►
Description
To learn more about critical open source JavaScript projects like Appium, Dojo, jQuery, Node.js, and webpack, and 27 more checkout The OpenJS Foundation: https://openjsf.org/
A
Collaboration
so
anyway,
the
the
short
story
of
this
document
is
we
get
a
lot
of
great
feedback,
but
not
a
lot
of
you
know
concrete
contributions,
so
I'm
not
sure
what
to
say
about
you
know
committing
to
deadlines
and
things
like
that.
B
B
C
C
Yeah
that
that'd
be
great
I
have
about
like
15
different
things,
I'm
talking
with
him
about
at
any
given
okay.
So
so
you
know
maybe
good
to
have
someone
else
on
that
desk,
so
either
of
them
I
think
would
be
super
helpful
to
to
fill
in
I'll.
D
Also
yeah
I'll
also
try
to
brainstorm
if
I
can
think
of.
If
I
can
remember
any
example
or
like
I
could
look
at
the
CSS
repo
for
like
CSS
bugs
that
were
sort
of
recently
reported.
That
might
be
easier
to
construct
an
example
around.
A
A
That
has
how
you
know
what
the
end
of
that
story
is
so
yeah
it'd
be
nice
to
have
a
you
know
more
mainstream
example
that
has
really
kind
of
gone
through
the
whole
lifestyle
cycle,
but.
C
What
about
I'm,
like,
maybe
maybe
like
Marcos,
could
because
I
mean
Marco,
send
Mike
Taylor.
They
ran
oh
gosh.
What
was
that
site.
C
Oh
they
had,
they
had
a
I'll.
Think
of
it.
Sorry
I
feel
like
those
two
would
be
at
once
good
people
to
ask
to
for,
like
a
complete
to
your
point,
Mike,
that's
like
a
completed
kind
of
bug,
because
there
for
a
while
they
did
a
lot
of
mentorship
on
this
topic.
A
I
I
got
to
agree
with
whoever
said
that
CSS
would
probably
be
a
good
source
of
examples,
because
that
is,
you
know,
that's
kind
of
more
problem
driven.
You
know,
people
real
developers
have
a
problem,
and
people
come
up
with
various
Solutions
and
and
they
eventually
get
you
know,
implemented
and
prototyped
and
ultimately
standardized
so
but
I
don't
know
the
CSS
World
well
enough
to
pick
an
example,
but
that
might
be
a
good.
You
know,
source
of
something.
That's
you
know
important
enough
to
be
interesting,
but
you
know
small
enough
to
be.
D
Yeah
I
think
we
we
have
we're
having
two
different
types
of
examples
discussed
here.
One
example
is
the
Json
schema
one,
for
example,
where
you
come
up
with
an
entirely
new
feature.
You
have
a
proposal,
then
you
wonder
how
to
turn
it
into
a
spec
and
there's
that
process,
and
that
is
that's.
That's
very
useful
and
I
think
that
the
interview
format
that
Robin
proposed
would
work
very
well
there
and
the
other
one.
What
I?
What
I
actually
had
in
mind
when
I
was
when
I
mentioned?
D
Having
a
full
example
was
more
like
a
smaller
thing
like
you
know,
you
notice
that
something
doesn't
work
the
same
way
across
two
browsers.
You
you
dig
in
to
see
that
is
this
a
browser
bug
or
what
does
the
spec
say?
You
realize
the
spec
doesn't
actually
say
anything
about
it,
so
you
realize
it's
a
bug
on
the
spec.
You,
you
file
an
issue
with
the
CSS
working
group
repo.
What
should
we
do?
In
that
case,
it's
not
defined
anywhere,
it
gets
discussed.
D
Stuff
gets
added
to
the
spec
end
of
example,
like
I
thought,
that
kind
of
something
small
and
self-contained
and
relatable
like
that,
might
work,
but
I
think
actually
both
kinds
would
be
helpful.
A
So
maybe
somebody
who
knows
CSS
better
than
I
do
come
up
with
such
an
example,
and
maybe
we
interview
one
of
the
people.
That's
been
driving.
Json
schema.
