►
From YouTube: DXbiz Weekly Gathering [2022-01-03]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Welcome
to
the
weekly
developer
call.
We
are
waiting
for
john
to
join
to
join
the
call
when
his
internet
is
better.
So
let's
do
a
recap
of
all
the
squads
on
everything
that
has
been
happening
in
the
last
last
week.
I
think
not
too
much
because
it
was
new
year's
eve,
so
everyone
was
taking
some
days
off
to
spend
time
with
their
fam
with
their
friends
and
family,
but
we
want.
I
want
to
do
a
demo
of
the
sign
boats
feature
that
I've
been
working
on
on
the
xbox.
A
B
A
A
Okay,
I'm
going
to
do
it
myself
now,
so
this
is.
This
is
what
we
have
right
now,
I'm
going
to
go
through
all
the
process
of
signing
and
what
the
current
the
current
risk
of
the
implementation
that
we
have
right
now
we
are
signing
raw
messages,
raw
messages
on
using
the
ethereum
account
which
it
is
not
safe.
A
A
You
are
going
to
see
this,
so
you
have
to
sign
on
your
own
risk,
I'm
going
to
try
I'm
going
to
try
to
show
as
much
information
as
possible
on
the
on
the
xbox
before
signing,
but
it
is
not
safe
right,
so
it
is
not
ideal,
and
this
is
what
we
are
going
to
be
seeing
soon
when
we
work
on
the
new
dx
dxd
boring
machine,
we
are
going
to
sign
type
messages
where
you
are
going
to
be
seeing
like
I
signed
the
vote
for
this
proposal
using
this
reputation
on
this
network,
so
you're
going
to
be
able
to
verify
what
you're
assigning
so
the
current
implementation
is
not
safe.
D
A
Used
a
snapshot,
but
I
don't
know
I
don't
know
if
a
snapshot
shows
you
what
you're
assigning,
but
here
what
we
are
showing
is
the
hash
of
the
object
that
you
are
assigning,
so
you
need
to
yeah
the
only
way
to
verify
it.
Is
you
hash
it
on
your
own
using
time
using
some
tool
or
your
client,
or
I
know,
programming
something
right?
A
So
it's
it
is
very
hard
to
verify
and
to
check
what
you
are
signing
with
the
current
implementation,
and
this
is
what
eip
712
fix,
which
is
it's
in
a
standard
to
sign
type
data.
This
is
what
we
are
going
to
be.
I
don't
know
if
a
snapshot
shows
you
that
is,
if,
when
you,
when
you
sign
owner
on
a
snapshot,
you
see
something
like
this
on.
Metamask
is
because
it
supports
eap
712.
A
A
A
If
we
go,
for
example,
to
this
transaction
and
we
go
to
the
logs
here,
the
logs
we
are
going,
we
see
that
what
we
know
is
design
and
the
address
of
the
wolverine
machine,
the
other
the
proposal
id.
So
this
is
we
we
can
log
any
string,
and
what
we
are
learning
here
is
the
type
of
the
message
is
like
broadcasting,
a
message
on
on
a
test
network.
A
Right
now,
we
are
using
only
on
a
ring
kv,
but
we
plan
to
to
use
other
other
protocols
later
in
the
future
like,
for
example,
rvdb
or
maybe
swan
where
we
would,
where
you
would
only
need
to
sign
once
right.
A
So
to
sign
here
right
now
we
have
only
the
wi-fi,
the
y5
econ,
so
if
you
cross
it,
it's
that
you
won't
be
sending
the
transaction
the
network
later,
we
are
going
to
change
that
we
can
use
whatever
icon
you
want,
but
here
confirm
both
signature.
I
already
signed
it,
but
I'm
going
to
repeat
the
process
once
I
click
confirm.
I'm
going
to
see
this,
you
see
signing
the
message
can
be
dangerous.
This
signature
could
potentially
perform
any
operation
on
your
account
behalf
blah
blah
blah
blah.
A
Sorry,
you
say
that's
on
rank
of
b
or
next
time.
No
now
what
we
are
signing
is
the
raw
transaction
that
we
are
going
to
be
sending
on
ring
kevin.
So
we
are
not
sending
or
ringing.
We
are
signing
the
raw
transaction
and
broadcasting
it
to
rink
a
b
directory.
This
is
why
here,
for
example,
we
have
to
sign
other
message.
