►
From YouTube: DXbiz Weekly Gathering [2022-06-20]
Description
00:05 Welcome
01:08 Staking ETH Discussion
12:02 .limo switch from .link Discussion
32:30 ETHCC Update - GC co-host.
B
Hello
and
welcome
to
the
dxbiz
weekly
call
for
monday
20th
of
june
2022,
no
new
member
intros
and
no
presentations
today,
but
we
will
have
a
few
discussions.
B
One
is
about
staking
staking
eth
and
some
opportunities
that
have
been
discussed
in
previous
calls:
switching
to
dot
limo
with
swapper
and
others,
and
and
if
the
nyc
or
nfd
nyc
and
the
nyc
crypto
week.
There
are
a
few,
the
external
members
there
they're
gonna,
be
attending
a
few
things
and
then
yeah
on
the
dx
events.
We
have
some
good
news
about
ecc.
We
have
hacker
soul.
Bogota,
that's
coming
up.
B
I
guess
later
this
year
and
under
the
adventures
we
have
doing
good
proposal
so
yeah.
I
guess
we
can
start
with
the
staking.
If
opportunity
and
yeah
do
you
want,
do
you
want.
C
So
what
there
there's,
obviously
there's
ongoing
treasury
management
that
dxdow
does
it's.
C
We
we've
been
doing
it,
it's
a
if
it
involves
staking
eth
and
then
we
have
dollar
runway,
and
we
were
just
discussing
before
we
started
the
recording
that
there's
with
the
markets
behaving
the
way
they
are
there's
new
opportunities
and
then
there's
new
risks
that
that
appear
on
for
things
related
to
eath
and
staking
eath,
and
we've
had
some
of
those
discussions
based
on
the
the
plan,
the
distribution
that
the
excel
holds
and
then
plans
for
future
holding
of
state
teeth
and
how
to
treat
that
and
then
there's
also
similar
discussions
of
like
the
dollar
runway,
which
which
of
the
dollar
tokens
and
things
to
hold
and
and
then
there's
opportunities
that
arise
there
and
then
there's
also
new
risks
that
arise,
and
so
this
is
all
part
of,
I
guess,
treasury
management
who
and
dave
can
speak
to
it.
C
E
Well,
I'll,
keep
it
brief,
but
I
know
there
was
some
discussion
in
the
forum
about
lido
trading
at
a
discount,
so
I
actually
spoke
with
the
stakewise
guys
this
morning
and
they've
actually
kind
of
changed
their
position,
so
they're
not
aiming
to
maintain
the
peg
anymore
either
because
it's
not
efficient
for
them.
In
this
current
market
situation,
and
so
as
of
right
now
staked
eve
from
stake,
wise
is
also
trading
at
a
five
percent
discount
on
uni
swap
and
on
stake
wise.
E
You
actually
get
a
pure
eve
discount,
because
rewards
are
issued
as
a
separate
token,
while
in
lido
the
discount
includes
reward
tokens.
So
you
know,
with
that
in
mind,
the
the
discounts
currently
seem
to
be
pretty
much
the
same
between
lido
and
stakewise,
and
that
might
also
reopen
a
bit
the
discussion
about.
You
know
what
tokens
to
acquire
and
you
know
interest
in
going
for
the
more
decentralized
option
it
is.
You
know
for
stake
wise
at
this
point.
It
doesn't
even
matter
so
much.
E
Of
course,
we've
been
trying
to
work
with
them,
given
that
we
support
what
they
do
buying
on
the
secondary
market
is
not
really.
You
know
game
changing
for
them.
Of
course,
their
goal
is
to
issue
more
eve,
but
of
course,
in
the
current
market
situation
we
have
that
opportunity
and
you
know
we
could
re-evaluate
a
bit
which
tokens
we
want
to
acquire.
Of
course,
the
idea
was
to
get
2
000
eth
of
stake
wise.
