►
From YouTube: Open Decentralized Voter Committee | January 18, 2023
Description
A
Foreign
hello,
everyone
and
welcome
it's
Wednesday,
January
18th
2023
here
with
a
bunch
of
awesome,
make
for
people
talking
decentralized
water
committee
stuff
with
roon.
So
this
is
our
More
or
Less
weekly
meeting
where
we
come
together
to
talk
in-game
progress
and
design
yeah.
If
you're
here,
you
probably
know
what
it
is,
if
you're
watching
it
recording
welcome.
Please
join
us
on
the
Forum
and
in
the
Discord,
if
you'd
like
to
get
more
involved,
but
without
further
Ado
and
the
mic
over
Darude
and
we'll
get
started.
B
Thanks
Peyton
yeah
so,
like
I,
said
last
week,
that's
finally
time
to
get
moving
on
the
getting
the
sort
of
first
drafts,
the
first
versions
of
the
pre-game
version
of
The
in-game
Constitution
out
there.
So
that's
what
we'll
be
doing
today,
we'll
just
be
running
through
that
and
and
so
I
mean
just
like
we've
kind
of
already
done
last
time
and
earlier,
but
now
I
will
I
mean
obviously
now
I'll
just
like
share
the
exact
I'll
share.
C
B
B
Basically
right,
so
it's
kind
of
like
it's
some
kind
of
like
sort
of
modifying
and
building
on
top
of
the
MIP
framework,
to
then
put
in
a
kind
of
a
new
approach
to
how
we
set
all
the
rules
right
and
then
I
also
talked
about.
Alexa
I
mean
basically
I'll,
just
I'll
pretty
much
just
be
repeating
last
time
right
because
I
mean
this
is
so
fundamentally
important
that
it's
just
crucial
to
go
through
it
bit
by
bit
and
and
have
people
get
some
sense
of
of
what
the
different
pieces
does.
B
B
Yeah,
so
this
map
will
contain
and
the
numbers
are
sort
of
I
mean
that's.
Some
of
the
stuff
I
still
haven't
had
time
to
fix,
but
this
map
will
contain
basically
three
components,
so
the
first
component
is
kind
of
the
Constitution
or
the
language
of
the
Constitution
itself,
which
is
a
right
now.
I
mean
I,
think
I.
B
Yeah
and
just
like
a
bunch
of
I
mean
this,
is
so
and
and
the
the
key
to
these
statements
is
this
is
actually
in
a
sense
of
this
is
what
MPL
is
agreeing
to
right,
but
this
is
what's
important
as
like
a
governance,
token
holder
in
it
now
right,
you
have
to
understand
that,
like
governance,
risks
are
really
extreme.
When
there's
no
legal
protections.
B
This
is
like
really
where
we
expect,
and
you
know,
to
see
the
the
problems
occurring,
which
is
why
they
need
to
be
really
the
fundamental
thing
we're
focused
on
most
of
the
time
and
then
yeah
the
you
know.
Voter
apathy
is
sort
of
the
central
issue
right,
but
the
problem
is
really
just
it's
a
principal
agent
problem
that
and
Carol
is
way
too
lazy
to
do
anything
about
it.
So
they'll,
just
let
the
agents
run
the
show
and
then
the
agents
will
use
the
lack
of
oversight
to
enrich
themselves.
B
Yeah,
so
that's
I
mean
this
I
think
these
all
I'm
not
sure
if
this
is
the
complete
set
of
like
the
principles
so
and
I'm
hoping
this
can
become
much
more
like
right
now.
This
is
written
relatively
sort
of
quick
and
freeform
and
and
I
think
this
really
needs
to
become
like
a
very
crucial
piece
of
of
text
over
time
and
then
there's
like
the
combined
with
these.
This
is
more
like
concrete
stuff
like
this
is
where
it
gets
a
little
bit
more
concrete
right.
We
need
good
health
matter.
B
All
this
stuff
is
extremely
dangerous
and
and
not
allowed
right,
and
we
want
to
keep
everything
as
stable
as
possible,
because
change
regenerate,
no
trust
that,
because
everyone's
asleep,
like
all
the
time,
goes
to
sleep
and
then
the
changes
that
they
we
expect
and
like
that
respect
to
be,
you
know
very
easily
be
changes
that
will
abuse
the
fact
that
the
totem
holes
are
so
on
average.
Going
to
be
asleep.
B
This
one
might
actually
be:
oh,
that's
like
there's
literally
a
copy
of
that
one
right
yeah.
This
is
actually
I
mean
I,
haven't
even
I,
promote
the
wrote
this
stuff
a
long
time
ago.
So
this
is
It's.
Also
two
separate
sections
right
now
and
and
we'll
combine
it
into
one,
and
so
subtitles
will
be.
This
rule
needs
to
be
completely
eliminated.
B
Well,
okay,
maybe
actually
this
part
specifically
shouldn't
change
from
pre-game
to
in-game,
but
all
the
other
parts
of
this.
This
is
the
pre-game
I
mean
this
is
the
pre-game
and
game
Constitution.
So,
as
a
result,
there's
like
no
reference
to
stuff
the
house
and
all
these
other
like
this,
this
this
stuff,
that's
not
going
to
be
in
effect
in
the
pre-game.
It's
not
contained
in
sort
of
the
actual
articles
of
the
pregame
Constitution,
and
then
this
call
principle
right
of
pushing
pushing
complexity
to
the
edges.
C
B
No
questions
yet
oh
yeah,
so
again,
this
is
just
like
a
bunch
of
principles,
basically,
and
the
idea
is
kind
of
that
that
in
the
end,
this
will
be
this
stuff,
where,
like
the
reason
why
I
want
this
stuff
to
be
a
lot
more
like
you
know
like
like
what
do
you
call
it
like
pros?
Or
would
you
call
it
right
like
a
bunch
of
text
or
words
and
metaphors
not
really
like
not
super
rigid
is
because
this
is
the.
B
What
is
written
here
right
and
and
try
to
find
sort
of
arguments
for
for
what
decisions
should
we
then
make
so
that
it
strengthens
the
the
overall
kind
of
constitutional
equilibrium
right
and
so
I
think?
So
that's
why
it's
actually
useful
having
it
be,
not
super
like
boiled
down
and
and
soulless
in
a
sense,
because
this
is
the
one
place.
There
is
some
kind
of
of
yeah
possibility
for
kind
of
being
flexible,
essentially.
B
Yeah
so
later,
Siri
is
saying
it
feels
like
a
preamble
I
mean
I
would
actually
I
would
compare
this
to
like
the
part
of
the
American
Constitution.
That
says
like
the
right
to
self-determination.
I
can't
remember
what
I
said
right,
but
the
truth.
You
know
humans
are
free
people
and
need
to
be
free,
and
these
are
self-evident
truths
and
yada.
Yada
I
mean
that's
kind
of
what
I
you
know.
That's
the
part
that
sort
of
inspired
Us
in,
in
my
opinion,
right
in
some
sense.
This
is
like
the
like.
B
Doesn't
have
to
be
perfect
at
launch
of
the
pregame
Constitution,
but
it
has
to
be
as
good
as
it
can
possibly
be
by
the
time
we
lock
it
in,
and
we
expect
that
the
constitution
will
be
impossible
to
change
from
there.
