►
From YouTube: Kubernetes Public Steering Committee Meeting 20200504
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
So
first
things:
first,
we
do
have
a
code
of
conduct,
so
please
be
excellent
to
each
other.
This
meeting
is
also
being
publicly
recorded
to
YouTube,
so
please
be
mindful
of
that.
Whatever
you're
going
to
say
is
going
to
be
recorded
forever
lucky.
You
said
you
want
her
to
take
notes
on
it
and
you've
also
added
your
name.
Ok,
so
much
and
before
we
okay.
Let
me
share
my
screen.
So
folks
can
see
the
agenda.
A
Okay,
so
before
we
move
on
to
the
items
in
the
agenda,
I
just
want
to
say
that
these
are
crazy
times.
So,
if
you
ever
want
to
hear
like
say
something
to
someone
or
just
like
want
in
here
want
someone
to
listen
to
you.
We
are
always
here
for
you,
no
judgments
whatsoever.
We
might
not
always
have
the
solutions
to
all
your
problems,
but
we
will
try
to
listen
and
make
sure
that
will
point
you
to
someone
who
knows
the
answer.
So
moving
on
to
the
agenda.
First
thing
is
welcome
lucky.
A
Okay,
moving
on
to
the
next
one
community,
how
check
updates
from
the
break
our
discussion?
So
a
bunch
of
us
steering
folks
met
last
week
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
the
community
health
check
issue
that
we
are
working
on.
If
you
don't
have
an
idea
where
weather
is
check
out
this
PR
by
Paris,
which
goes
into
detail
about
everything?
A
It's
what
we
have
a
quick
update
about
what
things
we
discussed
in
the
private
break,
our
discussion
in
this
public
meeting,
so
so
first
thing
we
talked
about
is
that
we
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
not
just
another
meeting
or
another
survey
or
forum
that
they
need
to
fill
out.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
the
idea
is
that
we
lead
with
what
the
chairs
and
a
six
cut
out
of
this,
and
the
next
thing
is
that
you
want
to
have
them
scale.
A
That's
the
goal,
so
if
they
want
private,
coaching
or
advice
on
any
roles,
we
are
also
happy
to
have
them.
Provide
that-
and
the
other
suggestion
was
to
rename
this
to
something
like
an
annual
report
for
your
community
group
to
make
it
sound
a
little
more
serious,
a
little
more
formal,
so
that
folks
actually
editor.
If
you
have
suggestions,
are
naming
or
anything,
please
feel
free
to
like
put
it
on.
A
Alice,
did
you
have
anything
else?
You
wanted
to
talk
about
yeah
I.
C
But
it
sounded
like
folks
just
wanted
one
report
for
one
group,
including
the
the
fields
of
how
they
are
doing
in
their
role.
So
I
guess.
My
question
to
the
group
is:
where
does
everybody
stand
on
that
now?
The
PR
has
the
language
in
it
about
one
report,
so
I,
didn't
and,
of
course
like.
If
you
didn't
review
the
PR,
that's
no
qualms!
We
can
talk
about
it
offline,
but
I.
Think
that's
where
I
think.
That's
like
one
of
the
only
open
questions,
/,
not
really
sure
about
at
this
point.
D
Yeah
I
spent
I
spent,
maybe
like
10
or
15
minutes
this
morning,
looking
at
the
updated
language,
but
you
you
pushed
in
yesterday
and
I
like
where
it
is
now.
I
definitely
want
to
go
like
fine-tooth
comb
and
make
sure
there's
nothing
that
I'm
missing
as
far
as
language
and
that
kind
of
stuff,
but
at
a
high
level,
I
think
it's
in
a
really
good
place,
as
is
right
now
and
we're
pretty
good
with
merging.
D
As
far
as
the
specific
question
around
private
items
and
that
kind
of
stuff
I
think
you
know
I
I'm
trying
to
remember
from
from
our
discussion
last
week,
but
I
think
we're
where
we
were
looking
with.
That
was
something
that
we're
going
to
talk
about.
