►
From YouTube: [SIG ContribEx] Weekly Meeting for 20210428
Description
[SIG ContribEx] Weekly Meeting for 20210428
A
A
A
B
B
Cubecon
is
currently
scheduled
for
october
13th
to
15th
in
los
angeles,
california,
and
we
have
space
monday
october,
11th
and
tuesday
october
12th
for
contributor
summit,
and
I
wanted
to
start
the
conversation
around.
Are
we
planning
on
doing
an
in-person
event,
a
hybrid
event,
a
virtual
event,
another
variety
of
events?
C
D
B
C
B
D
A
E
B
So
I
think,
just
if
those
that
haven't
heard
about
linux
foundation,
virtual
events
or
hybrid
events,
this
morning
we
announced
that
we
are
moving
forward
with
open
source
summit
in
end
of
september
beginning
of
october,
and
it
will
be
in
seattle
instead
of
dublin.
So
that
will
be
the
first
hybrid
event
that
the
linux
foundation
does
and
then
we
will
have
one
or
two
other
ones
between
now
between
then
and
the
cubecon
ones.
Currently,
again,
I'm
gonna
put
an
asterisk
on
everything.
I
say
because
right.
B
A
C
B
A
We
can't
jump
in
person
like
I
would.
I
would
personally
lean
more
towards
a
laid
back,
not
necessarily
like
a
social,
only
focus
thing,
but
something
with
a
lot
less
structure,
more
space
for
people
just
to
hang
out.
It's
also
really
hard
to
plan
attendance
wise
like
we.
We
really
can't.
I
don't
know
if
we
can
get
a
good
gauge
on
numbers
anytime
soon,
like
deb,
have
you
got
started
to
get
like
any
like
inklings
on
what
things
are
looking
like
for
kubecon
in
general,.
B
We
don't
have
an
inkling
on
specifically
cubecon,
we
did
do
a
survey
and
it
went
out
to
6000
attendees
or
a
mailing
list
of
six
thousand.
We
had
over
a
thousand
people
respond
and
forty
percent
of
folks
that
they
would
be
comfortable
traveling
within
the
us
by
september
october,
time
frame,
which
is
why
we
are
still
moving
forward
with
our
hybrid
events,
because
that
was
actually
honestly
a
better
number
than
I
was
expecting
to
see.
I
think
it
also
comes
down
to
corporate
travel
restrictions
as
well.
B
A
lot
of
people
in
that
survey
answered
that
it's
out
of
their
control
and
well,
they
may
feel
comfortable.
Their
companies
have
not
provided
a
date
on
when
they
will
support
travel
again,
so
we're
kind
of
keeping
an
eye
on
that.
I
will
also
note
that,
right
now,
los
angeles
is
at
a
25
capacity
for
events,
so
inside
of
a
room
that
has
typically
200
people,
you
can
actually
only
have
50
people
between
now
and
october.
We
expect
that
to
go
up,
I
would
say,
maybe
closer
to
the
50
percent.
B
Hopefully
so
then
you'll
be
able
to
find
100
people
in
the
500
or
in
a
200
person
room.
You
folks,
don't
typically
max
out
your
room
sets.
So
I
don't
foresee
that
being
a
huge
issue,
but
I
did
want
to
mention
that,
as
you
look
at
things,
room
capacities
will
be
something
that
you
do
not
have.
Control
over
it'll,
be
dictated
by
the
county.
G
So
a
couple
comments
as
far
as
what
we
do.
If
we
did
something
in
person,
I
I
think
we
we,
I
think
we
definitely
need
to
like
have
some
conversation
community
about
that,
because
I
I
don't
like
beyond,
like
a
social
event
like
a
contributor
celebration
which,
if
we
have
like
if
kubecon,
goes
ahead
as
far
as
a
in
person
thing,
I
think
it'd
be
nice
to
have
a
contributor
celebration
for
those
who
are
able
to
attend.
G
So
if
we
like
subdivide
into
smaller
groups,
if
we
as
a
contributor
group,
are
going
to
be
smaller
than
normal,
we
don't
really
know
how
small
those
like
subgroups
are
going
to
be,
or
if
it's
going
to
be
useful.
