►
From YouTube: Open Decentralized Voter Committee | January 4, 2023
B
B
Basically,
in
the
kind
of
the
Q4
there
were
a
bunch
of
like
sort
of
Dynamic
changes
happening
really
in
real
time
sort
of
over
those
those
meetings
and
then
now
I've.
You
know
I've
sort
of
gathered
all
together
into
something
that
I
I
think
it
will
eventually
I'll
call
it
like
the
V4
version,
basically
just
like
the
other
sort
of
major,
the
three
major
iterations
that
happened
in
the
past
right,
which
then
hopefully
keeps
saying
this.
B
But
then
it's
like
at
the
point
where
the
possibility
for
changes
kind
of
disappears
more
or
less
the
the
more
kind
of
clearly
defined.
All
this
stuff
becomes,
and
basically
what's
kind
of
the
really
big
like
driver
for
why
these
new
changes
are
possible
right
I
mean
one
of
the
biggest
ones
is
like
I
mean.
So
this
is
one
of
the
key
insights
of
endgame
is
basically
that
anytime,
there's
like
open
space.
B
That's
always
like
any
open
space
anywhere
in
sort
of
a
Dao
or
a
design
space
or
whatever
right.
That's.
You
know
it's
it's
a
huge
risk
in
a
sense
right,
you
just
it
introduces
a
huge
amount
of
uncertainty
right,
so
actually
open
space
and
flexibility
in
a
decentralized
context
is
doesn't
actually
give
you
sort
of
more
stability
or
more
certainty
or
more
whatever.
B
Flex
I
mean
it's
not
a
good
thing,
it's
a
bad
thing
because
it
gave
results
into
those
surprises
right
and
then
the
really
big
kind
of
open
space
that
we
left
open
was
basically
the
like
the
governor
does
and
the
question
of
what
to
do
with
like
the
mandated
actors.
What
to
do
with
coordinates
what
to
do
with
it.
B
B
Yeah,
and
so
the
outcome
is
kind
of
I
mean
it's:
it's
not
nearly
as
big
of
a
of
a
sort
of
set
of
changes
compared
to
to
like
the
earlier
earlier
iterations
at
all
right,
also
because
we're
so
much
further
and
kind
of
the
Practical
implementation.
Now
that
yeah,
it's
just
like
these
things,
are
much
more
related
to
kind
of
yeah
like
practical
questions
and
implementation
related
sort
of
details,
rather
than
kind
of
like
changing
the
big
picture
right.
B
So
in
the
big
picture,
pretty
much
everything
remains
more
or
less
the
same,
but
there's
a
lot
of
like
stuff
like
terminology
that
I
will
be
able
to.
You
know,
provide
more
clarity
on
and
then
also
priorities
and
roadmap
and
Milestones,
and
that
kind
of
stuff,
Netflix
and
I
think
the
really
big
kind
of
big
picture.
B
You
know
overview
of
what
is
what
this
means
in
practice.
Is
that
there's
now
this
very
clear
way
to
to
describe
the
sort
of
the
two-step
approach
to
how
to
actually
Implement
in-game
right,
which
is
that
there
will
basically
be
like
two
versions
of
the
Constitution
I
mean
actually
there'll,
be
a
lot
more.
But
there's
like
two
big
kind
of
like
major
versions
right
and
then,
of
course,
a
lot
of
like
minor
iterations,
but
but
and
the
first
one
is
this
like
the
pre-game
Constitution.
B
So
that's
something
we
want
to
get
basically
get
implemented
as
quickly
as
possible,
because
that's
going
to
give
us
the
tools
we
need
to
to.
Finally
like
get
our
act
together,
be
able
to
like
execute
on
all
the
challenges
and
opportunities.
We
have
in
front
of
us
right
now
and
then
there's
like
the
actual
sort
of
end
game
in
game.
Constitution,
that's
gonna!
You
know.
B
Transition
is
from
the
pre-game
to
the
early
game
and
then
from
there
into
the
end
game
through
a
kind
of
self-sustainable,
self-running
process
right
and
that
one
will
then
come
quite
a
bit
later.
So
so,
and
that's
actually
one
of
the
advantages
of
this,
this
approach
is
that
there's
like
there's
a
just
a
couple
like
basically
there's
a
couple
of
factors.
That
means
that
we're
we
can
safely
delay
the
launch
of
The
Tokens
The
subtop
Tokens,
which
is
a
great
thing
we
can
talk
about
that
later.
B
But
I
want
to
wait
a
little
bit
with
the
with
the
whole
tokenomics
stuff,
but
by
you
know,
by
delaying
the
launch
of
the
tokens,
then
it's
just
going
to
increase
our
chances
of
chances
of
success.
Basically,
because
launching
tokenomics
and
launching
tokens
is
just
I
mean
it's
there's
a
lot
of
risk.
There's
a
lot
of
I
mean
there's
an
insane
amount
of
opportunity
right,
there's
an
insane
amount
of
like
attention,
but
that
also
means
you
get
like
your
one
shot
right.
So
you
really
want
to
to
not.
C
B
B
You
know
like
kind
of
priorities
we
can
focus
on
because
there's
actually
like
there's
actually
a
whole
bunch
of
good
stuff
in
the
in-game
plan.
That
is
stuff
that
isn't
even
you
know,
it's
not
related
to
The
Tokens.
It's
not
related
to
the
subtitles
at
least
directly
that
we
could
that
and
as
a
result,
it's
like
it
doesn't
you
know
it
doesn't.
C
B
A
B
So
if,
if
there's
like
the
kind
of
you
know
the
safe
bet
in
this
kind
of
situation,
it's
just
always
going
to
be
take
our
Surplus
and
use
that
to
like
build
some
build.
Some
good
features
that
deliver
fundamental
value
and
don't
do
any
kind
of
of
kind
of
shifting
of
the
risk
or
kind
of
you
know.
Major
like
stuff
was
sort
of
major
long-term
consequences
such
as
tokenomics
and
Veterans
index,
and
all
that
stuff
around
that
I
guess,
like
irreversible
voter
incentives,.
B
B
You
know
some
examples
right
of
what
what
I'm
talking
about
when
I
say
stuff
that
can
be
done
in
a
short
run,
I
mean
so
a
rather
I'll
avoid
getting
like
too
much
into
specifics,
just
because
I
think
that's
just
I
mean
there
needs
to
be
like
more
kind
of
thinking
with
you
know,
a
more
basically
more
preparation
before
we
really
like
talk
about
like
an
actual
sort
of
concrete
objectives.
Right
but
but
I
mean
I.
B
Think
one
really
obvious
example,
or
something
that
we
could
build
immediately
is
either
die,
which
is
already
something
that's
been
discussed
before
right.
But
it's
like
it's
one
of
these,
like
it's
one
of
the
simplest
products
ever
right.
It's
just
a
red
I
mean
because
it's
it's
not
the
same
as
wrapped
Eve,
but
it's
close
basically
right.
It's
like
it's!
It's
a
it's
a
red
sticky,
basically
initially,
but
it
is
actually
a
real
like
it
would
give
us
a
real
steak.
