►
From YouTube: Local Offline Collaboration Monthly 2018-12-19
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
I'll
start
alright,
in
a
case,
hello.
Everyone
welcome
to
our
very
first
local
offline
collaboration,
working
group
monthly,
if
we're
gonna
be
just
mostly
spending
this
time
kind
of
a
knitting
booting
our
community
having
some
introductions
between
different
folks
and
what
we're
excited
about,
what
we're
working
on,
and
maybe
talk
more
about
kind
of
the
charter
of
this
this
community
and
what
we're
hoping
it
can
accomplish
and
what
we
want
to
get
out
of
it.
So
my
thought
was,
we
would
spend
the
first.
A
You
know
10
15,
minutes
kind
of
just
sharing,
who
we
are
doing
introductions
was
thinking,
could
introduce
yourselves
talk
about
what
project
or
projects
you
work
on,
especially
in
the
local
offline
first
space
and
maybe
share
their
favorite.
You
know
use
case
in
this
area
or
one
that
maybe
got
them
really
excited
about
the
space
and
then,
if,
if
you
have
feelings
or
thoughts,
say
a
word
or
two
about
what
what
you
hope
to
get
out
of
this,
this
group
and
community
I'm
happy
to
go
first.
A
So
that's
that's.
How
I
work
on
local
offline
first
and
my
favorite
use
case
I
come
from
an
education
background,
so
I
worked
in
education,
tech
for
a
long
time.
It's
all
of
the
students
with
pretty
crappy
low-end
devices,
probably
like
you,
know,
really
cheap
mobile
phones
sitting
in
a
classroom
trying
to
exchange
information
or
do
a
you
know,
a
fun
collaborative
quiz
game
that
helps
them.
A
Learn
that
shares
information
with
their
teacher
about
who's
getting
stuff
and-
and
it
can
do
this
all
offline
peer
to
peer
between
the
students
in
the
classroom
without
having
to
have
really
awesome
bandwidth
to
every
single
school,
which
we
know
is
definitely
not
the
case
even
in
the
most
wealthy
of
nations.
So
that's
that's
the
one
that
gets
me
really
excited.
What
I'm
hoping
to
get
out
of
the
this
working
group
is
I'm
excited
to
learn
about
all
of
the
cool
stuff.
A
That's
happening
in
the
space,
understand
what
other
people
find
really
exciting
and
then
be
able
to
to
kind
of
share
and
and
get
you
know,
iterative
feedback
on
some
of
the
discoveries
we
make
throughout
this
research
process
and
be
able
to
talk
about
that
as
a
group
and
come
to
kind
of
like
synthesize
these
conclusions
and
bring
them
back
to
the
community.
To
me,
like
wow,
look
at
this
cool
stuff
that
that
we've
been
discovering
like,
let's,
let's
continue
the
discussion
and
ideally
make
the
little
offline
first
Internet,
even
better
and
support
those
these
cases.
B
B
I
just
think
the
whole
offline
area
is
super
interested
and
we
don't
work
on
it
enough.
My
dream
use
case
is
to
be
on
a
train
and
being
able
to
install
things
on
my
computer
without
internet
access,
just
picking
them
up
from
somewhere
else.
Someone
else
and
that's
it
I,
don't
know
if
I
will
have
much
time
to
do
things
on
this
working
group,
but
I'm
watching
the
repository
itself.
I
will
be
following
at
least.
C
So
Domenic
I
mostly
work
on,
go
ipfs
and
specifically
around
like
platform
problems,
mostly
I'm
interested
in
stuff
like
this,
because
I
come
from
a
background
where
I'm
very
used
to
not
having
connectivity
or
having
really
awful
connectivity,
and
while
that's
much
better
today
than
it
was
say
ten
years
ago.
That's
not
the
case
for
the
most
of
the
world,
so
I
know
that
frustration
and
would
like
to
help
alleviate
that
if
I
can
so
yeah.
That's
me.
D
Awesome
Terry
don't
go
sure,
so
my
name
is
Terry.
Chen
born
I
currently
work
as
a
community
manager
at
protocol
labs.
So
it's
my
job
to
try
to
make
it
easier
to
understand
what
the
decentralized
web
is
and
why
we
would
want
to
use
it,
and
that
includes
looking
for
good
use
cases
that
make
that
easy
to
understand.
D
So
my
background
before
coming
to
protocol
labs
is
a
sort
of
a
co-organizer
of
the
broader
offline
first
community,
not
specific
to
decentralized
I,
got
into
that,
because
I
was
working
at
a
company
where
they
used
couch,
TV
a
lot
to
do
offline
data
storage
and
then
sink
pouch,
DB
and
couch
TV.
So,
while
I
was
there,
I
became
a
co-worker
and
I
serve
an
event
called
offline
camp,
which
is
for
the
broader
offline
first
community
and
camp.
D
I've
met
a
lot
of
people
who
are
interested
in
decentralized
I'd,
say:
maybe
a
third
of
the
people
that
some
of
the
events
are
interested
in
the
decentralized
web
as
opposed
to
working
around
the
limitations
of
the
more
centralized
web.
So
I'm
interested
in
seeing
more
about
where,
where
the
overlap
is
between
those
two
interests,
I'm
also
the
editor
of
publications.
