►
From YouTube: Administrative Regulation Review Subcommittee (6-13-23)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
C
This
regulation
is
being
amended
to
update
regulatory
references
and
the
material
Incorporated
by
Court
formats
conform
to
the
regulatory
basis
of
accounting
and
auditing
standards.
The
staff
suggested
Amendment
amends
various
sections
to
add
statutory
citations
and
comply
with
the
drafting
requirements
of
cares.
Chapter
13A.
B
B
C
This
regulation
establishes
a
form
that
a
county
attorney
is
required
to
file
beginning
on
July,
1st
2023
relating
to
preparation
of
settlements
under
krs-69370
and
64
830..
The
staff
suggested
Amendment
amends
section
one
to
specify
the
citation
and
the
title
of
the
form
Incorporated
by
reference
and
section
2
to
add
a
URL
where
the
material
Incorporated
by
reference
may
be
found
on
the
agency's
website.
B
E
201
kr5005
amends
to
update
definitions,
eliminate
barriers
to
establishing
the
doctor-patient
relationship
via
Telehealth,
incorporate
model,
Telehealth
language
relating
to
jurisdictional
concerns
and
establish
the
manner
in
which
Doctors
of
Optometry
May
utilize
Telehealth.
In
the
practice
of
Optometry,
the
staff
Amendment
amends
various
sections
to
comply
with
KRS
chapter
13A.
B
E
201
KR
2478
amends
to
authorize
dialysis
technicians
to
prepare
and
access
Central
Venus
catheters
if
they
have
six
months
of
training
and
experience
regarding
Central
Venus
catheters.
The
amended
after
comments
version
clarifies
that
a
dialysis
technician's
scope
of
practice
includes
preparation
of
catheter
ports
access,
including
connection
and
disconnection
and
site
care
of
the
percutaneously
or
surgically
inserted
central
venous
catheters.
The
staff
Amendment
admins
various
sections
to
comply
with
Kara's
chapter
13A.
B
There
is
a
staff
amendment.
Is
there
a
motion
for
approval
of
the
staff
Amendment?
We
have
a
motion.
Do
we
have
a
second
second
Senator,
Thayer,
I'm,
glad
you're
here
today,
with
Center
Adams
on
the
road,
it's
you're
doing
yeoman's
work.
B
H
C
3012
222
is
being
admitted
to
expand
and
clarify
definitions,
change,
boat,
right,
WMA,
waterfowl
hunting
rules,
replace
a
complicated
formula-driven
shot.
Shell
allowance
with
a
simple
25
shell
limit
at
boat,
right
Ballard
and
slues
wmas
limit
boat
access
on
boat,
right
WMA
from
December
1
to
January
31
to
people
participating
in
Department,
managed
activities
clarify
that
the
maximum
distance
party
members
may
be
a
part
of
75
feet
at
Ballard
and
slews
wmas.
B
B
Are
staff
amendments?
Is
there
a
motion
for
approval,
the
staff
amendments?
Do
we
have
a
second
without
objection?
It
is
so
ordered.
I
see
that
you
have
material
there
in
front
of
you
and
it
looks
like
you're
serious.
Do
you
need
to
provide
us
some
information
on
these
regs.
B
H
K
B
B
L
Ker
1120
is
amended
to
update
the
Department's
policies
and
procedures
on
health
and
safety
services,
including
policies
relating
to
definitions,
restraints
and
suicide
prevention
and
intervention.
505
Kar
1140
is
amended
to
update
the
Department's
policies
and
procedures
on
detention
services,
including
policies
relating
to
definitions,
the
delivery
system,
transportation
restraints
and
isolation.
N
Good
afternoon,
William
codell
good
afternoon.
B
You
there
is,
there
are
staff
amendments.
Is
there
a
motion
for
approval
of
Staff
amendments?
Is
there
a
second
without
objection?
Is
so
ordered
we're
going
to
slow
the
bus
down
for
a
second
here?
