►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Meeting [2020-11-18]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
the
governance
discussion
for
wednesday
november
18th,
starting
with
the
governance
1.0
stuff,
just
wanted
to
give
another
shout
out
to
the
community
rep
boost
round
two.
I
know
peppo
had
submitted
his
proposal,
so
if
anyone
needs
help
with
that
reach
out
to
skye
mars
myself
for
trying
to
have
the
onus
beyond
the
the
award
winners
for
that,
but
encouraging
people
to
continue
to
do
that
wanted
to
look
at
kind
of
two
different
proposals
that
are
currently
in
the
queue
that
I
think
are
kind
of
interesting.
B
One
is
the
the
first
one
is
the
funding
for
omen
squad,
which
0.1,
I
think,
and
so
this
is
something
that's
been
talked
about-
a
lot
about
working
on
liquidity,
provisioning
on
omen
and
having
some
experimentation
with
that,
and
this
would
be
the
first
funding
of
that
which
would
be.
I
think
I
think
it
was
33
eth
sky.
I
think
you
submitted
when
I've
kind
of
been
leading
that
do
you
have
any.
C
Yeah
so
like
it
came
up
as
an
example
today
is
we
have
a
like
there's
a
there's,
an
omen
market
on
metallics
chess
match
that's
coming
up,
but
it
only
has
500
dollars
of
liquidity
and
on
mainnet
at
this
point
like
given
the
price
of
gas
and
the
like
how
much
you're
going
to
bet
versus
how
much
it's
going
to
cost
you
to
bet.
C
Unless
you
use
ethereum
like
markets
that
don't
have
at
least
a
few
thousand
or
something
of
liquidity
are
even
hard
to
use
as
marketing
like
that
could
be
a
really
cool
marketing
thing
like
vitalik
will
tweet
about
it
like
people
will
see
it,
but
like
no
one
will
trade
it.
C
If
it
has
500
liquidity
like
you,
could
do
a
50
bet
and
pay
thirty
dollars
in
gas
or
something,
and
then
it's
not
even
worth
it
so
even
to
use
like
cool
markets
like
that,
as
for
marketing,
it'd
be
good
if
we
could
put
some
liquidity
behind
it,
which
is
using
some
of
the
like
liquidity
that
we're
asking
for
here
and
it's.
This
is
a
short
market.
C
This
only
like
lasts
a
week,
and
then
we
can
put
that
into
another
market,
and
then
we
could,
you
know,
promote
that
too,
but
someone
dcc
one
raised
in
like
the
chat
he's
like.
Should
we
even
be
promoting
markets
that,
like
don't,
really
have
some
liquidity
behind
them,
because
it
just
leads
to
a
bad
experience
so
having
some
capital
to
move
around
and
play
with
different
markets
in
order
to
promote
them
and
market
them
is
powerful.
C
The
idea
is
to
do
this,
learn
how
to
do
this
in
a
in
a
in
a
money-making
way.
So
how
do
we
use
dx
dow's
capital
to
provide
liquidity
on
whether
it's
swapper
or
on
omen
to
actually
make
money
for
the
dow?
Now
that's
going
to
take
some
practice
and
risk,
and
things
like
that
and
we're
going
to
learn.
C
So
this
first
ask
is
just
for
some
amount
of
money
to
do
that
with
the
markets.
There's
a
few
people
that
have
actually
already
expressed
that,
like
really,
we
should
be
doing
this
in
larger
size,
like
kind
of
mirroring
what
gnosis
has
been
doing
with
you
know,
a
bunch
of
the
markets
that
they've,
promoted
and
and
backed
have
like
50
000
k
in
those
markets,
and
that
makes
it
a
pretty
good
liquid
market
that
most
people
can,
you
know,
take
the
position
they
want
to
take
him
now.
C
50K
of
markets,
obviously
a
lot
bigger
than
what
we're
talking
about
at
this
point.
But
I
guess
the
the
argument
at
this
point
is:
let's:
let's
do
it
with
some,
maybe
five
or
ten
thousand
dollars
in
a
market
or
something
just
make
sure
that
we
know
how
this
system
works
and
everything
like
is
work,
you
know,
doesn't
break
and
that,
like
we
can
interact
correctly
and
in
a
timely
manner,
so
that
and
then
we
can
always
ramp
it
up.
We
can't
like,
but
we
don't
want
to
start
with
200
grand.
C
We
want
to
start
with
a
smaller
amount,
and
so
that's
the
that's
the
plan
and
it's
just
another
another
test
that,
like
if
dxdao
as
a
as
a
dow
can
can
you
know,
interact
with
its
own
products,
now
we're
using
a
multi-stick
in
this
case,
but
eventually
we
would
want
to
probably
do
it
from
like
a
an
omen
squad,
dao
or
like
a
dx
like
a
dow
like
a
omen
guild
or
something
would
be
cool
if
we
could
do
the
actions
from
there,
but
right
now
we're
starting
this
way.
B
I
was
gonna,
I
asked,
I
guess
to
me:
there's
kind
of
two
different
management
parts
of
this,
because
I
guess
this
is
like
33
eat,
that's
kind
of
given
a
certain
amount,
that's
being
managed,
and
one
is
on
market
curation
or
what
markets
will
be
selected
or
provided
liquidity
provided
to,
and
then
two
is
like.
The
actual
liquidity
provisioning-
and
I
know
you
know
providing
liquidity
on
omen-
is
tricky
and
like
how
you
balance
that
and
so
like
what
exactly?
What?
B
C
So
there's
there's
you
know
people
can.
Can
we
had
a
spreadsheet
in
the
past
that
we're
going
to
revamp
that
where
people
can
put
markets
on
that
spreadsheet
and
then
we
can
do
votes
and
things
for
which
markets
to
create
and
then
and
then
to
your
second
point
like
how
it's
gonna
be
managed.
