►
From YouTube: Kubernetes Public Steering Committee Meeting 20200706
Description
See https://github.com/kubernetes/steering for more information about the Kubernetes Steering Committee!
A
Hello
and
welcome
my
name
is
Lachlan
Evensen.
You
are
at
the
Public
kubernetes
steering
committee
meeting,
which
happens
once
a
month
twice
a
month
every
other
week
today
is
July
sixth
Monday
July
six
2020.
All
conversations
are
fall
under
the
kubernetes
code
of
conduct,
so
please
be
respectful
to
each
other.
In
all
your
conversations
and
this
meeting
will
be
recorded
and
posted
to
youtube.
So
please
keep
that
in
mind.
A
Excellent
I
think
that
is,
it
feel
free
to
interrupt
me
for
second
time
boughs
inning
today,
okay,
so
we
have
a
packed
agenda,
so
I'm
going
to
be
running
a
tight
ship
today,
so
that
we
can
get
through
everything
on
there.
So
if
there
are
longer
conversations
and
we
need
to
side-by
them
into
into
slack
or
other
mechanisms,
I
will
be
calling
conversation
short
so
that
we
can
get
through
everything
here.
A
If
you
have
anything,
you
would
like
to
add
feel
free
if
you're,
showing
up
to
this
meeting,
to
bring
something
to
our
attention
feel
free
to
add
it
to
the
agenda
and
we
will
try
and
get
through
it.
Okay.
So,
on
the
order
of
things
we
have
crystal
here,
crystal
has
the
first
agenda
item
election
officers
for
2020
have
been
nominated.
There
is
a
link
to
a
comment
here:
call
vote
to
ratify
these
I'll,
pass
it
to
Christophe
and
let's
push
through.
B
Well,
good
morning,
everyone
so
in
previous
steering
committee
meeting
we
were
talking
about
causing
to
contribute
experience
and
getting
officers
for
our
current
election
cycle.
We're
also
talking
about
how
to
kind
of
modify
this.
You
know
as
far
as
future
election
cycles,
but
we're
going
to
implement
our
current
policy
or
this
fall's
election
cycle.
Trebek's
has
reached
consensus
and
they
are
suggesting
josh
burkas,
a
Jason
Dumars
as
the
election
officers
for
this
upcoming
fall
election
I'm
wondering
if
there's
any
comments
or
thoughts
or
if
we
should
call
about
to
ratify
those
three
officers.
B
A
You
election
officers-
yes,
absolutely,
and
thanks
for
all
the
work
Georgia
for
putting
that
together
and
everybody
that
worked
on
coming
up
with
those
names.
He
on
the
call,
congratulations,
hijo
and
looks
like
Jase
and
Josh
excellent.
Okay.
Moving
on
I
had
placed
an
agenda
item
here:
late
on
Friday
organized
code
of
conduct
committee
elections
for
seats
ending
in
August
7th
2020.
There
are
three
seats
up.
There's
a
couple
of
links
there
I
think
Paris
has
created
a
link
to
an
issue
169.
Is
there
any?
What
are
the
actions
out
of
that?
E
Pretty
much
nothing,
it's
like
a
place
order
for
us.
The
only
action
that
I've
drawn
so
far
is
discussing
how
we
nominate
and
I
think
folks
have
some
concern.
I,
don't
know
if
we
want
to
call
them
concerns,
but
I
think
folks
had
some
discussion
points
that
they
wanted
to
raise
around
how
we
nominate
so
I
thought
that
was
kind
of
a
priority
level.
A
C
Way
it
has
worked
previously
is
that
at
this
time
we
would
sit
asked
the
chairs
and
tech
leads
of
our
various
community
groups
to
nominate
somebody
so
basically
leads
at
kubernetes,
dot,
IO
and
then
sort
of
confirmed
that
those
people
are
interested,
get
the
similar
sort
of
description
of
who
they
are
what's
their
experience.
Why
are
they
interested
in
doing
this,
and
then
we
would
use
SIVs
to
hold
the
election
and
steering
committee
members
would
be
the
people
voting.
So
it's
a
mostly
open
nomination.
F
F
E
F
A
B
Ultimately,
like
I,
don't
mind
if
we
chose
to
read
like
open
up
that
pool
wider
from
the
perspective
of
ultimately,
these
you
know
as
it
talks
about
with
Syria
committee
elections
themselves.
You
know
you
can
put
constraints
on
the
electors
or
you
can
put
constraints
on
the
nomination
process.
In
this
case,
the
constraint
is
already
on
the
electors
where
there's
only
seven
votes
like
it's
only
going
to
be
the
seventh
steering
committee
members
in
there.
