►
From YouTube: Community Committee Meeting
Description
A
B
B
Yes,
the
last
two
weeks,
each
Saturday
we've
had
a
hackathon
where
me
offers
John
and
focus
all
hung
out
and
packed
away
on
getting
the
new
website
laid
out.
Now
that
doctor
has
a
has
a
mock
all
squared
away,
so
we
are
working
in
a
staging
branch
on
the
new
dev
repo
and
we're
making
really
good
progress.
B
Oscar
has
the
homepage
blocked
out
we're
gonna
need
content
with
you
there
at
some
point
soon
we
have
the
learn
page
reformatted,
so
the
new
style.
We
have
the
API
Doc's
page,
rendering
out
missing
some
fees
linking
features
and
and
all
that,
but
it
is
coming
along
really
really
nicely
and
John
got
a
whole
bunch
of
infrastructure,
stuff
working
for
es,
linson,
prettier
and
he's
moving
on
to
the
download
page
for
layout.
Once
they
block
all
those
out,
all
the
major
sections
will
be
packed
in
there.
B
B
B
C
B
Requires
the
backend,
so
the
existing
site
also
does
the
whole
deployment
process
for
the
the
existing
static
site
that
gets
generated.
This
thing
is
a
Gatsby
site.
So
it's
you
know
it's
all
static
content,
that's
very
least
we're
actually
the
way
we're
doing
API
Doc's
right
now
we're
actually
getting
up
some
of
the
generated
assets
from
the
current
docs
pages.
So
it's
nothing
new
had
to
for
the
docs
for
API
Doc's
generation.
We're
not
you
know,
there's
no
process
changes.
A
One
question
I
have
on
that,
is
you
know,
I
know
there
is
a
discussion
at
some
point
about
changing
how
we
do
Doc's.
Is
that
still
in
play?
Are
you
just
trying
to
go
minimal.
B
I,
like
you
to
leave
it
or
not,
there's
I
might
have
some
API
Doc's
like
content
modifications,
because
there's
some
places
where
it
doesn't
so
thus
pleasantly
surprised
at
how
it's
actually
broken
up.
It's
more
granularly
broken
up
and
labeled
than
I.
Then
I
thought
it
was
that
being
all
this
in
markdown.
So
the
way
it's
the
way
it's
drafted
may
seem
a
little
monolithic
but
somewhere
in
the
build
where
it
generates
the
API
like
JSON
content.
B
B
B
You
I
still
love
to
explore
it.
We,
it
seems,
like
I,
haven't,
dug
deep
into
our
API
doc
parsers
yet,
but
it
it
seems
to
do
something
similar,
we're
just
not
using
that
metadata
for
anything
as
details,
I
gotcha.
So
we
we
have
that
information
I,
don't
know
how
strict
ly
enforced
it
is,
but
it's
a
it's
a
cool,
oh
yeah,
but
that
we
should
definitely
feel
have
the
conversation
it
like
happen
incrementally
make
updates
back,
because
there
is
room
for
improvement.
It's
just
not
gonna,
be
a
blocker.
Okay,
cool.
D
D
I
was
gonna,
say
it's
not
really
much
of
an
update,
but
I
think
I
mentioned
this
last
time
that,
in
terms
of
user
feedback,
the
actual
survey
work
we
are
going
to
move
to
the
open
jazz
foundation
so
that
it
can
be
taken
advantage
of
by
more
projects.
That's
a
work
in
progress
on
my
end.
I
should
have
a
new
repo
open
up
there
soon
and
we
can
close
that
aspect.
Oh
I'm,
not
sure
about
other
aspects
of
user
feedback.
D
Now,
no
one
else
I'll
be
great,
not
not
too
much
of
an
update
from
the
CPC.
We
we
meet
weekly,
we're
making
lots
of
progress,
but
it's
a
lot
of
you
know,
process
progress
so
we're
one
of
the
big
areas
that
were
working
on
is
project
project
progression,
bringing
in
new
projects.
