►
From YouTube: Finance Committee Meeting 8/25/2021
Description
Finance Committee Meeting 8/25/2021 9:00 AM
A
B
A
We
need
a
vote
in
terms
of
mr
long
attending
by
zoom.
Is
there
a
motion
to
approve
feather
lanes
12
seconds?
Mr
long,
do
you
want
to
say
anything.
D
A
C
I
would
just
like
to
call
out
it
does
fit
in
with
our
work
related
stipulation
within
our
county
code,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
it's
noted
for
the
record.
A
Let's
do
that
vote
again
there
all
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed,
nay,
emotion
carries
point
of
personal
privilege.
If
I
might
I
attended
yesterday
by
zoom,
because
I
had
a
family
member
who
had
been
at
a
outside
meeting
where
one
of
the
participants
ended
up
with
kovid
that
family
member
tested
yesterday
negative,
so
everything's
good
in
our
household.
A
E
A
Opposed
nay
motion
carries
presentation.
We
move
to
the
economic
alliance.
Has
a
presentation
on
back
to
business
grant
program.
Mr
nugent,
you
can
either
sit
here
if
you're,
more
comfortable
or
stand
feel
free.
Whatever
you
think
the
mic
will
work
best.
You
sit
here
because
the
microphone's
not
working
over
there
all
right,
that's
good.
F
It
off
got
this
one
on
all
right.
I
just
want
to
take
a
couple
minutes
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
a
new
grant
that
recently
come
out.
It's
the
back
to
business
grant.
You
know,
we've
got
a
little
presentation
on
the
screen.
It's
250
million
dollars
in
cobra
relief
to
illinois's
hardest
hit
employers.
F
The
next
slide
is
the
part.
That's
part
of
governor
pritzker's,
1.5
billion
dollar
economic
recovery
plan.
Again
this
is
250
million
dollars
throughout
the
whole
state.
So
it
sounds
like
a
lot
of
money,
but
when
you
think
about
you
know
throughout
the
whole
state
of
illinois,
you
know
it's
really
it's
it's
not
a
ton
of
money,
but
it's
still
250
million,
and
it's
supposed
to
be
targeting
the
small
businesses
and
businesses
that
have
not
had
the
ability
to
be
able
to
be
part
of
any
of
the
other
grants.
F
It's
the
part
of
the
money
that
the
state
of
illinois
has
gotten
from
the
american
recovery
plan
act
the
arpa
fund.
So
what
the
state
is
doing
is
taking
money
that
they've
gotten
from
the
federal
government
and
passing
it
through
and
trying
to
distribute
it
to
some
of
the
hardest
hit
businesses
throughout
the
state
of
illinois.
F
250
million
dollars
is
going
to
be
awarded
in
5
000
to
150
thousand
grant
increments,
so
the
smallest
grant
award
will
be
five
thousand.
The
largest
is
a
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
you
know
and
I'll
show
you
the
formula
as
to
how
they
determine
that
there's
a
hundred
million
dollars
that
is
going
to
be
allocated
to
businesses
in
what
they
say
is
considered
disproportionately
impacted
areas
or
dias.
F
The
state
has
issue
has
given
us
a
map
and
that
will
be
on
the
screen
later,
but
kankakee,
bradley,
pembroke,
township
and
aroma
park
are
pretty
much
all
considered
a
disproportionately
impacted
area.
So
if
you
have
businesses
or
you
know-
of
businesses
in
these
areas,
you
know
that
might
qualify
for
this
grant.
Please
let
them
know
about
it.
They
can
you
know
we
can
we'll
forward
this
presentation
to
you.
They
can
also
call
our
office,
but
any
businesses
in
that
area,
and
even
if
you're,
not
in
that
area,
you
still
qualify.
It's
just.
F
They
have
a
checklist
and
you
get
more.
You
get
preference
points
depending
on
where
you're
located,
so
they
encourage
us,
not
you
know
to
have
people
in
these
areas
apply,
but
if
you're
outside
the
area
that
doesn't
disqualify
you,
you
just
might
be
put
put
down
a
little
farther
in
the
letter.
Mr
hunter.
G
F
Right
we,
we
will,
you
know,
walk
the
people
through.
I've
got
to
give
credit
to
the
state
on
this
grant
that
you
know
historically
the
state
when
they've
issued
grants.
You
know
they
come
out
with
30
35,
page
applications
and
people
get
to
page
two
and
they've
got
so
much
information
that
they're
asking
that
they
just
kind
of
throw
up
their
hands
and
say
you
know,
hey
it's
not
worth
it.
I
can't
do
it.
This
one
is
really
simple:
it's
about
a
four-page
application
online.
F
They
ask
you
some
pretty
basic
questions
which
I'll
get
through
here.
If
you
have
that
information
in
front
of
you
and
you
know-
and
you
you
know,
you've
gotta,
you
know
you
can
do
it
on
your
computer.
It
has
to
be
done
on
the
computer.
You
can
actually
complete
this
grant
in
about
20-25
minutes.
F
Earlier
in
the
kowitt
crisis,
25
million
for
hotels
again,
a
lot
of
hotels
are,
you
know
out
there
didn't
qualify
for
some
of
the
other
grants
and
then
25
million
for
any
business
that
has
not
received
a
big
grant
a
couple,
some
of
the
criteria,
so
you
can
tell
your
businesses
that
you're
aware
you
know
that
you
know
of
they
had
to
be
operating
in
2019
and
they
you
know
they
must
have
filed
a
tax
return
in
2019
and
they
you
know
they
have
to
have
their
2019
business
tax
return
and
they
have
to
have
their
2020
business
tax
return.
F
So
they
have
to
have
those
you
know
on
a
flash
drive
or
on
their
computer
somewhere
where
they
can
upload
them
on
this
application.
Grant
the
next
criteria
is,
they
have
to
have
revenues
of
less
than
20
million
dollars.
Well
in
kanke
county
I
mean
you
know,
that's
not
you
know.
Most
businesses
are
not
that
big
that
have
the
revenues
or
income
of
20
million
dollars.
F
So
I
mean,
if
you're,
if
you're
dealing
with
a
company,
that's
got
a
25
million
dollar
revenue,
they
don't
qualify
but
might
say,
majority
of
our
businesses
in
the
area
are
less
than
20
million
dollars
and
there's
priority
for
small
businesses
that
have
let
that
have
revenues
of
less
than
5
million
dollars
and
the
other
criteria
is
they
had
to
make
less
money
in
2020
versus
what
they
made
in
2019.
F
So
what
you
know
you
look
on
your
on
your
business,
tax,
return
and
and
item
number
one
c.
It
tells
you
you
have
to
file.
You
know
your
gross
or
your
your
retail,
your
revenues
for
the
year,
if
that
number
in
twenty
thousand
in
2019
was
higher
than
it
is
in
2020,
then
obviously
2020
was
a
bet
was
not
as
good
of
a
year,
so
you
had
to
make
you
have
to
make
less
money
in
2020
than
you
did
in
2019.
But
you
know
that's.
F
Obviously
when
cobia
was
hidden
and
that's
you
know
there.
This
is
what
they're
trying
to
make
up
for
the
hard-hit
areas
that
have
experienced
prolonged
hardship,
hotels,
restaurants,
arts
and
entertainment,
child
care,
home
health
care,
salons,
fitnesses,
museums,
all
these
that
file.
F
You
know
that
they've
made
less
money;
they
are
all
given
preference
so
when
they
go
through
in
this
process
and
file,
they're
going
to
be,
you
know
asked
obviously
what
type
of
industry
what
you
know
where
they're
at
and
if
they're
in
these
industries,
they're
going
to
get
preference
point
again,
it
doesn't
eliminate
any
other
companies
that
are
outside
these
industries.
F
It
just
puts
them
a
little
bit
farther
down
the
list
and,
what's
going
to
happen,
is
the
state's
going
to
have
this
250
million
dollars
allocated
they're
going
to
start
awarding
it
to
the
companies
that
you
know
meet.
You
check
the
most
boxes
that
meet
the
most
criteria,
but
if
there's
still
money
available,
then
they
will
continue
down
that
list
and
other
companies
may
also
be
able
to
receive
something.
F
F
Priority
will
also
be
given
to
companies
that
have
not
received
any
money
from
the
payroll
protection
program.
This
you
know
this
program
is
hopefully
to
assist
some.
You
know
people
in
some
companies
that
didn't
qualify
for
the
ppp.
Also,
if
you
receive
the
restaurant,
revitalization
fund
monies
you
you
know
it
will
count
against
you.
If
you're
part
of
the
business
interruption
grant,
it
will
count
against
you
or
if
you
receive
money
from
the
shuttered
venue
operators
grant,
it
will
count
against.
You
doesn't
disqualify
you,
but
it
does.
F
It
does
make
you
not
as
a
preferential
applicant
again
the
hardest
hit
industries
that
experience,
prolonged
hardship,
part
of
a
disproportionately
affected
area,
businesses
that
haven't
qualified
those
are
the
ones
that
you
know
have.
You
know
are
really
should
look
at
this
that
this
grant.
What
do
they
need
in
order
to
apply
the
first
page
of
the
application
you've
got
to
have
you
know
the
business
owner?
You
have
the
business
owner's
id
your
tax
id
number.
You
have
to
supply
them
current
two
currents
or
two
bank
statements.
F
One
bank
statement
from
you
know,
between
april
and
december
of
2020,
to
show
that
you
were
in
business
and
you
were
you
had
a
bank
account
during
the
covid
crisis,
and
then
you
also
need
a
current
bank
statement.
Your
most
recent
bank
statement
to
show
that
you're
still
in
business,
the
state
does
not
want
to
fund
company
companies
that
went
out
of
business
or
that
aren't
that
you
aren't
operating
anymore.
So
they
want
to
see
that
you
were
in
business
during
covid
and
you're
still
in
business.
F
The
numbers
on
the
bank
statement
are
just
you
know,
are
not
what
they're
looking
at?
What
they're
looking
at
are
the
dates
that
you,
you
know
that
you
were
in
business
in
2020
and
that
you're
still
currently
in
business,
then
you
also
have
to
provide
them
your
2019
and
your
2020
business
tax
return,
not
your
personal
tax
return,
your
business
tax
return,
whether
your
corporation
llc
partnership,
whatever
you
are,
those
are
the
you
know.
Those
are
what
you
you
know.
Those
are.
F
Those
are
the
items
that
you
have
to
you
have
to
submit
on
the
next
screen,
how
they
determine
what
you're
eligible
for.
This
is
just
an
example.
If,
if
in
2019
your
gross
receipts
were
700
000
and
in
2020,
your
gross
receipts
were
100
000,
obviously,
there's
a
600
000
difference.
What
they
do
is
they
take
that
difference
and
divide
it
by
six,
so
this
in
this
instance
that
individual
that
company
would
be
eligible
for
up
to
a
hundred
thousand
dollar
grant.
F
If
the
number
comes
out
to
be,
you
know,
92
93
000,
they
raise
it
up
to
the
next
90.
You
know
into
the
next
five.
So
if
you're
eligible
for
42
000
it'll
go
to
45,
000
or
51
it'll
go
to
55.,
but
they
expect
that
the
majority
of
these
grants
are
going
to
be
small.
F
That
they're,
not
you
know
that
they're
gonna,
be
you
know
in
the
the
five
to
ten
to
fifteen
twenty
thousand
dollar
range
and
they're
hoping
that's
what
it
is
because
they're
hoping
you
know
the
smaller
the
grant,
the
farther
that
this
money
is
going
to
go,
that
they're
going
to
be
able
to
you
know,
help
more
and
more
businesses,
so
I'd
say
relatively
easy.
Like
you
know,
it
can
be
done
in
25
to
30
minutes
on
the
computer.
As
long
as
you
have
all
the
information.
F
If
anybody
is
you
know,
if
you
start
the
application,
and
you
find
you
don't
have
something
you
can
you
you
can
stop
it
get
the
information
come
back
and
get
you
go
back
into
the
website.
So
it's
you
know.
If
you
don't
disqualify
yourself,
if
you
don't,
you
know,
if
you're
in
the
middle
of
it
you
and
you
can't
do
it-
you
do
have
to
go
on
the
illinois
dceo
website.
The
last
page
will
show
you
you:
can
you
can
go
to
the
application
portal
on
on
the
economic
alliance
website?
That'll.
F
Take
you
there's
a
there,
a
button
there
to
click
it.
You
can
also
then
go
to
the
illinois.gov
dceo
website.
It's
labeled
back
to
business
or
b2b
grant
and
go
through
the
process.
You
do
have
to
create
a
you
know,
a
page
with
your
email
address
and
a
password
once
you
file
and
get
everything
in
there.
You
will
get
an
email
from
the
state
saying
that
you
know
that
they
received
it,
that
you
were
successful
in
the
application
and
that
you
are
ranked
in
a
certain
category.
There's
32
categories.
F
You
might
be
ranked
you
know.
If
you're,
you
know
32
out
of
32.
That
means
you
didn't
meet
a
lot
of
the
criteria
and
you're
at
the
bottom
of
the
list.
If
you're
in
category
10
out
of
32,
obviously
you're
farther
up
the
ladder
they're
going
to
be
taking
applications
from
now
until
october,
13th
and
hopefully
the
money
is
going
to
get
dispensed.
You
know
rapidly,
after
that
they
will
start
dispensing
some
money.
F
Previous
to
that
to
companies
that
have
the
higher
scores
that
meet
all
these
criteria,
so
my
recommendation
to
any
of
your
businesses
is
to
get
on
the
website.
You
know
as
soon
as
possible
and
get
their
applications
submitted.
You
know,
and
then
they
can
also
go
back
onto
that
website
and
kind
of
see
what
their
status.
If
they
were,
you
know
approved
and
they're
going
to
be
hearing
more
or
if
they
were
not
approved
after
the
13th
they'll
be
able
to
keep
track
of
where
they
stand.
F
If
anyone
has
any
issues
or
has
any
problems,
they
can
contact.
You
know
the
economic
alliance.
The
economic
alliance
is
what
we
call
a
community
navigator.
The
the
state
has
given
money
to
a
number
of
different
organizations
throughout
the
state
and
one
of
those
organizations
reached
out
to
us-
and
we
are
about
you
know
you
know,
providing
regional
support
for
anybody
that
has
any
problems
going
through
this
process.
If
they
don't
know
whether
they
qualify,
then
we
just
want
to
talk
to
somebody
about
it.
Have
them
call
our
office
email?
F
Our
office
is
actually
better
because
we're
in
and
out
a
lot,
but
we
will
be
happy
to
go
through
the
process
with
them
tell
them
what
they
need
to
have
you
know.
Actually
we
we've
already
gone
through
and
worked
some
people
through
the
you
know
the
application
process
and
as
time
permits,
we'll
be
happy
to
go
through
and
do
that.
