►
From YouTube: Delegate Office Hours | Setting MakerDAO Priorities
Description
The Delegate Office Hours call is hosted by the Governance Communications Core Unit in collaboration with Recognized Delegates of MakerDAO.
The call aims to bring together all delegates and discuss recent events, governance activity, and other domains relative to governance and delegation.
https://forum.makerdao.com/t/delegate-office-hours-3-includes-poll-for-discussion-topic/16723
C
D
B
Yeah,
if
you
took
off
your
headphones
and
just
make
sure
that
your
input
and
your
settings
is
changed
to
your
default
computer
input,
that
should
fix
it.
A
Having
I
apologize
for
that
I
do
I
apologize
for
that
all
right.
Well,
let's
get
going!
Thank
you.
Everyone
for
joining
us
I'm,
going
to
just
get
started
with
some
of
the
polling
that
we
get
for
today's
topic,
which
is
to
on
focus
on
dial
priorities
and
I,
will
open
the
floor
to
that
faces
the
polling.
That
was
what
folks
wanted
to
talk
about
today.
So
I
was
wondering
who
would
like
to
open
up
the
floor.
Some
of
you
did.
A
Thank
you
Peyton.
It
wouldn't
be
a
maker
call
without
a
few
technical
difficulties.
That
is
true.
That
is
true.
So
who
would
like
to
get
us
started
on
talking
about
maker
Dow
priorities.
E
Yeah
I
can
can
probably
just
from
my
point
of
view
so
I
think
basically
like
I.
Think
at
the
moment.
E
There's
this
this
kind
of
weird
vacuum,
because
Runa
is
pushing
his
hand,
game
plan
which
I'm
also
supporting,
but
then
we
have
the
regular
operations
of
the
dial,
and
so
this
is
one
thing
and
then
in
the
regular
operations,
I
think
there's
some
absence
of
a
clear
Direction
like
what
is
the
one
thing
that
we
want
to
optimize
like,
let's
say
in
the
next
three
to
six
months,
so
like
just
in
this
round.
What
would
you
like
to
discuss?
Would
you
like
to
discuss?
E
Should
we
prioritize
finding
a
way
for
the
dial
to
kind
of
decide
on
on
what
to
do
in
the
meantime,
until
like
a
proposal
like
the
end
game
plan
comes
to
the
MIP
stage,
or
would
you
like
to
to
take
a
longer
View.
E
Just
just
the
overall
room
like
like:
what's
your
opinion
here
so
for
me
actually
I
think,
because
the
ant
game
plan
is
not
in
a
stage
where
we
can
really
decide
upon
it.
So
actually
for
me,
it
would
be
enough
to
focus
like
what's
the
thing
we
want
to
do
in
the
next
three
months.
E
For
instance,
I
think
that's,
basically
that
should
be
within
our
grasp
in
a
way
and
already
help
a
lot,
because
if
we
say,
for
instance,
we
want
to
prioritize
increasing
world
usage
right,
then
I
think
that's
a
very
good
goal
to
have
and
then
also
we
can
set
like
some
expectations
about.
Where
do
we
want
to
go
with
budgets
for
the
next
three
months?
Not
for
ever,
but
just
like
for
the
short
term
I
think
so
that's
my
my
ask
at
least
what
would
help
me
so
I
think
team
black
is
has
raised
Yeah.
F
Tim
go
ahead,
yeah
I
think
it's
a
good
standoff
point
to
say
like
after
coming
back
from
a
little
bit
of
a
break,
the
one
thing
I've
sort
of
noticed
from
calls
that
are
unofficial
and
then
calls
that
are
official
is
that
there
are
a
lot
of
functions
that
are
missing.
There's
a
lot
of
discussions
about
structure
on
the
Forum.
Those
are
great
but
I
think,
ultimately
something
what
I
think
your
question
is
actually
pulling
out
is
what
is
the
Downy,
but
also
how
can
delegates
help?
Is
that
a
fair
way
of
saying
that?
F
F
F
Sure
I
was
going
to
get
into
it,
but
water's
thing
started
as
like
this
high
level:
Bottoms
Up,
strategic
Vision
thing
and
a
sort
of
pivoting
into
solving
more
of
our
immediate
problems,
which
is
kind
of
echoing
the
point
I'm
making
right.
F
These
teams
are
not
operating
in
a
vacuum,
but
there's
these
opportunities
where
teams
can
overlap
and
what
happens
is
that
means
that
they're,
extending
their
mandates
or
they're
not
fulfilling
something
that
maker
holders
might
understand
or
want,
but
they
will
in
the
long
term
right,
and
so
we
need
to
come
together
and
start
to
build
a
Cadence
around
these
alignments
right.
F
How
do
these
teams
cross
together?
What
can
they
do
to
be
more
efficient
or
what
can
they
do
to
actually
deliver
on
certain
sets
of
outcomes
and
I
think
it?
Alignment
also
starts
with
the
Raphael's
Point
understanding
expectations
and
it
all
and
eventually
probably
comes
back
towards
what
is
our
total
output?
And
what
are
we
focusing
on
and
are
we
allocating
our
quote-unquote
energy
Capital?
The
right
way,
which
is
just?
F
Are
we
working
towards
the
right
direction
and
it
starts
with
basically
a
notion
dock
or
like
a
Google
doc,
of
a
big
list
of
all
these
different
priorities
that
we
just
meet
week
on
week
and
bring
people
in
kind
of
the
same
as
the
DVC,
but
except
it's
a
little
bit
more
buy-in
I
would
say
rather
than
opt-in.
