►
From YouTube: Circulation Special Interest Group - 3/3/2021
Description
Chat logs:
00:57:55 Jason Robb: Agenda: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Zyz_oWfqn_CbAtbmAUsjzsVuAke9ruN0T03iTXHc16U/edit?usp=sharing
01:00:05 Jason Robb: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26224
01:00:10 Jason Robb: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26136
01:46:57 Lisette: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27068
01:49:13 Jason Robb: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21946
01:51:04 Lisette: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16748
01:51:41 Lisette: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25261
A
And
we're
recording,
so
this
is
the
march
2nd
circulation
sig
meeting
at
2021,
and
we
have
a
few
topics
to
to
cover
today.
So
that's
kind
of
awesome,
the
first
one
was
it
was
michael
adamic
and
I'm
sorry
if
I'm
butchering
his
name,
but
he
was
having
some
trouble
with
the
in-transit
slips
requiring
two
check-ins
he's
actually
running
1911.,
and
is
anybody
else
seeing
this
or
experienced
this,
or
is
everybody
pretty
much
on
2005
now.
B
We're
on
2005
this
is
lizette
from
valmet
and
it
happens
to
us
sometimes,
and
it
was
happening
before
we
updated
too,
when
if
a
transfer
was
cancelled
like
if
a
whole
like
if
an
item
was
in
transit-
and
this
is
still
happening
to
us
on
2011
or
25,
if
a
hold
was
cancelled
in
transit
like
because
staff
went
in
and
canceled
it
for
some
reason,
then
you
have
to
check
it
in
twice
when
it
gets
to
your
branch
to
send
it
either
back
home
or
on
to
wherever
the
next
hold
is.
A
His
name
here
mentioned
that
sometimes
when
they
check
in
that
need
a
transfer,
they
have
to
check
it
in
twice
for
the
transfer
receipt
to
properly
print.
B
C
We
also
have
that
issue
where
it
was
like
submitting
the
form
twice
simultaneously
and
then
like
that,
would
prevent
the
slip
pop-up
from
popping
up.
I
guess
barbara's
joined
in
on
camera.
C
I
will
do
not
talking,
so
I
think
that
was
mostly
resolved
with
a
couple
of
bugs
in
the
upgrade
which
I
will
put
in
the
chat,
but
basically
what
we
were
seeing
and
it
was
affecting
our
quarantining
too,
because
we
were
using
the
cart
to
quarantine
things
and
if
you
check
the
logs,
when
you
were
using
that
very
first
check
in
any
time
we
checked
in
using
the
header
bar
was
when
it
was
happening,
and
if
you
check
the
logs
for
the
quarantine
stuff,
it
would
put
them
in
quarantine
and,
at
the
very
exact
same
moment,
take
them
back
out
of
quarantine.
C
So
it
was
like
it
was
checking
in
twice
at
one
time,
and
I
think
that
was
also
causing
our
problems
with
the
slips,
not
printing,
because
it
was
checking
in
something
that
had
a
hole
twice.
At
the
same
time.
So
we
were
missing
the
opportunity
to
hit
the
print
button,
but
then,
when
we
pressed
it,
when
we
checked
it
in
again
on
the
check-in
screen,
not
in
the
header
search
than
the
the
slip
would
print-
and
I
think
that's
mostly
been
resolved
with
with
2005..
C
I
haven't
had
anybody
complaining
about
it
since
our
upgrade,
but
I'm
interested
to
see
if
we
do
have
this
issue.
That
was
that
was
talking
about.
B
B
I
think
that's
all
been
fixed
and
isn't
going
to
be
a
problem
for
anyone,
but
we
also
had
like
a
very
particular
set
up
for
our
consortium
because
of
how
things
were,
who
was
open
and
who
was
closed
and
how
everybody
was
dealing
with.
It
was
really
messed
up,
and
so,
when
we
updated
to
2005
the
holtz
queue
stopped
working
basically,
and
so
we
had.
We
were
cancelling
a
lot
more
holds
in
transit,
because
the
holds
queue
was
not
telling
us.
B
B
So
we'd
cancel
the
hold
and
check
our
new
one
in
and
then
call
the
owning
library
and
say
hey.
