►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Meeting [2020-11-11]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Welcome
to
the
november
11th
governance
discussion,
we're
going
to
kick
it
off
by
starting
and
talking
about
the
xdi
developments
and
the
x
deep
style,
which
has
been,
I
think,
redeployed.
So
elon.
Do
you
want
to
kick
us
off
with
that.
B
Yeah
sure
so
it
has
been
redeployed
I'll,
send
the
link
here
once
again,
like
I
said
in,
I
think
it
was
a
business
called
yesterday.
This
is
using
arc
v1,
so
it
is
essentially
it's
near
identical
code
base
to
dx
down
mainnet,
meaning
that
you
know
the
multi-generic
scheme
that
we're
developing
right
now
we'll
be
able
to
go
on
we'll,
be
able
to
go
on
this
now
as
well,
so
that
could
be
used
also
for
testing
purposes.
If
you
want
to
test
new
schemes
and
stuff
like
that.
B
So
that's
that,
oh
thanks,
kai
and
yeah,
I
think
maybe
like
a
question
that
we
can
ask
is
like
what
would
be
what
could
be
the
first
competition
and,
like
we
kind
of
discussed
yesterday,
like
prime
dow,
has
a
meme
competition
ongoing
with
like
two
thousand
dollars
in
awards
which
just
started,
I
think
yeah.
I
know.
Maybe
we
can
open
it
up
with
that.
C
Yeah
we
and
we
did
a
we
just-
did
a
test
transaction
and
moved
one
x
guy
from
the
the
excel
dev
fund
on
mainnet
across
the
bridge
straight
into
the
dow,
and
it
worked
well.
So
that's
great!
We
need
to
get
gen,
we
need
x-gen
in
the
dow,
and
so
a-line
would
be
good
to
know
if
the
if
the
dial
stack
gen
bridge
can
do
that
and
if
not,
I
think,
we're
going
to
have
to
use
some
other.
C
We
either
need
a
multi-stick
dev,
a
dev
multisig
on
xdi
to
use
that
to
then
turn
it
into
x-gen
or
get
the
x-gen
into
the
dow,
or
we
need
a
solution
for
that.
Yeah.
A
B
Yeah
yeah,
so
the
dow
stack
bridge
basically
deploys
it's
the
exact
same
token
address
as
well.
So
when
you
use
the
dalsec
bridge
it,
the
xgen
has
the
same
token
address
and
then
the
dao
reads
that
token
address
same,
as
is
maintenance.
Exactly
yeah
yeah
same
as
minute.
D
B
C
Yeah
the
important
thing
in
this
scenario,
though,
is,
though,
that
most
of
the
bridges
other
than
the
the
main
x-tie
bridge
by
their
team
has
an
alternate
receiver
option.
So
what
we're
doing
is
we're
sending
die
from
a
multi
sig
on
mainnet
and
we're
sending
it
and
it's
going
to
the
dao
directly
on
xdi,
which
is
a
different
address.
It's
not
the
same
address
as
the
multisig
right,
but
in
the
other
bridges,
the
omni
bridge,
and
I
believe,
dallastax
genbridge
you.
B
E
A
Concern
what's
what's
the
risk
here
is
that
someone
is
responsible
for
funds
from
dx
dow
that
would
from
dx
style
mainnet.
That
would
then
be
put
into
yeah
like
I
guess
there
wouldn't
be
once
the
funds
would
be
in
there.
There
wouldn't
be
any
centralization
risk
right.
C
A
If
it's
more,
we
could
do
it,
but
I
feel
like
that's
a
fine
thing
for
someone
like
the
front.
I
do
also
have
some
x-gen
that
could
be
could
be
used
tonight.
So
yeah.
C
A
C
C
E
I
mean
the
main
issue
with
doing
that
with
dye.
Is
the
external
maintenance
doesn't
have
any
dye.
C
A
So
I
think
I
think
skye
is-
I
think
this
guy's
talking
about
like
a
an
interesting
concept
for
dx
dow
as
a
trustworthy
financial
institution.
This
is
basically
saying
like.
Would
you
spend
something
and
then
on
the
faith
that
geek
style
would
reimburse
you
and
even
if
it's
like
cross
chain,
I
think
that's
a
cool
thing
to
build
up,
but
we
don't
always.
A
But
for
xdi
xdx
style,
you
know
I
knew
that
we
needed
to
like
install
a
bunch
of
new
schemes
in
things
to
kind
of
have
governance
capabilities
on
before.
Does
that
need
to
be
done
again
or
are
they
kind
of
all?
No,
so.
B
Like
I,
I
I
basically
cloned
the
dow
from
like
the
post
governance
decision,
so
post
the
reduction
of
parameters
to
all
the
schemes
basically
and
post,
like
adding
the
competition
so.
