►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Meeting [2020-11-04]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
the
governance
discussion
for
november
4th
2020.
We
were
just
talking
about
time
zones
and
kind
of
aligning
meeting
meeting
meeting
times
because,
of
course,
daylight
savings.
Time
has
kind
of
thrown
everyone
off
a
little
bit
and
it
sounds
kind
of
like
a
funny
problem,
but
it
is,
it
is
kind
of
difficult
to
coordinate.
B
Gusto
was
trying
to
hop
in.
I
was
hoping
to
give
him
a
chance
to
say
anything
on
that.
B
But
let's
keep
going
and
we'll
if
he
gets
in
the
chat,
we
can
figure
it
out.
So
just
governance,
1.0
stuff
the
community
rep
boost
round
two.
There
hasn't
so
we
kind
of
talked
about
that
last
week,
we're
going
to
identify
the
people
that
would
be
willing
to
kind
of
do
that.
We
haven't
kind
of
come
to
consensus
on
what
the
process
was
so
last
time
we
had
skye
and
myself
that
submitted
proposals,
but
we
wanted
to
kind
of
reach
out
to
those.
B
So
I
don't
know
if
we
need
any
other
signal
to
like
tell
someone
that
they
should
submit,
as
you
know,
a
rep
request
or
like
whether
they
should
just
do
that
and
like
the
signal
is
rep
holders
voting.
I
don't
know
if
there's
any
thoughts
on
moving
forward
for
the
rep
boost.
C
Sky
since
last
time,
yeah,
so
the
last
time
like
as
we
talked
about
like
the
giving
so
like
we
do
it
for
them
was
cool,
and
so
this
time
we
can
try
it.
We
can
actively
reach
out
to
them
and
have
them
do
it
and
then
we'll
see
how
that
experience
goes
and
then,
like
then,
the
third
time
we'll
know
which
one
seemed
better.
But
if
we
have
a
list,
I
guess
we
could
reach
out
to
them,
make
sure
they
know
how
to
do
it.
C
Have
them
maybe
do
a
post
on
walk
them
through
it,
maybe
personally
reach
out
to
them
and
then
and
then
your.
I
agree
that,
like
the
dow
voting
on
that
is
kind
of
the
signal,
so
there
is
the
signal
you
don't
need.
We
could
have
social
consensus
outside
of
that.
I
guess
maybe
maybe
he's
in
the
forum
post,
you
said
like
say
we're
going
to
start
doing
this
process
and
then,
if
anyone
has
any
problems
with
this
write
in
the
forum
right.
B
Yeah,
I
think
that
makes
sense.
I
think
we
have
like
the
rough
consensus
on
the
0.1
percent
as
like
this
round
and
then
yeah.
The
signal
comes
from
reporters
themselves,
so
I
do
think,
though,
as
you
said,
kind
of
documenting
that
process
just
to
be
like
well.
This
is
what
is
happening,
and
then
we
can
kind
of,
of
course
compare
how
those
go
yeah.
B
Cool
and
then
next
treasury
diversification,
no
big
update
here
there
was
just
an
interesting
post
from
that.
So
I
wanted
to
about
allocating
some
to
the
d5
tokens
because
they're
underperforming.
B
C
C
You
know
a
month
or
two
of
like
move
it
to
the
malt,
that
multi
snake
doing
the
conversion
and
then
move
it
back
into
the
dow
in
small
chunks
like
20,
000
chunks
or
something
if
we
think
that
we
want
to
have
diet
people,
because
there
are
some
people
that
actually,
I
think
want
to
get
paid
die
on
their
on
their
monthly
basis.
Probably
so
the
question
is:
do
we
want
to
do
something
immediate
because
waiting
for
a
real
layer
and
all
that
stuff,
we
don't
need
to
do
that
we
can
put
we
can.
B
I
made
the
this
silly
decision
to
like
when
I
wrote
my
dow
talk
post.
I
said
that
I
would
request
compensation
on
a
certain
date
and
so,
like
I
felt
you
know
obliged
to
follow
that
that
dow
talk
post
and
east
was
at
like
4
13.,
then
I'm
just
like.
D
D
D
B
Four
one
three
but
sky,
I
agree.
I
think
the
question
is
like
do
we
want
to
do
that
immediate
or
is
the
timeline
on
like.
C
Die
if
people
want
32,
we
wanted
like
k
of
dye
in
there
because
there's
like
at
least
okay.
If
five
people
want
to
get
p
like,
if
everyone
wants
to
get
die,
then
that's
not
going
to
work.
But
if
there's
literally
a
couple,
people
that
want
die
like
zed
and
he's
not
doing
his
proposal
because
of
that
we
can
easily
get
30
or
40
or
50k
of
dye
in
there
like,
with
with
like
a
multi-sig,
not
that
hard.
