►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2021-07-14]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
geek
style
governance,
discussion
for
wednesday
july
14,
1500
utc,
happy
two
years
of
on-chain
governance
to
dx
dow.
This
is
the
two-year
anniversary
of
when
governance
started
on
dxtau.
So
after
the
initial
staking
period,
it
wasn't
until
july
14th
that
the
first
proposal
started
flowing
through
deke
style.
B
So
it's
quite
a
quite
a
I
don't
know
if
accomplishment
or
a
something
to
kind
of
take
stock,
and
so
we
do
have
a
co-app
that
should
be
sent
to
any
address
that
has
interacted
with
the
external
governance
over
the
last
two
years.
I
think
it's
you've
been
voted
or
staked
or
boost
a
proposal,
and
we
tried
to
get
as
much
the
xi
activity
as
we
could,
but
and
just
to
show
it
real
quickly,
because
you
can't
see
the
the
image.
B
This
is
a
nice
little
image
that
I
think
boris
had
done
to
to
to
get
that,
and
so
we'll
also
be
doing
an
article
that
hopefully
we'll
get
out
the
end
of
the
today
and
then
tomorrow,
on
the
community.
A
B
Will
be
another
kind
of
opportunity
to
do
that
so
just
wanted
to
highlight
the
two-year
anniversary
at
the
beginning.
B
Cool
and
then
yeah
just
going
on
to
the
proposal
roundup.
So
on
mainnet,
there
are
13
proposals
that
are
boosted
or
pending
boosting
ln
hb's
worker
proposals.
There
is
the
updateswapper.eth
proposal,
so
this
is
an
update
to
the
latest
release
of
swapper.
That
will
fix
a
couple
key
things.
I
think
this
is
nice
to
see
another
proposal
like
this
kind
of
turn
around
so
quickly
there,
and
then
there
are
three
buybacks
currently
in
progress
on
mainnet.
So
that's
six
proposals
total.
B
B
This
is
a
nice
way
to
increase
the
rep
distribution
on
mainnet
and
so
keenan
and
sky
had
just
claiming
the
rep
that
they'd
earned
from
their
xdi
proposals
that
it's
paid
out
already,
and
so
those
proposals
are
there.
There
is
a
proposal
for
deke
style
attending
the
taoist,
which
is
a
two
thousand
dollar.
It
sends
two
thousand
dollars,
I
think,
to
the
taoists,
multisig
or
dao.
I
don't
know
if
keenan
or
sky
want
to
talk
briefly
about
the
the
taoist
proposal.
C
Sure
yeah,
so
it's
it's
a
it's
a
it's
a
dow
focus
event
and
it's
really
okay,
we
say
call
it
attending
the
dallas.
It's
really
like
a
sponsorship,
slash
support,
splash,
slash
backing
and
then
potentially,
actually
it
may
get.
Dx
dow
membership
in
the
taoist
dao
once
that's
created
and
then
we'll
be
a
part.
A
participant
in
this
entity
that
will
be
at
a
bunch
of
different
events
will
have
their
own
speaker
things
and
could
become
something
much
bigger
than
just
one
time
event,
and
so
showing
support.
C
Like
is
the
initial
step,
but
it's
not
like
the
official
I
mean
I
guess
it's
a
sponsorship
we're
on
their
site.
Now,
as
like,
we
have
one
of
the
lower
sponsorships
and
there's
some
like
top
medium
and
lower
ones
and
we're
the
lowest
one,
but
our
logo
is
on
there
and
we'll
likely
be
on
materials
at
the
event
and
stuff
too
there's
no.
We
have
our
own
swag.
C
I
think
some
some
of
our
own
swag,
that
we
would
be
bringing
that
we
could
share
there,
but
it's
not
they're,
not
doing
anything
for
us
for
that,
and
then
there's
separately,
trying
to
organize
a
panel,
that's
planning
to
organize
the
power.
I
think
it's
on
the
agenda.
C
It's
like
dao
is
building
in
the
dallas
space
like
across
a
spectrum
so,
like
you
know
from
from
true
dallas,
to
to
not
true
dallas
and
have
a
discussion
around
how
like
some
of
the
obstacles
and
and
things
and
grow
the
awareness
of
what
the
challenges
are
for
like
taos
to
build
in
this
space,
if
they're
actually
on
chain
like
decentralized
taos,
and
then
that
will
like
highlight
to
the
crowd
there,
hopefully,
which
is
really
doubt,
focused
more
awareness
of
of
what
the
different
ways
that
thous,
including
dick
stau,
are
approaching.
C
B
Definitely,
that's
why
it's
cool.
I
think
it's
coming
from
a
proposal
too
right,
like
unchained
kind
of
demonstrate,
that,
to
other
other
doubts
in
the
space,
so
cool.
B
Okay
and
then
there
is
the
initial
funding
proposal
for
the
communications
and
marketing
multi-sig
resubmission.
So
just
as
a
recap,
this
was
a
resubmission
proposal
that
we
had
problems
with
two
weeks
ago,
because
we
had
sent
usdc
to
the
a
relayer
contract
we
went
over
this
two
weeks
ago.
B
That's
not
why
the
sirens
are
coming
for
us
now,
but
it
was
yeah
whenever
it's
two
weeks
ago
and
talked
about
it
there
and
on
the
call-
and
this
is
just
a
resubmission
of
that
previous
one-
we
did
like
triple
quadruple
check
and
even
do
a
sample
transaction
to
the
multi-sig.
B
So
I
think
we're
feeling
good
about
this,
and
this
is
a
good
step
in
terms
of
enabling
the
dx
connect,
marketing
communication
squad
to
kind
of
be
more
nimble
and
be
able
to
act
and
and
kind
of
engage
with
different.
A
Groups
yeah,
I'm
just
wondering
regarding
that
failed
proposal
like
what
can
we
do
in
the
future
to
like
prevent
this
from
happening
like
this
should
be
like
one
learning
curve
and
we
should
probably
have
something
in
place
so
that
I
don't
know
either
like
more
people
check
out
proposals,
or
I
don't
know
something
like
that.
C
Yeah
one,
I
think
one
thing
that
came
out
of
it
that
I
just
put
like
officially
in
my
worker
proposal
and
that
everyone
is
supposed
to
do
this.
