►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
You
look
around
and
you
see
people
at
game,
forests
pioneering
near
real-time
credits
and
enabling
people
to
create
dowels
that
assess
the
baseline
of
particular
projects
on
the
ground
and
begin
to
decentralize.
This
bottleneck
that
the
likes
of
vera
and
gold
standard
are
currently
having
in
place,
and
so
I
came
onto
this
insight
as
I
lean
into
roller
refi
dao.
A
Blank
slide
here,
not
sure.
What's
supposed
to
come
next
but
yeah,
this
is
the
kind
of
mission
that
we're
catalyzing
ourselves
around
and
our
thesis
for
change
is
to
really
lean
into
the
concept
of
network
effects
and
metcalfe's
law,
and
we
believe
that
if
we
can
improve
the
depth
of
relationships
between
early
stage
founders
and
improve
the
quality
of
their
interactions,
we'll
see
an
economic
system
emerge
that
really
does
express
the
true
values
of
regeneration
and
helps.
To
kind
of
you
know:
temper
the
combative
energy
that
comes
around
building
for-profit
systems.
A
We've
got
a
bunch
of
founder
circles
that
are
forming
around
git
coin,
grant
round
15.
one
of
those
the
mrv
circle
and
we
decided
to
yeah
just
kind
of
take
a
step
back
and
look
at
the
whole
ecosystem.
People
have
been
building
maps
upon
our
directory.
We've
got
one
of
the
largest
databases
of
people
building
at
the
intersection
of
impact
in
web3
and
we're
seeing
all
these
different
opportunities
to
make
a
difference
across.
You
know:
liquidity
as
a
public
good
lobbying
venture
investing
grant
funding
looking
at
how
to
unlock
identity.
A
But
time
and
time
again,
mrv
seems
to
be
the
central
bottleneck
for
all
of
this,
so
in
kind
of
true
prototyping
fashion
we
lent
into
bringing
people
together
to
have
a
single
day
to
celebrate
all
of
these
different
actors
that
are
in
this
movement,
exploring
this
intersection
and
we
learned
a
lot
about
what's
happening
in
the
space
and
what
actually.
This
is
at
a
really
specific
level.
A
This
is
about
human
behavior,
and
I
think,
when
you
lean
into
this
definition
of
measurement,
reporting
and
verification,
it
kind
of
starts
to
simplify
some
of
the
work
that
we're
doing
here.
This
is
about
determining
whether
a
specific
person
in
a
given
context
actually
did
something
that
you
need
to
incentivize
them
to
do,
and
this
you
know,
measurement
reporting
verification
fits
within
a
greater
process
that
has
been
defined
over
the
last.
A
You
know
few
decades
by
these
environmental
asset
markets
and
is
rooted
very
tightly
towards
the
development
of
methodologies,
which
is
to
say
what
does
this
science
actually
articulate
about?
What
is
planet
positive
and
what
can
we
assume
these
behaviors
will
result
in
in
terms
of
carbon
sequestration
or
biodiversity
impact,
but
project
financing
usually
comes
before
the
actual
yeah.
The
measurement,
reporting
and
verification
process,
which
creates
a
major
bottleneck,
and
I
think
what
zenken
and
other
actors
are
doing
and
trying
to
look
towards
the
forward
market
is
a
major
unlock
in
this
space.
A
This
is
a
you
know,
definition
of
the
hypothesis
around
mrv
which,
if
you're
from
a
web
3
background,
feels
very
much
like
the
problem
set,
we're
trying
to
solve,
and
yet
the
challenge
is
the
people
who
are
doing
this.
Just
don't
have
the
culture,
they
don't
have
the
infrastructure
and
they
don't
have
the
ability
to
scale
this,
and
so
this
is
really,
I
think,
up
to
us
in
large
parts
to
figure
out
how
to
do
this
from
the
bottom
up
and
we
need
an
entire
ecosystem
of
innovation
to
make
this
work.
A
A
It
really
does
come
down
to
project
origination
and
the
confidence
that
we
instill
in
buyers
to
say
that,
yes,
your
money
definitely
can
produce
this
impact
and
we
have
publicly
verifiable
evidence
to
suggest
it
and
as
soon
as
we
move
those
levers
we're
going
to
see
price
action,
change,
we're
going
to
see
the
narrative
change,
because,
right
now,
people
are
just
lacking
confidence
that
these
financial
instruments
are
actually
having
a
difference
and,
as
everybody
knows,
keep
going
on
this
course.
We've
got
some
pretty
massive
detrimental
effects.
