►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2021-05-26]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Welcome
to
geek
style
governance,
discussion
for
wednesday
may
26
1500
utc
time,
starting
first
with
the
proposal
roundup,
five
proposals,
boosted
or
pending,
boosting
on
mainnet.
There
are
two
deke
style
treasure
treasure,
diversification,
proposals,
one
to
usdc
and
one
to
die.
We
did
a
trade
on
monday,
I
think
for
susd
and
usdt
as
part
of
that
and
dave's
going
to
speak
to
some
things
on
on
treasury.
In
a
bit,
then
there's
a
proposal
to
transfer
funds
to
xdx
dow
for
the
dxd
buyback,
swapper
farming,
bowman
competition
and
opolis
reimbursement.
A
So
this
is
a
hundred
eth
transfer
to
be
split,
one-third
converted
to
die
and
then
both
bridged
over
and
deposited
into
xdx
dow.
This
is
kind
of
like
just
a
rebalancing
of
funds
partially
because
there's
been
some
expenses
on
xdi
that
depleted
it
most,
notably
the
the
the
opolis
grant
investment
was,
was
taken
out
so
needing
to
re-up
that
and
then
there's
a
good
amount
of
weft
that's
being
used
on
the
buyback,
so
this
is
meant
to
to
to
reimburse
xdi
base.
A
For
that
I
think
that'll
pass
in
six
days.
I
think
it's
next
monday
to
what
monday,
night
or
tuesday
evening,
and
it
would
be
good
to
get
those
funds
over
there
quickly,
because
there
are
a
good
amount
of
proposals
that
are
going
through
now
and
then
there's
roy's
worker
proposal
for
march
and
april,
and
then
the
open,
multi-call
installation
scheme
is
actually
set
to
pass
in
three
and
a
half
days.
So
this
is
the
one
that
would
allow
geeks
down
to
interact
with
any
arbitrary
smart
contract.
A
It
would
be
an
open
one,
but
there's
just
a
very
long
time
for
the
voting
period.
I
think
it's
16
days
or
18
days
around
that,
and
so
this
is
important
for
the
dx
yield
discussion
that
we'll
get
to
in
a
minute
there
and
that's
it
for
mainnet
any
thoughts,
questions
on
mainnet
proposals.
A
Cool
then,
moving
on
to
xdi
base
nine
proposals
boosted
our
pending
boosted,
hexel
and
adams
worker
proposal,
the
funding
proposal
for
xtxd
buyback
number
four
violet's
worker
proposal,
which
did
not
include
a
reference
to
a
german
disco
song
in
some
of
his
past
work
proposals.
But
I
look.
I
look
forward
to
recommendations
from
violet
in
there
in
the
future
and
then
there's
a
second
full
audit
for
this
swapper
farming
contract.
So
this
has
been
done.
A
The
firm,
I
think,
the
far
the
audit
I
think
was
actually
just
included
yesterday,
and
this
is
for
phil
there.
It's
also
a
request
in
usdc,
so
that's
using
some
of
the
usdc
that
was
bridged
over
in
the
last
xdi
based
transfer,
there's
replus
for
cabello
actually
two,
because
he
has
the
regular
rap
boost
and
then
a
discord,
rep
boost
and
the
rep
boost
for
luigi
lemon
and
then
there
is
the
add
tokens
to
omen
token
currency
list.
A
I
think
that
adds
the
west
and
wbtc
tokens
as
collateral
in
in
omen.
I
think
this
would
be
really
important
for
the
the
flipping
markets
that
the
omen
squad
is
working
on
so
wanting
to
have
good
liquidity
in
die,
west
and
wbtc
as
collateral
as
a
way
of
of
for
these
markets,
and
so
that's
a
proposal
to
add
them
as
collateral
there.
A
And
then
there
is
a
just
recently
boosted,
xtxt
buyback
order,
number
four
that
yeah
will
boost,
hopefully
at
the
next
day,
and
then
I
was
open
for
voting
for
for
four
days.
So
those
are
the
current
ones.
I'm
gonna
go
through
buy
back
stuff
in
a
second
and
do
actually
a
little
bit
of
a
demo,
but
any
thoughts
on
other
xdi
proposals
or
any
outstanding
proposals.
A
Cool
and
then
just
for
the
buyback
just
to
kind
of
do
a
check-in,
so
we
have
there's
been
three
orders
that
have
been
placed
on
gp
protocol
through
the
buyback,
so
the
first
one
was.
I
think
it
was
nine
days
ago.
It
have
been
like
the
friday
before
the
last.
A
That
was
the
one
that
was
at
50
percent
and
that
acquired,
I
think
it
was
85
or
90
dxd,
and
so
that
was
the
first
one
and
then
buyback
order,
number
two
was
executed
and
order
placed
on
sunday
and
then
buyback
order.
Number
three
was
actually
just
executed
in
place
yesterday.
A
So
right
now,
if
you
look
on
mesa,
you
can
see
like
the
order
book,
there's
a
bid,
for
I
think
it's
like
124
dxd
at
0.1101
wef
or
something
like
that,
and
then
there's
also
a
bid
at
0.98
west
and
that's
the
0.98.
Wef
is
buyback
order.
Number
two
and
the
0.110
wef
is
buyback
order
number
three
and
then
we
have
the
the
buyback
order.
A
Number
four
is
proposal
has
just
been
just
been
submitted,
and
these
are
all
on
xdi
mainnet
was
we
had
a
little
bit
of
a
snag
because
we
actually
couldn't
we
installed
the
new
multi-call
scheme
in
order
to
be
able
to
interact
with
the
gp
relayer
on
mainnet,
but
the
new
scheme
actually
wasn't
showing
up
in
alchemy,
but
I
think
that
has
been
fixed
yeah.
That
was
actually.
C
A
And
then
I
wanted
to
go
over
like
a
quick
demo
of
basically
like
how
you
know
this
works,
and
this
is
it's
really
kind
of
a
really
cool
way
of
of
doing
this,
and
I
think
it's
some
really
cool
things
being
done,
because
I
think
there
was
a
someone
in
the
chat.
A
I
can't
remember
if
it
was
significant,
I
think
was
talking
about
the
or
he
noticed
the
order
of
the
proposal,
and
he
asked
the
question
like:
can
anyone
sabotage
these
proposals
right
and
I
think
it's
a
cool
way
that
that
this
relay
has
been
been
built
and
so
nico
is
doing?