B
This
is
these
are
some
fairly
big,
in-depth
changes
and
we
do
have
someone
here
to
speak
in
opposition
from
the
Department
of
Public
advocacy.
So
if
you
would
just
give
us
a
brief
overview
of
what
we're
doing
here,
the
reason
for
the
changes-
I'm,
assuming
the
reason-
is
us
the
legislature,
but
if
you
could
just
briefly
comment
on
what
what
we're
looking
at
here.
Yes,.
M
This
most
significant
part
of
the
changes
are
to
meet
legislative
changes
and
to
have
non-lethal
ability
to
help
control
the
juvenile
population.
So
we've
modified
definitions
to
allow
that
we've
taken
out
prohibitions
to
allow
that
we've
also
modified
the
suicide
policy
to
have
a
little
more
control
and
safety
at
the
highest
watch
Level.
So
those
are
the
the
most
prominent
changes
we've
made.
B
I'm
going
to
start
with
a
question:
is
this:
did
we
mandate
these
changes
or
are
they
all
enroll,
just
on
your
own,
related
to
a
response
to
the
riots
that
have
occurred,
or
is
it
a
mixture
combination
initially.
M
It
was
in
response
to
some
of
the
disturbances
they've
had
at
the
facilities,
because
these
were
filed
prior
to
the
legislative
change.
Part
of
them
were
then
essentially
ratified
by
the
Legislative
change,
and
we've
made
some
adjustments
based
on
differences
in
our
operations
and
the
legislation
that
came
through.
B
O
And
I'm,
thank
you.
Mr
chair
I
may
be
running
a
two
regulations
together.
So
if
I
am
please
forgive
me,
but
in
the
in
the
effort
to
separate
the
males
and
the
females,
how
do
you
attend
to
address
gender
identity
in
this.
N
That's
not
expressly
dealt
with
in
the
regulation
and
fortunately
that's
not
an
issue
that
we've
had
come
up
subsequent
to
having
separate
facilities
for
female
Youth
and
male
youth.
That's
an
issue
we
would
have
to
study
it's
not
included
in
this
current
regulation
so
that
that
would
be
something
that
I
would
have
to
approach.
Djj
leadership
about
get
some
feedback
and
then
follow
up
with
you.
I
apologize
I'm
not
really
prepared
to
speak
on
that
today.
Now.
B
You're
welcome
any
other
members:
okay,
if
we
could
now
Tim
Arnold,
if
you're
here
to
speak.
P
Go
all
right,
we're
going
usually
I
don't
need
a
mic.
My
name
is
Tim
Arnold
I
am
the
post
trial
division
director
at
the
Kentucky
Department
of
Public
advocacy.
I
am
here
today
to
speak
on
specifically
KR
505,
Kar,
1
140
and
specifically
the
proposed
policy
700.1.
That's
incorporated
into
that.
This
doesn't
address
many
of
the
issues
that
have
been
mentioned
previously
in
this
testimony.
P
The
specific
issue
that
this
regulation
presents
for
us
is
that
the
regulation,
even
after
the
staff
Amendment,
does
not
require
or
give
any
procedure
to
have
a
plan
to
eventually
require
a
regional
system
of
juvenile
detention,
which
is
what
the
statutes
require
so
KRS
15a
305
has,
since
its
adoption
in
1998
required,
the
DJJ
had
a
regional
Juvenile,
Detention
system
and
indeed
all
of
the
detention
centers
are
named
Regional
and
juvenile
detention
centers
recently,
in
the
last
session,
Senate
Bill
162,
section
6
subpart
1
directs
DJJ
to
return
to
a
regional
system
as
soon
as
practical.
P
That
was,
you
know,
because
the
changes
these
changes
were
made
prior
to
the
legislative
session,
so
the
legislative.
You
know,
obviously,
this
body
considered
the
fact
that
those
changes
and
made
it
clear
that
they
wish
to
have
the
system
returned
to
a
regional
system
as
soon
as
they
can
there's
a
good
reason
for
this
Regional
system.
