►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Meeting [2020-10-28]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Welcome
to
the
governance
discussion
for
october
28th,
I
wanted
to
start
with
governance
1.0
stuff
and
go
over
another
round
of
community
rep
boosts
that
I
think
we
should
kind
of
start
talking
about
and
doing
so
remember.
This
was
a
program
we
started
the
beginning
of
september
to
kind
of
proactively
reward
community
contributors
that
are
helping
in
a
whole
bunch
of
different
ways,
and
so
we
concluded
that
I
think
with
ten
new
addresses.
That
was,
you
know.
A
People
like
cl,
like
some
people,
like
finn
zet,
before
kind
of
coming
on,
and-
and
so
I
think,
it's
a
good
way
of
doing
that,
and
so
then
I
posted
actually
share
my
screen
quickly.
So
I
posted
a
new
post
to
that
thread
to
try
to
kick
start
the
process
again.
So
I
just
these
were
ones
that
I
think
people
had
talked
about
elsewhere.
So
I
think
dcc
one
who's
been
really
helpful
in
the
omen
community
doing
a
bunch
of
things
pepo.
A
I
think
the
solution
for
that
keo
was
mentioned,
matt
b
for
fresh
perspective
and
calls,
and-
and
I
wanted
to
say
something
about
the
the
trading
and
random
chat,
but
I
thought
we'd
be
a
little
bit
more
buttoned
up
and
then
crypto
larimer,
who
is
someone
who
actually
is
a
podcast
that
created
did
kind
of
or
it's
a
youtube
podcasty
thing
and
did
like
20
25
minutes
on
dxdow
for
the
cis
or
russian
community
pulp
machina,
who
I
think
was
at
a
really
great
discussion
that
kind
of
kicked
off
last
week
and
then
mad
max
who's
kind
of
been
been
been
doing
that
elsewhere.
A
So
this
is
kind
of
just
meant
to
kick-start
the
discussion.
I
don't
know
if
anyone
has
any
kind
of
additions
or
like
thoughts.
You
know.
Obviously
there
aren't
numbers
around
this,
but
we
can
kind
of
use
the
prior
prior
round
as
a
precedent.
C
A
He
he
I
wanted
to
put
the
random
in
the
trivia
and
the
I
wanted
to
put
the
contributions
to
the
random
and
the
trading
key
base.
But
I
thought
that
was
two
in
the
weeds.
A
A
C
C
It
would
be
good,
it's
a
good
way
for
them
to
learn
how
to
do
it,
but
at
the
same
time
there's
something
nice
about
the
dao
doing
it
without
them
being
involved
in
the
asking
process.
That's
kind
of
like
the
beauty
of
it
is
that
they
don't
have
to
ask
it's
being
given
to
them
by
the
dao.
C
D
Yeah,
I
agree
one
one
way
we
could
do
it
is
while
we
actually
approach
them
with
like
hey.
The
community
wants
to
give
you
rep,
if
so
like,
explaining
that,
if,
if
they
actually
requested
by
themselves,
they
will
just
earn
more
reputation
but
then
like.
D
I
think
why
we
approach
them
and
like
tell
them
about
the
red
boots,
we
can
just
inform
them
about
the
that
they
can
request
it
by
themselves
and
earn
more,
and
if
it's
not,
if
it's
not
happening,
we
still
have
the
address,
and
then
we
just
progressively
proactively.
D
Do
it
by
ourselves.
I
think
it's
quite
important
that
we
it's
like
a
very
strong
signal
from
us
that
we're
like
we
invite
you
now
and
it's
like
yeah.
So
it's
like.
I
still
think
it's
a
it's
an
important
signal
that
we
are
pro
actively
care
about:
expanding
the
membership
size
and
the
decentralization.
E
Yeah,
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
have
people's
consent
on
taking
the
rep
and
kind
of
also
to
indicate
that
they
actually
want
it
right.
I
guess
we
need
that
anyways,
because
we
need
to
get
their
address
in
most
cases
right,
but
yeah
well,.
A
That's
great,
I
don't
think
so
because
there's
a
mad
max
in
the
key
base
too.
I'm
pretty
sure.
So
I
think
it's
it's
both,
but
actually
augusto
does
bring
up
a
good
point.
So,
like
you
know,
I
did
going
through
the
proposals.
You
know,
there's
people
like
block
rocket
and
I
guess
all
pl
or
phil
the
auditor-
people
that
are
kind
of
definitely
contributing
to
dx
dao.
A
I
guess,
we'd
call
this
just
worker
compensation
agreements,
and
so
I
don't
know
if
we
also
want
to
kind
of
do
a
separate
rep
award
or
if
that
kind
of,
because
they're
you
know
because
they're
getting
a
compensation
agreement
with
the
dow.
Does
that
mean
that
the
rep
shouldn't
or
should
come
with
that
or
how
are
people
thinking
about
those
contributors?
Well.
C
What
would
be
cool
so
the
second
payment
for
block
rocket?
We
had
them,
do
it
themselves,
so
they're
all
getting
some
rep
there
like
they
were
not
getting
asking
for
rep
as
part
of
the
execution
of
the
agreement
but
phil
like
if
he
like.
