►
Description
Executive Director of Early Childhood at Boston Public Schools, Dr. Jason Sachs, covers the program’s strategic plan and notes how the program has helped create parity in the early learning space.
Explore the full playlist:
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrLes3ojwahls8aD_l5FT_kdyNDMb32mS
Visit NCSL.org for more information on this series:
https://bit.ly/2W9Vo1p
A
Okay,
so
what
I
did
today
was
basically
I
gave
you
our
whole
strategic
plan,
which
has
a
ton
of
information
about
the
boston,
public
schools
and
all
of
our
strategies
and
there's
no
way
I
can
take
16
years
and
sum
it
up
for
you
in
eight
minutes,
which
I
believe
was
my
task.
A
So
what
I'm
going
to
do
basically,
is
you
now
have
the
strategic
plan
and
I'm
going
to
spend
maybe
five
minutes
telling
you
what
I
think
are
the
most
important
things
that
we
should
pay
attention
to
for
based
on
part
of
what
I've
heard
today,
as
people
were
talking,
I
was
retyping
and
then
then
just
share
with
you,
some
data
for
you
to
ponder
and
then
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions,
but
you
have
our
whole
strategic
plan.
A
But
let
me
give
you
a
little
context
so
about
15
years
ago
the
mayor
of
boston
said
we
want
to
do
universal
preschool.
My
first
question
was:
do
you
want
to
do
it
in
community-based
programs?
You
want
to
do
the
public
schools.
He
said
we
can't
do
it
in
community-based
programs.
They
don't
get
paid
enough
for
it.
A
There's
not
enough
resources,
I
want
to
do
at
the
public
schools
so
okay,
so
we
opened
up
about
2
800,
not
classrooms
spaces
and
about
150
classrooms
in
the
boston
public
schools
for
four-year-olds,
and
then
we
always
knew
that
we
wanted
to
do
community-based
programs
as
well,
and
so
we
did
a
pilot,
and
then
we
got
some
some
private
funding
to
do
it,
and
then
we
got
the
preschool
in
enhancement
the
ped
grant
preschool
enrichment
grant.
A
I
don't
remember
what
it's
called
anymore
and
then,
when
that
those
federal
dollars
went
away,
then
there
the
new
mayor,
basically
kicked
him
money,
and
so
we
now
have
about
a
quarter
of
our
preschool
slots
are
in
community-based
programs
and
the
rest
are
in
the
public.
A
Schools
so
know
that
this
is
really
a
city
initiative
that
is
mostly
funded
by
the
city
that
the
dollars
are
funded
in
the
public
schools
and
what
we
do
is,
as
we
expand
the
community-based
program
which
we
are
sort
of
calling
upk,
but
it
just
means
in
community
base
and
the
public
school
system
is
driving
this
and
the
dollars
are
mostly
city
dollars.
Okay,
so
here
are
the
points
that
I
think
you
all
should
take
away.
A
Based
on
what
I
heard
today,
you
can't
pay
people
less
than
target,
it's
it's
a
really
hard
job
and
you
should
pay
public
school
wages.
So
our
starting
teachers
in
the
community-based
programs
earn
the
same
salary
as
the
boston
public
school
teacher.
They
do
not
they're
not
in
the
union
scale,
so
it
stops
there.
We
do
allow
for
increase,
but
we
require
that
they
have
a
bachelor's
degree
in
the
community
based
program
and
that
they
get
the
same
starting
salary.
A
That
of
course
meant
that
the
director
was
getting
paid
less
than
the
teachers,
so
we
allowed
for
money
for
directors
and
assistant
teachers.
In
fact,
we
encouraged
it
and
there's
says
it's:
it's
a
direct
requirement
and
we
track
that
their
salaries
are
included
and
then
has
lifted
salaries
of
other
staff.
So
just
so
you
know
that
that's
a
requirement.
A
It's
funny.
One
of
the
presenters
earlier
was
saying:
well,
you
need
competencies
and
she
walked
out
one
competency,
one
two
and
three.
I
think
you
need
certification.
I
think
it
needs
to
be
comparable
to
the
public
schools.
A
I
think,
frankly,
we
just
need
a
teaching
and
educational
certification
system
and
it's
probably
sadly
going
to
be
state
bound,
though
that
would
be
nice
if
there
was
a
national
one
again,
because
you
need
that
in
order
to
get
paid
and
since
we're
talking
about
paying
people,
we
just
need
to
help
people
get
there,
but
we
need
definitely
to
pay
them.