C
C
I
think
we'll
have
to
have
in
a
in
like
a
the
omen
channel
or
a
separate
omen
squad
channel
that
we
can
agree
on
like
fast
consensus
on
like
within
a
certain
time
framework,
but
we're
and
then
we'll.
Obviously
we'll
have
all
this
data
on
chain
and
and
the
actions
that
are
taken
and
we'll
be
able
to.
After
doing
it
a
few
times
like
look
back
at
that
data
and
make
decisions
on
whether
it
made
sense
or
what
we
could
change
and
how
we
can
improve
it.
C
I
mean
the
idea
is
to
like
okay,
we
need
to
start
somewhere
and
then
like
more
and
more
people
will
hopefully
get
involved
in
it
and
then
be
like.
Let's
do
it
this
way
and
then
we
can
improve
it
and
things
like
that
so,
but
we're
just
starting
with
some
amount
and
some
markets
so
that
we
can
do
something.
You
know.
B
And
should
we
look
at
that
as
a
loan,
an
investment
or
an
expense?
You
know,
I
think
it
kind
of
is
probably
all
of
those
wrapped
in,
but
I'm
just
wondering
like.
If
we're,
maybe
it's
a
little
bit
about
like
what
success
looked
like
for
this.
I
guess
the
number
one
priority
is
kind
of
omen,
usage
and
learning
some
bit
about
that.
But
obviously
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
not
lose.
I
mean
be
regretting
to
make
money
but
like
so,
I
think.
C
C
How
to
frame
it,
I
I
think
we
would
have
to
let's
look
at
the
parallel
of
like
what
gnosis
has
been
doing
and
okay
gnosis
has
been
doing
it
on
bigger
amounts,
but
part
of
it
is
bootstrapping
and
kickstarting
your
product
that
you've
that
you
that
you
as
a
dow
own,
so
you
know
providing
more
opportunities
to
like
get
it
going
and
get
awareness
and
and
participate
in
it.
C
So
it's
it's
partly
marketing
like
yes,
there
is
a
chance
that
all
the
money
could
get
lost
like
someone
takes
the
other
side
of
a
market
and
like
liquidity,
gets
taken
and
then,
like
we
end
up
on
the
wrong
side
of
the
bed
or
something,
but
that's
not
the
goal,
because,
as
a
normal
lp
would
do,
you
would
want
to
hopefully
remove
the
liquidity
before
you
get
to
the
point
where
you
can
just
get
drained
on
it.
So,
yes,
it
is
at
risk.
C
C
So
there's
in
there's
that,
but
how
to
yeah
it's
a
it's
a
it's
a
slash.
It's
it's
a
mix
of
a
lot
of
things,
it's
investment
to
turn
into
more
money.
It's
it's
bootstrapping,
your
products,
it's
marketing
and
it
is
learned,
it's
a
learning
how
to
be
a
successful
lp
on
omen,
and
maybe
the
answer
is.
We
need
to
increase
omen
fees
to
10
in
order
to
be
a
successful,
lp
or
something
but
yeah.
That's
that's
how
we
would
classify
it.
D
I
think
it
would
be
interesting
to
see
once
we
have
scalar
markets.
You
know
playing
around
with
some
of
you.
You
know
like
the
price
ones,
on
crypto
and
even
kind
of
setting
them
up
almost
like
options,
markets.
B
C
Actually
add
on
to
your
questions
crystal
like
the
question
is
like
a
month
from
now.
If,
if
it
let's
say
it
was
profitable,
and
now
we
have
more
like
because
this
is
this-
is
about
fifteen
thousand
dollars
of
die.
Let's
say
a
month
from
now,
after
a
few
markets,
we
have
20.
Thousands
and
20
000
have
died
like
at.
That
point
is
like.
Is
there
any?
C
C
Probably
not
so
it
is
a
you
could
think
of
it
as
leaving
the
dao
for
maybe
to
be
used
for
omen
forever.
You
could
think
of
it
that
way
right
and
let
because
you
already
keep
expanding
it
right
like
so.
I
don't
know
if
this
money's
gonna
ever
go
be.
If
what
would
be
the
reason
to
send
it
back
to
the
x
dial,
it's
still
in
control
of
the
dx
style
community,
but
when
would
it
go
back
like
a
dividend
back
to
the
dow?
That
would
be
cool
if
it
was
like
working
right.
B
Yeah,
I
think,
a
next
after
this
would
be
a
larger
question
on
like
how
dick
stow
is
providing
liquidity
on
omen
and
how
that's
managed,
but
and
that
that
hopefully
is
kind
of
some
back
and
forth
with
the
treasury
and
dxd
holders
too.
But
I
think
for
this
it
is
definitely
more
of
a
investment
in
omen.
B
Cool
yeah,
so
that's
that
that
just
got
boosted
and
then
the
other
one
that
wanted
to
highlight
is
the
1kx
git
coin:
grants
round
8
hackathon
proposal
that
we
talked
about.
I
think
thursday
on
last
call
and
then
on
monday's
biz,
biz,
dev
call
and
then
wrote
a
forum
post
for
that,
so
that
just
got
boosted
and
yeah.
So
just
go
ahead
and
support
that
one.
If
you
feel
so
inclined
I'll,
be
waiting
until
gas
comes
down
this
afternoon.
To
do
that
and
then.
B
So
tuesday,
I
believe
the
24th
and
so
there's
kind
of
some
talking
omen
about
this
and
separately
yeah
on
some
of
the
possibilities
but
and
then
mesa.
I
think
I
mean
it
would
be
good
to
finalize
that,
and
maybe
I
would
get
involved
with
the
mesa.
Yeah
that'd
be
great.
E
C
You're,
an
active
user
of
omen.