All
this
work
is
like.
The
whole
point
is
like
you.
Basically,
you
can't
sabotage
it
in
a
certain
way.
You
just
like.
A
Maybe
like
don't
succeed
on
it
right,
you
you,
you
have
to
fill,
you
have
to
call
the
certain
things
in
a
certain
order,
but
it's
meant
to
be,
I
guess
like
un,
un
or
anti-fragile
in
a
way.
So
anyway,
I
just
wanted
to
share
my
screen
to
go
through
how
to
execute
this.
I'm
gonna
put
this
in
a
guide
later,
but
I
talked
to
nico
this
morning,
so
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
go
over
it
on
the
call
here
and
see
if
there's
okay.
A
So
this
is
a
order
number
four,
so
you
can
see
this
one
will
boost
in
21
hours.
So
if
someone
wants
to,
if
we
want
to
execute
this
order,
so
let's
say
the
proposal
is
passed
and
we
want
to.
We
want
to
be
able
to
place
these
orders
on
gp
relayer.
Anyone
should
be
able
to
do
it,
so
the
the
first
thing
you
need
to
do
is
actually
execute
the
funding
proposal.
A
First,
so
that's
not
this
order,
but
if
it
was,
there
would
be
a
little
thing
at
the
the
top
and
just
simply
executed,
and
that
will
actually
send
the
weft
to
the
gp
layer
and
then
the
second
thing
would
be
to
once.
That's
done
once
the
weft
is
in
the
gpu
layer
is
then
to
execute
this
proposal
right.
So
both
of
those
are
done
through
alchemy.
A
You
just
execute
the
proposals
through
the
little
blue
button
that
will
appear
at
the
top
here
and
then
next
you
go
to
the
gnosis
protocol
relay,
and
so
that's
just
the
link
in
this
right
here,
and
so
this
is
block
scout.
So
this
is
the
gnosis
protocol.
Relayer
0xa369
grow
to
know
that
and
love
it,
and
so
what
we
want
to
do
next
is
find
the
order
index
number.
So
the
multi-call
scheme
proposal
basically
interact
with
this
relayer,
but
you
actually
can't
see
the
transaction
on
this
screen.
A
It's
actually
kind
of
like
an
internal
transaction,
so
the
easiest
place
to
look
at
to
find
the
order
index
number
is
under
the
logs
point
right
here
so
logs.
This
is
like
the
the
interactions
with
the
with
the
gnosis
protocol,
relayer
and
you'll
notice.
This
is
for
each
order.
A
There's
the
proposal
execution
right
here
and
then
the
second
one
is
the
place
trade
right.
So
this
transaction
right
here
is
actually
the
transaction
that
executed
the
proposal
on
alchemy
and
it'll
appear.
It
should
appear
as
the
top
one
on
the
logs
right
here
and
what
we're
looking
for
is
the
number
three
right
here.
So
this
order
index
number
three,
because
this
is
actually
the
fourth
order.
A
So
now
that
we
have
number
three
we
wanna
go
over
to
well,
first,
actually
you
can.
You
can
check
to
make
sure
this
is
the
right
order
in
the
in
the
read
contract
area
here,
because
you
can
get
the
order
details
so
right
here,
three
and
then
right.
A
This
stuff
is
the
is
the
same
as
the
all
of
these
parameters
are
the
same
parameters
right
here
that
were
outlined
there
and
then
so
we
know
it's
order,
number
three,
and
so
now
we
want
to
basically
place
order
number
three
onto
the
noses
protocol
itself,
and
so
in
order
to
do
that,
we
have
to
go
over
to
write
contract
connect
and
we
need
to
there's
two
functions.
We
need
to
call
the
first.
A
A
And
then
we
would
wait
120
seconds
for
that
transaction
to
go,
because
what
it's
doing
is
it's
taking
the
average
price
over
that
two
minutes
and
it's
using
that
as
basically
the
oracle
price.
So
once
you've
done
two
transactions
of
number
nine
update
oracle
120
seconds
in
between,
then
you
take
the
same
number
and
you
put
it
in
this
one
number,
seven
three
and
then
just
press
right
again
and
then
that
will
actually
place
the
trade
itself
so
really
kind
of
three
key
steps.
A
One
get
the
order
index
number
and
that's
on
the
logs
component
of
the
gnosis
protocol
relayer.
It
should
be
the
top
transaction
right.
It
should
be
probably
this
one
and
if
you
look
at
it
it
should
be
yeah
it'll
have
the
information
right
here.
So
you
take
the
order
index
and
then
second,
you
put
that
in
the
number
nine
they
get
oracle
and
you
call
that
twice
after
120
seconds
and
then
third,
you
take
the
same
order
index
and
you
put
it
into
the
seven
place
trade
and
then
do
the
transaction.
A
I
think
that
was
correct.
I
don't
know
if
john
nico
can't
be
couldn't
make
it,
but
I
talked
to
him
before
that,
so
I
was
trying
to
to
echo
him
as
much
as
possible,
but
any
questions
or
thoughts
on
on
that.
D
And
after
all
those
steps,
I
think
the
person
who
wants
to
actually
profit
out
of
it
somehow
should
also
also
prepare
or
like
check
out
how
to
use
mesa
they
just
they
can
just
go
to
meter.edu
link
and
deposit
dxd
if
they
actually
want
to
sell
and
yeah.
C
C
C
D
A
Yeah
and
it,
I
think,
it's
kind
of
interesting
how
the
orders
are.
You
know
how
this
it's
basically
like:
how
do
we
place
orders
for
dxd
through
a
proposal
process
right
and
like
as
a
result
of
that
it
kind
of
creates
this
whole
structure
there.
So
it's
a
cool
cool
thing
that
we
should
yeah
highlight.
I
guess
we
we
have
not
wanted
to
like
tweet.
You
know,
there's
a
big
we're
selling
we're,
sell
your
dxd
or
something,
but
I
think
we're
like
we
have
to
figure
out.
D
Also,
it's
fine
that
it's
like
a
just
like
a
community-wide
know-how
right
like
as
long
as
the
community
is
making
sure
that
the
geek
star
is
doing
the
diversification
and,
at
the
end,
at
the
end
of
the
day.