So
yeah
I
mean
it's
a
preamble
to
act,
the
actual
rules,
but
it's
actually
really
where
the
real
like
it's
the
mo.
It's
in
in,
like
sort
of
in
spirit,
is
the
most
important
part
of
the
Constitution.
B
All
right,
then,
we
get
to
the
Articles.
So
this
is
like
the
equivalent
of
the
amendments
in
the
American
Constitution
right
with
freedom
of
speech
and
right
to
bear
arms
and
all
this
stuff
and
here's
yeah
I've
gone
through
this
a
couple
of
times
on
excalil
draw
and
so
on
right.
So
this
is
the
first
time
I'm
I'm
finally
trying
to
write
down
the
rules
for
this
stuff
and
and
and
sort
of
the
like
the
intent
right.
B
C
B
That
needs
to
be
something
very
prominent
right,
because
that's
sort
of
a
change
in
expectation
that
allows
us
to
use
mpr's
collateral
and
then
there's
this
like
the
purpose
system,
just
like
sort
of
underline
I,
mean
basically
putting
at
the
top
this
requirement
for
charity,
even
though
that
will
not
be
in
effect
in
the
pre-game.
That's
one
of
the
and
that's
one
of
the
only
examples
of
like
something
in
the
pre-game
rules,
not
actually
mattering,
but
that's
just
because
it's
important
to
keep
that
at
the
top.
B
I
think,
because
it's
essential
that
this
is
like
front
and
center
and
it's
what
motivates
people.
And
then
we
have
this.
You
know
the
clean
money
replacement,
which
I
Call
Scientific
sustainability,
which
is
basically
you
know,
actually
making
it
function
by
using
nuclear
instead
of
solar
and
wind,
is
maybe
a
little
bit
of
an
over
simplification.
But
it's
sort
of
the
pretty
much
the
the
the
reality
of
like
unscientific
sustainability
versus
scientific
sustainability
and
and
so
what
I'm
right
now
suggesting
is.
B
We
simply
allocate
20
000
gar
to
yeah
basic
I
mean
like
nuclear
washing,
which
is
basically
it's
green
washing,
but
it
works,
and
basically
we
can
actually
not
anything,
and
that
needs
to
be
more
specific.
I
mean
that
is
specified
more
in
the
real
asset
scope
itself
and
will
need
to
be
sort
of
fleshed
down
right.
B
But
basically,
as
long
as
we
support
the
development
of
scientifically
sustainable
energy
sources,
then
there's
it's
actually
it's
I
mean
it's
there's,
there's
really
very
few
things
that
you
can
do
wrong
in
in
terms
of
sustainability,
with
with
supporting
coal,
perhaps
being
the
only
one.
That's
just
like
straight
up
bad,
but
that's
of
course,
really
useful
for
us,
because
this
just
means
we
can.
We
can
significantly
simplify.
B
Yeah,
like
there
were
Raphael
asked:
doesn't
that
open
us
up
to
his
power
stories
about
what
the
sign
says?
Yeah
I
mean
I,
think
I
think
basically
like
it
actually
needs
to
go
into.
We
will
have
to
put
that
into
the
Constitution.
I
mean
already
it's
it's
relatively
simple,
because
I
mean,
and
actually
it
is
like
this
question
of
like
scientific
sustainability.
You
can
actually
you
can
I
mean
the
reality
is
the
sort
of
scientific
reality
and
the
physical
reality.
Is
that
and
sort.
B
Is
that
and
there's
some
I
mean
we're
sort
of
moving
into
an
equilibrium
where,
because
we
have
such
massive
amounts
of
solar
and
wind,
then
it's
actually
possible
to
use
that
to
make
nuclear
energy
pretty
much
on.
I
mean
make
that
make
that
less
profitable
and
in
return,
make
gas
and
coal
really
really
profitable.
B
So
what
happens
is
if
you
simply
ensure
that
there's
nuclear
energy
like
if
you
sort
of
ensure
that
a
priority
is
to
make
sure
that
there's
the
nuclear
energy
isn't
sort
of
discriminative
against?
Then
you
avoid
this
sort
of
bad
local,
local
Maxima,
where
you
you're
able
to
decarbonize.
To
some
extent,
it's
very
expensive
though,
but
you're
not
you'll,
never
be
able
to
fully
do
it,
because
you'll
always
be
addicted
to
backup
power
generation
using
fossil
fuels,
which
is
something
that
unfortunately,
nuclear
technology
can't
really
do,
except
for
some
more
advanced
future
stuff.
B
But
yeah
I
mean
I,
think
it's
just
I
mean
we
should
really
just
say:
scientific
sustainability
means
nuclear
energy
and
only
us
good
stuff.
Like
all
the
stuff,
that's
good
inserted
you
with
nuclear
energy
yeah
such
as
switch.
You
know
replacing
coal
with
natural
gas
is
great
and
then
Hydro
storage
is
great.
B
And
I'm
really
I
mean
I'm
surprised
to
learn.
This
is
only
something
I've
really
learned
now,
but
there
is
some
kind
of
strange
overlap
between
actually
new
and
clear
nerds
and
and
crypto
people
surprisingly,
and
so
I
really
I'm,
actually
counting
on
this
being
like
something
where
we
can
actually
like
gather
people
that
will
be
extremely
passionate
and
then
we'll
have
the
kind
of
the
the
knowledge
to
engage
in
in
maker
governance
from
I
mean.
B
Like
maker
is
also
similar
in
that
regard,
so
I
think
that's
like
really
exciting
to
get
like
a
real
serious
commitment
and
sort
of
tangible
sort
of
meta
engineering
initiative,
basically
right
by
just
simply
by
just
like
in
this
very
impactful
proposal,
earmark
funds
for
this
stuff,
so
we're
sort
of
signaling.
Maybe
even
we
were
able
to
get
some
some
some
broader
attention
in
that
we
are
going
to
to
significantly.
B
B
Then
the
next
thing
we
got
is
like
establishing
the
easy
voting
front
end,
which
is
such
a
also
hoping
we
can
find
a
better
word
for
it.
But
it's
it's
so
strange
that
this
ultimately
enzyme.
This
is
like
the
central
element.
In
fact,
in
some
sense,
the
Constitution
is
only
about
this,
which
is
really
odd,
but
this
is
like
the
centerpiece
of
in
game.
It's
also
in
some
sense
the
weak
point
or
like
the
the
the
the
critical
assumption,
and
it
goes
back
to
like
also
this
statement
up
here
somewhere
and.
B
Challenge
is
community
participation.
Fundamentally,
the
end
game
exists
because
of
voter
apathy
right
and
and
the
whole
set
of
highly
detailed,
very
complex
and
sort
of
weird
rules
all
revolve
around.
Ultimately,
the
fact
that
we
have
to
pay
people
to
vote,
and
if
we
got
to
pay
people
to
vote,
then
we
create
up
this
new
crazy,
difficult
challenge,
but
that
at
least
we
hope
that
there
is
some
kind
of
answer
to
that,
because
of
course
I
mean
nothing
is
so.
