►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Meeting [2021-04-14]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
geek
style
governance,
discussion
for
wednesday
april
14th,
starting
first
with
the
proposal
roundup
on
mainnet.
There
are
three
proposals
that
are
boosted
or
pending,
boosting
and
we're
kind
of
in
the
lull
in
the
middle
of
the
month
here
with
less
worker
proposals.
So
there's
there's
less
amounts
on
both,
so
the
three
proposals
are
actually
are.
One
deposit,
400
eath
into
swapper
x,
die
across
five
pairs,
so
this
would
be
another
big
deposit.
The
biggest
deposit
in
swapper
on
x
die.
It
would
be
400
each.
B
The
past
couple
have
only
been
250
eth.
This
would
be
across
five
pairs.
This
past
two
have
only
been
actually
across
four
pairs,
and
this
one
would
add,
stake
eth
as
an
additional
pair.
That
was,
I
think,
just
I
I
submitted
that
and
it
was
just
boosted
like
two
days
ago,
so
it
still
have
four
or
five
days
to
go
there
and
then,
of
course,
if
that
passes,
then
there
will
need
to
be
corresponding
proposals
on
xd
style.
B
To
put
that
liquidity
in
next
is
a
revised
dxd
payment
proposal
based
on
the
all-time
high
value
dxd.
So
this
is
from
roy
and
he
has
a
dxd
vesting
contract
and
then
the
last
one
in
the
ens
scheme,
it's
d
stats,
dot,
eth
release
which
is
exciting.
It's
got
x,
die
and
mainnet,
and
actually
those
last
two
I
think
I
checked.
I
just
used
those
proposals
this
morning
I
did
some.
B
I
hopefully
confirmed
to
test
them
a
little
bit,
but
if
anyone
has
could
check
out
those
again,
that
would
be.
That
would
be
great.
C
The
roy
one
is
drawn
on
two
is:
is
that
the
one
for
the
dxd,
the
vesting
dxd,
so
we've
contacted
him
a
few
different
times,
yeah
he's
using
the
wrong
dxd
amounts.
I
think.
B
Yeah,
I
think
this
is
a
new
proposal
that
uses
523
the
all-time
high
as
it,
and
so
I
think
this
is
the
updated
one.
So,
like
I,
I
calculated
it
based
on
the
dxd
in
the
proposal
he
said
and
I
think
it's
good
to
go.
He
sent
it
to
the
contract
address.
The
contract
is
like
a
best
in
contract,
but
I
assume
it
is
a
like
proper
investing
contract
but
geronimo.
I
think
that
was
it
looked
good
to
me,
cool.
B
And
then
yeah
and
then
there
was
the
dx
stats,
ens
update,
which
was
just
boosted
this
morning,
too
looks
great
and
so
that'll
pass,
hopefully
by
the
end
of
the
week
may
friday
there.
So
any
thoughts
comments,
questions
on
like
mainnet.
B
Cool
and
then
on
xdi,
four
proposals,
boosted
or
pending.
Boosting
first
is
the
geek
style,
dxd
vesting
and
payroll
smart
contracts
from
block
rockets.
So
this
is
a
three
thousand.
Six
hundred
dollar
die
payment
to
block
rocket
for
the
vesting
contracts.
I
think
the
contracts
were
shared
in
the
development
key
base
channel
there.
B
Then
there
is
the
second
half
of
a
developer
poser
for
levo
t8.
There
is
federico's
worker
proposal,
the
zero
percent
rep
one,
and
then
there
is
augusto's
contribution
compensation
for
github
for
the
month
of
march.
I
think
gusto
had
mentioned
some
things
in
the
governance
channel
on
key
base
last
week
of
trying
to
do
it,
a
different
approach
in
terms
of
worker
payout.
So
those
are
the
current
ones
on
xdi
based.
C
Nothing
x
type
proposals
go
so
quick.
Yeah.
I
sent
out
a
note
in
the
main
general
channel.
I
think
it
was
that
especially
everyone
here,
but
even
we
would
like
to
get
everyone
that
has
rep
to
make
sure
that
they
have
their
correct
amount
of
rep
on
xdi
that
matches
the
rep
that
they
have
earned
and
deserve
in
order
to
be
more
actively
to
correctly
and
accurately
be
able
to
vote
in
governance
on
exti
voting
and
participating
governance
on
x
die.
We're
like
obviously
getting
our
number.
The
participation
numbers
up
is
great.
C
We've
gotten
like
51
over
50
percent
actions
in
in
the
recent
couple
weeks,
but
making
sure
everyone
has
their
rep
because
there's
a
handful
of
people,
that's
like
said.
Oh,
I
can't
I
can't
I
can't
vote
on
xdad
because
I
don't
have
rep
there.
It's
like!
Well,
if
you
don't
have
rep
there
make
sure
you
have
your
correct
amount
of
rep
there
and
and
we
can
help.
If
you
have
any
questions.
D
Yeah
and
also
like
when
you're
doing
your
worker
proposals
and
submitting
them,
you
can
run
your
numbers
by
by
me
or
chris
or
skye
like
just
to
make
sure
you
have
your
rep
numbers,
correct
and
then
we'll
let
you
know
and
then,
if
you
need
to
like
resubmit
it
and
get
asked
for
more,
then
that's
that's
fine.
B
And
it's
also
somewhat
important
to
kind
of
sky
in
the
mapping,
because
getting
50
proposals
is
a
really
like
effective
way
of
us
doing.
