►
Description
Joint Planning / Agriculture & Rural Affairs Committees - Official Plan Meeting - Day 1, Part 1 - 14 October 2021
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas
A
A
The
peoples
of
the
algonquin
asian
nation
have
lived
on
this
territory
for
millennia,
their
culture
and
presence
have
nurtured
and
continue
to
nurture
this
land.
The
city
of
ottawa,
honors,
the
people
in
the
land
of
the
algonquin
and
shinobi
nation.
We
extend
our
recognition
to
all
first
nations,
inuit
and
metis
peoples
for
their
valuable
past
and
present
contributions
to
this
city
and,
of
course,
the
future
contributions.
A
So
this
is
the
first
time
we've
had
a
discussion
about
the
official
planet,
conjoint
committee.
Obviously
we've
been
doing
this
for
the
last
couple
years,
but
this
is
the
final
version
of
our
new
official
plan.
It
incorporates
all
the
feedback
that
staff
have
collected
from
residents,
members
of
council
and
other
stakeholders.
A
A
This
marks
the
end
of
a
multi-year
process
that
started
well
before
2019.
When
we
officially
tasked
that,
with
giving
with
having
the
official
plan
completed
before
the
end
of
2021.,
they
did
an
incredible
amount
of
work.
They
continue
to
incredible
metal
work
and
we
are
here
two
months
before
the
end
of
the
year,
with
the
final
products
before
us
on
behalf
of
council
and
everyone
in
ottawa,
because
this
plan
does
impact
everyone
in
ottawa.
We'd
like
to
say
thank
you
to
the
incredibly
talented
team
that
has
delivered
this
new
official
plan.
B
Eli,
thank
you
very
much,
chairman
of
it
and
steph
for
an
amazing
job
on
tight
line
timeline
before
we
continue.
Let's
get
through
a
call
out
of
the
way
I'll
ask
our
committee
coordinator,
mr
desjardins,
to
call
the
role
and
I'll
remind
you
that
we
need
seven
of
our
third
team
member
president
to
maintain
calls.
Please
leave
your
camera
on
during
that
time.
Mr
again,.
C
A
E
F
G
C
B
H
C
H
B
Everyone
present,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr
desjardins.
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
declarations
of
interest
see
now,
so
let
me
outline
how
we
will
proceed.
If
you
may
we'll
ask
staff
to
give
us
an
overview
of
the
new
official
plan
that
will
take
about
half
an
hour.
B
B
We
will
only
consider
motions
after
delegation
but
having
them
on
the
table.
Early
speakers
will
be
able
to
be
aware
of
everything
being
considered.
Unfortunately,
we're
gonna
we're
not
gonna,
be
able
to
introduce
motions
this
morning
or
before
this
gonna
go
to
the
speaker
first
and
then,
whether
tomorrow
or
monday,
we'll
introduce
the
motion.
So
if
you
have
any
emotion
or
you're
thinking
about
any
motion,
please
submit
it
to
the
clerk's
office.
B
A
So,
as
cancer
was
changing
mentioned,
we
will
not
be
hearing
motions
this
morning.
We
do
have
delegations
that
we
will
be
getting
to
as
soon
as
the
presentation
from
staff
is
done.
We
have
94
delegations
registered
to
speak
before
us
today,
and
we
also
have
many
written
submissions
as
well,
and
you
can
see
those
submissions.
A
So,
as
we
go
through
each
delegation,
we
will
keep
announcing
who's
next
to
come,
so
make
sure
we
keep
things
flowing
so
we'll
provide
an
update
on
the
next
three
every
time
that
we
introduce
another
speaker.
So
this
will
help
anyone
waiting
their
turn
or
watching
on
youtube
know.
Your
speaking
time
is
approaching,
which
brings
us
to
information
about
zoo
meetings.
B
Let
me
cover
a
few
basic
for
everyone.
Joining
us
today
remember
to
keep
our
your
microphone
muted.
Until
we
call
you
calling
you
to
speak,
you
should
also
use
the
raised
hand
button
at
the
bottom
of
the
screen
to
let
us
know
you
want
to
speak
with
the
help
of
the
committee
coordinator.
