►
From YouTube: School Board Meeting September 13, 2022
Description
Fargo Public Schools - Board of Education Meeting - Live Broadcast - September 13, 2022
A
C
A
Same
sign
motion
passes.
Okay,
we
will
move
on
to
recognition
of
the
audience
at
this
time.
The
board
will
hear
comments
from
the
public.
We
ask
that
each
speaker
who
has
signed
up
to
address
the
board
State
their
name
and
home
school
district
for
the
record
speakers-
must
refrain
from
using
this
forum
to
criticize
or
complain
about
a
specific
employee
or
student
by
name.
Vulgar
or
profane
language
will
not
be
tolerated.
A
The
board
is
interested
in
your
comments
and
we
will
listen
carefully
but
is
not
obligated
to
respond
or
to
debate
issues
in
this
forum.
Should
you
desire
a
written
response
to
a
specific
question?
You
may
request
it
this
evening.
Each
speaker
will
be
allotted
a
maximum
of
five
minutes
upon
conclusion
of
the
allotted
time,
a
chime
will
sound
and
the
speaker's
asked
to
conclude
if
necessary.
A
final
time
will
sound
15
seconds
later,
signifying
the
end
of
the
speaker's
time
at
the
podium.
I
will
now
call
our
first
and
only
speaker
this
evening,
Devin
stachinski.
D
D
D
D
D
I
suggest
you
roll
back.
The
version
go
to
the
previous
version
of
gp3
E
School,
Board
ethics,
section
2.,
which
reads
honest
and
sincere
Having
the
courage
of
their
conviction
and
always
voting
their
beliefs,
because
that
seems
to
be
the
course
of
action
for
the
plurality
of
this
board,
where
they
would
rather
vote
their
beliefs
than
in
the
best
interests
of
the
district.
So,
instead
of
continually
having
non-compliance
from
here
until
the
end
of
time,
you
could
just
vote
to
roll
back.
D
A
E
Thank
you
in
your
board
packet.
You
have
the
first
or
you
have
our
long-range
facilities
plan
for
your
first
reading.
Our
long-range
facility
plan
is
part
of
our
strategic
plan.
It's
one
of
the
ways
that
we
use
to
create
our
priorities
for
our
facilities
in
our
district.
It
is
also
the
preceding
document
to
the
long-range
financial
plan
so
upon
approval.
We
would
create
our
long-range
financial
plan
that
also
talks
through
what
we
need
to
do
for
our
long-range
facilities
plan.
E
Knowing
that
we
were
going
to
be
going
through
a
pretty
significant
strategic
Plan
update
last
year,
we
did
not
present
a
long-range
facilities
plan.
We
were
also
going
through
some
work
that
we
wanted
to
do
so
this
is
going
to
be
kind
of
putting
us
back
on
track.
I
do
want
to
just
start
by
saying
that
our
long
range
facilities
plan
is
just
a
guide.
This
is
just
kind
of
what
we
see
things
based
on
the
condition
that
we
get
right.
E
Now
we
work
with
our
demographer,
which
presents
to
the
board
an
updated
annual
enrollment
analysis.
Every
December
so
should
conditions
change,
such
as
they
did
over
the
last
couple
years
with
the
impact
of
kobit
covid.
We
would
change
those
as
well
and
then
sometimes
other
things
just
happen
as
well.
The
other
piece
that
I
wanted
to
share
is
that,
since
we
started
the
long-range
specific
facilities
plan
over
the
last
couple
years,
I
think
in
2014
or
2013,
we
have
always
had
a
10-year
plan
for
our
facility,
recycle
schedule.
E
That
is
what's
included
this
year
as
well.
Over
time
we
might
be
changing
that
to
A
Five-Year
Plan,
just
based
on
more
of
our
needs.
Kind
of
the
10-year
plan
is
something
that's
worked,
it's
what
the
district
has
worked
as
well,
but
in
2014
we
had
some
Consultants
that
really
advise
the
district
that,
on
an
annual
basis
from
our
general
fund,
we
should
have
about
four
million
dollars
in
expenses
for
to
upkeep
with
our
facilities.
We've
been
making
it
work
on
two
million
dollars
and
and
that's
just
a
little
bit
to
our
staff.
E
That's
us
trying
to
be
as
a
good
fiduciaries
of
our
dollars
as
we
can
to
be
able
to
stretch
what
our
facility
needs
are,
but
we
may
share
that
as
well.
So
I
will
now
kind
of
go
through
just
a
brief
summary
of
some
of
the
major
projects
that
we
are
seeing
as
immediately
in
our
long-range
facilities
plan
and
I
apologize
for
scrolling.
If
you
get
motion,
sickness
I
am
sorry
about
that,
but
really
a
couple
of
pretty
big
significant
projects
for
us.
E
First
and
foremost
in
2018
or
2019,
we
had
created
a
task
force
to
talk
about
the
continued
growth
for
Early
Childhood
special
education
services.
That
task
force
had
recommended
three
locations
for
North,
Middle
and
South
part
of
town
to
be
able
to
have
access
to
Early
Childhood
special
education
services.
Those
are
they've
been
centralized
at
Agassi.
Until
this
point
with
the
couple
of
satellite
campuses
based
on
how
we
had
classroom
spaces,
we
added
four
rooms
to
Longfellow,
so
that
project
is
complete
and
done.
E
Last
year
we
proposed
to
the
board
addition
to
Hawthorne
Elementary
School.
We
put
a
pause
on
that
solely
Because
by
the
time
that
all
of
the
work
was
done
and
ready.
The
market
just
wasn't
favorable,
given
where
Supply
and
labor
was
at
that
point
and
that
we
were
going
into
the
winter
season.
So
we
want
to
continue
with
the
Hawthorne
project
and
then
the
intention
would
be
what
if,
whenever
we
do
build
the
next
South
Side
Elementary
School,
which
we
will
need.
E
We
build
a
addition
onto
that
building
as
well,
or
we
make
sure
that
we
have
space
to
accommodate
Early
Childhood
special
education
services
in
Far,
South
Fargo.
So
that's
what
that
first
piece
is
selling
the
former
district
office.
Is
there
building
use
of
ancillary
programming?
Those
are
kind
of
standard.
The
North,
High,
School,
track
and
field
is
on
its
way.
You
can
start
seeing
it
takes
shape
at
North,
High
School
still
a
ways
to
go,
but
grateful
for
that
work
and
the
north
high
booster
club.
That's
really
assisted
with
that
as
well.
E
Agassi
and
Dakota,
high
school
and
adult
education.
We've
talked
about
that
as
well.
Trying
to
find
a
place.
That's
going
to
be
the
best
home
for
for
Adult,
Ed
and
Dakota
High
School
paired
together
in
the
future.
I
I
want
to
focus
more
on
just
future
School
sites
and
then
mainly
resolving
the
South
Side
enrollment
increases.
E
At
that
time,
what
was
discussed
were
the
potential
of
that
property
to
be
used
as
a
future
site
for
an
elementary
school
and
or
middle
school.