Does
that
make
sense.
E
Yeah,
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
me,
so
it's
kind
of
what
but
we're
kind
of
lacking
that
now
we're
lacking
these
kind
of
yeah,
exactly
infrastructure
right
to
yeah
totally
and.
A
Let
me
ask
you
a
question
on
that.
Let's
say,
for
example,
you
know
you
want
to
know
what
a
core
unit
is
they're,
you
know
objectives
or
their
okrs
or
whatever.
How
do
you
go
about
finding
that
information
if
you're,
just
curious,
you're
kind
of
looking
for
particular
core
unit
information
about
what
their
goals
are
there
information
out
there?
What
what's
your?
What's
your
thoughts
on
that
Tim?
How
do
you
go?
How
would
you
go
out
and
look
at
the
Forum
or
a
myth,
or
something
like
that?
What's
your
thought.
F
When
you
say
Tim,
you
mean
Tim,
one
Tim,
one,
sorry
I'm
gonna
make
that
joke
every
time.
Until
people
send
me
packages
that
I
need
to
stop
anyway,
so
I
mean
core
units,
post,
updates,
I
think
people
tend
to
miss
them.
They
they
get
buried
a
little
bit,
but
I'm
lazy
and
I
just
ask
and
then
most
often
people
just
point
me
back
to
their
update
I'm
like
oh
god
there.
F
It
is
right,
so
that
kind
of
Echoes
that
point
a
little
bit
right,
we're
sort
of
waiting
for
ses's
dashboard,
which
would
be
the
passive
way.
This
is
important
way
of
going
in
to
find
what
people
are
doing
and
how
get
a
nice
little
progress
bar
on
their
goals
or
whatever
but
I.
Think
again,
alignment
comes
down
to
understanding
what
are
the
outcomes
we're
going
towards
and
are
we
getting
in
that
right
direction?
F
I
think
what
we'll
actually
find
if
we
start
to
put
some
time
on
the
calendar
and
some
of
us
delegates
actually
do
some
of
this
light
work
that
we're
probably
all
marching
in
a
direction
and
we're
all
probably
pretty
aligned.
We
just
haven't
figured
out
how
to
communicate
that
at
a
higher
level
for
everybody,
so
that
it's
simpler
for
people
who
aren't
in
the
community
to
understand,
but
that's
just
my
sort
of
fresh
eyes
coming
back
into
the
community,
and
everyone
keeps
talking
about.
Oh
alignment,
alignment
I'm
like
okay.
F
F
Here's
where
you
find
like
where
they
all
roll
up
to
each
other,
so
the
first
iterations
of
what
louder
is
decentralized
Ops
thing
is
it's
essentially
like
what
is
the
total
output
of
initiatives
that
the
Dow
is
doing?
How
do
they
all
cohesively
come
together
and
essentially,
it's
sort
of
like
okrs
like
what
are
the
higher
level
kpis?
Are
we
allocating
our
time
in
the
right
way?
My
guess
is
mostly
yes,
but
I
think
this
is
where
we
can
sort
of
start
to
come
together.
A
E
Thomas
I'm,
sorry
to
interrupt
you
because
I'm
I'm
thinking
like
I,
get
the
question.
But
how
is
that
tied
into
finding
the
priority
priorities
for
also
officing
the
priorities
that
are
already
there?
Can
you
tie
it
in
somehow.
A
B
I
mean
also
there's
like
a
distinction
to
be
made
between
core
unit
level
priorities
and
DOW
level
priorities
right.
The
core
unit
priorities
are
usually
informed
by
the
higher
level
priorities
that
they
see
like
being
set
in
governance
in
various
ways,
and
so
yeah
I'm
curious
like
what
are
proper
Dow
level
prioritization
decisions
that
delegates
see
themselves
making
because
I
know
you
know
you
can't
you
can't
have
a
hand
on
everything:
you're,
not
micromanaging,
all
the
core
units
and
what
they're
doing
right.
G
Yeah
I
mean
getting
sorry
Thomas
again
getting
back
to
priorities.
I
mean
it's
right
now,
the
the
easiest
priority
that
we
sorry
for
the
background
noise,
but
the
easiest
priority
that
we
should
be
focused
on
in
my
opinion,
is
you
know
the
all
the
cash
that's
sitting
in
the
balance
sheet
of
this
dial?
That's
not
going
to
work
I,
don't
think
there
would
be
any
company
in
their
right
mind
right
now.
G
That
would
have
three
billion
dollars
in
cash
sitting
in
their
balance
sheet
and
not
going
to
work
every
single
day.
So
to
me,
the
priority
here
should
be
to
get
MIP
65
and
take
a
look,
how
monetellas
and
then
diversify
from
there,
because
obviously
you
as
the
one
that
exposed
it
to
one
one.
You
know
player
in
the
U.S
treasury,
space
or
others,
but
yeah.
H
Yeah,
just
just
a
great
opportunity
to
counter
Frank's
things,
so
I
I,
think
yeah,
so
putting
the
putting
the
the
vast
amount
of
UC
that
we
have
into
work
is
probably
good
idea
to
do.
But,
honestly,
my
main
priority
wouldn't
be
that,
but
really
just
yeah
basically
find
a
way
to
actually
increase
the
dye
Supply
because
we
clearly
have
die
demand.