The
economic
alliance
is
what
they
say.
What
we
call
a
community
navigator,
we're
working
as
a
spoke
for
this
greater
auburn,
gresham
development
corporation
and
other.
F
You
know
other
organizations
throughout
the
south
suburbs.
So
if
anyone
has
companies,
you
know
they
they
can
go
to
the
dceo
website.
They
go
to
our
website
if
they
have
questions,
contact
us
and
we'll
be
happy
to
take
them
through.
I've
had
a
couple
people
call
already
saying:
well,
you
know,
is
it
worth
my
time?
Well,
you
got
the
opportunity
on
the
lowest
end
to
make
five
thousand
dollars
and
it
takes
25
minutes
yeah.
I'm
thinking
that
you
know.
F
H
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Mr
nugent,
this
is
the
way
I
read
it.
It's
an
individual
business
owner
doing
this
work
right,
it
could
be.
What
I'm
referring
to
is
like
the
ppp.
If
you
weren't
aligned
with
the
bank,
you
know
there
were
a
lot
of
businesses
that
were
aligned
with
credit
unions
that
couldn't
actually
get.
F
Into
that
program,
now
you
can
do
this
from
your
house.
You
do
not
have
to.
The
bank
does
not
have
to
do
this
with
you
like
they
did
in
the
ppp
okay,
but
as
long
as
you
have
to
provide
them
with
the
information
that
they're
asked
for
we
did
have
some
questions
too.
Let's
say:
I'm
you
know,
I'm
an
llc
or
I'm
a
corporation.
The
first
page
of
the
application
says
business
owner's
name
well
on
a
corporation
or
a
bill
or
llc.
You
know
the
owner
is
multiple
people.
F
Well,
what
they're
looking
for
is
the
person
who's
filling
out
that
application?
The
secretary
of
the
organization,
the
president
of
the
organization,
whoever
it
is
and
they're
going
to
want
that
person's
name,
that
person's
social
security
number
that
person's
address,
but
then
farther
down
into
the
application
they
ask
for
the
you
know
the
corporation
name
or
the
llc
name
and
the
address
for
the
business
where
they
operate
on
and
they
ask
for
the
fein
number
for
that
corporation.
F
So
if
that
company
qualifies
for
the
money
and
they
get
it,
the
w-9
tax
return
will
be
for
the
business
for
the
corporation,
not
for
the
individual
who's
filling
it
out
perfect.
But
but
again
we
had
that
question
the
first
day.
Is
that
hey,
I'm,
not
the
owner,
I'm
the
secretary
of
the
organization.
You
know
I
don't
want
to
fill
it
out.
Yeah,
any
officer
of
the
corporation
can
fill
it
out
and
you
will
have
to
provide
that
social
security
number,
but
you
won't
be
the
one
that's
going
to
be
taxed
on
this
benefit.
F
These
will
be
taxable
too,
because
this
is
going
to
you
know
this
is
supplementing
profit
that
you
lost
back
in
2020.,
so
it
you
know
next
year
in
january
you
know
the
company
will
get
a
w.
You
know
they
ask
for
a
w9,
you
will
get
a
tax
form
and
you'll
have
to
pay
taxes
on
whatever
the
amount
is
that
you're
that
you're
getting
got
it.
Thank
you.
F
Have
some
flyers
in
the
back
anybody
that's
interested,
they
say
we
have
them
contact
our
office
again.
The
email
is
a
lot
easier
than
phone
calls,
because
you
know
people
call
and
we're
on
the
other
line,
and
you
know
the
email
we
got.
We
will
get
back
to
you
and
we'll
help
people
out
as
much
as
we
can.
F
Actually
we
are
keeping
track
of
all
the
companies
that
you
know
that
we
help
because
we
have
to
file
reports
too,
with
our
you
know,
as
being
a
community
navigator
as
to
which
organizations
that
we
helped
out.
F
No,
the
fact
that
you're,
an
elected
official,
has
no
it's
not
a
conflict
of
interest,
it's
the
business
that
they
look
at,
not
the
individual
yeah.
You
know
if
you
were
a
legitimate
business,
that
filed
2019
and
2020
tax
returns
and
you
qualify.
Your
status
in
the
community,
as
elected
officials,
should
have
no
impact.
I
Brother,
thank
you,
mr
chairman.
My
district
encompasses
some
of
the
village
of
mantino.
Is
there
a
line
where
the
village
is
doing
something
and
the
county
isn't
or
how
is
that
working.
F
Out,
though,
the
economic
alliance
is
the
community
navigator
for
the
entire
county.
Now
the
city
of
moments,
also,
the
main
street
moments
is
doing
some
work
with
the
with
the
organizations
there,
but
we
have
reached
out
to
all
the
local
or
to
the
kanke
county
chamber
and
the
mantino
chamber,
and
they
are
pushing
this
out
to
all
their
businesses
too
and
we're
telling
them
the
same
story,
but
you
know
but
we're
the
organization,
that's
helping
people
throughout
the
whole
county.
Okay,
thank
you,
mr
hunter.
Mr.
A
G
Yeah,
just
real
quick
tim.
If
you
talk
with
gloria
kennedy
with
the
black
chamber.
F
Okay
right,
actually,
they
had
a
gentleman
from
illinois
d,
ceo
yesterday,
here
to
talking
to
the
black
chamber.
C
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
The
it
seems
to
me
that
that's
not
a
whole
lot
of
money,
considering
you
know
250
000
for
hotels
and
things
like
that
is
the
impetus
time
people
need
to
get
on
this
right
now
because
it
could
be
gone.
I
I
asked
that,
because
I
was
trying
to
help
people
with
the
restaurant
opportunities
that
came
along
in
the
past.
F
I
think,
if
you're
gonna,
you
know,
if
you
end
up
being
you
know
in
category
32
out
of
32,
the
likelihood
of
getting
funded
is
probably
going
to
be
pretty
remote
anyway,
but
if
you
are
in
one
of
the
disproportionate
areas,
you
did
not
get
any
of
the
other
funding.
You
did
not
receive
any
of
the
ppp,
you
haven't
gotten
anything
and
you
were
impacted.
F
I
think
those
are
the
areas
that
they're
going
to
look
at.
You
know.
I
know
those
are
the
areas
they're
going
to
look
at
first
and
as
soon
as
you
know,
if
they
get
rid
of
all
the
money
in
those
categories,
there's
some
people
that
are
going
to
miss
out.
So
I
would
say
yes,
the
sooner
the
better
it
doesn't.
You
know
it
you're.
You
know
it
doesn't
hurt
to
get
it
done
now.
A
Other
questions,
if
not
thank
you
very
right.
We
move
on
to
the
finance
department.
Mr
mccarty,
you
have
the
reports
in
your
packet
we're
going
to
try
and
move
along
on
this
pretty
quickly.
So
as
soon
as
he
gets
up
here,
I'm
going
to
let
him
move
this
as
quickly
as
he
can
through
and
to
answer
any
questions
you
have.
A
J
Just
real
quick
sales
tax
continues
to
impress
if
we
will
so
continue
to
watch
that
you
know
provided
all
the
regular
information.
So
I
know
there's
something
that
jumps
out
for
questions
we
look
at
this
every
month,
so
I
won't
spend
a
lot
of
time
on
it,
so
we
did
have
a
few
that
went
down,
but
overall,
the
overall
trend
for
the
years
is
positive
as
we
go
through.
So
we'll
spend
a
lot
of
time
now.
J
Okay
and
then
the
cash
flow
update,
not
a
lot
to
talk
about
because
of
the
property
tax
distribution
in
july.
That
was
for
the
funds
that
are
included
in
this
cash
flow
report.
10.4
million
dollars
was
distributed
for
tax
for
the
property
tax
distribution.
So
no
complaints
at
this
point
got
the
information
as
far
as
estimates
flowing
through
the
rest
of
the
fiscal
year.
J
So
I
don't
know
if
there's
any
specific
questions,
one
one
unique
thing,
because
this
is
cash
flow,
the
inmate
bed,
rental
and
the
inflows
that
can
go
up
and
down
because,
depending
on
the
timing,
if
it
crosses
a
calendar
month,
you
know
that
might
throw
off
one
month
might
be
lower
one
month
might
be
higher,
but
that
doesn't
the
actual
activity
you
know
average.
J
We
have
you
know
you
have
in
the
other
reports,
so
just
realize
that
this
is
more
of
a
cash
when
the
timing
of
when
it
hits
and
what
month
it
hits
in
so.
A
A
D
A
C
Let's
we're
going
to
wait
until
we
get
to
the
bottom
of
the
agenda
and
that's.
A
If
that's
okay,
we'll
hold
on
those,
are
we
holding
all
three
of
those
items
in.
J
We
we
put
a
request
in
to
the
state's
attorney's
office
for
those
on
zoom
passed
out.
What
we're,
having
reviewed.
It's
a
purchasing
program
that
the
the
canon,
copiers
and
all
purchasing
goes
through
a
bit
a
bid
program.
So
we
believe
that
they're
already
bid
out
and
we're
we've
checked
in
we're
eligible
to
participate
in
this
program.
So
we're
double
checking
with
the
state's
attorney's
office
to
make
sure
that
it
covers
the
bid
process
that
we
have
that
we
are
under
and
then.
J
Proven
I.t
has
told
us
that
if
we
purchased
through
this
program
through
them,
they
would
be
the
dealer,
but
we
would
get
the
the
pricing
as
the
county,
but
we
have
to
go
through
a
dealer
to
get
it
that
they
would
connect
any
new
machines
to
our
previous,
our
current
maintenance
program,
which
they
were
the
lowest
responsible
bidder
back
in
2018.
So,
okay.
J
J
This
stuff,
before
it
was
on
there,
we
were
hoping
we'd,
be
able
to
move,
but
we're
we're
not
there
yet
yeah.
So
we
put
it
on
there
just
in
case.
You
know
that
everybody's
busy,
so
we
we
just-
we
weren't
sure
the
timing.
So
so,
anyway,
you
know
we.
The
current
units
are
age.
J
So
with
underneath
this
program
of
lost
revenue,
we
believe
infrastructure
improvements.
You
know
so
we're
looking
at
upgrading
all
the
older
units
to
new
units
and
then
saving
money
on
an
annual
basis,
because
the
maintenance
contract
is
is
at
a
lower
rate,
so
all
good
stuff
we're
just
not
to
the
point
of
being
able
to
actually
move
yet.
So
I
just
wanted
to
give
you
an
update
where
we're
at
what
we're
doing
this
is
just
fyi
right
now.
I
When
we
go
to
this
ipad,
we
go
to
this
ipad
thing.
Are
we
going
to
be
using
copiers
as
much
when
we
technology
changes
here
in
the
next
10
years?.
J
Are
we
going
to
shoot?
I
mean
we've
we've
seen
lower
volumes,
but
there's
it
doesn't
go
down
to
zero.
You
know,
especially
the
operational
aspects
within
each
department.
You
know,
but
we
over
the
years
we've
seen
the
amount
of
volume
you
know
come
down
some
because
of
people
scanning
and
emailing,
and
that
sort
of
thing
so.
G
Savings,
I
don't
want
to
be
redundant
chairman,
but
steve
you're,
giving
us
all
the
reasons
why
we
should
go
with
this
program:
savings
etc
heretofore.
You
talked,
we
talked
about
going
ahead
and
getting
new
new
printers
equipment
so
forth,
and
I'm
not
understanding
not
that
I'm
you
know
a
spender
spender
spender,
but
you've
justified
why
we
need
to
move
on.
J
Well,
it's
it's!
If
we
need
to
do
a
a
bid
process
or
not
or
if
this
qualifies
that
we
can
purchase
under
it.
So
that's
where
we're
not
sure
yet
which
direction
we
need
to
go
in
order
to
accomplish
the
the
purchase.
J
A
All
right,
oh
yes,
yeah!
We
move
we
the
annual
audit.
We
have
not
bid
out
the
audit
for
a
couple
of
years
right.
J
There
was
some
interest
chairman
wheeler
asked
us
to
develop
a
request
for
qualification
for
the
annual
audit.
J
So
what
you
have
a
document
in
front
of
you
would
cover
the
fiscal
years
ending
november
30th,
2021,
22
and
23,
with
an
option
for
24
and
25
so
three
years,
with
an
option
to
go
out
to
five
years.
So
it's
15
pages.
J
I
won't
spend
a
lot
of
time
on
it,
but
this
would
basically
the
the
date
timeline
would
if,
if
it's
approved
today,
then
the
proposals
would
be
back
in
time
for
next
month's
finance
committee.
The
time.
A
B
J
Oh
just
real,
quick
yeah.
I
put
this
in
this
presentation
when
the
sarpa
information
started
and
just
remind
you
of
what
keeps
me
up
at
night
and
that
is
the
general
fund
budget
and
how
tight
it
is
not
only
now
but
into
the
future
and
just
a
reminder
that,
as
we
go
through
arpa,
especially
for
internal
things,
to
please
keep
an
eye
out
and
and
and
process
and
and
analyze,
any
ongoing
expense
that
will
hit
the
general
fund
beyond
arpa
timeline.
J
Please
keep
that
in
mind
for
ongoing
general
fund
flow
and
and
beyond
arpa
funds.
Please
that's
all
I
had.
A
All
right,
thank
you
very
much.
Then
I
will
move
to
the
treasurer's
office.
You
have
the
reports
from
mr
africano.
A
This
poll
promotion
to
combine
and
approve
is
there
a
second,
mr
daniel
any
questions,
comments
on
the
motion
to
combine
and
approve.
A
Aaron
nunn,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
opposed,
nay
motion
carries
the
sheriff's
department.
The
monthly
update
is
in
there
sure
if
you
want
to
come
up
yeah
real,
quick.
K
Good
morning,
everybody
just
a
couple
things
that
you
know
some.
We
kind
of
go
without
saying
because
of
what's
going
on
nationally,
but
our
revenue
from
out
of
county
is
down,
which
is
not
a
surprise.
We
reported
that
every
month
we
have
leveled
off
a
little
bit.
I
I
would
like
to
give
a
shout
out
to
miss
hudson
and
mr
kirkstra,
who
actually
came
out
a
couple
weeks
ago
for
a
rather
lengthy
tour
of
our
jail
and
some
of
the
department.
K
We
sat
in
the
conference
room
and
had
a
good
conversation
for
about
a
couple
hours,
and
it
was
a
very
good
tour
and
thank
them
both
for
taking
the
time
to
come
out
and
that
invitation
is
always
open
for
anybody
who
wants
to
come
so
appreciate
you
guys
coming
out
covered
with
with
the
what
do
they
call
it
now,
the
deviant
whatever
it
is,
the
delta
variant,
the
deviant
whatever
the
heck
it
is.
We
have
been
fairly
fortunate
throughout
the
jail
we've
had.
