►
From YouTube: 2022-09-30 meeting
Description
Instrumentation: Messaging
A
C
Usually
Alex
and
Tyler
do
I've
also
has
been
seeing
Benedict
in
here
lately,
but
it
might
be
a
few
minutes
still
last
time.
Some
people
showed
up
I
think
about
five
minutes.
After
the
hour,
yep.
D
I
have
the
same
problem
with
all
of
my
other
Hotel
meetings
that
people
are
used
to
the
meeting
doesn't
start
until
five.
After
so
now,
nobody
shows
up
until
five
after
I
I'm,
the
maintainer
of
the
JavaScript
seg
and
I've
been
slowly
training.
People
earlier
and
earlier
I
start
one
minute
after
the
hour
now.
B
People
show
up
pretty
much
in
time.
C
These
days
well,
I
don't
know.
I
have
been
at
least
the
past.
Well,
it
was
two
weeks
ago.
I
wasn't
here
last
week,
but
previous
to
that
it
was
usually
Tyler
or
Alex.
A
C
You
can
start
one
thing:
I
wanted
to
discuss.
Real
quick
was
this
issue.
I
was
just
wondering
if
you
had
any
ideas
for
this
hasn't
gotten
any
discussion
for
a
while.
Now
I.
A
B
To
be
honest,
it's
more
like
it's
not
something
that
we
can
just
decide
right
away
here.
I
I
agree
we
we
need
to
like
bought,
probably
that
would
be
codowners
on
a
regular
basis
and
then
that
what
potentially
can
apply
a
label
like
hey,
consider,
considers
marking
as
maintained
or
something
like
that.
B
So
it's
clear
like
we
have
been
maintenance
that
many
times
no
one
responded
and
like
both
suggests,
hey
this.
This
component
clue
well,
it
looks
like
qualifies
for
marketing,
is
maintained.
A
B
C
Cool
attention
mostly
because
so
the
past
couple
meetings,
we've
actually
gotten
back
to
I,
think
about
the
June
time
frame
in
terms
of
triaging
issues,
I've
been
keeping
up
with
triaging
them
as
they
come
in,
so
we
could
start
there
if
you
want-
or
if
you
had
another
place,
you
want
to
start
for
this
meeting.
That'd
be
fine
too,
but
I
just
want
to
bring
that
up,
because
I
think
that
would
help
with
some
of
the
like
the
really
really
old
issues,
just
kind
of
marking.
Those
is.
A
C
Close
so
I
got
back
to
it
looks
like
early
June,
but
I
didn't
note
a
couple
of
issues
that
need
to
be
triaged
between
that
point
and
a
little
bit
later
on
anyway.
This
one
was
the
first
one.
This
looks
like
a
new
component
request,
but
I
wasn't
sure
how
to
classify
it.
It
could
just
be
a
needs.
Discussion.
B
C
The
gist
of
it
is
just
propagating
the
attributes
from
parent
spans
to
child
spans.
It
seems
that
the
suggestion
is
that
there
should
be
a
processor
specifically
to
do
this,
but
it's
well,
it's
possible
that
there
could
be
something
that
already
does
this
pretty
easily
I
know
that
the
transfer
pulled
this
off,
but
I
don't
know.
B
I,
don't
believe
we
have
anything
like
this,
so
essentially
they
want
to
propagate
the
Spanish
attributes
to
parents,
no
I'm,
pretty
sure
we
don't
do
anything
like
that,
and
this
probably
can
go
to
spawn
processor,
but
at
the
same
time
actually
no
spank
processor
operates
on
span
only
so
it
doesn't
know
anything
about
like
parents.
B
So
this
this
processor
is
supposed
to
know
the
state
and
I.
Don't
know
what
like
the
good
candidate
we
have.
That
knows
about
the
state.
Probably
like
I,
don't
know
like
table
based
sampling.
Processor
does
not
does
know
the
state,
maybe
that
guy
can
do
this.
But
anyway
it's
pretty
like
it's
pretty
complicated
task
to
be
honest
in
area.
C
B
No
I
I
believe
this
could
go
to
tell
them
something
because
or
we
can
move
tailbase
sample
functionality
for
the
state
of
the
trace
somewhere
like
in
the
library
and
that
the
new
component
can
reuse
that,
because
essentially,
we
need
to
wait
for
the
whole
span
to
like
no
to
the
whole
spine,
but
at
least
to
like.
But
anyway
it's
actually
a
cool
span,
because
you
one
one
span
can
have
different
patterns
right.
B
No
one's
parent
can
only
have
only
one
parent,
so
we
need
to
wait
for
one
parent
spend
only,
but
still
we
we
need
to
wait
for
that.
I
don't
know.
Maybe
a
new
processor
maybe
tell
best
sampling,
processor,
okay,
new
processor,.
B
Yes,
I
follow
up
it's
pretty
big
one.
Let
me
let
me
read
it
after
and
I'll
I'll
respond.
Okay,
thank
you!
So
we
can
so
we
can
go
to
the
next
one.
Yeah
yep.
A
B
I,
don't
even
know
if
we
can't
do
that
with
like
existence,
but
anyway,
let's
put
It
P3
like
a
lowest
priority.
It's
not
a
big
deal
incentive.
Sure.
A
C
C
D
C
Yeah
those
do
exist,
we
haven't
been
using
them
as
much
we've
usually
been
putting
them
toward
a
like
a
specific.
This
looks
like
it's
the
the
heck
exporter,
though,.
B
And
it
looks
like
there
is
already
some
kind
of.
B
C
It
that's
this
istio
one
Hotel.
A
B
A
Okay,
okay,.
B
Definitely
not
the
thing
we
want
to
do
on
the
championship,
it's
it
should.
It
should
be
a
processor
and
like
this
is
what
Dan
was
talking
about
like
some
time
ago
that
we
potentially
can
extract
operators
that
cannot
live
only
in
local
related
receivers
tools
like
another
processor.
So
this
is
the
thing
that.
D
I
think
this
is
probably
won't
do
right.
I
mean
it's
handled
by
the
transform
processor,
the
logs
transform
processor.
B
C
B
B
C
Yeah,
it
doesn't
seem
very
high,
yeah.
Okay,
this
one
just
needs
a
priority,
which
is
probably
just
going
to
be.
A
B
C
Okay,
okay,
so
that's
that
puts
us
at
here
which
these
are
all
fairly
straightforward.
It's
just
a
matter
of
applying
it
there's
a
lot
of
these.
B
C
Can
figure
out
what
they
want
to
do
with
that?
Let's
see,
but
next
this
one
I
can
just
apply
a
thing
to
this
needs
a
proper
label.
Okay,
that
never
got.
A
A
Oh,
let's
go
up,
it
was
a
battle.
B
This
is
a
significant
task.
Let's
see
what
the
addresses
said.
B
A
A
A
No
critical
missing
components:
I
can't
tell.
A
C
You
might
want
to
paint
the
code
owners
again
to
confirm
same
with
this
one
and.
A
C
Yes,
it
still
seems
active,
and
this
is
the
eager
receiver.
C
No,
they
just
said
they're
seeing
same
no,
they
just
mentioned
it.
It
wasn't
necessarily
being
resolved.
Okay,.
A
A
C
One
I'll
just
let
them
they
clearly
are
working
on
it:
okay,
blocked
by
that
we
should
avoid
them.
B
A
C
A
That's
all
right
here:
it's
it's
in
progress.