►
From YouTube: Finance Committee Meeting 11-03-21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
E
Thank
you
very
much.
Let's,
please
all
stand
for
the
pledge
of
allegiance.
E
E
F
D
E
E
E
Seeing
no
one?
I
will
call
public
comment
closed
and
we
will
move
on
to
item
number
seven
communications.
I
need
a
motion
to
receive
and
file.
Our
communications
commissioner,
kowal
supported
by
commissioner
moss.
Anybody
have
any
items
on
the
communications
they
want
to
discuss
or
pull
up.
Commissioner.
B
Yes,
nothing
to
pull
off
just
to
to
highlight
that
num
item
number
or
letter
f
is
a
very,
very
happy
thing
for,
for
anyone,
who's
driven
down
northwestern
highway
by
the
old,
copper
canyon,
it's
literally
falling
to
pieces,
and
so
I'm
really
grateful
for
the
new
soul
garden.
Who
has
decided
to
take
ownership
of
that
property?
You
know
per
passing
of
course,
and
that
makes
me
very
happy
so
just
wanted
to
highlight
new
soul
garden
for
making
that
happen
for
the
people
in
south
field.
E
Next,
on
the
agenda,
we
have
item
8a
out
of
the
lago
committee
fiscal
years,
2022
23
24
and
collective
bargaining
agreement
for
employees
represented
by
the
michigan
american
federation
of
state
county
and
municipal
employees,
afscme
council
25,
local
2437,
representing
the
circuit
court
and
family
court
employees.
I
need
a
motion,
commissioner,
charles
supported
by
commissioner
long.
E
E
Oh
okay,
sorry
april,
you
want
to
jump
in
and
tell
us
a
little
bit
about
this
one.
B
B
I
H
E
So
we
are
talking
about
the
collective
bargaining
agreement
for
the
employees
represented
by
afscme.
So
that's
our
first
item
on
the
agenda,
so
you
want
to
just
fill
us
in
a
little
bit
april
about
this
one.
J
She
may
not
be
able
to
hear
you,
commissioner,
oh
no,
maybe
we
could
shout.
D
Madam
chairman,
I
suggest
that
we
pass
this
agenda
item
over
until
until
until
ms
lynch
can
get
her
communication
stuff
or
get
herself
over
to
the
conference
room
or
something
well,.
H
C
E
Good
all
right,
ms
lynch
welcome
good
morning
and
thank
you
for
joining
our
meeting.
We
are
talking
about
item
number,
eight,
a
which
is
the
collective
bargaining
agreement
for
the
afscme
employees.
So
you
want
to
talk
to
us
about
that.
A
little
bit.
C
Sir
sorry
about
that,
yes,
thank
you.
So
again,
this
is
another
contract.
This
is
a
full
open
contract
with
afscme.
The
folks
in
afscme
are
in
circuit
court
and
the
family,
typically
in
the
family
division,
so
probation
officers,
some
youth
assistant
workers
and
things
of
their
youth
case
coordinators,
just
different
people
over
in
the
the
family
court.
C
They
are
very
similar
to
the
other
unions
that
we've
brought
forward
so
far.
They
have
a
slight
difference
in
that
they
were
not
at
this
time.
They
would
prefer
a
two
percent
raise
rather
than
the
increase
in
the
contribution
to
the
457,
so
that
works
better
for
their
members.
So
there's
a
little
slight
difference.
There
there's
a
couple
of
positions
that
we
shored
up.
C
I
did
some
review
with
the
processing
comp
and
changed
a
couple
of
positions
over
there,
as
well
as
they
have
agreed
to
the
five-year
model
for
the
health
care
that
I
presented
to
to
lago
it,
and
you
guys
received
a
copy
of
that.
So
they're
going
to
be
looking
at
some
internal
changes
to
health
care
in
22
increase
in
a
contribution
in
23
and
another
change
in
to
their
prescription
in
2024..
C
So
again
other
little
ancillary
things
addressing
410s
and
cap
time.
Nothing
too.
E
B
I
press
the
button,
but
I
don't
see
my
name.
Maybe
I
don't
know
hi
april
lynch
just
wanted
to
ask
a
couple
of
questions.
I'm
not
familiar
with
the
me
too.
Well,
I
am
a
little
familiar
with
me
too,
but
in
this
case
it
says
the
metoo
and
quotation
marks.
Could
you
speak
a
little
bit
about
that
and
then
are
these?
Are
these
the
only
ones
represented
under
ask
me
or
are
there
other
instances
where
afscme
might
be
coming
before
us.
C
B
That's
the
metoo
part
yeah,
okay
and
then
are
these
all
the
afscme
representations
that
we'll
have
we
have
in
the
county,
or
is
this
just
one
grouping.
C
E
Okay,
anybody
else
have
any
questions
or
comments.
Are
we
ready
to
vote
on
item
8a?
The
collective
bargaining
agreement
asks
me:
are
you
raising
your
hand?
Mr
no.
D
D
I
have
haven't.
I
I
even
took
the
sorting
hat
program
into
my
astonishment.
E
All
right
motion
carries.
Thank
you
very
much.
Next
up
we
have
item
8b,
which
is
the
supplemental,
2022-2024,
supplemental
collective
bargaining,
agreement
for
supervisory
and
non-supervisory
employees
that
are
represented
by
the
uaw
local
889
of
the
probate
court.
E
C
Sure
can
this
is
another
supplemental,
as
it
relates
to
the
uaw.
This
is
for
the
department
of
probate
again
very
similar
to
their
everything
else.
Talk
with
clarifying
general
practices
that
are
already
in
place
over
there,
and
then
there
was
a
couple
of
classifications
that
need
to
be
that
needed
to
be
reviewed
during
the
process.
B
B
E
G
Good
morning,
commissioners,
so
this
is
our
our
quarterly
report
submitted
in
the
communications
was
the
executive
summary
of
the
progress
against
our
master
plan
and
and
that
details
how
we're
doing
against
those
projects
that
have
been
identified
and,
as
you'll
recall,
every
quarter.
We
bring
essentially
an
invoice
and
it's
the
appropriation
to
move
the
funds
from
the
department
budgets
that
were
put
there
during
the
budget
process
and
move
them
over
into
I.t
to
pay
for
the
development
of
the
previous
quarter.
B
Yes,
hi
mike
timms
hello.
I
wanted
to
just
clarify
and
it
may
not
be.
You
might
be
the
right
person
to
answer
because
it
says
item
review
tracking
in
the
summary
where,
on
the
21st
it
says
border
commissioners,
then
executive
office
et
cetera,
et
cetera,
so
I'm
not
really
familiar
with.
Where
it's
been
the
blc,
then
it
goes
through
other
processes
and
ends
up
back
at
committee.
G
I
believe
that's
the
the
civic
clerk
routing
process,
these
documents.