I
would
bet
that,
like
it's
a
win-win
for
everyone,
I
think
the
the
premium
is
it's
pretty
low.
D
I
think
it
will
take
us
a
lot
of
time
to
actually
get
the
1
million
usd
in
dxd
back,
but
as
long
as
we
do
it
like
not
quietly
but
like
calmly
and
just
pushing
limit
orders
in
all
the
time,
I
think
we
will
yeah.
It
will
take
a
time,
but
I
I
already
it
looks
like
dxd
is
actually
appreciating
and
most
of
the
limit
orders
are
are
not
getting
filled
right
now.
E
Yeah
a
couple
a
couple
interesting
things
on
that
is
so
gnosis
you
know
in
the
past
has
done
what
we're
kind
of
describing.
I
think
they
were
doing
it
more
for
testing
purposes,
but
they
were
putting
like
orders
out
there
into
like
the
mesa
world
at
like
at
prices
that
made
arbs
possible.
So
it
was
attracting
community
to
come
and
use
the
system
in
order
to
like
take
advantage
of
those
arms
so
like
we're
doing
that
in
a
in
a
real
way,
now
not
a
testing
way,
but
you
have
to
have
that
well.
E
That
incentive
is
what
creates
the
pull
for
the
community
to
come
in
and
use
it
and
take
advantage
of
that
that
opportunity
and
then
secondly,
it's
interesting
that
it's
like
it
also
is
like
is
similar
and
it
like
looks
a
lot
like
member
balancer
with
maybe
a
more
attractive
premium
if,
depending
on
what
the
premium
is
at
the
time,
but
it's
a
it's
like
well,
I
guess
over
time,
we'll
learn
what
that
premium
is,
that
is
that
attracts
people
and
that
that
actually,
that
premium
could
be
used
as
knowledge
in
in
additional
programs.
D
Yeah,
I
think
dc
is
just
not
liquid
enough
to
to
make
those
limit
orders
filled
quickly.
I
think
just
like
those
small
orders
from
the
dx
now
trigger
like
a
big
slippage
on
on
main
net
one
inch
or
swapper
on
next
die,
so
I
think
yeah
either
we
increase
the
premium
or
we
just
do
like
the
slow
process
and
wait.
D
There
are
arbitrage
opportunities
and,
like
my
last
question,
is
how
long
will
those
limit
orders
stay
on
the
autobook.
C
Know
yeah,
I
actually
pulled
it
up,
probably
just
down
here
and
see
if
this
works.
You
all
can
see
this,
so
I
actually.
C
Book
open
on
the
x
diagnosis
protocol,
the
weft
dxd,
and
can
you
see
if
I
hover
over
it?
Can
you
see
the
pop-ups
yeah?
C
So
there's
there's
basically
two
live
orders
here
right,
so
you
can
see
the
higher
priced
one
with
a
bit
of
point,
one
one
such
on
and
so
forth,
with
per
txd
with
a
volume
of
124,
and
then
this
is
counting
the
volume
cumulatively.
I
think
here.
So
it's
like
another
109
at
this
lower
price.
So
I
think
this
was
the
second
order
that
went
through
from
the
buyback
pros-
and
this
is
the
third
one
I
think-
and
I.
C
I
think
maybe
it
was
actually
like
luigi
lemon,
I
think,
maybe
sold
a
couple
of
of
txt
messing
around
with
it
yeah
and
so
like
I'll.
Just
close
out
this
real
quick
just
too
so
people
see
it's
important
that
you
actually
connect
to
xda
to
to
actually
be
able
to
see
it.
And
then,
when
you
go
in
here,
you
actually
have
to
paste
the
dxd
address,
which,
if
you
don't
know
it,
you
can
get
it
from
dx
stats.
C
You
can
go
to
block
scout
and
just
like
search
for
dxd
and
then
you
gotta
paste
the
dxt
address
in
there
you'll
get
the
the
token
ticker
comes
up,
and
then
you
can
see
the
order
book
by
clicking
on
this
link
over
here.
D
A
I
C
It
should
persist,
I
think,
on
that
browser,
but
yeah
we
could
be
good
if
we
add
txt
to
our
own.
That
makes
sense.
J
D
A
Yes,
I
can,
I
think
I
can
figure
that
out.
I
it's
very
difficult,
but
you
can
look
on
the
yeah
yeah.
You
look.
C
A
A
To
say
it's
actually
120,
so
basically,
I
think
there
were
11
bought
out
of
that
first
order
and
then,
like
12,
bought
out
of
the
second
order,
oh
interesting,
because
that
one
was
first
at
like
135
or
something
I
noticed.
So
I
think
I'm
a
little
bit
different
than
people.
I
don't
really
think
these
need
to
get
filled
immediately.
A
I
think
it's
kind
of
more
about,
like
the
dow,
like
showing
support
for
like
dxd
and
in
all
honesty
like
dc,
should
not
drop
below
the
price
anymore,
because
there's
the
support,
like
I
mean
what
happens,
is
we
don't
have
enough
bid
on
dxd,
which
means
like
people
go
to
sell,
dxd
and
then
like
the
price
just
drops.
But
if
people
like
go
to
sell
dxd
in
the
future
like
these
orders
are
still
gonna
be
there.
So
then
the
arbitrage
opportunity
will
be
even
larger
right
and
so,
like.
A
I
guess,
like
I
kind
of
think,
we're
pushing
up
the
price
of
dxd
and
then
like
buying
them.
You
know
the
the
community
is
coming
in
for
arbitrage
opportunities
like
when
they
are
necessary,
but
I
I
don't
see
the
like
impetus
to
like
fill
these
immediately
capital.
There
is
a
capital
efficiency
loss
right,
which
is
basically
like
we
have
west
sitting
on
an
order
book
and
that
wealth
could
be
better
spent
elsewhere,
but,
like
we
have
a
lot
of
eth.
So
I
don't
think
that
is
that
much
of
a
lost
opportunity
cost.
D
C
I
mean
in
fact
like
half
of
these
should
be
getting
filled
if
people
were
watching
it,
and
I
think
that
kind
of
actually
brings
brings
me
to
my
other
point
here,
which
is,
I
think,
if,
if
people
actually
were
aware
of
how
to
do
this,
we
wouldn't
see
the
orders
sitting
around,
because
when
they're
placed
there
is
an
arbitrage
opportunity,
unless
the
the
price
happens,
to
move
very
quickly
like
on
on
swapper
in
that
time.
