►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Meeting [2021-04-21]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
textile
governance,
discussion
april
21st,
1500
utc,
starting
first
with
the
proposal-
roundup,
mute
yourself,
fewer
unmuted,
starting
first,
the
proposal
roundup.
We
have
two
proposals
on
mainnet:
one
is
a
revised
dxd
payment
based
on
all-time
high
value.
This
was
from
roy
and
it
was
a
substitute
for
a
previous
proposal
that
had
had
an
incorrect
amount
of
gxd
in
there
and
that's
sent
to
a
vex,
vesting
contract
and
then
second
there's
a
signal
proposal.
Treasury
diversification,
authorization
program,
v2,
also
corresponding
proposal
on
x,
die.
B
I
think
we'll
talk
about
that
in
a
second
and
then
just
going
through
the
x
die
base.
Actually,
let's
just
start
with
the
signal
proposal,
so
we
have
the
signal
proposal
for
the
treasury
authorization
v2.
So
this
was
discussed
last
week
and
then
we
had
the
proposal
that
was
submitted
on
both
xdi
and
mainnet
and
so
sky.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
give
like
an
overview
of
what
this
authorization
proposal
encapsulates.
A
Yeah,
I
don't
have
it
in
front
of
me,
but
it
was
the
idea
of
the
v2
treasury
diversification
proposal
is
to
continue
and
extend
the
first.
The
first
proposal
was
to
acquire
three
million
dollars
in
stables,
which
the
overall
idea
is
to
give
dx
dow
a
known
runway
match
caught
massed.
A
It
match
assets
to
cost
all
of
dxdow's
costs
are
basically
in
dollars
on
a
monthly
basis
and
so
acquiring
dollar
stable
coins
is
a
smart
risk
management
move
and
is
what
provides
is
what
locks
in
the
the
known
future,
for
you
know
having
assets
to
continue
to
build
and
grow
dx,
dow
and
so
at
the
same
time.
Overall,
if
if,
if
an
entity
or
dx
dow
is
going
to
hold
dollar
stable
coins
and
there's
a
certain
target
that
we've,
you
know
established
through
these
two
proposals.
A
But
if
we're
going
to
hold
dollar
stable
coins,
it
then
makes
sense
to
put
those
dollars
stable
coins
to
work
in
in
you
know
relatively
safeish
protocols
and
things
so
putting
it
using
dollar
stables
in
our
own
protocols
like
swapper,
on
omen
and
then
also
seeking
yield
on
the
dollar
stable
coins
that
we're
holding
makes
sense.
A
So
there's
included
in
the
v2
proposal
an
idea
to
put
up
to
five
million
dollars
in
yield
earning
assets
such
as
starting
from
like
basic,
more
safe
things
like
compound
and
ave
to
you
know
higher,
yielding
ones
like
why
earn
and
then
also
potentially
exploring
putting
some
of
the
ex-style's
eth
to
work,
trying
to
acquire
some
yield
on
that
and
that
can
be
through
e2
staking
or
potentially
other
protocols
as
well.
A
And
it's
also
noted
that
it
that
dx,
dow
in
general,
is
very
open
to
any
one-off
proposals
for
new
ideas.
So
if
there's
a
new
protocol
or
maybe
a
euro
stable
coin
or
something
that
that
dx
dow
is
always
wants
to
see
those
and
the
best
way
for
someone
to
convey
that
strategy
and
that
idea,
it
would
be
through.
A
You
know
a
forum
post,
slash
type
deal
memo
explaining
why
dx
dao
should
should
do
this
thing
and
then
those
can
always
be
set
voted
on
by
rep
holders
separately
from
this
program
that
we
already
have
in
place,
and
so
we
put
the
v2
treasury
diversification
proposal
on
mainnet
and
on
x
die
both
at
the
same
time,
so
that
we
could
hopefully
get
lots
of
voting
participation.
A
The
main
net
proposal,
even
though
it
is
a
signal
proposal,
is
what
it's
you
know.
This
is
a
big
amount
of
money.
Then
it
all
states
that
the
mainnet
proposal
is
the
main
proposal.
So
you
know
a
bunch
of
people
should
probably
vote
on
that
one.
But
anyone
else
can
is
what
is
hap.
You
know
is
welcome
to
vote
on
the
xdi
proposal
and,
theoretically,
the
two
proposals
should
line
up
and
and
the
xdi
version
is
more
fun
and
cheaper
and
allows
you
to
participate
better.
A
So
it's
it's
great
if
people
can
be
very
active
in
voting
on
x,
die
chain,
because
that
that's
really
shows
like
the
growth
and
and
governance
of
of
x,
of
of
dx,
tao
and
so
yeah.
That's
the
overall
summary
where
there's
a
couple
issues
with
like
leveraging
the
multis
or
actually
no
there's
chris,
maybe
you're,
going
to
get
into
it.
There's
a
couple
issues
with
like
sending
money
from
dxdow
right
now.
A
We're
excited
redeeming
money
from
dxdow
once
a
proposal
passes,
but
I
think
we
can
get
that
sorted
out
and
maybe
there's
some
delays
and
even
though
you
know
they
excel.
In
general,
the
there's
been
a
very
gradual
process
of
layering
into
dollar
stable
coins.