A
B
So
this
genetic
scene
with
that
so
just
like
on
it.
A
And
I
thought
that,
like
this
might
like
swap
her
actually
might
be
a
good
opportunity
to
try
out
some
x-style
signaling
right
like
if
we're
looking
to
get
some
short-term
like
consensus
or
something
since
that
has
a
little
bit
tighter
frames.
I
don't
know
if
there's
anything
we
could
do
with
with
that,
even
in
just
kind
of
the
the
governance
process,
as
we
iterate
on
different
decisions.
B
I
mean,
I
think,
that
I
think
it's
super
smart
to
actually
try
it
on
xdi.
Just
because
you
can
you
can
test
it
on
there
right
and
it's
the
same.
Let's
say
you
know
it's,
it's
very
similar
code
base
and
you
can
test
it
with
actual
money
and,
like
the
governance
parameters
are
shorter.
So
if
it
takes
you
two
weeks
to
upload
this
to
dx
dow,
it
takes
you
one
week
or
next
week's
now
and
then
you
can
just
get
it
going.
A
A
A
B
Yes,
so
I
think
that's
that
any
ideas
for
competitions-
I
guess
we
can.
I
guess
we're
gonna-
ask
we
can
do
a
poll
like
you
did,
set
on
telegram.
B
I
don't
know
like
a
competition
like
which
competition
should
we
start
with
in
the
exile,
I
mean
competition,
I
don't
know,
what's
the
dx
dao
song,
I
I
want
to
start
with
like
kind
of
silly
easy
things
and
then
you
know
we
can
later
move
on
to.
You
know,
requests
for
proposals
and
stuff
like
that.
C
What
about
some
good,
some
good
marketing
designs
like
my
job
ones,
but
for
swapper
instead
of
jolt.
B
Yeah,
it
could
be
like
you
know.
Even
you
know
we
can
pay
like.
This
is
something
interesting.
I
think
we
can
pay
for
like
quality
marketing
by
you
know:
okay,
publish
a
medium
article
or
you
know
somewhere
else
about
why
swapper
is
more
interesting
than
uniswap,
and
you
know
when
you're
paying,
basically
for
one
or
for
two
you're
paying
for
the
top
two
people
but
you're
getting
a
lot
more
submissions,
so
you're
getting
like
more
than
you
actually
paid
for.
G
I
mean
if
we
look
at
the
poll
we
did,
it
only
got
below
100
voters.
I
would
try
to
do
an
announcement
first
on
like
twitter
on
on
medium
and
just
I
think,
because
we
have
2
000
people
in
the
chat,
but
I
don't
think
everyone
is
it's
active
there.
We
we
haven't
really
communicated
so
much
so
I
would
rather
like
first
go
with
some
kind
of
announcement
to
just
bring
up
without
attention
and
then
I'll
do
some
kind
of
competition.
G
Otherwise
we
just
have
like
10
people
doing
this,
and
I
think
if
we
should
put
any
effort
on
into
this,
it
should
be
more
than
more
than
10.
At
least.
A
Yeah,
I
think
that's
a
good
idea-
and
I
just
I
think
I
said
this
earlier
in
the
week
like.
I
think
that
naming
scheme
like
with
the
telegram
was
a
really
great
way
to
engage
with
the
community
and
so
building
on
that
foundation.
I
think
would
be
good,
but
I
think,
having
like
a
little
bit
of
a
structure
around
what
exactly
were
looking
for,
and
maybe
it
is
just
like
a
little
announcement
thing
that
we're
doing
and
around
xdi
is
a
cool
thing
to
brand
it
or
associate
it
with.
E
Yeah
also
like
like
to
not
be
dependent
on
clairos
regarding
om,
bringing
or
omen
on
next,
I,
if
we
prioritize
the
audit
for
the
arbitration
contract
for
dxdo,
we
could
like
make
sure
omen
is
installed
on
xdi
with
dxtor
as
a
main
arbitrator
first
and
then
we
like
add
all
the
remaining
parts
from
claros
into
into
omen.
E
So
with
that,
I
think
we
also
need
the
token
registry
for
the
xdi
system.
Not
only
do
you
know
the
state
of
the
token
registry
now.
B
Scheme
or
something
oh,
I
mean
we
we
just
need
to
I
mean
if
omen
is
deployed
on
xda.
You
just
need
to
add
a
generic
scheme
that
you
know
the
target
contract
is
omen
like
just
it's
the
same
as
on
mainnet,
so.
E
Now
they're,
like
two
two
depend
like
two
tasks
for
us
on
extra.
First,
getting
the
arbitration
contract
connected
installed
on
x
time
and
the
token
registry
sure
we
could
also
hard
code
the
the
currencies
into
omen
for
x
type.
But
why
should
like
we
should
we
should?
We
should
install
the
token
registry.
