►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
afternoon
we'll
go
ahead
and
get
started
with
the
meeting.
Welcome
to
the
health
and
family
services
meeting.
This
is
our
third
meeting
and
we
have
four
important
bills.
We
have
some
important
guests
with
us
today,
so
we're
going
to
go
ahead
and
get
started
secretary.
If
you
could,
please
take
the
role.
B
A
Okay,
we
have
a
quorum
established
and
are
ready
to
do
business.
I'd
like
to
take
a
moment
just
to
thank
our
members,
our
our
friends
from
caico
for
for
being
here
today
we
have
boone
county
judge,
executive,
gary
moore
here
with
us
he's
the
current
president
of
naco
pass
immediate
past
president
of
the
national
association
of
counties.
So
welcome-
and
I
don't
know
if
mayor
joe
meyer
is
in
the
room
yet,
but
just
wanted
to
say
hello
and
and
welcome
to
everyone.
A
Do
we
have
any
other
gu
any
members
who'd
like
to
introduce
any
guests?
Okay,
all
right!
Well,
we
will
go
ahead
and
get
started.
The
first
piece
of
legislation
on
the
agenda
is
senate
bill
100.,
so
senator
adams.
If
you
would
like
to
approach
the
table
and-
and
I
don't
know
if
you
are
joined
by
any
guests-
I
know
that
we
have
two
folks,
two
people
online
and
I'll
go
ahead,
and
let
you
introduce
yourself
for
the
record
and
please
proceed.
A
G
So
this
legislation
is
modeled
after
the
essential
caregiver
provision
that
was
included
in
the
21
regular
session
house
bill
one,
and
then
we
also
put
it
in
the
21
special
sessions
senate
bill,
2.,
and
so
the
essential
caregiver
provisions
included
in
sb2
are
set
to
expire
on
january
31st.
Which
is
why
I'm
so
grateful
for
you
all,
including
it.
We.
A
We
do
have
a
committee
sub,
yes
thank
you,
and
this
will
be
the
committee
sub
2,
all
in
favor
of
adopting
the
committee
sub.
Oh
okay,
hang
on
just
a
second.
Do
we
have
a
question
represent
marzian.
H
G
It
thank
you
and-
and
I
also
want
to
say
the
reason
for
the
sub
is
you
know
we
modeled
it
on
what
we
had.
We
had
already
passed
and
we
didn't
think
that
there
would
be
a
lot
of
discussion
that
it
would
be
fine
moving
through
well
after
it
moved
through
the
senate.
G
We
did
have
some
people
reach
out
and
say,
there's
a
few
things
that
we
would
like
you
to
tweak,
one
of
which
was
the
way
that
our
our
senate
bill
read
is
that
it
was
only
one
person
that
was
allowed
to
be
able
to
visit,
and
sometimes
you
know,
let's
say
me
and
my
sisters.
We
would
all
like
to
go
visit,
my
mom
or
dad
in
the
facility.
G
So
this
what
the
sub
does
to
representative
marzian's
inquiry
is,
if
you
go
through
section,
3a
is
different
than
the
senate
version,
so
section
3a
clarifies
that
at
least
one
essential,
personal
care
visitor
can
visit
the
residence.
This
change
addresses
concerns
that
more
than
one
caregiver
could
be
prohibited
from
visiting
a
resident.
This
change
is
necessary
to
allow
more
than
one
caregiver
to
visit
their
loved
ones.
We
believe
that
there
that
there
is
a
safe
way
for
siblings
to
be
able
to
visit
a
parent
together
within
a
facility.
G
This
change
is
necessary
to
address
the
needs
of
those
who
are
immobile
and
they
might
have
to
meet
in
their
room
rather
than
in
a
designated
spot
within
the
facility,
and
then
the
other
change
is
3g
and
that
permits
an
assisted
living
community,
long-term
care
facility
or
mental
health
hospital
to
limit
the
number
of
essential
personal
care
visitors
at
any
one
time.
So
this
changes
in
response
to
the
feedback
that
we
receive
from
the
cabinet
for
health
and
family
services.
G
So
those
are
the
big
changes,
but
you
know,
as
I
said
it's
you
know,
I'm
sure
we've
all
had
stories
from
our
constituents
over
the
course
of
the
pandemic,
where
they
say
I
can't
go
visit,
my
loved
one,
and
so
this
will
put
in
statute
and
codify
their
ability
to
visit
their
loved
one
in
any
of
these
facilities.