Should
that
need
a
rise
and
again
as
a
district,
we
are
really
fortunate.
As
a
sub
entity
of
the
government,
we
don't
pay
holding
tax
if
we
have
an
opportunity
to
purchase
property
ahead
of
time
as
well.
E
Well,
the
situation
that
we're
in
right
now
is
Bennett
is
already
very
much
near
or
over
the
target
enrollment
that
we
want
for
that
building
and
we
are
going
to
need
a
elementary
school.
Sooner
than
later,
we
can't
build
on
the
property
that
we
own
on
76,
although
it's
a
great
location
until
the
diversions
figured
out,
because
if
not,
we
have
to
be
able
to
accommodate
the
flood
protection
measures
that
we
have
to
put
in
place,
which
comes
at
a
significant
cost
to
the
district
as
well.
E
I've
said
this
before
and
I'll
say
it
again,
you
know
I
think,
no
matter
what,
unfortunately,
just
the
nature
of
being
a
linear
City
where
we're
fighting
against
developers
and
City
infrastructure
and
the
school
district.
It's
a
it's
always
a
chicken
and
an
egg
situation
about
who
goes
out
there
first,
because
one
has
the
implication
of
the
other,
not
only
in
which
is
the
starting
point
of
a
slippery
slope
of
individuals
moving
out
there,
but
then
there's
also
things
of
consider
like
specials,
City
infrastructure.
Things
of
that
nature
as
well.
E
I
think
that,
no
matter
what
building
we
build,
we're
not
going
to
be
far
south
enough.
So
now
we're
in
this
situation
with
where
do
we
do
Bennett
is
currently
on
58th.
We
have
land
on
76,
but
we
can't
build
there.
So
we
have
to
figure
that
piece
out.
There
is
land
that
is
flood
protected
west
of
the
interstate
kind
of
South.
E
By
that
Walmart
on
64th
we
don't
think
it's
necessarily
best
to
build
an
elementary
school
there
now
for
the
purposes
of
supporting
Bennett,
because
Kennedy
still
has
space,
and
we
expect
that
side
of
the
interstate
to
continue
to
grow
as
well
and
after
Kennedy's
filled,
and
then
you
start
going
west
of
the
interstate
and
I
know
I'm
sharing
a
lot.
So
hopefully,
there's
a
lot
here
that
I'm
trying
to
pack,
but
as
if
you
go
west
of
the
interstate,
we're
going
to
need
a
school
down
there
down
the
road
as
well.
E
So
what
administration
is
proposing
with
all
of
that
being
considered?
Also
knowing
that,
when
we
had
a
task
force
to
look
at
the
boundary
changes
that
the
board
approved
recently
over
the
last
couple
of
years,
our
community
and
our
board
resoundingly
said
that
they
never
wanted
to
split
up
or
to
the
best
of
our
ability.
They
want
to
keep
a
middle
school
high
school
feeder
pattern.
So
that
means
all
middle
school.
Kids
go
to
the
same
high
school,
well
in
a
linear
City
with
where
the
conditions
are
right.
E
E
That's
big
enough
for
a
high
school
east
of
the
interstate,
so
part
of
what
you
see
in
the
long
range
plan
is
to
look
at
potentially
purchasing
land
west
of
the
interstate
south
of
near
where
that
Walmart
is
or
if
you
know
where
the
Sanford
Sports
Complex
is
going
to
be.
If
there's
going
to
be
opportunities
there
for
a
future
high
school
that
Discovery
would
feed
into.
E
We
are
proposing
that
at
this
time
to
accommodate
the
needs
of
all
three
we
look
at
potentially,
where
that
we
have
land
it's
about:
eight
Acres,
directly,
east
of
Davies,
between
Davies
and
Dakota,
Dakota,
Boys
and
Girls
Club.
There
has
been
a
property
or
Dakota
Boys
and
Girls
Ranch
right.
Sorry,
aside
from
my
peripheral
I
apologize,
there
we've
done
work
when
we
were
going
through
the
boundary
changes.
E
Seeing
is
there
an
opportunity
to
build
a
middle
school
there,
and
some
of
that
work
has
already
been
done
in
the
past
in
this
long-range
plan.
Administration
would
say
that
our
best
bet
right
now,
given
the
conditions
that
I
just
outlined
would
be
to
build
a
middle
school
there,
but
don't
open
that
middle
school
as
a
traditional
six.
Eight
school
open
that
middle
school
as
a
589
building
to
provide
assistance
to
Bennett,
which
is
on
58th.
E
This
would
be
on
73rd,
provide
a
assistance
to
Discovery
and
provide
a
assistance
to
Davies,
and
then
once
we
need,
or
once
the
diversion
is
figured
out.
We
built
that
elementary
school
that
we
can
on
76.
So
then
Bennett
would
have
another
South
Side
option,
just
where
we
planned
on
on
the
land
that
we
own
and
then
we
will
see
how
enrollment
patterns
hold
up
as
we
need
we'll
build
the
next
high
school
and
for
Discovery
Middle
School
to
go
into
and
once
that
high
school
is
built.
E
This
building
that's
directly
east
of
Davies
would
then
become
your
traditional
6-8
school
that
feeds
into
Davies
High
School.
It
is
very
close
to
Davies,
so
the
concept
would
be
very
similar
to
what
West
Fargo
Public
Schools
is
doing
with
liberty
and
Cheyenne
sharing
athletic
facilities
and
things
of
that
nature
on
that
property.
But
that's
probably
the
biggest
piece
again
lots
to
unpack
there.
B
F
B
A
A
B
I
would
like
to
make
some
comments
on
this,
because
this
is
this:
I've
got
them
in
order
here.
The
the
RSP
demographic
company
is
the
same
company
that
West
Fargo
uses
they've
been
quite
accurate
over
the
years
and
and
they've
been
quite
accurate,
with
Fargo
Public,
Schools
and
I
know
that
that
has
been
under
scrutiny
in
the
past
number
two.
B
B
Number
three
I
was
visiting
with
several
Bennett
students
today
and
I
said.
How
are
things
going
at
your
school
and
and
I
said
it's
busy?
Isn't
it
and
I
actually
had
kids
that
knew
exactly
what
the
enrollment
was
in
their
school,
so
their
parents
are
talking
to
them.
A
couple
of
them
said
we
have
650
kids
in
our
school
right
now
and
we're
going
to
have
700
pretty
soon
and
I
thought
wow.
B
This
is
a
community
conversation
and
I
think
this
is
a
responsible
approach
as
a
first
reading
to
put
that
out
there
and
then
get
some
feedback
from
our
community.
It's
it's
different
than
what
we're
used
to
in
the
in
the
near
future
or
in
the
the
pre
the
near
history,
but
we've
done
it
before
it's
not
ideal,
it's
not
final,
but
it
is
effective
as
a
transition
strategy
and
that's
the
reason.
H
B
I
think
that
typically
Administration
would
leave
would
lead
that
okay,
but
allowing
some
time
before
a
final
approval,
I
think
is
very
wise
from
an
administration's
standpoint.