We
have
a
few
projects
that
are
in
the
pipeline
that
have
that
have
applied
they're
still
in
the
private
phase
of
this.
D
While
we
work
through
some
things,
but
it's
been
helping
us
figure
out
like
what
that
means
to
take
on
new
projects
and
how
we
go
about
it
and
what
the
process
should
be
and
such
so
we're
making
really
good
progress.
They're
working
on,
like
like
code
of
conduct,
work
and
reporting
issues
and
making
sure
we
have
that
all
squared
away
is
that's
a
very
important
issue
and
the
travel
fund
process
moving
that
to
the
open,
JSF
is
still
in
progress,
but
I
think
we're
nearing
the
end
stages
of
that
as
well.
F
F
The
other
thing
I
might
mention
is
that
there's
an
update
to
the
code
of
conduct
handling
side
of
things,
so
is
so
we
had
a
proposal
which
had
the
external
reporting
addresses
and
what
you
did
externally.
We're
updating
it
to
include
the
process
for
how
reports
will
be
handled
once
they're
submitted.
So
again.
If
anybody
in
this
in
this
group
has
an
interest
that
sort
of
up
and
being
discussed,
I
think
we've
try
to
remember.
F
D
My
Noah's
been
doing
some
of
the
work
there,
so
thank
you
for
that.
Man,
oh
and
then
the
other
thing
I
would
just
add
to
you
is
that
we
have
a
couple
of
working
groups
that
are
starting
up.
So
if
you
have
any
interest
in
infrastructure
which
there's
a
lot
of
infrastructure
needs
with
over
30
projects
in
the
foundation,
so
if
you
have
any
interest
there,
let
me
know
and
also
standards
figuring
out
how
to
approach
standards,
bodies
from
the
foundation
and
community
perspective
and
the
helpful
there
as
well.
D
F
I
guess,
following
on
to
the
CPC
update,
since
it's
in
the
same
section
on
the
board
front,
the
next
board
meeting
is
one
week
from
tomorrow.
I
just
checked
the
board
on
the
admit
on
the
admitting
there
that's
been
raised
in
terms
of
things
to
bring
up
with
doors,
but
if
there's
anything
that
you
do
have
in
mind
that
you
haven't
raised.
Yet
just
let
you
know
through
some
mechanism,
because
that's
the
next
opportunity
well
other
than
through
email
and
stuff.
D
A
Was
indeed
thank
you
thank
you,
I
had
no
missus,
Ella
I
hope
I
pronounced.
Alright.
Would
you
be
willing
to
give
a
quick
update
on
issue
507,
just
since
its
kind
of
in
between
an
initiative
and
an
issue
right
now,
and
it
seems
like
there's
like
a
relatively
late
status
update,
but
not
a
massive
one.
C
It's
a
very
small
update,
I
created
a
slack
channel
and
basically,
what
I'm
looking
for
is
I,
guess
momentum,
which
I
don't
know
where
to
start
like
how
to
jump
start,
making
next
steps
and
so
on,
but
I
I
think
it's
it's
for
me.
It
would.
It
would
be
good.
You
know
those
who
are
interested,
maybe
having
an
out
of
an
meeting.
We
you
know,
preferably
where,
where
the
time
was
allowed
to
just
go
more
into
detail
and
if
at
all
possible
it
would
just
be
recorded,
not
live
stream.
C
So
we
can
pause
the
recording
at
some
times
where
you
know,
then
there
might
be
some
I
guess,
off-topic
discussions
that
that
could
be
helped.
So
so
I
think
this
is
where,
where
things
stand,
it's
my
belief
that
there
are
too
many
directions.
The
initiatives
can
actually
try
to
tackle
it's
very
hard
to
know
which
one
be
the
first
most
effective
one
to
focus
on,
and
it's
also
important
to
align
that
with
things
who
are
interested
to
work
on.
Not
just
you
know
things
that
look
like
they're
going
to
be
very,
very
promising,
I
guess!