B
Eat
related
product
that
we
could
launch
and
have
sort
of
associated
with.
This
is
like
one
of
the
you
know.
This
is
one
of
the
things
we're
working
on
and
we
would
actually
be
able
to
begin
building
liquidity
in
that
immediately
right
and
we
could
give
it
things
like
preferable,
Vault
parameters
and
that
kind
of
stuff-
and
that's
just
like
that's
an
example
of
something
that
it
will
it's
a
it's
like
a
step.
B
It's
a
stepping
stone
towards
implementing
the
actual
launch
of
the
end
game
like
the
full
end,
game,
Constitution
and
the
subdials,
but
it
doesn't
have
to
be.
You
know
coordinated
with
the
other
stuff.
So
it's
a
lot.
It's
a
lot
simpler
and
easier
to
say:
okay,
let's
build
that
stuff.
First
right,
let's
build
the
pieces
first
that
we
can
build
now
and
sort
of
this
kind
of
Standalone
project
and
then
build
it
and
launch
it,
and
you
know
kind
of
get
done
with
it
and
then
move
on
to
the
next
thing
right.
B
So
one
of
the
things
that
I
I
now
think
is
like
the
the
right
like,
given
all
the
the
kind
of
the
the
external
environment
of
the
various
external
factors
that
are
impacting
us
now.
I
think,
basically
the
right
thing
to
do
when
it
comes
to
like
the
burn
and
the
options
there
right
is
basically
I
mean
still
don't.
Do.
Mkr
burn,
like
I'm,
against
doing
sort
of
direct
classic
mkr
burn,
Within
game
plan,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
that
the
MPR
Supply
is
too
centralized
right.
B
So
it
just
doesn't
make
any
sense
trying
to
burn
the
mkr
supply
when
all
that's
going
to
do
is
just
further
sort
of
consolidate
the
the
few
whales
that
have
most
of
the
Supply
right,
but
but
also
think
that
the
the
I
mean
this.
The
kind
of
initial
alternative
to
that
that
I
then
presented
was
foreign
right.
B
The
protocol
owned
Vault
emulation,
which
is
this
basically
the
the
the
partial
YOLO
of
the
old
days
of
you,
know
tornado
cash
Panic
right
that
we
were
basically
like
lever
up
underneath
and
stake
eath
very
slowly
and-
and
that
would
just
be
like
a
way
to
to
to
sort
of
like
keep
the
capital
that
we
earn
inside.
The
ecosystem,
avoid
like
just
burning
and
consolidating
the
big
MK
holders
and
all
that
stuff,
while
acquiring
eth
and
then
also
getting
more
decentralized
knowledge.
B
So,
but
I
think
basically,
there's,
like
a
number
of
you
know
things
that
have
really
changed
and
that
have
become
huge
downsides
to
that
approach.
Right
so
I
think
the
first
one
is
just
that
we're
just
not
in
a
like
at
the
time.
It
wasn't
clear
that
we
would
have
this
like
a
proper
crypto
winter
right,
where,
like
people
have
literally
left
the
space
right
and
we're
back
to
crypto
being
a
joke
for
a
long
time.
B
Right
I
mean
it's
going
to
take
a
while
for
for
some
of
the
the
The
public's
interest
in
crypto
to
recover
from
just
the
endless
humiliation
right,
we've
gone
through
again
and
again,
right
and
so
I
think
that
just
means
that
it's
not
really
like
if
being
cheap,
is
actually
not
really
like.
It's
just
that's
not
necessary.
It's
not
an
obvious
like
buying
opportunity
or
like
an
obvious
kind
of
a
dip
or
something
of
it
which
I
I
think
it.
It
looked
a
lot
more
like
that.
B
You
know
before
you
assume
that
every
single
you
know
lender
is
bankrupt.
Every
single
exchange
is
bankrupt.
You
know
everything
is
a
scam
right,
take
your
average
crypto
name,
it's
probably
a
scam
or
probably
a
punch
scheme
right.
Even
the
I
mean.
That's
that's
how
it
feels
to
me
today,
right,
like
every
single
company
we
thought
were
reliable
in
the
space
was
actually
a
Giants
game,
which
is
a
very
different
world
compared
to
when
they
weren't
all
goddamn
scams
right.
This
games
was
games,
but
the
the
institutions
or
institutions
right
turns
out.
B
We
were
you
know
we
over
I,
don't
know.
We
were
too,
we
were
too
generous
in
kind
of
trusting
the
people
who
who
sort
of
run
the
space
anyway.
The
result
is
there's
just
no
rush,
I
think
to
to
accumulate
a
bunch
of
State
Deeds,
even
though,
obviously
it
is
kind
of
it
fits
with
the
kind
of
overall
philosophy
of
the
end
game,
Constitution
right
to
to
basically
accumulate
eth
over
time
and
and
have
this
kind
of
I
mean
this
whole
mechanism
of
the
protocol
involved
makes
sense.
B
It's
just
there's
no
reason
to
basically
rush
it
or
and
and
the
whole
Russian
thing
I
mean
the
other.
The
other
Factor
consider
there
is
that
the
protocol
of
Vault
emulation
mechanic
was
this
like
elaborate
sort
of
mip-based
manual
process,
which
would
create
a
whole
bunch
of
like
governance,
overhead
and
so
on.
Right.
So,
basically,
it's
like
you
know.
The
benefit
isn't
really
there
and
the
cost
is
actually
high
up
to
it
right
so
I
think
that
should
just
be
scrapped.
Basically,
it
should
be
turned
into
like
a
future
smart
contract.
B
So
yeah
so
I
mean
the
the
kind
of
the
takeaway
from
that
is
that
I
will
basically
propose
some
kind
of
by
just
deleting
it
off
like
removing
the
map.
Whatever
you
do
right,
it
was
mid,
4
I
think
it
is,
and
then
instead
it
will
be
like
built
into
the
in-game
Constitution
as
a
sort
of
required
long-term
feature,
but
but
there's
no
like
rush
to
getting
it
done
and
anyway.
So
then
that
leaves
us
with
okay,
so
there
so
like
pure
NPR
burn
that
consolidates
the
whales
is
bad.
B
Kovi
manual
process
is
bad
instead,
I
think
what
the
kind
of
obvious
shot,
in
fact,
I
think
this
should
be
like
the
top
priority.
I
think
like
this
is.
This
is
really
like,
the
just
other
than
like
getting
even
more
basic
stuff
in
order
like
cleaning
up
the
budgets
and
deploying
the
capital
so
we're
in
return,
and
all
that,
like
really
basic
stuff,
then
I
think
the
the
big
opportunity
in
terms
of
what
to
do
with
all
this
money.
B
We're
going
to
earn
them
is
like
Implement
sort
of
the
first
half
of
the
let's
call
the
smart
burn
engine
or
whatever
we're
going
to.
You
know
it
used
to
be
called
the
Amber
burn
engine,
but
I'm
not
allowed
to
to
give
things
funny
names
anymore.
So
it
has
to
have
some
kind
of
boring
name
or
acronym
type
of
name
right.
So,
whatever
we
call
it
right,
so
there's
like
new
smart
version
right
and
so
so.
