►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
As
we
begin
the
meeting,
could
I
ask
all
attendees
to
mute
their
microphone
unless
I
invite
them
to
speak.
This
will
avoid
disruption
from
background
noise.
In
order
to
avoid
any
disruption
to
the
meeting.
Should
I
lose
internet
connect
connectivity.
I
propose
that
we
appoint
a
vice
chair
who
could
step
in
during
my
absence.
A
A
A
Welcome
finn,
liz
isn't
joining
us
this
evening.
Preet
kundy.
D
A
B
Thank
you,
chair
under
agenda
item
one.
There
were
no
appeals
against
the
refusal
of
inspection
of
documents
under
agenda
item
two.
There
are
no
items
which
require
the
exclusion
of
the
press
or
public
underwriting
three
layer
items.
I
previously
circulated
an
additional
well-being
project
raby
park
fencing.
So
I
think
that's
agenda.
Item
12.
B
B
Under
a
gender
item,
five
apologists
for
absence,
no
apologies
for
absence.
We've
got
a
full
house
agenda
item
six
opened
for
them.
We've
not
received
any
communications
regarding
open
forum.
A
Okay,
and
could
we
just
ask
any
members
to
declare
any
possible
disclosable
pecuniary
interests,
nobody's
putting
the
hand
up.
A
Yeah,
it
was
20
20..
Do
members
wish
to
raise
any
matters
arising
from
the
minutes,
apart
from
the
fact
that
it's
2020.
A
I
You
I
just
wanted
to
bring
to
your
attention
that
there's
going
to
be
new
funding
available
this
year
and
in
years,
ongoing
for
pond
creation
and
restoration
for
the
purpose
of
conserving
great
crested
newts.
I
This
funding
is
coming
from
natural
england,
it's
being
delivered
by
the
yorkshire,
wildlife
trust
and
it's
come
because
of
changes
to
the
district
to
the
licensing
scheme
for
great
crested
newts
in
terms
of
development.
I
So,
what's
changing
is
that
developers
now
have
the
option
to
pay
a
conservation
payment
to
natural
england.
Instead
of
going
through
the
previous
steps,
they
might
have
done
to
get
licensing
for
development
where
great
crested
meets
the
present,
and
this
money
will
go
towards
either
creating
or
restoring
ponds
for
the
purpose
of
sort
of
landscape
scale
conservation
for
this
species.
I
The
difficulty
with
it
is
that
natural
england
have
they've
identified
what
they
call
strategic
opportunity
areas
for
great
crested
new
conservation.
I
Now
I
have
access
to
the
the
maps
where
they
think
these
areas
are
but
they're
not
publicly
available
at
the
moment,
which
makes
it
difficult
they
will
be
available
later
in
the
year.
I
But
if
you
can
think
of
areas
where
you
think
pond
creation
would
be
suitable,
then
I
can
check
the
maps
for
you
or
you
can
contact
the
yorkshire
wildlife
trust
directly.
I
There's
certain
criteria
to
be
met
to
get
this
funding.
One
is
that
you
have
to
be
within
500
meters
of
an
existing
pond
they're,
also
looking
for
sites
where
you
could
possibly
fit
at
least
two
ponds,
preferably
up
to
six
or
eight
on
site,
and
they
must
be
shaded
on
the
southern
boundary
either.
So
it's
really
just
to
bring
it
to
your
attention
that
this
funding
is
available
and
to
kind
of
getting
ahead
of
the
game.
I
At
the
moment,
it's
just
a
pilot
scheme
and
it's
due
to
go
live
I
think,
later
this
year,
but
I
think
you
think
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
interest
in
this,
so
it
would
be
useful
to
get
in
sort
of
ahead
really
does.
E
Thank
you
chair
and
thank
you
jody.
I
just
wanted
to
ask
one
quick
question,
which
is
if,
for
example,
a
pond
cannot
be
relocated
within
500
meters.
Will
that
obviously,
then
have
the
implications
that
it
would
do
already?
Currently,
how
does
it
currently
work
out?
How
what's
going
to
be
the
difference
about
in
terms
of
planning,
applications,
etc
and
development.
I
So
at
the
moment,
if
great
crystal
newts
are
present
in
your
pond,
they
may
only
be
say
a
small
population
of
them.
Maybe
two.
You
know
two
to
ten
adults
or
something
like
that.
What
natural
england
have
done
is
they've.
I
Looked
at
past
biological
data
they've
also
done
a
sweep
of
what
they
call
edna
surveys
in
2018
across
the
whole
district
and
they've
mapped
the
areas
that
they
think
would
most
benefit
great
question
conservation,
so
the
payments
go
into
creating
sort
of
linking
habitats
and
creating
stepping
stones
where
they
think
population
can
expand
from
rather
than
saving
small
ponds
that
are
hemmed
in
by
development.
I
That
really
don't
have
a
chance
of
actually
standing
the
test
of
time.
If
you
know
what
I
mean
so
yeah,
the
the
500
meters
from
an
existing
pond
is
where
they're
looking
at
the
strategic
opportunity
areas,
although
you
may
be
in
one
of
those
areas,
you
still
need
to
be
within
500
metres
of
a
pond.
I
It
doesn't
have
to
have
great
crested
nuts
in
it,
but
it
needs
to
be
a
pond
there
already
and
it's
to
kind
of
create
these
stepping
stones
and
looking
at
the
wider
landscape
that
will
benefit
the
does
that
answer.
Question.
E
And
the
the
the
reason
that
no
just
asking
a
question
about
it,
I
think
there's
the
it's
just
interesting,
that's
mentioned,
and
we've
got
a
number
of
different
areas.
Obviously
the
problem
we've
got
is
we
haven't,
got
as
much
public
land
in
the
outer
northeast,
maybe
elsewhere,
and
therefore
finding
sites
is
gonna,
be
much
more
difficult.
E
It
could
be
a
problem,
but
it's
certainly
something
to
think
over.
So
thank
you.
I
I
mean
this
doesn't
have
to
be
on
public
land.
It
can
be
in
private
land
as
well,
so
obviously
not
in
tiny
gardens.
But
if
you
know
landowners
that
do
have
have
the
space,
you
could
point
them
into
in
the
direction
of
this
scheme
as
well.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
public.
D
Thanks
chair
yeah,
thanks
jody
for
bringing
this
to
the
board,
because
I
think
that
I
it
should
be
made
clear
that
the
all
woodley,
hardwood
and
weatherby
areas
are
some
of
the
areas
where
this
overlaps
with
north
yorkshire
and
so
the
the
the
rim
of
this
scheme
overlaps
with
what
should
be
aimed
at
north
yorkshire.
I
should
be
clear
on
that,
so
it
makes
sense
for
us
to
to
access
this
chair.
Can
you
make?
D
Can
we
make
sure
that
this
is
sent
to
all
parish
councils,
and
can
we
look
to
make
any
recommendations
to
jody
where
significant
land
owners
herewood
estate,
mexiburs
state
others
like
that,
can
come
back
and
and
report
back
and
ask
the
council
what
sites
it's
also
looking
at
on
its
own
land
in
our
areas
to
bring
forward?
That
would
be
very
useful
and
jody.
It
would
be
remiss
of
me
given
we're
discussing
transport
next,
to
not
ask
what
are
the
criterias
and
planning
around
where
planning
can't
go
ahead
when
new
populations
do
exist,.
I
I
And
if
your
development
falls
into
a
green
zone,
you
can
pay
a
sort
of
one-off
payment,
a
conservation
payment
that
will
then
go
to
creating
ponds,
offsite
the
the
payments
kind
of
escalate
and
get
bigger,
depending
on
whether
you're
in
the
green,
amber
or
red
zone.
I
You
would
still
have
to
do
mitigation
such
as
the
new
fencing
and
possibly
even
translocating
individuals,
and
that's
another
reason
for
getting
these
ponds
created,
sort
of
ahead
of
the
scheme.
It's
one
it's
so
that
developers
can
see
where
their
payments
are
going
and
two
it's.
If
the
need
is
there
to
translocate
great
crested
nuke
populations,
they
can
put
them
into
receptor
puns,
which
are
already
established.
D
Okay,
thank
you
just
to
add
to
that
chair
that
the
as
we
know,
we've
declared
a
climate.
Emergency
ponds
are
a
better
way
for
climate
storage,
for
carbon
storage
and
carbon
capture
than
trees
are.
If
we're
seeking
to
plant
more
trees,
we
should
also
be
looking
to
have
more
ponds
in
the
area
too.
G
Thank
you,
jay.
It
follows
on
from
council
robinson's
point
I
was
going
to
suggest
it
would
be
really
useful
if
we
could
get
a
written
briefing
of
this,
so
we
can
circulate
it
to
our
parish
councils
and
there's
quite
a
lot
of
community
groups
locally.
That
will
find
out
of
interest
and
that
way
we'll
get
the
most
eyes
on
it
and
the
most
information
coming
back,
and
I
think
that
will
help
us
to
to
take
advantage
in
the
best
way
that
we
can.
H
Thank
you
chair.
My
question
comes
from
ignorance.
Really,
when
does
a
pond
just
become
a
water
source
or
when
is
it
defined
as
a
pond?
Sorry.
I
That's
a
really
difficult
question
to
answer.
Yeah.
I
think
it's
got
to
hold
water
for
a
certain
amount
of
time
during
the
year.
I
think
another.
Another
criteria
that
natural
england
are
making
for
these
new
ponds
is
that
they
must
hold
water
at
least
one
in
every
three
years.
I
Another
thing
to
bear
in
mind
is
that
they
also
won't
paint
for
lining
of
them,
so
it
needs
to
be
land
that
will
hold
water.
So
I
can
probably
tell
you:
we've
been
looking
at.
We've
already
been
looking
at
pawn
creation
at
loverton
hall
as
part
of
this
scheme,
but
one
of
the
big
problems
there
is
the
geology
of
the
site
and
not
all
of
it
will
hold
water
just
because
of
its
it's
on
the
magnesium
limestone
ridge
and
there's
no
clay.