We
we've
had
a
very
small
bout
with
it.
K
Actually,
we've
had
a
bigger
bout
with
our
staff
than
we
have
the
inmates
and
detainees.
So,
at
the
present
time
we
have
zero
of
our
inmates
and
detainees
in
custody
who
have
any
form
of
covid,
whether
it's
the
regular
covet
or
the
variant
or
whatever
one
thing
to
keep
in
mind.
K
When
we
talk
about
things
going
on
and
how
what's
happened
over
the
last
couple
years
and
and
and
I
know
I
talked
about
domestic
batteries
at
length-
we
have
started
that
process
of
moving
those
who
are
in
custody
for
domestic
battery
into
their
own
housing
unit.
We've
also
started
to
move
those
with
opioid
issues
into
their
own
housing
unit,
so
that
we
can
deal
with
them
specifically
and
hope
that,
obviously
the
goal
is
that
they
don't
come
back
to
our
jail.
K
However,
on
another
topic
and
I'm
sure
that
you're
aware
of
of
the
number
of
homicides
that
are
occurring
in
our
county
yesterday
marked
the
12th
homicide
in
kankakee
county
in
2021,
and
we've
still
got
three
months
to
go
in
the
fiscal
year.
K
Four
months
to
go
into
calendar
year,
that
is
significant
and
and
when
you
compare
that
to
last
year,
we
had
nine
the
year
before
that
in
2019
we
had
five
the
year
before
that
we
had
six
and
the
year
before
that
we
had
seven,
so
those
that
number
this
year
has
basically
doubled
back
from
2018
and
that's
certainly
concerning
for
for
our
department
for
the
safety
of
our
community.
So
obviously
we
are
looking
to
you
know,
try
and
deal
with
some
things.
K
Jim
roh
has
put
together.
Jim
roh
and
myself
have
put
together
a
meeting
monthly
with
local
detectives,
and
so
we
are.
We
do
meet
every
third
fourth
thursday
we're
meeting
tomorrow
and
because
a
lot
of
the
players
are
all
related.
So
it's
it's
good
that
we
have.
You
know
we're
lucky
in
this
county
that
we
have
police
agencies
that
all
work
together.
So
just
to
keep
you
apprised,
I
can
tell
you
that
within
the
county
we've
had
two
in
the
county.
This
year
those
12
two
of
them
were
in
county's
jurisdiction.
K
Last
year
we
had
one
in
our
county
in
the
county's
jurisdiction
the
year
before
that
we
had
one
the
year
before
that
we
had
two
and
in
2017
we
also
had
one.
So
we're
still
battling
that
so
and
that's
the
rest
are
other
municipalities.
I
didn't
break
it
down
by
each
municipality.
K
Like
I
said,
the
one
yesterday
was
in
moments.
So
that's
all
I
got.
I
K
I
K
With
all
due
respect,
mr
featherling,
I
don't
know
that
we
have
enough
time
in
this
meeting
because
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
things
going
on
today,
okay,
but
I
would
be
more
than
happy
to
answer
that
at
the
criminal
justice
meeting
just
because
of
time
today
I
mean
I
like
I
said
I
talked
for
another
hour
about
it,
but
I
just
think
we
need
to
move
on
with
the
matter
at
hand
and
but
there's
a
lot
of
things
and
that
contribute
to
it
and
some
of
them
people
aren't
going
to
want
to
hear.
K
A
A
Anything
else,
if
not
thank
you,
we
moved
to
the
arpa
funds
and
let
me
turn
the
chair
over
to
the
chairman,
andy
wieder,.
C
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
the
and,
and
thanks
for
everybody's
future
time
that
you'll
be
dedicating
here
to
this
process
and
everybody
sitting
in
the
back
who
are
decomposing
as
we
speak,
because
this
would
be.
This
is
going
to
be
a
haul
but
I'll
try
to
keep
things
moving.
I
tried
to
come
up
with
a
system
to
vet
every
specific
request
that
we
have
in
this
area
in
a
in
a
expedited
fashion.
C
Give
you
a
chance
to
answer
any
questions
the
board
members
may
have
and
then
to
move
things
forward
in
a
manner
that
satisfies
the
requirements
was
placed
upon
us
by
the
department
of
treasury.
So.
C
We're
starting
on
the
arpa
fund,
that's
the
first
one
we're
starting
with
now
I'm
calling
this
the
arpa
fund.
This
is
the
one
that
is
dedicated
and
we
have
to
call
out
a
specific,
coveted
reason
for
these
projects.
So
these
when
we
we
submit
our
backup
to
the
us
department
of
treasury.
We're
gonna
have
to
note
exactly
which
part
of
the
the
allowed
uses,
via
our
final
resolutions,
to
provide
in
the
packet
to
the
federal
government.
C
So
we
want
to
make
sure
this
is
buttoned
up
and
tight
as
it
as
it
needs
to
be
even
to
the
point
of
obsession,
because
we
want
to
make
sure
none
of
this
comes
back
on
us
to
you
know
to
to
repay
so
we're
when
we
make
these
choices
and
and
I'll
explain
a
little
bit
more
in
a
second,
but
we
will
then
send
it
to
finance
for
them
to
go
through
and
make
sure
that
our
assertions
are
correct,
with
the
the
the
reasons
that
the
department
of
treasury
provides
them,
as
our
grant
monitor,
if
you
will
within
the
county,
so
there'll
be
another
check
and
balance
before
it
gets
to
the
full
board.
C
You
know
there's
seven
sections
here
in
front
of
me:
it
was
part
of
the
application
the
applicants
had
to
call
out
which
section
it
applied
to
if
they
didn't
we're
going
to
make
some
assumptions
here
in
the
room.
Some
not
educated,
guesses,
based
on
the
nature
of
their
quest,
assign
a
number
to
it.
We'll
go
through
this
sheet
for
the
arpa
fund,
we'll
either
approve
or
deny
via
voice
vote.
C
Then
we'll
go
back
and
have
a
roll
call
vote
on
what
we
just
did
to
send
that
to
the
full
board
and
start
moving
on
some
of
these
bids.
If
you
will
now,
there
will
be
a
couple
of
different
things
that
we
can
do
the
for
one
of
the
first
things
is.
We
can
approve
it
because
it
met
all
the
standards,
and
you
know
that
that
is
you
know.
We
think
this
is
something
we
want
to
do.
C
Part
of
that
is,
is
we
already
know
the
numbers,
so
it
can
just
go
forward
and
we
can
purchase
things
if
it's
internal
or
move
whatever
the
external
use
may
be.
There
also
may
be
a
bid
process,
so
your
vote
will
allow
us
to
go
through
the
bid
process
and
then
place
it
on
our
future
allocations
list.
C
Is
it
going
to
come
back
or
we
have
to
spend
more
money
on
local
businesses?
You
know
those
types
of
things,
so
we've
got
budget
budgeting
constraints,
also
the
ability
to
budget
and
then
adherence
to
the
us
department
of
treasury
regulations
and
then
want
to
do
the
most
good
that
we
can
for
our
policies
that
we've
already
passed.
So
I
hope
that
makes
sense
the
way.
C
I
explain
that
I'm
just
here
to
facilitate,
if
I
notice
something
that's
going
sideways
I'll
mention
it,
but
obviously
you
all
make
the
decisions
in
the
final
end
of
things.
So
one
of
the
first
things
that
we
have
to
do,
though,
is
we
have
to
decide,
as
we
mentioned
in
the
committee,
the
whole.
C
C
C
I
would
throw
out
there
that
I
think
a
quarter
million
dollars
is
a
good
place
to
start
for
businesses
and
not
for
profits
and
and
maybe
have
the
same
thing
for
the
the
non-covered
governmental
units
we'll
get
into
that
in
a
second
and
then
from
that
we
establish
what
types
of
individual
caps
we
may
have
and
what
stipulations
we
have
on
that
so
for,
if
anybody
has
any
thoughts
on
that,
please
discuss
it
now.
Mr
swanson,
mr
schweinsten,
thanks.
H
Mr
chairman,
on
the
non-for-profits
money
received
from
the
arpa
fund
that
do
we
have
any
way
to
verify
that
the
money
we
give
is
used
for
the
use
requested.
I
mean
that's,
not
foiable
right
well,.
C
Under
and
then
steve,
I
need
you
to
chime
in
on
this,
because
there
is
the
stipulation-
and
I
will
where's
it
at
here.
Sorry,
I've
got
all
these
papers
in
front
of
me,
section
2.9,
which
says
small
business
and
economic
assistance.
That's
just
general
as
far
as
I
know,
and
as
far
as
we've
talked
about
that
doesn't
require
the
backup
that
they
spend
it
on
anything,
covert,
related.
Okay,
the
law
allows
us
just
to
grant
this
to
those
businesses.
J
Yeah,
I
agree
the
the
the
application
that
we
developed
was.
We
requested
information
that
we'll
have
to
report
on.
So
that's
how
we
developed
and
backed
into
the
the
application
that
we
have
and
then
the
the
categories,
and
so
we'll
also
have
to
request
additional
information
when
it
comes.
You
know,
depending
on
if
it's
arpa
or
lost
revenue,
there's
a
lot
of
different
stipulations
when
it
comes
to
reporting
what
we'll
need
that
is
backed
up.
C
So,
there's
more
to
come,
like
maybe
sign
offs,
you
know
that's
saying
that
the
information
they
provided
was
accurate
and
all
of
that
kind
of
stuff.
But
to
you
to
to
that
point,
you
know
the
the
what
we're
doing
with
these
not-for-profits
and
for-profits
is
they're,
telling
us
what
they're
going
to
do
with
it
and
then
we're
just
trusting
that
they're
going
to
do
that
with
it
they
qualified.
C
We
could
put
more
stipulations
on
it.
I
don't
know
that
that's
necessary,
but
it
depends
on
how
big
of
a
cap
that
you're
going
to
institute
if
you
are
going
to
have
each
applicant,
can
have
a
a
cap
of
x
amount
of
dollars
from
the
county,
keeping
in
mind
that
they
can
apply
with
the
cities
as
well
that
they're
in.
So
that's
that's
the
second
thing
that
we're
going
to
have
to
take
a
look
at
as
well.
So
please.
M
A
Someone
what
well
just
to
open
the
discussion
here,
a
motion
to
prove
the
concept
of
capped,
total
cap
to
go
into
each
of
these
funds
and
and
mount
for
that
capped.
A
A
As
I
understand,
what
is
being
proposed
here
is
there's
two
different
kinds
of
caps
that
are
we're
going
to
be
talking
about
we're
going
to
talk
about
the
fact
that
we've
got
this
large
sum
of
money
to
20
21.3
million
dollars
over
two
years
and
within
that
we're
pulling
out
part
of
that
money
and
saying
that
in
this
category,
involving
business
and
the
nfp
fund,
we're
going
to
say
at
this
point
in
time
we're
not
going
to
spend
more
than
x
number
of
dollars.
A
C
If
I
could,
mr
chairman,
yes,
the
the
second
part
of
that
would
be
is
to
discuss.
Is
there
going
to
be
an
individual
cap
per
applicant?
So
the
first
is
the
total
amount,
so
we
can
budget
for
the
businesses
not-for-profits
and
then
separately
the
capped,
non-covered
governmental
units
like
fire
protection
and
park
districts
that
didn't
get
any
money
on
the
other
side
of
it.
A
A
The
total
in
your
cap
business
nfp
fund,
one
motion
on
that:
oh
yeah,
and
then
a
separate
motion
on
the
individual
caps.
Okay,.
A
C
I
A
G
Yeah
just
a
question-
and
I
had
a
discussion
with
the
chairman
about
this,
and
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
that.
We
need
to
expedite
this,
and-
and
he
did
say
also
that
that
could
be
modified
as
well
too.
In
terms
of
that
is
the
intention.
So,
okay.
J
This
might
help
clarify
some
of
the
concern
per
the
federal
regulations
if
there's
a
reward
over
50
000,
there's
actual
on-site
monitoring
required
if
it's
under
50
000
there's
not
so
there's
paperwork,
so
50
000
is
the
threshold
that
the
feds
set
as
far
as
what
the
county's
responsible
additional
responsibility
to
monitor.
So
I
don't
know
if
that
helps
answer
the
questions
that
board
members
have.
G
What
you're
saying
is
that,
mr
chairman,
thank
you:
we
have
the
obligation
to
provide
on-site
monitoring
or
who
does
that
the
county
is
responsible.
G
A
Well,
if
I
might
hear
mr
writer
for
these,
when
we
get
to
individual
caps,
I
think
you're
going
to
see
a
recommendation
that
will
be
less
than
50
000.
so
on
this
portion
of
the
expenditures.
A
We
have
a
motion.
Is
there
further
discussion,
public
question?
There's
a
call
for
the
question:
do
we
I
think
we
can
do
this
by
voice.
A
We
need
a
recommendation
on
an
amount.
Mr
waiter,
thank.
C
You,
mr
chairman,
the
the
the
reason
I'm
going
to
throw
out.
This
number
is
really
there'll,
be
two
different
numbers
coming
one
for
each
fund:
it's
based
on
their
access
to
previous
funds.
If
you
saw
what
mr
nugent
brought
up
that
the
funds
that
currently
are
existing
are
after
everything
else
has
been
applied
for
and
they're
to
catch
the
people
who
fell
through
the
cracks,
the
lower
amounts
of
money.
So
if
you
say
it's
50
000,
that
may
seem
like
not
a
lot
of
money
if
you're
a
business
owner.
C
But
then,
if
you
only
got
250
in
the
fund,
it's
gone
quick,
so
I
would
recommend
something
lower
either
10
or
20
000,
preferably
10.,
and
I
think
that
is
a
good
way
to
go
for
our
local
businesses,
because
they
should
have
already
been
eligible
for
and
applied
for
other
things
on
that,
so
that
that
would
be
the
cap
on
that
fund.
That's
my
suggestion.
L
A
Mr
hunter,
I
agree.
Mr
swanson,
were
you
seconding
that
is
there
any
discussion
on
the
individual
cap?
A
Hearing
no
discussion.
All
in
favor
of
the
motion
say:
aye
aye.
E
A
Opposed
say
no
motion
carries
a
reference
to
municipal
match.
We
should
make
comment
on
that.
C
Sure
we
had
talked
about
this
also
in
the
committee
meetings,
we're
getting
requests
from
businesses,
individuals,
governmental
units
that
lie
within
and
serve
residents
and
other
municipal
areas
coming
to
us,
maybe
because
we're
actually
the
ones
who
are
moving
forward
on
this
and
that's
not
a
slam
on
the
cities
or
anything
like
that.
They've
got
their
own
processes,
we've
just
kind
of
moved
it
at
a
quicker
pace.
I
I
personally
think
a
lot
of
other
board.
