►
From YouTube: OSE Mentorship Agreement
Description
There is now a clear route to receive mentorship for starting OSE-related programs worldwide. Here is the mentorship agreement being developed, with help of Dan Cushman, a lawyer volunteering his services to the world. Thanks Dan! See more notes at https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/wiki/OSE_Chapters_Proposal
-----------------
What you see here at Open Source Ecology is an ambitious open source project for the common good. Join our development team:
http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/OSE_Developers
We run One Day Extreme Build workshops in many locations. Please put yourself on our map if you'd like us to host a workshop near you:
https://microfactory.opensourceecology.org/request-a-workshop/
Take a minute to subscribe to our email newsletter (updates, workshops, etc): http://bit.ly/1LtcM44
A
A
A
A
B
B
All
right,
so
I
think,
there's
not
the
beginning.
I
just
rearranged
a
little
bit.
I
first
want
to
get
make
sure
you're.
Okay,
with
the
concept
it
was
sort
of
a
you,
become
a
thing
called
an
osc
fellow
through
his
mentorship,
but
not
until
you
finish
it
you're,
a
fellow
you're,
not
a
fellow
along
the
way,
you're
just
a
candidate,
and
that
so
you
can
be
a
fellow
and
then
you
can
have.
Maybe
the
thought
is.
B
A
B
A
Yeah,
that's
good,
that's
good,
and
we
have
basically
switched
this
to
this
very
low
risk.
Mentorship
thing
that's
great,
I
like
it
and
it
it
makes
it
tailored
to
the
specific
person's
needs
like
like
le
sego.
He
was
more
like
get
me
on
the
tractors
as
soon
as
you
can,
and
it
wasn't
so
crucial
like
as
far
as
what
happens
afterwards
like.
How
am
I
going
to
be
making
money
with
this?
B
A
A
Right
so
the
explanation
there
is
that
they,
as
a
fellow
you,
you
free
we're
training
you.
Hopefully,
of
course
you
contribute
much
further,
but
if
things
don't
work
out
or
you
just
want
to
start
your
own
thing,
you
can't
you
can
by
all
means
we're
all
open
source.
You
can
use
our
materials
with
attribution,
which
just
means
like
respect
for
you.
You
say:
oh
yeah,
we
got
this
material
from
osc.
They
can
produce
it
no
problem.
B
A
Production
of
printers
yeah,
I
think,
unless
there's
very
formal
agreements
like
a
actual
license
or
brand
like
license,
could
mean
the
license
agreement
that
where
we
grant
them
the
use
of
the
osce
brand
like
the
actual
logo.
But
if,
but
short
of
that,
I
don't
see
how
I
mean
they
don't
have
to
do
anything.
They
just
use
that
being
nice
guys.
Hopefully
they
just
attribute
saying
like
if
they've
got
a
website.
This
is
based
on
osc's
work,
but
they
don't
they
can't.
They
shouldn't
really
be
using
the
osc
lab
oc
trade,
osc
name
on
it.
A
They
can
say
it's
from
based
on
ose
designs,
but
they
can't
say
this
is
osc
because
they
haven't
been
certified
or
anything.
So
we
don't
know
what
what
kind
of
properties
they're
putting
into
the
product
so
unless
they
get
formal
certification,
no
we'd,
rather
them
just
call.
This
is
just
based
on
osc
work.
They
don't
call
it
just
that
or
they
don't
call
it
anything
they
just
do
it.
Are
you
familiar.
A
That's
a
well-recognized
brand
and
they
they
require
that
you
can't
call
your
thing
arduino.
You
can't
say
this:
if
you
built
one
of
their
boards,
you
can't
call
it
an
arduino.
You
can
call
it
it's
based
on
arduino
design,
so
they
just
want
you
to
not
use
the
the
brand,
because
that
stands
for
very
specific
things
like
yeah.
B
A
Specific
way
they
do
things
and
for
us
definitely
specifically
how
we
do
things
like.