So
I
would
suggest
that,
as
far
as
parts
of
our
program
like
working
sessions,
maybe
we
need
to
reach
out
and
have
conversations
with
the
the
chairs
and
tails
to
see
like
how
everybody
is
feeling
about
that.
But
yeah.
It's
it's.
C
A
A
The
other
thing
is
like,
I
think,
no
matter
what
we
are
going
to
be
putting
on
another
contributor
like
a
virtual
contributor
celebration
again,
just
because
they're
like,
if,
if
it
is
restricted,
inspiration
like
us,
only
we're
ruling
out
like
a
good
chunk
of
our
contributor
base
and
honestly,
if
we
do
a
hybrid
style
event
where
it's
mostly
social
focused.
That's
not
cool.
A
B
I
wanna
also
mention
for
contributor
celebration
that
it
sounds
great,
but
celebrations
or
off-site
receptions
or
really
any
receptions
are
gonna,
look
very
different
as
well,
because
that
is
when
masks
come
off
and
that
makes
it
much
more
prone
for
corona
to
spread.
So
we're
still
looking
at
what
those
kind
of
activities
look
like,
but,
as
you
think
about
a
contributor
celebration,
just
consider
that
it
may
not
look
the
same.
We
can
try
to
find
ways
to
make
it
work,
but
it's
not
going
to
be
quite.
A
A
I
was
thinking
about
sort
of
what
this
might
look
like
in
person.
If
you
want
to
do
something
and
that
would
be
again
location
pending,
but
more
so
like
large
spaced
out
like
picnic
tables
or
something
like
that
or
rounds
that
have
a
large
amount
of
space
between
them
and
that
that
might
be
the
best
we
could
potentially
do.
A
C
A
E
A
E
I
mean
normally
so
it's
a
problem
so
normally
with
an
event
where
my
numbers
were
very
unreliable
and
there
was
no
way
to
make
them
reliable.
It's
a
situation
where
right,
because
even
if
we
have
people's
answers
in
people's
corporate
policies
and
that
sort
of
thing,
if
there's
a
new
strain
of
coronavirus
or
an
outbreak
in
a
particular
place,
that'll
change
and
it
could
change
a
few
days
out
from
from
the
event,
we
would
do
some
kind
of
unconference
type
thing
right:
yeah,
that's
that's
kind
of
the
best.
A
Right
you
do
pretty
much
need
like
when
you're
doing
that
sort
of
thing
is
like
you
need
a
facilitator.
That's
explicitly
like
watching
all
the
virtual
participants
and
they're
the
ones
like
drive
like
basically
signaling
the
and
meet
space
people
to
the
the
virtual
feeling
when
something's
happening
yeah.
E
H
Matt,
I
know
you
have
ideas.
I
really
don't
think
I
have
anything
innovative
to
add
here.
It's
a
really
quite
weird
scenario,
where
this
is
the
first
major
activity
where
many
of
us
hope
to
be
able
to
attend.
Many
who
want
to
attend
will
have
no
possibility,
and
I'm
torn
between
the
energy
of
letting
people
see
other
people
connect
and
getting
the
joy
of
seeing
people
connect
that
they
care
about
and
also
how
cruel
that
can
feel
to
not
be
able
to
be
there.
H
H
People
still
talk
about
that
and
if
we
can
make
that
special
again
and
have
some
of
those
really
interesting
breakout
experiences
like
the
bake
off
that
we
did
on
on
saturday,
like
that's
still
like
a
meme
inside
our
community,
it's
like
the
number
one
video
in
the
past,
like
two
quarters
yeah,
that
was
a
freaking
blast
and
paul
did
a
great
job.
I'm
sure
we
could
try
to
tap
him
to
do
it
again
and
get,
and
maybe
just
level
that
up
too.
H
I
I
B
I
I
So
you
could
come
up
with
something
where
you
have
online
participation,
where
you
have
like,
if
you're
online,
submit
ideas
for
what
you
would
like
to
see
on
the
cookies
or
something
not
like
that.