C
Members
have
told
me
that
they
agree
that
the
the
municipality
should
spend
some
of
their
arpa
money,
not
lost
revenue
but
arpa
money
on
their
own
municipalities,
so
my
suggestion
would
be
to
us
to
have
a
municipal
match
requirement,
as
as,
as
is
a
is
a
as
a
incentive
for
the
municipalities
to
participate,
because
we
both
benefit
on
the
tax
revenue
side
of
things.
The
services
that
we
provide
to
the
citizens
are
driven
by
the
tax
revenue
coming
out
of
those
areas.
C
So
if
the
business
or
not-for-profit
primarily,
is
in
within
municipality
x,
then
we
would
say:
okay.
Well,
your
request
was
twenty
thousand
dollars.
Our
cap
is
ten,
so
we're
fine
we'll
contribute
to
10
and
you
can
chase
them
down
for
your
other
10..
But
if
the
request
is
12-5,
then
the
most
we
would
contribute
if
they're
in
a
municipality
is
62.50.
C
C
So
that's
just
my
own.
My
own
thoughts
and
the
committee
can
kind
of
talk
about
that.
A
A
motion
to
approve
that
concept
of
municipal
match,
mr
kinser,
mr
miller
segments
any
discussion.
Mr
bones.
N
C
C
C
P
C
I
I've
been
thinking
about
that.
I
think
it's
unfair
to
put
the
municipality
in
a
box
like
that
by
saying
they
must
approve
it
for
you
to
get
ours,
we'll
just
limit
ours.
What
we
contribute
we'll
cut
the
check.
We
don't
need
the
paper
trail
because
it
falls
under
I'm
sorry
2.9
of
our
our
our
list
here
of
allowable
uses,
so
we're
able
to
rest
on
what
we
are
on
a
trail
and
I
think
steve
would
agree.
We
satisfied
our
requirement.
C
So
if
they
say
it's
for
to
buy
a
new
van
for
deliveries
and
they
go,
you
know
buy
tvs
and
doritos.
I
mean
I
don't
know
it's.
It
doesn't
matter
at
that
point
we
granted
to
the
based
on
their
need.
Does
that
make
sense?
Yeah?
I
don't
want
a
box
of
municipalities
in
because
then,
if
they
say
no,
it's
we're
making
them
the
bad.
P
P
C
G
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
but
they'll
be
interfaced.
I
mean
you'll
be
able
to
provide
them
what
we've
done
and
they
can
make
that
that
match.
You're
you're
interfacing
with
chris
curtis,
for
example,
in
terms
of
what
you're
talking
about
and
you
have
shared
with
us
already
that
there's
going
to
be
an
interface
and
a
sharing
and
a
collaboration
with
other
municipalities.
C
C
C
M
Kidney,
you
know
more
about
these
arpa
funds
than
I
do,
but
I
have
been
in
many
occasions
where
I
had
to
have
two
approvals
in
order
to
get
what
I
wanted
done
and
the
first
approval
is
contingent
upon
the
second
approval.
I
don't
see
why
we
have
to
give
seven
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
for
a
new
van.
M
C
You
look
at
if
you
look
at
the
nature
of
the
request
2.9.
I
believe
it
is
small
business,
economic
assistance,
general.
We
don't
need
to
really
know
what
the
project
is
for,
so
they
could
request
7,
500
bucks
from
us,
and
we
could
give
it
to
them.
They
could
tell
us
what
it's
for
what
they
intend
to
do
it
to
me.
That's
that's
kind
of
what
these
funds
were
put
out
there
for
is
for
not
to
manage
their
business.
C
A
And
I
would
say
that
at
the
ucci
meeting
monday,
when
the
business
to
the
back
to
business
program
was
presented,
that
same
concept
was
part
of
this
back
to
business
there,
the
state
government's
not
going
to
be
monitoring
exactly
how
the
money
is
spent
after
it
is
awarded
that
they're
going
to
assume
that
the
business
had
a
good
enough
need
that
they've
evaluated.
A
H
D
C
Our
individual
cap
is
ten
thousand
dollars
and
any
the
the
if
it's
within
a
municipality,
the
applicant
operates
within
the
municipality
or,
I
would
say,
domiciled
within
the
municipality
that
we
would.
We
would
do
fifty
percent
up
to
ten
thousand
dollars
of
that
request.
G
G
I
think
there
probably
is
I'm
looking
at
the
downside:
should
should
a
business
or
a
vendor
be
penalized
because
that
particular
business
is
domiciled
within
a
municipality
whereas,
if
they're
not
within
a
municipal
and
they're
out
in
an
unincorporated
area?
What's
what's
the
comparison
in
terms
of
the
money
being
provided?
Is
there
a
sharing.
A
Well
understand,
I
would
suggest
one
thing
that
if
they're
within
a
municipality
they're
paying
taxes
to
both
the
county
and
to
the
municipality,
so
they're
contributing
in
a
way
that
maybe
it's
time
for
the
municipality
to
return
some
of
that
funds
when
they
have
these
extra
money.
G
That
would
be
my
position,
yeah,
that's
your
position
and
I'm
not
sure
I
I
I
can
buy
that.
Okay.
A
Mr
mccarty,
did
you
want
to
comment?
Well,
I'm
just
saying.
G
I
just
don't
want
to
be
necessarily
a
mandate
per
se.
I
understand
that.
There's
some
concern
about
policy,
but
we're
getting
caught
up
on
minutia.
I
think,
but
I
guess
this
is
an
exercise
that
we
can
modify
as
we
go.
I
don't
think
everything
should
be
set
in
concrete,
so
we'll
see
what
happens.
That's.
G
Now
you're
going
to
tell
me
is
that
we're
only
going
to
give
them
50
of
what
they
are
asking
for
in
light
of
maybe
the
city
not
having
the
wherewithal
to
match
our
match,
and
I'm
not
sure
I'm
I'm
there's
someone
readiness
on
my
part,
because
it
goes
back
to
if
indeed
they
make
a
grant
for
for
15
000
and
we're
only
going
to
give
them
7
500.
They
can't
do
what
they
want
to
do.
C
The
cities
don't
approve
anything
and
the
county
has
to
spend
all
of
its
money
on
the
businesses
where
there
needs
to
be
more
participation
out
of
municipalities,
and
so
I
I
the
only
way
to
start
with
is
having
a
policy
that
that
protects
the
interest
of
everybody,
and
hopefully
people
will
join
in
in
that,
because
kankakee's
got
14
and
a
half
million
reasons
and
bradley
and
bourbon
a
have.
What
three
and
two
respectively-
and
I
mean
moments-
has
four
hundred
thousand
dollars.
G
C
M
A
Yeah,
I
think
we
have
a
motion.
Oh
we
have
a
motion.
I
think
I'm
going
to
call
for
a
role
called
voter.
B
D
C
B
C
All
right,
the
last
thing
I
have
is,
I
wrote
in
what
it
occurred
to
me.
It
occurred
to
me
that
we
should
have
some
proof
that
this
is
a
business
or
not-for-profit.
That
is
still
in
good
standing,
so
we
would
require.
We
should
require
that
they
are
business
that
is
within
good
standing
with
the
state
of
illinois.
C
That's
part
of
the
prove
up
that
you
saw
earlier
with
the
economic
alliance
presentation.
So
while
that
doesn't
necessarily
require
a
vote,
is
that
acceptable
that
we
get
that
certificate?
If
they
don't
have
it?
I
think
there's
an
online
portal
that
you
can
look
up
and
see
if
they're
still
still
legitimate.
So,
okay
yeah
we'll
start
well.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that
was
kind
of
that
we're
gonna
do
that.
C
Okay,
now
the
next
one,
mr
chairman,
if
it's
okay,
yes,
the
capped
non-governmental
unit
fund,
those
are
those
people,
as
I
mentioned
that,
are
you
know:
fire
departments
park
districts.
You
know
the
rural
fire
departments,
the
people
that
didn't
get
funds
before
basically
or
weren't
covered
by
this
round
of
arpa.
C
It's
it's
it's
or
or-
and
it
could
be
both
because
some
got
money,
but
they
weren't
covered
by
this
round
in
and
of
itself,
so
the
first
one
or
this
those
governmental
units,
so
the
total
amount
on
that
one
would
also
be
the
ask:
do
you
want
to
do
the
same
amount
of
money
and
see
where
that
leads
us
down?
The
road
yeah
got
a
lot
of
requests
up
front,
so
a
quarter
million
in
that
one
as
well.
So,
mr
chairman,.
A
Mr
hunter
makes
a
motion
on
that
is
our
second
poke
poke
stephens
any
discussion,
quite
a
quarter
of
a
million
dollars
right.
Yes,.
S
A
All
right,
if
there's
no
discussion,
voice,
votes
enough
on
that,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye,
aye
opposed,
nay
motion
carries.
C
C
to
the
group
because
those-
and
it
would
still
have
the
the
other
stipulations
as
we
have
voted
before
the
municipal
match.
You
know
for
their
associated
municipalities
that
they
serve
those
other
things
as
well.
So
it's
it's!
Basically
the
50
percent
everything
that.
G
A
A
C
G
A
C
Alrighty
now
we're
going
to
start
with
the
arpa
fund.
That's
the
first
thing
in
your
packet.
The
very
first
item
on
the
the
list
is
the
the
vendor
or
the
recipient.
Should
I
say
I
put
vendor
on
there:
that's
probably
the
wrong
thing:
it's
mechanicals
air
and
pathogens.
We
have
to
do
an
rfq.
We
need
to
make
that
part
of
the
design
build
bids
that
we
do.
This
is
us
basically
saying.
Yes,
we
want
to
address
air
quality
in
our
buildings
when
we
do
this
yep.
So
that's
it's.
C
C
All
righty
the
next
one
under
arpa,
where
you
received
a
request
from
mr
from
taylor,
publications
regarding
a
series
that
he
wants
to
do
and
it
does
fall
under
the
arpa
guidelines.
If
you
will,
it
would
be
in
a
number
of
areas,
so
we'll
we'll
pick
out
the
one
that
best
suits
it,
but
it
it's
it's
all
over.
C
It
fits
so
what
I
was
gonna
ask
was
is
if
the
board
would
make
a
motion
to
allow
us
to
use
the
ten
thousand
dollars,
but
have
it
be,
as
I
mentioned
to
mr
beavis
yesterday,
an
advertising
campaign
towards
those
communities
of
color
that
in
a
public
awareness
campaign
to
to
get
vaccinated
if
they
so
choose.
C
A
Peyton
moves
I'm,
mr
honestly,
you
know
spoke
to
that
yesterday.
Also,
you
heard,
I
don't
know
if
somebody
mentioned
mbesbe
and
all
that
stuff
meets,
that
criteria.
Call
for
the
question.
A
All
in
favor
of
the
motion
say
aye,
mr
payton.
You
made
the
motion.
Yes,
mr
hunter's.
Second
opposed
motion
carries.
C
All
right-
and
just
so
you
know
those
will
be
paid
as
the
bills
come
in
with
tear
sheets
that
they,
you
know,
ran.
So
we
that's,
we
require
the
backup,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
everybody
knows
we're
just
not
handing
over
it's
paid,
we'll
work
on
the
plan
and
everything
with
mr
taylor
and
figure
out
how
we're
going
to
get
that
out
into
the
community.
C
There
may
be
other
things
that
we
bring
back,
whether
it's
billboard
or
other
things,
depending
on
if
the
variant
becomes
more
of
a
deviant,
as
somebody
might
have
mentioned
before.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
you
know
that
that's
just
the
start
of
that.
We
can
spend
some
of
this
money
and
we
should
the
health
department
is.
I
don't
know
if
they're
doing
that
or
not,
but
I
think
we
can
so
it
should
so
we're
going
on.
Yes,
mr
miller,.
A
L
I
have
a
quick
question:
is
this
taylor
publications
domiciled
in
a
municipality
that
will
have
to
match
what
we
pay
or?
Is
that
not
it's.
L
C
C
This
will
pick
up.
The
next
item
on
here
was
the
staffing
to
catch
up
on
coveted
cases.
The
circuit
clerk
had
asked
for
four
people.
We
didn't
have
a
total
amount
on
what
that
was,
and
my
recommendation
is,
is
because
of
what
the
state
of
illinois
has
done
to
us.
Taking
five
million
dollars
a
year
in
revenue
away
from
us.
We
have
to
wait
and
see
the
budgets,
and
that
also
really
goes
towards
the
request
that
mr
pennowick
had
and
I'm
assuming
what
mr
rowe
will
have.
C
G
C
C
How
are
we
going
to
do
it
based
on
the
money
we
have
and
for
what
time
period
and
that
kind
of
goes
to
and
we'll
speak
to
that
a
little
bit
more
and
if
you
want
to
handle
the
public
defenders
at
the
same
time,
it's
legitimate
it's
under
6.1,
which
is
provision
of
government
services.
So
we
could
do
this,
so
we
can
okay,
the
the
thought
of
doing
it,
but
when
it
comes
back,
then
we'll
know
based
on
budget.
C
A
C
T
Yeah,
I'm
not
sure
exactly
the
protocol.
Today's
meeting
I
thought
today
was
a
day
for
presentation
and
if
I
was
wrong,
I
was
wrong
and
that's
fine.
As
far
as
formal
or
informal
presentation
right,
I
submitted
a
request.
I'll
use
the
term
request
back
in
june,
which
I
have
copies
of.
If
anyone
wants
it,
but
I
guess
we're
talking
about
two
different
things
chairman
as
far
as
the
procedure
today
and
the
procedure
in
the
future,
so
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
hear
my
presentation
today.
T
My
justification,
I'm
of
the
opinion
that
the
arpa
money
is
there
independent
of
the
budget.
I
know
they're
not.
I
know
they
are
intertwined,
but
I
you
know
I
do.
I
can
separate
them
mentally
in
my
mind,
as
far
as
the
money
request
versus
long-term
budgetary
concerns
within
the
county,
but
I'm
kind
of
deferring
this
to
you
guys
to
what
you
want
to
hear
from
me
today.
C
Well,
I
was,
I
was
hoping
you'd
be
able
to
tell
them
about
the
need.
So
when
we
get
back
together,
we
kind
of
solve
that,
like
we
have
cases
backed
up
oh
yeah,
if
I
could
I'd
rather
yeah,
please
yeah
come
on
up.
This
is
important.
People
need
to
hear
this.
We're
not
going
to
spend
a
lot
of
time
on
it,
but
the
the
request
is
valid.
The
dollars
and
cents
aren't
adding
up
right
now.
T
Yeah,
I
won't
be
that
long.
Hopefully,
so
you
got
it
first
of
all.
My
name
is
ed
pennewick,
I'm
the
chief
public
defender
in
kankakee
county,
I'm
not
sure.
If
everyone
here
knows
me,
I
was
appointed
by
the
judiciary
as
of
september
1st,
of
2019
to
take
on
this
responsibility.