Even
just
let
me
tell
you
about
the
germany
case
like
right
now:
osc
germany
just
started
informally
they're,
not
using
our
logo,
but
even
with
that,
I
have
a
tiny,
tiny,
tiny
issue
where
they're
not
focusing
on
the
mass
collaborative
development,
which
is
really
the
core
of
osc.
A
It
actually
transitioned
to
that,
like
initially
like,
of
course,
we
always
knew
it
was
about
collaboration,
but
right
now
it
became
very,
very
clear
that
we
are
about
mass
collaborative
development,
because
a
lot
of
the
problem
with
open
source
is
that
a
lot
of
open
source
people,
don't
collaborate,
believe
it
or
not.
I
mean
they
typically
go
off
in
the
corner
and
once
they're
finished
they
publish,
but
it's
very
common
that
they're
very
non-collaborative
and
the
germany
branch.
A
B
B
A
Say
what
they
don't
leave
a
public
record
of
what
they're
doing?
Well,
they
do
they
document
their
work,
so
it
is
open
source
which
is
great.
It
contributes
to
the
overall
thing,
but
we
could
get
further
like,
for
example,
one
of
the
things
right
now
that
we
want
to
do
as
an
inverter
for
the
solar
system.
A
It
so
there's
an
example
of
non-collaboration
in
sense
that
we're
not
coordinating
development,
but
it's
good
that
some
other
people
can
simply
download
that
and
build
that,
and
we
can
build
that
too.
So
it's
still
open
source,
that's
good,
like
I'd
get
violent
if
they
were
actually
closing
it
up
and
using
osc
name.
A
I
tell
them
to
stop
using
our
name,
but
right
now,
if
they're
using
our
name,
informally
they're,
you
know
osa
germany,
but
I
I
see
very
deliberately
that
they're
not
collaborating
or
creating
mass
collaborative
protocols
that
we
are
working
on,
which
is
core
to
how
we
think
we're
going
to
change
the
world.
So
they
haven't.
B
A
That's
a
good
question
and
the
the
answer
to
that
question
is
largely
ignorance,
not
evil.
It's.
We
are
very
much
conditioned
not
to
collaborate
throughout
the
different
institutions
and
paradigms
of
society.
So
unless
we
get
this
called
global.
Well,
this
more
conscious
evolution
of
that.
On
that
front,
I
do,
I
think,
highly,
that
that,
for
us
to
survive
as
a
species,
we
have
to
collaborate
more
like
it's
an
aside,
but
I
actually
the
other
day.
A
I
looked
up
at
the
sky,
and
I
saw
three
shooting
stars
and
I
said
what
what's
out
there
like?
Is
there
other
life?
There
start
getting
this
global
consciousness,
which
kind
of
framed
it
was
related
to
the
abundance
thing,
because
there
is
that's
a
long
story,
but
in
my
conscious
kind
of
more
consciousness
about
the
the
vastness
of
the
universe
and
how
there
is
no
other
life,
because
one
theory
is
that,
once
once
we
get
good
enough,
we
destroy
ourselves
right
once
we
get
capable
enough,
we
destroy
ourselves.
A
B
A
A
Yeah,
I
mean
the
kind
of
grand
vision
for
grand
vision
or
like
the
vision
on
the
planet.
Here
is
it's
to
start
up,
we're
we're
going
towards
2028
as
the
finishing
of
all
the
global
votes.
Construction
set
technology,
so
we
can
really
focus
on
applications,
whether
it's
building
schools
or
micro
factories
or
entire
facilities
or
like
villages
literally,
we
call
that
our
form
of
replication,
the
osce
campus,
it's
an
education.
I
think
I
mentioned
that
I
mentioned
the
osce
campus
last
time.
B
A
Yeah
the
facility-
that's
like
a
university
campus,
but
it's
got
like
real
life,
real
production.
It's
like
a
real
unit
of
societal
development
that
becomes
more
than
just
like
you
go
there
for
four
years.
It
could
be
longer,
but
it
focuses
around
education.
So
I
envision
that
communities
of
the
future
will
have
a
much
deeper
sense
of
the
education
and
and
continuous
development
like
that
kind
of
that
kind
of
a
nature
to
them.
But
yeah.