It's
called
the
offline
camp
publication
of
medium
and
I'm,
always
looking
for
articles
there.
I
will
also
be
launching
a
blog
here
in
key
one,
so
I'm
a
good
place
to
send
content
ideas
to.
D
If
you
want
to
get
something
out
there,
that's
really
kind
of
like
story,
forum
or
video
from
your
conference
talk
or
an
idea.
You've
been
batting
around
or
something
cool.
You
made
that
put
these
things
into
practice.
I
have
places
to
get
those
stories
out
there
and
I'd
love
to
touch
people
with
them.
E
For
that,
because
it
was
the
most
user
friendly
at
the
time
and
I
do
a
little
I'm
doing
like
freelance
product
design
for
another
offline
first
project
called
project,
Lantern
I'm,
also
part
of
school
for
quite
a
computation.
We
trusted,
like
peer-to-peer
web
m.I.c,
meet
up
last
year
and
I
volunteer
for
NYC
mesh
and
I'm.
There's
a
potential
project
using
ipfs
cluster
that
I've
been
working
with
for
museums
in
the
United
States.
E
The
current
museum
is
like
a
kind
of
distributed
museum
where
the
people
who
are
members
and
support
it
get
to
vote
on
like
what
gets
acquired
and
things
like
that
and
they've
been
talking
about
how
to
reliably
collaborate
and
acquire
pieces
that
are
pretty
large
files
and
make
sure
that
they're
backed
up
in
in
multiple
locations
but
still
private
to
their
own
pod.
So
I've
been
poking
and
prodding
on
ipfs
cluster,
but
it
still,
it
seems
like
there's
a
lot
to
learn
to
get
it
working.
F
I
work
on
I,
mostly
focus
on
sort
of
data,
stewardship
topics
in
a
protocol
apps,
and
so
my
interest
in
the
offline
first
stuff
is
that
ultimately,
an
offline
first
application
needs
some
way
for
the
data
to
accumulate
and
persist
over
time,
and
that
ends
up
being
some
sort
of
data
set.
That
needs
to
be
steward
it
and
there's
lots
of
different
options
on
that
side
of
how
to
do
that
in
distributed
ways,
and
so
I
see
these
two
things
fitting
together
in
interesting
opportunities.
Also
there's
the
exciting
thing
that
came
from
the
first
time.
F
Distributed
apps
and
decentralized
apps,
thus
far
have
often
been
slower
and
from
peer
and
less
responsive
than
the
centralized
alternative.
Meanwhile,
offline
first
is
often
like
people
often
go
to
offline
first
in
order
to
make
things
more
responsive,
and
so
so
I'm
really
curious,
whether
where
we
can
leverage
that
opportunity
to
flip
this
flow,
a
lot
of
that
has
to
do
with
just
like
having
a
smarter
approach
to
the
user
experience
and
being
smart
about
what
you
synchronize
when
and
so
I'm
really
curious
to
see
where
we
can
take
advantage
of
that.
F
G
F
Indigenous
peoples
and
actually
mapping
their
local
region,
maybe
for
things
where,
like
companies
are
illegally
logging,
things
like
that,
and
then
they
choose
whether
to
synchronize
that
data
back
to
a
global
view,
because
they're
also
doing
things
like
marking
where
traditional
medicines
grow,
which
they
don't
necessarily
want
to
share.
And
so
it's
like
a
really
rich
dynamic
application
of
offline
first
and
where
it
also
percolates
into
this
topic
of
stewardship
of
data.
Over
time.
F
D
And
I,
like
I,
appreciate
your
comment
about
the
user
experience
because
I'm
in
the
middle
of
editing,
an
interview
that
I
did
with
someone
who's
who's
big
to
the
decentralized
community,
we're
talking
about
like
all
of
the
onboarding
challenges
and
getting
people
to
understand,
decentralized
and
use
that
stuff,
and
one
of
the
things
that
came
up
was
like.
Is
the
decentralized
web
just
and
inherently
like
user
hostile
model
compared
so
the
other
options
that
are
out
there.
So
that's
definitely
a
big
challenge
to
overcome
yeah.
A
That's
something
Pedro
who
is
part
of
the
dynamic
data
capabilities
working
group
inside
of
IPs.
They
they
spend
a
lot
of
time,
thinking
about
and
prototyping
and
building
apps
on
top
of
some
of
the
ipfs
tools
and
have
this
this
area.
What
it's
like,
wow,
it's
not
even
so
much
the
technical
aspect,
that's
really
difficult
in
the
space,
it's
figuring
out
the
right
UX
practices
and
principles
so
that
you
can
think
about
alright,
my
document
is
syncing
to
one
peer,
but
maybe
that's
not.
The
peer
I
meant
to
be
collaborating
with.
A
There
is
no
more
concept
of
like
there's
a
central
source
of
truth
for
how
how
you
might
be
doing
like
a
Google
Docs,
that's
fully
distributed,
and
so
there's
definitely
some
UX
principles
around
offline
or
local
first
applications
that
are
outside
of
the
realm
of
existing
patterns
and
paradigms
that
are
well
yeah.
Yeah.
D
F
If
you?