I
So
it
looks
like
we're
going
to
have
to
do
a
load
of
boreholes
to
test
where
we
can
get
them
in
because
they
do
need
to
be
at
least
a
metre
deep,
as
well
and
of
an
area.
I
think
it's
10
by
10
square
meters,
so
100
square
meters
in
size,
the
the
one
meter
depth
only
has
to
be
in
the
in
the
very
center.
In
the
very
deepest
point.
I
The
other
thing
that
natural
lingam
will
pay
for
is
fencing.
So
if,
if
it's
likely
that
they're
in
a
place
where
there's
going
to
be
lots
of
disturbance
from
other
people
or
dogs,
they
probably
want
them
fenced
off,
which
I
think
in
in
a
way
works
for
us,
because
we
don't
have
to
worry
about
water
safety
and
things
like
that.
Either.
H
So,
following
on
from
the
previous
two
cancer
points,
yeah
something
written
on
that
one
guidance
would
be
helpful
as
well
for
anybody
considering
this.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
Thank
you
I'll.
Take
it
jody
that
you
will
be
able
to
send
that
information
to
either
john
grieb
or
to
preach
yeah,
and
then
we
can
send
it
out.
I
A
But
that
will
be
in
the
information
that
you
send.
It
will
yeah.
Okay,
all
right!
Thank
you
very
much
jody.
I
take
it,
there's
no
more
questions
because
there's
no
more
hands
raised,
so
thank
you.
You're
very
welcome
to
stay
with
us,
but
feel
free
to
leave.
If
you
need
to
thank
you,
okay.
So
agenda
item
number
eleven.
Oh
sorry,
number
ten
is
the
outer
northeast
community
committee
draft
connecting
connecting
lead
transport
strategy
and
we
have
finn
campbell.
A
I
think
we've
also
got
paul
foster
here
paul.
We
were
met
in
the
meeting
last
week,
so
I
I
guess
that
you're
here
to
support
finn.
Are
you
in
this
or
or
the
other
way
around?
Maybe.
K
Yes,
so
thank
you
chair,
so
we've
got
a
brief
presentation
for
for
members
which,
hopefully
finn,
can
share
on
the
screen
and
I'll
talk
through
for
you.
I
thought
I
think
some
specific
questions
you
wanted,
raising
or
answering
as
well
chair,
so
I'll
get
on
to
that
in
terms
of
the
consultation
response
we've
had
so
far
so
I'll
I'll
I'll
cover
that
towards
the
end
of
the
presentation.
K
So
the
transport
strategy
draft
was
approved
executive
board
in
december
and
we're
currently
in
the
process
of
going
through
a
consultation
on
that
we're
making
sure
that
we
go
to
as
many
groups
as
we
can
and
I
think
if,
if
members
have
other
places
they
feel
we
need
to
go
groups,
we
they
would
like
us
to
engage
with.
Please
do
let
us
know
please
forward
on
the
consultation
information.
K
That's
that's
in
your
pack
to
everyone,
because
I
think,
what's
really
important
is
that
we
do
get
the
views
of
as
many
people
as
possible
to
ensure
this
transport
strategy
fits
what
the
people
of
leeds
want
and
not
just
the
strategy
written
by
me
and
finn.
You
know
it's
got
to.
It's
got
to
work
work
for
everyone
and
we
need
to
get
those
views
and
ensure
that
we
develop
it
accordingly.
K
Okay,
so
the
vision
for
the
strategy
is
for
a
city
where
you
don't
need
a
car.
This
evolved
over
a
bit
of
time,
it
started
with
where
you
don't
need
to
own
a
car
use
user
car
and
we've
sort
of
simplified
it.
But
what
I
probably
want
to
stress
with
this
is
it's
not
anti-car
strategy.
This
is
about
actually
improving
the
alternatives,
so
we
want
alternatives
so
that
everyone
has
an
affordable,
accessible,
healthy
and
low
carbon
choice
in
how
they
travel,
and
so
so
that's
what
we've
we've
developed.
K
We
hope
we've
really
got
that
point
around
everyone
and
every
journey
and
tried
to
put
something
in
the
strategy
that
solves
all
those
issues
that
we
have.
So
it's
based
on
sort
of
our
three
key
objectives
around
tackling
climate
change,
transport's,
currently,
a
third
of
the
emissions
that
we
have
in
the
city.
So
we've
got
to
look
to
reduce
that
if
we're
going
to
meet
our
2030
net
zero
target,
inclusive
growth.
K
This
is
very
much
about
making
sure
that
everyone
has
access
equal
access
to
the
employment,
education,
leisure
and
healthcare
facilities
of
the
city
and
ensuring
that
they
can
get
to
them
easily,
but
also
by
having
a
much
more
efficient
transport
system
using
less
resources
and
vehicles.
To
do
that,
we
should
be
able
to
reduce
the
cost
to
everyone,
and
that's
something
that's
come
out
quite
strongly
from
people
is
about
reducing
the
cost
of
travel
to
them.
So
we
want.
I
hope,
this
strategy
sort
of
sets
us
on
the
road
to
doing
that.
K
Improving
health
and
well-being.
Obviously
walking
and
cycling
are,
you
know,
well
documented,
as
massively
improving
our
health
in
terms
of
both
physically
and
mentally.
You
know
really
important,
but
also
within
strategy.
We've
got
to
look
to
deal
with
the
negative
effects
transport
has
on
our
health
in
terms
of
air
pollution
and
road
danger.
K
So
we've
set
ourselves
some
challenging
targets
in
terms
of
the,
as
I
said,
the
the
2030
net
zero
for
the
climate
emergency,
a
real
shift
in
how
people
travel,
reducing
car
use,
increasing
public
transport
walking
cycling
by
by
a
huge
amount.
K
But
as
you
can
see
on
the
far
side,
that
still
means
that
we
we
accept,
there's
still
going
to
be
a
significant
amount
of
private
car
travel
in
the
city
by
2030,
and
we
need
to
look
at
how
we
can
decarbonize
that
probably
we've
also
put
in
the
strategy
statement
around
vision,
zero
and
a
target
we
want
to
have
for
zero
people
killed
or
seriously
injured
in
leeds
roads
by
2040..
K
Now,
if
you
put
into
context
that
in
2019
there
were
350
of
these
types
of
injuries
and
fatalities
on
the
road,
so
we've
got
a
long
way
to
go
on
that,
but
through
a
sort
of
collaboration
between
ourselves
and
partners,
especially
the
police,
to
change
the
way
we
do:
enforcement
education
and
change
the
infrastructure
of
the
highway.
K
It
can
be
done
and
it
has
been
done
in
other
cities
around
the
world.
Oslo
is
a
notable
success
story
with
that,
but
it's
about
changing
the
approach
and
making
sure
all
partners
are
working
towards
that.
Okay
finn,
I
think
the
climate
emergency
is
one.
That's
really
focused
our
attention
when
we've
been
developing
this
strategy
and
and
and
you
know,
to
meet
that
2030
target
is
going
to
be
hugely
challenging.
K
So
what
we've
set
out
in
the
strategy
is
probably
the
sorts
of
measures
and
policies
that
we
could
introduce
if
we
got
sufficient
backing
and
funding
from
the
combined
authority
and
central
government
to
deliver
about
a
43
reduction.
K
K
We
think
that's
that's
going
to
happen
to
an
extent
as
well,
so
we
could
maybe
reduce
a
bit
further
because
of
that,
but
still
there's
a
huge
gap
to
to
me,
and
so
we've
put
a
number
of
measures
in
the
strategy
that
we're
suggesting
and
want
to
understand
people's
views
on
they're
things
like
workplace
parking
levy
or
a
low
carbon
zone
which
are
about
charges
that
will
encourage
that
behavioral
shift,
but
also
generate
some
funding
to
spend
on
the
positive
things
that
we're
putting
in
the
in
in
the
strategy
to
enhance
public
transport
and
sustainable
travel.
K
We're
also
looking
at.
Therefore,
how
can
we
fund
public
transport
differently?
How
can
we
make
it
work?
Every
meeting
we
ever
go
to
every
consultation
we
ever
do
go
to
people
tell
us
about
the
buses,
how
they're
not
doing
everything
that
they
want
them
to
do,
whether
that's
be
reliability,
frequency
places
they
serve
or
fares
and
we've
got
to
make
ourselves
do
something
about
that
and
maybe
putting
some
more
public
money
into
that
is
is
a
way
to
kick-start
that
virtuous
circle
with
that
element.
K
Okay
finn,
the
transport
strategy
has
six
big
moves
and
I
think,
contained
in
your
pack
and
report,
there's
a
bit
more
detail
on
each
of
these
and
the
obviously
key
themes
that
we
felt
need
to
be
addressed,
and
it
goes
back
to
that
point
around
trying
to
have
solutions
for
every
journey,
and
hopefully
a
number
of
these
elements
work
here,
but
I
think
maybe
focusing
on
sort
of
that.
Creating
healthier
space
street
spaces
and
communities
is
very
important
here.
K
How
do
we
make
the
the
residential
areas
that
we
live
in
and
the
district
centers
that
are
close
by?
How
do
we
make
them
better
connected?
How
do
we
make
the
obvious
choice
for
travel
to
be
to
walk
or
cycle
to
those
local
facilities?
How
do
we
increase
working
with
planning
colleagues
with
other
services
within
the
council
and
other
providers
across
the
city?
How
do
we
make
sure
that
the
things
you
need
to
access
on
a
daily
weekly
basis
are
actually
within
those
easy
walking
distances
within
your
community?
K
K
But
you
know
it's
not
all
about
the
city
centre
and
I
must
stress
that,
with
this
strategy,
enhancing
public
transport,
as
I've
said
about
buses,
it's
very
you
know
essential
that
we
do
this
enhancing
rail
as
well,
but
in
the
end
buses
and
are
going
to
be,
do
carry
the
most
people
of
all
public
transport
forms
and
are
going
to
continue
to
be
that
and
we've
got
to
make
a
success
of
them
and
make
them
better.
K
And
so
there's
some
some
suggestions
in
the
strategy
about
how
we
do
that
in
terms
of
allocating
road
space
to
them,
reducing
the
delay,
making
the
operational
cost
of
those
buses
lower
and
therefore
returning
some
of
that
investment
from
the
private
companies
into
better
services.