Governance
sometimes
and
the
more
people
have
rep
on
xdiv
the
easier
it
is
to
do
that.
We've
already
done.
I
think
three
or
four
majority
vote
proposals
on
xdi
in
the
last
month
or
so.
B
Cool
all
right:
well,
that's
it
for
current
proposals
in
the
queue
just
looking
discussion
items
rep
boots,
so
we're
at
the
middle
of
the
month
for
april,
which
is
the
I
think,
sixth
or
seventh,
maybe
the
seventh
month,
we've
done
rep
boost.
So
again
we
wanna
do
these.
On
xdi
I
nominated
two
people
I
think
thirth
new
or
like
the
rf
noob
who's
been
like
a
really
active.
I
think
discord
contributor.
B
I
was
taking
this
section
before
he
made
some
comments
today,
but
it's
just
the
last
month
or
so
he's
been
active
and
then
I
think
our
hat
who's
been
really
active
on
these
calls-
and
I
know,
there's
a
separate
worker
proposal
going
on,
but
I
just
think
he's
been
an
active
community
member
and
wanted
nominated
for
a
rep
boost
and
then
yeah,
and
this
kind
of
is
related
to
the
something
going
on
with
keenan
and
the
discord
getting
a
discord
rep
boost
in
there-
and
I
guess
we
don't
have
that
for
this
month-
keenan,
but
maybe
that's
something
we
can
work
for
next
month.
B
Or
do
we
want
to
make
any
nominations
out
of
that
document
that
you
drafted
up.
E
Well,
it
depends
on
how
we
want
to
do
it.
I'm
not
sure
if
you
had
a
look
at
the
document,
but
I
just
kind
of
arbitrarily
threw
some
numbers
around
where
I'd
figure,
a
full
rep
boost
where
we're
giving
someone
like
hey
this
person,
isn't
deserving
of
a
rep
boost
is
like
a
0.1,
then
kind
of
below
that
to
like
a
.01
would
be
a
suitable
range
for
a
larger
kind
of
rollout
of
rep.
E
I
think
like
10
people
at
at
this
level
is
equivalent
of
a
single
rep
boost.
Let
me
get
the
the
document
your
hands
again.
I
think
we're
I'm
happy
to
coordinate
sending
it
out
in
this
round.
It
would
kind
of
just
be
obviously
the
the
main
bottleneck
right
now
is
the
numbers
and
making
sure
that
we're
comfortable
with
the
amount
that
we
have
here,
but
really
it
would
just
be.
E
It
would
be
hey
you're
entitled
to
this
make
if
you
want
to
key
base
or
discord,
some
kind
of
verification
to
say
this.
Is
your
identity
confirm
it
in
discord
and
request
it
on
on
xdi,
and
I
think
it
would
be
quite
simple
and
also
if
the
whole
goal
is
to
get
the
community
involved
in
governance
and
then
throwing
through
a
proposal
would
be
a
good
start
as
well.
B
Yeah-
and
I
think
that
I
guess
that
doc
is
not
in
the
forums
yet,
but
maybe
we
can
I'll
have
another
look
at
that
doc
and
maybe
put
it
maybe
just
reply
to
this
thread
with
some
ideas
there
and
some
initial
ones
for
the
the
month
and
so
yeah
we
can.
We
could
figure
out
or
suggest
what
those,
what
those
are.
E
Yeah
for
sure,
I
think
I
think
it
was
in
the
forums
under
a
governance
discussion,
if
I
recall,
but
I'll
definitely.
B
Try
searching
this
morning
this
has
been.
I
should
have
done
a
better
job.
I
like
searched
this
morning
and
I
was
like
my
rep.
Maybe
I
did
anyway
I
should
have.
I
can
talk
about
that
with
y'all
offline.
E
Yeah
I'll
and
I'll
I'll
leave
a
mention
of
it
in
the
in
the
thread
for
now
cool.
B
Cool
and
then
next
discussing
the
treasury
diversification
proposal,
which
is
the
version
two,
but
I
think
before
we
get
to
that.
We
had
some
kind
of
confusion
on,
as
we
were,
trying
to
close
out
version,
one
of
the
treasury
authorization
proposal
yesterday,
and
so
just
as
a
background.
B
The
treasury
authorization
proposal
was
to
accumulate
three
million
dollars
worth
of
stable
coins,
and
so
this
was
done
through
various
different
methods
and
so
we've
now,
as
this
process
has
been
going,
we're
now
approaching
that
kind
of
three
million
number,
and
so
we
were
executing
up
all
the
transactions
yesterday
on
the
multisig,
and
there
were
some
questions
on
whether
or
not
we
breached
that
amount
and
then,
if
we
breach
that
amount,
what
does
that
mean
for
those
proposals?
And
what
should
we
do
next?
B
So
I
think
and
dave
kind
of
maybe
correct
me.
I
think
you
you
had
looked
at
numbers
and
we
looked
to
be
at
like
two.
F
Correct
yeah,
so
I
think
it
depends
on
how
you
look
at
that
excited
transfer
of
funds
right.
So
the
way
I
looked
at
it
or
like
the
way
it
was
described
on
alchemy,
I
think
that
was
a
transfer
of
funds
to
x
type
base,
because
x-tie
base
is
obviously
all
the
transaction
fees
are
on
x-tie.
And
if
you
consider
that
not
part
of
the
treasury
diversification,
then
exactly
it
was
2.8,
something
I
believe,
yeah
and
more
or
less
in
the
exact
amounts
that
were
outlined
in
the
original
v1
identification.