A
B
D
E
D
F
End
is
receiving
the
signature
like
it
doesn't
doesn't
matter
what
metamask
is
connected
to,
because
it's
all
evm
right.
So
it
doesn't
matter
where
you,
where
you
put
like,
create
the
signature
on
which
network,
because
they
are
all
the
same.
F
A
What
no,
no,
we
are
doing,
the
we
are
doing
the
transaction
here
on
on
the
application.
What
we
do
we
sign
it
and
we
use
the
default
ring
kb
provider
when
you
switch
to
ring
kv.
We
are
using
like
the
one
from
pocket
network,
so
we
are
using
that
one
and
we
send
the
raw
transaction
there,
and
this
is
what
this,
who
is
we,
who
is
we.
A
But
ideally
you
will
only
have
to
sign
once
and
it
will
it's
going
to
be
a
type
message
later
in
the
future.
We
can
add,
for
example
like
where
do
you
want
to
share?
Let's
see,
like
you,
have
a
checkbox
where
you
select
rbdb,
swarm,
ipfs,
ipns,
rinkaby
or
user
everything,
and
you
share
the
signature
everywhere.
A
So
once
that
happens,
you
will
see
the
sign
board
that
is
going
to
appear
here
once
the
transaction
is
shared,
because
here
what
we
are
doing,
every
time
that
you
load
a
proposal,
you
are
going
to
see
the
sign
boats,
that
is
being
that
is
being
loaded.
Let's
see
later,
we
are
going
to
improve
this
because
right
now,
I'm
every
time
that
you,
lo
that
you
know
the
proposal
you
enter
you
see
here.
It
appears
sign
both
and
what
you
can
do
that
you
can
do
it.
A
You
can
do
it
only
on
schemes
that
you
see
that
use
dxe,
borrowing
machine
which
are
the
only
the
wallet
schemes.
So
the
only
wallet
skin
that
we
have
in
inside
is
the
quick
wallet
scheme,
the
version
1.0,
the
the
version
1.1
is
going
to
be
registered
and
I
can
execute
the
sign
board
right
now.
I'm
executing
the
word
myself,
but
maybe
someone
else
here
can
do
it.
D
Can
you
just
repeat
I
got
I
got
lost
like
you
signed
a
message,
you
signed
a
message
yeah
and
then
that
just
like
goes
on
to
wrinkle
b.
What's
the
next
step
that,
like
goes
to
confirm
votes
or
what
are
you
doing.
A
D
A
Yes,
if
I
mean
if
five
people
sign
it,
we
are
going
to
see
five
votes
here
and
you
can.
You
can
send
it
to
confirm,
and
this
is
going
to
be
unchanged.
This
is
going
to
be
like
the
on-chain
boards.
So
let's
say
you
have
a
you:
have
a
wallet
scheme
that
you
need.
I
know
like
five
percent
on
boosted
proposals
to
be
executed,
so
you
can
sign
both
for
free
and
later.
A
A
D
A
Votes
positive
and
he
did
it
with
my
vote.
He
didn't
vote
it.
He
he
just
executed
my
vote
so
here
we
only
need
to
execute
a
few
votes
right
to
make
the
proposal
pass,
but
we
can
have
a
lot
of
sign
votes.
Everyone
can
sign
any
votes
as
they
want
for
free
and
you
can
I
mean.
Hopefully
we
are
going
to
see
a
lot
more
people
voting,
because
it's
going
to
be
free
right.
A
We
just
stay
there
I
mean
if
the
proposal
ends
and
the
sign
mode
wasn't
confirmed
right
later.
We
we
can
change
the
name.
I
will
use
like
votes
on
chain
and
both
off
chain
or
something
like
that.
We
need
to
work
on
the
naming
right,
but
you
need
to
execute.
This
is
just
a
way
to
say,
for
example,
on
mainnet.
This
would
be
super
useful
because
we
can
have.
I
know,
like
10
percent,
of
both
and
signal
the
the
approval
on
something,
and
only,
and
only
do
one
on
only
confirm
one
or
two
votes.
D
D
G
A
C
C
D
A
One
is
the
boat
that
is
signed,
which
is
the
most
important
one
and
the
second
one
is
the
signature
of
the
ring
heavy
transaction,
because
you
are
sending
it
with
your
incoming
account
and
actually,
I
think
it
might
fail,
because
you
need
it
worked.
