►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2021-07-28]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
dx
style
governance,
discussion
for
wednesday
july
28th,
1500
utc,
just
starting
first
with
the
proposal
roundup
on
mainnet,
there
are
eight
proposals
boosted
or
pending
boosted,
dxd
buyback
number
16,
the
funding
proposal
and
multi-call
proposal.
That's
should
be
the
last
one
that,
under
the
current
or
under
the
previous
signal
proposal,
I
think
there's
like
920
000
or
something
like
that.
That's
been,
and
there
was
just
an
order
placed
this
morning
so
that
one
I
think
is
set
to
go
today.
B
I'm
sorry
tomorrow,
number
16.,
then
there
is
a
set
omen.ethanxdy.omen.ed
content
hash.
I
think
this
is
the
second
omen
release.
In
a
week,
I'm
just
noticing,
like
the
the
releases
on
updating,
it,
has
been
pretty
consistent,
so
there's
another
one
there
and
then
yeah
the
signal
proposal
to
extend
the
dxd
buyback
program
for
an
additional
1
million
dollars
in
dxd
purchases.
So
this
is
something
we
talked
about.
The
last
two
weeks
put
up
a
signal
proposal.
B
Pretty
simple,
basically
says:
extend
the
program
under
the
same
parameters
as
before
for
another
million
dollars.
It
does
suggest
in
the
in
the
signal
proposal,
there's
like
relationship
with
the
buyback
reserve.
Obviously,
like
the
buyback
reserve,
we
can't
access
that
right
now
until
the
bond
until
the
t
token
contract
would
be
upgraded,
but
I
think
that's
part
of
that
process,
so
yeah
there's
it's
on
xdi
and
mainnet.
So
I
think
there's
a
bunch
of
people
that
are
voting
on
next
time.
B
If
it's
up
for
three
days
more
and
yeah,
I
wasn't
sure
if
anyone
had
any
thoughts
on
on
that.
We
kind
of
discussed
the
last
two
weeks.
C
C
But
then
you
explain
that
there
is
a
dxd
token
right
and
people
are
interested
in
that
dual
model
and
then
actually
often
the
dxd
buyback
program
comes
up,
because
it's
a
very
unique
program
that
you
know
there
are
a
few
projects.
C
I
guess
why
earn
urine
is
is
by
has
brought
back
some
wi-fi
and
things,
but
in
general,
that's
not
like
yeah
maker,
like
the
system
buys
mkr
and
stuff
like
that,
but
actually
actually
having
like
a
buyback
program
due
to
like,
like
observance
of
undervalue
versus
where
we
like
the
dao
or
the
treasury,
thinks
it
should
be,
is
a
pretty
interesting
thing.
C
C
D
E
D
C
D
D
I
I
don't
think
they
need
money,
so
I
think
it's
just
like
resource
allocation,
but
there
there
is
an
initiative,
a
working
group
and
the
dxr
who's
like
preparing
or
running
our
own
solver.
Until
the
buyback
program
is
done.
So
I
think
it's
actually
not
a
lot
of
effort
to
run
the
software
on
xtoy
and
that's
something
we
we're
gonna
prepare.
So
there's
no
like
delay
on
progressing
with
the
buyback.
B
Yeah,
I
think
sky,
I
think
you're
you're
you're
right
and
I
think
luckily
we
are
documenting
this
because
we
like
pass
proposals
and
we
do
things
on
chain
and
everything
is
kind
of
like
there
and
we've
been
talking
about
it.
I
think
we
need
to
go
back
and
kind
of
piece
that
together
and
put
it
in
like
a
more
like
bite-sized
portion,
but
I
think
what
geronimo
is
describing
is
kind
of
we're,
maybe
not
all
the
way
through
yet
right,
we're
kind
of
like
still
halfway
through.
B
We
need
to
maybe
figure
out
this
next
step
of
running
our
own
solvers,
and
I
also
think
maybe,
if
we
can
integrate
with
swapper
and
doing
the
buyback
program
on
swapper,
I
think
there's
some
opportunity
to
kind
of
like
even
keep.
I
don't
know,
maybe
telling
a
longer
story.
There.
D
Want
v2
with
solvers
yeah,
like
I,
I
don't
think,
there's
an
issue
with
us
like
maintaining
the
infrastructure
until
we
actually
have
a
better
solution
and
I'm
curious
why
we're
actually
picking
swapper
for
for,
like
as
an
integration,
we
might
actually
like
look
into
aqua
integration
with
like
when
the
auction
functionality
is
done.
B
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think,
that's
the
long
term
like
I
think.
That's
like
the
way
that
geek
style
should
purchase
tokens
is
through
the
aqua
platform,
but
just
like
I
don't
know
we're,
as
you
can
see,
there's
like
we
want
to
like
this
is
kind
of
like
the
life
of
a
doubt
like
okay,
we
want
to
like
buy
back
dxd
we've
kind
of
gone
through
this
process,
and
we
have
this
like
one
way,
we're
doing
it
and
then
it's
like.
B
Oh,
no,
that's
shutting
down,
and
it
turns
out
it's
really
hard
for
a
dow
or
a
non,
something
like
from
a
smart
contract
to
interact
and
put
limit
orders
so
we're
kind
of
like
I
don't
know
we're
stuck
in
all
of
these
different
situations,
and
I
think
it's
just
like
a
way
of
coming
up
with
our
own
solutions.
B
Yeah
I
mean:
is
that
a
realistic
thing
I
don't
know
if
kermit
wants
to
we're
talking
about
these
solvers
or
someone
who
could
run
the
solvers
would
be
that's.
We
shouldn't
do
that
because
I
think,
like
in
general,
we
need
to
think
about
infrastructure.
D
Yeah
and
like,
and
it's
actually
working
quite
well
right
like
we
shouldn't
stop
it,
we
should
make
sure
that
we
continue
as
it
is,
and
yeah.
B
I
would
say
that
nico,
I
think,
who's
working
on
the
the
obviously
the
integration
of
swapper.
I
think
that's
like
a
broad-based
relayer
that
would
be
able
to
do.
I
think,
even
like
unit
swap
v3
purchases.
B
D
Yeah,
but
I
also
agree
with
sky
like
that:
that's
something
like
very
rare
teams
are
doing
like
everyone
is
doing
the
opposite,
but
basically
printing,
but
we
actually
like.