T
Previous
to
that
I
was
an
assistant
states
attorney
here
in
kankakee
county
since
1995.
I
know
most
of
you,
but
I'm
not
sure.
If
I
know
all
of
you,
I
can
try
to
be
as
brief
as
possible.
I
do
want
to
be
clear
that
if
covet
did
not
happen
and
the
courthouse
wasn't
shut
down
for
months,
I
wouldn't
have
been.
I
wouldn't
be
here
right
now.
If
the
money
wasn't
available
potentially
from
the
government.
I
wouldn't
be
here
right
now
because
it
did
happen.
T
We
know
the
effects
on
our
lives
and
our
families.
We
know
about
county
businesses
and
how
they
were
substantially
affected.
I'm
not
going
to
belabor
the
effects
of
covid
but
to
say
that
it's
real,
we
know
it
and
it
happened.
The
money
is
available,
it's
been
allocated
and
it's
ready.
I
don't
want
to
repeat.
What's
in
my
presentation,
I
do
have
copies
for
anyone
who
doesn't
have
it.
I
have
many
many
copies.
T
I
think
I
went
through
kind
of
step
by
step
as
to
my
thought
processes
as
to
what
I
was
looking
for
and
why
I
was
looking
for
it,
but
I
do
want
to
highlight
a
few
things
briefly.
T
There's
been
a
real
increase
in
the
number
of
cases
pending
due
to
the
courthouse
being
shut
down
from
effectively
march
2020
to
june
2020.
During
that
period
there
was
virtually
nothing
going
on
in
the
courthouse.
Everyone
was
working
on,
a
skeletal
staff.
Stay
at
home
order
was
in
effect,
we
couldn't
see
clients
at
the
jail
cases
were
being
summarily
continued.
The
right
to
speedy
trial
was
and
still
is,
suspended.
Things
simply
were
not
getting
done
for
literally
a
period
of
months.
I
know
that
sandy
can
speak
to
this.
T
Mr
rokin
speak
to
this
tom
latham,
the
sheriff
there
was
nothing
going
forward
after
reopening,
we
had
all
the
cases
that
were
continued.
We
had
all
the
cases
that
were
called
just
before
the
shutdown
that
were
continued.
We
had
all
the
cases
that
were
up
anyway.
They
got
continued.
We've
got
all
the
cases
that
were
felt
during
the
shutdown
that
had
to
be
addressed.
T
I
know
mr
rowe
has
been
filing
more
cases
that
he's
been
catching
up
with,
so
that's
been
going
to
grand
jury,
so
those
are
more
cases
being
submitted
to
the
court
system
that
are
real,
quantifiable
and
directly
affecting
what
we
do
on
a
day-to-day
basis.
T
That's
basically,
that's
that's
my
biggest
concerns
right
now
I
mean
the
money
I'm
asking
for
is
primarily
for
staffing,
if
not
exclusively
for
staffing,
my
money
request
is
directly
for
the
the
backlog
I
put
down
in
my
report.
The
statistics
using
the
monthly
report
data
felony
cases
have
increased
from
my
office
from
828
to
955,
or
approximately
14
misdemeanors
have
increased
approximately
11
traffic's
up
32
percent.
As
I
stated
in
my
report
juveniles
down,
I
think
that's
because
of
the
fact
that
many
state
agencies
were
closed
dcfs.
T
So
that's
basically
where
I'm
at.
As
far
as
the
concerns
I
have
regarding
the
necessity
for
additional
funding
the
numbers,
I'm
not
sure
if
we're
talking
numbers
today
or
not-
I
don't
know,
but
I
am
requesting
175
thousand
dollars
a
year.
I
compute
that
to
be
approximately
2.5
percent
of
the
potential
2
23,
I'm
20
21.3
million
dollars
available.
That
money
would
be
basically
have
a
sunset
provision
when
it
runs
out.
T
Obviously
it
would
run
out,
hopefully
since
we're
addressing
a
backlog
and
not
just
funding
my
office,
which
I'm
more
than
happy
to
discuss
at
a
later
date.
When
that
money's
gone
it's
gone,
and
if
personnel
decisions
need
to
be
made
within
my
office,
I
will
do
that,
but
that's
all
I
have
as
far
as
that
goes.
If
anyone
has
any
questions
regarding
this,
I
guess
the
question.
T
G
Ed,
let
me
got
a
question.
You
know
you're
asking
you
know
of
money
from
these
opera
funds.
What
steps
have
you
taken
to
secure
soft
funds
other
than
these
opera
funds.
T
G
T
T
G
C
C
Do
you
understand
what
I'm
saying,
because
we
won't
have
the
general
fund
budget
to
pay
for
it,
you've
got
to
understand
how
budgets
work
and
that's
part
of
how
budgets
work.
If,
if
there's
a
million
dollar
allocation
to
a
department,
and
then
we
say
we're,
gonna
use
covet
funds
to
hire
extra
people
and
that
allocation
goes
down
to
eight
hundred
thousand
because
of
the
five
million
dollars
the
state
took
from
us.
If
we
don't
reduce
that
head
count,
then
we
palace
we've
passed
a
deficit
budget,
I
mean
that's
got
to
sink
in
here.
C
P
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Mr
wheeler,
do
you
do
you
have
a
time
frame
in
mind
for
the
public
defenders
office
or
any
of
these
other
offices
that
are
allocating
for
staffing
in
leading
to
my
question,
because
it's
tough
to
find
people
to
work
right
now
and
the
process
might
take
longer
for
the
public
defender
or
whoever
else
that's
needing
staffing,
even
if
they
could
go
today,
they
might
not
actually
be
able
to
fill
those
seats
or
do
we
have
a
time
frame
or
can
we
advertise
or
post
or
you
know,
head
hunt?
C
T
T
C
Everybody
has
this
the
ask
in
their
packet,
so
I
said:
ask.
C
A
Mr
fairfield
motioned
I'll
miss
vote
for
dr
polk
for
the
second.
All
in
favor
of
the
motion
to
deny
say
aye
opposed,
nay
motion
carries
if.
C
This
would
have
came
in
last
year.
We
we
could
have-
and
I
can't
say
that
we
didn't
use
arpa
money
to
cover
it
before,
but
it's
just
not
our
rules,
department
of
treasury
rules,
so
the
next
items,
all
the
corner
items
I'm
going
to
group
under
1.7
of
the
capital,
investments
or
physical
plant
changes
to
public
facilities.
C
You
know
so
those
are
mostly
capital
investments
with
some
equipment
in
there
that
are
directly
covered
related.
I
will
call
them
out
by
name
the
morgue
freezer
mortuary
racks.
Autopsy
cart,
we'll
said,
chart
descendant
storage
tables
back
in
that
delta
controls
for
negative
airflow.
C
Now
the
employee,
due
to
cost
cost
due
to
cova,
that's
something
that
we
just
need
the
payroll
receipts
and
then
we
could
move
that
back
over
into
the
corners
line
item.
If
you
will-
and
it
would
go
back
to
march
only
it
would
not
go
back
any
further.
So
we
I'm
asking
saying
we
should
approve
that
based
on
the
regulations,
but
we
just
need
to
get
that
back
up
from
payroll
and-
and
let
me
go
back
just
a
moment
I'll
finish
these
and
then
the
completed
cova
testing.
C
That
was
something
that
was
already
done
and
it
fits
and
then
the
autoclave,
oh
excuse
me:
salary
reimbursement
will
be
funded
as
it
occurs.
So
it
doesn't.
We
don't
allocate
money
ahead
for
salary
reimbursement,
it
happens
when
it
happens.
So
please,
mr
hunter
yeah,
so.
G
For
under
1.7
is
that
the
eight
pack
he
was
he
was,
I
think,
cavender
or
I
don't
know
if
it
was
bob
who
came
before
us,
because
you
only
got
room
for
two
in
the
freezer
and
you
want
something.
Eight
right.
Six
more
we've
got
guys
like
snipes
and
a
chair.
A
Is
there
a
motion
to
approve,
as
recommended
mr
swanson
moves
to
approve
is
recommended?
Is
there
a
second,
mr
fairfield,
any
further
discussion
hearing
no
further
discussion
just
about
the
coroner
would
like
to
make
a
comment.
S
Just-
and
I
think
I
pointed
out
to
you
chairman,
that
the
prices
are
going
up
considerably
so
as
soon
as
some
of
that
stuff,
I
don't
know
how
how
quick
it
can
be
ordered.
C
It's
as
soon
as
the
full
board
approves
it.
So
it's
you
know
tuesday.
You
can
let
the
the
purchase
order
slide.
You
know,
after
the
meeting.
C
N
J
C
C
A
Recommendations
the
motion
is
to
agree
with
the
recommendations
and
that
item
is
removed
from
the
recommendations.
C
A
C
I
just
heard
something
I
want
to
make
sure
that
it
wasn't.
Thank
you
noted,
for
the
record
next
item
was
the
basement:
coved
remodel
the
the
space.
A
C
So
the
motion
on
that
one
was
it's
already
funded.
So
it's
it's
a
deny
on
this
end
of
the
week.
It's
a
general
fund.
So
no,
it's
already
included.
C
The
committee
need
explanation
where
we're
at
the
drawing
of
the
basement
is
in
the
packet.
Mr
bright
is
here
to
answer
any
questions,
but
the
main
goals
of
this
project
were
to
take
advantage
of
the
400
000.
The
state
is
giving
us
couple
it
with
this
money
and
take
care
of
all
the
social
distancing
requirements.
C
The
space
needs
issues
that
we
have
over
there,
which
equal
covid,
so
we
think
most.
If,
if
not
all,
this
can
be
funded
out
of
the
covid
arpa
fund
under
1.7,
section
1.7.
So
that's
noted
for
the
record
and
then,
if
any
we'll
we'll
go
down
that
path,
if
something
ends
up
changing
and
it
has
to
go
over
to
lost
revenue,
that
is
much
more
substantial
fun
for
us
and
we
could
move
it
over
there.
If
we
had
to
just
want
to
make
sure
everybody
knows,
do
you
have
anything
wes
on?
C
By
the
way,
I
wanted
to
include
I'm
sorry,
the
the
architectural
services
for
this
project
as
well.
That's
part
of
this.
A
Q
Thank
you
as
long
as
doug's
here,
I
think,
there's
been
some
misunderstanding
with
regards
to
where
we're
at
in
the
process
just
from
some
dialogue.
So
as
long
as
he's
here,
would
the
committee
like
to
hear
an
update
as
to
where
we
stand
on
the
project.
W
Hello,
everybody
just
wanted
to
give
you
a
quick
update
on
where
we
are
with
the
project
we've
been
going
through
this
for
several
months,
in
conjunction
with
the
the
the
sheriff's
office,
the
clerk's
office,
the
chief
judge,
wes
department,
and
also
the
the
chairman
in
terms
of
how
we
wanted
the
lower
level
to
lay
out
to
function
to
improve,
and
so
we've
basically
completed
a
preliminary
design,
which
is
a
preliminary
design
floor
plan
which
you
said
was
in
their
packet
correct.
W
Yes,
okay,
so
we
have
a
preliminary
design
and
what
we
had
as
part
of
the
motion
was
a
proposal
to
move
forward
with
construction
documents
and
in
bidding
process
for
the
project.
So
we're
just
getting
started
on
that.
So
we're
going
to
be
working
with
the
county
to
develop
a
schedule,
refine
the
scope.
So
it's
going
to
be
an
ongoing
ongoing
process
for
a
while
in
terms
of
getting
those
documents
and
the
bidding
process
complete
any
questions.
W
Me
personally,
we
work
with
imag
corporation
they're,
an
engineering
firm,
they
do
mechanical
electrical
and
they
are
not
a
minority
firm.
Now,
okay,.
C
The
court
just
as
a
statement
the
coordination
part
of
this
will
begin
with
the
courts.
Obviously
because
there
is
some
disruption,
but
where
that's
part
of
this
process
and
figuring,
where
is
jury
assembly
going
to
go,
we
think
we
can.
W
Yes,
that's
that's
going
to
be
that's
going
to
be
part
of
this.
That's
going
to
be
part
of
the
whole
process,
we're
going
to
have
to
cut
we're
going
to
work
that
into
the
construction
documents,
because
I
would
assume
that
this
is
going
to
be
a
phased,
phased
approach,
because
there's
going
to
be
a
pretty
significant
disruption
to
the
basement
and
we're
going
to
have
to
coordinate
who
goes
where
for
what
period
of
time
and
how
we
work
around
those
logistics.
Yes,.
C
Right
next
item
up
was
the
as
mentioned
before.
We
have
space
needs
within
the
courts
and
that
translates
into
covet
implications.
C
So
we're
able
to
draw
that
parallel,
because
we
have
now
have
a
study
that
says
we
are
too
cramped
on
space,
multiple
studies,
if
you
will
one
recently
and
the
number
of
people
working
in
these
spaces,
so
in
in
consultation
with
the
courts,
we
wanted
to
go
out
for
a
design
build
rfq
that
will
include
like
we
talked
about
all
these
building
projects,
someone
to
kind
of
like
be
wes's
right
hand
to
manage
all
of
these
potential
building
projects,
but
we
first
need
to
know
how
much
it
is
and
build
budgets
from
there.
C
Okay,
so
we
know
what
we
we
can't
afford,
which
is
all
new
great
big,
big,
shiny,
new
buildings
like
they're
doing
in
will
county.
We
have
to
approach
this
as
pennies
from
heaven
and
how
do
we
save
taxpayers
for
what
they're
going
to
have
to
spend
money
on
over
the
next
20
years
and
get
that
done
now
so
and
do
it
efficiently?
C
C
This
includes
off-site
juvenile
specialty
court
space.
No,
the
next
item
is
something
except
for.
A
A
I'm
recognizing
your
first
okay.
Is
there
a
second
hundred
seconds
in
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye.
All
right,
opposed,
nay
motion
carries.
C
And
so
you
know,
part
of
the
thought
process
is
remove
the
juveniles
from
the
criminal
proceedings
and
because
we
we
want
to
keep
them
away
from
that.
That's
the
judge's
ask
if
you
will
and
then
we
have
long-term
space
issues
to
deal
with.
The
next
item
is
the
circuit
clerk's
office,
space
that
we're
asking
that
that
be
put
on
the
bid
process
and
the
design
build
prospectus
and
then
we'll
go
to
the
future
projects
list.
As
we're
talking
about
that
will
be
ranked
we
have
to
address
the
circuit
clerk's
office.
C
I
think
she
will
attest
to
the
fact
that
it's
like
the
bunk
room
and
a
submarine
we
we
have
ada
issues
there.
We
have
space,
needs
covet
issues
and,
and
frankly
you
know
it
would
probably
come
right
after
we
do
the
basement
because
they
have
to
move
somewhere
while
we
redo
our
office.
