►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Meeting [2020-11-25]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
the
november
25th
dxdow
governance
discussion,
starting
with
governance
1.0,
the
current
roundup
of
things
going
on
actually
just
want
to
give
a
kind
of
overview
of
what
we
want
to
talk
about.
It's
a
couple
different
things,
so
the
governance,
1.0
stuff
proposal,
roundup,
there's
kind
of
a
couple
different
things
in
there.
I
just
want
to
go
over
and
flag
and
see
if
anyone
has
any
updates
and
then
I
would
like
to
talk
about
a
little
bit
of
the
treasury.
B
In
a
lot
of
different
areas-
and
I
think
we
could-
we
could
devote
a
bit
of
a
time
to
that
and
then
just
if
we,
the
one
point
except
I
don't
know
if
there
was
anything
on
next
side,
yixed
out
and
then
governance,
2.0
the
working
group
midway
check-in
and
then
maybe
chatting
a
little
about
the
bonding
curve
group
and
then
ezra
if
they're.
B
Maybe
if
we
wanted
to
talk
at
the
end
about
kind
of
some
of
the
questions
you
had
on
some
of
that,
it
might
be
a
good
time
there,
but
yeah
so
starting
first
with
kind
of
the
proposal.
B
Roundup,
the
first
one,
that's
kind
of
there
that
I
want
to
talk
about
was
the
dxd
burn
proposal.
So
I
believe
this
proposal
has
the
it
would
burn
500dxd
from
the
pre-mint
augusto
had
written
up
a
forum
post
on
it,
and
there
was
some
back
and
forth
on
that.
And
then
he
submitted
a
proposal.
B
I
think
a
couple
days
ago,
and
I
think
it
is
now
pending
boosting
yeah
and
so
there's
kind
of
a
bit
of
interesting
discussion
on
the
forum
thread.
There
just
wanted
to
see
if
anyone
had
any
thoughts
on
that
that
they'd
like
to
bring
up
now.
D
Well,
I
thought
you
could.
We
can
share
the
discussion
here.
What
it
is
not
going
to
be
here
in
the
video,
but
there
is
a
doubt,
talk
post
about
it.
So
the
main
thing
that
happened-
I
I
created
a
short
topic
asking
how
much
dxe
should
be
burned
just
to
kick
start
the
discussion
of
of
it.
D
What
if
we
were
going
to
burn
dxe
and
share
my
view
on
it,
and
I
created
the
poll
without
it,
I
forgot
to
add
a
zero
percent
option
so
that
that
is
something
that
was
important
and
some
users
reflected
that
they
wanted
to.
They
would
support
a
zero
percent
option.
Nevertheless,
I
think
they
were
not
as
much
as
the
one
that
the
that
they
wanted
for
0.1,
but
they
voted
for
the
for
the
lowest
possible
option.
D
We
also
so
a
lot
of
votes
go
to,
for
example,
the
10
option
where
there
is.
There
is
a
sentiment
where
we
see
that
users
they
want
to
burn
the
token
because
where,
for
the
reasons
explains
in
the
in
the
topic,
so
we
have
mixed
reply
there
and
above
some
feedback,
and
I
submitted
a
proposal
to
burn
0.5
percent.
The
winner
was
0.1
just
by
one
vote
over
10
percent.
D
So
in
order
to
give
some
to
take
in
count
the
rest
of
the
vote
that
they
wanted
to
buy
more
than
0.1
percent,
I
thought
that
it
was
that
it
was
going
to
be
good
to
raise
right
now,
write
the
number
to
0.5.
D
So
now
it's
going
to
be
boosted
and
let's
see,
if
it's
going
to
pass,
I
I
guess
we
are
going
to
have
mixed
boats
on
it,
which
is
going
to
be
good,
because
it
will
be
good
to
have
a
split
decision
once
in
a
while
for
good
governance.
Yeah.
B
I
I
just
had
a
couple,
so
I
I
had
posted
on
that
thread
there,
and
so
I
I
do
plan
to
vote
against
this
proposal.
Even
though
kind
of
as
a
gooser
said,
I
really
enjoyed
kind
of
like
how
this
is.
You
know
making
us
think
about
these
things
and
it's
like
making
it.
So
I
love
when
things
like
make
us
understand
the
systems
that
we're
using
more
right
like
so,
I
feel,
like
I
understand,
dx
trust
a
little
bit
more
and
then
obviously
like
having
a
contentious
proposal
like
kind
of
helps.
B
Everyone
understand
dow
stack
and
you
can
check
out
my
post
on
on
the
forum
for
kind
of
questions
about
why
my
reasoning
for
that-
and
I
just
the
other
point-
I
just
wanna-
make-
is
kind
of
a
meta
governance
discussion
point
here
and
you
know,
as
augusto
is
trying
to
say.
Okay,
we
want
to
think
about
burning
dxd,
but
then
the
question
is
like:
how
much
do
we
do
burn
and,
of
course,
alchemy.
Dow
stack
is
built
on
up
or
down
proposals.
B
So
whatever
you
submit
as
a
proposal
right,
that's
you
can
only
submit
one
number,
and
so
this
kind
of
process
reminded
me
a
lot
of
what
maker
does
on
a
weekly
bi-weekly
basis
in
terms
of
setting
the
stability
fee,
and
so
they
have
to
basically
basically
have
a
on-chain
poll
the
week
before,
or
I
think
it's
like
four
days
before-
to
give
a
range
of
options
for
the
stability
fee.
That's
voted
on
and
then
the
the
winner
of
that
one
is
then
put
to
an
executive
vote.
B
That's
an
up
and
up
and
down
one,
and
so
I
just
think
like
thinking
about
how
we
can
maybe
have
some
some
tools
on
that
to
kind
of
better
get
to
a
get
to
a
specific
number.
When
we
want
to
have
a
number
that's
going
to
be
put
to
an
up
or
down
vote.
D
F
All
right
competition
scheme
like
we're
about
to
do
the
first
competition
scheme
on
an
x
now
on
x,
die
chain
for
to
source
some
popular
omen
markets
from
the
community,
and
it
will
be
open
because
anyone
can
enter
a
a
market
and
then
rep
holders
on
x
die
can
vote
and
it
will
be,
like
you
know,
about
a
week
like
a
bunch
of
days
to
half
a
week
to
submit
markets
and
then
there's
another
voting
period
where
rep
holders
vote
to
to
to
choose
the
best
ones,
and
then
the
winners
automatically
will
get.
F
The
proposal
is
that
the
winners
will
automatically
get
like
0.05
percent
rep
on
x
that
xdxdow.