So
they
can
receive
feedback
in
the
board
can
receive
feedback
a
lot
of
times.
These
conversations
have
been
stretched
out
three
years.
Okay
and
I
think
it's
it's
really
good
to
put
some
timelines
on
to
when
the
board
would
finally
approve.
Yes,
okay,.
H
E
And
thank
you
for
the
question
too.
I
think
you
know
this
is
the
long-range
facilities
plan.
So
this
is
just
a
guiding
document.
There's
nothing!
That's
set
in
stone
here
that
there's
nothing
in
here
that
initiates
a
project.
This
is
just
kind
of
where
are
we
going
and
then,
when
the
time
is
right
to
initiate
the
project,
then
we
do
that.
That's
when
it
comes
to
the
board
to
work
with
Architects
and
work
with
the
bids
and
then
oftentimes.
E
Sometimes
that's
when
we
get
feedback
right
when
it
starts
for
lack
of
a
better
term
to
some
people
starting
to
get
real.
But
the
challenge
is-
and
we've
kind
of
went
through
this
with
the
last
couple
years
or
with
the
boundary
changes
as
well,
is
that
Administration
needs
a
guide
post
on
where
to
concentrate
our
time,
energy
and
efforts.
E
So
if
we
concentrate
on
this
model
and
then
something
gets
flipped
because
the
values
flip
and
then
something
flips
back,
that's
a
little
bit
of
challenge
for
us,
and
so
it's
the
long-range
planning
piece
is
a
tool
used
in
strategic
planning,
just
to
kind
of
make
sure
that
we
say
like.
We
know
that
there's
so
many
factors
that
go
into
where
schools
are
located
and
people
won't
always
be
happy.
E
So
what
are
the
factors
on
what
you're
making
this
decision
on-
and
this
is
a
lot
of
this-
is
based
on
that
consistent
feeder
pattern
and
what
we're
seeing
right
now
too,
but
I
can't
guarantee
you
that
you
know
in
between
these
meetings.
You
you'll
get
all
the
feedback
you
want,
and
it
won't
happen
when
the
project
becomes
real,
because
that
could
happen
too
so
I
just
don't
want
to
allow
for
that.
Yeah
notion.
C
Question
yeah:
we
discussed
this,
you
know
in
planning
and
one
of
the
first
things
that
came
to
my
mind
in
planning
is
motion
or
no
motion.
We're
gonna
get
a
lot
of
feedback
about
this,
because
it
is
not
a
typical
thing
to
do,
but
it
is
when
we,
when
you
live
in
a
city
that
grows
so
fast
in
Only
One
Direction.
We
have
to
think
outside
the
box
to
be
able
to
accommodate
our
students
and
and
and
use
our
our
taxpayer
dollars
to
the
best
of
our
ability.
C
So
I
anticipate
that,
as
this
starts
to
take
shape,
we
are
going
to
get
a
lot
of
feedback
and
I
just
want
to
you
know
kind
of
let
the
public
know
that
don't
hold
back.
Let
us
let
us
let
us
know
what
you
think
and,
and
so
we
can
move
forward
and
have
a
have
the
best
solution
that
we
possibly
can
so
because
yeah,
it
is,
like
you
said,
Robin.
A
You
Seth
I,
if
I
may,
I
just
have
a
clarifying
question.
I
was
trying
to
I've
heard
this
multiple
times
now
and
I
still
have
questions,
so
you
stated
that
land
west
of
the
interstate
near
Walmart
is
not
ideal
for
an
elementary
school
I'm
just
curious.
If
we
could
know
why
or
a
little
because
it
seems
to
me,
our
immediate
problem
has
been
in
the
elementary
school
and
we're
sort
of
doing
this
roundabout
way
to
do
it.
So
why
is
that
land
not
suitable
I'm.
E
Saying
that
it's
not
it's,
probably
not
the
best
solution
for
the
elementary
school
now
to
solve
the
benefit
problem,
because
we're
going
to
need
an
elementary
school
down
there,
as
that
part,
continues
to
develop
and
fill
out.
So
we
would
be
potentially
telling
families
to
move
back
and
forth
right
and
because
that's
closer
to
64th
than
it's
on
58th,
so
the
encatchment
area
that
you'd
be
able
to
capture
wouldn't
be
even
as
far
south
enough
as
if
you
can
hold
off
till
you
can
get
to
76.
and
the
way
one
of
the
guiding
principles.
E
That's
in
our
long-range
facilities
plan
is
that
we
don't
start
to
build
a
new
building
until
you
have
50
percent
of
the
students
that
can
occupy
that
building.
So
when
you're,
a
lit,
which
makes
good
fiduciary
sense,
but
then,
when
you're,
a
linear
City,
the
problem
with
that
is
you're
already
50
percent
too
far
north
right,
because
infrastructure
is
just
going
to
keep
coming
further
south
so
that
that's
that
piece.
It's
like!
Okay!
If
we
build
an
elementary
school
on
the
west
side
of
the
interstate,
you
still
have
room
in
Ken.
A
H
I
Oh
mine
is
a
simple
one:
would
we
ever
get
a
tour
for
the
for
the
Aldi's
location
that
we
discussed
him
because
we
can
have
them
on
in
our
written
paper
and
everything?
But
sometime
is
good.
You
know
to
really
look
at
the
place
and
then
you
have
a
clue
exactly
what
has
been
written
in
here,
because
I
think
that
it
would
be
really
good
to
have
a
tour
and
just
look
at
it
as
a
board
and
just
to
make
sure
that
we
really
comprehend
what
we
ex.
What
are
we
exactly
looking
for.
E
So
I
think
I
just
kind
of
want
to
know
where,
if
it
can
turn
on
the
monitors
I
can
give
you
at
least
a
virtual
tour.
Now,
so
you
can
see
the
property
that
we'd
talk
about
building
on
everything
else
is
is
just
going
to
be
at
this
point
here.
I
can
I
can
show
you
where
there
is
development
at
this
point,
so
one
second.
E
B
To
to
save
dead
air
time,
it's
not
uncommon
for
the
district
to
purchase
real
real
estate
in
advance
to
save
money
and
Lead
prior
to
it
becoming
zoned.
And
what
have
you
and
it's
also
not
uncommon
for
the
district
to
swap
land
with
other
entities
or
sell
it
to
to
shift
things
into
place,
but
I,
but
is
it
is
responsible
to
use
taxpayer
dollars
to
purchase
that
land
in
advance
before
it
is
so
escalated
in
cost?
A
E
E
Basically,
this
sidewalk,
when
we
talked
about
it
initially,
would
be
kind
of
the
stopping
point
of
our
land
currently
that
we
could
use
so
it
would
be
working
with
the
park
district,
which
we
do
on
most
of
our
buildings
to
potentially
flip
the
field
over
here
and
then
have
the
middle
school
over
here.
