►
Description
Internet Society Board Open Forum on Structures of Consultation
Session 2
25 May 2022 (French)
A
B
A
The
first
logistical
step
is
to
respect
the
course
of
conduct
for
individual
members
of
the
internets.
You
are
you
ever
agree
when
you
are
recorded,
we
have
simultaneous
interpretation
of
it,
which
is
available
in
english,
french
spanish.
There
are
also
subtitles
which
are
available
in
english.
You
can
select
these
options
in
the
zoom
panel
and
we'll
show
you
how
to
keep
your
microphone
on
mid
august
at
all
times.
A
A
A
Proposals
cannot
reduce
and
the
ability
of
stakeholder
communities
to
choose
possible
candidates
of
directors,
nor
proposals
which
would
require
the
removal
upon
dissolution
of
in
the
United
States
This
course
of
work
will
not
consider
and
proposals
which
vi
olent.
The
current
legal
relationships
and
agreements
between
the
state
of
association
was
illicans
or
between
the
internet
society
and
the
public
interest
registry
and.
A
We
had
a
few
topics
that
will
be
more
considered
for
further
studies
in
aid
now
had
two
sessions
twice.
The
first
was
about
diversity.
There
is
a
few
weeks
and
this
one
on
the
communication
that
is
missing
the
bad
communication
interrupted
between
the
members,
the
chapters,
so
there
no
c
ommunication
between
individual
members
between
staff
and
the
board.
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
The
council
is
happy
to
take
this
into
consideration,
but
it
would
be
useful.
Nevertheless,
if
you
could,
if
you
could
give
us
some
suggestions,
if
you
see
any
metals
that
work
well
in
other
organizations
of
the
same
size
and
as
ours,
especially
when
no
ch
structural
change
is
required
because
we
had
discussions
before
and
regarding
the
problem
that
a
speaker
just
told
you
about
with
the
chapters.
There
is
a
lot
of
administrative
work
to
do
so.
A
The
Advisory
Council
often
looks
at
this
administrative
work
at
the
instead
of
leaning
more
on
the
success.
Free
of
information.
Do
n't
want
to
change
the
structures
until
when
our
experiment
has
shown
us
what
to
change
it
must
when
you
have
an
idea
of
such
an
experiment.
It
would
be
great
to
have
your
opinion
on
your
thoughts,
but
it
would
be
especially
useful
to
do
these
experiments
without
having
to
make
or
undertake
structured
changes.
A
big
thank
you.
A
A
We
do
not
really
know
what
was
sent.
What
was
received,
what
were
the
reactions
from
our
members
if
the
members
have
reacted
or
not
I,
don't
know
how
we
can
fix
this
problem,
but
it
would
be
a
good
idea
if
this
information
would
be
available.
It
tends
in
this
categorization
of
the
messaging
of
the
communication.
A
C
One
of
the
questions
we
dealt
with
earlier
is
trying
to
see
how
we
can
measure
and
evaluate
success,
and
it
seems
that
you
have
touched
on
this
question
and
in
relation
especially
in
relation
to
interaction
with
chapter
members.
How
do
you
do
this
evaluation
question?
We
do
n't
measure
what
happens
between
between
members
and
messengers.
So
what
we
do
is
we
take
the
messages
and
try
to
see
what
is
particularly
important
to
us
as
a
chapter.
C
We
have
our
list
but
the
lists,
and
then
we
have
discussions
at
the
policy,
level
etc
and
other
things
that's.
There
are
people
who
are
passionate
about
certain
subjects,
but
there
is
a
wider
group
or,
of
course,
wider
members,
and
among
them
we
do
n't
know
what
succeeds
in
reaching
an
end
or
especially,
on
the
general
communication
plan.
C
We
don't
know
if,
if
there
is,
if
we
get
no
something,
we
say,
we
realize
that
there
are
things
that
have
been
sent
by
board
members,
and
so
there
are
things
that
need
progress
that
has
been
made
on
this
issue.
Thank
you
for
that
suggestion.
In
relation
to
these
different
types
of
communication
from
the
conversation
box
I
see,
then
Rita
said
there
are
different.
There
are
difficulties
of
communications
that
must
be
done
among
different
ages.
C
The
deployment
of
infrastructure,
with
with
work
on
the
in
relation
to
the
program
of
the
internet
company,
in
my
opinion,
is
that
must
be,
must
operate
at
the
level
of
local
communities,
but
we
need
to
document
some
of
these
activities
that
we
are
working
on,
that
we
are
working
on
locally
and
regionally.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
C
We
have,
we
have
involved
this
for
both
some
years,
so
historically,
we
have
had
a
bit
of
a
difficult
time,
especially
in
relation
to
writing
objectives
for
some
programs,
and
for
the
past
few
years
we
have
been
doing
some
progress
waxing.