B
The
way
it
works
is
that
it
accumulates
what
used
to
be
called
Elixir,
but
right
now,
yeah
like
right
now,
I'm
thinking
it
should
be
called
The,
Maker,
optimal
liquidity
pool
or
malt,
or
maybe
they
make
a
cold
with
the
pools
or
mclp.
The
problem
with
mclp
is
it's
like
it's
confusing
what
coal
it
means
in
a
country.
So
maybe
we
call
mob
to
be
fun
for
the
the
anti-lexia
haters,
but
so
the
anyway.
C
B
The
way
it
works,
it
accumulates
that
with
all
this
income,
so
even
you
know,
regardless
of
what's
Happening
it's
when
when
maker
is
earning
lots
of
income,
it
will
be
buying
some
mkr,
but
it's
not
going
through
like
YOLO
all
in
on
NPR,
and
it's
not
going
to
remove
it
from
the
market.
It'll
actually
be
like
most
most
of
the
assets
will
go
into
like
die
and
then
stay
teeth.
So
stake
teeth
like
it's
actually
still
an
accumulation
of
a
state.
B
B
So
so
that's
a
really
cool.
You
know
long-term
product,
but
what
we
can
do
in
the
short
run
is
we
can
just
implement
the
first
part
of
it.
So
we
can
just
simply
get
a
kind
of
burn
going
with
with
actually
like
a
significant
amount
of
our
I
mean
I.
Think
all
of
our
profits
could
go
straight
into
that
because
in
the
end,
we're
not
like
we're
not
we're
not
just
buying
and
removing
it
from
the
market,
we're
mostly
keeping
it
in
hard
assets
right.
B
But
but
it's
going
to
it's
going
to
really
make
a
difference
for
mkholders
I
think
to
have
that
kind
of
you
know.
Suddenly,
there's
this
significant
cash
flow
not
going
into
the
accounting
directly
but
going
into
liquidity
frame
count
and
that's
the
kind
of
email
I
think
that
would
be
possible.
You
know
it's
it's
sort
of
already.
It
would
require
GSS
kill
right.
B
So
it's
already
the
kind
of
mechanism
that
was
on
the
on
the
roadmap,
for
you
know
the
the
protocol
Vault
emulation
system
and
then
just
like
a
little
bit
more
right
like
a
balance
of
pool
and
then
of
course,
initially
we
we
could
simply
do
it
with
Lido
stick
eth
rather
than
with
either
dye,
but
then
eventually
just
eat
the
diet
got
developed.
We
could
like
swap
them
out,
and
this
should
all
be
like
pretty
easy
to
do
when
the
Standalone
these
things.
So
we're
not
talking
about.
B
B
So
I
think,
basically
that
that
approach
just
fits,
let
that's
that
makes
sense,
and
actually
it
like
kind
of
changing
things
on
the
product
side
actually
helps
with
that
right,
because
then
that
makes
that
means
now
we
can.
We
can
do
this
approach
of
like
gradually
easing
in
to
the
the
kind
of
the
governance
style
of
end
game,
but
we
can
do
that
with
some
more
practical.
B
You
know
things
to
focus
on
right,
so
they
can
be
less
theoretical.
It
can
be
a
little
bit
more
practical
or
Hands-On
and
then,
instead
of
like
in
in
place
of
all
the
theory,
what
we're
going
to
get
is
more
time.
So
we
just
have
more
time
to
like
do
things
Hands-On
and
practice
stuff
before
the
the
big
moment
when
it,
when
kind
of
we
opened
Pandora's
box
right
and
we
turn
on
the
last
scale,
irreversible,
voter
incentives-
and
so
that's
something.
That's
like
the
pregame
Constitution
is
really
going
to
focus
on
right.
B
It's
like
the
the
really
the
kind
of
the
primary
like
mechanism
and
interaction
of
governance.
That'll
happen
over
the
next
quarters.
Right
is:
is
the
voter
committees
and
then
the
delegates
and
how
they
interact
with
it,
because
the
whole
point
is
to
make
it
so
that
the
delegates,
basically
you
know
they,
they
sort
of
follow
the
voter
communities
of
actual
and
careless
right.
So
if
you're,
a
professional
delegate,
that's
getting
paid
I
mean
and
we
want
to
and
then,
as
I've
always
talked
about
for
a
long
time
right.
B
B
Then,
when
it
comes
to
governance,
it's
really
voter
getting
voter
committees
going
and
getting
delegates
going
right.
That's
going
to
be
the
big,
the
big
Focus
right
that
we
need
to
have
in
place
before
we
can.
We
can
move
on
like
before.
It
even
makes
sense
to
sort
of
move
on
any
other
stuff
right,
foreign
and
then
basically
the
idea
is
that
Beyond
like.
B
B
That'll
have
to
be
able
to
self-regulate
over
time
and
yeah.
It's
a
it's
a
big
challenge,
basically,
and
so
then,
rather
than
kind
of
half
solve
it
up
front
and
then
try
to
fully
solve
it
later
or
something,
then
the
better
option
is
to
Simply
say:
look
we'll
wait
with
you
know,
we'll
just
basically
go
with
these.
Like
all
this
kind
of
random
interim
stuff.
B
B
Let
me
pause
for
a
second
here,
as
David
just
wrote,
and
she
wrote
in
the
shed
before
I
keep
going
because
I
guess
at
this
point.
I
could
just
keep
I
can
just
keep
going
for
another
hour,
but
maybe
before
I
do
that,
then,
let's
see
if
there's
any
questions
or
any
any
feedback
or
anything
that
just
wasn't
clear
I
mean
maybe
I
was
maybe
I
should
slow
down
a
little
bit
and
try
to
kind
of
yeah.
You
know
unpack
some
of
this
stuff.
D
B
Well,
I
mean
so
in
all
cases
we
should
cut
budgets
and
cut
stuff
right
and
we've
been
in
that
process
already
for
a
long
time.
Now,
right
and
that's
I
mean
I've
been
talking
about
that
for
I
mean
I.
Think
probably
it's
about
a
year
ago,
I
started
like
saying:
look
it's
time
to
cut
costs
and
something
so
I,
there's
I'm
almost
certain
that
there
are
still
all
sorts
of
like
budgets
and
and
resource
just
like
inefficiencies
that
we
should
see
if
we
can
fix.
B
B
C
B
You
know:
buy
maker
governance
with
funding
for
certain
ecosystem
actors
that
we
need
in
the
long
run
right
that
eventually
need
to
sort
of
survive
in
the
free
market
of
of
the
sub-dials
and
all
that.
But
until
that
point
until
that
moment
in
time
comes,
they
need
simply
sort
of
top-down
funding
in
the
classic
way.
Essentially,
but-
and
the
expectation
was
that
that
would
last
for
two
years
right,
so
we
sort
of
set.
B
B
Right
or
rather,
you
have
to
to
you,
know,
deliver
value
to
the
subdials
or
deliver
value
sort
of
win,
some
kind
of
open
bidding
process
defined
in
the
Scopes
and
so
all
in
all.