We
should
signal
to
him
that
these
proposals
like,
if
he
wants
it
and
wants
to
be
involved
and
wants
rep.
C
He
should
he
can
be
submitting
those
proposals
himself
and
there's
quite
a
few
of
them,
so
he
can
build
up
rep
that
way,
in
addition
to
potentially
receiving
rep
as
worker
compensation,
but
a
rep
boost
also
works.
If
they're
you
could
do
it's.
Reboosts
are
always
on
top
of
on
top
of
worker
compensation.
Rep.
G
Yeah,
just
I
think
it
will
be
awesome
to
to
have
someone
feel
involved
in
the
community,
but
yeah.
There
is
a
question
if
he
really
wants
it,
so
we
should
communicate
to
it
to
him
or
or
invite
him
to
any
more
that
we
will
get
him
rep
just
to
be
mobile.
Some
decisions
that
involve
security
and
technical.
C
Yeah
the
other
topic
related
to
this
is
which
martin
kind
of
brought
up
in
the
last
round.
It's
like
how
do
you
decide
how
much
these
rep
boosts
are
right
and,
and
is
there
a
process
to
that
and
they
kind
of
outline
some
of
the
factors
that
went
into
the
process
last
time,
but
they
are
up
for
interpretation.
So
the
question
is
as
part
of
the
should.
A
Yeah,
I
think
that's
a
good
goal.
I
I
think
we're
a
little
too
early
to
like
solidify
those.
I
actually
think
we're
kind
of
building
up
precedent
to
be
able
to
like
create
a
structure
like
that.
That
could
be
more
sustainable
and
kind
of
like
operating
on
its
own,
but
I
just
don't
think
we
know
enough
about
like
the
rep
distribution
kind
of
component
at
this
point
to
solidify
that
amount.
D
Yeah-
and
it's
a
I-
I
see
it
similarly
to
the
bottom
up
approach
about
evaluating
which
experience
level
someone
is
in
in
like
a
working
group,
for
example,
at
omen
like
we
need
to
ask
around,
and
everyone
is
actually
defining
what
kind
of
level
they
think
the
others
are
so
and
that's
kind
of
similar
to
like
the
person
who
promoted
someone
for
a
red
boost.
I
think
this
person
kind
of
have
a
feeling
about
how
much
it
should
be,
depending
on
like
the
work
they
did.
D
So
it's
pretty
difficult
to
to
set
a
number
in
general,
like
even
like
with
you
different
type
of
work,
different
type
of
evaluation.
So
it's
still
like
a
bottom-up
trust
approach.
C
Yeah
but
the
the
good
thing
we
we
know-
and
this
was
I'll
outline
these
factors
like
assuming
we
don't
really
put
monetary
amount
attached
to
rep
like
we
know,
what's
earned
for
a
proposal
that
it's
submitted,
we
know
what's
earned
for
a
month
of
worker
compensation.
We
know
like
some
number.
That
is
enough.
C
That
makes
their
vote
feel
like
it
counts,
but
not
big
enough
bigger
than
a
monthly
worker
proposal
right
so
and
if
they've
been
doing
work
for
like
five
months
or
six
months,
like
matt,
did
last
time
and
never
got
any
rep
like
the
reason
he
got
point
three
rep
is
point
three
percent
rep
is
because
it's
been
extended.
It
was
many
many
months
of
work
like
that
right.
C
So
the
the
point
one
point
two
point:
three
percent
for
exceptional
seems
reasonable
for
this
scenario
at
this
point
in
time,
until
we
make
changes
to
other
variables.
A
Augusta,
I
think
I
mean
I
think
it's
an
interesting
idea
if
we
did
do
a
fixed
amount
of
rep
and
I
think
we
would
be
able
to
only
do
that
if
we
made
these
regular
and
so
it
would
be
like
that's
a
basically
like
months
contributions
or
something
right
and
it
would
be
tied
to
that.
But
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
speak
more
about
that.
G
Yeah,
I
think
that
if
we
try
to
measure
the
contribution
from
each
individual
is
going
to
receive
breakfast
and
compare
against
each
other,
we
are
going
to.
We
are
going
to
be
discussing
over
that
for
hours,
so
it
would
be
very
if
we
just
I
mean
what's
the
goal
here.
The
goal
here
is
to
increment
our
our
rep,
our
distribution
right
so
to
distribute
rep
to
individuals
that
we
consider
important
in
our
community.
G
So
we
decide
which
lao
we
choose
a
list
of
individuals
that
are
going
to
receive
rep
every
item
two
or
three
months,
and
we
give
them
a
fixed
amount
of
rep
and
that's
it.
At
least.
We
begin
that's
a,
I
think,
that's
a
good
way
to
the
until
we
figure
out
how
our
rap
inflation
would
like
to
be
managed,
because
this
hasn't
been
signaled
by
the
exile
ever
right.
G
C
They
do
a
worker
compensation
proposal.