F
I
believe
there's
some
minor
discrepancy,
but
you
know
that
always
happens
like
some
point:
zero,
zero,
eight
discrepancy
or
some
stuff
like
this
based
on,
because,
of
course
we
wanted
a
different
share
of
dye,
usdc
synthetic
us
dollar
and
usd
tether,
but
more
or
less
we're
on
target.
It's
just
that
one
open
question:
if
we're
still
missing
those
last
ones
or
not
yet.
B
Yeah
and
so
now
there
are
two
proposals
that
have
been
executed
with
100
each
each,
so
presumably
those
200
years
are
supposed
will
fill
that
last
150k
to
get
to
3
million
and
then
and
then
some
so
yeah.
I
guess
the
question
is
kind
of
moving.
What
should
we
do
with
the
existing
funds
in
the
multisig
now,
and
I
guess
like
in
terms
of
calculating
that
yeah
what
what?
What
are
kind
of
the
next
steps
there
so.
G
G
G
C
So,
in
general,
this,
this
issue
of
like
having
dollar
target
amounts,
is
always
going
to
be.
An
issue
is
when
we
start
doing
these
exact
same
like
executions
and
ideas
using
like
fully
executing
through
gnosis
protocol
v1,
which
is
being
deprecated
but
a
separate
issue,
but
like
if
these
things,
if
these
proposals
are
being
done,
if
these
executions
are
being
done
by
a
dao
proposal,
instead
of
like
a
multi-sig
or
something,
these
proposals
will
go
in.
You
know
eight
days
before
they
will
be
based
on
certain
eth
amounts.
C
Yes,
there
are
people
that
to
call
oracles
and
then
execute
it
and
stuff,
but
there
won't
be
any
like
decision
to
kind
of
execute
or
not
execute
like
if
the
proposal
passes
we're
going
to
be
executing.
So
I
think,
maybe,
if
we
change
our
logic
to
like
instead
of
target
a
like,
we
could
target
a
dollar
amount,
that's
like
being
held
by
of
stables
in
ndx
dow,
or
we
could
say
we're
going
to
turn
2000
eth
into
dollar
stables
or
something
and
we're
going
to
do
it
in
in
250.
C
Eth
clips
and
those
are
being
done
through
dow
proposals.
Really
the
authorization
is
a
big
picture
overview,
but
like
the
individual
proposals
that
people
should
look
at
and
vote
on
are
going
to
be
like
here
is
to
move
100
each
out
of
dx
dao.
That's
going
to
be
executed
on
in
a
trade
to
turn
into
a
dollar
stable
coin.
At
the
then
current
price
of
whatever
eth
is
at
that
future
price,
which
is
in
eight
days,
which
could
be
a
thousand
dollars
higher
or
it
could
be
a
thousand
dollars
lower.
C
G
B
Voting
on
a
proposed
trade
that
falls
through
the
parameters
set
out
in
the
authorization
proposal
just
to
give
like
some
examples.
So
in
like
the
usdc
proposal,
so
that's
one
of
the
100
youth
we
have
now
that
was
like
voted
upon
on
april
8th
and
so
like
the
price
of
eth
on
april
8th,
where
you're
like
do.
I
want
to
authorize
this
100
eth
to
usdc
proposal.
B
Well,
on
april,
8th,
like
the
you
know,
the
east
price
is
like
you
know,
whatever
amount
and
we're
not
exactly
sure
what
the
price
will
be
of
the
upcoming
treasury
diversification
authorization
proposal.
So,
like
I'm,
going
to
vote
to
authorize
and
approve
this
hundred
eth
to
usdc
transfer
in
this
condition
now
and
then
the
proposal
passes
two
days
later
and
then
like
the
price
of
these
changes,
and
then
would
that
converting
that
would
push
it
over
the
three
million.
B
B
G
G
C
Yeah
though
the
only
issue
is
dollars
are
really
important
because
our
our
our
cost,
our
monthly
costs,
are
in
dollars
right
so
to
figure
out
five
years
of
runway.
We
need
to
say
this
is
how
many
dollars
we're
going
to
need
at
this
rate
and
we're
doing
all
of
our
books
and
our
costs
are
in
dollars.
C
So,
to
then
say
like,
let's
start
a
plan
today
to
turn
2
another
2
000
each
into
dollars
that
could
end
up
being
5
million
or
that
could
be
end
up
being
15
million
dollars
and
that's
a
different
amount
of
runway
and
and
really
we
need
to
target
where
you
know
we're
thinking
about
things
in
in
runway
and
our
costs
are
in
dollars.
So
it's
important
to
keep
the
dollar
amount
in
mind.
G
G
B
Yeah,
so
what
would
we
want?
How
would
we
word
this
to
work
on
addressing
that.
H
G
G
F
Then,
when
a
proposal
then
is
made
to
top
out
that
extra
million
dollars,
that's
missing,
that
is
just
done
in
ether
at
what
the
red,
whatever
rate
it
is,
and
if
it
happens
to
be
more,
it
doesn't
really
matter
because,
since
we
only
redo
a
new
proposal,
when
we
hit
the
new
threshold
that
nine
million
dollar
or
a
ten
percent
less
or
whatever
it
is,
we
just
keep
topping
it
up
in
ether,
but
just
having
the
main
amount,
I
mean
the
main
amount.
Obviously
you
want
to
have
some
indication
of
what
right.