Next
is
having
like
a
liaison
and
that
kind
of
stuff,
and
if
there's
anything,
that's
like
specific
or
private.
E
The
parents-
this
is
Derek
I,
know
I,
wasn't
in
the
meeting
last
week
where
this
was
discussed,
but
reading
the
language
you
have
there,
it
seems
perfectly
fine
and
so
I
just
wanted
way.
My
+1
on
support
for
the
language
there,
given
that
I
wasn't
in
the
meeting
and
my
initial
read
on
it,
which
is
not
biased
by
any
other
attendance,
is
thinking.
C
I'm
gonna
address
all
of
Nikita's
comments,
and
here
I'd,
say:
I
took
a
quick
glance
at
all
of
them
this
morning
and
I'd
like
nine
out
of
ten
of
them,
I
like
zero
qualms,
so
I
will
go
ahead
and
submit
I.
Think
the
only
that
one
was
the
only
one
that
I
wanted
to
discuss
the
one
that
you're
showing
right
now
on
your
screen.
Nikita,
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
push
out
an
update
based
on
the
comments
and
then
get
everybody
to
check
that
out.
The
next
app
that
I
left
on
the
issue.
C
E
C
Oh,
you
know
a
report,
sorry
mixing
up
words
now
turning
the
report
in
to
us
on
steering
private
indicating
that
there's
private
tags
on
there
kind
of
like
the
Apache
kind
of
like
Apache
Software
Foundation,
does
it
where
everything
that
you
submit
is
initially
private
until
we
tell
you
otherwise
and
then
the
otherwise,
when
we're
good
with
it,
we
would
say
PR
this
into
your
community
folder
in
the
community
repo
and
then
any
follow-ups
would
be
at
a
sig.
Chair
and
tech
leads
meeting
with
the
groups
that
we
would
need
to
followup
with
okay.
F
For
this
year
Paris,
could
we
do
this
like
a
trial,
balloon
thing
saying
it's
optional,
but
please
here
is
what
you
can.
You
know,
try
with
us
and
see
how
that
goes.
At
least,
we
will
work
out
the
kinks
in
the
process
for
this
year
and
then
we'll
mandate
it
like
beginning
of
next
year
sounds
good
to
me.
What's.
A
A
D
To
be
frank,
though,
I
have
a
feeling,
like
the
one
of
the
purposes
of
this
particular
process,
was
to
make
sure
that
we
have
a
pulse
on
the
entire
project
if
we
don't
have
a
pulse
on
the
entire
project.
I
think
a
lot
of
the
value
of
this
goes
away,
in
particular,
if
we
make
it
optional
there
we're
kind
of
feeling
that
we're
going
to
get
the
same
voices
that
we
hear
the
other
communication
channels,
but
we
already
have
things
like
the
chairs
and
tech
league-leading,
like
the
options.
D
We
should
be
more
generous
with
people
and
more
generous
timelines,
and
things
like
that,
but
I
I
guess
I
kind
of
disagree
with
the
idea
of
making
it
optional
in
2020,
like
even
if
we
say
hey,
you
have
three
months
to
do
this.
Like
you
have
a
quarter
to
to
do
this
and
fill
this
out
and
return
this
and
that
kind
of
stuff,
but
please,
like
humor,
us,
go
through
this
process
so
that
we
can
make
it
better
for
the
like.
F
F
So
I
was
thinking
of
doing
the
same
thing
here
and
the
other
thing
is
yes,
we
can
give
it
a
three
month
deadline,
but
you
know
you
know
just
like
how
P
are
some
caps
gets
reviewed.
You
know
the
day
before
the
deadline.
That
is
what
is
gonna
end
up
happening,
so
we
know
how
we
work.
We
know
that's
what
we
light
up
doing
so
why?
F
A
H
C
I
was
fine
waiting,
I'm,
just
gonna
say
for
optional
versus
not
optional.
We
can
always
start
with
working
groups.
I
think
that's
actually
the
how
we
even
got
here
kind
of
I.
