►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
afternoon
everyone
and
welcome
to
this
meeting
of
South
and
Westland
spaniel.
My
name
is
councilor
Eileen,
Taylor
and
I'll
be
chairing
today's
meeting.
Today's
meeting
has
been
streamed
and
Lead
City
Council
YouTube
channels,
so
the
public
can
observe
the
meeting
without
needing
to
be
present.
South
investment
panels
deals
with
application
from
the
south,
Northwest
and
west
of
the
city.
The
aim
of
the
panel
is
there
all
relevant
information
from
applicants.
Members
of
the
public
and
Council
offices
to
help
members
of
the
panel
make
their
decisions.
A
B
B
You
thanks
Chad,
there's
no
appeals
against
refusal
of
inspection
of
documents;
agenda
item
two
there's
no
items
which
require
the
exclusion
of
the
press
and
the
public
agenda
item
three
I'm,
not
aware
of
any
late
items
of
business.
Your
gender
item:
four:
can
members
declare
any
interests:
foreign
agenda
item:
five:
apologies
from
Council
Reagan
and
Council
Bowden
Council
Brooks,
here
in
attendance,
Council,
Bowden.
A
F
We're
talking
very
quietly
today
finished
page
12.
when,
where
it
says
resolved
I,
think
on
that
list
of
bullet
points.
There
should
be
a
reference
to
community
use
of
the
facility
and
the
management
stroke
maintenance
of
the
historic
track,
which
goes
through
the
middle
of
the
site,
because
we
did
raise
those
at
the
time.
A
Yeah
I'm
sure
that
will
be
corrected
any
other
come
in
now
so
could
I
have
approve
the
minutes
and
so
well
sure
I
will
counselor
Finn
again.
A
Because
I
am
except
there's
no
more
matters
arising
to
that
item.
Seven
proposal
of
new
cheap
3G
pitch
and
tennis
court
and
Associated
fence
up
to
4.5
meters
and
pharmaceutical
leads
golf
course
and
Gypsy
Lane,
Beeston
I'm.
Sure
members
are
very
familiar
with
this
application,
so
we
I
won't
go
into
any
details
at
this
moment,
I'll
hand
over
to
the
planning
officer
to
present
there
yeah.
B
No
but
yeah,
but
I'm,
not
I'm,
saying
I,
don't
know
whether
I
want
to
be
part
of
this
discussion
today,
because,
if
there's
to
be
a
judicial
review
coming
forward
as
a
result
of
a
number
of
emails,
we've
received
this
week
and
the
one
that
we
got
from
the
exec
member
yesterday,
I
do
not
want
to
be
part
of
trying
to
pretend
anything.
I
just
want
clarification
on
the
email
that
we
were
sent
yesterday
by
the
executive
member.
A
G
Yeah,
yes,
thank
you.
I
was
going
to
make
reference
to
it
in
in
my
presentation,
I've
taken
it
as
a
further
letter
from
the
counselor
counselor
prior
to
be
just
maintaining
support
for
the
application
in
terms
of
my
presentation,
but
Pippa
maybe
want
to
say
something
from
a
legal
standpoint.
C
So
we
are
taking
the
approach
that
all
members
here
today
have
had
view
of
this
email
that
has
been
sent
and
therefore
it
is
effectively
in
councilor.
Brooks
apologies,
I've
not
had
sight
about,
can
send
that
to
you,
but
Steve
is
going
to
recount
the
details
and
the
sort
of
go
over
the
summary
of
that
and
therefore
that
it
can
be
taken
as
a
letter
of
representation.
C
Although
the
member
has
not
been
able
to
speak
today
because
of
the
public
speaking
rights
and
protocol
that
covers
this,
because
it
is
a
matter
that
has
come
back
to
the
panel,
but
we
are
taking
it
to
the
late
Leisure
of
representation
so
that
the
views
can
be
shared
and
obviously
because
all
members
here
present
have
had
site
apart
from
councilor
Brooks,
and
that's
why
Steve
is
providing
the
summary
that
it
can
therefore
be
that
all
members
have
the
same
information
before
them
as
that
of
the
late
letter
of
late
representation.
C
F
I,
just
I
I
appreciate
Council
Brooke
hasn't
seen
this
and
and
presumably
will
get
a
sight
of
it
can
I
just
ask:
is
this
a
letter
of
representation
from
an
individual
counselor,
or
is
this
a
representation
from
a
member
of
the
executive
board,
expressing
presumably
the
view
of
the
executive
board.
A
I'm
not
sure
what
he
I
can't
speak
for
that
individual.