E
A
Got
it
all
right,
I
think
deke
styles
and
arbitrator
on
x,
diet.
Omen
is
a
really
it's
a
good
idea,
because
I
think
in
general
it's
good
for
dick's
daughter
to
be
able
to
do
that
in
some
cases,
even
as
it's
just
a
redundancy
thing
and
I
think
it
kind
of
supports
the
idea
of
like
xdi
being
a
experimentation
place,
and
so,
if
dxo,
wherever
be
an
arbitrator
on
mainnet
it
could
you
know
it
has
a
history
of
production
or
ability
to
do
that.
So
that's
cool.
E
Yeah,
and
also
in
general,
like
like
dcc
one
like
one
of
the
pro
users
of
omen,
he's
actually
skeptical
about
clara's
being
actually
like
way
better
as
an
arbitrator
or
like
a
chord
compared
to
dxo,
because
we
have
like
way
more
at
stake,
it's
our
product
and
if
we
it
up,
it's
like
way
more
punished
for
us
compared
to
claro's
that
could
like
we
don't
still
don't
know
who's
staking
and
like
how
how
there
may
be
a
catalan
in
cyclers,
it's
still
like
unproven
and
by
having
us
as
like
an
option,
and
we
can
experiment.
E
We
can
actually
prove
that
we
are
maybe
even
a
better
arbitrator
or
oracle
for
for
omen.
C
So
the
one,
the
one
thing
with
dx,
dow
being
an
arbitrator,
is
as
we're
seeing
in
the
us
elections
right
now
is
like
if
it's
a
contentious
thing
and
it's
50,
50
and
dx
dow
as
an
entity,
makes
a
decision
on
this
is
the
answer
to
this
market.
According
to
how
rep
holders
vote
on
xdxdow
to
make
this
decision,
50
of
people
are
gonna,
be
pissed
off
right,
no
matter
what
like,
if
it's
contentious,
so
all
of
a
sudden,
instead
of
it
being
like
on
the
claro
system
or
the
reality
system.
C
It's
on
dx,
dow
they're,
like
50
of
people
that
just
participate
in
omer,
are
like
I
hate
the
x
dow.
They
chose
to
make
that
decision
and
that
kind
of
right
now
we're
like
a
third
party.
We
run
this
product
on
neutral
protocols
and
dx.
Dow
can
never
be
blamed,
but
once
we
do
that
people
will
blame
dx
dow
for
certain
things,
whether
we
can,
whether
we
like
it
or
not.
You
know
I.
E
I
agree
but
like
let's,
let's
take
the
exact
example
like
with
the
presidential
election.
If
dxr
would
be
the
arbitrator,
we
could,
for
example,
have
some
more
flexibility.
For
example,
we
could
downstake
the
proposal
to
have
to
to
get
like
30
days
more
for
like
waiting
until
we
actually
like
know
the
results
of
that.
That's,
of
course,
not
always
like
possible.
E
But
for
that
specific
purpose
we
could
actually
like
play
around
with
pushing
back
the
decision
making
for
us
until
the
the
correct
answer
is
actually
known
but
like
for
that
specific
like
for
I.
We
know
that
that's
an
issue
with
reality
that
I
know
so.
There
are
thoughts
about
like
how
to
improve
the
way.
If
an
outcome
is
not
known
on
closing
date,
it
should
be
possible
to
say
we
just
all.
Don't
know
they
aren't
the
answer
for
that,
and
we
should
all
should
just
wait
right.
D
C
A
A
A
Cool
well,
that's
x
die
just
moving
along.
Oh
I
better
hurt.
Was
there
someone
that
said
something?
No?
Just
moving
around
I
made
an
updated
post
a
little
delayed
on
the
community
rep
boost
round.
I
saw
that
pepo's
proposal
is
already
in
there.
I've
contacted
pulp,
matt,
mackina
and
matt
b
and
then
also
crypto
lamer
who's,
the
kind
of
russian
person
who's
actually
working
on
some
more
content.
Now
too.
A
So
I
think
that's
going
well
and
then
skye
has
had
a
previous
kind
of
guide
for
how
to
do
the
rep
community
boost
and
so
we'll,
hopefully
be
pushing
those
through
and
just
as
an
update,
I'm
looking,
I
always
like
to
see
the
number
of
deep
style
members
is
run
out,
443
members
and
then
we
now
have
over
1.4
million
rep
in
circulation.
So
I
think
the
having
a
we
were
about
like
a
hundred
thousand
rep
in
the
last
six
weeks
or
so
so.
A
Yeah
I
mean,
I
think
it's
good.
I
mean,
I
think
the
important
thing
for
us
is
like
the
it's
like
the
community.
You
know,
rep
holders
is
that
we're
encouraging
that
and
kind
of
having
an
open
hand.
