►
From YouTube: House Standing Committee on State Government
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
B
C
B
Representative
hevron
president
in
the
room
representative
johnson
here
in
the
room
representative,
maddox
representative
mentor,
representative
nemes,
representative
smith,
representative
stevenson,
here
in
my
annex
room.
Thank
you,
representative,
tate
representative
tipton
representative
upchurch
representative
wheatley,
here
representative
bowling
here,
representative
bratcher,
representative
miller,.
A
Here
we
have
a
quorum
that
are
duly
constituted
and
oh,
we
are
going
to
go
in
order
members,
please
remember
all
the
rules,
silencing
your
phones
and,
if
you're
on
zoom
unmute
yourself,
if
you
wish
to
speak,
and
otherwise
we
are
going
to
move
right
on
the
agenda.
First
item
is
house
joint
resolution,
77
sponsored
by
speaker
osborne
accompanied
by
his
guest,
who
needs
no
introduction.
President
stivers,
there
is
a
committee
sub.
A
D
D
I
appreciate
president
stabbers
being
here
as
well,
because
I
do
believe
that
this
this
is
a
resolution
that
speaks
to
the
institution
of
the
legislature
and
the
legislative
authority
that
we
have
and
the
importance
of
equal
branches
of
government
and
separation
of
powers,
and
I
think
that
this
resolution
addresses
some
of
those
things.
D
As
I
think,
all
of
you
got
this
sub
last
night
house
trunk
resolution
deals
with
some
of
the
executive
orders
that
have
been
issued
by
the
governor
and
by
and
large,
this.
This
resolution
is
in
response
to
and
a
result
of,
the
fact
that
franklin
circuit
court
has
enjoined
senate
bill,
1
senate
bill,
2
and
house
bill
1.
D
that
those
decisions
will
likely
not
be
made.
While
we
are
in
session,
we
will
likely
leave
march
30th
without
knowing
the
result
of
that
and
in
recognition
of
that
there
are
some
executive
orders,
even
though
we
don't
know
what's
going
to
be
happening
with
in
some
respects,
60
90,
180
days
down
the
road.
We
do
know
that
there
are
some
of
the
executive
orders
and,
and
obviously
there's
been
some
some
criticism
of
certain
executive
orders.
D
But
some
of
the
executive
orders
are
critical
to
to
businesses
and
individuals
across
the
commonwealth,
and
it
is
important
that
we
that
we
resolve
those
and
extend
those
appropriately.
D
In
in
the
governor's
lawsuit
in
franklin
circuit
court,
which
again
in
joined
senate
bills,
1-2
and
house
bill,
1
judge
shepherd
himself
suggested,
as
he
excuse
me.
Judge
shepard
himself
suggested
that
that
we
we
get
together,
that
we
communicate
with
the
governor
the
governor,
communicate
with
us
and
try
to
find
resolution
to
to
some
of
these
executive
orders.
D
D
D
D
And
section
three
of
the
committee
sub
identifies
those
items
that
will
be
extended
for
a
a
shorter
period
of
time
for
30
days,
pending
action
on
the
administrative
regulation
process,
in
other
words,
things
that
that
would
normally
have
to
go
through
the
administrative
regulations
process.
D
If
there
are
any
specific
questions
about
specific
orders,
I
can
get
to
those
again.
I
know
you
all
had
the
sub
last
night,
so
you
probably
had
a
chance
to
go
through
that
with
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
president
stivers.
E
I
think
it
was
the
acreage
case
where
the
supreme
court
said
the
legislature
pursuant
to
statute
has
the
ability
to
declare
these
executive
orders
over.
That
is
from
the
kentucky
supreme
court
if
I
am
not
badly
mistaken
within
their
107
page
opinion.
So
to
that
extent
we
can
declare
them
over
per
the
kentucky
supreme
court.
We
can
also
extend
them.
E
So
this
is
what
this
joint
resolution
does
and
as
an
institutional
show
of
support
between
the
house
and
the
senate.
I'm
here
to
speak
to
the
resolution
with
the
speaker
to
say
we
are
here
ready,
willing
and
able
to
work
with
the
administration,
and
here
is
the
example
per
the
request
of
judge
shepherd
in
the
franklin
circuit
court.
D
Again,
mr
chairman,
this
is
not
a
necessarily
a
an
inclusive
list.