I
think
it's
like
10
of
your
role
at
dxdow
should
be
based
on
governance
proposals
looking
at
every
single
one
of
them
staking
voting,
and
so,
if
you're
not
doing
that,
it
could
be
now
included
in
your
worker
proposal,
because
the
only
thing
that
stops
this
is
attention
from
lots
of
different
people.
Basically,
technical
and
non-technical
people.
A
D
Yeah
I
mean
this.
It
was
pm
surprisingly,
like
some
things.
We've
done
like
past,
like
using
tenderly,
for
example,
to
simulate
whether
our
proposal
is
successful,
like
that.
That
wouldn't
have
really
saved
us
here,
because
it
like
works
in
terms
of
getting
the
things.
So
so,
and
you
know,
and
it's
like
we
had
actually
done
relay
our
stuff
before
so
I
think
there
was
like
a
false
sense
of
confidence
right
that
we
had.
D
We
knew
we
were
doing
and
that
we
I
mean
so
and
and
there's
also
like
the
technical
issue
of
you,
know
why
we
have
to
do
relays
at
all
is
because
we're
on
outdated
software.
D
So
I
mean
there's
several
layers
of
like
where
this
sort
of
slipped
through
the
cracks
and-
and
I
think
you
know
those
are
all
lessons
that
we
kind
of
have
already
looked
at,
and
so
I
mean
like
simulating
proposals
like
making
sure
that
yeah,
like
the
the
once,
we
upgrade
the
garden
system,
we'll
kind
of
get
rid
of
that
old
code.
D
It's,
like
you
know
you
kind
of
missed
it
here,
listen
here
and
miss
it
here,
and
I
think
maybe
one
of
the
newer
lessons
from
this
is
like
just
like
how
we
do
the
communication
right
like
so
when
we're
doing
something
you
know,
that's
moving
a
certain
amount
of
money
or
whatever.
Maybe
we
have
a
little
bit
of
a
process
there
around.
You
know
say
what
you
want
to
do
like
put
it
in
something
and
like
it
needs
to
get.
D
You
know
reviewed
by
one
or
two
technical
people
or
something-
and
I
was
actually
just
talking
with
tammy
about
about
this
before
the
call.
So
I
mean
maybe
we'll
we'll
do
something
process
wise
just
to
try
to
yeah.
A
Communication,
yes,
I
was
also
thinking
it
could
be
beneficial
if
someone
making
proposal
is
an
obligation
to
bring
at
least
two
people
to
review
it
like,
or
you
know
have
like
he
had
somebody
like
audited
and
also
like
I
saw
somebody
commented
on
that
post.
Like
can
we
implement
like
minimum
like
percentage
of
harm
of
world
power.
E
This
is
something
that
we
already
implemented
in
in
the
export,
where
we
are
requesting
a
minimum
percentage
of
votes
in
boosted
proposals
now
in
order
to
be
executed,
and
I
think
something
a
big
takeaway
here
is
that
it
was
a
lot
of
money
and
it
was
not
no
not
as
as
much
review
as
it
should
be
right.
So
if
you
are
going
to
transfer
such
a
big
amount,
you
don't
need
you
shouldn't
have
one
pair
of
eyes.
E
You
have,
I
know
at
least
four
or
five
right
like
we
were
traveling
like
75
75
thousand,
so
I
guess
we
should
measure
risk.
There
was
a
bad
grease
measurement
here.
No,
we
should
have
more
people
on
on
it.
I,
for
example,
if
someone
were
to
tell
me
that
that
proposal
was
was
being
executed.
The
way
it
was,
I
would
have
catch
it
at
the
at
the
far
side,
but
but
I
didn't
so,
oh.
D
D
About
how
it
worked,
that
was
like
not
right
right
and
we
didn't
catch
that.
That
was
the
the
problem
right
and,
like
I
said,
in
kind
of
an
initial
call
we
talked
about
like
I
voted
on
that
proposal
and
like
I
was
actually
screening
it
for
what
I
was
worried
about
it
when
I'm
voting
like
that,
it's
always
something
malicious,
but
I
didn't
do
any
critical
thinking
about
what
like
was
actually
happening
technically
and
I
was
capable
of
if
I
did
do
that.
Thinking
like
I
could
have
realized.
D
Oh
wait
a
minute
there's
something
wrong
here
like
this,
isn't
actually
gonna
work
right,
but
I
wasn't
thinking
like
that
when
I
was
like
reviewing
the
proposal
and
voting,
so
I
made
this
like
had
this
assumption
baked
into
my
viewing
that,
like
allowed
me
to
make
this
mistake-
and
I
think
it's
like
that
sort
of
has
happened
several
times
in
this
process
right
so
yeah
like
I
mean
it's
kind
of
like
if
people
think
something
is
going
to
work
a
different
way
and
we're
wrong-
that's
really
dangerous
right.
E
Addition,
I
just
don't
want
to
say
that
I
would
have
100
percent
catch
it
right
like,
but
let's
say
if
I've
had
a
90
chances
of
got
that
that
error
and
john
did
that
too
right.
But
john
was
the
only
one
who
take
a
closer
look
at
it,
but
if,
if
I
would
have
taken
a
look
or
also
besides
me,
nico
or
or
fede
or
I
know,
or
some
or
someone
else
in
the
technical
team,
we
would
have
minimized
the
ice
risk.
A
lot
and
this
wouldn't
have
happened.
E
So
this
is
what
we
need
to
do
in
the
future.
If
you're
transferring
a
lot
of
funds
or
is
an
important
proposal,
get
more
reviews
in
the
in
the
in
the
technical
level.
One
is
not
enough.
D
C
Things
so
we
already
had
this
situation
again
and
we
don't
have
a
solution
to
it.
We
wanted
to
send
two
thousand
dollars
worth
of
a
token
to
a
dow
on
x,
die
from
x,
dx
dao.
C
We
still
don't
know,
even
though
it's
outlined
exactly
what
we
want
to
do.
We
still
don't
know
if
it's
possible,
we
don't
know
like
every
time
we
do
a
new
type
of
proposal
that
we
haven't
done.
We
don't
know
if
it's
possible
and
we
still
don't
know
if
it's
possible,
so
the
answer
that
we
did
was
because
we
don't
know-
and
we
and
no
one
technically
like
it's
not
easy
to
technically
figure
out.