Think,
like
the
initial
like
six
months
ago,
comment
was
hey.
I
thought
that
working
group
was
temporary
and
then
that's
how
we
kind
of
got
here.
So
maybe
we
can
make
the
working
groups
required
and
I
don't
know
and
then
go
with
other
optional
schedules.
C
I,
don't
know
I'm
just
kind
of
talking
out
loud
at
this
point,
since
we
you
know,
obviously
do
have
a
need,
but
at
the
same
time
there
is
extenuating
circumstances
going
on.
So
any
thoughts
about
like
some
kind
of
like
tiered
system
like
that.
I
A
I
I
D
I
C
You
see
I'm
saying
so,
meaning
like
we'll
work
in
tandem,
like
so,
for
instance,
say:
I
have
four
SIG's
right
as
I'm
the
on
the
liaison
for
steering
committee
I've
got
off
arch,
you
know,
name
name
your
cigs
and
then
for
those
four
SIG's
I
go
and
work
with
the
chairs
and
we
collectively
do
the
report
together
to
see
if
this
is
even
a
thing
that
is
possible.
I.
D
Does
that
combined
with
the
optional
clause,
because
I
know
the
one
issue
that
I
see
with
going
the
other
way
and
like
having
liaisons,
try
and
like
push
the
reports
out?
That
direction
is
there's
seven
of
us
and
there's
40
of
them,
which
is
why,
when
we
were
looking
at
this,
we
were
designing
it
in
be
like
okay,
you
prep
the
report
and
bring
it
to
us
and
then
we'll
help
review
it
and
work
through
any
issues
with
you,
as
opposed
to
a
steering
reach
out,
because
when
you
know
it
was
a
little
bit
different.
F
A
A
A
D
Yeah,
this
was
kind
of
one
of
the
items
that
we
had
talked
about
in
the
breakout
meeting
about
community
health
check
stuff.
So
when
steering
was
handling
Turner's
and
charter
ratification
and
that
kind
of
stuff
there
was
a
form
of
of
liaisons
where
it's
like.
You
know,
a
steering
committee
member
was
like
the
primary
point
person
from
steering
help
a
particular
sig
work
through
any
charter
questions
and
that
kind
of
stuff,
and
then
when
the
Charter
was
done,
then
the
Charter
would
come
to
the
full
steering
committee
I.
D
You
know
we
discussed,
and
maybe
it's
a
good
idea
for
us
to
have
like
semi-permanent
liaisons
from
steering
to
our
various.
You
know
community
groups
to
work
in
groups,
user
groups,
that
kind
of
stuff,
so
that
if
a
particular
community
group
has
questions
that
maybe
come
up
out
of
band,
they
know.
Okay.
This
is
like
the
steering
feet.
Person
who
I
can
reach
out
to
who
maybe
is
either
already
10
meetings.
There's
already
someone
involved
nothing,
but
not
necessarily,
but
they
have
like
a
point
contact
person
that
that's
their
representative.
D
This
liaison
would
not
be
somebody
who
is
making
decisions
on
behalf
of
the
steering
committee,
but
is
more
kind
of
facilitating
that
point.
The
initial
point
of
contact
is
like
hey,
for
example,
we
want
to
update
our
charter
once
the
pros
has
to
go
around
that
or
does
a
charter
change
that
we
make.
Does
that
actually
have
to
come
the
steering,
or
is
that
charter
change
good
and
not
for
us
to
do
on
our
own
depending
on
what?
What
it
is
that
that's
being
changed
in
the
Charter?
D
Any
any
kind
of
questions
around
the
bat
would
kind
of
they
have
a
person
to
kind
of
talk
to
first.
This
would
also
you
know
if
we
go
into
community
health
checks
knock
on
stuff.
The
liaison
will
also
be
like
the
first
point
of
contact
for
their
community
held
check,
any
questions
that
would
arise
there
and
then
bring
that
to
the
full.
The
full
committee,
if
needed
there
for
a
decision.