You
need
michelle
and
others
have
talked
about
professional
learning
systems,
so
we
have
coaches,
our
coaches
are
long-term
teachers
or
directors
of
programs,
and
they
support
robust
professional
learning.
A
It's
not
just
one
and
done.
We
do
three
to
five
days
in
the
beginning,
but
then
we
do
monthly
or
bi-weekly
coaching,
depending
on
where
the
program
is.
We
build
a
lot
of
professional
learning
communities
and
we
support
principals
that
are
interested
and
directors
and
so
really
kind
of
building
that
ongoing
professional
learning.
And
none
of
that
we
now
focus
on
our
curriculum,
and
so
we
have
a
course
on
our
curriculum
that
you
can
get.
A
You
can
get
course
credit
for
or
not
and
again,
of
course,
there's
issues
around
writing
and
access
and
success
in
the
course
so
thinking
through
all
of
those
things,
and
just
to
give
you
a
sense,
even
when
you
have
a
bachelor
degree
teacher
and
you
give
them
credit
and
you
pay
for
it
only
about
half
of
them,
make
it
through
the
course
and
so
we're
working
on
why
that
is
and
what
we
can
do
to
change.
A
That
course,
and
all
of
this
stuff
sounds
good,
but
when
you
start
doing
in
a
practice,
you're
only
going
to
be
roughly
50
successful
in
the
beginning.
Obviously
there
are
people
who
have
done
it
better
than
this,
but
just
giving
you
a
sense
of
scale.
The
other
thing
is
in
community-based
programs.
So
if
you
take
the
exchange
shift
into
public
schools,
we
actually
have
something
called
common
planning
time
in
which
kids
go
to
a
science,
specialist
or
they'll
go
outside
and
do
physical
activity
or
they'll
do
they'll.
A
Do
some
pe
or
something
so,
teachers
actually
have
a
common
planning
time
that
they
get
on
a
regular
basis
in
community-based
programs.
You
have
map
time
and
that's
about
it,
so
developing
structures
to
really
think
about
how
teachers
work
together,
how
they
plan,
how
they
look
at
student
work,
how
they
do
differentiation.
That's
a
structural
thing
that
does
not
exist
in
community-based
programs,
but
exists
in
the
public
schools.
So
again,
not
only
do
you
have
you
have
to
have
coaching
and
sports,
you
have
to
have
time
for
planning.
A
You
should
have
a
standard
alliance,
strong
curriculum,
that's
anti-racist,
equitable
and
standard.
Well,
I
said
standards
already,
but
you
know
we
we
have.
We
have
shifted,
you
know
when
we
first
started.
We
were
like
early
childhood
principles
reggio
you
know,
really
strong
observation
and
documentation.
A
A
So
we're
really
trying
to
combine
a
curriculum
that
really
teaches
kids,
how
to
read
and
write
and
communicate,
but
also
gets
them
to
ask
all
the
big,
important
questions
and
does
so
in
a
loving
joyous
way,
and
so
in
some
of
my
slides
later
on,
you
can
go
down
on
your
own,
but
you'll
see
kind
of
the
pieces
of
our
curriculum,
all
right.
So
other
things
you
need
to
have
whoops,
I'm
gonna
go
back,
so
I
was
just
trying
to
move
my
little
bars
in
the
way.
A
So
I'm
just
trying
to
move
the
bar.
Without.
Can
I
get
it
okay?
So
the
other
thing
is:
you
need
to
have
some
other
structures
and
community-based
programs
that
make
it
work.
So
you
need
comprehensive
services.
Beverly
just
talked
about
sort
of
the
relationship
building
and
the
and
the
traumatic
experiences
and
brain
development,
and
so
you
really
need
to
have
comprehensive
services.
Special
ed
services,
family
engagement
strategies,
community
building
strategies,
supports
for
directors.
A
The
other
thing
is
community
based
programs.
Don't
have
consistent
budgets
budgets
like
the
public
schools,
so
you
know
really
trying
to
build
stability
in
the
program
and
and
some
of
those
things
will
reduce
a
lot
of
the
turnover
that
daphne
is
talking
about,
because
even
when
you
pay
people,
there's
still
a
lot
of
budget
instability
in
community-based
programs,
and
so
that's
a
piece
of
what
you
have
to
think
through
the
other
thing
is
we
require
nauic
accreditation
for
programs.