A
So
it's
you
know
it's
a
it's
a
slow
drawn
out
process
and
that's
probably
good
in
general
that
it
creates
like
an
averaging
in
to
dollar
stable
coins,
and
you
know
we
started
when
eth
was
closer
to
a
thousand
dollars
and
and
now
we're
closer
to
you
know
three
thousand
dollars,
and
you
know,
dx
style
has
benefited
from
that
appreciation
as
well.
So.
B
Skye
getting
a
little
ahead
of
himself
with
the
3k
east
3k
eve
call,
but
just
as
a
we
did
conclude
the
first
treasury
authorization
proposal.
We
did
the
last
proposal
yesterday,
so
we
reached
the
3
million
and
it
was
another
150
k
usdc.
So
we
have
all
of
those
and
then
yeah
after
this
proposal.
B
You
know
both
continuing
what
we've
done
before,
but
also
expanding
some
of
the
different
ideas,
and
I
really
like
the
idea
of
investment
memo
or
or
things
like
that,
where
we
can
talk
about
new
ideas
to
be
able
to
put
things
to
work.
So
yeah
excited
to
see
this
proposal
go
through.
B
Cool
and
then
just
looking
at
the
rest
of
the
xdi
proposals,
so
there's
six
others,
I
think
so.
We've
got
a
bunch
of
different
worker
proposals,
their
hexel
aliq
trial
and
the
first
one,
and
then
also
my
worker
proposal
and
then
there's
a
couple
of
other
interesting
proposals:
there's
the
worker
payment
reimbursement
to
gemino
for
the
the
compromise
wallet.
B
So
I
think
this
was
it's
like
3600
die
after
that
there's
a
thread
that
provides
some
good
lessons
in
cyber
security
on
that,
and
then
there
is
a
zorn
rep
transfer,
which
is
a
rep
sync
and
then
there's
also
a
audit
con
or
swapper
farming
contract
audit
payment
that
is
is
going
through
there.
I
did
have
one
question
on
the
burning
of
rep.
B
I
was
like
actually
trying
to
like
do
this
or
like
figure
out
what
to
do,
and
I
think
we
agree
that
all
you
need
to
really
do
is
just
have
the
negative
amount
of
rep
and
I
guess
the
concern
was
like.
I
know
that
rep
has
like
a
bunch
of
decimals,
so
I
was
like
worried
that
we
would
want
to
get
it.
So
it's
like
zero
rep
and
I
wasn't
sure
actually
where
to
find
the
rep
contract
on
block
scout.
B
But
I
don't
know
if
anyone
had
any
ideas
on
like
how
we
the
proposal
to
how
we
like
burn
someone's
rep
entirely.
B
B
If
we're
gonna
burn
it
all,
it's
like,
if
you
leave
a
little
bit,
it
would
like
not
do
as
good,
and
I
couldn't
find
the
rep
contract
on
lock
scout,
but.
D
Yeah
to
burn
repetition,
we
just
need
to
call
method
in
the
reputation
token.
Actually
we
need
to
make
a
call
to
burn
the
reputation
amount
that
we
banter
that
want
to
burn
it's
not
like
a
like
negative
minty
right,
so
you
have
burn
and
mint.
We
need
to
burn.
A
B
E
D
C
B
F
B
Up
in
the
ui
for
like
the
proposals,
it's
presumably
they
put
a
negative
amount
in
the
actual
proposal.
Submission
anyway,
that
we'll
figure
that
out
and
I'll
follow
up
with
a
gusto
on
getting
like
the
the
number.
For
that.
B
B
And
then
there
were
a
couple
different
unboosted
proposals
that
I
saw
that
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
flag
and
talk
about
here.
I
think
they
were
submitted
recently.
So
I
think
the
first
one
is
the
software
development
for
deek
style,
which
I
believe
is
from
quail
code,
and
so
I
guess
is
that
yeah.
What
is
that
proposal
should
be
boosted
is
anyone
that
has
an
insight
into
to
that
proposal.
C
B
Already
and
then
the
other
one
was
a
proposal
to
retain
outside
counsel
for
dick
style.
This
is
one
that
tammy
had
posted.
I
think
at
the
forum
like
a
week
ago,
it's
kind
of
been
up
there
and
I
think
it
was
just
submitted
in
the
last
day
or
two
so
tammy.
I
don't
know
if
you
had
any
thing
to
add
to
that.
G
B
G
Morning
and
it's
I
I
see
it
seemed
like
I,
it
was
generally
supported
as
far
as
the
dow
talk
post.
So
if
you
support
it,
please
vote
for
it,
if
not
vote
against.
Thank
you.
B
Cool,
okay
and
then
looking
just
returning
to
problems
executing
recent
proposal,
so
the
main
net
proposal
to
deposit
400
into
swapper
on
xdi
by
way
of
the
multi-sig
passed
on
monday
morning,
and
then
yesterday
we
tried
to
redeem
the
proposal
to
execute
it
and
we
ran
into
some
problems
redeeming
the
proposal
and
there
was
a
lot
of
hunting
to
figure
out
exactly
what
the
problem
was.
B
And
so
I
think
we
are
still
figuring
out
the
the
the
next
steps,
but
right
now
it
appears
that
it
it's
hard
for
us,
it's
not
capable
for
us
to
directly
redeem
each
proposals.
So
I
don't
know
if
augusto
or
john
wanna
give
an
insight
into
the
issue
facing
redeeming
proposals
now
on
mainnet
and
what
what
are
the?
What
are
the
issues
with
it.