Actually
they
should
this
shouldn't
really
matter
for
the
the
changes
in
the
in
like
the
timeline
of
the
in-game
Constitution.
B
It
would
only
matter
if
we
end
up
delaying
the
final
Constitution
so
long
that
we
sort
of
surpassed
this
like
two-year
time
frame
right,
which
I
mean
I,
think
that
would
that
really
from
from
my
perspective
now,
that
would
be.
That
would
be
too
long
like
there'll,
be
no
reason
to
delay
it
for
that
long,
and
so
that's
when
it
would
be
like
late
fall
2024,
and
that
seems
like
unreasonably
far
out
to
me
at
this
point
in
time.
B
Of
course,
Maybe
it
turned
maybe
there's
something
that
just
turned
out
to
be
way
more
difficult
than
we
think
I
doubt.
That
would
be
the
case
now
like
for,
for
the
most
part,
actually,
the
kind
of
the
features
of
and
and
the
complexity
I
mean.
Luckily,
for
the
most
part,
it's
turned
out
to
be
like,
as
we
actually
look
at
implementing
it,
it
seems
it
seems
sort
of
simpler
than
you.
B
You
think
when
you,
when
you
kind
of
just
get
get
sort
of
faced
with
it
all
in
in
one
burst
right,
but
yeah,
but
basically
I
mean
beyond
that.
Then
they
should
not
matter
at
all
like
so.
Basically
the
teams
that
you
know
that
that
are
basically
that
use
something
like
an
SPF
now
I've
met
I
mean
I've
I've
wanted
to
to
propose
a
change
to
the
FPS
process.
B
I
haven't
managed
to
I,
don't
know
if
the
windows
actually
up
yet,
but
there's
like
I'm,
because
I've
been
sort
of
stuck
focusing
on
the
Constitution
I
haven't
been
able
to
get
to
the
more
practical
stuff,
with
the
with
something
like
changing
the
SPF
process
and
so
on
right,
but
once
that's
in
place,
I
mean
it
will
basically
be
you
know.
They'll
will
have
these
like
processes
that
will
be
accessible
to
basically
fun
teams
right
and
and
provide
that
kind
of.
B
B
And
then
there's
just
one
more
point
I
want
to
make,
and
so
that
is
that
one
of
the
big
kind
of
objectives
of
this,
like
latest
design
I've
done,
is
to
really
try
to
like
incorporate
all
available.
Knowledge
related
to,
like
I,
mean
compliance
and
also
like
legal
resilience
and
just
kind
of
minimizing.
B
All
these
I
mean
basically
all
the
kind
of
the
the
the
the
weird
kind
of
edge
case,
Black,
Swan,
Regulatory
and
legal
risks
that
could
apply
to
Makers
a
whole
or
to
maybe
like
individuals
that
are
basically
unlucky
and
and
are
caught
up
in
in
the
I
mean
just
like
the
big
like
in
sort
of
potentially
right
in
in
the
process
of
the
big
transition
into
the
end
game
or
the
launch
of
the
subtitles,
or
something
like
that
right.
So
so,
basically,
making
everything
just
much
more
like
better
design
in
that.
B
Rather,
you
want
to
make
sure
those
other
companies
and
people
and
and
kind
of
you
know
like
things
that
are
anchored
in
the
in
the
legal
World
they
want.
They
need
to
be
more
on
the
sidelines
and
that's
actually
like
a
better
decision
for
them
right,
and
so
the
consequence
of
that
is
that
a
lot
more
of
the
different
roles
and
the
different
kind
of
yeah.
It's
just
like
roles
and
responsibilities
that
that's
been
defined
so
far.
A
lot
of
that
will
be
redefined
as
ecosystem
actors
and.
C
B
Like
so
and
later
on,
I
mean
so
this
is
the
is
again
where,
instead
of
getting
the
details
of
that,
it
makes
it's
easier
to
just
kind
of
think
of
all
of
that
as
like
mandated
actors
from
now.
That
then
sort
of
you
know,
as
as
we
get
more
clarity
and
like
how
exactly
we
want
to
implement
this
again.
I
already
have.
B
This
I
already
have
like
a
very
clear
plan
for
this,
that
I'm
going
to
basically
write
out
and
going
to
actually
Implement
through
sort
of
a
draft
final
in-game
Constitution,
and
then
the
point
is
with
that.
Then
there
is.
This,
like
I,
mean
basically
a
a
superior
way
in
many
regards
to
how
we
kind
of
envisioning
things
so
far
in
terms
of
how
people
can
on
one
hand,
you
know,
be
deeply
involved
with
dials,
be
deeply
involved
in
communities.
B
But
you
know
as
much
as
possible
professional
participants
in
either
make
a
call
or
in
a
sub-dial
should,
in
the
end
as
much
as
possible,
remain
sort
of
community
members
right.
So
maybe
they're
like
getting
paid
grants
or
something
right
or
or
some
other
form
of
compensation
and
they're
participating
some
way.
B
But
you
want
to
try
to
sort
of
still
make
sure
that
they're
not
they're,
not
kind
of
like
they're,
not
agents
off
the
dial
right,
they're,
not
like
sitting
at
the
center
of
it
all
they're
as
much
as
possible,
more
out
to
the
side
right,
which
is
really
also
where
professionals
typically
like
to
be
right,
because
they
want
to
get
work
done.
They
want
to
do
things
and
build
stuff,
and
you
know
execute.
They
don't
want
to
worry
about
legal
risk
or
Dow
politics
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff
right.
B
So
I
yeah,
that's
a
very
long-winded
answer
to
this
whole
question
of
what
to
do
with
ecosystem
actors,
but
actually
the
big
takeaway
from
that
is
just
like.
This
means
that
it's
not
going
to
be
like
being
having
being
designated
an
ecosystem
actor,
isn't
going
to
be
some
kind
of
second-rate
citizen.
In
this
setup
right
pretty
much,
everybody
will
be
an
ecosystem
actor
like
anyone.
That's
like
a
professional
like
doing
a
job,
doing
some
kind
of
work.
B
You
know
scope
framework
draft
thing:
I
did
a
while
back
right
so
like
something
like
that,
but
for
the
Constitutional
rules
right,
the
problem
is
just
like
the
because
it's
the
Constitution.
It
deals
with
the
most
sensitive,
most
kind
of
dangerous
stuff,
really
right
that
that,
because
because
it
has,
it
regulates
the
the
fundamental
power
dynamics
of
of
like
delegates
versus
voter
committees,
for
instance
right
and
it
tries
to
basically
give
MPR
holders
tools
to
figure
out
what
to
do.
B
If
delegates
are
corrupt,
what
to
do
if
voter
committees
are
corrupt,
right
and
and
other
you
know,
actors
that
were
all
totally
at
one
point
or
another
be
corrupt
right,
and
so
it
just
means
that
it.
You
know
it
really
needs
to
like
it
could
it
could
really
create
a
huge
amount
of
confusion
to
have
something
like
that
that
just
isn't
that
has
some
kind
of
you
know
that
that
has
some
kind
of
obvious
flaw
in
it
right
and
then
it's
also
just
like
a
this
is
a
massive
challenge.