A
We
do
have
a
qris
program
but
nayc
with
the
way
we've
done
it
with
coaching.
The
three-year
supports
really
helps
to
build
stability
into
the
program
and
make
them
think
systematically
intentionally
and
meaningfully
about
what
a
strong
early
childhood
program
means,
and
so
that's
been
another
structure
that
we
put
in
place.
Then
a
lot
of
the
data
I'm
about
to
show.
A
You
really
is
about
the
public
schools,
but
even
if
you
do
really
strong
early
childhood
practice
and
you
do
it
high
quality
and
you
pay
people
you'll
get
a
nice
gain,
but
you'll
lose
it
in
the
public
schools.
You've
heard
it
talked
about,
it
fade
out,
fade
out
effect.
It's
really
around
alignment
and
it's
really
about
fixing
the
public
schools,
so
I
think
this
work
cannot
be
done
alone.
Just
oh,
let's
fix
community-based
programs
or
oh,
let's,
let's
do
it
in
the
public
schools.
A
I
think
we
really
need
to
think
of
an
aligned
system,
and
so,
oh
well,
that
moved
a
lot
faster
and
I
wanted
to
hang
on,
and
so
it's
not
just
a
curriculum
which
I'll
walk
you
through,
but
it's
enrollment
policies.
We
are
leveraging
now
behavioral
and
special
educational
sports
from
the
public
schools.
We
actually
have
full-time
equivalents
that
are
in
the
public
schools
that
are
now
working
in
community-based
programs,
and
so
that's
been
a
great
connection
through
this.
A
As
I
mentioned,
the
program
is
city
funded,
but
it
sits
in
the
budget
of
the
public
schools.
So
in
your
every
time
we
think
of
like
a
new
thing
like.
Oh,
you
want
to
add
special
ed
ftes.
We
do
that
first
through
the
city,
with
a
trust
and
then
in
year
two
it
becomes
part
of
the
boston
public,
school's
ongoing
budget.
So
that's
sort
of
the
way
out
of
this.
Now,
I'm
just
gonna
quickly.
Click
you
through
a
couple
pieces
of
data.
A
This
just
says
that
it
makes
a
difference,
but
on
the
right
is
class
and
what
you
see
in
the
class
basically
is
grade
one
two
and
three,
those
red
those
are
quality
scores.
A
So
even
if
you
do
well
in
preschool
and
kindergarten,
you've
got
to
worry
about
first,
second
and
third
grade
as
well,
and
so
that's
what
we
did
in
2012,
which
then
helped
us
write
our
own
curriculum
and
so
we've
written
our
curriculum
and
that's
what
kids
are
experiencing,
but
not
all
schools
are
experiencing,
which
is
what
I'm
going
to
move
you
through.
A
Okay,
so
and
this,
this
just
is
a
way
of
showing
you
how,
when
you
come
up
with
an
idea,
then
how
do
you
operationalize
it
and
then
how
does
it
become
projects?
And
then
literally,
how
does
the
budget
connect
to
it
both
in
personnel?
So
it's
just
showing
you
kind
of
the
process
of
how
we
measure
ourselves
all
the
time.
These.
These
are
just
examples
of
what's
in
our
curriculum,
pre-k
all
the
way
to
second-
and
this
is
just
all
the
different
pieces
of
our
curriculum.
A
But
again,
I'm
not
going
to
walk
you
through
that.
The
last
thing
I
want
to
kind
of
leave
you
with
is
a
fidelity
study
that
michelle
actually
helped.
Michelle
came
with
our
staff
and
we
defined
the
components
of
our
curriculum
and
how
to
measure
them,
because
it's
one
thing
to
say:
hey
use
our
curriculum,
it's
another
thing
to
say,
use
it
with
fidelity
and
use
it
with
quality,
and
then
what
we
did
is-
and
I
don't
know
if
you
know
about
boston
but
boston-
is
an
autonomous
school
district.
A
We
can't
just
come
in
and
tell
people
they
have
to
do
anything,
and
so
each
school
school
will
decide
whether
or
not
they're,
using
our
curriculum
in
each
community
in
the
community-based
programs,
they
all
share
curriculum.