A
A
A
B
A
A
B
A
A
A
B
A
B
B
A
I
think
when
a
lot
of
times,
when
you
see
something-
and
you
use
it
like,
you,
don't
pay
attention
to
give
attribution
like
that's
independent.
That's
fine
like
if
they're
doing
good
work,
that's
all
good,
but
then
as
long
as
they're,
simply
not
using
the
osc
logo
and
calling
that
as
official
ose
work
and
then
because
for
that
that
means
you
should
be
following
the
critical
path
and
therefore
be
a
chapter
with
a
charter
and
an
explicit
agreement
that
says
yeah.
You
can
use
the
brand
in
these
particular.
A
It
makes
sense
I
mean
really
really
looking
at
like
mcdonald's
like
you,
you
can't
call
your
place,
mcdonald's
and
put
the
art
shop,
but
you
can
call
it
maybe
mcnuggets,
and
do
it
a
little
differently
or
something
something
like
that
yeah,
so
so
the
the
logo,
all
that
that
comes
with
an
identifiable
brand.
That's
that's
the
charter
stuff,
deeper.
B
B
A
A
B
A
A
A
B
A
Yes,
it's
a
week
or
is
it
yeah?
I
think
I
think
we
have
to
simply
say
like
once
a
week
we
meet
because
most
of
the
time
will
be
spent
on
them
actually
practicing
like
say
it's
initially
say
on
a
3d
printer.
They
have
to
order
the
parts
and
build
it.
So
there's
a
lot
of
work
there.
So,
but
the
guidance
is
critical
like
just
getting
the
constant
feedback
on
the
guidance
to
if
they
have
questions
or
whatever.
So
it
may
take.
B
B
A
Do
you
see
any
issues
with
like
conflict
of
interest
where,
where
like
I'd
love
to
meet
with
people,
when
they're
doing
the
work,
obviously
right,
like
when
they're
producing
like
say
this
guy's
actually
developing
the
next
tractor
for
his
mining
operation?
Right,
I
mean
that's
exciting,
so
I'd
want
to
meet
with
them.
Do
you
see
any
issues
with
how
we're
structuring
this
that,
if
they
don't
have
enough
product,
we're
still
meeting
like
they're,
not
they're
kind
of
like
floating,
and
they
just
want
me
to
talk
to
them?
B
Well,
I
mean,
I
think,
in
your
some
of
the
edits
made
later
said:
if
you're
not
really
they're
just
made
the
tractors,
they're
happy
and
they're
done,
and
they
just
want
to
chat
with
you
it's
up
to
you
to
decide.
If
you
want
to
continue,
I
mean
I
don't
I
wouldn't
call
it
a
conflict
of
interest.
It's
whether
or
not
you
want
to
be
committed
to
saying
well,
yeah.
You
know
you're
paid
paid
for
a
check
in
a
week.
I'm
happy
to
do
that.
B
A
Yeah,
because
from
the
just
from
the
numbers
perspective,
if
it,
if,
if
la
seco,
if
he's
around
for
two
years
because
he's
got
a
job,
so
that's
about
a
hundred
meetings
and
I'm
getting
paid
ten
thousand.
So
it's
a
hundred
dollars
a
meeting
plus
some
prep
time.
I
mean
it's
like
I'm
getting
paid
for
the
stuff.
I
I
already
do
like
you
know.
I
already
do
this
nature
of
work
so.
B
B
No,
I
don't.
I
don't
see
the
issue
because
I
assume
you're
going
to
give.
You
know
you
will
shoot
you
an
email
on
a
question
on
the
design.
You'll,
probably
answer
that
outside
of
the
meeting
and
yeah.
You
know
some
sort
of
support,
so
I
think
that's
another
thing.
I
was
wondering
if
we
want
to
put
here
that
it
may
not
be
dedicated
one-on-one,
so
say
you
get
four
of
these
people.
You
might
have
the
meeting.
At
the
same
time,.
A
Okay,
okay,
so
that
yeah
yeah
we
do
need
to
include
that.
I
was
if
I
forgot
that
the
intent
was.