If
we
can
even
do
this
payment
correctly,
we
decided
to
do
a
mainnet
proposal
and
send
usdc
to
a
multi-sig.
C
D
C
D
E
C
D
B
Just
this
specific
instance,
I
think
violet
is
kind
of
right
to
think
about
like
what
are
we
doing
differently,
and
I
think
the
big
thing
I
think
about
here
is
like
proposal
like
before
submitting
a
proposal
getting
feedback
and
kind
of
having
someone
else
look
at
it,
and
I
think
it's
a
really
good
way
of
you
know
I
I
when
I
do
a
lot
of
proposals,
I
will
create
like
a
google
sheet,
a
google
doc
and
then
just
place
things
in
there
and
maybe
have
someone
else.
B
Look
at
that,
but
long
term.
We
do
need
to
think
I
think
about
incentives
for
governance.
This
is
something
we
talked
a
little
bit
on
governance
2.0,
but
like
we
that's
really
the
long.
We
need
an
incentive
to
build
this
in
the
long
term
of
getting
eyes
on
governance
and
yeah.
I
think
that's
something
that
we
could
try
to
solve.
B
Okay,
just
want
to
move
along
here,
so
that's
it
for
mainnet
and
then
for
xi
base.
We've
got
12
proposals
boosted
and
pending,
boosting
just
to
go
through
some
of
the
proposals.
I
want
to
talk
about
martin
one
in
a
second,
but
there
are
worker
proposals
for
adam
hexel
venky
level
k
medusa
there
is
a
74
die,
dx
docs
registration
reimbursement.
Thank
you
keenan.
B
B
And
then
yeah,
I
wanted
to
kind
of
open
the
floor
up
for
the
martin
martin
krung's
worker
proposal.
This
was
a
discussion
topic
last
week
and
then
a
proposal
was
submitted.
I
think,
on
thursday
and
boosted
and
then
actually
went
into
overtime
here,
and
it
looks
like
it
will
it's.
The
proposal
is
still
alive
for
another.
I
think
22
hours
but
looks
like
it
is
set
to
fail.
B
So
I
was
hoping
that
we
could
try
to
regroup
a
little
and
figure
out
how
to
find
a
resolution
on
on
how
to
move
move
forward
here.
So
I
know
martin
is
on
the
call
and
there's
some
people
also.
That
voiced
some
comments
in
the
thread
on
this.
I
I
did
kenny
fork
did
vote
for
the
proposal
that
one,
the
one
that
was
freely
submitted
and
I'm
just
kind
of
hoping
that
we
can
come
to
some
way
of
figuring
out
a
a
path
forward
for
both
both
parties
going
forward.
B
So
I
don't
know
if
anyone
wanted
to
kick
off
with
specific
comments.
G
Yeah,
maybe
myself,
if
that's
okay,
hi
hi,
so
my
proposal
failed
yeah.
Let's
take
a
step
back
and
I
will
try
to
and
to
make
a
new
proposal
which
will
then
pass
through,
and
my
suggestion
is
that
and
yeah
there
has.
There
was
a
dynamic
in
this.
You
know
I
did
the
proposal
and
then
I
got
another
push
back
and
then
I
did
see
that
I
don't
think
that
I
will
have
a
few
genetic
styles,
so
I
yeah
looks
like
I'm
out.
I
think
everyone
will
know
this
so
yeah
and
during
this
process.
G
So
what
I
suggest
is
that
I
take
a
haircut
and
my
haircut
will
be
in
the
sense
that
I
don't
claim
you
know
my
my
june
payment,
because
it's
maybe
some
some
some
did
not
completely
understand.
I
worked
seven
months,
but
the
proposal
was
just
about
the
six
months
and
there
was
a
reason
I
kept
like
this
because
yeah
it.
Then
it
fits
the
dow
talk
proposal.
G
But
what
I
would
suggest
is
that
I
will
write
a
make:
a
new
proposal.
The
amount
will
be
the
same,
but
I
will
write
down
that.
I
will
waive
my
that
I
don't
I
I
will
not
claim
my
june
proposal
and
my
june
salary,
so
this
is
the
hellcat.
I
take
it's
around
14
of
all.
G
Secondly,
what
I
would
suggest
because,
what's
disputed
now
in
this
vote,
now
it's
it's
the
rep
part
and
even
in
the
last
the
last
talk
we
had
a
week
ago.
I
suggested
somehow
that
I
take
a
rap
cut,
but
then
the
end
I
didn't
so
my
proposal
would
be
that
I
make
I
make
two
proposal.
One
will
be
the
same
amount
like
now,
but
I
will
write
down
into
proposals
that
I
take
the
haircut
by
not
claiming
the
june
month
and
then
I
will
do
a
second
proposal
who
is
just
about
the
rep.
G
D
Just
for
me
that
sounds
like
a
very
reasonable
approach.
I
think
it's
good
to
to
break
it
down
you're
good,
to
clear
up
any
ambiguity
about
you
know
what
you're
not
claiming
and
what
you're
claiming
you
know.
My
stance
is
basically
the
same
as
what
I
said
last
time
that
I
think
you
should
get
paid
fairly.
The
reason
I
ended
up
voting
against
this
one
is
there
did
seem
to
be
like
some
voices
that,
like
you,
know,
weren't
getting
attention
about
whether
it
was
fair
or
not.
A
D
And
because
I
think
it's
really
important
that
we
do
establish
accountability
here
right,
like
I
think
we
all
want
to
see
this
kind
of
end
and
put
this
behind
us,
but
like
accountability,
is
also
important
and
yeah.
I
will
support
any
proposal
when,
when
we
have
some
like
clarity
and
any
kind
of
major
concerns
are
addressed.
H
Yeah,
okay,
go
first!
Okay!
Let's
do
so.
I
think,
from
my
point
of
view,
why
I
voted
against
is
what
was
communicated
during
the
meeting
and
then
what
was
presented
during
their
proposal
seems
to
be
like
different,
at
least
from
my
point
of
view,
I
expected
some
rep
cut
and,
and
the
and
the
june
cut
that
you
you
mentioned-
wasn't
actually
mentioned
in
the
yes.
Yes,
that's
true,
that's
the
only
like
for
me.