It
work,
okay,
but
you
need
ring
cable
ether.
You
know
to
work
okay,.
D
A
A
G
I
mean
one
way
to
think
about
this,
and
I
I
think
you
already
said
this,
but
I'm
just
kind
of
repeating
it
to
see.
If
I
understand
is
we're
using
rink
b
as
the
way
to
communicate
transaction,
it's
signatures
right,
like
you,
could
actually
send
them
in
other
ways,
potentially
right
exactly
yes,
yes,.
A
C
A
Yes,
exactly
that's
another!
That's
another
blogger.
F
I
don't
think
this
is
going
to
be
to
be
used
on
production
right.
I
I
think
this
is
like
a.
I
don't
know
like
an
mvp.
I
think
ceramic
is
the
way
to
go
like
the
ux
is
like
just
so.
I'm
not
sure
if
that
is,
if
that
should
go
to
on
production,.
A
Yeah
the
issue
now
hero
is
that
you
don't
see
what
you
are
signing,
what
you
see
what
you're
signing
when
we
support
eap
712,
you
can
use
rink
a
b,
but
I
think
it
will
be
our
latest
option
like
our
last
resource
option.
First,
we
shall
focus
on
I
mean
this
is
this
was
a
simpler
thing
to
do,
because
I
did
already
like
in
the
past,
so
I
just
needed
to
show
you
guys
how
how
it
will
work
right
now
in
the
future.
A
It
will
be
again
only
signing
one
one,
sending
one
message
that
is
going
to
be
the
same
boat.
Are
you
going
to
see
the
data
and
it's
going
to
be
spread
using
ceramic
or
vdb
ipfs
swan
everywhere
right
and
you
we
can
use
ring
kv
as
well.
If
you
want,
which
is
actually
like
the
more
the
more
robust,
because
it's
a
test
network
that
it's
always
working
and
you
can
share
anything
there.
F
Yeah,
I
see
the
main
issue
that
users
need
to
like.
We
hide
like
a
different
network
which
is
used
to
aggregate
signatures
from
the
user,
and
then
we
actually
need
to
tell
them
hey.
You
needs
like
wrinkle
by
eath
to
do
something
right.
A
E
So
is
this,
but
in
the
future
could
we
also
have
like
I
mean
we
could
also
do
the
signature
of
the
transaction
on
x
die
right,
so
the
ui
could
just
read
the
balances
of
the
user,
doing
the
transaction
on
xtype,
polygon,
rinkerby
and
whatever
else
and
then
decide
where
to
do
it
depending
on
whether
or
not
the
user
has
a
balance.
Is
that
correct.
C
No
because
it
needs
to
be
executed
on
the
chain
it's
happening
on,
it
all
needs
to
come
back
to
that
chain.
At
some
point
we
could
share
things
with
x
tag,
but
then
obviously
you're
using
like
now.
C
C
E
A
A
So
yeah
a
lot
of
work
here,
but
this
is
this-
is
a
working
prototype
is
going
to
be
improved
later
right.
So
this
is
the
first
and
the
we
are
only
using
ring
key,
but
we
are
going
to
use
other
protocols,
and
I
I
I
think
the
exciting
thing
for
this
is
that
it
enables
like
sharing
or
spraying
or
expressing
your
vote,
pushes
the
vote
to
x
die.
D
D
A
I
mean
it
doesn't
need
to
be
secure,
it
needs
to
be.
How
can
we
call
it
redundant
like
be
up
like
that?
It
doesn't
need
to
have
any
downtime
and
we
need
to
be
able
to
have
the
signatures
and
the
data
they
are
available.
Yes,
so
this
relies
on
the
rank.
E
A
A
A
Exactly
yes,
you
can't
change
the
vote
and
because
that
signature
signs
a
hash
of
the
boat
on
chain.
You
know,
so
the
only
way
to
generate
that
hash
on
the
voting
machine
is
by
voting
for
a
specific
proposal
id
from
a
specific
voter
within
a
specific
amount.
If
you
do
a
minimal
change
there,
the
hash
is
going
to
be
different
and
the
signature
won't
work.
F
F
If
we
would
use
ceramic
or
swarm,
it
would
be
just
one
signature
right.
Basically,
just
the
just
the
on-chain
signature
wait:
yeah
the
vote
itself.