E
Initially,
then
the
stake,
if
lido
dpeg
happened,
now
all
stake
if
assets
are
kind
of
depect
somewhat,
and
so
that's
just
something
to
revisit
yeah
and
you
know
I'll
leave
it
short
and
sweet
and
leave
it
there.
B
Yeah,
I
was
just
going
to
write
this,
but
I'll
just
say
it
like.
If
we
do
that,
like
what
ross
just
said,
if
we
like
dca
into
all
those
take
these,
I
mean
this
is
strategically.
It
makes
sense
for
us
and
we
could
like
leverage
this
for
like
marketing
purposes.
You
know
deep
style
is
here
like
trying
not
necessarily
trying
to
restore
the
peg,
but
you
know
we
as
an
organization
believe
in
you
know
the
future
of
of
state
teeth,
which
is
pretty
cool.
C
Yeah
well,
the
big
thing
is
dave's
new
information,
though,
that
that
stake,
wise
eth
also
has
a
discount
when
you
trade
on
your
swap,
that's
very
important
new
information,
because
that
was
a
big
factor
in
the
discussion
of
like.
Should
we
do
that
when
we
could
do
it
on
lido
and
make
a
bunch
of
extra
money
and
like
do
we
give
that
up
and
now,
if
they're
similar
discounts,
then
it's
let,
then
that
becomes
less
of
an
important
factor
and
then
it
makes
sense
to
be
diversified.
C
E
I
actually
need
to
check
because
rocket
pool
well
rocket,
pool
the
price
completely
deviates
from
from
ether
anyway,
so
I
just
need
I
have
to
check.
What
do
you
mean
completely?
Deviates
that
sounds
bad
like
rocket
pool
just
becomes
more
expensive,
so
they
don't
issue
new
rewards.
As
a
token.
The
original
token
you
stake
just
becomes
more
expensive
because
it
kind
of
like
includes
the
reward
gotcha,
but.
E
F
Just
through
tj
spartan
update,
who
I
actually
literally
think,
is
the
reason
that
stick
wise
abandoned
the
peg.
I
think
he
says
that
rocket
pool
is
an
outlier
that
they're
basically
still
pegged.
F
But
definitely
sky
said
that,
like
the
yeah,
I
mean
the
fact
that
this
is
not
specific
to
lido
right.
It's
all
state
thief
and
so,
like
you
know,
as
a
reminder,
there
was
that
there
is
a
past
signal
proposal
for
2008
staking
with
stakewise
the
first
proposal
to
execute
that
just
went
through
and
we
haven't.
I
don't
think
it's
actually
required
we'll
do
that.
F
Maybe
today
after
this
call
and
then
there
is
another
proposal,
the
second
500
of
that
2000-
that
is
boosted
and
would,
I
think,
has
seven
days
for
voting,
and
I
honestly
actually
like
wrote
up
something
this
morning.
D
F
Doing
another
separate
proposal
to
redirect
some
of
the
remaining
1500
eth,
including
the
proposal-
that's
lived
today-
maybe
voting
against
that
proposal
so
that
that
each
that
was
earmarked
for
stakewise,
that
that
would
be
used
to
acquire
lido
because
it's
at
a
discount
but
like
now.
I
don't
think
that
makes
any
sense,
because
I
think
the
concerns
about
lido
about,
like
centralization
are
still
real
and
very
true
and
really
the
only
reason
it
was
being
to
like
get
lido
ease
was
because
it
was
trading
at
such
a
discount.
F
But
if
stake
wise
is
at
the
same
discount,
then
yeah,
I
think
it.
I
don't
think
I
don't
know
if
there's
anything
that
needs
to
change
from
the
existing
plan
and
strategies
that
was
laid
out
in
the
recent
staking
proposal,
which
is
to
yeah
state
2000,
with
with
stakewise,
presumably
they're,
all
going
to
be
like
maybe
around
the
same
amount
like
whenever
things
settle,
and
I
think
they
are
kind
of
trading
like
you
know,
94
95,
for
for
both
of
them
for
all
of
them.
