►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Hello
good
morning,
thank
you
for
having
us
welcome
to
the
summit.
B
Thank
you
for
joining
us
for
presentation
to
talk
about
decarbonizing
supply
chains
and
what
role
blockchain
can
play
in
improving
the
current
state
of
carbon
emissions
accounting.
My
name
is
linda
jurskova,
I'm
a
corporate
engagement
manager
with
rmi's
climate
intelligence
program
as
part
of
the
work
that
we
do
within
this
program.
We
look
at
increasing
emissions,
visibility,
transparency
and
improving
accounting,
and
our
specific
focus
is
on
how
to
abate
industrial
sectors
I'll
leave
it
to
charles
for
his
intro.
A
Thanks,
linda,
it's
great
to
be
with
you
all
today,
thanks
again
to
allen
and
protocol
labs
for
having
us.
My
name
is
charles
cannon,
I'm
a
manager
on
our
climate
intelligence
team
and
I
coordinate
our
carbon
accounting
efforts
across
those
different
industrial
sectors.
So,
in
addition
to
approving
improving
carbon
accounting
in
general
and
how
it's
done,
we
need
to
go
into
heavy
industrial
sectors
and
work
out.
B
So,
as
charles
just
said,
we're
sustainability
and
climate
focused
people,
so
I'll
start
us
off
with
some
climate
data,
maybe
painting
a
little
bit
of
a
big
picture,
but
hopefully
that
will
inspire
us
for
action
so
bottom
line.
We
have
eight
years
to
cut
global
emissions
in
half
and
we're
not
on
track
how's
there
for
that
to
sink
in.
B
When
we
look
at
our
carbon
budget,
the
total
amount
of
emissions
that
we
can
release
into
the
atmosphere
to
keep
the
temperatures
from
rising
above
1.5
degrees
celsius.
We
are
lacking
in
progress
to
maintain
this
current
carbon
budget
that
we
have
and
what
it
means
is
that
it
could
have
pretty
significant
impacts
on
the
way
we
live.
You
have
I'm
sure
most
of
you
in
this
room
have
seen
different
reports
different
ways
of
summarizing
this
impact.
B
B
Currently,
the
seven
heavy
emitting
sectors
contribute
about
30
percent
of
global
carbon
emissions.
That's
a
pretty
significant
amount.
I
spoke
earlier
about
that
carbon
budget.
If
these
sectors
continue
to
operate
the
way,
they
are
right
now
we're
expected
to
overshoot
that
carbon
budget
by
20
by
2030.
B
so
again
pretty
significant
impact
and
the
biggest
challenge
within
these
sectors
are
the
supply
chains
a
lot
of
the
companies.
You
know
they
can
control.
They
have
relatively
good
understanding
of
where
they
are
with
their
own
operations,
with
their
own
emissions
at
their
factories
and
their
assets.
But
what's
much
more
difficult
is
what's
happening
elsewhere
in
the
supply
chain,
whether
it
is
upstream
where
they
get
the
raw
materials
from
or
downstream
as
their
products
move
further
down
to
the
consumers.
B
Some
of
you
might
say:
well
there's
a
lot
of
work
already
being
done
on
this,
which
is
true.
We
see
everyday
news
around
new
coalitions
being
built
new
targets
being
set
companies
and
are
signing
up
for
as
for
for
their
sbti
targets,
you
know
their
cases
being
brought
to
court
about
high
high
emitters,
which
is
great
all
of
that.
We
welcome.
We
want
to
see
that,
but
really
when
we
look
at
the
impact
today
and
where
we
are
we're
not
seeing
meaningful,
measurable
impact
in
decarbonizing
supply
chains,
so
we
need
to
do
more.
B
There
are
many
challenges,
but
I'll
highlight
just
a
few
when
it
comes
to
decarbonizing
supply
chains
and
reporting
on
the
carbon
emissions.