This
particular
resolution
is
created
by
the
information
technology
team
based
on
the
project,
work
that
we
do
and
then,
when
we
submit
that
it
routes
through
the
civic
clerk,
routing
and
approval
process,
and
that's
what
that's
referring
to.
Okay,.
G
Right,
those
are
all
just
the
every
resolution
that
we
do
goes
through
those
review
and
approval
process,
depending
on
the
type
of
resolution.
It
has
different
departments
that
will
review
it.
Okay,
but
all
of
the
it
ones
are
reviewed
by
the
fiscal
team,
they're
reviewed
by
corp
council,
they're,
reviewed
by
hr
and
risk
management
before
they
even
get
into
the
board
staff
and
then
eventually
to
the
chair
of
the
committee,
to
actually
put
it
on
the
agenda.
E
When
I
get
my
civic
clerk
approval
display
up
to
me,
it
shows
me
all
of
the
departments
and
who
has
approved
them,
and
then
our
staff
has
a
couple
of
steps
that
take
place
before
I
get
it
and
I'm
final
approval,
and
usually
when
I
look
at
it,
everything's
all
done
and
occasionally
I'll
kick
one
back
and
ask
a
question
about,
but
I
like
it
because
it
does
show
me
the
whole
pathway
that
something
has
to
go
through.
That's
helpful
to
me.
B
Yes-
and
I
think
it's
helpful
too-
I
this
is
kind
of
a
wish,
but
I
would
really
I
liked
charts
and
like
pie
charts,
because
you
know
I'm
team
I.t
all
the
way,
and
I
give
them
the
shirt
off
my
back.
B
If
I,
if
I
could,
but
it's
helpful,
to
see
the
big
picture
in
a
graph
as
opposed
to
report,
one
week
report
the
next
week
like
basically
year
to
date
or
just
something
so
that
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
the
appropriations
and
making
those
adjustments,
but
it's
just
a
little
helpful
to
see
the
full
picture
and
how
all
of
these
little
things
add
into
it.
At
least
for
my
take.
But
that's
all
I
have
thank
you
and
you're
talking.
J
G
And-
and
I
believe
that
is
in
the
there
are-
there
are
actually
some
pie
charts
in
the
executive
summary
that
was
part
of
the
communications
package
and
that
references
the
work
that
we
did
in
this
quarter
in
that
master
plan.
But
I
will
also
happily
send
it's
a
public
document
public
website
of
the
two-year
master
plan
and
that's
updated.
G
Yes,
that's
one
of
the
one
of
the
charts
that
shows
how
much
development
work
was
done
in
this
last
quarter,
but
the
two-year
master
plan
gets
updated
every
quarter
and-
and
you
can
look
at
each
individual
quarter
and
we
have
those
same
pie,
charts
for
how
much
work
is
spent
in
support.
How
much
is
in
maintenance?
How
much
is
in
planned,
maintenance
and
upgrades?
How
much
is
in
enhancements
and
new
developments?
So
those
all
those
major
categories,
and
then
it's
also
broken
out
by
department.
B
Okay,
thank
you
that
that's
something
I
haven't
seen
before,
where
the
supplemental
is
kind
of
in
the
communication
space,
so
don't
mind
it.
I
just
didn't
know
it
was
there.
Thank
you.
E
E
E
J
Good
morning,
I'm
just
going
to
give
a
brief
background
and
then
obviously
kyle
and
lin
can
provide
some
some
deeper
background
for
each
of
you.
You
should
have
received
to
each
of
the
finance
committee.
Members
should
have
received
this
in
your
in
your
package
already,
but
just
to
give
a
little
bit
of
context
around
this.
I
think
you
just
heard
from
mike,
but
our
I.t
department
of
I
think,
we've
got
a
lot
of
projects
going
on.
J
But
if
we
look
at
in
regards
to
our
what
I
would
say,
our
top
three
projects-
radios,
a
60
million
dollar
project-
certainly
the
erp
system
is,
is
in
that
more
than
20
million
dollars.
And
then
we
have
our
ucc
project,
which
would
probably
be
our
third
one,
which
is
wi-fi
and
the
voice
over
ip.
That
is,
is
going
on
so
very
critical,
important
project
for
the
county.
We
have
an
old
system
in
peoplesoft.
We
made
this
decision
a
few
years
ago.
How
many
years
ago,
four
or
four
years
ago,
when.
J
So
we've
been
heading
down
that
track
on
erp
systems.
Certainly
if
you
look
at
government
erp
systems,
it's
no
easy
task.
There's
a
lot
of
data
out
there.
That
shows
that
a
lot
of
counties
struggle
with
a
new
implementation
on
a
financial
system.
K
Sure,
thank
you
sean.
So
again
you
do
have
the
background
memo
I'll
try
to
go
through
this.
You
know
high
level
and
fairly
quickly
and
then
certainly
we're
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
K
As
you
recall,
this
project
was
split
into
two
phases
so
phase
one
of
the
project,
which
is
the
the
hr
and
the
payroll
side,
went
live
successfully
last
july,
so
employees,
you
know,
including
everyone
at
this
table
you
know-
is
entering
their
time
and
getting
paid,
and
there
are
a
number
of
other
hr
functions
that
are
happening
right
now
through
workday
phase
two
is,
is
the
financial
side
of
it,
so
you
know
all
the
things
you
know
that
involve
county
funds,
you
know
in
terms
of
our
our
base,
accounting
system
and
so
on
and
so
forth
was
delayed
until
this
current
october.
K
So
last
month
a
year
ago.
You
know
I
would
just
want
to
preface
all
of
this.
You
know
by
expressing
our
appreciation
for
the
group
of
employees
there's
about
30
full-time
employees
across
fiscal
services,
hr
the
treasurer's
office
purchasing
at
iit,
there's,
there's
actually
a
larger
group
of
people
working
on
the
project,
but
there's
about
30
people
that
have
been
you
know,
working
on
this
for
substantial
hours
above
and
beyond
their
day,
jobs
starting
with
lynn,
but
you
know
lots
of
other
people
behind
the
scenes.
K
So
I
I
wanted
to
mention
that,
so
you
know
there
have
been
some
some
key
factors
in
terms
of
creating
the
delay
and
top
of
the
list
is
covid
from
two
perspectives
really
in
terms
of
the
competing
demands
in
terms
of
all
of
the
dollars
that
the
county
got
out
very
quickly
to
local.
You
know,
households
and
businesses
and
the
competing
demands
that
created
and
then
secondly,
you
know
the
fact
that
it's
just
harder
to
do
a
complex
project.
K
What
everybody's
remote
and
trying
to
you
know
do
this
on
a
zoom
call
versus
doing
it
in
person,
and
you
know
we're
hoping
that
we'll
be
able
to
do
more
in
person
as
we
get
closer
to
the
end
here.
You
know,
obviously,
depending
on
the
code
situation.