Otherwise
we
wouldn't
have
a
full
PSM,
and
that
would
be
my
primary
primary
thing.
We
were
always
hoping
for
rwas
to
make
that
happen.
H
We
certainly
don't
have
a
mechanism
right
now
to
to
get
dicer
by
through
walls
which
I'm
really
really
sad
about,
but
I
think
that
should
be
so
from
my
point
of
view.
That
is
the
the
highest
priority
right
now
on
on
a
very
short
term
view
yeah.
So
it's
I
think
we
should
dedicate
resources
to
to
the
immediate
problems
that
we
have
right
now
and,
of
course,
dedicate
resources
as
well
to
long-term
plans
like
the
end
game,
for
example,
or
any
other
thing
that
might
pop
up
in
the
future.
But.
H
Running
business
right
now
and
I
do
agree
that
nib65
would
help
not
only
not
it
would
help
on
the
on
the
profitable
perspective,
but
I
don't
care
too
much
about
the
protocol
being
product
profitable
right
now,
I
do
care
about
the
pro
the
product
of
being
in
a
shape
that
we
can
actually
grow,
and
this
is
certainly
not
helping
us
to
grow.
H
If
it's
not
cannibalizing,
efforts
on
on
other
things
like
I,
don't
know,
get
I,
don't
know
more
institutional
evolves
into
into
the
space
I
doubt
this
is
working
right
now
or
I.
Don't
know
do
something
that
we
actually
encourage.
World
usage
again
I,
don't
see
a
big
majority
in
favor
for
doing
that
right
now,
but
those
are
things
that
that
I
would
see
on
the
operative
side
for
for
the.
If
the
priority
of
actually
helping
on
on
dye
Supply
would
actually
be
something
we
can
agree
on.
E
So
great
point
about
expanding
diet.
Supply
I
think
like
these
are
like
my
my
personal
two.
Top
priorities
are
getting
more
profitable,
which
means
like
monetary
65
and
putting
3
billion
to
work,
because
just
one
percent
yield
on
that
per
year
is
like
solving
a
lot
of
our
problems
and
that
increasing
to
isobab.
What
would
that
mean
to
you
Tim?
Would
that
mean
basically
L2
usage
or
or
where
do
you
see
like
the
the
lowest
hanging
fruit?
There.
H
We
have
protocol
engineering,
who's
who's,
doing
a
lot
on
L2,
which
is
probably
a
good
idea.
I
guess
we
have
Workforce
on
growth,
who
are
collaborating
with
partners
and
integrated
us,
and
what
not
to
do
that.
They
will
probably
come
up
with
the
better
answer
to
the
questions.
So
how
do
we
actually
increase
the
diet
Supply
or
what
can
we
do
for
for
the
dye
Supply.
E
Okay,
but
then
that's
a
very
interesting
point,
because
I
love
that,
like
basically
giving
the
the
ball
to
the
workforce,
but
it
seems
like
these
three
entities-
do
not
actually
work
on
the
like
pull
on
the
same
string
right.
So
maybe
it's
our.
E
It
is
our
task
to
kind
of
bring
them
together
and
say:
hey
look!
Our
top
priority
now
is
growing
diet,
Supply
and
making
and
doing
that
in
a
profit
as
profitable
fashion
as
possible.
We
need
some
like
two
people
from
growth:
two
people
from
protocol
engineering
and
two
people
from
somewhere.
E
Sorry
I
forgot
what
this
is
and
then
you
six
get
together
here
in
a
car
or
in
a
different
call,
and
you
know
just
start
formulating
ideas
or
let's
do
it
async
or
whatever,
but
just
I
think
these
kind
of
priority,
like
agenda
setting
and
in
a
way
enabling
these
priorities
I
think
who's
going
to
do
that,
because
small
lab
care
holders
are
not
going
to
do
it.
The
core
units
are
not
going
to
do
it
so,
like.
H
Yeah,
but
why
not
I
mean
I,
honestly,
I'm,
pretty
sure
they're
actually
doing
it,
I'm
I'm,
pretty
sure
that,
for
example,
political
engineering
is
collaborating
with
growth
and
collateral
onboard
or
collateral
I,
don't
know
there
is
already
stuff
happening
between
the
coordinates
and
I
mean.
This
is
part
of
the
facilitator.
Also,
it's
a
facilitator.
D
I
About
you,
so
so,
if
it
involves
collateral,
you
know
we're.
You
know
in
this
in
this
world
that
we're
working
in,
we
have
limited
bandwidth
and
there's
a
lot
of
work
to
be
done
so
collateral.
If
you
think
collateral,
whether
it's
new
collateral
or
collateral
in
the
system,
that
means
to
be
better
utilized,
think
CES
will
partner
with
with
PE
when
needed,
and
we
already
do
that.
There's
a
lot
of
work.
I
E
Yeah
sure
I
mean
that
makes
perfect
sense,
but,
like
I,
think,
what's
what's
missing
for
me
and
I
think
what's
but
clarify
Robert
is
like
push
back
because
I'm
totally
wrong.
If
I
think
this
kind
of
prioritization
doesn't
really
exist,
so
nobody's
saying:
hey
our
number
one
priority
as
a
dial
is
growing
by
Supply.
E
Who
can
help
like
do
you
know
these
things
and
then
do
you
actually
work
with
these
other
core
units
like
growth
and
to
to
to
focus
on
growing
dire
Supply,
because
I
think
what
you're
doing
is
is
you're
working
on
your
mandate
and
you're
doing
an
excellent
job
there.