A
Okay,
so
just
to
be
clear,
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
adopted
the
committee
sub.
We
were
kind
of
in
process,
so
I
are
there
any
further
questions
or
any
further
discussion.
Okay,
so
all
in
favor
of
adopting
the
committee
sub
to
please
say:
aye
aye.
Are
there
any
opposed?
Okay?
Thank
you
now.
Please
proceed.
A
A
Yes,
and
so
that's
that's
the
other
change
that
I
wanted
to
just
talk
about,
and
this
is
permissive
language.
So
this
means
that
this
is
an
option
for
facilities
to
adopt
any
time,
and
the
gist
of
this
is
that
there
will
never
be
zero
visitors
allowed
correct
so
that
that's
the
the
gist.
We
do
have
two
guests
online
and
I
would
like
to
just
give
them
each
a
couple
of
minutes.
A
If
we,
if
you
don't
mind
since
they've,
taken
the
time
to
be
here
to
just
explain
what
their
thoughts
about
this
provision
so
first
online
we
have
sherry
culp
with
the
who
is
the
ombudsman
with
the
ombudsman's
office
for
long-term
care,
and
I
probably
got
that
wrong.
But
please
introduce
yourself
for
the
record.
I
Thank
you
chairman.
My
name
is
sherry
cole,
but
I
am
the
state
long-term
care
ombudsman.
In
kentucky,
I
became
an
ombudsman
as
a
volunteer
in
1996
and
currently
right
now,
I'm
the
state
long-term
care
ombudsman,
which
is
housed
as
a
nursing,
home
ombudsman
agency
of
the
bluegrass.
I
Approximately
60
percent
of
residents
don't
have
visitors
of
the
40
percent
that
do
there's
a
small
percentage
of
them
who
have
visitors
that
you
know
come
in
they're,
typically
very
close,
family
members
or
friends,
and
they
give
care
and
they
report.
You
know
some
of
them,
do
that
because
of
preferences
and
providing
direct
care
helps
them
have
a
strong
connection
with
the
with
the
residents.
I
I
While
we
advocate
that
long-term
care
facilities
provide
all
the
care
and
services
that
residents
are
entitled
to,
we
hope
that
we
never
again
see
all
visitors
banned
from
visiting
facilities
in
long-term
care
residents
in
long-term
care
facilities,
because
we're
concerned
about
an
unnecessary
decline,
and
we
are
so
grateful
for
senator
adams
for
recognizing
these
devastating
effects
of
visitation
bans
and
these
changes
in
the
substitution.
I
I
We
know
that
residents
need
to
be
able
to
have
these
essential
visitors
at
their
bedside
so
that
they
have
privacy
and
dignity
when
the
caregiving
tasks
are
being
done,
and
you
know
we
know,
if
there's
anything
that
can
be
done
to
help
clarify
that
these
visitors
could
have
access.
You
know,
day
or
night,
because
sometimes
family
members
and
friends
who
come
in
to
provide
care,
they're
doing
care,
that's
needed
at
different
times
of
the
day
or
night.
I
But
I
just
thank
you
so
much
for
taking
steps
on
this
and
allowing
me
to
share
with
you
today.
Thank
you.
A
G
A
Yes,
I'd
be
delighted
to
give
you
a
couple
of
minutes.
Just
please
introduce
yourself
for
the
record.
Thank
you
great.
J
Thank
you.
Thank
you
so
much
for
allowing
me
to
speak
today,
chairman
moser,
my
name
is
marla
carter.
I
live
in
owensboro
and
my
mother-in-law
linda,
resides
in
a
nursing
home
just
a
few
miles
away
from
my
home.
My
husband
and
I
are
her
co-guardians
and
the
lockdowns
and
isolation
have
definitely
had
a
very
detrimental
effect
on
linda
in
the
summer
and
fall
of
2020,
and
we
were
doing
weekly
outdoor
visits.
J
15
minutes
six
feet
apart
supervised,
and
these
were
very
difficult
for
linda
because
she
did
not
understand
why
we
couldn't
come
inside
or
why
we
couldn't
hug
her
and
no
matter
how
many
times
we
told
her
and
she
she
really
thought
that
we
were
abandoning
her.
Then
in
the
fall
of
2020.
