►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment meeting 2-15-18
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Board
of
Adjustment
says
a
nine-member
board
and
we're
appointed
by
the
City
Council,
and
we
serve
on
a
voluntary
basis
without
any
compensation.
Our
procedure
for
conducting
businesses
I
will
call
the
petitioners
name
that
would
please
come.
The
podium
speak
clearly
into
the
mic,
so
our
recording
secretary
can
take
notes.
Anyone
that
wishes
to
have
any
questions
or
in
opposition
to
a
particular
item
will
be
given
the
opportunity
to
come
forward
and
voice
your
concerns
and
ask
for
any
questions
from
the
petitioner.
B
Once
we
received
public
testimony
on
that
particular
item,
the
members
of
the
board
will
deliberate
and
we
will
render
a
decision
tonight
I'll
remind
members
with
a
personal
or
a
financial
interest.
In
any
particular
item
you
required
to
recuse
yourself
from
voting
any
testimony
that
is
submitted
by
the
petitioner
or,
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner
during
the
presentation
of
the
agenda
item
will
be
binding
as
the
indecision
mic
Board
makes
relative
to
that
motion
I'll
remind
the
members
of
the
board.
B
If
a
motion
to
deny
on
a
particular
item
has
made
a
reason
must
be
given
this
time.
I'll
introduce
the
members
who
are
here
tonight.
Mr.
Steve
Hughes
mr.
Jennifer
Shaw
mr.
Mark
Prince
mr.
piket
Rhys
mr.
George
Howell
jr.
and
I'm
John
Stanley,
your
chairman.
We
have
six
here
tonight.
It
requires
five
votes
to
approve
a
motion.
B
B
B
C
A
B
Thank
you
any
other
questions
before
we
get
started.
First
item
is
presented
by
Michael
Kelly,
requesting
a
side
yard,
variance,
a
separation
between
structures,
variance
and
a
coverage,
variance
for
three
existing
accessory
structures
located
at
40,
24,
fawns,
Dale
Drive
and
an
R
75
s
for
zoning
district.
Mr.
Kelly,
we
delayed
this
one
from
our
last
meeting
and
mr.
Kelly
I
believe
we
requested
that
you
and
your
neighbors
get
together.
Yes,
sir,
we
did
and
talked
about
it
see
how
y'all
could
resolve
your
differences
if.
A
A
B
B
That
was
there
when
the
house
was
bought,
okay
and
so
that
that
building
640
square
feet
so
you've
got
a
you've
got
a
coverage
issue
here.
You've
got
more
buildings
than
the
zoning
allows.
Okay
and
then
you've
got
a
separation
issue
and
then
you've
got
another
building.
That's
within
three
feet:
four
inches
of
the
property
line.
Right,
yes,
okay!
So
if
you
would
just
tell
us
the
board
how
what
ya'll
agreed
to
do
and
then
we'll
decide
if
that's
acceptable
or
not
contacted.
A
B
B
B
A
Met
several
times
with
the
Kelly's
to
discuss
the
issue
they
put
forth
several
options
for
us
to
choose
from.
We
discussed
privacy,
fencing,
we
discuss
the
landscaping
and
we
came
to
the
conclusion
that
landscaping
would
be
the
best
way
to
go.
We're
just
trying
to
finalize
what
we
want
to
put
in
that
would
work
best
for
us
and
in
the
space
involved.
But,
yes,
we've
come
to
a
compromise
with
it
that
we're
both
happy
with.
B
B
A
A
C
B
Presented
have
a
motion
to
approve,
for
mr.
reason,
I
have
a
second
from
my
shop,
any
further
questions
or
discussion
all
in
favor
of
the
motion
to
grant
these
variances
based
upon
the
testimony
of
the
petitioner.
What
you
are
willing
to
do
right,
yes,
Polly!
You
got
all
that.
Okay,
because
that's
important
okay
and
you
are
on
record
of
having
agreed
to
do
what
you
said.