The
signature
signature
would
be
stored
on
ceramic
or
swarm.
A
Exactly
on
ceramic
and
swamp,
I
mean
I,
I
think
the
best
the
best
thing
to
do
would
be
to
provide
like
a
check
box,
or
something
like
this.
Where,
where,
where
do
you
want
to
check
to
share
the
signature,
and
you
can
share
it
like
everywhere
are
or
only
in
one
place,
if
you
want
and
then
on
the
more
places
you
share
you
are
you
are
I
mean
you
know
that
is
going
to
be
available,
so.
D
A
F
A
public
database
verifiable
like
snapchat,
there's
an
amazon
server
and
the
voters
talk
to
the
amazon
servers
and
like
no
one
knows
about
what
exactly
is
going
on.
It's
pure
trust
on
snapshot,
servers.
A
Exactly
so
that
was
the
demo.
I
hope
you
like
it
and
we
are
going
to
be
improving
it.
Hopefully
a
lot
now
in
the
future
yeah.
The
idea
is
to
have
it
available
on
on
x-I
soon,
when
we
have
the
quick
quality
scheme
1.1
and
start
signing
messages
yeah
on
arbitrary
2.
This
will
be
available
on
arbitrary
because
we
are
using
the
dxe
voting
machine
there
too.
A
D
So
this
would
be
is,
is
this
correct
that
this
would
be
like
currently
we're
doing
a
few
proposals
on
mainnet,
and
then
we
mirror
on
xdi
to
like
do
a
separate
proposal
that
like
lets,
you
support
the
thing
that's
happening
on
mainnet,
but
then,
like
one
person
votes
on
mainnet.
So
if
we
had
an
important
proposal,
that's
gonna
be
on
mainnet.
We
could
once
this
is
on
mainnet.
We
could
get
everyone
to
sign.
I
mean
we
just
need
the
proposal
on
mainnet.
D
We
get
everyone
to
sign,
and
then
we
do
one
push
to
move
it
all
into
on
chain
vote
on
mainnet
and
then
it
passes,
and
then
that
allows
like
everyone
to
vote
cheaply
and
easily
on
mainnet.
A
Is
that
correct?
That
is
correct.
Yes,
in
fact,
we
can
reach
50
percent
of
votes
in
sign
in
sign,
voting
right
and
then
execute
that
50
all
at
once.
If
we
want
to
make
it,
it
will
be
very
expensive
right,
but
at
least
we
will
ensure
that
okay,
we
don't
have
like
we
don't
reach
49
percent
and
everyone
spend
their
money
voting
like.
We
only
spend
it
once.
We
are
sure
that
the
proposal
is
going
to
be
executed.
D
A
Yes,
yes,
yes,
but
at
least
you
are
sure
that
that,
for
example,
let's
say
that
you
need
20
people
to
sign
and
only
19
sign
and
everyone
like
spend
money
on
on
on
right.
D
G
A
Yeah
well,
yeah
yeah.
Actually
the
dxd
body
machine
supports
the
watch,
but
well
it
is
a
fork
of
chinese
protocol.
So
it's
not
optimized.
Yet
it
can
be
optimized
a
lot
and
hopefully
in
the
future.
We
are
going
to
be
spending
less
gas
on
this,
but
the
good
thing
they
are
again
that
let's
say
that
you
need
20
votes
and
19
and
you
have
90
and
that's
it.
The
proposal
finished
every
one
of
the
90
votes
spend
gas
on
it.
D
E
G
C
C
Yes,
obviously
the
best
option
is
always
going
to
be
like.
Oh,
if
we
could
get
everyone
to
vote
on
chain,
then
that's
great.
That's
like
the
best
option.
It's
the
most
secure
so.
D
G
G
But
like
optimistically,
this
would
only
happen
like
rarely
or
maybe
never
right.
It's
like
the.
C
G
I
would
agree,
I
would
say
it
is
better
than
what
we
are
currently
doing.
It
is
not
ideal,
though
right
because,
if
like,
where
are
those
signed,
votes
basically
is
like
when
you
actually
want
to
look
at
the
security
better.
D
G
I'm
comparing
it
to
running
to
like
what
we're
doing
where
we
have
an
important
proposal.
We
put
it
on
mainnet
and
then
we
also
put
it
on
xdi
to
make
sure
that
there's
like
better
signal,
which
is
pretty
easy.