G
Or
he
creates
a
proposal
saying
hey
I've
been
doing
this
and
this
and
this
and
this
I
think
that
I
deserve
more
rep
and
if
the
dxo
agrees
he
will
give
him
more
rep,
but
at
first
a
minimum
amount
for
just,
I
know,
acknowledge
the
contribution
that
the
individual
has
done.
I
think
that's
good
enough,
because
in.
A
G
C
G
C
Contributing
that
that
new,
that
worker,
that
actual
regular
proposal
may
involve
some
value,
like
ether,
dxd
plus
rep,
like
that
it
wouldn't
be
surprising
if
it
included
both
if
they
were
actually
contributing
to
the
dow
right.
G
Yes,
I
don't
know
if
the
limit
I
mean,
I
don't
know
it
will
then
the
exile
will
be
safe.
The
amount
is
right,
but
yeah
he
can
ask
for
an
extra
compensation
on
top
of
the
red
bulls.
I
guess
I
think
the
red
bulls
already
give
you
a
lot
of
validation
about
saying,
hey.
You
already
did
something
very
valuable
to
us.
So
here
you
have
some
rep
but
yeah.
G
E
I
think
having
the
standard
in
the
guideline
is
good,
because
it
makes
it
easy
for
people
who
maybe
aren't
confident
yet
in
you
know
whether
they
can
pass
something
or
what
they
can
do.
You
know
having
like
this
is
like
the
standard
thing
but,
like
I
think,
like
anything
with
the
dow,
it's
a
guideline
or
standard,
and
if,
like
the
nominator
wants
to
say
this
person
went
way
above
and
beyond
and
deserves
more
than
like,
they
can
always
justify
that
right
and
try
to
push
something
bigger.
A
I
do
remember
some
good
discussion
on
on
the
first
rep
rewards
for
skye
and
myself
kind
of
over
the
summer,
which
I
think
actually
were
ending
up
being
a
good
good
for
the
community.
To
kind
of
have
that
discussion,
I
would
recommend
anyone.
I
took
some
of
these
like
nominations
from
different
people
that
had
said
it.
So
if
you
have
thoughts
on
specific
people,
it'd
be
really
great
to
kind
of
put
a
reply
on
that
thread.
Just
with
maybe
some
more
information
about
how
they've
contributed.
A
And
then
we
could
kind
of
figure
out
exactly.
I
think
the
process
we
probably
individual
by
individual
in
terms
of
how
we
can
do
it,
but
I
think
in
general
we
should
try
to
be
deferring
to
getting
people
involved
in
the
governance
process
as
much
as
possible,
and
I
think
that
means
trying
to
create
their
own
proposal.
D
So
yeah
like
I,
I'm
really
curious.
How
would
we
work
with
with
like
50
because,
like
the
the
current,
how
we
do
it
right
now
is
like
a
two
sentence,
description
about
what
they
did
and
it's
like
a
lot
of
trust
and
it's
right
now.
It's
working
because
I
actually
almost
know
everyone
on
the
list
and
it's
kind
of
like
yeah.
D
I
know
that
everyone
is
like
contributing
important
stuff
to
to
the
collective,
but
I
think
we
also
need
to
start
learning
to
like
request
more
stuff
from
people
who,
like
not
for
the
repos
but
like
I,
I
see
it
with
compensation
proposals
like
people.
Don't
give
feedback,
don't
comment,
maybe
because
it's
just
like
oh,
it
will
go
through
anyway.
I
don't
know,
but
I
I
think
it's
also
important
to
like
in
the
omen
team,
that
the
omen
people
actually
give
feedback
on
dow
talk,
which
is
crazy.
D
It's
like,
but
it's
it's
important
like.
We
need
to
learn
to
be
critical
and
give
feedback,
and
that's
actually
even
in
the
open,
because
otherwise
we
will
create
like
silo
groups,
and
you,
like
others,
will
not
know
what's
going
on,
but
giving
like
very
positive
feedback
about
people
who
did
really
great
work.
This
month
is
something
which
it
will
be
important
in
the
future,
because
it's
like
written
in
in
da
talk
and
everyone
will
have
access
so
yeah.
D
For
for
the
red
boost
itself,
I
mean
it's
difficult
for
people
who
are
like
spending
a
lot
of
time
on
even
on
key
base
right.
How
do
you
prove
that
someone's
like
gave
us
a
lot
of
feedback
on
key
base?.
A
Yeah
well,
let's
continue
this
discussion
in
the
forums
I
wanted
to
move
on
to
just
like
a
proposal
roundup,
it's
just
a
way
to
kind
of
see
what's
in
the
queue
right
now,
so
there's
a
new
mesa
update
proposal
and
there's
also
a
kind
of
to
the
point.
A
Jerome
was
just
talking
about
there's
a
worker
proposal
for
out
pi
and
the
only
reason
I'm
bringing
it
up
is
especially
passed
in
two
days
and
I'm
actually
the
only
one
that
has
voted
for
it
and
I
just
want
to
check
with
who
proposed
it
and
kind
of.
What's
maybe,
who
boosted
it
and
get
a
quick
rundown
of
that
and
make
sure
that's
a
good
proposal.
Gas
was
really
cheap
over
the
weekend,
so.
