that
are
more
aspirationals
and
that
are
set
up
to
kind
of
help
us
drive
in
a
certain
direction
and
I.
Think
as
party
said,
it's
fine,
we
can
have
it
as
a
result
that
we
did
not
achieve
that.
A
But
at
least
we
reinvest
the
effort
on
our
side
to
try
and
drive
something
forward
in
a
certain
direction
and
I
think
that's
been
the
case
also
like
with
other
initiative,
like
the
included
name
initiative
that
you've
been
driving
forward
for
with
a
lot
of
passion.
I
have
to
say
all
that
for
some
time
and
it
I
mean
we
did
not
have
control
on
the
timeline
that
it
took,
but
at
least
it
was
on
the
roadmap
and
I
mean
you
took
the
ownership
and
drove
it
forward
and
ultimately
it
happened.
A
F
Yeah
thanks
to
blood
for
checking,
because
yeah
personally
this
time,
I
just
said
that
the
input
the
name
initiative
is
rather
dead
after
I
send
a
message
to
the
governance
email
and
they
received
no
response
in
one
month
but
yeah.
If
it's
not
I'm
just
happy
for
that.
A
F
As
long
as
we
say
that
all
Deeds
is
inspirational,
I'm,
fine
with
it
but
yeah
regarding
making
stroke
I
mean
once
I'm,
basically
the
same.
Unless
we
are
fully
employed
by
some
medical
meeting
time.
There
is
no
time
commitment.
A
D
C
A
Doesn't
things
won't
happen
by
themselves,
but
I
think
when
we
go
and
Define
okrs
and
say
okay,
we
want
this
to
happen
and
that
to
happen.
We
should
try
and
have
like
name
of
people
that
feels
like
they're
interested
in
putting
effort
into
that,
so
that
the
work
is
shared
and
we
don't
put
in
our
roadmap
things
that
no
one
is
interested
in
driving
it
that
we
know
that
no
one
is
working
on
yeah.
F
The
biggest
problem
is
actually
not
putting
items
on
the
roadmap
when
we
struggled
with
it
over
the
past
year,
but
during
something
that
used
to
think
that
got
stuck
because
people
lose
interest,
priorities,
change
there
are
external
dependencies,
and
for
that
actually
so
doing
this
Plumb
Bank
might
be
difficult.
So
I
keep
saying
that
the
project
manager
has
needed
to
make
it
efficient,
but
without
it,
yeah
I
think
that
just
looking
at
the
roadmap
regularly
like
we
used
to
do
before
it's
all,
we
can
do
but
yeah.
F
F
Yeah
so,
for
example,
the
to
see
so
we
have
roadmap,
so
we
used
to
do
and
we
should
do
roadmap
updates
to
all
interested
parties,
including
the
governing
board.
F
But
what
can
happen
is
that
we
say
we
have
occurs.
We
have
road
maps,
we
supporters,
then
this
roadmap
is
communicated,
for
example,
by
the
CDF
to
Premier,
Members
stores,
parent
members
and
it's
perceived
as
a
commitment
of
the
foundation.
F
F
Yeah,
so
you
have
a
question
whether
we
put
a
disclaimer
or
leads
no
commitment
roadmap,
for
example
like
we're
doing
Jenkins
or
whether
we
say
that
it's
a
roadmap
we're
coming
to
like
some
vendors.
Do
then
there
is
a
big
difference
between
these
two
approaches.
D
F
D
F
A
D
A
Think
we
I
would
to
make
to
the
fact
that
we
we
want
to
work
on
certain
things.
I
mean,
of
course,
the
results
we
can
be
achieved
or
can
be
failed
yeah
because
they.
A
Okay,
so
my
idea
was
to
we
could
set
up
an
initial
document
and
then
propose
some
initial
okrs
and
I.
Think
then
it's
part
of
that
document.
We
should
kind
of
clarify
what
is
the
the
expectation
for
KRS
and
what
is
the
approach
that
we
are
following
as
a
team,
so
we
could
set
the
document
up
and
then
discuss
it
within
the
TSC.
A
A
F
E
F
F
F
They're
going
to
spread
to
some
extent
but
yeah,
mostly
these
reviews
and
formatting
this,
where
you
wouldn't
champion
this
initiative,
rather
assist.