We
are
continuously
showing
skin
in
the
game
and
actually
buying
our
dxd
back
for
a
very
cheap
price
and
just
like.
D
I
think
it
could
also
like
not
only
one
medium
article,
but
rather
like
a
a
progress
update
of
where
we
are
and
how
it
works
and
yeah,
and
also
like
potential
upgrades
on
like
how
how
does
actually
doing
it
right
now.
We
are
using
v1
and
like
actually
looking
into
if
we
like
what
what
is
the
replacement
for
v1,
maybe
v2,
maybe
aqua,
maybe
gnosis
auction.
H
Yeah,
maybe
I
could
even
reach
out
to
shreyas
at
the
llama
community.
You
know
they
portray
themselves
as
thought
leaders
in
the
space
of
dow
treasury
management
and
they
get
a
lot
of
traction
with
every
anything
they
publish.
They
are
featured
on
panels
and
forums.
F
Yeah,
we
have
all
the
documentation.
I
think
basically
at
this
point
so,
like
chris
said
it's
just
putting
it
together
in
like
a
it's
just
past
tense.
At
this
point,
and
like
I
guess
maybe
some
like
I'm
sure
chris
has
a
and
maybe
dave
as
well,
has
some
past
thoughts
on
like
what
was
working
well
and
what
wasn't
working
well.
B
Yeah,
I
mean
I
told
niko
this
last
week
like
it
is
pretty
cool
like
I
was
like
you
know,
you
wrote
this
like
it's
a
relayer
contract
that,
like
we've
just
like
I
don't
know,
I've
interacted
with
a
lot
or
like
lots
of
people,
have
interacted
with
a
lot
sending
funds
there
like
sending
two
different
proposals.
I
think
there's
like
I
mean
I
think,
there's
been
30
buybacks,
basically
32.
B
I
think
buybacks
over
two
months,
so
it's
like
one
every
other
day,
pretty
evenly
split
between
xdi
and
mainnet,
and
you
know
each
of
those
are
two
proposals.
So
it's
like
60
proposals,
really
that's
like
was
executed
over
that
time.
So
there's
a
lot
of
like
you
know
maneuvering
going
on,
but
it
is
kind
of
cool
that
we
were
able
to
do
that
in
a.
I
think,
pretty
trustless
way.
C
Yeah
in
the
last
couple
months,
even
members
of
the
gnosis
team
who
built
gnosis
v1,
didn't
know
that
it
was
it
was.
We
were
able
something
like
this
using
that
protocol
and
so
like
that,
relayer
innovation
and
the
way
dx
dial
created
to
basically
leave
orders
like
that
in
a
trustless
and
safe
way,
is
even
been
groundbreaking
for
like
gnosis
who
built
the
protocol.
So
we
didn't
really
yeah.
We
didn't.
Unfortunately,
it's
going
away,
I
guess,
but
that's
that's
really
interesting.
D
Yeah,
I
agree
like
there
could
be
an
opportunity
with
actually
like
reaching
out
to
knows
his
comments
and
working
together
on
this.
Like
diagnosis
with
that,
like
gnosis,
actually
built
something
very
useful
for
like
new
type
of
organizations,
right.
D
B
F
F
D
Yeah
and
just
the
fact
that,
like
that,
it's
just
in
the
progress
right
like
I
think
this
stuff
will
continue
for
a
while.
So
I
think
that's
also
like
good
for
making
dxd
attractive.
B
Yeah
yeah,
I
mean,
I
think,
one
of
the
goals,
or
at
least
from
my
perspective,
like
the
buyback
program,
is
kind
of
like
really
forward
signaling
dx
dow's
commitment
to
dxd,
like
in
a
lot
of
ways
you
think
of
like
the
federal
reserve
and
how
they
like
try
to
signal
guidance
on
like
future
interest
rates
or
kind
of
you
know.
You
trust
certain,
like
kind
of
figures,
because
they
kind
of
executed
on
it.
What
did
mario
draghi
say
like
whatever
it
takes?
B
So
in
a
lot
of
ways,
I
think
like
what
we're
doing
by
like
purchasing
it
consistently
is
just
like
geeks.
I
was
like
putting
money
in
like
kind
of
funds
behind
us,
and
it's
like
executing
on
this,
and
I
think
telling
people
about
it
is
like
a
good
way
to
do.
That,
like
that's
part
of
that
process
is,
is
communicating
that
story
to
a
broader
audience.
B
Dxd
cool
so
vote.
On
extension,
that's
the!
I
guess!
That's
that
proposal
is
up
there
and
then
I
guess:
there's
one
yeah,
there's
one
more
buyback
proposal,
number
17
and
we'll
have
to
figure
out
probably
whether
to
do
any
more
on
mainnet
or
xti,
but
we'll
explore
that
and
then
just
the
rest
of
proposals
on
mainnet.
There's
a
rep
sync
for
fluid
drop
dave,
and
I
think
that's
just
he's-
got
three
months
of
ex9
proposals
that
he's
thinking
on
mainnet.
B
Then
there
is
a
transfer
400
eth
to
xtx
dow
for
swapper
deposits
and
xdx
dial
operations.
So
this
is
kind
of
combining
two
different
transfers.
B
One
is
a
150
eth
transfer
to
xstow
for
basic
operations,
so
half
of
that
is
converted
to
x,
die
and
is
used
for
salary
or
paying
out
to
workers,
and
then
the
other
half
is
going
to
be
kept
in
west
or
wrapped
into
ethan
into
west
and
put
in
x
seeks
out
which
we
use
for
the
buyback
or
anything
else
that
exceeds
now
needs
for
for
wef.
B
Maybe
farming
campaigns
or
something,
and
actually
if
we
do
end
up
using
xseq
style
for
most
of
the
buyback,
we
probably
need
to
put
more
in
do
another
one,
but
so
there's
150,
that's
kind
of
daily
operations
for
x8
style
and
then
there's
250
eth,
that's
earmarked
for
swapper
x,
die
deposit
for
the
weth
x
die
pair.
I
think
it's
like
what
I
guess.
B
Each
price
is
like
five
hundred
thousand
dollars,
so
this
is
another
deposit
I
think
into
the
west
die
pool
that
I
think
there's
been
there's
about.