It
was.
It
were
right
where
they
were
items
that
that
we
felt
like
again
were
important,
that,
regardless
of
of
other
factors,
these
would
be
things
that
would
deal
with
professional
licensing,
with
fines
that
are
being
waived
in
certain
cases
against
businesses
that
are
shut
down.
D
Price
gouging
statutes,
the
suspension
of
any
copay
for
vaccinations
for
covid
testing.
Things
of
that
nature
are
included
in
this,
and
then
many
of
the
licensure
requirements
that
are
being
waived
are
addressed
in
section
3,
which
would
again
have
to
go
through
the
regular
administrative
regulations
process,
but
does
put
those
off
for
30
days.
F
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
and
thank
you
for
both
bringing
this
it's.
It
is
obviously
it
pretends.
It's
gonna
do
well
in
the
senate
when
the
president
of
the
senate
is
here,
and
that's
that's
really
good
and
my
question
is
really
a
process.
Question
institutional
question
related
to
what
is
the
effect
of
a
house
joint-
or,
I
am
sorry,
a
joint
resolution
versus
a
legislative
bill
and
what
can
be
done
in
those
bills.
F
For
instance,
if
we
had
a
some
a
really
big
bill
like
a
like
a
new
pension
system
bill,
could
it
be
brought
as
a
house
or
a
joint
resolution
the
same?
What?
What
is
the
effect
of
a
joint
resolution
as
opposed
to
a
legislative
bill.
D
A
joint
resolution
does
carry
the
effective
law
with
it,
but
it
does
not
codify
that,
and
so
these
would
be
things
that
are
like
temporary
orders
that
don't
necessarily
need
to
be
codified.
So,
therefore,
a
resolution,
while
carrying
the
effect
of
law,
does
not
write
them
into
statute.
A
G
G
No
quits,
when
I
was
coming
back
to
frankfort
talking
to
my
constituents,
I
was
worried.
I
was
worried
that
this
general
assembly
was
going
to
overreact.
We
were
hearing
a
lot
from
our
constituents
who
are
frustrated
and
angry
and
they
still
are,
but
we
also
understand
that
the
pandemic
is
real.
So
I
was
worried.
We
were
going
to
overreact
senate
bill
1
senate
bill
2
house
bill
1
were
not
overreactions,
they
were
responsible,
they
were
measured,
they
were
getting
us
back
and
getting
us
back
in
a
responsible
way.
This
bill.
G
This
resolution
is
in
that
vein,
and
so
I
want
to
thank
you
all
for
one
taking
it
seriously
and
getting
us
back
to
school,
getting
us
back
to
business,
getting
us
back
to
life
at
the
same
time
being
respectful
and
understanding
that
the
pandemic
is
real
and
it
has
killed
a
lot
of
our
people.
So
I
just
want
to
say
this
is
a
measured
approach
and
from
the
suburbs
of
jefferson,
county
and
south
odom.
G
Thank
you
for
standing
up
for
our
people
and
our
businesses
and
getting
them
back
to
life
into
work,
while
at
the
same
time
not
overreacting
and
just
wiping
it
all
out.
I
think
this
is
the
way
it
should
have
been
done.
I
wish
the
governor
would
have
worked
with
us
on
this,
but
this
is
good
government
at
its
finest.
So,
thank
you,
gentlemen.
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
A
H
I'm
not
a
lawyer,
and
so
I'm
just
asking
the
question:
what
happens
if
we
have
a
disaster
and
senator
you
were
here
when
eastern
kentucky
was
hit
with
tornadoes
back
then
in
2010,
I
think
or
2008
and
a
disaster
takes
place.
Is
the
governor
still
going
to
be
allowed
under
this
particular
house
joint
resolution?
If
something
happens
and
many
of
us
and
are
unable
to
get
back
to
frankfort,
to
make
decisions,
how
will
this
be
hander
handled
with?
D
D
As
a
matter
of
fact,
this
this
document
acknowledges
that
there's
an
ongoing
state
of
emergency
and-
and
I
think
that
that's
it's
important
to
to
acknowledge
that
there's
we're
still
in
an
emerging
situation.
There
are.
There
are
many
reasons
whether
it
be
federal
funding,
whether
it
be
use
of
national
guard
to
administer
testing
and
control
crowd
control
for
vaccines.