B
All
of
that
is
super
helpful
to
me
right,
but
I
think
in
the
end,
the
way
we'll
get
to
the
next
step
is
when
I
release
sort
of
my
thoughts
on
this.
Then
that's
gonna
get
like
the
real,
that's
gonna
crystallize,
so
much
like
opinion
and
input
and-
and
you
know,
people
that
will
be
able
to
take
the
kind
of
scaffolding
right
like
the
basics
of
skeletal
form,
of
how
I
think
this
is
possible
to
operationalize,
and
then
we
can
I
mean
then
we'll
get
sort
of
the
real
discussion
on.
B
What
do
you
think
is
the
ideal
in
Ideal
World?
What
is
done
by
the
end
of
q1,
so
I
mean
basically
three
things
right.
So
number
one
is
like
governance
housekeeping,
so
that's
I
actually
think,
like
fixing
the
you
know,
fixing
the
the
the
spec
the
SPF
MIP
to
figure
out,
like
the
you
know,
basically
enable
it
to
contain
MPR
Rewards
and
put
this
like
hard
two-year
limit,
after
which
it
sort
of
self-destructs
that
we
definitely
want
have
done
this.
B
This
quarter
right,
so
we
can
start
giving
people
some
job
security
with
that
thing,
and
then
I
think
this.
This
other
stuff,
like
there's
other,
like
deleting
certain
myths
that
are
that
are
causing
issues
right
now
and
there's
probably
like
a
whole
bunch
of
like
random
proposals
right
now
that
we
need
to
deal
with
right
where
I
think
for
the
most
part,
all
of
the
kind
of
random
stuff
we're
getting
in
I
mean
that's
a
big
flaw
with
the
mid
process
in
general
right
that
that,
like
most.
C
B
B
We
don't
really
know
what
applies
or
what
doesn't.
Then.
You
know,
there's
mips
that,
like
really
powerful
mips
that
I
keep
forgetting
even
exist
that
suddenly
pop
up
randomly
into
the
random
context
right,
and
so,
if
we
can
sort
of
clean
that
up,
then
we
can
really
replace
it
with
basically
the
Constitution
and
the
skill
Frameworks.
And
then
what
really
matters
for
q1
is
like
the
the
pre-game
Constitution
right.
B
So
there's
like
relatively
simple
Constitution
that
focuses
on
voter
committees
and
focuses
on
like
constitutional
voter
committees
that
are
that
have
like
special
support
and
sort
of
special,
a
special
role
under
the
Constitution
and
then
constitutional
delegates
that
have
like
special,
also
like
responsibility
and
get
compensated
under
the
Constitution
right.
That's
the
most
important
to
get
done
in
q1,
because
that
allows
us
to
then
move
into
Q2
and
begin
the
real
operational
kind
of
cycle
right
of
of
governance
in
in
game.
B
Where
everything
revolves
around
the
voter
committee
subcommittee
meetings
and
changing
this,
the
the
skill
Frameworks
and
then
we
could
even
have
some
of
the
scope
Frameworks
ready
for
that
right.
Even
though
we
don't
have
to
have,
don't
really
have
to
have
them
ready
and
and
maybe
we
have
none
of
them
ready-
or
maybe
we
just
have
a
few
of
them,
but
the
idea
is
right.
B
That's
how
we
want
to
get
into
this
rhythm
of,
like
operating
by
having
these
clearly
defined
Scopes
these
areas
that
we
we
focus
on
and
then,
when
we,
when
we
change
something
related
to,
let's
see
you
know
a
decentralized
collateral,
then
we
only
change
it
through
the
designers
collateral
scope.
We
don't
like
mess
around
with
random
mips
and
random
single
requests.
It's
random,
whatever
stuff
right,
that's
a
really
key
thing
to
to
prepare
for
be
able
to
do
in
Q2
and
then
I
think.
B
The
final
thing
is,
you
know
getting
the
actual
like
business
operations
and
kind
of
the
actual.
Like
you
know,
the
sort
of
the
putting
out
the
fires
as
it
relates
to
I
mean
I
was
talking
about
earlier
figuring
out.
If
there's
stuff,
we
can
do
to
further
improve
the
budgets
and
then
deploying
our
collateral
and
also
getting
rid
of
all
our
useless
collateral,
because
we
have
so
much
collateral
right
now.
That's
like
unprofitable
due
to
Oracle
fees
or
has
like
super
low
stability
fees.
B
When
you
compare
it
with
something
like
the
you
know,
coinbase
custody
or
some
of
the
other,
the
the
other.
You
know
like
yield,
generating
opportunities
on
the
table,
and
then
we
basically
need
to
deploy
the
collateral
right.
We
deploy
into
coinbase
custody.
We
need
to
deploy
into
paxils
and
mid
90
and
scale
up
make
65
I
made
90.,
and
really
this
I
mean
and
but
probably
not
too
much
more
than
that
I
think
right
and
then
maybe
like
deploy
like
either
die.
B
If
we
can
do
that
and
try
to
scale
that
up
or
something
but
generally
I
think
you
know,
we
should
focus
on
like
like
cash
flow
and
fundamentals,
you
know
get
the
budgets
down,
get
the
income
up,
get
sort
of
a
house
in
order
with
that
kind
of
stuff,
right
and
and
I
mean
stop
any
kind
of
experiments
or
prod.
You
know
stuff.
B
What's
the
deal
you
know,
will
you
sort
of
the
allow
list
approach
right
in
the
sense
of
saying
the
only
way
you
can
do,
governance
is
through
these
mechanisms
here.
So
as
a
result,
if
there's
something
we
forgot
about,
there's
some
random
crabby
dumb
project
somewhere,
where
a
bunch
of
resources
and
attention
and
money
is
being
wasted,
we
don't
have
to
like
be
aware
that
exists
and
identified
and
shut
it
down.
We
can
sort
of.
We
can
indirectly
shut
it
down
by
saying
you
can
only
do
you
know
by
some
datifying.
B
This
is
the
stuff
we
do
right
and
then
it'll
just
sort
of
what
What's
it
called
right,
it'll
as
a
consequence.
Okay,
like
just
kind
of
like
this,
you
know
the
chaotic
stuff.
That's
that
the
that's
happening
for
sort
of
Legacy
reasons.
Well,
then,
we
will
know
that
it's
cleaned
up
right,
which
can
otherwise
be
pretty
much
impossible
to
verify
the
wage
things
currently
run
unless
you're
like
map
out
literally
everything
that's
happening
everywhere,
which
I
don't
I'm,
not
sure,
that's
even
really
possible
to
do
today.
B
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
ended
up
happening,
though,
was
that
I
mean
there's
just
like
you
know,
there's
there's
a
lot
of
places
in
the
workforce
where
the
kind
of
the
the
the
collaboration
just
doesn't
isn't
so
great,
basically,
naturally,
because
of
the
kind
of
decentralized
you
know,
approach
and
the
silos
that
I've
developed
as
a
result
and
so
on
right.
So.
B
There
are
many
cases
where,
like
you,
can't
really
necessarily
repurpose
a
team
you
have
to
actually
just
like
rebuild
the
team
and
instead
the
key
is
to
then
basically
pick
who,
like
which
core
units
stay
and
which
coins
go
right,
but
I
think
like
as
we
go
further.
