►
From YouTube: Decentralized Voter Committee | January 25, 2023
Description
A
B
Thanks
Mitchell
yeah
so
like
I
was
just
saying
my
aim:
I
mean
right
now,
I'm,
just
in
the
last
phase
of
preparing
the
Indian
constitution,
the
pregame
Constitution
draft
for
being
published
and
I'm
just
getting
these
like
there's
some
sort
of
final
reviews
and
final
feedback,
that's
resulting
in
some
revisions
to
it
that
I
really
useful
to
get
in
at
this
point,
because
it's
a
really
good
I
mean
it's
getting
better
and
better.
Obviously,
and
it's
still
going
to
be
in
a
very
rough
draft
form
once
it's
published
and
it
will
change
significantly
from
then.
B
But
of
course
this
is
better
to
have
less
major
changes
happening
immediately,
because
then
you
would
have
people
reading
it
and
then
giving
feedback,
and
then
they
would
be
giving
feedback
to
something.
That's
already
outdated
right,
so
want
to
avoid
that
as
much
as
I
can
right,
but
yeah
I
think
it's
really.
B
And
then
the
at
least
the
at
least
the
like
at
least
four,
the
the
four
and
now
then
reworked
four
primary
scope
framework
which
are
stability
and
liquidity,
decentralized,
collateral,
real
ethyl
collateral
and
the
ecosystem
scope.
So
all
of
these
mips,
which
is
I,
mean
since
I,
said
we're
basically
six
myths
in
total.
They
will
be
submitted
for
RFC
in
February,
I.
B
Think
the
7th
of
February
rain
so
before
at
some
point
before
then
they
have
to
be,
they
have
to
be
published
and
first
in
order
to
then
go
and
get
in,
you
know
go
into
effect
in
beginning
of
April,
but
there's
still
there's
plenty
of
time.
So
right,
there's
still
another
10
days
and
in
the
end,
once
they're
published,
they
will
still
be.
You
know
we'll
still
be
able
to
edit
them
for
another
three
weeks
from
then.
B
So
we
can
have
plenty
of
time
to
make
these
like
last
edits,
to
have
it
in
place
for
April
and
then
I
mean
I,
guess
it'll
start
being
affected
April,
but
then
we
will
immediately
start
changing
right.
So
we
will
very
rapidly
change
these
documents
right
from
when
they're,
when
they
are
posted,
and
we
just
get
some
kind
of
hands-on
experience
with
on
operating
with
a
meeting.
B
You
know,
with
this
renewed
focus
and
like
what
can
we
do
right
now?
How
can
we
use
the
in-game
governance
tools
to
improve
efficiency
in
the
next
three
months
right
in
the
super
short
term
and
then
get
that
on?
You
know,
get
things
in
the
short
term
really
running
smoothly
and
then
start
to
focus
on
the
later
in
the
longer
term,
right
on
the
in-game
launch,
with
something
else
in
in
summer
2024,
but
but
still
alongside
this
I'm,
also
working
on
then
the
actual
endgame
Constitution
right.
B
So
like
the
long,
then
this
the
rule
set
that
will
govern
the
long
term
and
will
unleash
the
subtitles
and
all
that
and
there's
I
mean
I've,
have
I've
been
making
some
some
cool
additional
sort
of
small
changes
to
that
as
well
and
yeah
I.
Think,
basically,
today,
I
mean
I
want
I.
Think,
because,
because
the
the
Constitution,
the
pregame
presentation,
still
isn't
published,
I
think
what
we
can
do
is
we
can
just
talk
about
random
random
q,
a
about
sort
of
what
people
I
want.
B
What
uncertainty
yourself,
any
questions.
People
have
about
that
and
then
I
will
just
also
go
quickly
through
this,
like
in-game
changes
to
tokenomics
and
that
kind
of
stuff,
even
though
that's
a
bit
more
like
it'll
still
be
part
like
this
is
also
something
that
we
published
relatively
soon,
because
it's
important
to
sort
of
keep
the
two
pieces
in
sync
right.
B
Yeah,
hopefully
I'm
I'm
I
mean
right
I'm,
making
one
sort
of
medium-sized
change
now
and
then,
when
that's
done,
I'm
hoping
that,
like
over
the
weekend,
I
will
have
it
done
so
maybe
on
Monday
I
will
have
it.
I
will
have
it
published,
so
you
could
aim
for.