So
this
is
not
a
criticism,
but
I
think
this
kind
of
a
function
of
targeting
the
efforts
towards
a
strategic
game
is
What's
missing.
I
Yeah-
and
you
know
something
it's
a
great
point,
because
the
when
I
take
a
look
at
like
like
even
I,
can't
the
calls
blur
together.
So
there
was
a
call
yesterday
and
Nadia
was
on
it
and
she
was
like
Hey.
You
know.
Part
of
my
mandate
is
supply
and
demand
right,
but
Supply
is
different
for
her
than
supplied
for
me
because
we're
implementing
to
create
the
supply,
whereas
then
she's
pulling
you
know,
she's
out
there
killing.
You
know
killing
the
the
Beast
and
bringing
them
forward
and
we're
skinning
it
and
preparing
it.
I
Do
the
field
dressing
and
all
that
to
get
it
ready
and
then
onboard
it,
and
then
she's
got
to
be
responsible
for
the
pull
through
the
demand
side
of
the
equation
right.
So
we
work
closely
in
that
Loop
and
then
we've
got
real
world
finance
and
right
now
they
they
take
the
lead
on
the
deals
that
happen
for
RW,
rwas
and
and
they
have
a
process
set
up.
So
we
we're
highly
collaborative
with
them
to
make
sure
that
we're
doing
that
work
as
well.
So
our
stakeholder
alignment
calls
that
happen
on
Monday
and
I.
I
You
know
I'd
be
happy
to
encourage
any
of
you
to
attend
those
calls
they're
on
the
public,
calendar
and
Thomas
or
trying
to
think
of
who,
from
govcoms
or
SES
moderates
that
Thomas,
maybe
you
know,
but
you
know
just
show
up
we'll.
Let
you
in
you'll
see
the
whole
thing
and
you'll
see
the
cross-core
unit
coordination
happen
there.
It's
it's
quite
extensive
and
very
detailed
yeah.
So
we're
doing
a
lot
of
it,
like
you
said
we're
doing
a
lot
of
this
right
now.
It's
just
not
visible.
I
That
give
us
you
know.
The
thing
is,
is
that
then
you
know
this
is
this
is
really
what
I'm
asking
for
is
is
that
is
that
I
I
can
read
the
tea,
leaves
and
say
I
think
this
is
important
and
go
off
and
execute
a
plan
based
upon
that
that
aligns
with
my
mandate
but
I,
don't
truly
know
if
that's
what's
being
expressed
by
the
community,
I'm
doing
a
best
guess
right
now,
but
if
it's
specific
you
know,
for
example,
we
set
very
clear
kpis
between
my
core
unit
metadata
whatever
it
is.
I
You
want
to
call
me
and
and
make
her
doubt
and
it's
clear
and
we
use
those
to
measure
performance
I'll,
tell
you
what
I
need
right
and
I'll
share
a
budget
with
you
and
then
we'll
have
accountability
and
I'll
go
off
and
I'll
do
that
thing
and
I'll
deliver
and
then
we'll?
You
know
we'll
check
in
to
make
sure
that
things
are
being
done.
The
way
they
need
to
be
done.
I
That's
that's
the
direction
that
I'm
heading
Frank
I
know
that
you
asked
like
what
is
CES
doing
so
we're
putting
together
a
strategy
that
we
will
then
come
back
to
the
community
that
I
think
will
be
compatible
with
whatever
it
is
that
this
group
or
the
end
game
or
whoever
comes
up
with
to
build,
be
supportive
of
a
structure
that
allows
us
to
get
back
to
work
and
start
delivering
thanks.
Everyone.
A
And
thank
you
Rob
appreciate
that
and
if
you
don't
have
the
calls
on
a
call
calendar
and
get
you
the
link
for
it,
so
Monday
I
do
have
a
hand
raised
I've
been
for
for
a
few
minutes.
I
want
to
the
floor
to.
C
Hi
yeah
thanks
is
it
related
to
just
a
discussion
on
increasing
the
the
demand
I'm,
not
sure,
if
it's
sort
of
out
of
the
scope
of
this
discussion,
but
at
least
when
I
was
at
powerful
one
of
the
things
we
always
talked
about,
especially
now
that
a
maker
seems
to
have
like
the
infrastructure
set
up
for
generating
revenue
on
its
like
usds.
C
The
revenue
coming
in
from
the
stability
fees
can
be
used
like
to
basically
lowering
them
strategically
and
just
being
very
competitive,
so
I
know,
like
rates,
are
generally
low
right
now,
but
I
think
it
would
make
sense
for
the
doll
to
like,
especially
when
we're
into
high
to
just
like,
be
really
really
competitive
on
that
side
and
basically
bring
those
to
zero
because
and
that
that
would
increase
the
iso
Supply
to
me
tremendously,
because
it
would
make
like
maker,
obviously
the
best
place
to
borrow,
and
it
doesn't
seem
like
any
of
the
other
like,
for
example,
Ava
will
have
quite
the
same
infrastructure
to
to
to
like
generate
Revenue
under
dollars.
C
G
G
G
If
we
could
get
mip65
going
and
get
some
of
that
usdc
to
work,
that
could
be
an
option,
I
kind
of
see
it
that
but
I
generally
think
that
you're
not
going
to
generate
a
lot
of
dye
Supply
unless
you
improve
just
the
overall
ux
right
and
right
now,
on
the
institutional
side,
it
seems
like
there
isn't
going
to
be
much
of
an
appetite
for
crypto.