What
we
expect
councilor
Campbell,
as
you
know,
he
emailed
each
and
every
one
of
us
and
copied
everyone
in
it
so
I'm
reading
it
the
way
you
are
reading
it
and
is
counselor
Pryor
here,
I,
don't
know
if
I
would
like
to
just
clarify
the
email,
why
you
sent
the
email
the
way
you
did.
Please
do
I.
A
A
A
But
that
is
totally
different.
Now
you
asked
me
a
question
that
I
can't
answer
because
I
did
not
send
the
email.
I
did
not
sit
with
the
individual
to
write
the
email.
I
cannot
give
the
reason
why
he
wrote
that
email,
so
I'm
asking
him
to
clarify
on
your
behalf
with
the
question.
So
legal
could
answer
that.
C
So
it's
we
are
taking
it
as
a
letter
of
representation.
It's
the
child's
discretion!
If
we
now
take
the
step
to
responding
to
clarif,
to
get
the
clarification
that
you
thought
councilor
Campbell
as
to
background
to
in
what
status
that
has
been
submitted
by
councilor
prior,
so
his
chair's
discretion
to
to
put
that
to
councilor
prior
because.
B
Good
afternoon,
yes,
I
wrote
the
letter
in
my
capacity
as
Executive
Board
member
for
economy,
culture
and
education.
B
So
decency,
Council
behalf
of
Leeds
city
council,
he
is
recommending
that
we
approve
this
application
today,
so
there
would
be
no
detrimental
effect
on
the
education
of
children.
That's
what
I
treat
from
the
the
email
and
I
feel
that
I
ca.
How
can
I
in
all
Consciousness
say
I,
don't
have
my
mind
made
up
already
I'm
sitting
here.
I've
received
an
instruction
from
the
exec
member
who
we've
got
to
respect
in
their
role
as
the
exec
member
on
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
council.
B
A
Understand
counselor
and
this
and
then
Campbell
what
you
are
saying
and
I
quite
understand
the
way
the
email
went.
However,
a
question
was
asked
and
there's
two
answers:
there's
a
yes
and
a
no.
So
it's
your
opinion
at
the
last
meeting.
There's
quite
a
few
bullet
points
for
what
went
back,
and
this
is
what
we
are
going
to
focus
on
today
and
what
you
required
at
the
last
meeting.
We
will
not
take
what
counselor
Pryor
said
in
his
email.
We
are
going
to
give
your
judgment
today,
based
only
on
what's
present
in
front
of
you.
A
That's
that's
the
whole
idea
of
it
and
I
don't
have
counselor
prior
wrote
on
the
behalf
of
the
council.
Maybe
wrote
it
as
itself
as
an
exact
member,
but
today
we
are
here
to
discuss
what
your
refer
back
to
come
back
today
and
I
would
like
to
make
a
decision,
and,
what's
here
today
in
front
of
you,
exclude
councilor
prior
email
and
focus
on
the
agenda
we
have
today.
C
Just
confirm
your
reference,
there
councilor
Anderson
this
being
an
instruction
from
an
executive,
but
it's
not
an
instruction.
This
is
a
a
letter
of
representation
in
the
same
way
as
any
other
representation
letter
would
come
in
in
relation
to
a
planning
application
and
to
be
considered.
There's
as
you,
you
know,
I
mean
on
panel
for
a
number
of
years.
Is
that
distinct,
different
role
of
the
council.
C
One
is
local
planning,
Authority
and
one
as
a
council,
in
this
instance
counselors
provider
of
education
for
numerous
children
across
the
city,
so
that
is
the
almost
the
basis
on
and
background
to
the
letter
of
representation
as
the
council.
But
you
are
here
as
members
of
the
council
today,
that's
the
council
as
local
planning
Authority.
So
it's
not
an
instruction
to
members
to
vote
or
think
in
a
certain
way.
It's
simply
as
with
all
letters
of
representation.
It's
it's!
A
On
this
note,
I'm
not
going
to
debate
this
any
further.
As
I
mentioned
earlier,
we
are
going
to
make
the
decision
and
what
you
request
on
the
1st
of
September.
If
you
have
any
issue
with
that,
then
we
can
clarify
that.
But
let's
please
don't
focus
on
that
email
from
Council
prayer
Steve.
Can
you
now
please
present
to
you.
G
Thank
you
chair
members
will
recall
this.
Application
relates
to
the
proposal
for
3G
pitch
and
tennis
courts
and
Associates
fencing
up
to
4.5
meters
in
height
at
the
former
Southlands
Golf
Course.