E
D
Yes,
yes,
so
jikon,
I
think
he
did
a
trial
of
two
weeks.
He's
a
primarily
reacts
solidity
death.
D
D
I
think
he's
yeah
he's
on
the.
I
think
he's
now
in
the
second
month
trial,
so
he's
requesting
90
of
his
salary
for
his
level.
Five
experience.
E
And
just
to
clarify,
because
gerard
you
said
he
matured
during
the
trial
like
jacob
actually
has
a
lot
of
exp
he's
got
years
of
experience
he's
a
pretty
senior
developer,
but
I
think
there
was
a
little
bit
of
a
rocky
start
in
terms
of
you
know.
Was
he
actually
doing
the
designs
the
way
they
were
supposed
to
right,
but
but
he
kind
of
adapted
quickly
to
what
you
were
expecting
and
it's.
D
D
Not
a
lot
of
people
will
can
do
like
adding
features
of
safe
sub
craft
improvements
and
stuff
like
that
which
is
in
general
difficult
to
find
these
days.
So
he's
he's
an
important
asset
and
he's
like
he's,
providing
a
lot
of
value
for
for
the
omen
team
right
now.
A
Cool
and
I'm
just
looking
back
kind
of
to
sky
point
about
several
work
proposals.
I
think
he
is
like
two
weeks
ago
that
two-week
trial.
He
had
two
separate
proposals,
one
for
eth,
one
for
the
dxd,
and
then
this
is
the
next
one
which
is
the
month
long.
So
I
think
that's
why
that
is.
A
I
just
pasted
it
in
there,
but
I
was
just
fighting
it
because
you
know
I
look
for
signal
on
those
things
and
I
should
have
probably
been
more
attuned
to
that
next,
one
just
because
it's
there
and
I
didn't
know
what
to
do
with.
It
was
a
test
proposal
that
says
to
stake
down,
please
down
vote
and
I
wasn't
sure
if
we
should
be
staked
down
or
down
vote.
If
there's
something
pasting
it
in
now.
F
Nick
is
that
you
yeah
just
to
clear
up
things
like
we
have
been
working
on
a
new
integration
on
the
security
bot
on
key
base,
which
actually
analyzes
some
of
the
information
that
is
sent
along
the
proposal,
and
in
order
to
test
that
I
created
a
proposal,
so
it
doesn't
have
any
meaning.
A
Cool
and
then
the
last
one
that
is
in
the
queue
is
the
or
the
other
one
that
discusses
the
mou
between
luna,
social
and
dick
style.
And
so
that's
just
going
on
now.
And
if
anyone
wanted
to
speak
to
it
now
be
the
time
or.
E
E
I
muted
you
so
I
think,
there's
a
great
example
to
set
in
terms
of
projects
that
are
doing
an
ideo
and
mesa,
then
also
providing
liquidity
on
dx
swap
and
that's
their
their
plan,
and
so
you
know
kind
of
what's
involved
with
that.
We're
talking
about
basically
just
like
kind
of
doing
a
little
marketing
around
that
or
like
kind
of
recognition
of
what
they're
doing
yeah.
E
I
think
it's
an
important
example,
because
we've
seen
in
the
past
yeah
a
couple
of
projects
like
mta
and
dmm
up
to
ideos
on
mesa
and
then
subsequently
seen
a
lot
of
liquidity
on
unit
swap
and
balancer,
and
it
would
be
great.
You
know,
for
the
profits
for
the
dow
to
see
that
kind
of
trading
happen
on
dx
swap
and
if,
if
we
can
set
a
good
example
with
a
luna
here,
I
think
it
would
be
the
hope
that
we'd
see
more
of
this
in
the
future.
A
Yeah,
it
kind
of
speaks
to
some
of
the
like
partnership
signal
proposals.
That
kind
of
sky
has
been
working
on
too.
So
I
think
that
type
of,
like
not
exactly
doubt,
a
dao
interaction,
but
I
think
it's
a
good
yeah
precedent
to
kind
of
try
to
signal
to
different
communities,
intentions.
E
Cool
or
good,
oh,
as
you
say,
there
is
like
a
second
part
here,
isn't
that,
like
it's
not
binding
either
it's
just
continuing
the
conversation
of
a
possible
like
further
integrations
they're
interested
in
using
prediction
games
as
part
of
their
social
trading
platform.
So
there's
some.
You
know
exploration
to
do
there
with
the
omen
team,
and
you
know
some
other
potential
stuff
we
could
do
with
them.
You
know
they
are
social
trading
platform,
and
so
they
look
at
exchanges.
E
Maybe
you
know
we
look
at
mesa
and
dx
swap
and
see
how
those
might
be
integrated
into
their
platform
as
well,
and
I
think
they're,
maybe
even
interested
in
looking
at
layer,
two
stuff
so
yeah
different
things
to
talk
about
with
them
different
technical,
possible
cooperations.
That
might
happen
in
the
future,
but
just
ideas
right
now
around
that.