Lower
fares,
increased
frequencies
there's
a
lot
of
work.
Obviously
we
can't
do
that
alone,
as
the
council
we're
working
with
the
combined
authority
on
that
who
are
the
public
transport
provider,
and
I
think
that
you
know
they've
they've
set
out
their
strategy
as
well.
K
For
this,
at
a
west
yorkshire
level,
new
mobility
solutions
is
very
much
about
some
of
the
again
some
of
those
journeys
that
are
not
easily
dealt
with
by
public
transport
ones.
Such
a
ideas,
such
as
bike
bike,
hire
schemes,
car
sharing
schemes,
car
clubs
and
demand,
responsive
transport,
which
I
believe
is
really
important
and
one
that
could
really
work
for.
K
You
know,
for
example,
the
weatherby
type
scenario
where
you
know
minibuses
that
are
on
a
dial
up
or
app
based
system
which
can
provide
people,
those
short
journeys
that
are
not
done
by
lots
of
people
at
the
same
time
and
therefore
a
double
decker
bus
is
not
the
most
efficient
way
to
do
that.
K
But
by
having
a
smaller,
more
flexible
system,
we
can
actually
provide
that
service
and
and
reduce
those
people
who
are
isolated
because
of
the
lack
of
public
transport
connectivity,
and
it
can
work
really
well
in
a
rural
setting,
as
well
as
those
small
towns
and
then
finally
delivering
mass
transit.
And
I
know
I
can't
er
chair
you.
K
K
So
I
think
we
did.
We
did
look
back
at
the
the
results
of
the
the
consultation
or
conversation
we
had
in
2016
around
what
outer
northeast
told
us,
and
I
think
I've
covered
a
number
of
these
in
terms
of
the
public
transport
provision,
the
irregularity
and
expensive,
expensive
buses,
community
travel
again,
that
that
sort
of
demand,
responsive
transport
and
and
tackling
those
local
connectivity
issues
on
street
and
and
footpaths.
K
That's
noted
there,
but
I
think
all
the
time,
the
point
at
the
top
around
parking
and
making
sure
that
those
who
are
using
the
car
have
got
the
place
to
connect
into
those
systems,
especially
for
the
more
rural
areas,
is
really
important.
So
you
know
stationing
stations
and
park
and
ride
obviously
play
a
part
in
those
long
getting
a
replacement
for
in
part
for
those
long
distance
journeys
that
we
make.
K
Okay
finn,
so
the
consultation
is
open
until
the
11th
of
april.
It's
been
extended
to
ensure
that
everyone
has
an
opportunity.
K
We
realized
that
you
know
it
was
going
to
close
on
the
26th,
but
given
we're
coming
to
these
meetings
on
the
22nd,
we
need
to
extend
that
and
make
sure
people
have
got
adequate
time
to
have
a
look
at
the
documents
and
comment
on
that
really
welcome
people
to
do
that,
and
as
much
as
you
encourage,
as
I
said
before,
I
think
now
is
probably
the
opportune
time
for
me
just
to
look
at
the
stats
that
we've
had
so
far.
K
So
then
just
correct
me.
I
think
that
if
I'm
wrong,
these
are
for
the
responses
so
far
in
in
in
outer
northeast.
Is
that
right?
There's.
K
Six
has
only
been
68
respondents
on
the
survey
so
far
of
those
55
strongly
agree
or
agree
with
the
objectives
that
we've
set
out.
They
have
the
reason
that
they
may
change
their
travel.
Behavior
has
been
mainly
that
the
most
answered
was
around
concern
for
the
environment
and
the
second
was
a
low
carbon
zone.
There
was
many
comments
around
the
strategy,
not
focusing
on
outer
areas,
and
I
think
I'm
sure
there'll
be
some
questions
on
that,
but
I
just
want
to
say
that
this
is
the
overarching
strategy
that
does
apply.
K
What
we
do
need
to
set
out
at
the
next
stage
is
the
action
plan
and
what
schemes
we're
actually
going
to
deliver.
So
there
needs
to
be
a
level
of
detail
that
will
come
forward
at
the
next
stage.
Once
we've
got
the
principles,
principles
right
and
there's
a
there's,
a
couple
of
comments
on
bike
iron
park
and
ride,
which
I've
also
covered
just
to
put
that
into
context.
We've
had
3
500
comments
overall
across
the
city
from
probably
about
one
and
a
half
thousand
respondents.
K
So
if
you
can
encourage
people
to
make
up
make
up
the
numbers,
that'd
be
really
important.
K
There
are
a
number
of
webinars
as
well
that
we've
done
that
are
available
on
youtube
to
watch
back
and
they've
been
watched
back
at
2
000
times
already.
So
obviously
there's
you
know,
there's
quite
an
interest
in
the
city
on
these
issues
and
the
transport
strategy.
So
I
think
I'll
finish
chair
just
by
sort
of
asking
a
couple
of
questions
when,
when
members
are
commenting
on
this
about
whether
they
agree
with
the
vision
and
the
objectives,
have
we
missed
anything
out
in
the
draft
strategy
and
then
understanding
from
you?
K
K
Useful
introduction,
chair
and
happy
to
take
questions
thank.
A
G
Yes,
thank
you
chair.
Well,
I'm
just
waiting
for
my
blood
pressure
to
settle
back
down,
which
always
seems
to
go
right
through
the
roof.
When
we
have
a
presentation
on
transport
strategy
for
for
the
city,
I
think
what
it
should
really
have
been
entitled
is
that
if
you
live
in
the
outer
northeast,
there's
nothing
to
see
here,
plan
and
the
transport
strategy
for
some
of
the
city,
but
not
if
you
happen
to
live
outside
the
ring
road.
G
In
terms
of
answering
your
three
questions,
the
first
but
yes,
the
objectives
are
all
lovely
if
you
live
inside
the
ring
road.
The
second,
I
forget
what
the
second
question
was.
I
think
it
was
what
what's
missing
and
well
the
outer
north
east
is
missing.
I'm
pleased
you've
managed
to
actually
find
a
map
to
put
on
the
presentation
this
time,
which
is
at
least
progress
this
time.
G
We
just
seem
to
go
around
in
circles,
which
is
somewhat
ironic,
given
the
subject
matter,
and
we
don't
seem
to
be
making
any
progress.
I
think
the
reason
so
few
people
have
responded
to
the
to
the
consultation
is
because
they're
fed
up
that
nobody's
listening.
We've
had
consultation
after
consultation
and
people
keep
saying
there
is
nothing
here
for
the
outer
northeast.
There
is
still
nothing
here
for
the
outer
northeast
and
that's
why
people
are
they're
fed
up
of
being
asked
the
question
and
giving
the
answer
and
being
ignored.
G
So
I
don't
know
what
else
to
say
really
because
it
just
seems
like
there
is
nothing
that
this
is
not
a
strategy
for
the
outer
northeast.
I'm
not
to
be
honest,
I'm
not
sure
why
you've
come
it's
a
bit
of
a
waste
of
time
and
I'm
sorry
to
be
so
down
beat
on
its
chair.
But
the
message
needs
to
go
back
to
those
who
are
responsible
for
this.
That
this
simply
will
not
do
for
our
area
is
pathetic.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
council.
I
understand
that
you
have
very
strong
feelings
about
this,
as
do
several
of
our
residents
in
in
the
weatherby
ward,
and
can
I
take
councillor
stevenson's
point
next
and
then
maybe
paul
you
could
respond
to
those
two
and
then
we've
got
another
couple
of
councillors.
So
councillor
stevenson.
F
Thanks
chair,
unlike
council
lamb,
I
won't
hold
back.
F
Council
lamb
hit
the
nail
on
the
head.
Have
we
missed
anything?
Yes,
the
outer
door?
Feast,
if
you
imagine
leads
as
the
city
of
leeds
is
a
clock,
face,
there's
absolutely
no
public
transport
between
12
and
3
p.m.
There's
nothing
and
what
you're
giving
us
is
a
few
bush
routes
and
that's
not
going
to
solve
the
problem
at
all.
Neither
will
the
park
can
ride
in
a
location,
that's
completely
useless
on
the
a64
and
doesn't
catch
anything
from
york
or
utilize,
the
motorway.
F
So
you
need
to
go
back
to
the
drawing
board
on
that
consultation
consultation-wise.
F
It
always
amazes
me
when
local
authorities
seek
to
do
a
consultation,
then
they'll
get
a
response
which
is
probably
at
best
10
of
the
electorate
and
they'll
base
their
whole
ideas
around
the
response
of
the
ten
percent
and
they
miss
the
fact
that
the
best
consultation
available
is
how
people
currently
choose
to
use
transport
and
the
majority
of
people
in
the
city
choose
to
use
their
car
for
different
reasons,
not
least
the
reliability
of
public
transport,
but
travels
a
bit
like
water.
F
F
So
we
can
all
be
green
and
at
the
same
time,
lee
city
council
is
still
telling
us
that
we
can't
then
use
those
electric
vehicles
to
travel
into
into
league.
So
I
think
an
answer
on
that
and
some
joined
up
thinking
would
be
helpful
to
us
in
terms
of
general
motor
vehicle
usage.
Is
it
the
case
that
we
want
to
ban
them,
even
if
they
are
green?
Or
will
there
be
some
sort
of
acceptance
that
if
you,
if
you
can
afford
an
electric
car,
you
can
travel
into
elites
as
you
please,
thanks
chair.
A
Paul
would
you
like
to
respond
to
those
two
councillors.
K
I
think
I'll
take
the
the
bit
around
electric
vehicles.
First,
I
think
I
think,
there's
the
government
policy
overseas
to
a
government
target
for
net
zero
is
2050.
K
and
as
a
national
strategy,
that's
a
a
much
easier
target
to
to
deliver
on
than
a
2030
target,
and
given
the
production
rates
and
the
availability
of
electric
vehicles,
the
average
vehicle
you
know,
average
vehicle
is
10
to
15
years
on
the
road
from
from
new,
so
to
get
that
turnover
by
2030
is
not
going
to
be
possible
in
leeds
the
other
points
I'm
raised
around
the
strategy
around
making
sure
that
it
is
inclusive
for
everyone.