K
You
know
so
earlier
this
year
you
know
the
team,
you
know,
as
I
got
on
board
and
and
and
and
the
team
was
talking
through
and
evaluating
where
the
project
was.
It
was
clear
that
not
enough
progress
was
being
made
and
then
and
that
we
didn't
have
a
clear
enough
view
of
status
to
get
to
an
october
go
live
this
year.
K
The
key
step
we
took
quickly
was
to
bring
on
a
full-time
project
manager,
which
this
project
had
not
had.
Someone
working,
you
know
on
the
county's
behalf
to
manage
the
project
holistically.
You
know
that
was
that
was
that
was
one
of
the
things
lynn
was
trying
to
do
on
top
of
on
top
of
everything
else.
She
does.
K
We
were
able
to
quickly
identify
an
individual
named
matt,
clater
who's,
actually
on
the
call.
If
there
are
any
questions
for
him,
he
brings
substantial
experience
working
on
workday
implementations.
K
He
had
just
come
off
actually
spending
a
number
of
months,
helping
the
city
of
baltimore
get
their
workday
project
back
on
track
during
this
time,
as
we
brought
matt
on
to
to
assess
where
things
were
at
a
more
detailed
level
and
build
a
comprehensive
and
detailed
plan
to
get
us
across
the
finish
line,
we
did
slow
the
pace
of
work
to
reduce
our
costs.
K
You
know
with
our
contractor
and
try
to
and
and
try
to
reduce
the
level
of
employee
burnout.
So
you
know
matt's
assessment
identified
a
number
of
weaknesses
which
are
which
are
outlined
in
the
memo
in
which
we
have
already
taken
steps
to
address
a
portion
of,
and
then
are
asking
for
some
for
some
additional
funding
to
address
the
other
weaknesses.
So
at
this
point
you
know
we
do
have
a
detailed
plan.
K
I
provided
with
the
memo
a
summary
of
what
the
timeline
looks
like,
but
there's
a
a
whole
system
of
information
underlying
that
that
you
know
has
detailed
tasks,
who's
responsible
for
them.
You
know
so
that
we
could
be
monitoring
on
a
weekly
basis.
What
the
status
of
the
project
is
and
if
there's
any
slippage,
make
sure
we're
addressing
it
as
quickly
as
possible
to
get
us
to
that.
May
ninth
go
live,
so
the
request
in
front
of
you
as
sean
mentioned,
includes
a
total
of
4.9
million.
K
K
You
know
for
the
fact
that
there
there's
a
longer
period
of
time
here
that
comes
out
to
about
1.6
million
out
of
the
4.9.
That's
a
net
figure.
We
have
about
2.7
million
dollars
in
remaining
costs,
but
because
we
did
slow
work,
we
have
about
1.1
million
dollars,
that's
remaining
from
the
existing
project
budget,
so
that
gets
you
the
net
1.6
million.
K
We're
also
asking
for
1.3
million
to
add
resources
to
both
ensure
project
success
and
try
to
reduce
the
demands
on
county
staff
and
put
them
in
in
position
to
be
as
as
successful
as
possible
with
a
major
system.
Overall,
like
this,
you
know,
people's
day-to-day
jobs
are,
are
really
impacted
and
changed,
and
you
know
in
the
long
run
that
should
that
should
provide
efficiencies
and
improved
work
product.
K
But
in
the
short
run
you
know
people
need
as
much
support
and
training
as
possible
to
know
how
to
use
the
system
and
then
finally,
there
there's
two
million
dollars
in
components.
You
know
that,
frankly,
were
always
going
to
be
needed,
but
just
hadn't
been
contemplated
in
the
original
budget.
So
there's
the
need
for
support.
You
know
after
the
system
goes,
live,
there's
a
period
where
you're
still
troubleshooting
problems,
identifying
solutions
and
stabilizing
the
system,
and
then
there
are
a
couple
of
key
components
that
weren't
included
in
the
original
budget.
K
In
terms
of
we
have
to
be
able
to
build
the
budget
book
and
we
have
to
be
able
to
produce
the
annual
financial
report.
So
that's
the
third
component
to
get
to
the
total
of
4.9
million
dollars.
We
are
proposing
to
use
arp
funds
here.
You
know
this
would
kind
of
go
in
the
county
operations
budget
we
had.
We
had,
if
you
recall,
originally
proposed
15
million
dollars
in
arp
funds
for
county
operations
for
the
upcoming
fiscal
year.
You
know
that
was
reduced
to
five
million
dollars
in
the
adopted
budget.
K
I
think
so
that
we
could
have
these
kinds
of
conversations,
so
this
is
kind
of
the
second
five
million
dollars
in
our
view,
out
of
that
15
and
these
costs
are
eligible.
K
K
For
this,
so
that's
kind
of
the
high
level,
and
you
know
we're
certainly
happy
to
answer
questions
and
and
have
the
whole
group
here
to
do
so.
E
Okay
with
that,
I
will
start
with
commissioner
powell,
if
you
guys,
if
you
can
put
in
your
request
to
speak
okay,
I
did
my
job
on
there.
I
put
my
yep.
I
have
angela
followed
by
charlie,
followed
by
gary,
so
I
don't
have
chris
yet
and
I
and
eileen
so
eileen
will
be
after
gary
and
chris
will
be
after
eileen.
So
angela
goes
first,
oh.
L
Just
had
a
question
in
regards
to
the
peoplesoft
financial
system,
so
that's
like
a
just,
if
you
can,
is
that
the
system
like
the
naming
of
it
and
then
the
human
capital
management
system,
just
I
just
want
to
know
what
human
capital
management
like.
What
is
what
is
that,
or
what
type
of
is
that
just
the
name
of
the
new
system,
where
anybody
see
that
it's
more
definition
wise,
I'm
just
trying
to.
E
Okay
is
that
it
commissioner
powell?
E
Okay,
next
up,
we
have
charlie
commissioner
cabell.
H
Thank
you
chair.
I
have
a.
I
have
a
few
questions,
but
I
think
gary's
gonna
jump
on
a
few
of
them
related.
You
know
this
started
as
a
13.8
million
dollar
project.
Understandably
before
your
10
years
then
got
an
additional
5.2
million
in
december,
and
then
now
you
know
coming
back
for
another
4.9,
so
I'm
sure
gary's
got
something
to
say
about
that,
so
not
to
delve
on
into
that,
but
kyle
you
mentioned
arp
being
used
for
this.
H
My
biggest
hang
up
about
this
is
one
what
gary's
probably
going
to
talk
about,
but
the
second
thing
is
not
to
boost
you
up
too
much
gary
how
gary
and
mike
got
it
going
in
right,
but
but
just
this
seems
kind
of
like
double
speak
in
term,
not
that
this
isn't
a
worthy
cause,
not
that
this
isn't
something
that
has
to
happen.
