►
From YouTube: DXdao Weekly Meeting #7 [2020-08-13]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
D
D
B
B
E
D
Yeah
with
this
release,
we
had
a
lot
more
plans,
but
it
was
kind
of
mostly
related
to
subgraph
changes
and
that's
been
a
real
bottleneck
from
us,
because
it's
just
allen
working
on
it
and
I'm
sure
he's
got
a
lot
on
this
plate.
So
past
few
days
I've
been
digging
into
the
graph
of
it.
So
that's
gonna
be
something
I'm
focusing
on
more
going
forward
and
then
next
few
releases
we
should
be
able
to
get
a
lot
more
valuable
things
done
nice.
D
You
know
what's
up
next
for
the
next
one
yeah
so
like,
for
example,
we
have
an
issue
with
the
my
markets:
tab
where
it
will.
It
will
only
display
markets
that
I
think
you
you
purchase
outcomes
in
and
not
ones
that
you
funded
liquidity.
For
example,
there's
also.
We
want
to
use
a
token
registry
so
that
we
can
determine
whether
or
not
we
can
inform
users
whether
markets
are
valid
or
invalid,
based
on
kind
of
our
governance.
D
D
B
The
order
book
kind
of
is
a
pop-up
that
you
have
to
click
on
in
a
modal,
and
so
there
there's
a
talk
and
I
think,
an
effort
now
to
make
that
kind
of
just
naturally
fit
into
the
ui.
So
I
think
that'll
be
a
good
good
update
and
then
some
work,
I
think
also
on
helping
interfaces
for
the
market
makers
and
then
yeah.
That's
all
I
am
aware
of,
and
do
you
have
anything
to
update
on
mesa.
F
Not
specifically
on
mesa,
but
I
guess
a
few
members
already
also
joined
me,
but
we
had
a
few
people
with
with
teams
looking
to
do
an
ito,
so
nothing
really
new,
but
it's
yeah.
This
use
case
seems
to
really
get
traction,
and
next
week
the
there's
going
to
be
an
idea
of
a
project
that
really
didn't
talk
even
to
us
or
no
see
so
these
dao,
but
so
interesting
to
see.
F
C
G
Right,
I
asked
one
of
the
projects
that
listed
without
talking
to
anybody
like
why
and
it
was
it
just
wasn't
like
a
consideration.
They
were
very
much
like
we're
doing
it
this
way,
because
we're
doing
it
this
way,
but
I'm
like
it's
on
you
like.
Don't
you
understand
that,
like
you
could
get
like
some
extra
value
by
even
just
trying-
and
I
know
they
kind
of
met
that
with
just
like-
we
don't
care.
B
Yeah
yeah,
I
guess
for
for
some
projects,
perhaps
it's
more
of
a
they're
just
going
down
a
checklist
and
they're,
not
thinking
too
deeply
about.
You
know
different
things,
but
I
think
it
makes
sense
for
you
know
when
we
get
these
materials
out,
we'll
just
make
it
very
clear
what
the
value
is
for
getting
it
properly
listed
and
talking
with
the
dxtel
community
about
or
doing
those
things.
F
A
A
So
that's
a
plan
for
the
for
the
next
week.
We
are
going
to
have
that
up
and
running
and
then
main
deployment
is
going
to
come
around
and
then
mainnet
announce
is
going
to
happen,
but
yeah
everything
is
is
without
is
going
is
going
good
there.
I
was
sharing
on
keyways
some
updates
and
deployments
of
of
the
app
of
the
current
of
the
app
working
with
the
coven
contracts
yeah.
I
was
sharing
that
during
this
week
with
the
fees.
That's
it
it's
happening.
I
said
it's
a
lot
of
work,
but
yeah
it's.
A
B
A
Yeah,
actually,
I
just
updated
the
0.0
release
on
the
x-swap
core
and
if
you
enter
the
release
note
you
can
see
a
chain
log
of
all
the
commits
between
a
uniswap,
b2,
core
master
and
dx
swap
core
master.
So
you
can
see
all
the
commits
that
happen.
You
can
go
through
them.
You
can
go
through
all
the
changes
I'm
going
to
do
the
same
for
dxo
periphery
contracts.
B
Great
and
I
encourage
people
to
take
a
look
and
provide
a
review
if
you
can
good
stuff,
so
I
think
the
last
product
to
talk
about
would
be
rails
daddy.
I
don't
think
federico
is
on
the
call,
but
he
had
drafted
a
worker
proposal.