Eight
hundred
thousand
dollars
already
of
dxd
liquidity
in
the
swapper
weth
dye
pool
on
x-die.
B
It's
actually
been
profitable,
there's
a
post
up
in
the
forum
on
this,
but
that
pool
has
actually
been
profitable.
So
I
think
it's
good
to
increase
the
commitment
to
swapper
liquidity.
So
it's
a
400th
proposal
to
transfer
to
xcx
dow
it'll
pass.
I
think
next
thursday.
B
Cool
and
then
moving
to
xdi
bays
there's
some
worker
proposals.
There
is
kaden
caden
zipfel
we
got
up
and
we
have
two
cadence.
I
gotta
kaden
zipple
zipville
software
tammy
contract
proposals,
skymine
labs,
dev,
violet
worker
proposal.
I
did
not
check
to
see
if
there
was
a
techno
song
in
the
the
key
base
saw
package,
but
those
are
the
four
work
proposals
and
then
yeah.
There's
the
dxl
compensation
compensation
structure,
overhaul
2021.
So
I
don't
know
if
melanie
wanted
to
say
anything
about
this.
B
We've
discussed
this
a
lot
over
the
last
couple
months.
It's
been
up
in
the
forum
for
a
bit
but
yeah
melanie.
I
Yeah,
so
the
compensation
compensation
structure
overhaul
is
up
on
alchemy
to
get
so
go
vote
on
it.
I
think
it
just
was
boosted
yesterday,
but
there's
a
few
things
I
want
to
highlight
if
this
does
pass
so
one
is
that
there
will
be
an
increase
in
compensation
overall
for
contributors
in
this
new
structure.
I
I
In
addition
to
that,
there
is
a
process
outlined
in
the
proposal
of
how
we
will
transition
from
the
current
structure
that
has
five
contributor
experience
levels
to
the
new
structure.
That
has
eight
eight
levels.
So
essentially,
each
contributor
is
going
to
be
responsible
for
determining
their
new
level,
they're
encouraged
to
meet
with
other
contributors
at
dxtau
to
help
determine
your
new
new
level.
I
B
B
I
also
think
this
is
like
kind
of
coming
after
the
buyback
discussion.
I
think
this
is
also
like
an
important
like
long-term
alignment,
with
kind
of
the
people
building
and
running
and
contributing
to
dxdow,
and
I
think
that
these
are
all
like.
We
talk
a
lot
about
tokens,
but
tokens
do
have
very
powerful
incentives
and
yeah.
I
think
this
is
part
of
that
process
of
making.
I
B
Of
distributing
incentives
to
the
right
stakeholders.
F
I
I
had
a
question
about
that.
It
came
up
when
I
was
speaking
with
melanie
earlier
this
week
and
we
don't
have
to
like
fully
talk
about
it
now,
but
I'm
just
curious
what
people
think
so.
Are
we
currently
operating
under
the
assumption
that
you're
fully
paid,
if
you're,
still
working
for
dx,
dow
in
three
years
from
the
contract
date
or
like?
I,
I
think
we've
had
different
versions
of
this
discussion
about
what
the
vesting
with
cliff
like
the
vesting
cliff
and
then
the
schedule
means
as
far
as
like.
F
What's
the
requirement
for
continued
vesting,
is
it
just
like
a
a
proper
completion
of
work?
You
know
for
the
two-month
period
and
then
you
can
expect
barring
any
like
bad
conduct
of
the
you
know
the
contractor
in
the
remaining
three
years.
Even
if
they
don't
work
for
dx
doubt
or
is
it
like
requirement
that
you're
working
for
dx
dao.
D
Yeah,
so
the
slashing
definitely
like-
I
am
very
pro
slashing
because,
like
if
there's
no
raptor
splash
value
needs
to
be
flashed.
C
Since
this
is
since
this
is
in
line
with
like
contributors
to
dxdow,
whether
they're
full-time
contributors
or
part-time,
like
you
can
I
mean
it's
mainly
full-time
contributors
that
are
earning
this
locked
up,
dxd
right,
like
part-time
contributors
or
or
like
one-offs,
could
theoretically
ask
for
dxd
locked
up
as
part
of
compensation.
C
But
we
haven't
had
many
examples
of
that.
Most
contractors
and
things
have
just
gotten
paid
in
like
dollars
and
then
that's
just
set,
but
it's
it
is
an
option
there
as
well,
but
so,
if
you
assume
most
are
full-time
workers,
those
full-time
workers
historically
have
also
earned
reputation
so
you're,
assuming
that
if
you
earn
locked
up
dxd
as
a
contributor,
you're,
probably
also
earning
reputation
and
then
you're
earning
pay
as
well,
and
so
theoretically,
these
these
contributors
should
always
have
like
should
start
to
gather
lots
of
rep
or
more.
C
You
know
a
decent
amount
of
reputation
which
can
always
be
slashed,
so
you
do
always
have
the
ability
to
slash
reputation
whether
you
want
to
also
slash
dxde,
which
is
kind
of
historically
we've
been
looking
at
as
part
of
your
pay,
and
so
it
is
locked
up
to
align
interest,
but
most
people
that
have
received
its
investing
contracts
in
the
past
it.
The
dow
does
not
have
the
ability
to
slash
that
pay,
because
it
was
kind
of
looked
at
as
pay
rather
than
like
the
kid
like
slashable
reputation,.
F
Right
so
one
thing
I
want
to
clarify
with
with
geronimo
and
then
also
what
sky
said.
So
that's
my
understanding
is
that
it's
been
in
the
past
and
maybe
we're
going
to
continue
it
to
have
that
way.
It's
assumed,
even
if
you're,
maybe
you
know,
maybe
you
go
somewhere
else,
you're,
not
working
for
dx
down
anymore.
Maybe
you
worked
for
two
months
for
dx
day,
I'm
not
sure.
F
Whatever
right
you
a
year
from
now,
you
still
have
your
dxd
that
starts
investing
and
as
long
as
you're
not
doing
anything
malicious
or
in
bad
faith
to
dx
dao.
You
can
expect
that
your
dxd
is
going
to
vest
for
the
next
three.
You
know
three
years
or
are
we?
Is
it
conditioned
upon
even
the
vesting
happening
of
you
still
working
for
dxdo
right?