D
Those
bills
specifically
spoke
with
how
the
governor
must
act,
must
engage
the
legislature
in
that
process
and
I
think
very
appropriately
so
gave
the
the
governor
30
days
before
he
had
to
to
bring
us
back
in
to
to
act
on
that
that
state
of
emergency,
just
as
we
are
doing
here
this
this,
since
we
are
in
session,
we
have
the
ability
to
to
have
that
input.
D
We
have
the
ability
to
to
affect
policy
to
affect
our
constituents
and
effectively
represent
those
constituents
in
a
very
well-reasoned
thought
out
manner,
acknowledging
that
this
is
a
a
changing
environment
and-
and
that
is
what
we're
doing
in
in
this.
This
particular
bill
is
showing
exactly
how
it
would
work
in
in
any
other
situation,
and
we
may
take
up
something
before
we
leave
here.
Quite
frankly,
that
will
deal
with
the
ongoing
emergencies
in
east
kentucky
with
the
flooding
and
ice
storms.
D
E
We
speak
often
in
terms
that
we
understand
as
legislators,
but
a
for
instance,
practical
application
driver's
licenses.
You
did
not
have
to
get
a
renewal
because
of
an
executive
order.
We
are
extending
that
executive
order.
I
think
in
one
of
these
continuing
educations,
you
know
they
were
suspended
during
this
pandemic.
This
is
a
a
concrete
example
that
we're
extending
the
orders,
we're
not
stopping
orders
we're
extending
them,
because
we
see
the
need
and
the
rationale
for
those
orders
being
in
place
and
continuing.
I
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
and
thank
you
both
gentlemen
for
your
work
on
this.
It's
very
serious
business
very
important.
I
just
had
a
very
brief
question
on
page
four
of
the
sub
under
letter
b,
where
it
requires
state
agencies
on
point
two
to
provide
and
conduct
services
by
mail,
internet
phone
and
or
video
conferencing.
D
No,
actually,
if
you,
if
you
read
the
very
first
line
of
that
representative
medics,
it
it
encourages,
it
does
not
require
that
they
not
do
in
person
encourages
uses
of
alternative
technologies,
virtual
technologies
when
possible,
but
certainly
does
not
it.
It
eliminates
the
ban
on
in-person
meetings.
Thank.
D
That's
particularly
was
brought
to
light
by
speaker
pro
tim
mead
on
the
the
child
care
child
services
portion
of
the
executive
orders.
J
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
and
just
representative
nemas,
said
everything
I
was
going
to
say
in
almost
as
well
as
I
would
have
said
it.
So
I
might
not
say
too
much,
but.
K
J
I
would
like
to
answer
the
question
the
gentleman
from
woodford
or
excuse
me
from
franklin:
it's
not
just
30
days
if,
if
the
governor,
if
the
governor
does
an
emergency
action
for
a
flood
which
would
be
acceptable,
obviously
anybody
in
this
room,
if
that
more
than
30
days
is
needed,
he
doesn't
have
to
call
us
back
if
the
local
county
government
approves
it
and
that's
an
important
distinction
to
understand
that
the
local
county
of
government
can
extend
that
30
days
if
they
need
to
for
their
for
their
own
needs.
J
So
we
can't
forget
that
it's
time
to
get
kentucky
back
to
work,
it's
time
for
us
to
to
do
what
other
states
have
already
started
doing,
and
so
I
do
appreciate
this
bill
and
or
this
resolution
and
look
forward
to
supporting
it.
L
M
B
H
I'm
I'm
voting
no,
and
I
want
to
explain
my
vote
and
I
understand.
H
Yes,
I
understand
what
the
two
leaders
are
trying
to
do,
but
I'm
I'm
voting,
though,
because
throughout
this
whole
session
we've
been
trying
to
erode
the
responsibilities
of
the
executive
branch
of
government
and
I'm
concerned
about
that
not
just
for
this
governor,
but
for
the
next
governor
and
the
governors
beyond.
So
I'm
going
to
know,
thank
you.
C
M
C
C
G
N
30
seconds
I
appreciate
senator
and
president
stivers
and,
and
the
speaker
seemed
like
the
first
week
we
took
on
a
big
task
on
getting
some
things
out
to
help
our
people
back
home.
I
go
back
home
and
explain
what
all
we've
done
for
them.
C
F
I'll
briefly,
explain:
I
am
going
to
vote.