C
But
there's
new
information
like
doing
new
signal
proposals
I
mean
talking
about
in
the
forum-
is
always
like
the
fastest
way
to
do
it,
but
then
get
doing
new
signal
proposals
like
the
draft
you
were
writing
up.
Chris
is
pretty
important,
but
it's
like
and
then,
if
people
were
observing
from
the
outside
or
not
paying
very
close
attention,
they
could
see
potentially
actions
being
taken.
C
That,
like
kind
of
are
confusing
when
you
just
read
like
one
of
the
proposals,
if
you
don't
have
all
of
the
info,
all
of
the
updated
proposals
and
information
as
we
get
new
information,
so
it's
it
shows
how
tricky
it
is.
But
it's
you
know,
making
it
as
transparent
as
possible
and
and
as
clear
to
follow
the
the
decision-making
and
past
as
possible.
I
think
is,
is
key
for
the
like
on
the
actual
unchained
proposals,
but
it
is,
it
is
very
gets
complex
quickly.
B
Yeah,
I
was
just
yeah.
I
was
just
about
to
say
that
this,
like
what
you
just
described,
this
complexity
could
be
interesting
to
sort
of
solve
this
with
ux
in
dxgov
yeah,
like
how
sort
of
like
proposals
are
changing
as
they
go
or
yeah.
I
guess
things
are
changing.
D
Yeah,
I
want
to
realize
too
much,
but
I
think
we've
put
some
thought
into
that
in
terms
of
even
just
having
the
forum
in
your
governance.
Application
will
give
you
a
lot
of
opportunities
to
highlight
and
make
proposals
more
fluid,
but
if
people
have
thoughts
on
how
that
could
be
better,
let
us
know
because
it's
still
very
much
in
development.
B
D
C
B
Yeah,
okay,
so
I
guess
the
next
topic
is
sort
of
the
limo
switch
from
yeah
from
dot
link,
which
is,
you
know,
been
unstable.
We've
discussed
this
several
times
the
best
so
yeah,
I
don't
know
like.
B
G
We're
doing
similar
things
to
what
the
style
is
doing.
I
guess
on
the
website,
but
for
swapper.
So
I
think
some
some
things
we
could
like
to
do
immediate
action
is
just
ask.
G
Instead
of
that
link,
I
think
that's
the
biggest
factor
we
can
do,
but
other
things
we
could
do
is
just
strengthen
our
seo.
I
don't
think
we've
focused
any
seo
on
our
websites
and
I
think
if
we
just
guide
google,
what
is
right
and
what
is
wrong
and
google
can
start
rank
the
right
site
on
search
result
right
now.
If
you
search
for
swapper
or
the
stats
or
dxdao,
the
first
results,
always
dot
link
and
it's
broken
you,
you
can't
go
go
in
there.
G
We
had
people
on
this
code
coming
in
and
saying
hey,
I
feel
rugged.
The
drug
is
swapper
dead.
I
mean
there's
a
bunch
of
comments.
Right
people
think
it's
dead,
I
think
yeah
from
our
side.
We
should
change
all
links
from
geek
docs
to
website
to
the
landing
page,
to
always
have
that
limo
and
ask
our
partners
to
also
change
the
links,
but
other
than
that.
I
think
that,
and
actually
we
could
just
yeah
just
look
into
the
seo.
G
C
Better
yeah
thanks-
and
I
just
put
that
on
here,
because
some
of
us
were
on
the
swapper
call
and
there's
obviously
a
clear
discussion
and
there's
a
now
a
strategy,
and
it
was
mainly
focused
on
you
know:
swapper
dot
eth,
but
it's
really
important.
I
don't
know
someone
probably
know
chris
probably
knows
like
well,
there's,
probably
like
nine
or
ten
dx,
dow
e
s
sites
or
pages
that
use
it
and
the
strategy
that
we're
going
to
apply
with
swapper.