You
know
all
of
the
services
that
these
youth
are
receiving.
P
Certainly
services
from
our
agency,
but
services
from
other
agencies
as
well
are
generally
provided
geographically
and
having
a
system
where
there
is
no
regionalization,
and
so
youth
are
spread
out
across
the
state,
create
significant
burdens.
For
example,
you
know
we're
here
in
Franklin,
County
I'm,
a
Franklin
County
attorney.
If
I
wanted
to
go
visit,
clients
in
the
Frank
I
would
be
going
to
the
Fayette
County
Detention
Center.
P
Prior
to
this
change,
that's
about
a
you
know,
36
mile
round
trip
from
my
office,
those
kids,
those
youth
from
Franklin
County,
are
now
in
breathit
and
McCracken
County,
which
means
there
is
now
a
712
mile
round
trip
to
visit
all
of
these
youth.
That's
not
just
my
travel.
That's
also
going
to
be
the
travel
for
the
sheriffs
who
are
required
to
take
them
to
court,
and
so
the
effect
of
that
is
has
been
that
many
of
these
youth
are
simply
not
going
to
court
that
they
are
being
that
they're.
P
You
know
they're
being
brought
in
over
Zoom
or
some
other
means
that
is
not
an
effective.
These
are
kids.
They're
often
don't
understand
the
process.
To
begin
with,
they
need
a
lot
of
hand-holding
attention
and
they're,
not
getting
that
through
this
online
process,
and
so
and
indeed
in
some
instances
they
can't
even
get
to
court,
because
there's
so
many
different
places
to
have
court
that
the
Detention
Facility
can't
get
to
all
of
the
courts
they
need
to
get
to
so
some
kids
are
delayed.
P
The
effect
of
this
in
practice
is
not
merely
that
they're
not
receiving
the
legal
services
that
they're
entitled
to
or
that
the
courts
are
not
providing.
You
know
able
to
process
their
cases
as
well
as
we
might
like,
but
it's
actually
increasing
the
population
of
DJJ,
because
many
of
these
instances,
you
can't
you
know
so.
For
example,
you
know
they're
too
Todd
County
Youth
in
the
Detention
Center
there
would
have
been
in
Warren
County,
but
now
they're
in
Boyd
County.
So
they
are
a
654
mile
round
trip
from
the
from
their
home
Community.
P
If
they
were
to
be
released,
how
would
they
get
home?
The
answer
is,
somebody's
gonna
have
to
take
them,
and
the
resources
to
get
them
home
are
not
are
not
immediately
available.
Oftentimes,
it's
the
sheriff
would
take
them
the
court
if
the
court
was
to
release
them.
Typically,
the
court
would
want
them
in
court,
so
they
can
release
them
from
court
because
their
family
members
will
be
there,
but
they
can't
get
to
court
because
they're
so
far
away
the
sheriff
can't
go,
get
them,
and
so
these
are.
P
This
is
really
having
a
very
negative
effect
on
the
system.
The
regulation
that's
been
promulgated
continues
to
maintain
the
non-regional
system
and
does
not
have
any
indication
in
it.
That
of
any
plan
to
return
to
a
regional
system.
There's
nothing
in
the
regulation
that
says
that
until
this
you
know,
here's
a
process
we're
going
to
follow-
or
this
is
true
until
this
date
and
then
after
this
date
there's
a
new
system,
nothing
like
that
is
included
in
the
regulation.
P
B
Okay,
I'm
going
to
have
a
question
and
a
clarification
for
you,
real
quick,
so
for
for
all
the
members
and-
and
here
in
a
second,
you
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
okay,
I
think
we're
looking
at
505,
K
or
one
point
one.
B
Four,
oh
I,
think
with
with
this
regulation,
the
department
is
basically
re-upping
their
man,
their
procedures,
manual
and
and
procedures
for
doing
business,
and-
and
your
point
is
that
the
regionalization
is
not
in
the
manual
and
you
would
prefer
that
it
be
in
the
manual
in
the
future-
is
am
I
summing.