D
I
mean
for
me,
I'm
not
I'm
not
waiting
for
you
to
convert
to
die.
I
just
want
to
know
who
wins
the
the
if
trump
wins
or
whether
wins,
and
I
just
want
to
see
how
the
market
like,
I
don't
want
to
see
a
huge
100
dip
there
yeah,
but
that
your
your
big
risk
is.
C
D
That
I
just
I
just
don't
want
to
like
do
my
proposal
and
then
it
goes
down.
That's
mine,
okay,.
C
We
we
have
a
workaround,
we
haven't
been
using
for
worker
proposals,
but
with
audit
and
with
block
rocket
like
they're
the
you
could
say.
If
there's
a
giant
move
of
more
than
10,
you
get
like
a
little
top
up
or
something,
but
that
would
be
more
proposals
and
more
complications.
But
that
is
possible
because
we
do
that
with
audit
people
and
other
people
outsource
people.
D
C
Yeah
yeah
yeah,
like
who
violets
milan's
proposal,
which
john
had
staked
part
of
I
sticked
on
top
of
it,
still
didn't
stink
enough
and
it
failed.
So
then
I
staked
more
last
night
but
yeah.
It's
like
3
000
gen
to
like
boost
it
basically,
and
you
would
probably
be
more
than
that
so
yeah.
Maybe
it
is.
B
Nice
yeah.
I
think
we
need
to
start
with
a
a
forum
post
kind
of
outlining
this,
because
I
think
even
the
kind
of
other
discussions
on
like
treasury
stuff,
it's
more
of
like
diversification,
whereas
now
I
think
we
have
like
real
world
experience
just
from
like
workers
like
talking
about
this
experience,
I'll
write
a
forum
post
up
about
this,
and
then
we
can
maybe
talk
about
the
solutions
as
they
get
there.
D
E
B
C
It
no
we're
not
we're
not
using
the
current
the
currently
deployed
one,
because
there
are
issues
with
it.
So,
if
anything
we're
waiting
for
a
new
deployment,
so
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
keep
testing
or
using
that
one
and
it's
losing
people
again
or
locking
people's
gen
up.
So
that
is
basically
on
hold
we're
not
using
it
all.
F
Yeah
yeah
also,
there
are
big
questions
about
which
version
of
we
were
talking
with
john
about
this,
about
which
version
are
we
going
to
use
of
our
the
exile
contracts
in
excel,
because
one
of
the
reasons
that
we
were
talking
about
using
the
exit
that
you
guys
convinced
me
is
about
using
it
as
a
staging
but,
for
example,
environment
to
test
our
word
ups
and
everything,
but
if
the
contracts
that
we
already
played
there
are
different
to
the
ones
that
we
are
using
a
minute
that
doesn't
make
sense,
and
now
it
doesn't
even
work.
F
F
I
mean
I
mean
I,
I
appreciate
a
lot,
therefore,
that
was
put
there,
but
if
we
are
going
to
analyze
it
like
it
was,
it
was
a
failure
because
we
spent
time
deploying
to
xi
using
their
pushing
into
the
community.
I
even
distributed
150
that
I
did
and
requested
among
the
among
the
rep
holders.
So
we
put
a
lot
of
time
there
and
now
we
cannot
use
it.
So
if
you
take
that
in
count,
it's
a
failure.
H
F
B
But
thank
you
for
that
x.
Die,
die.
F
B
That
was
my
favorite
part
because
it
like
it's
like
you
got
so
little,
but
then
you
were
like.
Oh,
my
goodness,
I
can
do
so
much
with
it.
Yes,
so
that
is
a
kind
of
good
update
on
xda
as
we
kind
of
jump
around.
I
don't
know
if
there's
anything
else
to
say
there,
but
to
tie
up
the
worker
proposal
thing.
I
don't
think
it
can
be
done
at
next
time.
We
need
to
kind
of
think
of
how
we
probably
move
towards
another.
C
Proposals
so
what
another
alternative
to
get
dye
into
dx
style,
if
we
didn't
want
to
like
take
out
eth
turn
it
into
die
with
a
multisig
and
then
put
it
back
in
is
workers
or
people
could
say,
send
ten
thousand
dive
through
the
dow
and
then
make
a
proposal
to
get
eth
out.
So
it's
like
a
safer
for
the
dow,
because
you're
pre,
if
people
wanted
to
put
die
in
and
get
the
x
without,
like
you,
that's
how
the
dow
could
get
die.
G
We
can
build
the
integration
for
gnosis
protocol.
I
think
that's
just
a
matter
of
prioritizing
that.
So
I
think
if
you
make
a
post
about
what
the
intention
is,
that'll
give
some
clear
guidance
to
the
technical
team
like
what
we're
trying
to
accomplish,
and
then
I
think
we
can
do
it
relatively
quickly.