A
Stuff
cool
and
then
that
was
it
for
proposals
and
then
looking
at
governance,
one
point
x
stuff,
I
think
elon
we're
gonna
push
the
arc
1
r2
conversation
to
tomorrow
and
so
wanted
to
just
kind
of
shift
to
the
xdi
discussion
and
and
kind
of
check
in
on
xdxl
and
what
we're
kind
of
doing
there.
Because
I
know
there's
been
a
lot
of
activity
over
the
last
week.
H
Yeah
sorry
was
there
a
question
at
the
end
like
for
me.
A
No
we're
just
gonna
I'm
trying
to
start
the
conversation
on
xdx
dow
and
whether
you
know
I
think
we
got
to
switch
to
a
new
deployment.
And
so
what's
the
kind
of
update
or
process
on
there-
and
I
know,
there's
some
discussion
with
sky
on
getting
funds
into
the
avatar.
But
I'm
not
sure
of
the
specifics.
H
Yeah,
so
so,
basically,
we
disconnected
the
scheme
that
has
these
proposals
and
I
think,
there's
like
another
proposal
to
basically
put
these
back
so
like
people
will
redeem
all
their
genbak.
Don't
worry.
There
probably
won't
be
rewards,
though,
because
there's
no
sense
in
funding
this
dow
and
getting
that
reward,
so
everyone,
I
guess,
paid
that
little
fee
to
stake,
but
they're
not
going
to
get
the.
H
H
So
that's
that
and
yeah
like
all.
We
will
do
all
these
fixes,
like
basically
to
redeem
from
the
dx
style
like
the
xdxdl
and
then
we'll
redeploy
like
a
new
one,
so
agusta,
basically,
no,
no,
so
no
gen
stakes
are
lost
like
you'll,
be
able
to
let
them
all
come
back.
Everyone
is
everyone
is
panicking
and
augusta.
H
What
happened
basically
is
that
we
redeemed,
so
we
had
a
plugin
manager
that
okay,
so
there
was
a
plugin
manager
proposal,
two
proposals,
one
to
change
the
the
rewards
scheme
and
want
to
change
the
plugin
manager,
and
so
we
redeemed
the
plugin
manager
one
first
and
because
of
that
it
disconnected
basically
the
old
plugin
manager
like
when
it.
When
you
update
it.
It
basically
removes
the
old
one
and
creates
a
new
one.
So
the
proposal
to
change
the
reward
scheme
is
basically
in
a
plugin
manager.
H
That's
disconnected
from
the
dao
so
that
that
that
that
plugin
manager
and
the
past
proposal
is
kind
of
like
in
the
ether
and
now
there's
a
proposal
to
basically
add
it
back
it's
in
the
queue
there
and
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
noticed,
but
another
thing
that
we
kind
of
that
was
kind
of
up.
Is
that
the
like
the
minimum,
dow
bounty
and
the
proposal
reward
distribution?
Those
like,
I
guess,
a
bug
in
the
ui
that
basically
inputted
as
way.
H
So
when
I
put
like
500
minimum
dow
bounty
it
it's
like
500
way.
So
that's
like
you
know,
eighteen
zeros,
zero
point,
eighteen
zeros
and
then
five
hundred
wow.
So
that's
the
minimum.
H
Yeah,
but
I
mean
this
is-
I
think
this
is
great-
that
we've
experimented
with
all
these
things
before
actually
sending
lots
of
funds
and
stuff
like
that.
C
Yeah
so,
but
elon
just
to
john,
was
asking
me
about
this,
and
I
couldn't
give
him
the
correct
answers.
I
understand
that,
like
there's
something
on
x
died,
now,
that's
not
being
forwarded.
If
you
send
funds
to
the
avatar
they're,
not
getting
forwarded
to
the
vault,
but
john
is
looking
at
mainnet
dao,
because
we
want
to
understand
exactly
how
main
that
dial
works
and
it
didn't.
It
doesn't
appear
like
when
people
send
funds
on
mainnet.
C
H
Oh
so
I
actually
don't
know
about
that.
Like
I
think
it's
I.
I
think
that
part
of
the
architecture
is
still
the
same,
so
I'm
not
entirely
sure
I
can
ask
oren
like
I
asked
him
a
couple
of
times,
but
he
said
like
yeah.
Basically
I
re-edited
what
he
said
and
sent
it
in
the
chat.
So
I
I'll
ask
him
again,
but
I
don't
think
there's
any
difference
in
that
regard,
because.
C
E
Interesting
yeah
because
on
main
net,
everything
goes
straight
to
the
avatar
right
like
I'm
right
about
the
start
of
gusto
like
it's
just.
I
think
the
bun
everything's
getting
sent
straight
to
the
avatar
and
we've
been
able
to
use
the
funds
of
the
avatar
right.
I
don't
think
there's
any
well.
What's
the
issue
on
on
so
on
the
x
died
doubt.
Can
we
get
the
funds
out
of
the
xti.
C
We
were
sending
to
the
avatar,
which
is
what
we
always
do
on
mainnet,
which
we
would
do
mainnet.
So
it's
important
to
understand
if
they're
exactly
how
both
of
the
systems
work.