Okay,
if
you
embrace
the
language
of
decentralized
and
distributed
being
distinct
terms
from
the
like
call
barren
paper,
we're
distributed,
is
fully
peer-to-peer
and
decentralized
as
some
like
federated
the
value
and
the
power
of
having
things
that
are
for
pragmatic
reasons
functioning
as
a
decentralized
thing
where
you
do
have
what
scuttlebutt
calls
pubs
and,
like
you
have
this
notion
of
like
that
people
can
run
and
rely
on
for
reliability
and
connectivity
and
all
those
things.
But
then
it's
all
done
using
distributed
protocols.
F
So
the
information
is
identified
in
a
way
and
passed
in
such
a
way
that
it
could
be
done
totally
distributed,
but
for
efficiency
you
can
use
these.
These,
like
hubs,
I
think,
is
a
thing
that
will
end
up
leveraging
more
in
water
and
figuring
them
getting
the
messaging
clear
on
that,
so
that
people
understand
what's
going
on
and
they're,
not
like.
Oh
that's
not
distributed,
that's
not
peer
to
peer
I.
Think
might
be
one
of
the
stumbling
points
for
for
getting
people
to
buy
in
yeah.
A
But
if
anyone
can
be
a
hub,
but
anyone
can
provision
a
hub
like
that's,
it
has
these
distributed
patterns
and
paradigms
that
we
care
about,
but
with
all
of
the
good
stuff
of
actually
yes
being
able
to
rely
on
a
connection
to
something
and
having
nodes,
maybe
with
more
capability,
more
storage
like
better
bandwidth
stuff
like
that
so
completely
agree.
I
think
that's
a
really
good
point
that
that
we
should
be
doing
notice
that
Peter
jumped
back
on
so
Peter.
We
have.
We
spent
the
first,
whatever
10,
minutes
or
so
doing,
introductions.
A
G
Okay,
hello,
my
name
is
pizza
I'm,
mostly
here,
to
listen
and
learn
my
interesting
offline
process
to
learn
of
solution
or
technologies
that
we
can
use
or
I
can
museu
to
to
solve
a
couple
of
problems.
Look
and
personally
experienced
situations
using
web
apps
if
you
I
wish,
if
only
it
could
work
offline,
so
that
got
me
interested
in
offline
interest
and
joining
the
offline
community
and
I've
worked
with
couchdb
to
solve
some
of
those
problems
for
evolution.
G
A
Thank
you
yeah.
Maybe
that's
a
good
Segway.
You
know,
I
I
think
this
is
we're
having
interesting
discussions,
and
we
should
make
sure
that
there's
time
for
that
here,
but
also
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
kind
of
where,
where
this
group
is
heading
in
the
short
term,
and
so
similarly
to
a
lot
of
the
other
working
groups
in
the
wider
ipfs
project,
we
do
quarterly
okay,
ours
to
kind
of
set
goals
for
ourselves
and
track
some
of
the
work
that
we're
doing
so
can
present
that.
A
A
So,
if
you
can
see
I'm
actually
presenting
my
my
screen
right
now
thumbs
up
all
good
awesome,
and
so
we
have
a
place
on
github
which
documents
this
group,
which
maybe
some
of
you
guys
saw,
and
we
have
an
open
issue
about
our
q1.
Ok,
ours
and
kind
of
the
the
main
three
goals
were
focused
on
for
q1.
Is
you
know,
forming
this
community
first
off
and
like
making
sure
this
is
a
place?
A
A
Think
in
general,
there's
a
lot
of
interest
to
to
talk
more
with
people
to
document
best
practices
and
make
sure
that,
as
we
boot,
this
community
we're
following
those
to
make
sure
we
spend
our
time
really
effectively.
So
if,
if
folks
have
ideas
or
input,
I
think
right
now,
it's
Terry
Pedro
and
me
who
are
starting
to
drive
this
forward,
but
as
if
people
want
to
kind
of
contribute
or
want
to
talk
more
about
some
of
these
topics
or
volunteer
for
some
areas
for
super
open
to
it,
and
that
the
that'd
be
awesome
curious.
A
A
So
I
think
a
couple
of
the
areas
where
we
have
kind
of
like
explicit,
open
questions.
I
think
I
wrote
this
in
the
doc
are
kind
of
like
what
who
are
the
research
orgs,
maybe
that
we
should
be
reaching
out
to
that
are
actually
actively
doing
user
research
in
this
space,
because
we
want
to
learn
from
their
understandings
and
knowledge.
Matt
I
know
you
have
a
couple
of
connections
like
Nikola.
Space
right
was
was
one
of
the
folks
that
you're
connected
with
who's.
A
Like
you
know,
in
the
field,
understanding
pain
points
actively
in
kind
of
doing
offline
collaboration
and
and
trying
to
have
more
mesh
networking
tools
curious.
If
anyone
else
is
familiar
with
some
folks
that
you
know
we
can
just
source
a
list
of
people,
we
should
start
reaching
out
to
and
see
if
there's
opportunities
to
collaborate
back
then
well,.
D
G
D
D
But
yes,
I
know
many
people,
I
can
tell
you
which
camp
attendees
care
about
II,
centralized
more
than
others,
but
also
go
into
the
offline
camp
popping
clicking
on
that
decentralized
tab.