Now
this
whole
competition
scheme
goes
into
a
proposal
and
to
even
start
the
competition
scheme.
Rep
holders
have
to
vote
on
whether
or
not
they
like
to
pass
this
competition
scheme
and
then
that's
what
kicks
the
competition
scheme
off.
So
you
can.
F
If,
if
we
do
that
successfully,
we
can
also
do
something
like
that
for
more
decision
like
easy,
multiple
decisions
from
from
rep
holders,
but
in
this
case
we're
doing
it
on
x,
dx
dial,
not
on
main
net.
You
you
can
theoretically
do
it
on
main
net
too.
It
would
just
be
a
lot
more
expensive.
I
think,
but
if
we're
doing
a
major
decision,
we
probably
want
the
competition
scheme
on
on
on
mainnet
too.
G
Yeah,
so
I
actually
it
would
be.
I
mean
I
don't
think
it's
even
possible
to
upload
the
competition
onto
the
main
it
down
just
because
of
the
arc
version.
So
like
I
mean
it
could
probably
happen,
but
it
might
be
risky
so
yeah,
that's
that
so
I
mean
yeah.
I
guess
signaling
proposals
like
that
should
happen
on
x,
die.
B
Well,
yeah,
I
mean
I
I
think,
luckily
we're
not
you
know,
makers,
setting
interest
rates
every
week,
like
it's
really
important
that
they
figure
out
like
how
to
narrow
it
narrow
it
down
like.
We
don't
have
that
many
governance
decisions
that
are
like
this
right
now,
but
I
think,
like
this
is
just
going
through
this
process.
I
think
it's
kind
of
pointed
that
out,
and
maybe
we
just
need
to
think
about
how
we
would
you
know
narrow
decisions
before
the
up
or
down
vote
in
a
way.
E
Yeah,
so
one
thing
that
just
worth
bringing
up
here
is
the
possibility
of
of
you
know
just
having
a
feature.
That's
that's
polling
based
on
your
reputation,
which
could
be
on
chain,
but
it
could
also
just
be
off
chain
but
based
off,
based
on
your
you
know,
still
based
on
your
your
reputation
like
adding
a
feature
like
that
to
alchemy
is
is
a
thing
we
could
consider.
If,
if
that's
something
the
doubt
wants
to
do
it's
something
that
I've
considered,
you
know
if
that
should
be
on
the
roadmap.
B
It
cool
awesome
and
then
just
kind
of
moving
on
to,
I
think,
just
another
proposal
that
I
think
I
should
just
pass
the
omen
squad
and
so
that
awards,
I
think,
33
eth,
which
I
don't
know
how
much
it
was
in
the
original
proposal,
but
maybe
a
bit
more
now
that
will
kind
of
be
used
to
help
provide
liquidity
on
omen
markets.
I
think
it's
a
really
important
kind
of
step
forward
and
so
sky.
B
I
guess
you
kind
of
been
leading
some
of
its
efforts
so,
like
what
so
now
the
proposal
is
passed,
I
guess
from
like
a
governance
perspective.
B
F
Yeah,
the
the
main,
the
main
idea
of
the
entire
thing
is
to
let
the
community
of
omen
and
dx
dow
community
and
draw
people
in
to
help
curate
and
create
markets
that
everyone
agrees
would
be
good
markets
to
have
on
omen
and
at
first
rep
holders
will
be
the
one
like
anyone
can
propose
things
and
then
rep
holders
will
be
the
ones
who
decide
like.
Oh,
these
are
three
awesome
markets.
F
Let's,
let's
fund
those
and
the
idea
is
to
use
community
knowledge
to
to
understand
what
great
markets
would
be
and
then
omen
squad,
like
literally
just
takes
the
decision
of
the
community
and
executes
them
and
puts
them
on,
puts
them
on
omen
and
yeah.
So
the
the
idea
is
that
we
have
to
start
sourcing
in
and
leveraging
the
greater
omen
community
in
order
to
make
omen,
successful
and
so
using
some
capital
to
help
accomplish
that.
F
F
Cool
yeah
I
mean
like
that,
will
all
happen
mainly
in
the
key
base,
omen
the
omen
channel
on
key
base
and
then
we'll
also
involve
obviously
like
omen
telegram
and
like
if
you
wanna.
If
anyone
wants
to
or
that's
listening
here,
wants
to
get
involved
in
that
just
follow
the
omen
channels
on
related
to
dx
dial.
B
Cool
and
I
think
there's
you
know
as
we
develop
different
processes
or
ways
of
engaging
with
the
community.
Obviously
there's
kind
of
like
a
lot
of
overlap,
so
maybe
there's
some
things.
We
can
learn
about
using
the
competition
scheme
or
just
kind
of
getting
feedback
from
the
community
elsewhere.
So
that's
good.
B
And
just
moving
along
there
were
kind
of
three
proposals
that
are
other
on
ongoing
right
now,
so
there's
a
dx
down
market
curation
batch
number.
Six
on
omen.
I
think
that's
for
some
of
the
gnosis
dao
related
markets,
there's
also
a
proposal
to
add
api
three
token
to
mesa
api.
Three
has
been
kind
of
in
and
out.
B
There's
been
several
members
of
api
three
dow
community,
that's
kind
of
been
overlapped
a
little
bit
with
the
dxtel
community,
there's
a
key
base
channel
with
api
three,
and
I
think
they're
planning
their
idea
next
monday
and
then
there's
an
additional
proposal
to
add
uni
and
pnk
as
omen
collateral.
So
the
kind
of
different
options
for
for
omen,
collateral.
B
There
cool
and
then
switching
to
treasury
tbtc
updates.
So
yesterday
there
was
a
call
with
stephanie.
I
believe
I
can't
remember
exactly
your
name,
someone.
C
B
Carolyn
carolyn
from
thesis
kind
of
walking
several
member
community
members
through
tbtc
and
kind
of
what
it
how
it
functions
and
just
for
background.
B
This
is
part
of
an
ongoing
discussion
about
how
to
maybe
diversify
the
treasury
a
bit,
and
so
luckily
ethereum's
been
performing
well,
but
there's
definitely
some
need
to
diversify.
That
we've
talked
about
into
stable
coins,
perhaps
for
runway,
but
then
there's
also
maybe
some
opportunity
to
diversify
into
other
assets,
one
of
which
being
bitcoin
and
so
tbtc
is
kind
of
positions
itself,
as
decentralization
maximalist.
Also
that's
kind
of
what
their
their
approach
to
synthetic
bitcoin
is
and
trying
to
create
what
they
call
a
trust,
minimized,
bitcoin
synthetic.