Well,
that's
easy,
but
I
think
this
is
also
like
I
mean
from
the
voting
perspective.
You
would
just
because
you
don't
have
to
use
rink
be
right.
We
could
use
x
die
like
so.
It
would
be
like
the
very
similar
to
that
in
a
way
right,
and
you
could
do
it
with
one
proposal.
G
It
does
get
more
complicated
when
it
comes
to
what's
actually
getting
executed
on
chain,
but
I
guess
in
theory
the
ui
can
simplify
that.
But
again
it's
like
not
fully
secure
because
like
you're
well,
actually
you
know
if
you're
using
x
die
instead
of
ring
b.
Now
you
kind
of
get
the
security
of
x
die
and
then
you're
kind
of
just
relying
on.
G
C
Could
be
a
plug
for
federico's
thing
right
having
automated,
like
upgrading
of
the
volts
to
on
tune.
G
A
The
you
don't
want
yeah.
We
can
also
incentivize
the
the
execution,
the
execution
of
the
votes,
by
giving
a
very
small
reward
on
ether.
So
you
know
you
only
need
to
have
the
enough
gas
to
pay
the
cost
and
you're
going
to
end
up
with.
I
don't
know
like
five
dollars
of
ether
or
something
like
that.
Just
because
you
execute
a
vote.
C
F
Yeah,
like
we
could
use
gelato
to
schedule,
like
I
don't
know,
five
minutes
before
proposal
ending
like.
G
I
don't
actually,
I
don't
understand
the
importance
or
like
the
benefit
of
scheduling
here,
because
I
thought
the
idea
of
what
we're
talking
about
more
is
like
not
having
to
spend
like
the
main
reason
people
aren't
voting
on
midnight
is
the
cost
right.
So
I
think
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
get
people
to
show
their
votes
without
having
the
same
cost,
so
scheduling
you're.
Just
you
still
have
to
spend
the
money
right,
yeah.
F
That's
right,
like
I
kind
of
combined
like
lutzy's
keeper
network,
with
like
scheduling
over
like
at
the
end
of
the
day,
we
kind
of
don't
want
that
voters
pay
for
it
right.
Someone
else
should
pay
for
it
and
that's
probably
the
dick
store
well
like.
A
Guilt
so
here
he
here's
the
example.
Let's
say
that
you
have
five
proposals
on
maine,
one
is
from
john
one
is
from
hero.
One
is
from
me:
I
enter
on
mainnet.
I
select
two
pro.
I
select
shadow,
john
and
other
proportion
of
mine,
and
I
say
okay,
I'm
going
to
I
want
to
vote
for
for
all
of
them
and
share
and
only
share
the
vote,
only
sign
the
world
right.
A
I
do
it
and
I
share
four
symbols
for
the
pro
for
those
proposals
and
you
guys
do
the
same,
and
I
go
to
my
proposal
where
I'm
interested
and
I'm
like
I'm
interested
on
this
being
executed
and
I
execute
the
same
votes
there
right.
Okay,
that's
the
same
on
the
on
his
proportion
and
john
that's
the
same
one
on
their
proposal
and
you
enter
a
minute.
You
select
on
a
batch,
which
proposal.
Do
you
want
to
vote
or
you
do
the
votes?
A
Anyone
who
is
a
charity
on
the
only
proposal
or
who
is
keeping
the
doll
healthy,
is
going
to
be
executing
these
sign
boats,
and
we
are
already
doing
like
a
over
refund
right
on
maintenance
on
on
the
next
refund.
Dave
is
going
to
be.
We
are
going
to
doing
to
be
refunding
more
than
the
gas
cost
right.
A
A
So
we
have
four
boats
and
or
the
the
only
ones
that
are
going
to
no,
maybe
not
all
of
them
are
going
to
go
on
chain
which
is
going
to
end
up
with
me.
Spending
less
money
and
lately
and
later
have
to
wait
on
a
gas
refund
to
happen
so
that,
yes,
to
start
automating
that
to
spend
this
money
and
do
more
governance
actions.
A
A
Also
john,
for
example,
milton
luli,
I
know
new
new
developers,
maybe
they
they
don't
have,
maybe
they
don't
have
like
fives.
I
know
500
ether
to
pay
for
gas
transactions
right
so.
C
If
it
was
just
signing
yeah
and
most
people
we
see
from
like
even
from
asking
people
to
make
like
rep
syncs.