How
vote
both
versions
work,
because
if
we
could
have
easily
sent
10
000
to
the
avatar
or
next
time,
yeah
yeah,
but
thankfully
good
job
testing
first
people
are
gonna,
have
the
same
issue
on
main
net,
though
so
mainnet
understanding
is
also.
Maybe
we
should
test
also.
G
C
G
H
I
mean
that's
all
also
a
choice,
and
I
guess
this.
This
could
be
like
an
interesting
discussion
for
tomorrow,
because.
H
Want
to
discuss
you
know,
differences
between
arc,
v1
and
v2
personas
from
today
to
tomorrow.
F
E
E
Or
something
10
million
but
like
yeah,
the
x
died.
Dow
is
apparently
so
just
I
just
want
to
be
super
clear
with
people.
This
is
a
problem
on
the
x-9
now,
which
is
very
experimental,
doesn't
have
any
funds
in
it,
except
for
one
die.
So
we
need
to.
It
sounds
like
we
need
to
test
this
rv2.
A
little
more
was
it
audited
was.
Has
this
been
used
like.
H
Yeah
so
it
has
been
audited
and
the
org
has
been
using
it
for
a
while
now
so
yeah,
I
guess
they
they
never
transferred
directly
from
the
bridge
like
they've
done
it
like.
They
basically
gave
someone
the
kind
of
like
an
essentialized
weight.
This
is
how
they
transfer
funds,
so
they
never
had
a
problem
with
that
and
where
did.
E
To
why
does
it
matter
that
it's
coming
from
the
bridge
versus
somebody
else's
address,
there's
something
to
do
with
like
oracle
stuff.
H
I've
been
really
like,
I
understood
it,
something
with
how
the
bridge
functions
and
how
the
bridge
sends
like
funds.
Basically,
I'm
not
I'm
not
entirely
sure.
H
C
D
E
H
C
E
H
E
Don't
know
if
this
is
a
good
general
call
topic
I
feel
like.
We
really
need
to
dig
in
here
and
understand
what
the
what's
going
on
with
the
x
died.
Now.
H
So
I
mean
this
would
be
like
a
more
general
call
regarding
whether
deep
style
won't
use
arc
v2,
let's
say
in
the
future,
or
maybe
we're
good
with
arc
v1
and
then
because
you
know,
davostak
also
wants
to
focus
and
you
know
deploy.
I
mean
developing
for
our
v1
and
v2.
E
So
like
right,
so
I
don't
think
this
is
a
ready
for
the
general
right
like
we
can't
answer
very
basic
questions
on
this
call
like
yeah.
Why
can't
we
get
the
money
out,
then
it
shouldn't
be
on
the
general
call
like
this
needs
to
be
a
separate,
deep
dive,
the
tech,
the
tech
people
on
dx
now
need
to
understand
better.
What's
going
on
before
we
start
talking
about
it.
On
a
general
call,
oh
I
mean
you.
H
Like
you
should
be
able
to
take
get
the
money
out,
and
then
you
know
the
proposal
that
is
out
in
the
dx
style,
xd
external.
I
think
it's
gonna
pass
in
like
four
days
or
something
that
proposal
is
just
to
make
that
make
sure
that
you
can
because
listen
like
this
is
still
experimental
like
it
should
work.
I
mean
the
orga
has
been
using
it
and
taking
money
out
so.
E
H
Fixed
basically
because
the
the
dao
was
the
owner
of
the
year
620
token
contract.
He
couldn't
like
do
actions
on
it,
but
you
know
that
was
fixed
as
well.
E
So
yeah
I
mean,
I
guess
I
don't
know
I
mean
I
it
just
feels
like
this
is
not
well
understood
at
this
point,
at
least
on
our
side
or
dx
downstairs.
So
I
don't
think
it's
a
good
general
call
topic.
E
H
Yeah
I
mean
I
don't
know:
if
funds
are,
you
know,
sort
of
not
safe
or
lost
or
any
of
that
stuff,
but
there
are.
There
are
like
a
couple
of
basically
permission
implications,
especially
like
when
we
changed
the
the
plugin
manager
or
when
we
change
the
funding
and
voting
power.
Just
like
you
know,
intricate,
like
dao
stuff,
basically.
G
Yeah,
we
need
to
understand,
I
mean
complete
what
happened.
I
think
john
john
and
me
were
a
lot
of
involved
about
governance,
employment
and
we,
I
think
we
are
the
people
who
most
unders,
who
most
nicotine,
the
dao
stack
infrastructure,
and
even
if
we
are
having
trouble
to
understand
what
happened,
I
cannot
imagine
the
rest
of
the
people
that
is
going
to
be
on
the
call
and
it
is
not
about
how
we
lost
five
died.
We
got
our
loss,
I
don't
know
like
three
thousand
dollars,
for
example,
or
or
a
bit
more
right.
H
E
F
H
H
The
first
issue,
I
think,
that's
fairly,
like
straight
forward
to
understand,
is
that
we
disconnected
the
plugin
manager
scheme
that
we
created
a
proposal
to
change
the
funding
and
voting
power.
Plugin
right
make
sense,
because,
like
does
that,
make
sense.