C
If
you
maybe
some
people
will
remember
that
when
that
proposal
passed
and
we
tried
to
execute
it,
it
failed,
and
I
mean
the
reason
for
this
is
so
we're
having
now
the
same
issue
with
sending
ether,
so
that
was
sending
ether
to
the
deployer
contract
for
swapper
and
then
now
we're
having
the
same
issue,
sending
ether
to
a
gnosis,
safe
multi-sig,
and
the
problem
is,
is
that
the
dow
stack
code,
which
is
a
couple
years
old,
a
little
older
than
that
at
this
point,
uses
just
the
simple
transfer
function
to
send
the
eth,
and
this
has
like
a
hard-gutted
coated
amount
of
gas
that
it
can
use
in
that
transfer
function.
C
And
so
when
the
recipient
contract
is
not
doing
like
the
vanilla
thing,
if
it
has
a
what's
called
a
fallback
function
with
some
like
custom
code,
basically
like.
Basically,
if
it's
trying
to
do
more
complicated
stuff,
it
might
want
to
consume
more
than
the
hard-coded
amount
of
gas,
and
so
that
is
actually
now
failing
with
the
gnosis
safe
multi-sig.
And
I
think
we
think
this
is
probably
related
to
the
gas
cost
changes
the
berlin
hard
fork,
although
I
suppose
yeah
yeah-
it's
probably
related
to
that.
C
C
D
Yeah
this
array
was,
it
is
with
ether,
because
when
we,
when
you
transfer
ether
the
default,
the
default
function
that
we
are
using
use,
21,
south
and
gas.
D
So
this
is
what
this
is,
the
behavior
we
are
having
after
the
berlin
fork,
and
it
is,
it
is
only
happening
on
ether
on
any
other
asset.
We
shouldn't
have
any
problem.
C
And
yeah,
so
this
is
a
setback.
Obviously,
because
now
you
can't
do
that,
but
there's
a
way
around
it.
I
think
if,
if
the
excel
deploys
a
relayer
that
doesn't
have
this
kind
of
fallback
function,
that's
basically
you
have
this
like
intermediary
step
to
getting
to
the
multisync
yeah.
So.
A
It's
it's
quite
dx
that
was
quite
lucky
in
this
scenario
like
at
least
in
the
short
term,
that,
like
we,
have
the
power
of
xdxdow
with
a
decent
amount
of
funds
there.
So
it's
like
having
funds
on
different
changes
in
different
places
is
like
making
dx
dial
more
resilient,
which
is
good
to
know.
B
Yeah,
and
just
in
terms
of
like
I
guess,
this
is
kind
of
a
little
bit
of
limitations.
This
does
slow
down
some,
I
mean
obviously
like
we
we
had.
This
was
going
to
be
deposited
into
swapper,
and
so,
if
it's
as
sky
said,
not
only
did
we
have
x
takes
down
there's
a
and
there's
a
good
amount
of
weft
there,
but
also
we
have
other
assets
stable
coins
in
the
mainnet
treasury.
B
If
there
was
something
that
we
needed
to
get
a
mainnet
proposal,
but
in
terms
of
moving
forward,
I
guess
there's
yeah.
What
should
we
be
thinking
about
how
to
move
forward.
A
Well,
actually,
to
rf
noobs
question:
if,
if
to
wrap,
if
the
dx
that,
if
dx
dow
had
a
ability
to
just
wrap
using
a
wrapper
to
wrap
eath,
is
that
does
that
you
do
you
have
to
send
each
to
wrap
eath?
Or
can
you
or
is
wrapping
each
an
easier
mechanism
that
would
we
would
be
able
to
handle
the
gas
and
then
you
could
just
start
wrapping
each
and
then
using
weft.
D
A
D
No,
you
are,
you
are
calling
a.
I
guess.
D
I
guess
you
you
can
do
it
both
both
ways.
I
guess
they
have
a
fallback
function,
but
we
we
cannot
execute
any
fallback
function
like
that
is
going
to
have
extra
computation.
So
I
guess
we
should
clean.
We
should
send
ether
calling
the
deposit
function
on
with
and
we
are
going
to
have
it
the
exactly
the
same
amount
on
what
tokens
that
we
send
on.
D
A
D
We
don't
have
the
width
and
you
see
in
the
multi-core
scheme
right,
so
I
guess
maybe
we
can
do
it
in
the
future,
but
for
now
the
the
quicker
solution
would
be
to
deploy
like
chansey
and
re-layer
that
we
only
are
having
this
problem
for
ether.
So
it
will
be
a
smart
contract
that
will
receive
the
ether
and
it
will
send
it
to
another
address
right.
It
can
be
a
smart
contract.
All
the
ether
are
received
from
the
exile,
send
it
to
the
exile,
multi
signature,
cool.
B
And
so
is
the
relayer,
the
fix
that
we
should
be
working
towards
or
and
that's
what
are
we
looking
at
like
that
timeline
for
that.
C
D
D
D
Yeah
yeah,
we
should
be
able
to
review
it.
I
mean
if
you,
if
you
got
your
eye
john
federico
nico
everyone
look
at
it.
We
cannot
miss
it.
A
A
B
And
on
the
proposal
front,
I
guess
we
don't
have
to
this-
wouldn't
be
like
a
new
multi.