Right
so
like
once
once
people
like
once,
you
have
arbitrage
like
actually
watching
for
this.
D
I
I
don't
think
the
deal
is
actually
pretty
good.
I
think,
like
immediately
after
the
order
is
placed,
there
is
a
premium,
but
this
is
a
quickly
arbitraged
away
and
then
it's
you're
actually
pushing
the
prices
up
on
on,
swap
on
x,
die
and
then
it's
like
pretty
quickly
gone.
You
just
eat
up
the
premium.
A
What
is
this
yeah?
It's,
so
you
can,
you
could
buy
one
each
of
dxd
for
10.
for
0.106
on
swapper
x
die
right
now,
and
then
you
could
sell
that
right.
So
I
mean
calculate
that
like
0.004,
what
the
opportunity
is
like,
I
guess
we
kind
of
like
I
mean
as
a
doubt.
I
don't
think
we
should
like
we
kind
of
have
to
just
set
this
as
like
a
set
the
incentives
right
and,
like
trust
that
we
can
figure
out
how
to
like
that
they
will
be
met.
A
So
each
each
order
has
a
as
an
end
date,
and
so
you
can
see
like
what
they're
in
the
original
proposal
itself.
So
I
think,
for
I
can't
remember
exactly
what
the
date
was
put
for
those,
but
it's
like
10
days
or
so.
A
Yeah,
so
this
one
will
go
the
order
number
three:
that's
there
is
actually
only
gonna
be
there
for
five
more
days.
A
So-
and
I
had
I
haven't
put
any
so
I
did
that
no
number
four
and
I
think
I
did
it
till
like
10
or
11
days,
but
I
guess
that's.
The
question
is
like:
how
long
should
these
orders
be
open,
for
I
was
kind
of
thinking
that
we'd
want
to
be
able
to
like
adjust
the
orders
automatically
right
and
so,
if
they
just
if
they
fall,
then
then
like
we
could.
We
could
withdraw
it
back
and
then
put
a
new
order
in.
A
A
I
think
if
you
like,
the
more
we
recycle,
the
more
it's
like
we're,
getting
like
the
fresh
market
price
and,
like
I
mean
obviously
like
a
key
component
of
this,
is
like
being
able
to
acquire
dxd,
but
part
of
it
is
like
the
price
may
go
up,
even
if
they're,
not
even
if
they're
not
being
acquired
from
it.
But
I
just
think
more
limit
orders
is
the
answer,
because
there's
the
the
opportunity
cost
of
us
putting
limit
orders
is
like
very,
very
small.
You
know,
especially
next
time
when
there's
like
literally
no
gas
cost.
D
A
And
then,
if
someone
goes
like,
I
mean
because
this
is
what
has
even
happened.
The
last
like
two
months,
basically
like
someone,
a
big
dxc
holder,
is
just
like
selling
a
bunch
and
that's
like
someone
and
they're
like
typically,
they
don't
they're,
not
engaged
with
the
project.
They
don't
know
anything
they're.
Just
like
hitting
a
you
know,
market
sell
on
on
unisop
or
something
so
that
will
like
drop
the
price.
A
C
J
C
D
Trying
to
get
back
the
dxd
or
is
it
like
support
for
the
price.
A
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think,
it's
a
great
question.
I
don't
know,
I
think
we
could
move
towards
aggressive
of
like
oh,
we
want
to
acquire
this
now.
Then
we
would
obviously
increase
the
price,
and
so
then
maybe
we
would
like
actually
have
a
lower,
have
a
higher
cost
of
acquisition
or
purchase,
as
opposed
to
like.
C
Yeah,
I
guess
you
could
make
an
argument
that
that,
like
the
2.5
could
be
increased,
especially
given,
like
you
know,
the
amount
of
slippage
with
the
current
levels
of
liquidity
on
chain.
If
it's,
if
it's
kind
of
about
like
creating
a
proper
arbitrage
opportunity,.
A
So
there
is
a
good-
and
this
is
a
really
key
point-
keenan
question:
the
volume
is
the
number
of
or
the
the
volume
increase,
so
I
have
been
tracking
the
volume
increase
and
unfortunately,
we
have
not.
We've
been
like
the
last
week
has
been
good,
but
we
have
not
increased
it
that
much
and
that's
mostly
because
the
last
couple
months
were
not
very
low
volume,
but
the
last
week
has
seen
an
increase
in
volume,
but
it
has
not
materially
affected
the
average
daily
trading
volume.
C
D
Cool
yeah,
so
I
think
we
should
think
about
increased
premium
to
at
least
get
like
at
least
get
some
portion
of
the
plan
by
a
buyback
like
back,
and
then
we
could
do
like
the
slower
mode
just
to
make
sure
that
we
actually
like
buying
back
dxd.
D
It
yeah,
maybe
we
should
like
drive
with
that
for
at
least
a
month
and
see
if,
if
there
are
like
any
actions
going
on
and
then
we
we
should
probably
adjust.
A
Size
of
the
that
says,
the
arab
opportunity
is
related
to
the
slippage
you
can
get
on
the
order
right.
So
that's
kind
of
related.
E
E
If
these,
if
these
orders
like
start
to
kind
of
sit
out
there
and
create
this
like
rough,
like
floating
floor
level
and
obviously
that
will
slowly
go
up
and
like
move
up
and
down
over
time
at
the
same
time,
could
we
just
say
to
the
public
like
dx
dao
is
willing
to
buy
back
like
dxd
at
point
one
two
e
like
send
as
much
as
you
want
to
the
dow
and
do
a
proposal
and
request
these.
E
E
You
can
do
way
more,
it's
way
more,
it's
way
easier,
it's
you
could
do
massive
volume
and
it
you
could
do.
You
could
do
unlimited
amounts
at
that
price
without
doing
any
of
this
stuff.
A
Just
because
I
just
calculated
it
in
the
gnosis
protocol,
so
there's
been
105,
dxd,
acquired
and
so
like
at
current
prices.
That's
like
30,
30
000.
and
that's
that's
through
yeah.
I
think
there
was
like
80
85
in
that
first
order
and
then
there's
been
like
10
on
each
of
the
second
or
the
second
and
third
order,
which
still
is
like
an
opportunity
for
like
10
or
15
dxd
right
now,
as
an
arb.