It's
a
place
to
see
some
of
the
folks
you've
written
about
it
and
what
up
it's
they've
written
about
in
that
connection,
overlap.
D
E
As
part
of
like
school
for
credit,
computation,
which
I
put
a
link
in
the
notes
for
Tay
and
joy,
has
been
working
on
kind
of
a
long-standing
project
called
the
distributed
web
of
care
and
I'll.
You
know
I,
don't
want
to
speak
for
him
too
much,
but
the
one
of
the
ideas
that
he
talks
about
a
lot
and
like
I
hope
he
had
kind
of
two
students
that
were
working
under
him
for
a
separate
project
and
some
of
the
ideas
around
distributed.
E
Technologies
and
decentralized
technologies
was
not
about
the
technology
itself,
but
about
the
communities
that
they
create.
So
thinking
about
kind
of
higher
level
like
okay,
the
tech
could
be
decentralized
or
distributed,
and
it
talks
about
node
privilege,
but
there's
also
like
communal
privileges
and
I.
E
Don't
know
they've
just
been
doing
like
a
lot
of
really
deep
thinking
about
that
and
I
can
connect
you
to
them,
and
similarly,
I
saw
a
lot
of
representation
for
debt
and
a
little
bit
around
scuttlebutt
when
they
hosted
the
peer-to-peer
web
conference,
which
had
probably
the
most
amazing
opening
of
any
conference.
Any
technology
conference
I've
been
to
what
Wi-Fi
don't
so
we
started.
E
So
like
we
all
have
a
private
key,
you
know,
I,
don't
know
it
was
just
like
pretty
wild
and
kind
of
set
the
tone
for,
like
you,
kind
of
stopped
people
from
being
like
that's,
not
decentralized
or
not,
for
that's
not
perfectly
distributed.
You
know,
like
people
are
starting
to
think
about
more
impactful
things,
so
yeah
they're
researchers
did
that's.
A
E
A
E
E
You
know
we
can
give
you
space
and
like
a
platform
and
chat,
but
I
don't
know
many
people
who
went
maybe
like
I,
think
Caroline
senders
might
have
gone
who's,
a
researcher
on
who
deals
a
lot
with
like
how
to
build
better
UX
to
deal
with
online
harassment,
which
is
kind
of
an
interesting
question
for
communities
like
scuttlebutt,
for
example,
where,
like
you,
only
see
the
data
of
people,
you
follow
and
people
they
follow
and
like?
How
does?
How
does
that
interact
with
like
the
idea
of
censoring
or
dealing
with
harassment?
E
A
I'm
curious,
like
I,
definitely
see
like
the
UX
challenges
of
trying
to
not
having
centralized
applications
as
being
a
big
challenge
for
developers
who
are
kind
of
coming
in
and
trying
to
build
bottoms
up
for
kind
of
offline
or
local
first
collaboration
model,
where
it's
like
great.
My
application
should
be
just
as
powerful
when
people
are
not
connected
to
any
central
server
as
but
like
with
a
subgroup
of
people
that
they
want
to
collaborate
with
or
communicate
with.
So
I
see
a
lot
of
challenges.
A
There
I
see
a
lot
of
challenges
around
like
the
persistence
connectivity
side.
Curious,
like
identity
seems
like
something
that
is
also
super
challenging
in
the
kind
of
distributed
decentralized
model,
I'm,
not
quite
sure
about
the
intersection
with
offline.
So
if
anyone
who's
thought
about
that,
more
would
be
curious
about
your
your
thinking's
about
you
know,
offline
first
and
identity
and
if
there's
additional
challenges
over
just
decentralized
it
when
we
start
thinking
about
like
people
who
have
like
sporadic
connectivity
and
stuff
like
that,.
E
E
Is
that
if
you
feel
like
a
more
tight-knit
group,
because
you
are
a
smaller
group
and
you're,
not
broadcasting,
the
behavior
I
mean
it
still
has
like
problems
of
employess
of
power
structures
and
and
people
having
different
expectations
that
aren't
like
written
out
but
they're,
much
easier
to
deal
with
when
things
go
wrong
because
you
you're
not
like
appealing
to
something,
that's
massive
or
faceless
or
distant
to
moderate,
for
you
so
actually
I
think
it's
identity.
Verification
might
be
easier
with
peer-to-peer
or
offline
stuff.
F
Possibly
the
most
successful
offline
first
use
case
is
get
it.
It
is
offline
first
and
you
use
it
locally,
and
then
you
choose
to
sync
it
to
what
github
is
actually
not
even
part
of
get.
The
centralized
thing
is
not
even
part
of
the
get
application
or
its
protocol,
and
so,
if
you
think
about
that
and
how
you
identifies
new
signs,
you
optionally
sign
your
commits
we've
get
and
then
that
deals
with
the
authentication
thing
because
it's
like
it
just
boils
down
to
your
standard
web
of
trust.
F
A
Absolutely
I'm
curious,
if
any
one
kind
of
switching
gears
a
little
bit
talk
about.