That's
like
my
my
main
reason.
G
You
know,
maybe
we
don't
have
the
easy
thing
about
doing
two
proposal
is,
then
we
don't
have
to
find
consensus
on
the
rep.
You
know
everyone
can
vote
how
they
want
to
vote.
I
will
accept
this.
Maybe
I
don't
get
any
rep.
Maybe
I
get
half
fit
yeah
and
otherwise,
if
I
do,
if
we
make
two
propose
one
proposal
in
one,
then
we
need
like
to
discuss
now
and
yeah,
because
I
don't
want
to
make
another
round.
E
Yeah,
martin,
I
I
would
suggest
that
create
two
proposals:
okay,
one
regarding
the
reputation
and
another
the
compensation
and-
and
in
fact
I
express
you
on
the
on
the
outpost.
I
think
that
you
are
the
cat
you
are
receiving
is,
I
think
it's
is?
Is
too
much
like
it's
more
like
it.
I
feel
like
more
like
a
punishment
where
it
shouldn't
be
that
but
yeah.
E
Okay,
okay,
if
it
is,
if
it
is
okay,
yeah,
the
important
thing
that
I
the
important
thing
is
that
you
don't
feel
it
as
a
punishment,
because
that
is
that
is
not
even
though
you
are.
I
feel
like,
even
though
that
you
decided
to
leave
the
exile
you
should,
if
you
want,
you
should
still
be
involved
in
the
in
in
the
organization,
and
you
will
still
be
highly
appreciated
for
all
your
work.
E
Yeah
and
then
yeah-
and
I
also
wanted
to
say,
like
what
sky
said
about
the
reputation
that
yeah,
I
think
it
says
you
work
or
all
the
work
you
order,
what
you
did,
even
even
if
it
wasn't
like
different
in
in
eyes
of
other
residential
orders,
you
should
receive
reputation
for
your
work
that
that
you
did
how
much
revelation
that
that
we
are,
that
is
going
to
be
decided,
but
yeah,
usually
you
should
receive
rep
and
you
should
still.
E
G
H
I
C
C
Yeah
well
so
there's
already
a
haircut
on
rep
and
there's
already
a
haircut
on
pay
and
there's
a
number
of
people
zet
zett
proposed
you
should
get
no
rep
evan
proposed.
You
should
get
no
rep
geronimo
supported
a
proposal
with
no
rep
john
seemed
to
be
supporting
no
rep
in
general.
That
and
and
this
idea
to
me
of
separating
of
even
the
idea
of
saying
someone
who's
contributed
should
get
paid
dollars,
but
not
get
paid
the
rep
that
they've
earned
by
contributing.
C
G
A
C
H
C
D
A
D
And
he's
not
here
on
the
call
today,
so
he
can't
clarify
that.
But
but
I
mean
I
just
for
my
standpoint,
like
I
think
that's
suggestion
is-
is
reasonable.
Right,
like
the
governance
process,.
C
Was
skipped
like
putting
that?
So
if
you
skip
governance
for
x
number
of
months,
you
don't
get
that
rep
right.
C
B
Right
forward
right,
I
I
think
reputation
is
incredibly
important
to
scaling
dx
tau
and
we
need
to
think
about
ways
to
encourage
and
bring
in
new
people
in
into
dxtown
and
giving
them
governance
power.
There
are
lots
of
growing
pains
with
this.
We
can't
just
go
out
and
kind
of
distribute
rep,
but
I'm
I.
I
think
that
our
overall
attitude
of
dextal
should
be
one
about
expanding
and
distributing
and
inflating
rep,
not
kind
of
hoarding.
It.
H
Yes,
so
I
can
make
my
point
here:
I'm
not
saying
that
we're
gonna
make
it
harder
to
get
rep.
If
someone
knows
the
rules
gets
reminded
of
the
rules
and
for
whatever
reason
there
is
ignores
the
governance
right,
it's
disrespecting
the
system
or
the
rep
system
that
that
we
are
giving
them
right.
It's
not
it's
on
purpose,
it's
not
like
not
on
purpose
or
something
happened.
Someone
was
sick,
I
would
say
we
should
be.
H
H
G
H
You
in
almost
in
the
exact
same
situation,
but
like
I'm,
not
trying
to
get
into
details
here
but
there's
like
different
ways.
You
can
do
this
right,
you
could.
You
could
still.
K
Actually,
you
guys
are
not
in
the
same
position
like
the
reason.
Martin
martin
did
everything
he
could
to
set
up
his
company
there's
just
he
had
to
wait
a
certain
amount
of
time
for
tax
reasons
like
I
understand
we're
all
in
the
same
position,
because
we
figure
out
our
different
statuses
and
figure
out.
You
know
processes,
but
just
because
you
know
we
all
live
in
different
parts
of
the
world
and
we
have
different
legal
obligations
to
deal
with
our
taxes.
K
Not
everyone
has
the
same
obligations
so,
like
I
think
you
know,
martin
really
did
try
to
do
what
he
thought
was
best,
and
maybe
it
was
you
know,
definitely
took
longer
than
it
should
have,
and
we
should
have
all
communicated
better
with
one
another
about
how
to
deal
with
the
situation
earlier
on,
but
yeah.
K
Otherwise,
I'm
just
gonna
agree
with
sky
and
chris
that
I
think
we
should
be
discussing
about
how
to
give
rep
out
more
and
decentralize
governance
as
much
as
possible,
and
I
think
we're
gonna
get
into
a
very
difficult
situation
where
we
start
scrutinizing
rep
distribution.
I
thought
we,
I
thought
our
stance
was
full-time
employees
or
contributors
received
0.1667
percent
rep
per
month.
K
So,
how
do
we
I'm
just
trying
to
wrap
my
head
around
kind
of,
like
that's
point
about
governance,
and
how
do
we
address
this
going
forward
like
with
what
sky
said
like
how
do
we?
How
do
we
either
make
it
more
of
like
a
blanket
acceptance
of
you
know
rep
when
you're
working
or
like?
What's
the
what's
our
takeaway
from
this
like?
What?
What's
that?
What
would
you
have
liked
to
have
improved
upon
separately,
that
maybe
we
could
fix
for
the
future?
H
I
mean
I
would
say
obviously
like
us
workers
when
we
see
something
like
this
happens.