D
Those
needed
so
yeah
just
want
to
kind
of
bring
that
up
a
point
discussion
if
we
see
other
than
any
value
in
that,
obviously
these
would
have
to
change.
You
know
every
time
you
have
a
an
election
or
something
like
that
we'd
kind
of
play,
musical
chairs
with
who
is
who's,
the
liaison
or
which
particular
stage
Bob.
F
So
continuity
is
important
right,
so
we
after
the
election,
we
would
rebalance,
and
then
you
push
a
set
of
people
until
the
next
election
right
and
then
we
would
update
the
website
saying
for
each
of
the
same
and
then
when
new
six
come
in
or
six
could
go
out,
then
we
could
think
of
in
figuring
out
who
who
couldn't
take
on
the
additional
load
or
get
freed
up
right.
Is
that
what
you
are
thinking?
Kristoff.
D
Think
no,
because
this
person
isn't
going
to
be
a
decision
maker
like
they're,
not
necessarily
making
decisions
on
behalf
of
steering,
so
it
doesn't
necessarily
need
to
be
a
different
person.
It's
just
like
a
point
of
contact.
If
you
have
questions
and
that
kind
of
stuff
for
how
to
bring
things
up
to
steering
this
person
would
be
kind
of
at
that
point
of
contact
before
something
okay,
end
up
coming
to
the
full
committee,
I.
F
D
I
I
would
actually
like
Tim,
said
just
get
in
that.
The
last
time
that
we
attempted
the
liaison
role
for
the
steering
committee
was
to
have
people
go
out
and
solicit
charters
from
six
and
then
also
act
as
approvers
for
six
charters.
And
so,
even
though
I
was
on
the
steering
committee,
I
needed
to
make
sure
I
had
other
members
of
steering
act
as
the
liaison
to
be
able
to
approve
my
charter.
So
I
feel,
like
the
extra
pair
of
eyes
for
a
sanity
check
is
valid.
B
Just
a
question:
do
you
see
this
is
being
an
active
or
a
passive
role,
so
active
as
in
you
know,
we
talked
about
charters
right
now
and
did
going
and
working
on
the
health
check
might
be
another
example
or
as
they
they
come
to
steering
and
steering
them
as
your
liaison
work
with
your
liaison
to
deal
with
the
communication
process,
then
bring
it
forth
to
steering
or
is
it
both
I?
Just
if
it's
both,
then
we
just
need
to
say
what
what
bits
are
active
and
what
bits
are
passive,
because
you
know
it.
B
D
I
at
least
envisioned
it
as
a
passive
role,
as
opposed
to
an
active
role.
But
again
you
know
is
it
was
just
an
initial
idea.
We
can
kind
of
scope
out
like
if
there
are
pieces
that
we
would
see
in
addition
to
the
general
path
of
being
a
point
of
contact,
but
you
know
things
that
we
want
them
to
to
actively
do.
C
I
Guess
I'm
overall
plus
one
on
the
concepts
I
will
register
that
I'm
wary
of
dropping
the
ball
on
even
more
things.
I
don't
know
if
this
is
still
the
case,
but
steering
committee
members
tend
to
be
pretty
highly
overloaded
people,
as
is
so
it's
probably
a
good
idea.
Hopefully
we're
not
signing
up
for
some
of
the
FIR
I'm,
not
writing
a
check.
We
can't
cash
I.
C
Don't
do
like
the
idea
of
us
some
of
us
like
taking
some
cruise,
that
we
already
work
with
not
necessarily
chair,
but
then
we'll
already
have
you
know
kind
of
that
relationship
with
some
of
those
groups.
I
mean
we
can
maybe
even
put
a
clause
in
that
says,
we
can't
necessarily
be
the
liaison
to
something
that
we
chaired,
but
I
mean
if
we're
active
in
the
crew
that
should
be
okay
but
play
key
roles,
not
necessarily
applicable
or
bias,
or
something
I.
F
D
Not
exactly
sure
where
it
would
go
off
the
top
of
my
head,
but
yeah
I
think
we
should
have
it
definitely
up
step.