So
that's
part
of
the
staging
process
that
we
go
through
in
a
bid
process.
E
A
C
All
right
next
one
moving
right
along
the
request
as
a
non-cover
governmental
unit
from
bourbon
a
fire
protection,
it's
for
a
lucas
device
chief
is
here:
if
can
we
grab
you
up
at
the
mic?
Real
quick
per
our
previous
conversation,
this
fits
into
our
cap,
but
it
also
requires
me
to
ask
a
question
chief
thanks
for
coming.
I
appreciate
it
thanks.
C
C
So
it
understanding
what
we
just
talked
about
earlier,
the
the
county
would
would
authorize
basically
50
of
that
today
and
bourbon
a
would
be
in
for
the
other
half.
Is
that
kind
of
something
that
you
want
to
proceed
with
along.
C
Because
I'd
be
happy
to
sit
with
both
of
you
and
talk
about
that,
but
that
when,
when
I
spoke
with
their
administrator,
I
said
this
is
one
of
the
projects.
We
think
that
we
should
share
okay,
and
so
that's
I
I
we're
not
saying
no,
but
you
know
we.
We
definitely
want
to
help
with
this,
but
we
need
partners
sure,
okay,
absolutely
sound
good.
So
as
if
that's
okay,
then
we
could
have
a
motion.
N
A
C
Moving
on
all
right,
so
the
next
one
is
the
planning
department
delbert's
here
and
his
his
wish
list
is
was
coined
by
another
department.
Head
was
prolific,
so
we
have
a
few
things
on
here:
the
first
one
laptops
for
remote
work.
We
it
says
mr
duvall
will
get
quotes.
C
They
see
it
as
a
need.
I
say
we
get
the
quotes
and
then
put
it
on
future
projects
to
be
able
to
talk
about
what
that
is
electronic
display
system.
He,
I
have
excuse
me,
phones,
print
scan.
I
would
recommend
we
deny
and
then
spend
it
as
we
need
it.
We
just
don't
throw
the
money
out
there
if
we
actually
need
it
for
printers
and
scanners,
then
we'd
ask
for
that
demonstrated,
probably
through
committee.
C
Is
that
a
coveted
reason,
or
is
that
a
reason
that
we
need
it
in
the
budget?
You
see
my
point.
I
think
that
some
of
those
conversations
should
happen
on
the
committee
level,
but
I
didn't
want
to
not
give
him
his
day
in
court
if
he
wants
to
defend
that
and
stand
up
here
in
front
of
the
committee
so
to
speak,
and
you
know
say
what
we're
talking
about,
but
like
cell
phones
for
the
employees,
I
I
don't
know
that
that
fits
into
this
request.
C
So
that's
up
to
you
all
to
decide,
but
we
can
talk
about
each
one,
the
electronic
display
system.
It's
an
ask.
It
can
go
to
future
allocations
because
it
is
infrastructure,
but
it
wouldn't
be
arpa.
It
would
go
into
the
infrastructure
one
and
then
you
could
decide
whether
it's
critical
or
not
or
if
it
goes
to
the
general
fund
website,
redesign
and
restructuring.
That's
actually
something
we're
going
to
be
handling
within
the
county's
website
project,
so
we
can
kind
of
set
that
to
the
side
dell.
Would
you
agree
we're
dealing
with
that?
C
We
met
yesterday
on
the
new
county
website
that
we're
going
to
be
working
on.
That's
on
the
other
ask
list.
If
you
will
gis
employees
that
I'm
just
listing
all
requests,
we
already
have
searches
underway
and
it's
not
bearing
fruit
multiple
times
so
we're
in
the
same
boat.
Everybody
else
is
so
that's
not
something
that
we
we
could
do
it
if
we
were
dedicating
an
employee
towards
covid
and
mapping
out
of
the
arpa
fund,
but
otherwise
it
would
fall
to
the
general
fund.
Does
that
make
sense
the
way
that
I'm
putting
that
okay.
C
Got
to
list
the
rest
of
them,
then
I've
got
to
list
the
rest
orally.
It's
like
reading
another
record
yeah.
We
need
these
in
the
record,
permitting
software
we
it's.
We
should
deny
that
it's
already
part
of
the
budget
20
000
a
year,
the
server
I'm
recommending.
We
deny
that
update,
4
800.,
we'll
purchase
it
with
it's
necessary
and
then
we'll
determine
if
it's
critical
infrastructure
right
now.
If
we
need
it,
I
don't
I
we
haven't,
demonstrated
the
need,
and
so
we
can
come
back
through
regular
committees
on
that
stuff.
C
X
I
don't
know
that
I
understand
the
rules
of
covid,
but
our
counter
area
is
very
small
and
very
tight
with
the
social
distancing
required.
We
were
able
to
allow
about
one
person
into
the
counter
at
a
time,
so
we
would
like
to
reconfigure
it.
We
have
some
open
space
at
the
end.
Extend
the
counter
out
with
our
new
software.
People
can
actually
input
their
own
data
into
our
system
when
they
come
in
to
apply
if
they
actually
come
into
the
office.
C
C
And-
and
you
know
it
goes
along
with
how
many
computers
you
would
need,
so
I
could
see
putting
one
up
there
now
to
let
customers
do
their
own
thing
if
you
will
but
and
that's
for
the
committee
to
decide,
but
my
recommendation
would
be
to
put
it
on
future
allocations
once
we
get
a
number
behind
it,
so
we
could
get
a
bit.
Maybe
that's
part
of
our
design
build
package
if
you
will
so
just
want
to
make
sure
everybody's
okay
with
that
or
understands
that
part
of
it
and
webcams?
A
Proving
the
recommendation
as
pres
centered
by
the
chairman
with.
C
C
A
C
Well,
the
question
is
about
that:
it's
where
the
amount
of
money
stacks
up
against
other
priorities,
so
we're
saying
yes:
if
it
does,
then
we're
gonna
put
it
on
a
list
and
prioritize
that
that
list
so.
C
C
C
Yeah
it
was,
it
was,
deny,
spend
it
if
we
need
it,
and
so,
if
you
want
to
talk
about
how
that
document
scanning,
are
you
talking
about
the
in
the
field
document
scanning.
X
I
was
talking
about
scanning
our
current
documents.
We
have
65
filing
cabinets
with
all
of
our
property
records
in
them.
One
thing
we
found
out
during
covid
that
in
the
field
and
working
from
home
we
were
very
limited
because
we
did
not
have
access
to
any
of
those
files,
so
we
would
like
to
scan
them
all
into
a
computer
database
so
that
we
could
access
them
from
anywhere.
Do.
C
You
collect
any
special
funds
for
that
no
use.
Well
then,
I
guess
the
recommendation
was
is
get
a
price
and
then
we'll
put
it
on
the
list.
Would
you
agree.
G
Yes,
question:
wasn't
the
sheriff
or
somebody
or
was
it
corner
the
recorder?
No,
no,
but
somebody
was
using
some
kind
of
company
that
was
able
to
scan
all
of
these
records
and
stuff.
Who
was
that
corner.
G
C
D
C
A
X
About
65.
that
that
number
I
gave
was
a
it
talks
to
people
in
the
industry
and
they
said
it'd
be
about
a
thousand
dollars.
A
C
X
Or
email,
it's
it's
not
a
matter
of
people
coming
in
for
those
records.
It's
a
matter
of
our
staff
being
able
to
search
those
records
to
find
out
what
happened
on
a
property.
Previously,
what
permits
have
been
issued?
We
find
a
building
there
that
we
don't.
We
don't
know
how
it
got
there.
We
go
back
to
see
if
there
was
a
permit
on
it
code.
Enforcement
is
very
helpful.
Have
we
issued
violations
before?
Is
this
an
ongoing
problem,
it's
more
for
our
staff
than
it
is
the
public
all
right.
Thank.
C
You
moving
on
to
probation
webcams
to
me.
This
seems
like
it
fit
because
of
remote
visits
on
probation,
it's
300,
so
that
would
be
a.
I
would
recommend
yes
and
then
the
monitor
the
500
monitor.
I
don't
see
the
coveted
reason
for
that.
The
recommendation
will
be
moved
to
the
lost
revenue
list,
which
is
your
other
list
that
we're
going
to
go
through
now.
So
those
are
the
two
thoughts
I
have
there.
E
A
Poke
seconds
we
have
a
recommendation,
a
motion
to
agree
with
the
recommendation:
if
there's
no
further
swiper.
C
All
right
next
item
for
probation,
there
was
a
full
program
that
was
put
forward
by
mr
latham.
It
looked
pretty
buttoned
up
because
they
deal
with
with
grants
quite
a
bit.
Unfortunately,
moves
into
that
kind
of
social
service
side
of
things
that
I
was
going
to
ask
that
we
consider
that
separately
with
that
group
of
things
not
in
today's
meeting.
It's
not
a
no
it's
more
like.
C
We
really
need
to
get
our
arms
around
this
and
how
it
fits
into
the
overall
continuum,
and
it
may
be
a
quick
yes
based
on
us
going
through
that
in
a
probably
our
next
finance
committee
meeting.
Is
that
acceptable
tom?
Is
there
any
time
sensitive
things
on
there
that
are
like
got
to
do
it
right
now?.
O
Since
covet
started,
basically
any
agency
we
used
for
juveniles
for
drug
and
alcohol
aren't
doing
in-person
counseling.
What
they
do
have
is
some
virtual
stuff
and
it
was
a
huge
gap
we
identified.
So
we
said
we
hired
a
counselor
that
comes
in.
We
keep
it
limited
to
a
certain
number,
so
they
can
social
distance,
but
we're
able
to
have
face-to-face
weekly
counseling
sessions
and
that's
what
that
cost
was.
O
C
I
think
that
would
fall
under
6.1
as
well.
Did
you
agree,
mr
hess
all
right.
C
Yes,
yep
the
next
one
up
was
the
recorders
request
it
was
modified.
I
believe
everybody
was
given
a
new
version
of
this
in
a
separate
document.
Today.
Originally
it
was
153
927.
Z
As
you
know,
is
this
on,
as
you
know,
the
recorder's
office
does
have
a
special
fund,
but
it
is
a
budgeted
fund
each
year
and
when
covet
happened
and
searchers
weren't
coming
into
my
office,
and
we
were
identifying
the
need
for
something
more
accessible
to
them
to
be
able
to
continue
doing
their
work
in
order
to
keep
recording
in
my
office,
we
filled
that
12-year
gap
which,
at
the
time
we
were
hoping,
was
going
to
be
covered
by
the
cures
act
because
it
was
an
immediate
need.
Z
It
was
going
to
continue
keeping
people
employed
in
in
the
economy
moving
forward,
so
this
was
never
budgeted
in
any
in
my
computer
from
budget.
Do
I
have
a
special
fund?
Yes,
my
special
fund
is
used
more
and
more
for
employees
now
more
than
projects.
I
still
budget
projects,
but
I'm
not
dissolving
this
fund,
because
I
need
longevity
to
maintain
staff
and
operations
of
my
office,
so
I
was
asking
for
originally
the
scanning
project
to
be
covered,
but
because
of
that
march
3rd
date,
now
that's
off
that's
not
possible.
Z
So
I
had
started
a
book
project
which
I
presented
to
my
committee
that
was
going
to
take
about
five
years
to
do
because
again,
I
did
not
want
to
deplete
my
fund
and
kind
of
keep
that
alive
for
longevity
for
at
least
three
years
of
operations.
If
something
was
to
happen,
the
need
for
the
digital
index
of
these
books
would
increase
opportunities
for
those
working
from
home
or
other
places
not
having
to
come
into
my
office.
These
books
are
used
every
day.
C
Z
Had
I
planned
this
out
the
way
originally
proposed
it
would
have
been
over
five
years.
This
is
to
get
it
done
now
and
get
a
full
index
accessible
and
available
online,
because,
right
now
I
can't
put
online
what
we've
already
done,
because
it's
not
a
contiguous
searchable
opportunity.
I
need
it
all
done
so
it
can
all
be
put
on
together
for
creating
chain
of
title
and
understanding.
Does
that
make
sense,
I'm
a
very
benign
office.
I
understand
I'm
not
exciting
and
things
like
that,
but
believe
it
or
not.
Z
C
Q
G
I
didn't
hear
that
being
articulated.
M
AA
Z
Z
Well,
I
I
mean
absolutely,
you
know,
people
right
now
are
getting
ready
for
the
auction.
That's
coming
up
so
they're
using
our
system
to
look
into
properties
that
are
going
to
be
available.
I
mean
there's
various
different
reasons.
Every
day
somebody
comes
into
my
office
or
has
a
need
to
use
services
from
my
office
to
get
a
good,
clean
title,
search
or
whatever.
A
We
have
not
done
the
vote
yet
and
I
I
will
decide
when
discussion
is
ready
unless
there's
a
call
for
a
question.
A
All
right,
it
would
be
unless
someone
wants
a
roll
call,
would
be
a
voice
vote.
A
A
I
A
B
A
V
D
W
C
The
last
one
was
the
request
from
the
sheriff
on
a
formal
quote:
to
should
we
connect
with
jails
and
and
the
recommendation
was
to
get
the
bid
and
then
send
that
to
future
allocations.
C
It's
something
that
involves,
I
believe,
the
courthouse
and
corrections,
and
so
we
need
to
get
the
formal
bid
on
that
and
then
put
it
on
future
allocations
again,
where
that
whole
list
is
ranked.
So
that's
the
recommendation.
There
that'd
be
a
simple.
A
A
A
C
G
Just
a
question:
would
the
committee
reconsider
an
amendment
that
the
recorder
had
submitted
to
us.
G
G
A
H
C
The
we're
actually
doing
okay,
11
11.
first
item-
is
the
bourbon
a
township
park
district.
These
lost
revenue
funds.
We
do
not
need
to
note
the
section
based
on
the
arpa
rules,
because
these
are
based
on
lost
revenue.
The
same
rules
do
not
apply
to
these,
as,
as
we
mentioned
before
so.
A
C
Alrighty,
the
first
one
is
kind
of
the.
I
want
to
say
the
test
case
that
we
had
going
through
our
committees.
Mr
clark
is
here,
but
we
most
everybody
here
has
heard
that
request.
He
did
actually
prove
up
his
his
lost
revenue
number,
so
he
in
this
fund,
you
would
have
to
show
that
you
had
lost
revenue
in
order
for
us
to
to
be
able
to
allocate
towards
that.
That
was
our
stipulation
that
we
had
so
with
that.
Would
it
be
a
recommendation
to
approve
that
98.53
as
a
lost
revenue,
reimbursement.
A
C
The
next
item
is
a
business
request
from
lacks
mortuary.
It
actually
falls
under
section
2.9
of
the
arpa
money
spend.
So
I'm
recommending
that
we
approve
that,
under
the
stipulations
we
just
established
earlier
that
it's
the
the
request
amount
was.