We
will
do
our
best
to
watch
those
cues
if
any
counselors
or
staff
are
joining
by
phone.
You
can
press
star
9.
To
raise
your
hand,
you
can
also
press
star
6,
six
commute
and
unmute
yourself.
B
A
Thank
you
and
a
reminder.
This
meeting
is
being
live
streamed.
It
will
be
archived
on
youtube,
which
means
over
the
christmas
holidays.
If
you
have
20
to
30
hours
to
spare,
you
can
go
back
and
re-watch
our
entire
meeting
on
youtube,
which
is
super
exciting.
So,
as
you
would
might
assume,
if
you
enable
your
camera,
while
you
speak,
you
will
appear
on
screen
captured
for
eternity
on
the
live
youtube
stream.
A
If
you
don't
want
to
appear
on
screen
like
if
jeff
has
to
change
from
pants
to
shorts,
make
sure
you
turn
your
camera
off
when
we
call
a
delegation
to
speak,
please
unmute
your
mic
and
begin.
If
you
have
provided
a
presentation
to
the
committee
coordinator,
please
tell
him
to
advance
the
slides
as
necessary.
A
While
you
speak
and
that's
commonly
next
slide.
Please
next
slide.
Please
and
mark
will
get
used
to
that
today.
As
he
hears
it
probably
a
thousand
times
our
coordinator
will
do
his
best
to
give
a
one
minute
warning,
so
you
can
make
sure
you
get
in
your
main
points
and
wrap
up
each
committee
member
will
have
the
opportunity
to
ask
questions
of
delegations.
We
also
welcome
questions
from
any
counselors
who
may
have
joined
us
when
questions
to
delegations
are
finished.
A
The
coordinator
will
place
you,
the
delegation
back
in
the
zoom
lobby,
on
mute
where
you
can
watch
the
rest
of
the
meeting
if
you
wish,
or
you
can
simply
tune
in
via
youtube.
I'll
also
point
out
that
this
meeting
has
been
set
up
with
french
and
english
interpreters
on
the
bottom
of
your
zoom
window,
you
see
an
option
for
interpretation
where
you
can
select
an
audio
channel
to
listen
in
either
french
or
english.
Given
a
large
number
of
delegations,
we
won't
likely
get
beyond
hearing
for
speakers
today.
We'll
probably
finish
that
up
tomorrow.
A
Only
after
we
have
heard
from
all
delegations
will
counselors
have
the
opportunity
to
ask
questions
of
staff
which
again
tomorrow
afternoon
or
monday,
depending
on
how
things
go
today,
but
we'll
make
sure
we
update
committee
members
by
the
end
of
today
as
to
what
the
plan
is
for
tomorrow
and
into
monday.
At
that
point,
we
will
consider
so
after
we're
done
everything
and
motions
and
motions
after
questions
to
staff.
Sorry
we'll
get
to
the
motions
to
deliberations.
B
So
we
plan
to
go
no
later
than
8
00
pm.
Today
we
will
take
a
30
minute
lunch
break
at
about
12
30,
depending
on
the
speakers
and
another
30-minute
break
at
about
5
30..
We
might
pause
for
more
bio
break
if
we
need
to.
But
at
least
you
can
plan
your
lunch
and
your
dinner
time.
It
will
be
a
long
meeting
and
will
last
a
few
days.
The
official
plan
is
ottawa's,
most
comprehensive
planning
document.
B
A
However
long
this
takes,
we
just
want
to
remind
members
of
committing
everyone
to
be
considerate
patients.
As
we
proceed,
we
see
sometimes
meetings
where
patients
in
consideration
doesn't
happen.
I
don't
think
we
want
to
experience
that
over
and
over
again,
so
what
we
have
today,
what
we're
looking
to
do
is
a
significant
task,
we're
looking
to
replace
an
official
plan,
that's
been
in
effect
since
2003.
A
So
it's
not
just
a
document,
that's
from
2003,
it's
a
much
older
document
and
in
that
time
we've
seen.