C
C
Also,
gas
costs
right
and
and
there's
like
a
couple
dimensions
to
that
right:
there's
the
gas
costs
of
making
the
arb
trades
and
then
actually
depositing
or
whatever
into
mesa
or
hypnosis
protocol,
and
there's
also
the
overhead
cost
of
doing
the
proposals
for
dx
tower,
which
doesn't
necessarily
affect
the
trader.
But
it
I
mean,
I
think
we
should
think
about
it,
because
it's
if
you're
yeah,
it's
part
of
the
cost
of
doing
the
trade.
So.
A
A
C
Yeah,
I
think
it'd
be
interesting
to
see
how
this
continues
to
play
out
over
the
next
couple
weeks,
with
like
one
on
another
or
more.
Maybe
the
another
concept
that
has
been
discussed
a
bit
would
be
building
and
deploying
a
swap
another
swapper
wheeler,
not
a
liquidity
relay,
but
like
a
trading
relayer.
That
could
let
this
happen
actually
directly
as
a
market
by
on
swapper,
which
I
think
could
become
interesting,
especially
if
liquidity
conditions
are
improving.
A
Cool
all
right.
Well,
I
want
to
keep
moving
because
we
actually
do
have
a
bunch
of
other
things,
but
this
is
any
other
thoughts.
Questions
on
this
buyback
number
four
proposals
up
on
xdi
there
so
have
a
look
verify
and
then
we'll
we'll
try
to
keep
keep
cranking
these
out.
I
Yeah
just
quick
comment:
I
think
we
should
circle
back.
I
know
we're
already
planning
on
it,
but
making
sure
we
get
the
community
informed.
Asap,
I
think,
would
be
good.
A
A
Okay,
all
right
and
then
dx
yield
switching
closest
to.
K
L
L
Now
exactly
that
summed
up
to
5
million
usd
and
stable
coins
and
1
000
in
ether,
and
alongside
that,
we
also
had
like
three
pre-authorized
protocols,
so
to
speak
so
compound
other
and
yearn,
and
so
I
just
really
prepared
a
rough
draft
which
I
published
on
dow
talk
this
morning
with
a
potential
way
of
allocating
these
funds
among
the
three
platforms
and
kind
of
keeping
in
mind
that
we
don't
want
to
go
all
in
on
one
protocol,
and
we
want
to,
of
course
also
invest
a
certain
diversified
set
of
stable
coins.
L
So
the
four
we
have,
of
course
and
yeah.
This
is
also
dependent
still
on
the
multi-core
installation,
which
chris
already
mentioned
before,
and
I
believe
we'll
also
need
a
re-layer,
then
to
be
able
to
actually
interact
with
these
protocols
directly.
L
So
we're
still
not
able
to
do
this
yet,
but
I
just
wanted
to
lay
down
a
bit
the
framework,
so
we're
ready
to
go
as
soon
as
the
tech
stuff
is
up
and
running
and
yeah.
If
anyone
has
any
feedback,
please
feel
free
to
just
drop
it
in
the
in
the
forum.
You
know
highly
appreciate
it.
I
saw
nathan
already
proposed
another
yielding
protocol,
so
to
speak.
So
that's
also
nice.
L
These
would
likely
have
would
have
to
be
approved
in
another
signal
proposal
so
likely
not
eligible
for
this
round,
but
for
any
future
allocation.
We
do.
We
can
take
a
look
at
other
protocols
as
well,
so
yeah,
that's
pretty
much
it
from
my
side
in
terms
to
dx
yield
yeah.
A
Cool,
I
think
it's
a
great
prime
to
just
get
the
spray
kind
of
spray
approach.
It's
just
important
to
put
it
diversify
risk
in
a
couple
different
areas.
You
know
we
traverse
our
risk
and
the
number
of
stable
coins,
different
types
of
stable
ones,
we're
holding
and
we
also
diversified
it
and
where
those
ones
are
are
doing
so.
It's
nice
to
see
that
the
plan
laid
out
there
exactly.
L
And
talking
about
the
yield,
which
is
actually
the
main
attraction
of
dx,
yield
right,
so
the
first
five
million.
Of
course,
the
rates
change,
24
7,
you
know
being
in
crypto,
but
taking
the
30-day
average
ap
wise
of
the
past
30
days
with
the
5
million
allocated
it
comes
out
to
around,
like
55
000
a
month
more
or
less,
which
is
already
a
significant
part
of
our
burn
rate
as
well.
So
it
will
of
course,
be
nice
to
be
able
to
subsidize
that
somewhat
by
these
yields
we
get.
A
Yeah,
I'm
just
so
just
think.
Six
months
from
now,
it's
like
monthly
we're
going
to
have
like
revenue
and
yield
itself
are
going
to
pay
like
the
burn
right
like
it's
a
it's
a
I
don't
know
we're
just
we're
in
a
good
spot,
and
this
is
a
key
component.
I
think
of
like
the
long-term
sustainability
is
to
have
that
that
security
in
in
these
stable
coin
yielding
assets
that
gives
us
the
flexibility
in
a
whole
bunch
of
other
areas.
C
D
C
Generally
yield,
you
know,
correlate
you
know
the
higher
the
yield
it
correlates
with
risk.
Generally
speaking,
and
I
think
you
can
see
that
in
these
protocols
right
like
in
general,
there's
you
always
have
the
smart
contractors,
then
sometimes
there's
like
additional
protocol
risk
right
so
like
some
of
the
strategies
that
require
might
be
deploying
they
might
magnify
your
smart
contract
risk
by
using
you
know
four
protocols
chained
together,
you
may
also
introduce
other
kinds
of
risks.
C
Like
you
know,
if
curve
is
one
of
the
yield
generation
strategies
and
you're
using
a
stable
coin
pool
and
curve,
if
what
something
happens
to
one
of
those
stable
coins,
it
drastically
depends
like
if
usdt
were
to
just
fall
to
40
or
something
that
would
cause
drastic
losses
in
that
curve
pool.
So,
like
you
know,
there's
different
risks
that
you're
taking
on
by
using
these
and
like,
but
yeah.
C
To
the
yield
compound,
I
would
describe
that
as
probably
the
closest
thing
to
a
risk
free
rate
in
crypto.
It's
a
really
tried
and
true
platform.
That's
not
doing
anything
too
fancy!