I
don't
know
how
many
people
here
are,
and
this
is
pretty
product
specific,
but
it's
really
hard
to
keep
track
of
like
your
activity
and
if
you
made
money
or
lost
money
and
what
you
need
to
do
at
a
certain
time
before
a
certain
date
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff
and
all
and
all
your
my
markets,
all
just
sit
there
together
and
you
have
no
way
to
know
which
ones
are
already
settled
and
which
ones
are
not.
C
But
I
don't,
I
propose
it
as
a
potent
as
a
possible
hack
for
the
hackathon,
but
it
may
be
bigger
than
that.
It
may
be
more
of
like
a
bigger,
longer
term
bounty
or
something.
But
it's
one
idea.
If
someone
really,
you
could
see
someone
wanting
to
make
that
for,
like
all
prediction,
markets
combined
and
include
omen
and
have
the
other
ones
as
well.
C
C
Exactly
so,
there's
now
gnosis
has
a
token
conditional
token
1155
explorer,
which
is
still
not
fully
released
yet,
but
that's
exactly
why
you
need
this
type
of
platform,
because
the
only
way
the
only
place
you
can
really
see
your
positions
and
tokens
is
not
omen
right.
So
you
can't
use
other
systems
in
the
d5
world
to
to
manage
your
omen
positions.
C
So
someone
would
have
to
build,
as
you
said,
like
a
custom
platform
specifically
able
to
handle
these
conditional
1155
tokens,
but
make
the
experience
almost
like
a
zapper
fi,
where
you
it's
really
easy
to
see
everything
in
one
place
together.
That
would
be
pretty
cool,
I
think,
and
and
it's
and
that's
for
users
and
also
for
lps,
and
without
that
I
don't
think
any
of
these
prediction.
Markets
platforms
are
going
to
like
take
off,
I
mean
without
zapper
and
xerion
d5
wouldn't
be
nearly
as
big
as
it
is.
C
B
Yeah,
I
mean
you
can
kind
of
see
it
with
prediction
markets
how
they're
kind
of
just
a
little
bit
behind
some
of
the
other
d5
kind
of
products
and
services,
but
like
also
very
different,
and
so
that
they'll
have
a
lot
of
likes,
maybe
similar
steps
and
engagement,
and
I
think,
especially
with
like
the
presidential
election
that
was
kind
of,
like
I
think
in
a
kickstart,
another
wave
of
like
secondary
services
and
products
so
yeah.
I
think
it's
a
great
idea
too.
F
Regarding
the
hackathon
I
I
haven't
followed,
what
is
what
is
happening
and
how
and
how
we
are
doing
it,
but
we
should
try
to
take
the
most
of
it,
as
we
can
something
that
I
did
on
past
hackathons
that
I
organized
I
highlighted
like,
for
example,
not
goals,
but
I
thing
that
we
were
looking
for
on
on
on
the
company.
F
That
was
that
was
supporting
the
hackathon
here,
for
example,
sky
say
we
are
going
to
be
looking
for
something
regarding
prediction
markets,
or
you
can
throw
up
some
ideas
and
from
this
idea
they
can
create
their
own
dabs
or
solutions.
F
Maybe
they
will
follow
another
another
way,
but
simple
needs
where
they
can
build
something
and
also
maybe
even
more
features
over
it
or
came
up
with
a
new
designs
or
something
that
we
haven't
think
on
or
we
haven't
came
up.
So
that
is
a
that
would
be
the
idea
for
the.
I
think
that
would
be
great
for
the
hackathon
and
nevertheless
I
don't
know
who
is
organizing
the
hackathon
and
how
much
time,
though
you
are
putting
into
it
it's
a
it's
very
important
and
power
for
two
that
we
can
use.
F
C
B
Yeah,
it's,
I
think
it's
a
great
way
to
kind
of
prepare
for
that,
but
so
this
was
something
so
one
kx
capital
had
sponsored
the
gitcoin
hackathon,
and
that
gives
them
a
couple
two
slots
for
bounties
or
hackathons
and
they've
allotted
those
to
dx
dow,
and
so
we
are
offering
certain
two
bounties
and
there's
a
proposal
right
now
in
the
queue
to
offer
those
two
bounties
one
for
omen
and
one
for
mesa
and
we're
kind
of
talking
about
here,
because
we
haven't
actually
finalized.
What
those
ideas
are.
B
It's
just
a
signal
proposal,
but
it
does
say
on
there
that
first
place
would
get
three
eth
and
point
one
percent
rep
and
five
hundred
dollars
dxd
invested
over
six
months
as
the
prize
and
it's
and
that
would
be
for
both
both
the
omen
and
the
mesa
one,
and
so
that
signal
proposal
is
currently
in
there
and
then
on
the
24th
of
november,
which
is
next
tuesday.
We
had
to
submit
the
final
descriptions,
and
so
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
be
able
to.
B
I
think
it's
like
martin
can
help
finalize
the
mesa
description.
I
know
sky
and
geronimo
talked
about
for
omen
and
so
we'll
get
that
and
then
I
think
the
hackathon
is
december,
2nd
through
like
the
14th
or
something
like
that,
and
then
we'll
have
to
figure
out
also
the
judging
criteria.
What
we
want
to
do
for
that,
but
I
think
it's
a
good.
I
mean
I
think
it's
very
serendipitous
in
terms
of
we
were
talking
about
having
a
larger
geek
style
hackathon.
B
F
Awesome
sorry,
it
was
me
yes,
so
also
it's
super
powerful
to
create
a
community.
You
know
you
can
get.
You
can
get
started
a
lot
of
things
if
you
organize
it
properly
with
time
and
even
more
a
physical
hackathon.
I
think
that
there's
going
to
be.
That
is
something
that
we
were
talking
on
about.
What's
going,
what
is
going
to
happen
on
devcon
for
the
exile?
Maybe
that
is
good.
Maybe
that
can
be
a
good
place
to
organize
something
on
my
previous
company.
F
We
did
a
hackathon
next
to
debcon
and
it
was
a
success.
It
was
a
complete
success.