So
Davey's,
here,
Middle
School
here
the
current
land
that
we
own
on
76,
is
in
this
region
right
here
and
Bennett
is
on
I'm
gonna
zoom
out
here
is
on
58th,
so
Bennett
is
right
here.
E
In
this
area
that
we're
talking
about
so
when
you
talk
about
west
of
the
interstate,
another
piece
of
consider
is,
we
can
only
go
up
to
45th
before
we
hit
West
Fargo's
School
of
District
boundaries.
So
any
development
over
here
is
what
we're
talking
about.
So
it's
still
not
as
South
as
far
south
as
we'd
like,
but
the
other
piece
is
Kennedy
is
located
over
here
as
well,
so
right
across
Microsoft
you'll
see
Kennedy.
E
E
J
When
we
look
at
Bennett's
numbers
what
we
did
last
year
of
changing
the
boundaries,
for
example,
made
a
difference
of
about
a
classroom
size
of
kindergarten
at
Bennett
Bennett's
at
six
sections
of
kindergarten,
but
they
do
have
some
space
for
some
students
within
the
classrooms.
So
without
that
little
adjustment
we
made
last
year,
we
really
would
have
felt
it
even
very
packed.
So
that
was
helpful.
J
J
K
Then,
as
we
look
at,
for
example,
Middle
School
numbers,
we
know
that
we
made
a
boundary
change
and
that
did
impact
Discovery.
So
we
were
above
a
thousand
students
this
year
as
of
September
1
we're
at
973..
So
even
with
the
boundary
changes,
we
are
fairly
close
to
the
Target
enrollment
number,
which
is
a
Thousand
Eleven
at
Discovery,
so
we'll
continue
to
grow,
as
our
community
continues
to
grow
on
the
South
Side.
So
right
now
we're
below
that
Target
number.
But
we're
going
to
continue
to
inch
over
that
in
the
near
future.
K
F
10
years
is
too
far
out,
I.
Think
for
for
this
type
of
stuff,
in
it
I
think,
is
especially
apparent
when
we
look
at
the
maintenance
in
mode
appendix
B,
because
the
first,
the
first
five
years
of
anticipated
spending
are
not
even
I
mean
they
don't
make.
They
make
the
the
next
five
years
not
make
sense,
or
we
someone's
giving
us
a
very
Rosy
Outlook
of
years
6
through
10.
F
I
mean
it
was
like
an
average
of
almost
15
million
a
year
for
the
first
five
years
and
then
magically
our
maintenance
costs
dropped
to
2.7
million
per
year,
and
I
was
like
that.
That's
not
so,
yes,
I
am
wholeheartedly
in
favor
of
maybe
shortening
the
the
time
frame
on
potentially
only
certain
aspects
of
the
the
long
range
planning
when
it
comes
to
facilities,
but
for
some
things,
particularly
maintenance,
it
seems
10
years
is
too
long
to
ground.
You.
E
Yeah,
we
wholeheartedly
agree
and
came
to
the
same
conclusion.
It
would
have
that
piece
and
then,
along
with
just
there's,
been
so
many
changing,
Dynamics
and
needs
for
facilities.
Secure
entries
is
something
that
came
up
prior
to
you
know.
A
lot
of
the
original
plans
were
built
in
that's
become
a
priority
for
us
as
well.
We've
also
had
some
projects
that
get
funded
by
donors
that
we've
been
really
grateful
for
in
our
community
as
well.
In
the
reality
of
the
situation,
is
that
and
having
a
a
process?
E
That's
collaborative
with
a
wide
variety
of
stakeholders
to
take
a
look
at
immediate
versus
long-term
needs
and
automatically
add
it
into
the
what
will
be
like
a
new
five
year
plan
and
a
shorter
plan?
It's
all
in
the
works.
We
already
have
the
kind
of
the
software
that
we
wanted
to
do
it
I
think.
As
most
of
all
know,
we're
gonna
have
some
change
in
leadership
in
our
maintenance
department
Department
two,
so
we
kind
of
just
need
that
year
this
year
to
recycle
the
10-year
plan,
but
then
put
a
new
plan
into
once.
A
E
So
some
of
the
things
that
I
shared
earlier,
like
Dakota
and
other
things
you
know
some
of
those
are
going
to
be
based
on
opportunity
if
we
could
find
the
right
fit
for
Dakota,
high
school
and
things
of
that
nature.
The
the
South
Side
enrollment
is
what
I
wanted
to
focus
on
right
now,
because
that
will
be
something
that
we
would
want
to
move
sooner
rather
than
later.
If
Bennett's
continue
to
grow
at
that.
E
So
should
that
be
something
that
we're
going
to
move
forward
with,
it
would
be
our
hope
to
start
working
on
bringing
recommendations
to
the
board
as
as
soon
as
that's
potentially
feasible,
given
where
those
enrollments
are
Hawthorne
is
pretty
much
underway.
North
High,
as
we
know,
is
underway
as
well.
B
Yes,
Robin
since
there's
a
motion
on
the
floor.
You
know
I,
don't
know
how
the
board
wants
to
handle
first
readings
and
second
readings
on
other
boards.
That
I
am
we.
We
typically
approve
the
first
reading
and
I
should
have
brought
this
up
in
governance,
just
to
say
we're
on
the
right
track,
get
public
feedback,
so
I'm
happy
to
withdraw
that
I
just
need
you
know.
Just
let
me
know
what
you
want
me
to
do.
A
A
F
A
L
Foreign
I
just
had
a
couple
things
for
you
to
take
a
look
at
when
you
discussed
the
operational
plan
on
the
si5,
the
Equitable
resources
standard,
eight
and
just
where
it's
got
the
inclusion,
and
it
says,
progress
towards
results
and
how
that
will
affect
teachers,
and
is
that
part
of
their
evaluation
and
how
they
become
paid.
So
just
something
to
kind
of
look
at
because
of
that
wording,
and
then
also
on
page
eight.
L
They
use
differences
between
task
force
and
committee.
Is
there
a
difference
are
both
of
them
paid
per
the
contract,
so
just
I
know
there's
some
different
different
words
that
we
use
and
not
sure
that
if
they're
similar
or
have
different
meanings
and
then
quite
excited
to
be
a
part
of
this
back
to
school,
bash
FDA
had
a
booth
and
it
felt
it
was
really
well
attended
from
all
areas
of
our
district
and
a
lot
of
good
things
going
on.
L
So
looking
forward
to
that
work,
and
then
lastly,
we're
hopeful
to
have
our
annual
fundraiser
during
November
14th
through
the
18th
for
American
Education
week,
and
we
do
that
in
hopes
to
get
money
for
scholarships,
and
so
we
just
paid
out
our
fourth
scholarship
for
all
four
high
schools
this
month.
So
that's
always
exciting.
Thank
you.
E
I
don't
have
much
just
because
I
will
share
a
lot
when
we
go
through
the
operational
strategic
plan,
but
you
know
just
in
response
the
results
that
was
just
kind
of
questioned
in
the
FEA
report.
Those
are
the
results
of
the
Strategic
plan.
Are
there's
nothing
in
our
operational
plan?