But
you
know
something
that
involves
everyone
in
some
kind
of
activity
and
is
fun
in
a
broadcasting
sense.
E
A
H
Yeah,
I
would
promote
something
an
experience
like
that,
but
really,
if,
or
only
if,
like
what
caslin
was
saying,
was
happening
where
you
basically
have
people
acting
as
on-the-ground
reporters
or
somebody
curating
that
experience
for
the
remote
people
that
that
can
be
a
nice
way
to
make
it
very
like
for
them.
If,
if
we
have
that
kind
of
volunteerism
and
the
space
all
works
out,.
A
B
Oh,
I
mean
we're
stepping
up
our
game
because
it's
hybrid
now
so
right
now
I
have
on
reserve,
for
you,
essentially
all
the
space
we
were
going
to
have
last
year
in
boston.
So
if
you
would
like
to
do
a
full
contributor
summit,
full
shebang,
you
can,
if
you
don't
want
to
that
space
will
go
to
other
things.
So
it
would
be
helpful
for
us
to
know
that
in
the
next
coming
weeks,
as
we
plan
space
and
plan
activities
and
things
like
that,
but
you
have
space
to
do
what
you
like.
B
So
if
you
would
like
one
meeting
room,
that's
just
set
up
with
av
equipment
to
do
you
know,
meetings
with
our
two-way
integration
so,
like
you
can
speak
to
folks
and
spokes
folks,
virtually
can
speak
out
to
you.
We
can
definitely
set
one
of
the
rooms
up
like
that,
and
just
that
way
you
can
schedule
sing
meetings
closer
to
the
time
if
folks
are
gonna
be
on
site.
B
B
That's
what
we've
got
in
terms
of
space
and
then
av
equipment,
obviously
we're
still
working
through
with
our
av
vendors.
What
this
looks
like,
but
since
we're
doing
hybrid,
the
av
equipment's
definitely
going
to
be
taking
a
step
up
so
that
we
can
do
hybrid.
So
I
we
are
looking
for
ways
to
improve
the
fact
that
you
can
hear
what's
going
on
in
the
room
and
picking
up
on
things.
B
The
way
that
we're
gonna
do
that
in
sessions
is
with,
I
mean
the
speakers,
but
then
having
a
moderator
that
repeats
everything
into
a
mic
for
those
that
are
virtual
and
then,
if
someone
virtually
has
a
question
or
has
a
comment,
the
moderator
can,
you
know,
raise
their
hand
or
step
into
it
and
turn
the
audio
on.
For
that.
That
doesn't
quite
work
the
same
for
your
sig
meetings,
but
I'm
sure
we
can
find
a
way
if
you're,
just
setting
up
one
or
two
rooms
to
do
that.
G
I
was
good.
I
was
going
to
ask
what
time
frames
are
we
looking
at
deb
to
make
some
of
these
decisions?
Why
that's
my
question
when
thinking
along
the
same
lines,
bob
yeah
like
what?
What
what
are
the
time
frames
where
we
start
to
have
to
firm
up
some
of
these
decisions
in
order
to
secure
space,
av,
etc?.
B
B
So
we're
trying
to
look
at
all
the
things
which
is
going
to
take
more
time
and
then
the
city
has
all
the
moving
variables.
So,
the
more
time
we
can
get
the
better,
but
I
would
say
working
for
a
decision
by
the
end
of
may
would
be
appreciated.
It
doesn't
have
to
mean
you
know
exactly
what's
happening
in
those
rooms
or
what's
going
on,
but
you
could
say
hey
instead
of
doing
a
full
summit,
we're
only
going
to
do
three
rooms,
so
we're
going
to
you
know
never
mind
we're
going
completely
virtual.
A
A
A
E
A
One
other
event
related
thing
and
talked
about
this
a
little
bit
earlier.
This
could
also
depend
on
the
server
results,
but
would
we
want
to
like
I?