It
up
correctly.
P
To
a
point,
it's
actually
the
language
in
the
in
the
regulation
specifically
does
not
require
regionalization.
It
says
that
DJJ
shall
place
them
where
they
feel
it
is
best
based
on
a
variety
of
factors.
They
identify
requires
that
there
be
a
high
risk
and
a
low
risk
set
of
Institutions.
So.
B
P
B
Any
questions
for
DPA
from
any
of
the
members.
Okay,
so
could,
if
you
could
the
department,
if
you
could
respond
to
that.
M
Took
out
language
that
required
a
separate
female
facility
so
that
that
wouldn't
be
a
problem
as
DJJ
Works
its
way
back
toward
the
new
legislation.
You
just
can't
wave
a
wand
and
say
we're
back
to
where
we
were
part
of
the
difficulty
is
Staffing
levels
they
have
improved.
They
have
to
continue
to
improve
at
some
of
the
facilities
that
are
in
markets
where
it's
difficult
to
obtain
staff,
because
there's
high-paying
jobs
in
that
area.
Several
of
the
city
areas
are
like
that
and
we
still
have
some
difficulties
with
it.
M
We
also
have
to
be
primarily
concerned
with
security,
so
they
have
the
high
level
and
the
low
level
risks
so
you're,
looking
at
having
three
different
types
of
juvenile
and
a
same
facility
based
on
what
DBA
is
asking
us
to
do,
the
facilities
aren't
able
to
separate
the
children,
basically
in
six
divisions,
because
you
have
to
have
male
and
female
high
and
low,
so
you've
got
six
sets
of
of
juveniles.
M
You
have
to
divide,
so
it's
it's
a
process
to
get
the
security
elements
in
place,
plus
there's
some
physical
issues
at
some
of
the
facilities.
So
it's
a
this.
Isn't
the
end
of
everything
in
this?
This
is
a
step
toward
the
legislation
and
djj's
looking
at
how
to
manage
the
the
children
at
the
facilities
that
exist
so.
N
Fine,
certainly
it
and
I
understand
the
the
citation
that
the
Department
of
Public
advocacy
is
making,
but
that
particular
provision
of
policy
does
not
prevent
a
regional
system
What.
That
particular
provision
of
policy
states
is
that
in
the
regional
system,
DJJ
has
to
retain
the
discretion
on
occasion,
with
particular
youth,
to
move
them
to
a
different
facility
than
where
they
would
have
gone
in
a
regional
facility
and
DJJ
needs
that
discretion.
For
various
reasons.
N
For
example,
sometimes
we'll
get
orders
from
the
court
saying
that
code
defendants
have
to
be
kept
separated,
you
can't
have
two
co-defendants.
The
court
makes
the
determination
communicating
together,
so
we
have
to
keep
those
two
co-defendants
separated
if
they
both
went
to
the
same
facility
in
the
regional
system.
That
would
be
very
difficult
to
enforce.
We
need
that
discretion
to
say
we
have
a
regional
system,
but
this
particular
youth
is
going
to
go
to
a
different
facility.
For
this
specific
reason
same
thing.
N
If
a
youth
is
very
assaultive,
unfortunately,
we
do
have
some
very
violent
young
men
and
young
women
that
commit
assaults
in
our
facilities
and
we
have
to
transfer
them
to
a
more
secure
facility
in
the
Department
of
Juvenile
Justice.
The
Adair
Juvenile
Detention
Center
is
our
highest
security
facility
and
we
need
that
discretion
if
a
youth
is
very
assaultive.
If
there's
perhaps
gang
activity
going
on
at
a
certain
facility,
we
need
that
discretion
for
Safety
and
Security
reasons
to
be
able
to
separate
youth.
So
we
do
have
a
regional
system.