Trends
emerge,
that's
place
our
current
official
plan
somewhat
out
of
date
and
not
able
to
address
some
of
the
best
practices
that
have
evolved
over
that
time.
So,
in
recent
years,
we've
seen
improved
planning
incorporated
into
our
new
secondary
plans
and
our
growth
management
strategy,
and
now
we
need
to
incorporate
those
same
approaches
into
the
city's
principal
planning
documents.
A
A
For
in
the
in
the
major
changes
proposed,
that's
not
to
say
we
can't
find
ways
to
make
it
better.
There
will
be
opportunities
to
tweak,
what's
come
before
us
and
recommend
and
recommend
adjustments
to
counsel
with
so
many
moving
parts.
It
doesn't
make
sense
that
we
ensure
our
professional
planning
staff
support
anything
we
might
propose
to
ensure
internal
consistency
of
the
plan
and,
just
with
your
perspective,
it's
also
worth
remembering
that
the
new
official
plan
will
continue
to
change
and
adapt
in
the
years
to
come.
A
A
A
Now
is
the
time
to
stop
thinking
about
that
in
abstract
terms
and
set
the
policies
in
place
to
make
it
happen.
It's
an
important
step
in
a
longer
process,
but
it's
still
just
one
step
and
it'll.
Take
us
to
the
next
step:
remaking
our
zoning
bylaw,
which
is
an
incredible
task
for
the
next
general
council.
It's
all
part
of
the
process
and
making
sure
we
have
a
cohesive
set
of
urban
planning
policies
to
get
us
to
our
goal.
Now
I'll
turn
to
council
el
chantiri.
B
You
chairmanford,
I
also
look
forward
to
hearing
the
ideas
and
concerns
of
members
over
the
next
few
days,
I'm
a
rural
resident
and
a
counselor
for
a
rural
board.
I'm
also
chair
of
the
agriculture
and
rural
affairs
committee
so
won't
be
surprised
anyone
that
might
construct
mostly
about
how
the
new
op
treats
rural
ottawa
at
our
last
journey.
H
B
We
provide
a
policy
directions
on
urban
expansion.
As
a
result,
the
new
op
includes
policies
to
protect
agricultural
land
for
agricultural
uses.
That's
important
rural
ottawa
is
massive
covering
about
eighty
percent
of
our
land.
Massive
base
size
along
the
agriculture
sector
is
essential
to
iowa's
economy.
B
B
Those
are
the
policy
that
will
make
easy
to
live
our
life
without
relying
as
much
on
our
cars,
and
we
saw
that
the
village
of
carp
had
been
as
a
pilot
for
the
15-minute
walk.
Those
policies
had
the
conditions
for
diversified
mix
of
housing,
services,
schools
and
green
space
in
every
cabinet,
and
you
might
think
that
such
a
policies
will
mostly
benefit
more
central
urban
area,
but
it
is
worth
remembering
that
our
rural
villages
will
also
benefit.
B
We
have
26
villages
across
ottawa
and
the
op
will
encourage
new
small
local
service
businesses.
Residents
will
benefit
from
those
support
from
the
services
they
provide
and
from
the
economic
benefits
they
generate.
Rural
resident
will
also
benefit
from
the
new
op
policy
that
protect
and
build
villages.
Green
space,
dopey
envision
a
healthy
connected
network
of
natural
areas
offering
a
wide
range
of
benefit.
B
B
B
I
Thank
you
chairs.
It's
my
pleasure
to
be
here
this
morning
to
introduce
the
presentation
and
tabling
of
the
staff
report.
I
My
name
is
dawn
herwire,
I'm
the
director
of
long-range
planning
and
economic
development
at
the
city
following
me,
charmaine
fourie
will
be
speaking
about
the
engagement
side
of
this
lengthy
process
and
I
think
the
success
story
that
that
we've
realized
through
that
process,
alain
miglez,
will
be
delivering
the
bulk
of
the
presentation
and
he'll
be
supported
by
inga
rosendahl
from
ottawa,
public
health,
which
was
a
key
part
embedded
in
our
official
plan
team
and
andrea
flowers,
who's
the
lead
on
our
climate
change
and
resiliency
team.