C
B
B
C
C
C
F
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
hit
the
three
million
right,
excluding
the
die
we
move
to
extire
and
then
I
agree
that
the
ether
can
be
retained
in
a
multi-sig,
given
that
we
do
have
an
intention
to
eventually
increase
exposure
on
stable
coins
right,
so
I'm
fine
with
parking
them
in
the
multisig,
given
east
cost,
etc.
G
Yeah,
I
think
that
makes
sense
and
I
don't
think
we
need
another
proposal
on
x9
like
I
think
we
can.
Just
you
know,
do
this
v2
and
then
that
ease
can
be
used
towards
the
v2.
C
So
are
the
all
the
details
of
the
v2
proposal?
Do
we
think
that,
because
chris
had
some
comments,
we're
waiting
for
other
people's
comments,
like
these
numbers
are
just
kind
of
estimates
or
do
we
think
that
we
have
a
pretty
good
handle
on
what
the
exact
details
and
plans
should
be
for
the
v2
proposal?
I
mean.
G
I
think
this
looks
pretty
good,
as
is
we
might
want
to
like,
since
we
know
now
that
gnosis
protocol
is
being
deprecated,
we
might
want
to
look
at
that
in
more
detail.
G
I
Wait
we
still,
we
are
still
planning
to
use
the
gpv
one
right.
G
I
don't
know
if
you
saw
a
turnover
but
there's
a
post
by
martin
copeland
in
dow
talk
this
morning
about
gtv
one
being
deprecated
pretty
soon
like
not
going
to
be
supported
pretty
soon.
So
I
think
that
kind
of
calls
into.
C
C
G
Yeah
yeah,
but
I
mean
it
is
one
of
the
three
options
here,
so
I
guess
there's
not
much
harm
in
leaving
it
as
an
option.
If
it
doesn't
work
out,
it
doesn't
work
out.
I
was
speaking
with
nico
a
bit
about
a
fallback
plan
and
I
think,
without
too
much
more
work
we
can
enable
like
a
new
relayer
to
do
buybacks
through
or
or
trades
through,
swapper.
I
guess
for
the
diversification.
That's
not
great,
though
I
mean
we
could,
but
we
could
maybe
have
it
access
unit
swap
as
well.
B
B
C
All
right,
and
so
also
so
we'll
try
to
move
ahead
with
a
the
treasury
diversification
v2
proposal
by
later
today,
or
maybe
tomorrow,
like
to
get
it
to
get
it
up
in
in
alchemy.
C
G
So
I
mean
this
is
the
I
mean
all
the
execution
proposals
are
going
to
reference
this
proposal
right
as
the
actual
like
decision,
and
therefore
I
think
this
one
should
be
on
main
net.
I
agree
that
you
know
xdx
is
a
great
operational
base
because
it's
cheap
and
we
should
move
a
lot
of
things
there,
but
when
it
comes
to,
you
know
acquiring
like
a
decision
on
moving
five
million
from
the
treasury.
I
think
that
should
stay
on
main
net
and
if
it's
a
matter
of
gas
optimization,
what
we
could
do
is
actually
like.
G
Have
the
first
transfer
go
with
the.
G
But
actually
doesn't
match
maintenance
exactly,
and
things
can
diverge
on
the
basis
right.
The
less
people
will
be
voting
if
we
do
it
on
maintenance.
Well,
of
course
I
mean
the
optimal
thing.
Is.
G
To
vote,
the
optimal
thing
is
for
one
person
to
vote,
but
everybody
has
the
opportunity
to
vote,
and
I
mean
if
it
was
something
that
was,
you
know
doing
something
wrong
with
five
million
dollars.
I
think
you
would
see
the
votes,
but
yeah
yeah
I
mean
the
point
is:
is
that
the
like?
As
you
know,
I'm
fully
aware
of
the
operational
problems
with
mainnet
but
like
the
reality
is
that's
the
doubt
like
the
taoism
yeah.
B
I
mean,
I
think,
pretty
strongly
that
xdxdow
can
do
signal
proposals
for
dxtau,
given
that
a
mainnet
proposal
passed.
That
said
explicitly
that
I
agree
that,
if
we're
moving
fun,
I
think
moving
funds
would
be
a
good
way
to
justify
combining
these
proposals
together.
But
I
do
think
dx
dao
as
a
collective,
can
get
signal
from
xdxl.
G
B
G
And
so
I
mean,
I
think.
The
main
thing
here
is
that
xd
stuff
is
a
base
right
there
we're
going
to
be
there's
going
to
be
more
bases,
arbitrary,
maybe
being
the
next
one
and
bases
are
going
to
diverge
in
terms
of
rep
like
composure
from
what
mainnet
is
right,
so
it
doesn't
really
make
sense
for
mainnet
to
like
seed
control.
G
G
If
the
thought
is
well,
I
don't
know
if
we're
getting
an
accurate
picture
here,
because
people
are
going
to
be
discouraged
from
voting.
Well
then
do
it
as
well
on
xdi
and
then
that
can
inform
us
in
the
future
like
if
it's
a
discrepancy
on
next
night,
then
maybe
we
can
raise
the
question
of
like
should.
C
C
Yeah,
so
I
think
we
had
that
idea
doing
on
both
a
great
idea.
If
what
happens,
if
they
come
out
differently,.
B
B
B
G
Yeah
I
mean
that
authorization
of
the
ex
type
base
like
the
first
line
right.