I
definitely
think
it's
still
a
good
thing
to
commit
to
doing
a
like
a
separate
virtual
event,
sort
of
what
we
did
for
the
celebration
just
because
that
hits
everyone.
G
I
think
we
should,
but
it
all
it's
like
it
depends
on
what
the
scale
of
that
is
like.
Is
it
the
same
as
we
did
last
time?
As
far
as
like
you
know
a
day
schedule
of
stuff
is
that
you
know
a
few
key
like
in
you
know.
Maybe
there's
some
highlight
things
that
we
want
to
pick
out.
That's
like
one
or
two
things
we
want
to
do
there.
Do
we
want
to
make
it
bigger,
smaller.
A
A
A
A
B
G
A
A
No,
actually,
I
will
say
one
thing
about
the
community
meeting
is
that,
despite
the
calendars
being
borked,
there
was
still
a
good
amount
of
people
there
and
that
people
seemed
a
little
bit
more
engaged.
So
the
discussion
thing
might
actually
be
the
the
way
forward
to
start
using
those
meetings
a
little
bit
more
productively.
A
D
It's
the
same
same
time
as
the
mentoring
meeting
is
but
right,
yeah
pretty
much
pretty
much
almost
there.
Also
regarding
media
contributors,
I
went
on
the
kubernetes.dev
site
and
found
the
media
contributors,
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that
the
time
I'm
there
on
the
the
website
matches
the
time
it's
the
first
wednesday
of
the
month,
apparently
at
3
30
pm
udc.
But
I
don't
think
that's
the
correct
time.
I
think
we
moved
it
to
mondays.
D
F
Speaking
about
gsoc,
we
have
so
all
the
potential
mentors
have
to
review
and
select
their
respective
projects
by
next
monday
may
shirt.
I
believe
we
have
a
few
proposals
from
kubernetes,
but
I'm
not
sure
if
any
of
the
mentors
are
here
in
this
meeting
so
just
put
in
this
as
fyi.
For
those
who
will
review
the
notes
for
the
recording
and
with
lfx,
we
are
in
an
active
stage
in
preparing
for
the
summer
cycle.
We
are
currently
accepting
proposals
from
the
projects
to
participate
in
in
the
lfx
summer
cycle.
F
E
E
I'd
like
to
first
see
that
we
actually
have
proposals
before
soliciting
any
scholarships
from
from
the
various
project.
Sponsors,
including
cncf,
because
we
don't
want
to
well
outreach-
is
a
is
a
terrific
organization.
Kubernetes
is
still
nonprofit,
and
so
it's
also
a
non-profit,
and
so
there
isn't
any
good
reason
to
buy
scholarships
from
them
that
we're
not
going
to
use
yeah.
A
So
one
one
potential
idea:
ihorn:
this
is
actually
more
so
for
the
cncf
if
they
want
to
do
something
for
lfx
or
outreachy,
and
that
actually
be
to
update
the
electio
app
to
do
the
fractional
voting
that
all
the
cncf
maintainers
have
to
do.
I
know
that
would
help
amy
out
a
lot
instead
of
it
being
separate
emails
to
everyone.
E
I
think
it
would
be
really
good
to
have
a
resource
somewhere
where
people
can
just
list
projects,
because
for
a
lot
of
these,
like
for
the
various
programs
as
restrictions
and
what
kind
of
an
intern
you
can
have
and
what
kinds
of
projects
you
can
do,
but
from
the
perspective
of
our
sigs
etc,
I
don't
most
of
the
time
they
don't
really
care
like
you
know,
they
want
a
mentee
for
a
particular
project
and
they
don't
care
whether
that's
gsoc
or
lfx
or
outreachy.
Just
timing.
E
F
That's
actually
a
good
idea.
It
would
be
great
yeah.
It's
a
good
idea
based
on
the
number
of
potential
mentoring
opportunities
within
the
kubernetes
community,
but
I
agree
that
most
of
the
maintainers
they
they
should
not
be
aware
of
all
the
details
of
of
the
timeline
and
all
the
mentoring,
a
program
specific.
So
if
someone
can.