F
I'm
just
wondering,
like
that's
one
thing
to
clarify,
and
then
the
next
thing,
of
course,
is
if
we're
assuming
that
you
know
it
doesn't
matter
if
you're
working
for
dx
dare
not
if
it's
more
like
a
question
of
malicious
conduct,
bad
faith
actions
and
in
like
the
future,
that's
like
a
different
thing.
I
think.
C
So
if
you,
if
you
are
earning
locked
up
dxd,
you
should
be
the
whole
point.
Is
you
should
be
incentivized
as
a
person
to
contribute
value
to
increase
the
xd
price
because
you
have
it
there
and
it's
locked
up
right.
It's
financial
incentive,
if
you
did
something
to
like
bring
down
dxd
you're,
making
your
money
go
to
nothing
which
is
not
a
smart
financial
decision
right
and
like.
C
F
Right
so,
if
you're
being
like
a
bad
yeah,
acting
in
bad
faith
like
not
towards
the
interests
of
like
the
dao
or
something
like
that,
that's
like
clearly
like
adversarial
in
interest,
but
then
it
gets
like
confusing
how
to
define
that.
But
I
just
wanted
to
just
get
some
opinions
on
that
to
like
figure
out,
maybe
how
to
write
this
a
bit
for
people
who
start
working.
So
they
can
understand
that
you
know
this
is
pretty
much
a
part
of
your
pay.
But
you
know
if
you
do
something:
that's
like
super
negative.
F
You
could
get
slashed
like
rage.
Quitty
kind
of
thing
could
happen
different
than
just
like
continued
work.
C
Dxd
will
go
concurrently,
go
into
the
vesting
contracts
that
we've
already
been
using
or
a
new
system
which
we
have
planned.
Dxd
would
go
into
that
system
and
you
have
the
ability
to
make
it.
B
Stop
investing,
I
mean
so
there's
no
vesting
contracts
now.
Geek
style
also
needs
to
upgrade
the
dxl
dxd
token
and
can
up
upgrade
the
dxd
token,
so,
like
geeksdale,
ultimately
has
control
over
like
how
we
could
build
this.
So
I
think
we
have
to
make
decisions
on
that.
I
think
it's
one
of
those
things
that
decisions
kind
of
like
go
up.
B
J
We
have
an
example
of
someone
that
should
have
got
dxd,
but
we
would
probably
slash
as
an
example
tony
which
actually
got
salary
from
us,
but
for
some
reason
tony
said
he
didn't
want
dxt,
so
we're
lucky
there,
but
if
he
actually
got
dxt
and
now
we
know
he
yeah,
I
mean
he
was
malicious
at
another
place.
It
wasn't
actually
malicious
here.
Would
we
slash
his
dxd
100
yeah,
I
mean,
but
we
don't
have
proof
like.
Do
we
trust
another
team
like?
Can
we
just
do
that?
I
don't
know
like.
B
B
I
know
I
don't
know
this.
First
of
all,
it's
not
a
hundred
percent
drama
because,
like
I've,
I've
talked
to
julian
on
this
and
like
I
think
it
sounds
like
dona.
You
know
it
sounds
like
tony.
Maybe
did
something
and
I
like
it,
be
very
bad
if
he
did
something,
and
I
think
that
it'd
be
fine
for
geeksdale
to
like
take
a
position
on
that.
D
Yeah,
I
mean
that's
a
good
point
like
I
think
there
needs
to
be
like
a
working
group
creating
a
report
about
if
the
guy
is
actually
tony,
like
our
tony
and
if
they're
like
clear
evidence,
it's
our
tony
and
it's
clear
that
he
was
malicious.
I
mean
that
then
it's
I
mean.
F
There's
any
evidence
like
this,
so
this
is
okay,
so
that's
mostly
like,
I
think
that
gives
a
lot
of
information
for
the
working
group
for
to
think
about
this.
This
issue,
I
just
wanted
to
get
an
idea
if
it
was
like
a
idea
of
you're
still
working
or
if
we're
talking
about
malicious
activity.
So
it
seems
like
it's
more
in
the
malicious
activity.
Bad
faith,
category
of
things
so
maybe
melanie
and
chris
and
everyone
else
with
contributor
x,
can
like
formulate
some
proposals
around
this
and
then,
when
it's
built
see
what
actually
makes
sense.
K
Well,
hey
guys,
so
I
don't
know
chris
is
telling
me
I'm
maybe
reading
the
spreadsheet
wrong,
but
I'm
looking
at
the
spreadsheet
and
the
if
you
look
at
the
200
level
for
dxd
it
says
dxd
per
month
is:
is
that
not
per
month?
K
B
Well,
can
you
can
you
should
I
share
this
spreadsheet
because
no,
I
I
understand
that
that
know
what
I'm
saying
when
you
get
paid
in
dxd
right
that
dxd,
that
is
issued
every
month,
that's
sent
to
a
contract,
it's
not
circulating
in
that
first
year,
it's
actually
vested
over
three
years,
so
only
a
third
of
that
dxd,
that's
paid
out
in
that
first
year,
is
actually
hitting
the
market.
The
rest
of
that
is
coming
over
the
next
three
years.
So
it's
like
a
gradual
like
issuance
through
that.
So
if.
K
B
The
percentage
of
the
inflation
rate,
the
inflation
rate
like
is
a
year
denominator,
so
you're
right,
though
in
years
two
and
three
like
you,
would
start
to
have
issuance
of
the
first
of
like
next
year's
dxd
issuance
the
first
year.
Investing
would
hit
next
year
plus
the
second
year
of
this
year,
and
so
you
would
start
to
have
like
a
larger
amount
in
the
in
the
like
starting
in
years.
B
I
guess
second,
the
third
year,
you
would
have
all
three
years
of
things
starting
to
vest
another
way
it
wouldn't
happen
to,
and
that
wouldn't
happen
to
two
or
three
years
and
just
thinking
about
like
the
issuance
schedule
of
dxd.
You
know
it's
been
like
a
year
since
txt
has
been
issued,
so
we're
talking
about
like
three
years
from
now.
You
know
having
18,
you
know
having.
I
guess
that
would
be
7
000
or
8
000
onto
the
market.
Four
years
after
dxd
launch,
I
think,
is
like
that
seems
pretty
pretty
fair.