B
So
then,
there's
just
some
principles
related
to
that
right,
and
this
I
mean
this
kind
of
information
that
that's
here
is
really
important,
because
we
have
to
assumed
that
everybody
sort
of
on
the
inside
are
sort
of
at
be
working
in
maker.
In
the
long
run,
everyone
well,
everyone's
selfish
would
be
attempting
to
control
the
voting
front
right
and
and
change
it,
because
this
is
how
you
take
control
of
the
doubt
basically
like
this
is
like
the
key
to
the
to
the
down
right,
because
this
is
where
mkr
votes.
B
This
is
where
I
mean
this
is
where
yeah
voter
participation
occurs
right,
and
so
it's
extremely
simple
to
understand.
It's
important
to
understand
that
people
are
using.
It
are
very
lazy,
and
you
know
it's
very
limited.
What
kind
of
information
you
can
give
them,
because
I
mean
that's
going
to
be
one
of
the
attack.
Surfaces
right
is
that
people
will
argue
that
they
need
more
information
and
that's
going
to
be
a
way
too
complicate
it
and
somehow
break
down
the
defenses.
B
And
but
instead
that's
not
going
to
be
allowed
right,
it
has
to
be
simple
and
gamified.
Basically
right
and
actually
that
needs
to
be
I
mean
we
need
to
be
much
more
clear,
we'll
do
that
over
the
next
one
and
a
half
years,
we're
like
have
to
really
spell
out
exactly
how
it
needs,
how
it
functions,
how
it
looks
and
because
any
anything
where
we
don't
spell
out
exactly
how
it
works
and
how
it
looks,
will
be
abused
right
and
and
will
be
used
to
take
control
and
somehow
bias
it
in
someone's
favor.
B
And
yeah
and
The
Purge
is
basically
like
a
bird.
It
has
to
feel
like
voting
in
a
something
that's
familiar
to
people
like
voting
in
a
democracy
where
you
pick
up
some
kind
of
political
affiliation,
alignment
or
rotor
strategy,
as
we
call
it,
and
we
need
to
rethinkle
I
mean
the
terminology
needs
to
be
probably
thought
through.
Of
course,
foreign.
B
B
This
perfect
balance
of
gamified
incentivized
voted
to
participation
where
we
sort
of
get
some
kind
of
useful
information
on
people
without
somehow
filibustering
ourselves
on
one
hand,
are
sort
of
like
preventing
action
from
being
taken
or
making
it
too
easy
to
take
action
and
then
have
whoever
is
able
to
kind
of
be.
On
top
of
that,
you
know
power
skate
and
use
it
to
consolidate
their
control
over
the
system.
C
B
One
thing
that's
sort
of
being
referenced
here
is
just
an
interest.
Something
important
to
know
is
that
all
of
the
sub-dials
will
run
their
own
version
of
this
right.
So
we
call
it.
The
easy
Builder
front
ends
like
there's
going
to
be
multiples
of
them
in
the
long
run.
Initially,
that's
not
going
to
be
the
case,
and
so
this
will
just
have
to
be
edited
to
reflect.
B
It
has
to
just
be
assumed
to
be
corruption
and
an
attack
against
the
system
right,
and
you
simply
can
allow
the
slippery
slope
to
her,
no
matter
what
right,
because
it's
a
death
sentence,
foreign
and
so
as
a
result.
This
is
why
all
the
people
involved-
I
mean
this
is
maybe
a
little
I
mean
this.
Is
this
it's
difficult
to
understand
in
the
in
the
pre-game
Constitution
how
the
sort
of
the
the
logic
leap
that's
occurring
here,
actually
I
think
in
general
this!
This
is
not
perfect,
so
this
will
have
to
be.
B
What
sort
of
wants
to
happen
is
the
controlling
and
benefiting
wants
to
merge
right,
so
the
people
who
control
the
front
end
wants
to
I
mean
not
I
mean
I
mean
not
in
a
specific
sense,
but
in
a
general
sense
it's
sort
of
a
force
right.
That's
trying
that's
pushing
for
the
for
the
the
kind
of
I
mean
what
we
now
call
the
mandated
actors
and
the
delegates
to
merge
right
and
then,
and
because
we
need
to
make
sure
these
roles
don't
merge.
They
we
could.
B
We
we
designate
a
constitution
for
servers
and
so
ensure
that
it's
always
made
clear
that
their
job
is
always
primarily
just
the
protection
of
the
Constitution,
and
this
also
goes
back
to
this.
This
thing
that
was
actually
written
twice
up
here
right,
but
that
here
there's
the
clear
definitions,
deletion
of
roles.
There
can
be
conflict
of
interest
and
it's
very
clear
who
is
what
right
and.
C
B
Then
we
just
talk
about,
then
we
get
into
constitutional,
conservance
right
so
yeah.
This
is
like
this
General
umbrella
term
for
anyone
that's
like
operating
at
Absolute
sort
of
core
of
the
of
the
doubt
and
today
that
would
be
delegates
and
mandated
actors
and
in
the
the
pregame
we're
adding
the
Constitutional
voter,
Committee
Member
and
then
in
the
end
game.
We'll
also
have
the
budget
allocator
role
and
then
at
that
point
there
will
also
then
be
the
anonymity
requirement,
maybe
not
initially,
but
it
will
at
some
point
all
like.
B
You
know
colluding
Networks,
because
you,
the
more
people
you
sort
of
involve
in
your
you're
colluding,
like
your
collusion
scheme,
the
more
likely
your
identity
is
to
be
revealed,
so
it
sort
of
creates
a
sort
of
natural
safety
mechanism
instead
of
a
very
unnatural
and
very
problematic
safety
mechanism,
which
is
you
know
what
I
originally
tried
to
push
for,
which
was
you
know
everyone
hated.
It
was
significantly
rejected
right.
Was
this
like
control
over
like
how
are
people
allowed
to
communicate?
B
B
Yeah
so,
and
then
there's
this
really.
This
is
one
of
the
most
Central
actually
kind
of
ossification
elements
of
the
of
the
in-game
Constitution
right
that
it
becomes
like,
like
basically
so,
to
be
a
constitutional
conserver
and
to
benefit
from
the
Constitution
and
to
to
sort
of
offer
like
operated
and
and
function
within
it.
B
B
You
won't
have
situations
where
the
Constitution
is
like
supporting
someone
who
then
is
sort
of
you
know
like
undermining
it
and
as
a
result,
revealing
it
to
be
a
kind
of
a
extremely
fragile
system
that
is
stupid
enough
to
even
undermine
itself
right
foreign,
and
so
this
doesn't
mean
it's
not.
This
isn't
sort
of
disenfranchising
or
actually
I
mean.
This
is
entirely
still
at
the
social
layer
right.
This
is
all
like
sort
of
governance,
rules
and
incentives,
and
so
on
right
right.
B
This
has
absolutely
nothing
to
do
with
the
smart
contract
itself.
So,
in
the
end,
what
is
all
this
really
impacts?
Is
the
the
easy
voting
front
end
and
the
compensation
which,
in
sort
of
a
hyper,
rational
sort
of
hyper
technical
environment,
means
nothing,
because
that's
just
a
soft
factors
right
which
don't
really
matter
in
in
face
of
the
real
physical
reality.