If
you
know,
if
you
aim
for
late
next
week,
that's
probably
gonna
fit
with
the
timing.
Hopefully.
B
Also
yeah
so
question
from
do
on
the
thought
on
the
reason,
cluster
proposal
and
how
a
government
should
approach
such
Topic
in
the
future.
Yeah
I
mean
so
like
I
mean
so
this
is
what
the
end
game
Constitution
has
always
been
about.
Is
that
there's
right
now?
It's
not!
It
doesn't
work
very
well
right.
It's
kind
of
a
it's
bad
right
and
we
sort
of
all
aware
of
that,
and
it's
just
difficult.
B
B
It
will
create
this
like
broader
frame
of
like
what
are
all
the
pieces
and
how
they
all
move
together
right,
so
the
and
then
I
mean
and
then
in
addition
to
that,
there's
this
new
change
where
clusters
and
stuff
I
mean
clusters
and
ecosystem
actors,
just
all
becomes
the
same
thing
right.
So
a
lot
of
core
units
are
will
sort
of,
alongside
the
kind
of
the
groups
that
that
wanted
to
to
you
know
to
Cluster
with
the
subtitles
and
a
lot
of
these
will
just
all
become
incubation
clusters
as
I
call
it.
B
So,
basically,
you
know
companies
that
are
getting
subsidized
that
are
not
core
units,
meaning
they
don't
have
governance
Powers
directly.
They
have
they
have,
they
might
have
governance
policies
to
go
through
a
coordinate
and
then
they
get
a
budget
and
they
get
milestones
and
then
they
sort
of
do
work
for
maker
and
they
do
the
kind
of
work
for
makeup
that
they
will
later
do
for
sub-dance.
B
So
all
the
I
mean-
and
so
I
will
just
have
I
mean
all
of
the
all
of
the
the
ecosystem
actors
and
all
the
Clusters
that
that
I
think
are
like
what's
needed
and
what
the
what
sort
of
makes
up
the
constellation
that
we
need
in
the
pre-game
will
be.
They
will
be
in
I
mean
they
will
not
all
be
in
when
I
publish
them
it'll
be.
But
my
goal
is
they're
all
in
there
for
April.
B
So
the
only
thing
that's
left
now
is
the
kind
of
last
minute
Bridge
funding
from
now
until
April,
for
something
like,
like
the
legal,
you
know
the
legal
resource
in
the
Viridian
cluster,
for
instance,
which
is
like
a
really
critical
resource.
That
right
now
is
a
yeah
I'm,
actually
not
sure
if
we
lost
that
or
not,
but.
B
I
mean
that's
a
kind
of
that's
the
kind
of
stuff
that
now
is
still
a
problem
right.
Where
we
can,
we
have
a
problem
with
getting
the
talent
that
we
need,
but
then
from
April,
basically
I'm
gonna
make
sure
through
editing
the
the
scope,
Frameworks
and
just
getting
listening
to
all
the
feedback
right
and
getting
all
the
different
points
of
view
over
this
RFC
period.
That
everybody's
got
the
funding.
B
They
need
of
the
critical
pieces
that
we
need
and
then
also
that
they
have
short-term
objectives
and
Milestones
and
means
to
create
value
with
resources
that
they
get.
So
there's
going
to
be
none
of
these
clusters,
or
you
know
these
incubation
clusters
that
will
be
just
like
sort
of
like
spitting
the
wheels
and
doing
nothing
and
sitting
around
and
waiting
one
and
a
half
year
until
the
someday
of
stuff
that
comes
out.
B
How
should
recognize
delegates
and
apricot
let's
measure
these
subsidies
seems
like
everyone
has
a
different
idea
on
what
quantities
are
fair
and
which
quantities
are
overwhelming?
Overpriced
I
mean
yes,
so
in
the
long
run
this
I
mean
this
would
I
mean.
So
actually
this
was
not
even
this
will
not
even
really
apply
to
the
like.
The
incubation.
B
Colossus
would
be
this,
like
very
kind
of
you,
know
unique
construction
specifically
for
the
pregame
right
and
so
just
for
some
very
specific
groups
that
we
need
and
for
them
it's
mostly
just
like
carrying
over
like
for
a
lot
of
people.
It's
like
carrying
over
the
re
like
sort
of
the
salary
and
the
conversation
they're
already
getting
elsewhere
in
the
organization,
and
then
for
you
know,
and
for
others
it
will
simply
be
then
adding
Budget.