No,
I
still
feel
like
we're
in
the
throes.
You
know
coming
from
working
in
emergencies,
it's
been
a
year
for
a
lot
of
this
and
it
just
feels
like
we're
just
a
little
bit
too
close.
I
appreciate
a
lot
of
the
wording
in
here.
I
appreciate
this
short
section
in
section
five
that
says
that
the
governor
can
still
do
things
if
substantially
similar
facts
have
changed.
So
that's
that
gives
them
the
opportunity
to
do
that.
A
O
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
members
of
the
committee,
as
you've
got
the
bill
before
you.
O
A
O
M
K
H
No,
I
looked
at
this
initially
representative
made
and
I
thought
it
was
going
to
vote
no
on
it.
I'm
not
going
to
vote
on
it
today,
but
as
I
look
at
this
and
go
over
it,
it
has
some
factors
in
here
that
I
I
have
to
say
I
agree
with,
but
I'm
going
to
pass
on
on
it.
B
C
C
C
C
C
A
A
I
Thank
you,
mr
chairman
house,
bill
217
is
a
cleanup
of
senate
bill
one
and
includes
legit
our
legislative
response
to
each
of
the
unaddressed
points
from
the
supreme
court's
decision
in
beshear
versus
zakri.
It
modifies
the
statement
of
legislative
intent
to
reflect
that
government
power
in
an
emergency.
Is
a
delegation
of
legislative
authority
not
inherent
to
the
executive
branch.
A
We
have
any
questions
if
there
are
questions
well,
representative,
nemus,.
I
I
Thank
you.
It
modifies
krs
to
11.025
to
limit
the
cabinet
for
health
and
family
services,
power
to
supervise
local
health
departments
and
do
all
other
things
reasonably
necessary
to
protect
and
improve
the
health
of
the
people.
It
modifies
krs
211.180
to
limit
the
power
of
the
cabinet
for
health
and
family
services
to
act
other
than
through
properly
promulgated
regulations,
and
not
just
administrative
fiats.
I
Each
of
the
points
was
specifically
addressed
by
the
court
to
justify
unlimited
emergency
power
in
the
executive
branch
in
situations
the
executive
unilaterally
determines
to
be
an
emergency.
Without
these
changes,
the
court
will
be
able
to
point
to
its
previous
decision
and
the
legislature's
inaction
as
evidence
of
legislative
intent
that
the
governor's
executive
or
powers
remain
expansive.
A
Very
good,
thank
you
for
the
complete
answer.
Representative
nemes.
Is
that
sufficient
for
your
needs?
Thank
you.
We
have
representative
wheatley,
has
a
question.
F
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
and
I
think
these
are
pretty
simple.
Straightforward
page
one
has
it's
section:
one
has
a
large
strike
out
of
all
the
potential
emergencies
you
know
not
limited
to.
Is
there
some
reason
we
we
struck
all
of
those.
F
I
Well,
I
think
that
it's
important
to
bear
in
mind
that
not
only
would
we
have
said
that
originally
in
1998,
whenever
the
statute
was
created,
that
we
couldn't
have
necessarily
foreseen
an
example
or
you
know,
a
year-long
state
of
emergency,
and
perhaps
it
was
more
so
intended
for
more
like
ice
storms
and
floods,
tornadoes
things
of
that
nature,
but
also
in
the
future.
We
have
no
way
of
being
able
to
forecast
what
could
possibly
constitute
a
state
of
emergency.
F
F
Else
is
in
the
queue
right
now,
and
this
is
a
specific
question
to
a
line
on
page
five
and
section
three
in
the
middle,
where
it
does
affect
the
health
and
family
services,
and
we
strike
and
I'll
read.
I
We
have
an
administrative
regulation
process
that
can
and
should
be
relied
upon
to
promulgate
regulations
pertaining
to
public
health,
and
I
think
that
that
is
perfectly
sufficient
to
meet
our
public
health
needs
and
that's
why
that
language
here
was
struck,
because
we
don't
want
to
go
above
and
beyond
beyond
that
and
make
sure
that
we
don't
have
that
supervisory
role
in
the
administrative
regulation
process.
A
Thank
you
see
seeing
no
other
questions,
madam
secretary,
please
call
the
roll.