We
also
had
this
and
it's
for
our
patron.
Do
you
want
to
grab
it
off
your
shelf
before
our
courier
comes
to
pick
it
up,
and
sometimes
they
didn't
so
it
would
just
still
come
in
quarantine
and
then
we'd
check
it
in,
but
that's
not
happening
as
much
now,
because
our
holds
queue
has
been
fixed
for
a
while.
A
D
Okay,
when
you
look
at
the
patron
record
in
patron
details
compared
to
when
you
look
at
the
patron
when
you're
on
the
checkout
screen
the
information
at
the
top
displays
in
a
different
order
between
those
two
screens,
so
it
shows
like
and
I'm
not
real
good
at
sharing
screens.
But
let
me
try
and
see
if
I
can
do.
D
A
D
Okay,
so
on
this,
this
is
the
patron
details
screen
so
up
at
the
top
you've
got.
It
goes,
charges
the
restrictions
and
expiration
notes
and
messages.
But
if
you
go
to
the
checkout
screen,
it's
in
a
different
order.
First,
it's
expiration,
then
restrictions,
then
charges
is
that
the
way
it
is
for
others-
and
if
so,
do
you
see
a
it
seems
like
it
ought
to
be
the
same
order
on
both
screens
to
me,
but
I'm
wondering
if
other
libraries
have.
A
A
C
Yeah,
I'm
seeing
that
it's
out
of
order
in
our
system
too,
you
have
some
extra
formatting
on
these
messages.
It
looks
like
maybe.
C
D
Our
circ
staff
said
that
they
preferred
the
view
on
the
checkout
because
they
wanted
to
see.
Of
course,
I
expired
this
patron,
but
they
said
you
know
they
wanted
to
see
like
restrictions
and
charges
up
top
that
that
was
the
first
thing
they
wanted
to
see.
D
Whereas
on
the
details
you
know
you're
just
kind
of
getting
a
different,
it's
just
because
it's
a
different
view.
It's
like
opposite.
D
B
I
also
feel
like
it's
confusing
that
it's
inconsistent,
it
seems
like
it
should
be
the
same
on
both.
B
E
A
All
right,
the
second
or
the
third
topic
was
actually
mine.
It
just
came
up
today
and
actually
yesterday,
and
it
was
once
we
went
to
2005
our
edi
stopped.
Accepting
invoices.
C
Look
yeah,
it
looks
like
marcy
at
mckinney
said
something
in
slack
about
edi
invoices
not
getting
stuck
in
pending.
So
you
might.
I
would
touch
base
with
bywater
on
on
that
one.
Maybe.
A
Any
topics
they
want
to.
E
E
I
am
looking
to
have
a
report
that
will
tell
me
when,
like
an
item
that
is
on
hold
or
has
a
holds,
list
is
lost
or
claims
returned,
because
we
don't
have
a
good
system
for
making
sure
that
an
item
gets
replaced
for
somebody
who's
been
waiting
on
hold
and
I
wondered
if
anybody
had
a
report
out
there,
I
can
get
a
report
that
will
pull
up
lost
or
missing,
but
it
it
doesn't
pull
up.
B
So
for
the
claim
return
we
have
once
a
week
at
our
branch
and
different
people
in
our
consortium
handle
it
differently,
but
at
our
branch
once
a
week
we
look
for
the
claim,
return
items
and
then
once
they've
been
looked
for
three
times,
including
the
data
claim
is
put
in
or
three
other
times.
If
whoever
put
in
the
claim
didn't
look
for
the
item
on
the
shelf
that
day,
then
we
mark
it
as
a
different
status.
B
We
like
check
it
in
and
resolve
it
and
mark
it
as
a
different
like
claim,
return
lost
status
that
we
have,
and
so
then,
at
that
point,
if
there's
a
hold
on
it
and
there's
it's
either
an
item
level
hold
or
there's
no
other
copies.