G
If
anything,
I
think
right
now
it
has
such
a
huge
black
eye
that
I,
don't
just
don't
see
it
as
a
welcoming
thing
that
people
want
to
talk
about
in
a
positive
light
and
when
I
say
people
I
mean
people
that
don't
work
in
this
industry
or
aren't
you
know
investing
in
it
or
trading
in
it?
What
have
you
so
I
think
it's
going
to
take?
Maybe
six
or
12
months,
and
hopefully
I'm
wrong
for
that
black
guy
sort
of
swell
down
right.
G
So
will
stability
fees
go
into
zero,
incur
more
people
to
open
votes,
Maybe,
but
right
now,
I
think
a
lot
of
the
C5
centralized
Finance
platforms
so
not
too
eager
to
get
their
hands
on
anything
because
of
what's
happening
right
and
of
course,
A
lot
of
them
are
still
under
pressure
and
there's
still
companies
this
morning
going
into
bankruptcy.
So
we're
not
out
of
the
woods
yet
with
that
regard,
so
I
don't
know
if
it
will
expand
die.
G
We
could
but
yeah
there's
a
lot
of
powerful
things
that
we
could
do
with
die
right,
such
as
DSR,
but
obviously
that's
not
something
we
could
do
right
now,
but
yeah.
It's
an
interesting
thought
by
Nica.
Actually.
A
E
So
like
getting
back
to
the
question
of
priorities,
is
that,
like
the
the
the
the
number
one
priority
that
that
you
see
out
there,
I
mean
like
for
me:
what's
what
like
in
a
way
what
I'm
missing
is?
How
do
we
surface
that
going
forward
like
do
we?
Do
we
create
these
kind
of
polls
on
a
forum,
or
do
we
do
them
here?
You
know
just
just
like
a
temp
check
to
just
see.
Okay,
where
are
we
have
these
discussions
like?
Why
is
die?
E
Supply
number
one
and
not
Vault
usage
number
one
so
like
as
far
as
I've
seen,
there's
like
three
candidates
at
the
moment,
like
just
for
the
short
term
right.
It's
like
dice
of
black
growth,
it's
Vault
usage
and
it's
profitability,
PSM
usage.
Basically,
so
can
we
how?
How
do
we
discuss
like
how
do
we
agree
on
something.
G
Yeah
I
think
I
think
delegates.
We
delegates
delegate
platforms.
What
have
you
we
need
to
kind
of
ourselves
and
mkr
token
owners
right,
not
just
delegates,
but
it
can
start
with
the
delegates
right
because
we
talk
to
each
other
a
lot.
We
communicate
et
cetera
kind
of
online.
You
know
Division
and
come
to
an
agreement
that
this
has
to
be
the
priority
whatever.
That
is
whether
it's
budget
cuts.
It's
getting.
You
know
MIP
65,
going
what
have
you?
How
can
we
help
collateral
onboarding?
G
You
know
the
mandates
that
these
core
units
have
to
follow.
Are
they
following
it?
If
they're
not,
let's
be
supportive
and
like
get
them
to
follow
the
Mandate
right,
but
just
together
like
at
this
crucial
moment
in
in
the
entire
ecosystem,
is
very
crucial,
especially
for
maker.
G
Doubt
like
I
think
we
need
to
as
as
delegates
come
together
and
somehow
you
know
hey
look
man
like
myself,
I'm,
not
the
biggest
fan
of
cutting
budgets
right,
but
I've
come
around
and
I
I'm
willing
to
work
with
any
of
you
guys
who
are
like
you
know
that
love
to
cut
budgets
or
what
do
you
guys
call
yourselves?
Hawks
so
yeah
I'm
willing
to
work
with
you
all
and
like
make
something
happen
for
the
benefit
of
maker
thou
right.
G
A
You
Frank.
That
brings
up
a
really
good
point.
Actually,
the
DVC
call
yesterday
strategic
Finance
presented
options
for
budget
cuts
and
it's
recorded
it
out
have
all
the
details,
but
maker
man
says
sorry
I'm
late.
Thank
you
for
joining
us,
but
it
was
a
presentation
from
strategic
Finance
about
those
different
options
in
the
budget
cuts
you
know
slashing
or
across
the
board.
So
I
don't
know
if
anybody
else
saw
that
and
I
thought.
That
was
a
interesting
presentation
from
from
those
folks.
E
Peyton
had
a
really
good
point
in
the
in
the
chat.
I
think
that's
that's
quite
important
to
to
the
discussion,
because
it's
like
I
agree
to
this
point
like
he
says
clear.
Feedback
from
NPR
holders
is
pretty
important
piece
for
priority
and
I
I
can't
agree
more.
So
there's
two
things.
First
of
all,
we
as
delegates.
How
do
we
come
to
a
conclusion
and
how
do
we
make
sure
that
we
represent
in
a
way
as
much
of
at
least
the
people
that
delegate
to
us.
E
Or,
or,
and
even
better
how?
How
can
we
get
like
the
broadest
input?
I
mean
like
I,
don't
know,
I
think
this
is
something
like
a
mechanism
for
this.
This
kind
of
this
is
missing.
I
think
we
did
two
of
these
priority
parts
that
was
kind
of
I,
think
I
found
it
was
very
powerful
and
I
loved
it,
and
maybe
we
can
just
do
that
here,
informally,
just
say
like
yay
or
nay,
you
know
like
who's
who's
in
favor
of
of
die.