I
actually
think
the
only
thing
holding
him
back
from
making
the
proposal
already
is
these
gas
prices,
but
he
is
planning
to
make
that
proposal
and
work
on
launching
rounds
on
eth,
which
would
be
great
because
of
these
gas
prices
interface
to
blueprint,
pay.
E
E
Is
something
that
we
they
can
put
a
family
thought
into
over
the
next
few
weeks
or
whatever
x
die?
Is?
Is
the
most
usable
option
right
now,
like
the
most
useful
place
that
you
can
go
and
deploy?
Essentially,
your
unaltered
solidity
contracts,
there's
other
options,
if
you,
if
you
obviously
willing
to
to
rewrite
things,
but
you
know
if
we
just
want
to
deploy
things
as
is
then
exercise
the
most
viable
thing
right
now,
but
I
guess
caveat
is
that.
E
It's
you
know
using
using
omen
in
its
current
form
is,
is
pretty
the
the
baseline
for
the
size
of
a
trade
that
you
have
to
make
for
it
to
be
worthwhile
outputting
that
gas
is
really
really
high
right
now,
you
know
making
a
trade.
I
think
right
now
costs
you
like
30
bucks,
so
you
need
to
have
a
you
know.
It
needs
to
be
a
pretty
decent
sized
position.
It
kind
of
rules
out
any
any
just
fun
market.
E
B
E
We're
currently
exploring
matic
optimism,
optimistic
roll-ups,
a
few
different
variants
of
x-dire,
so
obviously
there's
there's
extra,
but
there's
also.
We
could
potentially
deploy
our
own
instance
of
the
x-star
chain
using
say
like
al
as
the
native
token
and
then
a
handful
other
other
scaling
solutions
like
the
scale-
and
I
think
I
already
mentioned
matic
and
who
knows
what
we
got
but
yeah
a
handful
of
them
that
are
worth
us
kind
of
looking
into
aztec.
E
Yeah,
so
I
think
reality.if
would
be
easy
enough
to
deploy
another
instance
of
elsewhere,
so
we
can
probably
deploy
that
alongside
of
the
conditional
tokens
framework.
Cleros
is
another
story.
It's
that
it's
a
larger,
more
complex
system
and
obviously
requires
virtual
workers
intended
requires
people
to
become
staking
so
there's
two
ways
you
could
do
it.
One
would
be
to
deploy
another
instance
of
clarisse
and
have
people
stake
on
that
instance.
The
the
other
would
be
to
use
something
like
proof
of
authority.
E
E
B
B
Yeah,
it
might
be
interesting
to
do
a
little
bit
of
due
diligence
on
like
the
actual
nodes
and
that
like
how
it
works.
I
vaguely
remember
poa
network
being
composed
of
like
notarized.
You
know
something
like
21
nodes
and
like
a
lot
of
them
had
like
notary
publics
in
the
united
states,
and
so
you
could
verify
that.
I'm
curious
how
that
would
like
maybe
impact
any
decision.
E
B
Yeah
or
there
was
at
least
enough
representation
by
the
dx
now
that
you're
kind
of
like
aligning
those
like
those
trust
assumptions,
are
not
like
kind
of
you're
not
like
compounding
them
right.
It's
like
well
you're,
already
trusting
gates
now
to
run
omen,
and
so
you
can
trust
them
to
run
the
chain
as
well,
but
yeah
yeah.
F
The
advantage
of
each
die
is
like,
I
think,
there's
at
least
elite,
I'm
not
entirely
sure,
but
there's
a
little
like
already
community,
and
you
know
engagement
around
it
and
those
assets
there.
So,
basically,
if
you
run
your
own
l2,
you
need
to
put
stop
it
from
zero.
Get
people
like
depositor
funds
and
stuff.
E
Yeah,
I
I
think,
that's
a
reasonable
point.
I
don't
think
that
they
have
enough
traction
like
enough
of
a
network
effect
to
really
justify
kind
of
using
that
and
excluding
other
options
that,
like
yeah,
I
don't
think
they're
far
enough
away
from
essentially
like
starting
at
zero,
that
it
would
justify
kind
of
neglecting
other
options
or
at
least
not
exploring
other
options
as
well.
H
Oran
matt
here
one
thing
we
could
do
and
I
kind
of
discussed
this
with
john
very
lightly
is
I
mean
we
can't
deploy
omen
in
its
whole
form
on
loopering
or
on
a
zk
roll
at
all,
as
you
mentioned,
but
we
could
have
the
trading,
I
mean
if
the
trades
are,
what
you're
saying
is
prohibitively
expensive
and
maybe
creating
the
markets.