First
of
all,
there
are
many
different
reporting
mechanisms
again
all
with
good
intentions,
all
doing
part
of
the
work,
but
the
challenge
is
that
most
of
them
use
estimation
they're,
not
using
primary
data
and
by
that
obviously
we're
getting
to
imperfect
information,
because
we're
really
not
looking
at
the
actual
real-time
primary
data.
B
Also,
as
you
can
imagine,
some
of
the
supply
chains
that
we
work
on
they're
super
complex,
there's,
so
many
different
actors
in
them.
You
may
have
dozens
hundreds,
sometimes
thousands
of
different
actors
that
are
contributing
to
the
development
of
the
final
product
that
a
consumer
sees
so
transferring
data
in
between
them
and
making
sure
the
data
is
accurate
and
it
can
be
trusted
is
a
challenge
and
in
some
ways
probably
the
biggest
point
is
you
know
we're
in
21st
century,
but
the
methods
that
are
used
for
this
reporting
are
pretty
old
school.
A
So
what
would
it
look
like
to
realize
the
next
generation
of
carbon
accounting
and
emissions
reporting,
and
really
resonated
with
a
lot
of
the
points
that
alan
laid
out
in
his
keynote
of?
How
can
we
have
emissions
data
that
is
based
more
on
primary
data,
directly
measured
or
modeled
information
that
is
carried
through
our
supply
chain
emissions
factors
have
their
utility
and
are
going
to
continue
to
be
around
we're
not
going
to
have
sensors
on
everything
overnight.
A
But
how
can
we
work
to
define
at
least
how
much
primary
data
we
can
represent
with
supply
chain
emissions
today
and
improve
that
over
time?
How
can
we
make
sure
that
emissions
reporting
is
comparable
across
industries
or
industrial
sectors
if
you're
going
to
produce
a
phone
or
a
car,
and
you
have
options
in
your
material
selection?
A
Indeed,
we
want
to
be
able
to
compare
apples
and
oranges
here
and,
lastly,
how
can
how
can
we
avoid
the
crutch
or
the
you
know
the
atlas
scenario
of
excel
spreadsheets
in
the
next
generation
of
mission
reporting?
How
can
emissions
reporting
be
verified,
smart
and
digital
first,
and
so
really
appreciative
of
alan
giving
that
primer
on
carbon
accounting?
It's
not
the
most
exciting
topic,
because
right
now
nobody
goes
to
jail.
A
So
the
broadest
and
most
ambitious
aspect
of
reporting
is
also
one
of
the
newest
national
level.
Carbon
accounting
that
launched
on
the
heels
of
the
paris
agreement
and
ndcs
corporate
carbon
accounting
has
existed
for
almost
two
decades
at
this
point,
but
the
use
of
it
is
changing
from
maintaining
corporate
license
to
operate,
or
you
know,
demonstrating
corporate
responsibility
to
really
being
able
to
make
meaningful
product
declarations
and
adjustments
against
scope.
A
3
emissions
targets
that
companies
are
beginning
to
make
an
asset
level
is
the
most
tangible
and
understandable
level
of
emissions
reporting,
because
you
have
a
site
boundary.
You
have
some
operations,
you
have
some
smoke
stacks.
You
can
measure
against
that.
The
challenge
is
going
from
this
asset,
both
up
and
down
on
these
levels,
but
specifically,
our
work
looks
at
refining
how
to
go
from
asset
level,
carbon
accounting
to
a
product
level
where
information
is
exchanged
at
a
point
of
sale
between
businesses.
So
how
can
we
bring
information
to
that
level?
A
So
there's
an
easier
action
point
than
a
company
needing
to
look
at
another
company's
sustainability
report
and
look
at
that
annualized
cadence
of
information.
A
And
our
role
in
in
trying
to
bring
this
to
light
as
a
non-profit
is
through
a
project
called
horizon
zero,
which
is
funded
by
the
larsen
land
climate
foundation
and
aims
to
improve
greenhouse
gas
accounting
and
create
a
technical
architecture
to
catalyze
climate
differentiated
markets.
