►
From YouTube: Ethereum Cat Herders Meeting #15 [2019/07/09]
Description
Agenda: https://github.com/ethereum-cat-herders/PM/issues/80
A
B
A
A
A
B
A
B
And
Lane
had
commented
on.
It
is
added
some
comments.
If
let
me
enter
link
over
here,
if
anybody
was
want
to
add
more
comments,
that
would
be
nice.
Otherwise
we
can
go
ahead.
I
mean
somebody
can
go
ahead
and
like
accept
it.
I
don't
want
to
do
it
myself,
because
it's
it
would
be
nice
to
look
at
it
Yuri
you
again.
B
B
D
I
had
a
look
at
the
comps
template.
The
emergency
constantly
and
I
had
a
couple
of
things
to
add,
but
I
have
everything
kind
of
in
a
Google
Doc,
just
because
I'm
still
kind
of
getting
to
know
github
a
little
bit
so
I
can
circulate
that
in
the
group
and
then
we
can
maybe
merge
the
two
and
see
if
I'm,
you
know
where
there's
a
few
things
missing.
Yeah.
E
F
This
was
a
couple
weeks
ago,
so
I
can't
remember
who
it
was,
but
we
follow
it
up.
So
there's
that
ticket
still
open
with
coin,
and
we
did
finally
get
the
accurate
dump
of
data
from
get
coin.
It
was
Willy
and
I'm
just
checking.
Yes,
it
was
William,
so
he
and
I
looked
into
this
a
couple
weeks
ago,
or
he
primarily
did
we
finally
got
an
accurate
data
dump
from
good
coin
of
all
the
transactions
that
came
through
as
a
result
of
both
of
the
campaign's
right.
F
So
there's
the
original
one
to
fund
the
cat
herders
and
there's
the
second
one
for
Prague,
cow
and
William
began
the
painstaking
work
of
sort
of
sifting
through
them
and
trying
to
reconcile
them
against
what
we
actually
see
in
the
multi
save
and
didn't
get
very
far.
So
that's
that's
the
only
status
update
I
have
it
the
good
news.
Is
we
have
the
data?
The
bad
news?
A
B
And
start
taking
a
note
in
process,
but
is
this
thing
before
writing
it
up
formally
I
hope
we
would
not
be
following
the
gate
coin
thing
anymore,
and
the
process
would
be
taken
care
by
the
calendar
that
brett
has
created
and,
like
he
created
the
calendar
for
everybody
who
are
interested
and
then
scheduled
for
taking
notes
for
which
call
which
day
and
then
submission
process,
but
going
like
a
tendon
attend.
The
meeting
notes
it
submitted
and
I
would
be
referring.
B
The
guideline
template
shared
by
lanes
for
the
meeting
for
the
first
meeting
that
we
easy
to
pick
out
who
they
see
and
then
a
person
would
be
adding
an
issue
for
finding
that
this
job
has
been
done.
We
have
submitted
this
thing
and
adding
it
as
an
issue,
and
then
we
can
follow
up
in
subsequent
this
meeting.
Does
this
sound
like
a
process
that
we
would
be
following
boundary
things.
B
We
used
to
have
a
process
like
if
we
have
to
write
notes,
be
sure,
point
bounty,
somebody
over
there
and
the
person
would
be
selected
and
the
process
would
be
taken
forward
from
there.
But
since
we
have
people
on
board
who
are
like
four
or
five
people's
are
there
who
are
taking
notes
of
different
new
things.
So
breasts
came
up
with
a
calendar
meeting
Challenger,
so
he
actually
have
made
it
very
nicely
that
no
one
person
should
be
asked
to
take
to
meeting
notes,
and
he
did
it
really
good.
B
So
I
was
thinking
that
now
we
can
have
a
little
change
in
the
process.
We
can
go
by
the
meeting
calendar
created
by
him
and
whosoever
wants
to
join,
although
we
think
that
Mia
come,
but
he
made
it
covered
for
a
year,
but
whoever
wants
to
join.
He
should
reach
out
to
bread
to
add
him
to
the
column
there.
Then
the
person
would
be
taking
notes
submit,
it
might
be
respective
places
like
different
column,
different
aliases.
Then
he
would
come
back
to
sha
issue
for
creating.
B
B
B
B
G
G
A
G
A
A
A
A
A
Sounds
good
14.3
William
to
work
with
Lane
on
the
initiative
to
perform
an
account
and
an
account
of
the
current.
If
they're
and
catheters
funding
create
a
vote
within
the
cat,
herders
dial
to
decide
for
the
round
for
note-taking,
so
we
had
that
vote.
So
this
one
is
done
engaged
with
Hudson
regarding
the
requirements
for
streaming
of
theorem
cat
herders
calls
I'm,
not
sure
what
was
meant
here.
B
B
A
F
F
Thought
it
was
Bret
I
believe
it
was
Bret
who
I
think
it's
also
not
on
the
call
today
and
I
hope
I'm
getting
that
right.
We
set
up
a
gnosis
safe
account,
as
I
think
I
may
have
mentioned
by
text
message.
The
team
functions
are
not
enabled
yet
so
I
think
in
the
future.
The
ideas
you'll
be
able
to
attach
multiple
externally
owned,
aetherium
accounts
to
it
and
sort
of
control
it
that
way.
So
what
we
did
instead
was
we
just
shared
the
private
key.
G
A
Yes,
so
yes,
I
will
invite
you
to
that
I
feel
like
maybe
we
could
just
post
the
links
in
the
general
channel
like
like
we
do
for
all
core
devs
and
then
if
people
come
on
and
they
don't
really
belong
there
or
have
any
like
strong
reason
for
being
there,
we
can
just
ask
them
to
leave,
but
typically
people
don't
really
do
that.
I
think
it's
happened
like
once
or
twice
in
all
the
Chordettes
calls
I
was
on.
Would
anyone
disagree
with
posting
the
Xoom
link
more
publicly
in
the
in
the
public
Channel.