It's
like
a
larger
person
that
could
get
over
that
hurdle
trading
on
loopering
zk
roll
up
is
possible.
H
We,
if
we
token
if
we
erc
20,
wrap
the
outcomes
right
now
like
it's
something
that
actually
we've
been
discussing
internally,
and
so
we
could.
We
could
wrap
the
tokens
and
it
could
be,
you
know
yes
versus
die
or
no
like.
However,
you
do
that
and
that's
like
good
to
go
like
whenever
it's
just,
I
guess,
there's
some
work
yeah
and
then
in
the
upcoming
version,
in
like
two
months
from
now
version
3.6
we
could
support
erc
1155s
natively,
so
no
need
to
wrap
it.
You
could
trade,
the
the
outcomes.
H
So
again,
we
can't
like
do
the
whole
thing,
but
trading
we
could
do
right
now
by
wrapping
it,
and
so
maybe
you
could
have
like
one
bulk
person
that
wraps
a
whole
bunch
of
the
outcomes
and
it's
we
could
experiment
with
like
a
very
popular
market
and
just
list
that
pair
and
I'm
not
sure.
If,
yes,
so,
that's
that
and
then
in
two
months
it
could
be
just
trading
natively
there
no
need
to
wrap.
So
that's
something
to
consider
like
we'd,
be
happy
to
help.
H
You
learn
more
or
dig
in
dig
into
that.
The
one
thing
is,
I'm
not
sure
if
we
would
put
it
on
the
loopering.io
interface,
for
maybe
regulatory
reasons
or
just
in
general,
like
maybe
it
gets
cluttered.
How
do
we
expose
it?
So
maybe
it
has
to
be
like
you
have
this
you.
You
could
do
this
all
by
speaking
to
lupring's
api,
just
like
any
kind
of
centralized
exchange.
H
E
E
Does
that
exist
already
on
the
print
and
then
the
other
thing
is
I
mean
if,
if
where
most
of
the
time
like
when
you're,
when
you're,
interacting
with
a
with
the
automatic
markup
maker
you're,
just
kind
of
like,
like
I
haven't,
seen
a
whole
bunch
of
like
back
and
forth
trading
like
you,
you
kind
of
you
buy
and
then
you
sell
and
the
the
amn
right
now
doesn't
give
you
an
option
to
like
trade.
Yes,
no
or
something
like
that,
like
you,
you
buy.
Yes,
you
sell.
Yes,
you
buy.
E
No,
you
sell
that
kind
of
thing.
So
there's
not
like
a
whole
lot
of
back
and
forth
between
options
which
yeah
I
don't
know.
I
guess
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
like
what
what
that
might
look
like
what
the
flow
might
look
like
for
a
user
who
comes
in
to
try
to
buy
an
outcome
and
then
later
on,
sell
an
outcome
or
buy
an
outcome
and
then
claim
the
collateral
later
and
if
there
would
actually
be
any
gas
savings
or
like
significant
gas
savings.
E
H
We
can't
support
the
amm.
Like
I
get
like
the
full
thing.
We
basically
have
to
just
take
it
and
represent
it
as
like.
Take
one
outcome:
I
guess
represent
it
as
its
own
asset
and
trade
it
on
the
order
book,
gas
free.
Then
people
could,
if
they're
on
loopering.org
or
if
they
come
there,
they
could
trade
it
for
no
gas.
You
know,
but
then
yes,
it's
true
interact
with
layer
one
when
they
want
to
redeem
or,
actually
you
know,
exit
they'd
have
to
get
off.
H
E
Yeah,
so
that
makes
me
think
that
there
probably
wouldn't
be
all
that
much
in
the
way
of
gas
saving,
because
the
thing
that
eats
gas
right
now
is
one
like
interacting
with
the
automatic
market
maker
and
then
two
splitting
and
merging
tokens
which
yeah
like.
If
we
can't
move
those
two
things
to
layer
two,
then
it
probably
doesn't
give
us
much
of
an
improvement
unless
we
just
totally
change
the
way
that
trading
works.
H
H
E
On
that,
like
wrapping
outcome,
tokens
and
then
putting
them
into
other
exchanges
is
something
we're
totally
wanting
to
explore.
Alan's
already
written
an
erc
erc20
wrapper
for
the
conditional
tokens.