K
K
So
over
the
course
of
yeah,
so
yeah
it's
not
going
to
be
fully
on
the
market
so
a
year
from
now
a
third
of
that
would
be
on
the
market,
and
then
you
know
two
years
you'd
have
that
same
third,
like
plus
another
third.
So
then
you
have
a
two-thirds
of
that
rate
and
in
the
third
year
it
goes
into
the
full
rate
of
release
right
and
then
and
then
it's
at
so
you're,
really
just
you
know,
building
up
to
that
rate.
B
Yeah,
but
your
second
and
three,
the
dxd
price,
hopefully
like
that's
higher,
so
it's
priced
at
that
one
like
we're
playing
on
that
two.
The
circulating
supply
will
be
higher
in
years
two
and
three,
because
there
will
be
dxd
issuance
in
year
one.
So
you
can't
use
like
the
denominator
the
same
denominator
from
like
year.
One
and
like
I
think
this
like
is
a
staggered
approach
like
by
design.
B
We
want
to
like
like
ramp
up
to
this
and
like
not
do
it
kind
of
all
at
once,
but
like
I
do
think
we
should
be
planning
for
like
over
the
next
like
three
to
four
years
to
be.
You
know,
issuing
dhd
to
workers
and
kind
of
at
the
appropriate.
B
K
A
couple
of
things
is
like,
with
the
buyback
we'll
actually
be
decreasing
the
circulating
supply
right,
so
the
percentage
could
actually
increase
to
the
buyback,
and
then
I
I
think
that
the
minimum,
the
intent
should
be
to
protect
us
from
a
situation
where,
like
things,
are
not
necessarily
going
well
right,
so
we
could
go
like
yes,
of
course,
we
all
hope
that
the
dxd
price
is
doing
much
much
better
than
200
and
there's
many
reasons
it
should
be,
but
like
in
a
bear
market
like
who
knows
right.
So.
F
Right
we
we
talked
about
this
a
couple
weeks
a
few
weeks
ago,
right
chris
and
then
I
think,
keenan
put
together
this
spreadsheet
and
you
were
doing
you.
It
seemed
like
you
thought
about
it.
A
lot
dave
was
on
the
call,
I'm
not
sure
if
there
was
anything
more
that
we
like
we
need
do
we
need
to
like
do
more,
like
I
don't
want
to
say
modeling,
but
like
some
sort
of
trajectory
like
projected
circulating
supply
like
like
how
deeply
do
we
need
to
go.
K
I
mean
I
like
my
main
question
here
is
like
do
the
stakeholders
actually
understand?
Because
when
you
look
at
the
proposal
tax,
like
three
percent,
I
don't
think
is,
I
think
it's
very
misleading,
and
so
my
question
would
be
like
what
do
txt
holders
think
about
this
rate
of
inflation
to
the
circulating
supply.
K
With
we've
incentivized
it
with
farming,
so
there
has
been
some
release
of
dxd
from
the
farming
campaigns,
but
the
net
the
net
net,
with
the
buy
back,
is
actually
taking
a
good
amount
of
dxt
out
of
the
circulating
supply.
The
the
buyback
has
taken
like
10x
what
was
spent
on
the
farming
campaigns
and
there
at
least,
as
I
understood
there,
was
no
intention
to
continue
the
farming
campaigns
with
dxd
as
the
reward.
F
Okay
right,
so
I
think
because
yeah
like
we,
we
kind
of
got
into
this
like.
Basically,
the
question
would
be
like
with
the
continued
buyback,
but
that's
happening
immediately
versus
like
when
this
passes
you're
saying
like
at
the
point
where
dxd
starts
getting
released
through
the
vesting
contracts.
What's
going
to
happen
to
the
circulating
supply.
K
Yeah
I
mean,
I
think,
that's
a
key
number
for
people
to
look
at
right
for
everybody.
Look.
B
K
B
B
Word
literally
you're
describing
the
worst
case
scenario
and
that's
also
like
we
have
the
ability
to
like
that's
only
if
we're
like
paying
people
that
full
amount
over
that
entire
year,
and
I
still
think
like
20
over
three
years
is
like
that's.
This
is
what
dxd
is
for
it's
to
incentivize
stakeholders.
K
I
mean
I
obviously
I
conceptually
agree
with
the
idea
of
incentivizing
people.
That's
not
my
concern
here
right.
The
flip
side
of
that
is
like
what
are
you
like.
We
only
have
so
much
to
work
with,
and
you
have
to
be
mindful
of
that
supply
and
I
think
the
idea
of
the
minimum
is
to
kind
of
put
a
lower
bound
on
it
right,
so
you
should
be
considering
worst
case
scenarios
and
in
terms
of
like
what
scenario
we're
considering
here,
the
225
is
a
worst
case.
K
Dxd
scenario
for
the
pricing
of
the
thing,
but
you
know,
like
I
said,
like
dxd
buyback-
could
actually
decrease
the
circulating
supply,
which
would
increase
that
percentage
and
like
are
we
accounting
for
like
an
increase
in
potential
increase
in
head
count
that
could
also
change
it.
Right,
like
these
are
based
on
current
head
count.
I
think.
C
What
are
the,
if
that
I
mean
that's
a
that's
that
20
or
if
20
leaving
the
treasury,
is
a
lot
per
year.
I
agree
it
is
locked
up
which
is
to
align
interest
is.
Is
there
some?
What's
the
alternative
like
so
you
could
lower
dxd.
If
you
want
to
keep
like,
you
could
do
locked
up
eth,
but
then
that
doesn't
align
interest.
So
is
there
a
way
to
like
what,
if
the
total
pay,
which
is
made
up
of
locked
up,
dxd
and
eth,
sorry
not
eth
die
and
locked
up
dxd?
F
C
C
In
this
case
we
switched
it
to
market
dxd
price
and
we
actually
came
up
with
like
a
minimum,
because
if
it
goes
to
like
50
dollars
like
it's
gonna
just
drain
the
xd,
so
we
there
was
some
minimum
in
there
right,
I
believe-
and
so
maybe
there's
some
number
like
between
market
price
and
all-time
high
price.
That
makes
more
sense
that
would
address
this
concern
yet
still
accomplish
all
the
goals.
B
So
there
is
a
minimum
of
225
in
here,
and
so
I
think,
with
the
225,
it's
8500
dxd.