B
So
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
good
project.
It
is
clearly
behind
run
btc
and
wbtc
in
terms
of
market
penetration.
I
think
there's
about
25
million
tbtc.
B
Now
that's
been
minted
about
85
percent
of
that
is
sitting
in
a
curve
pool
now
to
kind
of
help
with
the
peg,
so
it
can
be
easily
traded
for
red,
btc
or
wbtc.
B
So
I
think
the
conversation
was
good.
That
kind
of
takeaways
from
from
my
side
and
anyone
else
can
kind
of
join
in
or
are
one
tbtc
current
liquidity.
Current
penetration
is
still
in
development
and
it
doesn't
really
rival
those
other
ones
and
then
two
it
seems
to
fit
the
ethos
of
dx
dow
amongst
the
bitcoin
synthetics
right.
So
obviously
wptc
is
custody
bitcoin,
so
that
would
be
kind
of
a
central
point
of
failure
and
then
the
red
btc.
B
Now
I'm
not
exactly
familiar
with
the
technical
details,
but
I
think
it's
like
basically
still
run
by
like
a
multi-sig
or
at
least
a
bridge
there.
So
I
think
there's
some
alignment
there
and
then
third,
perhaps
most
interestingly,
I
think
the
conversation
after
the
call
saw
that
maybe
this
is
an
opportunity
for
swapper
to
have
a
tbtc,
eth
pool.
B
So
obviously,
if
geeksdale
wants
to
diversify
into
tbtc,
that
tbtc
could
just
sit
in
the
treasury
where
it
would
benefit
hopefully
from
price
depreciation,
but
it
also
could
be
put
to
work
in
a
swapper
pool
and
given
that
tptc
does
not
yet
have
the
same
kind
of
market,
penetration
of
wptc
or
nvt
run
btc.
There's
a
hope
that
this
would
be
a
way
for
kind
of
swapper
to
own,
like
a
big
big
pool,
so
that's
kind
of
where
right
now,
we'll
kind
of
go
back
forth
with
them
a
bit
more.
H
Add
think
there
was
some
talk
there
too
about
potentially
having
like
ezra's
mentioning
some
deal
there,
but
I
think
they
do
have
some
keep
tokens
set
aside
for
liquidity
incentives.
So
I
think
there
is
some
potential
that
we
could
figure
something
out
with
them
regards
to
swapper.
No,
I
mean
no
guarantees,
obviously,
but
I
think
there
was
that
was
a
possibility.
B
B
B
I
H
I
I
don't
know,
and
I
might
think
it
isn't
it's
it's
completely
synthetic
like
yeah
like
the
project,
sync
syntax,.
B
It's
not
very
capital
efficient
right
and
that's
like
kind
of
their
biggest
struggle
now,
but
I
think
I
mean
to
me,
it
seems
like
deep
style
would
be
a
great
opportunity
for
them.
Someone
that.
F
Yeah,
it's
kind
of
a
terminology
thing,
but
I
I
usually
in
I'm
pretty
sure
when
people
talk
about
synthetic
derivatives
like
synthetic
is
like
they're.
The
actual
underlying
is
not
there
and
so,
like,
I
would
say,
even
wdb
btc
tbtc,
like
when
they're
backed
by
actual
real
btc
somewhere,
it's
just
a
matter
of
who
controls
it.
I
would
call
that
a
derivative,
it's
a
bitcoin
derivative,
but
it's
not
sin.
I
wouldn't
say
it's
synthetic,
because
synthetic
usually
means
it's
like
created
out
of
thin
air
like
the
exposure,
but.
H
Sorry,
chris
dear
elder,
I
think
the
other
cool
thing
about
this
is
that
if
the
goal
is
to
diversify
and
hold
both
assets,
then
permanent
loss
is
not
really
an
issue
or
less
of
an
issue.
I
guess
you
want
some
balance,
but
if
you
yeah,
if
you
want
50
50
and
that
the
pool
is
actually
doing
that
for
you
and
maybe
even
helping
you
keep
your
diversification,
the
way
you
want.
B
Yeah,
I
I
actually
remember
listening
to
a
podcast,
specifically
someone
talking
about
derivatives
and
synthetics
and
like
how
those
words
like
don't
mean
anything,
so
I
don't
yeah.
I
don't
think
we'll
find
the
conclusion
to
that,
but
I
just
think
that
is
kind
of
an
update.
We
don't
have
there's
not
like
a
clear
plan
right
now,
but
I
think
just
from
the
community
side
we
kind
of
see
maybe
some
potential
there
that
we
need
to
develop,
particularly
as
they
kind
of
I
think
they
need
to
build
out
a
so.
B
Their
system
relies
in
the
same
way
that,
like
maker
dow,
relies
on
like
a
healthy
eat
to
die
market
right.
So
if
each
crashes
and
you
need
to
liquidate
like
you're
selling
heat
for
dye
and
there's
a
whole
keeper
system
to
do
that,
for
this,
it's
east
to
tbtc,
so
they
would
need
to
like
have
you
know
a
pretty
healthy
liquid
market
of
that
and
they
don't
like
have
any
of
that
right
now
and
the
recent
moves
that
they're
doing
so
they
have
things
in
curve
right
now.
B
Those
are,
I
think,
mostly
about
peg
management,
making
sure
that
this
tptc
trades
at
the
the
right
price
of
of
bitcoin
and
they
haven't
done
as
much
on
the
eth
tbtc
market,
which
I
think
is
going
to
be
pretty
crowded
because
sushi
swap
and
uniswap
have
a
super
super
big
ewptc
pool.
So
maybe
that's
an
area
where
we
can
kind
of
kind
of
work
together.
H
B
E
H
E
H
A
E
C
B
B
Okay
and
then
I
think
that
was
it
on
yeah,
so
the
last
count
on
the
governance
1.0
front
is
just
wanted
to
kind
of
pick
up
a
little
bit
of
a
conversation.
That's
been
going
on
over
the
last
couple
weeks
and
it's
kind
of
I
think,
heightened
over
the
last
this
week,
just
broadly
about
worker
proposals,
worker
onboarding
and
how
we
can
kind
of
get
get
better.
At
that.
B
Okay,
so
I
think
in
general,
we're
like
we're
looking
for
more
clarity
on
the
worker
pro
proposal
process,
so
d
style
contributors
should
focus
their
time
on
building
geek
style
products
and
community
engagement,
not
jumping
through
bureaucratic
hoops
or
inducing
unnecessary
stress
from
uncertainty
or
lack
of
clarity.