So
that's
that's
something
we
should
explore
either
way,
whether
or
not
it
becomes
the
solution
to
from
scaling
omen
or
moment
on
layer
2.
I
don't
know,
but
it's
either
way.
It's
interesting.
B
Cool
it's
super
interesting
though,
and
and
yeah.
I
suspect
it
sort
of
has
to
do
with
what
kind
of
use
case
how
you
what
use
case
you're
looking
at
like
so
the
beauty
of
bloopering,
is
you
have
the
same
trust
guarantees
of
ethereum,
but
it's
really
only
giving
you
an
advantage
of
the
trading.
So
I
almost
think
like
maybe
high
volume
markets
is
where
that
could
be
useful
versus
like.
If
you
want
to
allow.
G
Yeah
just
just
to
because
I
think
it's
such
an
important
discussion.
I
was
just
talking
about
omen,
but
you
know
gas
is
like
a
fact
of
life
and
it's
kind
of
really
affecting
a
lot
of
different
things,
and
I
think
the
shift
to
way
or
two
is
going
to
be
a
huge
kind
of
secular
trend
over
the
next.
I
think
more,
like
a
year
really
and
the
next
couple
months
to
six
months.
G
Where,
clearly,
that's
not
like
a
real
prediction
market,
but
if
you
could
get
like
great
volume
on
just
the
trump
and
vitamin
biden
market
through
blueprint
like
that,
would
be
a
great
win
for
the
next
kind
of
three
months.
So
yeah,
I'm
just
just
thinking
about
the
solutions
and
which
ones
can
kind
of
be
implemented
now,
but
knowing
that
this
is
a
a
trend
that
will
kind
of
will
really
present
opportunities
for
for
firms
that
are
super
projects
that
are
in
the
right
scaling
solution.
B
E
E
Yeah,
so
that's
that
may
be
something
that's
worth
considering
for
the
dx
doubt
you
know
it
was.
Is
it
actually
kind
of
a
lucrative
venture
for
us
to
go
and
deploy
this
thing
onto
another
chain
because
we're
going
to
receive
an
incentive
to
do
it
and
maybe
they're
just
a
mix
of
different
deployments
of
solutions
across
different
layer?
Two
platforms,
cool.
E
E
This
event
happening
east
2.0
launching
before
2021
will
have
an
eleven
percent
impact
on
the
price,
or
at
least
people
are
willing
to
pay
eleven
percent
more
for
ether
in
the
case
that
it
does
happen
versus
the
case.
That
does
not
happen.
That's
a
really
really
cool
piece
of
information.
It's
one
that
I
one
love
to
kind
of
expose
within
the
interface,
but
even
short
of
that,
like
it's,
it's
even
information.
That's
relatively
easy
to
derive.
E
G
E
Yeah
totally,
I
started
the
process
of
trying
to
add
rent
btc,
so
I
made
a
proposal
to
to
add
rainbow
to
c,
and
that
was
essentially
that
I
don't
know
if
anyone
saw
I
made
a
market
on
them
and
to
piggyback
on
joe
lubin
and
jimmy
song's
bet
on
the
kind
of
future
dap
usage.
That's
right.
I
made
it
one
in
in
ether,
and
I
would
like
to
spin
up
a
duplicate
of
that
market
in
bitcoin.
For
the
exact
same.
B
Yeah-
and
I
think
this
actually
dovetails
very
well
with
the
idea
of
like
governance
as
a
service
and
also
kind
of
leading
the
way
in
governance
like
this-
is
sort
of
like
a
very
experimental
forward,
thinking
kind
of
way
to
look
at
governance,
and
I
I
I
think
it
would
be
awesome.
If,
yes,
I
was
somehow
involved
in
pushing
the
envelope
there
and
yeah.
I
mean
it's
like
the
prediction
market
platform
and
the
focus
on
governance.
It
kind
of
fits
supernaturally
into
what
we're
doing.
F
I
think
I
think
the
concept
is
is
kind
of
very
intuitive,
like
a
lot
of
people
after
you,
you
explain
it.
A
lot
of
people
will
kind
of
assume
that
if
price
will
will
have
a
positive
impact,
I
don't
know
the
exact
percentage.
But
if,
if
if
that
is
to
we
will
ship
on
time-
and
even
some
traders
would
definitely
I'm
sure
will
be
a
will-
will
want
to
bet
that
it
will
be
more
than
11.