It
wouldn't
be
part
of
the
multi
call,
because
it
would
presumably
would
be
the
funding
and
voting
power
scheme
and
then
it
would
send
it
to
the
relayer
itself
like
that
would
be
the
address
in
the
in
the
the
the
proposal,
and
I
guess
we
would
have
to
redo
this
proposal,
and
I
guess
this
is
the
only
proposal
sending
out
eth
so
yeah.
Would
we,
I
guess,
we'd-
have
to
redo
this
proposal.
H
Layer
once
it
is
employed
guys
just
just
a
detailed
question,
but
we
would
not
be
able
to
use
funding
and
voting
proposal
right.
Actually,
we
would
have
to
do
two
separate
proposals
even
for
that
little
kind
of
detail,
because
we
somehow
need
to
provide
the
information
where
we
actually
want
to
send
it.
Finally,.
B
B
A
G
Right,
it's
calculated
in
u.s
dollars,
so
usd
we
could
do
any
equivalent
to
that
or
we
can.
I
guess
that's
actually
part
of
the
question
we
need
to
determine.
We
want
to
do
ethernet.
A
Yeah,
so
it
could
not,
it
could
yeah,
it
could
not
be
the
other.
The
other
thing
we
could
do
in
if
we,
for
example,
needed
more
non-eth
assets
into
the
style,
is
like
a
delayed
member
balancer,
where,
like
people
put
like
give
low
people
individually,
give
loans
to
like
pump
die
into
dx
dow,
and
then
request
e,
like
in
two
months
when
this
is
sorted
out
and
one
in
two
weeks
when
this
is
sorted
out.
B
And
they
do
just
in
terms
if
there
is
anything
that,
like
you
know,
immediately
comes
up,
we
do
still
have
there's
a
hundred
weft
in
the
x
died
base.
That
is
there
for
general
funding
purposes.
So,
presumably
that
still
works,
and
obviously
someone
would
have
to
take
it
on
xdi
and
then
yeah
other
tokens.
B
The
stable
coins
would
be
presumably
accessible,
but
it
sounds
like
this
would
only
be
something
that
would
be
a
couple
weeks
at
max
in
terms
of
our
inability
to
send
eth
out-
and
I
guess
is
this
like
the
long-term.
Would
this
be
the
long-term
fix
or
is
like
the
long-term
fix?
We
need
a
better
like
dow
stack
system
or,
like
you
know,
something.
C
Yeah
yeah
yeah,
I
mean
we
could
do
other
things
with
the
relayer
to
kind
of
like
make
it
even
more
flexible
to
deal
with
the
current
setup.
But
I
mean
the
long
long
term
fix
is
to
like
migrate
to
a
new
governance
system
that
doesn't
use
the
old
deprecated
like
transfer
function,
and
you
know
yeah,
and
if
a
gusto
is
so
he's
saying
you
know
I
was
saying
a
week
and
a
half
not
really
knowing
who
could
work
on
it.
But
august
is
saying
that
he
would
work
on
it
today.
D
And
even
I
can
test
it
with
the
avatar
contract
on
the
extra
contract.
We
use
exactly
the
same
contract
that
we
use
on
mainnet,
so
we
can
write
the
test.
We
can
see
that
it
works.
We
can
test
it
on
ringkevi
if
we
want
using
dx
vote
so
yeah,
I'm
in
the
long
term.
We
started
talking
about
some
changes
that
we
need
to
do
on
the
on
the
boring
machine
that
that
looks.
That
is
going
to
happen
on
the
on
on
the
xboard.
D
One
is
the
minimum
threshold
for
the
boosted
execution
or
for
the
execution
of
booty
proposals
so
to
to
be
able
to
require
a
minimum
percentage
of
positive
votes
in
a
boosted
proportion
to
be
executed
and
also
the
automatic
boosting
of
proposals.
Right
now,
when
a
proposal
isn't
pre-boosted,
you
have
someone
needs
to
click.
The
execute
button
to
pass
it
to
boosted
state
or
a
or
robot
is
doing
that.
That
is
to
do
that
automatically.
D
So
that
is
already
starting
to
happen,
and
I
think
this
is
part
of
the
long
term,
the
exile
2.0
governance
contracts,
that
that
is
what
I
guess
we
are
going
to
be
working
on
the
on
the
rest
of
the
year.
Once
we
have
the
expo
deploy
on
on
our
networks
and
everyone
is
using
it,
everyone
is
going
to
like
this
features,
request
appeared
yesterday
and
we
already
have
issues
from
it
and
we
are
going
to
be
working
on
it.
B
Yeah
and
and
gusto
has
been
doing
a
lot
of
work
on
dick's
phone.
I
didn't
put
this
in
the
in
the
agenda,
but
there's
I
gave
a
presentation
thing
was
yesterday
and
the
dev
call
there.
So
I
guess
that
you
know
that's
something
that
we're
working
on,
creating
a
whole
new
system
that
we
can
interact
with.
So
we
don't
run
into
these
these
problems
and
it's
in
a
lot
of
ways
like
we're.
B
The
things
we're
doing
with
alchemy
and
dao
stack
are
legacy
issues
and
legacy
problems,
and
the
way
to
solve
it
is
to
move
to
a
new
system,
and
augusta
is
doing
a
lot
of
great
work
on
dx
vote.
I
don't
know
if
there's
there's
a
he's
got
a
github
set
up
for
other
issues
that
people
are
if
people
are
interested
in
in
contributing
there-
and
I
don't
know
if
there's
anything
else
on
dx
vote
augusto
that
you
were
looking
for
input
or
things
from
from
the
community.