But
even
if
everybody
is
using
our
curriculum,
you
can
see
that
there's
variation
in
quality
of
fidelity
and
in
continuation
of
that
fidelity.
A
So
what
you
see
here
basically,
is
only
about
a
third
of
our
schools,
which
is
the
second
bar
high
high
about
a
third
of
our
schools,
have
high
quality
fidelity
instruction
from
pre-k
and
k
alarms?
That
means
two-thirds
of
our
schools.
Are
three-quarters
roughly
yeah?
It's
a
little
less!
It's
like
more,
like
one.
Two-Thirds
are
not
high
fidelity
all
the
way
through.
A
So
just
imagine,
even
if
you
have
a
department
of
early
childhood
and
we're
aligning
all
of
this
stuff
between
pre-k
and
k,
you
don't
get
as
much
alignment
and
that
alignment
is
related
to
vocabulary
or
the
is
a
as
related
to
student
outcomes,
and
so
you
can
see
in
the
high
high
category
you're
getting
your
strongest
ppvt
scores,
which
is
vocabulary
and
in
your
lowest
aligned
schools
where
they
never
really
implemented
the
curriculum
very
well
again,
if
you're,
not
paying
people
and
they're
turning
over
and
they're,
not
as
well
educated,
you're
going
to
get
more
low
low,
and
you
can
see,
sadly,
that
it's
related
with
outcomes.
A
And
then
the
next
slide
shows
you
that,
sadly,
this
is
related
with
income
of
students.
So
if
you're
poor
you're
like
less
likely
to
have
an
alliance,
the
curricular
experience
and
then
if
you
are
latinx,
you
are
the
least
likely
to
have
an
alliance
curriculum
experience,
and
this
is
public
school
data,
and
this
is
with
all
of
the
investments
we
make.
So
I
think
I
will
stop
there,
and
so
I
stop
sharing
and
leave
time
for
discussion
with
all
of
us,
but
it's
just
to
say
that
roll
up
your
sleeves.
A
This
is
a
lot
of
work.
It
costs
a
lot
of
money
and
if
you
want
to
do
it
well
and
you
want
to
do
it
right,
then
it's
going
to
take
a
lot
of
thinking
and
work
and
it's
not
going
to
be
a
single
policy
lever
and
it's
got
to
be
an
alignment
between
the
public
schools
and
community-based
programs.
B
Great,
thank
you
so
much
jason,
so
yeah,
please!
If
you
have
questions
for
jason
or
anyone
on
our
panel,
please
unmute
yourself
and
feel
free
to
ask
them.
You
can
put
those
in
the
chat
as
well.
B
So
please
go
ahead
with
that
with
some
of
our
time.
I'm
sure
I
can
come
up
with
a
question
for
jason.
That
was
fascinating.
Can
you
talk
about
by
the
efforts
you've
made
to
to
pay
teachers
more
and
get
paired
to
k-12?
Are
your
retention
rates
different
from
what
we
saw
daphna
described
and
are
you
seeing
some
of.
A
It's
not
a
question
of
seven,
but
in
community-based
settings
there
are
structures
that
need
to
be
put
in
place
and
supports,
and
so
yes
turnover
has
definitely
gone
down,
but
we've
had
programs
where
the
you
know
the
teachers
leave,
even
though
we're
paying
them,
but
the
director
space,
so
we've
done
work
with
the
directors
and
again
it
is
stability
of
budgets,
and
you
know,
is
a
is
a
piece
of
this
that
has
to
be
supported.
So
we
have
all
sorts
of
differentiated
strategies
depending
on
the
type
of
program.
B
Great
thank
you
separately.
C
Oh
yeah,
I
wanted
to
just
add
a
word
about
that.
I
completed
a
study
recently
of
you
universal
pre-kindergarten
sites
in
new
york
city
and
we
looked
at
nine
different
sites
across
three
different
districts
in
new
york
city
that
were
socioeconomically
different
and
we
looked
at
both
public
school
settings
as
well
as
the
community
community-based
centers,
and
what
we
actually
found
was
that
the
there
was
way
less.
There
was
way
more
turnover
in
the
community-based
centers.
C
They
were
more
knowledgeable
about
early
the
teachers
in
those
centers
and
the
supports
in
those
centers
were
more
knowledgeable
about
child
development
and
early
childhood
education,
and
that
the
centers
provided
more
comprehensive
services
than
were
available
through
the
new
york
city
public
schools
system
and
that
the
match
between
the
cultural
and
racial
backgrounds
and
linguistic
backgrounds
of
the
children
and
the
families
was
much
greater
in
the
community-based
organizations.