Feedback
and
performance
review
are
also
kind
of
important
for
this.
So
I
think,
there's
kind
of
almost
like
two
different
things
we're
talking
about
here
right,
so
one
is
the
proposal
process
for
ongoing
workers.
B
So
this
is
a
lot
of
people
myself
has
kind
of
included
like
do.
We
have
standards
on
when
to
submit
how
long
the
proposal
process,
like
et
cetera,
et
cetera,
accountability
like
how
do
we
establish
kind
of
standards
on
this
in
terms
of
seeking
feedback
on
the
scope
of
work
reflecting
on
your
previous
work
and
then
maybe
against
creating
kpis
and
how
we
actually
kind
of
do
that,
and
then
second
is
kind
of
new
worker
onboarding,
and
I
think
one
of
the
things
we're
maybe
overlooking
this
is
like.
B
How
do
we
make
decisions
about
whether
someone
is
a
fit,
whether
their
skills
match
up
whether
they're
kind
of
whether
we're
willing
to
kind
of
engage
with
them
even
on
a
like
trial
basis
like
who
makes
that
decision?
Obviously,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
rep
holders
make
that
decision
in
terms
of
like
approving
or
disapproving
a
worker
proposal,
but
there's
a
lot
that
needs
to
kind
of
get
done
until
we
get
then.
B
So
I
think
it's
kind
of
incumbent
upon
people
in
the
community
to
maybe
see
how
we
can,
I
don't
know,
provide
feedback
to
new
workers,
but
maybe
clear
guidance
on
whether
things
are
a
fit
or
not.
And
then
I
think
it's
also
very
important
is
like
how
do
we
make
it
easier
for
new
workers,
just
in
kind
of
general,
in
onboarding
and
making
things
kind
of
clear,
so
there's
kind
of
two
different?
I
think
instances
that
are
kind
of
in
or
in
the
last
kind
of
week
or
two.
B
So
one
there's
a
couple:
newish
workers
that
are
in
the
process
of
of
trying
to
get
integrated,
so
martin
is
kind
of
one
of
them
and
then
keenan
is
another
and
so
there's
kind
of
a
whole
process
of
like
okay.
Well,
how
do
we
deal
with
them?
They're
kind
of
two
people
that
are
looking
to
get
integrated
and
onboarded.
B
So
is
there
an
opportunity
to
maybe
set
some
new
precedence
there
and
then
second
there's
been
some
discussion
on
a
couple
different
workers
that
are,
I
think,
in
various
processes
of
or
various
stages
of,
the
worker
proposal
process.
So
some
people
have
written
out
a
scope
and
some
people
have
already
completed
a
trial
period.
B
So
this
is
actually
bram
g
and
eugene,
and
so
there's
kind
of
been
some
confusion
over
like
how
we
evaluate
their
trial
periods,
how
we
evaluate
their
initial
work
of
scope,
maybe
they
think
they're
a
worker
level
five,
but
we
think
they're
a
worker
level
three.
So
I
just
kind
of
wanted
to
kick
off
the
conversation
there
and
see
where
people
are
going
and
just
as
a
addendum,
I
don't
think
we
have
to
have
only
hard
and
fast
rules
or
only
kind
of
cultural
precedence.
B
I
think
there
will
be
kind
of
some
combination
of
both
of
those,
but
I
think
it's
probably
important
that
we
do
provide
clear
guidance.
That's
kind
of
the
goal
here,
so
thoughts,
questions,
comments.
K
Yeah,
I
maybe
I
maybe
start
because
I
was
like
probably
one
of
the
guys
who
who
asked
like
for
a
bit
more
like
details
and
like
accountability
in
these
in
these
forum
posts.
While
we
are
kind
of
like
sifting
through
the
forum-
and
this
is
kind
of
like
you
know
mainly
for
us
like
when
we
were
like
new
to
the
exhaust
these
worker
proposals,
they
seemed
very
yeah
rudimentary.
K
I
would
almost
say,
and
then
like
also
like
in
in
exchange
for
like
the
money
that
was
kind
of
like
being
paid
right.
I'm
not
saying
that,
there's
like
too
much
or
too
too
little
being
paid.
I
just
I
don't
want
to
go
into
that
conversation.
It
just
feels
like
you
know.
The
community
is
making
decisions
based
off
like
very
few
variables.
K
I
can
definitely
see
how
that
is
not
going
to
improve
by
kind
of
like
in
introducing
like
more
bureaucracy,
and
so,
but
what
I
would
maybe
suggest
is
to
to
have
teams
so
like
to
have
like
teams
which,
like
with
certain
responsibilities
and
to
kind
of
like
define
like
a
team,
lead,
and
then
this
team
lead
is
going
to
be
judged
by
the
community
and
the
team
lead
himself.
You
know
they
can
like
then
see.
Okay,
like
I'm
gonna.
K
I
need
like
three
more
people
for
this
right,
but
if
they
don't
perform,
you
know,
then
the
team
lead
is
responsible
for
this,
and
that
way
it's
maybe
easier.
You
know
to
kind
of
like
for
the
for
the
community
to
really
keep
keep
these
workers
in
check
and
also
like
a
team
can
have
like
a
more
defined
scope
over
like
a
longer
period
of
time.
K
Right
I
mean
you
could
basically
say:
okay
like
I
want
to
like
create
v2
for
for
swapper
or
kind
of
like
provide
straddle
options
to
remove
impermanent
loss
and
they
kind
of
like
say,
okay.
I
need
50
000
for
this
and
I'm
gonna
hire
like
two
or
three
people
to
do
this
with
me
over,
like
I
don't
know
like
a
two
month
period
or
something,
and
that
way
it's
kind
of
like
much
much
easier
to
have
accountability.
K
In
my
opinion,
I
know
this
doesn't
work
like
for
a
lot
of
things
like
you
know,
especially
like
what
what
chris
and
john
are
doing,
but
I
think
this
would
work
for
a
lot
of
like
the
very
product
related
stuff.
B
And
just
to
add
two
specific
examples
of
of
that
so
yeah,
so
we
do
have
like
the
worker
proposals.
I
guess
I'd
be
people
kind
of
on
here,
but
I
guess
they're
probably
been
two
examples
of
more
contract
based
work,
and
so
one
is
the
auditor
we're
dealing
with
phil
and
so
he's
kind
of
had
a
bunch
of
proposals
that
are
paying
him
for
work
that
he's
doing
on
automating
different
ones.