D
A
Shall
I
put
myself
and
and
you
all
again,
and
maybe
we
can
take
offline
and
I-
can
start
this
this
and
we
can
do
it
some
review
between
the
two
of
us
and
then
get
into
a
state
where
we
are
happy.
You.
A
Next
item:
okay,
we're
a
bit
or
anything
about
this
time;
I
guess,
but
the
TOC
Vice,
chair
or
co-chair
I
think
we.
This
is
an
issue
that
we
discussed
before
about
the
editing
a
co-chair
and
when
I
had
some
comments,
I
thought,
maybe
having
a
main
chair
advice
chair,
would
be
a
preferred
approach
to
avoid
anything
like
deadlock,
situations
and
I.
Think
there
is
a
proposal
out
there
to
a
discussion
started
with
the
legal
team
to
update
the
charter
abilities.
A
Yeah,
so
I
just
wanted
to
bring
this
up
this
topic
up
again
from
my
perspective,
I
think
it
would
make
sense
to
to
a
vice
chair
role
and
yeah.
It
should
be
someone
that
is
attending
the
the
meeting
on
a
regular
basis,
so
in
case
the
the
chair
is
not
available
if
I'm
seek
or
whatever
for
some
reason,
I'm
not
available,
we
can
ensure
continuity
in
the
team.
F
Recruitment
is
a
natural
candidate
for
vice
chair,
so
let
me
guess
a
step
or
top
or
in
the
elections
and
participate
in
there.
So
I
think
that
it
will
be
natural
if
you
want
to
introduce
this
framework.
Just
have
mid
Lisa
taking
this
role,
but.
F
So
if
we,
the
two
Seas,
is
still
plus
one
for
having
quite
share
framework.
I
think
that
for
us
that
one
is
more
or
less
clear,
foreign.
A
F
Kind
of
thing:
General,
it's
just
tradition
consensus,
so
why
we
had
no
decisions
that
based
on
consensus
so
yeah,
we
had
a
formal
voting
for
some
things
like
project
membership
and
accreditations
yeah,
but
regarding
other
decisions,
he's
just
discussed
in
the
chart
of
the
meeting.
If
everyone
is
okay,
if
there
is
an
upholds
feedback,
we
can
proceed.
F
It
creates
some
delays
for
some
things,
for
example,
roadmap
or
other
documentation,
sometimes
I.
Just
thinking
for
pull,
request,
reviews,
but
I
think
that
consensus
mechanism
has
been
working
well
so
far,.
F
So
if
there
is
something
discussed
at
the
meeting
which
is
not
in
the
meeting
notes,
I
would
rather
say
that
it's
not
a
consensus,
but
if
we
discuss
a
topic,
if
it's
in
writing,
if
it's
communicated
to
people,
if
they
don't
respond
after
some
time,
okay,
it's
fine
to
move
on.
E
F
So,
for
example,
for
voting
Etc,
it's
normal
to
bring
people
hey,
you
haven't
voted
Etc,
and
maybe
some
of
you
received
such
messages
from
me
before,
but
yeah
regarding
General
discussions,
decisions
again,
I
think
that
just
plain
majority
consensus
is
fine.
F
A
F
A
F
Of
the
biggest
problem
for
consensus
mechanism
that
it
takes
time
so
getting
any
decision
to
conclusion
is
lengthy
in
the
people
takes
time
so
sometimes
through
line.
So
our
main
increase
just
doesn't
work
as
Communication
channel
right
now,
so
we'd
see
the
slot
for
this
meeting
and
yeah
even
for
slug
for
all
requests.
Sometimes
it
takes
several
things
to
get
a
response.
F
F
A
F
I,
don't
think
it
has
to
be
you
always
but
yeah,
sometimes
yeah.
It
will
require
your
participation.
A
Well,
at
least
in
this
instance
I'm
happy
to
to
take
ownership
for
that.
If
that
helps
so.
D
A
Sure
that
everyone
from
the
TOC
is
not
today,
I
will
reach
out
to
to
get
their
confirmation.
So
I
just
added
to
the
note
that
there
is
consensus,
Among
The
Presence
at
the
meeting
about
the
device
chair
idea.
A
A
Should
get
thanks,
I
like.