A
E
B
Their
concern
from
my
side,
with
doing
that,
is
just
timelines,
because,
if
we
put
on
hold
the
nomination
process
as
it
is
to
consult
with
COC,
then
we're
like
two
weeks
into
like
a
month,
long
process
already
it
for
of
accepting
nominations.
If
we
wanted
to
go
that
route
and
and
talk
to
COC,
then
maybe
we
just
go
with
the
regulations
and
stuff
the
process
that
we
have
now
and
try
and
reform
it
for
next
time
or
yeah
that
that
would
be.
A
A
E
Okay,
I'm
gonna
see
what
page
we
were
on
so
that
we
can
act
quickly
so
because
so
what
needs
to
happen
there
is
to
some
lucky
and
I
can
either
do
a
PR
to
correct
that
piece
of
the
election
policy
and
then
what
we
can
talk
to
code
of
conduct
about
nomination
and
selection
and
what
their
thoughts
are
there.
Since
I
know
they
have
some.
E
A
A
A
F
So
the
mutual
love
has
been
under
charge
and
violinist
relaying
information
from
them.
So
to
be
clear
that
the
credit
needs
to
go
to
them,
they
don't
make
good
because
see.
So
there
are
two
requests
when
an
issue
has
been
already
created
for
calendar
at
urban
areas
start
IO.
The
idea
is
that
this
account
will
join
all
existing
on
mailing
lists.
F
All
signaling
lists
and
it
will
be
set
to
auto
in
might
auto,
accept,
invites
so
when
you
look
at
the
calendar
from
calendar
at
kubernetes
turn
io,
it
will
contain
the
list
of
oil
community
events.
The
problem
that
we
like
the
solution
that
we
use
right
now,
is
this
random
string
that
you
need
to
take
random
account
of
string.
I,
don't
know
what
that
is,
that
you
need
to
invite
to
all
meaningless
all
in
invites
right
now,
but
then
anyone
can
do
that
anyone
in
anywhere
in
the
internet,
so
we
have
something
related
to
Android.
F
Some
of
your
things
in
our
community
calendar,
so
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
it's
like
we
scoped.
The
idea
is
that
this
would
be
owned
by
the
contracts
reads.
For
now.
It
really
wouldn't
have
to
care
too
much
about
what
goes
on
there,
because
it's
all
automated
it
will
auto
accept,
invites,
but-
and
we
cannot
use
contributors
at
kubernetes
Rio,
that's
the
one
that
we
use
for
lots
of
things
right
now,
because
that
has
elevated
access
to
a
bunch
of
stuff.
F
I'm,
just
gonna
go
with
the
other
one
too,
and
then
we
can
talk
about
both
of
them,
so
the
other
one
was
sick.
Fool
eats
at
kubernetes
Tourneo.
In
the
past,
we've
tried
not
to
create
too
many
g-suit
accounts
for
a
bunch
of
people
like
very
few
people
who
are
a
people,
but
something
that
we've
noticed
or
something
they
noticed
is
for
sake
for
docs,
apps
and
release
a
bunch
of
these
needs.
Mailing
lists
have
gotten
stale
and
their
owner
isara,
Novotny
and
google
calm,
which
means
we
cannot
access
those
lists
again.
F
So
the
idea
that
they
were
thinking
is
to
have
a
G
suite
account
for
each
lead
group,
so
that,
like
if
the
leads
change,
then
they
could
just
create
a
PR
document.
Something
related
to
this
I
created
a
PR
in
the
case,
a
diary
for
recently
to
split
Crips
Tatyana
according
well.
However,
you
wanted
to
so.
There
is
like
we
can
automate
it
do
not
end
up
as
a
huge
party
like
yeah,
so
I
think
about
this
I.
C
H
C
B
Iii
do
have
a
question
about
that.
Just
from
the
perspective
of
like
at
the
moment,
our
G
suite
administration
is
not
through
steering
so
technically,
as
its
documented
that
this
is
the
right
way
to
go,
is
to
come
to
steering
to
ask
for
those
things
to
be
approved.
I,
don't
mind
if
we
want
to
delegate
it
out
to
contributor
experience
or
working
group
case
intro,
whichever
one
makes
more
sense
there,
but
right
now
like
again,
we
have
like
to
do
to
actually
do
the
calendar
action,
which
is
a
the
calendar,
isn't
actually
a
group.
G
F
F
A
E
Open
I
might
pump
myself
till
the
end
here,
but
anyway,
what
the
deal
is.
It
would
be
January.