B
So,
in
fact,
this
actually
pretty
much
like
locks
in
this
is
almost
certain
to
like
to
lock
in
the
end
game
completely,
because
you'll
just
not
have
nobody's
gonna
really
bother,
engage
with
the
protocol
and
if
they
get
paid
and
no
one's
going
to
get
paid.
Unless
the
saying
the
Indian
constitution
is
great
and
and
they
supported
and
they're
not
going
to
try
to
change
it
outside
of
the
framework
for
changing
it
or
sort
of
let
the
culture
drift
of
any
of
this
stuff.
B
C
B
B
Right
I
mean
we
don't
want
delegates
messing
around
with
the
Constitution,
because
there
will
be
it,
it
controls
their
yeah
I
mean
it
actually
also
controls
the
compensation
of
the
of
the
because
of
the
voter
community
members.
So
this
is
not
like
a
foolproof
logic
and-
and
of
course
we
also
want
to.
B
You
have
an
opinion
on
how
delegates
should
be
paid
right
and
and
be
able
to
sort
of
sort
of
trust
that
there's
any
kind
of
objective
effect.
You
know
facts,
but
it's
rooted
in
some
opinion
yeah
right
in
in
the
best
interest
of
ambulance
like
it
could
be,
but
it's
impossible
to
prove
that
or
verify
or
or
even
just
like
assume,
that.
B
B
B
B
It
was
sort
of
frowned
upon
frame
shareholders
to,
for
instance,
and
voice
concerns
around
the
budget
right
and
that
was
sort
of
seen
as
like
yeah
I
mean,
and
what
that
was
a
negative
Dynamic
that
occurred
where
the
the
main
detectors
had
been
so
sort
of
used
to
be
completely
in
charge
that
this
has
caused
a
closer
drift
right.
Where,
like
this
sort
of
the
the
the.
B
Objective
of
ensuring
that
the
incentives
and
the
interests
are
align
with
them,
cannabis
has
started
to
erode
right,
at
least
from
the
I
mean
I
would
guess
from
the
perspective
of
most
importance
right,
although
of
course
from
the
perspective
of
the
workforce,
it
was
simply
like
this
is
the
best
you
know:
let
the
workforce
do
its
thing.
This
is
the
best
and
so
on
right,
but
that's
exactly
the
kind
of
that's
a
this
sort
of
The
Road
to
Hell
people
with
good
intentions,
right
where
this
is
always
going
to
happen.
B
B
The
Constitutional
voter
committees,
they
basically
get
a
bunch
of
benefits
like
they
get
a
little
bit
of
compensation
and
the
a
huge
amount
of
influence
because
they
go
into
the
easy
building
front
end
as
strategies
that
then
impact
what
the
delegates
do.
So
they
actually
like.
They
end
up
being
like
the
almost
like,
the
equivalent
of
like
the
board,
or
something
like
that
right,
the
most
powerful
sort
of
formal
role
in
the
system
or
the
Constitutional
world
of
communities.
In
terms
of
like
making
the
decisions
and.
B
So
they
sort
of
understand
their
clearly
daily
needed
role
in
the
checks
and
balances
of
the
Constitution
and
then
they're
doing
some
like
they're,
basically
doing
some
sort
of
measure
to
be
doing
some
work
and
have
MPR
registered
with
it
constitutional
voter
committee,
and
then
they
get.
You
know
they
need
to
access
communication
platforms.
So
this
actually
replaces
like
the
mega
form
eventually,
because
it's
a
cool
I
mean
it's
a
dumpster
file
right.
B
So
the
current
maker
forum
is
a
is
sort
of
failure
of
of
how
you
can
do
down
communication,
and
it
will
be
replaced
by
basically
communication
platforms
that
are
more
like
Echo
Chambers.
But
then,
where
I
mean
or
in
the
sense
that,
where
instead
of
becoming
irritious,
it
becomes
more
like
constructive
collaboration
on
what
people
actually
thinks
benefits
them.
Without
being
the
kind
of
you
know,
personal
attacks
and,
and
so
yeah
subsurface
politics,
that
the
current
Mega
form
is.
B
This
is
actually
so
here
the
number
hasn't
been
put
in
yet,
but
basically,
at
this
point,
I've
arrived
at
a
compensation
about
a
500
MPR
per
month
for
the
Constitutional
voter
committee
members.
So
you
have
this
like
participation
requirement
right,
which
is
like
you
must
attend
meetings,
and
you
must
do
some
minimum
activity
to
to
I
mean,
in
addition
to
be
a
constitutional
con
server.
In
addition
to
be
a
member
of
a
constitutional
voter
committee
and
and
then
there
is
a
total.
B
And
that
could
be
you
know.
So
it's
a
you
know
it's
500
NPR
and
then
let's
say
there
are
10
spots
and
they
get
on
average
as
a
result,
15
care
per
year
and
and
then
that
sort
of
calculated
in
this
week,
but
of
course
it's
and
then
finally,
I
mean
this
is
yeah.
But
basically
what
this
means
is
in
practice.
It's
sort
of
calculated
more
like
in
shorter
periods,
right,
I,
think
maybe
a
better.
B
Maybe
a
similar
approach
would
be
something
like
weekly
or
and
and
definitely
calculate
it
after
the
fact
right,
where
you
would
see
the
goal
is
that
if
you
somebody
spends
some
time
on
a
constitutional
voter
committee
and
they
have
a
significant
amount
of
employer
like
they
have
enough
MPR
to
be
one
of
the
the
active
CBC
members
that
have
you
know
a
significant
amount
of
NPR
compared
to
the
other
ones
they
should
be.
You
know
they
should
be
paid
for
the
time
or
something
on
a
hourly
basis.
B
You
know
all
the
all.
The
skill
Frameworks
get
updated.
Every
quarter,
rather
they're
they're
votes
to
attempt
to
update
them
every
quarter,
and
then
every
voter
committee
must
have
some
kind
of
non-spam
document
that
gives
their
kind
of
review
of
basically
the
sort
of
the
performance
of
the
scope
framework
and
then
what
they
think
could
be
changed
to
improve
it
according
to
their
bias
right,
so
everything
you
know
so
every
quarter
the
growth
CBC
will
attempt
to
adjust
parameters
and
adjust
language.
B
Yeah
and
then
there
needs
to
be
these
subcommittee
meetings.
This
will
probably
I'm
not
sure
this
should
really
be
I
mean
this
makes
sense
of
having
the
pregame
Constitution.
This
may
not
make
sense
for
the
in-game
Constitution,
because
over
time,
eventually,
these
constitutional
conservatives
will
increasingly
be
like
robots
and
AIS
and
companies
and
stuff
so
having
these,
like.
B
B
C
B
Mean
at
least
one
member
has
to
be
a
constitutional
conserver
and
have
this
verified
public
ownership
yeah.
This
needs
to
be
better
formatted
for
sure,
like
right
now,
I
think
there's
some.
This
can
be
yeah,
there's
some
stuff
that
can
be
collapsed
together
here
to
improve
it
a
bit
and
then
CBC
is
like
mini
dials.