K
So
there
we
know
there
are
33
of
households
in
leeds,
don't
have
access
to
a
car.
There
are
many
people
who
do
either
through
age,
disability
or
financial
constraints
can't
afford
car,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
this
is
a
an
equal
strategy
for
all
and
as
as,
as
council
stevenson
pointed
out,
the
cost
of
new
electric
vehicles
is
very
high,
so
we
want
to
provide
alternatives.
K
To
that.
I
do
accept
that
they
are,
you
know
in
a
hierarchy.
They
are
going
to
be
preferable
to
a
petrol
or
diesel
car
and
those
people
who
feel
that
it
is
their
best
best
alternative.
K
Then
you
know
we
are
doing
work
to
encourage
that
in
terms
of
putting
in
charging
infrastructure
for
for
evs,
etc,
to
make
sure
that
that
is
a
option
for
people
going
forward.
But
I
think
the
whole
point
of
the
strategy
is
that
we
do
need
to
in
a
in
a
sort
of
urban
environment.
It's
probably
we
do
still
need
to
do
that.
There's
going
to
be
some
the
30
figure
as
well.
There's
going
to
have
to
be
some
spatial
distribution
about
that.
It's
not
going
to
be
30
on
every
road
and
every
street.
K
Is
it
we're
gonna
have
to
look
at
that
and
we're
doing
some
work
to
show
where
how
that
applies
and
how
that
might
differ
between
the
inner
and
outer
areas
and
therefore,
what
our
strategy
needs
to
be
in
terms
of
road
design,
ev
provision,
ev
charging,
infrastructure
provision
etc,
and
you
know
naturally
the
outer
areas
will
have-
will
need
a
greater
provision
of
that
and
higher
capacity
for
cars
in
the
future
than
the
city
will.
So
I
think,
probably
that's
something
that
starts
to
answer
council,
lamb's,
question
and
criticism.
K
We
have
heard
it
loud
and
clear
from
other
areas
as
well.
The
outer
areas
around
this
strategy.
I
do
think
you
know
I'm
I'm
sorry
that
it
has
got
you
so
heated
and
so
upset
about
that.
I
do
think
that
what
we're
setting
out
in
terms
of
the
vision
and
trying
to
achieve
the
targets
that
we've
got
achieve
the
the
objectives
around
the
climate
emergency
has
put
a
huge
challenge
on
us
that
we're
responding
to
and
we're
giving
you
the
options
that
we
can
look
at
the
ways
we
can
start
to
do
that.
K
You
know
there
is
a
whole
one
of
our
big
moves
is
on
decarbonisation,
and
that
might
be
the
answer
that
you
see
and
many
individuals
see
as
the
way
to
go
is
to
just
change
the
the
power
of
their
vehicle.
But
really
we've
got
to
look
at
the
others
as
well.
K
You
know
the
outer
areas
need
better
public
transport
services
to
ensure
that
you
don't
have
those
areas
of
social
isolation
where
you
know
it's
even
more
acute
there
if
80
of
people
in
in
an
area
own
a
car
and
therefore
there's
not
the
demand
for
bus
routes,
the
20
who
don't
are
suddenly
isolated
even
more
so
we've
got
to
look
at
systems
that
get
more
people
to
use
them,
make
them
more,
economically,
viable
and
and
provide
that
facility
for
everyone.
So
I
think
there's.
I
think
there
are
things
in
this
strategy.
K
It's
not
defined
purely
for
the
inner
city.
This
does
apply
to
all
of
leeds,
and
I
think
you
know
if
you
look
closely
at
it.
There
are
many
many
of
these
issues
that
you'd
share,
whether
it's
a
village
or
an
inner
city
community,
in
terms
of
feeling
safe
on
the
road
being
able
to
walk
and
cross
the
roads
that
that
you
have
not
having
rap
running
or
traffic
effects
and
air
quality
effects
of
traffic
through
those
neighborhoods.
K
So
the
the
the
things
we're
trying
to
solve
are
similar
in
these
communities,
acknowledging
the
differences,
but
we
have
got
similar
things
that
this
strategy
is
setting
out.
That
does
start
to
tackle
some
of
the
issues
in
in
the
outer
northeast
and
I,
I
think,
I'll
I'll
I'll
I'll
tackle
head-on.
If
you
like
the
mass
transit
point,
which
I
think
is
one
that
you
know,
I
understand
members
feel
quite
strongly
about
that
there
should
be
mass
transit
to
out
of
northeast.
K
If,
if
I'm
reading
some
of
the
comments
comments
correctly
but
there's
there
is
a
reality
around
the
level
of
demand
and
some
of
that
from
the
high
car
rocket,
the
high
car
ownership
level.
So
actually
it's
difficult
to
get
that
alternative
and
get
get
get.
That
shift.
There's
also
the
points
around
how
funding
comes
to
us
from
central
government
to
deliver
that
and
therefore
we
have
to
make
a
business
case
for
it.
It
has
to
run
efficiently.
K
It
works
best
when
there
are
a
high
density
of
around
the
stops
so
running
and
building
a
system.
For
instance,
the
weatherby
across
significant
amount
of
green
areas
will
be
highly
costly
and
really
difficult
to
justify
as
terms
of
business
case.
So
when
the
combined
authority
have
done
this
work
looking
at
the
options
of
where
we
should
serve
and
their
consultations
out
at
the
moment,
so
you
can
make
representation
to
say
that
they've
missed
that
and
I'm
sure
you
will-
and
you
know
strongly
urge
you
to
do
that.
K
But
they've
been
looking
at
this
on
an
evidence
base
in
terms
of
the
possible
future
demand
and
they've
determined
that
you
know
it's
not.
It
doesn't
meet
that
criteria.
So
what
you
need
to
be
looking
at
probably
is
what
are
the
bus
solutions
that
will
work
and-
and
I
I
understand
the
issues
and
reputation
around
bus
and
why
it's
not
something
people
want
to
use,
but
in
terms
of
the
numbers
of
people
that
move
and
the
cost
effective
service
that
you
can
provide.
K
Buses
are
probably
the
the
answer
for
a
lot
of
the
north
outer
northeast
area,
so
that
I
think
you
know
that
that's
a
large
classroom,
I'm
sure
members
won't
wholly
agree
with
what
I've
said.
But
I
hope
that
explains
some
of
the
justification
behind
what
we've
done.
A
Okay,
thank
you
paul.
So
I
know
I've
got
councillor
cohen
and
councillor
buckley
and
then
I've
got
councillor
robinson
first
and
then
councillor
richard.
So
can
we
try
to
keep
the
points
to
the
point?
Please,
thank
you.
So
councillor
cohen.
B
Thank
you
yeah.
I
will
do
my
best
to
be
to
the
point
I,
although
I
do
have
three
in
text.
If
you
will
number
one,
I
think
when
you
were
giving
us
the
data.
You
were
telling
us
that
you
had.
If
you
was
not,
then
I'll
be
able
to
see
that
you'd
had
68
responses
for
the
outer
northeast.
Is
that
right
yeah?
So
that's
that's
not
even
to
get
anywhere
near
councillor
stevenson's
10!
B
That's
that's!
Under
0.2
of
a
percent.
I
believe
the
outer
northeast,
in
fact
you've
had
in
total
0.19
response
rate
to
this
consultation.
You
look
at
the
population
of
leads.
Looking
at
the
1500
people,
who've
bothered
to
respond
so
1500
individuals
have
participated.
You
told
us
that's
00.1
of
the
city's
population.
B
Goodness
me,
that's
that's
a
terrifyingly
low
figure
to
be
basing
any
kind
of
conclusions
on.
It
was
also
interesting
when
you
said
the
phrase
55
overwhelmingly
and
I
stopped
listening
once
you
said:
55
you're
shaking
your
head.
That
is
what
you
said.
B
Hello.
Please
do
nothing
now
because
54,
that's
just
over
half,
so,
in
other
words,
just
under
the
half
didn't
think
it
was
a
great
idea
at
all,
and
you
said
in
when
you
were
answering
council
alum
a
moment
ago.
This
gives
me
real
cause
for
concern
and
I
think
it
sums
up
for
me
why
we
have
such
an
issue.
B
However,
you
haven't
got
enough
demand
in
the
outer
northeast
to
deliver
mass
transit,
so
we've
got
to
rely
on
buses,
even
though
we
accept
people
aren't
going
to
and
don't
want
to
use
buses,
in
other
words
from
the
very
outset,
the
problem
you
have
is
the
facts.
You
state
you
are
not
going
to
fix
the
issue
as
you
see,
with
people
relying
on
cars
unless
you
are
prepared
to
front-end
the
investment
in
the
outer
areas.
B
My
third
and
final
point-
and
I
struggle
particularly
with
this-
we
have
an
election
in
may
for
a
mayor
for
west
yorkshire,
one
of
whose
responsibilities
is
an
integrated
transport
policy,
and
the
document
that's
been
produced
by
the
combined
authority
shows
lines
all
over
the
place
that
cover
much
of
what
you
have
said.
B
Why
are
you
trying
to
come
up
with
a
strategy
for
transport
that
the
mayor
may
or
may
not
agree
with
I'll
tell
you
now.
If
the
person
sat
in
this
virtual
room
is
elected
in
a
few
weeks
time,
I'll
tell
you
now
most
of
what
you're
saying
will
have
been
an
absolute
waste
of
time,
I'm
speaking
for
him.
He
can
speak
for
himself,
but
I'll
guarantee
he
won't
be
leaving
vast
swathes
of
the
city,
or
indeed
west
yorkshire,
out
of
a
transport
system,
as
you
seem
to
be
doing.
C
Chair,
please
one
or
two
of
them
might
just
overlap
with
what
counselor
cohen
has
just
said,
but
they
would
do
anyway
just
to
call
them
out
really
in
no
particular
order.
C
Paul
paul-
and
I
have
had
discussions
on
this
in
many
different
forums
over
the
last
two
three
four
years
or
whatever
it's
been,
but
surely
the
problem
as
council
alum
said
and
council
stevenson.
