►
From YouTube: 12/5/2022 - Economic Forum Pt. 2
Description
This is the fourth meeting in calendar year 2022. Please see agenda for details.
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
B
C
C
Think
by
approving
the
forecast
report
the
table
is
subsumed
into
that
Madam
chair,
so
I
think
we're
good
at
from
your
status
perspective.
What
I
thought
I
might
do
is
just
again
for
those
are
that
are
listening
and
then
also
for
those
that
know
the
Dynamics
of
what's
going
on
here
that,
yes,
the
forms
bless
the
tables
and
the
report
through
the
motion
that
they
just
did.
But
staff
would
ask
the
the
chairs
permission
to
just
like
go
through
the
report,
one
more
time.
C
In
fact,
Mr
Zahn
and
the
chair
had
a
couple
suggestions
to
us:
there's
nothing
so
as
staff
we
wouldn't
be
doing
anything
substantive
and
and
clearly
not
changing
numbers.
Just
we'll
go
through
the
report,
one
last
time
and
look
for
anything
spelling,
grammatical
or
format,
consistency
before
we
would
distribute
it
to
the
governor
and
the
legislature
and
put
that
information
up
on
your
section
of
the
legislature's
website
and
so
Madam
chair.
C
What
I
just
thought
I
might
do
again
for
those
listening
is
to
go
to
put
the
numbers
out
there,
so
the
forecast
approved
by
the
form-
and
this
is
net
after
the
tax
credits
it
for
FY
23-
is
5
billion,
668
million
555
760
dollars
and
just
again
to
provide
a
reference.
The
actual
amount
for
FY
2022
was
5
billion,
439
million
three
hundred
and
thirty
five
thousand
105
dollars.
C
C
So,
if
you
take
the
20
the
forecast
for
fy24
and
fy25,
which
in
our
vernacular
is
the
23-25
biennium,
that
is
approximately
11
billion
434
million
dollars,
and
that
would
be
compared
to
the
forecast
for
the
21-23
By
Any
Which
is
the
FY
22
actual
and
the
forecast
approved
by
this
body
today
for
fy23.
C
That's
approximately
11
Point
11
billion
108
million,
so
the
forecast
for
the
23-25
biennium
is
approximately
325.8
million
dollars
more
and
so
I
would
just
as
I
did
sort
of
when
we
were
covering
the
agenda
item
for
for
the
tax
revenues
to
keep
the
the
context,
which
is
right.
The
the
fy24
and
fy25
you've
lowered
the
MBT
due
to
the
rate
reduction
compared
to
22
and
23,
and
also
the
net
proceeds
of
minerals
and
the
gold
and
silver
excise
tax.
C
Aren't
there
for
24
and
25
compared
to
being
there
for
21
and
20.
Excuse
me
22
and
23..
So
I
just
wanted
to
get
that
information
out
there
Madam
chair,
because
when
people
start
to
go,
look
at
these
and
think
things
you
need
to
make
sure
you
have
the
proper
context
for
evaluating
comparing
one
set
of
fiscal
year
to
another,
but
especially
comparing
the
next
biennium
to
the
current
biennium,
and
so
with
that
Madam
chair.
C
Those
were
the
comments
that
I
wanted
to
make
with
regards
to
this
agenda
item
and
so
I
think
I'm,
okay
to
proceeding
to
the
next
agenda.
C
If
you
are
Madam
chair,
which
is
instructions
to
the
technical
advisor
committee
which
staff
will
be
working
with
chair
Rosenthal,
probably
in
that
March
time
frame
to
get
the
April
meeting
and
so
right-
you
just
keep
sort
of
in
that
for
the
economic
Forum,
then,
if
I'll
just
blend
into
the
next
agenda
item
atom
chair,
which
is
scheduling
on
future
economic
floor
meetings,
so
by
Statute,
the
economic
forum
is
required
to
prepare
a
revised
forecast
if
necessary,
on
or
before
May
1st
of
odd
numbered
years.
C
May
1st
actually
falls
on
a
Monday,
so
staff
would
probably
be
asking
the
chair
and
the
members
to
please
get
May
first
open
on
your
calendars,
because
to
try
and
do
it,
April
28th
would
be
pretty
rough
for
LCB
staff.
It's
rough
for
all
staff,
but
staff
is
LCB.
Staff
is
in
session,
and
so
there
it's
just
rough.
The
wear
both
hats,
which
is
LCB
staffed
in
the
form
and
so
having
that
two
extra
days
called
the
weekend,
would
be
pretty
beneficial.
C
Think
those
were
the
comments
that
wanted
to
make
for
agenda
item
nine
and
agenda
item
10,
because
we
will
just
proceed
as
we
proceeded
with
regards
to
having
attack
meeting
in
late
April
and
then
bring
that
forward
to
the
Forum
for
the
consideration
and
that's
for
so.
If
everybody
knows,
especially
in
the
two
new
ones,
we
don't
have
multiple
meetings
for
the
may,
like
we
do
for
this.
C
It's
just
logistically
and
functionally
more
difficult
during
session
to
perform
that
and
so
we'll
be
monitoring
the
actuals
as
they
come
in
for
FY
22
and
attempting
to
update
the
tables
and
and
as
as
available
as
possible,
get
them
out
to
the
members
of
The
Forum.
So
they'll
have
an
idea
of
how
the
actuals
are
coming
in
for
the
monthlies,
because
right
we'll
have
a
few
more
months
of
the
month.
Please
we
will
have
see
that
would
be
the
quarter
ending
march.
A
A
Okay
down
in
Las
Vegas
see
nobody
there.
So
then,
finally,
I'd
like
to
ask
the
BPS
staff.
If
anyone
is
called
in
that
would
like
to
provide
public
comment.
B
A
Okay
with
that
again
I'd
like
to
to
thank
all
the
the
presenters
and
the
members
of
The
Forum
for
their
time
today,
and
this
meeting
is
adjourned.