►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
B
I
I'm
kinda
new,
my
name
is
Dan
and
I'm
from
a
group
called
migrate
in
Google
and
I'm
interested
in
learning,
more
about
controller
runtime
and
Hue
Builders.
Since
we
are
using
this
as
part
of
our
products.
A
So
the
next
setup
is
Community
interests,
right,
I
think
the
first
one
was
mine,
I
think
he
I
don't
know
if
you
agree
folks
in
the
I'm
understanding
that
in
the
last
meeting
the
communities
for
the
new
release
right,
Angie
I
would
like
you
to
propose
I,
don't
know
if
you
or
you
agree.
We
just
do
that
after
we
merge
the
decided,
if
you
will
measure
Notch
the
pr
for
the
large
change,
I,
think
everybody
conveying
like
a
move
and
change
the
layout
right,
more
decimated.
Why?
A
They
go
virtue
in
the
follow-up
way,
so
people
you
try
to
probably
upgrade
the
project
if
they
to
the
notch.
So
maybe
they
want
to
use
they
go
before
Alpha
right.
C
I
just
had
one
comment
on
this.
So
right
now,
when
I
looked
into
the
cube
Builder
repository,
there
were
two
PRS
which
would
add
like
a
significant
feature
to
cube.
Builder
one
was
the
one
which
Camila
just
now
mentioned
the
change
of
layout
according
to
the
two
standards
and
the
next
one
is
the
Matrix
plugin,
which
is
basically
a
scaffolding
out
the
best
practices
for
having
the
metrics
using
a
new
plugin,
which
is
monitoring
plugin,
so
like
I,
wanted
to
bring
this
up
like.
C
It
will
be
good
to
have
a
release
in
Cube
Builder.
But
do
we
want
to
block
our
release
or
wait
for
these
two
PRS
to
merge
in
are?
If
the
community
immediately
wants
a
new
release,
then
we
can
cut
a
new
release
with
the
alpha
changes
and
then
cut
again.
A
new
release
after
this
monitoring
plugin
is
included.
A
I
I
think
you
watch
our
thing
makes
sense.
My
only
motivation
for
we
get
to
choose.
One
message
is
because
I
believe
that
we
should
remind
people
again,
that's
in
the
next
one.
We
will
move,
we
go
with
you
about
to
choose.
One
I
think
we
need
to
discuss
right
if
he
Facebooking
is
something
that
you
want
to
receive
in
the
project.
What
you
are
at
the
value.
Do
you
want
to
keep
you
Dutch
mountain,
or
should
we
or
is
a
good
candidate
for
external
plugins.
C
C
But
the
folks
wanted
the
monitoring,
plugin
Cube
Builder,
to
support
monitoring
plug-in
like
a
pretty
urgently
like
this
was
like
more
kind
of
a
priority
since
more
of
the
folks
were
asking,
so
we
thought
of
moving
with
the
phase
1.5
plugin,
which
is
what
we
have
now
to
get
an
idea
to
get
the
like
the
sentiments
of
the
community
if
they
like
the
Plugin
or
not,
and
all
those
things
and
then
probably
move
this
to
an
external
plug-in
later,
because
doing
an
external
plug-in
right
away
would
be
an
added
effort
to
the
current
team.
C
A
C
A
Okay,
so
the
idea
of
the
blue
game
is
like
help:
people
how
they
can.
Let
me
know
if
I'm
wrong
how
they
came
living
to
the
metrics.
Their
own
metrics
right
in
the
projects
follow
good
practice
right,
that's
fine!
Then
I
was
looking
here
right
watching
what
debugging
does.
Let
me
know
I
I
approach,
my
bunch
of
you
right
so
here
we
have
these
new
targets,
one
to
build
the
documents.
D
A
A
Watch
a
change
the
chance
and
that
penis
that
you
have
only
designing
in
the
image
and
the
chance
to
reach
me
I,
didn't
read
that
so
I.
Don't
want
your
comments
about
this
anything
that
you
right
as
the
example
of
the
Matrix
right,
and
we
have
these
metrics
here
just
to
use
and
then
we
have.
It
is
uchus
things.
A
So
if
you,
if
you
want
to,
we
have
two
Autos.
Actually
the
plugin
shows
for
me
that
you
only
do
two
two
things:
it's
called
4G
code
like
yeah.
Would
you
like
a
Libby
to
generate
the
Matrix
and
the
other
thing?