Let
me
get
to
that
real
quick.
C
Sorry
I
had
to
get
you
had
to
give
me
a
totals
page.
It
was
14
7.
I
believe
you
have
fourteen
thousand
seven
hundred
dollars,
and
so
we
are
in
for
fifty
percent
of
that
per
our
rules.
So
if
there's
a
motion
on
that,
we
can
move
forward
on
that.
Mr.
A
And
there's
any
discussion
hearing
no
discussion.
All
in
favor
of
the
motion
say:
aye
aye,
opposed,
nay
motion
carries
all
right.
C
So
that
will
move
over
to
the
arpa
list.
If
you
will
the
career
center,
I
was
the
next
one
had
a
emt
program,
I'm
I'm
mentioning
that
that
will
be
part
of
the
impact
projects
that
we're
going
to
be
looking
at
as
far
as
the
larger
social
service,
education,
workforce
stuff
that
we're
doing
so.
This
is
not
a
no
just,
basically
saying
yes,
we
agree.
We
should
move
forward
in
exploring
this.
A
C
All
righty
the
next
one
was
document
scanning
for
the
circuit
clerks.
It's
the
same
policy
that
we
discussed
before.
There
are
special
funds
that
are
collected
for
this
purpose
and
but
we
support
anything
over
the
use
of
those
special
funds,
which
means
leaving
a
reasonable
amount
to
do
other
things.
C
A
M
A
C
All
righty
next
item,
as
mr
mccarty
talked
about
the
printers
and
the
copiers,
those
are
deemed
critical
infrastructure
to
the
county.
The
he
is
preparing
the
rfq
we've
already
heard.
The
stipulations
just
need
the
okay
to
go
ahead
and
place
it
on
this
lost
revenue
fund
list.
When
we
get
it
back
and
you
will
have
the
chance
to
approve
that
later,
once
we
get
the
the
determination
from
state's
attorney.
C
Next
item
a
new
website,
as
mentioned
earlier
talking
with
dell
and
his
needs,
our
website
is
critical
infrastructure
required
by
law
on
a
lot
of
areas
to
to
exist.
To
do
certain
things
it's
just
to
put
where
we're
talking
to.
We
started
with
a
few
companies
that
we
narrow
down
on
people
that
do
government
websites
and
know
exactly
what
is
going
on,
so
we're
going
to
bring
a
number
back,
but
it's
basically
to
approve
that
this
is
critical
infrastructure.
It's
something
we
want
to
address.
A
C
All
righty
next
item
is
the
request
from
the
chief
judge
on
doing
an
rfp
on
a
new
court
management
system.
This
is
a
big
ticket
item,
something
that's
a
long
process,
and
so
the
the
question
is.
Is
that
something
that
we
want
to
address?
And
I
think
it
is
something
that
we
agreed
it's
a
big
drain.
C
The
only
recommendation
I
have
for
the
committee
is
is
that
we
lead
the
project.
That's
the
only
recommendation
because
we
have
a
bond
that
we're
paying
for
the
current
system,
even
though
it's
very
non-functioning,
I'm
not
comfortable
getting
into
this
project.
If
we're
not
leading
it
and
then
we've
got
to
eat
with
the
courts.
We.
C
Two
million
dollars
by
the
time
this
is
implemented
on
a
bond,
but
it's
the
system
is
the
only
one
that
exists
in
the
state
of
illinois
and
anytime.
There's
an
update,
we're
at
the
mercy
of
the
company
to
do
things
when
they
want
to
do
things
or
when
we
get
to
it.
It's
just.
If
we're
gonna
we're
gonna
go
down
this
process
and
we're
gonna
pay
for
the
same
system
twice.
I
guess
that's
the
only
stipulation
that
I
would
put
on
it
that
we
lead
the
project
with
the
courts.
A
A
All
in
favor
of
the
recommendation
say:
aye
opposed,
nay,
ocean
carriers.
C
Next
item
was
a
wi-fi
boost
broadband
improvement.
This
was
on
the
original
list.
I
don't
know
kevin.
Are
you
here?
Is
that
still
necessary,
or
has
that
been
addressed
at
the
courts
between
the
requests
coming
in
and
now.
R
It's
been
addressed
and
they've
purchased
through
another
grant.
Some.
I
don't
know
if
this
microsoft,
okay,
some
additional
wi-fi
units
to
expand
or
replace
so
unless
this
is
something
I'm
not
aware
of,
it's
been
addressed,
but
there
could.
It
could
be
something
new
that
I'm
not
aware
of,
but
as
far
as
I
know,
yes,
it
is
okay.
C
So
this
one
we
just
kind
of
hold
for
now
and
if
it
becomes
necessary
in
the
new
technological
improvements
that
we're
doing
in
the
courts,
potentially
remote
traffic
and
other
things
that
we're
looking
at
then
we'll
address.
It
then
acceptable,
so
we're
just
kind
of
leaving
it
off
for
now,
but
it
may
come
back.
C
One
was
a
series
of
scanners,
I've
kind
of
asked
kevin
to
get
involved
in
that
to
get
the
pricing
and
what
the
need
is
with
dell.
What
types
of
scanners
the
ones
is,
if
we're
doing
new
copiers,
can
we
put
the
scanner
on
the
copiers
and
everybody
doesn't
get
one
at
their
desk,
trying
to
be
frugal
with
this
as
much
as
possible?
So
what
my
ask
would
be
is
to
go
out
and
get
pricing,
and
then
this
may
be
the
mobile
scanner
that
dell
is
talking
about
as
well
dell.
C
The
mobile
scanner
is
this
part
of
this
ask
okay,
so
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that
we're
aware
this
isn't
the
final
approval,
but
they're
kevin's
doing
some
work
on
the
back
to
see
what
exactly
we
need
and
what
those
costs
are.
If
you
agree
that
those
are,
we
should
at
least
have
a
scanner
and
maybe
a
mobile
scanner.
That
would
be
the
opportunity
to
approve
this.
C
That
would
be
the
first
one.
I'm
sorry,
I
was
finding
my
place
a
counter
computer
delbert
had
asked
for
three
of
those,
but
is
that
necessary
to
start
with,
could
you
use
one
right
now
would
be
my
question
dell.
V
C
Next
one
credit
card
reader
dell
had
asked
for
two.
I
think
I
don't
know
a
reason
why
we
need
two,
maybe
one,
but
there
is
a
reason
to
take
credit
cards
at
the
counter
in
the
planning
office.
So
I
would
recommend
that
we
would
go
forward
with
one
and
it
would
be
integrated
with
up
to
kevin's
specifications
as
far
as
I.t
mr
featherly
houston,.
I
As
far
as
those
scanners
go
is
that
something
wants
to
for
credit
card
readers?
I
K
Sheriff
has
commented
sure
yeah
about
planning
go
figure,
we
have
we
use
at
the
jail
and
the
circuit
clerk
uses
a
company
called
court
money
where
they
take
the
credit
cards
and
they
charge
the
fee.
The
fees
go
to
the
credit
card
company,
the
the
purchaser
pays
those
fees,
but
it
doesn't
cost
anything,
including
the
readers.
X
I'm
also
all
about
saving
money
too.
Our
current
software
program
allows
the
acceptance
of
credit
cards,
but
only
when
applying
for
a
building
permit
or
contractor
registration.
There's
many
other
times,
though,
where
people
are
in
the
office
and
they
want
to
pay
their
fees,
fines
with
credit
cards.
That's
why
the
credit
card
reader
at
the
counter
would
be
helpful
because
our
computer
system
doesn't
allow
that
currently,
okay,.
X
C
Squiggle
square,
for
that
you
know
a
little
that
you
put
in
your
phone,
so
remote
inspection
software.
If
you
want
to
discuss
that
dell
remote
inspection
software,
you
might
as
well
stand
over
there
is
that
two
thousand
dollars
a
year
plus
or
two
thousand
dollars,
plus
five.
X
Two
thousand
dollars
to
buy
the
software
about
five
hundred
dollars
a
year
on
maintenance
fees,
and
we
didn't
get
exactly
hard
cost
on
that,
but
we
did
look
into
it.
Software
would
allow
the
applicant
to
it's
almost
like
facetime,
where
the
contractor
or
the
applicant
can
be
on
site
and
our
inspectors
here,
and
it's
an
interactive
video
so
that
they
can
show
them
what
needs
to
be
inspected
and
they
can
take
them
around
the
building.
X
C
X
Out
of
our
contractor
registration
fee
that
we,
that
is
paying
for
our
our
building,
permit
software.
Yes,.
C
X
X
No,
but
I
mean
we
covered
the
entire
county,
so
just
driving
to
yellowhead
could
be
30
minutes.
C
Oriented
yeah
would
the
committee
agree.
I
get
motion.
Second
well,
wait
a
minute,
there's
one
more
two
more
so
you
got
digitized
files.
We
already
spoke
on
that
we're
going
to
get
a
bid
because
there
is
no
special
fund.
That
supports
that.
I
want
to
make
sure
everybody
understands
that
there's
no
money
collected
from
the
public
for
that
specific
purpose.
X
That
entire
portion
of
my
office
is
paid
for
by
billing
permit
fees,
but
it's
not
a
special
fund.
Those
fees
go
into
the
general
fund.
The
county
board
reallocates
it
back
out
to
us.
C
X
To
give
my
inspectors
access
to
all
of
our
codes
and
all
of
the
code
manuals
anywhere
they're
at
currently,
we
have
hard
copy
books
in
our
office
last
year.
They
had
to
be
in
the
office
to
review
any
of
those
codes.
These
are
subscription
services,
so.
X
That
you
would
with
the
subscriptions
they
would
be.
I
mean
these
are
copyrighted
documents
like
the
entire
bokeh
building
code
or
the
irc
building
code.
We
can't
just
scan
those
and
put
those
in,
but.
C
X
About
eight
hundred
dollars
a
year
for
all
the
codes
that
we
use
users,
what's
that,
how
many
users,
I
think
the
800
gets
you
up
to
10.,
okay,.
C
R
G
R
D
X
A
A
C
So
this
sheriff's
request,
two
corrections,
vans,
that's
a
bid
and
we
were
to
send
to
future
allocations.
Would
you
have
a
comment
on
the
two
corrections?
Vance
sure.
K
K
We
actually
found
three
transit
vans
and-
and
if
you
recall,
the
full
board
already
approved
the
purchase
of
one
of
the
vans
for
animal
control.
So
that's
that's.
We
don't
need
to
even
mess
with
that.
The
other
two
vans,
however,
are
in
greenfield
illinois
at
the
state
bid
price
at
forty,
forty
four
thousand
two
hundred
eighty
dollars
for
a
total
of
eighty
eight
thousand
five
hundred
and
sixty
dollars.
They
are
in
sitting
on
the
lot
waiting
to
hear
from
me
after
this
meeting.
K
C
A
B
A
C
The
next
one
was
the
corrections,
bus
that
would
be
a
formal
bid
process,
not
quote,
and
then
we
would
recommend
sending
it
to
future
allocations,
so
we
can
rank
them
all
with
everything
else.
Correct.
C
I
apologize
roll
call.
These
next
few
would
be
all
grouped
together,
so
the
corrections
bus
again
will
go
to
future
allocations
once
we
get
put
it
out
to
bid
same
with
the
body
scanner.
Once
we
get
a
formal
quote,
I
do
have
one
okay,
all
right.
K
C
So
it's
159
again
would
go
to
future
allocations
list
to
be
prioritized
the
jcdc
outdoor
wreck
area
that
may
fall
into
coven,
but
it's
it's.
I
don't
know
it's
kind
of
a
stretch,
so
we
have
to
do
some
talking
about
that.
It's
on
lost
revenue
right
now.
Have
you
got
any
bids
so
far?
No!
Nothing
yet
so
would
be
allowing
us
to
go
get
bids
on
that,
potentially
with
our
design
build
rfq.
C
If
we
want
to
include
that
into
that,
the
10
lpr
cameras,
this
one
might
take
a
little
bit
of
explaining.
Are
these
the
license
plate
readers.
D
C
K
With
there
are
already
some
in
the
municipalities
which
have
been
beneficial
to
those
municipalities,
the
for
the
20,
this
would
this
would
be
10
cameras
that
we
are
able
to
move
to
set
different
locations
depending
and
I
think
for
27
500
a
year
for
the
three
years
and
again,
following
that
three-year
period.
K
C
C
For
clarification,
that's
for
the
three
years
and
then
we
re-evaluate
then
yes,
first
and
second,
okay
just
want
to
make
sure.
Yes.
C
Next,
one
is
animal
control,
building
that'd
be
to
be
determined
because
we
have
to
do
design
build
on
that
or
if
it's
a
retro
find
a
property.
There's
a
big
process
on
that.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
still
okay
to
go
forward
with
that,
and
it
could
be
called
infrastructure.
C
So
this
is
just
to
move
it
to
that
future
project
allocation
list
and
then
once
we
start
plugging
in
numbers,
it's
right.
Next
one
was
training,
it
was
just
a
general
bucket.
We
were
hoping
to
get
like
some
specifics.
You
know.
K
C
K
17
697,
for
both
those
are
flir
drones
which
allow
us
to
use
them
at
night.
For
those
of
you
that
may
have
seen
a
couple
weeks
ago,
the
bank
robbers
ended
up
down
in
the
I
think
it
was
the
paxton
area
we
sent
the
drone.
We
had
down
there,
which
was
great
because
it
was
during
daylight
hours,
but
the
offenders
actually
were
in
a
cornfield
and
once
it
got
dark,
the
drone
really
wasn't
capable
of
of
seeing
anything.
So
those
would
be
a
big
help
for
us.
C
A
Is
there
a
motion
to
approve
that
recommendation
ms
parker
seconded
by
mr
fairfield
any
discussion
that
would
be
a
roll
call
vote.
A
C
The
next
one
is
the
virtual
reality
trainer.
I
was
almost
looking
at
this
as
the
same
as
the
other
training.
Once
we
get
together
the
total
bucket
of
training,
then
we
can
do
those
all
at
the
same
time.
Yeah
that's
because
there
is
a
solution
to
kcc.
Now
but
again,
there
is
the
night
shift,
can't
train
right,
yeah,
that's
the
big
issue,
and
so
we
we
need
to
figure
that
out.
So,
if
we're
holding
off
on
that,
but
it's
it's,
we
need
to
wait.
C
It's
not
a
hard
note.
The
10
camera
thermometers.
Y
C
Not
yeah
so
the
25
computers,
I
had
kevin
bid,
but
it
seems,
like
you
got
a
guy
too
so
well,
we've.
K
R
R
That
that's
a
that's
approximately
the
same
price
that
it's
a
little
bit
cheaper
than
what
we
would
have
paid,
which
is
what
you're
looking
for
is
to
be
in
line.