B
Where
the
kind
of
the
subsidy
will
switch
sort
of
from
going
directly
to
the
ecosystem,
actor
and
we'll
start
going
into
the
subtitles?
Who
will
then?
And
it
will
be
the
sort
of
this
sort
of
smooth
transition?
So
they
will
start
to
get
to
bring
to
have
to
they'll.
Be
able
to
do
some
of
the
work
for
free
for
the
subtask,
but
they'll
have
to
be
paid
for
some
part
of
it,
because
not
all
the
subsidies
go
into
them
anymore,
or
rather
it's
not
even
really
like
the
funding.
Essentially.
B
But
yeah
I
mean
but
of
course,
I
mean
I'm
care
holders
and
delegates
have
no
clue
about
this
stuff.
That's
the
other
thing
right.
There
they've
got
no
clue,
and-
and
it's
a
complete
I
mean
that's,
why
everything
is
so
bad
right
now
right,
because
we
thought
somehow
the
free
market
will
figure
it
out
and
then
okay
hold
us
will
somehow
learn
to
care
or
something
right
and
then
what
we
see
in
practice
is
they
basically
only
vote
when
it's
about
something
that
directly
benefits
them
and
can
either
hurt
them?
B
If
it,
you
know
like
you
want
to
prevent,
you
know
that
that's
kind
of
how
it
works.
For
me,
the
new
people
act
based
on
very
basic
incentives
and
and
expecting
mkr
holders
to
to
sort
of
figure
out.
All
this
like
super
in
challenging
and
public
and
stuff
is
pretty
much
impossible
right,
and
so,
in
the
long
run,
the
way
it
will
work
is
in
the
school
Frameworks
it
sort
of
designates
who
this
Council,
which
has
which
works
slightly
different
number.
B
But
basically,
the
council
is
like
ecosystem
actors
that
are
independent
from
the
rest
that
you
go
to
basically
give
your
advice
on
how
to
construct
an
RFP
right
so
that
you
will
get
Fair
bits
and
how
to
construct
a
sort
of
decision
process
for
picking
the
best
bit
on
RFP.
For
instance,
okay,
hey
Ness,
go
through
hypothetical
subtle
product
life
cycle
so
create
a
town.
Has
a
new
nft
learning
idea.
They
feel
is
constitutional.
A
B
As
I
would
say
so
first,
hopefully
this
is
not
going
to
be
like
that.
They
think
it
will
be.
They
should
hopefully
not
be
at
all
thinking
about
constitutional
stuff
in
their
subnaut
right.
They
should
be
I
mean
that
should
be
pretty
much
invisible,
and
only
that
should
only
be
about
you
can't
do
like
fraud
or
something
right
so
I
guess
it
would
be.
You
know
they
found
an
NFD,
it's
more
about
other.
B
Do
they
think
it's
exciting
for
whatever
reason
and
have
they
determined
that
it's
not
like
fraud
or
an
ethical
or
going
to
destroy
our
image
or
something
right?
That's
the
extent
that
the
constitution
interferes
with
a
sub-dials
ability
to
do
a
project
right
and
but
then
basically
so
I
think
now
I
mean
this
still
needs
to
be.
This
will
need
to
be
figured
out
over
the
next
one
and
a
half
year
right,
but
I
think
it
would
basically
be
that
step.
B
One
would
be
that
if
it's
like
purely
like
fully
kind
of
like
Grassroots
or
like
some
token
holders
want
to
see
this
happen,
and
they,
you
know
they're
they're,
just
purely
sort
of
yeah
like
they
have
an
idea,
they
want
it
done
they
want
to
ex.
You
know
they
want
to
use
sub-dial
resources
to
get
it
done,
then
step
one
for
them
will
be
to
I
mean
if
it's
something
completely.
If
it's
like
a
new
category
of
a
activity,
they
will
create
an
entirely
new
scope
framework
for
the
subtop.
B
So
they'll
make
like
a
proposal
to
sort
of
create
a
new
scope
framework
for
the
subdial
which
subtitles
can
do
right
or
if
it
maybe
they
have
maybe
in
the
nft
case
it
could
be.
They
already
have
an
nft
scope
framework
and
then,
instead
they
will
operate
within
that
and
they
will
maybe
and
but
the
but
the
key
is
they
will
basically
sort
of
they
will
have
to
first
Define
the
sort
of
the
language
of
what
do
they
want
to
do
like
something
like.