B
Then
we
email,
the
librarians
and
we
say,
there's
holds
our
item-
is
claim
return
lost
and
then
they'll
decide
if
they
want
to
cancel
the
hold
or
order
a
new
copy,
and
let
us
know
when
we
either
cancel
the
hold
and
put
a
note
on
the
account
like
we
would,
if
we're
looking
for
a
hold,
if
we,
if
we're
like
looking
for
a
hold
and
can't
find
it,
and
it's
the
only
copy,
we'll
mark
it
as
lost
and
put
a
note
on
the
patrons
account,
that's
like
we
have
to
cancel
the
hold
because
we
all
copies
are
missing.
B
So
do
you
run
a
report
to
catch
those
or
do
so
the
ones
that
are?
We
have
a
report,
that's
like
things
that
are
on
the
holds
list
too
long
that
haven't
been
filled
and
that's
how
we
do
those
ones.
And
then
we
do
have
a
claim,
return
lost
for
report
that
gets
run
monthly,
automatically
and
emailed
to
our
librarians
and
then
the
claim
return.
One
gets
emailed
to
the
claims
return
person
every
week.
Also-
and
that's
with
the
like
reports,
crown
job
that
bywater
can
set
up.
C
B
Sent
to
our
person
and
and
all
are
like,
we
have
a
bunch
of
different
loss
statuses.
We
recently
overhauled
our
whole
lost
process
at
our
district,
and
so
we've
got
like
our
anything.
That's
been
lost
and
paid
for
that
hasn't
been
taken
care
of
already
gets
emailed
to
the
librarians
at
the
start
of
the
month,
so
they
can
deal
with
it.
B
We
because
we
let
them
know
but
like
if
something
fell
through
the
cracks
and
they
didn't
get
it,
then
we
can
still
get
that
out
of
the
system
as
soon
as
possible
and
yeah
we
have.
I
think
we
have
like
28
reports
being
run
on
a
regular
basis
right
now,
okay,
yeah.
B
It's
very
helpful.
I
mean
consortium
wide
yeah
absorption
wide.
We
probably
have
that
many,
because
there
are
a
few
that
are
like
a
specific
branch
had
something
particular
they
wanted
to
run
and
sent
to
them,
but
it's
it's
very
helpful.
It
takes
a
while
to
get
it
set
up.
If
you
have
more
than
a
couple
reports,
we
recently
changed.
We
had
had
some
that
were
sending
like
just
a
certain
people.
E
B
It
up
so
that,
like
it's
going
to
either
mailing
lists
or
generic
email
addresses
that,
like
people
will
still
keep
getting
through
changeovers
so
that
we
hopefully
don't
have
to
have
you
know,
put
in
tickets
whenever
there's
one
person
who's
on
the
mailing
list,
changes
and
so
like
it
can
take
a
little
while
to
get
it
set
up.
But
if
you
just
have
one
or
two
reports.
B
C
Basically,
it
checks
to
see
if
the
goal
of
the
report-
I
don't
know
how
efficient
it
is,
is
to
see
if
there
are
no
copies
available
on
the
record
to
fill
outstanding
holds
but
we're
in
a
consortium.
So
it's
formatted
in
a
way
that
it's
like
hey
this
library
over
here,
isn't
gonna
fill
your
hold,
so
you
need
to
come
in
and
do
something
about
that
hold.
So
you
may
need
to
tweak
it
a
little.
I
can
put
it
in
the
chat,
I'm
not.
It
may
lose.
E
C
C
So
you
may
need
to
add
that,
but
the
the
magic
is
in
the
the
select
statements
where
it's
counting,
how
many
statuses
are
on
the
item
and
then
it's
counting
how
many
items
are
on
the
record
and
then
it's
comparing
the
two
to
see
if
the
holds
can
be
filled
or
not
so
like.
I
said
it's
probably
not
exactly
what
you
need,
but
it
might
have
some
logic
in
there
that
can
help
you
get
it
massaged.
B
Out
since
item
claim
return
uses
an
item,
loss
status
so.
B
C
C
It
covers
withdrawn
loss
damaged,
not
for
loan,
and
then
I
have
our
item.
Type
for
doesn't
circulate
is
dc,
so
that's
in
there
also
are.
That
would
be
branches.
I
think
those
are
the
only
two
custom
like
to
us
pieces
of
information
in
there.
D
Well,
I
guess
I'll
just
say
that
mary
and
jaclyn-
and
I
we're
all
here
and
we're
all
from
bedford.