J
So
when
we
last
saw
her
in
november
of
2020,
she
was
talking
playing
jeopardy,
painting,
craft
projects
and
and
then
when
we
saw
her
in
january
2021
just
two
months
later,
she
was
completely
non-verbal,
barely
alert
or
aware
of
her
surroundings,
and
yet
when
we
would
call
to
speak
to
the
staff
and
inquire
about
her
condition,
they
told
us
she
was
fine
and
she
obviously
was
not-
and
I
emailed
each
of
you
on
pictures
of
linda.
So
you
could
see
the
changes
in
her
and
family
members
are
direct
care
partners.
J
J
As
another
family
member
said
to
me,
a
blind
person
would
not
be
denied
her
seeing
eye
dog
a
hard
of
hearing
person,
his
hearing
aid,
an
unstable
person,
his
cane
a
non-ambulatory
person.
His
wheelchair
family
members
are
like
a
cognitive
wheelchair
for
patients
who
have
lost
part
of
their
mind,
they're
essential
for
our
loved
ones,
who
have
failing
cognitive
ability.
We
are
their
compass,
they
know
where
they
are
in
the
world
because
of
us.
J
We
need
essential,
caregiver
legislation,
because
we
are
not
just
visitors.
We
are
active
care
partners
in
the
care
of
our
loved
ones.
Nursing
home
caregivers
are
doing
the
best
they
can,
but
even
before
the
pandemic,
there
was
a
chronic
staffing
problem
in
the
industry.
Family
members
and
friends
often
operate
as
staff
extenders.
We
brush
teeth.
Comb,
hair
trim,
nails,
look
for
missing,
glasses,
hearing
aids,
tv,
remotes
and
laundry
items.
J
J
I
am
so
grateful
to
the
legislature
for
addressing
this
issue,
and
it
sounds
like
some
of
the
concerns
that
I
had
with
the
bill
have
already
been
addressed.
I'm
anxious
to
read
over
those
and
to
really
protect
the
right
of
residents
to
their
essential
caregivers
and
we've
learned
that
the
bills
must
be
quite
specific,
and
so
I
have
emailed
each
of
you
my
concerns,
and
so,
for
the
sake
of
time,
I'm
not
going
to
go
into
those
because
you
I've
already
seen
them
and
seem
to
have
addressed
them.
A
Thank
you
so
much
for
being
here.
Thank
you
so
much
for
telling
us
the
story
of
why
this
is
so
critical.
I
I
know
that
during
the
pandemic,
we've
all
been
touched.
Our
loved
ones
have
been
touched
by
this
very
much
and
the
the
isolation
that
that
our
loved
ones
endured
during
the
pandemic.
We
all
wish
that
this
had
been
in
place
prior
to
this.
A
We
worked
on
this
on
in
house
bill
1
in
2021,
and
then
again
we
extended
it
in
in
the
special
session
in
house
bill
two,
and
I
just
wish
that
this
had
been
in
place
when
my
dad
was
in
his
independent
living
community
and-
and
we
were
completely
shut
off
for
him
from
him
in
his
last
year
of
life,
and
I
just
think
that
you
know
had
we
had
access.
Maybe
we
would
have
gotten
him
known
that
he
needed
the
care
that
he
needed
a
little
sooner.
A
So
yesterday
was
a
year
since
he
passed,
so
this
is
very
important
to
me.
Thank
you
center
ad
senator
adams.
I
I
appreciate
this.
A
C
I
also
in
my
family
was
affected
by
this.
My
cousin
went
in
the
hospital
on
friday
night.
They
told
us
we
couldn't
see
until
the
next
day
and
he
died
that
night.
So
thank
you
for
bringing
us
forward
and
I
vote
yes.
D
D
E
B
A
F
F
My
wife
was
the
executive
director
of
an
assisted
living
facility
after
a
number
of
years,
being
the
director
of
nursing
in
a
nursing
home,
but
the
emotional
toll
on
her
was
devastating
because
she
had
to
tell
residents
and
their
families
all
the
time
you
can't
see
each
other,
and
so
she
would
come
home
every
day
from
work,
and
it
was
obvious
the
toll
that
it
was
taking
on
her.
You
know
she
told
me
all
the
time
she
said.
F
D
H
A
A
A
We
have
a
motion
in
a
second
to
adopt
the
committee
sub
all
in
favor,
please
say
aye
any
opposed
all
right.
If
you
could
please
proceed
in
describing
the
committee
sub.
Thank
you.
C
My
name
is
representative
bentley
district
98
of
the
great
commonwealth
state
of
kentucky
to
my
left.