F
G
Yeah,
I
think
it's
a
I
really
like
predictions.exchange
and
thinking
about
how
that's
like
a
front
end
for
different
omen
markets
or
different
prediction
markets.
In
the
background,
I
think
for
this
kind
of
if
this
is
used
in
some
like
governance,
service
or
governance
product,
it's
kind
of
like
that
may
be
the
way
that
people
are
actually
looking
at
the
distance
between,
and
they
may
not
even
know
that
it's
plugging
into
this
in
the
background,
because
it
is,
it
just
seemed
like
a
nice
and
specialized
product.
E
Right
exactly
and
that's
where
I
think,
like
so
compound
users
boardroom,
and
so
you
can
imagine
an
option
for
when
you've
got
a
proposal
up
on
a
boardroom
to
essentially
spin
up
a
pair
of
omen
markets,
one
in
one
in
some
stable
currency
and
one
in
the
governance
token,
and
so
on
board
room.
It
could
just
show
you
know
what
the
predicted
price
impact
of
this
is
and
then
our
own
minute
just
has
the
markets
like
you,
don't
necessarily
have
to
expose
that
information.
H
E
That
information
is
relevant
wherever
the
governance
decisions
are
being
made,
and
all
of
the
needs
to
see
is
the
markets
that
they
have
currently
now.
Obviously,
the
more
information
that
we
can
kind
of
elegantly
expose
in
home-
and
you
know
the
explosion
without
cluttering
the
interface
and
making
it
confusing
for
for
regular
users
the
better
but
yeah.
The
way
that
information
is
really
relevant
is
wherever
decisions
are
actually
being
made.
B
G
Oh,
yes,
a
lot
went
down,
so
we
had
three
visitors
approach.
Us
we
had
omonit,
I
think
ayala
was
his
name.
There
might
have
been
two
guys.
Al
moniz
is
a
decentralized
search
engine
for
decentralized
websites
and
they
propose
some
form
of
integration
with
dxtaos
content,
and
you
know
and
a
potential
investment
opportunity.
G
We
had
henrique
and
alvin
of
luna
social
approaches
about
possible
ido,
which
I'm
pretty
excited
about
because
out
of
the
out
of
like
the
four
last
ideas
that
happened
like
this
is
the
first
one
to
actually
like
talk
directly
to
dxdow
about
it.
And
it's
you
know
it's
a
good
platform
and
john
and
agusto
have
had
pretty
big
experience,
helping
them
develop.
That
which
is
great.
G
G
A
A
So
that
way,
the
exact
we
delegate
a
certain
amount
of
tokens
to
be
used
on
the
dlc
gear,
and
it
can
also
do
it
on
different
gears,
and
that
is
what
we
are
going
to
start
doing
as
soon
as
we
get
started
with
the
giggles
idea
and
implementation
of
the
txc
holders
here,
yeah
that
was
very
interesting.
They
are
very
eager
to
for
us
to
start
using
the
using
our
governance
tokens
because
they
are.
They
are
quite
a
lot
so
and
yeah.
A
B
G
Governance,
just
posted
notes
there,
another
packed
call
started
off
with
the
manifesto
that
we've
kind
of
been
noodling
over
the
last
couple
weeks.
Some
good
discussion
on
how
that
can
kind
of
be
a
guide
to
new
people
interested
in
the
digs
down,
but
also
kind
of
lay
out
some
of
the
principles
and
ideals
of
the
dx
dow.
The
timeline
that
I'm
we're
kind
of
thinking
about
this.
For
now.
G
I
would
like
to
have
some
more
eyeballs
on
this,
so
please
any
and
all
thoughts
moved
on
to
more
general
documentation,
realizing
how
that's
an
important
part
of
a
community
growing
and
communicating
with
different
stakeholders
in
the
system,
so
pete
smith,
who
had
been
in,
I
think
it
was
the
call
last
week-
is
kind
of
working
on
some
of
that,
specifically
around
dxd
documentation
or
from
the
dfd
type
of
development.
It's
a
really
important
thing.
G
We
think
about
how
documentation
builds
in
general
and
and
communicating
then
talked
a
little
bit
about
both
the
governance
as
a
service
that
gusto
mentioned,
and
also
the
mesa
and
gig
swap
ideas
and
then
lastly,
talked
a
little
bit
more
about
the
dhd
voting
rights
and
how
potentially
that
could
work
and
moving
forward.
And
as
anger
mentioned,
there
is
a
separate
dx
swap
call
now
scheduled,
which
will
be
tomorrow
at
this
same
time.