We
increasingly
are
getting
to
the
point
where
I
mean,
even
though
I
said
earlier,
I
think
that
there
probably
are
still
like
budgets
that
can
be
cut
and
so
on.
B
Right
then
I
think
that
I
mean
what
we're
sort
of
left
with
at
this
point
is
starting
to
be
kind
of
I
mean
it's
starting
to
be
obvious,
that
if
you,
if
you
touch
the
stuff,
that's
remaining
I
mean
very
quickly
you're
going
to
be
messing
with
some
critical
things.
You
don't
want
to
mess
with
unless
you're
really,
you
know
sure
about
what
exactly
you're
doing
right
and
so
like
I,
said
earlier.
B
B
They
make
like
a
proposal
to
like
hey.
We
want
to
do
this
project,
give
us
half
a
front,
give
us
the
other
half
after
and
then
the
voters.
Actually,
you
know
the
voters,
vote
to
First
pay
the
first
half
out
and
then
afterwards
vote
to
see.
Has
it
been
delivered
correctly
and
then
paid
out
and
that's
I
mean
that's
kind
of
in
the
very
very
generally
and
that's
sort
of
the
point
of
an
ecosystem
actor
right.
It's
like
ecosystem
actor
means
there's
no
permanent.
B
You
know
top-down
budget
that
just
keeps
sending
money
forever
right
for
sort
of
vague
full-time
responsibilities.
Rather
it's
like
very
specific,
very
clearly
sort
of
described
tasks
right.
Some
of
them
could
be
permanent
because
it's
like
you
know,
like
I,
don't
run
a
keeper
in
this
way
forever
until
we
say
stop
doing
it
or
something
right.
B
That
could
be
something
where
you,
then
you
could
pay
your
ecosystem
actors
on
an
ongoing
grant
for
that
right,
but
I
think
the
big
difference
is
you
want
really
want
to
avoid
something
where
you
kind
of
give
ecosystem
mattress
a
kind
of
agency
of
like
hey
you're
in
charge
of
you
know:
you're
the
head
of
marketing
right.
Here's,
the
money
figure
out
what
to
do
right,
I
mean
that's
both
a
problem
from
sort
of
a
like.
B
You
know,
management
perspective
in
a
sense
right,
and
we
have
no
way
of
then
actually
sort
of
assuring
like
ensuring
that
a
good
work
gets
done
with
that
approach.
But
it's
also
just
like
creating
you
know
bad
legal
risk
for
a
person
in
that
position
right
because
then
there's
this
attention
is
being
put
on
this.
B
B
B
So
that's
just
yeah
right.
We
can
make
them
free
and
more
robust
and
fully
decentralized
zero
Reliance
on
on
humans
right,
and
this
is
already
something
that
Chronicle
you
know,
the
the
Oracle
coordinate.
That's
also
transitioning
into
an
ecosystem
active
like
this
is
already
something
they're
working
on
right.
B
And
then
maker
on
L2
I
mean
the
idea
is
basically
that
I,
don't
I
have
no
idea
to
what
extent
this
is.
This
has
been
implemented
yet
right,
but
the
idea
is
that
there's
basically
like
like
a
portion
of
the
core
development
team,
is
just
like
fully
devoted
to
L2.
It
has
been
so
always
right,
I
mean
there's
people
like
Arctic
that
have
always
been
like
L2
focused,
so
hopefully
that
work
just
continues
as
it
always
has.
B
I'm
not
I.
Don't
have
the
details
of
like
what
the
what
the
progress
is
with
that,
but
I
mean
we
also
have
something
like
the
stagnet
coordinate
right,
which
also
is
just
like
purely
focused
on
deploying
Shadow
volt
engines
and
deploying
and
building
a
maker
teleport.
So
that
works
you
just
all
like
that.
Doesn't
really
have
any
kind
of
of
dependency
relationship
with
in-game
in
any
way
that
just
how
that
happens
in
parallel
and
then
eventually
it
gets
regulated.
B
B
We
want
to
go
on
right,
but
like
really
go
where
the
action
is
right
and
have
some
kind
of
scalable
model,
for
how
do
we
regulate
it
through
the
scope?
Frameworks
right
for
like
how
do
we,
you
know,
set
aside
resources
pick
the
best
Builder?
Is
that
you
like
pick
the
best?
You
know
ecosystem
actor
and
then
pay
them
the
resources
to
do
the
work
right
so
that
we
have
this
kind
of
atomic.
B
You
know
scalable
Incorruptible
permanent
process,
for
how
do
we
build
out
this
stuff
right
and
we
know
exactly
what
we
want
to
build.
We
know
how
to
we
know
how
to
keep
it
secure.
Of
course,
the
only
way
to
do
that
is
through
prototypes,
so
that
doesn't
mean
I
mean
the
work
should
get
like
the
work
on
arbitrum
optimism
and
stocknet,
which
is
kind
of
the
back
like
the
the
bread
and
butter
of
the
L2
strategy.
Of
course,
should
just
like
continue
on.
My
point
is
that
we
just
don't
want
to
rush
it.
B
B
And
then
David
Richard
says
about
basically
a
governance
cleaner
with
gold
clubs
being
the
first
case,
I
mean
that
so
that's
not
I
mean
I,
actually
haven't
I've
sort
of
stayed
away
from
the
my
golf
comes,
I
mean
I've,
looked
at
the
thread,
obviously,
but
I
think
yeah.
My
understanding
is,
there's
some
dispute
around
golden
parachute
or
whatever
and
I
guess.
I'll
I'll
see
I'll
figure
out.
B
What's
going
on
with
that,
if
it
completely
blows
up
I'm,
not
sure
if
it
has
already
completely
blown
up
or
not,
but
but
that's
not
what
I'm
talking
about
at
all,
though
I
mean
that
is
like
the
off-boarding
of
gov
comes
I
think
is
that
is
like
a
consolidation
of
budgets.
Right
I
mean
that's.
Basically,
it's
like
a
budget
related
thing.
B
I
mean
I'm,
hoping
that
any
future
budget
changes
will
be
less
like
the
Gulf
Coast
situation,
where
we
end
up
in
these,
like
I,
mean
I
think
so
far
right.
It's
just
all
not
really
I
mean
we've
had
the
right.
We've
had
Real
World
Finance,
which
was
his
own
sort
of
meltdown,
and
then
there
was
the
the
collateral,
the
Cs
and
and
now
God
comes
and
I.
B
Think
I
mean
probably
if
there
are
more
coordinates,
will
be
off-bone
or
more
budgets
that
we
cut
it'll,
be
it'll,
be
pain
as
well,
but
yeah
I'm
I
think
that
by
moving
a
little
bit
more
slowly
going
forward.
Now
that
we
are
we're
sort
of
in
a
better
spot
in
terms
of
the
budget
has
been
lowered
a
bit,
and
there
definitely
is
this.
Like
I,
mean
self,
like
this
incentive
right
across
the
workforce
to
to
to
rein
in
spending
and
then
at
the
same
time
we're
growing
our
income.