We
don't
need
to
go
in
to
like
the
black
work
or
the
quality
whatever
it
could
be,
but
just
if
we
see
the
governance
process
not
being
respected,
if
we
have
internal
chats
for
workers-
and
we
don't
actually
have
like
that
person
doesn't
have
a
proposal,
then
maybe
we
should
like
like
ask
this
person
like
hey,
do
your
proposal,
otherwise
you
can't
be
in
our
like
worker
chat.
H
I
know
this
sounds
like
extreme,
but
if
that
happened
to,
let's
say
martin
martin
would
maybe
like
think
hey.
Maybe
the
solution
for
me
to
get
my
internal
workshop
active
is
is
to
do
a
single
proposal.
It
doesn't
need
to
pay
you
out
anything
right.
So
something
like
that
right.
C
G
C
C
It
just
sets
a
precedent,
and
as
long
as
everyone's
aware
of
that
and
we're
all
cool
with
it,
then
let's
do
it.
But
if
someone
doesn't
deliver
something
one
month
and
they
don't
get
them,
they
don't
get
the
rest,
but
they
only
get
some
of
the
pay.
That's
great,
all
right.
G
G
B
Yeah,
I
I
think,
yeah.
I
think
we've
actually
had
a
good
discussion
this
week
too,
and
I
think
we're
there
are
a
lot,
a
lot
of
long-term
things
to
think
about
here
in
terms
of
how
deep
style
structure-
and
I
think,
that's
kind
of
where
more
of
the
the
discussion
is
now
as
opposed
to
like
how
do
we,
you
know,
solve
and
get
to
resolution
right
here.
B
So
I
do
just
kind
of
want
to
move
on,
but
I
want
to
see
if
there's
any
one
kind
of
a
last
comments
on
this.
In
terms
of
kind
of,
I
think
we
want
to
get
to
a
resolution
stage.
So
martin
will
look
for
for
those
proposals.
It
should
be
very
cl.
C
Like
we
should
define
exactly
what's
gonna
be
in
there,
because
the
last
call
we
had
about
this,
we
thought
we
had
this
exact
thing
and
then
it
was
put
on
there
and
then
like
new
things,
come
up.
So
it's
it's
fine,
but
like
we
just
like
we
should
someone
should
say
exactly.
What's
going
to
be
in
the
proposal
that
everyone
now.
G
E
E
E
We
should
be
used
to
that,
and
maybe
we
are
going
to
see
something
happen,
that
we
should
that
we
didn't
expect
into
it,
and
that
is
going
to
happen
more
often,
I
don't
know
if
I
don't
know
if
more
often,
but
it's
going
to
happen
again
when
we
are
bigger
when
we
are
not
20
but
40
people
thinking
with
different
opinions,
thinking
different,
even
all
across
the
world,
so
we
should
we
are.
We
are
going
to
have.
E
If,
if
you
compare
this
governance
score
to
one
from
a
from
a
year
ago,
it
was
like
oh
yeah,
we
are
going
to
do
this
and
a
thing
happens.
Now
we
are
getting
discussion,
we
are
going
in
ourselves
and
it's
going
to
happen
in
the
future,
so
yeah
yeah
we
we
should
be
ready
and
open
for
these
type
of
things
to
happen
and
open
to
to
try
to
find
a
solution
quickly
and
yeah.
You
don't
need
to
find
a
solution
here,
and
this
is
going
to
find
a
bit
reflective
on
the
blockchain
level.
B
D
B
J
B
D
B
I
One
last
question:
before
we
move
forward:
there
is
also
another
proposal
for
november.
What
do
we
do
with
that?
One.
B
B
B
D
If
you
do
vote
on
a
proposal
that
is
not
boosted,
four
percent
of
your
rep
gets
locked
into
that
proposal
and
you
get
it
back
when
either
the
proposal
expires
or
if
it
passes
the
way
you
voted.
If
it
fails,
it
goes
against
the
way
you
voted
like
you
lose
that
that
rep,
so
that
everybody
should
be
aware
of
that.
Like
mechanic
too,
when
you're
in
your.
B
Cool
here's,
the
sweet
transition,
segway
2.
dave.
You
want
to
kick
us
off
with
some
nice
charts
and
grass
about
the
treasury.
L
Sure
absolutely
I'll,
try
and
keep
it
short,
given
that
we
don't
have
that
much
time
and
we'll
also
be
going
over
this
tomorrow
on
the
community
call.
So
if
you
do
have
any
questions,
maybe
we
can
address
them
as
well
tomorrow
on
the
community
call,
but
I
prepared
a
little
short
just
overview
of
the
q2
treasury
and
I
guess
we
can
jump
right
into
it.
Whoops,
okay,
so
of
course
the
accounting
period
is
just
a
q2
same
as
the
financial
quarter
q2.
L
Overall,
the
treasury
has
actually
increased
roughly
10
percent
compared
to
the
last
quarter,
mostly
of
course
driven
by
volatility
in
the
crypto
market.
As
usual,
the
bulk
of
our
treasury
funds
still
lie
on
the
ethereum
main
net
and
we
still
have
quite
a
bit
of
capital
in
the
buy
back
smart
contract
as
well,
which
is
just
sitting
there
again.
L
We
had
a
lot
of
volatility
during
the
quarter,
and
one
thing
that
it
actually
made
me
think
about
is
that
perhaps
we
should
think
about
the
way
of
being
a
bit
more
dynamic
when
we're
trying
to
diversify
and
buy
some
stable
coins,
because
at
some
point
we
did
reach
almost
like
a
three-digit
minion
territory
with
without
treasury,
but
of
course,
passing
a
proposal
to
actually
sell
some
ether
on
mainnet,
where
all
our
funds
reside
does
take
eight
days.
L
If
the
proposal
is
boosted
and
executed
as
quickly
as
possible,
and,
of
course,
in
eight
days,
the
price
of
ether
can
completely
change,
so
maybe
something
to
think
about
in
the
future.
If
there
is
some
arrangement,
perhaps
on
smart
contracts
or
multi-sigs,
where
some
funds
can
be
parked
and
kind
of
be
able
to
act
more
quickly
on
treasury
diversifications
and
then
in
this
quarter,
we
of
course
did
the
treasury
diversification
proposal
two,
which
has
been
fully
executed.