C
We
really
need,
like
an
overall
strategy
and
coordination
around
doing
that
for
all
of
the
yeah.
Every
everyone
we
use
swapper
is
probably
the
most
used
most
important
one,
but
and
and
like
you
said,
we
could
you
could
you
could
either
first
do
try
to
do
like
the
the
plan
you
come
up
with
for
swapper.ed.limo,
and
then
we
could
try
to
replicate
that
or
we
could.
C
G
I
mean
we
could
right
now,
I'm
just
using
like
free
free
to
use
tools
or
like
trials
to
see
what's
going
on
and
who's
linking
to
what,
but
we
could
do
like
like
a
top
top
100
list
where
we
could
just
reach
out
and
see
as
an
example.
G
What's
her
name,
ens
domains
basically
always
links
to
that
link
and
it's
dead,
I'm
not
sure
what
what
their
plan
is,
but
it
is
pretty
bad
from
their
side
also
right
to
link
to
something
that
is,
that
is
always
dead
almost
if
we
reach
out
to
them
and
change
it
for
swapper,
then
obviously
it's
worth
it
worth
it
to
to
change
it
for
for
for
the
rest
of
the
products,
I'm
not
even
sure
if
it's
possible
right,
but
we
should
definitely
have
that
kind
of
list
where
we
say
yeah.
G
B
G
But
this
can
happen
again.
I
mean
all
the
work
we're
doing
now.
I'm
not
saying
that
limbo
guys
will
will
do
something
I
mean
I
mean
it
can
happen
again
right,
dot,
lim
all
the
work
we're
doing,
and
we
we
push
everything
to
dot
limo
and
then
one
day
that
limo
is
slow
or
bad
or
so
we
we
need
to
prepare
ourselves
like
to
not
be
too
dependent
on
these
things,
that
we
don't
control
or-
or
it's
not
even
reports
to
controlling
these.
G
So
maybe
I
don't
know
preparing
for
the
next
step
like
how
can
we
not
be
depending
dependent
on
these
stuff?
Can
we
work
together
with
let's
say,
ens,
to
make
ens
official
like?
Can
we
push
that
thing
to
be
so
it's
built
into
like
every
browser,
because
the
day
that
eth
becomes
like
native
in
the
browsers,
then
we
need
to
do
all
this
work
again
right.
C
So
one
of
the
things
we
a
year
and
a
half
ago
ago
we
to
be
to
make
examples,
is
we
were
trying
to
push
the
you
know
like
even
on
our
home
page,
when
we
were
linking
the
products
we
were
linking
to
like
swapper.ethanomen.eth,
and
we
wanted
to
lead
with
that,
like
use
metamask
to
resolve
to
the
actual
just
swapper.eth,
assuming
you
have
metamask
on
your
browser
and
then,
if
you
didn't,
then
there's
a
side
link
that
says
like
if
you
aren't
in
like
a
web3
browser
that
can
resolve
to
ens
click,
this
link
and
then
it
used
like
swapper.ethotling.
C
So
like
the
the
the.
What
we'd
really
want
is
people
to
resolve
the
enses
like
through
the
easiest
mechanism
they
actually
have
like
on
their
own
computer,
and
that
you
could
do
that
in
status
wallet.
You
can
do
that
in
metamask.
You
can
do
that
with
a
hand
full
of
other
ones,
and
then
the
backup
was
use
eat
that
link.
C
But
I
don't
know
we
basically
abandoned
that,
because
overall,
it
was
a
worse
user
experience
for
people
getting
to
our
products.
I
think,
but
it
sounds
like
in
the
future
that
that
may
become
easier
for
people
to
do,
but
in
the
meantime
we
are
leaning
into
link
or
sorry
into
limo
we're
moving
away
from
dot
link,
and
we
should
make
that
more
public
and
more
clear
and
just
tell
people
that
very
regularly
like
once.