You
know
what
is
green
steel,
what
does
sustainable
commodities
look
like
and
how
is
emissions
reporting
contributing
to
climate
change?
A
The
the
problems
that
we've
faced
we're
going
to
address
in
in
three
main
ways:
the
first
via
greenhouse
gas
accounting,
which
I've
touched
on
the
second
being
technical
architecture
which
I'll
touch
on
more
in
a
moment
and
the
last
being
around
engagement?
How
can
we
ensure
that
the
tools
that
we're
developing
that
are
open
source
and
we
want
to
be
available
to
all
practitioners-
are
built
for
use
in
in
the
in
this
systems?
We're
working
within.
A
And
so
that
phase
one
on
greenhouse
gas
accounting
is
how
do
we
apply
these
principles
for
consistency
across
sectors,
and
these
three
principles
are
to
use
primary
data
whenever
possible
and
increase
the
share
of
it
over
time
to
create
bounds
for
comparison.
So
we
do
have
apples
and
oranges
in
the
same
emissions
perspective
and,
lastly,
to
define
measurement
made
for
markets.
A
Phase
two
is
a
part
of
what
brings
us
here
today.
How
do
we
develop
a
technical
architecture
for
emissions
reporting?
How
do
we
transform
climate
disclosures
and
more
comprehensively
track
and
trace
emissions
through
complex
supply
chains
and
digital
emissions
reporting
should
be
all
on
one
line,
but
we
wanted
to
do
the
thought
exercise
to
see
if
you
can
piece
the
words
together
when
they're
stacked,
but
we
want
them
to
be
verifiable,
transparent,
secure,
comparable
and
interoperable.
A
You
know
terms
that
are
likely
familiar
to
a
bunch,
a
bunch
of
people
in
this
room
and
what
brings
us
to
our
kind
of
third
phase
of
engagement,
of
how
blockchain
principles
and
and
web3
can
be
used
in
this
technical
solution
right
and
a
lot
of
the
principles
that
alan
laid
out
in
in
the
keynote
again
we
are
examining
here
of
how
they
can
be
secure
and
verifiable,
provide
clear
provenance
and
a
shared
record
of
truth
and
be
used
to
bring
this
cadence
of
reporting
from
a
corporate
and
annualized
to
a
product
level
and
more
close
to
present
day
or
present
time,
emissions
reporting
and
our
work
in
non-profits.
A
You
know
we
have
a
number
of
relationships
with
corporates
who
are
trying
to
tackle
sustainability
reporting
we
ourselves
are
not
web
developers
or
or
have
been
in
the
technology
space
for
long.
We
have
a
40
year
history
and
it's
mostly
around
techno-economic
analysis
in
in
environmental
science.
So,
as
we
are
stepping
through
this
project,
we're
running
into
challenges
and
rhetoric,
rhetoric
that
provides
that
offer
some
barriers
to
adoption
of
web
3
principles
in
the
next
generation
of
emissions
reporting.
A
A
How
can
we
encourage
adoption
of
of
a
new
technology?
The
second
challenge
kind
of
blends
with
the
first
in
that
a
lot
of
sustainability
and
supply
chain
solutions
that
are
coming
out
of
the
web.
3
and
blockchain
space
are
crypto
and
web3
centric
right.
The
the
the
blockchain
space
needs
to
meet
corporate
sustainability
practitioners
where
they
are
at,
and
indeed
some
of
the
best
conversations
we've
had
with
blockchain
traceability.
Companies
are
not
around
blockchain
right.
A
It's
through
the
second
and
third
conversation
that
they
are
using
common
sense
principles
of
web
3
in
2022
to
meet
the
needs
and
the
pain
points
that
we
see
in
emissions
reporting,
and
the
last
last
challenge
we
see
is
a
design
challenge
right.