A
And
yes,
while
web
3
does
provide
these
tools
to
decentralize
this
and
scale
it.
We've
also
got
a
massive
culture
problem.
People
look
at
this
space
and
they
laugh
because
so
much
of
our
branding
and
presentation
is
around
ponzi's
games
and
get
rich,
quick
adventures.
And,
frankly,
I
think
we
need
to
be
really
critical
about
the
way
that
we
use
these
tools
and
about
the
you
know,
natural
human
desire
to
accumulate
wealth
and
status.
So
I'm
not
going
to
sort
of
you
know.
Try
and
shame
anybody
who'd
gone
to
the
nft
game.
A
I
personally
bought
a
lazy
lion
as
an
experiment.
I
used
to
walk
around
feeling,
like
that
was
a
cool
thing
to
do,
and
then
I
was
like
hang
on
a
second
actually.
This
is
totally
not
the
right
use
of
my
money
and
I
think
we
need
to
be
really
critical
about
our
own
motivations
in
this.
Are
we
in
it
to
make
money?
Are
we
in
it
to
make
an
impact,
because
sometimes
those
things
are
actually
at
odds
with
each
other?
A
So
we
know
that
this
is
the
bridge
between
what
we
actually
need
to
do
and
how
we
can
incentivize
people
to
do
it.
We
know
we
have
a
map
through
speed
and
scale
how
to
reach
net
zero
by
2050
and
how
to
reduce
emissions
by
50
by
2030.
We
have
this
action
plan,
but
we
need
scalable
mrv
infrastructure
to
be
able
to
both
measure
yeah
what
people
are
doing
on
the
ground
and
how
our
supply
chain
systems
are
working.
A
A
You
know
starting
local
businesses
whatever
it
is.
These
are
real
people
in
real
contexts
and
the
only
way
that
we
can
verify
this
is
by
having
other
people
on
the
ground,
taking
photos
and
videos
of
this,
and
we
can
kind
of
sense
check
the
data
with
higher
fidelity
through
remote
sensors
devices
planted
in
the
soil
satellites-
and
you
know,
make
sense
of
that
through
ai
and
machine
learning,
and
thankfully
folks,
like
ipfs
and
ocean
protocol
and
ceramic,
are
making
this
data
available
to
then
bring
into
nfts
and
tokens
and
make
that
available
through
decentralized
exchanges.
A
Folks,
like
gold
standard,
are
leaning
into
this,
they
see
the
power
of
smart
contracts,
they
recognize
the
importance
of
blockchain,
but
I
don't
know
about
you.
I
personally
don't
think
we
can
trust,
centralized
entities
and
corporate
actors
and
nation
states
to
hold
this
massive
set
of
data,
because
this
is
also
you
know,
a
potentially
major
risk
for
authoritarianism
and
manipulation
and
control.
This
stuff
is
incredibly
powerful
if
you
can
determine
what
people
are
doing
on
the
ground
all
over
the
world,
and
that
is
so.
A
This
is
a
couple
slides
from
the
website
and
white
paper
from
some
of
our
friends
at
game.
Forest
david
dao
is
here.
I
absolutely
love
what
these
folks
are
doing.
I
feel
like
they
have
such
a
clear
conscience
on
how
to
solve
some
of
these
problems,
and
it
would
be
amazing
to
see
the
rest
of
the
solana
ecosystem
really
lean
into
this
and
say
what
can
we
build
with
the
data
that's
coming
from
these
satellites?
A
This
is
just
a
quick
snapshot
of
yeah,
I
guess
a
little
iteration
above
the
usual
tape
measure
bringing
in
phones
and
using
samples
to
be
able
to
validate
data
on
the
ground.
We
learned
from
revive
mrv
collective,
which
is
a
protocol
building
on
cello,
that
only
three
percent
of
carbon
removal
funding
is
going
into
mrv,
and
so,
if
you're,
an
investor
in
this
space
lean
into
this
conversation
about
what
infrastructure?
Can
you
deploy
capital
into
to
unlock
this?
Because
it
is
the
major
bottleneck?
A
You
know
a
quick
incentive
to
people
who
are
providing
data
across
nature-based
solutions
so
that
you
don't
need
to
wait
for
the
environmental
asset
market,
to
tokenize
these
into
credits,
but
basically
pay
people
for
providing
data
of
various
types.
I
won't
go
much
into
the
infrastructure
here,
but
the
interesting
thing
is
that
this
can
be
applied
for
both
positive
and
negative
externalities
offsetting
and
in
setting,
and
so,
as
you
start
to
look
at
mrv,
this
is
not
just
about
you
know
offsets.