We
would
kick
off
the
year
with
steering
code
of
conduct
and
say
architecture
having
community
meeting
updates
and
then
February
and
March
doing
just
working
group
updates
since
February
and
March
ours
is
going
to
be
the
large
amount
of
work
for
annual
report,
and
then
we
kick
into
a
regular
schedule
like
we
do
now
from
from
I,
think
it's
April
until
November,
and
then
we
also
cycle
in
ke
dev
updates
as
well.
E
So
what
this
means
is
community
groups
will
have
one
slot
during
the
community
meeting
update
one
keep
one
ke
dev
update,
and
these
would
be
at
different
halves
of
the
year
and
then
also
the
addition
of
the
annual
report.
So
governance
is
going
to
read
that
you
pretty
much
have
three
updates
a
year
for
your
community
group.
I
can
show
all
of
this
in
writing
as
soon
as
I
reduce
the
tabs.
The
tab
toil
that
I
have
from
a
million
to
one
so
okay
later
on
later
on
in
the
meeting.
E
A
F
E
E
First,
then,
now
that
we've
assigned
all
of
our
steering
liaisons
want
to
make
sure
from
everybody
that
they're
good
to
go
there
and
that's
really
it
so
also
the
PR
there's
a
PR
in
the
notes
that
needs
to
get
approved
about
the
process
and
I.
Oh
no
I
just
got
my
PR
rejected.
No
I
was
doing
my
homework
while
on
the
phone
with
y'all,
I'm
I
was
doing
an
update
to
that
PR
anyway.
A
C
C
It
I
don't
know
I'll
just
register
the
it
feels
like
moving
from
doing
the
same
same
activity
at
a
certain
cadence.
He
doesn't
like
slightly
less
work
than
doing
three
different
kinds
of
activities
across
the
air.
I
feel
like
this
is
asking
kind
of
more
folks
than
before,
but
I'm
also
open
to
experimenting
with
this
trying
to
sound
skate
with
feedback
from
the
communities.
C
E
E
I'm
putting
in
that
we're
kicking
on
the
steering
committee
liaisons
need
to
kick
off
the
first
week
of
July
with
their
working
groups,
I'm,
not
listing
a
specific
date.
I
just
said
first
week
of
July,
which
that's
this
week,
is
there
any
objections
with
us
kicking
off
this
week,
I
hope
to
have
the
k2
have
email
out
by
5:00
p.m.
PDT.
Today
that
would
be
my
goal.
There
I.
F
Yeah
so
I've
created
appear
to
add
PR
in
reasons
I'm
steering
people
which
doesn't
have
because
a
new
working
group
so
right
now
there
are
45
groups,
which
means
we're
even
we
have
evenly
divided
all
the
community
groups.
So
the
question
is
who
liaisons
for
working
group
name
from
the
steering
committee,
so
we
Twitter
to
minute
does.
E
F
I
B
If
we're
talking
about
an
annual
reports
as
well
like
just
in
the
short-term
looking
at
working
groups
like
who
has
worked
because
we,
when
we
assigned
liaisons,
we
just
went
like
all
community
group
assign
liaison
if
we're
looking
at
just
working
groups,
I
think
Paris
and
myself
have
two
working
groups.
Aaron
dim
and
Nikita
have
one
oh
and
Eric.
Has
one
Lockheed
has
two.
F
A
G
G
G
E
E
So
I
wanted
to
see
what
the
group
thought
about
to
locking
a
section
every
meeting
to
just
CN
CF
discussion,
that's
so
mine
was
meta
because
I
think
conversations
like
these
are
important
and
they're
getting
kind
of
like
lost
in
the
shuffle
there's
like
so
much
more
than
this
conversation
just
based
on.
What's
going
on
with
the
TOC
and
contributors.
K
C
E
I'm,
more
than
happy
to
sure,
there's
just
so
much
going
on
y'all!
That's
why
it's
like
it's
moving
at
the
paint
like
just
a
incredible
pace
right
now,
and
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that,
like
a
sandbox,
incue,
bation
and
graduation
requirements
start
to
really
firm
up
that
we
are
just
kind
of
like
and
know
and
understand,
what's
going
on,
and
the
other
thing
is
they're
not
necessarily
trying
to
change
graduated
projects
with
this.
So
a
lot
of
people
saw
this
as
like.
E
G
G
B
There's
there's
opportunities
for
us.
If
we
keep
our
ear
to
the
ground,
so
I
think
there's
definitely
value
and
I
would
agree
that
the
it
seems
like
the
pace
of
things,
the
sein
sampling,
I,
don't
know
if
it's
just
the
CN
CF
is
kind
of
hitting
a
stride
now,
but
the
pace
of
things
definitely
picking
up
to
the
point
where
I
know
I'm
having
problems
kind
of
keeping
track
of
everything.