Let's
talk
about
our
favorite
tools
or
existing
folks
who
are
operating
in
kind
of
the
offline
first,
local,
first
decentralized
collaboration
space,
just
as
as
to
get
a
sense
of
like
those
things
that
exist
out
there
that
we
think
are
doing
a
really
good
job
or
ones
that
maybe
are
like
well-known
and
popular,
and
we
can
talk
a
little
bit.
A
You
know
that
gives
us
a
sense
of
what
is
the
the
gamut
of
applications
that
exist
out
there
that
are
trying
to
do
cool
stuff
and
some
folks
that
maybe
we
can
talk
to
you
about
best
practices
and
what
has
made
them
so
successful
and
their
key
insights
and
in
getting
the
either
with
that
popularity
or
building
tools
in
a
really
good
well-designed
way.
So
do
you,
folks
have
have
ones
that
come
to
the
top
of
their
head.
E
E
You
know
telling
them
okay,
open
this
Web
browser
and
find
a
page
you
like
and
then
make
it
your
own
feels
pretty
powerful
that
one's
pretty
good
and
scuttlebutt
if
you're
in
the
same
room
as
someone
else
feels
amazing
like
if
you
open
it
up
and
you
don't
have
an
internet
connection
or
you're
like
connected
to
the
same
router
but
you're,
not
you
know
joining
a
pub
or
doing
that
dance.
E
If
someone
just
says
here,
have
you
know
here's
a
USB
key
open
this
and
now
you
can
like
chat
with
people,
and
you
could
look
at
history
and
that
first
time
sink,
if
you're
in
the
same
room
together
feels
really
good.
If
you
just
go
to
the
website
and
try
and
like
connect
to
the
network,
it
feels
awful
I.
Think.
A
C
I
I
suppose
there's
that
what
are
they
called
pirate
box?
There's
like
little
lunchboxes
people
make
that
they
leave
around
and
it's
just
a
Wi-Fi
access
point
that
people
can
connect
to,
and
it's
got
a
ton
of
weird
services
on
it
like
you
can
host
files
on
it,
there's
chat
and
all
that
stuff,
and
it
is
not
only
all
fine
first
but
I
guess
it
would
be
all
fine.
Only.
E
Airdrop
also
feels
pretty
great
yeah,
it's
like
so
smooth
yeah,
you
just
click
on
something
on
the
sidebar
and
you
can
send
it
to
people.
You
can
kind
of.
You
can
kind
of
not
abuse
airdrop
but
views
words.
It
called
mdns
Bonjour,
so,
like
I,
made
a
chat
application
that
forces
itself
into
everyone's
finder.
E
So
you
came
like
is
the
only
local
chat
that
doesn't
require
an
install
where
you
can
broadcast
hey.
I
have
a
file
share
here
and
the
file
share
name
could
be
whatever
text
you
want
and
then,
if
someone
clicks
on
it,
there's
just
a
file
and
if
they
edit
the
file,
then
that
becomes
a
new
share
name.
So
I
kind
of
had
this,
like
really
weird
ping-pong,
chat
room
that
you
know
whenever
anyone's
connected
to
the
same
Wi-Fi
and
they
open
up
finder,
they
can
start
a
conversation.
E
F
Airdrop
also
highlights
the
things
that
can
go
wrong.
I
mean
it's
not
always
when
it
works,
it's
beautifully
smooth,
but
when
it
doesn't
work,
it's
sort
of
like
baffling
and
like
I've
had
comical
scenarios
like
a
friend
trying
to
share
three
photos
with
me
managed
to
share
with
the
ten
other
people
at
the
table.
A
Weird
yeah
I
think
a
case
that
drives
me
crazy
and
those
is
like,
but
like
it,
it
needs
to
work
between
everyone
and
I.
Have
this
moment
where
I'm
like
trying
to
transfer,
but
just
someone
with
Android
and
I'm
like
I'm.
So
sorry
but
I
have
nothing
for
you.
A
When
that
comes
to
mind
from
some
kind
of
like
my
my
area
of
passion
is
the
work
that
Khan
Academy
Light
is
doing
around
distributing
kind
of
all
of
the
Khan
Academy
videos
and
and
I
believe
some
of
the
tooling,
as
well
for
teachers
and
students
around
kind
of
tracking
student
progress
through
watching
a
number
of
offline
videos.
I
think
they
have
a
more
manual
process
of
kind
of
interfacing,
directly
with
schools
and
getting
the
set
up
and
having
server.
A
E
E
They
just
like
made
a
repository
for
tools
that
are
offline
first,
so
that
you
know
they
don't
just
yeah
I
think
it
was
just
a
repository
of
the
filter
tools
for
all
in
person
and
the
video
showed
people
just
being
like
alright
plug
this
USB
stick
into
your
Android
phone,
and
now
you
can
install
apps
and
you
can
chat
with
people
and
that
but
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
how.
Well
it
actually
worked.
C
C
E
Hard
is
it
right
now
Dominic
for
you
and
I
to
pretend
to
be
on
the
same
network
and
send
like
my
favorite
after
I
tapped
to
you,
or
vice
versa.
You
know
like.
Why
is
that's
another
thing,
I've
used
and
rock
for
like
command-line,
you
know
web
server
testing,
but
nothing
setting
up
a
VPN
seems
really
painful,
especially.