B
Then
I
think
we
we
hopefully
can
have
less
kind
of
colorful
situations
when
it
comes
to
budget
changes
right,
which
really
is
something
that
we
just
I
mean
it's
so
fundamental
to
be
able
to
do
that
right.
But
it's
really
one
of
the
most
just
impossible,
difficult
things
to
figure
out
how
to
deal
with
in
a
decentralized
context.
It's
just
like
I
mean
yeah,
I,
think
people
that
have
tried
like
firing,
people
in
the
past
or
downsizing
companies.
B
Something
will
really
be
able
to
kind
of
just
like
imagine
dealing
with
that
in
decentralized
contracts
and
like
the
level
of
like
you
know,
like
disputes
and
and
like
miscommunication,
that
will
occurs,
is
yeah
I
mean
we've
always
managed
to
to
underestimate
that
and
get
surprised
that
it
it.
You
know.
Even
if
we
had
low
expectations,
it
ended
up
getting
even
worse
than
we
thought.
B
Foreign
all
right
so
3F,
good
meta,
asks
with
regards
to
MPR
utility.
Realistically,
when
will
DVC
front
ends,
go
live,
I,
don't
understand
the
question.
Maybe
it's
really
something
like
the
toolkit
for
voter
committees,
but
I
I
have
no
idea
when
that's
I
mean
and
I
actually
don't
think
it's
that
important,
because
I
think
initially,
you
could
run
sort
of
voter
committee
governance
right
where,
like
voter
committees,
can
vote
internally
to
include
new
members
and
exclude
new
members
and
do
a
split
and
so
on.
B
Those
mechanics
can
be
I
mean
they'll,
be
just
like.
Basically,
the
pregame
Constitution
will
describe
those
mechanics
and
how
to
do
them
using
the
Forum,
basically
like
using
mips,
I
guess
we'll
actually
we'll
have
something
like
the
voter
committee.
Emulation
MIP
would
maybe
be
the
right
solution
for
that.
B
It
will
get
totally
spammed
I,
don't
know
if
that
would
happen
with
it,
but
but
I
mean
with
the
mid
framework
you
can
actually
make
like
you
can
use
mips
as
extremely
actually
like,
very
flexible
and
and
kind
of
you
know
like
like
programmable
constructs.
Actually
as
long
as
we
can
get
Peyton
and
Patrick
to
agree
to
to
dealing
with
it,
you
know.
B
You
know
unless
the
the
pro
like
sort
of
the
the
different
bits
and
pieces
during
the
pre-game
is
before
you
build
some
kind
of
automated
solution.
If
it's
something
Mission
critical
first,
you
got
to
build
the
manual
solution
because
you
never
know
if
the
automation
solution
will
be
ready
in
time,
it
will
even
work
if
it's
suddenly
gonna
break
right.
So
you
always
gotta
know
how
to
do
it
manually
if
it's
Mission
critical.
B
B
When
our
voter
committee
is
set
to
form
this
quarter
later,
yeah
so
I
mean
it'll,
so
so
I
mean
so.
First
of
all,
you
know
the
DVC
term
is
is
going
away
right,
it's
good
like
there's.
Basically,
there
I
think
I
call
them
permissionless
motor
committees
right,
it's
the
way
we
call
it
PVCs
or
maybe
just
voter
committees.
It's
like
the
right
I
mean
basically
just
like
delegates.
B
The
idea
is
that
a
voter
committee
is
something
that's
just
available
to
anyone
right,
and
so
anybody
and
the
sort
of
the
definition
of
a
voter
committee
is
simply
MPR
holders
that
publicly
discuss
their
interests
and
sort
of
you
know,
coordinating
their
votes
and
and
really.
Basically,
that
idea
is
a
response
to
kind
of
this
kind
of
weird,
almost
weird
taboo,
that
existed
in
the
past,
that
mkr
holders
sort
of
shouldn't
kind
of
talk
about
how
to
vote
I
shouldn't
so
align
on
how
to
vote.
B
I
mean
that's
really
important:
to
have
that
kind
of
coordination
and,
most
importantly,
having
APK
holders
provide
Clarity
to
everybody
like
the
entire
sort
of
Workforce
of
what
do
they
actually
want
right,
so
so
that
so
the
the
voter
committee
concept
is
simply
trying
to
sort
of
formalize
and
encourage
mkl
holders
to
team
up
and
so
publicly
coordinate,
right
and
safer
delegates
right.
It's
just
like
anybody
should
be
able
to
do
a
delegate.
It's
just
that's
just
a
smart
contract.
B
It's
it
needs
to
be
sort
of
easily
available
right
and
encouraged
for
anyone
to
make
a
delegate
if
they
feel
like
it
right.
The
catch
is
when
it
starts.
Having
kind
of,
like
actual
you
know,
major
sort
of
game
theoretic
impact
on
the
core
mechanisms
of
how
the
end
game
sort
of
equilibrium
is
maintained.
Right
so
and
then
the
designation
for
this
kind
of
stuff
is
constitutional
right.
It's
a
constitutional
voter
committees
and
constitutional
delegates.
B
So
that's
when
it
starts
to
be
like
default
stuff
like
showing
up
by
default
when
people
are
getting
voter
incentives
right
and
you
start
to
be
able
to
get-
you
know,
have
right
to
to
so
to
to
to
kind
of
governance.
Support
with,
like
you
know,
forums
and
infrastructure,
and
and
sort
of
the
tools
for
for
constitutional
voter
committees
and
then
significant
compensation
for
constitutional
delegates.
B
But
then
it
also
gets
very
strictly
regulated
through
the
Constitution
right,
because
the
problem
is
basically
without
extremely
strict
regulation
of
something
and
this
it
immediately
sort
of
spins
out
of
control
but
instantly
you'll.
Have
you
know
delegates
taking
control
of
the
you
know,
delegates
taking
control
of
the
voting
front
end
and
redirecting
all
voter
incentives
to
whoever
delegates
to
them?
And
then
you
know
it
becomes
just
like
a
power
spiral,
Power,
Cascade
or
whatever.
You
want
to
call
it
anyway.
B
So
that's
so
the
this
I
mean
so
the
concept
of
like
the
like
the
actual
stuff,
we're
sort
of
going
live
with.
That's
going
to
really
matter
is
like
the
Constitutional
voter
committees
and
constitutional
delegates
right,
and
the
idea
is
that
that
goes
live
Q2
and
we
start
operating
with
sort
of
a
very
sort
of
a
light
version
of
that
in
Q2.
B
B
I
mean
that's
going
to
be
one
of
the
things
of
the
Constitution
right.
It
needs
like
a
very
clear
sort
of
dictionary
for
all
this
stuff.
Right
especially
I
mean
right
now
the
terms
are
changing
as
well
right
because
now
I'm
trying
to
get
rid
of
like
the
the
sort
of
the
Mimi
language
of
stuff
right
so
and
replacing
everything
with
with
acronyms
instead.
But
then
that's
all
gonna
be
like
that's.