But
from
what
I've
been
told
by
our
leadership
and
what
I've
heard
has
been
told
on
the
executive
side
of
things.
H
Is
we're
not
going
to
do
these
one-off,
piecemeal
projects
to
try
and
make
sure
that
we
figure
things
out
in
like
an
ad-hoc
as
needed
way,
because
we
have
three
years
to
figure
out
how
to
spend
this
money
we're
going
to
do
in
a
diligent
planned
out
way?
Part
of
that's
on
the
commission
because
we
haven't
given
you
like
a
spending
plan,
that's
cohesive
and
coherent,
but
I
believe
the
commission
has
plans
in
the
works
to
figure
it
out
by
the
end
of
the
year.
H
I
suggest
we
table
this
till
january
when
we
have
our
commission
plan
together,
where
we
give
the
appropriate
buckets
for
the
appropriate
amount
of
money.
I
know
you
had
mentioned
kyle
best
practices,
15
percent
for
government
operations.
H
That
means
there'd
be
plenty
enough
for
this
we'd
happy
to
also
work
on,
if
not
tabling
this,
perhaps
until
january,
perhaps
figuring
out
what
we
can
do
to
make
sure
people
still
get
paid.
But
that's
not
the
full
4.9
million
because,
as
you
said,
there's
two
million
additional.
H
J
Yeah,
you
know
I'll
just
weigh
in
just
in
regards
to
when
we
look
at
I'm
just
going
to
speak
best
practices
on
on
the
portion
of
the
arp
funds
and
I'll
stay
at
that
level
and
and
kyle
you
can
jump
in.
But
first
of
all,
I
think
it's
oakland
county
the
board
of
commissioners
here
to
be
commended
when
I've
been
on
conference
calls
with
other
naco
members
and
folks
around
the
country
of
a
county
of
this
size.
We
spent
27
percent
of
our
cares
money
on
county
operations.
J
Most
counties
of
this
size
spent
40,
if
not
close,
to
70
percent
of
their
dollars
on
county
operations,
so
we
spent
27
percent.
Most
of
it
went
out
to
households,
businesses
non-profits
to
really
preserve
oakland,
county's,
quality
of
life
and
ecosystem,
and
so
that's
to
be
commended
by
this
board
of
commissioners
for
appropriating
those
dollars
and
the
speed
in
which
that
took
place
by
the
county
executive
office
number
two.
As
we
look
at
these
arp
dollars,
we've
said:
hey,
we
don't
need
27
percent.
J
There
has
been
a
conversation
and
dialogue
around
those
county
operations
being
down
around
15
percent
and
so
we're
looking
at
a
portion
of
this
for
for
this
project.
This
is
clearly
eligible
when
we
look
at
the
treasury
guidance
and
we
think
that
this
is
a
very
appropriate
spend.
So
that's
what
I'll
weigh
in
on
that
that
piece
and
kyle-
I
don't
know
if
there's
anything,
you
want
to
add.
K
Substantial
dollars
have
been
appropriated
for
already
by
this
board,
addressing
long-term
chronic
needs,
which
I
think
is
the
piece
you
know
where
we
want
to
be
as
thoughtful
as
possible,
and
you
know
and
wait
till
january
before
we
start
moving
forward
on
on
those,
so
that
we
have
the
best
possible
plans
in
place
and
then
the
third
you
know
kind
of
smaller
bucket
is
the
operational
piece,
and
I
think
we
view
that,
as
as
part
of
that
that
bucket
and
as
you
mentioned,
you
know
we're
looking
at
at
15,
which
would
be
36
million
as
being
an
appropriate
amount
of
dollars.
H
So
if
I
may,
you
still
have
a
four
okay,
so
not
to
say
that
this
isn't
covid
or
arpa
worthy
totally
understand
and
agree.
What
I'm
coming
from
it
of
is
because
we're
talking
about
acute
and
chronic
and
then,
like
you,
said,
kyle
having
the
third
bucket
for
government
operations.
H
I'm
of
the
mind,
let's
maintain
what
we're
doing,
let's
make
sure
no
one
goes
hungry.
Let's
make
sure
things
don't
stop,
but
until
we
all
figure
out
what
we're
willing
to
spend
from
being
the
holders
of
the
purse
and
having
the
prerogative
to
figure
that
out,
give
us
60
days
to
figure
that
out
so
that
then
through
the
holiday
season
right,
if
we're
just
having
real
talk,
there's
thanksgiving,
there's
all
the
holidays,
there's
new
year's,
so
there
isn't
going
to
be
two
million
dollars
worth
of
additional
things
implemented
in
the
next
60
days.
H
G
Commissioner,
if
I,
if
I
could,
I
I'm
not
going
to
address
the
the
prioritization
of
arp
dollars
or
any
of
that,
but
I
will
just
to
give
give
all
of
you
some
context
on
why
there's
some
sense
of
urgency.
G
So
that's
just
a
little
bit
of
the
back
history
on
peoplesoft
as
a
platform,
it
still
works,
we're
still
processing
all
of
our
financial
transactions
through
it.
We
absolutely,
as
kyle
mentioned
earlier,
expect
efficiencies
in
our
financial
operations,
our
purchasing
operations,
our
project
tracking
of
all
the
financial
projects
in
in
all
projects.
G
H
E
Let's,
let's
move
on
commissioner
mcgilvary
thank.
D
We
started
back
in
2018
and
the
anticipated
cost
at
that
point
was
13.8
million.
Then
we
added
an
additional
5.2
million.
It
was
budgeted
last
december
and
now
we're
adding
another
4.9
million.
Is
that
my
understanding
so
all
together
this?
This
is
a
25
million
dollar
project
to
install
work
date
for
the
county.
Is
that
correct?
G
Well,
the
the
implementation
schedule
is
that
we
will
go
live
with
the
financial
modules.
The
purchasing
modules
may
was
it
may
9th,
but
some
of
these
dollars
are
to
help
us
with
that
ongoing
support
both
in
the
departments
with
our
consulting
arm,
our
implementer,
as
well
as
the
I.t
resources
for
several
months
after
that,
as
well
as
kyle
mentioned,
there
were
two
additional
increases
in
things
that
we
knew
we
had
to
do
that
weren't
part
of
the
original
project
around
the
kafir
statement,
as
well
as
the
budget
process.
G
D
When
we
approved
the
13.8
million
back
in
2018
or
17,
I
don't
remember
exactly
when
it
was.
I
kind
of
thought
that
that
was
going
to
be
the
cost
of
this
whole
system
and
now
we're
up
to
25
million,
and
we
don't
know
exactly.
If
that's
going
to
be
the
final
tally
when
we're
all
done
so,
I
have
some
real
concerns
about
attacking
on
a
million
at
a
time
here
or
several
million
at
a
time.
K
I
would
just
I
would
just
emphasize
you
know
this
budget
request.