One
would
be
figuring
out
like
who's
gonna.
Do
what
and
then
documenting
that
somewhere.
So,
like
you
know,
I
can
again
we
take
the
next
step,
which
I
think
would
be
list
out
all
of
our
community
groups
into
like
a
spreadsheet
or
something
like
that
and
figure
out
how
many,
how
many
per
steering
committee
member
and
then
we
start
sliding
them
out.
Maybe
five
Aaron.
D
D
D
Yeah
and
then
you
know
we
can,
we
can
start
dropping
dropping
names
and
that
kind
of
stuff
in
there
on,
on
the
make
sure
that
we
have
coverage
and
then
document
that
somewhere
and
then,
like
last
step,
would
be
communicating
out
SIG's
like
hey
here's,
your
new
liaison,
if
you
have
any
questions
in
these
kind
of
categories,
this
is
this
is
at
least
your
first
point
of
contact,
but
also
feel
free
to
reach
out
to
the
the
full
steering
committee.
If
you
need
like
decisions
on
things,
because
that's
who's
gonna
have
to
make
decisions,
anyways.
F
D
A
A
This
was
just
so
we
had
an
issue
be
having
a
show
in
the
finding
repo
about
setting
up
a
digital
ocean
account
for
you
to
each
listing.
Jones
has
created
a
service
desk
ticket
and
CN
CF
said
that
they'll
talk
to
digital
ocean
and
come
back
with
a
response
by
in
a
week
or
so
that
we've
started
discussion
with
dissolution,
any
other
updates
or
anything
you
want
to
mention
them
so
hard.
This.
F
Just
in
terms
of
numbers,
it
was,
it
would
be
between
six
hundred
and
a
thousand
dollars
per
month
and
according
to
the
calculations
that
we
ended
up
making
on
that
PR
so
and
CN
CF.
Actually,
the
Chris
actually
said
that
you
know
no
problem.
We
will
be
able
to
do
it,
even
if
we
don't
get
credits,
but
let's
try
the
credits
first.
So
that's
where
we
are.
J
C
C
So
obviously,
for
that
doc
it
had
a
very
specific
purpose,
but
when
you
mix
that
type
of
doc
in
with
three
other
Doc's
that
say
the
same
thing
about
the
purpose
of
that
doc
being
the
word,
you
know
the
member
equals
this
term.
It
gets
a
little
crazy,
so
I
wanted
to
get
some
some
discussion
around
this
from
steering.
C
I
did
not
include
too
many
next
steps,
because
I
wanted
to
talk
about
this
before
we
kind
of
dove
headfirst,
because
we
do
have
the
contributor
ladder
at
community
membership,
community
membership,
dot,
MD,
and
then
we
also
have
like
I
said,
say:
the
sig
governance
and
other
governance.
Doc's
that
are
floating
around
I
talked
about
member
and
other
ways.
K
In
the
in
the
previous
elections,
we
got
a
dump
from
Deb
stats
of
any
email.
That
with
arms
are
any
github
account
that
was
associated
with
50
or
more
contributions
in
the
past
year,
and
we
then
take
that
map
get
like
the
dump
of
email
addresses
from
dev
stats
and
and
try
and
line
it
up
and
make
that
Association.
C
F
K
C
Say
there's
all
together
so,
as
you
can
see,
there's
a
lot
of
things
are
intertwined
here
and
it
would
be
cool
if
we
could
at
least
try
to
say
okay,
if
you're
a
member
here
in
the
upstream
kubernetes
project.
That
means
you
belong
to
the
github
organization
and
then,
when
we,
when
ever
we
define
member
of
standing.
That
means
hey
you're
in
the
github
organization,
plus
50
dead,
stats
plus.
Whatever
else
you
know,
you
know
whatever
arbitrary
thing
we
decide
at
that
time.
Okay,.
K
K
I
Number
of
people
who
are
toward
members
jumps
out
at
me
is
unusually
high
compared
to
the
previous
two
years
of
elections,
just
when
it's
worth
like.