C
Oh
and
then,
and
then
on
worker
proposals
ideas.
Theoretically,
if
you
have
the
multi-call
like
with
like
numerous
fields
like
you,
could
make
one
big
proposal
to
pay
like
10
people
all
same
or
different
payments,
all
as
one
proposal
and
everyone
votes
on
that
one
proposal
that'd
be
like
in
a
way
to
make
it
more
efficient
month,
monthly
distribution.
G
And
I
think
if
we
could,
you
know
I
mean
there's
a
little
bit
of
inefficiency
in
the
number
of
proposals
you
have
to
do
per
work
right.
You
do
the
initial
one
and
the
second
one
with
dxd
with
the
multi
call.
I
think
you
could
maybe
condense
that
or
with
you
know,
I
think,
there's
some
efficiency.
You
could
get
and
still
have
people
individually
getting
approved
kind
of
for
their
worker
periods.
G
Approval
proposal
and
then
maybe
all
the
payment
proposals
are
rolled
together
like
through
a
guild
or
x,
die
or
whatever
yeah.
B
Yeah,
I'm
just
just
kind
of
hearing
these
different
discussions.
I
think
it's
clear
that
there
are
a
bunch
of
other
things
on
kind
of
compensation
structure
in
general,
that
we
need
to
change
a
kind
of
upgrade.
This
hasn't
been
getting
into
the
dxd
locking
component,
and
I
think,
like
augusto,
has
a
good
point
about
me.
B
We
switched
to
three
months,
and
so
I
don't
think
this
is
something
we'll
be
solving
now,
but
we
probably
should
be
probably
not
an
update
to
the
worker
compensation
guidelines,
but
maybe
something
that
kind
of
gives
some
guidance
in
these
general
areas,
but
we
need
to
it'll
also
require
building
some
stuff
too,
and
so
I
think
we
should
keep
our
expectations
on
like
the
medium
term.
B
The
next
I
wanted
to
just
the
governance
refunds
round.
One
run
number
one,
not
round
zero
nico
made
a
post
about
it,
so
a
refund
contract
has
been
deployed
and
then
there's
a
proposal
to
fund
that
contract
and
once
that
proposal
goes
through,
you
can
reclaim
your
refunds.
Skye
had
made
a
walk
through
of
how
to
do
it
for
the
last
time,
and
you
can
get
that
there
in
the
in
the
nico's
post.
B
Cool
and
then
I
was
gonna,
do
proposal
roundup
and
also
I
wanted
to
talk
about
the
time
zones,
but
I
guess
in
terms
of
the
proposal
roundup,
a
bunch
of
worker
proposals
that
have
kind
of
kept
flowing
in
nothing
too
new
there
and
then
their
is
the
post.
The
proposal
on
changing
the
dx
swap
default
fee
and
I
think
that's
about
it.
I
don't
know
if
there's
any
that
anyone
wanted
to
discuss
or
comment
on.
G
I
think
augusto
brought
this
up
in
key
based,
but
for
the
deployments
and
the
initial
deployment
of
dx
swap
there's
like
the
opportunity
basically
to
deploy
a
few
pairs
with
custom
fees
like
we
could
set
it
to
whatever
to
begin
with
right
and
instead
of
waiting
for
the
governance.
But
I
think
it's
limited
due
to
gas
constraints
to
about
three.
If
kurugusov
can
correct,
because
he's
the
one
actually
doing
this.
F
Yes,
yes
exactly,
we
agreed
on
six
initial
pairs
right
to
be
used
and
we
can
only
deploy
three
initial
pairs
on
the
one
transaction
that
deploys
the
the
x
sub
factory
and
the
and
the
other
pairs
like.
If
we,
if
we
want
to
play
four
pairs,
we
are
going
to
reach.
The
gas
limit
is
right
now
about
12
million
on
g
way,
something
like
that
anyway,
it
does
a
lot
yeah.
We
cannot
deploy
more
than
three
initial
pairs
on
the
beginning,
so
we
we
should
prioritize.
F
We
chose
which
of
these
six
pairs
are
the
most
important
ones
at
least
decide
internally,
because
we
are
going
to
agree
on
the
dxop,
the
configuration
once
we
send
to
the
exact
deploy
once
we
wanted.
The
exile
through
through
a
proposal
on
the
founding
and
voting
power
scheme
sends,
let's
say
one
ether
to
a
dxof
deployer.
Then
the
deployment
is
going
to
happen.
B
And
I
guess
with
these
new
ones,
we
would
probably
want
to
like
experiment
with
in
the
early
days
or
let
me
not
experiment,
but
I
guess
like
how
we
would
be
testing
it
live.
Or
what
should
we
be
thinking
about
what
these
pairs
should
be?.