However,
you
know
we
sat
down
across
a
number
of
meetings
to
ensure
you
know
that
we've
got
everything
built
in
that
we
need.
You
know
to
get
this
this
project
across
the
finish
line,
to
get
it
stabilized
and
to
add
the
components
that
we
need.
You
know
for
effective
and
efficient
county
operations
so
that
we're
not
in
the
position
of
of
having
to
come
back
a
year
from
now
and
ask
for
additional
dollars.
J
And
I
think
commissioner
mcgilvray
and
that's
what
you're
driving
at
how
do
we
know
right,
I
mean
I
I
think
in
in
essence.
How
do
we
know
you're
not
going
to
come
back
for
another
5
million
dollar
request.
He
asked
for
five
and
then-
and
that
was
the
direction
at
the
county
executive
office-
is
hey.
Let's,
let's
understand
the
mistakes
that
were
made
on
this
originally
and
kyle
talked
about
it
earlier
project
manager
wasn't
assigned
to
this.
That
was
very,
very
important.
We
made
that
adjustment.
J
That's
part
of
this
cost,
that's
in
there
and
then
also
what
are
the
things
that
were
not
included
in
this
originally
and
folks
said
originally
hey.
Let's
just
leave
the
price
tag
there
we'll
come
back
for
these.
No,
let's,
let's
handle
this
all
up
front
right
now
and
and
come
with
the
true
price
tag
so
that
we
can.
We
can
be
done
with
this
project,
and
so
I
think
what
mike
has
been
referring
to
too
is
even
though
the
go
live
is
may
9th.
There
are
costs
that
we've
put
in
here
as
well.
J
E
Thank
you,
commissioner
mcgilvray.
So,
commissioner
powell
and
commissioner
mcgilvary,
if
you
would
push
the
little
button
that
says
undo
that
I'm
requesting
a
speak
there
we
go.
Thank
you
all
right.
Next
up,
we
have
commissioner
kowal
followed
by
commissioner
long.
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
thank
you
for
your
efforts
and
your
presentation
here
today.
I
think
what
I've
heard
said
that
we
already
took
so
much
of
the
art,
money
and
appropriated
it,
and
this
would
be
part
of
that
money
that
we
did
set
aside.
So
that's
something
we've
done
already.
F
Out
of
that,
so
we've
already
kind
of
had
that
discussion,
and
this
would
be
the
second
withdrawal
of
that
money.
Correct
just
have
some
questions
about
when
you
mention
resource
turnover,
volume
and
complexity
of
numerous
integrations.
I
understand
the
resource
demands
and,
by
speaking
of
complexity,
of
numerous
integrations.
Is
that
systems
integrations,
or
is
that
partially,
due
to
the
fact
that
there
was
numerous
departmental
reorgs
going
on
during
that
very
time,
because
that
was
you
know,
I
think
pretty
much
supposed
to
be
revenue
neutral.
F
So
I
don't
know
if
that
played
into
it
in
any
way,
shape
or
form-
maybe
it's
more
I.t
related,
but
if
the
fact
that
there
was
a
lot
of
reorganizing
of
different
departments,
if
that
contributed
in
any
way,
that's
something.
I
think
that
we
that
we
need
to
know
and
be
aware
of
and
obviously
kovan
19
impacted
it
hugely.
F
But
at
the
end
of
the
day
I
just
like
to
say
that
you
know
we've
all
looked
to
the
state
of
michigan
and
how
they
do
I.t.
F
You
mentioned
using
this
for
the
to
produce
the
kafir
to
do
all
these
other
things,
so
it
you
know,
would
there
what
would
the
return
on
investment
be
in
that
regard?
So
I
guess
that's
three
things
I've
covered,
but
just
if
you
could
address
the
complexity
of
numerous
integrations
and
perhaps
what
the
roi
might
be
on
this
system.
K
Sure
why
don't
I
take
the
the
first
crack
at
that?
So
the
integrations
piece
is,
you
know,
you
know
an
erp
system.
Again,
you
know
involves
every
dollar.
You
know
that
flows
through
the
county
and
one
way
or
another-
and
you
know,
certainly
we
have
other
it
systems
that
are
involved
in
in
in
processing
the
county's
finances.
So,
for
example,
you
know
the
the
treasurer's
I.t
system,
that's
used
to
collect
property
taxes.
K
That
system
has
to
be
able
to
talk
to
this
system,
and
that
involves
a
lot
of
work
in
terms
of
making
sure
that
those
systems
can
talk
to
each
other
in
a
seamless
way,
and
you
know
that
there
aren't
glitches
that
are
causing
then
problems
with
those
financial
transactions
either
either
for
the
users
on
the
other
end
or
for
the
county.
So
that's
just
one
example.
You
know
out
of
about
50
of
those
integrations
across
the
county.
K
You
know
in
terms
of
return
on
investment,
you
know
as
as
mike
mentioned,
you
know.
The
first
impetus
for
this
project
is
just
that
the
current
system
was
outdated.
You
know
hadn't
been
updated.
You
know,
there's
concerns
about
security.
Whenever
you
have
an
outdated
system,
you
know
so
part
of
it
was
just
it
was
time
and
we
needed
a
new
system.
K
You
know
we
certainly
do
see
efficiencies,
and
you
know
we
are
driving
the
team
to
to
identify
you
know,
as
the
system
is
being
configured
for
operations,
let's
not
just
do
things
the
way,
we've
always
done
them.
You
know,
what's
let's,
let's
find
those
efficiencies-
and
you
know
lynn
can
probably
talk
to
to
a
couple
examples
of
that,
but
you
know
on
the
budget
side.
You
know
this.
This
this
system
will
not
just
produce
the
budget
book.
K
It's
also
going
to
give
us
planning
tools
to
to
be
able
to
forecast
within
a
system
as
opposed
to
doing
sort
of
manual
calculations
in
a
spreadsheet.
So
you
know
that's
the
that's.
The
first
example
that
that
pops
into
my
mind
as
a
as
a
budget
person
at
heart-
I
don't
know
if
you
have
anything
to
add
to
that
one.
A
Well,
I
was
just
going
to
say
another
example
is
like
the
county's
point
of
sale
system.
That's
used
at
various
within
various
departments:
animal
control,
clerk's
office,
treasurer's
office,
the
utility
billing
system
so
be
prior
to
those
integrations
being
in
our
or
being
built
with
peoplesoft
people
used
to
have
to
do
all
of
that
work
manually
enter
those
journal
entries
record
those
cache
receipts
and,
and
now
it's
an
integration
existing
in
peoplesoft.
A
There's
multiple
different
variations
on
how
the
integrations
take
place
as
far
as
the
so
it's
mainly
the
integrations
that
are
being
spoken
to
as
far
as
complexity.
Reviewing
all
that
there,
the
other
piece
of
that
you're
talking
about
the
reorganizations
there
was
no
cost
dollars
in
in
related
to
the
department's
reorganizing.