B
But
those
are
it's
actually
with
his
company
sunfish
technology
and
I
think
the
way
that
those
are
structured
are
much
more
contractor
based
as
opposed
to
ongoing
worker
base
and
then
the
other
one
is
with
block
rocket,
which
is
a
development
shop
that
has
been
working
on
some
vesting
contracts,
and
then
there
was
some
previous
discussion.
I
think
on
a
kind
of
mix
and
working
with
more
like
contract-based
work,
and
so
I
think
contract-based
work
is,
is
very
good
and
and
like
that's
definitely,
I
think
more.
You
get
something
easily
accounted
accountable.
B
The
question
is
like:
how
do
we
create
the
contract
work?
How
do
we
create
some
like
scope
of
work?
That
is
like
on
a
platter
that
we
can
all
kind
of
agree
on
and
that's
kind
of
like
a
difficult
process,
but
yeah
and
those
are
from
the
contract
work.
There's
we
have
done
some
regards
in
in
in
that.
L
Can
I
mention
something
as
well
sure
so
one
thing
that
may
help
just
because
it
seems
like
with
the
work
or
proposals
in
order
to
get
the
bigger
rep
holder
community
involved,
because
there's
so
many
worker
proposals
every
month
and
it's
really
hard
for
a
rep
holder
who's,
not
also
someone
who's
being
paid
by
the
dow
working
for
the
dow
to
actually
know
you
know
the
specific
details
of
what
each
worker
does
so
they're
not
going
to
feel
informed
enough
to
want
to
vote
it
could
help
to
get
more.
L
You
know,
get
more
engagement
from
rep
holders
and
eventually
dxd
holders
when
they
do
get
rep
to
try
to
do
some
sort
of
semi-annual
quarterly
budget,
and
then
we
can
relate
the
worker
proposals
to
that
budget.
So
there's
some
sort
of
tracing
you
know
with
where
the
money's
coming
from
and
then
you
know
kind
of
checking
in
to
see
how
projects
are
moving
along
and
then,
if
something
new
comes
up,
that's
a
new
idea.
Then
a
new
budget
gets
proposed,
so
it
doesn't
have
to
be.
You
know
super
strict.
L
B
All
yeah,
I
love
the
in
general.
I
love
the
idea
of
having
things
that
are
quarterly
or
half
year
that,
like
rep
holders
are
engaging
with
and
those
are
like
larger
issues,
maybe
they're
kind
of
and
so
they're
not
getting
like
caught
up
in
the
minutia
of
every
individual
proposal,
but
like
how
can
we
have
some
larger
budget
or
strategy,
things
that
are
engaged?
The
the
broader
community.
F
Yeah,
I
I
remember
I
remember
when
I
was
getting
involved
a
few
months
ago,
like
there
was
kind
of
talk
of
that,
but
it
felt
like
the
last.
Maybe
three
four
months
has
been
like
a
ramp
up
period,
so
they're
all
these
like
moving
parts,
and
so
now
that
things
have
ramped
up
and
there's
more
of
a
known
workforce
and
known
needs
around
products
and
stuff.
I
think
another
take
at
at
that
actual
like
annual
budget
for
pay
annual
budget
for
rep
distribution,
annual
budget
for
or
semi-annual
whatever
is
is.
F
Probably
we
could
do
that
a
lot
better
right
now,
because,
like
during
this
ramp
up
it
was
you
know
it's.
It
grew.
So
it
grew
from
three
people
to
20
people,
and
now
you
kind
of
have
to
it's
like
startup
world
right
like
when
startups
start.
They
need
money
and
they
start
growing
but
like
in
the
beginning,
they
don't
even
have
budgets,
but
now
we
probably
are
in
a
position
to
do
it,
which
would
be
great.
K
Yeah
right,
you
also
create
like
departments
right
when
you
have
suddenly
like
20
people.
It's
not
like
that.
You
know
like
the
ceo
is
just
managing
each
one
of
them
individually
right,
but
he
has
like
two
or
three
people
that
he
manages
that
are
managing
the
other
people
and
that's
kind
of
like
what
I'm
trying
to
suggest.
You
know
with
trying
to
form
teams
around
certain
things,
because
that
would
make
accountability
and
also
like
managing
what
is
going
on
much
easier
plus.
B
Yeah,
just
on
the
let
me
switch,
I
don't
know
how
I
switch
screens
here,
because
we
so
yeah
kind
of
as
sky
was
saying.
We
actually
did.
I
feel
like
have
these
comments.
B
We
started
these
kind
of
conversations,
I'd
say
like
yeah
in
september
and
october,
and
we
did
some
work
on
there,
but
it
was
kind
of
like
during
that
time
things
were
kind
of
changing
so
much
that
yeah,
but
now
I
think
we
can
kind
of
have
time
to
maybe
reflect
on
that,
and
this
was
actually
the
budget
was
something
in
the
five-point
plan
that
was
passed
two
months
ago,
and
so
I
just
want
to
quickly
share
like
where
we
had
done
some.
B
It
was
here
splitting
up
some
of
these
into
groups
and
products,
and
this
was
actually
with
some
expectation
when
we
were
looking
to
hire
people.
This
is
actually
not
the
right
one,
but
anyway
I
I
think,
there's
kind
of
a
good
point
about
just
broadly
how
we're
kind
of
tracking
it
and
figuring
out
how
to
have
yeah.
I
think
the
goal-
probably
that
is
for
like
a
quarter,
is
it
a
quarterly
budget
or
something
that's
like
more
of
a
approval
thing.
B
Second,
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
take
it
a
little
bit
back
to
specific
the
worker,
the
current,
like
worker
onboarding
process,
so
I
think
that's
like
a
more
structural
thing
and
think
about
how
we
can
have
accountability
at
that
level,
but
just
in
terms
of
like
submitting
worker
proposals
now
and
kind
of
establishing
clear
guys,
precedence
on
that
and
then
also
evaluating
some
of
the
recent
worker
inflows
from
some
of
the
developer
communities.
B
I
don't
know
if
anyone
had
any
kind
of
reflections
on
how
we
can
do
a
better
job
of
say,
evaluating
or
like
whittling
down
workers
before
the
trial
period
as
we're
kind
of
getting
to
know
them.
This
is,
I
guess,
brings
up
the
whole
kind
of
onboarding
discussion
in
general.
B
Cool
all
right.
Well,
just
the
last
thing
I
guess
on
on
this
before
moving
on
is
there
has
been.
I
think
I
mentioned
earlier,
that
there's
just
kind
of
been
some
discussion
and
some
maybe
pushback
from
a
couple
of
certain
couple:
individuals
that
are
now
submitting
worker
proposals
and
scopes
of
work
and
some
kind
of
community
members
are
trying
to
figure
out
what
what
the
what
the
deal
is,
and
I
think
there
will
hopefully
be
some
clarity
that
we
can
ask
questions
in
the
forum
going
forward.