We
take
the
steps
to
to
make
this
move.
C
We
should
you
know,
along
with
stressing
how
dx
diet
uses
ens,
we
should
say
why
we're
using
dot
limo-
and
you
know
there
is
also
an
option
to
resolve
it
yourself,
but
we
should
be.
We
should
get
more
awareness
around
this,
because
it's
one
of
the
most
unique
things
that
dxdow
does.
I
think
I
think.
G
G
We
will
have
like
there's
a
place
where
you
could
click
and
you
can
see
you
can
see
all
the
different
places
where,
where
swapper
can
be
resolved,
so
let's
say
that
link
or
that
limo
or
if
there's
more
options
in
the
future,
and
you
see
if
they're,
online
or
offline,
and
then
you
see
what
the
native
link
is
right.
This
way
people
knows.
Oh,
this
is
the
different
ways
I
can.
G
G
I
think
tornado
tornado
cache
has
a
place
where
you
could
click
and
you
see
all
the
links
right.
It's
on
the
front
page.
It
doesn't
explain
anything,
but
you
kind
of
understand
like
this
is
the
different
ways
you
can
go
to
the
to
the
site
and
then
and
then
yeah.
The
user
can
decide.
B
Yeah,
I
guess
interesting,
and
this
is
yeah.
I
think
I
feel
like
yeah.
Like
you
guys
said,
we
need
to
be
more
public
about
this
and
be
sort
of
like
the
leaders
in
this,
because
we
are,
I
guess
the
question
is:
how
do
we
communicate
this
and
how
do
we
work
with
this
and
I
think
yeah,
this
partnership
with
that
limo?
Is,
you
know
one
of
the
first
things
and
yeah?
We
need
to
figure
out
how
to
be
vocal,
yeah.
Maybe
moving
on
to
the
next
topic.
C
Yeah
now
I
just
real
quick
related
to
that
and
yeah.
Some
of
the
little
guys
are
here,
but
they've
been
funding
limo
based
on
basically
some
grants.
I
think
ef
has
given
them
some
grants.
C
I
don't
know
if
other
people
have
but
given
dx,
dao's
use
of
and
and
you
know
and
leadership
in
the
enf
space
in
in
this
tool
that
enables
us
to
allow
people
to
even
use
our
products
is,
I
think
you
know,
even
if
it's
some
small
amount,
I
think
it
would
could
be
interesting
for
dx
dow
to
officially
give
a
grant
and
support
like
that
type
of
tool
that
is
being
built,
especially
since
it's
yeah
it's
granted,
so
that
limo.
G
H
Okay,
cool
all
right
and
so
just
be
clear:
I'm
not
the
developer,
I'm
the
community
person
here,
so
my
brother
would
be
the
one
that
is
more
technical,
but
as
far
as
like
grants
go
so
yes,
we
received
a
small
grant
from
the
ethereum
foundation
and
from
ens,
but
really
other
than
that.
I
mean
it's
been
hard
to
work
with
ens.
H
I
don't
want
to
get
into
that.
The
ethereum
foundation
has
helped
us
through,
like
aws
credits,
and
they
have
another
developer.
That
they're
basically
have
put
like
on
a
contract
role
on
like
a
quarterly
basis,
but
outside
of
that
yeah,
it's
been.
H
H
I
mean
I
would
say,
because
it's
free,
you
know
like
we
we're
not.
You
know
we're
never
going
to
charge
people
to
use
the
gateway.
You
know
there's
features
or
things
that
you
know
after
we.
You
know
the
public.
Good
aspect
is
first
and
foremost,
but
you
know
there
are
ways
that
potentially
we
can
provide.
You
know
anonymized
analytics
to
try
to
get.
D
H
H
It's
my
understanding
when
he
went
to
prison
and
I
guess
got
out
like
on
his
bail,
he
transferred
it
to
cloudflare
and
then
cloudflare
now
runs
it
sort
of
just
as
like
a
I
don't
know.