N
N
Regions
do
we
have
well,
we
have
seven
facilities
and
currently
one
of
them
is
female
only
and
so
basically
we
have
three
regions,
because
the
remaining
six
are
high
level
and
low
level
offenders
for
more
severe
offenses
and
lower
level.
Offenses
and
again,
there's
some
discretion
there.
A
low
level
offender
can
earn
their
way
into
a
higher
level.
Offense
facility
that.
B
B
Q
And
this
isn't
redirected
to
one
agency
or
the
other,
but
I
think
the
point
that
you
brought
up
about
the
transportation
costs
and
issue
even
that
that
impacts
our
local
County
governments
and
so
I
I
do
think
that
that
is
something
that
needs
to
be
considered
greatly,
because
that
ties
up
Personnel
vehicle
gas.
You
know
there
is
quite
a
bit
of
an
expense
to
that.
So
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
comment.
B
Any
other
questions
I'm
going
to
flip
it
back
now
to
DPA.
If
you
would
would
like
to
respond.
P
Thank
you
very
much
so
the
regulation,
the
section
that
I'm
referring
to
was
before
the
staff
Amendment
section,
J
I,
think
that's
now
been
promoted
to
section
I,
because
I
think
Section
8
was
H
was
deleted,
but
it
says
DJJ
May
determine
and
designate
the
Detention
Center
where
a
youth
will
be
detained
based
on
multiple
factors
such
as
safety
security,
staffing
needs
and
the
fluctuating
number
of
Youth
at
different
locations.
The
sheriff
of
the
Jailer
of
the
use
County
shall
transport
the
youth
to
the
Detention
Center
designated
by
DJJ.
P
Unless
DJJ
agrees
to
conduct
the
transport
doesn't
say
region
or
anything
in
there
like.
That
is
the
provision
that
is
just
you
know
about
whether
where
they
go
and
there's
absolutely
no
reference
to
region,
in
fact,
there's
no
reference
to
region
in
the
entire
document,
and
so
it
is
not.
It's
I
think
it's
simply
incorrect
to
say
this
is
a
regional
system.
Today,
it's
not
Regional
in
practice.
You
know
if
you
I
can
name
whatever
County
and
I.
You
know.
If
I
have
the
data
I
can
tell
you
in
general.
P
P
Those
are
our
two
largest
county,
Kenton
County
kids
are
in
three
of
the
separate
institutions
and
not
in
the
one
that
is
a
mile
from
their
office
and
a
mile
from
the
courthouse
like
it
is
a
very,
very
unregional
system
at
the
moment
and
there's
nothing
in
this
regulation
that
sends
us
back
to
a
regional
system.
Regionality
is
not
mentioned
at
all.
B
Back
to
the
department
is
there?
Is
there
a
goal
to
get
to
the
regionalization
more
more
regionalization,
I
guess.
N
Certainly,
a
goal
to
continue
and
as
we
expand,
Jefferson
detention,
because
that's
really
kind
of
the
Genesis
of
a
lot
of
these
issues
is
previously
Jefferson.
County
was
the
one
county
in
the
state
that
did
their
own
Detention
of
Youth
and
that
recently
somewhat
recently
shifted
over
to
the
state,
and
so
that
was
a
lot
to
absorb
and
digest
a
much
higher
number
of
Youth
thrown
into
the
system
and
the.
B
N
Have
we
have
catchment
areas
and
it
is
a
regional
system
currently,
sometimes
it
doesn't
make
sense
for
various
reasons,
for
the
Youth
to
go
to
the
closest
Detention
Center,
where
they're
located,
for
example,
youth
in
Bullitt
County,
once
Jefferson
is
up
and
operating
Jefferson
will
probably
be
a
catchment
area
all
into
its
own,
where
only
Jefferson,
County
Youth
are
going
to
go
to
that
detention
center
and
they'll
probably
keep
it
filled
up.