The
one
thing
I
could
say-
and
I
don't
know
if
that's
added
in
there,
they
may
need
an
updated
version
of
office
which
would
throw
another
300
on
top
of
that.
R
A
B
B
L
C
Next
item
was
a
new
payroll
system.
Pricing
was
tbd.
I
asked
that
we
first
schedule
meetings
with
the
vendor
and
the
users
in
the
sheriff's
department
to
make
sure
that
we're
just
not
misusing
the
system
or
don't
know
about
things
that
can
be
done
to
solve
the
problem
and
workarounds
correct.
If
there
isn't
a
workaround,
then
we
can
gauge
that
against
the
total
cost
and
man
hours
to
change
our
payroll
system.
Is
that
fair?
Okay,
all
right?
So
that's
the
process
we'll
go
through
this
methodically
in
a
project
way.
C
So
last
item,
I
believe
the
sheriff's
request
it
does
fall
under
4.1
of
the
the
arpa
laws
that
say
that
we
can.
We
may
provide
a
bonus
to
staff.
C
My
recommendation
would
be
to
put
it
on
future
allocations,
don't
say
no
kind
of
gauge
what
we
have
down
the
road,
but
that's
this
committee's
pleasure,
so
just
keep
in
mind
that
you
do
for
one.
You
do
for
all.
K
So
well
I
I
guess
I
would
say
that
during
covet
when
offices
closed
down-
and
mr
pennowick
referred
to
earlier-
the
courthouse
closed
down
the
courts
closed
down,
our
guys
didn't
stop
responding
to
calls
and
our
crux
officers
didn't
stop
booking
prisoners
in.
So
it's
a
little
bit
different.
I
I
don't
think
you
have
to.
If
you
do
it
for
one,
you
have
to
do
it
for
all.
I
think
you
have
to
look
at
you
know.
Unfortunately,
we
couldn't
close
down
and
we
still
dealt
with
the
same
problems.
I
Mike,
how
is
that
going
to
be
paid
to?
Would
that
be
like
a
one-time
thing
or
a
per
hour
increase
for
being
hazard
pay
like
taipei,.
K
C
So
the
I
guess
the
question
is:
do
you
consider
it
separately
and
approve
it,
or
do
you
go
with
the
put
in
our
future
allocations
and
then
rank
it
against
other
priorities?
That's
the
question.
So
if
there's
not
a
motion,
then
it
goes
in
with
all
the
other
things
that
we've
talked
about
in
that
section.
I
C
C
Negotiating
teams
knew
that
so
yeah.
There
was
also
a
lot
of
people
who
did
didn't
stay
home
that
actually
worked
every
day
in
the
county,
so
it
it's
you're,
just
not
approving,
in
my
opinion,
the
180
or
whatever
it.
It
goes
up
to
exponential
over
the
top
of
that.
C
C
Employees
before
we
give
it
back
to
the
government
right,
yeah,
okay,
okay,
that's
what
I'm
saying.
I
think
they
deserve
it
right,
but
I
think
there's
priorities
and
they
were
paid
while
they
were
here-
and
I
think
that
if
there
is
money
left
at
the
end
of
this,
it
should
go
to
employees
rather
than
back
to
the
federal
government.
But.
A
We
need
a
motion
to
approve
the
recommendations
in
terms
of
over
I'm
sorry.
We've
got
three
more
items.
My
fault.
A
Okay,
we've
got
to
do
all
the
sheriff's
partner
requests
that
we
did
not
previously
act
on.
Is
there
a
motion
to
approve
the
recommendations
in
terms
of
the
sheriff's
requests
that
were
not
previously
acted
on,
mr
miller,
moves
to
approve
those
recommendations.
Is
there
a
second
fairfield
seconds
discussion,
all
in
favor
of
proving
those
recommendations
say
aye.
R
C
AB
Scott
o'brien,
I'm
actually
the
county
board
appointee
for
the
etsb
board
and
also
fire
chief
of
mantino
fire
with
the
cobot
with
the
staffing
crisis,
as
well
as
the
consolidation.
AB
As
a
scanning
we
find
out
about
a
structure
fire,
an
ambulance
call
a
car
accident
from
the
police,
dispatcher
notifying
the
local
police
department
before
we
get
the
page.
So
we've
identified
this
as
an
urgent
need
to
help
with
our
ability
to
serve
our
public,
but
we
don't
have
it
budgeted
for.
Thus,
we
ask
for
consideration.
C
Miss
peterson
to
bring
her
special
fund
or
her
reserve
numbers
with,
and
she
had
mentioned
that
we
should
have
those
numbers
ourselves.
So
I
went
ahead
and
pulled
those
up
and
I
guess
first
of
all
do
you
know
if
what
the
other
municipalities
said
when
they
were
requested
for
a
portion
of
this
that
are
part
of
cancom?
Do
you
know
if
they
were
asked,
or
is
it
just
us.
C
All
right,
well,
cancon,
is
made
up
of
what
kankakee
bradley
bourbon
a
county
man
mantino.
AB
C
I
would
say
that's
one
reason
why
I
don't
know
that
we
should
act
on
this
in
my
opinion,
because
we're
a
group
that
should
share
the
cost
proportionally
if,
in
fact,
we
want
to
do
that.
The
second
thing
is:
is
there's
8.4
million
dollars
in
their
reserves.
C
I
would
argue
that
they
could
pay
for
this
out
of
their
reserves.
Much
like
we've
already
talked
about
with
the
special
funds
of
the
county,
so
I
that
that
would
just
be
my
own.
You
know
you
just
can't,
and
I'm
not
saying
this
is
the
intent
with
any
of
these
requests,
but
by
default
you
can't
sandbag
your
special
funds
just
to
get
this
money
and
save
money
for
down
the
road
that
that
doesn't
really
work
with
the
process.
A
I
hope
that
the
message
would
be
taken
back,
that
we
certainly
would
be
open
to
working
with
a
group
in
terms
of
how
to
properly
fund.
This
need
right,
because
I,
like
the
concept
of
working
with
the
group.
C
A
C
Next
one
make
you
get
back
up:
mantino
community
fire,
so
that
one
that
we
had
just
talked
about.
We
have
the
request,
and
I
went
back
and
forth
with
chief
yesterday
about
the
lost
revenue
in
their
ambulance,
part
of
the
which
is
a
big
part
of
it,
and
they
were
asking
to
cover
that
loss
off
the
86
681..
C
AB
AB
C
This
township,
so
the
cost
is
the
miles
when
you're
driving
the
pumper
right
right
yeah.
So
is
this
50
50
a
fair
split?
If
we
approach
mantino
about
doing
the
same
thing,
I
would
be
be
fine
with
that
420
and
they're
20
you're
still
left
with
a
gap,
but
I'm
just
wondering
if
that's
a
workable
solution.
I
would
do
that.
Okay,
because
it's
it's
better
than
you
know
the
other
alternative
correct.
So
is
that
something
you
want
to
act
on
separately
to
allow
that
to
happen
under
our
rules,
capped
fund.
A
C
All
right
last
one
on
this
is
limestone.
Fire
protection
district
see
them
here.
This
one
was
based
on
revenue
loss.
The
total
was
seventy,
seven
thousand
eight
hundred
thirty
dollars
sixty
two
cents.
I've
got
a
listing
of
all
their
expenses
and
there's
only
one
that
qualifies
from
5
5
21..
C
So
I
would
recommend
that
they,
this
would
be
considered
lost
revenue
and
not
you
know
reimbursements
for
because
we
can't
reimburse
it,
and
so
if
we
are
able
to
get
hold
on
just
a
moment,
please
the
lost
revenue
number
it
seems
like
it
would
fit
that
this
would
be
village
of
limestone
and
us
share
this
50
50..
So
that
would
be.
C
The
recommendation
is
if
we
are
able
to
ascertain
that
they
did
have
a
lost
revenue
between
19
and
20,
then
we
would
be
in
50
50
with
the
village
of
limestone.
Is
it
a
city
or
a
village
village?
It's
a
village,
yeah,
village.
Okay,
thank
you,
mr
long,
miss
weber.
I.
C
Well,
yeah
they're
asking
for
7
800
dollars
in
much
like
the
same
place
case
with
the
park
district.
We
figured
out
a
way
to
cover
this
expense,
but
call
it
lost
revenue
and
they're
not
asking
for
more
than
that.
So
that's
what
we
would
approve
is
half
of
the
78,
30,
32
and
and
then
hopefully,
the
the
limestone
fire
protection
or
limestone
village
would
choose
to
support
them
as
well.
So.
C
A
A
Yeah
we
need
a
roll
call
on
all
of
the
recommendations,
including
the
spending
of
money
and
other
recommendations.
Is
there
a
motion
to
get
to
accept
all
those
recommendations?
C
Yeah,
that's
under
the
lost
revenue
fund
and
there's
one
or
two
that
we
said
we're
going
to
move
it
over
to
arpa
like
the
limestone,
the
mantino
fire
protection
ones.
The
sheriff
request
bonus
to
staff
it
would.
It
would
go
on
the
list,
but
it
would
still
be
allocated
towards
covet
reasons.
As
noted
2.9
under
lacks
moturary,
I
believe
4.1
under
the
bonus
for
staff
6.1,
for
both
the
fire
protection
districts.
B
C
All
righty
try
to
be
quick.
The
rfq
we're
wanting
the
permission
to
go
ahead
and
prepare
an
rfq
to
look
for
that
partner
to
help
us
organize
hold
the
meetings,
get
everybody
together
to
figure
out
what
gaps
are
in
our
systems.
If
you
will,
with
its
substance,
abuse
mental
health
workforce
training,
all
of
those
things
that
we've
been
talking
about
that
have
gaps
in
them,
transportation.
All
of
those
things
to
figure
out
what
social
service
best
foot
forward.
We
should
be
putting
out
there
and
then
to
manage
that
for
us.
A
Mr
payton
moves
to
proven
rfq.
Is
there
a
second,
mr
fairfield.
A
I
will
recognize
dr
pope,
this
time
any
discussion,
hearing
no
discussion,
all
in
favor,
say
aye.
E
A
Opposed
nay,
the
motion
carries
modification
of
the
agreement
with
alfred
ronan
ltd.
C
So
I
don't
know
how
many
people,
I've
told
a
few
people,
but
right
at
the
end
of
the
legislative
session,
our
lobbyists
al
ronan
had
a
pretty
substantial
stroke
and
he's
been
recuperating.
His
firm
has
still
been
acting
in
our
behalf
as
led
by
his
daughter,
and
you
have
her
firm's
information
in
there.
There
they
worked
with
al
obviously,
and
their
whole
team
are
still
working
on
our
legislative
agenda.
C
However,
much
of
it,
we
can
still
get
across
with
the
climate
in
springfield
aside,
we're
still
trying
and
still
knocking
on
all
those
doors,
but
it's
become
evident
to
marin,
al's
daughter
and
the
owner
of
marin
ronan
limited
that
there's
going
to
have
to
be
a
modification
that
allows
us
to
pay
her.
C
Instead
of
al
ronan,
limited
alfred
ronan
limited,
it's
still
the
same
people
doing
the
work,
but
if
he's
the
principal
on
the
one
company,
so
the
modification
would
be
allow
us
me
to
work
with
the
state's
attorney
to
add
marin
ronan
limited
onto
the
agreement,
because
we're
still
contracted
for
for
the
next
legislative
session.
So
it's
just
allowing
us
to
still
work
with
the
same
people
but
billing.
The
legal
entity
that
needs
to
be
built
that
makes
sense
so,
and
I
I
there's
any
questions
beyond
that.
P
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
and
I
hate
to
hear
that
about
mr
ronan.
Would
we
dissolve
our
agreement
with
al's
part
part
of
it
and
then
just
put
her
in
or
the
agreement's
gonna
go
together?
So
it's
still
gonna
cost
us
the
same.
C
Cost
is
the
same:
it's
just
allowing
her
company
to
be
one
of
the
people
that
were
contracted
with
because
he
may
come
back.
It's
it's
unknown
at
this
point
on
his
recuperation.
You
know,
I'd
say
you
know.
All
al
needs
is
a
telephone,
yeah
and
he's
dangerous.
You
know
so
it's
it's
it's
and
he
just
he
knows
how
to
get
it
done
so
and
believe
me,
I'm
sure,
he's
chomping
at
the
bit
to
do
that.
C
P
A
C
Well,
it
would
be
after
the
full
board
approves
it.
I
see,
so
it
would
be
just
changing
allowing
the
modification
to
be
inserted
at
that
point.
So
I
just
wanted
you
to
know
it
wasn't
just
a
you
know,
a
fly-by-night
organization,
that's
picking
it
up.
This
is
actually
the
people
that
have
been
working
for
us
just
in
a
different
format.
B
A
R
B
R
C
Have
something,
mr
chairman?
Yes,
unfortunately,
I
received
a
letter
from
mr
kinzinger
effective
the
27th.
He
has
announced
his
resignation
from
the
county
board.
He
is
pursuing
business
interest
outside
of
the
county
board.
So
I'm
sorry,
he
couldn't
stay
here,
obviously
he's
pursuing
business
interest
at
the
moment,
but
you
know
I
just
wanted.
You
know
this.
C
We
won't
have
the
opportunity
again
to
to
thank
him
in
the
room
because
effective
the
27th
he's
no
longer
a
member
of
the
board,
so
we'll
vote
on
that
at
the
next
county
board
meeting
for
all
of
the
yeah
to
accept
the
you
know
the
to
the
vacancy
and
then
to
announce.
So
I'm
going
to
be
sending
all
of
our
letters
or
someone's
going
to
be
sending
all
of
our
letters
today
out
to
the
political
parties
as
required.
E
I'd
like
to
ask:
let's
talk:
go
ahead,
yes,
I'd
like
to
ask
the
question:
have
we
decided
when
we
will
be
able
or
how
much
we
will
be
able
to
give
pembroke
for
the
storage
sewage?
U
E
U
Well,
we
have
already
requested
it,
but
we
don't
know
you
know,
we
don't
know
what
the
bed
is
going
to
be
so
the
last
bit.
C
E
C
If
I
could
miss
paul,
I
just
wanted,
I
had
it
on
a
handwritten
note
on
our
list
to
to
to
kind
of
maybe
get
a
not
to
exceed
number
of
five
75
dollars,
because
that's
about
where
it's
coming
in,
but
we
haven't
got
the
second
bid,
so
we
could
do
that
and
then
the
second
bid
actually
contains
everything
that
needs
to
be
done.
C
N
C
So
that's
the
only
reason
I
thought
it
not
to
exceed,
but
I
don't
know
what's
really
wrong
with
everything.
Yet
because
it's
not
just
the
pumps,
it's
the
the
rails
and
the
the
boards
and
everything's
just
random
it
panels
everything
yeah.
So
it's
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
be
75,
it's
kind
of
where
I'm
at
but.