D
Well,
I
created
at
least
we
have.
We
talked
on
the
last
on
the
latest
governance
call
and
we
decided
on
the
issues
that
are
going
to
be
for
the
first
mice,
that
is
the
exotic
1.0,
where
we
say
the
minimum
requirements
and
also
that
it
should
be
deployed
on
arbitron
that
I've
been
working
on.
But
we
have
a
list
already
on
all
the
things
that
need
to
be
ready
on
the
xbox
1.0.
So
I'm
trying
to
submit
my
proposal
like
a
signal
proposal.
D
How
much
time
is
going
to
take
me
like
a
contribution
like
a
signal
proposal
for
a
contribution
compensation
that
I'm
going
to
be
working
on
in
the
next
one
two
months
and
yeah.
The
most
important
thing
is
that
a
few
requirements
and
deploy
on
arbitrary
because
we
need
it
the
this,
and
we
should
be
talking
also
to
today
that
we
need
a
governance
platform
in
a
bit
room,
because
we
are
going
to
be
using
our
parts
in
everything.
So
we
cannot.
D
B
B
Okay,
moving
on
next
up
proposal,
exact
search
for
marketing
lead.
So
this
was
a
potential
proposal
from
trey
from
position
company.
He
was
on
the
biz
dev
call,
I
think,
10
days
ago,
to
kind
of
present
himself
and
then
there's
been
some
discussion
here.
B
I
think
this
is
important
for
us
to
kind
of
increase
our
capabilities,
especially
as
we
see
the
marketing
infrastructure
we
have
is
not
really
where
we
want
to
be
in
terms
on
a
product
level,
and
I
think
this
would
be
a
good
way
of
like
bringing
in
additional
resources
to
take
time
to
really
kind
of
find
someone
that
would
fit
the
candidate,
and
I
think
the
way
that
the
deal
is
structured
it
you
know
the
the
upside
is.
B
If
you
know
the
the
price
would
be
40k
if
everything
worked
out,
but
that
basically
guarantees
us
a
senior
marketing
person
for
a
year,
because
there
is
a
if,
if
a
person
doesn't
isn't
a
fit
or
leaves
during
that
time
they
said,
they'll
refill
the
position
automatically
or
or
without
extra
costs,
so
yeah.
I
think
this
is
something
that
is
important
and
I
was
hoping
to
get
some
consensus
today
before
having
trey,
submit
the
proposals
so
wanted
to
open
up
two
comments
and
feedback
here.
F
I'll
just
a
brief
comment:
I've
flip-flopped
on
this
mentally
quite
a
bit-
it's
quite
a
steep
cost,
but
the
bottom
line
is:
we
need
this
senior
marketing
person
and
we
needed
them
yesterday,
and
if
this
is
the
approach
that
we
need
to
take
to
do
that,
then
we
need
to
do
that.
I
don't
think
that
we
should
wait
any
longer
or
try
to
do
stuff
on
our
own
if
it's
not
going
to
to
be
feasible
and
then
we
end
up
circling
back.
F
I
think
that
I'm
in
I'm
in
support
of
this-
and
we
just
need
to
do
what
we
need
to
do
to
get
this
marketing
person.
G
I
have
two
reservations
which
doesn't
mean
that
I'm
not
for
going
forward
with
this
effort
along
with
other
ones.
I
just
would,
I
think,
it'd
be
good
to
discuss
it
with
with
them.
Maybe,
and
I
could
bring
it
up
in
the
forum,
but
I
might
as
well
first
see
what
other
people
think
the
timeline
10
to
12
weeks,
if
we're
going
to
be
launching
a
token
and
all
these
other
product
changes
in
the
next
before
that
time
frame,
I
don't
know
how
well
that
fits.
G
If
not,
you
know
within
the
next
few,
you
know
within
the
next
month,
if
possible.
So
that's
one
thing
that
maybe
we
could
just
talk
with
them
about
and
just
try
to
get
some
clarity
on
that,
and
that
could
be
something
that
we
could
update
the
post
about.
Because
to
me
this
is
you
know
this
is
all
we
have
to
rely
on
as
far
as
in
writing
what
they
agree
to.
So
there's
that,
and
I
also
agree,
I
think
the
cost
seems
still
a
little.
G
A
little
off
doesn't
seem
quite
like
market
rate,
I'm
not
in
hr,
so
I
don't
completely
know,
but
just
basic
searches
show
what
20,
usually
of
whatever
the
cost
of
the
employee
hire
is.
Okay,
fine,
so
it's
crypto
we're
in
a
bull
market.
Let's
pay
more,
we
have
the
money,
but
what
about
at
least
I
know
we're
doing
what
like
30
or
10
000
in
dxd?
Why
can't
we
make
it
more
proportionate
to
how
we
are
paid,
which
is
a
40
60
split
between
ethan
dxd?
G
I
think
that
would
be
a
nice
gesture,
a
gesture
on
their
part
as
well.
Those
are
my
two
concerns,
oh
and
separately.
I
guess
with
this.
If
they
come
across
anyone
who's,
a
lower
level
marketer
that
we
could
help
kind
of
start
filling
up
a
team
for
all
of
our
products,
because
I
know
we
have
keenan.
We've
had
other
support
from
other
contributors,
but
really
like
some.