G
F
Yes,
that
we
have
paired,
we
agreed
on
it
on
a
on
a
swap
fee
of
0.10,
and
now
the
default
is
going
to
be
0.25
and
we
have
six
pairs.
That
is
the
ether
I
think
dxe
dmg
dxe,
being
k.
B
I
think
it's
you
know,
even
as
a
discussion
on
the
0.25
percent.
I
I
think
it's
also
cool
in
a
marketing
way
to
have
different
fees
right
because
it's
like,
oh,
like
that's,
why
dx
swap
is
kind
of
different.
It's
because
there's
a
couple
different
fees
and
then
it
also
allows
us
to
experiment
a
little
bit
and
you
know,
do
different.
Fee
fees
have
any
type
of
effect.
I'm
not!
B
I
I'm
agnostic,
I
guess
of
what
those
pairs
would
be,
but
maybe
it
would
be
cool
to
even
do
one
pair
with
a
lower
fee
than
point
two
five
percent
and
one
fee
with
like
a
high
one
pair
with
a
higher
fee,
just
as
kind
of
an
experiment.
Obviously,
then
maybe
the
lower
fee
pair
would
need
to
be
one
where
jig
style
was
providing
liquidity
on.
C
Augusta
just
to
clarify,
I
think
that
the
the
proposal
to
like
to
make
the
default
0.25
was
also
based
around
like
dxde
conversation,
and
I
don't
know
if
the
point
one
percent
is.
I
think
that
old
past
proposal
is
kind
of
stale
now
am
I
correct
chris,
like
dxd,
is
what
we
kind
of
want
at
0.25.
F
F
Okay,
well,
that's
that's!
No
bueno
does
no
when
at
all,
because
we
don't
decide
the
fees
that
we
are
going
to
have.
We
cannot
deploy
it,
I
mean
or
we
can
deploy,
but
it's.
F
F
G
Yes,
I
linked
to
the
proposal
the
the
one
that's
already
been
passed
that
lists
the
six
pairs
for
0.1.
So
I
mean,
if
you
look
at
this
proposal,
it's
saying
we
wanted
to
sponsor
these
with
these
pool
fees.
You
know
it's
going
to
take
a
little
bit
of
figuring
out
before
the
dsm
actually
provides
the
liquidity
to,
and
at
some
point
you
know,
either
around
the
same
time
or
shortly
thereafter.
The
dx
down
should
be
able
to
also
change
those
fees.
So
I
think
it's
okay,
that
these
don't
start
at
the
default.
You
know
like.
B
G
F
G
Can
you
summarize
why
yeah
the
basic
the
basic
idea
is
that
you
know
initially,
our
our
thinking
was
dx
style
would
provide
liquidity
from
the
treasury.
So
we
thought
because
we're
going
to
use
the
treasury
to
make
the
xbox
successful
and
if
we're
going
to
do
that,
we'll
make
it
cheap
for
the
traders,
because
it'll
attract
more
traders.
So
that's
why
we
initially
thought
0.1
percent.
Then
we
got
pushback
from
the
community
saying
we
don't
want
to
dxdow
to
to
compete
with
txt
liquidity
providers
using
dxd
from
the
treasury,
and
we
said:
okay
yeah.
G
Let's
not
do
that
right
away,
at
least
let's
try
to
encourage
the
existing
liquidity
providers
to
come
over
and
along
with
that
feedback.
These
liquidity
providers
also
said
they
didn't
want
to
have
like
too
low
of
a
fee,
because
then
it's
less
appealing
to
to
move
over
from
you
to
swap
or
balancer
yeah
to
that
that
length
that.
F
H
F
Can
do
it,
but
it
doesn't
make
too
much
sense.
Even
you
can
use
the
liquidity
of
how
much
equity
that
you
want,
but
a
lot
of
trades
hopefully
are
going
to
go
through
that
pair
because
we
are
going
to
encourage
dxe
and
ether
being
as
base
as
base
tokens.
Therefore,
this
is
the
most
important
pair
and
it
should
have
the
lowest
fee
possible.
G
Well,
I
mean
the
good
news:
is
it
can
be
changed
later
right?
So
I
mean
that's
a
good
argument
and
I
think
I
think
maybe
that
argument
does
win
like
pretty
soon
in
the
near
term,
but
I
think
because
of
this
feedback
we
got
about
you
know
existing
liquidity
providers
not
liking.
It,
though
0.1
I
think
it's
a
good
idea
to
start
with
the
0.25,
so
we
can
see
if
we
can
move
them
over
and
then
you
can
kind
of
once
we
see
what
kind
of
liquidity
and
who's
doing
it.
Then
we
can
decide.
G
F
Yeah,
a
lot
of
arbitration,
hopefully,
is
going
to
happen
through
this
pair,
so
the
lower
the
sub
feed
the
more
fish
that
we
are
going
to
collect.