The
report
presented
to
the
members
of
panel
today
should
be
read
in
conjunction
with
the
earlier
plans.
Point
report
presented
on
the
1st
of
September
2022,
which
is
appended
to
the
covering
report
as
appendix
one
I,
would
also
add
that
the
reference
to
a
draft
decision
nurses
in
the
recommendation
of
of
the
later
report
for
today
should
be
ignored.
G
I
didn't
think
that
you
really
want
another
nine
pages
with
25
conditions
to
to
model
over,
so
I've
I
took
that
out,
but
I
actually
forgot
to
take
that
reference
out
following
the
consideration
of
this
application
at
South
and
West
plans
panel
on
the
1st
of
September
members
resolve
to
defer
this
application,
to
enable
further
information
to
be
provided
in
specific
conditions
to
be
added
in
full,
relating
to
the
following
issues:
surfing
just
go
through
the
lower
18
total
points.
So
there
was
a
Landscape
Management
plan
which
is
added
as
a
condition.
G
That's
in
the
full
report.
A
car
park
management,
the
full
text
again,
is
in
the
report
as
construction
Environmental
Management
plan,
a
condition
in
the
report.
A
biodiversity
advancement,
enhancement
and
management
plan,
condition
in
Texas
in
the
report
and
the
biodiversity
monitoring
program
condition
is
in
the
report,
plus
a
construction
access
management
plan.
So
all
those
conditions,
as
requested
by
members,
are
in
full
in
the
reporting
see
the
text.
G
The
other
issues
that
were
raised
was
to
see
site
of
the
community
use
agreement
which
has
been
appended
to
the
report
and
the
discussion
of
the
end
of
life
strategy
condition
for
Chrome.
So
the
first
six
of
these
issues
as
I
said,
relate
to
conditions
and
you'll
see
in
the
text.
The
five
conditions
have
actually
been
laid
out
because
issues
four
and
five
have
actually
been
combined
into
one
condition.
G
So
the
proposed
hours
of
access
are
as
follows.
In
turn
time,
it's
Monday
to
Friday
five
till
nine
PM
Saturday
8
o'clock
in
the
morning
to
5
p.m:
Sunday
8
o'clock
in
the
morning
to
5
p.m
and
during
school
holidays
it's
Friday,
8
A.M
to
nine
o'clock,
P.M
Saturday
8
o'clock
to
seven
to
five
o'clock
and
Sunday
8
A.M.
G
That
would
be
open
later
than
than
Darkness
falling
would
allow
and
just
as
a
fail
safe.
If
members
have
had
the
opportunity
to
to
read
it
in
full.
G
If
you're
not
minded
to
accept
this
agreement
and
requiringly
further
Clarity
to
avoid
delays
of
just
suggesting
an
additional
condition
as
an
alternative,
a
paragraph
11
of
the
report,
so
I'm
I'm,
hoping
that
members
will
accept
the
the
contents.
But
if
not,
there
is
a
a
condition
that
we
could
use
to
help
help
it
along
the
way
right
with
regard
to
0.8
and
the
end
of
life
strategy,
condition
for
rubber
Chrome
I'd
make
the
following
comments.
G
Consider
what
we
thought
before
it
is
understood.
There
are
several
operators
who
provide
innovative
solutions
for
dealing
with
these
such
matters
and
for
reusing
waste
materials
in
a
safe
and
sustainable
way
and
I've
taken
advice
from
our
minerals.
Colleagues
who
know
of
companies
within
leads
that
actually
are
regulated
to
deal
with
the
the
rubber
crumb.
G
G
G
There
are
numerous
waste
carries
in
Leeds
and
Nationwide
to
handle
the
process
and
process
this
type
of
waste
and
seek
to
secure
its
secondary
reuse
rather
than
disposal
by
landfill
or
incineration.
There
is
one
company
in
County
Anderson
part
of
the
UK
that
does
actually
burn
it
to
generate
electricity,
but
in
the
main
it
seemed
better
to
actually
reuse
the
rubber
Chrome
and
a
lot
of
it
actually
ends
up
as
ballast
in
the
town
Academy
on
roads
and
footpaths.
G
So
it's
it's
therefore
considered
economically
environmentally
more
viable
for
such
ways
to
be
reused
ultimately,
rather
than
disposed
of
in
any
way.
I
would
also
point
out,
as
was
referred
to
in
the
previous
discussions,
that
paragraph
198
to
the
mppf
states.