Getting
us
roughly
five
million
us
dollars
in
stables.
L
We
actually
traded
at
an
average
price
of
2876
ether,
which
is
actually
10
percent
above
the
average,
for
the
quarter
could
of
course,
have
been
better.
But,
of
course,
with
our
governance
process,
we
just
have
some
delays,
which
you
know
you
can't
get
over
in
the
current
setup.
L
Here
you
can
just
see
you
know,
as
the
proposals
pass
are
kind
of
stable
coins
increasing
and
just
like
a
quick
balance
sheet
overview
and
on
the
right,
you
can
actually
see
the
comparison
to
q1,
so
you
can
actually
see
where
we've
kind
of,
of
course
use
some
ether
for
expenses
and
also
bridging
it
to
x,
die,
but
also
the
majority
of
our
kind
of
movements
have
been
just
ether
into
stables
right.
L
So
we've
seen
quite
a
significant
increase
in
stable
coins,
which
of
course
also
the
idea
behind
that
being
is
to
secure
some
potential
runway
and
just
to
look
at
it
a
bit
more
visually
as
well.
We
can
see
on
the
left
we
have
the.
I
should
have
actually
written
this
down
perhaps,
but
on
the
left
we
have
the
at
end
of
q1
treasury
holdings
and
on
the
right
we
have
end
of
q2
treasury
holdings.
L
So
again
we
can
see
the
real
treasury
diversification
proposal,
taking
effect
here
with
stable
coins,
starting
to
make
up
a
significant
amount
of
the
treasury
and
we're
already
close
to
around
15.
L
So
also
the
numbers
don't
add
up
to
100,
because
I
didn't
include
like
pink
coin
and
all
the
kind
of
like
smaller
tokens
we
have
a
couple
of,
but
so
in
case
you're
thinking.
Why
doesn't
it
add
up?
L
That
is
why-
and
I
also
took
a
bit
of
a
look
at
rep,
given
that
we
of
course
migrated
over
to
x
die
and
we
actually
currently
have
around
462
addresses
on
mainnet
who
hold
rep
341
on
xdi,
and
this
is
kind
of
just
a
brief
overview
of
like
how
the
distribution
is
it's.
There
are
a
lot
of
few
larger
accounts
on
exile,
I
would
say,
but
I
guess
that's
also
due
to
the
fact
that
less
people
are
active
there
compared
to
mainnet.
L
But
of
course
this
also
includes
a
historic
rep
which
was
issued
a
long
time
ago.
So
I
would
actually
say
it's
not
bad.
The
fact
that
exi
has
been
adopted
quite
quickly
so
to
speak
and
in
fact,
65
of
addresses
who
hold
rep
on
mainnet,
also
hold
rep
on
x,
die,
and
this,
of
course,
only
works
for
private
wallets.
So
if
people
have
a
smart
contract,
if
you
take
that
into
account,
the
number
might
actually
be
higher.
L
But
I
think
this
is
a
good
measure
to
show
that
there
has
been
quite
some
strong
adoption
of
x-tie
and
in
fact
I
believe
all
worker
proposals
have
been
taking
place
there,
except
for
really
a
couple
that
have
gone
through
on
mainnet
other
than
that.
We
also
have
two
roughly
2.8
million
of
capital
deployed
on
swapper
lps,
which
is
probably
soon
going
to
increase,
as
well
with
the
launch
arbitrary
right.
Now
we
have
roughly
800
000
on
mainnet,
which
is
just
a
die
ether
pair
and
then
on
xdi.
L
We
have
a
couple
more
lp's,
namely
these
here
and
kind
of
things.
We're
looking
to
work
on
for
q3,
of
course,
is
dx
yield,
which
is
something
we
already
wanted
to
take
a
look
at
in
quarter
two,
but
yields
dropped
a
lot
so
that
was
kind
of
like
pushed
away
for
a
while
and
then
we've
actually
also
been
working
on
a
treasury
dashboard.
L
So
right
now,
if
you
want
to
see
how
much
dxtile
has
in
the
treasury,
it's
quite
difficult
like
you
would
have
to
look
on
etherscan,
then
on
xdi
in
the
future
on
arbitrary,
add
up
the
various
amounts
and
we
actually
already
have
a
proof
of
concept
dashboard
which
is
going
to
be
integrated
into
dx
volt
directly
so
from
there.
L
We'll
kind
of
like
have
a
live,
screenshot
anytime,
to
see
what
the
current
holdings
of
the
dxtile
are
and
then
potentially
looking
at
some
other
treasury
diversification,
maybe
looking
at
some
other
stable
coins,
of
course,
for
dx
yield
as
well.
There
are
a
number
of
potential
platforms
to
yield
on,
and
we've
spoken
to
a
few
as
well,
and
then,
of
course,
I
believe
arbitrary
should
be
going
live
this
quarter
as
well.
So
that's,
of
course,
also.
L
Another
kind
of
chain
will
be
allocating
some
capital
to
both
for
our
products
like
swapper,
but
also
just
for
holding
a
small
treasury
there,
and
it's
actually
very
brief
presentation
for
the
day,
and
another
thing
of
course,
we've
also
been
doing,
is
the
buy
back
program,
and
with
that
I
might
just
give
it
over
to
chris.
Who
has
something
to
say
about
that.
B
Well,
just
to
we
are
dave,
is
gonna,
be
presenting
this
tomorrow
on
the
community
call
too,
and
it
would
be
good
to
have
like
a
pretty
good
discussion
there.
Maybe
some
questions,
I
think,
with
the
community
from
there.
So
I
think
once
people
have
had
the
time
to
digest
this.
It's
a
good
time
to
it'll
be
good
to
present
that
and
start
that
conversation
with
with
the
community.
L
Yeah
just
one
other
thing
as
well:
I've
also
been
working
a
bit
on
looking
at
the
funding
products.
I
don't
know
if
you
recall
in
the
q1
presentation,
we
also
had
like
a
sankey
diagram
showing
all
the
flows
and
I've
actually
been
having
some
trouble
plotting
it
now
and
it's
getting
a
bit
bigger,
but
I'm
also
working
on
including
that
soon
as
well.
Yeah.