G
What
I
just
said,
actually
I
I
have
no
idea,
because
I
haven't
been
involved
in
exile
next
in
the
exa
infrastructure.
I
don't
know
how
it
works
now
seems
like
we
will
have
to
dig
into
what
happened
to
understand,
because
I
I
don't
know
if
anyone
from
the
exile
is
able
to
answer.
H
So
like
this
is,
this
is
kind
of
like
the
first
issue,
which
is
yeah
like
it's
a
straightforward
issue
that
you
create
a
proposal
in
the
schema
in
the
in
the
plugin
manager
to
change
a
plugin
and
then
that
same
plugin
manager
was
disconnected
before
we
redeemed
the.
Maybe
maybe
I'll,
create
like
a
quick
diagram
of
this
and
I'll
share.
It.
H
Yeah
so
yeah
there
are
other
like
small
issues,
I
guess
we'll
we'll
do
a
recap.
I
think
oren
is
already
working
on
that
of
kind
of
like
listing
all
these
issues
and
everything
we
found
out
in
the
last
like
week
or
so.
E
A
Cool
yeah,
it
sounds
like
we
need
to
do
some
more
work
there,
but
I
wanted
to
just
quickly
move
on
to
to
get
in
a
bit
of
augusto's
post
on
a
the
d
style
vote,
dap
post
that
he
made
just
a
couple
hours
ago.
That
has
some
good
information
and
some
great
gifs
too
so
gusto.
If
you
want
to
just
kind
of
explain,
lay
it
out.
G
Yeah
yeah
yeah.
Well,
the
idea
is
to
start
working
on
on
a
decentralized
application
that
will
communicate
directly
with
the
blockchain
without
any
third-party
services.
That
will
make
good
use
of
this
modular
architecture
that
we
have
on
our
governance
infrastructure.
We
are
actually
there.
We
have
schemes
contracts,
we
have
a
controller.
G
This
controller
communicates
with
the
avatar,
so
it
allows
us
to
have
a
different,
a
different
scheme
and
voting
machine
that
it
doesn't
necessarily
need
to
be
need
to
be
supported
by
the
current
application
that
we
are
using
by
alchemy
right.
I
can
deploy,
I
mean
we
can.
Even
you
can
even
interact
with
us
within
a
scheme.
If
you
want
just
by
communicating
on
the,
I
know,
just
send
transactions
to
it.
G
That
just
happens
where
we
have
as
much
control
as
possible,
and
it
is
as
decentralized
as
possible
right,
because
here
we
are
depending
a
lot
on
on
on
centralized
services
and
entities
that
are
controlling
our
our
infrastructure.
We,
it
is
good,
we
have.
It
has
been
working
so
far
right,
but,
for
example,
we
six
months
has
has
passed
if
we
rise
ether
from
the
express
ether
that
has
been
sitting
down
in
our
treasury.
G
We
weren't
able
to
use
because
we
didn't
have
the
infrastructure
for
it.
So
the
idea
would
be
to
start
working
independent
independently
on
the
development
of
that
and
everything
is
going
to
be
open
source
and
it's
going
to
follow
the
same
architecture
that
we
are
using
on
on
on
alchemy
yeah.
That's
the
idea
to
start
working
on
the
on
that
is
in
this
application.
G
That
again,
maybe
the
idea
is
to
make
something
powerful
and
decentralized
that
it
works,
and
maybe
it
won't
be
as
fast
to
use
or
you
will
take
some
time
loading
right,
because
it's
going
to
use
all
the
he's
going
to
say
all
the
information
on
chain,
I'm
very
confident
that
we
can
that
once
we
have
the
app,
we
can
figure
out
the
way
to
optimize
it
right.
G
First,
we
want
something
that
it
works,
that
we
allow
us
to
handle
funds
and
to
make,
for
example,
sign
boats
and
share
it
across
another
network
and
send
all
these
votes
at
once.
Pay
for
both
pay
for
governance
actions,
unchained
on
the
same
proportion
when
we
are
interacting-
and
this
will
increment
a
lot
and
we
give
us,
for
example,
nico.
G
I
guess
nico
put
some
hours
and
effort
on
creating
the
refunds
for
the
the
next,
the
exile
refunds,
so
that
is
time
and
effort
that
nico
could
have
used
a
developer
working
on
the
dxr
player,
so
using
an
infrastructure
that
would
allow
us
that
it
will
refund
the
ether
on
chain.
Every
time
we
make
a
vote
or
we
create
a
proportional
mistake,
it
would
allow
us
not
to.
G
We
won't
have
to
bother
anymore
about
creating
refund
grounds
about
putting
work
and
effort
there,
every
two
months
or
every
month
to
refund
the
money
to
the
or
the
interest
paid
to
the
borders,
eventually
automating.
This
whole
process
right
things
like
that.
G
This
can
be
done
with
very
minimal
changes
on
the
on
on
a
voting
machine
and
reusing
all
the
code
that
we
have
on
a
minute
on
our
minute
contracts
and
eventually
we
can
grow
from
there.
We
can
grow
from
there.
We
can
ask
the
community
what
feature
do
they
want
to
integrate
on
this
newest
application?