The
number
of
people
who
came
in
through
a
forum
instead
of
through
def
stats,
was
in
the
low
double
digits
past
two
years,
I'm
curious
what
was
different
this
year.
D
So
we
have
right
now
we
have
over
1200
people
in
our
github
org
right
now
the
github
org
is
treated
as
a
permission
set.
So
it's
like
it's
a
technical
permission
set
you
get
if
you
need
access
to
the
github
org.
Basically
it
lets
the
old
ztm
things
it
previously.
You
needed
to
be
in
the
order
to
be
assigned
things.
That's
no
longer
the
case
anymore,
but
in
let's
see
well
do
10
things.
D
So
we
think,
like
what
the
what
the
voting
threshold
is
with,
who
gets
into
the
github
or
we'd,
be
clicking
a
lot
of
people,
I,
really
github
work
and
right
now
we
don't
have
an
active
set
way
to
get
people
out
of
the
org
I
know
with
my
like.
My
organ
donor
happened.
Github
administration
team
had
on
I
know
that
we're
working
on
that
and
we're
gonna
try
and
start
telling
people
have
not
been
active
in
like
some
number
of
years
from
me
from
the
org.
F
Okay,
so
my
opinion,
my
opinion
is
basically
what
partners
started
seeing
which
is
we
have
so
that
we
have
less.
We
have
either
people
who
are
members
of
our
github
org
or
they
are
in
our
owners
files
for
specific
groups
right.
So
it's
basically
not
somebody
who
opted
into
something
like
joining
a
mailing
list.
It's
more
like
somebody
in
our
group
noticed
and
added
somebody
to
something
right.
That
is
who
I
would
consider
a
member
you
know
loosely.
F
So
if
we
actively
added
somebody
to
an
owner's
file
or
we
added
somebody
to
the
github
are
then
the
I
remember
so,
which
means
we
have
three
kinds
of
members.
One
is
all
member
sig,
member
and
working
group
member
right,
so
those
would
be
like
the
three
different
varieties
of
members.
So,
if
you
use
that
yardstick
and
the
places
we
would
go
to
look
at
who's
on
record
is
the
owners
files
and
the
github
org
and
github
groups.
F
A
A
That's
point
number
one
point
number
two
would
be
like
them
said:
Sigma
mo
would
be
someone
who
has
contributed
to
us
say
a
is
added
an
owners
file
or
a
github
group.
For
that
said,
I
would
also
like
extend
that
to
any
non
code
contributions
or
any
other
contributions
to
a
repo
owned
by
the
SEC
and
yeah,
and
then
we
also
have
something
called
as
a
working
group.
Member
I
had
another
question
around
the
fact
that
the
previous
steering
committee
had
mentioned
that
they
don't
want
to
use
the
term
lead.
Foil.
F
I
I
think
it
was.
It
was
something
like
that,
possibly
to
underscore
that
we
would
prefer
the
tech
leads,
make
technical
decisions
as
opposed
to
people
seeking
a
technical
decision
from
somebody
who's
more
about
keeping
everything
organized
and
the
in
line
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
But
I
personally
have
kind
of
used
the
term
lead
to
describe
the
the
union
of
people
who
are
either
a
chair.
A
tech
lead
a
light
sub-project
under
when
it
comes
to
talking
about
somebody
who
is
like
the
single
point
of
contact
birth
through
the
bugging
people.
I.
I
I
F
So
the
problem
I
think
I'm
talk
about
this
before,
as
I
said,
lead,
you
don't
know
who
you
can
rely
on,
who
you
can
delegate
to
who
you
can
count
on,
and
if
somebody
becomes
a
member,
then
they
automatically
get
drafted
into
okay.
You
have
some
roles
and
responsibilities,
and
this
is
some
of
the
things
that
you
need
to
do.
F
C
F
D
C
A
A
F
You
know
we
had
talked
about
how
we
could
give
people
who
are
not
necessarily
diversity
candidates,
a
way
to
a
way
for
us
to
say
that
you
know
do.