C
A
Cool
with
that
I
think
we
can
move
on.
Let
me
get
back
to
gender
issue,
cool,
so
I
think
that
covers
most
initiative
updates
now
I.
There
are
some
like
calm,
calm
process
things
that
I
would
like
to
have
a
quick
discussion
of
if
it's
worth
creating
an
issue
or
if
it's
worth
having
just
this
session
here,
we
would
you
all
prefer
that
to
be
front
loaded
before
agenda
items
or
postponed
to
you
after
agenda
items
or
no
opinion.
A
In
that
case,
I
think
we
should
be
able
to
get
through
these
relatively
quick,
like
also
one
of
these
issues
is
clothes
now
yeah
I
think
we
can
get
these
really
quick.
So,
let's
pressurize
the
agenda,
then
we
can
talk
about
that
after
okay.
So
first
agenda
item
is
notice:
admin
408,
which
is
recertifying
moderation,
team
members.
A
So
this
is
effectively
you
know.
Every
year
we
have
to
recertify
the
moderation
team
members,
I
believe
five
or
six
people
step
down
by
Dan
Shaw
happy-go-lucky
at
Tracy,
Hines,
George,
Adams,
Gibson
and
then
I,
the
fourth
I
I,
don't
want
to
butcher
their
name,
so
those
five
people
step
down
which
these
five
people,
so
that's
Benjamin,
myself,
Jordan,
Hubbard,
Forrest,
Norville
and
Ryan
Lewis.
A
So
the
process
here
is
when
new
people
are
added
to
the
moderation
team.
Every
single
there
has
to
be
no
minus
ones
from
anyone
on
compound
nor
TFC,
but
to
recertify.
There
has
to
be
general
consensus
between
you
know
in
each
group
that
these
people
are
ok
and
I've
done
an
ok
job,
an
acceptable
job
and
can
continue
so
I
am
going
to
abstain
from
some
voting
in
this
because
I'm
one
of
the
people,
however
I
think
we
should
probably
run
a
quick
vote,
since
this
is
technically
a
voting
issue.
A
So
quick
I'm
going
to
go
down
the
list
of
people
and
ask
for
objections.
If
there
is
no,
if
there
are
no
objections,
you're
more
than
welcome
to
or
you
know,
that
person
will
be
recertified.
If
you
do
not
feel
comfortable
voicing
in
objection,
you
can
I
would
suggest
either
comforting
in
the
public
chat
and
zoom,
or
you
can
ensue.
A
A
F
G
F
Okay,
so
I
think
we
can
say
there
were
no
objections
to
recertifying
from
the
car.
The
voting
members
here
so
we'll
we'll
mark
that
as
plus
one
votes
in
the
issue
itself
for
the
other
people,
it's
D
Shah
at
hockey,
Kola
ki
at
G,
Adams
I'd,
give
them
and
the
fourth
I
you
know
the
recommendation
was
not
to
recertify.
A
F
A
A
A
So
I
have
closed
that
issue
and
unlabeled
it
just
for
clarity
in
the
future,
because
I
found
that
I
turns
out
those
clothes,
but
still
labeled
issues
are
sometimes
pesky.
We
already
covered
for
less
conflicts
from
biases
and
assumptions,
biases
/
assumptions
and
communication
style
/
conventions.
For
now,
since
we're
we
retained
that
and
the
initiative
update,
like
the
kind
of
in
between
the
initiative
and
issue,
it's
a
very
cute
cat,
Adam
I'm,
going
to
remove
the
CC
agenda
label.
A
Okay,
so
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
charter
update
to
reflect
new,
open
jazz
foundation.
So
this
is
a
PR
I
submitted
for
last
week,
so
I
think
same
day
as
our
previous
meeting.
They
are
not
last
week
two
weeks
ago
there
are
three
kind
of
basically
I
went
through
and
updated.
Everything
as
I
saw
appropriate
to
the
best
of
my
understanding
of
open
joyous
and
calm
calm
and
the
state
of
the
world.