You
would
yes,
okay,
and
if
you
don't,
then
your
neighbor
can
come
back,
I
resent
it
to
us,
and
then
we
can
deal
with
it
and
I.
A
B
C
C
B
B
Item
number
three
is
presented
by
Don
Dee
Williams,
hey
Donny,
representing
North
Star
development,
USA
/mh,
a
request,
an
exception
to
smart
code
for
pneumonia
monument
sign
to
be
located
on
the
east
side
of
North
Union
Street,
approximately
410
feet
north
of
Columbus
tree
and
at4
are
smart
code.
Zoning
district
thank.
A
John,
this
is
a
little
bit
of
a
deja
vu
request.
We
came
to
you
on
phase
one
with
a
similar
petition
and
it's
because
of
the
smart
code,
there's
no
allowances
in
the
smart
code
for
a
monument
sign
to
designate
the
property.
So
what
we're
proposing
here
is
another
monument
sign
that
was
of
the
same
size
and
scale
as
the
board
approved
for
the
first
phase
for
the
second
phase
and
as
was
stated,
it
will
be
off
of
the
interest.
That's
that
comes
off
the
extended
extended
north
Union
Drive.
This
that's.
B
A
B
My
question,
let
me
make
sure
you
don't
know,
was
there's
a
six
and
a
half
six
feet,
five
inches
from
the
ground,
or
is
it
sitting
on
a
one
foot
base?
And
then
it's
six-and-a-half
feet
above
that
base
just
from
the
ground
it'll
be
about
six
feet
tall,
okay
from
the
ground?
Yes,
is
it
lit?
It
will
be
lit
back
letter,
grandma,
ground
ground
left
both
sides.
Yes,.
C
B
A
A
B
A
A
B
A
Purpose
of
acquiring
this
property
is
to
actually
expand
our
current
facility
to
include
additional
athletic
fields
possible.
Classroom
expansion,
as
well
as
the
possible
Chappell
Chappell
you'll
notice,
from
the
diagram
that
this
property
is
directly
across
from
our
current
campus
and
therefore
is,
will
be
easily
accessible
for
our
families
and
for
kiddos.
B
A
B
B
B
A
B
There
are
some
issues
that
concern
me
personally
that
I'm
very
familiar
with
the
property
you
got
you're
asking
for
two
curb
cuts:
you've
got
right
now:
there's
no
D
cell
and
acceleration
lanes
for
that
property,
and
your
curb
cut
on
the
west
end
of
that
property
does
not
line
up
with
your
traffic
light
that
comes
in
and
out
of
your
existing
campus.
So
we're
not
gonna
deal
with
that
right,
but
I'm
bringing
that
to
your
attention
because
traffic,
the
engineers
gonna,
have
to
deal
with
it
right.
B
A
A
A
B
A
B
A
B
B
A
B
A
B
B
B
A
B
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
To
what
no?
No,
no,
it's
the
use
of
a
house,
that's
what
Miss
Brown
was
concerned
about.
If
we
I
mean
I'm
just
trying
to
clear
that
at
this
point.
Okay,
any
other
questions
board
members
I've
tried
to
bring
out
some
of
these
points,
but
the
main
thing
is:
petitioners
got
to
get
an
approval.
Traffic
engineering
about
access
in
and
out
of
this
property
I
have.
A
B
B
A
I'm
saying
in
the
future
would
constitute
it
being
a
prior
considered
private
school.
Okay.
Now
my
next
question
is
miss
over
me.
You
said
that
you
have
talked
to
the
tiller
of
residents
in
this
area,
the
ones
that
live
in
the
homes
over
to
the
left
of
the
picture
that
we're
looking
at,
but
you
have
not
spoken
with
the
people
who
live
in
the
townhouses
to
the
right.
Why
is
that
sheer
numbers?
A
Recreational
fields
on
this
property
and
they're
right
behind
the
homes
of
these
people.