We
got
questions
like
that.
Isn't
voting
free
because
people
are
so
used
to
snapshot
even
when
it's
extra
amounts
of
money
like
a
tenth
of
a
cent.
They
still
are
like
questioning
why
they
need
to
pay
that,
just
because
they've
gotten
so
used
to
snapshot
yeah.
F
G
C
G
G
C
G
D
So
so
the
way
we're
doing
the
mirrors
is
a
really
good
way
to
already
get
that
extra
signal
like
it
doesn't
matter
that
it's
on
x
die
because
the
other
ones
are
on
rinkeby
right
and
all
you
do
is
have
one
person
vote
on
mainnet
to
pass
the
proposal,
and
then
we
already
do
the
signal,
which
is
very
easy
and
fun
on
xdi
and
that's
better
than
rinkaby.
So
it's
already
we're
already
solving
this
same
thing
that
we're
trying
to
solve
right
now.
C
D
D
That
is
then
a
good
system
that
is
more,
like
you
know,
safe
snaps,
where
everyone
signs
on
snapshot,
which
I
know
is
not
secure
but
then,
like
you,
don't
like
move
all
the
save
the
snapshot
votes
on
to
unchain
you
just
you
just
let
the
answer
like
do
one
action
on
chain
unless
it
gets
overwritten
or
something.
G
Yeah
and
what
you're
paying
for
on
chain
right
is,
is
you
know?
That's
why
we
have
gas
right
is:
is
for
the
computation,
so
if,
if
you're
doing
20
votes
all
at
once,
but
what
you're
actually
doing
on
chain
is
just
calling
the
vote
function
20
times
it's
like
the
same
computation
right
and
it's
going
to
be
like
roughly
the
same
cost.
G
D
Some
votes,
so
I
I
I'm
pretty
sure
the
way
you
do
that
and-
and
this
were
you
should
listen
to
this
starkware
podcast.
But
I
think,
if
you
use
starks,
you
can
basically
take
all
those
votes,
those
individual
votes
and,
like
condense
them
down
into
one
little
tiny
thing.
This
is
like
what
vitalik
always
talks
about,
and
then
you
use
that
to
put
that
thing
on
chain
and
it's
verifiable
that
that
little
tiny
thing
is
representing
and
it's
provable
representing
all
of
the
signatures.
D
Basically,
and
so
maybe
we
need
a
snark
expert,
but
I'm
pretty
sure
that
solves
that
problem,
even
though
I
don't
know
how
it
works.
G
A
A
D
G
Yeah,
I
think
what
sky
is
describing,
though
I
feel
like
that
should
be
possible
to
accomplish
with
some
kind
of
tech
and-
and
I
don't
know-
I
posted
a
blog
post
from
element
finance
on
how
they're
using
I
think
it
was
aztec.
Actually
they
weren't
using
it
for
votes,
but
they
were
talking
about
like
combining
transactions
and
kind
of
netting
them
out
right.
So
so,
like
you
want
to
take
like.
G
Basically,
what
you
want
to
commit
on
mainnet
is
simply
the
result
of
the
vote
right
and
you
want
to
actually
like
do
the
tallying
of
the
20
votes
somewhere
else,
but
it
needs
to
be.
You
know,
cryptographically
verifiable
and
that's
where
I
think
the
zk
comes
in,
but
I
don't.
I
don't
understand
that
so.
D
So
starkware
and
I
think
ross
you've
met
them.
I
introduced
you
to
them.
They
presented
at
the
taoist
at
in
lisbon,
and
they
presented
what's
called
stark
vote
and
stark
vote
is
basically
verifiable,
condensed
signature
snapshot,
voting
that
is
provable
and
cheap,
like
that
is
what
stark
vote
is
basically,
and
so
that
ties
in
really
well
with
with
what
we're
trying
to
do
here,
I
think
so.
G
They
have
a
product
that
they're
calling
stark
vote
yeah.
They
presented
it
in
lisbon
yeah
because
that
would
be
really
interesting
to
maybe
evaluate
like
I,
I
think,
we'll
probably
have
to
modify
the
actual
voting
machine
to
to
interact
with
that.
I
would
assume
yeah
yeah
100
yeah.
A
Yeah
yeah,
I
mean
that
can
be
done.