Is
scaffolding
code
like
a
library
to
generate
a
being
that
usually
the
documents
for
the
metrics.
A
So
if,
let's
imagine,
if
you
want
to
provide
methods,
functions
to
help,
people
create
the
metrics
which
that's
featuring
discovers
in
my
own
project
or
audio,
that
is
like
operator
leap
like
a
controller
runtime
like
something
that
that
I
can
import
into
the
news,
because
during
all
projects
that
they
have,
you
have
the
same
code
and
if
I
want
something
that
you
generate
a
binary
that
you
generate
the
documents
for
Dutch
metrics.
Should
you
not
should
be
provided
for
another
project
that
I
only
consume
the
binary
as
well
like
a
controller
chain?
A
I'm,
not
saying
that
you
that
should
be
going
controller
chain?
But
my
point,
the
point
that
I
want
to
cross
is
like
what
is
the
value
of
I?
Have
a
project
I
have
a
cheesy
Stuff.
It's
called
you
there.
So
the
United
States
implementation
going
at
30
projects
as
a
leap
and
it
easily
provides
the
binary,
however,
into
the
documentation
with
the
suggestions.
A
C
So
my
like
my
I,
understand
the
question.
The
question
is
more
like:
if
this
is
something
which
is
getting
scaffolded,
this
is
the
common
method
which
is
getting
scaffolded,
then
having
it
in
a
library,
makes
more
sense
than
just
scaffolding
it
out,
but
the
eventual
idea
for
scaffolding,
the
documentation
was
say,
for
example,
I,
have
a
custom
metric
in
my
project,
which
basically
finds
out
the
time
to
reconcile
a
resource
now
to
have
the
best
practice
of
having
a
documentation
for
it
in
a
specific
place
inside
the
project.
A
C
So
having
the
documentation
in
like
having
the
function
and
methods
in
a
library
make
sense,
but
having
documentary
it
is
like
scaffolding,
a
skeleton
code,
so,
for
example,
how
we
scaffold
like
a
readme
in
a
cube,
Builder
project.
Now
we
scaffolded
out
the
basic
things
in
the
readme,
and
then
people
can
include
things
about
that
project.
So
the
same
way,
this
plugins
scaffolds
the
basic
things
like
how
to
use
a
metric
how
to
get
things
about
all
like
how
to
add
a
new
alert
for
your
particular
metric.
C
A
C
And
then
the
best
practice
of
having
the
documentation
is
usually
inside
this
tool,
slash
monitoring,
slash
in
a
specific
location,
so
this
just
does
imposes
that
kind
of
structure.
A
Yeah
easy
I
go
there.
Amg
I
have
a
project
right.
I
want
to
read
me
of
my
post
right
how
I
deploy
my
project?
How
I
test
my
projects?
Probably
you
want
to
have
a
contribution
guide
as
well,
how
I
contribute
with
my
project
right
so
that
we
have
been
installful,
because
all
methods
is
are
by
the
phone
right.
So,
okay,
the
plugin
is
Comforts
The
Rhythm
is
is
okay
but
see.
My
points
is
like
90
percent
of
the
watching.
The
plugin
does
shows
not
a
feed.
A
In-App
projects
itself
shows
better
feeds
in
alib,
so
should
we
we
don't
need
to
decide
so
they
budget,
your
everybody
can
disagree
as
well.
Like
my
the
points
that
I
would
like
to
that,
we
think
about.
Is
that
something
that
you
really
fits
in
yeah,
really
something
that
you
want
to
support
into
keeping
the
project
like
he?
We
really
want
to
provide
a
plugin
that
she
is
binaries
ngos
and
like
a
coach
for
that
you're
being
all
projects
like
it.
Would
you
that's
the
best
way
to
to
address
the
need.
C
Yeah
definitely
like
I,
don't
have
the
answer
for
it
right
away,
because
these
were
a
bunch
of
authors
from
the
openshift
monitoring
team
who
are
contributing,
but
I
can
I'm
in
touch
with
them.
Async.
C
So
I
can
point
them
out
to
look
at
this
discussion
and
try
to
explain
it
to
them
and
I'll
invite
them
for
the
next
community
meeting
so
that
they
can
put
their
point
of
view
also
because
I'm
I'm
I
I
don't
want
to
speak
for
the
point
of
view
which
they
have
so
I'll
definitely
get
in
touch
with
them
and
ask
them
to
look
into
this
yeah.