You
don't
consider
that
to
be
important
to
speak
with
them
to
find
out
what
their
feelings
are
about.
It
I
don't
know
the
most
of
the
owners
of
those
homes,
so
it
would
involve
going
to
meet
them
as
certainly
to
do
that.
I'm
not
unwilling
to
do
that,
but
also
the
current
property
as
it
is,
is
fields
and
as
practice
fields.
A
A
B
Mr.
Behrman
I
think
there's
some
I'm
detecting
some
issues
here
with
the
boy.
Okay,
as
it
relates
not
only
the
concern
from
this
brown
head
and
them
is
Shaw
and,
of
course
it's
it's
common
for
us
to
have
a
petitioner
have
bet
with
adjacent
property,
or
at
least
attempt
to
do
so
before
you
come
here.
Okay,
there's
a
lot
of
courtesy,
even
though
I
know,
there's
signs
close
to
them.
The
property
belonged
on
tree.
B
The
signs
will
pay
attention
to
them
and
a
lot
of
times,
even
if
they
get
notices
in
the
mail,
they
may
not
pay
attention
to
it.
Okay,
so
with
that
I'm
gonna
ask
a
motion
to
be
made
to
delay
this,
for
you
to
come
back
and
resubmit
it
and
and
making
sure
that
we,
the
the
issues
of
the
house
or
dealt
with
at
a
later
date.
B
We've
we've
got
a
very
comparable
and
I
won't
get
into
the
details.
We've
got
another
private
school
has
something
very
comparable
to
this
before
and
so
I'm.
Not
we're
not
asking
you
to
do
anything
that
we
haven't
done
before.
Okay
and
I
think
you'll
find
that
the
neighborhood
will
be
am
a
lot
more
receptive
after
you've
at
least
attempted
to
talk
with
okay.
So
if
I
can
get
a
motion
to
that
effect,
will
rely
ask
for
delay
the
next
next
meeting.
B
C
B
B
B
B
Item
number
500
Xenia
by
Goethe
mills
and
Cawood,
representing
Montgomery
Chamber
of
Commerce
Foundation,
requesting
an
exception
to
smart
code
for
the
lot
width
for
to
propose
Lots
to
be
located
at
the
northwest
intersection,
South
4th,
Street
and
West
South
Street,
and
an
r/t
for
our
smart
code.
Zoning
district,
hello,
Patrick.
Mr.
A
Chairman
Cedric
Campbell
would
go
with
Mills
and
K
wood
here
representing
Montgomery
area
Chamber
of
Commerce,
the
Chamber
of
Commerce
owns
all
the
property
bound
by
Wilson
Street,
Court,
Street,
South,
Street
and
SEF
Street
several
years
back,
the
city
rezone
this
parcel
t4r.
When
smart
cork
oak
came
about
small
code,
smart
code,
one
of
the
things
about
it
is
is
for
smaller
Lots.
This
is
one
big
parcel.
A
B
B
A
motion
to
approve
to
have
a
sucker
second
sorry,
mr.
Reese
any
further
discussion.
All
in
favor
raise
your
hand
she
anonymous
they
Thank
You
Cedric.
It
was
unanimous
Paul
item
six
presented
by
Nick
Milner,
representing
Jonathan
waters,
requesting
a
rear
yard
vent
for
an
addition
to
a
dwelling
located
at
76
12
our
leaf
road,
and
there
are
100
zoning
districts
which.
A
A
B
B
A
B
B
B
A
A
A
A
A
B
C
Name
is
Todd
Williams,
Todd
Williams,
yes,
sir
and
I
reside
in
1905,
Windflower
Court,
which
is
a
lot
the
big
lot
that
you
were
talking
about
directly
behind
his
I,
also
I'm
here
representing
the
other
two
neighbors,
which
is
1930
Brooks
stoned,
which
is
the
lot
to
the
Westside
with
the
pool
and
the
other
neighbor,
which
is.