We
have
been
working
on
an
overdue
three
notice
using
template
toolkit
and
it's
been
a
process
for
sure.
D
Lucas
had
us
using
putting
the
code
into
the
overdues
slip
and
then
using
that
as
a
test
to
see
to
go
into
the
patron
account
and
look
at
the
overdue
slip
and
see
what
the
content
was
and
that
all
worked
great.
But
then,
when
we
went
to
print
it,
none
of
the
css
or
none
of
none
of
it
printed
the
way
that
was
actually
in
the
template
toolkit
and
it
was
partly
because
that
preview
isn't
a
real
preview
of
what
you
get.
I
don't
know.
D
I
didn't
completely
understand
it,
but
so
we
worked
back
and
forth
with
fonts
and
spacing
and
different
elements,
but
we,
finally,
I
think,
have
got
it.
We've
made
one
last
change
on
the
font
size,
but
our
goal
was
to
include
subtitle
part
number
part
name
so
that
you
would
get
a
full
title
and
you
wouldn't
just
get.
You
know,
derby,
of
a
wimpy
kid,
but
you
wouldn't
get
the
rest
of
it.
So
you
didn't
know
which
one
you
had
that
kind
of
thing
or
for
tv
series
and
we
wanted
to
get.
D
So
we
wanted
the
patron
to
have
all
that
detail
of
exactly
what
they
had
checked
out
and
then
we
included
replacement,
cost
and
mary
wrote
a
whole
bunch
of
verbiage.
We
finally
went
fine
free,
so
we
kind
of
made
our
our
overdue
three
a
little
more
okay,
you
know
you've
reached
the
end
and
your
privileges
have
been
suspended
and
here's
what
you
have
and
here's
what
it
costs,
but
I
think
it's
finally
all
come
together
and
so
it
it
was
a
process,
but
it
got
us.
D
E
Anyway,
yeah
jacqueline
used
to
long
hand
out
all
these,
like
you
know,
notes
of
what
volume
number
and
you
know
what
book
number
whatever,
and
why
your
item
didn't
over
d
over
renew
or
whatever,
and
so
it
kind
of
when
jacqueline
was
on
vacation
and
I
had
to
fill
in.
I
was
like
man.
This
has
not
happened,
and
I'm
not
doing
this
so
poor
jacqueline
suffered
for
years.
D
Right
so
all
the
the
fields
from
the
template
toolkit
are
in
there,
and
then
we
put
all
the
css
in
there
and
part
of
the
problem
I
was
coming
up
with
is
like
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
repetitive
css
in
there,
which
I
hate
to
see
because
it
just
seems
like
shouldn't.
D
It
be
cleaner
and
but
I
would,
I
would
add,
the
css
to
a
section
and
it
would
you
know
I
would
think
I'd
be
affecting
the
whole
notice
and
it's
like,
but
it's
only
affecting
this
section
and
I'm
going
through
and
it's
like,
but
I'm
targeting
the
right
piece.
So.
Finally,
I
ended
up
with
like
every
every
div
has
all
of
the
okay.
E
C
D
I
think
what
made
this
so
much
more
tedious
is
because
it
was
overdues.
We
had
to
make
a
change,
wait
for
the
overdues
to
run
print
out
the
overdues
the
next
day
see
if
the
changes
were
good
or
bad
or
whatever,
and
then
some
days
I
didn't
want
to
make
too
many
changes.
You
know,
so
we
were
really
stepping
it
through,
but
yeah.
I
think
we're
there.
A
A
Yeah
we
had
that
problem
too,
with
our
our
third
notices,
which
we
print
out
and
send
to
people,
and
it
has
been
kind
of
a
chore
to
to
fix
it
because
the
you
know
the
the
overdue
print
slip
you
can
get
that
looking
beautiful,
but
it
just
doesn't
translate
into
the
the
overdue
notices.
A
D
We're
looking
at
it
and
we're
really
only
at
the
stage
of
of
the
looking
at,
we
think
we
need
to
switch
to
it,
and
I
haven't
looked
at
how
it
gets
set
up
or
the
last
time
I
looked
it
looked
like
we.