So,
hopefully
they
can.
They
can
do
it.
A
And
then
yeah,
just
thinking
of
you
know,
beyond
the
eye
for
kind
of
more
people
as
more
people
get
involved
in
the
community.
I
just
saw
that
status
document
partnership
document
from
larae,
which
I
think
has
been
good
and
she's
been
kind
of
involved.
So
hopefully
we'll
continue
to
kind
of
expand,
expand
the
rep
distribution.
A
Cool
and
then
just
other
proposal,
roundup,
not
too
much
going
on
some
of
the
worker
proposals
and
yeah.
I
think
there
were
just
a
couple
of
worker-
proposes
the
audit
proposal
and
nothing
to
fancy
there.
I
don't
know
if
there's
any
of
those
that
anyone
wanted
to
talk
about.
C
Yeah
there
was
some
some
discussion
in
the
I
don't
know
which
chat
it
was,
but
some
interesting
ideas
around
how
and
when
to
do
worker
proposals,
because
everyone's
kind
of
been
doing
it
in
different
ways.
I
know
some
people
like
chris.
I
think
your
latest
one
was
like
I'm
gonna,
do
like
I'm
working
for
the
next
two
months.
At
the
end
of
each
of
those
months,
I'm
gonna
submit
a
proposal.
That's
great
federico.
C
Just
did
one
similar
to
that
where
he
said
I'm
going
to
do
that,
but
at
the
end
of
each
month
I'm
going
to
use
the
average
youth
price
over
the
course
of
that
month
to
use
for
my
proposal,
because,
chris
you
maybe
well
you
can.
Maybe
you
want
to
clarify
it
but,
like
you
might
be,
if
you're
doing
at
the
end
of
the
month,
you
like
whether
you
get
stuck
with
some
crazy
eth
price
or
not.
C
Who
knows
so
the
average
of
a
month
for
eath
price
seems
like
a
good
idea
that
people
can
use
to
leverage
historically,
what
people
have
been
doing-
and
I
explained
in
there-
is
I'm
gonna
work
for
the
next
two
months.
I'm
gonna
do
a
proposal
at
the
start
for
half
and
a
proposal
at
the
end
of
the
two
months
for
the
other
half,
that's
the
most
typical
one.
C
A
Yeah,
I
think,
the
the
eighth
price
and
the
dive
thing.
I
think
we
need
to
figure
that
out.
We
talked
about
that
last
week,
so
I
think
that
you
know.
Hopefully
we
find
a
kind
of
medium
or
long-term
solution
to
that.
So
that's
not
as
much
of
a
concern
and
I
think
it's
hard
to
have
like
a
hard
and
fast
rule
on
what
people
should
do
there,
but
I
think
kind
of
the
the
broader
points.
The
two
broader
points
of
taking
from
yours
is
kind
of
one.
A
How
does
the
congestion
of
worker
proposals
like
kind
of
go
through?
How
is
that
process
to
rep
holders?
Right?
Because
if
reporters
are
voting
on
things
like
what
do,
what
do
they
kind
of
look
at
on
a
consistent
basis
in
terms
of
worker
proposals
and
like
how
are
they
coming
in
at
just
random
times?
And
then
second,
is
the
individual
worker
going
through
the
same
process
to
submit
their
worker
proposals
in
terms
of
like
when
they're
getting
paid
and
like
how
long
it
is
so?
The
worker
compensation
guidelines
didn't
really
address
this.
A
That
much-
and
I
think
this
is
kind
of
one
of
those
things
that
I
think
we
need
to
kind
of,
let
things
develop
a
little
bit
out
in
the
wild
and
see
what
people
are
doing
and
what
works
and
then
try
to
put
like
some
structure
on
it
in
terms
of
like
standards,
because
I
think
for
a
lot
of
people,
you
know
coming
into
beauty.
It's
like
people.
Just
don't
really
know
right
like
well
like
since
rna
standards,
then
you
have
to
think
them
up
yourself
and
that
kind
of
just
takes
time.
A
G
From
my
perspective,
I
didn't
know
like
the
process,
so
I
just
I
thought
I
knew,
but
apparently
I
did
it
wrong.
I
did
it
at
start
of
each
month
month
because,
first
month,
like
you,
do
the
proposal
and
in
the
proposal
put
in
the
payment
and
payout.
So
I
thought
okay
next
month.
It's
the
same
thing,
naturally,
because
this
is
how
I
was
told
to
do
it
so
that
could
work
from
the
perspective
of
you
writing
something
you're!
G
Writing
what
like
first
month,
you
can't
say
what
happened
last
month,
because
obviously
you
didn't
work
so
the
first
proposal,
you
say
I'm
going
to
work
on
this
this
and
that
this
is
these
are
my
goals
and
then
on
the
next
month,
when
you
do
your
next
month,
you
tell
okay.