E
A
Guess
we
should
get
confirm,
I
mean
we
have
majority,
but
I
will
reach
out
to
to
people
not
present
in
the
meeting
to
get
consensus.
D
A
Then
we
can
discuss.
I
would
like
to
to
volunteer
of
this
role.
G
A
All
right
moving
forward.
A
A
So
project
should
have
documented
how
their
governance
works
and
what
part
of
the
governance
team
and
so
forth,
transparency
in
meetings
and
communication
channels.
So
it
should
be
possible
to
attend
meetings.
There
should
be
no.
A
The
community
should
be
public
and
should
be
possible
to
access
those
meetings
and
communication
channels
and
to
help
streamline
infrastructure
cost
I
think
it
would
be
nice
also
to
recommend
projects
to
have
an
infrastructure
spend
report
which,
in
some
format
we
we
might
make
public
eventually
I
guess
I
was
chatting
with
fatty
about
these
I
mean
there
are
certain
numbers
that
maybe
we
cannot
make
public,
but
maybe,
at
least
in
percentage
say,
a
certain
percentage
of
the
spend
is
used
for
compute
power,
either
for
storage
and
so
forth,
so
that
we
get
more
visibility
across
the
project.
A
A
So
my
proposal
would
be
to
try
and
write
down
this
kind
of
guidelines
for
for
projects
and
as
if
we
have,
as
we
have
representative
in
the
TLC
meeting,
we
can
also
discuss
then
with
them.
How
to
to
how
we
can
help
implement
this
guidelines
if
there
is
any
question
clarification
and
no
suggestions,
of
course,.
F
G
D
G
So
this
type
of,
if
you
say
well
like
like
extending
existing
guidelines
and
perhaps
listing
those
things
in
that
document
next
to
actual
guidelines,
saying
like
Okay
for
all
our
projects,
like
Garner's
documents
or
communication
channels,
look
at
this
stock
and
that
talk
could
link
back
to
the
Project's
Governors
documents,
for
example.
So
we
don't
update
information
by
at
least
give
people
a
chance
to
see
all
those
things
in
one
document
and
easily.
F
F
F
Somewhere
on
the
CTF
side,
including
contributing
guidelines
and
public
channels,
because
contributing
guidelines
would
be
also
an
important
thing
for
this
navigation
map.
G
F
F
A
Okay,
thanks
for
the
comments
on
this,
the
last
two
things,
the
gsoc
application
reminder
and
then,
if
we
have
a
little
bit
of
time,
we
can
come
through
a
review
of
the
existing
roadmap.
A
So
I
believe
I
write.
You
added
this
about
the
G-Shock
you
anything
you
want
to
to
say
additionally,.
I
Yeah
I
think
G-Shock
is
good
for
the
foundation,
because
each
project,
the
business
rates,
gets
500
us.
So
it's
good
for
projects
like
Jenkins
X
that
don't
have
a
big
company
back
in
them,
and
good
for
diversity
as
well,
because
the
the
students
also
get
paid.
So
if
anyone
any
projects
need
advice,
I'm
happy
to
help
them.
F
So
it
depends
on
the
year
so
two
years
ago
it
was
for
projects
from
this
year.
Last
year
it
was
Jenkins
under
Titus
I
feel
as
participated
right
yeah,
you
said,
yeah
and
drinking
sex
was
basically
participating
yeah.
It
was
also
participating
separately.
F
I
think
that's
all.
Last
year.
E
A
So
what
what
is
the
difference
if
I
am
trying
to
understand
for
a
project
to
join
Json
by
themselves
to
operate
the
CDF.
I
Yeah,
so
the
projects
will
have
to
apply,
so
this
is
for
the
org
applications.
So
this
is
all
projects
that
want
to
participate.
We
have
to
apply
next
week
and
then,
the
months
later,
all
the
contributors
that
want
to
do
a
proposal
for
the
project
will
have
to
start
applying
as
well.
If
that
makes
sense,
yeah.
F
It's
one
of
the
options
and
another
option
which
we
trade
for
two
years
is
having
continuous,
delivered
Foundation
applying
as
maintenance
organization.
So
the
idea
that
the
CDF
applies
then
well,
it
was
accepted
all
the
times
and
then
basically,
the
continuous
delivery
Foundation
can
basically
facilitate
project
IDs
across
all
projects
and
then
based
on
the
applications.