A
Yeah,
like
I'm,
trying
to
raise
the
questions
right
for
the
way
conveying
if
he
is
good
or
not
right,
because
every
plugin
that
you
engage,
we
need
to
support.
We
need
to
keep
him
on
time
right,
and
so
we
don't
have
it
so
much
contributors
in
the
project.
But
that
is
fine.
If
you
will
see
that
that
you're
plugging
is
useful
for
eight
percent
of
the
commonage
I
think
we
should
move
forward
right.
A
So
our
biggest
part
of
the
community
is
something
that
people
is
waiting
asking
that
and
the
plugin
actually
Edge
value
for
the
projects,
but
I
might
be
wrong.
I
didn't
see
review
properly,
but
the
points
that
I
want
to
cross
is
like.
If
it
is
better
in
your
lip
or
in
a
library,
should
we
really
accept
that?
Yes,
uploading.
A
Provide
the
library
in
the
binary
and
she
provides
the
best
practices
for
promises
right,
NGO,
King
news
that
in
the
Kobe
Builder
projects
right,
but
in
Shoji
we
accept
the
Plugin
or
not
see
things
only
for
what
we
think
about.
We
don't
need
to
convince
any
any
like
a
solution
today,.
C
Yeah
yeah
I
agree:
I'll
talk
to
the
others
and
I'll
start
a
discussion
on
the
slack
channel
so
that
they
can
also
contribute,
because
my
understanding
was
so,
for
example,
we
use
Cube
builder
in
it
we
scaffold
a
project
and
then
I
add
a
custom
monitoring
to
say
a
reconciler
now
for
a
user
who
is
trying
to
use
this
project
if
they
would
like
to
know
how
to
use
a
custom
monitor,
they
need
to
look
into
the
proper
documentation.
C
So
what
an
author
can
do
is
use
this
plugin
scaffold
out
a
bunch
of
readme
sent
bunch
of
documentations
so
that
they
need
not
write
a
documentation
for
their
custom
metric
time
and
again
they
this
project
would
enforce
the
best
practices
of
adding
a
Prometheus
or
a
monitoring
kind
of
setup.
But
I'll
again
like
defer
this
to
the
authors
and
I'll
start
that
expression.
A
That's
just
fine,
that's
fine,
just
see
trying
to
think
about
it.
Definitely.
D
C
Yeah
I
agree
that
definitely
makes
sense
because
of
this,
something
which
is
going
to
be
common.
It
makes
sense
to
have
it
in
a
library
but
yeah
I'll
get
the
point
of
view
from
those
four
zones.
A
Angie
I
think
we
have
okay.
One
thing
that
you
didn't
decide
is
like
a
should:
we
do
the
release
or
should
you
we
will
wait
for
try
to
see
if
you've
got
to
choose
one
marriage.
That
is
something
that
we
didn't
convey
right.
C
Yeah
I
I
kind
of
agree
with
that,
because
a
lot
of
folks
were
having
like
we
have
a
lot
of
bugs
which
are
fixed,
so
we
can
probably
do
a
release
next
week
and
then
once
the
layout
changes
prsn,
we
can
do
it
other
ways.
D
C
Okay,
so
I
just
wanted
to
bring
up
this
very
small
change
so
right
now
the
grafana
plugins
scaffolds
out
the
test
data
and
the
folder
name,
for
that
is
project
refo
with
metrics
and
for
now,
since
we
were
planning
to
have
other
plugins
which
were
related
to
metrics,
which
included
this
documentation
and
stuff
I
felt
that
with
metric
suffix
like
this
kind
of
misleading,
because
we
are
not
scaffolding,
a
plugin
with
metrics,
we
are
just
scaffolding,
a
plug-in,
a
project
with
grafana,
a
dashboard
support,
so
I
thought
if
it
would
be
fine,
like
especially
Tony
Sims,
you
are
the
author
of
The
plugin.
C
Yeah,
it
would
make
sense
to
put
it
in
the
same
sample
or
even
actually
include
all
of
these
plugins
into
a
single
tree.
But
for
now
as
like
as
before,.
A
C
Is
the
proposal
yeah
because
it
makes
more
sense
to
say
that
this
is
grafana
than
this
is
metrics
plugin?
It's
just
the
name
of
the
this
test.
Data
sample
folder.