That
would
be
maximum
of
the
20
if
I
think
it's
20
full-time
people
at
various
different
levels,
mostly
what
we
have
now-
and
I
just
think
that's.
B
Yeah
yeah
and
then-
and
so
that's
that's
like
the
8
500.
So
that's
like
what
it
would
be
if,
like
you
know,
so
it
wouldn't
be
now
because
the
obviously
at
300
now
and
you're
working
the
buyback
program
would
kind
of
be
in
that.
But
that's
our
like
you
know,
that's
what
we're
like
putting
as
the
minimum
to
protect
against
that
and
I
think
that's
like
a
pretty.
H
Fair
level,
yeah
and
also
it
seems
like
stakeholders
tend
to
measure
value
up
against
the
ethereum
in
treasury.
So
if
we
dial
it
down
on
the
txt
and
start
converting
ethereum,
it
will
actually
be
immediate
cell
pressure
and
and
devalue
the
token
rather
than
having
invested
over
three
years.
C
K
C
K
You
could
say
two
things
right
like
one
is
like
this
is
all
moot.
If
the
price
goes
up,
which
I
mean,
I
think
we
would
all
hope
for
right
so
like
I
hope
this
is
not
an
issue
but,
like
I
think
the
question
here
in
my
mind,
is
like
what
is
the
minimum
right,
because
the
minimum
is
supposed
to
protect
us
against
issuing
too
much
dxd
in
a
scenario
where
that,
like
the
price,
would
be
that
yeah.
That.
C
Well,
I
think
every
year
you're
going
to
want
to
reevaluate
this
the
worker
guidelines
right
and
and
doing
this,
like
you
know,
the
maximum
amount
that
can
leave
the
treasury
at
a
225
price
for
one
year
and
then
in
one
year
you
can.
We
can
even
put
that
in
a
proposal
like
in
one
year
we
will
reevaluate
and
and
you'll
be
able
to
you'll
have
a
lot
more
information.
At
that
point
and
the
most
you
know
you,
you
know
today
how
much
could
be
locked
up
investing
contracts
over
the
next
year.
H
There
are
these
gamified
platforms
where
they
incentivize
people
to
save
incrementally
every
month.
I'm
wondering
that
what
the
trade-off
is
between
a
vesting
contract
over
three
years
against
paying
people
immediately,
but
a
lower
amount
and
giving
them
a
chance
to
stake
it
in
a
special
staking
contract
that
allows
them
if
they
stake
that
amount
for
it
to
be
earning
them.
H
B
Work
yeah
violet
did
you
have
a.
A
I
want
that
maybe
one
suggestion,
because
I
don't
think
it's
fair,
for
example,
for
someone
to
work
for
a
couple
of
months
and
at
the
end
of
the
three
years
he
would
get
the
same
amount
of
dxd
as,
for
example,
someone
who
worked
three
years.
So
I
don't
know.
A
I
think
we
should
disincentivize
people
from
leaving
dxdoll
early,
for
example,
by
slashing
their
staked
dxd
by,
I
don't
know
20
or
30
percent
if
they
leave
early
and
basically
incentivize
people
for
staying,
you
know
to
get
the
full
amount,
maybe
at
the
end
of
the
period
that
way
we
can
reduce.
You
know
the
amount
of
dxd
which
yeah.
B
D
I
think
to
ross
argument,
I
mean
the
job
of
the
working
group.
The
person
is
like
working
with
needs
to
evaluate
their
like
work
value
right
like
if
they're
actually
performing
badly.
I
think
the
working
group
should
raise
their.
D
F
Yeah
we
anyone
who's
interested
in
this
topic
should
join
the
contributor
at
ux
call
and
we
can
dive
into
it
in
greater
detail.
I
was
actually
just
based
off
of
how
the
wording.
Currently
it
was
unclear
what
direction
it
was
and
melanie,
and
I
had
a
discussion
where
we
were
also
unclear,
so
I
wanted
to
start
sussing
this
out
because
it's
important
so
yeah,
that's
it.
On
my
end
with
that
question.
K
F
F
C
C
D
Yeah,
so
that's
actually
pretty
interesting
right,
like
allowing
the
dxt
holders
to
actually
like
really
voice
their
opinion
about
the
issuance
now
we're
preparing.
So
I
I
don't
see
why
not,
let's
see
like
it's,
it's
always
an
experience
right
to
like
integrate
holders.
K
F
B
K
I
K
F
Yeah,
I
know
I
think
that
we're
talking
about
it
like
I
said
we,
we
kind
of
talked
about
it
and,
like
keenan,
made
started
doing
like
the
the
spreadsheet
and
everything,
so
it's
good
to
figure
it
out
also
whether
or
not
to
snapshot.
It
seems
like
that's
we're,
starting
to
do
with
more,
like
large
funding
requests,
as
do
the
dxd
snapshot.
B
Cool,
I
just
want
to
keep
going
because
I
actually
we
have
a
call
I
need
to
run
to
at
the
top
of
the
hour.
So
I
guess
we
didn't
just
the
yeah.
So
that's
it
for
proposals
there.
There
is
the
deek
style,
idol
treasury
diversification
proposal.
Maybe
we
can
talk
about
later.
Actually
what
about
the
global
hackathon
sky?
I
was
wondering
if
we
needed
to
do
anything
for
that.
It
would
be
good
to
get
like
a
proposal
up
quickly
and
get
some
consensus.
C
Yeah,
so
there
is
the
dow
talk
post.
I
don't
think
there's
been
any
negative
comments
right.
We
could
do
an
x
die
well,
so
I
I
let
me
check.
I
asked
kartik
if
I
was
just
checking
like
triple
checking.
If
he
didn't
answer
me,
so
I
was
basically
just
triple
like
double
checking
with
him,
that
if
we
tell
him
like
tomorrow
that
we
want
like
we're
a
go
ahead
as
dx
dow
to
participate
in
this
hackathon.
C
Is
it
okay
to
like
make
the
payment
as
a
follow-up
and
stuff?
He
didn't
answer
me.
I
think
I'll
have
an
answer
tomorrow
morning
and
I'll
ping
him
again.
C
So
if
we
have
general
consensus
like
here
even
without
an
actual
proposal,
I
I
think
we
could
give
him
give
him
the
go
ahead.