The
focus
of
planning
policies
and
decisions
should
not
be
on
whether
proposed
Duality
is
an
accidental
use
of
land
rather
than
the
control
or
process
or
emissions
in
Brackets,
where
these
are
subject
to
separate
Pollution
Control
regimes.
Close
brackets
planning
decisions
should
assume
that
these
regimes
will
operate
effectively.
G
G
These
are
referred
to
in
guidance
as
the
six
tests
of
conditions,
and
each
of
them
needs
to
be
satisfied
for
any
condition
which
an
authority
intends
to
apply
any
such
condition
related
to
the
rubicum.
However,
I
believe
would
fail
four
of
these
tests.
So
we've
taken
advice
upon
this.
G
The
water
that's
stored
in
the
gravel
is
discharged
into
the
nearby
Street
environmental
and
underground
pipe
work.
The
manhole
contains
a
flow
control
device
to
limit
outflow
flow
at
5.4
liters
per
second,
an
assumpt
pick
to
remove
any
silt
or
other
suspended
fine
materials,
because
members
was
concerned
about
it
going
to
the
water
course.
So
just
to
flick
on
a
few
slides
I've
got
a
beautiful
cross
section
of
the
sun
pit.
G
There
we
go.
That's
a
song
page,
it's
just
it's
a
huge
tank
and
you
get
a
gist
of
the
the
scale
from
the
yellow
rings
on
the
left-hand
side,
which,
obviously
for
for
Access
for
cleaning
and
facilities,
and
basically
the
water
overflows
into
that
is
captured.
Solids
either
fall
to
the
bottom
or
caught
by
the
filter
that
you
can
see
on
the
right
hand,
side,
and
there
is
a
a
diagrammatic
section
as
well.
G
It's
also
noted
that
the
gravel
layer
also
acts
as
a
natural
filter
to
remove
suspended
materials
or
pollutants
from
the
water
flowing
through
it.
As
such,
it's
considered
the
rainwater
falling
onto
the
proposed
Sports
pictures
and
access
passes,
managed,
filtered
and
discharged
to
the
existing
water
costs
in
a
manner
that
prevents
it
coming
into
direct
contact
with
the
environment.
G
G
So
that
gives
you
an
example
of
the
mitigation
balls
at
the
bottom
to
stop
any
wind
blowing
debris
coming
off
the
the
pitches
and
there
you
can
see
the
the
how
far
it's
called
now
the
gate,
which,
in
effect,
is
to
to
scrape
off
any
of
the
crumbing
to
again
another
hole
which
is
periodically
cleaned,
which
is
the
bottom
slide
of
those
on
there.
G
Just
going
on,
although
the
scheme
is
policy,
compliance
plus
15
trees
and
therefore
acceptable
in
this
respect,
members
also
asked
if
more
trees
could
be
provided
by
the
applicant.
The
applicant
advised
that,
because
of
delays
and
Rising
costs
of
the
materials,
they
are
not
able
to
provide
any
further
additional
trees.
But
I
would
remind
members
again
that,
on
the
basis
of
the
current
policy,
it
is
actually
compliant
with
regard
other
matters
whilst
not
specifically
referenced
above
during
the
discussion
at
South
and
West
Palm.
G
However,
the
applicant
has
spoken
with
the
lead
city
council
project
managers
regarding
this
and
have
been
advised
that
again
for
reasons
of
Safeguard
and
security
to
long-term
maintenance,
they
wish
to
continue
with
the
diversion
of
the
footpath
Bridle
away.
So
at
the
moment,
they're
saying
that
the
defense
would
remain
to
the
northern
side
of
the
cobbled
footway
once
the
fence
is
erected
that
the
existing
puppet
right
away
were
then
within
the
School
boundaries,
so
its
maintenance
will
fall
to
the
school.
The
school
have
accepted
that
maintenance
liability.
G
The
completeness
it's
also
been
suggested,
though,
that
another
condition
should
be
important.
I'll
just
read
this
out
in
form,
which
is
prior
to
development,
brought
into
use
the
scheme
to
retain
and
maintain
the
section
of
the
footpath
known,
as
leads
to
our
seven
as
shown
contain
the
red
line.
Application
boundaries
should
be
submitted
to
approved
in
writing
by
the
local
Authority.
There
is
some
more
wording,
but
I'll
just
shorten
it.
G
I'd
also
add
on
this
point
that
we've
received
a
further
two
emails
concerning
the
thought
path
from
members
of
the
public,
the
one
of
which
is
from
the
Save
South
Leeds,
former
golf
course
community
group
and
one
from
the
beaston
neighborhood
planning
team.