Eventually,
if
it
succeed,
we
are
going
to
add
more
and
more
and
we
are
going
to
build
something
that
is
purely
centralized.
A
Awesome,
I
mean,
I
think
the
obvious
corollary
here
is
kind
of
you
know,
ethereum
clients
and
how
you
know
the
redundancy
of
having
several
different
options
and
how
that's
kind
of
important
to
decentralization
too.
So
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
cool
effort.
G
Yeah,
so
the
idea
is
to
start
working
on
that
next
month.
I
already
started
working.
I
have
some
code
already
written,
but
I
don't
have
time
because
I've
been
working
with
dxwap
and
I
still
have
some
dx
trust
responsibilities
left
for
going
to
take
some
time.
But
I
want
to
focus
on
that
video
next
month,
while
I'm
helping
on
dxo
development.
G
E
G
E
Something,
I
think,
is
related
to
this
too,
that
I've
been
kind
of
talking
just
floating.
The
idea
of
some
people
is
engaging.
The
auditor
who
has
been
working
with
us
phil
has
been
doing
a
great
job
about
kind
of
evaluating,
in
a
more
broad
sense
like
what
our
security
posture
is
with.
You
know
not
just
the
the
smart
contracts,
but
the
front
ends,
and
the
monitoring
and
and
everything,
and
maybe
even
some
of
the
products
and
how
that
ties
in
yeah,
maybe
a
security
working
group
yeah.
E
So
I
think,
with
this
proposal
that
augusto
has
up
on
dow
talk.
It
would
be
great
if
we
could
put
those
together
in
some
way
right.
They
should
go
hand
in
hand
if
we're
going
to
do
something
like
this.
G
E
G
A
A
Cool
running
out
of
time
here,
the
last
thing
I
just
wanted
to
talk
about
was
governance.
2.0
working
group
we
have
first
kickoff
meeting-
is
now
scheduled
for
next
tuesday
at
12.
A
30
p.m,
not
sure
if
we'll
kind
of
keep
those
times
going
forward,
but
trying
to
have
a
like
the
goal
is
probably
like
every
other
week
to
have
a
meeting,
and
so
yeah
I've
done
a
little
bit
of
work
in
terms
of
putting
out
some
of
the
ideas
in
a
notion
board
and
kind
of
some
of
the
documents
there,
but
I'll
kind
of
send
through
some
more
thoughts
on
what
we're
trying
to
what
the
group
hopes
to
accomplish
before
the
meeting.
A
Any
broad
thoughts
on
that
a
lot
of
people
have
seen
the
call
are
very
involved
in
the
process
and
anyone
that
is
interested
in
getting
involved.
Please
let
me
know
I'll
make
a
forum
post
about
the
specific,
the
kickoff,
but
any
kind
of
broad
thoughts
on
on
this.
As
we
move.
A
E
A
And
yeah
just
the
other
ways,
I've
kind
of
been
thinking
about
it,
and
I
want
to
get
your
guys
feedback
here
is
you
know?
I
think
we
have
a
couple
different
things
that
we've
talked
about
for
this
long-term
rep
alignment,
but
there's
a
lot
of
things.
I
think
that
we
are
talking
about
now
that
are
not
necessarily
thinking
more
about,
like
dxd,
guild
and
kind
of
some
of
these
other
conversations
that
I
feel
like
we
haven't
reached
consensus
on
and
so
like.
A
How
much
do
we
want
to
roll
into
the
governance
2.0
working
group
to
kind
of
find
consensus
on
these
things
versus
keeping
that
scope
kind
of
narrow
any
thoughts.
A
I
mean
I,
I
think
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
different.
I
mean
even
I
think,
the
excited
stuff
right.
A
I
think
some
of
the
things
we're
talking
about
like
governance,
experiments
in
general,
but
almost
roll
into
this
governance,
2.0
group-
and
I
think
this
would
be
like
ex-die
stuff
and
then
I
think
the
dxd
guild,
and
so
I'm
kind
of
wondering
if
we
want
to
maybe
include
those
like
more
medium
term
options
in
this
or
kind
of
stick
that
or
stick
to
kind
of
the
long-term
alignment,
because,
in
my
view,
some
of
these,
like
medium
term,
things
are
kind
of
part
of
the
process
of
like
creating
long-term
alignment
in
some
of
those
ways.
A
But
yeah.
E
I
feel
like
it's
worth
kind
of
acknowledging,
what's
happening
in
the
the
one
point
x
stuff,
but
but
I
mean
I
think
the
core
goal
of
the
2.0
thing
should
be
the
the
long-term
thing,
because
we
can
experiment
with
these
different
one
point
x
things.
So
we
can
roll
them
back
and
we
can
you
know
we
can
adapt.
So
it
doesn't
need
to
be.
G
Yeah
we
have
the
one
point
x,
initiatives,
the
the
idea
is
that
it
will
improve
our
governance
platform,
but
we
make
any
breaking
changes.
Hope
I
I
think
in
my
head,
like
something
it
goes
from
2.0.
It
will
be
like
a
major
overhaul
of
our
of
our
system,
something
that
would
include
breaking.