B
They
actually
vote
to
include
members
and
vote
to
cake
members
out
and,
and
they
can
also
split
and
then
there's
one
thing:
that's
not
detailed
here
and
that's
what
the
hell
happens
to
the
delegated
votes,
to
delegate
it
to
their
voter
strategy
when
they
split
it
and
that's
actually
like
that's
so
complicated
I,
hadn't
I
I
have
some
different
suggest,
a
solution
to
that,
but
that's
a
little
bit
too
difficult,
so
I
think
right
now,
probably
what
we'll
have
to
use
as
the
stand-in
rule
initially?
Is
that
actually
you
don't
really
like?
B
B
But
so
that's
I
mean
this
is
a
key
feature.
Eventually,
this
would
be
without
this.
Probably
the
system
will
fail
over
time,
but
with
it,
I
think,
there's
a
good
chance
it
can.
It
can
sort
of
recover
from
edge
cases
and
disputes
like
inside,
like
some
power
struggles
and
drama
inside
the
cvcs
and
then
the
kind
of
like
what
actually
the
thing
that
really
makes
cbz
so
powerful
is
that
they
get
this
ranked
positioning
in
the
easy
building
front
end.
B
So
what
that
means
is
the
biggest
CBC
is
automatically
considered
the
most
safe
and
most
trusted,
because
we
want
I
mean
so
sort
of
like
the
lazier.
Our
voter
is
the
more
likely
they
should
be
to
support
the
status
quo.
We
really
want
to
avoid
the
risk
of
kind
of
entropy
just
occurring
where,
if
someone
is
super
lazy
then,
which
we
expect
over
time,
people
expand
over
time.
People
will
get
lazy
and
lazier,
and
then
what
we
don't
want
to
happen
is
over
time.
B
Things
will
get
more
and
more
random,
so
we
introduced
that
kind
of
sort
of
order
into
the
chaos
in
a
sense
by
priming
the
lazy
voters
with
the
brain
and
the
name
of
the
biggest
cvcs,
not
kind
of
like
gamifying
like
like
not
making
it
so
that
they
can
just
play.
Okay,
I'll
just
vote
for
the
biggest.
That's
not
going
to
be
possible
for
them,
but
they'll
simply
have
that
information.
They'll
have
information
about
that
and
familiarity
with
that
which
they
won't
have
with
the
other
cvcs.
B
And
then
constitutional
delegates
can,
like
you
know,
follow
a
strategy
of
a
motor
committee,
but
voter
committees
can
and
if
you
do,
that
they
control
the
votes
right.
So
it's
not
like
the
voter
committee
controls,
the
delegate
and
the
delegate
fully
controls
the
votes
that
it
gets
through
a
CBC,
but
if
they
kind
of
if
the
delegate
sort
of
blatantly
breaks
the
Constitution
by
being
dishonest
or
something
I'm,
not
even
I'm,
actually
not
even
sure,
if
that's
written
right,
but
there
needs
to
be
something
like
I
mean
the
delegates
have
to
be.
B
You
know
act
in
good
faith
to,
of
course
like,
and
you
know,
help
the
people
who
delegate
to
them
to
get
the
results.
They
want
right.
So
if
a
delegate
and
receives
delegation
for
the
growth
strategy
and
then
uses
those
votes
to
completely
just
like
vote
every
budget
to
zero,
then
that
would
be
a
breach
of
the
Constitution
and
the
delegate
would
lose
their.
B
B
And
then
Raphael
S
I
am
care,
holding
monitored
could
be
borrowed
otherwise,
and
yes,
they
are
so
they're,
monitored
by
the
arbitration
scope,
which
has
to
sort
of
somehow
like
verify
that
it's
all
legitimate
and
it's
publicly
verified
right.
So
you
have
to
see
these
are
my
NPR
This
is
my
VR.
This
is
how
I'm
I'm
a
CVC
member
and
then
you
can
trace
where
it's
coming
from.
B
Then
you
got
delegates,
of
course,
there's
permission
as
delegates:
that's
what
we're
used
to
that's
just
smart
contracts
and
there's
constitutional
delegates
that
are
just
constitutional
conservators
that
operate
these
markets
and
then,
in
doing
so,
they
become
eligible
for
this
full-time
conversation
of
part-time
conversation,
I'm,
hoping
to
find
a
better
way
to
work
for
this.
Well,
basically,.
B
This
is
even
hard-coded
right
now,
because
this
is
just
for
the
pregame
rifle
there's
going
to
be
seven
full-time,
full-time,
constitutional
delegates
and
seven
part-time
constitutional
delegates,
and
then
they
become
a
liable
conversation
if
they
work
a
certain
amount
of
hours
which
is
defined
here.
We're
like
so
basically
like
you
don't
automatically
it's
like
you
both
have
to
first
get
in
the
top
14
delegates.
B
By
voting,
then
you
have
to
be
a
constitutional
conserver,
no
actually
yeah
like
if
it
was
more
like
you
have
to
be
contribution,
conserver
and
then
being
the
top
14
of
the
Constitutional
conserver
like
constitutional
delegates,
and
then
you
have.
Then
you
have
to
follow
the
voter
metrics,
the
delegate
conservation,
Matrix
metrics
of
some
variant
of
that
which
right
now
is
not
written.
B
C
B
Because,
of
course,
you
can't
like
that's
the
the
defense
we
can
make
we
can
provide
against
abuse
is
something
to
the
extent
of
that,
and
we
just
have
to
accept
that.
There's
still
going
to
be
tons
of
abuse
and
tons
of
like
delegates
that,
just
like
free
ride
and
unlucky
and
get
tons
of
money
and
there's
there's
actually
nothing.
We
can.
We
can't
be
all
we
can't
do
more
than
something
like
this,
because
the
delegates
themselves
are
like
the
Watchmen
right.
So
we
can't
we
end
up
in
this
like
turtles,
all
the
way
down
who.
C
B
To
be
this
equal
share
of
2000
MPR
for
the
full-time
delegates,
so
with
seven
full-time
delegates
that
would
give
each
of
them,
like
285
I,
think
it
is
MPR
per
year,
if
there's
seven
and
for
yeah
80.
Something
I
think
it
is
for
this
for
the
part-time
constitutional
delegates
or
like
the
standby
constitutional
values
right,
and
we
want
to
really
like
this
needs
to
be
like
a
high
value
role
right.
We
want
to
attract
some
like
high
level,
people
and
companies
to
do
this,
and
we
will
want
them.
B
B
So
delegates
are
very
well
positioned
with
all
this.
Also,
this,
like
mid.
You
know
minimum
pay
guarantee
basically
where
there
has
to
be
I,
mean
I'm
still
not
sure
how
to
this
is
one
of
the
very
strange
and
difficult
things
to
Define
right,
but
this
is
I
mean
right
now.
I
have
this
definition
of
like
an
average
global
upper
management
role.
B
Now
we
got
a
problem,
because
now
we
can't
really
pay
for
all
these
delegates
and
and
it's
a
problem
for
them,
and
then
we
have
this
kind
of
emergency
backup
power
that
exists.
That
enables
us
to
pay
them
extra,
but
only
in
these
like
extraordinary
circumstances.