E
I
think
this
is
a
good
idea,
just
like
camel
just
mentioned
like
previously.
It
was
because,
when
trying
to
ask
the
coopstick
metrics,
then
we're
thinking
if
we
can
have
the
naming
to
be
more
General
and
when
considering
like
the
monitoring,
plug-in
and
I
was
trying
to
like
renaming
it
with
with
metrics,
just
like
the
intention
for
in
the
future,
where
we
can
have
all
of
those
plugins
to
be
tested
in
this
simple
project.
E
But
that's
just
for
sure
like
said
that,
maybe
for
now
maybe
it's
better
to
like
turn
it
back
to
the
name
as
a
region
which
is
with
grafana,
because
I
was
also
seeing
that
in
the
pr
of
developing
the
monitoring
plugging
it
feels
like
they
have
some
confusion
on
generating
other
projects
with
certain
names,
and
it
feels
like
if
right
now,
we
can
just
have
the
Whisk
refund
again,
with
the
developer
of
the
monitoring.
Plugin
won't
be
bothered
by
the
scaffolding
of
the
test
data.
A
C
C
Eventually,
we
could
have
a
single
test
data
where
we
have
grafana
plug-in
the
monitoring
plugin,
any
other
plug-in
related
to
metrics
in
the
same
test.
Data
folder
but
like
since
we
don't
have
everything
right
now
like
with
monitoring,
is
kind
of
misleading
for
users,
but
yeah.
They
should
probably
be
having
a
separate
test
data
with
just
the
monitoring
plug-in
I
think
they
are
missing
in
the
pr.
A
The
problem,
if
you
have
so
many,
is
like
it,
because
you
are
inclusive
right
and
we
it's
not
a
big
problem
actually
if
he
is
only
detected,
but
we
need
to
test
as
well
so
like
today
we
have
one
two,
three,
four
five
one,
two
three
four
five
six
right
but
you'll,
have
it
one
more.
That
is
time
right,
but
she,
but
that
is
okay.
I
can
convince
if
you
folks
think
that
she's
the
best
I
I
go
along
to
it.
D
E
I
was
just
have
some
concerns
on
the
pr
for
the
monitoring
plugin,
just
some
different
thoughts,
because
because,
like
last
time
when
I
guess
surely,
when
brain
about
the
pr
I
didn't
really
know
about
the
context,
and
so
there's
some
like
recent
updates
in
the
region
issue
when
like
Shirley,
has
bring
some
more
context
and
I
saw
like
originally,
it
was
route
from
the
operator
SDK.
E
Whether
she's
also
has
another
issue
wondering
of
like
how
to
have
some
best
practices
of
monitoring
operating,
SDK
and
I
saw
that
there
was
some
discussion
over
there
when
wondering
about,
if
have
some
like
documentations
in
group
Builder,
to
have
some
instructions
and
suggestions
for
the
operator
authors
to
have
some
good
writing
format
for
generating
metrics.
And
so
then,
right
now
like
they
was
trying
to
approach
like
release
such
PR
for
have
like
a
new
monitoring
plugin.
E
And
that
feels
like
it's
like
very
specific
to
the
Prometheus
ideas
and
the
stacks
because,
like
because
I
feel
like
there's
one
comment
in
the
pr
when
somebody's
mentioned
that
for
the
first
glance
of
the
name
of
the
monitoring
plugin,
it
was
feels
like
some
like
tools
to
bring
the
functions
to
provide
permissive
Stacks
so
that
users
don't
necessary
to
like
deploy
or
configure
Prometheus
or
just
can't
just
direct
directly
use
the
plugin
to
have
those
Stacks
deployed
and
they
can
directly
get
their
metrics
and
see
what's
happening.
E
But
that
is
not
what
this
monitoring
plugin
bring
about.
And
so,
when
I
was
looking
inside,
I
feel
like
this
monitoring.
Plugin
is
very
focusing
on
the
idea
of
Prometheus
like
how
to
build
metrics,
how
to
generate
recording
rules
and
alerting
rules.
So,
in
my
own
opinion,
it
feels
like
very
specific
or
it's
more,
like
a
Prometheus
plugging
versus.