Originally,
this
is
an
urban
strategy
and
we
don't
live
in
the
urban
area.
That's
the
first
thing:
we
are
not
an
urban
area.
C
C
We
need
a
mass
transit
system
for
all
sorts
of
good
reasons,
so
you
said
paul,
but
then
in
outer
north
east
we're
not
going
to
have
one
we'll
have
to
make
do
with
buses.
C
Well,
buses,
you
get
a
bus
somewhere,
bitter
leads,
it
takes
ages
and
it's
stopping
and
it's
just
not
well,
there's
nobody
on
the
thing,
even
when
we
are
allowed
to
go
on
it
in
comparative
terms
and
that's
the
reason
why
and
and
just
I'm
hopping
around
a
bit
here,
but,
for
instance,
the
walking
and
cycling
strategy
at
the
heart
of
some
of
this
is,
if
that
was
actually
applying
properly
to
in
this
particular
case,
all
would
they.
C
We
have
a
footpath
on
a
country
lane
which
is
a
main
arterial
route,
running
north
west,
south
east,
from
all
woodland
to
idle
and
so
on,
and
that
footpath
is
dangerous
and
highways
know
it
is
dangerous,
and
yet
nobody
will
fix
it.
There
could
also
be
a
cycling
provision
there
of
some
way,
but
this
is
where
the
reality
is
different
to
the
to
all
the
plans
on
paper.
C
Just
coming
to
climate
change,
paul
mentioned
2030
we've
had
this
discussion
before
we've
got
2030
we've
got
2038,
which
is
like
we've
got
2045,
which
is
the
uk
cities.
We've
got
2050,
which
is
the
government
and
right
at
the
heart
of
the
document
that
that
I've
got
here,
which
is
the
the
big
document
on
on
this.
Is
the
airport
it's
right
right
in
the
middle
of
the
drawing,
and
if
you
take
the
airport
as
one
of
the
objectives
of
the
feeder
transport
links,
that
completely
negates.
C
Does
it
not
the
point
about
climate
change,
because
the
chairman
of
the
climate
emergency
advisory
committee
has
already
said
that
in
his
view,
leeds
cannot
meet
2030
without
without
we
don't
have
the
airport
and
just
on
to
the
particulars
of
the
of
the
consultation,
you
said
paul
what
the
people
want.
C
C
There
are
just
so
many
things
here.
One
final
point,
joe:
if
I
can
low
carbon
zone,
what's
the
difference
between
a
low
carbon
zone
and
a
congestion
zone.
K
I
think,
I'm
probably
from
councillor
cohen,
probably
just
taking
those
points
on
board,
although
I
think
probably
maybe
I
I
didn't
say
myself
clear.
I
think
you
know
I
do
think
buses
have
got
potential
are
the
answer
and
we
do
have
to
grow.
Those
people
are
gonna
have
to
understand
that
they
can
use
them.
There
are
examples
in
other
cities
in
other
areas
and
even
in
routes
in
leeds,
where
you
know,
for
instance,
the
36
which
goes
from
harrogate
to
leeds
has
seen
patronage
growth
over
the
years.
K
It's
increased
its
frequency
because
of
that
by
offering
a
quality
product,
we
can
get
people
to
change
from
the
private
car.
The
number
of
people
who
own
a
car
but
still
use
that
as
their
commute
is,
is
quite
high.
I
don't
know
the
exact
numbers,
but
I'm
sure
transdev
could
tell
us
that,
but
I
know
it's
something
that
they
quote
quite
often.
The
other
example
is
park
and
ride.
K
Where
we've
done
that
you
know,
we've
we've
seen
the
successful
uptake
of
people
using
park
and
ride
again
get
a
quality
product
with
a
bus
based
solution
and
people
will
change
and
use
it.
K
So
I
think
except
accept
what
what
the
main
points,
but
I
think
that
that
will
be
there
mass
transit
just
just
one
more
point
on
mass
transit-
and
I
you
know,
I'm
a
real
advocate
of
it
and
I
do
think
we
need
it
in
in
leeds
and
lead
city
region,
but
just
as
context,
manchester's
metrolink,
which
has
been
developed
over
the
last
30
years,
only
carries
1.2
of
all
trips
in
manchester,
so
mass
transit.
K
However
quick
you
build
it,
however
much
you
extend,
that
is
not
going
to
be
the
answer
to
reducing
you
know
the
whole
answer.
It's
part
of
the
answer
for
high
demand,
high
density
corridors.
So
yes,
council,
buckley
and
I
have
had
numerous
debates
on
these.
I
think
I
think
you
point
around
not
the
urban
area.
Again,
I
think
we've
heard
that
a
number
of
times.
I
think
we
are
going
to
make
sure
we
respond
to
that
in
the
in
the
final
final
strategy.
K
I
think
it's
clear,
that's
that's
part
of
the
solution.
We
need,
I
think
the
buses
point
just
made
footpaths
and
cycling.
I
think
I
think
probably
this
highlights
the
how
far
we
have
to
go
and
and
leads
that
point
he
makes
around
funding
and
how
much
we
would
need
to
change
the
infrastructure
that
we've
got
at
the
moment.
K
To
achieve
this,
we
you
know,
we
know
that
we
don't
get
enough
funding
to
deliver
everything
we
want
to
deliver
and
the
change
that
we
need
to
make
is
huge
and
we've
all
should
be
making
the
case
that
we
need
that
investment.
K
So,
yes,
I
accept
that
you
know
at
the
moment
the
levels
are
coming
in
a
real
challenge,
but
we've
got
to
spend
it.
What
we
do
get
on
the
right
things
show
that
we
can
deliver
quickly,
have
success
from
that
and
then
hopefully,
deliver
more
and
and
get
more
through
the
next
round
of
funding
that
there
might
be
the
the
climate
commission's
statement
on
the
airport
understand
understand
that
it's
a
similar
argument
by
many
people
on
this.
You
know
it's
similar
to
the
well.
K
Why
should
we
bother
if
china
aren't
doing
it
if
the
united
states
aren't
doing
it?
If
other
countries
aren't
doing
doing
it,
but
there's
a
point
around
taking
responsibility?
Isn't
that
for
our
own
actions
and
how
we're
contributing
to
climate
change
and
so
tackling
individual
transport
should
not
do
it,
because
someone
else
is
isn't
doing
their
part?
I
think
that
that's
maybe
after
some
of
that
point,
but
you
know
we
should
be
pushing
pushing
for
all
aspects
to
be
done.
K
If
we
believe
that
we
need
to
solve
that
issue
around
carbon,
don't
we
I'm
just.
Finally,
so
a
low
carbon
zone
would
be
based,
the
charges
for
the
vehicle
would
be
based
on
its
carbon
emissions,
whereas
congestion
zone
would
just
be
for
the
vehicle
and
the
space
and
the
time
or
the
the
route
that
it
takes.
So
a
low
carbon
zone
would
be
would
discriminate
based
on
the
the
emissions.
A
K
Is
that,
in
terms
of
the
numbers
of
people,
council,
cohen,.
K
B
No,
it
wasn't.
It
was
about
the
fact
that
a
west
yorkshire
mayor
is
shortly
to
come,
along
with
an
integrated
transport
policy
that
will
cover
pretty
much
everything
set
out
within
this
and,
frankly,
override
anything
contained
within
this
leeds
policy,
because
it's
an
integrated
transport
policy
for
the
whole
of
west
yorkshire.
K
So
I
think,
there's
there's
two
points
on
that.
One
is
leeds:
is
the
highway
authority
so
we'll
still
be
responsible
for
delivery
of
the
infrastructure
on
that
on
the
highway
and
the
elements
of
that
and
those
decisions
are
made
by
elite
city
council's
executive
board.
I
think
probably
the
second
element
is
around
again
the
governance
at
west
yorkshire
level.
The
mayor
will
be
one
of
six
representatives,
one
there
with
each
of
the
council
leaders
as
well
on
that.
So
this
is
maybe
setting
out
leeds
is
position.
K
What
leeds
would
like
to
see
and
achieve
in
the
city
region,
so
it'll
be
one
for
the
mayor
to
acknowledge
and
understand
how
he
can
help
deliver
that
in
leeds
or,
as
you
say,
maybe
not
deliver
that
in
these
books.
But
I
think
it's
setting
out
the
position
of
what
lead
city
council
would
like
to
see
as
transport
investment
in
our
city.
K
A
Thank
you.
So
we
now
have
council,
robinson
and
councillor
firth
and
then
I'll
come
to
councillor
richards
councillor
robinson.
D
Thanks
chair
a
quick
question
to
paul
first
that
you
can
hopefully
answer
before
I
go
into
the
main
body
of
points
he
mentioned
about
a
mass
transit
system.
They
didn't
suggest
what
he
was
advocating
in
the
plan.
What
mass
transit
system
is
being
advocated.
K
So
I
think
if
you,
if
you
look
at
the
mass
transit
vision
by
combined
authority,
they
are
haven't
determined
a
mode
yet
so
there's
a
number
of
options
and
it
might
be
a
blend
of
those
ranging
from
bus,
rapid
transit
options
through
light
rail
trams
to
tram,
train
systems
that
would
integrate
with
the
heavy
rail
network
as
well.
So
there's
a
range
of
options
that
they're
looking
at
and
it's
it's
weather
on
particular
corridors.
K
You
might
one
might
be
more
appropriate
than
the
others,
but
what
they
want
it
to
do
is
be
seen
by
the
user
as
one
system.
So
you
know
you
have
this,
you
know
they
have
the
same
livery,
the
same
ticketing,
the
same
experience,
the
shared
ethos
between
them.
D
Well,
I
can
get
on
board
with
the
same
ticketing
element,
but
what
I
can't
get
on
board
with
is
that
west
yorkshire's
command
authorities
plan
has
no
costs
in
it.
It
doesn't
talk
about
what
are
the
economically
viable
routes.
It
doesn't
suggest
roots.
In
many
cases
it
has
a
very
thick
line
that
goes
across
the
map,
as
we
know
from
any
transport
plan.