That's
actually
looking
at
a
pay
for
performance,
I
think
was
kind
of
what
the
condition
was.
E
Actually,
in
fact,
our
strategic
plan
is
based
on
the
premise
of
maybe
potentially
down
the
road,
decoupling,
teacher,
Effectiveness
and
teacher
evaluation,
because
there's
so
many
so
much
variability
that
goes
there,
but
that's
a
larger
conversation
down
the
road,
so
yeah
just
wanted
to
clarify
that.
But
I'll
share
a
lot
more.
When
we
go
into
the
operational
and
strategic
plan.
Conversation
in
business.
A
B
G
Technically,
when
you
want
to
change
the
agenda,
it
should
be
done
at
the
beginning
of
the
agenda,
but
this
board
has
been
kind
to
others
in
the
past
to
have
it
removed
at
this
time,
but
in
the
future
it
should
be
removed
before
the
agenda
is
approved
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting.
So
you
would
need
unanimous
consent
to
change
that
at
this
time.
C
B
A
A
E
E
Will
go
ahead
and
get
started
as
again:
I'm
gonna
wait
for
it
to
maybe
just
turn
on
the
monitors
in
the
back
as
well.
I'm
gonna
do
something
a
little
bit
different,
because
they're
going
to
be
related,
so
I'll
introduce
the
operational
plan,
but
much
of
what
I'm
going
to
say
is
also
going
to
serve
as
the
introduction
for
the
Strategic
plan,
as
well
as
I
just
buy
some
time
here.
E
I
think
a
lot
this
summer
in
our
work
session
and
other
things,
including
my
staff,
opener
you've
heard
me,
speak
a
lot
about
like
what
are
our
metrics
for
success
and
making
sure
that
we
Define
that.
So
in
this
presentation,
my
metric
for
Success,
along
with
eloquently
presenting,
is
to
impress
the
one
person
whose
profession
is
in
data.
So
hopefully
I
could
do
that,
but
that
is
just
me
separately.
E
I'm,
going
to
start
with
our
strategic
plan
and
who
we
are
as
a
district
right.
There
are
so
many
different
factors
that
different
complexities
in
our
district,
better
Nuance,
in
terms
of
what
is
the
function
of
the
board
dictated
by
governance
versus
the
function
of
administration,
and
then
what
are
our
metrics
for
success
and
all
the
different
pieces
as
an
organization
that
we
have.
E
So
you
know
if
we
take
a
look
at
our
strategic
plan
in
terms
of
an
org
chart,
our
mission
vision
and
our
values
are:
are
what
really
drive
us
as
an
organization?
We
know
that
that's
kind
of
the
framework
for
everything
we
do.
We
have
Focus
areas.
Each
of
those
Focus
areas
are
the
six
strategic
initiatives
that
are
going
to
be
in
the
Strategic
plan
that
you're
going
to
approve
our
strategic
initiatives.
Each
of
those
has
a
certain
amount
of
results
that
we
want
to
follow
within
each
result.
E
We
had
a
work
session
where
we
said
okay
board.
What
are
you
looking
for
to
be
able
to
evaluate
those
results?
And
that's
where
you
gave
us
those
result,
policy
indicators
that
we're
going
to
talk
about
as
well.
Under
each
result,
policy
indicator
you
may
potentially
have
a
standard,
which
is
just
a
minimum
standard
of
Education
that
we
want
to
provide
throughout
this
organization
that
we
put
in
our
strategic
plan.
E
We,
these
operational
plans,
has
gone
through
a
two
reading
process.
That's
what
this
is.
The
second
reading
for
the
Strategic
plan
in
itself
has
gone
through
a
two
reading
process.
So
all
of
these
pieces,
the
board
has
full
weigh-in
on
through
multiple
opportunities
to
provide
feedback
as
well.
Additionally,
within
our
governance
structure,
the
superintendent's
evaluation
is
tied
to
progress
on
these
results
as
well.
So
that's
why
it's
important
to
have
Clarity
in
terms
of
where
we
go,
so
our
vision
would
be.
E
Well,
how
do
we
evaluate
these
results
that
are
big
and
Broad
in
scope?
Well,
that's
where
we
look
at
the
result
policy
indicators,
so
we
had
originally
on
the
first
Reading
had
indicators
such
as
graduation
data
Choice,
ready
data
Greg
had
talked
about
this
when
we
had
our
work
session
as
well.
When
you
look
at
a
lot
of
the
data
points,
I
believe
of
the
28
26
of
them
that
we
had
talked
about
at
our
board
work
sessions
that
we
propose
in
the
first
reading.
E
What
an
analysis
will
include
for
each
of
these
indicators
is
information
in
one
of
these
three
categories:
key
accomplishments
challenges
and
next
steps
that
way
we
can
really
kind
of
have
conversations
about.
What's
working,
what's
not
and
for
whom
and
then
what
is
the
district
planning
on
doing
moving
forward?
E
Yep,
that's
why
I
said
they'll
kind
of
be
tied
together,
so
because
alignment
is
key
because
of
everything
we're
doing
so
when
you
approve
the
operational
plan.
What
you're
going
to
be
doing
is
approving
these
28
action
items.
That's
going
to
be
the
scope
of
work
that
we
do.
This
isn't
necessarily
all
the
tasks
some
of
these
might
be
tasks,
but
some
of
these
are
just
the
big
goals
that
we
want
to
accomplish
this
year
to
focus
our
time.
E
Energy
and
effort-
and
these
are
our
operational
plan-
is
aligned
to
cognia,
which
is
our
accreditation
system.
There
are
three
main
indicators,
but
these
are
also
aligned
to
our
strategic
plan
and
I
think
that's
critically
important
too.
So
when
you
approve
the
operational
plan,
these
are
the
things
that
we're
going
to
work
on,
for
example,
the
first
thing
is:
communicate
and
Implement
a
new
revised
strategic
plan.
E
You'll
see
that
the
results
are
what
the
board's
going
to
monitor
under
each
result.
You
have
the
four
indicators
or
the
indicators
that
the
board
approved,
but
under
that
you
have
not
only
all
of
the
standards
that
are
in
our
strategic
plan,
but
all
of
the
actions
that
we
put
in
the
operational
plan
now
show
up
under
the
indicators
as
well.
So
you
see
how
everything
rolls
up
into
something
else.
So
I've
talked
a
lot
about
this
summer
about
the
work
that
we
do
as
a
district.
E
We
we
focus
on
the
results,
because
not
any
one
point
a
day
at
a
time
is
just
one
data
point
relative
to
so
much
of
the
other
work
that
happens.
The
other
piece
that
you'll
see
upon,
hopefully
by
the
end
of
this
year,
when
we
get
this
up
and
going
with
our
operational
plan
as
well,
is
we're
going
to
also
be
able
to
tie
all
of
our
operational
plan
items
to
the
budget
right
now.
E
Only
the
preliminary
budget
for
this
year
has
been
approved
when
the
full
budget
is
tied,
we'll
be
able
to
line
by
line
and
then
take
a
look
at
which
operational
item
based
on
how
much
budget
has
been
spent
as
well.