It's
just
america
to
your
votes
and
you
regenerate
the
signature
and
you
do
the
votes
for
all
the
signed
votes
in
the
market,
so
yeah
that
can
be
owned.
You
just
need
to
write
the
solidity
code
for
it,
which
implies
changing
the
dxe
body
machine
which
we
have
to
already
do,
because
we
need
to
so
very
interesting.
This
is
something
that
we
can
do
100
we
can
use
magnetic
for
boats
and
we
can
have
the
same
or
better
experience
than
a
snapshot
for
sure.
G
F
G
H
H
This
is
something
expected
so
just
looking
at
competitors
and
what
is
people
doing
here
on
other
projects
just
keeping
up
with
with
what
is
working
actually
and-
and
there
is
something
that
is
being
more
and
more
popular
right
now,
actually,
like
super
super
relevant
for
now-
and
it
is
this
kind
of
vested
tokens-
and
we
already
planned
that
so
I'm
taking
a
look
at
that
and
trying
to
find
at
least
like
three
people
that
could
be
advisors
to
us.
H
That
can
help
us
with
the
tokenomics
and
yeah
find
find
the
way
up
again
for
for
swapper
token
and
give
relevancy
to
it.
G
Yeah,
that's
great.
It
definitely
feels
undervalued
with
what
it's
it's
doing
price
wise.
So
it
would
be
interesting
to
play
with
some
other
options.
There
cool
yeah
running
out
of
time
here
on
carrot.
I
wanted
to
mention
briefly.
You
know,
I
think
the
three
campaigns
have
now
concluded.
I
haven't
looked
at
the
carrot
ui.
Yet
there
was,
I
don't
know
if
we
call
them
issues
per
se,
but
there
there
was
some
hiccups
on
the
agave
campaign.
G
So
one
of
the
things
and
part
of
this
is-
I
don't
know
you
know-
luigi-
is-
is
kind
of
his
own,
like
kind
of
freight
train
right
and
he
kind
of
went
ahead
and
did
everything
we
didn't
really
even
have
much
in
the
ways
of
of
discussions
ahead
of
what
they
were
doing
and
one
of
what
things
they
wanted
to
do
was
they're.
G
Getting
the
incentive
rewards
from
symmetric,
which
is
the
balancer
fork
on
x,
die,
slash,
nurse's
chain
now,
and
but
the
problem
was
since
they
had
deposited
their
lp
tokens
into
the
carrot.
Farming
campaign
symmetric
the
way
they're
distributing
their
incentives
is
to
like
airdrop
it
to
the
lp
token
holder.
So
they
airdrop
their
rewards
to
the
carrick
campaign
and
the
current
contracts
are
not
like
don't
support
like
removing
random
erc
20
tokens.
So
I
think
luigi
added
that
feature
in
a
pr.
It's
a
it's.
G
A
good
idea
to
have
you
know,
sort
of
an
oversight.
I
wouldn't
necessarily
say
like
totally
our
fault
there,
because
it
was
kind
of
using
it
out
of
how
we
had
initially
envisioned.
But
you
know
never
liked
to
see
anybody
losing
funds
there,
and
so
I
think
that'll
be
a
good
feature
to
add
and
then,
in
addition
to
that,
another
kind
of
there
was
a
little
bit
of
a
screw-up
in
how
the
agave
campaign
was
was
set
up
and
it
was
set
up
using
integer
representations.
G
I
think
of
the
the
range
which
I
mean
is
fine
on
the
smart
contract
level
as
long
as
the
oracle
reports
it
that
way,
and
I
think
the
assumption
was
made
that
reality
would
not
convert
integers
in
the
ui,
but
it
it
does
right.
So
so
the
result
of
that
was
that
the
carrick
campaign
actually
was
not.
You
know
in
reality,
was
not
successful.
I
think
the
average
like
tvl
and
agave
was
something
like
two
million,
but
the
oracle.
G
I
believe
I
haven't
actually
kind
of
looked
at
it
myself,
but
I
was
just
looking
at
what
luigi
and
federico
were
talking
about
it.
Didn't
it
resolved
it
as,
like
a,
I
think,
a
fully
successful
campaign.
G
So
now
anybody
who
is
farming
that
can
actually
go
and
redeem
their
carrots
for
the
full
rewards,
which
was
sort
of.
G
I
think
reality
basically
reported
like,
as
far
as
what
the
campaign
was
looking
at.