I
So
I
think
I
think
the
the
chairs
have
provided
a
very
good
overview,
an
introduction
of
where
we
are
and
where
we've
come
from.
If
we
go
to
slide
three
I'll
provide
just
a
brief
recap
of
the
it
seems
like
many.
I
Three
years,
sorry,
the
slide
before
that
please
mark,
thank
you,
so
in
in
september
of
2018
council
directed
staff
to
initiate
a
comprehensive
review
of
the
official
plan.
So
that's,
as
chair
moffatt,
said
no
longer
an
update
of
a
previous
plan,
but
a
brand
new
official
plan.
I
Less
than
a
year
later,
we
had
a
report
before
council
that
established
the
preliminary
policy
directions
that
have
guided
this
new
official
plan
exercise
and
the
five
big
moves,
which
is
really
the
again
the
guiding
framework,
the
the
lens
on
which
the
the
new
official
plan
was
was
developed.
I
So
less
than
a
year
later,
we
had
our
first
draft
of
the
new
official
plan
released
in
november
of
2020
and
a
lot
of
engagement
and
discussion
along
the
way
that
jeremy
will
touch
on
and,
of
course,
members
will
recall
in
may
of
2020.
I
The
first
growth
management
strategy
report,
which
was
approved
by
council
and
that
established
the
land
supply
requirements
for
both
residential
and
employment
or
industrial
and
logistics
lands,
and
that
was
adopted
at
that
point
fast
forward
again
february
2021,
the
growth,
the
second
growth
management
report
was
approved
by
council
and
that
dealt
with
the
urban
expansion
and
industrial
land
requirements
that
would
be
incorporated
into
the
official
plan
that
we
have
before
us
today.
I
Along
the
way
again,
there
was
extensive
consultation
and
work
with
agencies
and
stakeholders.
Our
second
draft
of
the
new
official
plan
was
released
in
july
of
this
year
and
yeah
fast
forward.
Here
we
are
october
with
with
the
report
before
us.
There
was
an
open
health,
successful
open
house
held
in
september
of
2021
and
again
a
lot
of
work
in
a
very
condensed
time
period
by
a
dedicated
team
of
professionals
not
just
from
within
planning,
but
across
the
city
that
have
inputted
into
this
plan.
H
Thank
you
don
and
good
morning.
Everyone,
as
mentioned,
I
am
charmaine
cory,
and
I
had
the
pleasure
of
being
the
lead
on
the
engagement
for
the
new
official
plan
chairs
and
committee
members.
I
would
like
to
outline
the
public
engagement
efforts
for
the
new
official
plan.
We
started
the
engagement
early
in
the
process
with
beyond
2036
and
2019,
and
we
continued
the
momentum
until
here
we
are
today.
We
used
a
different
approach.
H
We
got
out
of
city
hall
and
we
went
into
the
community
to
the
residence
unfortunately
covid19
hit
and
we
had
to
pivot
the
way
we
do
business
so
no
longer
could
we
was
that
an
option
and
we
moved
to
a
virtual
platform
residents
and
stakeholders
now
welcomed
us
into
their
homes.
The
outreach
was
beyond
the
residents
who
are
regularly
engaged
in
planning
matters.
The
virtual
platform
provided
others
to
join
the
conversation,
and
we
saw
many
new
faces
that
we
had
not
seen
before
as
slide
indicates.
H
We
had
157
engagement
activities,
we
had
29
surveys
online
surveys,
which
include
surveys
on
the
discussion
papers,
the
21
highlight
sheets,
the
five
big
moves
and
the
most
responded
to
was
the
15-minute
neighborhood
survey,
which
we
had
over
4
000
responses.
H
Also,
we
have
the
engage
ottawa
website,
which
is
one
stop
shop
for
all
of
the
products.
Everything
was
there.
They
could
ask
their
questions.