So
we
should
find
the
right
number
anyways,
it's
good,
that
we
have
the
e4
pair
and
we
lower
it
and
we
lower
it
later,
because
that
is
going
to
be
the
highest
fee
that
we
are
going
to
have.
Hopefully
that.
G
Yeah,
hopefully
it
won't
be
very
long
before
we
can
lower
it,
because
I
mean
we
just
have
the
scheme
installed
and
then
we
can
make
proposals,
so
that
would
be
cool
too
right.
If
you
could,
like
you
know,
we
make
some
argument
for
why
it
should
be
lower
and
then
try
to
get
feedback
from
the
community.
This
is
the
kind
of
thing
too.
I
would
love
to
see
like
a
dxd
guild
also
vote
on
this,
because
then
we
could
see
the
the
xp
holders
like
this
idea,
or
do
they
not
like
this
idea.
F
I
mean
I
I
I
need
to
know
the
most
important
pairs
chassis
and
that
we
are
going
to
use
with
different
fee
is
going
to
be
dxe
pnk,
dxz
dmg
and
the
stereo
coins
are
going
to
have
the
default
fee
or
a
lower
one.
F
Those
ones
also,
those
also
should
have
a
basically
all
all
tokens
are
going
to
be
used
as
base
pairs
are
going
to
be
the
most
popular
to
be
used
as
base
tokens
of
ace
pair
should
have
a
lower
a
lower
fee
against
ether
right
because.
C
F
C
F
Same
like
it's
the
same
issue
that
you
are
going
to
have
with
the
dft
ether
pool
we
are
going
to
be.
The
plan
is
to
provide
liquidity
using
dxd
from
the
treasury
on
those
pools
too.
So
suddenly,
we
are
not
doing
that
either.
G
I'm
not
too
worried
about
it
because
I
think
by
the
time
there's
significant
liquidity
or
we're
adding
liquidity
from
the
treasury.
We
should
have
the
ability
to
change
the
fees
right
and
then
so,
while
we're
doing
it,
we
could
set
it
lower
right
like
so.
If,
if
we
miss
one
now,
it's
not,
I
don't
think
it's
the
end
of
the
world.
H
G
F
G
F
F
I
This
is,
we
don't
have
it
in
the
treasury
and
we
don't
have
the
ability
yeah
yeah,
we
have
some
died,
500
died.
G
F
Maybe
we
can
maybe
we
can
create
a
smart
contract.
Relayer
we
are
using
ether,
is
exchanged
to
die
or
any
like
a
like
a
swap
layer
for
the
eye
using
unicef.
So
you
send
ether
to
this
smart
contrast
from
the
exile
on
the
receive
function,
and
it's
going
to
do
all
the
swap
and
it's
going
to
send
the
die
to
the
to
the
exile.
F
We
experiment
we
already
have
kind
of
these
scripts
that
run
some
receive
functions
so
so
eventually,
this
allows
you
to
use
an
ether
to
a
smart
contract
and
it's
going
to
run
some
operations
and
in
this
case
it's
going
to
exchange
to
that
and
send
the
die
back
to
the
excel
to
a
dxr.
We
will
need
three
swap
layers,
one
for
each
stable.
G
F
F
H
B
B
B
If
that
means
it'll
be
a
couple,
even
if
there'll
be
a
couple
weeks
until
the
the
treasury
can
get
stable
coins.
G
And
it's
a
base
barrier,
that
doesn't
I
mean
it's
still
a
bad
user
experience
either
way,
but
the
fact
that
it's
a
base
pair
doesn't
change
really.
You
know
it's
not
going
to
break
it.
The
fact
that
you
have
the
ustc
listed
as
a
base
pair,
it's
just
a
bad
user
experience
because
they
can't
get
if
there's
no
liquidity
for
usdc,
then
I
would
say
we
should
be
prepared
for
dxf
is
not
going
to
be
a
great
user
experience
early
on,
because
there's
not
going
to
be
a
lot
of
liquidity
in
some
things.
G
Right
and
personally,
I
think
the
answer
to
that
is
pulling
in
the
uniswap
liquidity
through
the
router,
and
I
think
that
could
be
that's
on
the
roadmap.
I
think
we
can
do
relatively
soon.
F
Yeah,
actually,
it
depends
like,
I
think,
the
custom
base
pairs
feature
that
we
might
have
does
something
super
cool
that
that
will
also
we
are
going
to
bring
a
lot
of
liquidity,
because
if
we
are
going
to
use
the
stable
coins
as
space
tokens,
the
estebans
ether
they
are
going
to
have
a
lower
feed
and
unit
swap
we
are
going
to
eventually
have
like
better
pain,
better
connections
between
stable
coins
and
uni,
swap
I
mean
more
profit
for
traders,
so
hopefully,
more
trades
are
going
to
happen
there
through
aggregation,
because
our
price
is
going
to
be
well.