M
M
H
H
My
vote,
I'm
voting
no,
and
I
think
what
the
cabinet
has
done
over
the
period
of
time
that
we've
been
in
this
pandemic
shows
that
they
need
to
have
those
things
in
place
so
that
they
can
address
that,
and
all
you
have
to
do
is
look
at
the
numbers
here
in
kentucky
versus
our
neighbors
to
the
north
and
neighbors
to
the
south
because
of
what
they
have
done
during
this
yearly
corona
virus.
H
C
C
G
Briefly,
explain
in
a
in
a
time
when
we
have
a
pandemic,
it's
important.
It's
it's
extra,
important
that
the
law
is
followed.
All
this
bill
does.
Is
it
says
that
the
dele,
the
powers
that
have
been
delegated
by
the
legislature
shall
be
followed
and
the
reason
that
we're
taking
out
the
shall
do
all
other
things
reasonably
necessary
so
forth,
and
so
on
is
because
that
is,
as
they
say
in
some
places,
broad
as
a
boulevard.
G
It
can
be
anything
that
anybody
wants
it
to
be,
and
what
we're
saying
is
the
law
that
exists
you
have
to
follow
if
they
want
more
call
us
in
the
special
session.
That's
all
it
says
all
the
regulations,
all
the
statutes
that
give
them
authority.
None
of
those
have
been
changed.
It
just
makes
sure
that
the
laws
are
being
followed.
I
think
this
is
a
good
bill,
it's
necessary
to
follow
the
law
at
all
times,
including
during
the
pandemic.
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Yes,.
C
C
N
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I
appreciate
the
bills
that's
been
before
us
today.
I
think
this
goes
along
with
some
of
the
things
we've
tried
to
accomplish.
As
a
legislature.
You
know,
we've
heard
about
you,
know:
government
keeping
us
safe
and
that
just
flies
in
in
the
face.
I
think
of
of
my
personal
responsibility
government
did
not
keep
me
safe
during
this
pandemic.
N
N
F
A
A
The
final
matter
to
come
before
the
committee
today
is
senate
bill
169
sponsored
by
senator
mcdaniel,
and
he
is
accompanied
by
a
guest
needs
known
introduction
for
the
house
representative
blanton.
So
welcome,
gentlemen,
mr
chairman
I'll
move
the
committee
sub.
We
have
a
motion
and
a
second
on
sub.
All
in
favor,
please
signify
saying
aye
aye
oppose
like
sign
sub
is
before
us.
Thank
you.
L
Please
proceed.
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
and
members
of
the
committee
for
hearing
this
bill
today.
We
remiss
to
start
out
without
saying
thank
you
first
and
foremost
to
representative
blanton,
who
brought
this
issue
forward
last
year.
Also
to
yourself,
mr
chairman,
for
your
work
on
this
representative
duplicity
has
put
in
yeoman's
effort
as
well
as,
as
we
know,
bills
that
clear
the
senate
by
and
large
are
perfect,
but
sometimes
there's
some
adjustments.
L
No,
they
are
all
a
work
in
progress,
and
we
appreciate
everyone's
diligence
effort
to
include
that
of
the
fraternal
order
of
police
in
the
kentucky
league
of
cities,
as
we've
advanced
this
cause.
This
is
one
of
those
bills
that
the.
Why
is
far
more
important
than
the?
What
I'm
briefly
going
to
touch
on
the
what
what
this
bill
does
is.
L
It
is
extended
to
all
member
actually
every
anyone
who's
currently
qualified
as
permanent
and
total,
which
there
have
been
a
total
of
12
people
in
the
last
10
years
to
achieve
that
designation
moving
forward,
it
will
be
anyone
in
a
hazardous
system
or
anyone
in
a
non-hazardous
system
whose
job
duties
could
reasonably
be
defined
by
the
retirement
system.
As
meeting
the
definition
of
hazardous
in
the
kentucky
retirement
system
kentucky
revised
statutes-
forgive
me
also.
It
includes
reporting
and
auditing
requirements
agreed
upon
by
all
parties
with
that.
A
Good
representative
blanton
did
you
want
to
speak
or
have
to
have
your
guests.
P
Hi,
I'm
kathy
heich,
I'm
wife
of
detective
darryl
heich.
First,
I
want
to
thank
you
guys
for
giving
me
the
opportunity
to
talk.
I
want
to
thank
representative
blandon
and
senator
mcdaniel.