So
this
is
not
going
to
be
abused
in
normal
situations,
where
delegates
will
be
paid
significant
significantly
more
than
this
right
and
will
tend
to
be
these
like
organizations
that
that,
like
yeah,
hopefully
in
some
cases,
produce
a
lot
of
extra
value.
B
So
it's
very
actually
extremely
easy
for
delegates
to
like
not
be
dishonest,
not
be
super
incompetent
and
then
get
promoted
to
the
top
of
the
easy
voting
front
right.
You
just
need
to
be
a
constitutional
conserver,
and
then
you
need
to
Simply
pick
two
voting
strategies
and
then,
when
it's
time
to
vote,
you
need
to
not
screw
it
up
and
actually
do
the
voting
that
you
pledge
to
do.
B
So
this
is
like
a
mechanism
that
helps
automatically
sort
of
self-heal
from
basically
very
ambitious
delegates
and
some
very
politically
charged
delegates,
which
we
won't
avoid
right.
The
delegates
we
want
to
be
more,
like
you
know
the
they're,
like
the
military
of
the
network
state
in
the
sense
that
they
have
all
the
power.
So
we
expect
them
to
be
extremely.
You
know,
sort
of
stay
out
of
internal
politics
right
and
simply
preserve
the
peace.
B
B
Get
you'll
always
be
fine,
like
you'll
you'll,
be
able
to
appeal
to
sort
of
the
base
you
want
to
appeal
to,
but
you
will
not
be
getting
that
much
of
the
or
like
the
world
incentives
right,
especially
if
there's
a
huge
amount
of
more
unbiased
delegates
that
operate
because
they'll
all
be
shown
about
you.
So
so
the
the
appeal
time
specifically
looking
for
these
ranked
two
constitutional
delegates,
they're
they're
much
less
likely
to
end
up
voting
for
them
at
random.
B
So
that
should
really
like
reduce
the
I
mean
that
should
completely
eliminate
the
incident
that
exists
in
Mobile
Democratic
politics
right.
The
incentive
is
to
be
abrasive
and
radical
and
Stand
Out
by
by
you
know,
advocating
for
for
bad
stuff
right
that
causes
conflict
and
but
but
in
in
in
the
end
game,
Constitution
Constitution,
that's
a
I
mean
that's
a
massive
downside
and
there
needs
to
be
such
a
huge
base
that
exists
from
that
view
for
it
to
make
sense.
B
Otherwise,
it's
just
never
going
to
make
sense,
because
your
Luna
Lewis
out
in
all
the
broader
incidents
I'm,
not
all
but
a
large
amount
of
the
incentivized
building
and
then
Constitution
delegates
can
also
like
ban
voter
committees
and
the
main
reason
why
they
would
do.
That
is
because
they
would
want
to
reduce
the
amount
of
weight.
The
voter
committee
has
in
the
easy
building
front
end.
So
this
is
basically
if
the
first,
the
top
voter
committee,
is
just
absolutely
garbage
and
and
bad.
B
You
know,
de-recognized
them
as
constitutional
conservances,
then
that's
a
way
for
it
like
they'll.
Get
coordinating
to
to
ban
voter
committees
is
a
way
to
get
them
out
of
the
the
top
and
at
least
or
delegitimize
them
without
actually
impacting
the
delegate
like
the
delegates
can
do
this
and
if
they're
doing
it
in
good
faith,
it
shouldn't
actually
damage
them.
B
Yeah,
this
is
not
even
but
basically
that
first
of
all
delegate
contracts
expire
for
two
years,
but
voter
incentives
I
mean
this
vote.
Incidents
don't
apply
in
premium,
so
this
is
sort
of
I'll
put
it
in
there
anyway.
Just
to
help
give
some
context
in
this
right,
but
basically,
every
year,
there's
going
to
be
this
like
new
window
of
Voters
voters
and
Border
incentives
have
expired.
B
So
you
have
to
vote
again,
but
you
need
to
vote
on
like
a
fresh
like
a
recently
deployed
delegate
contract.
So
this
becomes
the
moment
where
all
delegates
they
sort
of
update
the
delegate
contracts
and
then
once
again,
basically
attempt
to
get
people
to
Delegate
for
them,
because
this
will
be
the
moment
where
people
will
be
redelegating
because
their
voter
incentives
expired.
B
B
B
Do
whatever
it
takes
to
make
it
look
like
they're
working,
but
in
many
cases
they
will
I
mean,
and
there
will
be
do
and
the
most
important
function
will
be
to
protect
the
Constitution,
which
will
absolutely
do
because
that's
where,
if
they
don't
do
that
they
they
their
money,
is
at
risk.
So
they'll
do
what
it
takes
to
sort
of
protect
their
money,
and
but
the
problem
is
that
I
mean
delegates
are
incentivized
to
not
be
seen
as
bringing
the
Constitution
and
they'll
absolutely
make
sure
of
that.
B
So
they'll,
like
vote
they'll,
not
vote
for
like
stuff
that
tries
to
change
the
Constitution
or
or
something
that
goes
down
a
slippery
slope
or
something
that's
going
to
be.
That's
going
to
be
relatively
easy
one
to
to
make
sure
it
happens,
and
the
thing
is:
that's
actually
all
they
need
to
do
so
if
we
can
get
that
done
and
that
costs
us
an
emission.
A
mission
of
you
know:
2
500
per
year.
That's
a
completely
acceptable
trade.
B
In
my
opinion,
especially
because
on
on
a
relative
basis,
the
the
emissions
go
down
in
that
sense
right,
but
then
I
mean
what
you
would
like
to
have.
In
addition
to
them.
Protecting
the
Constitution
is
that
they
also
kind
of
like
proactively
use
these
huge
amount
of
resources,
because
they're
getting
the
share
of
the
the
NPR
right
and
it's
income
price
goes
up.
It's
really
high,
then
they'll
have
a
significant
amount
of
resources
available
right.
B
It
could
be
entire
companies
and
you
would
hope
they
would
do
stuff
like
additional,
like
marketing
for
the
Dow
or,
like
independent
analysis,
independent
research-
and
you
know
really
like
supporting
the
the
voter
committees
and-
and
this
should
sort
of
be
their
work
right.
But
the
problem
is
that
this
is
not
really
their
incentive.
Isn't
to
actually
do
those
things.
B
They're
incentive
is
to
make
it
look
like
they're
doing
those
things
and
because
it's
politics,
it's
going
to
likely
in
like
some
people,
will
absolutely
brand
themselves
and
gain
attention
and
gain
support
by
actually
doing
stuff
and
proving
actually
doing
stuff.
But
but
in
many
cases
it
will
be
more
like
political
campaigning
right,
which
is
sort
of
actually
a
waste
of
everyone's
time
in
a
sense
but
that'll.
B
We
should
expect
that
that's
the
equilibrium
is
that
if
you
campaign
and
you're
very
political
and
you
you
know,
that's,
what's
going
to
get
you
votes
and
not
actually
doing
real
work
anyway.
So
what
that
means?
So
it's
like
it's
it's
it's
important
to
think
about
these
rules
and
think
about
the
constitution
in
in
the
real
sort
of
game.