The
impact
meal
is
put
in
place
through
contemplating
the
goals
of
the
projects
and
seeing
if
there
are
effects
that
are
really
having
effects
and
seeing
how,
if
those
effects
are
actually
impacting
the
world
in
which
we
operate
and
most
of
what
we
do
in
these
cases
involves.
C
For
the
last
mild
twelve
months,
we
have
been
trying
to
measure
this,
and
hopefully,
in
the
years
to
come,
the
impact
will
be
able
to
be
able
to
identify
some
key
matrices
that
relate
to
healthy
internet
and
that
we
could
the
networking
be
in
a
healthy
way.
So
we've
been
working
on
that
kind
of
stuff
and
we've
been
involved
and
that's
side
and
how
we
could
have
that
kind
of
evaluation
to
reflect
on
and
capture
stories
that
illustrate.
C
How
this
all
works,
I
hope
this
has
given
you
a
little
insight
into
what
is
going
on.
Thank
you,
one
of
the
things
if
I
can
take
the
liberty
of
picking
up
on
the
question
that
was
mentioned
by
baraque.
There
are
so
many
individuals
of
members
who
have
had
of
impact
in
Kenya,
for
example,
everyone
has
an
impact
story
at
iso
level,
so
we
understand
and
participate
in
the
process.
C
With
the
community,
whatever
the
projects
and
where
the
prejo
is,
generally
speaking,
this
is
channeled
to
through
the
character
there
might
be
value
in
across
the
wide
calls
for
additional
stories
that
one
could
collect
through
this
site.
Then
the
side,
the
disadvantage
and
that
and
that
the
purpose
of
the
impact
report
and
to
make
sure
that
we
are
going
to
use
this
report
to
attract
people.
C
C
Sometimes
things
that
are
reflected
back
to
us
as
a
community
without
reflecting
outwards
and
and
they
are
not
in
synchronicity,
especially
compared
to
people
who
are
who
are
in
the
Internet
society.
There
are
interests
that
are
different,
etc,
and
we
should
try
to
see
the
kind
of
type
of
audience
that
exists
and
that
This
is
the
way
that
seems
the
most
judicial
to
me,.
C
We
would
have
to
be
careful
to
see
how
we
use
the
effects
of
the
impact
of
the
impact
report,,
especially
when
we
face
what
exists,
it's
wonderful
to
see
all
this,
and
that
kind
of
this
whole
number
90,000
people.
But
I
would
like
it
to
expand
even
further,
because
there
are
more
people
who
are
interested
in
the
internet
and
the
internet
society.
C
Thank
you,
I
think
your
point
regarding
regarding
both
different
the
two
r
different
contributions
that
you
mentioned
is
important
to
ensure
how
we
communicate
with
the
different
and
variable
groups,
especially
by
region
by
age
and
also
by
their
level
of
commitment.
The
report
must
mention
those
who
are
really
engaged.
Maybe
that's
is
significant
of
significantly
different.
C
C
C
C
C
I
suspect
that
there
is
p-
maybe
in
my
thinking,
things
might
not
work,
or
maybe
there
is
the
essential
goal
of
the
common
communication.
Communication
has
to
be
done
in
a
fair
way,
but
we
have
to
look
at
the
objective.
Then.
The
question
is:
what
is
the
objective
of
different
types
of
communication
that
we
put
in
place?
What
is
needed
in
reporting
for.
C
For
the
good
interest
is
different,
it
is,
it
is
important
to
be
able
to
split
our
the
membership
of
the
members
and
of
this
communication
is
important
and
there
should
be
efficiency
in
the
process.
It
is
important
to
be
able
to
target
the
specificity
of
the
objective
and
the
design,
especially
when
we
talk
about
communication.
C
C
C
It
is
st
the
point
where
the
consultation
should
go
to
if
you
just
want
to
have
general
information,
a
gathering
of
a
gathering
exercise
of
the
members
of
chapters.
It
is
probably
not
necessary
to
manage
at
this
stage,
especially
in
relation
to
global
a
and
to
the
members
of
chapters
to
ensure
a
flow
of
influx
between
chapters
and
feedback.
But
to
do
this,
it
is
important
to
have
general
information
and
material
of
the
material
and
also
use
of
very
small,
necessary
and
appropriate
resources
to
create
a
parity
at
the
level
of
the
process
and.
A
I
think
it's
this
conception
and
that
I
would
like
to
experiment
and
then
another
thing:
when
we
talk
about
how
we
communicate
for
the
moment
we
have
done,
we
talk
about
what
we
have
done
instead
of
talking
together
about
the
political.