G
We
need
kind
of
a
team
with
three
different
products
and
a
dow,
maybe
that's
something
we
could
also
kind
of
expand
the
scope
of
the
search
to
include
as
well,
and
for
that
I
would
also
be
open
to
expanding
the
amount
that
we
pay
them
if
they
find
other
individuals
to
fill
those
roles.
B
Definitely,
and
on
the
timeline,
I
think
actually,
that
timeline
is
more
dependent
on
our
ability
to
come
to
a
decision
on
the
candidates,
because
it
takes
a
lot
of
back
and
forth,
but
we
can
like
maybe
think
about
how
we
can
frame
that.
But
I
just
know
in
his
past,
like
when
you're
doing
searches,
a
lot
of
it
is
okay.
We
have
to
go
through
different
rounds
of
interviews.
B
You
have
to
find
the
right
candidates
obviously
be
like
much
different
for
us,
because
it's
kind
of
we'll
probably
know
pretty
pretty
quickly
and
so
yeah.
Maybe
we
can
think
about
that
and
then
on
the
breakdown
of
the
the.
F
B
I
think
they're
pretty
open
to
anything.
I
would
actually
just
lean.
I
don't
know
if
we
need
to
like,
I
guess,
I'd
rather
pay
ether
dollars
than
dxd
right
now,
but
I'm
kind
of
open
to
whatever
the
breakdown
would
be.
A
Yeah
and-
and
so
my
I
put
this
in
the
forum,
but
I
agree
like
that's
if
you
just
look
at
the
cost
like
that
sounds
like
a
high
number,
but
when
you
factor
in
the
fact
that
they
guarantee
12
months
and
they
can
replace
someone
like-
I
don't
think
other-
I
don't
know,
if
other
recruiting
firms
do
that,
but
like
that,
in
my
mind,
justifies
the
cost
easily.
A
Basically,
especially,
if
you
know
it's
a
split
of
different
things,
that's
a
that
that
that
extra
clause
is
what
makes
the
deal
much
safer
from
a
dx
dow
perspective.
If
it
was
like
pay,
some
guy,
40
grand
and
then
he
has
to
go
out
and
find
someone,
then
the
guy
comes
in
a
week
later.
He
leaves
that's
a
massive
risk.
B
Yeah
cost
justifies
it
to
me
just
on
quick
on
that,
like
there's,
actually
a
couple,
two
different
recruiters,
that
I've
won
tray,
that
I've
worked
with
before
and
he
had
this
experience
and
another
one
and
another
company
that
like
during
that
first
six
months
a
year,
they
are
trying
to
make
sure
that
that
candidate
is
happy
right,
so
they're
like
becoming
involved
and
kind
of
like
there.
So
that
is
yeah.
B
I
think
that's
important
for
that
whole
process,
and
I
think,
and
also
the
dxd
component-
will
also
align
this
us
with
them
long
term,
so
that
they
would
be
interested
in
seeing
the
success
of
dxdow
and
so
hopefully,
as
like
tammy
said,
there's
other
like
lower
level
people
that
we
could
find.
There's
also
like
a
bunch
of
other
jobs,
I'm
sure
we're
going
to
need
in
in
a
long
time.
So
maybe
they
by
aligning
with
them.
We
can
start
that
process.
A
Yeah,
not
many
other
dows
have
a
an
awesome
recruiting
agency,
that's
like
looking
out
for
their
best
interests
like
which
could
be
full-time
almost
or
like
on
a
regular
basis.
That'd
be
pretty
cool.
G
Maybe
I
don't
need
to
raise
my
hand
so
branching
off
of
this
conversation.
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
maybe
I
don't
know
if
the
contributor
experience
squad
wants
to
deal
with
this,
but
I
do
think
melanie
and
ali
can
kind
of
combine
efforts
with
trey
and
his
team
and
be
points
of
contact,
including
chris,
in
order
to
figure
out
a
proper
process
for
hiring.
You
know
figuring
out
how
we're
going
to
bring
in
recruited
individuals
into
the
organization.
G
I
think
that
this
is
going
to
be
more
complicated
than
they
think.
Even
I
know
they've
recruited
people
before
and
maybe
you've
been
caught.
Maybe
some
of
you
have
been
contacted
in
this
effort,
but
it's
actually
very
hard
to
convince
someone
to
move
from
a
successful
position
unless
they're
getting
more
money
or
there's
some
sort
of
status
growth
opportunity
right.
So
I
just
I
would
love
if
we
could
figure
out
some
sort
of
streamline
process
with
people
who
have
some
familiarity
with
recruiting
to
like
really
make
this
as
efficient
as
possible.
I
Yeah
I
mean
I
definitely
think
that
we'll
be
kind
of
working
hand
in
hand
with
them
during
this
whole
process,
to
find
our
marketing
exec
just
to
kind
of
like
circle
back
and
and
share
my
thoughts
on
the
process.
I
I
I
do
also
share
a
similar
opinion
about
the
price
being
pretty
steep
for
an
executive.
I
think
it
is
pretty
standard
to
fill
the
position
if,
if
the
person
that
they
find
doesn't
last,
I
think
that's
pretty
pretty
standard
with
a
lot
of
recruiting
agencies.
I
do
understand
that
we
are
in
like
a
bullish
market,
so
it
may
be
a
little
bit
more
challenging
to
find
to
find
a
candidate.