That
also
blends
with
the
other
two
of
blockchain
and
web3
is
not
always
the
best
solution
and
how
it
is
applied
through
a
process
of
emissions.
Reporting
needs
to
be
thoughtfully
done,
one
that
I'm
sure
many
of
you
all
in
the
audience
have
been
actively
thinking
about.
B
And
with
that
now
that
charles
has
gone
kind
of
through
the
opportunities
we
see
with
blockchain,
but
also
some
of
the
challenges
I
kind
of
wanted
to
summarize.
What
are
we
really
looking
for
and
when
we
think
of
blockchain?
What
are
some
of
the
questions
we're
asking
ourselves
when
we
work
with
the
industrial
actors
with
those
companies,
we
really
want
to
make
sure
that
we
solve
the
problems
that
they
have
when
it
comes
to
gag
accounting
in
the
most
efficient
way,
rather
than
trying
to
push
on
them
a
certain
technology.
B
We
really
want
to
look
at
the
root
issues,
the
root
causes
and
the
problems
that
they're
facing
and
design
a
solution
that
solves
it
effectively
and
efficiently
with
the
right
technology
and
rather
than
putting
the
technology
first.
We
also
know
that
you
know
these
actors
were
working
when
they're
busy.
B
They
have
their
own
priorities,
business
priorities,
environmental
reporting,
sustainability
is
just
one
of
the
things
that
they
have
on
their
plates,
so
we
kind
of
want
to
meet
them
where
they
are
meet
them
with
their
level
of
understanding
with
the
resources
that
they
have
the
incentives
that
they
have
in
front
of
them
and
rather
than
kind
of
expecting
them
to
come
to
a
certain
solution,
certain
technologies,
kind
of
prebaked
for
them.
B
And
thirdly,
what's
in
a
way
almost
the
most
important
to
us
is
that
whatever
technical
solutions
we
help
put
out
there
and
design
and
propose,
we
want
them
to
be
interoperable,
because
you
know
there's
one
option
of
solving
a
particular
reporting
issue
for
a
specific
company
with
a
customized
solution.
But
if
that
solution
doesn't
speak
to
another
one,
then
we're
really
not
solving
the
issue
holistically
for
the
whole
whole
sector
and
for
the
whole
ecosystem.
So
interoperability
is
something
that
is
really
really
important
for
us.
B
So,
in
kind
of
closing,
as
we
are
here
talking
to
you
and
hopefully
connecting
more
over
the
next
day
or
two,
we
wanted
to
outline
some
of
the
things
that
we're
looking
for
and
would
welcome
feedback
from
this
audience
and
for
this
pretty
diverse
group
of
people
here.
First
we're
looking
for
examples
where
blockchain
has
been
applied
to
solve
sustainability
challenges,
and
especially
in
the
industrial
sectors
in
the
hard
to
obey
sectors.
We
would
love
to
hear
kind
of
lessons
learned
what
has
worked,
what
we
can
improve
going
forward.
B
So
some
real
examples
are
very
much
welcome.
As
charles
mentioned
we're,
having
conversations
with
a
lot
of
actors,
including
you
know,
technical
solutions,
providers
and
really
what
we
are
keen
to
find
is
kind
of
openness
to
sort
of
design
fit
for
purpose
solutions.
What
I
mean
by
that,
as
I
said
earlier,
we
want
to
find
efficient
ways
of
solving
this
problem
and
meet
our
clients
where
they
are
so
we're.
B
Looking
for
really
kind
of
solutions
that
meet
meet
this
purpose
and,
as
charles
said,
you
know,
we're
a
non-profit,
we're
looking
to
solve
this
pretty
big
major
issue
and
what
we
want
to
put
out.
There
are
solutions
that
kind
of
serve
the
public
good
that
are
open
source
that
can
be
used
by
everyone
that
can
be,
you
know,
really
applied
across
the
sector
across
the
whole
ecosystem.