B
We
want
to
spend
X
resources
to
do
this
and
this
and
that
and
this,
and
we
want
these
people
helping
us
in
this
way
and
I
mean
this
type
of
people.
This
is
where
they
start
helping
us
this
way
right.
So
it's
something
it's
something
like
it
would
be
something
like
that
that,
like
the
way
that
that
actions
are
taken
bottom
up
by
tomb
holders
is
by
modifying
the
rules
so
that
the
rules
now
accomplish
I
mean
so
that
the
rules
sort
of
say.
B
B
If
there's
language
like
that,
then
any
user
system
actor
couldn't
just
come
and
propose
to
make
a
you
know
a
profile
picture,
nft
project
like
even
if
they
made
a
proposal,
it
wouldn't
like
trigger
a
vote
on
on
paying
them
the
funds.
But
if
there's
no
language
like
that,
then
actually
I
think
it
would
be
I
mean
this
is
this
is
of
course
this.
B
B
Two
types
of
subtitles
is
actually
Creator.
Subtitles
May
be
allowed
more
kind
of
freedom
to
to
to
what
extent
they
kind
of
take.
You
know,
do
sort
of
quick
decisions
and
which
could
of
course,
backfire
right,
because
sometimes
you
could
end
up
being
like.
Oh,
this
sounds
really
cool,
let's
give
them
200k
and
then
it's
like
some.
B
No
due
diligence
is
done
and
it's
a
very
crappy
nfts
and
turns
out
if
you
asked
three
others
then,
and
you
could
have
gotten
a
way
better
project
out
of
it,
but
in
other
cases
it's
of
course
also
like
this
means
you
can.
You
would
be
you
can
do
some
things
and
you
can
maybe
do
some
tiny
projects
with
relatively
small
overhead
small
cost
and
then
actually
get
a
lot
of
things
done,
because
you
don't.
B
You
have
like
a
Creator
stuff
that
would
have
pretty
much
no
bureaucratic,
Hoops
whatsoever
to
go
through,
but
if
it
was
facilitate
or
something
else
and
protect,
your
sub-dials
need
to
be
more
like
it
is.
They
need
to
have
a
higher
standard
for,
like
the
level
of
checks
and
balances
that
exist
within
their
governance.
Culture,
essentially
so
I
think,
like
I,
think,
there's
a
possibility
that
could
be
like
a
differentiating
factor
between
creators
and
protectors
and
facilitators.
B
Yeah
and
to
do
this
point
right,
this
is
a
issue
in
realization
of
all
doubts.
Right
and
maker
certainly
has
this
issue
of
like
YOLO,
paying
for
endless
crap
all
the
time
right,
I
mean
90.
Well,
all
pretty
much.
Almost
all
proposals
ever
made
to
maker
are
like
self-serving
and
malicious.
Almost
right,
like.
A
B
B
It's
in
the
interest
of
me,
I
think
you
should
give
me
this
right
and
if
we
accept
that
pretty
much
any
of
those
reversals,
you
would
just
be
losing
money
because
they're
all
like
you
know-
and
the
same
applies
to
Collateral
right-
that,
like
it's
like
maker,
is
The
Dumping
Ground
for
all
the
crappy
deals
all
the
crabby
collateral
right.
If
they
can't
go
anywhere
else,
they
come
to
us
right.
So
this
is,
of
course,
and
and
yeah.
B
But
the
idea
is
kind
of
like
I
mean
create
something
like
create
or
subtitles.
They
could
potentially
be
allowed
a
little
bit
more
sort
of
survival
of
the
fittest
of
like
just
see
what
happens
and
let
them
you
know,
take
actions
with
less
required
check.
I
mean
the
community
may
still
develop
its
own
I
mean
it
should
otherwise.
It
will
fail
right
if
it
doesn't
develop
its
own
checks
and
balances.
But
the
point
is
that
it
may
not
be
constitutionally.
B
You
know
the
in-game
Constitution
may
not
could
contain
very
few
requirements
on
how
Creator
governance
is
supposed
to
function,
while
it
will
certainly
need
like
there'll
need
to
be
some
requirements
on
protector
and
facilitator
governance
like
something
like
you
can
never
like.
You
know
like
if
a
facilitator
protector,
just
as
a
general
rule,
would
never
be
able
to
just
accept
a
random
proposal
for
some
random
counterparty
like
there'll,
be
some
requirement
of
like
any
proposal
from
ecosystem
actor.