Supply
like
something
like
that.
I
mean
I,
I'm
really
open.
E
F
A
F
I
was
just
agreeing
and
it
happened
on
mute,
but
yeah
I
think
the
most
important
thing
is
I
I,
think
I'll
be
echoing
people
who
aren't
here.
Is
that
we're
not
just
like
arbitrarily
deciding
things
for
everybody
like
what
I
was
sort
of
talking
about
with
alignment?
Is
that
we
come
together.
F
F
And,
to
a
certain
extent,
if
we
can
I
mean
I
I,
do
I've
been
working
on
something
that's
a
little
crazy
for
mkr
holders
for
like
a
token
gated
Chat
thing,
but
it's
not
complete
yet
I
think
that
would
solve
some
of
that
communication
issue,
but
yeah
I,
just
don't
want
us
to
be
arbitrarily
deciding
things.
I
want
us
to
be
like
liaising
more
bringing
these
together
more,
but
that's.
A
My
own
opinion,
thank
you,
Tim,
hey
maker
man,
got
you
hand
raised,
so
you
want
to
add
to
that.
J
Sorry,
I'm
late
guys,
I'll,
probably
missed
some
important
discussion.
So
my
take
here,
you
know,
like
I,
said
in
the
chat.
The
communications
seem
to
be
unidirectional
lately
and
we
kind
of
have
sort
of
a
Schism
in
with
respect
to
governance
in
in
the
loosest
sense.
There's
two
strong
factions,
one
that
wants
a
more
centralized
maker,
another
one,
that's
basically
rune,
factioned
and
I.
Don't
see
these
groups
really
Reaching
Across
the
table.
J
I,
don't
see
a
good
mechanism
for
discussion
and
cus
they're
kind
of
divided
between
these
groups
or
sitting
somewhere
in
there,
and
so
you
know,
I
see.
The
real
issue
is
like:
how
do
you
create
a
forum?
You
know
for
these
players
to
get
together
and
delegates
are
squarely
in
the
center
because,
as
a
delegate,
I
can
only
guess
I
I
know
most
of
my
makers
delegated
by
roon.
So
you
know
I
should
vote
the
way
roon
wants,
but
that's
not
the
way.
J
I
go,
and
so
you
know
there's
a
real
issue
here
between
what
maker,
the
five
to
six
seven
whales
want
with
maker,
and
they
have
disagreeing
opinions
strongly
right
and
then
cu's
have
an
opinion
and
delicates
or
squares
in
the
center,
and
so
I,
don't
know
how
to
bridge
the
gap.
But
a
gap
needs
to
be
bridged
because
I've
seen
this
all
too
often
in
many
organizations,
is
that
various
schisms
and
communication
failures
occur,
and
then
someone
has
to
figure
out
how
to
be
a
bridge
and
an
effective
Bridge,
not
a
pretend
Ridge.
J
Can
I
ask
a
question,
and
this
is
up
for
everyone
yeah
one
of
the
issues
that's
been
ongoing
and
this
is
the
reason
one
of
the
main
reasons
why
we
got
delegates
is
it.
It
just
seems
like
we.
Don't
our
maker
whales
really
aren't
stepping
up
to
the
plate.
I
mean
runes,
clearly
here
right
and
has
an
idea
and
the
rest
of
them
kind
of
was
the
hasu
plan
right.
It's
like
it's
almost
like.
J
We
need
to
get
our
maker
whales
in
a
room
because
there's
only
six
or
seven
of
them
and
let
them
come
out
with
some
idea
of
a
vision
for
maker.
You
know,
and
then
we
can
all
go
at
that
Vision
I
I
see
a
real.
Does
anybody
have
any
contact
with
with
these
VCS
that
we
can
get
them
in
the
same
room
and
have
a
real
engaging
discussion
with
them?.
H
Yeah
sorry,
just
jumping
in
I
can
clearly
say
that
everybody
who
is
delegating
to
me
is
not
putting
me
into
any
kind
of
position
in
in
terms
of
guiding
me
into
any
direction.
Sometimes
there
are
questions
that
I'm
answering
and
I
basically
point
out
how
I
view
things,
but
I
have
never
ever
encountered
a
situation
where
some
of
the
delegators
said
good
that
you
made
that
clear,
I'm
going
to
undelegate
now,
at
least
not
in
a
way
that
I
realized.
H
That
was
happening
because
of
that,
so
it
yeah
I,
don't
know
if
this
is
true
for
everybody
else,
but
I
can
clearly
say
that
I'm
not
I'm,
not
Guided.
By
mkr
token
holders
and
I
always
hear
that
and
Peyton
was
pointing
this
out.
We
need
the
opinion
of
mkr
token
holders.
Well,
from
my
point
of
view,
they
don't
have
an
opinion.
They
just
want.
H
I
guess
or
someone
else
to
take
over
the
the
charge
of
the
the
voting
power
or
whatever,
so
it's
going
to
be
pretty
hard,
I
think
to
actually
get
everybody
on
the
table.
I
mean
yeah.
There
are
some
that
are
even
active
on
the
Forum,
but
the
vast
majority
is
not.
G
I
mean,
in
my
opinion,
when
you
delegate
to
a
delegate
you're
going
risk
off
right,
so
why
would
they
want
to
go
risk
on
it,
wouldn't
make
any
sense
for
them?