This
gentleman
here
he
works
for
the
attorney
general.
His
name
is
blake
christopher
he's,
deputy
general
counsel
with
the
office
of
the
attorney
general
and
this
gentleman
here
I'm
going
to
let
him
introduce
himself,
because
everybody
knows
him
already.
K
Thank
you,
I'm
gary
moore,
I'm
the
boom
camera.
K
Yes,
I'm
gary
moore,
I
am
the
judge
executive
in
boone,
county
and
past
president
of
kentucky
association,
counties
and
past
president
of
the
national
association
of
counties.
C
House
bill
92
was
brought
about
really
in
2021
when
the
general
assembly
passed
without
a
single,
nay
vote.
What
was
known
as
hb
427
hb
427
created
a
plan
for
administering
the
settlement.
Proceeds
from
the
litigation
against
four
manufacturers
and
distributors
of
opioids
house
bill
427
was
signed.
The
law
can
be
found
in
krs,
1,
5.291
and
105.293.
C
C
Importantly,
we've
spoken
to
our
local
partners
at
caico
and
klc
and
their
support
of
this
change.
The
second
change
states
that
the
plan
created
by
house
bill
427
applies.
If
the
defendants
declare
bankruptcy,
we
want
to
be
clear
that
any
funds
from
a
bankruptcy
proceeding
will
be
treated
the
same
as
those
from
a
typical
settlement.
C
C
I
believe,
representatives
from
these
groups,
keiko
klc
league
of
cities
and
others-
are
in
the
room
today,
and
they
have
assured
me
that
they
agree
to
the
language.
In
this
change
under
house
bill,
427
50
of
settlement
proceeds
go
to
the
state,
opioid
abatement
fund
and
50
go
to
the
local
governments.
C
The
local
government's
share
is
to
be
distributed
accordingly
to
an
agreement
reached
by
them.
Local
government
leaders
requested
that
51
percent
of
the
litigating
local
governments
be
required
to
approve
of
any
agreement.
This
third
and
final
change
reflects
that
request,
and
I'm
now
happy
to
take
your
questions
or
these
other
two
gentlemen,
either
would
take
questions.
A
L
Thank
you,
representative
bentley.
I
know
this
has
been
a
very
gigantic
undertaking
working
with
all
these
groups.
I
do
have
a
question
about
the
distribution
metrics,
which
is
in
section
four
of
the
of
the
remaining
fifty
percent
of
the
fund,
which
would
go
to
the
counties
how
how
is
that
going
to
be
distributed?
Ultimately,
that
may
be
a
technical
question,
but
I'm
interested
in
is
that
by
population
or
body.
K
Thank
you
for
your
question.
I
want
to
thank
the
ag's
office
and
dr
bentley
representative
bentley.
There's
no
change
in
that
part
of
the
distribution
in
this
particular
committee
sub.
What
was
in
the
original
bill
is
still
the
same.
To
answer
your
question
more
specifically,
it's
not
population.
It's
based
on
number
of
pills
distributed.
It's
a
number
of
overdoses.
K
It's
really
to
drill
down
to
those
impacted
cities
and
counties
those
communities
and
get
the
funds
where
the
impacts
have
been
have
happened.
We
felt
like
population
wasn't
a
fair
formula
and
I'm
the
fourth
largest
county,
so
population
would
have
benefited
me,
but
when
we
think
about
the
commonwealth
and
where
these
funds
need
to
go,
it's
through
those
formulas
by
the
way,
that's
the
same
formula
that
sends
the
money
to
kentucky
from
the
national
settlement.
So
the
state
distributions
use
the
same
formula.
That's
in
the
bill
you
passed
last
year.
L
K
K
A
A
Elliott
for
that
question
I
think
it's
it's
helpful
to
to
clarify
those
two
different,
two
very
different
parts
of
this
bill.
Do
we
have
any
other
questions
representative.
H
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
So
now
he's
thought
made
me
think
of
another
question
representative
elliot.
So
you
said
the
money
is
just
distributed.
Is
there
an
application
process
or
how
does
that
work
with
the
different
county,
governments
or
cities
or.
M
So
to
clarify,
I
they're
they're,
two
different
two
different
sort
of
funds
that
will
will
come
as
a
result
of
house
bill
427
from
last
session.