So
when
the
board
is
evaluating
the
operational
plan
at
the
end
of
the
year,
we
can
do
a
clear
kind
of
Roi
not
only
towards
the
results
that
we're
getting
for
our
students
but
be
able
to
take
a
look
at
it
that
way
as
well.
E
So
that's
why
I'm
tying
the
three
conversations
together
and
just
saying
that
when
you
approve
the
operational
plan
in
addition
to
the
Strategic
plan
this
year,
what
you're
going
to
be
doing
is
saying
this
is
where
we
want
our
budget
to
be
focused.
These
are
the
action
items
that
we
feel
like
will
get
us
there
and
then
that's
how
we're
going
to
monitor
our
results
moving
forward,
so
that
is
kind
of
the
introduction
to
our
operational
plan
for
the
school
year,
which
is
included
in
your
board
packet.
Should
you
have
any
questions.
B
A
B
M
Could
we
visit
a
little
bit
about
what
Kim
had
shared
with
us
earlier
about
their
couple
points
of
potential
concern?
I
guess
it
was
reached
out
to
me
as
well,
and
one
of
that
was
under
strategic
initiative,
five,
which
deals
with
Equitable
resources.
There's
some
concern
about
the
inclusion
of
progress
towards
results.
What
what
exactly?
Does
that
look
like
there's
a
concern
that
that
could
shift
a
little
over
time
in
defining
teacher
effectiveness
based
on
test
scores?
It
could
morph
it
and
I
can
see
the
concern.
M
E
The
standard
eight
says:
Implement
a
framework
for
employee
performance
appraisals
that
are
based
on
professional
growth,
reflection
and
progress
towards
the
results
and
the
Fulfillment
of
Fargo
Public
Schools
Mission.
The
results
that's
referenced
here
are
the
same
results
that
we
defined
earlier
in
the
policy,
which
is
what
the
board
is
adopting
as
how
you're
monitoring
your
systemic
performance
so
shouldn't.
We
all
be
working
towards
the
results
shouldn't
that
be
exactly
what
our
performance
evaluations
are.
So
I
I
actually
think
that
alignment
is
is
better.
That
result
doesn't
say.
E
M
K
Most
of
these,
in
this
section,
are
around
teaching
and
learning,
so
we
tried
to
define
a
committee
as
something
that
will
be
more
than
just
one
year
in
duration,
so
a
committee
that
would
be
multiple
years,
something
that
we
continue
with
a
task
force
is
something
that
we
will
solve.
A
particular
issue
do
some
particular
research
and
then
be
done
at
the
end
of
the
year.
F
F
Being
punitive
and
harsh
and
employee
appraisals,
but
I
I,
do
say,
I
do
think.
I
I
have
broader
reservations
about
having
progress
towards
results
used
in
employee
performance
appraisals
other
than
the
superintendent
in
particular,
because
right,
the
results
policies
are
how
we
hold
the
superintendent
accountable
for
those
particular
results
and
not
necessarily
any
particular
employee
outside
of
that
purview.
E
Correct
so
this
would
be
a
scope
of
work
that
we
would
put
in
and
I
don't
so
my
question
here
would
be:
do
we
not
think
that
any
of
our
employees
performance
should
be
related
to
their
effectiveness
in
their
job
or
towards
the
results
that
we
work
in,
because
currently
we
are
dictated
by
the
state
to
use
one
of
three
Frameworks,
Marzano
or
Danielson.
Marzano
is
what
we
are
using
as
a
district
that
is
also
directly
tied
to
teaching
Effectiveness.
That's
a
sole
measure.
F
I
think
you
know
the
results
policy
is
going
to
have
very
few
targeted
things
that
this
board
looks
for,
including
like
Choice,
ready,
stuff
and
I.
Think
it's
really
hard
to
tie
that
to
the
performance
appraisal
of
a
kindergarten
teacher,
so
I
think.
Maybe
if
we
are
going
to
use
if
we
do
use,
you
know
that
Marzano
framework
Maybe,
we
can
be
a
little
bit
more
specific
in
the
language.
B
You
know
I
received
the
same
email
and
I
I
asked
for
some
more
dialogue
and
so
I
think
the
elephant
in
the
room
here
is
for
lack
of
a
better
term.
We
are
hearing
about
student
achievement
and
accountability
and
we're
hearing
that
not
only
locally
but
nationally,
and
a
lot
of
them
are
tied
to
third
grade
reading,
scores
and
math
proficiency,
and
so
that
scares
a
lot
of
people
I
think
there
is
two
RuPaul's
point:
I
wrote
down
effective
teachers,
effective
teachers
help
their
their
students,
grow
toward
and
I
say
growth.
B
The
Target
and
effective
teachers
will
help
those
kids
grow,
but
that's
not
anybody
who
understands
education,
it's
not
based
on
test
scores,
there's
so
much
to
unpack
to
get
them
there
and
there's
so
much
growth,
but
that's
what
we're
being
held
accountable
to,
because
we
pick
a
third
grade
point
in
time
in
eighth
grade
point
in
time
and
and
the
ACT
score
and
I.
Think
if
you
were
to
review
presentation
on
the
back
to
school
opener,
it
really
talks
about
some
of
the
semantics
behind
that,
because
it's
so
much
more
complicated
than
test
scores.
E
Yeah,
unfortunately,
I
think
some
of
this
is
semantics
and
I.
Think
one
thing
that
we
could
do
should
this
policy
get
approved
is
I
would
have
maybe
just
capitalize
the
r
in
results
that
you're
reading,
because
results
are
defined
on
page
seven.
The
irony
of
this
situation
is
that
I
gave
a
30-minute
speech
at
our
staff
opener
that
members
of
the
FDA
saw
that
brought
this
concern
today.
That
speaks
to
the
exact
opposite
of
what
this
conversation
is.
E
Actually,
if
you
look
at
the
entire
document,
and
this
entire
framework
that
we've
talked
about
is
the
fact
and
I
even
said
it
earlier
today,
inadvert
into
this
conversation
that
we
are,
we
need
to
decouple
teacher,
Effectiveness
and
teacher
evaluations.
Results
are
actually
defined
by
being
bigger
and
broader
in
scope
and
just
being
monitored
because
of
what
I
put
on
page
nine
of
a
strategic
plan,
broken
burner's
theory
of
ecological
Child
Development
that
child
development
is
a
part
of
so
many
different
pieces.
E
The
whole
point
of
the
Strategic
plan
is
to
take
away
from
one
measure
at
one
point
in
time
being
able
to
use
that.
So
it's
I,
don't
know
I,
don't
want
to
say
it's
challenging
to
hear
that
the
exact
framework
that's
been
written
in
in
the
language
in
front
that
people
have
had
multiple
opportunities
to
provide
for
is
being
used
against
to
go
against
the
intention
of
exactly
what
was
shared
so
I
mean
we
happy
to
capitalize
a
result,
but
we're
also
happy
to
change
if
something
needs
to
happen.