We
probably
would
only
do
it
for
text
messages
and
it
seemed
like
the
cost
would
be
reasonable
and
that
we
could
cover
it.
I
think
it's
old
pricing,
perhaps
so
it
may
be
different
now,
but
we're
interested
in
it.
C
D
It's
a
it's
got
like
seems
like
many
different
elements.
You
can
target
your
notices.
D
And
your
communications
to
like
specific
parts
of
your
patron
base.
So
if
I
only
wanted
to
send
you
know
some,
and
some
of
this
would
be
within
cohan,
some
would
be
you
know
outside.
So
if
I
only
wanted
to
send
some
kind
of
you
know
communications
to
parents
with
children,
you
know
I
could
set
up.
D
I
don't
know
like
profiles
and
stuff,
and
they
can.
You
know,
target
specific
messages,
but
one
of
the
things
about
it,
too,
was
within
not
really
within
coho,
but
I
guess
using
your
the
people
who
need
to
get
your
notices
they'll
send
out
these
like
really
beautiful
notices,
so
they
don't
look
just
like
plain
email.
They're
almost
like,
like
that,
I
think
they
had
read
a
light
like
if
you
got
an
advanced
due
notice
or
something
like
that.
D
E
Yeah
and
then
the
other
part
of
it,
there
was
an
aspect
of
identification
for
getting
library
cards.
Yeah
you
could
like
a
patron,
would
fill
out
a
form
online
and
then
they
would
verify
that
they
were
really
living
at
this
address.
They
were
really
a
resident
or
whatever
the
only
thing
that
I
didn't
like
about
that
aspect
of
it
was
we
we
always
ask
for
photo
id,
and
so
when
I
asked
the
question
to
our
rep,
I
said
you
know
how
they
come
in
to
get
their
card.
E
How
do
we
know
that?
It's
really
them?
If
you
don't,
you
know,
require
them
to
show
a
photo
id
because
they
get
their
card,
and
then
we
really
wouldn't
know
that
it
was
that
person
and
he
didn't
really
have
an
answer
for
that.
So
I
could
just
foresee
somebody
getting
a
card
and
not
really
being
the
person
who
they
say
they
are
which
could
be
problematic,
especially
if
you're
that
person
so.
E
But
yeah
it
was,
I
mean
a
lot
of
their
marketing
materials
were
beautiful,
looked
very
professional,
so
we're
using
library
aware
right
now
for
a
lot
of
our
different
things
and
our
librarians.
A
lot
of
our
librarians
are
very
creative
and
they
don't
like
the
restrictions
that
libraryware
has
so
they're
more
apt
to
do
their
own.
E
C
E
C
That
they
can't
control
more
canva
yeah,
but
this
does
get.
I
mean
this
gives
me
ideas
for
other
uses
of
library.
Where
I
mean
we
could
make
like
a
cool
overdue
notice
template
to
send
out
via
library
aware,
because
we
do
for
some
of
my
libraries
do
unique
management
and
they'll
send
out
their.
E
C
I
definitely
had
something.
I
definitely
don't
remember
what
it
was.
It
was
there
a
few
minutes
ago.
E
C
We
upgraded
last
week.
The
biggest
problem
we
had
was
that
it
was
keeping
the
search
terminology
populated
in
the
search
bar.
So
I
I
used
jquery
to
fix
that,
but
it
was
causing
me
big
headaches,
because
if
you
scan
into
barcode
and
then
scan
in
another
barcode,
it
wouldn't
clear
the
first
barcode-
and
that
was
like
apocalyptic
level
stuff
at
my
library,
so
had
to
figure
out
how
to
wipe
that
out.
Pretty
fast.
A
Yeah
that
showed
up
the
next
morning.
We
got
complaints
about
that,
and
it
was
luckily,
I
think,
danny
or
lucas
had
already
put
the
jquery
in
the
in
slack.
So
we
just
copied
and
pasted
it
solve
that
issue
so
far,
so.
C
Yeah
and
my
my
issue
was
like
the
the
jquery
that
they
sent
me,
was
using
a
an
onload
like
a
window
load
instead
of
a
document
ready,
so
it
had
to
wait
for
the
whole
page
to
load,
to
clear
the
term
and
on
the
details
screen.