This
is
what
happened
last
month
and
those
were
my
goals,
and
this
is
what
I
succeeded
with,
and
this
is
what
I'm
gonna
do
next
like
the
coming
month.
G
G
H
Yeah,
I
think
it's
it's
super
important.
The
good
thing
about
everyone,
creating
their
individual
working
reports
is
that
everyone
knows
what
the
other
person
is
working
on,
and
the
goals
and
responsibilities
for
that.
H
I
think
the
worker
payments
it's
a
big
chunk,
maybe
the
the
only
thing
that
the
excel
has
been
spending
money
on
right.
So
I
think
it
would
make
sense
to
start
thinking
about
how
we
can
automate
automatics
in
a
way
where,
for
example,
we
can
have
a
smart
contract
where
you
just
the
exile,
add
addresses
that
are
going
to
receive
payment
each
month
and
depends
on
dependency
level
or
that
you
are
as
your
address,
for
example,
let's
say
I
would
still
want
to.
H
I
want
to
start
working
for
the
exam,
and
this
is
going
to
be
my
responsibilities,
my
goals
for
the
next
two
months,
and
I
am
added
to
this
registry
of
workers
that
each
month
they
are
going
to
receive
their
payment.
Even
you
can
receive
it
on
ether.
You
know
by
executing
one
transaction
checking
the
price
from
an
oracle
on
and
you
can
receive
the
the
instant
price
on
ether
using
a
stablecoin
oracle
depends
on
how
much
you
are
going
to
be
paid.
H
We
have
a
clear
rule
already
on
that,
so
there
is
a
lot
of
things
that
we
can
optimize.
Most
of
our
higher
percentage
of
the
proposals
are
rated
worker
proposals,
so
it
will
be
super
interesting
to
see
how
we
can
keep
this
at
the
minimum
at
least.
Maybe
have
a
smart
contract
where
we
just
send
funds,
and
this
is
going
to
be
used
for
paying
workers
in
the
next
following
months
and
the
dxo
just
agrees
on
which
level
the
current
worker
is
on.
H
For
example,
you
can
the
exile,
we
create
profiles
to
add
one
as
a
registered
worker
and
to
how
can
we
say
to
promote
a
worker
or
maybe
to
lower
it
down
or
to
another
to
another
level
and
say
how
much
time
is
going
to
be
working
and
from
that
we
can
get
unchanged.
We
can
calculate
because
we
already
agree
or
not
right
how
much
we
are
going
to
be
how
much
we
are
going
to
get
paid
then
what
they
think
that
it
won't
be
clear.
It's
okay!
What
happened?
H
We
are
saying
what
we
are
working
on
every
two
months.
You
know
so
may
we
should
find
a
way
to
communicate
that
to
make
sure
that
the
community
understands
what
is
working
each
person
if
they
deliver.
What
they
did,
because
they
will,
if
not,
they
will
need
to
be
removed
right
from
the
registry,
so
yeah.
E
Yeah
not
only
on
automating
it
on
chain,
but
I
think
the
main
issue
is
that
no
one
knows
exactly
how
to
do
it
and
by
having
a
very
easy
to
use
interface,
which
gives
which
sets
sets
you
boundaries.
So
you
just
like
fill
out
some
kind
of
form
form
and,
at
the
end,
this
form
results
into
like
a
a
well-defined
proposal
and
with
that
well-defined
form,
everyone
has
like
everyone,
is
using
the
exact
same
thing.
E
So
it
will
also
much
easier
to
audit
like
the
proposal
on
chain,
because
the
structure
is
exactly
the
same.
Everyone
is
using
the
same
formal
form,
and
this
will
first
like
reduce
any
anxiety
about.
Like
am
I
doing
it
right
because
we
just
sent
them
a
link
inside
like
fill
out.
The
form
say
exactly
how
how
long
you
want
to
work.
What
are
your
goals?
What
are
your
responsibilities?
E
Press
the
button,
make
the
proposal
and
that's
it,
and
everyone
is
using
the
same
thing,
so
it's
like
with
yeah,
so
that
that's
my
vision,
it's
I
think,
even
more
yeah
is
that
just
yeah
yeah.
We
don't.
H
We
don't
even
need
it
in
needed
app.
For
that
I
mean
it's
like
you
can
interact.
We
can
create
the
form
you
can
interact
with
that
as
a
smart
contract
later
on
intercom,
because
I
mean
just
the
level
and
how
much
time
you're
going
to
be
working
on,
claim
your
payment
and
and
that's
it-
I
I
mean,
even
though
we
can
have
it
up.
E
Change
yeah,
I
think
I
think
the
main
anxiety
or
not
anxiety,
but
just
like
I
don't
know
how
to
do.
It
is
because
we
just
point
them
to
some
contract
on
ether.