C
Because
we
don't
like
it's
not
over
land,
we
would
have
to
do
it
over
I
guess:
cereal,
like
Bluetooth
cereal,
however,
I
know
that
someone
in
our
organization
has
a
working
version
of
a
repo
hosted
through
ipfs.
So
in
theory,
if
we
both
installed
that
fork,
we
could
send
packages
to
each
other
over
the
network,
but
how
we
would
you
know
about
each
other
like
getting
the
identity
down
of
like
I,
want
Jonathan's
stuff
that
that
doesn't
seem
like
it's
solved.
E
With
the
Nintendo
switch,
it
has
a
really
awful
story
for
adding
friends.
They
give
you
a
UUID,
you
put
it
in
and
then
it
connects
through
their
servers,
but
they
have.
They
have
something
that
was
popular
maybe
ten
years
ago,
where
you
could
bump
two
phones
together
and
based
on
the
time
stamp
of
when
two
people
hit
the
API.
It
was
like.
Okay,
you
two
are
the
closest:
it's
probably
these
two
people,
so
they
they
just
show
I.
Think
it's
like
playing
card
suits
or
icons
that
are
some
sort
of
hash.
E
C
So
something
related
to
this
that
me
and
Molly
talked
about
a
while
ago
was
the
Nintendo
DS,
where
they
had
the
street
passed
off
I'm
a
big
fan
of
that
concept,
but
I
never
really
hear
that
talked
about
I
think
that's
brilliant
for
all
fine,
first
identity,
stuff!
The
the
concept
is
simply
that
two
people
have
devices
and
if
they
walk
near
each
other
enough
so
that
the
radios
can
communicate
all
it
does
is
tell
you
that
later.
C
So,
when
you
go
home,
you
say:
oh
I,
you
know
if
I
walk
by
you,
it
would
say:
oh
you
walked
by
Jonathan
today.
Would
you
like
to
add
them
as
a
contact
and
vice
versa?
So,
like
totally
no
interaction
like
human
interaction,
we
just
have
to
be
near
each
other
and
we
can
accrue
this
like
list
of
people
and
then
that
also
like
syncs
data
over
that,
so
the
next
time
you're
near
them.
C
It's
like
almost
like
a
dated
courier
service,
but
you
could
also
just
use
that
to
transmit
that
UUID
and
then
have
network
capabilities
around
that.
It's
that
make
sense
some
of
the
stuff
Nintendo
does
with
offline
stuff.
Is
really
interesting
and
just
I
think
a
lot
of
people
don't
focus
on
it,
I
guess,
because
it's
a
game
console
or
something.
E
He
want
to
do
Street
pest
for
coasters,
so
the
idea
was
like
he
wanted
to
walk
down
the
street
and
have
other
people
who
had
just
like
low
quality
pictures
of
shows
that
were
going
on
in
the
next
week,
like
that
were
local,
just
to
show
up
in
his
phone
and
be
able
to
like
scroll
a
feed
of
things
that
that
were
essentially
advertisements
but
ones
that
he
cared
about.
And
we
looked
into
like
how
low
level
can
you?
E
How
can
you
send
data
to
a
phone
without
connecting
to
that
phone
via
ad
hoc
right,
like
you,
don't
want
to
set
up
an
access
point
and
and
connect
and
setting
up
for
like
meshing,
is
not
that
great.
But
you
can
you
can
stuff
like
advertisement
packets
into
like
802
point
eleven
or
you
can
use
a
side
channel
like
Bluetooth,
which
is
how,
which
is
how
the
initial
negotiation
for
airdrop
works
right.
So
you
discover
each
other
over
Bluetooth,
but
then
you
transfer
using
Wi-Fi
direct.
E
C
Yeah
that
definitely
seems
like
the
sorry
to
jump
in
Lisa.
That's
that
seems
like
if
anything,
probably
the
biggest
challenge
with
this
stuff
is
like
as
soon
as
we
nail
the
concepts
down
at
the
end
of
the
day,
it's
like
we
have
to
figure
out
how
to
make
this
power
efficient
or
nobody's
kind
of
want
to
use
it
or,
more
importantly,
nobody's
going
to
want
to
sync
that
data
or
relay
that
data.
C
A
But
we
had
kind
of
one
around
the
the
education
enterprise
space,
which
is
you
have
people
who
are
collaborating
on
a
project
together
in
a
space
and
maybe
they
have
intermittent
access
or
they
just
have
a
thin
bandwidth
connection,
and
they
want
to
be
able
to
sync
a
lot
of
their
edits
and
changes
and
files
locally.
Before
maybe
persisting
to
some
some
server,
that's
gonna
stick
around
for
a
long
time
and
make
sure
they
have
replication.
A
So
that
was
kind
of
like
one
use
case
and
there's
like
a
number
of
sub
use
cases
in
that
space.
Things
like
Chadd
document
headed
a
and
a
lot
of
stuff.
In
there,
then
there
was
a
use
case
around
kind
of
just
like
peer-to-peer
file
transfer,
and
this
is
kind
of
the
airdrop
style
like
I
want
to
send
you
this
file
I
want
to
send
you
this
photo
I
want
to
get
this
photo
like
how
do
I
get
it?