C
So
if
it
kind
of
just
wanted
to
amplify
all
these
points
that
people
are
making
about
about
the
importance
of
reaching
our
entire
profession
and
and
also
that,
often
in
the
public
school
system,
at
least
in
new
york,
people
move
down
into
the
lower
grades,
who
have
not
had
backgrounds
in
early
childhood
and
the
folks
who
are
coming
up
through
the
early
childhood
system
in
the
community-based
centers
are
often
the
ones
who
work
their
way
from
often
parent
or
volunteer
to
aid
to
assistant
teacher
to
lead
teacher.
B
Great
thank
you
for
that
beverly
and
I
see
one
more
question
in
the
chat.
I
believe
this
may
be
for
for
jason,
but
it
is
what
is
the
relationship
between
the
community
and
public
programs
and,
more
specifically,
is
there
a
relationship
and
do
they
collaborate
with
each
other.
A
So
when
we
first
started
they
hated
us,
I
mean,
let's
be
honest:
we
opened
up
free
public
school
free
pre-k,
they
didn't
hate
us
wrong,
but
I'm
joking,
but
but
it
was
definitely
a
threat
to
their
business
and-
and
it
has
taken
years
to
rebuild
that
relationship,
and
now
we
have
a
really
strong
relationship
with
community-based
providers,
and
it
has
been
because
we
have
built
this
with
them
with
respect,
and
I
think
the
curriculum
was
never
really
a
challenge
like
I
think
they
really
loved
the
curriculum.
A
I
think
it
was
just
that
we,
you
know,
we
basically
say
if
you
get
into
the
public
schools
k
through
your
your
child
is
set
for
the
next
eight
years
right
because
they're
going
to
stay
all
the
way
to
sixth
grade
or
in
some
of
our
schools.
We
actually
go
to
eighth
grade.
If
you
go
to
a
community
based
program,
you're
not
guaranteed
a
space
in
that
school.
A
So
if
you
get
into
a
k-1
in
boston,
public
schools,
you
stay
in
that
school,
so
it
took
us
three
years
to
develop
and
have
the
school
committee
to
which,
by
the
way,
enrollment
and
the
school
committee
were
really
behind
it
and
that's
the
other
thing
is
the
city
and
the
superintendent
and
the
school
committee
have
all
really
had
a
very
pro-community
based
approach
in
that
they
want
to
solve
some
of
these
challenges.
A
So
we
developed
a
connector
where,
if
you
go
to
a
community-based
program,
you
will
have
access
to
a
seat
in
the
public
schools
and
you
get
priority.
So
we
worked
that
one
through
and
we've
also
just
really.
We
have
a
directors
group.
We
have
an
executive
director's
group.
A
We
have
a
family
stakeholder
group,
there's
there's
a
lot
more
grown,
trust
and
respect
that
that
has
taken
years
to
build
and
that
doesn't
come
overnight
and
it
certainly
doesn't
come
from
a
mayor
deciding
that
he
wants
to
do
public
school
preschool,
but
he
wasn't
wrong
because
he
was
able
to
really
move
the
dial
on
student
outcomes.
And
it's
just
how
do
you?
How
do
we
effectively
produce
strong
outcomes?
A
If
that's
the
goal
of
of
of
early
childhood,
then
and
build
community-based
programs
at
the
same
time
and
go
only
as
fast
as
you
can
do
it?
Well,
so
the
public
schools
were
able
to
open
up
2
800
spaces
relatively
fast
and
community-based
programs.
We've
been
incremental
in
designing
this
and
we
don't.
We
have
about
six
or
seven
hundred
kids
served.
We
could
do
more.
A
Programs
are
not
applying
in
part
because
they
cannot
produce
teachers
with
bachelor's
degree,
nor
do
they
feel
like
they
can
pay
that
much
and
then
there
is
resistance
in
the
head
start
community,
because
they're
already
doing
their
own
thing
and
they
already
have
resources,
and
so
there
is
that
that
challenge
there
are
some
head
start
programs
that
are
doing
it.
But
overall,
I
think
thinking
through
head
start
and
the
public's
closes
is
something
that
has
to
be
thought
through
more
carefully.