Assuming
he
says
it's
okay
to
ideally
tomorrow,
but
then
there's
a
little
bit
of
work.
We
still
need
to
do
and
defining
the
prizes
and
who
could
provide
some
time
committed
and
things
like
that.
We
need
to
make.
J
B
Yeah,
I
think
everyone's
pretty
into
it
and
there's
been
some
interesting
ideas,
so
I
would
say,
like
pretty
good
consensus.
C
Cool
so
by
tomorrow
I
like
I'll,
communicate
with
kartik
and
and
assuming
we
have
we're,
allow
like
we're
allowed
to
I'll.
Tell
them
like
we
want
to
go
ahead
and
then
we
can.
He
can
tell
us
what
else
we
need
to
give
them,
and
then
we
can
do
a
proposal,
and
I
said,
and
I
mentioned
like
would
be
awesome
to
do
a
proposal
for
the
dow
to
pay
each
global
directly
and
things
like
that
outlining
the
details.
So.
B
B
Yeah
and
then
I
just
had
a
couple
other
things
list,
I
wasn't
sure
if
anyone
wanted
to
chat
about
them
or
mention
anything
here,
there's
the
hats
collaboration.
I
think
we
need
to
think
about
the
next
step
and
then
the
just
the
contributor
ux
afterwards,
I'm
gonna
be
talking
about
we'll
talk
about
this
stuff.
We
were
talking
about
earlier,
but
we'll
also
be
chatting
about
the
mark.
B
A
couple
marketing
lead
candidates,
so
if
you've
been
involved
in
any
of
those
make
sure
and
step
by
and
then
yeah
there's
the
dxgov,
where
augusto
is
saying
he
doesn't
like
product
tokens
but
saying
we
should
have
unified
governance
interfaces
or
not
unified
universe
interface.
I
can't
remember,
but
anyone
have
anything
they
want
to
say
on
those
before
we.
B
E
E
Actually,
the
gear
was
designed
to
be
very
standardized,
so
it
is
not
hard
to
implement
like
a
kill
interface
in
dx
volt.
Of
course
it's
going
to
be
more
complex,
but
what
the
idea?
I
think
this
is
very
powerful,
because
it
is
our
responsibility
for
everyone
here
that
is
working
on
every
project,
to
bring
more
people
be
being
and
feeling
part
of
the
excel
governance
right.
E
This
is
the
more
people
that
joins
our
the
exile,
the
more
centralize
this,
the
more
reputation
for
that
we
have,
the
more
decentralized
it
is
so
are
these
kill?
Borders
are
going
to
be
taken
in
account
as
the
exiled
borders
or
dxo
members.
I
think
they
are
right,
so
we
can.
We
can
say
that,
for
example,
if
we
have
a
southern
member
that
are
going
to
be
partying,
swapper,
gila
and
5
southern
members
are
going
to
be
part
in
the
in
the
omen.
Gill
and
we
have
400
voters.
E
So
are
we
going
to
reach
like
6
000
voters
in
the
exile?
That
is
pretty
awesome
right.
So,
where
is
that
going
to
happen?
Is
it's
going
to
happen
this
world?
You
know
in
canada
in
a
centralized
if
we
can
unify
boring
platform
and
then
what
I
say
on
the
governance
code.
Is
that
yeah,
I
think,
working
with
in
like
deploying
these
product
tokens?
E
It's
is
a
such
method.
It's
something
that
I
don't
share.
I
think
that
the
projects
have
a
responsibility
to
use
dlc
to
bring
more
usage
to
dxe.
We
have
money,
we
have
tokens
so
there
is.
I
don't
think
I
don't
see
any
reason
why
we
should
be
deploying
new
tokens
to
play
around
to
add
more
complexity,
not
like
to
isolating
users
or,
for
example,
omen,
swapper
and
other
another
application
square.
What
we
want
is
bring
them
together
and
use
one
token
to
rule
them
all
so
yeah.
E
It's
not
maybe
a
popular
opinion,
but
I
I
never.
I
never
said
it
before,
because
I
know
it's
not
going
to
be
popular.
There
is
a
lot
of
talk
already
about
creating
and
deploying
new
product
tokens,
but
yeah.
I
think
it's
a.
I
think
it's
a
mistake
on
something:
it's
going
to
add
more
complexity,
and
it's
not,
and
it's
not
going
to
be
practical
at
all
for
other
users
to
bring
them
to
the
exile.
J
J
J
I
think
we
are
adding
a
lot
of
complexity
to
the
mix
and
I
wish
we
could
like
think
about
it
before
we
actually
create
all
these
stuff.
I
mean
obviously
now
we
want
that
product
token,
but
we
have
a
choice
to
to
actually
have
the
guild
under
the
vote
or
at
least
have
the
guilds
in
in
the
same
place,
even
though
we
would
really
want
to
have
them
in
the
products.
J
That's
my
opinion
at
least,
and
I'm
thinking
about
another
thing.
Also,
resources
swapper
doesn't
have
the
resources
to
do
everything
we
want
to
do.
We
need
to
prioritize
governance
is
super
important,
but
I
don't
think
we
will
drive
users
by
having
governance.
I
don't
think
so
or
sorry.
I
don't
think
we
can
drive
as
much
users
as
as
we
would,
if
we
like
focus
on
farming
or
whatever
else
that
other
other
projects
are
doing
so
resources.
J
K
K
You
don't
see,
omen
there
and
that's
simply
because
omen
doesn't
have
a
token
right,
and
sometimes
you
know,
if
you
you
know,
people
maybe
aren't
appreciating
that
all
of
dx
styles
products
are
actually
dx
styles
products,
and
I
think
part
of
that
is
because
the
the
ecosystem
is
very
geared
towards,
like
assuming
there's
a
token
and
like
kind
of
looking.
For
that
token,
so
I
think
that's
one
really
big
reason.
I
think
another
thing
that's
sort
of
related
to
that
is
by
having
a
token
associated
with
each
product.
K
It
allows
dx
tao
to
kind
of
experiment
with
many
projects
and
if
the
project
succeeds
it's
upside
for
dx,
dow,
but
the
separate
project
token
isolates
the
txt
and
the
style
a
little
bit
from
from
the
downside.
So
I
think
those
are
like
the
two
main,
like
reasons
I
see
for
the
product
tokens
besides,
like
the
governance
stuff.