That's
going
on
because
I'm
not
directly
involved
in
a
lot
of
the
CN
CF
level
stuff.
B
G
Right
well,
one
one
issue
I
have
right
now
is
like
we
haven't,
heard
anything
about
some
of
the
things
that
we
were
looped
in
or
at
least
triggered
on.
So
it's
like.
We
are
getting
information
about
things
that
don't
really
matter
but
things.
There
are
other
things
that
really
matter,
and
we
are
not
seeing
any
updates
there.
So
I
think.
E
This
is
the
communication,
then
I
talk
about
a
lot
between
CN
CF
and
us,
and
that's
why
I
feel
like
we
need
to
have
dedicated
time
to
open
those
doors
on
our
side
as
well.
So
that's
just
my
thing.
I
just
now
right
now
that
I
am
at
very
active
and
engaged
in
the
CN
CF
community
I
have
definitely
100%
seeing
that
there
is
a
block
of
communication
between
our
projects
and
I.
Genuine
excuse
me,
I,
genuinely.
Don't
think
that
that
was
any
negative
thing.
E
B
Agree
and
I
also
think,
like
I,
think
it's
just
a
natural
evolution
of
the
steering
committee,
where
you
know
previously
by
prior
to
last
election,
that
we
had.
We
had
a
steering
committee
member
that
was
also
the
TOC
liaison
for
kubernetes,
so
that
that
person
offered
Michelle
offered
that
kind
of
bridge,
naturally
being
okay,
I
hold
a
seat
here
and
I
hold
a
seat
here,
I'm
showing
up
to
both
meetings,
anyways
all
the
time,
so
that
information
was
naturally
communicated
more
than
said.
G
E
G
So
so
from
our
side
we
went
and
initiated
contact
with
Priyanka,
and
we
got
that
conversation
started
right
from
the
TOC
side.
There
is
supposed
to
be
a
person,
so
let's
see
if
we
can
get
that
conversation
going
with
through
our
liaison
right,
so
that
would
be
Michelle
and
the
GB
we
have
lucky
and
we
have
anybody
else
who
represents
us
on
G,
V
side.
B
F
B
Still
have
I
think
Paris
is
original
suggestion
of
let's
put
aside.
You
know,
sometime
at
least
like
an
agenda
item
expanding
to
be
like
hey.
Is
there
anything
from
the
CNCs
that
we
need
to
pay
attention
to?
Yes,
no
move
ahead,
I'm,
just
asking
the
question:
everything
is
still
still
beneficial.
Yeah.
G
I
agree:
it's
just
that
we
have
usually
our
packed
agenda
and
if
we
put
a
slot
for
it-
and
there
is
nothing
specific
to
talk
about-
we
might
talk
about
some
random
stuff.
If,
if
there
needs
to
be
agenda
item,
then
we
sat
on
agenda
item
when
we
talked
about
right.
So
there's
a
difference
between
the
two
like,
for
example,
in
the
Sikich
called
me
run.
If
sometimes
we
just
talk
about
one
thing
for
one
full
hour
right.
So
if
you
don't
have
a
problem
filling
up
time,
but
then
it
should
be
productive
as
well.
A
Okay.
So
if
the
paraffin
wants
to
invite
you
know,
Eva
was
here
Michelle
anybody
else
that
she
needs
to
pull
in
she'll.
Do
that
and
then
we'll
just
carve
at
a
time,
and
if
there's
nothing
in
that
agenda,
we
just
don't
talk
about
it.
So
there
has
to
be
named
agenda
items
that
we
will
discuss,
but
we'll
give
it
a
5-10
minute
slot
that
sound
good.
A
A
F
About
asking
sick
chairs
and
tears
and
talking
about
choice
and
here's
to
take
the
Linux
Foundation
unconscious
bias,
training,
which
is
free
and
takes
about
20
minutes.
The
idea
is
that
we
make
it
mandatory
with
four
new
chairs,
and
he
has
to
take
this
course
within
thirty
days
of
that
appointment
and
give
the
existing
leads
to
the
end
of
the
year.
The
questions,
the
open
questions
that
we
had
was
should
we
shorten
this
timeline
because
folks
would
probably
wait
till
the
deadline
to
do
it.
G
B
At
the
very
least
like
I'm
supportive,
if
we
can
come
up
with
more
ideas
to
be
creative,
I,
don't
have
any
right
now
either,
but
it's
a
very
least
if
we
I
say
it's
a
very
least.