It's
just
lending
it
up
right!
There's!
No
additional
smart
contract
risks
beyond
compound
protocol
itself,
which
has
been
around
for
a
while.
It
was
developed
by
a
very
capable
and
one-night
team
right.
So
it's
a
pretty
sturdy
like
relatively
raw
risk,
yeah
kind
of
goes
on
from
there.
L
Yeah
absolutely-
and
I
think
also
for
this
first
initial
draft-
we
would
really
just
use
compound
ava
and
wire,
which
were
part
of
the
proposals
right,
but
as
we
look
into
other
options,
these
likely
become,
you
know,
have
less
total
amounts
in
there
and
higher
returns.
L
It
would
be
great
to
also
get
some
technical
feedback
on
the
project
right,
maybe,
as
you
said,
like
someone
who's
an
expert
in
auditing
or
something
to
be
able
to
assess
these
risks
better
as
well,
because
of
course,
technically
speaking,
I
also-
and
I
am
not
able
to
really
give
an
opinion
on
that.
C
Yeah
definitely-
and
I
also
think
it
makes
sense
to
have
a
you
know-
there's
a
lot
of
attractive
yield
opportunities
with
stable
clients
and
crypto,
but
if
you're
looking
at
the
treasury,
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
be
fairly
conservative
with
the
stable
assets
of
the
treasury,
because
kind
of
the
point
of
those
is
to
secure
that
much
further.
D
C
M
D
So
like
I
think
that
is
already
like
a
a
beautiful
like
advertisement,
opportunity
for
us
to
the
d
stars,
pushing
liquidity
into
into
those
yield
yield
protocols,
and
it's
definitely
like
longer
term
right.
I
don't
expect
that
the
geek
star
will
move
move
that
stuff
out
anytime
soon.
C
A
I
do
think
the
risk-free
rate
in
crypto
may
be
the
die
savings
right
rather
than
compound,
but
unfortunately
the
dice
savings
rate
is
0.01
right
now,
so
not
much
yield
opportunity.
There
yeah.
C
C
C
A
Yeah,
okay,
all
right!
Next
up,
sorry,
I've
got
this
mainnet
rep
award
process,
so
I
just
want
to
kind
of
quickly
go
through
this
and
get
some
feedback.
I
made
a
post
in
the
forum
about
how
to
try
to
move
forward
with
contributors
claiming
their
main
net
rep.
A
I
don't
know
what
the
gas
prices
were
this
morning,
I
think
I
saw
like
a
20
28,
29
gray,
so
gas
is
really
kind
of
low,
and
so
all
I
really
did
there
was
maybe
layout
some
suggestions
for
what
people
would
need
to
do
to
claim
this.
I
don't
think
we
need
a
separate
proposal
because,
like
this
rep
has
already
been
earned.
A
It's
already
been
like
kind
of
even
like
ratified
by
rep
holders
on
xdi,
so
it
is
kind
of
closer
to
a
sink,
but
it
was
just
maybe
a
suggestion
of
some
of
the
things
to
include
in
your
proposal.
I
think
the
biggest
thing
basically
including
the
links
to
the
xdi
proposals
and
using
the
rep
amounts
from
that
for
the
entire
for
your
proposal
and
the
suggestion
to
wait
until
you
have
three
months
of
unearned
rep
to
be
able
to
do
it
so
that
we
can
batch
those
three
months
together.
A
I
think
a
lot
of
people
are
gonna
have
three
months
and
if
they
don't
have
that
now,
they'll
have
it
in.
You
know
five
days
as
we
get
to
the
end
of
the
month
here,
but
that
should
be
a
big
kind
of
rep
award,
a
rep
distribution
that
we've
been
missing
for
a
while
on
mainnet.
So
I
think
we
can
move
forward
that
any
thoughts
or
comments
on
maybe
best
practices
for
doing
this.
This
rep
sync.
I
I
guess
one
thought
I
had
is,
if
we're
doing
like
a
three
month,
rep
sync,
but
our
contracts
are
kind
of
two
months
and
we
don't
request
them
up
to
the
end
of
each
second
month.
Should
we
be
doing
like
every
four
months
three
times
a
year,
maybe.
A
Yeah,
that's
a
little.
I
guess
it's
cleaner
to
have
the
rep
that
you're
requesting
on
mainnet.
That
is
like
you're,
claiming
it
to
be
rep
that
you
have
like
already
earned
in
a
proposal
from
xdi
rather
than
like
you
claiming
your
may.
You
know
rep
award
through
mainnet,
so,
like
I
don't
know,
I
see
it
seems
it
would
be
easier
if
you're
referencing
x-type
proposals
that
have
had
issued
rep,
but
I
don't
know
how
others
think
sky.
I
know
you
had
some
thoughts
on
this.
E
Yeah
I
raised
the
same
question
the
so
there's
two
ways
to
solve
it.
You
could
right
now
when
we
do
two
month
proposals
on
x
die.
We
normally
get
the
rep
at
the
end.
If
you
take
half
the
rep
in
the
first
month
and
half
the
rep
of
the
second
month
that
solves
the
two-month
problem
right,
then
you
actually
get
rep
in
a
more
spread
out
basis,
rather
than
just
wait
till
the
end
of
the
two
months.
So
you
can
either
do
that
at
the
beginning.
E
Historically,
we
had
always
just
done
it
after
the
full
two
months,
because
what,
if
you
give
someone
rep
and
then
like
at
the
start
of
their
worker
proposal,
and
then
they
don't
do
anything,
then
they
already
have
the
rep
right,
so
we're
giving
them
half
the
payment,
but
we
weren't
giving
them
half
the
rep.
But
some
people
have
changed
that
so
they're
asking
for
in
the
first
proposal,
the
half,
the
payment
and
half
the
rep
and
at
the
end
they
get
the
other
half
of
the
payment
and
half
the
rep.
E
E
A
And
I
think
this
will
be
it'll
like
depend
on
the
person,
and
I
think
melanie
myself
and
I
would
be
happy
to
help
through
this
because,
like
for
instance,
I'm
about
to
do
my
work,
a
recap
and
that
will
be
like
the
next
like
I'll.
Do
that
proposal
for
may
and
I'm
just
gonna
wait
until
that
proposal
passes
to
then
claim
that
but
that'll.