J
And
then
I
would
also
say
what
we've
seen
too,
and
I
think
mike
tim
can
speak
to
this
a
little
bit
more
directly
but
with
the
vsip
program
being
offered
with
the
voluntary
separations,
and
it
has
also
allowed
certain
departments
to
to
leverage
as
people
are
departing
to
look
at
their
organization
and
say:
do
we
don't
need
to
backfill
that
person,
obviously,
because
there's
some
efficiencies
going
on
with
some
of
the
projects
coming
online
and
I
think
mike
you've
got
some
examples
of
that.
Just
in
the
it
department
alone.
G
Yeah
and
and
several
departments
really
the
so
we've
already
implemented.
You
know
over
a
year
ago
the
payroll
implementation
on
the
hr
side
of
of
the
workday
project,
and
we
used
to
in
many
many
departments
do
our
time
tracking
for
payroll
on
a
piece
of
paper
that
then
someone
did
data
entry
into
the
peoplesoft
system
so
that
it
could
go
to
the
payroll
department
to
actually
cut
checks
and,
and
that
paper
is
now
gone
and
some
of
those
positions
are
now
gone
county
wide.
G
That
work
is
now
done
by
an
employee.
Just
saying
yes,
I
worked
my
eight
hours
on
these
days
or,
in
the
case
of
you,
know
the
non-exempt
employees.
I
worked
8.2
or
I
worked
a
holiday
or
I
worked
a
second
shift,
so
those
things
are
all
there
are
rules
built
in
to
calculate
overtime,
shift,
premiums,
etc.
That's
all
done
automatically
inside
of
workday,
just
based
on
simple
data
entry
that
the
employee
now
does
and
the
supervisor
just
does
a
very
simple
review
and
approval
of
those
timesheets
online.
F
Thank
you
and
just
really
good
explanations
somewhere
along
the
line.
Somebody
mentioned
security
as
well,
and
that's
come
up
in
public
comment
here.
A
few
times
about.
You
know
our
public
records.
You
know
whether
people
are
dealing
with
a
clerk
or
the
treasurer
or
whatever
department
they're
dealing
with
and
that
that
their
records
be
secure
against.
F
So
with
this
system
I
take
it
would
not
that
we're
not
secure
now,
but
I
think
that
this
this
system
would
ensure
that
even
more
so
that
when
people
are
doing
transactions
with
the
county,
that
that
information
would
stay
where
it's
supposed
to.
G
That
that's
absolutely
correct.
I
mean
that
is
one
of
the.
The
benefits
of
implementing
the
new
technologies
is
improvements
in
in
both
access.
You
know
the
identity
of
the
user
and
both
of
those
are
key
attributes
of
maintaining
security,
identity
and
access
management
who's
allowed
to
get
to
it.
And
how
do
I
know
that
you
are?
Who
you
say
you
are
so
all
of
you.
If,
if
you
go
to
work
day,
if
you
do
it
from
from
a
different
network
than
the
county
network,
you
are
prompted
for
multi-factor
authentication
to
get
out
to
work
day.
G
A
And
I
will
just
add
to
that
mike
during
the
rfp
selection.
One
of
the
highest
rated
score
was
the
security
aspect
that
I
t
when
they
reviewed
all
the
applications
that
we
were
looking
at
great.
D
I
Okay,
I
just
have
a
couple
brief
questions,
so
the
project
started
in
2018
but
because
of
kova
delayed
it
I'm
looking
at
your
memo,
that's
why
it
qualifies
for
the
american
rescue
plan,
so
we
know
it
qualifies
for
sure
because
of
covet
hit.
I
Okay,
because
of
the
delays
during
that,
I
just
saw
this
on
them.
I
mean
I
found
that
that
was
my
question
a
while
ago,
but
then
I'm
like
I'm
finding
some
of
this
stuff
so
that
for
sure
that
4.9
qualifies
we
will
be
not
rejected
or
anything
absolutely
okay
and
then
my
second
question-
and
I
saw
a
couple
eyebrows
raises:
why
is
it
taken
to
may
to
how
much
more
it
sounds
like
we
have
a
lot
more
work
that
it's
taken
to
make
and
that's
right
for
you
mike
to
implement,
live.
G
It's
it's
really
a
very
cross-functional
project,
it's
and
it's
a
combination
of
of
the
it
integrations.
It's
a
combination
of
we
have
to
move
all
of
the
data
from
peoplesoft
into
workday,
and
then
somebody
in
fiscal
somebody
in
treasurer
somebody
in
hr
has
to
check
and
make
sure
that
the
data
is
actually
moved
correctly
and
and
that's
just
a
small
part
of
it.
Then
there's
the
changes
in
all
the
business
processes
like
how
we
actually
process
payroll,
how
we
process
vacation
requests,
how
we
process
expense
reports,
how
we
process
purchase,
orders
and
pay
invoices.
G
All
of
those
business
processes
are
going
to
change
for
everybody
that
executes
them
and
in
fact
there
will
be
new
people
involved
in
executing
and
there
will
be
people
that
used
to
execute
that
have
a
different
role
than
they
do
today.
So
so
there's
a
lot
of
training
that
has
to
occur
in
the
departments.
G
I
Users
expect
another
question,
so
what
other
larger
counties
or
counties
are
going
to
work
day?
I
forget,
you
probably
told
us
this,
but.
G
Is
there
anyone
denver
did
right?
City
of
baltimore
did
and.
A
A
A
Obviously
we
had
to
fix
anything
with
with
our
super
support
provider,
but
there's
not
been
any
any
new
functionality
added
since
2010-11
time
frame
and
then
the
cost
to
update
it
to
to
bring
it
up
today
was
going
to
be
just
as
it
would
be
like
an
implementation
in
and
of
itself
and
you're,
not
really
gaining
any
new
functionality.
So
to
speak.
So
that's
why
a
new
system
was
being
purchased.
E
H
Thanks
yeah,
I
appreciate
your
questions,
commissioner
long
because
so
if
peoplesoft
is
end
of
life,
that
means
it's
just
maintaining
right.
It
doesn't
mean
we
say
push
this
to
june
1st.
If
you
know,
god
forbid,
everything
falls
apart
and
we
have
to
push
this
to
june
1st.
It's
not
that
people
aren't
going
to
be
paid
or
people
can't
process
their
taxes
between
may
may
10th
and
may
30th
right.
G
Well,
and
and
again,
all
of
the
payroll
functions
are
already
in
workday
we're
talking
now
about
the
the
fiscal
side,
expense
reports
purchase,
orders,
invoices
right
the
budget
process,
I'm
sure
I'm
missing.
K
K
You
know
whether
to
delay
a
full
year
to
you
know
to
implement
next
october
first,
but
we're
concerned
about
the
costs.