G
So
to
try
to
close
this,
what
three
are
people
finding
she's
doing
the
the
stable
coins
in
it
low
first,
like
I
mean
basically,
I
don't
I'm
not
too
worried
about.
I
think
the
bigger
the
bigger
thing
is
getting
the
connections
up
and
running
and
getting
liquidity
in
and
stuff,
and
I
think
if,
if
you
want
to
do
the
stable
coins
to
start,
that's
fine
by
me
awesome.
B
It's
good
cool
glad.
We
talked
about
that
because
it
is
an
important
thing,
so
I
feel
like
we
came
moving
on
just
to
one
point
x
stuff
and
we
kind
of
talked
about
x
die
earlier
in
terms
of
kind
of
where
we're
at.
I
think
there
still
needs
to
be
some
more
movement
there.
I
don't
know
if
there's
any
other
conversation
that
we
wanted
to
pick
up
from
there.
G
So
for
x,
I
think
the
big.
The
big
thing
here
is
redeploying
one
just
like
confirming
that
the
path
forward
is
to
use
rp1
on
x
time,
which
is
what
my
sense
of
things
are
after
talking
with
ezra
last.
I
guess
that
was
last
week
and
and
then
figuring
out
how
to
actually
do
that
deployment
to
you
and
then
we
just
gotta
get
whatever
is.
If
there's
anything
left
in
the
arc,
v2x
died
out
just
close
that
out.
B
Cool
and
then
just
moving
on
dxd
guild
just
wasn't
sure
if
there
was
any
update
there
or
anything
that
we
should
be
thinking
about
there.
F
There
is
not,
there
is
not
because
I'm
the
only
person
working
there
and
I've
been
busy
with
dxop,
but
I'm
going
to
be
working
on
that
in
my
in
my
next
two
months.
Once
I
get
free
from
my
possibilities.
B
Cool
all
right
and
then
just
wanted
to
kind
of
spend
either
the
rest
of
the
time
talking
about
two
different
topics.
First,
is
just
governance,
2.0
and
the
second
is
time
zones
to
get
up
a
little
bit.
So
first
of
governance,
2.0
we
had
a
a
good
kickoff
call
yesterday
with
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
different
people,
people
from
kind
of
frequent
contributors.
B
A
lot
of
people
on
this
call
also
teams
from
dow
stack
and
delphi
digital
and
then
a
couple
kind
of
outside
perspectives,
kind
of
try
to
narrow
the
problem
and
get
everyone
on
this
in
on
the
same
page,
in
terms
of
the
misalignment
of
rep
and
dxd
long
term,
there's
some
shared
in
the
agenda.
I
shared
the
notion
board
and
the
meeting
notes
from
that
and
kind
of
the
the
next
steps
process
here
are
trying
to
really.
B
It
seems
to
be
that
there
will
be
some
kind
of
like
maybe
technical
equation
solution,
though
everyone
want
to
kind
of
call
it.
What
we're
trying
to
do
now
is
kind
of
like
list.
What
are
the
requirements
that,
though,
that
that
would
need
to
adhere
to
and
then
kind
of,
lay
those
out
there?
So
we've
got
a
document
that
started
that's
in
the
notion
board
for
that
several
people
on
the
call
that
were
here,
I
don't
know
if
people
wanted
to
comment
or
add
any
color.
G
Yeah,
I
think
the
goal
for
by
the
like
next
meeting
would
be
to
have
the
requirements
kind
of
clarified.
I
guess
what
I'm
hoping
for
on
that
like
is
that
we
can
retain
rep
reputation
and
dxd
kind
of
as
primitives
like
in
isolation.
Reputation
can
represent
an
individual's
contributions
to
the
dao.
G
I
think
that's
like
a
very
powerful
concept
that
could
be
extended
even
beyond
geek
style,
if
that's
like
kept
intact
and
then
on
the
other
side,
if
dxd
can
represent
your
financial
state,
I
think
that's
also
powerful,
because
you
can
basically
then
support
speculators
who
just
want
to
hold
dxd
and
nothing
else
or
workers
who
just
want
to
work
and
earn
some
credibility
and
nothing
else.
And
then,
if
voting
power
is
like
a
third
concept,
that
kind
of
draws
on
those
two
and
uses
some
kind
of
an
equation
to
calculate
the
voting.
G
J
J
J
Right
and
so
you
can
make
things
that
give
people
reputation
for
other
things,
but
then
you're
messing
with
the
idea
of
reputation
quite
right,
right
right,
yeah.
What
I'm
talking
about
is
actually
sort
of
a
generic
interface
that
says:
hey.