Thank
you
so
much
for
sponsoring
this
bill
and
all
those
who
are
co-sponsoring.
Yes,.
A
C
P
This
year
will
be
18
years
since
I
met
my
husband
at
the
time
he
was
a
u.s
soldier.
He
had
served
in
the
gulf
war,
he
had
a
great
career
and
was
very
proud
and
very
excited
to
be
a
soldier
a
few
years
after
that
he
became
a
police
officer
in
louisville,
equally
loved
that
job
he
began
on
the
beat
he
switched
to
the
viper
unit
after
a
few
years,
which
fought
the
most
violent
of
criminals,
and
then
he
moved
to
the
narcotics
office,
which
is
where
he
was
when
he
got
shot.
P
P
P
The
three
of
us
headed
to
the
hospital
hoping
to
get
there.
When
I
got
there,
it
was
just
surrounded
by
police
officers.
Two
met
me
at
the
door
and
took
me
directly
to
his
room,
where
I
saw
the
most
horrendous
of
sights.
No
spouse
should
ever
see
their
spouse.
That
looked
like
that.
P
P
P
He
has
shrapnel
on
his
head,
so
he
cannot
have
an
mri
which
may
help
with
other
treatments,
but
the
doctors
have
all
done
the
best
they
could
they've,
given
them
therapies,
they've,
given
them
medications
they've,
given
any
treatment
that
they
possibly
can
even
doing
a
jaw
surgery
last
summer,
where
they
cut
his
jaw
completely
off
to
try
to
get
it
to
grow
back
comfortably.
To
give
him
a
little
bit
less
pain
in
his
head.
He
had
his
wire
his
mouth
wired
shut
for
two
months.
P
P
Now
this
is
a
man
who
worked
overtime,
who
worked
off
duty,
who
was
security
at
churchill,
downs
in
security
at
another
country
club?
He
worked
many
many
extra
hours
to
not
only
provide
for
our
family
but
to
make
sure
that
we
wanted
for
nothing,
and
now
he
was
faced
with
25
of
his
base
pay
for
almost
given
his
life.
P
P
It
was
crushing
he
was
told
by
a
retirement
system
that
he
was
worth
more
dead
than
alive
after
taking
out
insurance
and
any
other
fees.
He
would
make
10
176
dollars
a
year
for
our
family
or
he
could
go
back
to
a
police
department
if
he
was
fully
recovered,
but
they
had
already
told
him.
He
could
not
come
back
unless
he
had
no
restrictions.
P
That's
really
not
a
good
choice
to
be
faced
with
this
bill
is
extremely
important
to
us,
but
it
is
also
extremely
important
to
all
first
responders
police
officers,
firefighters,
ems,
because
they
all
go
out
there
every
day
in
a
dangerous
world
all
of
them.
It's
also
important
for
future
firefighters,
ems
and
police
officers.
Who
is
going
to
want
to
do
those
jobs,
knowing
that
if
you
are
injured
and
permanently
and
totally
disabled,
your
family
is
not
going
to
be
taken
care
of.
P
K
I
will
hold
my
comments
to
the
floor
since
we
have
a
motion
a
second
I'm
not
going
to
believe
it.
P
K
I'm
the
fourth
wheel
over
here
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
to
everybody.
My
name
is
ryan
straw,
government
affairs
director
for
the
fop
we've
enjoyed
all
the
conversations.
Thank
you
for
all
the
support
and
we
also
want
to
thank
several
different
organizations
that
we
worked
with
to
get
to
this
point.
So
thank
you.
F
F
I'm
a
retired
firefighter
myself
and
I
have
represented
one
of
the
12
people
who
have
been
granted
this.
This
a
benefit
over
the
10-year
period,
only
12
people
in
the
last
10
years,
and
the
difference
is-
and
I
won't
get
into
this
too
much
because
of
the
tremendous
sacrifice
that
we
know
all
of
our
first
responders
make.
F
But
he
has
no
visible
thing.
That's
happened
to
him.
He
has
had
a
medical
incident
and
to
protect
his
privacy.
He
has
many
members
within
the
his
the
fire
service
who
were
wondering.
Is
he
really
something
wrong
with
him
and
that's
the
scope
or
that's
the
the
the
difference
between
the
people
who
are
permanently
disabled
and
can
no
longer
perform
their
job?