G
They
point
out
that
the
path
that
does
actually
lie
within
the
Beeston
neighborhood
plans,
and
it
appears
that
the
southernmost
boundary
of
the
planet
does
indeed
run
along
the
alignment
of
the
path,
and
this
is
actually
on
the
Beeson
neighborhood
plan
that
non-designated
Heritage
asset
survey,
so
the
bulk
of
the
site,
accepting
that
little
sliver
and
I'll
just
go
back
to
give
you
an
indication
of
where
it
is
I
think
I'll
forward.
G
Actually,
in
this
case,
if
you
can
see
there,
there's
a
red
line
at
the
top
of
the
pitch,
the
path
runs
down
that
red
line
and
actually
on
the
neighborhood
plan.
The
the
boundaries
follows
that
too.
So
accepting.
What's
in
the
the
Beast
neighborhood
plan,
the
path
itself
would
lie
within
the
their
plan,
but
as
I
say,
the
bulk
of
the
site
actually
lies
to
the
South
and
outside
of
it.
G
Just
to
point
out,
however,
that
this
is
still
part
of
their
initial
policy
intentions,
work
and
the
ndha
list
still
needs
to
be
thoroughly
assessed
to
check
whether
each
identified
asset
fulfills
the
criteria
for
designation.
So
it's
not
been
accepted
as
such
as
yet
and
furthermore,
as
was
pointed
out
at
the
last
plans
panel,
that
the
plan
is
still
in
the
preparation
stage
and
as
such
as
no
material
waiters.
G
This
is
correct,
but
and
how's
the
national
significance,
but
I
would
again
like
to
remind
members
that
the
application
site
has
no
protective
status
in
this
regard.
So
other
areas
have.
But
this
area
does
not.
G
A
further
email
was
received
yesterday
from
residents
of
the
South
Lee
estate,
which
is
to
the
north
of
the
the
main
part
of
the
schools
playing
pictures,
which
I
think
was
sent
to
all
members
of
City
plans
panel.
But,
however,
this
would
include
councils,
Finnegan
and
Campbell
I
think
that
was
done
an
era
to
be
fair,
so
so
two
of
the
members
I've
seen
sight
of
that
it
most
of
the
points
that
it
raises
actually
are
already
covered.
One
or
two
are
suggestions
in
terms
of
how
you
might
deal
with
certain
things.
G
I
mean
I
will
pick
out
the
ones
that
struck
me
as
being
different,
because
the
others
have
been
discussed
at
Great
length
previously,
and
one
was
that
if
the
proposal
was
to
go
ahead,
can
we
please
put
further
restrictions
on
the
school
such
that
no
further
planning
will
be
granted
and
there
is
currently
deemed
as
playing
areas?
Well,
obviously,
that's
completely
unnecessary,
because
any
other
further
Works
would
come
forward
as
a
planning
application
to
be
discussed
anyway.
G
So
it
wouldn't
be
appropriate
to
put
such
a
condition
on
what
else
have
we
got
a
wish
or
a
desire
for
the
school
to
provide
evidence
as
to
their
full
usage
of
the
sporting
facilities
for
the
next
10
years
and
half
penalties
upon
the
full
value
of
the
council
funding
given
if
these
are
not
achieved
with
with
waivers
due
to
extreme
weather
and
acts
of
God?
This
is
not
something
that
would
have
been
put
on
post
on
any
other
school
in
terms
of
a
community
use
agreement
and
and
to
be
would
be
unreasonable.
G
There's
reference
to
actually
giving
over,
what's
described
as
unusual
and
boggy
pitch,
to
be
subsumed
into
the
park
in
compensation
for
the
five
percent
reduction
of
the
golf
course.
A
result
of
this
proposal,
but
again
I've
got
to
remind
members
that,
although
these
ideas
have
so
many,
the
reality
is
that
the
school
is
still
under,
provided
that
pitch
is
usable
at
times,
just
not
in
extreme
wet
weather
when
it
does
become
boggy.
G
G
There
were
about
nine
pages
in
in
length
and
they
do
make
reference
to
a
number
of
websites
articles
and
journals.
Suggesting
caution
should
be
approached
when
using
plastic
struck,
rubber
Chrome
based
products
which
may
contain
potentially
harmful
chemicals,
and
that
the
European
chemical
agency
is
proposing
to
restrict
a
microplastic
use
and
that
the
council
should
not
rely
on
other
legislation
to
console
harm.
But
then
it
also
accepts
that
there
is
no
legislation
at
present
to
prevent
the
use
of
artificial
turf
or
rubber
Chrome.