Here's
also
is
1950
1915
I'm,
1905
he's
1915
Windflower
and
he's
the
one
with
the
other
pool
that
you
see
that
bottom
corner.
C
There's
really
two
issues
that
we're
concerned
about,
because
we've
been
fighting
this
for
years.
As
you
know,
that's
Prairie
soul
and
it
doesn't
perk.
The
water
is
number
one
with
him.
If
he's
and
the
good
news
that
we
we
like
is
the
store
shed,
is
coming
out
because,
right
now
the
store
shed
is
really
in
pending
as
a
eyesore
on
mr.
Hicks.
Is
it
at
9:15?
So
if
he's
taken
out
that
out,
that's
the
good
part,
the
thing
the
most
thing
that
I
think
we're
concerned
about
there's
two
issues.
C
The
first
thing
is:
is
the
water,
if
he's
gonna,
add
two
more
car
garage?
That's
going
to
bring
the
pitch
of
that
roof
toward
the
1915
or
1930
Brookstone,
which
is
the
pool
to
the
west
side
of
his
property.
So
that's
going
to
bring
it
closer
to
that
fence
line.
Now
they,
the
problem
that
we're
having
now
is:
we've
got
water
from
the
pool
on
the
west
side,
the
water
comes
off
his
property
and
runs
down
to
the
two
adjoining
properties
on
the
south
side,
mr.
childs
that
were
fighting
now.
So
what
we?
C
What
we
don't
want,
is
additional
water
coming
off
his
route
line
onto
the
1930
Brookstone,
and
that
because,
therefore,
that
water
will
run
down
to
mr.
Hicks's,
which
is
the
other
pool
at
1915
and
me
and
mr.
Higgs.
Our
water
is
joined
together
at
our
fence
line,
which
I'm
1905
and
right
now,
as
soon
as
it
dries
out,
we
already
have
plans
on
putting
in
a
four
inch
4
inch
stream
system
to
relieve
the
problem
that
we
got
now.
C
Redirect
that
water
to
the
front
of
his
property
and
steady
to
the
back,
because
we're
already
fighting
water
now
I'm
a
contractor
and
I'm
going
to
work
with
my
other
two
neighbors
and
we're
all
going
to
join
our
Frank
strands
together
to
join,
to
run
to
the
front
side
of
our
property
only
for
court.
So
we
just
don't
need
any
more
water
and
that's
what
we
want
to
be
sure.
I
mean
we
don't
want
to
be
I
mean
we're
not
disputing
his
garage
or
anything.
We
just.
C
B
We
understand
clearly
we
deal
with
this
every
month
and
that
one,
and
so
whenever
anybody
wants
to
go
beyond
the
limits
of
the
setback,
that's
one
of
the
first
things
we
ask
okay,
so
mr.
Charles
you've
got
a
suggestion,
or
do
we
delay
it
to
you?
You
guys
work
it
out
because
willing
to
prove
it
or
denied
we're,
not
gonna
solve
it.
Okay,
so
I
would
suggest
you
and
your
neighbors
work
out
a
plan
and
come
back
next
time
with
your
solution.
Yeah.
B
A
C
Privacy,
because
in
the
summertime
at
1930
Brookstone,
which
is
the
property
with
a
pool
to
the
west
side,
they
they
have
football
parties
a
lot
and
they
always
have
their
children
and
their
family
over
at
the
pool.
So
right
now
we
only
have
it's
either
a
six
foot
or
eight
foot
tall
privacy
fence
around
the
property,
so
they're
concerned
losses.
They
don't
want
a
basketball
game
going
on
well
we're.
B
Not
dealing
with
privacy
issues,
okay,
okay,
yeah!
You
don't
want
to
go
there,
we're
dealing
with
Saturday,
okay,
okay,
we're
trying
to
have
you
and
him
get
what
you
both
are
here
for
yeah,
okay,
fair
enough
and
so
y'all
are
apart
right.
So
we
can
either
prove
it
or
deny
you
guys
and
choose
to
try
to
work
again.