You
know
that
come
with
that
you
know
so
doing
it
approximately
halfway
through
the
year
is
the
next
best
option
and
the
option
you
know
that
we're
going
with
and
by
by
doing
it
in
may
it's
after
we've
closed
the
books
on
last
fiscal
year,
but
it's
before
you
know
we're
into
the
meat
of
the
budget
process
for
the
upcoming
fiscal
year.
K
So
that's
why
may
was
selected
as
the
date
you
know
for
that
context,.
H
Understood
so
well
to
that
question,
then
the
the
capper
that
usually
comes
out
when.
H
Of
march
okay,
so
you're
gonna
do
it
on
the
current
system.
Anyways.
Okay,
you
mentioned
tax
collection
is
the
treasurer
having
problems
with
tax
collection
and
foreclosures
right
march.
31St
is
kind
of
when
it
has
to
be
for
the
year
right,
taxes
or
december
and
summer.
So
I
mean
may
9th.
I
understand
the
timing
there,
but
like
the.
K
You
know,
obviously,
all
our
current
systems
are
currently
operating
the
longer
you
wait
to
to
replace
the
system,
a
there's
risks
that
things
break
and
stop
working
and
b,
there's
the
cost
factor.
So
that's
why
we
view
may,
as
the
most
as
the
most
strategic
time
to
go,
live
to
avoid
both
of
those.
J
Let
me
let
me
also
say
to
that
point.
I
think
this
is
an
important
point
to
emphasize
we're
not
saying
that
there's
risk
to
create
fear
to
garner
votes
here
today.
This
is
a
real
risk.
This
happened
recently
on
our
voice
over
ip
this
past
this
past
summer,
correct
in
regards
to
our
implementation,
not
pointing
blame
at
mike,
but
we
make
decisions
sometimes
when,
when
we
decide
hey
we're
moving
from
one
system
to
another
system
and
we're
not
going
to
maintain
any
more
in
order
to
save
costs,
that
puts
us
on
a
bridge.
J
That's
not
getting.
You
know
the
maintenance
it
needs
and
it
potentially
has
that
opportunity
to
fail
whether
it
fails
or
not.
We're
not
here
to
say
that,
but
there
is
an
enhanced
risk
with
that.
So
I
just
I
want
to
underscore-
and
that's
not
just
you
know
us
just
saying
that
to
say
it
there's
a
recent
example
of
it
happening
now.
J
H
H
That's
not
on
you
all!
That's
not
on
us!
That's
on
things
that
happen
before
all
of
us
just
to
say
that
I
understand
your
argument,
but
that
does
not
resonate
to
me.
So
I
would
like
to
move
to
make
an
amendment
to
have
this
be
a
2.9
million
dollar
resolution
instead
of
a
4.9
million
dollar
resolution.
H
E
So
I'm
not
seeing
a
second,
therefore
emotion,
fails:
okay,
okay,
all
right,
so
is
that
it,
commissioner
yeah
okay!
Next
up,
we
have
commissioner,
charles
thank.
B
You
my
my
comments,
are
actually
more
so
directed
to
the
finance
committee
back
to
my
little
pie.
Chart
needs
but
call
me
a
novice,
which
I
totally
am.
I
forgot
about
the
executive
side
of
this,
where
I
thought
it
was
our
200
million.
Quite
frankly,
and
every
time
I
hear
that
it
you
know,
there's
some
pulling
away
from
it.
I'm
like
wait,
a
minute,
we're
still
in
word
group
mode
so
for
for
me
I
mean
I'm
in
support
of
this.
That's
on
the
table
right
now,
but,
overall
you
know
our
work
groups.
B
So
it's
my
hope
that
the
next
meeting
for
the
finance
committee,
we
could
have
a
visual
aid
of
where
we
are
what's
coming
down
the
pike
and
almost
to
what
charlie
was.
Mr
cavell
was
saying
almost
a
moratorium
on
anything
right
now
until
we've
decided
what
it
is
we
want
to
do
with
the
arpa
money.
Like
I
keep,
even
in
my
other
committee,
we've
already
moved
to
spend
money.
B
E
Thank
you,
commissioner,
charles,
is
that
it
that's
yours.
Okay,
next
up,
we
have
commissioner
powell
for
a
second,
yes,
I.
L
Just
want
to
kind
of
support
charles,
as
far
as
let
me
be
clear.
I
am
a
yes
vote
for
this
today,
but
I
think,
because
we
have
had
several
conversations
in
different
roles
and
different
groups
about
our
money.
What
we're
planning
to
take?
What
are
the
plans?
What
we're
looking
at?
I
just
think,
at
least
by
the
close
out
of
the
year,
if
we
could
get
an
update
overall
of
the
projected
movement,
what
we
have
done,
what
we're
working
on,
what
we're
looking
at
from
the
executive
office.
L
I
think
that
would
be
great
for
us
to
have
an
update,
at
least
before
the
end
of
the
year,
but
I
am
a
yes
vote
for
today.
Thank
you.
E
You,
commissioner
powell,
so
I
think
what
I'm
hearing
is
that
we
would
like
to
hear
the
whole
picture
from
the
executive
branch
where
they
think
they're
going,
but
there's
also
the
piece
of
it.
That
is
us
because
we
have,
as
you
said,
work
groups
and
so
on,
where
we're
trying
to
figure
out
what
we
want
to
do.
We
are
a
team,
you
know
we're
the
legislative
branch
and
you
guys
are
the
executive
branch
and
we
do
need
to
be
working
together.
E
E
Arp
activities-
and
you
are
considering
this
4.9
million
a
piece
of
that
15
million
correct,
okay,
yeah
you're
nodding
your
heads:
let's
get
it
on
the
record
verbally,
yes,
okay,.
E
D
E
I
I
will
call
on
you
in
a
minute.
I
have
the
floor.
Mr
goodwill,
okay,
I
my
experience
in
in
business
as
well
as
government
is,
when
you
have
a
train,
that's
moving
down
the
track
as
far
as
this
one
has
and
you
decide
you're
going
to
stop
for
the
heck
for
whatever
reason-
and
it
may
be
a
really
good
reason.
E
E
You
know,
let's
be
very
intentional
and
and
thorough
in
how
we're
reporting,
what
we're
doing
with
the
arp
money
already
and
then
what
we're
planning
to
do
with
the
arp
money
in
advance,
because
I
think
we're
all
sitting
on
groups
where
gee
I'd
like
to
spend
4
million
here
and
they'd
like
to
spend
22
million
over
there,
and
you
guys
already
want
5
million
more.
So
you
can
see
where
it's
I
mean.
I
have
a
hard
time,
keeping
track
of
it
and
I'm
reading
all
this
as
fast
as
it.
You
send
it
to
us
right.