A
must
have
had
at
least
ecosystem
actor
B,
which
is
an
advisor
of
some
sort.
B
B
We
said
that
the
creators
do
whatever
the
hell
they
feel
like,
except
any
random
proposal
that
comes
with
Moreno.
If
they
feel
like
it,
and
then
it
just
blows
up
repeatedly
and
just
wastes
tons
of
money,
and
then
they
we
can.
The
ecosystem
scope
would
then
be
a
place
where
MPI
holders
could
sort
of
dynamically
say
Okay,
based
on
this
evidence
of
it.
Failing
again
and
again,
we've
realized
we
have
to
put
these
Protections
in
place,
but
then
they
could
also
be
removed
later
again.
B
B
But
the
framework
and
like
that,
this
kind
of
proposal
would
happen
under
would
be
also
by
itself,
like
already
be
a
very
rigid,
like
well-defined
process
of
like
the
you
know
of
like
this
is
the
type
of
thing
we
like
to.
Do
we
like
to
pay
experts
to
tell
us
how
to
improve
our
LM
model
or
something
right
right.
We
like
to
I
mean
there's,
there's
all
the
features
right.
All
in-game
products
of
like
we
like
to
pay
an
expert
to
come
and
and
do
an
iteration
on
the
design
for
this.
B
So
it
goes
from
a
sort
of
more
diff.
You
know
more
abstract
design
to
a
little
bit
more
detailed
design
right
but
I
mean
and
then
they're,
even
under
the
ecosystem
scope.
There
would
be
something
like
a
moonshot
grant
or
something
like
that,
which
would
be
actually
like
an
open-ended
Grant
process
where
any
company
can
come
and
just
like
get
grants
to
bootstrap
themselves
as
companies
that
are
going
to
do
stuff
in
the
ecosystem.
B
So
that
would
be
like
companies
that
have
an
idea
that
they
want
to
take
to
stop
the
house
or
maybe
take
to
other
ecosystem
actors,
and
then
maker
might
actually
fund
them
as
like
a
grant.
You
know
no
strings
attached
or
like
a
milestone
base
but
sort
of
in
a
grand
basis
so
that
they
can
get
bootstraps.
So
they
can
contribute
to
the
ecosystem.
B
B
B
B
Yeah,
oh
no,
sorry,
sorry
take
all
the
credit
proposals
to
the
creators
of
those
they'll
be
specializing
in
finding
the
diamond
in
the
rough
right,
yeah
right,
based
on
the
process.
We
just
talked
about
right.
There
could
actually
be
a
place
too,
like
that's
where
some
crazy
moonshine
proposal
could
go
and
maybe
even
actually
work
out
and
be
a
thing.
B
B
B
So,
first
of
all,
there's
this
new
tokenomic
change
with
the
facilitator,
something
else
right,
so
that
increases
the
yearly
emissions
to
75
000,
because
there's
this
additional
5
000
mkr,
that's
emitted.
That
goes
to
the
facility
in
the
Dallas
to
their
own
sort
of
mini
version
of
of
of
the
Alexia
Wars.
The
liquidity
Wars,
but
related
to
the
facilitator
function
that
yeah
I
want
I
want
to
try
to
Expo
I
want
I.
B
Think
I've
tried
to
explain
it
in
the
past,
but
that'll
be
I,
mean
that's
going
to
be
detailed
in
the
in-game
Constitution
right,
which
will
be
appended
to
the
pregame
constitutions.
Now
and
by
the
when
that's
written
down
and
probably
sort
of
explained
there,
then
we
can
really
go
through
it
and
talk
about
it.
B
B
Why
that
wasn't
the
case
from
the
start,
pretty
much
for
a
very
long
time
right
and
I
mean,
and
the
answer
is
that
it's
really
really
important
to
have
a
huge
amount
of
liquidity
for
diet
against
State
eth,
because
state
is
the
future
and
and
and
and
also
we
want
to
launch,
either
die
and
that's
a
really
important
product,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
we
can.
We
can
launch
that
right.
B
That's
a
very
high
impact,
high
value
product,
but
the
solution
to
this
change
of
like
removing
either
dye
from
Elixir
and
just
turning
into
I,
don't
know
maker
like
I,
mean
that's
finally
making
a
pretty
simple
right.