G
I
can
only
remind
members
again
whether
we
as
a
planning
service
or
planning
a
determining
Authority
like
it
or
not.
It's
not
currently
an
issue
for
the
planning
system
and
disposal
is
control
and
regulated
by
other
bodies
and
legislation,
so
it
would
not
be
appropriate
to
try
and
restrict
or
control
that
through
the
planning
process
or
in
this
this
this
forum
and
finally,
as
we've
talked
about
earlier
at
the
beginning
of
this
meeting,
I
did
receive
a
further
representation
from
Council
prior
maintaining
his
support
for
the
proposal.
So
members
just
in
conclusion.
G
F
If,
if
this
is
agreed,
I
noticed
there
are
a
number
of
references
to
the
local
Authority
agreeing
in
writing
some
of
the
conditions.
Would
it
be
possible
if
this
is
agreed
to
add
to
that
before?
F
First
use
of
the
first
use
of
the
pitch,
I
only
asked
that
question
because
I
think,
probably
all
of
us
have
developments
in
our
world
where
things
happen
and
there's
there's
still
a
number
of
outstanding
conditions
that
haven't
been
signed
off
by
the
council
and
given
the
controversy
around
this
particular
development,
I
think
it
will
be
diplomatic
if
nothing
else.
If
we
added
that
that
sentence,
because
there
appears
to
me
to
be
nothing
in
here
that
couldn't
be
worked
out
before
they
actually
got
the
thing
up
and
running.
F
I
am
conscious
that
the
last
meeting
a
number
of
members
expressed
a
view
in
relation
to
the
materials
used
and
what
happens
when
they
reach
the
end
of
their
life
and
I.
Understand
from
what
Mr
Butler
said
that
his
advice
is
that
it
will
be
inappropriate
for
us
to
specifically
condition
the
materials
I.
Think
that's
what
you
said
effectively
specifically
conditioned
that
there
has
to
be
a
an
end
of
life
or
a
10-year
end
of
life
scheme
for
the
disposal
of
rubber
Chrome.
G
Yeah,
but
no
sorry,
I,
don't
know
whether
slightly
across
purpose,
what
I
was
suggesting
is
that
specifying
how
it's
actually
disposed
and
actually
asking
for
that
information
to
be
brought
back
to
the
panel
because
that's
covered
by
other
regulatory
bodies?
That's
what
we
can't
condition.
So
it's
actually
the
way
it's
disposed
of
is
covered
by
other
bodies.
F
Right,
okay,
but
it
would
be,
and
I
I
I'm,
conscious
of
the
fact
that
this
is
a
site
within
the
green
belt,
and
presumably
the
school
will
go
on
forever,
but
under
normal
circumstances,
it
would
seem
to
me
that
we
would
include
a
condition
which
required
at
the
end
of
life
or
when
the
when
the
pitches
cease
to
be
used
for
the
the
designation,
we're
giving
at
the
moment
that
the
the
owner,
which
they
would
with
a
school,
would
have
in
place
or
we
would
expect
the
owner
to
restore
the
site
to
its
original
condition,
I.E,
if,
if
the,
if
for
any
reason
whatsoever
and
I'm,
not
saying
they
will,
but
if
for
any
reason
whatsoever,
they
cease
to
use
this
as
a
an
all-weather
pitch
in
fact
sit
on.
F
Well,
if
they
change
the
use,
they
would
need
a
different
planning
application,
but
if
they
cease
to
use
the
pick,
if
they
cease
to
use
the
area
altogether,
then
it
should
be
restored
to
Greenbelt
I've.
Had
that
clear
or
I
rambling
a
bit
there.
Thank.
G
G
F
If
the
use
ceases
and
I
think
with
all
of
the
view
and
I
wouldn't
perhaps
be
quite
so
worried
if
it
wasn't
for
the
fact
that
we're
just
in
the
middle
of
a
consultation
about
closing
a
school
in
my
ward
and
so
with
no
we've,
no
idea
how
long
Corbin
will
last
presume
it'll
last
forever.
F
But
if,
if
for
some
reason,
bearing
in
mind
it's
green
belt,
like
you
know
my
view
on
losing
green
belt,
I
believe
we,
we
have
the
power
to
put
a
condition
on
which
basically
says
if
it
ceases
to
be
used
as
a
plane
pitch,
it
has
to
be
restored
to
Green
Belt.