B
G
G
I
was
wondering
what
you
guys
thought
of
that.
It's
interesting
it's
an
interesting
issue,
because
I
think,
when
this
started,
no
one
predicted
that
that
this
would
be
like
a
concern
of
like
someone
throwing
in
millions
into
the
curve,
especially
since
the
the
goal
was
250,
which
was
50
000
at
the
time.
F
F
I
wouldn't
be
concerned
that
someone
controls
a
lot
of
dxd
but
more
that
than
that
the
we
need
to
think
about
funding,
basically
funding
the
dow,
and
if
we
don't,
if,
if
we
feel
we
don't
need
funding
for
for
a
while,
so
it
feels
like
I'm
not
sure
how
to
explain.
But
basically
it
feels,
in
my
opinion,
the
the
the
bonding
feels
a
bit
inefficient.
F
F
And
all
of
this
is,
is
it
also
ties
into
and
the
amount
of
capital
that
the
the
peakstown
needs
right
now
and
if,
if,
if
we
we
for
now,
I
don't
think
we
are
well
funded.
But
if
we
are
well
funded,
why
should
we
keep
raising
money
and
and
basically
creating
this
kind
of
obligation,
or
I
don't
know
how
to
call
it
but
and
committing
to
to
more
investors.
B
It's
interesting
that
almost
completely
opposite
concerns
are
kind
of
arriving
at
the
same
conclusion
that
the
curb
should
be
stopped
right.
Some
people
are
worried
that
the
price
you
know
people
won't
buy
because
the
curve
is
like
a
ceiling.
Almost
other
people
are
worried
that
people
would
buy
too
much
from
a
technical
perspective
there.
So
the
way
stopping
the
curve
could
could
work
right,
just
preventing
more
minting
is.
B
B
I
think,
and
what
you're
talking
about
in
terms
of
the
inefficiency
of
this,
like
buyback
reserve
in
the
curve
that
would
involve
like
upgrading
the
whole
system
and
finding
a
way
to
deliver
revenue
to
dxd
and
etc
would
be
much
more
involved,
but
the
capping
you
know
once
an
integration
would
be
set
up
between
the
external
voting
and
the
curve
which
it
owns.
Then
you
know
this.
This
parameter
could
be
set
relatively
easily.
G
Yeah,
I
think
the
the
fundraising
framing
is
like
a
really
important
one
right,
that
it
is
a
way
of
kind
of
like
raising
funds
and
that's
a
lot
of
the
point
of
it,
and
so,
if
it
doesn't
necessarily
like
no
longer
need
that,
then
it
can
kind
of
alter.
I
think
to
people
saying
that
they
can
like
bomb
the
curve.
I
think
they
should
do
the
math
on
that
because,
like
I
think
like
what
I
guess
like
there's
100
000,
but
it
would
be
close
to
100
000
dxd
owned
by
the
dx
dow.
G
B
G
G
Yeah
like
this
is
what
I'm
saying
you
do
that,
but
then,
like
the
dx,
dow,
a
controls,
all
of
that
you
just
gave
it
and
that's
like
the
rep
holders.
The
dxd
bike
holders
know
like
to
say
that
and
then
two
the
value
of
the
dxd
that
the
dxo
owns
is
just
like
rocking
it
up,
and
so
I
think
in
that
case
it's
I.
G
I
see
that
the
I
think
that
dao
is
insulated
from
that
attack,
but
from
like
a
fundraising
perspective
and
an
offering
perspective,
I
think
that's
an
interesting
way
to
look
at
the
curve.
I
think
you
know
in
traditional
markets
will
go
out
to
capital
markets
to
raise
money,
to
fund
different
projects
from
time
to
time.
Right.
They'll
issue
bonds
have
issue
new
shares
to
sell
to
the
market,
to
then
fund
something.
So
in
a
lot
of
ways,
I
guess
that's
what
the
t
staff
is
kind
of
doing.
F
B
B
G
Yeah
yeah,
I
think
the
attack
is
specific
on
the
governance
part
right.
I
think
everyone's
thinking
about
mkr
and
how
nkr
works
in
the
governance
angle
and,
like
obviously,
the
they
had
like
that
gsm
or
government
security
module
for
dealing
with
something.
If
someone
got
like
a
vast
majority
of
mkr,
but
since
dhd
is
insulated
from
rep,
I
feel
like
the
governance
attack
is
somewhat
muted
and
then
it
becomes
like
a
pure
market
attack,
but
I
think
it
was
interesting.