A
A
So
that's
something
we
will
want
to
consider
adding
back
later
and
in
a
more
appropriate
context,
but
it
is
not
something
that
I
think
can
survive.
This
specific
PR,
also
I
need
to
mark,
do
not
merge,
so
there's
that
there's
also
this
PR
is
not
trivial,
in
that
it
removes
all
references
to
individual
membership,
director
and
director
roles.
This
is
also
impactful
because,
as
far
as
I
know,
I
could
be
wrong
on
this,
but
the
current
individual,
Membership
Director
will
in
khaki
I,
do
not
believe
was
voted
in
as
a
member
I
could
be
wrong.
A
I'm,
not
certain,
but
that
is
the
process
that
we
had
for
individual
membership
directors
previously
is
that
they
are
automatically
a
member
of
calm,
calm,
which
will
no
longer
be
the
case
and
it's
automatic
and
perpetual,
regardless
of
involvement,
so
they
were
kind
of
abstract
from
any
of
the
governance
rules
we
had
so
that's.
You
know
one
important
distinction.
A
Also,
you
know
it
completely
dissolves
the
directorship
for
calm,
calm,
and
we
may
want
to
consider
you
know
at
a
higher
level,
going
through
admin,
resolving
the
kind
of
current
state
of
that
a
similar
position
of
Hong
Kong
representative
to
CPC,
currently
I.
Think
that
was
just
something
we
all
kind
of
like
waived
our
hands
and
agreed
on
that
compliment.
Tse
would
each
have
a
representative
sincerity
representatives
in
CPC
I
said.
F
F
A
Know
I
100%
agree.
It
was
more
of
a
I'm
trying
to
create
minimal
surface
area
and
as
far
as
I
as
far
as
I
had
understood.
That
was
not
something
that
was
documented.
If
that
is
documented
in
the
TSE,
it
should
absolutely
document
it
in
ours.
I
would
not
want
to
create
like
a
dynamic
where
it's
stuck
when
we
did
in
one,
but
not
the
other
yeah.
F
Okay,
no
yeah
I
actually
have
it
under
the
Section
six
election
says:
TSE
will
elect
from
against
voting
members
at
EC,
chair
per
share
person
to
work
on
an
agenda
for
TSE
meetings
and
an
open,
J's
cross-project
Council
voting
member
to
represent
the
TSE
in
the
open,
just
team,
yeah.
So
I
think
that's
that's
the
member
we're
talking
about
right
there.
Okay,.
A
F
A
That
goes
on
with
the
standard
text:
okay,
yeah,
if
you
can
send
me
that
that
would
be
wonderful,
just
like,
like
the
link
to
that
line,
if
I
can
adapt,
that
and
I
will
tap
that
into
the
CR,
so
yeah.
This
jar
removes
those
elements
from
our
Charter,
so
it
will
also
I
would
rather
not
lump
and
readme
updates
to
this,
but
it
will
also
affect
I,
read
me
and
that
we
will
remove
to
two
roles
from
from
folks.
It's
also
worth
noting
that
that
the
individual
membership
director
role
is.
A
A
A
A
A
A
The
Charter
is
the
other
thing
I
wanted
to
talk
about
through
at
the
end,
so
I
I
will
continue
that
discussion
there,
but
it's
worth
noting
that
you
know
our
Charter
is
very
interesting
and
not
at
all
representative
of
what
we
do.
So
that's
something
that
we
will
want
to
probably
try
to
address
in
the
future,
but
this
should
be
a
minimum
middle
instead
of
changes
to
make
it
consistent
with
the
new
foundation
that
we're
technically
a
bar,
that's
so
yeah!
That's
that
if
y'all
could
please
take
a
look
and
I.
F
A
G
F
A
F
A
A
Cool
we
can
move
on
to
the
next
agenda
item
then
nodejs
social
media,
community
collaboration,
I,
believe
the
ball
is
in
my
court
on
this
I
we
merged
the
PR
I
believe
but
I
don't
know
if
we
I
don't
know
if
I
actually
went
through
and
created
the
repo
also
I
know,
there's
weird
things
with
people
creating
repos.