F
They
can
basically
distribute
project
slots
between
projects.
It
creates
overhead
on
the
CDF
side,
including
the
application
or
Administration
financial
part,
but
at
the
same
time
it
provides
a
relief
to
the
projects.
The
biggest
cons
of
this
approach
is
visibility
of
the
project
themselves,
because
the
gsoc
website
is
not
designed
for
umbrella
organizations.
Unfortunately,
so
if
they
see
Jenkins,
if
they
see
tecton
but
yeah,
it's
a
project
they
heard
about,
they
can
search
by
keywords,
but
it's
unlikely
that
somebody
would
go.
F
That
students
know
what
continuously
with
Foundation
is
about.
The
foundation
is
not
that
famous
at
the
moment.
So
if
you
participate
on
the
data
umbrella,
you,
basically
you
would
rely
on
your
own
marketing
capabilities
and
your
own
Outreach
to
invite
students
it's
possible,
but
it
would
require
some
more
efforts
to
be
put
on
there.
I
F
Yes,
it's
possible
it's
what
we
did
the
first
year:
okay,
but
the
Jenkins
had
35
or
so
applications
that
year
and
the
CDF
fed
several
four
applications.
If
I
recall
correctly.
So
this
is
basically
again
the
question.
All
approaches
are
possible,
but
whatever
the
participation
organization
is,
they
are
expected
to
practically
participate
and
to
do
Outreach.
F
Even
now,
you
can
see
that
there
are
some
students
from
CDF
slack
reach
account
asking
what's
going
to
happen,
the
same
for
Jenkins
I,
guess
all
of
previous
mentors,
a
good,
a
bunch
of
direct
emails
and
incredible
messages
asking
for
guidelines.
But
if
you
want
to
have
quality
proposals
it
requires
Outreach.
H
Okay,
yeah,
the
Jenkins
project
is
definitely
going
to
go
solo
again
this
year,
we're
actively
preparing
happy
to
happy
to
offer
advice
to
others,
but
we're
intentionally
going
solo,
specifically
for
some
of
the
topics
that
Oleg
noted
right
visibility,
it's
easier
to
see
a
project
when
it
goes
solo
into
the
Google
summer
of
Code
system
and
hosts
its
own
org
admin.
But
that
then
means
that
project
is
assuming
the
responsibility
to
do
that.
Org
admin.
F
Plus
there
is
less
politics
involved
to
project
slots,
because
if
you
have
four
project
slots
and
a
bunch
of
proposals
from
different
the
projects,
whereas
politics
involved-
because
he
wanted
to
have
the
most
diverse
set
of
projects
which
is
draw
approach
from
the
foundation
standpoint.
But
an
individual
project
might
disagree.
A
No
okay,
just
to
summarize
and
thanks
Mark,
for
the
offer
to
to
share
kind
of
practice.
Practices
on
this.
It
sounds
to
me
like
the
hybrid
approach
is
possibly
the
best.
A
F
Who
would
take
care
of
the
application
of
all
other
logistics
is
actually
quite
well.
It's
quite
a
lot
of
work.
If
you
want
a
project
to
be
efficient,
if
someone
steps
up,
it
would
be
great
so.
I
Sorry
go
ahead.
Right,
I
was
just
going
to
say.
If
you
need
someone
for
serious
I
can
put
my
hand
up
to
Edmund
that
because
probably
taught
me
last
year
to
do
that
as
well.
F
I
can
do
advisory,
but
I
wouldn't
commit
to
our
Administration
and
the
city
of
this
yeah.
I
Yeah
to
help
and
and
be
the
admin
as
well,
if
required,.
A
Okay
right,
so
maybe,
let's
think
offline
on
that
we
only
have
one
minute
left
so
I,
don't
think
we'll
get
to
roadmap
preview.
This
time,
sorry,
there
is
a
lot
of
things
in
the
agenda
for
the
first
meeting.
A
Maybe
in
the
last
few
seconds
that
are
left,
I
I
just
wanted
to
to
say
I
mean
this
is
I'm
new
to
this
role.
So
please
feel
free
to.
Let
me
know
after
in
this
meeting
or
personally,
if
there
is
something
that
you
feel
on
doing
wrong
or
I
should
do
and
not
doing
or
positively
positive
feedback.