K
B
K
To
you
yeah
exactly
right,
maybe
just
probably
just
to
me
right,
but
therefore
it
would
be
great.
You
know
if
these
worker
proposals
could
maybe
include
some
references
to
previous
posts.
You
know
where
you
know
they
kind
of
like
refer
some
okay.
He
was
like
a
specific
call
for
that
specific
action
item,
or
he
is
kind
of
like
what
I
did
in
this
was
like
my
previous
engagement,
etc.
K
But,
right
now
it's
just
usually
like
copy
paste
of
like
the
initial
stuff.
K
They
did
like,
maybe
two
months
ago
or
like
probably
paste
from
someone
else's
workout
proposal
when
they
are
completely
new
and
then
just
you
know,
fill
in
their
own
specifications
and
that
that
just
makes
it
really
hard
for
anyone
else
to
evaluate
okay.
Is
this
this
kind
of
like?
Does
it
just
make
sense
or
not,.
D
Yeah
yeah
just
wanted
to
say
what
just
happened
like
a
few.
I
think
a
few
hours
ago
that
it
seemed
the
it
looked
the
same
to
me
when
I,
when
I
saw
the
proposal
from
from
the
user
kinan
that
I
didn't
remember,
seeing
him
on
the
calls
before
and
I
had
to
flag
one
proposal.
That
was
actually
it
was
for
sure
spam
and
it
wasn't.
D
Even
he
didn't
even
have
the
exile
tag
and
I
flagged
it
and
I
removed
it,
and
then
I
saw
the
kingdom
proportion
after
some
issues
that
happened
with
other
with
other
workers
that
we
had
to
review
because
we
weren't
sure
and
they
didn't.
There
was
some
trust
issues
with
other
with
other
workers
that
they
were
working
for
us
verifying
who
they
were
and
what
they
were
working
on.
So
when
I
saw,
for
example,
the
kingdom
proposal
were
like
wow.
This
is
look
exactly
the
same
because
no
external
and
it
had
no.
D
No
it's
not
into
nothing.
I
can
validate
just
by
seeing
it
the
first
time
and
again
it
didn't
have
any
animation
to
other
user
on
the
on
the
forum
that
he
could
refer
himself.
So
he,
if
it
has
attack,
for
example,
to
to
chris
or
skye
or
john
or
geronimo
or
anyone,
I
will
wait
for
them
to
say
I
would
avoid
the
frenzy.
D
Okay,
the
guys
are
going
to
reply
and
they're
going
to
see
the
reference
so,
but
there
was
nothing
so
I
flagged
it
and
I
shot,
and
I
showed
the
group
hey
guys.
I
shared
this
proposal
and
they
told
me
no
gusto.
We
know
him,
we
we
we
know
him.
We
were
with
them
on
the
calls.
So
there
we
found
two
issues.
One
is
that
we
need
to
later.
D
We
need
to
work
and
wha
on
how
what
are
we
going
to
curate
and
keep
our
forum
clean,
because
we
are
going
to
start
seeing
some
spam
there
and
we
need
to
have
a
process
for
that.
I
guess
that
data
all
the
users
who
had
the
the
rights
to
flag
a
proposal
may
we
are
going
to
have
a
chatroom
and
ask
before
flanking
something
hey
guys.
What
do
you
think
of
this?
D
Should
we
flag
it
and
should
we
we
should
have
a
process
for
that
and
then
yes,
I
identify
these
issues
like
a
worker
proposal
should
have
external
links
to
other
things,
to
previous
work,
to
verifications
to
code
or
anything
that
they're
working
on
pro
that
he
has
been
working
on
and
reference
to
other
team
members
that
can
vouch
for
him.
I
think
that's
also
super
important.
D
And
we
are,
we
are
just
identifying
these
issues
like
again.
This
was
the
first
time
that
we
flag
a
proportion
and
we
say:
okay
yeah.
Now,
how
do
we
plug
it?
So
we
are
running
into
this
video
the
first
time
there
is
no
guidebook
here,
but
I
think
that's
important
that
we
are
identifying
and
knowing
that
that
we
need
to
have
at
least
a
minimum
process
for
this.
M
For
for,
let's,
like
just
take
kenan
as
an
example
like
he,
he
read
a
lot
of
the
guidelines
out
there
and
he's
a
really
good
communicator
like.
I
think
the
proposal
was
good,
like
from
from
from
a
totally
new
like
perspective,
like
someone
that
hasn't
been
involved
with
dick
style
and
any
doubts
at
all,
I
would
say,
like
he
couldn't
do
more
right.
M
M
He
was
super
careful
like
if,
if,
let's
imagine
like
like
either
like
someone
just
not
talking
with
us
or
just
doesn't
know,
anyone
of
us
just
goes
on
the
forum
and
just
want
to
propose
something
like
can.
Can
I
do
this
like
that
person
will
probably
do
10
more
stuff,
that
that
isn't
right
for
us
or
whatever
it
could
be.
So
there
is
an
information
gap
and
I've
said
like
ever.
We
know
it
it's
it's
like
you
need
to
be
on
calls.
M
You
need
to
be
in
direct
contact
with
us
and
and
like
that's,
I
think,
that's
a
huge
mistake
from
our
part
and
nothing
keenan
is
actually
one
of
the
guys
that
will
try
to
solve
this.
M
So
just
unify
the
information
from
what
we
have
on
calls
from
from
updates.
We
have
on
guidelines
and
like
just
have
it
maybe
on
one
place
or
to
like
trust,
have
one
trusted
place
where
you
can
know
like?
If
I
go
here
will,
will
I
have
the
most
updated
the
version
of
whatever
and
just
to
have
that
place?
Even
me,
I
don't
know
where
to
go
to
find
the
latest
latest
documents
or
latest
updates
and
stuff.
M
B
Yeah,
I
think
links
are
really
important.
It's
just
as
like.
I
think,
we're
thinking
about
like
composer.
What's
the
way
to
kind
of
make
these
things
better,
it
really
is
just
like
linking
either
to
your
own
experience
or
kind
of
elsewhere
or
even
as
like
goose
just
said,
like
you're,
adding
other
community
members,
so
you're
just
kind
of
doing
things
that,
like
you
know,
maybe
explain
or
kind
of
or
demonstrate
some
of
the
legitimacy
so
yeah.
B
I
think
these
are
all
kind
of
good
points,
and
I
I
just
do
think
dylan
says
I
do
think
there
are
com,
several
examples
of
like
pretty
good
worker
proposals
in
terms
of
like
laying
out
lots
of
different
guidelines.