It
says
this
is
a
proposal
to
formally
anoint
to
the
xd
stuff
based
on
next
day
in
order
to
outsource
certain
activities,
particularly
worker
payments,
right
and
then
later
it
lists
the
three
things
and
the
last
one
is
vote
on
single
proposals
related
to
dxnow
governance.
C
So
so,
when
we
do
proposals
for
like
dicks,
venture
investments
and
stuff
and
we're
going
to
do
a
signal
proposal,
were
I
thought
we
were
going
to
do
that
on
x,
die
and
then.
B
C
G
Yeah-
and
I
mean
that's
fine-
I
think
there's
a
little
bit
of
a
difference
there,
because
there's
like
a
one-to-one
correlation
you're,
basically
doing
the
vote
again
on
mainnet
when
you
actually
move
the
funds
right
here,
we're
talking
about
doing
like
10
20,
different
proposals
that
are
all
going
to
reference
the
signal,
but
we
just
need
a
signal.
We
don't
need.
G
B
I
think
rep
holders
have
the
ability
to
vote
on
proposals
for
what
to
do
with
the
treasury.
There
are
overarching
proposals
that
we
want
to.
You
know
signal
a
certain
program,
but,
like
rep
holders
can
vote
on
trades
on
proposals
that
they
want
to
make
to
diversify
the
treasury
in
like
any
way
they
see
sp
specific,
but
that
would
be,
and
it's
up
to
rep
holders
to
decide
on
any
funds
that
are
moving
on
whether
they
are
you
know
justified
for
for
that
yeah
anyway,.
C
C
J
Actually,
the
important
thing
here
is
to
use
the
same
right
that
we
have
on
mainnet
on
our
networks
right.
So
if
we
have
the
same
repetition
on
mainnet
that
on
xi,
we
can
execute
the
signal
proposal
on
xi
or
even
on
ringkevi.
For
example,
if
we
are
using
dx
mode
and
we
have
exactly
the
same
reputation
to
the
same
accounts
on
rinkeby
right
so.
G
We
said
that
if
you
have
rep
on
mainnet,
that
is
good
on
any
of
the
bases,
but
not
all
base
rep
automatically.
B
J
B
So,
and
I
would
say
when
xdi
rep
does
not
match
up
with
mainnet
rep,
it
should
not
be
used
for
signal
proposals
like
the
reason
it
is
a
good
use
case
of
it.
Now
is
precisely
because
it
is,
I
think,
an
adequate
like
mapping
of
mainnet
rep
and,
as
augusto
said,
like
a
way
to
vote
using
that
main
network
on
other
now.
But
it's
going
to
diverge
right
right
now.
I
agree.
G
B
Is
it's
like
simultaneously
running
x,
die
operations
and
then
also
like
doubling
as
like
some
signal
for
dx
style
collective,
because
we
don't
have
another
way
of
like
getting
that
signal
in
a
perfect
world
like
we
would
have
maybe
like
some
roll
up.
That
is
actually
doing
the
mainnet
rep,
like
signaling
itself
or
under
the
cheap,
cheap
voting
itself.
J
I
think
we
should
be
able
to
update
first
of
all,
the
most
important
is
magnet
reputation,
but
there
is
two
ways
to
get
made.
Many
of
the
reputation
one
is
earning
erroneous,
mainnet
and
another
is
earning
internal
network
and
then
claiming
it
on
main,
which
means
that
I
cannot
repetition
on
xi,
which
is
awesome
because
it's
going
to
be
cheap,
but
it's
going
to
spend
some
time
till
we
are
going
to
update
mainnet
reputation
state
to
match
the
latest.
J
For
example,
let's
say
every
month
we
do
a
or
every
few
months
we
do
an
update
of
the
reputation
of
state
all
across
our
networks.
We
gather
all
the
information
that
we
can
and
we
say:
okay.
This
is
the
reputation
on
july
2020
and
we
are
going
to
update
many
reputation
here.
Then,
in
three
months
we
update
mainly
reputation
doing
a
gathering
of
information
about
all
the
repetition
was
each
of
if
it
is
if
the
reputation
is
issued
on
maintenance.
J
This
will
be
this
will
act
like
a
two-way
update,
where
you
can
get
quick
reputation
and
cheap
on
in
our
networks,
which
is
awesome,
but
you
will
have
to
wait
if
you
do
that,
for
the
official
update
of
the
reputation
of
maine,
that's
something
that
we
can
do.
We
can.
We
can
design
a
way
to
update
the
reputation
of
mainnet
every.
I
know
one
two
three
months
and
I
guess
that
would
be
the
ideal
scenario
where
we
have
a
main
source,
but
it
doesn't
stop
us
to
generate
the
repetition
somewhere
else.
G
Yeah
yeah,
all
that
makes
sense
like,
but
just
like,
wanted
to
be
clear
that
we
don't
want
all
the
bases
to
have
the
same
exact
rep
as
each
other
like
it's,
it's
good
for
them
to
diverge,
because
it's
going
to
enable
a
lot
of
activity
around
these.
J
Individual
bases
here
the
on
the
on
the
example
that
the
that
I
just
gave
your
the
amount
of
reputation
that
is
going
to
diverge
from
mainnet
to
the
other
networks
is
the
repetition
that
was
issued
on
that
network
during
that
update
time.
Let's
say
three
months
so
and
I
guess
it's
not
going
to
be
too
much
here.
We
need
to
see
we
need
to
see
okay
if
20
percent
reputation
was
issued
in
the
last
three
months.
Okay,
that's
no!