D
A
C
Actually,
it's
brainstorm:
CSX,
CSS
c
s:
s
example,
action
interview,
I,
guess,
then
Manhattan.
C
C
What's
the
time
all
right
cool,
so
next
anything
else
on
concise,
guide
for
right
now,
other
than
we're
all
gonna
keep
working
at
it
another
two
weeks,
all
right,
then
next
item
on
our
agenda,
Define
terms
for
SME
participation.
This
might
be
slightly.
C
Oh
I
opened
this
one
go
me
clarify
term
renewable
okay,
yes,
all
right
cool,
so
we
are
ending
we're
about
to
hit
sort
of
the
end
of
the
year
for
2022,
which
is
wild
to
me.
C
Can
you
guys
believe
that,
and
we
have
had
several
folks
representing
openjs
in
a
more
kind
of
formal
capacity
to
some
of
the
standards
orgs
like
tc39
w3c,
the
Unicode
Consortium
OSI,
so
we
haven't
really
been
super
strict
or
super
formal
on
defining
what
that
term
period
is
and
kind
of
how
we
just
take
a
minute
and
go
review.
Those
those
people
make
sure
they're
still
interested
in
doing
that
for
us
that
and
all
that
we
did
kind
of
just
do
that
for
Leia.
C
So
we've
got
Leia's
nomination
open
for
for
the
tag
vote
for
Leia
and
so
that
that
one's
kind
of
done
but
I
think
it's
it's
worth
actually
putting
this,
maybe
on
our
public
calendar
on
our
standards
calendar
as
a
moment
in
time
where
we
just
we
review
that
we
check
in
with
our
tc39
our
OSI
our
Unicode
reps,
and
see
if
they're
still
still
wanting
to
proceed
with
those
roles.
C
If
there's
a
change
that
needs
or
wants
to
be
made,
so
that
is
the
that's
that's
the
issue.
Yeah.
B
We
had
one
other
piece
of
the
issue
on
the
use
of
the
Community
Fund,
for
this
means
we
agreed
in
our
last
meeting
that
we
would
make
it
a
year.
So
so
you
wouldn't
have
to
go
through
a
PR
every
time
you
travel,
but
there
would
be
an
estimate
for
the
year.
Isn't
that
what
we
discussed
last
time
for
the
Community
Fund,
because
initially
your
approval
is
per
request
when
it's
like
a
maintainer
going
to
an
event
or
speaking
or
things
like
that.
But
you
know
we've
already
said
Leia.
B
C
Know
that
we
we
obviously
if
we're
we're,
supporting
you
and
making
a
commitment
to
to
support
you
as
the
rep
we
we
do
so
with
the
full
knowledge
that
that's
a
two-year
term
and
not
just
a
one-year
term
the
board.
It's
at
the
board's
discretion
to
say
we
fund
travel
for
X
many
dollars
on
the
year.
There's
no
I
think
indication
as
far
as
anybody
I
think
would
would
say
that
the
board
can
it
intends
to
stop
doing
that.
E
E
C
So,
okay,
so
so
it
kind
of
gets
to
the
the
the
the
financial
support
for
for
this
for
the
smes
and
for
the
that
bit
and
I
guess
the
other
question
is:
do
we
want
to
put
put
this
as
a
moment?
I
think
it'd
be
really
hard
to
do
a
or
maybe
maybe
it's
not
that
hard
to
to
track.
Okay.
Well,
the
membership
term
gear
for
ecma
starts
in
June.
You
know,
so
we
should
do
that
analysis
by
April
of
me.
C
That
kind
of
thing
I
think
it
might
make
more
sense
for
us
to
as
a
group,
look
at
the
plan
on
an
annual
basis
for
for
everyone
and
just
check
in
and
keep
it
simple
that
way.
What
do
you
all
think
that.
C
So
maybe
review
reps
in
December
for
the
upcoming
year.
B
Joe's,
deep
in
thought,
because
tracking
terms
has
been
confusing
for
the
CPC
right,
so
it's
one
thing
we're
trying
to
yeah
streamlined.
So
we
don't
have
to
dig
into
the
depths
of
our
repos
or
our
brains
to
remember.