I
know
skies
like
I'm
just
looking
at
skies
and
and
level
k's
are
kind
of
there,
and
I
know
gusto
is
kind
of
linked
to
those
in
the
past.
B
So
I
think
the
problem
is
like
how
do
we
make
sure
that,
like
the
good
ones
are
recreated
and
kind
of,
maybe
it's
like
setting
temp
like
samples
right
and
and
having
something
there,
but
I
think
the
the
spam
attack
is
probably
going
to
get
larger
too.
D
Yeah
two
things
just
a
shot
to
finish.
We
will
need
a
process
to
to
keep
the
forum
clean.
Now
we
learned
that
we
need
to
ask
other
island.
I
have
to
ask
others
before
flagging,
something
if
I
have
any
doubt
and
then
yes,
external
links
like
any
proposal,
you
cannot
say
hey.
I
did
this
and.
M
M
M
D
But
wait
I
mean
you
can
say
I
did
this
if
you
say
I
did
this,
and
I
shared
this
link
to
work
that
I
did
that
it
can
be
verified,
or
I
did
this
with
someone
else
right,
yeah
exactly.
You
need
to
prove
you.
You
need
to
prove
your
work.
For
example,
I
didn't
said
I
talk
with
chris.
I
share
the
proposal
with
sky.
If
I
see
something
that
is
okay
yeah,
this
guy
did
right,
but
when
I
was
winning,
I
thought
now
on
target
nothing
that
says
just
a
bunch
of
things
like.
M
M
B
K
Someone
also
answered
to
one
of
my
comments
that
would
actually
be
nice
to
have
like
an
extern
like
someone,
someone
else,
who's
kind
of
like
like
another
worker,
to
make
like
a
proposal
to
evaluate
you,
know
other
workers,
because
that
way
you
know
you
would
have
like.
I
I
like
this,
because
it
would
create
like
the
least
bureaucratic
burden
to
the
individual
workers.
You
know
they
would
just
have
to
like
be
subject
to
like
a
review
to
some
extent.
B
Does
give
that
person
an
awful
lot
of
power,
or
just
like,
I
think,
it's
kind
of
like
well?
Who
is
making
that
like
scope
decision?
I
think
that
that's
like
the
hard
thing
right,
so
it's
like
we're
kind
of
pushing
that
around,
but
I
think
actually
violet
had
some
kind
of
thoughts
on
this,
and
it's
just
in
general,
like
how
do
we
create
kpis
is
really
kind
of
what
it
is.
C
Yeah,
I
was
sending
messages
to
chris
because
I
think,
like
month
or
month,
like
we
need
some
metrics
to
evaluate
like
how
successful
our
projects
are
because,
like
okay,
we
have
some
people
leading
projects
like,
but
how
do
we
determine
if
they
are
leading
them?
Good
like
like
we,
you
know
if
this
continues
like.
C
If
someone
becomes
a
team
leader
like
he
will
stay
a
team
later,
no
matter
what
result
he's
producing
you
know,
so
I
think
that
should
be
accounted
for
somehow,
like
maybe
just
one
metric
even
would
be
good,
like
okay,
so
how
many
successful,
if
you
have
a
better
volume
on
the
platform
like
or
I
don't
know
like
whatever
what
happens.
M
I
mean
like
this:
this
stuff
works
if
it's
like
performance
based
where
you
your
effort,
is
a
measure
of
of
that
kpi
like
if
you're.
If
you
work
at
sales
and
you
have
an
average
and
then
you
can
like
measure
it,
but
if
this
like
for
us
that
creates
totally
new
products
that
would
come
up
with
bugs
or
stuff
that
maybe
blocks
us
or
community
says
no
to
something
or
whatever
it
could
be.
F
This
already
kind
of
happens
with
a
one
month
or
two
month
proposal
at
a
time,
because
when
you
work
for
a
company
you
have
kpis,
because
if
you
don't
perform,
they
measure
your
kpis
and
then
they're
like
after
six
months.
They
give
you
a
warning,
then
they're,
like
okay,
you're,
let
go
or
you're
fired.
That's
why
you
need
those
kpis
yeah.
I
mean
every
two
m
every
one
month.
You
have
to
do
a
proposal
with
what
you
propose,
what
you
accomplished
to
that
and
then
you
have
to
do
a
new
proposal
for
the
next
month.
F
B
It's
actually
a
really
important
like
power
dynamic.
That
does
not
exist
in
other
yeah,
it's
kind
of
saying
other
organizations,
but
that
is
like
something
that
yeah
it's
a
two-month
review
process
like
every
time
technically.
C
I
was
like
suggesting
kpis
because
right
now,
like
we
don't
know
like
if
we're
going
in
the
right
direction
in
terms
of
product
like
we
can
like
do
development,
but
we
might
gone
over
like
we
are
maybe
making
bad
decisions
and
we
are
just
continuing.
You
know
the
same
path.
Our
projects
are
not
successful.
Eventually
we
run
out
of
out
of
money
and
that's
it
like.
C
E
Yeah,
I
I
think
that
that's
a
really
good
point
violet
and
I
just
wanted
to
add
that
there's
a
little
there
was
a
little
conflation
there
like
kpis
for
like
workers
versus
kpis
for
products.
I
think
kpis
for
products,
not
not
by
you
by
other,
like
somebody
right
we're
talking
about
reviewing
workers
and
but
you're
talking
about
products,
and
I
I
agree
very
much
with
you.
I
think
it's
a
really
good
thing
for
us
to
have
clear
goals
for
the
products,
but
we
don't
necessarily
have
to
have
that
same
thing.
C
M
B
I
think
the
set
to
my
maybe
final
point
is:
I
think
we
might
need
a
kpi
working
group,
because
this
is
like
a
huge
thing.
B
It's
just
like
how
do
we
like
it
and
it's
like
not
accountability
on
like
one
person
or
like
one
kind
of
proposal,
but
it's
like
how
do
we-
and
this
is
like
such
an
important
thing
like
regardless
reflection
in
general,
right
reflection
for
individuals
reflecting
over
companies
is,
like
you
know,
a
incredibly
important
thing
that
we
need
to
be
able
to
do
but
yeah
not
making
it
a
task
of
itself.
So
this
is
yeah.
This
is
kind
of
a
huge
huge
thing.
We
need
to
figure
out.
F
Yeah
should
we
start
sourcing.
We
can
just
start
like
community
sourcing
from
from
workers,
but
also
from
outsiders
and
dxe
holders.