G
It's
done
that
to
councilor
Campbell,
sorry
chair,
but
I
think
the
other
instances
that
you're
referring
to
are
effectively
are
temporary
permissions,
where
the
likelihood
is
it's
known
from
the
outset
that
the
use
is
going
to
cease,
whereas
this
is
actually
a
permanent
permission,
so
I
don't
think
we
can
do
it
here.
Okay,.
B
This
one
is
that
it's
an
operational
development
that's
being
approved
rather
than
a
use
of
land
whereby,
if
it
was
a
use
which
could
cease
at
some
point
in
the
future,
there
may
be
an
opportunity
to
restore
it
to
its
previous
condition.
As
you
say,
whereas
this
is
operational
development
which
it
requires
taking
out
the
grass
area
and
replacement
with
a
new
facility
per
se,
I
mean
it
would
be
very
unusual,
in
my
opinion,
unreasonable
to
impose
a
condition
to
that
degree.
Even
though
it's
currently
Greenbelt
Land
understand
the
point
being
made
so.
D
D
What
we've
heard
today
from
Mr
Butler
is
was
best
described
as
extremely
comprehensive
review
run
through
chair
of
all
the
planning
issues.
There
are
actually
germane
to
this
application
and
our
deliberations
this
afternoon.
These
sentences
are
not
starting
well,
chair,
I,
have
to
say
maybe
I
should
start
again
he's
going
through
very
in
great
detail
that
the
matters
are
actually
germane
to
our
deliberations
this
afternoon
and
I
think
that's
important
that
we
have
that
very
clear
and
front
and
center
in
our
minds.
D
There
has
been
extensive
correspondence
aimed
at
panel
members
of
some
of
into
great
length
and
great
detail.
Not
much
of
those
correspondence
was
actually
relevant
to
to
our
decision
making.
This
afternoon,
unfortunately,
we've
covered
at
extents
the
the
materials
used
for
the
off
weather
pitch
the
all-weather
pitch,
rather
that's
covered
by
this
legislation,
but
Mr
Butler's
detailed
how
drainage
matters
had
handled
end
of
life
to
be
handled,
so
those
I
am
extremely
satisfied
with,
but
I
wouldn't
consider
those
material
planning
considerations
in
any
case
Jeff.
D
It
was
considerable
correspondence
regarding
the
climate
emergency
and,
as
as
you
would
be
aware,
which
I
have
considerable
experience
and
knowledge
with
regard
to
climate
emergency
I
find
it
extremely
difficult
to
consider
the
loss
of
the
relatively
small
number
of
trees
here
to
be
relevant
when
we're
not
only
replacing
them
times
three
but
we're
a
city.
That's
planting
5.6
million
trees
over
the
next
20
years.
That's
5.6
million
trees
over
the
next
20
years.
D
Also
I.
Don't
think
that
the
loss
of
five
percent
of
the
previously
unaccessible
Golf
Course
represents
a
significant
loss
of
immunity
to
the
community
and
should
be
considered
as
a
sufficient
reason
so
notice.
The
application,
especially
when
you
consider
the
incredibly
considerable
gain
for
the
community's
children
and
I've,
made
that
point
at
length,
so
I
won't
want
to
rehash
it.
So
if
we
View
oh
just
a
further
a
couple
of
points
actually
chair
before
bringing
about
big
old
plus
planning
decision,
dial,
Community
use,
we've
had
that
satisfied.
D
D
In
fact,
when
we
look
at
all
the
issues
laid
out
here,
there
aren't
any
reasons
sufficient
to
say
no
to
this
application,
not
one
and
I.
Think
members
should
consider
that
and
if
all
planning
decisions
are
an
absolute
yes,
an
absolute.
No
with
a
crossover
point
in
the
middle
and
lots
of
planning
decisions
go
you
know
somewhere
either
either
way
of
that.
D
A
B
We
did
have
a
strong
exchange
of
views
last
time
and
a
lot
of
the
concerns
that
were
raised
have
been
addressed.
I
raised
the
concern
about
Community
use,
I've
looked
at
the
community
use
section,
I
think
that's
solid,
I,
think
that
will
help
and
benefit
this
particular
Community.
B
This
school
has
done
wonderful
things
in
South,
Leeds,
South
Leeds
from
an
education
point
of
view.
If
you
go
back,
many
many
years
was
a
basket
case.
It's
not
a
basket
case
anymore.
This
is
doing
a
fabulous
job
with
working
class.