So
I
was
a
little
nervous
about
that,
but
now
that
I'm
sure
person
I
believe
that's
a
hundred
percent
within
the
scope
of
what
I'm
in
abled
and
allowed
to
do
yeah.
A
H
A
H
Now,
actually
I
don't
I.
The
only
thing
that
I
want
to
bring
up
is
we
were
kind
of
waiting
to
get
the
process
that
up
before
we
can
do
a
big
call
for
content.
So
you
know
as
soon
as
we
can
get
that
sort
of
you
know
in
a
good
place
that
everybody
is
comfortable
with.
We
can
start
you
know
reaching
out
to
community
folks
and
just
kind
of
let
folks
know
that
you
know
we're
we're
open
for
content.
Things
like
that.
So
thank
you.
Something
I
just
wanted
to
mention.
E
So
your
exact
needs
of
this.
When
this
P
is
much,
we
have
a
basic
process,
then
we
can
start
adding
more
person,
make
it
more
public
so
that
people
can
submit.
I
was
also
thinking
about
any
session
about
notice,
collection
and
social
media
debate.
So
maybe
we
can
discuss
more
ideas.
The
last
one
we
had
and
burning.
That
was
very.
A
One
additional
question:
I
have
or
one
additional
context
that
I
raise
anywhere
are
y'all
Rachel
and
Willie
too
familiar
with
dev.
Their
domain
is
dev,
but
they
called
it
slows
them
well,
leader
I
see
Rachel,
not
an
elite.
Are
you
familiar?
Okay.
E
A
So
one
of
one
of
my
teammates,
who
is
very
involved
in
angular
also
he
registered
the
nest.
Yes,
org
and
I
asked
him
to
maybe
share
that
with
the
project,
if
like
give
it
to
the
project,
if
that
was
something
the
party
was
interested
in,
so
he
added
me
as
an
admin.
So
we
also
have
to
slash
no
GS
as
an
available
thing
for
the
project
and
for
I
assume
collection.
If
we
want
to
do
that,
they
have
relatively.
G
A
G
A
H
A
H
I
A
G
E
E
A
And
rate
right
now
they
have
a
relatively
good
process
of
basically
consuming
RSS
feeds
and
then,
if
the
person
is
a
member
of
your
word,
you
can
have
basically
assign
them
as
the
author
or
to
that,
it's
like
you
can
consume.
The
media,
Marc
says
feed
and
then,
if
the
person
who
wrote
it
is
also
a
member
of
the
dev
to
organization,
you
can
add
them.
As
the
author
of
that
posting,
basically,
credit
them
effectively
and
it'll
also
still
do
the
conical
link
or
you
can
set
up
the
canonical
link
to
the
medium
post.
A
So
you
know,
theoretically,
you
lose
SEO
value.
That
way,
which
could
be
an
interesting
path
for
us
to
start
also
doing
it
primarily
on
budget
org,
and
that
if
we
want
to
go
down
the
path
of
a
more
complex
blog
that
we
already
have,
we
that's
theory
right
and
kind
of
move
away
from
medium
on
in
every
way.
But
yeah,
if
you
guys,
are
all
future
problems
and
I
just
wanted
to
raise
that
as
a
possibility
flying.
B
I
E
A
A
A
Charter
specifically
for
this
one
I
will
paste
the
link
into
the
zoom
chat
for
those
viewing
it's
accessible
at
the
notice
community
committee
repo
and
the
file
latest
community
committee
charter
and
then
top
of
the
directory.
So
in
reading
through
this
and
trying
to
make
sure
I
addressed
everything,
there
is
quite
a
few
things
that
are
not
representative
of
how
pom
pom
currently
does
it.
A
A
Basically,
being
kind
oh
wow,
I
apparently
broke
current
initiatives.