The
first
fund
is
the
state
opioid
abatement
fund
that
the
commonwealth
itself
will
run,
and
I
would
imagine
that
there
would
be
some
sort
of
process
like
you're
discussing
there
for
those
funds
to
be
distributed.
M
The
particular
change
that
mr
moore
was
referring
to
refers
only
to
the
50
of
the
funds
that
will
go
to
counties
and
city
governments.
I
will
leave
it
to
him
to
to
describe
whether
there
will
be
any
kind
of
application
process
or
how
those
funds
will
be
distributed.
M
K
On
the
local
government
side,
the
50
is
through
formula,
so
it
will
not
be
performance-based
or
applications
like
a
grant,
would
be
so
it's
strictly
through
formula
and
it'll
be
distributed
to
each
community
through
that
formula.
So.
K
I
believe
that
it
will
require
a
formal
request
from
the
local
government,
like
an
action
of
a
fiscal
court
or
a
city
council,
to
request
the
funds,
but
I
believe
all
they
would
have
to
do.
My
understanding
is
that
they
would
have
to
request
their
their
percentage.
Their
formula
dollar.
H
C
H
Good
and
madam
chair
can
have
just
one
last
question.
I
think
this
is
a
good
bill.
So
is
there?
Thank
you.
So
much
is
there
a
criteria
for
the
folks
that
apply
for
the
money
as
how
it's
going
to
be
used?
You
said
you
weren't
looking
at
outcomes,
but
is
it
going
to
go
to
like
a
rehab
center
or
needle
exchange
or
what.
K
Thank
you
for
your
question
because
that's
key
component
here,
the
permitted
uses
for
these
funds
is
the
same
for
local
governments,
as
is
for
the
states,
fifty
percent,
and
that
was
really
at
the
request
of
the
companies
paying
the
settlement.
They
wanted
to
make
sure,
and
we
do
too,
that
the
funds
go
toward
mitigating
the
damage.
That's
been
done
not
to
while
roads
are
important
and
animal
shelters
are
important.
A
county
or
a
city
couldn't
receive
these
funds
and
use
it
for
some
use
other
than
the
permitted
uses,
and
that's
pretty
tight.
M
It
representative,
I'll
just
add
real
quickly.
A
list
of
those
uses
can
be
found.
I
believe
it's
in
section
5
of
house
bill
427,
and
it
also
leaves
open
the
possibility
for
the
opioid
abatement
commission
to
basically
determine
any
appropriate
usage,
even
if
it's
not
listed,
but
ultimately
that
will
be
up
to
the
commission
itself
and
how
the
commission
distributes
its
share
of
the
funds,
will
be
left
up
for
the
commission
to
decide.
But
I'm
happy
to
to
point
you
into
the
direction
of
that
list.
Offline.
C
My
point
is:
the
commission
has
not
met
yet
it'll,
be
this
year
later
in
the
year
after
some
things
have
settled,
I'm
the
only
legislator
on
that
committee
and
every
one
of
you
out
there
in
the
whole
assembly
come
to
me.
This
is
the
communication
for
the
whole
state
of
kentucky
and
we're
concerned
about
our
commonwealth.
A
Okay,
thank
you
so
much
for
that
thorough
discussion.
I
don't
think
I
see
any
more
questions
or
comments,
so
I
will
entertain
a
motion
on
the
bill.
A
C
D
Yes,
I
like
to
explain
my
vote.
I
want
to
thank
you
all
for
your
work
on
this.
It's
really
important,
especially
giving
the
local
governments
the
51
percent,
whether
they
want
to
settle
or
not.
D
I
think
that
was
very
important,
because
you
know
the
state
may
decide
that
it's
in
their
best
interest
to
go
ahead
and
settle,
but
you
know
if
our
local
governments,
if
they,
if
they're,
not
ready
to
settle,
if
they're,
not
ready
to
do
that
at
that
time,
they
should
they
should
have
the
right
to
continue
their
case
to
whatever
level
that
might
be.
So.
I
appreciate
y'all's
work
on
this
and
I
fully
support
it.
Thank
you.
D
D
A
A
All
right
next,
we'll
hear
house
bill,
240,
representative
bentley
is
at
the
table.
I
just
want
to
say
that
we
have
just
been
handed
a
committee
sub.
Everyone
just
got
this
and
it
is
a
small
change,
so
I
will
allow
it
at
the
last
minute,
but
we
don't
normally
do
this
representative
bentley.
If
you
have
any
guests,
I
don't
know
if
you
do.