It's
just
so
much
I,
don't
know
I
attended,
like
maybe
like
four
coal
four
conference
meetings
today
at
ECC
and
all
about
legal
stuff
today,
and
it's
like
no
one
could
give
you
an
answer.
G
What
the
right
thing
is
when
it
comes
to
the
legality
of
doubts-
and
you
know
whether
they're
General
Partnerships
or
not,
or
how
they
should
be
structured,
should
they
be
legal
rappers,
so
not
not
trying
to
get
into
legal
stuff
about
this.
What
we
do
here,
but
why
would
it?
G
Why
would
someone
that's
you
know
busy
doing
investing
for
a
living
for
their
LPS
wanna,
also
get
involved
in
the
Dallas
Beyond
me
so
I
I
look
at
as
something
of
delegators
they're
they're
in
the
business
of
going
risk
off
when
they
delegate
they're
not
in
the
business
of
getting
their
hands.
You
know
more
dirty
than
there
already
might
be.
So
that's
that's
just
my
opinion.
A
Thank
you
Frank
appreciate
that
comment.
E
D
A
E
A
Right
Rafia
asks
a
good
question:
what's
what's
everyone's
thoughts
on
on?
Maybe
the
next
steps,
yeah
sad
great
yeah,.
D
D
That's
like
a
yearly
Road
I
think
it's
a
council
I
I'm,
not
looking
at
it
right
now
in
front
of
me,
but
couldn't
an
idea
like
that
kind
of
be
taken,
and
you
maybe
even
take
what
what
incrementally
like
from
the
end
game
plan
and
maybe
propose
that
as
an
actual
like
kind
of
the
way,
these
sexualized
voter
committees
have
kind
of
come
up
as
an
informal
way
to
like
Drive
kind
of
conversation.
Could
we
start
doing
something
like
that.
F
Yeah
just
Echo
that
and
put
it
together,
Raphael.
The
next
step
is
bringing
together
some
sort
of
document
of
all
these
different
priorities
and
making
sure
that
the
problem
statements
are
clear.
What
is
the
problem?
What
are
some
solutions?
You
know
as
active
as
the
Forum
has
been
lately,
I
think
the
Forum
might
be
the
best
place
to
sort
of
crowdsource
what
other
priorities
might
be
missing
or
figure
out.
F
The
best
way
to
put
them
together,
but
putting
the
rubber
to
the
road
really
is
to
make
your
man's
point
on
us
kind
of
to
sort
of
go
to
meetings,
facilitate
them
together
and
then
come
back
to
the
community
and
be
as
transparent
as
possible
to
make
sure
that
that
list
is
there.
You
know
A
ranked
sorted
list
is
usually
pretty
helpful.
D
I
I
just
wanted
to
like
Echo
Tim
and
what
Frank
said
earlier
and
make
Command
as
well
like
I.
Think
you
guys
have
the
token
voting
power
today,
which
means
as
far
as
I'm
concerned
are
the
most
important
people
in
the
room
and,
like
everybody,
talks
about
deed
for
improved
delegates
and
stuff
yeah
for
now
Tim,
but
I
actually
think
you
guys
are
in
the
best
position
to
do
this,
because
it's
clear
you've
been
thinking
about
these
problems
for
the
longest
time
now.
D
So
I
would
love
to
see
this
group
Take
the
Lead,
because
it
would
help
I
have
so
many
questions
and
things
I
want
to
talk
about
I,
don't
know
how
to
take
it
to,
and
it's
difficult
to
figure
that
out
and
if
I
could
just
come
to
you
guys
right
and
help
kind
of
contribute
to
that
document.
That
would
be
insanely,
effective
and
productive,
I
think
tool.
E
Okay,
so
from
a
golf
comp's
point
of
view
like
what's
the
procedure
here
and
I
I'm
pretty
new,
so
so
help
me
out.
Is
it
like
what
what
is
that
is
that
single
request?
Is
that
just
a
forum,
a
request
for
commands?
What's
what's
the
form
the
best
form
to
take
here.
E
So
the
objective
patent
is
is
to
have
a
way
to
serve
as
short-term
priorities
for
stakeholders
in
the
dial.
Basically,
so
the
way
I'm
seeing
it
is
the
ideal
thing
would
be
something
like
Reddit.
You
know
in
a
way
where
you
have
these
kind
of
what
team
described,
problem
possible
solutions,
and
then
people
can
kind
of
you
know,
plus
minus
and
something
Rises
to
the
top,
and
then
it's
like.
Oh,
this
is
the
number
one
priority.
Okay,.
K
But
but
the
like
underlying
challenge
here
is
that
you
have
a
bunch
of
independent
actors
right
whether
they're
delegates
core
unit
members
like
mkr
holders
like
basically
anyone
can
can
kind
of
participate
to
the
extent
that
they
wish
in
the
system
and
the
only
way
you
can
really
enforce
the
prioritization
model
is
with
you
know,
some
sort
of
centralized
entity
with
some
sort
of
yeah.
E
Yeah,
sorry,
but
but
I'm
not
really
worried
about
the
enforcement,
because,
because
that's
not
what
it,
what
it's
about
for
me,
the
function
I'm
trying
to
achieve
is
is
a
coordination
function,
something
where
stakeholders
can
participate
and
surface
their
desires
in
a
way
to
kind
of
incorporates
as
many
as
possible,
and
if
what
I'm
hoping
this
will
do
is
that
it
kind
of
crowdsources?