It
was
awesome,
then,
the
other
hackathon
that
way
that
we
didn't
that
we
did
in
other
places
that
there
were
next
to
a
developer
conference
or
visa
conference.
They
didn't
want
that
them
well,
but
yeah
shuffling.
The
idea,
I
think,
would
be
awesome
to
start
thinking
next
year
about
maybe
a
physical
hackathon
for
dxo.
B
Definitely,
I
think
devcon
is
something
looking
looking
like.
It
could
be.
A
nice
nice
event
for
a
nice
coming
out
party,
maybe
for
jake
stout.
B
Cool
and
then
next
wanted
to
switch
the
conversation
a
bit
and
pick
up
the
worker
compensation
structure.
Improvements
thread
that
we've
kind
of
been
kicking
around
the
last
week
or
two
last
couple
weeks
here.
B
So
we've
been
having
conversations
on
this
call
about
some
ways
to
improve
the
worker
proposal
process,
to
make
it
kind
of
clear
for
new
workers
and
to
also
kind
of
just
take
a
broader
view
of
of
how
we're
doing
that.
So
there's
been
some
really
interesting
discussion
on
that,
and
so
some
of
the
things
we've
been
working
on.
B
Obviously
the
the
ability
to
get
salary
and
die
is
one
that
is
kind
of
in
progress
dependent
on
a
couple
other
integrations
that
we're
working
on,
and
then
there
was
some
other
interesting
discussion.
I
think
about
not
accountability,
maybe
maybe
the
best
word
or
just
kind
of
something
says
evaluation
of
worker
proposals.
But
how
do
we
kind
of
look
at
work
that
is
proposed
and
then
is
maybe
paid
for
and
then
but
then
like?
How
do
we
like
decide
how
evaluate
that
work?
B
I
think
it's
a
really
interesting
question
and
you
know
there's
the
idea
of
how
do
we
come
up
with
those
things
and
then
like
what
does
it
mean
to
even
like
hold
those
accountable
for
that?
I
do
think
it's
interesting
just
in
the
structure
that
we
have
now
work
proposals
that
the
act
of
having
to
go
and
get
a
proposal
to
get
funded
every
two
months,
even
if
you've
like
worked
here
for
several
months.
I
think
that
is.
B
It
has
been
a
very
good
process
for
kind
of
contextualizing
people's
work
and
making
them
reflect
on
the
different
things
they're
working
on,
but
I
think
we
can
figure
out
different
ways
to
make
sure
that
that
process
is
efficient
and
that
people
are
that
we're
reflecting
on
the
work
that
we
say
we're
going
to
do
versus
the
work
that
we
actually
do.
F
Well,
there
are
some
rules
that
were
very
clear
on
the
community
on
the
exile
level
that
can
be
encoded
on
this
mark
on
the
smart
contract
level
and
as
a
decentralized
organization.
I
think
that
we
should
start
thinking
on
how
to
have
those
rules
on
chain
on
code.
F
Trusting
gold
maybe
start
giving
the
opportunity-
or
I
don't
know
right,
yeah
the
option
for
other
community
members
to
challenge
our
proposals
or
or
our
development,
to
help
them
to
help
us
accountable
right
of
our
of
our
performance,
because
right
now
that
has
been
happening
internally
yeah.
It
would
be
great
to
have
something
like
that
or.
B
B
Cool
yeah
well
that
threat
has
actually
kind
of
got
a
couple
of
good
ideas,
and
I
think
that's
something
we
can
continue
to
just
throw
different
ideas
at
and
figure
out,
because
part
of
it
is
like
every
time
someone
every
time
an
individual
worker
does
something
or
kind
of
makes,
a
proposal
that
helps,
sets
a
precedent
and
establishes
all
those
guidelines
for
the
community.
B
E
Vacation
and
it's
not
that
it's
not
it's
just
unclear,
I
think
I
think
we
should
write
that
there
is
no
occasion
paid.
People
should
say.
E
I
did
read
that,
but
I
didn't
get.
I
didn't
understand
it
because
it's
like
it's
like
you,
you
have
to
look
that
you
have
like
recreational
time,
but
it's
on
your
side,
but
is
it
paid
or
it's
not
paid?
I
think
it's
not
paid.
That's
it's!
Okay!
For
me,
it
should
be.
B
Yeah,
I'm
laughing
at
federico
every
in
italy
every
one
day
of
vacation
for
every
one
working
day.
E
B
B
How
does
how
do
we
kind
of
think
about
that
as
a
group-
and
I
just
got
to
give
you
my
take
on
the
full-time
one
work
I
think
it's
mostly
up
to
like
the
individual
and
what
they
define
as
full-time,
and
I
know
that's
something
that
is
goes
this
way
or
that
way,
but
I
think
it's
pretty
hard
to
be
like
hard
and
fast
with
it.
I
think
there's
a
generally
accepted
like
40-hour
work
week
that
people
are
doing
like
we
do
weekends
here,
there's
nothing
like
set
in
stone.
B
That
says,
like
saturday
and
sunday
shouldn't
be
work
days,
but
that's
kind
of
like
accepted
into
the
community.
I
I
think
that
a
lot
of
people
I
actually
like
take.
B
I
have
my
worker
competition
actually
80,
because
I
do
some
things
outside
of
dx
down,
so
maybe
that's
what
kind
of
people
do,
and
so
I
don't
know
if
it's
just
like
community
enforcement
on
that,
but
I
think
we
should
be
pretty
flexible
with
having,
like
short,
like
very,
very
part-time
right,
maybe
you're
working
20
or
that
you'll
be
able
to
have
half-time
part-time
and
also
kind
of
full-time.
I
don't
know
if
we
can
create
many
hard
and
fast
rules
around
it
for
vacation.