We
can
just
start
sourcing
kpis
like
we
need
a
good
platform
for
sourcing
those
things.
K
Yeah
I
mean
like
for
products
right.
I
mean
it's
still
very
early
for
that
right
and
like.
K
While
I
like
kpis
for
products,
you
know
to
kind
of
like
avoid,
you
know
like
going
down
the
wrong
route.
A
lot
of
these
products
are,
like
you
know,
in
a
very
early
stage
right,
and
I
mean
the
mesa
ui
right.
It's
it's
not
great
at
the
moment
right
so
like
before
we
have
like
more,
you
know,
usable
uis,
you
know
it's
kind
of
like
kpis
could
be
like
very
misleading
and
we
might
make
make
some
premature
decisions.
B
Well,
yeah,
I
mean,
I
think,
yeah
who
knows,
I
guess
it's
like.
I
think,
with
these
things,
there's
got
to
be
this
like
deck
style,
path
of
kind
of
like
narrowing
and
hardening
things
we're
doing
right.
So
it's
like
right
now
we
kind
of
need
to
have
some
structure
and
like
we
can't
make
it
too
much
structure
or
it'll.
Maybe
you
know
because
products
are
too
early
but
like
we
need
to
have
a
path
to
it
like
getting
harder
and
more
structured.
B
K
And
this
is
why
I'm
thinking
like
this,
you
know
this
team
idea
kind
of,
like
you
know,
having
like
one
responsible
person,
you
know
for
one
project,
you
know
and
they
can
like
get
a
bigger
budget,
and
you
know
they
have
like
at
least
some
freedom
to
like
execute
on
that
budget
with
you
know,
like
obviously,
some
predefined
goals,
it's
just.
It's
probably
like
the
easiest
way
right.
It's
gonna
create
like
the
least
bureaucracy
for
them,
and
then
they
can
really
try
like
a
lot
of
things.
L
Also
with
worker
proposals,
it
could
be
helpful.
You
know
if
you
want
to
vote
on.
I
know
we're
mostly
just
workers
voting
on
other
workers
proposals
at
this
point,
but
you
know
saying:
deadline
met
moving
on
to
next
deadline
or
if
a
deadline
or
some
goal
for
a
project
wasn't
met
by
an
expected
time
to
say
it
wasn't
met.
But
it's
because
of
this
reason-
and
we
resolved
it
this
way
and
then
it's
just
there.
B
Yeah,
I
think,
reflect
individual
reflection
right,
like
look
at
your
worker
proposal
and
say
like
how
did
that
turn
out
right
and,
like
you
kind
of
like
doing
it
yourself,
I
think
is
like
a
good
thing
and
I
just
kind
of
repeating
what
pope
said
earlier
about
like
figuring
out
things
that
are
for
all
rep
holders
to
vote
on
right,
because
everyone
can't
be
following
every
worker
proposal.
F
Real
quick
there's
a
I
made
this.
I
haven't
shared
it
like
publicly,
but
I
may
I
shared
it
just
with
a
few
people
like
the
the
flow
diagram
of
who
is
working
on
what
products
and
initiatives
so
not
just
individual
products,
it
could
have
like
a
team
like
add
the
team
leaders
to
those
as
well,
and
we
could
share
that
publicly
and
I
think
that
will
help.
F
You
know.
Newcomers
plus
outsiders
get
a
good
idea
of
these
themes,
which
kind
of
already
exist
and
there's
then
there's
people
that
go
across
teams,
but
yeah
we
can
make.
That
is
that
it.
I
know
it
doesn't
look
very
good.
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
better
way
to
make
it,
but
it's
pretty
clear
if
you
look
at
it
like
how
people
are
spreading
their
time
between
the
different
products
and
initiatives,
so
that's
cool,
but
we
should
share
that
publicly
and
and
get
input
and
feedback
on
it.
B
Yeah,
I
think,
scott.
I
love
that
idea
and
I
just
it's
funny,
like
you
said
earlier,
like
we
actually
do
kind
of
know
where
things
are
fitting
in
now,
but
like
a
month
ago,
we
did
right,
we
kind
of
like
we're
just
kind
of
easing
into
now.
B
So
it's
a
good
time
to
to
do
that,
and
I
also
think
maybe
this
is
like
how
could
we
like
show
that
really
creatively,
because,
like
I
mean
it's
not
like,
it's
just
be
like
a
normal
corporate
hierarchy
right
like
how
do
we
kind
of
show
the
different
workers
kind
of
engaging
in
different
areas,
but
I
think
that's
yeah.
It's
a
really
important
thing
that
we
need
to
think
about
also
for
the
the
main
website.
I
think
it
should
be
another
update
there.
M
Yeah
I
mean
I
I've.
I've
already
used
that
short
to
just
like
just
plan
out
stuff
or
look
at
the
like.
I
I
didn't
know
myself
everything
like
on
every
worker,
but
I
think
maybe
we
could
we
could.
Maybe
it's
not
one
chart.
Maybe
it's
like
three
shorts.
It
could
be
like
just
just
if
someone
wants
to
know
who's
who's,
the
team
leaders
or
project
leaders
and
what
devs
are
working
with.
B
Building
on
that,
I
I
think
I
had.
I
can't
actually
find
the
document
now,
but
the
budget
occurred
to
kind
of
six
weeks
ago.
I
think
could
go
with
that
in
maybe
kick
starting
this
conversation
a
little
bit
more,
but-
and
I
think
we
should
make
kind
of
a
post-
a
forum
post
about
that-
maybe
this
week
or
next
and
kind
of
reset
the
conversation
on
this,
which
could
maybe
pave
the
way
for
like
more
specific
accountability,
kpi
stuff.
B
Cool
all
right,
we're
like
over
the
hour,
I'm
assuming
this
recording
lady,
is
going
to
tell
me
in
a
minute
that
we're
at
the
end
the
kind
of
two
things
we
didn't
get
to
or
three
things
xdi
dx
dow.
I
don't
think
it
really
was
much
update
there,
but
we
kind
of
talked
about
that
working
on
a
couple
things
there
specifically
to
the
competition
scheme
and
then
second,
the
governance,
2.0
working
group.
B
We
have
a
call
next
tuesday,
there
is
an
midway
update
check-in
post
in
the
forum,
if
you're
kind
of
interested
in
checking
that
out
and
then
lastly,
we
haven't.
I
think
we
need
to
start
thinking
about
a
bonding
curve
working
group,
because
I
think
that's
kind
of
like
the
next
thing
that
we
need
to
tackle
as
we
as
we
move
forward
here.
So.