E
E
E
Okay,
yeah,
okay,
I
think
that'll
be
the
way
to
go.
We'll
set
it
up.
Allison
I'll,
we'll
talk
about
this
further,
the
next
mentoring
meeting,
because
I
want
to
pull
volunteers
because
the
other
big
task,
if
we
start
doing
things
this
way,
we'll
be
checking
every
couple
of
months
to
make
sure
that
the
projects
are
still
current.
A
A
C
A
A
H
What
have
you
what
brought
you
here
and
we
want
to
get
as
many
of
those
as
possible
so
that
more
people
see
themselves
as
potential
contributors
and
don't
want
to
put
you
on
the
spot
bob.
But
I
did
want
to
circle
back
that
we've
been
talking
as
if
we
want
to
go,
live
on
the
dot
dev
domain
and
that's
kind
of
a
new
scope
for
it
so
wanted
to
confirm
that
we
can
and
should
start
hit
and
publish
on
that
and
by
publish
I
mean
unhold,
those
pr's
yeah.
A
And
I
think
I
made
I
was
just
pulling
it
back
up.
I
made
a
couple
suggestions
in
the
reviews,
but
I
think
that's
that's
pretty
much
the
most
like
dates
and
some
of
the
other
like
yeah.
The
metadata
is
way
off
right.
We
can
touch
that
up.
I
think
that
was
that
was
it.
Regarding
the
remaining
comments.
H
Great
yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
reengage
because
we
floated
the
idea
months
ago
and
it's
it's
all
come
together.
We
were
trying
to
queue
it
up
right
before
kubecon.
So
that's
now,
oddly
enough
yeah,
you
let
that
happen,
okay,
great
and
if
that
peaks
anyone's
interest.
If
you
want
to
share
a
story,
you're
interested
in
writing,
reach
out
to
us,
you
can
at
contributor
comms
in
slack
or
dm
any
of
us
casual
and
anything
else.
You'd
want
throughout
there
give
a
thumbs
up
good
and
canal
again.
Man.
K
Yeah,
hello,
everyone,
so
I
just
got
almost
done
with
the
blog
on
sick
usability.
I
talked
to
tasha
and
gabby.
They
told
me
that
they
were
doing
a
talk
at
kubecon
regarding
sig
usability,
so
this
was
like
a
good
time
for
that
so
yeah
I
got
it
proofread
by
jason.
He
said
that
it
should
like
we
can
publish
it
this
week,
so
that's
good
other
than
that.
I'm
also
planning
on
writing
one
on
contrabex.
A
K
A
A
A
D
Dropped
a
link,
let
me
I
think
I
have
the
home
assistant,
the
home
assistant
github
or
when
you
create
a
new
issue
or
something
like
there's
an
example
of
that
working
in
action
and
what
it
is
is
you've
got
like
a
yaml
file
on
the
back
of
it.
Just
saying
put
these
fields
in
your
issue:
template
then
that
gets
fed
out
into
the
new
issue
when
you
create
it,
which
I
think
is
pretty
neat
sorry
for
tangent.
A
I
linked
an
example
of
what
it
looks
like
this
is
really
cool
bob.
It's
it's
it's
it's
kind
of
kind
of
like
we're
excited
about
forms,
but
it's
also
a
lot
of
issue
template
problems.
This
is
still
beta.
There
are
some
problems,
but
we
are
getting
more
like
projects
that
are
interested
in
using
it.
If
you
are
involved
in
a
sub
project,
that
is,
that
would
like
to
potentially
experiment
experiment
with
it.
Please
reach
out
to
the
github
admin
team.
A
A
Yes,
you
can
make
fields
required,
you
can
add
drop-down
items.
This
will
be
very
useful
eventually
when
we
can
roll
out
to
the
kubernetes
kubernetes
repo.
So
it's
just
like
here's.
Your
release,
notes
section
you
must
have
put
in
you
know
all
the
requirements
in
there
instead
of
having
the
giant
block
of
like
text
telling
people
what
to
do
in
the
the
issue
template
my.