A
A
That's
like
more
relevant
in
your
local
community
and
it
kind
of
brushes
up
against
the
education
Enterprise
case,
but
it's
more
around
like
and
if
maybe
gaming
or
community
networks,
or
like
social
social
sites
that
are
more
locally
relevant,
where
you
could
imagine
that
people
in
in
areas
have
have
similar
somewhat
to
some
extent,
similar
interests
in
the
most
popular
video
content
or
local
news
or
stuff
like
that,
and
so
how?
How
do
you
help
or
like
crowds
and
communicating
within
crowds
of
people
that
say
a
conference
or
a
concert,
or
something
like
that?
A
So
those
are
kind
of
the
high
level
categories
we
came
up
with
and
it
seems
like
there's
a
lot
of
stuff
curious.
If
people
either
have
ideas
or
use
cases,
they
are
familiar
with,
they
don't
seem
to
fit
well
into
one
of
those
or
want
to
thumbs
up.
One
area
in
particular
is
being
like
this
one's
actually
really
important
and
where
folks
should
be
spending
a
lot
of
their
their
time
early,
because
it's
going
to
be
the
most
powerful
or
the
most
heavily
needed.
A
E
E
Wayfinding
first,
which
might
be
a
little
outside
the
realm,
but
maybe
not
just
being
able
to
say
where
is
this
thing
and
then
that's
the
initial
couple
of
days
like
people
just
care
where
things
are
and
and
who
has
checked
in
where
and
then
for
long-term
relief?
One
of
the
cares
is
coordination
and
authenticity
and
being
able
to
make
it
easy
for
different
groups
of
people
to
have
some
sort
of
verification
or
signatures
of
good
data
and,
like
maybe
not
so
good
data.
E
E
There's
a
word
for
it,
like
the
audit
trail
of
how
things
go
from
A
to
B
or
C
to
D
so
like.
If
you
want
to
you,
know,
wend
a
digital
piece
to
someone
else
and
then
get
it
back,
and
you
want
to
verify
that
the
data
you
got
back
is
100
percent
bit
for
bit
correct.
But
they
have
this
idea
that,
like
that
lawyers
agree
with
that
bike,
even
if
the
data
is
the
same,
the
metadata
around
it,
a
history
that
it
went
somewhere
and
came
back
is
important.
E
So
it's
kind
of
this
contentious
like
you
know,
if
every
bid
is
exactly
the
same,
then
there's
no
way
technically
to
differentiate
it
from
where
it
came
from
right
yeah.
But
you
know
that
that's
why
I
like
content
address
thing
works,
but
what
they
care
about
is:
oh,
no!
No!
No!
We
went
to
you
for
three
months
and
this
event
happened
and
you.
A
E
A
E
And
and
like
oh,
you
know,
ownership
and,
like
time,
stamping
tend
to
move
away
from
decentralized
solutions
and
more
towards
like
central
authorities.
So
if
there
is
a
way
to
have
like
distributed
signatures
that
matter
or
something
like
that,
that
that'd
be
pretty
interesting
and
then
they
also
care
about
just
only
sharing
their
data
with
other
institutions.
They
will
trust
each
other
to
house
data
for
backups,
but
they
will
not
trust.
E
You
know
Dropbox
or
or
Google
or
whatever
so
there's
kind
of
like
the
use
case.
That
seems
pretty
well
accepted,
but
I
haven't
seen
anyone
do
it
well,
besides
space
monkey,
which
is
you
have
a
hard
drive
and
some
amount
of
it's
reserved
for
other
people's
data
and
the
same
for
you
and
you
know
hope
that
you
can
recover
it.
A
Interesting
yeah
I
think
the
this
idea
of
like
time,
stamping
of
stuff
was
like
spent
like
just
a
couple
hours
on
a
weekend,
trying
to
build
a
fully
decentralized
game
on
top
of
ipfs,
and
we
were
trying
to
do
bughouse,
which
is
this
timed
collaborative
chess
game,
and,
and
so
you
have
like
timers
on
on
different
chess
boards,
and
then
you
have
four
peers
that
are
playing
chess.
At
the
same
time,
it
was
like
wait
hold
on
how
how
do
the
timers
move
and
what,
if
people
disconnect?
A
How
do
we
know
whether
they've
disconnected
or
other
people
have
disconnected
do
we
boot
people
at
some
time?
It
was
just
like
this
entire
problem
of
like
synchronizing
states
and
among
four
people
when
no
one
is
the
source
of
truth
and
eventually
you're
like
there
are
hard
questions
here.
We're
gonna
choose
an
easier
game
without
timing,
but
all
right
thank
sector
but
yeah,
but
it'd
be
really
interesting
for
the
museum
case,
where
they
care
a
lot
about
tag.
Stampings
of
like
welcomes.
A
C
Know
about
strategic,
but
I
I
know
that
personally,
the
thing
I'm
most
interested
in
seeing
like
I
think
this
has
the
most
authenticity
is
I
like
the
idea
of
just
places
that
don't
have
connectivity
just
flat-out,
not
bad,
but
like
don't
have
it
I
love
the
idea
of
syncing
data
to
them.