J
J
Coordination,
I
think
something
like
this
would
be
awesome
to
have
a
recap
of
the
reputation
owners
in
the
latter
months.
So
we
are
doing
weekly
like
recaps
every
three
months
on
anything.
So
maybe
now,
it's
time
to
add
a
reputation
recap
or
or
review
on
the
repetition
attribution
on
other
networks
and
how
it
should
be
updated
on
mainnet.
B
Yeah
and
just
the
two
things
we've
been
talking
about
on
that
one,
melanie
and
ali
are
working
on
like
the
the
worker
tracker
proposal
sheet.
That
will
be
at
least
one
way,
we're
tracking
all
of
these
main
net
rep
awards
that
are
every
month
to
workers
and
contributors,
and
there
that's
also
what
we're
going
to
try
to
do
for
the
dxd.
B
So
we
can
make
sure
everyone
has
the
dxd
that
they've
earned
and
know
exactly
what
that
is,
and
we
can
double
check
that,
so
there
will
be
a
spreadsheet
for
that
there
and
then
separately,
elon-
and
I
guess,
was
oren-
maybe
not
sure
this
anymore
had
talked
about
doing
something
specifically
what
you
were
talking
about
gusto
about
like
that
alignment.
B
I
don't
know
where
that
was
left
up,
but
yeah,
it's
kind
of
all
about
having
a
setting
the
main
net.
It's
about
updating
the
main
net
one
and
allowing
the
individual
bases
to
kind
of
experiment
a
little
and
diverge
go
off
on
their
own.
J
Yes,
this
can
be
done
with
the
multi-core
scheme.
Later
we
can
talk
with
niko,
we
can.
J
We
can
check
it
out,
but
again
we
need
to
see
how
much
repetition
is
going
to
be
updated,
but
again
we
can
do
it
every
every
two
three
months
and
yes,
menani
should
be
able
to
to
follow
up
all
the
all
the
reputation
around,
which
has
just
a
in
a
number
of
total
survey
of
the
xd
and
reputation
and
the
token
is
there
later
later
melanie
if
you
need
help
finding
your
way
around
the
reputation
of
all
the
events
like
the
coding,
the
the
information.
J
G
Would
be
great
to
have
this
nice
like
outlined
in
the
new
documentation
book?
That's
coming
up
like
just
how
this
works,
how
the
bases
work,
yeah,.
J
Also,
this
is
something
that
I
want
to
have
on
on
the
export
like
a
good
way
to
display
your
reputation,
because,
right
now
you
enter
to
alchemy
and
it
would
be
awesome.
You
know
to
see
like
a
pie,
chart
of
all
the
reputation
that
is
distributed
and
see.
Okay.
How
decentralized
are
we,
how
much
reputation
is
in
control
on
which
individuals
is
it
super
important
which
the
egg
style
base
is
the
most
decentralized.
J
A
B
J
Well,
yeah,
it's
well,
it's
not
talking
about
it,
but
it
is
erc20
use
a
same
mint
environmental,
but
you
can
transfer
it,
but
even
even
more
is
even
more
it's
even
easier.
So
we
should
be
able
to
have
something
like
that
on
our
governance.
B
B
Hacks
cool
just
looking
at
the
gym,
I'm
conscious
of
time.
I
don't
want
to
we
kind
of
have
gone
through
a
lot
here,
so
I
just
want
to
hit
over
a
couple
things
here.
There
are
two
there's
a
two
proposals
or
drafts
still
in
the
forums,
one
about
retaining
outside
counsel.
That
tammy
has
been
talking
a
lot
of
people
about
and
working
with
that
next,
there
is
also
some
a
proposal
for
an
exec
search
for
marketing
lead.
B
There
was
a
discussion
on
this
in
the
forum,
so
still
some
some
just
disagreement
there.
We
can
figure
figure
out
that
and
then
third,
the
multi-call
installation
and
just
know
I
saw
the
proposal
is
there
and
I
think
we're
not
ready
to
boost
it
and
I'm
always
like
kind
of
want
to
boost
it.
Just
because
I
see
it
there
now.
But
what
is
there?
We
should
wait
to
boost
that,
because
we're
waiting
on
a
contract
to
be
verified.
B
Sweet
so
anyway,
so
that
one
is
we'll
get
that
in.
As
I
said,
the
pros
is
actually
in
there,
but
it
has
not
been
boosted
yet,
and
then
I
wanted
to
quickly
chat
a
little
bit
about
a
post
that
I
just
wanted
to
get
a
little.
I
guess
they
call
it
temperature
check.
So
I
don't
know
all
of
the
details,
but
I
think
gemino
had
some
problems
in
with
his
last
worker
proposal
and
getting
it
from
xdi
and
getting
it
back.
B
I
believe
he
lost
his
funds
to
a
hacker
who
I
also
think
the
hacker
I
guess
has
access
to
the
rep.
There
was
some
discussion
back
and
forth
about
how
to
fix
this.
This
is
obviously
like.
You
know
a
good
example
wanting
to
make
sure
that
things
are
easy
for
contributors
and
also
like
we
need
everyone
needs
to
be
taking
responsibility
for
their
own
security
and
so
yeah.
I
don't
know
if
anyone
had
any
thoughts
on
this
or
suggestions
for
moving
forward.
C
Yeah
it
so,
regarding
rep,
the
rep
is
xdx
dow
rep
into
the
wallet
that
he
was
taking
his
actually.
C
So
it
would
be
good
to
have
gemino
here,
but
he
he
his
his
his
address.