Theoretic
adversarial
sense
right-
and
this
is
something
that'll
be
in
effect,
even
50
and
100
years
from
now,
when
we
can't
trust
any
of
these
people
right.
B
We
have
no
idea
if
we
can
trust
them
right.
It
could
be
a
period
of
time
where
everyone
is
just
very
selfish
and
corrupt
and
the
world
is
falling
apart
or
something
or
it
could
be
the
other
way
around.
But
of
course,
if
everything
gets
better
and
people
get
more
trustworthy
and
and
The
Meta
engineering
works
and
everyone's
just
super
inspired,
and
then
that
you
know
should
also
result.
B
Like
part-time
delegates
versus
full-time
delegates,
getting
a
quarter
of
a
full-time
delegate,
compensation
is
still
first
of
all
would
still
be
a
huge
amount
of
money
and
checking
the
boxes
on
being
eligible,
for
that
is
not
going
to
be
real
work.
There's
never
going
to
be
a
way
for
us
to
like
check
whether
a
delegate
is
doing
the
real
work.
That's
going
that's
supposed
to
be
up
to
the
voters,
but
we
know
the
voters
don't
really
want
to
vote
they
just
want
to
like.
Basically
we
can
do
his
word
of
incentives,
so.
B
B
Now,
maybe
it's
better
to
call
them
into
bees
doesn't
mean,
but
this
basically,
we
already
have
existing
coordinates
that
are
funded
top
down
and
the
idea
is
we're
introducing
this
new
category
of
companies
that
are
being
funded
top
down,
but
yeah
I'm
not
coordinates,
and
it's
kind
of
yeah.
It's
going
to
seem
slightly
confusing
at
this
stage
and
what
will
actually
end
up
happening
is
all
the
coordinates
will
eventually
transition
into
being
ecosystem
actors
for
the
most
part
and
the
kind
of
the
meaning
of
coordinate
Will
Change
significantly
like
they
will.
B
They
will
be
purely
be
pure
administrative
and
there'll,
be
very
few
of
them
in
the
end
and
and
to
really
understand
that
I
mean
you'll
have
you'll
have
to
understand
that
we
have
to
look
at
the
endgame
Constitution
itself
like
not
to
pre-game
and
game
Constitution,
but
the
final
in-game
Constitution.
We
could
call
it
which
I
will
yeah
release
as
soon
as
possible,
but
that
one
is
like
you
know,
there's
quite
a
bit
more
stuff
in
there.
B
And
then,
finally,
what
the
Constitution
has
are,
then
the
scope
yeah
the
Constitutional
boundaries
for
the
school
Frameworks
right.
So
let's
go
Frameworks
are
basically
the
parts
of
the
Constitution
are
modifiable
and
that
happens
in
their
own
myth.
So
the
mechanism
for
modifying
a
scope
framework
is
like
the
actual
MIP,
the
modified
version
of
like
what
the
actual
MIP
process
that
we're
used
to
right.
It'll,
be
someone
the
same
as
that,
and
if
zero
will
be
changed
to
support
them.
B
B
I
mean
this
set
of
mid
lane.
I
mean
like
the
change
to
remember,
zero
and
then
the
Indian
constitution,
and
then
yeah
they
changed
my
BBC
or
in
the
Indian
constitution
will
basically
invalidate
most
myths,
so
they
will
just
sort
of
say
that
they
take.
You
know
then
then
I
mean
basically
because
of
language
like
this
in
the
Constitution,
then
they
just
become
invalid,
because
they're
like
you're
attempting
to
do
something,
that's
covered
by
scope
framework.
So
you
can't
do
it
with
this
movement
or
you're
attempting
to
do
something.
B
That's
not
either
you're
doing
something
that's
covered
by
skill
framework,
in
which
case
you
can't
do
it,
because
it's
done
by
the
scope
framework.
Are
you
intending
to
do
something
that's
outside
of
the
scope
framework?
In
which
case
you
can't
do
it,
because
the
scope
covers
everything
right
and
then
the
only
case
where
the
mips
continue
to
be
activated
either
if
they're,
like
sort
of
explicitly
defined,
to
be
pre-game
nips
to
their
myths,
that
sort
of
continue
to
function
during
the
pre-game
or
if
they
cover
something
that
is
supposed
to
be
covered
by
scope
framework.
B
Like
something
related
like
real
world
assets,
and
if
the
rebel
asset
scope
framework
isn't
in
place,
then
all
the
normal
asset
related
Maps
will
still
be
functional
right.
So
we
don't
nuke
ourselves
by
passing
the
Constitution,
but
deciding
not
to
pass
the
real
asset
scope
framework
and
then
suddenly
have
all
these
critical
infrastructure
mips
be
some
decommissioned.
Somehow.
B
Yeah
there's
like
there's
this.
The
key
consideration
for
what
is
a
scope
is
basically
that
these
areas,
where
nprs
need
to
have
direct
line
aside
right
and
the
kind
of
the
thing
we're
fighting
against,
is
that
there
is
a
force
that
wants
to
hide
the
important
stuff
right.
So
MPL
holders
aren't
able
to
notice
if
things
are
not
being
done
in
there.
You
know
the
principal
agent
kind
of
a
problem
with
taking
it
right.
B
And
then
they
can
be
changed,
so
this
is
where
the
flexibility
is
of
the
ability
to
do
stuff
comes
in
and
Define
process
and
all
this
stuff
granular
decisions,
and
but
every
time
they
changed
the
right
like
it
should
never
be
I
mean
maybe
in
if
there
are
really
good
sort
of
strong
constitutional
Arguments
for
it
it
would
be
possible
to
kind
of
roll
back
a
scope
framework
right,
but
basically,
every
time
you
make
a
change
just
go
framework.
You
should
always
like
either
at
worst.
B
You
can
keep
it
at
the
same
level
of
autonomy
or
sort
of
the
same
level
of
automation,
but
ideally
you
sort
of
start
I
mean
initially
we
pick
specific,
we
put
constants
into
the
scope,
Frameworks
right
and
we
say
something
like
we
want
to
500
million
dollars
of
usdp
or
something
right
and
that's
like
written
so
hard-coded
into
this
go
forward,
but
eventually
we're
like
look.
This
is
a
question.
It's
we
want.
B
You
know
we
want
20
of
all
our
yield,
stable
coin
allocation
to
be
in
ustp
and
then
later
on.
It's
something
like
this:
you,
you
know,
the
yield
stable
coins
are
analyzed
for
liquidity
and
adoption
and
blah
blah
blah.
Based
on
that
and
this
formula,
and
this
blah
blah
weight
of
each
of
these
things,
a
ratio
is
provided
and
updated
automatically
recur.
B
You
know
every
whatever
right
and
you
can
keep
you
can
always
well,
not
always,
but
you
keep
going
deeper
and
deeper
into
like
really
spelling
out
these,
like
very
complex
sort
of
Behavioral
trees,
for
how
all
the
decisions
are
made
and-
and
it
should
be
I
mean
it
should
correspond
to
how
initially
we're
going
to
set
these
constants
by
hand
in
a
sense
and
then
we're
going
to
sort
of
learn.
Why
are
we
doing
this
stuff?