How
do
how
do
they
get
updates
to
stuff
efficiently?
How
do
you
physically
get
it
there
all
that
stuff
to
me?
C
A
Jonathan
I'd
be
curious.
You
know
in
I,
took
a
peek
at
project
Lantern,
because
I
think
it
was
mentioned
in
the
offline
first
community
chat
and
so
I
was
I
was
looking
around
through
it
and
it
seems
super
cool,
I'm
curious.
A
How
like
the
data,
like
you,
have
all
of
these
like
hotspots
that
are
distributed
around
like
how
do
those
get
disseminated
is
like
someone
like
actively
going
and
setting
up
a
network
in
a
certain
area
and,
like
you
know,
other
other
stuff,
in
that
disaster
relief,
space
of
like
getting
data
to
people
and
doing
the
the
authenticity
verification
you
were
talking
about
so.
E
E
So
project
Lantern
as
I
understand
it
there
there's
a
lot
of
people
on
the
team
and
I
have
only
met
like
three,
so
maybe
there's
around
30
people
who
are
somewhat
involved
and
I,
don't
know
if
they're
involved
like
as
just
a
collaborator,
a
researcher
or
intern
or
working
for
them,
but
I
know
we
have
a
lot
of
researchers
at
McGill,
University,
who's
working
with
us
and
a
lot
of
the
research
that
I've
seen
is
been
unlike
feedback
and
UX
and
and
technology
and
the
field
research.
E
The
only
person
I
know
who's
on
the
team,
who's
done
field,
researchers,
the
founder
and
I
haven't
talked
to
him
a
lot
about
it.
So
my
general
understanding
of
the
state
of
how
this
gets
deployed
is
like
literally
we're
going
to
be
doing
our
first.
You
know
15
costs,
node
test
deployment
just
to
see.
Is
the
bass
good
enough
for
us
to
hand
this
over
to
people
and
and
actually
find
out
where
those
rough
edges
are
similar?
We
thought
the
project
that
I
worked
on.
A
E
D
E
We,
we
didn't,
distribute
any
data
that
wasn't
already
unlike
the
SD
card
right.
So
the
idea
is
like
it's
almost
ingest:
only
we're
not
we're
not
we're,
not
seeding
it
with
like
we.
We
seeded
it
with
some
map
data,
because
that
was
small
and
easy
to
do,
but
that
map
data
came
from
the
Internet
at
some
point.
So,
like
you
needed
to
have
some
connection,
but
once
you
were
on
the
network,
files
were
shared
from
each
other
and
I.
Don't
know
if
it
was
important
or
not,
but
any
single
Bakula
snowed
could
create.
E
Could
root,
strap
another
node
so
like.
If
you
had
one
Raspberry
Pi
with
an
SD
card
and
you
plugged
into
the
USB
port,
another
SD
card
reader
writer,
it
would
automatically
earn
a
second
image
and
make
a
pure
node
and
do
all
that
bootstrapping
so
that
you
wouldn't
need
to
connect
upwards
again.
That's
one
awesome.
A
I
think
that's
huge,
like
that's
actually
a
thing
when
we
talk
about
ipfs
nodes,
it's
like
okay,
well,
I
really
would
like
it.
If
all
of
the
people
in
my
space
had
IKEA,
that's
node,
so
that
I
could
be
pulling
content
from
them
and
they
could
be
pulling
something
for
me
and
we'd
all
be
this
happy
little.
You
know
offline
ipfs
family,
then
it's
like
well,
but
we
need
to
be
doing
this.
Node
bootstrapping,
we're
like
maybe
I,
come
in
with
this,
but
no
one
else
does
how
do
I
get
them
IP
of
us?
A
E
E
The
the
lantern
project
lantern
one
of
the
kind
of
groups
of
people
that
we
care
about
our
first
responders,
which
have
a
very
different
set
of
resources
available
to
them
and
concerns
available
to
them
so
for
them,
bootstrapping
from
one
to
node
to
another,
isn't
super
important
because
they
can
come
in
with
a
package
of
bootstrap
nodes.
Already
is
the
thought
for
me:
I
was
very
bottom
up
in
my
personal
values
and
goals,
because
I
don't
think
air-dropping
in
a
solution
ever
works,
but
that's
a
side
thing
well.
A
The
more
the
more
you
could
make
that
solution
available
and
accessible
before
you
physically
send
people
like
I
think
it
depends
what
what
your
use
case
model
is
right
like
if
this
is
like.
Oh,
these
are
first
responders
who
are
coming
in
like
in
the
amount
of
time
it
takes
up
to
deploy
a
first
responder
movement
and
the
size
of
something
that
will
merit
a
first
responder
movement
versus,
say.
You
know
a
school
with
all
of
their
Wi-Fi.
A
A
Thinkwell
will
then
end
it
here,
since
it's
just
the
two
of
us
left
I
feel
like
we
have
a
lot
of
good
good
stuff
to
work
on
a
lot
of
stuff
for
me
to
go
in
research,
and
maybe
I'll
share
back
some
of
my
findings.
After
learning
more
about
some
of
the
tools
that
were
mentioned
for
the
next
one,
I
think
it's
middle
of
January,
so
it's
good
have
sounds.