D
D
The
offer
is
because
they
basically
wanted
to
buy
a
lot
of
dxt
for
very,
very
cheap
prices,
and
that
was
not
acceptable,
but,
having
like
a
specific
and
and
overall
like
it
makes
sense
to
like
partner
with
like
product
tokens
and
not
like
the
index
dxd
token,
but
like
potentially,
we
can
do
that
if
a
team
is
basically
like
cross-partnering
through
through
our
project
right,
then
in
like
partnership
with
txt
might
sense,
but
yeah.
There
are
like
a
lot
of
reasons
why
product
tokens
is
very
positive.
E
Yeah,
I
think
it's
extremely
unnecessary
omen
belongs
to
the
exile,
the
exactly
the
one
who's
paying
all
men's
allies
right
and
who
owns
omen.
So
why
do
we
need
to
create
a
new
token
for
omen
to
work
independently?
Omen
should
be
depending
on
the
excel
and
dxd
talking,
and
we
should
be
using
dxd
token
for
everything.
This
is
why
the
price.
This
is
one
of
the
reasons
why
the
price
I
think
of
txd
is
going
to
the
I
mean
went
to
the
floor
like
it
went
like
10
cent
of
either
we
went.
E
E
C
E
D
What
about
guild
governance?
Do
you
expect,
like
people
lock
txt
for
women,
guild
governance.
E
E
One
right
I
mean
you
are,
you
are
creating
tokens
for
governing
certain
things
where
you
can
use
one
to
rule
them
all,
and
in
fact
we
have.
We
have
the
plans
to
have
a
dx
gear
and
it
was
always.
I
think
we
talked
about
that
for
for
a
few
months
now,
but
yeah
it.
Never.
It
never
got
implemented.
D
Yeah,
I
think
one
big
argument
for
a
new
issuance
is
to
not
be
as
like,
completely
dependent
on
like
history
and
psd.
E
You
have
to
power,
you
have
to
be
completely
dependent
because
omen
belongs
to
dxo.
That
idea,
you
don't
want
to.
We
don't
want
all
men
to
run
their
sign
free.
We
want
all
men
to
depend
from
from
the
exile
because
the
actuality
they
want
to
face
for
all
men,
salaries
and
who
belongs.
D
That
might
be
something
which
will
be
changed
in
the
coming
months.
Right
that
the
product
token
developers
will
actually
get
product
tokens
as
part
of
the
salary
so
like
the
goal
is
to
to
transition
out
of
txt
salaries.
E
D
E
C
So
really,
interestingly,
gnosis
is
actually
going
through
this
same
thing
where
they
have
gno
token
and
they're,
trying
to
figure
out
should
they
have
product
tokens,
how
that
will
work
and
all
that
stuff,
so
they're
concentrating
on
this
a
lot
and
and
and
we
talked
with
them
in
paris
about
and
it's
very
hard
and
not
many
projects
have
done
this
and
so
to
augusto's
point
like
maybe
we're
not
doing
it
right.
C
Maybe
we
are
doing
it
right,
but
no
one
really
knows
because
no
one's
done
this
so
we're
like
experimenting
and
the
cool
thing
about
tokens
is.
You
can
always
change
what
drives
value
to
tokens,
so
you
can
always
get
rid
of
tokens.
You
can
bring
new
tokens,
but
I
think
maybe
we
could
coordinate
with
more
like
token
experts
in
the
system
that
in
the
ecosystem
that
could
are
trying
to
solve
the
same
problems.
E
The
the
problem-
I
I
think
that
the
program
that
we
are
trying
to
solve,
we
already
have
the
tools
for
it.
We
need
uni
an
erc20
token.
You
need
a
user
base.
For
a
token,
you
need
a
token
to
be
distributed,
so
that
already
happened.
So
I
think
we
are
just
adding
more
work
on
our
robots
where
we
already
have
everything
we
need.
J
So
just
I
saw
adam
just
I
need
to
just
get
into
that
point.
I
think
I
agree
with
you
augusto
and
I
wish
we
could
just
have
one
token
and
leave
the
complexity,
and
but
we
we
are
competing
against
big
big
projects
when
it
comes
to
swapper
at
least
we're
competing
to
projects
that
that
means
tokens
and
has
20
30
40
of
the
tokens
going
to
to
liquidity
farming
right.
So
70.
I
mean
some
hundred
who
did
100
like
just
recently
yeah.
I
don't
remember
who,
so
this
is
who
who
our
competition
is.
J
So
I
I
I
agree
with
you
like.
If
you
go
back
a
half
year
ago
and
talk
listen
what
I
said,
I
said
we
could
do
it
without
the
token
and
I
I
obviously
was
wrong
like
if
we
released
a
token
sooner,
I
would
think
or
sorry
farming.
Sooner
with
token,
I
would,
I
would
say
we
would
be
somewhere
else
and
obviously
we
can
give
out
dxd
we
can
give
out
eth,
but
it's
not
the
same
thing
as
minting
a
token
that's
made
for
liquidity,
farming
and
and
for
a
specific
product.
J
We
can't
give
out
too
much
dxe,
like
we
already
sell.
Pressure
on
dixie's,
has
been
huge
for
for
a
whole
year
right,
I'm
not
sure
that
we
would
have
enough
dxd
to
compete
to
our
competitors.
E
Actually,
the
more
that
we,
the
more
that
we
use
the
more
features
and
the
more
usage
yeah,
our
token
is
going
to
have
right
now,
which
is
standing
there.
It
cannot
be
used
for
anything.
The
only
thing
that
is
going
to
be
useful
is,
for
example,
the
dxe
boring
machine
that,
quite
luckily
the
expo
is
going
to
support
it,
and
that
is
going
to
be
the
first
thing
that
you
can
use
dxe4.
E
E
E
Yeah
yeah
yeah
sure
I
know
I
know
that
is
this
is
why
I
usually
I
didn't
blow
it
up
before,
because
I
know
that
how
your
brain,
how
long
people
it
is
and
yeah
this,
is
this
exactly
what
I
think
I
think
it's
a
mistake,
and
I
hope
that
it
contributes.
E
I
read
on
the
discussion
on
there
on
how
you
guys
are
going
to
plan
the
the
product
tokens
but
yeah.
This
is
this
is
what
I
think
just.