They
just
run
it
for
e
s.
On
b,
I'm
sorry
yeah.
They
just
run
it
on
e
s
and
they
don't
really
have
any
it's.
My
understanding,
like
enos,
doesn't
really
have
any
control
over.
It
doesn't
really
care
and
cloud
flare
is
just
sort
of
meh
about
it.
Like
they're.
Just
you
know,
there's
there's
no
concern
to
them.
G
H
H
They
have
changed
some
stuff
with
it,
but
for
the
most
part
I
mean
cloudflare
really
has
no
incentive
to
make
it
better
because
they
don't
make
money
on
it.
The
only
reason
they
run.
It
is
because
they
can
just
say.
Well,
you
know
we're
supporting
this.
You
know
infrastructure,
but
I
I
really
don't
think
anybody
cares
about
it.
B
Yeah,
I'm
wondering
if,
if
there
is
a
way
similar
to
the
way
what
the
graft
did
with
sort
of
decentralizing
this
infrastructure,
if
there's
an
interesting
way
to
do
the
same
thing
with
you
know
the
limo
and
creating
like
you
know
a
whole
ecosystem
around
this
thing
and
yeah,
basically
allowing
yeah
people
to
run
sort
of
like
relayers
and
get
paid
with
tokens,
and
then
you'll
have
to
pay
a
small
fee
in
order
to
yeah,
I
guess
access
websites-
I
I
don't
know
kind
of
like
spitballing.
I
Yeah
sure,
can
you
give
me
a
little
context.
I'm
sorry!
I
we
had
another
call
for
something
unrelated
to
this,
but
I
rescheduled
that
so.
Can
you
just
give
me
a
quick
summary
of
what
what's
being
discussed.
H
I
Yeah
so
they're
we've
talked
about
this
a
lot
and
we
keep
kind
of
coming
back
to
a
few
core
problems
that
I
think
are
inherent
to
this.
This
sort
of
plan
and
the
main
issue
there
is
around
the
web,
2
dns
name.
So
in
this
case
you
know
star.eth.limo,
that's
obviously
got
to
has
to
be
owned
by
someone
and
operated
and
records
defined.
I
I
don't
know
how
you
can
get
around
or
decompose
that
into
a
more
decentralized
concept,
just
simply
because
the
nature
of
how
those
things
work.
However,
it
is
absolutely
possible
to
at
least
take
the
back
ends
of
this,
which
would
be
you
know,
basically,
the
reverse
proxies
and
all
that
stuff
ipfs
clusters,
everything
that
that
could
definitely
be
run
by
the
community
so
that
it's
not
just
entirely
something.
I
That's
within
our
custody,
and
I
think
that
that's
where
the
idea
of
content,
integrity
and
verification
becomes
even
more
important
if
you
start
allowing
you
know
there
has
to
be
a
trust
factor.
I
guess
that's
established
within
whatever
this
this
protocol,
whatever
form
that
would
end
up
taking
just
to
you
know,
give
those
guarantees
that
you
know
if
there
are
other
people
operating
this,
that
there's
not
a
way
for
them
to
maliciously
interfere
with
the
excuse
me
sorry,
someone
was
texting.
I
Me
maliciously
interfere
with
the
requests
and
response
payloads.
So
those
are
you
know,
I
think,
just
at
a
high
level,
some
of
the
pitfalls
with
trying
to
build
something
out
like
this.
I
think
it's
definitely
worth
an
effort,
but
I
think
you
know
another
kind
of
serious
issue
here
is
that
once
you
start
getting
into
pretty
deeply
technical
solutions
for
something
like
this
and
even
with
you
know
pairing
it
with.
I
You
know
some
sort
of
browser
that
has
these
resolution
capabilities,
you
kind
of
start
obviating
the
need
to
decentralize
the
infrastructure
itself
for
that
kind
of
web
2.5
thing
that
we're
providing
at
the
moment
so
yeah.