E
If
you
look
at,
if
you
look
at
the
strategy
map
that
we've
utilized,
that
we
put
in
place
prior
to
the
Strategic
plan
that
was
last
year,
is
that
we
actually
say
that
our
goal
is
to
just
get
better
every
single
day.
That's
a
framework,
that's
that
we
want
to
put
into
it.
It's
not
be
evaluated
by
one
test
score,
so
the
exact
direction
we're
going
to
is
opposite
of
I.
Think
what's
being
implied
in
this
conversation.
A
I,
just
have
a
brute
of
order
here
for
us,
so
we
are
currently
discussing
to
vote
to
approve
the
operational
plan.
Only
there
has
been
a
motion
and
a
second
on
the
floor.
Any
changes
in
language
would
require
an
addendment
to
that
motion
and
a
second
to
that.
Unless
we
want
to
take
different
action.
A
G
F
G
A
G
A
C
F
And
I
think
it
is
Dr.
Gotti
said
it's
very
clear
in
the
operational
plan
and
all
all
the
things
outlined
there
and
really
where,
where
I
would
actually
like
to
to
take
more
aim
at
the
language
we've
been
discussing
regarding
results
is
actually
in
that
in
the
Strategic
plan
is
where
I
think
it
should.
It
is
most
appropriate
to
make
sure
that
things
get
clarified,
because
the
Strategic
plan
is
much
more
Hefty
and
and
kind
of
all-encompassing
and
I.
B
E
So
that's
where
tying
your
results
to
all
seven
strategic
indicators
were
important
and
came
into
play
so
going
into
this
year,
we
built
our
strategic
plan,
knowing
that
we
had
to
refresh
it
and
identified
what
the
big
broad
results
that
we
wanted
and
results
are
also
defined
in
board
policies
where
they
say.
Basically,
this
is
the
reason
that
we
did
the
activity
the
budget
hold
them.
I
believe
what
results
do
you
want
at
what
cost
and
from
whom?
E
In
your
organization,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
one
of
the
biggest
challenges
in
in
public
education
is
that
everyone
has
their
own
measure
of
what
academic
achievement
looks
like.
So
for
some
people
it
might
be
a
test
score
at
one
point
in
time,
someone
else
it
might
be
something
else,
but
school
districts,
as
you
guys,
went
through
the
activity
with
the
budget
hold
them.
E
What
does
this
look
like
to
you?
If
the
standard
based
on
our
governance
model
is
going
to
be?
Are
you
monitoring
it?
Whether
you
make
reasonable
progress
or
not?
So
that's
the
piece
that's
also
tied
into
the
superintendent's
evaluation
like
Greg
said
because
it's
part
of
the
systems
performance.
So
then
we
take
that
same
piece
and
then
Stephen
Covey
you
backwards,
Clan
from
where
you
want
to
go
to
right.
E
So,
if
we're
all
working
towards
the
same
big
broad
goal
so
yeah
your
result
might
be
Choice
ready
when
a
student
graduates,
but
it's
still
applicable
to
a
kindergarten
teacher
because
I
think,
first
and
foremost,
are
you
making
reasonable
progress
towards
that
and
and
that's
not
maybe
a
specific
as
standard
as
some
high
stakes.
Accountability
individuals
want,
so
it's
actually
meant
to
if
those
of
you
that
remember
kind
of
when
I
share
this
at
the
work
session.
E
This
strategic
plan
and
the
framework
that
we
put
in
place
was
actually
used
to
defend
public
education,
Against
The
Narrative
of
some
data
points.
At
some
point
in
time,
because
it
really
is
unfair
when
there's
so
many
variables
that
go
to
it,
so
the
results
that
we
want
is
for
employees
to
be
able
to
work
towards
those
results
that
we've
identified
under
each
of
the
six
strategic
initiatives.
Some
of
them
have
two
results,
some
of
them
three.
Some
of
them
are
four.
Some
of
them
have
one.
E
So
we
think
that
all
of
our
work
should
should
be
focused
on
that
and
I
I
personally
think
that
there
should
be
no
fear
of
of
making
sure
that
that's
part
of
what
we're
doing,
because
we're
here
to
serve
students,
but
also
just
to
clarify
under
standard
eight.
It's
not
just
that
evaluation
is
your
evaluation
in
a
standalone.
E
It
actually
says:
Implement
a
framework
for
employee
performance
array,
appraisals
that
are
based
on
professional
growth,
reflection
and
progress
towards
the
results
and
fulfillment
of
the
Fargo
Public
Schools
Mission
and
I
I
struggle
with
not
being
comfortable
with
that.
If
that's
an
employee
in
the
district.
Just
because
that's
about
kids
and
that's
who
we're
here
for
if
you
go
back
to
the
definition
of
results
and
and
that's
why
we
should
be
doing
that,
you
know
I-
think
the
bigger
question
becomes.
F
Greg
last
thing,
I'll
say
is
I
think
as
much
as
is
kind
of
always
a
bummer
to
argue
over
semantics,
I
I,
really
actually,
like
your
suggestion
of
capitalizing.
The
R
I
think
that
is
a
very
elegant
solution
to
make
sure
that
it's
clear
what
the
expectations
are
and
that
those
expectations
are
from
the
board
down.
H
A
L
K
F
E
A
A
F
C
A
A
So
this
was
at
the
August
24th
governance
committee
meeting.
The
committee
discussed
a
drafted
resolution
for
potential
submission
to
the
North
Dakota
school
boards,
Association
delegate
assembly
regarding
expanding
sign-on
bonuses
for
teachers,
Beyond
classroom
teachers.
The
committee
reach
consensus
to
bring
the
resolution
to
the
full
board
for
discussion
and
approval.
The
governmental
Affairs
committee
also
discussed
this
resolution
at
its
September
6
meeting,
and
the
draft
is
provided
below
for
our
discussion.
If
this
is
approved,
it
will
be
forwarded
to
the
North
Dakota
school
boards
Association
for
the
delegate
assembly
at
the
annual
convention.
F
C
A
A
A
C
H
H
I
I
E
E
I
H
F
A
E
A
D
K
L
A
I'm
back,
we
do
not
have
the
need
for
item
F
to
take
any
potential
action
from
our
executive
session,
so
I
will
move
us
on
to
item
G,
which
was
also
item
G,
moved
from
our
consent
agenda.
This
is
in
regards
to
the
pilot
approval.
It
would
draw
your
attention
to
memo
number
26
6
and
that
was
brought
by
Greg.
So
I
will
defer
to
you
Greg.
F
So
I
I
noticed,
while
reading
memo
26
that
we'd
already
passed
the
deadline
of
30
days
to
respond
and
I
think
we
should
discuss
and
I,
don't
know
where
it
should
necessarily
be
done.
Maybe
in
governance
committee
not
sure,
maybe
the
planning
committee
somewhere
but
I
think
we
should
formalize
a
quicker
process
for
the
board
to
consider
these
items.