B
I
wanted
to
kick
off
the
conversation
on
the
future
of
buyback
program,
so
just
as
a
small
update,
we
have
geek
style,
has
acquired
2499
dxd,
just
one
short
of
the
the
2500
and
that's
been
through
xdi
and
main
net,
and
that
right
now
represents
730
000,
so
73
of
the
way
towards
the
1
million
dollar
goal,
and
there
are
currently
four
buyback
proposals
in
the
queue
their
average
buy
could
be
around
like
forty
thousand
forty
five
thousand
dollars
so
at
maximum
that
those
proposals
are
executed.
B
As
is
then
that
would
take
the
number
of
dxd
purchased
to
900
000,
with
the
proposals
already
in
the
queue
dave-
and
I
are
talking
about
submitting-
probably
two
more
proposals
that
would
be
comfortable
without
going
through
that
million
dollar
threshold.
But
I
think
yeah.
The
discussion
is
kind
of
starting
the
community
about
what
to
do
when
we
hit
that
million
dollar
threshold,
which
will
probably
happen
in
like
10
to
15
10
to
12
days.
There
has
been
a
previous
discussion
about
using
the
eth
from
the
buyback
reserve.
B
I
don't
think
that
we
would
like
take
the
eth
precisely
from
the
buyback
reserve,
but
maybe
just
like
as
a
use
that
as
like
a
accounting
way
of
continuing
the
buyback
program,
so
yeah
kind
of
two
questions
for
discussion
here.
One
is
very
like
practical.
We
actually
don't
have
very
much
weft
left
on
x
die.
B
So
if
we
want
to
continue
doing
it
on
next
die,
there's
one
current
proposal,
but
if
we
want
to
continue
doing
on
there,
we'll
have
to
send
some
more
weth
over
and
then
second
is
what
to
do
going
forward
as
we
approach
the
million
dollar
number.
Presumably,
if
we
want
to
continue
the
buyback
program,
I
think
we
need
to
do
another
signal
proposal.
B
D
Obviously,
one
of
the
core
questions
I
guess
is
to
like
what
is
that
threshold?
You
know
right
now:
it's
the
the
value
of
the
treasury
or
the
book.
However,
we
defined
that
in
the
buyback
right.
I
think
that's,
maybe
a
quick
question,
maybe
good
to
have
some
more
discussion
about
that
like
next
week
or
something
yeah.
D
B
D
B
A
ways
to
kind
of
go
and
we're
bumping
up
at
the
beginning
of
this,
like
threshold
and
yeah
I
mean
to
me
it
seems
it
makes
sense,
just
given
kind
of
the
the
numbers
and
and
and
executing
it.
I
guess
I
do
like
to
have
or
would
like
to
think
about,
like
limitations
on
it
right,
and
so
maybe
we
only
do
another
million
dollars
right.
B
So
maybe
if
we
do
another
million
dollars
like
we
only
get
200,
000
or
300
000
before
things
are
kind
of
there
and
then
of
course
the
big
like
you
know
unknown,
and
all
of
this
is
like
what's
eth
doing
and
what's
the
market
doing,
because
we're
kind
of
like
at
the
whims
of
that
so
yeah
would
a
million
dollar
like
another
million
dollars,
would
just
do
that
with
a
simple
signal
proposal
or.
D
C
It
could
be
related
to
like
when
you
talk
about
public
companies,
and
you
talk
about
book
value
right.
You
have
like
you,
have
the
market
cap
and
the
assets
that
a
company
holds,
and
then
you
have
the
shares,
which
are
the
equity
in
the
actual
company,
but
like
the
equity,
is
the
actual
company,
and
this
the
difference
here
is
that
currently
even
okay
in
the
future,
we
have
a
different
plan
for
this.
But
currently
dxd
token
is
not
a
claim
on
the
treasury.
It's
a
claim
on
revenue
from
products,
and
so
then
it's
like.
C
A
C
D
Know
that
the
you
know
the
topic
of
dxd,
not
having
governance
control
over
the
tradition,
got
a
lot
of
air
time
right
and
got
a
lot
of
discussion
and
so
yeah
I
mean
how
that
I
think
might
relate
to
this
discussion
is
like.
Does
that?
Would
it
make
sense
to
like
not
go
too
far
with
this
say
until
we
ship
governance
2.0
right,
because
maybe
that
is
more
fundamental
to
like
this?
C
B
I
do
think
that
the
buy
back
is
actually
a
nice
stepping
stone
to
that
governance
2.0
framework,
because
it
does
literally
closer.
It's
like
combining
ties
between
rep
holders
and
dxd
holders.
Right
rep
holders
are
taking
e
from
the
treasury
and
buying
kind
of
dxd,
and
so
it's
kind
of
supporting
that
narrative
of
the
union,
and
then
I
think
that,
like
helps
build
towards
the
actual
like
framework
that
will
lock
in
that
into
like
a
sustainable
ecosystem
going
forward.
K
Have
we
felt
that
this
has
been
like
engaging
dxd
holders
more
aside
from,
like
our
forum
perception
regarding
buyback
and
everything
versus
like
like,
as
you
said
like?
Is
this
stimulating
the
community
of
dxd
holders
to
like
kind
of
check
more
in
to
what's
going
on
with
dxdow
and
our
products
like?
Does
this
help
that,
in
some
way
like
have
have
you
seen
that
at
all
chris
or
maybe
keenan,
even.
B
Yeah
I
mean,
I
think
the
I
mean
even
like
hedgehog,
just
an
example.
Right,
I
think,
he's
kind
of
a
newer
is
she's,
probably
one
of
the
fewer
people
kind
of
numerous
dxd
holders
that
are
kind
of
come
in
and
I
think
it
is.
It
is
somewhat
engaging.
I
think,
especially
as
a
lot
of
assets
are
bleeding
now,
but
it's
yeah.
I
mean,
I
think
we
need
to
do
a
lot
more
in
engaging
like
the
dxd
community,
but
maybe
this
is
like
a
little
bit.
Yeah.
D
F
Yeah,
I
agree
with
that,
but
I
I
I
will
comment
that
it
has
been
a
significantly
noticeable
improvement
to
before.
In
my
personal
opinion
of
the
community
engagement
and
the
amount
of
people
chatting
and
coming
to
our
community
calls,
I
think,
has
increased
over
time
here.