He
uses
to
do
the
proposal
and
where
he
was
taking,
the
funds
were
two
different
addresses
and
the
rep
goes
into
the
one
where
the
funds
go
into
right.
When
you
ask
for
a
rep.
C
That's
that's
already
a
a
unique
scenario
there
because
I
guess
rep
gets
split
up
slightly
there
there,
but
anyway,
the
rep
most
of
the
rep
and
the
funds
went
into
an
x
die
wallet
now
that
that
wallet
is
compromised
on
mainnet,
mainly
but
it
theoretically,
it's
also
compromised
on
xdia,
because
the
same
private
key,
but
the
hacker
doesn't
know
that
he
has
rep
on
xdac,
probably,
but
he
could
so.
C
We
should
slash
the
rep
on
xdi
it'd,
be
a
great
test
of
slashing
rep
on
xdi
in
a
compromised
wallet
and
then
his
funds,
which
he
moved
across
the
bridge,
ended
up
being
stuck
there
because
he
could
once
it's
moved
across
the
bridge,
the
wallet
that
could
claim
it,
which
is
the
compromise
wallet.
C
Basically,
we
couldn't
find
someone
to
try
to
stave
it
and
overnight
the
hacker
found
out
that
he
could
claim
it
from
the
bridge
and
then
once
it
went
into
that
compromise
wallet,
the
hacker
took
it
so
I
proposed
I
I'd
be
comfortable
like
gemino.
Is
a
good
worker
he's
been
contributing
a
lot
to
omen?
C
It's
a
bad
mistake.
He's
learned
a
pretty
good
lesson,
but
you
know
he
hasn't
gotten
paid
for
any
of
his
work,
which
is
unfortunate,
so
I
I
would
be
okay
with
the
dow
repaying
that
to
him
if
people
thought
and
if
that
was
a
bad.
If
that
was
people
were
opposed
to
that
in
general,
then
I
would
then
I
propose
like
community
funding
it
from
community
workers,
but
ideally
the
dow
could
just
repay
that,
and
I
think
he'd
be
very
appreciative.
G
But
yeah,
I'm
in
favor
of
the
doubt
repaying
I
mean
he's
relatively
new.
It's
an
honest
mistake.
Most
likely
I
mean
we
don't
we'd
only
do
this
once
right,
so
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
to
help
him
out
and
make
him
whole.
It's
not
a
huge
cost
to
the
dow
and
yeah
lesson
learned.
It's
always
good
to
be
reminded
of
good
operational
security.
So
lesson
for
everybody,
even
though
it's
yeah.
E
We
should
have
like
a
workshop
on
on
key
management
and
just
kind
of
have
anyone.
That's
interested
in
learning
more
just.
A
It
may
be
people,
but
I
think
it
might
be
a
good
idea
to
at
least
have
something
in
the
docs
at
least
linking
to
something
for
people
regarding
the
product,
like
we
discussed
this
recently
melanie's
proposal
just
moving
stuff
from
over
the
bridge.
All
that
so
maybe
that's
a
good
idea.
It
seems
silly.
B
G
The
rule
is
never
give
anybody.
Your
private
key,
never
enter
it
anywhere
ever
now.
The
tricky
part
is
like
remaining
like
you
end
up
in
situations
where
maybe
you
like
are
just
yeah
whatever
is
happening
or
you
feel
pressure
or
something
people
make
mistakes.
You
know
I've
had
personally.
I've
had
somebody
faking
an
account
from
one
of
the
gnosis
safe,
like
admins,
like
one
of
the
guys
that
works
at
gnosis
who
works
at
us
is
safe.
G
Who's
like
the
admin
and
the
nurse's
safe
help
chat
like
tm
me
when
I
was
asking
about
no
society
questions
and
like
I
didn't
you
know,
I
knew
better
than
to
send
my
private
key,
but
I
was
fooled
for
a
few
like
a
few
minutes
about
who
this
actually
was.
I
didn't
know
like
I
thought
I
was
talking
to
an
actual.
I
noticed,
because
the
trick
was
is
like
he
changed
the
I
and
the
l
on
the
name
on
the
telegram
handle.
So
I
like
knew
enough
to
like
look
at
the
handle
and
be
like.
G
Is
this
the
right
guy?
But
he
fooled
me
because
he
had
like
one
that
looked
the
same
to
my
eye
and
what
I
should
have
done
is
verified
the
identity
in
the
like
actual
main
telegram,
chat
and,
of
course,
just
always
just
always
always
remember,
never
send
your
private
key,
never
put
it
anywhere
yeah
and
use
separate
development
ones
if
you
need
it
for
like
mnemonics,
and
that
kind
of
thing.
J
Yeah,
even
more
protecting
or
designing
and
testing
yourself
how
your
recovery
process
works.
I
do
I
do
this
every
year,
kind
of
to
pretend
that
I
lost
access
to
my
accounts
and
trying
to
recover
everything
and
make
sure
that
I
have
access
to
everything
and
my
recovery
process
works
and
using
multi-signature
wallets.
That's
something
so
super
powerful.
J
If
you
have
friends
and
family
that
you
trust
with
your
life
right,
I
I
always
recommend
if
you
are
well
involved
enough
yeah
and
you
have
friends
that
are
using,
for
example,
ethereum
or
something
like
that-
create
a
multi-signature
wallet
where
you
reduce
a
lot,
the
risk
for
your
funds
being
stolen
and
yeah,
and
having
always
the
fans
available
for
anyone
else
to
recover
them.