E
So
I
I
will
be
in
support
of
this
proposal,
but
I
think
you've
heard
that
we
need
to
be
more
intentional
about
the
reporting
that
we're
doing
and
the
coordination
between
the
two
executive
and
legislative
branches
on
the
arp
money
I
and
I'll
just
I'll
just
say
I
get
a
lot
of
emails
that
say
you
know,
come
to
this
zoom
meeting
nako's
going
to
talk
about
how
you
allocate
your
arp
money
or
come
to
this
meeting.
E
We
can
consult
with
you
on
this
and
that
and
I'm
assuming
that
you
guys
are
taking
a
lot
of
those
zoom
calls
and
meetings
and
because
that's
what
your
job
is,
it's
I
take
the
ones
that
I
can
that
I
have
the
time
for,
but
I
don't
feel
like
I'm
even
really
in
the
position
to
make
those
decisions
right.
E
I'm
just
the
chair
of
the
finance
committee
guiding
this
in
this
way,
but
I'm
hopeful
that
you
know
you
are
out
there
in
the
broader
mix
bringing
this
together
as
an
executive
branch
philosophically
and
priority
wise.
What
are
you
hearing?
What
do
you
want
us
to
be
concentrating
on,
and
you
may
find,
as
we
work
through
this
on
other
issues,
down
the
road
that
we're
not
all
in
agreement,
that
that
would
be
where
we
would
want
to
spend
the
money.
So
that's
a
philosophical,
throw
it
out
there.
H
Understood,
thank
you
chair
just
to
say
this
is
a
great
thing
that
we're
doing,
and
we
should
do
this,
but
to
piggyback
off
what
chair
markham
was
saying
so
just
to
make
sure
I
understand
this.
15
million
dollars
has
not
been
appropriated.
This
is
you
asking
for
new
money
from
us,
so
this
isn't
in
the
budget.
This
right
am
I
wrong.
There
correct,
corresponding.
K
There
was
a
plan
that
there
is
a
planned
15
million
dollars
for
for
county
operations.
In
the
current
fiscal
year,
5
million
was
appropriated
in
the
original
budget
we
have.
We
have.
We
have
requests,
we've
brought
for
approving
specific
spending
items
for
operational
needs,
driven
by
kovid
that
are
pending
before
the
pandemic
committee.
Out
of
that
5
million.
H
Understood
and
then
so,
follow-up
question
if
this-
and
I
may
not
understand
this-
so
I'm
glad
that
we
have
the
finance
folks
here
if
this
is
arpa
eligible,
can
this
not
be
a
general
fund
expense
that
we
then
reimburse
later,
because
my
biggest
hang
up
about
this
is
not
that
this
is
not
a
good
project,
not
that
work
day,
isn't
a
good
system,
but
the
fact
that
if
this
is
something
we
think
is
a
worthy
spend,
then
we
should
spend
it
first
and
then
second,
if
y'all
keep
coming
back
chipping
away
at
our
arpa
money,
then
we're
not
going
to
have,
like
commissioner
charles
said
enough
to
go
around
so
can't
you
make
this
a
general
fund
allocation
and
then
we'll
do
the
arpa
later
or
again.
K
Right
so
I'd
say
a
couple
things
one
is,
you
know
to
to
make
sure
we're
being,
as
is
as
thoughtful
as
possible
in
terms
of
how
we
track
arp
funds.
They
are
contained
in
a
separate
fund
than
the
general
fund.
The
cares
act.
We
ran
through
the
county
general
fund,
the
arp
dollars.
We
are
not
so
you
know
we're
trying
to
make
it
as
clear
as
possible
and
we
view
because
of
the
impact
of
covet
on
this
project,
it's
appropriate
to
use
arp
and
not
have
to
utilize
general
fund.
H
Just
to
that,
just
to
that
we've
already
used
13.8
million
dollars
from
the
general
fund
and
then
5.2
million
dollars
from
the
general
fund
to
do
this
so
you're
saying
it's
just
nice
and
easier
for
the
spreadsheets
to
make
sure
that
arpa
dollars
are
over
here
and
general
fund
dollars
over
here,
we've
already
spent
whatever
13.8
plus
5.2
is
in
general
fund
and
then
second,
we
we've
also
set
the
standard
or
shown
that
we
can
do
that
double
over
with
the
10
million
dollars
from
arpa.
That
was
then
reimbursed
correct.
K
As
you
know,
as
as
we've
had
the
conversation,
I
think
previously
with
this
committee,
you
know
our
goal
is
to
to
move
out
of
a
world
where
we're
kind
of
making
adjustments
on
the
back
end.
We
want
to
be
thoughtful
about.
What's
the
best
use,
the
best
fund
source
to
use
for
a
particular
purpose
up
front
appropriate
the
dollars,
you
know,
have
a
clear
funding
source
and
have
a
clear,
a
clear
maximum
spending
authority.
H
So
right
so
you're
saying
to
make
it
easier,
you're
going
to
use
arpa
when
you
could
use
general
fund
dollars
and
then
what
that
means
is
we
have
five
million
dollars
less
as
a
commission
to
help
figure
out
what
people
in
the
county
need
to
spend
it
on
sorry,
that
last
part
was
really
weighted.
We
can
use
general
fund
dollars
correct.
This
can
be
a
general
fund
expense,
certainly.
J
I
I
think
it's
I
just
want
to
step
in
here.
I
I
think
kyle
won't
say
this,
so
I'm
going
to
say
it
on
his
behalf.
We're
not
we
set
aside
15
million,
so
comments
of
saying
picking
away,
I
think,
are
inappropriate.
I
know
that
maybe
how
it's
perceived,
but
15
million
was
talked
about.
D
E
J
And
15
million
was
for
planned
use.
This
is
a
portion
of
that
15
million.
That
was
discussed
so
so
I
there's
an
insinuation
and
a
suggestion
that
the
executive
office
is
going
to
keep
coming
back
here
that
that's
that's
not
that
that's
not
the
case.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
going
on
record
to
say
that.
H
D
No,
the
discussion
with
the
the
board
of
committee
is
either
the
board
of
commissioners
has
a
policy
and
a
procedure
for
allocation
of
the
art
money
of
the
rmani
art
money
or
we
don't,
and
if
we
don't
we're
just
ad
hocking
it
to
whoever
comes
along
either
we
do
or
we
don't.
Thank
you.
E
Anybody
else
have
any
comments
or
questions
at
this
time.
If
not,
then
I
think
we're
ready
to
prompt
the
vote
on.
Let
me
make
sure
I
get
the
title
right:
the
financial
and
human
capital
management
replacement
project
implementation,
extension,
support
and
enhancement.
E
You
next
on
the
agenda.
We
have
public
comment.
Do
we
have
anybody
in
the
room
who
wants
to
speak
before
the
board,
seeing
no
one?
I
will
close
public
comment.
Is
there
any
other
business
to
come
before
finance
today,
seeing
none?
I
will
call
the
meeting
adjourned
at
12
24..
Thank
you.
Everybody
good.