Scan
like
this
is
not
how
we
should
do
it
in
engineering
like
even
I,
even
I
still
don't
know
like
the
vesting
contract
is
complex.
A
C
H
H
A
So
I
I
think
I
want
to
do
the
nesting
dxd
contract
and
I
have
not
done
that
and
I've
like
said
it
in
previous
proposals,
that
I
will
do
that.
So
I
will
use
that
as
an
opportunity,
hopefully
to
kind
of
shed
some
more
light
on
this.
I'm
just
realizing.
Also,
we
talked
about
something
similar
last
week
with
the
dye
stuff,
and
I
said
I'd
make
a
forum
topic,
but
I've
not
done
that.
A
So
I
think
we
just
need,
like
a
a
forum
topic
to
go
over
some
of
these,
like
larger
compensation,
things
that
we
there's
it's
really
just
like
like
worker,
I
mean
not
to
say
hr,
but
it's
like
all
these
kind
of
little
things
that
we
need
to
just
get
better
at
at
structuring
here.
But
I
think
the
dxd
vesting
is
kind
of
a
is
a
is
one
we
can
do
in
the
short
term.
Here.
G
I
mean
our
own,
like
the
whole
onboarding
of
the
dick
style
is,
is
pretty
like,
there's
no
onboarding.
I
know
that
and
like
federico
knows
that
and
because
everyone
is
like
writing
to
each
other
and
asking
like,
and
no
one
dares
to
ask
the
stupid
questions,
because
you
don't
wanna
like
we
all
smart
and
so
like
no
one
dares
to
ask
these
simple,
simple
questions
like
how
do
you
do
this
or
how
do
you
do
that,
and
I
was
the
victim
of
this,
and
I
was
so
stressed-
I
to
be
honest
with
you.
G
A
The
truth,
I'll
just
say,
as
someone
who's
like
now,
I
write
propose
like
I'm
just
like
I'll
do
a
proposal.
I
just
vividly
remember
like
having
that
proposal
window
open
and
just
like.
I
think
it
was
even
just
a
signal
proposal,
but
I
was
just
like
so
worried
that
I
was
like
gonna
mess
something
up
and
then,
like,
obviously
you
do
it
and
you
get
like
more
familiar
with
it,
but
that
is
a
huge
impediment
to
people
like
getting
more
involved.
I
think,
like.
G
The
the
the
thing
is,
it's
not
like
when
we
talk
about
these
issues
or
these
problems,
or
we
are
talking
about
them
like
isolated
stuff
when
you're
on
board
on
with
the
style
you
have
100
of
these
stuff.
You
don't
have
like
one
thing
you
have
so
much.
You
don't
understand
and
I
think
just
keep
that
in
mind
like
it's,
not
one
thing,
it's
a
lot
of
these
things,
which
makes
it
hard
like.
If
it's
just
one
thing:
it's,
it's
no,
no
big
deal.
G
I
I
I
agree,
you
know
there
are
many,
you
know
if
you
like
blockchain
pro,
then
maybe
it's
easy
and
if
you
follow
you,
I
followed
you
sometimes
so
the
organization.
Then
you
know,
maybe
you
think
it's
going
to
work.
But
if
somebody
tries
to
onboard
this,
maybe
not
that
technical
or
should
be
some
non-technical
roles.
Then
it's.
I
think
it's
really
strange
to
yeah
and
now
I'm
right
now
in
this
process
to
find
out
who
is
who
is
working
on
what
and
what
are
people
doing?
How
is
the
system
working
and
it's.
I
H
A
lot
of
things
that
you
need
to
know
you
know,
so
I
think
I
mean
check
now
said
and
federico
they
are
still
here
now
they
are
working
with
us
and
they
learn
a.
H
I
Yeah
for
sure,
because
you
need
people
who
can
like
manage
this
kind
of
structure
because
it
will
not
change,
it
will
always
be
a
little
bit
like
this.
Also,
if
you
have
more
structured,
I
know
an
onboarding
process.
So
in
a
way
it's
okay,
because
then
you
you
end
up
with
people
who
can
like
manage
this
kind
of
yeah.
I
A
E
Like
it's,
I
don't
think
it's
good
to
compare
developers
on
boarding
with
every
every
skill
set
else,
because
the
way
we
kind
of
made
sure
that
if
any
death
is
going
to,
it's
come
to
key
base
and
they
intro
introduce
themselves.
The
first
thing
I'm
doing
is
making
sure
I'm
shilling
the
out
of
omen,
so
they
joined
my
omen
team
because
we
needed
depths
similar
to
john
johnny
needs
to
make
sure
that
people
are
excited
about
dx
world
and
that's
different
with
any
other
area.