They're,
not
permitted
medically
to
return
to
work
and
sometimes
must
live
through
some
of
the
real
financial
hardships.
F
So
thank
you
for
bringing
this
thank
you
to
the
rep
representatives
and
senator.
I
appreciate
it.
There
are
some
questions
I
might
have
related
to
some
of
the
technical
things
how
this
thing
might
work,
because
I
want
to
inform
the
firefighters
who
I
represent.
I
still
represent
all
the
firefighters
in
the
state
of
kentucky
the
professional
firefighters.
So
thank
you
for
bringing
this.
C
I
I
sort
of
just
want
to
echo
his
representative
wheatley's
comments.
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
and
if
I
could
vote
for
100,
I
would
if
I
could
vote
for
150.
I
would
again
just
thank
you.
M
M
Your
husband's
name
comes
up
many
times
over
the
over
the
last
few.
I
guess
a
year
and
it
they
many.
You
have
many
fans
he
does
at
ford.
They
would
come
up
and
say
do
something
for
daryl
and
I'm
glad
that
we're
taking
this
first
step.
I
know
that
this
summer
has
been
a
terrible
time
for
the
for
the
policemen
in
louisville.
I
live
in
jefferson
county
and
I'm
glad
that
we
can
do
something
positive
for
the
police
and
for
you.
So
I
vote
yes.
Thank
you.
A
J
Briefly,
explaining
my
vote
please.
First
of
all,
I
wish
your
husband
was
here
for
me
to
thank
him,
but
please
do-
and
I
want
to
thank
you
also
for
standing
by
his
side.
J
H
H
The
only
thing
that
I'm
concerned
about
and-
and
I
was
not
able
to
ask
the
question-
was
that
it
started
off
senator
with
non-hazardous
and
hazardous,
but
the
committee
sub
took
the
non-hazardous
out
and
I
don't
know
if
that's
if
I'm
able
to
ask
that
question,
but
I'm
thinking
out
loud
in
terms
and
once
the
roll
call
is
made.
If
you
can
explain
that
I'd
appreciate
that.
A
K
Sure
I
don't
mind
at
all
representative,
graham
the
the
the
purpose
in
that
was
to
narrow
down
the
focus
specifically
to
our
first
responders
as
to
who
this
was
originally
thought
of
and
designed
for,
but
in
kentucky
not
all
first
responders
their
agencies
or
their
governments
participate
in
hazardous
duty.
K
Some
of
them
participated
non-has,
so
the
reason
non
has
was
originally
included
was
to
get
those
first
responders,
and
so
we
were
able
to
come
up
with
language
specifically
dealing
with
the
first
responders
and
kindly
carving
them
out
and
making
sure
that
they
got
what
the
people
in
hazardous
got
and
also
the
the
cost
would
have
been
much
greater
if
we
just
left
it
in
general
of
of
non-has
as
well.
C
Yes
quickly
explain
my
vote.
I
want
to
echo
the
comments
of
my
colleagues.
Thank
you
for
being
brave
to
come
and
advocate.
I
greatly
appreciate
it.
I
know
that
we
do
too
here
in
the
general
assembly
and
what
an
honor
and
commitment
to
your
husband
and
please
thank
him
for
his
service
and,
as
we
all
know
here
in
this
room,
you
more
than
others.
B
C
C
Briefly,
explain
my
yes,
please
thank
you
for
sharing
your
family's
story
and
I'm
so
terribly
sorry
and
thank
you
to
senator
mcdaniel
representative
blanton
for
bringing
this
and
to
my
colleague,
representative
wheatley,
who
you
know
represents
first
responders
as
well.
So
thank
you.
Yes,.
C
My
vote-
please
I,
after
serving
in
the
military
policemen
first
responders
and
it's
the
whole
family
that
gives
their
all
so
that
this
country
thrives.
This
community
thrives
and
the
difference
that
I
like
to
point
out
is
most
of
the
time
in
the
military.
I
knew
when
I
was
going
into
battle.
C
C
A
Resounding
yes
matter
passes
with
favorable
expression.
Same
two
shall
pass
on
the
floor.
Thank
you
so
much
all
for
bringing
this
bill
and
being
here
and
and
give
our
best
wishes
to
your
husband
man.
Thank.
A
No,
no
other
matters
to
come
before
the
body.
We
are.