But
it's
just
like
our
sort
of
core
liquidity
right
like
make
a
liquidity
pool
of
die
against
NPR,
which
is
the
really
I
mean.
That's
the
same
as
what
something
like
I,
don't
know:
I
mean
I,
think
Olympus
style
right.
B
They
sort
of
I,
don't
know
if
they
were
the
first
one
who
you
know
invented
what
is
it
called
PCB
right
but
and
they
I'm
pretty
sure
they
had.
You
know,
die
versus
tokens
and
and
a
lot
of
other
projects
have
been
have
been
doing
that
and
that's
sort
of
this
very
basic
thing
that
you
wanna
I.
Quite
you
know
I
want
to
accumulate
stable.
B
The
protocol
on
vault
is
a
magnet
I
mean
and
so
I
think
if
I
had
sort
of
and
I've
had
sort
of
come
up
with
these
mechanisms
in
a
different
order.
I
would
have
started
from
this
point
right,
but
it's
because
of
the
protocol
involved.
It's
like
that's
an
idea
that
only
really
got
sort
of
this
sort
of
central
position
in
the
design
post,
tornado
cash
right.
So
that
was
not
when
the
Alexia
was
originally
designed.
B
B
It's
just
purely
like
sort
of
you
know
we
pay
experts.
We
routinely
pay
experts
to
figure
out.
What
are
our
liquidity
needs
for?
Ensuring
that
Dai
has
a
very
competitive
liquidity
against
like
either
die
right
and
and
then
it's
like
and
and
then
the
that
either
die
has
good
liquidity
by
itself
and
so
on,
and
then
we,
you
know
we
deployed
exactly
as
much
Capital
into
that
as
we
need
and
no
more
no
less
right.
B
B
B
The
other
part
of
this
is
that
this
also
means
the
the
soft
dial
yields
to
to
either
diverse
going.
So.
Instead,
the
subtle
yields
is
50
50,
diem
care,
which
I
think
is
a
lot
cleaner,
like
I,
was
actually
getting
really
confused
by,
like
the
sort
of
weird
20
die.
40
like
this
weird
Supply
was
kind
of
confusing
to
me
and
I
think
having
it
fit
somehow
I
think
having
more
symmetry
like
that
is
just
sort
of
cleaner.
B
What
is
also
it
does
it
just
works
really
well
because,
for
instance,
I
mean
reversible
dies
just
like
the
simplest
and
easiest
way
for
people
to
farm
subtops,
right
so
by
having
huge
amount
of
subtle
tokens
go
to
die
holders.
That's
just
great
that
just
mean
we're.
Gonna
have
way
more
subtle,
rollers
and
and
either
die
uses
an
idios,
and
everyone
like
vultures
is
why
she
still
be
able
to
get
subject
right.
B
So
we
still
have
that,
like
sort
of
basic
use
case
of
if
you're
an
etholder,
you
want
to
turn
it
into
either
die,
and
you
want
to
use
that
to
farm
sub-out
tokens
with
and
that
just
comes
automatically
right
by
having
a
higher
healer
diet.
Then
it
just
automatically
open
up
for
that
use,
case
yeah
and
then
it
just
it.
It
helps
like
it
means
that
either
die
is
going
to
be
an
important
product,
but
it's
not
going
to
be.
B
This
kind
of
I
mean
there
was
this
weird
sort
of
dual
focus
on
die
and
either
that
I
were
equally.
It
was
sort
of
like
both
sort
of
the
top
products
right,
which
yeah
I
think
that's
kind
of
that's
sort
of
a
you
know,
sort
of
what
do
you
call
it
so
ancient
wisdom
that
you
want
to
focus
on
one
thing
right,
so
we
want
to
accept
it
with
this.
It's
absolutely
like
the
die.
B
Stable
coin
is
the
complete,
Central
focus
and
then,
finally,
in
terms
of
like
decentralization
and
and
you
know,
the
ability
to
handle
a
world
where
we
can
have
less
exposure
to
real
assets,
and
with
this
approach
I
mean
generally,
we
can
focus
more
on
generating
income
and
less.
You
know,
because
what
we're
doing
by
incentivizing
die
generated
from
either
diet
we
need,
it
would
help
I
mean
it
will
help
with.
B
Yeah,
more
decentralized
collateral
to
die.