E
For
the
dx,
though,
like
specifically
like
commons
and
marketing
yeah,
those
people
are
kind
of
still
solo,
solo
player
right
and
they're,
not
like
yeah.
G
And
we
need
to
start
thinking
competitively
also
like
there's
other
dows
out
there
and
there's
some
really
good
smart
developers
and
designers
marketers,
just
like
we.
If
we
have
a
good
onboarding
and
like
one
dev,
is
talking
to
another
one
and
and
like
if
we
just
have.
If
we
just
have
some
kind
of
structure
about
that,
it
could
be
also
a
really
easy
way
to
bring
in
someone
and
even
test
them
for
one
or
two
months.
Instead
of
having
a
full
month
of
just
onboarding,
you
could
have
that
in
like
one
week
or
two
weeks.
A
People
want
to
poke
around
right
like
how
do
you
poke
around
like
what
do
we
allow?
The
people
like
poke
around
versus,
like
the
only
way
that
you
can
figure
things
out,
is
if
you
go
zero
to
60
in
five
seconds
I
mean
I
think,
skye
is
true
that
you
know
this
is
like
it's
not
like
anyone
like
sat
in
a
room
or
like
we
should
have
really
bad
onboarding
so
that
we
can
like
only
get
like
the
the
the
most.
A
I
don't
know
the
strongest
or
something
it's
more
of
like
it's
a
reality
of
when,
like
the
decentralized
collective,
is
kind
of
like
forming
and
trying
to
expand,
because
it's
actually
hard
for
one
or
two
people
to
like
speak
for
the
rest
of
the
group
and
kind
of
on
board
in
that
way.
But
I
think
what
we're
doing
now
is
kind
of
like
all
coming
together
and
forming
some
consensus
around
it.
But
I
think
it's
like
a
lot
of
things.
It's
like.
A
Sometimes
it's
like
this
is
part
of
the
whole
process,
but
I
do
like
thinking
of
onboarding
more
as
like
pledging
so.
I
A
I
do
think
we've
gotten
a
little
bit
better
than
that
in
the
getting
introductions
and
getting.
I
guess.
We
have
two
different
channels-
maybe
that's
not
great,
but
they're
introductions
and
getting
started
but
like
I
think
we
kind
of
engage
any
when
you
came
in
like
you
know,
we
were
kind
of
talking
on
that.
I
think
it
is
more
about
like
yeah.
How
do
we
give
people
an
over?
You
know
idea
of
what's
going
on
in
a
lot
of
different
ways.
A
We
have
like
10
minutes
left
here,
so
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
switch
a
little
bit
to
talk
about
swapper
governance
process
just
to
go
over
what,
like
the
for
here
on
governance
call
in
terms
of
like
what
proposals
are
needed
to
go
through.
We
talked
about
this
on
the
dx
biz
call.
A
So
I
guess,
like
I
kind
of
had
four
proposals,
that
I
were
thinking
that
will
kind
of
be
and
one
and
is
starting
with
that
is
kind
of
like
anointing
or
proving
the
swapper
name
change,
and
so
that's
kind
of
one
and
then
second,
I
think,
is
the
swapper
factory
address
that
we
will
have
to
approve.
I
don't
know
the
words
for
these
things
and
then
the
third
is
like
the
ens
thing
and
then
I
think,
just
kind
of
going
forward.
A
We're
gonna
have
to
think
about
two
other
things,
just
in
terms
of
like
governance,
for
the
style,
governance
for
swapper
and
that's
like
dx
style
liquidity,
that's
supplied,
so
we've
already
signaled
about
certain
deposits
that
will
be
made
into
swapper
and
then
the
fee
setting
so
right
now,
of
course,
fee
setting
is
done
by
dx,
dow
governance
and
so
just
kind
of
wanting
to
get
us
started.
A
Thinking
about
how
we
might
want
to
like
discuss
these
or
figure
these
out,
because
it
you
know,
launching
swapper,
does
have
kind
of
give
some
extra
responsibility
or
obligations
to
de-excel
governance.
A
H
To
be
pruned,
maybe
yeah
chris
answering
your
question
to
change
the
fish.
We
will
need
to
make
a
proportion
from
the
the
exile
from
the
dxl
avatar
address,
which
could
be
through
alchemy.
Once
we
have
the
connection
once
we
can
make
a
call
to
the
dx
swap
fee
setup,
the
dxo
feature
will
be
able
to
change
their
stop
fee
from
any
pair
and
also
to
change.
H
That's
it.
That's
the
only
thing
that
the
exile
will
be
able
to
do
and
yeah
only
that,
because
they
to
take
the
fee
to
claim
the
fee
that
will
be
doing
automatically
from
public
functions.
So,
yes
to
change
the
fee,
we
just
need
to
be
able
to
make
a
call
that
I
think
that's
on
hold.