You
can
use
something
that
says
basically
hey.
You
can
use
anything
for
your
rep.
You
know
for
your
voting
power
contract.
We
just
need
to
be
able
to
check
balance
of
ad
or
something
like
that,
and
then
you
can
write
a
con.
We
can.
We
can
write
some
contracts
there
for
that.
J
Let
you
basically
this
could
even
be
up
to
the
dao
like
you
could
name.
Other
sources
like
you
could
have
a
contract.
That
says,
give
me
any
number
of
contracts
that
fit
that
and
weights.
You
know,
and
then
you
could
say:
well,
here's
our
reputation,
contract,
we're
gonna
use
that
for
75
percent
of
the
weight
and
here's,
this
dxd
locking
contract
we're
going
to
use
that
for
25,
and
you
could
adjust
that
later
and
you
could
add
a
third
source.
You
could
take
it
away
whatever
something
more
like
that
is
kind
of
what
I'm
imagining.
J
G
And
I,
from
a
platform
perspective
I
think
like.
If
I
was
in
dow
stack
shoes,
I
would
think
that
it
would
be
cool
to
allow
like
flexible
design
right,
because
the
design
space
is
potentially
big,
like
dxdow,
is
going
to
figure
out
something
right
that
we're
going
to
settle
on.
But
you
know
there
could
be
a
whole
range
of
ways
to
do
it
or
things
to
draw
on
that
could
kind
of
follow
a.
J
Yeah,
that's
that's
I'm
totally
on
board
with
that!
That's
that's!
Definitely.
What
I
have
in
mind
is
something
that
would
let
you
experiment
more
with
this,
and
and
let
us
have
you
know
whatever
you
guys
end
up
with
other
guys,
could
use
that,
but
they
could
also
make
their
variations
of
it.
I
I
think
that
this
is
this
area
like
understanding
voting
power
is
just
something
that
totally
hasn't
been
figured
out
yet
and
so
a
system
that
does
let
you
experiment
and
adjust.
Things
seems
like
the
right
way
to
go
to
me.
J
B
Yeah,
it's
like
what's
the
what's
the
reconciliation
process,
and
you
can
imagine
that
each
dow
might
have
a
different
approach.
But
I
think
deep
style
will
like
come
up
with
some
reconciliation
process.
To
probably
produce
voting.
Is
that,
like
modular
enough
for
other
dows,
to
kind
of
find
their
own
reconciliation
between
the
two.
J
B
A
Like
it
should
be
on
the
agenda
like,
if
you
ask
me
considering
what
I
saw
yesterday
during
the
call
was
that
there
is
a
sufficient
amount
of
clarity
regarding
the
problem,
and
this
path
to
the
solution
is
definitely
not
easy.
So
like.
If
we
are
going
to
be
creative,
we
should
allocate
some
time
to
discuss
about
possible
solutions,
especially
the
more
technical
people,
and
to
to
give
them
enough
space
and
freedom
to
make
quote-unquote
errors
and
mistakes
so
that
we
can
come
up
with
something
that's
going
to
be
effective.
B
B
Have
listeners
at
home-
and
this
is
important
there
is-
the
question
is
like
who
defines
time
right
because,
like
some
people
are
switching
by
to
buy
daily
savings
time
right
where
other
people
are
like
well
utc
time
is
this
like
this?
I
don't
want
to
say
immutable,
but
like
consistent
thing
that
never
kind
of
changes.
So
the
question.
C
C
Yeah,
so
I
I
think
that
the
main
issue
is
we
want
to
find
something
worse
for
everyone,
but
the
main
issue
is
there's
a
thing
called
middle
region
syndrome.
It's
like
middle
child
syndrome,
if
you're
in
the
middle
of
like
too
extreme
it.
It
doesn't
like
these
things,
don't
matter
to
you,
but
for
ezra
and
everyone
in
israel
and
the
ukraine
you're
pushing
up
at
one
one
edge
and
then
you're
west
coast,
u.s
you're
pushing
the
other
end.
C
G
F
Yeah,
I
think
also
yeah
yeah,
guys
just
to
be
clear.
You
we
should
find
the
time
in
utc
and
use
that
because
I
think
we
cannot
be
like.
Oh
now,
we
have
one
more
hour
in
europe
or
one
more
hour
on
oneness
hour
in
u.s,
and
one
like
there
are
places
where
time
like
never
changes.
For
example,
here
in
south
america,
we
don't
change,
we
achieve
the
hour
right.
B
I
think
the
most
important
thing
is
something
that
is
can
is
convenient
and
useful
to
all
participants.
I
think
changing
time
is
like
difficult,
but
I
don't
think
there's
anything
that
is
like
emotionally,
like
or
morally
wrong
with
like
switching
time
that
that's
like
something
to
do.