N
You
have
youth
in
Bullitt,
County
that'll
probably
have
to
go
to
Adair
or
Warren,
even
though
Jefferson
County
is
directly
adjacent
to
the
north,
and
right
now
in
our
regional
system,
counties
with
more
than
a
few
youth
are
going
to
have
youth
at
two
different
facilities.
No
matter
what,
because
we
have
a
high
level
facility
and
a
low
level
facility,
and
so
if
we
have
that
system
operating,
which
is
what
we
have
right
now
and
you
get
one
keep
separate
order,
then
all
of
a
sudden,
you
have
youth
in
three
different
facilities.
N
R
Wouldn't
it
be
possible
to
somehow
codify
the
mechanisms
by
which
youth
are
distributed
so
that
it
doesn't
at
least
appear
as
arbitrary
as
it
is
I
mean
you
guys
gave
very
clear
examples
of
why
you'd
want
to
do
it.
Why
isn't
that
in
the
regulation
specifying
a
process
by
which
the
youth
would
be
distributed
elsewhere,
because
the
gentleman
giving
an
example
of
of
the
youth
from
Jefferson
County
being
in
six
different
facilities
throughout
the
state?
N
That
that
would
probably
be
a
combination
of
keep
separate
orders
and
also
assaults
going
on
and
Safety
and
Security
reasons.
But
I
agree
with
your
point
as
far
as
it
would
be
a
goal
in
the
future
to
perhaps
write
in
the
regulation
what
these
catchment
areas
are
going
to
be
so
that
it
is
more
concrete
and
that
it's
something
that
we
can
all
point
to
right
now,
we're
in
sort
of
a
transition
period
where
the
legislature
has
provided
certain
funding
to
reopen
a
Detention
Center
in
Jefferson
County.
G
Thank
you
and
I
apologize
for
being
tardy.
This
may
have
already
been
asked,
but
in
this
system
that
you're
describing,
are
we
confident
in
the
capacity
available
for
these
regionals,
particularly
Jefferson
County?
Do
we
think
that
where
we
are
as
far
as
capacity
that
we
will
reach
it,
or
what
are
you
expecting.
N
In
all
Candor,
that's
a
concern.
You
know
it's
a
large
number
of
Youth
and
retention
and
recruitment
of
staff
to
be
able
to
maintain
the
ratio
of
Youth
to
staff
that
we
need
to
maintain
is
a
concern.
B
Any
other
questions
does:
is
anybody
any
member
asking
for
any
particular
action
on
this?
Seeing
none
I'm
I'm
not
prepared
to
the
points
of
DPA,
are
well
taken
by
me.
I
I,
too
truly
understand
what
you're
saying
and
it's
the
job
of
DJJ
to
follow
statute,
and
and
do
regionalization
I'm
not
prepared
to
make
a
deficiency
motion
this
time
on
it,
however,
because
of
all
the
all
the
problems
that
DJJ
has
to
face
and
work
through
and
issues
and
so
forth.
B
So
my
opinion
is
that
we
clearly
need
to
talk
about
this
particular
Topic
in
Judiciary,
Committee.
P
B
And
I
would
I'm
going
to
make
a
recommendation
that
the
chair
take
this
topic
up.
It's
a
very
important
topic,
but
I
think
DJJ
is
going
to
need
the
help
of
the
legislature
to
get
to
where
they
need
to
be
on
Staffing
and
that
sort
of
thing,
representative,
grossberg.
R
R
So
I'm
going
to
ask
that
everyone
in
the
meantime,
work,
as
the
chairman
had
requested
on
fixing
this
I
mean
there's
no
other
simple
way
of
putting
it,
because
I
know
that
some
of
the
people
who
perceive
me
on
this
committee
have
made
jokes
about
groundhog
day
and
I
hope
that
we're
not
going
to
have
Groundhog
Day
on
this
I
I
really
hope
that
next
time
we
see
you
all
that,
there's
something
that
is
agreeable
to
re-regionalize,
that
was
a
tongue
twister
the
juvenile
detention
system.