A
So
that
means
I'll
do
it
like
in
a
week,
but
maybe
you
just
have
already
claimed
your
you've
already
submitted
your
ex
type
proposal
and
you're
ready
to
go,
but
yeah,
so
maybe
case-by-case
scenario.
But
please
like
reach
out.
If
there's
any
questions
on
how
to
do
this,
because
it's
really
important,
I
think
that
people
get
their
main
net
rep.
E
A
Yeah
I
mean,
I
think
I
I
in
from
my
perspective,
my
judgment-
I
don't
think
there
like
technically
is
another
authorization
that
needs
to
like
occur,
because
this
has
already
happened.
So
it
is
kind
of
more
like
an
enabling
thing,
but
like
the
proposals,
it
would
be
nice
for
the
proposals
to
have
like
a
structure
to
it
so
that
we
could
do
it.
So
I
don't
know
if
someone
wants
to.
A
C
A
E
So
there's
still
the
open
question
I
think
on
like
what
would
be
the
rough
cost.
You
know
the
thing
about
cost
right
now
is
like
so
gas
like
there
are
times
when
gas
like
in
the
last
week.
Is
that
like
40
or
50.,
like
ideally
that's
when
a
bunch
of
people
enter
proposals
and
then
that's
when
like
boosts
happen
and
stuff,
so
we
can.
E
We
can
try
to
time
things
up
like
you,
obviously
can't
control
gas
markets,
but
I
think
we
could
do
this
in
a
relatively
efficient
market,
unlike
back
in
the
day
when
it
was
always
above
three
four
hundred,
so
I
don't
think
the
overall
cost
is
gonna,
be
like
super
significant.
If
we
try
to
time
things
up.
A
But
then
we
can't,
we
can't
force
it,
but
like
yeah,
please
use
gaster.
Please
submit
the
proposals
during
like
cheap
times.
I
mean
it
helps.
This
is
why,
if
you're
paying
10
the
proposal,
you're
incentivized
to
do
it
but
like
yeah,
it
actually
can
reduce
the
cost.
Incredibly,
if
we're
just
like
only
using
you
know
during
and
that's
governance
does
not
really
require.
E
Think
most
are
probably
waiting
for
someone
to
do
one
as
an
example,
and
then
everyone
can
mirror
that
example.
I
I
only
have
two
months
so
I
less
makes
legs
makes
less
sense
for
me
to
do
one
for
two
months,
but
then
I'm
waiting
for
like
another
two
months.
So
unless
we're
going
to
just
say
for
in
this
first
case,
because
we
need
this
in
the
next
two
weeks,
let's
like,
let's
include
two
month
ones,.
A
I
actually
have
three
months
because
I
didn't
do
my
february,
so
this
next
month
would
actually
be
my
fourth
month,
but
I
was
just
gonna
wait
for
it
anyway.
I
could
just
claim
the
three
months
february
march
and
april,
and
then
that
could
be
like
the
standard
one
and
then
I
would
just
may
would
be
the
start
of
like
my
next
three
months
there.
So
maybe
I
can
do
that
and
just
create
a
format
or
structure
for
it.
A
Yeah
in
the
post,
there
is
a
link
to
the
google
sheet.
I
can
post
a
link
of
it
here
yeah
and
it
has
a
link
to
the
specific
propos
like
exercise
proposals.
A
The
numbers
are
a
little
off
because
they're
estimates
based
on
like
the
monthly
amounts
and
their
percentages,
rather
than
what
was
in
the
xdi
proposals,
but
they're
like
pretty
pretty
accurate.
A
And
so
like
rep
holders
should
be
looking
at
this
right
in
terms
of
verify
the
proposal
you're
gonna
like
see.
Okay,
I'm
gonna
click
through
the
xdi
proposals
and
see
they
actually
earned
it
and
then,
like
maybe
double
check.
Then
you
can
double
check
with
this
google
sheet
to
make
sure
that
it's
like
the
right
amount.
A
Okay,
moving
along
contributor
ux,
melanie
we're
kind
of
running
out
of
time.
Maybe
we
can
get
a
quick
overview
of
things
been
working
on.
N
Yeah
definitely
hey
everyone.
Over
the
over
the
past
week,
we've
been
working
with
marketing
on
preparation
for
xerox
hack,
that's
a
hackathon!
That's
currently
going
on
and
being
held
by,
ethworks
john
actually
just
presented
just
a
few
hours
ago
on
the
emerging
decentralized,
dow
stack
I'll
link
in
the
chat,
if
you're
interested
in
finding
the
recording
for
it.
Hackathons
are
a
great
way
for
dx
dow
to
gain
exposure
in
the
community
and
also
a
way
to
recruit
new
people
into
our
growing
ecosystem.
N
I
know
a
developer
also
already
introduced
himself
in
the
channel
and
has
already
been
talking
to
martin
about
contributing
to
mesa,
so
definitely
a
great
way
to
network
and
engage,
but
mainly
today.
I
want
to
continue
the
discussion.
We
started
around
dx
dao's
worker
compensation.
Last
week
I
said
the
contributor
ux
would
begin
re-examining
the
current
structure.
N
At
the
moment
we
are
exploring
ideas
and
researching
what
we
can
do
to
improve
our
compensation
structure.
For
our
current
contributors,
but
in
addition
to
the
market
research,
we
want
your
feedback
I'll,
be
adding
a
poll
on
dow
talk
after
this
meeting
to
get
a
better
grasp
on
how
everyone
feels
about
our
current
comp
structure.
N
Some
of
the
questions
will
include
and
cover
contributor
satisfaction
with
current
dx
dow
compensation
allocation.
That
means,
are
you
satisfied
with
the
current
allocation?
60
die
stable
coin
and
40
dxd,
or
would
you
like
to
have
more
dxd
and
less
stable
coin
or
vice
versa?
N
Another
question
is
whether
you
think
dx
dow's
compensation
guidelines
are
in
line
with
the
industry
average
and
whether
you
think
dx
styles,
current
worker
level,
descriptions
are
adequate,
so
there
are
about
five
to
six
questions
and
should
take
you
a
fairly
short
amount
of
time
to
complete.