There
are
some
of
these
arguments,
but
generally
we
don't
say
that
we
are
in
favor
of
this
or
opposed
to
that
or
but
I
can't
really
speak
of
a
e
communication.
It
is
an
interaction,
but
it
is
not
a
development
of
a
policy.
Thank
you,
Mohamed.
Thank
you.
A
Mohamed,
unfortunately,
we
do
not
can't
hear
you
so
I'll
go
to
8
and
then
I'll
come
back.
Yes,
thank
you,
Ted
I'm
Amrita,
where
you
discuss
how
the
council
can
consult
the
community,
it
can
be
done
when
there
is
a
problem
and
then
the
consultation
is
different
and
often
and
when
we
have
calls
you
see,
we
don't
know
if
all
members
of
the
chapter
were
invited
or
only
the
criteria
of
the
chapters.
Sometimes
we
do
n't
like
each
other,
how
the
invitations
were
sent
out
with.
She
says
that
there.
A
A
A
We
have
this
document,
which
is
prepared
by
access,
and
the
chapters
are
presumed
to
have
of
these
documents.
There
are
several
points
that
they
go
back.
There
are
other
points
where
there
are
no
I'm,
not
sure
so,
I
wonder
if
all
the
members
of
the
chapters
have
been
asked.
If
there
is
perhaps
a
part
of
this
document
that
needs
to
be
modified.
A
A
A
That
what
you
want
to
have
is
exclusion
pounding
in
the
policy
development
process.
The
way
I
understood
it
and
that's
we
got
it-
is
the
consultation
angle
just
to
detect
and
the
ideas
of
the
chapters
concerning
the
policies.
Well,
there
is
this
process
which
is
controlled
by
the
Internet,
the
City,
and
there
is
this
process
in
the
image
which
exists,
but
in
other
instances
for
example,
axas
or
other
Internet
group
ask
us
about
it
and
if
it
their
idea,
vendetter
endorsed
by
the
70s,
then.
A
B
A
A
What
I'm
hearing
here
c
is
the
level
of
consultation
that
can
and
cannot
be
done
for
the
PDP.
It
may
be
appropriate
for
some
things,
but
not
for
others.
There
are
things
that
are
driven
by
other
parties
by
sometimes
by
our
partners,
but
sometimes
by
people
with
whom
we
have
to
have,
and
we
have
to
have
an
external
consultation
like,
for
example,
with
the
governments
we
have
the
different
things
and
which
are
happening
and
the
pace.
B
A
C
C
Disagreements
and
a
development
of
understanding
there
was
so
much
parsnip
with
multiple
perspectives
and
approaches,
but
this
exposed
the
issue
to
a
variety
of
people
and
there
were
multiple
perspectives,
multiple
thoughts
and
this
became
a
main
question
and
can
to
be
one
of
the
solutions
for
me,
that
was
probably
what
I
think
could
be
a
structural
potential
for
so
using
the
toolbox
as
much
as
possible,
or
something
like
that.
Maybe
that
could
be
a
an
example.
C
And
just
to
confirm
my
understanding
of
things,
it
sounds
like
what
you
are
shouting
about
is
a
situation
in
which
there
are
such
polarized
participants
that
are
constituted,
and
by
expanding
that
panoply
of
participants.
The
establishment
of
polarized
stops
coming
so
a
a
a
majority.
Maybe
we
could
have
a
a
laporization
was
n't
the
focus
of
the
conversation
and
the
conversation
could
go
in
essence,
productive
in
discussions.
C
C
Maybe
there
could
be
interest
on
this,
so
this
is
a
it's
a
polarized
view
of
from
that
perspective
and
thoughts
in
the
middle
and
and
look
at
stopping
at
the
end
of
the
day
to
see
what
the
main
interest
in
all
of
this
is.
This
is
this
is
a
group
that
tends
to
go
to
the
center.
Thank
you
very
much
for
this.
This
additional
comment.
C
No,
it
was
I
had
the
mallevé
by
mistake,
because
the
first
time
your
sound
was
interrupted.
I
had
listened
to
the
first
part
of
your
intervention.
I
wanted
you,
I
invite
you
to
go
back
again,
try
to
intervene
to
complete
your
reflection.
Yes,
I
think
the
part
of
the
question
I
wanted
to
ask
was
already
answered
by
Sheryl.
The
second
concerns
ISOC
and
Sarlat.
It
will
be
the
chapters
and
the
members
an
example
and
action
and
action
and
the
annual
action
plan.
C
I,
don't
know
you
are
in
a
better
position
to
tell
me
how
many
members,
how
many
chapters
have
contributed
to
the
plan
to
the
2022
plan
within
the
isoque
and
in
the
development
plan.