B
I
know
it's
impossible.
I
do
love
to
see
you
go
through
your
your,
like
restarting
process
every
year.
J
Actually
not-
and
in
fact
I
do
it
several
times,
because
I
well
the
way
that
I
have
designed
it.
I
have
it
encrypted
somewhere
else
in
different
in
different
devices
within
with
an
id
with
another
vga
private
key.
So
well,
don't
tell
everyone.
This
is
yeah
yeah,
no,
it's!
Okay!
It's
pretty
robust
and
I
have
most
of
my
funds
in
multi-signature
wallets,
which,
again,
that
is
what
I
recommend.
B
Oh
well,
jim.
No,
we
were
just
discussing
your
the
situation
with
your
last
worker
proposal
and
I
think
the
conclusion
was
to
slash
the
hackers
rep
on
x,
die
and
then
to
figure
out
a
way
to
get
you
repaid
for
the
funds
that
were
lost
and
then
try
to
figure
out
a
way
to
get
everyone's
security
up
to
up
to
staff.
B
But
cool
just
before
we're
going
because
I
know
I
melanie,
I
don't
know.
If
there's
I
wanted
to
always
kind
of
cover
up
time,
for
I
think
we're
almost
landing
on
contributor
experience
here,
but
just
to
see
if
there's
kind
of
any
updates
or
things
you're
trying
to
alert
people
of.
D
Yeah,
yeah
and
I'll
kind
of
I'll
just
make
this
pretty
quick,
because
I
know
we're
out
of
time.
So
thank
you,
everyone
that
is
still
staying
on,
but
just
to
give
a
quick
update
on
what
we're
doing
on
the
contribute
experience
squad.
The
past
few
weeks
have
been
heavily
focused
on
tracking
worker
proposals
and
just
making
sure
late
proposals
are
submitted.
D
We
definitely
feel
pretty
satisfied
about
how
how
many
late
proposals
have
been
completed
by
everyone
over
the
past
few
weeks,
and
I
want
to
thank
everyone
for
being
so
proactive
and
getting
them
done,
especially
because
I
know
writing
your
worker
proposals
is
not
a
fun
task,
but
just
a
few
more
and
all
of
the
past,
due
worker
proposals
will
have
been
submitted
on
dow
talk
and
alchemy,
and
so
right
now
we're
beginning
to
shift
our
efforts
more
on
to
the
recruiting
side.
First,
we're
working
on
finishing
writing
all
of
the
open
position.
D
Job
descriptions
that
are
still
not
complete
last
week
skye
had
mentioned
that
quite
a
few
of
them
needed
to
be
worked
on,
and
we
are
more
than
happy
to
take
that
off
everyone
else's
hands
and
just
write
them
so
before
finalizing
the
job
descriptions.
We
will,
however,
review
them
with
everyone
to
make
sure
you
all
feel
the
requirements
and
responsibilities
and
descriptions
accurately
captures
the
open
roles
and
what
dx
style's
looking
for.
D
Also
to
aid.
In
our
recent
open
position
recruiting
efforts,
our
squad
will
be
submitting
a
proposal
for
an
internal
referral
bonus
program.
Maybe
we
got
to
think
about
the
name
of
that,
but
a
lot
of
you
have
referred
someone
whether
it's
past
colleagues,
friends
or
acquaintances,
and
we
feel
as
if
you
should
be
rewarded
for
the
efforts
you
make
in
bringing
good
people
into
our
community.
D
C
One
other
idea
related
to
this,
like
community
awards
between
each
other,
it
it.
I
guess
it's
very
similar
to
what
yearn
why
iron
is
doing
with
like
their
coordinate,
but
there's
a
few
different
ways
to
do
it.
But
like
this,
a
simple
idea
that
could
be
kind
of
interesting
is
at
all,
like
community
workers
get,
let's
say,
a
thousand,
a
thousand
bucks
of
what
a
thousand
dollars
or
a
thousand
dollars
of
dxd,
basically
to
give
out
to
other
community
members.
C
So
it's
almost
like
a
monthly
bonus
or
you
could
do
this
every
quarter
or
something,
and
it's
just
like
it's
almost
like
giving
out
repos.
But
it's
actually
it's
actual
financial
value
and
you
can
give
it
out
to
whoever
you
just
can't,
keep
it
yourself.
So
you
have
to
decide
how
to
split
it
up
among
people
in
the
community
that
you
want
to
give
it
to,
and
so
it's
like
internal
community
financial
boosts,
which
is
a
cool
like
idea.
C
Even
if
it's
a
small
money,
a
hundred
bucks
at
first
or
something
it's
cool
for
people
to
like,
have
the
have
the
opportunity
to
give
that
out
to
other
people
that
they
appreciate
or
that
they
think
are
doing
valuable
things
yeah.
I
think
the
tech
for
it.
So
I
don't
think
I
think
we
could,
like
borrow
their
system.
B
I
think
that's
a
really
cool
idea.
We
had
that
just
reminds
me
when
I
was
in
fourth
grade.
We
had,
I
think,
looney
bucks.
This
is
like
what
the
teacher
gave
out
to
us,
but
just
because
we
had
these
money
that
he
told
us
was
worth
something
that,
like
automatically
creates
an
economy
of
like
people
interacting.
So
I
love
the
idea
of
just
some
of
those
rewards
or
like
pat's
in
the
back.
Well,
you
know
creating
some
economic
gain
from
them.