A
Awesome
thanks
and
it's
such
a
it
really
does
get
at
like
the
heart
of
what
we're
trying
to
do
here,
which
is
like
how
do
we
create
a
fair
and
transparent
system,
and
it's
really
hard
so
definitely
looking
for
feedback,
and
I
think
it's
just
as
important
like
the
process
we
go
through
to
figure
this
out
than
it
is
what
we
end
up
with
the
and
idea
for
that
so
cool
and
then
just
a
couple
minutes
a
minute
over
but
augusto.
I
wanted
to
give
you
some
time.
A
If
you
we
had
a
sweet,
dx
vote
demo
yesterday
on
the
dev
call
and
arbitrum
is
imminent,
so
any
anything
update
for
for
dx
vote.
I
think
the
rep
tracking
we
were
just
talking
about
there,
but
anything
to
update
us
on
dx
vote.
F
Yeah,
well,
if
you
see
the,
if
you
wanna
see
more,
you
can
see
the
developer,
call
that
was
recorded
yesterday
and
well.
I
think
that
we
should
we
change
internally
and
if
you
want
to
test
ds,
vote
on
rinkeby
that
we
have
now
deployed
well,
it's
working,
I'm
still
fixing
some
issues
that
are
rising,
but
we
are.
F
We
are
testing
it
on
on
drink
away
and
our
bedroom.
The
thing
that
happened
on
arbitrage
was
that
it
was
down
for
more
than
12
hours
on
sun
after
sunday
afternoon
here.
So
when
I
was
going
to
deploy
everything
for
arbitrary
to
test
and
player
on
monday,
it
was
still
down.
So
we
have
everything
ready
to
test
on
arbitrary.
I
shared
the
address
to
federico
and
swapper
team
of
the
avatar
address
and
yeah.
F
I'm
doing
a
lot
of
fixes
fixing
now
small
issues
and
the
final
smart
contracts
were
submitted
for
audit,
where
we
reached
a
hundred
percent
test
coverage
on
all
the
contracts
that
we
sent.
So
we
are
waiting
for
the
second
audit.
That
is
just
to
be
sure
that
we
took
a
look
at
everything.
We
had
a
very
good
call.
Two
weeks
ago,
where
we
talk
about
the
security
concerns
about
the
permission
ratio
that
we
are
going
to
be
using
and
well,
everything
is
working.
F
Fine
right
now,
the
only
thing
that
I
will
be
needing
it
for
us
to
test
and
to
play
around
on
ring
using
drink
by
and
arabic
room.
Now,
I'm
going
to
take
a
look
if
it
is
up
again,
but
the
test
net
is
it's
not
a
hundred
percent
mean
the
uptime
is
not
it's.
It's
not
going
to
be
up
every
time
I
don't
know
what's
happening
around,
but
I
I'm
very
skeptic
on.
D
F
A
H
D
F
Two
hours
on
sunday,
so
I
don't
know,
and
I
entered
the
twitter
and
now
on
twitter
about
it.
I
was
going
to
ask
the
the
arabic
people,
but
I
mean
it
was
12
hours
before
I
realized,
so
I
thought
they
already
knew
anyway.
It
went
up
again,
but
that's
kind
of
weird.
I
mean
that
this
didn't
happen
when
we
were
on
any
ethereum
network
and
any
public
test
net
on
a
tv
network.
I
don't
remember
seeing
it.
F
I
know
stopping
because
this
is
like
the
third
time
in
a
month
the
the
previous
testament
he
went
on.
He
went
offline
for.
A
F
F
F
I
I
was
hoping
to
talk
about
it
today
after
the
the
governor's
call
about
what
we
are
going
to
with
with
the
expo,
because
the
1.0
release,
I
think,
is
very
close,
but
I
need
to
get
it
documented
for
everyone
to
test
on
on
wrinkle
by
an
arbitrary
and
once
we
get
the
audit
results
from
the
second
hour
resort,
we
will
be
able
to
deploy
it
on
xi
and
I
started
using
it
on
the
on
exit
with
with
some
funds
like
a
south
end
2000
or
something
like.
F
In
fact,
it
looks
awesome,
it
is,
it
would
be
awesome
to
start
maybe
even
playing
with
xi
now
before
we
have
to
see
when
we
are
going
to
receive
the
other
results,
but
we
can
send
some
fans
there
and
start
sending
us.
I
know
some
money
between.
F
A
M
A
D
A
F
F
D
It
I
think,
that's
why
they're
calling
it
developer
mainnet
release
right
still,
cautious,.
A
A
Yeah
I
mean
it's
kind
of
coming.
Poor
nathan
is
coming
in
out
of
the
room,
but
yeah
I
mean
I
just
saw
like
I
don't
know
from
across
the
spectrum.
It's
kind
of
people
coming
to
the
conclusion
about
like
what
is
in
l2
and
then
realizing.
Oh
arbitrary
is
and.
C
C
A
C
Mean
I
think
that
the
length
of
time
that
it's
taken
has
allowed
a
lot
of
other
things
to
like
pump
flourish
whatever
right,
like
I
mean
the
reason
maddox
like
pushing
through
the
truck
they're
kind
of
hijacking,
that
layer,
two
narrative
right
and
like
yeah
all
these
killers
right,
the
whole
it's
all
about.
Well,
it's
not
you
know
not
scaling.
You
can't
use
it
right
now.
It's
too
expensive
right
if
actually
starts
to
do
something
real
to
chip
away,
at
that
it's
complete.
A
A
C
A
A
O
I
I've
been
trying
to
talk
for
like
10
times
for
the
past
15
minutes,
but
gt
is
having
some
problems
and
I've
been
logging
out
and
logging
back
in
and
it's
it's
been
so
for
the
past
few
days
I've
been
having
daily
calls
and
meetings
with
the
mesa
team.
I
think
jitsi
is
having
some
problems
with
the
service,
so
I
have
a
question
for
augusto.
O
F
Yeah,
the
main
issue
was
that
when
I
was
going
to
deploy
the
test
net
was
down
like
I
couldn't
deploy
anything
so
then
I
say:
okay
it.
If
it's
it's
down
for
12
hours,
I
mean
I
cannot
continue
waiting.
So
I
deploy
it
on
ring
right
that
we
know
that
it's
going
to
be
up
and
running
like
a
other
series
public
test
net,
but
now
that
arvid
room
is
up
yeah,
I
can
replay
on
arbitroman.
In
fact,
the
only
thing
that
we
need
to
do
is
to
restart
the
cache,
but
yeah.
That's
what.