Maybe
this
is
a
way
in
which
we
could
start
the
work
to
see
if
there
are
reflections
from
either
by
the
participants
present
by
us
or
to
see
if
there
are
lessons
that
the
isoque
is
able
to
draw
from
action
plans
that
could
who
will
who
will
be,
who
will
be
implemented
implement
this
year.
Thank
you
for
this
question.
C
Then
the
way
the
action
plan
is
developed.
It
is
a
plan
addressed
for
the
personal
nnel.
This
is
a
plan
that
the
staff
really
have
to
rely
on
that
can't
be
developed
as
a
community
effort.
We
could
change
this
quickly
in
order
to
change
the
nature
of
the
smoother
so
that
we
for
that
'we
don't
depend
on
professional
staff,
but
that's
the
position,
that's
the
objective
of
the
plan.
C
What
we
have
is
that's
a
significant
effort
to
consult
with
people
in
the
community
to
see
if
they
are
interested
in
projects
and
by
then
and
see.
If
there
are
any
projects
that
meet
certain
criteria,
then
a
question
and
see
the
main
question
and
see
if
any
interest
that
is
generated
by
the
audience.
C
There
is
important
to
see
than
to
say
that
the
biggest
response
we
got
was
30%..
We
are
not
getting
a
high
percentage
of
response,
and
this
means
that
it
is
difficult
to
assess
whether
chapters
are
interested,
but
we
are
getting
high
positive
responses
from
committed
chapters
who
are
interested
in
various
topics.
For
example,
we
had
positive
reactions
this
year
through
the
strong
links
or
digital
sovereignty.
C
That
was
part
of
the
reason
that
pushed
the
project
to
be
successful.
We
had
positive
and
consistent
interest
from
some
of
certain
parties.
Stakeholders
there
are
others
there
are
here,
are
parts
that
arouse
less
interest
from
the
audience
part.
For
example,
the
networking
was
interesting
when
the
project
was
underway.
It
was
difficult
to
explain
to
people
to
describe
what
was
happening.
There
wasn't
a
lot
of
reaction
two
years
ago,
but
when
we
started
producing
the
material
people
were
very
excited.
C
It's
because
that
they
started
drinking,
that
the
tool
could
be
used
for
such
and
such
purpose.
There
is,
there
is
a
combination
of
several
parts,
one
there
is
and
which
is
linked
to
the
official
mechanism
must,
by
which
one
makes
consultations
for
people
to
see
if
there's
interest,
and
then
the
other
mechanism
is
more,
is
an
informal
informal
mechanism
to
consult
with
staff
who
interact,
who
interact
with
the
chapter
and
that's
an
integral
part
of
what
we're
doing
to
consider
at
the
time
of
consideration
of
the
action
plan
action.
C
So
I
see
the
responses
are
directed
to
the
leader
of
the
chapters
we
have
had
instructions
to
follow
and
the
goal
is
to
engage
with
the
directors
of
the
leaders
of
chapter
not
directly
with
the
members
of
the
chapters
we
could
engage
directly
with
the
individual
members
of
the
isoque,
but
to
engage
with
the
chapters.
It
is
absolutely
done
this
way.
C
C
So
I
will
I
will
close
this
session
to
thank
everyone
for
dedicating
the
time
to
this
session.
Thank
you
for
your
attention.
Thank
you
for
bringing
your
perspectives
and
ideas
to
this
session.
The
Board
has
really
heard
of
group
work
from
and
then
from
your
perspectives.
So
I
see
that
there
are
more
consultations
that
desired
and
when
I
talk
about
consultation,
I
am
talking
about
different
types
of
consultations.
C
The
objective
and
to
try
to
pen
It
is
useful
to
think
about
how
we
can
experiment
with
different
types
of
consultation
and
communication
in
a
broader
way,
in
particular
how
to
measure
this,
and,
in
my
opinion,
one
of
the
essential
challenges
that
we
are
going
to
face
here
is
in
the
different
parts
of
Isaac
and
trying
to
see
models
elsewhere.
That
people
were
able
to
find
that
was
successful
and
start
model
was
used
to
demonstrate
success.
C
I
think
we
are
very
concerned
to
see
or
try
to
see
that
we
are
trying
to
devote
enough
time
and
effort
by
the
work
that
is
done
and
that
this
does
not
reach
a
large
group
of
people
or
who
can
or
must
ensure
that
we
meet
the
objectives
of
the
consultation.
Even
if
this
meeting
comes
to
an
end,
I
strongly
encourage
you
to
continue
to
discuss
to
think
about
this
problem
to
share
with
the
concert
of
the
Council
certain
objects,
certain
models
or
certain
reflections.