If
we
get
more
people
signed
up
yeah,
we
have
more
people
with
multiple
people
meetings
with
multiple
people,
with
also
the
intent
to
collaborate
like
also
nurturing
the
collaborative
skills
like
if
there's
another
guy
that
joins
the
polish
guy
and
the
polish
guy
wants
to
build
tractors
too.
A
B
Say
that
there
may
be
one
or
more,
you
know,
maybe
you
know
another
or
you
know
other
other
mentors
working
with
you
to
sort
of
be
vague.
It's
just
whatever
works
out,
and
you
have
the
time
issue.
Also
that
you
know
this
can
be
hard.
You
have
someone
in
south
africa,
someone
in
europe
and
then
you
and
you're
gonna
have
having
a
single
meeting.
Time
will
get
challenging
and
get
enough
people
around
the
planet.
A
B
A
A
B
Yeah,
if
I
was
them
right
now,
I'd
want
you
for
ten
thousand
dollars
yeah,
so
maybe
think
about
that
as
a
change.
Once
you
think
you
have
someone,
that's
your
replacement
and
it's
up
to
you,
where
you
wanna
yeah
about
the
possibility
right
now
that
it's
not
you
or
deal
with
that
when
you're
ready
to
actually
have
it
not
be
you.
A
B
B
B
I
mean
with
if,
if
you
want
to
make
very
clear
that
the
people
you're
about
to
engage
right
now,
may
not
always
be
you
on
the
meeting
with
them.
You
want
to
put
that
in
right
now,
but
if
you
think
it
will
be
somebody
you
sign
up
in
the
future,
knowing
that
person
will
be
handed
off
to
somebody
else,
you
could
deal
with
that
at
that
time.
A
Yeah,
so
for
right
now
I
think
I
mean
I
was
willing
to
do
that.
Definitely
myself
for
the
next
two
years.
I
think
that's
fine,
just
I
think
we
just
want
to
add
the
thing
that
we
might
add
more
people
to
the
call.
If,
if
we
have
more
fellas,
I
wasn't
expecting
too
many
to
show
up
right
over
the
next
two
years,
but
who
who
knows
what?
If
what?
If
this
actually
is
a
really
positive
thing
and
we
get.
A
B
You
may
have
to
bring
everybody
on
board
in
that
initial
stage
whenever
they
come
on
board
separately,
but
then
you
can,
you
can
plug
them
into
a
small.
You
know
future
module,
which
everybody
is
new
to
somebody,
the
whole
group
you
know,
and
they
just
have
different
alignments
of
all
the
parts
as
as
you
go
along
in
the
two-year
process.
B
A
B
About
the
the
picking
up
the
pace
right
just
just
from
a
math
perspective,
it
doesn't
make
sense,
but
I
don't
know
if
a
skill
set,
maybe
it
does
because
you're
you're,
just
you,
know
growing
it's
since
you're
doing
it
more
often
you're
growing,
you're
learning
faster
sticking
better.
So
your
your
time
to.
A
Yeah,
it's
kind
of
a
like
at
the
five
month
mark
it's
kind
of
like
whatever
he
missed,
because
he's
he's
got
a
job.
I
mean
it's
kind
of
if
he
wants
to
accelerate
the
certain
level
of
development,
he's
kind
of
losing
out
on
the
first
month,
first
few
months,
where
he
was
just
doing
half
time
yeah,
I
think
that's
somewhat
acceptable
right
or.
B
Yeah,
I
would
just
say
that
maybe
maybe
turn
that
into
an
example.
You
know
that
they
they
have
to
do
more.
You
know
40
or
more
hours
a
week
to
catch
to
make
up
the
difference,
because
just
just
if
I
was
sitting
here
you,
it
doesn't
sound
like
it's
entirely
thought
through
that.
I'm
I'm
on
a
20-hour
schedule.
B
A
A
A
B
B
A
Yeah
yep
and
with
let's
let's
say:
oh,
I
I
made
that
clear
already.
I
typically
do
that,
make
it
yeah.
We
should
make
it
yeah
they
work
openly.