Obviously,
but
the
problem
is
we
don't
I
mean
if
we
do
that
today
we
don't
know
if
we
need
that
today,
right,
it's
more
like
at
some
point,
we
may
need
a
lot
of
you
know
a
lot
of
decentralized
collateral
behind
eye
and
we
may
need
that
for
a
very
long
time.
B
So
the
much
better
approach
you
know
is
this:
like
the
pigeon
logic
right
of
like
when
we
can
use
real
assets,
we
should
really
everything
should
be
focused
on
generating
income,
and
then
we
use
the
protocol
on
vault
to
deploy
some
of
that
income
into
into
eth
and
into
East
liquidity
tokens
right
and
then
also
actually
click
time,
eth
and
mkr
together.
So
that's
another
thing
right
of
like
another
Central
goal
of
the
of
the
Indian
constitution
is
to
increase
the
utility
of
MPR
right
and
make
it
sort
of
more
for
Focus
that
mkr.
B
B
What
that
actually
does
in
some
sense
is
it
actually
like
moves
the,
and
it
removes
some
of
the
robustness,
sort
of
decentralized
stability
of
these
decentralized
assets
that
we've
accumulate
in
the
protocol
involved?
It
sort
of
ties
That
to
MPR
itself,
so
MPR,
also
because,
like
NPR
increasingly
becomes
a
very
strong
and
useful
decentralized
collateral.
B
You
know
like
subsidy,
for
you
know,
use
this
to
generate
dive
with
a
decentralized
collateral,
but
there's
a
decentralized
level,
but
the
way
we
just
end
up
achieving
that
through
the
subject
yield
farming
is
that
it
applies
to
empty
animals
right
because
mkr
itself
is
going
to
sort
of
bulk
up
on
on
having
a
large
treasury
of
I
mean
especially
State.
You
know
either
die
right.
B
B
The
value
going
right
and
everything
becomes
this
sort
of
split
between
diet
and
counter,
and
then
the
kind
of
you
know
the
the
the
the
the
decentralized
collateral
I
mean,
of
course,
we'll
still
have
the
other
things
we'll
still
have
vaults
with
Eve
and
either
die,
and
someone
right
and
either
that
I
should
still
be
incentivized.
It
should
just
be
incentivized
through
better
stability
fees,
and
that's
also
something
we
can
do
immediately
right.
B
Should
you
know
contain
that
logic
right
from
the
start
right,
but
it
will
be
a
lot
more
I
mean
we,
it's
better
we're
better
off
in
the
short
run,
only
doing
decentralized
collateral,
to
the
extent
that
we
can
make
money
from
doing
it
right,
because
if
we're
subsidizing
and
losing
money
on
subsidizing
and
then
we
might
actually
be
doing
sort
of
the
opposite
of
what
we
want,
which
is,
we
might
subsidize
decentralized
collateral
today
and
then
actually
losing
funds
that
we
could
have
used
to
buy.
You
know
like
accumulate
decentralized
collateral.
B
B
And
I
think
I
mean
and
there's
obviously
there's
some
more
there's
more
consequences,
because
either
diet
was
really
built
right
and
we
know
a
lot
of
places
where
we're
built
really
deeply
into
the
design
and
there's
definitely
going
to
be
some
like
consequences
from
kind
of
unrolling
that
out
and
and
putting
it
all
just
into
the
protocol
and
Vault.
That's
like
that's
the
place
where
we
handle
this
special
relationship
with
each
basically
but
yeah
I
think
I
mean
I.
Think
it's
going
to
be
a
big
one.
B
B
But
we
will
I
mean,
but
we
will
be
doing.
We
will
get
way
more.
You
know
like
you,
will
have
that
that'll
happen
in
a
sense
to
all
them
shareholders
right
that
they
will
have
they'll
be
getting
yield
from
mkr,
slash
die,
you
know
from
whatever
we
call
it
right
maker
liquidity,
the
maker
liquidity
pool
or
something
which
will
still
be
multi-chain
as
well
right,
so
it
will
not
be
as
simple
as
it's
literally
just
Unity
to
MPR,
slash,
diet,
right.
B
It's
going
to
be
image
of
all
the
markets
and
then
all
the
chains
and
so
on.
All
bundled
together
into
this,
like
multi-chain
token
set
of
Empire
against
I,
and
so
that
and
that
will
be
there
will
be
a
lot
of
that
owned
by
make
a
call
right.
So
if
you
just
hold
pure
MPI,
you
will
have
that
exposure
automatically.