They
could
see
all
the
presentations
everything
was
on
the
once
the
one
website.
We
did
awareness
videos
and
also
we
had
a
dedicated
official
plan
web
inbox,
which
residents
and
stakeholders
used
quite
actively
and
it
was
somewhere.
They
could
ask
their
questions.
H
We
had
the
opportunity
to
have
over
140
engagement,
touch
points
with
residents
and
we
also
reached
the
11
traditionally
underrepresented
groups.
We
formed
the
ambassadors
working
group,
we
did
youth
engagement,
we
had
customized
rural
engagement
attending
their
bias
and
their
farmers
annual
meeting,
and
also
we
applied
the
gender
and
equity
lens
in
all
of
the
policies,
our
indigenous
peoples.
We
have
an
open
invitation
with
no
specific
timeline
for
the
indigenous
peoples
to
provide
their
feedback
if
we
receive
the
indigenous
people's
feedback
and
the
op
requires
an
amendment.
H
H
We
gathered
unprecedented
amount
of
feedback
to
form
the
new
op
and
I'd
like
to
thank
the
residents
for
their
time
and
thoughtful
feedback,
and
also
to
the
counselors
for
hosting
all
of
the
events
as
well.
So
with
the
public
feedback.
What
did
we
do?
We
every
piece
of
public
feedback
was
tracked
and
shared
in
real
time
to
the
official
plan
planning
team,
so
they
could
take
it
into
account.
H
There
was
three
city-wide.
As
we
heard
it,
reports
were
released.
There
was
the
initial
one,
the
interim
one
and
now
the
final
one
23
more
specific,
as
we
heard
it
reports
as
well.
We
want
to
be
clear
and
transparent
that
we're
listing
and
adjustments
remain
with
the
feedback
that
we
received.
H
All
reports
can
now
be
found
and
have
been
found
throughout
the
process.
Unengaged
ottawa,
as
policies
were
dropped
drafted
next
slide.
Please,
as
policies
were
drafted,
we
released
them
on
the
website
for
review.
We
used
track
changes
to
ensure
everyone
could
see
the
changes
that
were
being
made
in
real
time.
As
mentioned,
all
the
material
was
made
available
as
soon
as
it
was
was
available.
We
really
had.
This
is
a
new
opportunity
too.
H
As
final
drops
were
available,
they
were
put
on
the
site
for
comments
and
believe
me,
our
residents,
they
commented,
gave
us
thoughtful
feedback
and
excellent
questions,
and
I
thank
them
for
that,
and
so
now
I
will.
We
are
here
today
and
even
the
report
that
we're
covering
today
was
put
weeks
in
advance
on
the
website
as
well
for
folks
to
review.
So
with
that,
I'm
going
to
turn
that
over
to
ellen.
Thank
you.
J
Thank
you
very
much
charmaine
chairs
and
members
of
committee
and
to
everyone
watching
this
morning
good
morning.
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
charmaine
highlighted
was
that
we
were
listening.
We
were
listening
to
what
people
were
saying
and
the
version
of
the
official
plan
that
we
are
submitting
for
consideration
today
does
include
a
number
of
major
changes
that
we
can
talk
about,
but
that
we
made
to
the
official
plan
in
response
to
what
people
were
saying.
J
As
the
chairs
pointed
out,
our
staff
worked
on
a
completely
new
structure
for
the
official
plan,
and
I
want
to
take
this
time
to
thank
my
staff
for
the
work
that
they've
done.
It
was
an
intellectual
and
technical
and
professional
effort
that
has
no
parallel.
I
think
in
ontario
and
probably
in
canada
and
the
plan
that
we
have
today
is
truly
a
plan
that
is
by
ottawa
and
for
ottawa.
J
Some
of
the
changes
that
we
talked
about
was
with
our
use
of
overlays.
We
did
some
significant
changes
to
better
map
what
we
are
portraying
as
a
good
way
to
outline
the
context
of
the
city
that
need
their
own
policy
directions
and
objectives.
J
We
address
the
issue
of
allowing
single
detached
dwellings
to
be
reconstructed
next
next
slide.