What's
the
reason
why
we're
changing
it
this
way?
B
And
then,
as
we
learn,
why
we're
doing
it,
then
we
start
saying
why?
Don't
we
just
put
that
logic
of
why
we're
doing
it
into
the
scope
framework
and
then
they'll
have
some
the
the
automated
thing
we'll
put
in
there
will
then
have
some
kind
of
meta
parameters
and
then
we'll
be
changing
those
metagrammers,
and
eventually
we
learn.
Why
we're
changing
those
meta-rammers
and
then
we'll
also
automate
the
change
of
them,
and
then
it
just
keeps
going
like
that
until
maybe
at
some
point
we
find
you
know
the
perfect
solution
right.
B
Okay,
I'm
just
gonna
like
there's
a
little
bit
more
blah
blah,
but
then
I
just
want
to.
You
know
like
I've
I'm
preparing
to
release
this
like
actual
documents
for
the
fall,
then
so
I
made
this
new
categorization
of
scope,
Frameworks
into
operational,
supporting
and
governance,
which
is
once
again
a
weird
change,
but
it
doesn't
even
it's
not
even
actually
relevant
in
the
pre-game,
but
it's
relevant
in
the
in-game.
B
So
as
a
result,
I
just
decided
to
put
it
in
there
immediate,
because
it's
so
confusing
for
these
things
to
change.
So
it's
better
that
they
just
only
change
once
I
think,
but
basically,
the
stability,
liquidity,
decentralized
collateral,
a
real
as
a
collateral
and
then
ecosystem,
which
is
much
more
like
wonky.
But
but
all
of
these
are
like
the
scope,
Frameworks
that
have
the
most
kind
of
day-to-day
work
and
process
and
kind
of
like
ongoing
stuff
in
them.
B
And
so
those
are
the
ones
I'm.
Starting
with
with
trying
to
cover
and
and
the
way
it
kind
of
works
right
is
that
in
the
Constitution
we
put
these
constitutional
boundaries.
You
say
like
this
is
what's
supposed
to
be
about
right.
As
a
liability
management
and
die
series
rate
adjustment,
and
then
you
gotta
basically
make
sure
you
have
a
professional
advisory
Council
and
continuously
up,
you
know
sort
of
improve
how
you
pick
them
and
how
you
pay
them
and
make
it
very
clear
how
that
stands
as
Richard's
parent
actually
more.
B
C
B
Can
you
can
add,
like
this,
ultimately
details
the
spirit
of
the
scope?
So
if
there's
like
a
gap
or
like
some
kind
of
logical
oversight
or
contradiction
or
something,
you
can
ignore
that
basically
you
can
or
you
can
cover
a
gap
in
functionality.
Yeah
like
it
actually
doesn't
say
anything
about
it.
We
should
hope
we
will
not
end
up
with
any
contradictions
in
the
Constitution
I
guess,
because
that's
actually,
of
course,
a
yeah.
B
That's
a
pretty
problematic
failure
mode
and
attack
surface
to
have
it,
but
like
sort
of
they're,
not
they're,
never
going
to
be
perfect,
so
you
can
extrapolate
from
them.
If
you
have
a
very
good
reason
to
do
so
and
you
it
doesn't
cause
you
to
like,
extend
it,
Beyond,
The,
Logical
boundary
and
some
of
the
spirit,
the
spiritual
boundary,
almost
right
of
the
the
the
scope
framework.
B
And
so
for
decentralized
collateral,
there's
like
is
an
MPR,
which
is
the
only
collateral
types
that
are
like
encouraged
actually
by
the
Constitution
and
then
there's
these
like
it's
very
strict
requirements
for
anything
else
that
is
allowed
to
exist
and
make
a
call,
which
is
very
little
of
all
the
time.
You
know
crazy
amount
of
tinical
aerotypes
we
currently
have-
and
you
know
I
mean
so
that's
one
of
my
objectives
is
we
get.
B
You
know
clear,
Direction
on
getting
started
with
getting
rid
of
all
of
that.
All
the
you
know.
It's
been
extremely
useful
for,
like
really,
you
know,
showcasing
the
ability
that
we
can
modify
and
and
we
can
keep
the
protocol
running
and
upgraded
and
do
so
many
things
with
it
right
and
there's
a
sort
of
Master
the
protocol,
but
yeah
I
mean
we're
basically
losing
money
on
almost
every
single
level
time,
except
very,
very
few
specific
ones.
B
B
And
then
there's
the
right
deposit
modules
and
then
there
is
fixed
rates
which
is
hopefully
going
to
I
mean,
which
is
because
we're
cutting
down
so
much
on
all
the
coins,
because
actually
nobody
really
wants
to
use
this
anyway
right,
then
we
can
get
into
fixed
rates
which
is
instead.
We
know,
that's
actually
a
big,
that's
a
big
area,
and
maybe
not
so
much
currently,
but
it
was
at
least
at
the
top
of
the
bull
like
it
is
sort
of
a
it's
one
of
those
things
that
are
scalable
just
like
sticky
beneath
escalator.
C
B
Liability
management
with
usdc
and
PSM
and
then
primary
yield
from
coinbase
custody
and
secondary
yield
from
ustp
and
that
kind
of
stuff
which
is
sort
of
met.
You
know,
which
is
covered
in
sort
of
the
Alm
implementation
mechanism.
That's
on
chain
and
basically
taking
money
in
and
out
of
coinbase
custody
is,
is
sort
of
a
really
basic
idea
for
that,
and
then
the
idea
is
that
all
the
more
advanced
stuff
is
going
to
basically
sort
of
emulate.
B
Having
protect
your
dials
by
you
know
getting
advice
from
ecosystem
actors,
so
that
would
be
the
cluster
like
the
The
Protector
clusters
would
then
be
defined
as
like.
These
are
ecosystem
actors
that
the
core
unit
is
supposed
to
take
advice
from
when
making
proposals
to
make
new
allocations,
and
then
we
split
the
50
50.
So
we
have
these
two
separate
groups
independently
and
trying
to
get
some
results
for
us,
which
then
like
begins
emulating
how
it's
going
to
look
like
with
protected
us
and
then
with
the
ecosystem
scope.
B
B
It
doesn't
really
have
to
to
in
practice
like
change,
how
things
are
it's
more
like
I
mean
and
I
guess
we'll
have
we'll
we'll
make
put
it
in
there.
So,
for
instance
like
according
to,
if
you
sort
of
took
this
literally
then,
for
instance,
if
SES
and
are
the
ones
that
are
responsible
for
the
ecosystem,
scope
and
got
welfare
is
responsible
for
arbitration
scope
and
then
Peyton
shouldn't
be
running
there.
B
B
B
Yeah
this
is
sort
of
up
here,
but
basically
providing
this
like
governance,
communication,
sport
and
then
there's
the
other
stuff
here
and
yeah
I
won't
get
into
that
I
want.
You
know.
These
are
the
ones
where
I'm
going
to
release
the
actual
scope
Frameworks
relative
soon
and
of
course
this
is
all
just
like
skeletal
structures.
This
is
all
drafts.
I
mean
this
will
really
I'm.
This
will
hopefully
change
a
lot.