B
I
think
that's
a
similar
issue
in
that
it's
hard
to
create
rules
around
that
that
I
think,
could
be
fair
and
clear
in
like
a
a
way
because
the
worker
workers
are
so
varied
right
because
there'd
be
part
time,
they'd
be
full
time
in
that,
and
so
I
think
one
of
the
things
with
the
I
think
with
the
worker
compensation
structure
in
general,
it's
like
how
to
have
as
simple
and
direct
of
like
compensation
with
like
no
strings
attached,
and
I
think
it
makes
like
vacation
or
things
like
that,
a
little
bit
more
difficult,
because
then
someone
has
to
manage
that.
B
So
I'm
just
to
show
my
cards,
I'm
thinking
about
this
for
myself,
because
I'm
supposed
to
do
a
new
worker
proposal
and
it
would
cover
the
holiday
season,
the
last
kind
of
and
I'm
thinking
of
going
somewhere
for
that
week.
And
so
I
don't
you
know,
I
think
I
will
probably
just
start
my
worker
proposal
and
it
will
end
right
before
say
christmas
and
then
I'll
probably
just
start.
My
other
one
like
a
couple
days
after
in
january,
and
I
don't.
E
B
G
G
E
E
E
B
E
G
So
in
sweden,
when
you,
we
have
like
a
really
good
rules
for
all
this
and
you
need
to
work
one
year
in
a
company
before
you
can
talk
about
vacations.
That's
first
of
everything.
So
even
if
someone
works
like
half
a
year
and
then
that
person
quits,
so
what
happens
if
that
person
quits,
they
get
paid
their
vacation
days
instead
of
getting
vacation
days.
But
if
you
work
for
a
full
year,
you
can
take
out
your
vacation
days
and
still
get
paid
for
that.
So
I
think
we
could
do
something
similar
for
us.
G
F
I
just
yeah.
I
just
want
to
say
that
one
of
the
reasons
I'm
working
here
is
that
I
can
take
vacations
whatever
I
want.
I
don't
have
any
rules
to
follow.
I
shouldn't
need
to
deliver
on
the
goals
that
I
said
that
I
say
I'm
going
to
work
on
this
for
the
next
two
months
and
if
I
want
to
take
vacation
for
a
month,
but
I
still
am
going
to
deliver
what
it,
what
the
exact
consider
like
a
full-time
engagement
for
that
for
those
two
months.
That's
fine.
F
I
think
that
the
best
rules
that
we
have
on
the
morphine,
that
we
gave
to
our
workers
to
be
able
to
deliver
the
goals
on
the
on
the
time
that
they
think
is
right
and
hurt
them
uncomfortable
if
they
not.
That
is
one
of
the
most
powerful,
powerful
things
of
our
worker
engagements
that
we
want
to.
G
G
Is
a
problem
everyone
around
there's
a
problem
here?
This
is
why
there's
rules
in
sweden?
It's
big
it's
not
only
because
of
like
having
rules
it's
because
of
the
health
of
the
workers.
Basically,
you
need
to
take
vacation
in
sweden,
it's
forbidden
to
not
take
vacations
and
some
people
like
me,
I
overwork
this
is
how
I
work
and
I
forget
about
stuff-
and
I
just
keep
working
for
two
years
and
forget
about.
I
don't
know
taking
like
free
time
and
I
think
like
for
for
now.
G
We
are
early
talking
about
this,
but
like
in
one
two
three
years
we
could
have
people
being
too
stressed
out
and
hurting
the
quality
of
the
work
we
have
and
stuff
like
that.
So
having
a
program
could
be
a
good
guideline,
we
won't
force
people
but
having
them
know
that
we
are
thinking
about
vacations
and
it
is
included
in
your
work
to
take
vacation.
G
E
You
know
I'm
worked
like
you.
The
last
like
forever
was
my
own
boss.
What
I
see
is
law,
it's,
maybe
it's
more
long.
Tail
risk
is
that
if
you
have
some
conflicts
with
people
now,
it's
everything
is
fine,
but
I
think
I
I
just
if
you
have
conflicts,
people
obvi,
don't
agree
with
people
the
value
they
had
or
you
want
to
kick
them
out
or
not
renew
their
their
proposal
whatever
how
how
this
work?
E
G
We
can
have,
we
can
have
someone
write
up.
I
know
actually
people
that
does
this
work
for
companies
that
come
into
a
company
and
write
these
cultural
things
and
this
stuff
for
companies-
and
this
is
a
like-
a
very,
very
unique
company.
So
we
could
try
to
like
like
talk
with
that
person
and
just
see
how
can
we
form
something
that
is
good
for
the
health
of
the
workers,
good
for
the
economy
of
the
company,
and
that
makes
sense
for
international
companies
like
this.
B
B
Someone
said
something
about
the
silicon
valley
policy
of
like
unlimited
vacation
and
anyone
can
take
it
whenever
they
want,
and
I
think
it
turns
out
that
what
dictates
what
people
do
is
not
the
rules,
but
what
the
cultural
and
in
silicon
valley,
like
the
leadership,
does
so,
if
you
have
leadership
that
just
works
entirely
and
doesn't
take
vacation,
then
no
one
else
takes
vacation
and
that's
separate
from
the
rules
kind
of
existing.
So.
D
Yeah,
I
think
the
dirty
secret
with
the
unlimited
vacation
policy
is
that
these
companies
don't
have
to
pay
out
a
crude
vacation
time
that
is
not
taken.
So
it's
basically
a
way
for
them
to
sound
cool
and
like
flexible
but
in
reality
spend
less
on
their
employees
and
taking
vacation.
Because
in
reality,
if
you
work
at
an
intense
startup,
you
can't
just
take
a
month
off,
it
would
be
lost.
And
what.
G
B
I
I
think
this
is
such
a
broad
cultural
trend
right
now
in
the
world
where,
like
the
internet,
is
like
discussing
different
rules
and
regulations,
and
everyone
doesn't
realize
that,
like
the
internet
like
defaulted
to
like
american,
like
cultural
and
rules,
I
think,
like
free
speech,
is
obviously
like
a
huge
like
part
of
this,
and
everyone
else
is
like
well
yeah.