I
My
my
only
additional
reservation
is
that
they
they
don't
have
like
a
lot
a
lot
of
success
in
the
well
I
mean
I
know
they
have
some
proven
successes
within
the
market
within
the
crypto
market
with
previous
candidates
that
they
have
that's
just
like
my
only
only
concern
as
well,
but
I
mean
there's
like
a
lot
of
mixed
opinions.
I
do
know
that
we
need
someone
as
soon
as
possible.
So
that's
why
I'm
really
kind
of
giving
the
thumbs
up
on
this
they'll
definitely
help
with
our
internal
recruiting
processes.
I
I
think
we
should
have
you
know
a
lot
of
different
channels
for
incoming
new
contributors,
but
yeah
I
mean
I'm
open
to
it,
but
definitely
that
the
price
tag
is
is
high
for
me,
but
if
we
can
use
them
for
long
term,
then
I'm
open
to
it,
but
I
am
also
open
to
like
looking
at
other
options
as
well.
But
those
are
my.
E
Thoughts
personally,
my
only
reservation
would
have
been
if,
if
we
gave
him
the
retainer
and
they
didn't
deliver-
let's
say
six
months
later,
so
it's
like
what
was
it
spent
on
like
just
ads.
You
know
if,
if
we
want,
we
could
also
boost
the
post
on
linkedin
and
and
advertise
our
open
positions
ourselves,
but,
as
sky
said,
it's
a
good
selling
point
that
they're
guaranteeing
that
they
will
provide
a
replacement.
E
However,
how
long
would
it
take
for
that
replacement
again?
So
it's
like
I'm
not
against
the
idea
of
recruiting
them
at
all,
like
I'm
totally
for
it
go
ahead,
but
I'm
just
wondering
how
soon
could
they.
E
B
Yeah-
and
I
think
tammy
made
a
really
good
point
about-
there
has
to
be
a
process
on
our
side
for
how
we
like
evaluate
and
decide
on
candidates.
So
even
if,
like
we
go
through
with
this
they're
gonna
just
be
like
bringing
people
introducing
us
and
like
kind
of
like
walking
it
through
us,
but
we're
gonna
have
to
you
know,
decide
yeah
your
nay,
whether
it's
a
fit
or
not.
B
So
I
definitely
want
to
work
with
melanie
and
ali
and
get
others
inputs
on
that
that
process
on
on
kind
of
filtering
candidates
there,
and
I
I
do
think
they
have
pretty
good
experience
in
crypto,
so
coindesk
keep
radar
relay.
B
Awesome
it
sounds
like
the
the
kind
of
discussion
on
well,
maybe
the
compensation
breakdown.
Maybe
we
can
try
to
work
on
that
a
little
bit.
As
I
said,
they
were
pretty
open
to
anything.
I
know
with
keep
the
tbtc
group.
They
had
actually
taken
payment,
a
lot
of
payment
in
keep,
but
I
kind
of
share
a
lot
of
people
I
think
txt
is
is
cheap.
B
So
I
think
the
payment
split
amongst
those
is
is
a
good
way
and
I
think
now
the
way
it
was
structured
was
so
it's
10k
up
front.
That
would
be
the
potential
cost
and
then
the
rest
of
the
30k.
I
think
it
was
20k
in
ether
die
and
then
10k
in
dxd.
B
So
we'll
all
work
on
the
content,
the
com
structure
and
then
something
about
the
the
timeline,
because
I
think
you're
right
tammy.
That
like
obviously
want
to
like
expedite
this,
and
if
it's
something
on
our
end
like
we,
we,
I
don't
think
we
kind
of
get
to
decisions
quickly.
So
we
can
figure
out
something
there
on
that.
B
Awesome
next
up
is
the
discord
rep
boost,
so
keenan
has
been
working
on
kind
of
expanding
the
rep
boost
program
to
include
our
growing
discord
community,
and
I
think
we've
got
some
people
who
want
to
nominate
for
rep
awards
at
different
amounts.
So
keenan,
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
talk
about
that.
F
Yeah,
so
I
think
I
I
already
mentioned
it
previously,
but
I've
kind
of
documented
the
first
quarter
of
the
discord
and
participation
and
put
arbitrary
numbers
up
to
to
delegated
rep.
F
We
kind
of
determined
softly
that
contributors
shouldn't
be
eligible,
obviously,
and
also
that
if
one
of
the
community
members
in
the
booths
is
eligible
for
an
actual
rep
boost,
that
would
supersede
the
discord
participation
booths
to
avoid
double
dipping.
I
guess
we
could
talk
about
that
further.
Perhaps
if
someone
has
a
lot
of
discord,
participation
and
is
also
being
recognized
for
something
else,
you
could
consider
kind
of
a
mishmash
of
it.
It's
not
a
significant
amount
of
rep
after
all,
but
yeah.
I
I
have
a
document
I'll
I'll
share.
F
So
I
need
some
work
to
be
a
bit
more
presentable
and
me
and
chris
will
be
solidifying
the
numbers,
but
this
is
basically
it
just
a
small
amount
of
rep.
You
know
making
sure
the
community's
like
hey
thanks
for
participating.
We
want
to
see
you
more
here's
some
a
small
amount
of
rep.
If
you
want
to
get
started
with
governance-
and
you
know,
join
us
kind
of
leave
the
door
open
to
the
community,
I
think,
is
the
the
primary
goal
here.
B
Sweet
and
that
was
like
an
under
let's
talk
about
the
rf
noob,
who
was
a
top
discord
contributor,
but
it
was
also
nominated
for
the
normal
rep
boost
because
he's
or
she
is
active
on
the
forums
and
also
even
on
this
call.