B
You're
down
to
debating
the
issues
surrounding
conditions
are
whether
a
green
fence
is
really
such
a
problem
in
the
green
belt
that
it
overwhelmingly
overtakes
the
positives
in
terms
of
giving
these
working
class
kids
the
best
start
that
we
can
possibly
give
them
and,
as
my
colleague
says
over
there
on
this
rare
occasion
that
I'm
agreeing
with
him,
there
is
much
of
a
balancing
I,
don't
think
it's
a
marginal
decision,
I
think
the
positives
are
so
overwhelming,
and
the
negatives
so
slight
that
it
would
be
regrettable
entirely
and
utterly
if
we
didn't
back
this
school
and
back
this
community
on
that
basis,
chair
I
am
quite
comfortable
to
probably
second,
my
learning
colleagues
recommendation.
E
Yeah
I've
I've,
listened
to
to
everything.
That's
been
said:
I
still,
I'm
still
concerned
about
the
lighting
issue.
E
We've
got
the
community
agreement
from
the
school
attached
as
an
appendices,
which
does
say
you
know
until
nine
o'clock
at
night.
Now
what
I'm
worried
about
is
the
lighting
I
understand
the
lighting's
getting
put
in
because
it's
it's
cost
saving
I
get
that
we
had
that
discussion
last
time,
but
I'm
then
concerned
that
this
agreement,
this
community
use
agreement
of
the
school,
is
taken
as
read
and
therefore
those
lights
can
be
erected
and
they
start
using
it
till
nine
o'clock
at
night.
E
So
I
understand
that
you're
saying
that
the
pitch
can
only
be
used
in
daylight
hours,
but
there's
nothing
in
this
community
agreement.
That
says
that
is
there.
So
I
am
still
concerned
that
these
lights
are
going
to
be
put
in
and
then
before
we
know
it.
The
columns
have
gone
up
and
we're
using
this
community
agreement,
and
it
says
oh
nine
o'clock
at
night
here
we
can
do
it.
So
I
still
have
reservations
on
that.
G
E
I
absolutely
understand
that
those
lights
are
subject
to
another
planning
application.
What
I'm
concerned
about
is
the
weather
with
the
plan.
Application
and
it'll
just
happen
is
what
I'm
concerned
about,
because
all
the
or
the
the
the
the
the
the
power
and
everything
is
going
to
be
laid
when
the
pitch
is
laid.
So
I
am
concerned
that
that's
going
to
be
taken
as
a
you
know,
we'll
just
do
it
and
we'll
put
a
retrospective
plan
application
in
and
we've
got
a
community
agreement
that
says
we
can
rent
out
till
now.
G
So
if
you
were
to
try
and
somehow
restrict
it
so
that
it
could
under
be
used
up
to
a
certain
certain
time
which
wasn't
until
nine
o'clock,
how
do
you
actually
do
that
when,
of
course,
daylight
hours
change
every
10
every
day
by
10
minutes?.
A
C
G
Can
be
amended
as
Council
Houser
would
have
said,
so
it
can
only
be
so.
The
pictures
and
the
tennis
courts
going
to
be
used
during
daylight
hours
yeah.
If
that's
what
members
want,
so
we
could
add
the
condition
to
that
effect
or
alter
the
community
use
agreement
to
that
effect.
If
that
that
helps,
but
as
I
said,
you
would
still
want
you,
you
would
still
have
to
submit
a
further
application
for
the
lighting
anyway.
G
But
yes,
we
could
add
that
to
the
community
use
agreement,
I
don't
think
the
school
will
be
struggled
by
that
because,
ultimately
you
know
if
an
application
came
forward
anyway,
there's
a
possibility.
They
might
be
trying
to
alter
the
community
use
agreement
as
well
because
of
the
hours
restrictions
but
I'm
sure
we
could
alter
the
community
use
agreement.
So
the
pictures
and
the
tennis
courts
are
going
to
use
throughout
their
light
hours.
Okay,.
C
Yeah
sorry
chair,
the
the
community
use
agreement
seems
to
cover
the
whole
school,
not
just
the
pictures
so
like
if
any.
If.
G
A
G
It's
properly
captured
so
so,
basically
with
the
recommendation
which
to
prove
subject
to
the
25
specified
conditions
and
a
variation
of
the
community
use
agreement
that
relates
specifically
to
the
use
of
the
new
3G
4G
I
forgot.
What
is
it
5G
pitch?
Whatever
it
is?
The
pitch
and
the
tennis
courts
have
only
used
during
daylight
hours.
The
application
has
been
moved
by
Council
Walsh
on
second
by
councilor,
Finnegan
kitchen.
F
G
So
I'm
just
sorry
chair
just
six
in
favor,
not
against
and
three
simply
not
voting.
Three.