We
just
like.
Don't
do
it
that
way,
so
we
have
no
so
yeah.
I
don't
hear
like
obviously
like
the
default
kind
of
has
been
to
a
like
off.
B
E
You
know
europe,
it's
very
different,
switzerland.
It's
different,
you
can
get
fired
quite
easily
in
effect,
legally
it's
easy
to
fire
people,
but
yeah
you
have
illegal.
They
have
like
a
reputational
risk
there
more,
but
that
normally
you
only
have
contracts.
You
can
get
fired
in
one
month
or
three
months.
So
it's
not
that
you
are
viable
in
germany,
it's
very
different
chamber.
If
you
have
a
certain
status,
you
you
are.
You
can't
get
fired,
it's
a
strange
concept
for
me,
but
going
back
to
the
whole
discussion
yeah.
B
Yeah,
it's
a
never-ending
discussion.
I
think,
as
we
try
to
figure
out
how
to
get
there.
G
We
we
will
have
people
coming
to
us
because
we
have
money
in
the
treasury
and
they
can
like
earn
better
than
they
do
in
their
own
countries
or
on
the
or
like
other
work.
They
can
work
like
two
jobs
at
the
same
time,
without
getting
notes
whatever
it
could
be.
It
will
have
a
lot
of
this
stuff.
I
think
us
not
having
hr
or
having
boss
or
whatever
it
could
be.
G
We
need
to
be
super
clear,
like
you
are
free
to
do
whatever
you
want,
but
you
have
tasks
to
complete
like
if
you're
a
super
genius
and
can
do
this
stuff
in
three
hours,
we'll
not
punish
you
for
not
working
eight
hours
like
we
want
quality
work,
we
want
stuff
to
be
done.
We
want
a
person
that
can
be
part
of
the
community
and
like
develop
this.
We
don't
like
this
is
my
vision
of
this.
I
can't
tell
you
how
you
think,
but
I
I
don't
care
if
someone
works
three
hours
concentrating.
B
That's
a
tougher
yeah,
but
anyway,
we'll.
E
Maybe
have
shortly
friend
because
I
invited
oh
sure,
yeah
yeah.
G
E
E
But
we
we
don't
have
this
problem
right
now.
Maybe
if
you
have
a
different
different
structure
where
we
hire
people
on
on
goals-
and
we
say
you
have
two
weeks
or
a
month
to
complete-
then
we
start
streaming
the
money
and
then
I
don't
know
somebody
looks
what
if
they
generate
value
and
then
after
these
two
months
the
value
stream
is
at
ending
then
b
we
got
the
work.
A
Yeah
thanks
for
inviting
me
martin,
so
I'm
of
I
I've.
Never
let's
say
I
don't
know
much
about
dx
now,
like
I
know
about
you,
but
I've
never
been
in
any
of
these
calls.
So
it
was
great
just
to
hear
you
hear
the
conversation
so
far,
so
I
could
get
some
background
and
how
you
guys
are
operating.
It's
fascinating
to
hear
that
you're
hitting
the
scaling
problems
of
startups,
so
it's
starting
to
think
about
holidays
and
how
to
pay
employees.
A
So
that's
quite
fascinating,
so
yeah
to
give
you
a
brief
overview
of
what
superfluid
is
so
we're
not
on
the
mainnet,
yet
we're
still
on
gertie
testnet,
but
essentially
what
we've
built
is
a
token
standard
that
enables
users
to
wrap
existing
tokens
and
give
new
functionalities
and
the
main
functionality.
A
That's
maybe
relevant
here
is
streaming
money,
so
this
is
built
in
directly
to
the
token,
and
what
this
allows
is
a
very,
very
cheap
way
to
do
it,
because
you
essentially
only
need
to
interact
with
the
blockchain
when
you
open
streams
and
when
you
update
or
close
the
streams.
So,
in
the
examples
that
martin
put
forward,
you
would
basically
have
one
transaction
when
you
open
a
stream
and
then,
if
the
you
know,
employee
stops
working
or
for
whatever
reason
you
want
to
stop
paying
them.
Then
there's
another
transaction
to
close
it.
A
There's
no
transactions
in
the
middle
and
the
the
funds
are
completely
liquid
on
both
sides,
so
the
receiver
would
basically
be
able
to
do
whatever
they
want
with
the
money
at
any
point
in
time,
including
opening
a
stream
to
someone
else.
So
you
know
you
can
imagine
in
the
future
these
streams
being
very
interconnected
and
a
lot
of
applications
being
built
where
you
can
basically
stream
on
your
salary
to
say
a
savings
account
or
you
know,
maybe
an
open
prediction
market
right.
So
this
is
kind
of
how
it
works.
A
You
can
have
any
number
of
streams,
so
as
a
company,
you
would
basically
need
to
manage
one
account.
So
imagine
you
have
the
ex
style,
salary,
vault
or
salary
treasury
contract,
and
that
would
basically
feed
all
of
the
open
streams.
So
if
you
have
100
employees
in
a
couple
of
years,
you
still
only
have
to
make
sure
that
that
single
account
is
always
topped
up,
so
you
don't
have
to
actually
lock
any
money
in.
A
It's
not
like
a
savvier
was
implemented
where
you
define
a
duration,
and
then
you
have
to
lock
up
the
full
amount
for
the
full
duration
with
superfluid.
You
literally
only
define
the
flow
rate
and
the
rest
is
up
to
you,
so
you
define
the
flow
rate
the
stream
starts,
and
it
will
continue
going
until
you
run
out
of
money
or
you
close,
the
stream.
A
So
again,
it
will
be
fairly
simple
for
you
guys
to
have
one
account
which
manages
all
your
streams
make
sure
that
account
is
always
topped
up
and
all
the
streams
will
keep
going
like
martin
says.