D
It's
when
you
start
to
get
into
the
detail
that
people
start
to
object
and
when
you
start
to
suggest
you're
going
to
run
something
past
the
back
of
their
house,
then
there
is
a
problem.
That's
there.
What
what
I'm
hearing
here
is
as
well
is-
and
I'm
amazed
is
that
the
outer
northeast
will
have
to
look
at
its
existing
services
rather
than
what
is
new.
D
That
would
come
along,
so
it
would
have
to
look
at
the
reliability
of
its
existing
bus
services,
as
opposed
to
a
mass
transit
system
where
you
talked
about
high-density
populations
been
required
to
allow
for
multiple
stops,
and
it
would
be
difficult
to
justify
in
the
outer
northeast.
It
will
be
hard
to
change
behaviors
from
people.
D
If
this
is
not
there
to
be
able
to
give
them
an
alternative
route,
we've
had
a
conversation
recently
about
park
and
rides
in
the
harewood
ward,
and
while
that
consultation
is
yet
to
take
place,
I'd
echo
the
concerns
raised
by
councillor
stevenson
about
placing
a
park
and
ride
site
in
the
wrong
location
to
allow
for
future
growth
and
future
transport
needs
some
of
the
locations
that
have
been
discussed
actually
hem
in
the
transport
system
in
the
future,
as
opposed
to
open
it
up.
D
Similarly,
my
understanding
is
that
thought
park
has
not
now
I've
heard
many
statements
in
the
council
where
we've
been
told
thought
park
is
confirmed
and
coming
this
last
week
I
was
told
the
funding
isn't
all
allocated
for
it
and
it
isn't
there
and
they
cannot
confirm
that
thought
park
will
be
happening,
which
was
an
incredible
sea
change
from
the
conversation
that
was
being
had
two
years
ago
18
months
ago,
and
and
I
asked
officers
to
confirm
that-
and
they
said
yes,
that
was
the
case
that
really
worried
me
because
thought
park
has
been
seen
as
a
transport
hub,
and
I,
like
this
idea
of
connection
to
rail.
D
It's
sad
that
weatherby
can't
connect
to
cattle,
that
is
their
nearest
railway
station.
That
would
allow
us
to
open
up
with
york.
It
doesn't
meet
the
connections
to
west
yorkshire,
but
it
meets
the
needs
of
the
people
of
the
weatherby
area
and
that's
exactly
what
should
be
the
driver
for
this.
What
meets
the
needs,
rather
than
what
meets
the
geography
as
we
go
through
this?
I
have
to
say
I'll.
D
Give
you
fair
warning
here
paul
for
the
8th
of
may
congestion
charges
ain't
going
to
fly,
I'm
not
going
to
have
those
they're
not
going
to
be
coming
in.
I
don't
don't
like
them.
They
hit
the
lowest
earners,
they
hit
the
people
who
are
on
fixed
incomes,
and
anybody
who
can
afford
to
pay
them
doesn't
change
their
behaviors
at
all
congestion
charges,
I'm
afraid
just
just
don't
work
in
terms
of
altering
the
mode
of
transport.
What
works
is
a
reliability,
a
reliable
system
and
having
reliability
in
place
and
10
years.
D
They
won't
take
the
bus
if
they
cannot
get
to
work
on
time
if
they
can't
get
to
their
doctor's
appointment
at
st
james's
or
if
they
can't
connect
to
the
city
center
and
that's
what
really
worries
me
about
this
and
I
would
hope
it's
the
thing
that
you'll
take
away
is
many.
People
in
the
outer
northeast
would
go
into
leeds
to
go
to
the
theater,
to
go
to
the
cinema,
to
have
a
meal
and
to
shop
and
would
and
would
look
to
take
a
bus
to
get
them
home.
D
They
just
can't
do
that
with
the
existing
system.
That's
in
place,
it
is
not
an
option,
that's
open
to
them,
and
so
that
hampers
the
economic
viability
of
businesses
in
the
city
centre,
but
the
choices
that
people
make
across
our
region
and
if
we're
changing
one
thing
on
the
buses,
it's
about
that
reliability,
it's
about
connecting
them
to
where
they
need
to
go
when
they
need
to
go,
and
at
the
moment
they
just
don't
feel
that
okay.
A
F
K
I
guess
the
challenge
is
that
to
deliver
the
things
you
talk
around
reliability
and
extended
services
and
times
in
a
deregulated
bus
environment
requires
either
public
subsidy
or
enough
demand
for
the
bus
operators
to
want
to
do
that,
and
I
think,
if
elected,
that
will
be
the
challenge
we
want
it
to
be
to
so
I
we
absolutely
agree
that
we
need
reliability.
We
need
better
services
that
go
to
different
places,
but
it's
how
we
actually
deliver
them
and
that's
that's
that's
the
challenge.
K
The
operators
will
tell
you
that
it's
about
reducing
congestion
on
the
route
so
giving
them
more
priority
to
help
them
run
efficiently,
etc.
But
you
know
that'll
only
do
so
much
it's
how
what?
How
do
we
get
more
funding
into
the
system
to
deliver
the
public
transport
that
people
want,
and
I
think
that's
what
we're
trying
to
set
out
in
this
strategy.
So
hopefully
I
think
it
will
be
a
common
common
challenge
from
there
to
may.
If
we
get
there.
A
E
Thank
you
very
much,
and
the
first
thing
I
want
to
say
is
it:
let's
not
forget
that
leeds
is
not.
It
was
mentioned
about
a
clock
earlier.
Leeds
is
not
a
clock
because
the
center
doesn't
sit
in
the
center.
I'd
actually
see
it
more
as
a
fried
egg.
E
At
which
point
we
all
went.
What
is
going
on.
It
doesn't
seem
to
be
much
progress.
Other
than
a
minibus
or
a
bus
that
moves
a
little
bit
like
a
certain
company
that
uses
telephones
to
to
google
technology
to
get
people
around
if
you're
trying
to
allude
which
company
I'm
talking
about,
I
think
the
biggest
thing
is
I
can
say
is
that
it
was
mentioned
that
this
is
the
plan
that
leeds
may
want
to
put
forward
to
west
yorkshire
combined
authority,
therefore
not
including
the
outer
northeast
effectively.
E
That
is
leads
his
vision
for
where
they
want
to
be,
and
at
the
same
time
as
that
talking
about
in
a
bit
further
detail,
isn't
it
funny
that
we're
having
two
consultations
about
more
or
less
the
same
issue
at
the
same
time,
wiker
and
lead
city
council
are
having
discussions
about
their
transport
strategy,
including
mass
transit,
including
improving
buses.
At
the
same
time,
no
wonder
there
is
68
people
of
the
1500
that
have
responded
in
this
particular
area,
because
I
have
to
be
honest.
E
The
question
is:
are
those
strategies
that
are
going
to
result
from
that
sorry,
the
results
that
are
going
to
be
compiled?
Are
they
going
to
be
compiled
and
actually
looked
at
reflecting
on
both
them?
Together,
or
are
they
actually
going
to
be
separate?
The
biggest
question
is
is
when
we're
in
this
situation
of
a
pandemic,
where
people
themselves
aren't
out
and
about
aren't
getting
much
information.
E
More
people
are
going
to
suddenly
work
from
home.
It
is
not
going
to
be
the
case
that
suddenly
we're
going
to
have
a
mass
movement
of
people
not
working
in
the
city
center.
The
city
center
is
waiting
to
boot
up
again
and
although
it
may
not
be
the
city
center
that
it
was
before,
it
certainly
is
getting
ready
for
it
and
there'll
be
many
people
that
will
be
waiting
for
that
chance.
If
the
road
map
is
followed.
E
And
the
fact
is
that,
when
it
looks
at
those
two,
the
fact
that
the
projects
themselves
have
been
looked
at
isolation,
as
council
robinson
said,
because
the
thought
part,
for
example,
which
is
literally
just
down
what
is
going
to
be
the
new
east
leeds
orbital
road,
hasn't
been
given
the
funding
yet.
But
if
you
spoke
to
the
same
people
that
are
telling
us,
otherwise
they
would
then
say
yes
well,
the
thought
park.
Isn't
it
going
to
be
great,
but
no,
when
we're
discussing
generally
the
strategy
of
the
whole
of
the
east
of
north
of
leeds.
E
E
A
E
H
Very
much,
thank
you
very
much.
My
point
would
start
off
with
the
ones
that
have
been
made,
so
I'm
not
going
to
reiterate
them
hugely,
but
you
can
say
we
started
by
saying
how
what
was
missed
out
and
the
answer
was
the
outer
northeast
and
I
think
the
clue
is
in
the
word,
the
answer
northeast.
H
It
is
the
largest
geographical
part
of
leeds,
and
that
is
reflected
in
that
distance.
Those
distances
which
in
themselves
then
contribute
to
the
lack
of
people
perceived
to
be
using
the
services
already,
and
one
of
the
reasons
is
before
they
have
the
number
seven
bus
from
lee's
to
harrogate
mentioned.
If
anybody's
actually
been
on
it,
it
is
a
rattling
one
that
goes
and
you're
right.
It
does
not
take
you
back
when
you
need
it,
so
you
are
right.
H
People
don't
just
go
into
leads
to
do
things
they
come
out
as
well
from
leads
to
come
out
to
actually
do
other
things
as
well.
So
now
can
we
have
people
who
love
coming
out
here,
as
they
have
done
in
covid
to
go
to
these
outer
northeast
places.
They
can't
use
the
buses
because
the
buses
don't
go
when
they
need
to
go
we're
back
to
that
problem,
and
you
know
I
would
agree.
People
have
not
responded
the
consultation,
because
things
haven't
changed
in
the
past.
That
is
the
other
thing.
H
H
It's
thinking
about
those
things
and
the
quest.
The
answer
that
you
know
counselor
robinson
put
was
that
it
should
meet
needs
and
one
of
those
is
accessibility.
So
I
am
very
hot
on
that
one.
Why
is
the
leeds
railway
station
on
the
opposite
side
to
the
bus
station,
with
no
perceptible
real
communication
between
the
two?
H
Yes,
unless
you've
tried
it
on
crutches,
you
don't
know.