I
will
fix
that
so
I
looked
at
the
readme,
but
currently
it's
rather
challenging
for
us
in
certain
ways
to
address
membership
and
remove
people
into
a
merit
I
should
they
become
inactive.
We
do
have
a
relatively
non-trivial
number
of
people
who
are
inactive
and
you
know
through
no
fault
of
their
own
and
we're
not
upset
with
them
for
that.
But
the
current
mechanisms
were
moving.
A
People
to
in
an
in
to
an
inactive
state
are
relatively
challenging,
and
the
emeritus
status
is
a
nice
kind
of
medium
in
that
that
we're
not
like
kicking
them
out
and
they
can
join
back
relatively
easily
if
they'd
like
to.
But
it
is
one
that
I
think
we
are
under
using
and
the
mechanisms
that
are
provided
to
us
as
a
committee
to
help
ensure
that
we
are
able
to
function
effectively
like
we
today,
technically
just
barely
passed
the
consent
quorum
to
be
able
to
vote.
A
A
So
that's
a
thing,
I
think
we
should
try
to
evaluate
that
and
see
if
that's
something
that
we
would
like
to
continue
shooting
for
as
they
go
and
see
how
we
can
start
up
an
initiative
to
kind
of
work
toward
that
or
if
that's
something
we
would
like
to
try
to
remove
from
the
Charter
and
I
know
that
saying
all
that
took
up
non-trivial
amount
of
time.
So
I'll
leave
it
to
the
floor
to
the
rest
of
y'all.
If
you
have
questions
or
thoughts
or
comments
or
feedback
on
any
of
that
last
ones,
minus
ones.
F
Think
bringing
it
up
to
up
to
like
to
what
we
consistent.
What
we
do
is
a
good
idea.
The
air
merit
I.
Obviously
it's
already
documented
there,
so
if
we
think
we
need
to
add
some
text
to
formalize
that
that
would
be
good,
I,
don't
think
like
in
terms
of
people's
activity
or
whatever.
We
need
to
be
too
aggressive,
but
it
does
come
to
a
point
where
it's
clear
and
probably
everybody
involved
will
just
say:
yeah
I,
just
haven't
had
time
for
the
last
three
or
six
months
right,
yeah.
B
A
Yeah
for
sure,
and
so
for
context,
there
has
been
a
point
word
that
has
not
been
the
case
where
there
has
been
a
member
and
I'm
not
going
to
sex
with
her
husband,
a
member
who
was
at
that
stage
and
asked
and
said
no
and
then
continued,
not
participating.
So
it's
more
of
a
just
documenting
the
ability
to
be
able
to
move
those
processes
along
as
necessary,
I
think.
A
Of
the
so
yes
and
then
the
the
so
yes,
the
challenging
thing
is,
then
you
are
asked.
If
you
want
to
remain
anybody.
Yes,
you
do
remain
without
any
kind
of
flower,
okay,
and
that
goes
until
six
months
where
at
which
point
I
believe
as
a
vote,
you
will
be
double
check
here,
but
you'll
be
voted
like
as
a
you
know.
Consensus
hey
is
this
person
song?
A
Yeah
and
I
think
I
mean
I.
Think
that
25
percent
thing
is
fine,
I,
think
it's
and
also
a
way
to
be
less
harsh
about
your
gone,
is
moving
to
emeritus
and
so
kind
of
automating
that
a
bit
of
okay
you've
not
participated
in
this
much
and
not
participated
in
initiatives
which
I
believe
is.
In
addition,
we
made
you
were
going
to
just
move
you
to
emeritus.
A
A
Yeah
and-
and
that
also
does
kind
of
complaint
it
is
like,
if
we
all
have
to
vote,
then
we
are
on
some
of
leaving
or
being
pushed
out.
We
are
also
technically
like
participating
in
public,
shaming
and
like
at
least
for
myself
and
for
others.
I
know
that
I
feel
would
not
particularly
be
enthralled
for
having
to
publicly
shame
someone.
If
it
is
a
vote,
we
can
make
it
a
private
session.
Yes,.