We
would
like
them
to
come
to
some
of
our
events
and
stuff
like
that.
So
a
in
you
know
work
with
the
rest
of
the
people
there
or
do
you
want
to
comment
on
the
scholarship
program
changes
and
how
they
affect
us.
J
Saved
this
election
is
basically
made
by
people
who
formed
our
program,
a
committee
of
the
event
and
other
folks
who
are
selected
so
I,
don't
have
enough
context
on
that
I'm
happy
to
connect
you
teams
and
other
folks
from
steering
whoever
is
necessary
ways,
folks
within
CLS
C
and
C
F,
to
continue
this
discussion.
So
just
reward
me
being
a
proxy
here.
I
can
connect
you
and
you'll
follow
up
and
happy
to
update
this
PR
later
so.
F
Let
me
be
very
clear:
I'm
looking
for
here
is
the
set
of
steps
that
you
know
either
steering
committee
members
or
contrib
X
members
need
to
do.
It
is
like
send
this
fill
up.
This
Google
Form
send
an
email
to
this
mailing
list.
Anything
I
just
need,
like
a
small
write-up
that
we
can
publicize.
So
we
can
get
this
ready
for
Boston
yep.
J
F
A
Okay,
I,
like
we
have
five
more
minutes,
left
I.
Had
this
super
tiny
thing
I
wanted
to
talk
about.
We
have
an
issue.
It
says
discussion,
topics,
meta
issue
with
questions
like
do
we
need
user
groups?
Do
we
need
an
insurance
I,
don't
think
this
was
particularly
actionable
and
that
we
could
probably
close
this
and
reopen
you
shoes
if
we
need
something.
F
So
yeah,
we
if
we
say,
use
a
group
right
now.
What
we
are
telling
people
is
okay
and
go
form
user
groups
at
the
CN
CF
level
for
insurance.
We
are
talking
you,
you
know.
The
foundation
is
covering
us
release
policy.
We
have
delegated
conflict
of
interest
policy,
I,
don't
know
we
all
poked
at
it
yet
so
that's
the
only
one
if
we
need
to
poke
at
it.
D
Don't
feel
strongly
I'm,
okay
with
just
closing
this,
and
if
any
of
these
particular
issues
come
up
and
we
are,
we
need
to
address
them,
then
we
can
at
that
time.
Okay,
the
only
one
here
that
might
concerns
me
from
a
proactive
standpoint
is
insurance,
but
I'm
going
to
trust
this
would
be
a
ZFS
book
covers.
I
A
Okay,
I
will
write
whatever
we
discussed
on
the
show.
Next
would
who
wants
to
be
the
next
person
I
I
mean
we
did
this
last
time,
I
I'm
happy
to
wasn't.
Let's
try
with
me
done.
We
just
a
purchase
the
person
for
the
next
private
public
meeting.
I
A
F
A
C
C
C
I
mean
I
think
I'm
rounding
the
corner
on
most
of
my
things.
Now
that
we've
had
discussions
about
a
lot
of
it,
I
think
that's
where
the
hardest
part
is
is
getting
everybody's
consensus
and
things
so
other.
F
One
paris's
can
we
do,
that
is
all
conversation
stuff,
so
it's
so
we
don't
have
to
get
in.
The
way
of
you
know
the
review.
I'm.
Sorry
repeat
that
one
more
time
so
in
the
PRS.
If,
if
there's
a
comment
from
somebody-
and
there
is
nothing
else-
we're
gonna
do
with
that
comment,
we
can
just
do
the
resolve.
I
C
F
C
F
C
Everything
that's
been
resolved
has
a
resolved
comment
and
everything.
That's
open
is
open
for
a
legit
discussion
reason
and
on
the
chair
handbook
in
particular
everything
that's
opened.
It
has
to
do
with
lead
the
term
lead
and
things
like
that.
So
that's
why
there's
like
eight
people
commenting
that
they
think
it's
confused
that
they're
confused.
So
that's.
Why
there's
a
ton
of
comments
that
are
still
open.