You've
lived
so
the
next
part
is
about
the
fight,
it
is
the
outer
northeast
and,
yes,
we
do
connect
more
to
tadcaster,
because
that
takes
us
to
a
major
rail
station.
Unfortunately,
it's
not
easy.
I
would
have
to
get
a
bus
from
my
village
into
wetherby
and
then
in
a
wonder
one
from
wetherby
to
tadcaster
and
then
the
bus
from
tadcaster
to
new
york
to
get
to
the
train
station.
H
Now,
please
don't
talk
about
a
connectivity,
that's
not
helpful
and
it's
those
sorts
of
things
that
would
give
people
confidence
if
they
were
looked
at
right
now
without
any
major
funding
requirements
to
actually
make
them
able
to
happen.
So
that's
part
and
parcel
of
it.
We
need
to
look
at
it
in
the
context
in
which
it
is,
which
is
that
people
will
not
vote
to
use
public
transport.
The
question
has
been
about
reliability.
H
K
I
think
I
agree.
I
very
much
agree
with
cancer
richard.
This
is
saying
you
know,
she's,
absolutely
right
that
you
know
the
services
have
got
to
get
better
and
and
work
for
people
haven't
they.
You
know,
but
it's
it's
easy
to
say
that
the
challenge
is
how
you
actually
make
that
happen
and
deliver
and
deliver
it.
K
How
can
we
you
know
if
I've
got
to
have
an
economic
service,
as
I
said
before,
or
it's
got
to
be
be
paid
for
by
public
subsidy
and
and
both
those
things
are
a
challenge
to
to
to
get
the
demand
up
to
do
them.
So
maybe
it's
a
build
it
and
they
will
come
or
provide
it
and
they
will
come,
but
who's
going
to
take
the
risk
on
that
and
I
think
councillor
first.
K
Amongst
those
comments,
I
think
the
point
around
leads
lead
city,
council
and
the
combined
authority
and
how
they
work
together
is
probably
one
I
should
should
address.
Isn't
it
in
terms
of
that,
so
we
do
work
closely
on
the
elements
that
that
that
cross
cross
over
especially
bus
provision,
especially
on
the
mass
transit
transit
work.
So
what
we're
saying
in
our
vision
very
much
corresponds
with
what
is
in
wiki's
vision.
K
I
think,
on
things
like
the
climate
emergency,
where
there's
different
time
scales,
some
of
that's
around
the
partners
involved
in
that
and
the
pace
that
they
want
to
go,
but
if
leeds
leads
and
delivers
by
2030,
then
that
will
surely
help
west
yorkshire
get
to
2038
and
we've
all
got
the
same
aspirations,
the
same
ways
of
looking
to
deliver
that.
K
So
I
think
that
there's
some
some
things
there
and
a
lot
of
the
funding
for
schemes
that
we
get
comes
from
central
government
is
distributed
by
the
combined
authority
again,
so
they
have
a
governance
and
assurance
role
in
the
schemes
that
we
deliver
to.
So
you
know
there
is
very
close
working
between
the
two
authorities,
but
you
know
it
is.
It
is
sometimes
needed
to
have
something
that
is
local,
as
you
would
probably
been
suggesting.
I've
been
suggesting
in
terms
of
you
need
something
that's
right
for
outer
outer
northeast.
K
A
Okay,
thank
you
paul
councillor,
buckley's
got
his
hand
up.
Is
it
coming
back
to
your
previous
point
near
law.
C
Just
to
come
back
very
briefly
chair
if
I
can
yeah,
if
it's
very
brief,
it's
very
brief.
Just
a
couple
of
comments.
Just
to
put
everybody
clear,
I
think
it
was
council
first
mentioned
the
parking
right
at
all.
Woodley,
that's
off!
That's
no
longer
in
the
plan.
It
doesn't
it's
not
there
and
then.
My
other
point
was
a
point
made.
I
can't
remember
who
made
it
actually?
C
It
could
have
been
paul
himself
about
the
fact
that
if
and
when
we
get
any
form
of
mass
transit
scheme,
the
bus
company's
role
would
actually
effectively
alter
and
they
would
lose
their
main
popular
profitable
routes
by
definition,
and
so
the
bus
companies
would
turn
into
a
feeder
service,
potentially
a
socially
funded
feed
a
service
for
mass
transit,
but
the
problem
is
with
that.
That
it
brings
me
back
to
my
final
point:
is
that
the
elephant
in
the
room
here
is
the
enormous
cost
you
know.
C
Does
any
of
us
sitting
around
this
virtual
table
actually
think,
given
that
the
government
stopped
borrowing
money,
they're,
just
printing
it?
You
know
it's
not
going
to
happen,
it
cannot
possibly
happen,
but
we're
just
paying
for
everything
by
social
means
somewhere
along
the
line.
Somebody
has
to
have
a
proper
business
making
a
profit.
A
Paul,
I
think,
you've
you've
answered
some
of
the
questions
that
you've
been
asked.
I
think
you've
had
an
awful
lot
of
feedback
from
councillors
and
I
did
suggest
to
you
at
the
chairs
brief
that
that
was
likely
to
be
the
case.
So
you
were
kind
of
forewarned
and
I
would
say
that
my
colleagues
have
actually
come
through
with
the
kind
of
things
that
I
thought
they
were
going
to
say
to
you.
A
D
K
So
so,
we'll
we'll
do
the
consultation
close.
Do
analysis
of
that
publish,
publish
that
develop
up
a
a
final
strategy
through
exit
board
some
point
in
the
summer
and
alongside
that,
have
an
action
plan
that
sets
out
if
you
like,
some
of
those
details
of
the
schemes
we're
going
to
do
in
the
first
couple
of
years,
two
or
three
years,
the
ones
that
are
committed,
the
policies
that
we
want
to
take
forward
so
they'll
be
included
in
that
at
that
point.
So
I
hope
that
is
that.
D
What
you
know
are
you
going
to
be
sitting
out
what
happens
in
the
first
two
years,
five
years,
10
years
and
that
way
and
and
how
this
is
going
to
look
and
how
it's
going
to
be
published,
and
presumably
when
this
will
be
revisited
again
because
a
bit
like
councillor
buckley
said
if,
if
and
when
mass
transit
comes-
and
I
believe
it
will
come
to
two
areas
that
fundamentally
changes
the
model
for
other
services,
it
fundamentally
changes
the
access,
that's
there
and
starts
to
influence
people's
movements.
D
So
what
is
what
we're
discussing
now
won't
be
right
in
five
ten
years
time,
because
there
will
have
been
an
impact
there'll
be
new
housing.
There'll,
be
other
elements
to
this
too.
K
Yeah-
and
I
think
that's
I
think,
that's
absolutely
right
councilwoman,
so
we
don't
want
to
set
out
exactly
what
we're
going
to
do
for
the
next
10
years,
because
we
don't
know
what
the
future
holds
in
terms
of
people's
travel.
Behavior
habits.
We
don't
know
what
the
funding
situation
is
going
to
be
and
we
and,
as
you
say,
things
will
change
over
time
and
we
need
to
be
flexible
and
adapt
to
that.
Don't
we.
G
I'll
be
very
brief,
chair
what
what
my
ask
following
on
from
council
robinson,
is
actually
there's
an
acceptance
that
this
does
not
scratch
the
surface
of
the
transport
issues
in
the
outer
northeast,
and
even
if
it's
not
going
to
be
in
the
final
strategy,
will
there
be
an
acknowledgement
that
it
isn't
addressing
the
issues
of
our
communities
and
there
is
a
need
to
address
them
rather
than
just
paying
lip
service
and
saying
well,
you'll
have
to
depend
on
some
buses.
G
That's
that
my
hope
is
actually
something
happens.
The
last
time
we
had
this
conversation,
nothing
happened.
There
was
no
acknowledgement.
It
was
just
well
struck
your
shoulders
and
there
we
go
so
that
that's
what
that's
my
ask.
K
A
You
okay,
thank
you
very
much
paul
you
better
go
while
the
going's
good
okay.
So
the
next
item
on
the
agenda,
gentlemen
and
ladies,
is
the
dates
times
and
venues
of
the
community
committee
meetings
and
that's
over
to
john.
B
Thank
you
chair,
so
this
report
comes
yearly
to
committee,
so
turn
into
page
42
of
the
pack.
We've
got
four
dates
suggested
7th
of
june
13th
september
6th
of
december
on
the
7th
of
march.
The
suggestion
is,
we
continue
to
operate
on
mondays
at
5,
30.
B
forever
foreseeable
future,
we'll
we'll
we'll
do
remote
meetings,
but
as
as
the
legislation
changes
we
we
could
be
back
in
the
civic
hall.
Hopefully
we're
not
too
distant
future.
B
Thank
you,
chad,
sorry,
I'm
just
slightly
thrown
by
the
last
comment,
because
our
first
our
first
meeting
was
june.
Of
course,
the
legislation
expires
in
may,
there's
no
current
timetable
to
table
primary
legislation,
which
is
what
it
would
take.
B
B
Well,
yes,
I'm
aware,
unless
the
legislation
changes
meetings
will
be
held
in
the
civic
hall
and
I
think
we're
making
plans
to
put
in
place
hybrid
meetings,
so
members
will
be
need
to
be
in
attendance
in
the
civic
hall,
but
officers
could
could
join
online
and
I
think
that's
currently
in
terms
of
being
discussion.
E
Yeah
thank
you
chair.
I
just
wanted
to
come
on
a
bit
further
to
councillor
cohen's
point,
which
was
actually
to
ask:
are
there
any
possibilities
that,
instead
of
having
it
in
the
civic
hall
that
actually,
if
we
are
able
that
we
can
actually
have
it
in
the
community,
or
will
it
be
too
difficult,
technologically
wise.
B
B
B
So
it
would
be
very
difficult,
but
we'd
like
we'll
have
to
see
how
things
progress.
C
B
Let's
assume
we'd
be
we're
in
committee
rooms,
six
and
seven,
because
that's
the
only
venue
we
can
broadcast
from
at
the
moment
and
also
the
council
chamber
committee
room.
Six
and
seven
can
only
hold.