Those
are
my
thoughts
on
it.
I
It's
it
is
a
a
complicated
problem
and
I
don't
have
like
a
great
solution
to
it,
just
simply
because
there
are
all
these
various
shortcomings
that
would
have
to
be
addressed
with
the
way
that
kind
of
all
this
fundamental
infrastructure
and
web
2
protocols
in
the
way
that
they
operate,
and
I
am
happy
to
elaborate
further
on
any
of
that
stuff.
But
that's
just
the
way
that
I've
been
seeing
it
recently.
B
Yeah
is
this
written
somewhere
like
in
one
of
the
forums
like
I'm?
I
don't
know
interesting
to
get,
maybe
in
one
of
the
conferences
to
get.
I
don't
know
roundtable
of
people
who
are
going
to
be
discussing
about
this.
You
know
like
the
graph
people
and
ens
and
stuff
like
that.
I
Because
this
is
yeah,
I
don't
know,
I
don't
think
we've
written
anything
down
specifically
about
it.
I
mean
I
know
it's
been
discussed
and
you
know
there's
probably
some
discord
post
or
something
out
there
with
it,
but
you
know
that
probably
would
be
a
good
idea,
though,
to
get
a
more
technical
audience
to
be
able
to
have
this
discussion
and
kind
of
ideate
and
brainstorm
around
so
yeah.
That's
something!
I
I
think
that
we
could
try
to
at
least
get
a
rough
overview
for
and
then
you
know,
try
to
get
a
discussion
started
there.
B
Yeah
cool
yeah:
do
we
want
to
talk
about,
like
other
things,.
B
B
Yeah
so
yeah
do
you
guys
want
to
mention
maybe
some
of
the
like
ecc
plans.
Maybe
I
think
that's
kind
of
like
immediate.
C
Yeah,
so
the
the
good
oh
well,
I
believe
the
good
news
that
maybe
nathan
was
referring
to
is
the
venue
for
the
happy
hour
kind
of
breakout,
discussion,
events
that
it's
going
to
be
with
gnosis
chain
dxdow
and
gitpo
app
yeah.
We
were
able
to
secure
this
really
cool
indoor
outdoor
venue-
that's
quite
close
to
ecc
nathan
and
it's
nathan,
to
confirm
it's
for
the
wednesday
right
from
four
to
eight
pm.
A
C
Up,
yeah,
and
so
that
we
were
discussing
with
the
organizers,
I
think
the
capacity
is
around
150
people,
maybe
200,
but
the
idea
is
to
get
well
initially
share
with
kind
of
there's
a
gnosis
ecosystem
chat,
telegram
group,
so
getting
people
that
are
close
to
the
gnosis
chain
ecosystem.
That
would
also
be
familiar
with
dx
dial
products
on
gnosis
chain
and
things
and
then
kind
of
builders
from
the
get
pop
echo
system
and
on
from
github
and
things,
and
so
the
three
organizers
together
were
gonna.
C
We
really
want
to
curate
it
way
more
than
that,
so
the
eventbrite
would
be
to
maybe
collect
interest
from
people,
but
we
can
also
hand
invite
people
that
we
want
specifically
to
be
there,
that
we
know
will
be
in
paris
and
so
as
we
as
we
get
closer
and
you're
talking
to
people,
and
there
are
yeah
people
that
you
want
to
specifically
invite
we'll
be
able
to
send
them
or
either
add
them
to
the
list
or
put
them
send
them
a
specific
sign
up
form
that
will
allow
them
access
or
something.
C
So
we
want
to
make
it
public
it
will.
It
will
exist
on,
like
the
the
shared
calendar
of
things
that
are
happening
happening
that
week,
but
it
won't
just
be.
Anyone
can
just
like
automatically
sign
up
for
for
immediate
access
to
this
event.
It
will
be
like
it
will
take
some
curation
by
the
three
teams
that
are
organizing
it.