We
have
novelist
and
sometimes
novelist
takes
seconds
to
load,
so
it
would
take.
C
Oh,
there
was
a
pretty
substantial
lag
between
like
pulling
up
the
page
and
the
terminology
getting
cleared,
so
I
had
to
dig
into
it
more
and
figure
out
why,
but
I
think
I
did,
and
now
it's
all
better,
but
I
need
to
comment
on
that
bug
about
why
it
should
be
an
option
instead
of
just
the
thing
that's
on
for
the
staff.
C
A
C
C
Oh,
I
have
one:
did
anybody
else
notice
the
some
of
the
images
broke
on
their
advanced
search
after
the
upgrade.
C
C
B
B
B
I
asked
megs
about
it
at
a
meeting
last
week
and
she
said
she
thought
we'd
probably
get
updated
to
09
when
the
people
who
just
finish
upgrading,
get
upgraded
like
next
month
that
they
probably
just
do
that
unless
there
was
something
from
seven
or
eight
that
was
like.
We
need
it
now,
because
it's
a
problem
for
us
so.
D
Well,
I
was
going
to
ask
now
that
the
schedule
for
upgrades
was
altered
this
time.
Do
you
think
that
going
to
what
was
2011,
I
guess
is
next:
do
you
think
that
stays
on
track?
The
way
bywater
normally
did
kind
of
a
spring
and.
B
Yes,
I
was
talking
to
kelly
about
it
last
week
and
it
sounds
like
that's
the
plan,
but
because
because
I
made
a
comment
about,
you
know
sounds
like
you're
almost
done
with
all
the
these
upgrades
next,
almost
time
for
the
2011
stuff,
and
she
just
went
oh
my
gosh.
It
is
so
I
don't.
B
I
don't
think
that
they're
planning
on
pushing
that
back
or
probably
not
more
than
like
a
month
that
that
does
give
them
some
time
in
between
finishing,
I
think,
either
everybody
is
upgraded
to
2005
now
or
this
week
is
the
last
week
of
it
and
then
and
then
I
think,
they're
going
to
try
to
finish
the
infrastructure
updates
like
in
march,
but
early
adopters
aren't
usually
till
end
of
april
or
early
may
anyway,
at
the
the
soonest
times
that
I've
heard,
I
know
like
the
first
couple
of
years,
we
didn't
upgrade
until
mid-june,
we
weren't
early
adopters,
but
I
would
guess
the
early
adopters
wouldn't
have
gone
until
like
mid-may
that
year.
B
C
Okay,
so
I
remember
my
problem:
it's
something
that
appeared
after
the
upgrade,
but
like
does
anybody
use,
holds
policies
to
restrict.
This
is
probably
a
consortium
thing
to
restrict
items
from
one
library
be
being
put
on
hold
at
another
library
or
to
like
prevent
that.
B
C
For
example,
we
have
all
these
new
item
types.
We've
got
new
book,
new
new
visual
media,
new
audio
media
and
most
of
my
libraries
freely
share
their
new
stuff,
which
we
love.
This
is
the
whole
sharks
and
the
fishes.
If
you
were
at
that
presentation
way
back
when
so
the
the
sharks
they
share,
the
fishes
they
don't
and
we've
noticed
recently,
possibly
related
to
the
upgrade,
possibly
not
but
like.
C
Sometimes
the
hold
can
get
on
the
record
from
from
a
non-sharer
and
then
that
hold
can
be
triggered
when
it's
checked
in
so
I
before
it
seemed
like
there
was
a
block
there
like,
even
if
the
hold
got
on
the
record.
B
This
might
be
related
to
our
problem.
We
had
jason,
where
we
had
been
using
the
library
transfer
limits
partially
to
prevent,
holds
from
being
placed
on
libraries
that
weren't
open
to
the
consortium
because
of
the
pandemic,
and
so
after
we
upgraded
it
stopped
preventing
people
from
placing
those
holds.
B
C
E
C
So
shareable,
so
they
were
able
to
place
the
hold,
but
if
they
were
all
marked
new,
then
they
can't
place
the
hole.