For
me,
one
of
the
super
interesting
things
is
that,
if
you
think
of
the
legal
structures
we
build
around
service
contracts,
they
are
generally
about
handling
what
happens
if
one
of
the
counterparties
doesn't
deliver,
so
you
can
think
of.
For
example,
when
you
rent
an
apartment
who
pays
upfront?
Do
I
pay
at
the
beginning?
A
At
the
end
of
the
month,
you
have
to
leave
a
deposit,
so
all
of
that
stuff
is
because
the
payment
and
the
service
are
decoupled
and
usually
one
of
the
parties
pays
before
and
the
other
party
gets
the
service.
So
basically
it's
decoupled
right.
Somebody
gives
first
and
the
other
gives
later
with
streaming.
You
have
a
perfect
match
of
time
and
money.
So
it's
really
good
for
services,
because
if
either
party
stops
working,
basically
you
can
just
stop
it.
A
So
you
don't
need
arbitration
or
so,
I
was
to
say
how's
it
better
than
a
smart
contract.
Well
with
a
smart
contract.
You
lock
the
money
in
at
the
beginning
of
the
month
and
then
at
the
end
of
the
month.
If
they
didn't
work
or
you
want
to
interrupt
it,
you
want
to
pay
less.
Then
you
have.
You
need
a
process
there
right
and
at
the
same
time
you
have
to
lock
up
the
liquidity
and
then
you
need
arbitration
with
with
a
payment
stream.
A
You
could
technically
interrupt
it
at
any
time
and
the
payment
and
the
service
are
linked,
so
you
could
immediately
know
if
they're
not
going
to
pay
you.
So
it's
better
for
the
receiver
in
a
sense
because
they
don't
work
over
if
the
employee
is
not
going
to
pay
them
and
it's
better
for
the
sender,
because
they
don't
actually
need
to
lock
up
the
full
quantity
at
the
beginning
of
the
month
to
to
in
a
smart
contract.
For
example.
A
I
don't
know
if
that
makes
sense.
Maybe
you
can
just
unmute
yourself
and
explain
what
you
mean.
F
A
F
You
can
call
anything
a
small
smart
contract
and
there
are
apprentice
solutions
or
payment
streams
on
smart
contracts,
and
also
I
don't
see
how
the-
how
is
this
related
to
the
governance
call.
I
think
it
is
not.
F
We
have
a.
We
have
a.
We
have
a
developer
called.
No,
no
sorry,
but
yeah
I
mean
I.
We
have
a
lot
of
calls
and
we
have
one
that
is
a
focus
for
developers
and
technical
stuff
that
that
happen
every
tuesday.
It
will
be
awesome
if
you
can
join
next
call.
We
can
talk
about
this
because
it's
super
technical
on
the
next
call
and
see
where
we
can
use
it
sure
on
our
on
our
solution.
E
B
No,
I
think
we
need
to
do
a
lot
of
thinking
about
how
we
structure
and
pay
people
and
there's
a
lot
of
processes,
cultural
norms
and
then
also
technical
solutions
at
the
end.
So
there's
a
overlap
of
a
lot
of
these,
but
it's
interesting.
So
hopefully
we
can
we'll
chat
more
about
that.
We
are
coming
up
on
the
hour
and
I
just
wanted
to.
B
There
were
like
two
other
things
I
did
wanted
to
up
update
in
here,
so
one
I
guess
elon
is
not
here
for
an
xdi
dxo
update,
but
I
think
there's
another
deployment
there
and
some
some
things
going
on
there.
B
You
can
check
out
the
key
base
channel
there
and
then
yesterday
we
had
another
governance,
2.0
working
group
meeting
with
a
bunch
of
the
participants
that
there
was
another
kind
of
good
call
where
we
kind
of
narrowed
down
what
are
the
foundation
or
necessary
items
that
we're
looking
for
in
a
solution.
B
So
what
do
we
kind
of
need
to
maintain
or
preserve
as
part
of
the
existing
system
and
then
what
what
changes
or
additions
are
made?
What
are
what
are
the
necessary
conditions
for
that?
There's?
I
just
uploaded
meeting
notes
to
the
notion
board.
I
need
to
link
to
those
in
the
forum
and
then
we'll
be
meeting
in
two
weeks
on
that,
and
I
don't
know
if
anyone
wanted
to
comment
or
add
anything
to
the
working
group
discussion.
There.
F
B
Yeah
I
mean
so.
The
original
schedule
had
two
additional
calls
two
weeks
from
now
and
then
that,
and
so
I
think
we're
kind
of
rounding
a
corner
here
in
terms
of
coming
to
some
consensus
and
agreement
on
things.
I
think
that
we
have
like
soft
consensus
on
things
in
that
document
and
I
think
that
we
need
to
think
about
how
to
the
wording
on
it
a
little
bit
more
particular.
B
So
I
think
that
before
the
next
call,
we
need
to
have
close
finalization
of
that
document,
and
then
we
kind
of
switch
to
implementing
and
executing
that.
But
I
think
that
discussion,
like
call,
was
good,
but
there's.
I
think,
gonna
need
to
be
a
lot
more
back
and
forth
to
finalize
things.
F
Maybe
came
up
with
different
steps
or
things
that
we
want
to
execute
in
different
order
or
goals
like
once.
We
start
with
the
requirements
like
prioritize
these
requirements,
or
I
know
goals
or
things
that
we
want
to
fix
and
and
change,
and
we
try
to
fix
one
at
a
time.
Maybe
we
are
trying
to
solve
everything
at
once.
I
don't
know
if
that
would
be
the
right
approach.
B
Yeah,
I
think,
that's
a
yeah,
I
mean
kind
of
not
looking
for
the
grand
bargain
that
solves
everything.