K
Well,
in
that
sense,
then,
it
is
good
for
the
governance
like
for
governance
2.0,
just
depending
on
like
timeline,
obviously,
and
luckily
like
the
current,
we
can
even
just
update.
K
You
know
the
current
kind
of
written
letter
that
we
had
chris
just
to
reflect
like
the
new
parameters,
which
I
mean
it
could
still
be
like
a
million
or,
if
like
what
you
guys,
decide
on
the
0.48
measurement
versus
what
we
currently
have,
and
you
can
always
stop
like
does
one
million
make
sense
from
a
treasury
management
standpoint
I
mean,
obviously
it's
much
less
than
what's
in
the
buy
back
reserve.
K
B
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think,
that's
I
mean
we
do
get
the
dxd
and
then,
like
I
mean
geeksdale,
has
a
lot
of
dxd
right
like
it
doesn't
actually
need
that
much
more
dxd
itself.
It
benefits
from
that,
but,
like
the
eth,
of
course,
we
could
sell
and
fund
products,
whereas
the
dxd,
it's
you
know,
we
don't
want
to
be
liquidating
that
as
much
so
there
is
some
of
that
there,
but
I
think
just
again
at
these
prices
like
I
think
it
just
makes
sense,
and
if
it's.
C
The
the
other
interesting
thing
is
that
the
dxd
that
we
buy
back.
We
now
have
the
flexibility
and
okay
we're
not
going
to
use
it
for
product,
maybe
for
like
farming
and
stuff
as
much,
but
we
could
in
specific
unique
circumstances.
We
now
have
the
ability
to
do
a
swap
or
a
a
token
swap
with
a
project
or
something
so
without
the
buyback.
We
can't
really
like
just
give
dxd
for
certain
initiatives
and
with
the
buyback.
D
B
Didn't
want
us
to
supply
it
to
use
it.
I
think
we
already
did
this
with
the
farming
right.
That
was
kind
of
all.
You
know
all
the
farming
rewards
we've
had.
I
think
it's
250
dxd
on
mainnet
and
like
180
dxd
on
xdi,
that
has
been
sent
out
from
dxdow
right
and
distribution
that
you're
kind
of
talking
about
sky,
but
that's
like
12
of
the
total
dxd
acquired.
C
B
I'm
I
remember
that
too,
but
I
am
like
I'm
more
open
to
the
burn
than
I
feel
like
I
used
to
be
just
because
it's
yeah
I
mean
there's
like
not
that
much
dxd
out
there
like
circulating
supply
right,
and
I
think
this
is
like
a
way
where
we're
kind
of
like
we're
kind
of
like
shrinking.
Maybe
we're
shrinking
the
supply
of
you,
know
dxd
holders
or
people
in
genetiques,
doubt
of
like
the
most
vested
entities
and
then
we'll
kind
of
go
go
from
there.
B
E
E
B
B
Is
that
too
much?
I
feel
like
that's
a
little
separate,
but
I
think
we
need
to
start
on
that.
Like
I'm,
not
gonna,
I
guess
it
is
because
it's
coming
from
the
buy
back
reserve
that
does
kind
of
open
that
possibility
up,
but
I
think,
like
the
burn,
does
like
eliminate
the
flexibility
now.
D
The
reserve
it
does
give
flexibility,
which
I
think
is
important,
but
I
think
maybe
the
other
element
of
like
a
disconnect
between
like
the
treasury
and
circulating
market
cap,
is
that
the
fully
diluted
cap
is
like
actually
kind
of
close
to
the
treasury
and.
D
Like
do
we,
how
much
flexibility
do
we
does
dx
really
need
right
right
is:
does
it
need
a
hundred
thousand
dxd
and
reserve?
Maybe
that's
too
much
like
I
mean,
and
speaking
from
like
you
know,
I
think
the
earlier
discussions
before
that
decision
was
made.
It's
like
the
pre-med
was
like
you
know,
once
you
pre-med,
you
can't
meant
more
really
right
so,
like
I
think
like.
Maybe
it
was
aired
on
a
larger
side
to
allow
flexibility,
and
so
so
like
when
augustus
was
like.
You
know,
burn
was
always
the
answer.
D
I
Also,
following
the
social
media
sentiment,
I
believe,
there's
a
certain
shift
among
dxd
holders.
They
they
see
some
light
in
the
tunnel
to
get
some
return
on
investment
from
dxt
with
the
new
tokens.
So
I
I
believe
that
this
will
improve
kind
of
like
the
sentiment
of
the
holders.
B
I
14
days
since,
without
a
meme
yeah,
no
I
I
was
just
judging
by
you
know,
having
yuri
come
by
two
weeks
ago.
He
was
kind
of
like
looking
forward
to
the
new
token
launches
that
will
you
know
for
the
airdrop
and
then
the
revenue
that
they
will
bring
with
the
liquidity
that
they
will
attract
from
the
incentives
and
the
farming
campaign.
So
I
I
think
that
there's
a
lot
of
opium
and
it's
good.
B
That's
what's
nice
when
we
like
have
been
doing
things
even
if,
like
when
people
come
and
stop
by,
like
I
was
thinking
about
this
but
del
like
delphi,
they
kind
of
came
in
and
it
is
nice
to
be
like
yeah.
We
are
talking
about
product
tokens,
we're
talking
about
like
buyback
and
they
can
kind
of
poke
around
and
see
things.
And
then
it's
like
oh
yeah,
they've
still
been
building.
I
Yeah
yeah,
it
was
nice
for
john
to
ping
anil
and
and
for
him
to
confirm
that
we
kind
of
like
following
advice
and
hearing
what
people
are
saying
listening
to
feedback
which
is
really.
B
Good,
okay,
I
know
we're
way
over,
so
I'm
gonna
we'll
cut
it
here.
Just
as
a
there
will
be
a
po
app
so
claim
it
keenan.
I
don't
know
if
there
was
the
response
there
and
then
also
have
a
look
at
the
compensation
structure
stuff.
We
didn't
get
a
chance
to
speak
with
melanie
out,
but
hoping
everyone
could
take
some
eyes
on
that.
So
we
can
look
to
move
forward
that
quickly
and
then
yeah.
The
community
call
tomorrow
will
also
be
like
kind
of
two-year
anniversary
governance
celebration.