A
Okay
and
if
you
could
just
introduce
yourself
again
for
the
record
and
welcome,
please
proceed.
A
Actually,
after
you
introduce
yourself
we'll,
go
ahead
and
adopt
the
committee
sub.
A
D
On
behalf
of
our
hospitals,
we
very
much
appreciate
the
work
that
dr
bentley
and
the
committee
have
done
in
the
last
session
legislation
was
put
in.
There
was
a
an
inadvertent
error
that
would
have
kept
our
hospitals
from
being
able
to
do
remote
pharmacy
entries,
and
this
bill
will
take
care
of
that,
and
we
really
do
appreciate
that
on
behalf
of
our
patients.
Thank
you
very
much.
C
A
Okay,
so
thank
you
for
that
and
the
committee
sub.
The
only
change
changed
in
and
to
an
ore
is
my
understanding.
C
Here
this
is
it
right.
Okay,
in
d
there,
on
the
last
page,
you'll
see
that
the
pharmacies
are
not
open
to
the
public
and
do
not
dispense
to
walk
in
patients
in
a
retail
setting
or
hospitals
license
or
krs
216b
and
would
have
applied
to
them
in
this
way
it
eliminates
it.
H
H
Wilner,
I
think
I'm
also
just
a
little
thrown
off
by
the
the
very
late
substitution
here.
So
could
you
just
give
me
an
example?
So
I'm
sure
I
understand
this
of
what
is
a
pharmacy?
C
E
Where
the
change
was
here
is
accidentally
the
word
and
was
put
in
there,
because
that
would
infer
that
both
those
both
the
beginning
and
the
end
of
that
sentence
would
have
had
to
apply
or
implies,
certainly
says
something
different
says
if
you're
a
hospital
pharmacy,
this
bill
does
not
remote
access.
E
The
database
does
not
apply
and
if
you're
a
closed-door
pharmacy,
it
doesn't
apply,
and
you
want
an
example
of
that
it'd
be
like
mail
order,
pharmacies
that
aren't
open
to
you
know,
and
that
are
we
have
some
companies
in
louisville
that
employ
a
thousand
or
are
better
people
that
are
closed
door,
that
do
some
manufacture,
rebate,
type,
work
and
dispense
medications
and
during
the
pandemic.
What
we
found
is
we
found
some
efficiencies
and
we
found
some
things
that
worked
very
well
so
that
remote
database
was.
E
A
Okay,
thank
you.
We
have
a
motion
in
a
second.
Do
we
have
any
further
discussion?
Okay,
seeing
none
secretary,
please
take
the
role
representative.
D
E
D
A
A
N
Thank
you
ma'am
chairman
ken
fleming.
I
represent
district
48
in
jefferson
county.
What's
before
you
is
a
very
straightforward
house,
joint
resolution
that
really
focuses
on
helping
out
the
healthcare
workforce.
N
As
we
know,
time
and
time
out,
workforce
is
a
big
issue
throughout
the
country,
particularly
in
kentucky,
and
we
and
this
basically
helps
establish
a
a
recommendation
to
the
various
boards
to
make
sure
that
they
look
at
engaging
in
some
type
of
interstate
commer,
compact
or
ease
or
establish
reciprocity
procedures
in
order
to
bring
in
more
folks
into
and
to
kentucky
to
provide
mental
health
services
and
so
forth,
and,
and
there
is
a
list
of
of
the
of
the
boards
this
bill.
N
Basically,
our
joint
resolution
is
a
product
of
the
severe
mental
health
that
we
took,
that
we
undertook
last
year
or
actually
last
year.
This
is
one
of
10,
and
so
basically
that's
what
it
is
in
terms
of
just
trying
to
help
out
with
the
workforce
and
making
sure
we
have
some
type
of
reciprocity
with
other
states.
So
we
can
provide
better
services
and
more
have
more
accessibility
to
folks
with
mental
health.
K
E
D
D
A
Yes,
okay
house
joint
resolution
5
passes
with
favorable
expression.
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
bringing
this
improving
our
access
to
care
and
allowing
all
of
these
disciplines
and
health
care
workers
will
improve
our
health
care
worker
shortage
issues
and
allow
folks
to
work
across
state
lines,
and
I
applaud
your
efforts.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
A
Thank
you,
okay,
see
another.
No
further
business
I'll
entertain
a
motion
to
adjourn.
We
are
adjourned.
Thank
you.