I
think
that's
a
good
thing
and
I
think,
when
you
think
about
some
of
the
other
issues
that
are
like
related
right
and
I
think
the
say
that
the
dxt
staking
for
gen-
that's
something
that's
related
to
like
the
broader
discussion,
but
is
not
necessarily
required
for
it,
and
so
it
does
kind
of
maybe
cloud
different
things.
And
so
how
can
we
do
this
piecemeal?
B
Cool
anything
else
on
the
mine.
I
did
one
I
put
the
dxd
burn
comment
at
the
end.
We
don't
have
much
time
to
talk
about
it,
but
it's
a
good
thread
about
I've
started
from
gusto
about
kind
of
whether
or
not
to
burn
dxd.
B
F
But
yeah,
I
should
allow
you
more,
but
they
are
well
placed
anyway.
I
was.
I
was
expecting
like
to
see
more
explanations
on
why
they
voted
on
on
on
on
those
on
those
options.
Yeah
only
a
few
people
explain
it.
I
would
be
interested
to
hear
why
why
the
people
who
vote
for
0.1
percent
of
primitive
token
things
things
to
mean
that
very
few
amount
of
tokens-
oh
in
my
opinion,
right
but
yeah.
I
think
it
would
be
great
if
we
can
get
more
discussion
there
and
it
would.
F
It
would
be
great
if
we
can
start
burning
tokens
at
this
small
amount
short
chance
to
start
it's
a
very
powerful
tool
that
we
have
so
yeah,
I'm
going
to
create
a
proportion
on
friday,
depending
on
on
how
what
was
inside
on
there
on
on
the
voting.
I
don't
know
if
I'm
going
to
choose
the
right,
I
mean
the
the
the
one
who
what
the
most
of
the
votes
or
may
choose
something
in
between.
I
will
try
to
choose
something
in
between
so
try
to
reach
some
concessions
there.
C
C
I
think
a
lot
of
people
like
the
idea.
I
think
the
open
question
is
like
what
is
the
goal,
and
what
do
we
expect
to
happen
when
we
do
this
and
I
think
people,
even
though
it
was
kind
of
outland
a
little
bit.
I
think
people
are
wondering
like
why
do
we
want
to
do
this
and
like
if
everyone's,
like,
okay,
that
totally
makes
sense?
Let's
that's
the
reason
we're
doing
this,
and
this
is
the
right
time
to
do
it.
C
Let's
do
it
and
then
okay,
how
many
tokens
do
we
do
with,
but
I
think
people
are
not
even
comfortable
with
like
is
now
the
right
time
to
do
it
just
like
is
now
the
right
time
to
stop
the
bonding
curve.
We
don't
know-
maybe
maybe
not,
but
we
don't.
I
think,
that's
what
people
are
it's
hard
to
vote
on
a
number
when
people
are
trying
to
still
understand
like
what
is
the
actual
reason.
C
D
I
think
I
think
a
related
question
that
isn't
super
clear
is
like
what
is
the
pre
meant
for
right
like
we're
using
it
for
workers.
We
we're
talking
about
liquidity,
but
what
like
you
know,
what
is
the
goal
with
the
pre-med,
because
you
know,
depending
on
how
the
goal
is?
Maybe
we've
burned
it
more
of
it
or
not,
but
once
you
burn
it,
you
can't
like
re-mint
it
right.
So
that's
kind
of
irreversible
unless
we
change
the
whole
bonding
curve.
D
C
I
I
think
that
one
goal
is
to
signal
to
dxd
holders
that,
like
dx,
dow
has
dxd
holders
and
dxd
price
in
mind,
and
we,
through
making
revenue
and
managing
the
bonding
curve
and
managing
the
token
supply,
have
an
objective
to
like
get
dxd
price,
higher
kind
of
which
is
hopefully
mainly
through
revenue
right.
But
as
we
make
revenue,
we
can
burn.
Dxd
and
revenue
is
way
more
important.
F
Yeah
also,
if
you
send
revenue
right
now,
if
you
send
well
yeah,
if
you
send
revenue
straight
to
the
cure,
there
are
two
things
that
you
can
do.
One
is
to
pay
and
one
is
to
send
ether
to
the
queue
right.
What
we
are
going
to
be
doing
from
swapper
the
sell
price
is
very
low,
so
we
are
going
to
be
just
sending
pure
ether.
F
But
then,
when
you
pay
to
the
cure,
we
can
issue
more
tokens,
which
means
that
the
organization
will
receive
a
certain
percentage
of
the
money
that
you're
selling
to
the
cure,
and
this
is
going
to
increase
the
ether
result
and
there
are
ingress
issue
mod
dxe,
so
we
are
going
to
still
be
receiving
dse.
F
If
we
do,
if
we
do
it
the
right
way,
if
you
use
our
money
to
generate
revenue
and
pay
to
the
cure,
that
is
why
it
was
designed
to
it
wasn't
designed
to
use
the
primitive
tokens
just
to
go,
giving
dlc
every
one
of
you.
I
I
should
say
this
is
very.
Like
I
said,
powerful
is
money
that
was
printed,
so
we
should
be
very
careful
about
how
to
use
it,
and
essentially,
I
think
we
have
more
than
enough-
and
we
can
start
burning
also
just
to
signal
like
well.
F
We
care
about
the
the
economy
and
there
is
going
to
be
a
time
where
we
are
going
to
be
burning
and
we
are
going
to
be
receiving
revenue
and
we
are
going
to
be
paying
to
the
cure
and
we
are
going
to
be
receiving
tokens,
so
that
is
when
the
ideally.
Ideally,
we
won't
have
any
more
premium
tokens
when
we
start
receiving
payments
to
the
queue
that
are
going
to
give
us
more
dxe
are
going
to
inject
more
dxe
into
the
market
through
us
through
dsl.
F
C
D
F
B
I
think
it's
interesting,
we'll
probably
have
the
recording
in
right
now
but
yeah.
Thanks
for
joining
see
you
in
the
forums
in
cubase,
see
ya.