Please.
J
We
did
quite
a
bit
of
work
on
the
issue
of
housing,
affordability
and
we
will
have
a
slide
on
this
a
little
bit
later,
but
basically,
the
new
op
that
we're
submitting
for
consideration
today
goes
much
further
than
the
one
we
currently
have,
both
in
providing
more
housing
choice
and
diversity
in
established
neighborhoods
and
putting
in
place
some
of
the
new
tools
that
we
have
in
order
to
continue
to
to
obtain
as
much
affordable.
J
J
So,
just
to
recap,
the
structure
of
the
new
official
plan
that
you
have
in
front
of
you
starts
with
the
five
big
moves
for
the
first
time.
We
have
a
number
of
cross-cutting
issues
because
we
recognize
that
there
are
several
issues
that
don't
belong
in
a
single
policy
silo
but
really
have
to
be
expressed,
interpreted
and
found
in
other
parts
of
the
policy
document.
J
We
do
express
the
growth
management
policies
as
per
the
growth
management
strategy
adopted
by
council.
We
have
our
city-wide
policies,
which
base
basically
are
built
on
this.
The
system
of
transects
designations
and
overlays
next
slide.
J
One
of
the
things
that
we
say
in
the
staff
report
is
that
this
is
not
just
any
other
plan,
and
I
think
the
shares
have
pointed
this
out.
This
is
a
milestone
plan
and
it's
one
of
the
plans
that
fits
in
a
continuum
of
plans
that
the
city
has
adopted
through
its
history.
J
This
is
a
milestone
plan
because
as
much
as
it
continues
the
momentum
of
legacy
directions
that
have
served
us
well,
it
does
introduce
new
ways
of
thinking
about
how
the
city
grows.
It
does
introduce
new
ways
of
addressing
the
challenges
that
we
have
today.
It
very
much
is
a
21st
century
plan
that
addresses
21st
century
challenges
with
21st
century
approaches,
and
that
is
very
much
the
way
we
wanted
to
position
this
plan
next
slide.
Please.
J
The
five
big
moves
that
we
are
all
now
familiar
with
are
big
moves,
each
of
them
and
for
a
north
american
city
like
ours,
there
are
significant
ways
of
thinking
about
the
city
and
how
it
grows
over
the
next
25
years.
One
of
the
things
that
we've
heard
most
is
how
will
we
make
sure
that
these
five
big
moves
are
not
a
silo
by
themselves?
J
You
know
how
do
they
connect
to
other
things
that
the
city
is
doing,
and
so,
throughout
our
process
we
have
been
working
with
colleagues
in
other
service
areas
and
other
departments
to
make
sure
that
the
five
big
moves
are
reflected
in
the
many
other
key
plans
that
the
city
has
in
order
to
build
to
deliver
services
or
to
deploy
what
it
what
it
provides
for
its
citizens.
J
The
infrastructure
master
plan
is
proceeding
in
lockstep
with
the
official
plan,
so
is
the
transportation
master
plan,
the
urban
forest
and
green
space
master
plan
as
well.
Of
course,
the
climate
change
master
plan
is
adopted
already
and
our
colleagues
from
the
climate
change
and
resiliency
section
you
know
have
participated
actively
in
crafting
the
policies
we
have
been
working
with
our
colleagues
in
housing
who
oversee
the
10-year
housing
and
homelessness
plan
and
the
just
adopted
parks
and
recreation
facilities.
J
Master
plan
have
had
their
staff
working
with
ours
on
everything,
starting
with
mapping,
and
at
this
point,
I'd
like
to
turn
it
over
to
my
colleague,
andrea
flowers,
to
illustrate
how
the
climate
change
master
plan
and
its
objectives
are
found
in
the
new
official
plan.
K
Thanks
ellen
in
january,
2020
council
report
approved
the
climate
change
master
plan,
the
overarching
framework
for
how
ottawa
will
mitigate
and
adapt
to
climate
change
over
the
coming
three
decades.