So.
B
Awesome
great
and
then
last
thing
just
contributor
experience
check-in
or
I
don't
know
if
you're
doing
contributor,
ux.
B
Contributor
experience
team
melanie:
do
you
wanna
give
an
update.
I
Sure,
last
week
I
mentioned
we
were
going
to
start
working
on
the
job
descriptions
for
all
of
the
current
open
roles.
Here
at
dick
style
and
they're
almost
finished,
I
will
be
reaching
out
to
the
squad
leaders
and
other
contributors
to
help
with
the
final
review
of
them
before
putting
them
into
our
contributor
hub.
In
addition
to
the
job
descriptions,
we've
also
been
making
revisions
to
some
of
the
other
documents
in
the
contributor
hub.
At
the
moment,
some
of
the
documents
just
require
a
refresh
and
we're
in
the
process
of
doing
so.
I
We're
happy
about
how
many
worker
proposals
are
being
submitted
on
dow
talk
and
alchemy.
Lately.
I
just
have
a
request
that
everyone,
please
run
their
proposals
by
ali
or
myself
before
actually
submitting
them
directly
into
alchemy.
We've
caught
quite
a
few
errors,
unfortunately
over
the
past
few
few
weeks,
and
we
want
to
prevent
them
to
be
from
continuing
to
happen.
Lastly,
I
want
to
say
thank
you
to
nathan
our
heart
who,
over
the
past
past
few
weeks,
has
refused
referred.
I
Quite
a
few
new
contributors
to
dx
dao
recruiting
hasn't
been
easy,
as
we
previously
discussed
in
this
bullish
market,
but
he's
been
so
consistent
with
his
actions
and
sent
quite
a
few
new
contributors
to
us.
With
that
being
said,
if
you
have
or
know
someone
that
you
think
would
be
a
great
addition
to
dxdow
just
send
them
our
way
and
also
we
have
not
quite
completed
the
dx
referral
program
yet,
but
that
is
coming
soon
as
well
and
then,
hopefully
looking
forward
to
working
with
some
recruiters
in
the
near
future.
B
And
then
the
kind
of
dxd
rep
spreadsheet
or
whatever,
when
people
can
check
to
make
sure
that
they
have
the
right
dxd
rewards.
That's
still
still
being
worked
on
right.
I
A
Also,
I
don't
know
if
there
is
consensus,
but
I
would
I
think
that
the
any
referral
program
that
gets
implemented
should
include
like
what's,
for
example,
what
nathan
is,
if
nathan's
doing
a
great
job
recruiting
like
it,
should
look
back
as
well.
I
think,
and
and
have
some
reward
for
the
you
know
things
the
recruiting
that
is
happening
now,
even
if
the
program
doesn't
exist
yet
just
yet.
B
Yeah
yeah
and
I
think
they're,
one
of
the
melanie
mentioned
they're
working
on
like
an
xdy
proposal
guide,
and
so
I
think,
there's
like
a
big.
You
know
we
need
to
have
a
lot
of
documentation
and
they
got
documentation
books.
So
you
know
things
that
we
think
that
we
need
in
terms
of
guides
or
things
like
you
know,
shoot
shoot
our
way.
So
we
can
maybe
work
on
those.
B
B
Yeah
any
other
thoughts,
questions
comments.
A
Red
rad's
good,
that's
good
for
the
rep
boost
for
the
rep
stuff.
Those
and
those
are
currently
coming
on
on
xdi.
Are
they
coming
currently
coming
on
main
net
or
both.
B
A
A
However,
you
know,
as
we've
stated,
though,
like
you
know,
like
the
treasury
versus
diversification,
v2
proposal
like
the
main
net
proposal,
even
though
it's
it's
on
duplicated,
on
both
like
the
main
net.
One
is
the
most
important
one,
so
dxdow
is
still
on
mainnet.
A
So,
even
though
there's
a
cost
to
it,
I
think
having
more
people
actually
get
their
rep
boost
on
mainnet
like
is,
unless
they
really
don't
want
to,
and
they
don't
want
to,
I
think
they
get
reimbursed,
but
if
they
it
would
be
ideal
to
continue
to
grow
the
mainnet
distribution
and
not
just
unless
we
get
like
working
proposals,
we're
keeping
track
of
it
and
then
we'll
do
it
once
a
quarter,
but
maybe
we're
due
to
do
a
once.
A
quarter
update
right
now
like,
but
it
would
be
good
to
for
repos
to
be
on
both.
B
Yeah,
I
agree,
I
think
I
think
the
way-
or
at
least
the
way
we
should
be
solving
this.
Is
that
like
quarterly
one?
And
we
need
to
work
on
that,
because
it's
a
huge
thing,
but
I
think
there
were
like
15
different,
like
nominations,
and
these
are
like
small
amounts
of
rep
right,
because
it
was
like
point
even
like
0.04
percent,
because
it's
based
on
like
their
discord
usage.
B
So
I
think
it
would
be
difficult
to
do
those
on
mainnet
and
remember,
like
we
actually
had
a
lot
of
rep
boosts
that
people
weren't
doing
on
mainnet
before,
even
if
they
get
reimbursed
so
like.
I
want
to
issue
mainnet
rep
to
people,
but
it's
like
hard
to
get
them
to
submit
the
proposal
and
made
that
I
think.