C
F
I
ask
a
question
about
one
of
the
earlier
issues
from
the
calendar
itself.
It
seems
as
though
the
only
way
to
find
it
right
now
is
in
that
issue,
which
will
probably
be
eventually
closed,
and
then
you.
B
F
C
Hundred
percent
I
didn't
even
think
about
that.
That
is
a
really
good
point.
Let's
add
link
to
the
readme
on
this
GitHub.
C
B
F
C
Okay,
I
just
added
those
as
actions
under
that
issue:
very
good
catch,
cool,
yeah.
C
All
right
so
the
other.
There
was
another
issue
that
was
opened
between
now
and
the
last
meeting
that
wasn't
tagged
but
Michael
Champion
oh
opened
this
possible
w3c
Advisory
Board
nomination.
C
So,
as
you
all
know,
we
did
an
an
election
for
the
new
w3c
board
and
and
openjs
cast
it's
ballot
whenever
that
was
they've,
decided
that
those
folks
who
had
been
a
b
members
who
were
then
elected
to
the
board
of
directors
should
step
down
from
their
a
b
duties,
and
so
there's
going
to
be
a
special
election
for
to
fill
the
spots
of
The,
Advisory
Board,
so
call
for
nominations
is
going
to
open
on
the
2nd
of
December
and
will
end
on
the
14th,
so
yeah
I
think
this
is
sort
of
maybe
twofold.
C
My
Champion,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
we
kind
of
want
to
know
if
there's
folks
from
our
community
that
we'd
like
to
nominate
and
then
second.
Secondly,
you
know
keeping
track
of
of
whom
is
nominated,
I
just
see,
tantek
is
so
far
the
only
person.
C
Maybe
it
might
be
useful
too,
to
kind
of
talk
about
how
we
think
that
group
is
Shifting.
Now
that
there's
a
board
of
directors
to
kind
of
take
over
management
capabilities
that
a
b
had
kind
of
previously
taken
on.
If
you
lay
event
curious
what
you.
C
E
Yeah,
well,
it's
an
interesting
opportunity
with
four
vacancies
and
since
the
incumbents
usually
run
and
get
reelected,
so
they
sell
them.
You
know
this
many
vacancies
and
there's
only
one
candidate
last
I
checked,
maybe
as
of
yesterday,
so
you
know
if
we
did
have
somebody
who's
really
say.
E
Well,
let's,
so
let
me
back
up
a
bit
one
of
the
for
the
last
few
years
the
ab
has
more
been
has
been
very
focused
on
spinning
off
w3c
as
a
legal
entity,
and
that's
now
done
that's
the
that's
the
board's
responsibility
going
forward,
so
the
a
b
should
be
getting
back
to
which.
E
Our
community,
and
so
there's
a
lot
of
in
there
to
you,
know
the
way
the
world
works
now
as
opposed
to
how
it
worked
in
95
when
w3c
got
going.
E
You
know,
especially
with
regard
to
the
role
of
Open
Source
in
in
this,
in
standards,
development
and
implementation.
So
you
know
it
could
be
a
real
opportunity
for
us
to
put
somebody's
forward.
Who's
got
some
Vision
there,
but
yeah
people
like
Jory,
who
would
be
my
preference
candidate,
have
a
lot
going
on
in
life
and
probably
don't
want
that
that
that
additional
you.
F
E
Hassle,
Brian
has
kind
of
said
no
I've
said
I'd.
Do
it,
for
you
know,
just
to
you
know,
have
some
knowledge.
You
know
to
keep
some
continuity,
but
you
know
I'm,
re,
I'm,
retired
and
I.
Don't
this
isn't
exactly
my
passion
anymore,
so,
but
I
really
really
hope
we
could
find
somebody
to
in
our
community
to
you
know
to
represent
us
or
represent
our
this
point
of
view.
So
I
don't
know
what
to
say.
C
Regrettably,
all
I
have
to
to
drop
all
poppy
note
stock
into
the
chats.
You
can
continue
this
conversation,
but
I'm
gonna
have
to
think
so.
Bye.