We
do
want
to
make
it
explicit,
because
some
people,
we
just
hired
180
degree
consulting,
which
is
a
student
consulting
group
that
helped
us
on
some
marketing
stuff
and
they
they
didn't
want
me
to
publish
at
the
end
of
the
day
they
published,
we
could
publish
the
final
report,
but
they
didn't
want
me
to
publish
the
first
meeting
and
stuff
like
so
I
I.
B
A
B
A
B
B
B
B
B
Yeah,
so
that's
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
some
of
the
wording
in
here
was
if
you're
terminated
for
non-performance.
You
don't
get
anything
back,
and
so
you
know
it
they
can
work
around
that
by
terminating
before
the
fourth
month,
which
is
fine
as
long
as
you're
aware.
That's
what
the
outcome
is.
It's
I
mean
if
they,
if
they're
not
performing
you
say
you're
not
performing,
they
can
withdraw
and
get
half
their
money
back
if
they
do
it
by
the
fourth
month
or
whatever.
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
B
A
A
Yeah,
if
the
guy
is
kind
of
just
floating
and
and
he's
not
really
putting
a
lot
of
effort
into
this,
I'm
willing
to
still
keep
with
him
for
entertainment
purposes,
I'm
getting
paid
like,
say
the
hundred
bucks
an
hour.
So
that's
okay,
I
mean
we're
we'd,
be
trying
to
you,
know
they're
paying
for
it.
So
if
they
don't
want
to
get
a
lot
out
of
it,
I
mean
that's
their
loss.
I
would
say:
yeah
yeah.
B
A
A
B
B
B
Say
you
know
there
are
places,
and
you
know
copyright
itself,
especially
in
the
u.s,
although
everything
through
the
licensing
model,
you
have
goes
to
the
public
sphere,
when
you
actually
do
it,
it's
theirs
and
they're,
giving
it
they're
licensing
it
away,
and
so
to
the
extent
that
exists
somewhere
else
or
they
fail
to
do
it
correctly
or
they
their
their
jurisdiction,
has
a
different
model.
I've
had
anything
they
create
all
those
rights.
B
B
A
B
If,
if,
if
that's
the
way
it
works,
I
mean
I
said
that
so
some
some
regime
may
say
that
the
the
inventor
always
gets
it
and
then
they
can
give
it
away.
So
I've
said
that
if,
if
somehow
you
didn't,
it's
not
oscs,
if
you
get
it,
you
agree
to
give
it.
That's
pretty
typical
language,
a
lot
of
creation
documents,
patent
type,
work
that
the
extent
there's
something
that
you
get
you
can
you
may
get
it
by
law,
but
you
got
to
give
it
to
us
and
then
we're
going
to
put
it
in
public.
B
A
A
B
All
right,
I
think,
there's
not
most
of
us
just.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
you
sort
of
I
sort
of
re-characterize
a
little
bit
differently
to
make
it
you're,
not
a
fellow
until
you're
done,
but
I
think
it's
a
good
word.
The
choice
you
had
for
you
know:
you're,
not
a
candidate
you're,
a
fellow
in
training
or.
A
A
A
very
dis,
distinct
claim
about
that.
Let's
talk
about
the
economy
of
affection
where
we're
respecting
people
and
caring
for
others,
as
opposed
to
it's
about
the
buck.
So
yeah
there's
been
some
writing
on
that,
but
that's
the
kind
of
like
when
we
say
fellow,
that's
consistent
with
this
notion
of
this
economy
of
affection.
B
A
B
B
A
B
That's
fine,
I
think
we
said
you
don't
start
to
be
paying.
We
since
you're
the
one
that
it's
it's
clear,
what
you
just
said,
but
I
don't
think
it's
necessary.
Okay,
you're,
the
one
starting
the
thing
and
you
get
to
the
payment,
because
if
you
only
accept
the
wire
a
wire
is
in
or
out
no
it's
there
or
not
sort
of,
but
I
agree,
we'll
put
it.
You
know,
you'll
confirm
payment
and
then
we'll
say
something
that
makes
it
sound
nicer.
Once
payment
is
confirmed,
mentorship.