Reality
reported
something
like
yeah,
like
you
know,
10
to
the
16th
times
bigger
or
something
that's
bad
right.
So
so
it's
important
that,
like
the
way
format
is
used
when
you
create
these.
These
campaigns-
and
you
know
our
mode
of
operating
right
now-
is
to
to
be
helping.
D
Yeah
yeah,
I
think
one
good
next
step-
and
we
talked
about
this
briefly-
would
be
another
use
case
of
carrot
that
we
would
use
for
ourselves
and
we
should
take
some
money
and
we
could
do
a
proposal
for
this.
Put
it
into
like
longer
term
carrot
tokens
like
maybe
one
year
based
on
swapper
price
or
dxd
price,
maybe
swapper
price,
something
that's
reasonable,
like
25
cents
or
something
higher
than
where
it
is
for
like
one
year
and
or
maybe
a
range
and
gift
those
carat
tokens
to.
D
Maybe
everyone.
That's
used
carrot,
including
agave
people,
just
maybe
small
amounts
or
something,
but
some
carrot.
Gift
like
air
dropped
just
distributed
to
all
the
wallets
that
participated
just
as
a
kind
of
like
sign,
a
good
sign
of
good
faith
or
something
plus
another
interesting
use
case
of
carrot,
and
just
so
that
people
don't.
G
Yeah,
I
think
we
should
like
stocks
right.
This
is
like
a
customer
service
business
thing
right
like
we.
We
should
try
to
do
something
that
to
make
people
feel
like
at
least
they're
we're
acknowledging
the
you
know
where
things
didn't
work
out,
because
I
think
the
dx
style
campaigns
again,
I
haven't
looked
directly
but
not
aware
of
any
issues
with
them,
but,
of
course,
like
the
swapper
price,
one
was
very
far
from
being
successful
at
all,
so
people
weren't
getting
anything
from
that.
Another
feature
that
luigi
was
talking
about.
G
D
G
Yeah
yeah
exactly
like
the
way
we
were
using
it
like
that,
like
we
were
already
giving
out
swapper
rewards,
so
this
is
yeah.
I
mean
I
think
it's
an
interesting
feature,
though,
because
you
could
condense
it
a
little
bit
but
but
yeah
I
mean
you
can
accomplish
that
just
by
how
we
were
doing
it
with
them.
It
would
be
more
difficult,
though,
right
because
they
weren't
using
like
it's
easy
to
do
when
you
have
a
dual
reward
capability
like
we
do
with
swapper
farming.
G
But
if
you
don't
easily
have
that
accessible
then
it
might
not
be
I
don't
know.
Maybe
agave
could
have
done
dual
rewards
pretty
easily
through
their
ui.
I'm
not
sure.
G
But
yeah
I
mean
part
of
this
is
like
there's
issues
we
need
to
fix.
You
know
we
can
improve
this
part
of.
It
is
like
there
wasn't
a
lot
of
coordination
either,
like
I
think
you
know.
Maybe
we
could
have
avoided
someone
if
there
were
more
coordination,
but.
D
And
so
the
the
the
swapper
tvl
one
which,
if
you
go
to
carrick
campaign
like
it,
looks
really
nice
actually,
but
it
was.
It
was
settled
in
the
range
I'm
wondering
if
you
can
see
the
exact
number
that
it
settled
at.
I
don't
see
that,
but
it
says
that
it
was
partly
reached
and
31.06
percent
of
the
collateral
is
unlocked,
so
it
was
basically,
you
know,
probably
around
a
little
over
a
million.
The
range
was
800
000
to
1.5
million
and
it
settled
at
31.
D
D
D
G
D
G
D
We
should,
I
think,
we'll
write.
G
D
I'll
write
like
it
would
not
an
article,
but
a
forum
post
like
like
looking
back
at
our
two
campaigns
at
least
and
just
having
some
conclusions,
and
we
can
people
can
add
their
own
reform
and
stuff.
G
Yeah,
I
think
that's
a
great
idea.
It
should
be
something
somewhere
because,
like
it'll
show
that
we're
you
know
that
we're
evolving
this
and
learning
and
moving
along-
and
you
know,
there's
some
other
things
we
were
talking
about
on
the
swapper
call
yesterday
that
I
think
are
interesting
ideas
that
you
know
we
should
also
probably
be
talking
about
somewhere.