B
B
So
I
think
that
this
is
related
to
the
same
problem.
It's
letting
them
place
the
hold
because
they
can
place
on
the
one
shareable
how
we
fixed
it
was
by
turning
the
holds
groups
on
and
limiting
that
way
for
each
branch.
But
then
that
was
broken,
and
so
that's
like
related-
and
I
don't
know
that
that
particular
part
has
been
fixed.
Yet
we
just
have
all
of
our
branches
are
open
now
to
the
whole
consortium.
C
C
I
do
see
a
big
red
bug
that
got
pushed
to
stable
in
2005
flat,
where
the
whole
pickup
library
match
is
not
enforced
correctly
when
using
hold
groups.
I
wonder
if
that's
the
one.
C
C
B
C
A
C
Yeah
so
I
created
like
I
started
with
the
sharks
and
fishes
and
that
confused
people.
So
now
I
have
like
this
map,
where
it's
geography,
so
there's
immediate,
sharing,
topia
and
then
the
delayed
sharing
islands
where
each
delayed
share
is
on
their
own
island,
so
they've
become
interchangeable.
A
little
bit.
B
B
A
B
B
B
To
give
it
a
try,
which
I
mean
it
works
out
for
us,
because
when
we're
not
early
adopters,
we
still
end
up
being
the
people
who
find
the
bugs,
like
especially
weird
consortium
bugs
that
are
only
happen
with
like
certain
setups,
and
so
we
figure
well,
if
we're
early
adopters,
there's
only
like
eight
of
us
adopt
updating
at
a
time.
So
they
have
more
time
to
fix
things
for
us,
because
there's
not
like
100
libraries
updated
in
one
week
or
whatever.
C
So
exciting
in
relation
to
circulation,
I
put
that
bug
in
the
chat.
Grouping
circulation
by
item
type
is
coming
in
2011,
which
should
be
really
helpful
for
us,
because
we
have
visual
media
and
new
visual
media
and
we'll
be
able
to
group
those
and
limit
enforce
the
limits
there
instead
of
having
to
fake
and
force
them
like.
I
am
right
now.
B
We
don't
even
really
fake
enforce
them.
We
decided
that
was
too
much
trouble
so
right
now
it's
five
each,
but
like
dvds,
blu-rays
new
dvds,
new
blu-rays
and
two-week
check
out
for
like
tv
shows
that
are
long
enough.
So
that
ends
up
pretty.
B
C
Have
our
our
item
types
used
to
be
things
like
21d,
1r,
0f
for
21
days,
wonder
new,
no
fines,
and
I
took
all
that
away
when
I
started
so
now.
We've
got
book,
we've
got
visual
media,
we've
got
video
media
and
those
are
the
big
three
that
expands
out
a
little
bit
from
there.
But
yeah.
That's
one
of
those
things
that
I
didn't
want
to
like
spread
out
a
lot
in
the
consortium
setting.
B
B
B
B
Oh
multiple
parts
handling
confirmation
alert,
so
that's
like,
if
you
have
the
materials
specified,
you
can
turn
on
that
people
have
to
press
like.
Yes,
all
these
buttons.
All
these
are
here.
Button
on
check
in
it
requires
a
system
preference,
but
so
you
can
say
like
yes,
I
want
to
make
them
say
it
contains
all
its
parts,
so
that
they'll
hopefully
actually
check.
B
C
B
Oh
on
a
check-in,
if
you
have
transfers
when
you're
doing
a
check-in,
it'll
say
that
the
item
check-in
resulted
in
the
completion
of
a
transfer
instead
of
just
saying
local
use
recorded,
which
might
be
helpful
like,
especially
with
newer
staff.
We
always
seem
to
get
questions
about
like
well.
It
was
in
transit.
Why
does
it
just
say?
Local
use
recorded.
A
A
Well,
that's
about
an
hour's
worth
of
chatting
about
quahog
circulation,
so
I
think
we
can
call
this
a
successful
new
meeting
so.
A
Yeah,
it's
great,
seeing
you
all
and
hopefully
we'll
see
you
next
month
or
at
another
sig
meeting.
So
everybody
take
care
and
hopefully
you're
having
great
weather.