A
C
So
then,
to
answer
your
question:
Greg
you
we
would
just
kind
of
this
is
kind
of
what
we
discussed
in
governance
is
that
it
would
be
up
to
us
as
board
members
to
make
sure
that
you
double
check
your
consent
agenda.
If
you
want
to
say
something
about
a
pilot
and
if
there's
a
pilot
on
there,
then
speak
up
because
it
will,
because
it
won't
for,
in
the
future,
go
to
a
committee
so
that
we.
F
E
Just
and
it
won't
it'll
be
Pilots
tiffs
and
there's
one
more
that
falls
into
that
category.
That
are
all
in
the
same,
so
that
that
is
what
we'll
do
yeah
it's
historically
been
something
that
the
district
supported,
but
we
know
that
we've
had
board
members
that
have
had
some
greater
conversations
about
it
too.
So
it's
a
process
that
we're
also
very
much
supportive
of.
C
G
A
A
First
this
evening
we
need
to
appoint
the
ndsba
convention
delegates
so
I
believe
we
all
nine
plan
to
attend
the
North
Dakota
School
Board
Association
Convention
in
October,
at
that
they
have
a
delegate
assembly,
it's
usually
on
the
second
day,
I
believe
on
Friday
and
Fargo
Public
Schools
is
allotted
five
members
to
represent
us
and
vote
in
that
delegation.
So
I
was
just
going
to
look
for
five
volunteers
who
are
willing
to
attend
that
session
on
Friday
and
willing
to
vote
on
our
behalf.
G
I
I
A
A
B
You
I
did
contact
my
liaison
schools.
You
might
want
to
put
this
on
your
your
board
calendar
board
members.
Davey's
Drumline
will
be
a
Discovery
Middle
School
on
Friday,
this
Friday
from
8
A.M
to
8
45
a.m
and
that's
kind
of
a
fun
event.
I
am
unable
to
attend
because
I'm
on
Grandma
Duty
and
Grandma
Duty
trumps.
B
Some
of
this
sometimes
so
I
also
visited
Hawthorne
Eagles
and
Longfellow
governmental
Affairs
committee
related
on
August
16th
I
I
do
serve
on
the
North
Dakota
school
boards,
Association
governmental,
Affairs
committee
we
did
meet.
We
went
over
administrative
rules
overview
on
August
16th
on
August
18th.
The
legislative
education
policy
committee
meeting
met
that
that
was
a
long
day.
I
did
witness
that
as
well.
B
August
30th
ndsba
gack
met
to
establish
the
resolutions
for
the
State
Convention
on
September,
8th
DPI
administrative
rules
hearing
occurred,
the
hot
topic
was
CRT
I'm
sure
you
all
heard
that
in
the
news
and
all
of
these
links
are
available,
live
or
recorded
at
the
State
State
website,
September
6th,
our
actual
local
committee,
met
Fargo,
Public
Schools
government
Affairs
committee
met
on
that
day.
We,
let's
see
here,
I
brought
our
minutes
really.
The
biggies
were
we.
B
We
talked
about
our
probable
and
expected
legislative
items
for
this
session
and
we
presented
our
work
calendar
and
that's
fluid,
of
course,
and
then
at
our
next
meeting,
we'll
be
focusing
on
our
preliminary
position
document
going
into
session
and
also
plan
for
an
informational
section
session
with
legislators
who
are
elected
after
the
November
election
and
then
our
next
meeting
is
October
4th
2022
at
7
30
a.m.
Did
we
decide
that's
Tuesday
Morning
gang?
It
was
Tuesday,
Mornings,
yeah,
okay
and
then
I
attended.
B
This
I
didn't
report
last
meeting
so
I'm
just
going
a
month
back
staff
opener
at
South
High.
That
was
that
was
great.
If
you
have,
as
I
mentioned
earlier
view,
the
recording
it
was,
it
was
really
well
done.
Thank
you.
I
know
that
rupac
is
a
speaker,
but
I
know.
Administration
has
a
lot
of
work
to
put
into
that
and
then
at
some
point,
I
met
with
with
the
governance
committee,
but
it
all
Blends
together.
A
I
I
I
I
If
you
want
to
come
or
not,
but
when
I
got
there
I
end
up,
I
got
sambusa
and
things
like
that.
Just
for
the
snack
and
everybody
show
up.
They
I
didn't
even
know
that
Kristen
actually
took
some
pictures,
so
she
shared
them
with
me.
While
I
was
talking
with
with
the
staff
and
and
thing
like
that,
so
I
was
just
then
again.
I
was
just
introducing
myself
telling
them
that
I'm
available.
You
know
to
be
able
to
work
with
them.
Just
trying
to
make
sure
that
you
know
we
have
a
good
relationship.
I
H
M
Thank
you
I'll,
be
brief,
because
I
forgot
my
phone,
so
it's
all
going
to
be
kind
of
General,
but
cea
met
last
Thursday
and
we
had
a
new
group.
We
had
several
new
members
so
I'm
looking
forward
to
that.
We
set
all
of
our
meeting
dates,
so
we
can
get
those
out
there.
This
Thursday
North
Dakota
DPI,
is
the
full
Essa
task
force
group
meeting
that'll
be
Thursday
morning.
M
Oh,
it
was
I
want
to
say
Monday
morning
teacher
shortage
committee,
so
I
was
on
that
being
run
through
NDSU
and
I
believed
Epi,
but
I
know
that
the
gal
who
heads
it
up
is
through
NDSU
and
then
I'm
also
serving
on
the
North
Dakota
School
Board
Association
nominating
committee,
and
we
are
going
to
meet
Friday
morning.
So
that
is
new
thanks
great.
F
K
F
Visit
at
McKinley
Elementary
with
principal
Jansen,
that
was
a
really
good
tour
of
the
school
and
discussion
about
McKinley
and
then
I
also
spent
two
weeks
ago
now,
at
a
meeting
with
Doug
andering
about
all
sorts
of
HR
data,
that
was
a
it's
always
fun
to
get
in
a
room
and
talk
about
data
with
someone
who
has
an
equal
appreciation
for
it
and
I
hope.
Our
future
human
capital
officer
is
also
willing
to
put
data
at
the
at
the
Forefront
and
that's
it.
A
N
A
It
excellent
thank
you.
My
president's
report
will
be
brief
as
well.
We
governance
has
met
since
we
last
met
I
had
my
Council
of
school
health
executive
council
meeting
as
well,
and
then
on
September,
8th,
the
FEA
leadership
and
FPS
cabinet,
and
myself
and
Seth
had
a
meeting
I
think
it
was
really
good.
A
Actually
Jim
was
there
as
well
attended
the
North,
Dakota
School
Board
Association
welcome
reception.
They
had
an
event
here,
kind
of
a
regional
event
all
weekend,
and
so
that
was
nice
to
to
and
represent
Fargo
I
believe
that
is
all
I
have.
So
our
next
general
meeting
date
will
be
September
27th.
It
is
seven,
did
you
have
one
thing
to
add,
I.