I
think,
15
seats,
if
you
like,
so
there
will
be,
would
be
have
to
be
some
restrictions
on
how
many
people
could
come
in.
I
mean
I
know.
You've
said
social
distancing
is
going
to
go
on,
I
think
21st
of
june.
A
And
I
think
it's
it.
It
sounds
as
if
it's
something
that
is
still
being
discussed
and
they
are
planning
for
possibly
having
hybrid
meetings,
which
would
mean
that
for
the
for
anything
to
be
enacted,
the
ward
members
would
have
to
be
actually
in
the
room
to
vote.
So
you
could
join
remotely.
But
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
vote
if
we
were
required
to
vote
on
anything.
So
it
might
be
that
we
have
to
have
a
hybrid
meeting
but
of
course,
we're
waiting
to
see
what
happens
about
the
legislation.
C
Sorry
sorry
chair,
if
I
can
just
briefly
just
come
back
on
that
yeah
what
I
don't
want
to
get
into
a
situation
with,
is
this
slippage,
which
is
so
predictable
the
legislation?
As
I
understand
it,
finishes
in
june.
C
A
Well,
I
think
that's
the
hope,
neil,
but
I
think
that
from
what
I've
grasped
from
what
john
was
saying
to
me
earlier
is
that
yes,
they
are
lead.
City
councils
are
looking
at
that
provision
because
we
don't
know
for
definite
whether
they
are
going
to
do
something
about
changing
the
legislation
or
not,
and
I
accept
that
counselor
cohen
said
there
were
time,
frames,
etc.
But
emergency
legislation
has
been
brought
forward
before
so
I
think
john's
just
trying
to
outline
to
us.
A
B
That's
pretty
kind.
Thank
you
check.
Let
me
just
be
clear.
This
is
not
something
I
am
leveling
in
any
way
shape
or
form
a
job,
no
or
or
indeed
yourself
chair,
but
I
realize
that
john
is,
I
know
john,
would
like
everybody
back
in
the
civic
hall
as
quickly
as
possible.
I
don't
put
you
on
the
spot
here,
john,
but
I
know
many
officers
would
like
us
all
back
in
the
sippy
call
as
quickly
as
possible.
B
Making
meetings
for
sure
being
in
person
and
and
the
initial
line
that
john
took
was
not
that
and
what
I'm
saying
is
from
may
to
let
when
it
when
as
it
stands,
the
legislation
comes
to
an
end.
The
plan
should
be
that
we
are
meeting
in
public.
We
shouldn't
be
making
a
plan
to
meet
remotely,
because
that's
not
what
the
current
provisions
are
and
from
june
we
don't
know
what
the
social
distancing
requirements
will
be.
D
D
Okay,
could
with
that
in
mind,
then,
could
I
suggest
that
the
first
meeting
takes
place
in
the
civic
hall
and
we
have
a
meeting
room
booked,
because
I
intend
to
be
going
to
that
meeting
room
and
to
be
there
for
that
meeting,
whether
anybody
else
is
there
or
not,
and
and
could
I
suggest
that
for
the
other
form
and
council
buckley's
going
to
be
there
as
well
we'll
be
in
the
pub
afterwards
too
now
and
and
could
I
then
suggest
that
venues
are
sought
for
those
other
meetings
in
each
of
the
three
wards
to
set
this
out
now
and
whether
that's
you
know,
herod
or
woodley,
whether
it
be
whatever
order
you
want
and
pick
it
up,
and
we
agree
that
now
and
if
it
has
to
change,
then
we
look
at
that
but,
as
has
been
said,
the
default
position,
the
legislation
runs
out,
we
meet
in
person
and
I
think
we
should
operate
on
that
basis.
A
That'll
do
for
me
right:
okay,
out
of
northeast
community
committee
finance
report,
you
have
all
seen
the
finance
report.
Preet
is
going
to
just
highlight
the
the
things
that
need
a
decision
making
she's
not
reading
the
whole
report
out.
It's
the
points
that
she
needs
clarification
on
from
ward
members.
J
Thank
you
chair.
Yes,
so
I'm
just
going
to
quickly
read
through
the
applications.
I've
been
considered
at
ward
members
or
via
email,
and
I
just
need
to
get
approval
so
I'll
just
go
through
those
in
turn.
So
the
first
one
and
this
it
starts
on
page
49.
So
the
first
one
is
the
purchase
and
installation
of
a
communal
shed
500
pounds
and
it
covers
weatherby.
Are
we
in
agreement
to.
J
The
second
one
is
allerton
primary
school
crv
school
expansion
works,
and
this
is
coming
from
the
all
woodley
ward
6600
from
their
capital
pot
3400
from
their
well-being.
Are
we
in
agreement.
B
Well,
could
I
just
clarify
that,
while
it
was
linked
to
allerton
cv
expansion,
it's
also
to
facilitate
the
drop-off
for
allerton
high
school
as
well?
It
is
for
both,
which
is
one
of
the
reasons
why,
in
total,
we
are
indeed
contributing.
J
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Council
cohen.
Sorry
go
on
okay,
so
the
next
one
is
nature:
reserves,
footpath
repairs
for
improved
public
access,
harewood
ward
and
it's
2
250
pounds,
and
this
will
be
taken
from
their
environmental
pot
where
they've
top
sliced
10
grand
from
their
well-being,
yep.
A
J
J
Super
stuff,
so
the
next
one
is
bins
for
slade
hill,
and
this
is
an
all
woodley
project.
They're
asking
for
460
pounds.
Are
we
okay
with
that.
J
Okay
and
then
the
one
on
page
50
installation
of
a
greenhouse.
This
is
additional
funding.
It's
part
of
a
project
to
pay
for
a
greenhouse
for
a
school,
and
it's
just
additional
funding
for
that
for
the
shed
to
be
installed
so
266
pounds
super
excellent.
Thank
you.
J
I'm
gonna
now,
just
literally
go
on
to
page
52
there's
one
project
that
has
been
that's
coming
for
youth
activity
and
that's
the
starcraft
cricket
club
junior
coaching
program
and
the
amount
proposed
is
five.
Sorry,
seven
thousand
five
hundred
and
thirty
six
pounds
and
that's
for
hairwood.
J
And
we
had
one
last
project
that
came
in
before
the
before
the
papers
were
published,
and
I
will
just
get
that
now.
J
So
this
is
a
supplementary
to
the
finance
and
it
was
a
project
that
was
discussed
last
week
for
weatherby
and
its
raby
park.
Fencing
1448
pounds
is
that
okay,
oh
excellent,
so
those
are
my
projects
and
I've
got
my
approval
so
yeah,
I'm
happy.
A
Thank
you,
councillor
robinson
thanks.
D
Chad
pre
just
for
clarity
and
confirmation,
the
coveted
funding
towards
cullingham
does
that
need
signing
off,
or
is
that
good
that
we
send
off
to
another
avenue.
D
B
It
wasn't
a
question
if
I
may
chair,
but
just
a
comment.
I
just
wanted
to
pass
on
some
thanks.
Actually,
as
probably
no
the
woodley
award,
members
used
a
big
chunk
of
the
covered
funding
to
fund
tech
in
local
schools,
and
I
just
wanted
to
say
a
big
thank
you
to
the
speed
at
which
all
of
those
payments
were
made
through
to
the
schools,
because
it
allowed
the
effect
to
be
bought
incredibly
quickly
and
out
to
families
really
quickly.
So,
thanks
for
that,
yeah.
A
A
As
well
yeah,
okay,
thank
you.
So
the
the
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
community
committee
update
report
again,
preet
he's
not
going
to
read
it
out.
If
there's
anything
major
that
you
want
to
point
out,
could
you
do
so
now?
Please.
J
A
B
That's
right,
chair
an
email
was
circulated
to
members
health
implications
from
from
motorways
submitted
by
a
a
resident
of
bramham.
I
mean
if
it's
agreeable
to
members.
I
think
I
think
you
need
a
lot
more
information
than
what's
provided.
B
A
Yeah,
I
think,
there's
various
departments
having
having
read
the
email
on
sunday
night
that
there
are
quite
a
lot
of
areas
that
are
in
that,
so
it
we
just
need
to
make
sure
that
we
get
input
from
all
of
the
areas
that
could
answer
a
question
for
that.
Lady,
okay
and
there's
no
reason
why
they
community
committee,
environmental
subcommittee,
couldn't
actually
look
at
that
as
well
when
they
have
their
next
meeting.
If
there's
anything,
they
want
to
do
with
that.
A
D
A
D
A
Right,
okay,
we
don't
usually
do
any
other
business.
F
Yeah
thanks
very
briefly
on
encouragement
from
the
executive
member
for
communities.
We
recently
invited
our
of
this
committee
recently
invited
parish
colleagues
to
a
training
session,
which
was
helpfully
named
far-right
training.
F
I
think
the
the
training
was
somewhat
well
received,
I
think,
by
some
parishes
across
the
area,
but
it
it
strikes
me
that
there
was
a
yougov
poll
out
recently
that
showed
an
equal
number
of
of
people
are
very
concerned
about
hard
left,
left-wing
extremism
as
as
far
right
and
in
light
of
the
shocking
scenes
from
bristol
this
weekend
and
they're
right
the
riots
of
last
summer,
which
are
hijacked
by
militant
and
capitalist
renter
mobs.
F
I
think
it's
worth
us
as
a
committee
formerly
writing
to
the
executive
member
of
four
communities
asking
her
to
give
equal
weight
to
hard
left
extremism
and
put
into
place
so-called
training
sessions
that
we
can
share
with
our
parish,
colleagues
and
our
communities.
So
I
would
like
to
propose
that
we
do
that
chair
as
a
short
letter
asking
for
that
and
highlight
that
we,
as
an
outer
area
committee,
give
equal
weight
and
concern
to
extremism
wherever
it
is
under,
not
just
far-right
extremism.
Thank
you
chair.
I.
A
A
So
look
forward
to
seeing
you
all
then,
if
well,
we'll
see
some
of
you
before
then,
but
look
forward
to
seeing
people
on
the
community
committee
at
that
time.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
patience
and
your
attendance.
Thank
you.