B
B
B
Some
kind
of
like
more
like
like
when
you
think
about
like
the
some
like
historical
Constitution
or
founding
document
of
like
a
nation,
or
something
like
that
right,
so
so,
some
kind
of
more
like
subjective,
maybe
description
of
of
the
goals
of
end
game
and
the
goals
of
like
sort
of
theory
of
Taos
and
the
key
kind
of
you
know
like
Solutions.
We
believe
in
that's
gonna,
allow
us
to
survive
right
and
the
central
element
of
the
in-game
Constitution
is
resilient,
scalability
right.
So
it's
a
way.
B
It's
a
fundamentally
like
a
set
of
rules
that
allow
the
Dow
to
keep
scaling
and
growing
and
growing
growing,
but
not
like
implode,
as
that
happens,
which
is
sort
of
what
we
I
mean.
That's
exactly
what
we
kind
of
saw
right,
that
everything
was
going
right
and
things
were
growing
and
then
suddenly
they
stopped
growing
and
sort
of
suddenly
it
kind
of
it
wasn't
able
to
like
think
the
mechanistatic.
The
mechanics
started
to
break
down
as
we
as
we
scale
right
and
then
that's
really
fundamentally.
What
sort
of
the
like
this!
B
B
And
then
the
second
part
of
the
conservation,
I
guess
the
second
component
and
maybe
I,
don't
know.
Maybe
this
would
be
some
reason
to
have
more
components,
but
it
probably
is
enough
to
just
have
to
have
these
two
components
right.
The
second
component
is
then
like
the
kind
of
details
of
the
Constitution
or
like
the
articles
of
the
Constitution.
B
How
is
the
enforcement
and
oversight
done
in
endgame
I
mean
so
that's
basically
like
that's
so
I
mean
in
the
I
mean
it's
a
fundament.
So,
first
of
all,
that's
that
is
the
you
know.
The
the
focus
or
like
the
objective
of
the
in-game
Constitution
is
exactly
that
right
and
that's
exactly
like
the
entire
challenge
of
like
how
the
hell
do
you
do
that
in
a
in
a
Dao
and
so
in
the
sort
of
the
pregame
Constitution
right.
B
Well,
it's
a
very
I
mean
so
in
that
context,
basically,
both
sides
do
oversighted
enforcement
right,
because
the
voter
committees
have
some
Powers
against
the
Constitutional
delegates.
Basically,
and
then
the
Constitutional
delegates
have
some
some
like
Powers
as
well
against
the
building
committees
and
it's
a
it's
a
kind
of
almost
like
a.
B
Maybe
you
could
describe
a
little
bit
like
a
prisoner's
dilemma,
possibly
offline.
You
need.
You
basically
need
a
lot
of.
You
know
you
need
a
few
good
actors
to
to
basically
make
it
very
difficult
for
Bad
actors
to
coordinate,
or
at
least
for
them,
for
the
Bad
actors
to
like
coordinate
without
being
discovered
by
Hollis.
Broadly.
B
Yeah
so
I
mean
it's
all
about
checking
messages,
but
but
of
course,
so
the
thing
is
like
what
I
just
described
now,
it's
just
like
it's
not
even
close
to
being
enough.
I
mean
that's
not
going
to
be,
if
you
just
have
voter
committees
and
delegates
and
you
pay
them
a
bunch
of
money
and
you
give
them
a
bunch
of
resources
and
then
you
give
them
some
like
basic
tools,
that's
not
going
to
like
last
for
like
100
years
or
a
thousand
years
or
whatever
so
like.
B
Basically,
there's
it's
not
covering
enough
edge
cases,
and
it
doesn't
have
enough
checks
and
balances,
basically,
so
the
full
end
game
Constitution.
Has
this
like
much
greater
focus
on
like
real
sort
of
resistance
against
even
the
most
severe
edge
cases
and
the
sort
of
the
key
to
all
of
that
is
the
I
mean
oh
yeah
I
mean
the
central
kind
of
mechanism
for
all.
That
is
what
used
to
be
called
a
governor
Dao,
which
I'm
renaming
to
facilitate
a
doubt.
B
So,
like
the
phrase,
facilitator
is
going
to
have
like
a
different
meme,
but
it's
just
I
think
in
the
end,
it's
like
it
has
a
it's
sort
of
in
in
the
context
of
like
the
other.
The
names
for
the
other
sub-dials
facilitator
is
like
a
really
good
good
word
to
use
in
this.
In
this
context,
basically-
and
then
so,
you
have
these
like
entire
sub-dials.
B
So
you
have
actual
sort
of
a
type
of
sort
of
decentralized
actor,
and
that
can
you
know
that
that
is
able
and
sort
of
trained
and
and
in
the
kind
of
100
how
to
say
that
like
has
sort
of
the
the
the
muscle
memory
of
operating
the
processes
and
that
is
then
held
accountable
through
sort
of
direct
penalties
to
its
collateral.
If
some
processes
are,
you
know,
undone
incorrectly,
based
on
this
as
much
as
possible,
highly
specified
and
detailed
descriptions
of
the
Constitution
and
the
scope
Frameworks.
B
Well
again,
like
I
said
that
gets
very
Advanced
and
complicated,
because
you
get
into
things
like
you're,
very
free
to
get
into
the
question
of
compensation.
I
mean
already
there's
the
challenge
of
compensation
with
delegates
not
have
time
for
that
now,
but
but
we
have
to
already
come
up
with
some
kind
of
long-term
solution
for
failure,
compensation
which
I
will
describe
soon.
B
What
I
think
is,
like
the
I,
mean
the
least
bad
option
for
that,
because
I
mean
in
all
cases,
it's
just.
You
know
how
to
how
to
pay
people
that
vote
and
vote
for
their
own
pay
is
kind
of
the
problem
right,
but
I
think
there's
some
like
decent
tools
that
hopefully
like
actually
provide,
can
provide
us
with,
with
a
like
an
actual
like
resilient
approach
for
this
I
could
I
could
last
permanently.
B
Like
I
said,
I'll
be
following
around
with
like
various
bits
and
pieces
and
then
yeah
like
I,
mean
more
than
anything
else.
I'm
hoping
I
can
get
this
like
this
simple,
like
the
draft
of
like
the
the
pre-game
Constitution
as
quick
as
possible
right,
that's
really
gonna
change
everything
once
we
get
that
down
and
we
can
start
to
discuss
that.
Then,
of
course,
the
scope,
Frameworks
and
I
think
with
like
these
I
mean
now
that
I've
had
this.
We
had
this
conversation
now
or
whatever.
B
We
call
it
one-sided
conversation,
I've
sort
of
I've
kind
of
you
know,
prepared
the
mentally
prepared
people
for
then,
like
you
know,
the
changes
sort
of
the
assumptions
that
are
necessary
to
to
have
in
place
for
me
to
be
able
to
release
the
the
Pre-K
Constitution
so
now,
I
I
think
it
should
there's
not
really
any
bloggers
left
for
that.
It's
just
going
to
be
a
matter
of
actually
like
wordsmithing
and
getting
it
to
a
nice
enough
state.
So
hopefully
I'll
be
able
to
to
do
that
reasonably
fast
laughs.