That's
directly
depends
on
the
multi-coil
integration
of
the
schematical
iteration,
so
yeah.
A
Yeah
and
so
then
I
guess,
if
the
it's
just
creating
a
proposal
from
the
avatar
that
would
change
the
fees,
so
I
guess
just
getting
to
start
thinking
about
like
well.
What
would
we
need,
in
terms
of
consensus,
to
get
to
the
point
where
the
avatar
is
like
submitting
a
proposal
to
change
the
fees?
So
I
don't
know
if
that's
just
something
that
we'll
discuss
in
terms
of
people
want
higher
fees,
lower
fees,
we'll
do
polls
on
forums
or
if
we
have
other
ways
of
kind
of
getting
signal.
A
But
I
think
we
should
start
thinking
about
the
governance
processes
that
come
into
like
changing
changing
fees,
at
least
for
as
long
as
dx
out
governance
is
kind
of
in
charge
of
the
the
pool
fees,
especially
because
we'll
also
like
want
to
engage
other
projects
who
may
have
liquidity
on
the
pools
right,
and
so
maybe
we
kind
of
engage
with
them
in
a
way
to.
I
don't
know,
find
some
signal
or
consensus
on
that,
but
that
should
be
another
thing
that
we
should
be
thinking
about
in
terms
of
governance.
H
H
We
will
have
to
give
also,
how
do
we
set
the
right?
The
power
to
change
the
fee
to
the
dlc
eth,
give
to
the
dsd
slash
die,
give
to
each
pair
for
for
the
bike.
D
Be
for
starting
a
guild
right
because
at
the
beginning,
all
pairs
are
controlled
by
the
the
doubt,
the
dx
style
right.
So
do
we
automatically
start
setting
up
the
guilds
for
each
one,
or
is
there
like
some
kind
of
a
process
for
the
lps
to
request
to
from
the
dx
style
to
create
the
guild?
Right?
Like
I
mean
this
can
be
handled
in
the
ui
but
yeah,
something
to
think
about.
D
A
A
Cool
I'm
running
up
on
the
end
of
the
hour.
Now,
if
there's
any
other
points,
questions
to
bring
up
governance,
2.0
meeting
next
tuesday,
I
have
trouble
with
my
calendar-
invites
I
think
I
just
sent
out
the
calendar
invite
about
an
hour
ago.
I
tried
to
send
it
out
yesterday,
so
that's
going
well,
but
anything
else.
Any
thing
on
the
mind.
F
Maybe
just
regarding
the
staking
contract
we
talked
about,
I
I
think,
like
some
lightweight
like
front-end
interface,
can
be
implemented,
like
that's
some
lightweight
application.
Well,
where
you
know
basic,
just
one
form
for
the
contract,
for
you
know
for
all
the
fields
required
that
could
be
made
within
a
day
and
like
for
not
non-technical
people.
They
don't
have
to
go
on
inter
scan
and
you
know
input
every
field
like
it
is
now.
G
I
mean
we
should
do
tools
for
the
workers,
everything
from
calculating
stuff
like
if,
if
we
made
the,
we
should
just
yeah,
do
some
kind
of
form
or
like
just
simple
basic
and
then
yeah.
I
think
I
could
design
this
like
in
one
day
literally
and
then.
F
C
F
No,
no,
no!
No!
It's
not
connecting
to
alchemy
it's
like
I'm
talking
just
deploying
the
contract,
and
then
you
just
input
that
contract
into
the
alchemy,
investing.
C
C
Like
the
whole
investing
well
the
whole
vesting
program,
you
could
have
one
single
contract
because
right
now
everyone
makes
their
own
contract
every
time,
but
you
have
one
contract
that
people
basically
just
call
to
create
when
needed,
and
then
you
it
gives
you
your
address
and
you
use
that
address
in
your
proposal,
but
it's
one
contract
managing
all
of
the
vesting
for
every
worker
for
dxd,
instead
of
hundreds
of
different
separate
contracts.
The
point
is:
no
one's
need.
No
one
needs
to
deploy
their
own
contract.
C
No,
there
will
be
a
front
end.
It
will
be
like
part
of
the
governance
you
would.
You
would
interact
with
that
in
the
front
end
like
on
dx
governance,
dx,
gov
or
something.
C
We're
gonna
sh,
we
haven't
shown
it
to
block
rock
gate
yet,
but
we
were
gonna,
ask
block
rocket
to
look
at
it,
but
they
were
they're
going
to
need
to
design
for
the
front.
End
really
well
gusto
says:
there's
a
smart
contract
that
has
to
be
made,
which
is
not
apparently
that
difficult
which
is
familiar
with,
but
we
wanted
to
have
someone
else,
probably
create
it,
and
then
there's
going
to
need
to
be
a
front
end
and
an
easy
design
for
that
too.
Yeah.