This
is
a
step
in
the
right
direction
and
like,
as
we
noted
last
time
like
asking
30
minutes
of
anybody
who's
in
that
kind
of
leadership
role,
especially
with
the
benefit
of
like
you
know.
B
So
30
minutes,
it's
not
not
along
like
to
ask
I
suggest
I
would
still
suggest
shorter
than
end
of
year,
because
if
we
say
end
of
year,
literally
nobody's
going
to
do
it
until
December
and
then
the
convergence
is
everyone's
gonna
be
like
I
want
ppl.
So
I
suggest,
like
do
do
want
to
just
say,
like
you
know,
45
days,
90
days,
something
like
that
and
just
say
like
it's
mandatory,
do
it.
It
takes
30
minutes
it's
for
our
community.
Please
do
it
and
then
sign
off
here
leave
Donna
your.
A
B
Well,
that's
that
I
think
everybody
in
the
community
should
do
this.
It's
only
30
minutes
and
I
know.
There's
a
lot
of
things
that
we
go.
Oh,
it's
only
30
minutes
and
add
it
to
the
pile
early,
but
I
think
this
one
in
particular
is
important
and
and
may
be
helpful.
So
like
yeah
I'd
say
my
god
says:
45
days
is
fine
I'm,
okay
with
extending
that
to
90.
But
the
thing
is:
if
it's
not
India
just
means
it
could
be
3
months
before
they
do
it
as
opposed
to
45
days.
I.
B
Think
45
days
is
generous
enough
that
if
we
say
like
you
know,
we
put
it
out
next
week
and
say
hey
by
the
end
of
August.
Go
get
this
go
get
this
done
and
then
sign
off
here
that
you've
done
it
and
if
you
haven't
we're
gonna
chase
you
down,
we
have.
We
have
liaisons
now
to
go
and
chase
everybody
down
and
be
like.
Take
your
training,
please
it's
30
minutes!
B
B
B
A
About
what
about
offering
up
a
badge,
you
can
add
to
your
readme
for
your
repo
to
say
that
leadership
has
completed
unconscious
bias,
training
and
then
a
a
signal
working
groups
can
add
a
bad
saying
that
at
least
their
leadership
has
been
trained
in
this
baseline.
Like
the
other
badges
you
have
on
you,
you
know
wall
of
your
brag
wall
on
you
read
me
because
then
you
could
say
that
it's
just
a
commitment,
you're
making
to
say
that
look.
At
least
the
leadership
of
this
piece
of
the
community
is
trained.
That
could
be
a
carrot.
A
F
A
F
So
I
have
concerns
on
like
shipping
flags
to
unconscious
bias
trading,
because
I
think
that's
something
that
people
should
take
and
not
because
they're
getting.
This
is
bad
and
yeah.
That's
kind
of
what
I
think
and
if
we
are
like
giving
off
a
snausage
are
so
cool
other,
like
signe
other
than
other
folks
are
that
cichlids
should
also
get
a
chance
to
cut
right,
because
everyone
would
love
them.
E
C
C
E
E
C
A
B
Her
last
first
rolling
this
out
as
far
as
rolling
this
out
in
policy.
Do
me
just
one
like
send
an
email
to
Cade
out
or
are
the
new
leads
email?
The
new
leads
list,
because
that's
who
it's
like
focused
on
hey
leads
list.
Here's
a
new
thing.
It's
it's
mandatory!
Please
do
this
by
45
days
from
this
date,
which
put
an
email
and
then
once
that's
out
like
I,
can
take
on
writing
that
email.
B
F
A
Ok,
wrapping
up
because
we're
at
time
one
thing
I
would
like
to
just
comment
is
we
should
go
and
take
a
look
at
the
project
board.
I
am
going
to
take
a
look
at
everything
that
we
said
we're
going
to
do
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks
and
make
sure
it's
actually
in
progress
and
assigned
correctly,
because
I
just
quickly
skim
the
project
board
and
it's
not
accurately
representing
what
we
say
we're
going
to
do.
So,
if
you
get
to
that
before
me
great
otherwise,
is
there
anything
else
before
we
wrap
up.
F
A
F
A
She'll
take
August,
you're
gonna,
take
it
Nikita,
ok,
I
will
make
make
sure.
That's
wrapped
up.
Thank
you
very
much
Nikita
and
thank
you
for
keeping
this
tight
agenda
and
all
your
items
today.
Thank
you
all.
This
concludes
our
July
6
public
steering
meeting
and
we'll
see
you
all
at
the
public
steering
meeting
in
August.
Wonderful
have
a
great
day.