This
is
not
just
about
the
tokenization
of
credits.
A
This
is
about
holding
people
accountable
for
what
they
say
that
they're
going
to
do.
I
think
insetting
has
a
huge
cultural
potential
if
we
can
lean
into
encouraging
people
to
look
at
their
own
supply
chains
and
invest
with
the
people
who
are
actually
providing
them
with
the
products
and
services
that
their
companies
need
to
survive.
A
I'm
super
bullish
about
the
work
that
region
network's
doing
for
mrv.
These
guys
have
definitely
been
pioneering
the
space
for
a
long
time.
They
are
some
of
the
only
people
working
on
open
source
methodologies,
which
is
incredibly
hard
nut
to
crack.
As
many
of
you
know,
vera
has
these
kind
of
closed
working
groups.
They
publish
their
methodologies
on
pdfs,
but
these
are
not
living
adaptive
software
systems
that
can
take
inputs
from
the
field
and
say
actually
we
need
to
update
our
assumption
about
how
much
carbon
is
being
sequestered
here.
A
So
I
think
it
would
be
incredible
to
see
people
get
behind
region
network
both
on
the
web
3
and
on
the
legacy
market
and
embrace.
You
know
open
methodologies
as
a
core
building
block
to
this
system,
because
methodologies
really
do
inform
what
you
need
to
measure
for,
and
it's
it's
hard
science
stuff
and
as
what
we
learned
from
sam
like
yes,
we
need
more
web
three
people,
but
we
also
need
the
you
know
classical
scientists
in
the
climate
science
community
to
get
on
board
with
this.
A
So
you
know
just
going
back
into
that
kind
of
culture
problem
interesting
to
see
some
of
the
experiments
at
d
climate
with
like
a
carbon
2.0
version
that
completely
bypasses
registries
as
a
whole
and
basically
allows
for
web3
native
carbon
credit
issuance.
I
won't
go
deep
into
it,
but
just
good
to
see
that
you
know.
A
But
the
important
thing
to
take
here
is
that
this
location
data
is
starting
to
be
wrapped
into
zero
knowledge
proofs
to
ensure
the
privacy
and
integrity
of
what
these
people
are
doing
on
the
ground,
and
I
cannot
emphasize
enough
about
the
importance
to
recognize
the
the
vulnerability
that
this
massive
data
infrastructure
plays
to
so
many
people,
especially
those
who
are
working
to
preserve
endangered
species
and
bringing
things
into
zero
knowledge.
Proofs
basically
allows
us
to
have
confidence
about
these
claims
without
exposing
you
know
the
relocation
of
these
individuals.
A
I
had
no
idea,
but
apparently
there's
now
a
google
data
set
called
dynamic
world
that
is
across
the
entire
planet,
with
a
10
meter
resolution
of
the
entire
earth,
and
this
is
open
source
and
this
is
available.
So,
if
you're
looking
at
stuff
to
build
with
this
is
an
incredible
material.
But
again
my
preference
would
be
for
people
to
look
at
web
3
native
versions.
I
don't
trust
google,
as
long
as
I
can
yeah
anyway,
we'll
leave
that
there,
but
people
are
really
leaning
into
this.
A
A
We
need
storytellers
to
show
that
actually,
the
regeneration
on
the
ground
is
happening
in
marginalized
communities
all
of
the
world.
This
capital
is
flowing
to
people
that
are
really
making
a
difference.
We
need
land
stewards
to
recognize
that
we
have
tools
that
can
make
their
lives
easier
and
bring.
You
know
more
economic
business
models
to
yeah,
whatever
they're
doing
in
the
land.
A
There's
a
huge
imbalance
between
supply
and
demand.
The
science-based
targets
people
who
are
committed
to
using
evidence-based
methodologies
is
increasing
exponentially.
We've
got
over
a
third
of
the
entire
global
market
cap
committed
to
making
science-based
net
zero
targets,
and
I
personally
have
have
hoped
for
this.
A
Yes,
our
current
system
is
flawed,
but
we
have
all
these
incredible
tools
that
we
can
use.
So
I
would
encourage
each
and
every
one
of
you
to
lean
into
making
the
biggest
difference
that
you
can
make
in
the
shortest
amount
of
time
and
yeah
really
push
the
boundaries
of
what's
possible
because
while
we
don't
have
much
time
left,
we've
got
some
superpowers
here
and
yeah,
even
uncle
sam's
getting
involved
so
love
to
have
you
thanks
for
your
time,
check
out.