R
C
This
regulation
is
being
amended
to
correct
a
clerical
error.
Remove
the
requirement
that
live
fire
instructors,
submit
verification
of
ifsac,
accredited
Kentucky
or
ifsac
accredited
reciprocity
certification
as
a
level
one
instructor
if
the
applicant
was
previously
certified
as
a
level
one
instructor
on
or
after
September
6
2003
remove
the
requirement
that
live
fire
instructors
in
charge,
submit
verification
of
ifsac,
accredited
Kentucky
or
ifsac
accredited
reciprocity
certification
as
a
level
two
instructor.
B
A
F
B
K
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman,
just
on
the
overall
reg,
the
Drew
Jennifer
good,
to
see
you
guys
here
today,
since
this
comes
from
the
Breeders
incentive
of
legislation
that
I
got
past
18
years
ago.
Just
want
to
hear
from
you
about
the
change.
Is
this
to
help
eligibility
for
horses
that
weren't
nominated
early?
They
turn
out
that
they
can
actually
perform
well,
their
owners
or
breeders
can
make
them
eligible
later
on
for
higher
payments
sort
of
like
the
Breeders
Cup
model,.
I
Yeah
you
hit
the
nail
on
the
head.
Basically,
you
know
when
you
set
a
deadline.
People
miss
that
deadline
and
with
this
program
it's
very
similar
we're
actually
making
it
similar
to
the
Thoroughbred
side
of
things
as
well.
It
gives
these
people
an
opportunity
when
they
miss
the
mayor's
Certificate
of
Eligibility.
They
have
to
file
that
during
the
conception
Year
from
January
1
to
December
31st,
then
they
actually
go
a
full
year
and
a
half
until
that
next
yearling
payment
is
due.
K
Very
good
members
may
not
know
this,
but
in
the
standard,
bread,
business,
a
lot
of
their
purses
and
big
races
are
funded
by
nomination
payments,
stacked
up
with
races
all
over
the
country,
so
I
could
see
how
they
could
easily
miss
a
deadline
when
they're,
probably
writing
checks
to
various
for
Charities
Etc
around
the
country
and
also
members
should
know
that
there'll
be
a
third
harness
track.
Opening
up
at
Cumberland
run
in
Corbin
in
October.
K
B
I
B
L
900-5020
emergency
amends
to
allow
care
hospitals
to
convert
existing
beds
to
psychiatric
beds
if
specified
circumstances
are
met.
900
Kar,
6075
emergency
amends
to
Grant
non-substantive
review
status
for
con
applications
wishing
to
so
convert
the
amended
after
comments.
Version
of
these
regulations
change
the
maximum
number
of
beds
that
may
be
converted
from
25
beds
to
20
percent
of
the
facility's,
acute
care
beds
up
to
a
maximum
of
25
beds.
E
900
KR
14010e
amends
to
replace
the
reference
to
an
assisted
living
community,
long-term
care
facility
or
state-owned,
or
operated
mental
or
psychiatric
hospital
with
a
health
facility,
Health
Service,
Medicaid
waiver
service
or
psychiatric
Residential
Treatment
Facility,
in
accordance
with
Senate
Bill
43
from
the
2023
regular
session,
902
KR
5515e
amends
to
designate
Tian
Neptune
as
a
schedule.
1
controlled
substance.
B
I
got
a
quick
question
on
the
personal
care
visit
visitor
program.
Could
you
just
describe
that
in
a
little
bit
more
detail,
what
we're
actually
doing
sure.
S
It
just
expanded
through
I
think
Senator
Meredith's
legislation
to
to
a
broader
spectrum
of
Health
Care
Facilities
gotcha.
S
It
was
initially
covered
related
now,
it's
visitation
in
general,
with
any
communicable
diseases.
Gotcha.
T
B
Short
meeting
today,
any
I'm
sure
we'll
have
discussion
on
dates
for
next
month.