D
E
If
this
can
be
a
library
and
I
was
also
having
some
concerns
on
that,
because,
like
the
basic
idea
of
how
you
want
to
bring
some
good
approach
to
to
Simply
implement,
the
metrics
looks
over
really
good
and
I
was
thinking
if
it
can
also
be
a
library
because,
as
I
was
like
an
operator
author
I
might
use,
could
Builder
partially,
which
means
my
project
might
not
necessarily
to
be
originally
scaffolded
by
good
Builder,
but
I
will,
or
possibly
to
utilize
some
tools
from
crew
builder,
for
example,
to
control
runtime
or
controller
gen.
E
Also,
in
that
case,
if
I
was
saying
here
so
there's
like
a
feature
from
the
converter,
they
can
bring
some
approach
to
Simply,
implement
the
metrics
and
then,
if
my
operator
project
is
not
scaffolded
by
group
Builder,
it
may
be
hard
for
me
to
utilize
that.
But
if
it
is
a
library,
then
possibly
I
can
just
import
it
and
have
some
functions
in
my
code
and
I
can
simply
use
these
functions
to
generate
the
metrics
and
also
one
last
thing
is
so
I
guess,
there's
like
a
number
of
plugins
right
now.
E
We
have
are
not
language
specific,
for
example,
the
customized
plugin,
integral
frontal
plugin
they're,
like
regardless
of
like
what
the
programming
language
is.
Writing
for
your
operator.
You
can
always
use
that
to
like
generate
your
fun
and
manifest
or
generate
crds,
and
so
for
this
matrix,
it's
very
specific
to
the
go
programming
language,
which
means,
if
you're
using
some
other
programming
languages,
you're
very
hard
to
import
this
to
your
project,
all
right,
so
I.
A
I
really
I
really
go
along
with
short
IG
as
well.
I
I
was
wondering
if,
like
a
Primitives,
has
not
a
repository
where
a
library
or
some
place
that
she
they
use,
allow
they
create
like
a
library
there
right,
because,
as
you
said,
it's
a
promising
and
they
are
importing
primitive
stuff
here.
I
think
he
has.
If
we
we
came
here
and
they
go
launch,
we
need
to
find
your
I
want
that.
It's
not
the
monitor
right.
She
is
she's
one
right.
They
are
importing
his
clients
to
go
so
why?
Why
not?
D
A
I
I'm
concerned
that
that
it
doesn't
fit
you
very
well
like
Builder.
Could
you
be
a
library
here
like
I,
don't
know
they
are,
is
important
things
wrong
here
right.
Could
you
not
to
be
yeah
if
you
choose
one?
Why
why
something?
That
is
a
good
practice
to
work?
If
you
promises
you'll
be
outside
of
Prometheus
War
projects,
why?
Why
not
contribute
to
if
it
is
to
have
the
library
there?
Can
you
help
any
person
that
you
use
a
promise
using
to
go
like
no
matter?
D
A
A
Not
a
skill
as
you
monitor,
right
but
I,
have
the
same.
Feeling
like
you
like
a
monitor
is
something
that
is
logs.
It's
like
how
are
you
aggregate
your
logs
right?
How
you
you
I,
don't
know
it's
so
much
right.
It's
not
promiscuous
thing.
A
A
Let's
see,
I
can
try
to
find
that
change
the
for
the
next
meeting
and
do
we
also
came
success
like
they
go
there
and
speak
refugees
group.
They
charge
a
group
of
people
that
they
are
looking
for,
monitor
solutions
for
kubernetes,
yes,
Solutions
right,
my
concern
is
like
a
actually
I
actually
see.
My
first
impression
is.
D
E
Yes,
because,
like
for
the
kubernetes
community,
there's
like
also
some
other
projects
that
is
focusing
on
instrumentations,
but
rather
they
are
more
like
focusing
on
populating
metrics,
not
aggregating,
metrics
or
visualizing,
because
how
the
metrics
can
be
aggregated,
how
users
want
to
visualize
that
it
really
depends
on
like
how
users
want
the
dev
Stacks
from
the
user
side
and
Prometheus
can
be
like
a
very
general
approach.
E
But
it's
definitely
not
the
only
approach
to
reach
that,
for
example,
there's
also
like
other
things
like
elasticsearch
or
go
around
that,
and
even
if
focusing
on
metrics
I
personally
feel
like
like
for
some
like,
like
the
sick.
Instrumentation
teams
are
trying
to
do
some
focusing
on
how
to
govern
with
open
telemetries.
That
is
a
more
General
like
specifications
on
populating
metrics,
and
that
is
also
very
general.