You
know
decentralized
fashion,
what
the
dial
wants
to
do
next,
because
they
cannot.
There
cannot
be
a
leadership.
E
We
cannot
have
like
this
group,
which
already
doesn't
even
include
all
the
delegates
decide
on
what
the
dollar
should
do.
Next,
you
know,
that's
that's,
clearly
not
possible,
so
something
that's
that's
pretty
inclusive
and
in
the
end,
also,
not
because
I
think.
Of
course
the
forums
are
that,
but
they
are
too
broad.
So
we
need
something
that
kind
of
cutscope
down
in
a
way
that's
more
accessible.
K
So
to
that
I
would
say,
then
you
may
consider
that
you
don't
actually
need
a
MIP,
at
least
for
for
the
start
of
it
right,
because
essentially
you're
talking
about
a
tool
for
for
organizing,
like
you
know
that
doesn't
necessarily
have
to
go
through
governance.
It
can
just
be
an
initiative,
that's
pushed
forward
and
if
it
gets
adoption
great,
like
I
I,
think
we
we
sometimes
default
to
thinking
of
as
governance
as
a
silver
bullet
right
I'm
like
oh
well,
it's
passed
so
now
we're
good,
but
it's
like
oftentimes.
K
When
when
something
is
passed,
we
we
lack
a
lot
of
the
muscle
to
really
enforce
it
or
implement
it.
So
I
don't
know
like
starting
with
just
a
group
like
this
or
the
d
decentralized
voter
committees
like
yeah.
If
you
have
a
platform,
if
you
have
something
you
can
run
with,
you
can
just
start
going
and
then
trying
to
get
by
and
then
and
that's
almost
more
effective
than
than
arguing
about
it
from
the
implementation
standpoint.
I
think.
A
All
right,
thank
you
and
I.
Just
want
to
be
mindful
of
Tom.
We've
got
about
10
minutes
left
wanted
to
see
if
we
obviously
want
to
continue
the
conversation,
but
maybe
start
to
think
about,
you
know
what
our
next
steps
would
be.
I
know:
we've
had
a
few
few,
a
few
ideas
go
around
Raphael.
What
just.
E
A
In
something
like
this,
this
is
such
a
short-term,
long-term
Big
Goal.
Whatever
is
this
I
mean?
Would
this
be
a
continued
continuing,
even
though
we'll
continue
with
the
polls
and
the
topics
weekly
with
this
also
be
a
continuing
topic
that
will
always
hit
on
each
week?
Is
that
something
is
that
an
idea
that
we
could
put
out
there
just
just
as
a
thought
as
we
continue
to
build
Memphis
Doc
and
talk
about
it?
Raphael
Tim,
anyone.
A
And
also
to
the
the
list,
and
we
create
the
Google
Doc:
where
would
you
house
it
and
who
would
have
access
to
it.
E
I
Yeah
I
just
have
a
quick
comment
and
Peyton
I
know:
you've
stepped
into
the
role
of
kind
of
being
the
chief
gov
Alpha
person,
and
you
know
when
I,
when
I
started
in
the
Dow,
you
know
I
feel
like
I've
always
been
part
of
it,
since
the
foundation
is
that
you
know
one
of
things,
long
long
always
was
Anne.
Payton
have
have
impressed
upon
me.
I
Is
that
if
you
don't
like
something
write,
something
up
put
it
out
there
vote
on
it
and
change
it,
and
so
I
spent
a
lot
of
times
in
a
lot
of
time
in
in
the
mips
portal
trying
to
get
answers
to
my
questions,
and
it's
just
it's
really
clear.
If
you
don't
like
something
take
something
amended
deprecate,
it
add
a
new
map
whatever,
but
that
is
the
quickest
way
to
get
anything
done
in
the
Dow.
So
it
highly
encourage
this
group
to
put
something
together
and
get
it
out
there
in
RFC.
I
Whatever
it
is,
is
a
prioritization
structure
strategy,
whether
it
relates
to
budgets,
which
is
a
really
complex
one
by
the
way
and
I
could
share
with
on
a
letter,
call
what
that
why?
But
I
just
highly
encourage
the
to
embrace
the
mips
process
and
moving
forward.
E
I
thought
update
that
the
other
guy
got
sick
canceled.
He
would
be
happy
to
come
on
next
week,
so
we
can't
have
him
this
week.
I'm
sorry
very
last
minute,
I'm
gonna,
repeat
that
in
the
other
call,
so
really
sorry
about
that.
We
can
think
about.
If
you
want
to
have
him
on
the
next
week,.
A
Interesting
I
was
just
looking
through
the
chat
paper
says
not
a
lot
of
mips
from
delegates.
Lots
of
work
high
risk
no
reward
beyond
the
new
Bounty
of
alpha.
So
thank
you
for
that.
F
F
A
That's
good
for
the
last
few
minutes.
It
just
sounds
like
we've
got
some
next
steps
here,
Raphael
with
the
doc
and
the
conversation
today,
a
lot
of
great
ideas
does
anyone
else
have
any
more
thoughts
before
we
wrap
up
foreign.
A
All
right
parting
thoughts,
we
will
follow
up.
Let's
stay
connected,
we
will
talk
about
with
the
prioritizations
to
the
Google
doc.
Thank
you
Raphael
for
doing
that.
We
look
forward
to
the
comments
and
we
also
hopefully
look
forward
to
seeing
on
the
GNR
call.
Take
care
we'll
see
you
next
week.