I
think
the
concern
for
me
is,
I
think,
the
west
coast
of
the
us
specifically
san
francisco
is
an
extremely
important
market
for
us
and
for
kind
of
any
technology
company
and
I
think,
there's
a
huge
difference
between
7
a.m
and
8
a.m.
B
C
That
would
work
for
like
vancouver
san
francisco
la
but
and
that
currently
works
for
for,
like
the
the
other
extreme
ukraine
and
and
and
tel
aviv,
for
example,
but
the
the
problem
is,
we
keep
it
4pm
utc
all
year
long
when
the
for
half
of
the
year,
that's
okay,
because
that's
a
little
later
for
us
west
coast
in
local
time,
but
then
it's
really
late
for
for
the
other
edge.
C
B
B
G
We
have
a
bigger
problem,
I
think
which
is
like
you
know.
Yeah
we
can
talk
about
yeah
west
coast
is
important
in
the
us,
but
like
there's
entire,
like
swaths
of
the
world,
that
we
are
not
even
remotely
accommodating
that
actually,
where
the
bulk
of
the
population
of
the
world
is
and
yeah.
So
I
mean
like,
in
terms
of
scheduling
calls.
I
think
we
need
to
address
the
east
a
little
better
like
australians
and
and.
F
Also
guys,
I
think
it
is
not
bad
if
we
change.
If
I
agree
that,
okay,
the
time
might
change
once
twice
a
year,
but
it
should
be
communicated
right
because
right
now
what
happened?
It
was
a
mess
right
because
it
was
like.
Oh
wait.
Oh
what's
up,
I
will
come
in
the
car
now
or
in
an
hour.
So
now
we
should
decide.
Okay,
we
are
going
to
use
utc
4
p.m.
Maybe
we
should
know
before
that.
Okay,
the
time
is
going
to
change
the
hour
is
going
to
change
two
weeks.
I
C
G
B
F
C
B
I
will
tell
you
my
my:
this
is
really
important.
My
grandfather
died
a
couple
years
ago,
but
for
the
last,
like
20
years
of
his
life,
he'd
always
send
emails
to
everyone
like
happy
birthday,
emails
to
people
like
everyone
in
the
family
and
then
he
would
always
send
an
email
the
day
before
daylight
savings
time
to
be
like
remember,
to
turn
back
your
clocks-
and
you
know,
phones
and
the
internet
have
now
like
replaced
that.
So
we
don't
need
to
actually
turn
back
our
clocks.
B
G
B
B
C
C
B
F
G
G
B
Here,
as
I
was
saying
before,
they
call
china,
the
entire
country
is
on
one
time
zone
and
it
like
covers
what
you
should
think
should
be
like
three
time
zones
so,
like
the
western
part
of
the
country
like
tibet
and
elsewhere,
they
just
like
the
sun.
Just
gets
up
really
really
late
and
people
adjust
and
they're
crazy
people
in
the
world
who
think
that
we
should
get
rid
of
time
zones
all
together
and
everyone
should
just
adjust
to
like
each
other's
like
working
hours.
B
So
then
we
wouldn't
have
these
coordination
emails
issues,
but.
B
C
First
time
zone,
it's
next
climate
change
and
then
to
address
asia,
which
the
only
time
that
I
know
that
really
works
with
a
western
combined
with
asia
is
like
later
in
the
day
like
end
of
day
west
coast
right
would
be
for
asia.
So
there
could
be
a
call
once
every
couple
weeks
or
something
that
is
at
that
time.
For
yeah,
you
would
want
to
probably
include
as
much
of
the
us
as
possible,
plus
asia.
C
B
As
someone
I
used
to
live
in
in
asian
time
zones
and
I
used
to
love
watching
american
sports
and
so
like
the
west
coast,
sports
are
actually
like
the
best
ones,
because
you
get
7
p.m.
In
l.a
is
11
a.m.
In,
like
hong
kong
in
asia.
So
that's
actually
kind
of
an
easy
way
to
do.
You
can
even
do
like
5
p.m.
B
La
time
is
9
00
a.m.
In
in
asia,
of
course,
it's
asia,
the
asia,
the
difference
between
asia
and
u.s
time
difference
switches
every
six
months
too.
B
So
you
have
to
go
from
adjusting
by
like
12
to
13,
for
the
east
coast
or
from
15
hours
to
16
hours
for
the
west
coast,
and
then,
when
you
like,
get
to
16
hours
ahead,
really
you're
like
eight
out
you're
like
one
day
ahead
eight
hours
behind,
so
it's
easier
to
do
the
math,
there's
subtraction
but,
like
I
said
I
just
google
all
the
time
zones,
I
keep
thinking
the
recording
is
going
to
come
in
and
say
that
it's
it's
over
here,
but
I
think
we
finished.