E
A
Okay,
I
think
you'll
be
put
here
heavily
any
other
topic
that
you'd
like
to
speak
about.
D
A
Okay,
so
this
one
was
open
a
good
time
ago
by
Eric
the
idea
was
using
actually
working
polish
instead
of
a
cool
RBC
blocks
right,
which
is
a
kubernetes
API,
and
today
we
could
remove
the
dependence
of
use
the
image
which
he
today
is
a
size
container
right.
Then
I
was
looking
there
and
I
put
here.
A
The
motivations
shows
that
he
exactly
the
motivations
It's
like
because
the
natural
work
follows
doesn't
share
things
to
requirements,
so
I
think
this
one.
Would
you
be
nice,
like
do
you
know
we
discuss
if
you
want
or
not
to
watching,
is
the
pros
into
the
cons,
but
she
doesn't
need
to
be
today
as
well.
A
I
I'm
not
against
engine,
nothing
favorite
as
well
I'm
just
trying
to
bring
that
she
has
reasons
for
in
the
past
exists
this
process
engine
in
the
past
that
be
accepted,
accepted
using
the
blood,
so
I
think
we
need
to
have
your
jeeper
and
others
like
he.
If
he,
what
is
the
best
for
Kobe
Builder
right.
A
E
A
E
A
Yeah
I
was
not
a
working
in
the
project
as
well
when
the
decision
was
made
so
I
don't
have
the
context.
I
just
found
like
a
some
reference
right
and
just
try
to
put
you
there,
but
if
you'll
be
able
to
do
that
should
be
very
helpful
because
I
was
thinking
like
if
you
could
evaluate
like,
as
you
are
saying
that
you
that
you'll
be
amazed.
We
also
could
you
bring
like
after
the
evaluation
bringing
in
the
channels
and
see
what
everybody
thinks
right.
Engineering
taking
the
decision.
A
A
C
So
this
one
we
had
discussed
about
it
before
so
I
think
this
was
related
to
controller
at
times
I'm
right
yeah.
So
it
was
related
to
modifying
the
path
and
the
scaffolding.
So
the
question
was:
does
controller
and
time
even
allow
adding
custom
parts
like
how
does
controller
and
time
serve
metrics
because
the
code
for
serving
metrics
is
in
that
Library.
So
if
a
path
is
added,
there's
even
controller
and
time
spin
up
the
server
to
serve
metrics
with
the
custom
endpoint.
C
So
that
was
what
we
were
about
to
look
into,
but
I
think
case
was
10.
So
I
can
add
a
comment
on
what,
where
we
have
to
look
into
it,
then
probably
repairs.
A
I
can
try
to
do
in
the
next
one
foreign
is
frozen
right.
It's
like
we
had
the
configuration
so
that
you
would
be
like
trying
to
create
a
project
with
you
using
copy
Builder
and
you
use
a
configuration
or
see
if
that
could
be
featuring
a
plugin
like
operational
I
iot
be
modding
favor,
like
we
have
a
cool
Beijing,
for
example,
using
the
code
and
it
could
be
building
as
a
lead.
Then
we
have
the
plugin
for
the
same
as
regions
right.
A
C
Yeah
I
I
could
work
on
this
issue,
but
the
reason
why
we
get
this
open
is
just
because
we
have
a
few
folks
who
are
using
Perfect,
10
like
who
may
not
be
like
active,
but
they
have
been
I
have
seen
a
few
projects
using
config
gen,
so
I
just
kept
this
open
in
the
community
in
case
someone
wants
to
to.
C
Say
tell
hey:
my
project
will
break
if
you
do
this
like.
If
there
are
some
comments
like
that,
so
I
just
kept
it
open.
Just
to
like
wait
for
any
comments
which
come
so
yeah.
C
Sure,
like
based
on
what
the
decision
is,
I
can
work
on
moving
into
a
plug-in
or
moving
into
a
separate
binary.
Whichever
works.
C
A
A
A
C
Yeah
so
I
think
the
question
which
the
author
had
is:
why
is
roles
dot
yeah?
Well,
not
getting
updated.
So
I
just
replied
to
them
that
it
is
based
on
DQ
Builder
markers
which
are
in
our
sample
project
added
in
controller.com.
But
basically
it's
the
cube,
Builder
markers,
which
are
used
by
controller
with
scaffold
out
rules
and
the
one
thing
which
I
realized
was
when
looking
through
the
documentation
in
Cube
Builder.