The
climate
change
master
plan
includes
short,
mid
and
long
term
targets
to
reduce
greenhouse
gas
emissions
to
zero
by
2050..
K
One
of
the
eight
priorities
in
the
climate
change
master
plan
is
to
embed
a
climate
lens
in
the
new
official
plan,
so
that
climate
considerations
are
embedded
throughout
our
land
use
policy
and
our
frameworks
to
do
this.
The
official
plan
sets
a
vision
for
ottawa
to
be
an
energy
conscious
city,
where
people
can
live,
work
and
play
in
all
climate
conditions.
K
The
growth
management
strategy
is
consistent
with
energy
evolution,
ottawa's
plan
to
reduce
emissions,
and
it
includes
ottawa's,
60
intensification
targets,
the
city,
monitors
and
reports
annually
on
our
corporate
and
community
greenhouse
gas
emissions.
The
op
sets
the
intent
for
us
to
apply
a
climate
lens
to
the
monitoring
of
intensification
where
it
can
influence
emissions.
K
L
C
J
So,
as
don
indicated
in
his
introductory
remarks,
one
of
the
milestone
stages
of
the
the
journey
to
this
official
plan
was
the
adoption
of
the
growth
management
strategy
council
adopted
what
we
called
the
balanced
scenario
and
the
balance
that
we're
talking
about
is
indeed
a
very
careful
balance
of
a
lot
of
priorities.
J
Of
course,
we
do
have
to
comply
with
the
provincial
policy
statement
with
respect
to
the
the
land
supply
and
we
also
have
to
comply
with
policy
directions
coming
from
the
province
about
intensification.
J
The
big
takeaway
here
is
that
we
can
reach
our
goals
of
intensification
with
an
average
change
of
only
one
percent
of
neighborhoods
over
the
next
25
years,
which
means
when
you
come
back
in
25
years.
75
percent
of
what
you
see
around
us
will
still
be
the
same.
The
change
is
gradual,
it
is
incremental,
it
is
gentle,
and
the
policies
that
we
have
in
the
official
plan
will
make
sure
that
the
change
fits.
The
transact
system
that
we
have
will
ensure.
J
That
context
is
one
of
the
drivers
of
design,
and
this
is
what
we
want
in
terms
of
also
allowing
neighborhoods
to
either
stay
or
become
50-minute
neighborhoods.
We
also
need
to
address
future
demand
for
housing,
including
larger
ground-oriented
units
in
existing
neighborhoods,
so
that
we
have
options
for
every
type
of
household
in
our
neighborhoods
next
slide.
Please.
J
This
map
shows
the
other
side
of
the
growth
management
strategy,
which
is
the
urban
expansion
package
and
for
those
who
have
not
yet
seen
this
map,
there
are
three
distinct
colors.
There
is
a
purple
color,
which
shows
the
future
neighborhoods
that
are
contiguous
to
the
existing
urban
boundary.
J
The
blue
shows
new
industrial
and
logistics
lands
that
have
been
positioned
strategically
along
the
400
series
highways,
which
allows
ottawa
to
also
position
itself
economically
within
the
larger
toronto
ottawa
gatineau
montreal
mega
region
and
take
advantage
of
our
centrality
within
that
corridor
to
our
advantage.
J
In
orange,
you
see
the
preliminary
outline
of
the
new
community
of
taewin
next
slide.
Please,
the
15-minute
neighborhood
concept
is
our
understanding
of
what
people
are
looking
for,
but
also
our
recognition
that
neighborhoods
have
to
be
complete
communities.
15-Minute
neighborhoods
is
taken
by
some
as
a
buzzword,
but
we
don't
want
it
to
be
a
buzzword.
We
have
an
official
plan
that
lets
it
be
something
real
so
that
you're
not
just
talking
about
more
housing,
you're,
not
just
talking
about
more
population
but
you're.
J
M
M
M
So
this
sets
us
up
to
creating
the
conditions
to
promote
health
and
well-being
and
reflects
those
planning
considerations
that
make
us
more
resilient
to
major
disruptors,
such
as
with
the
current
covit
19
pandemic.
We
know
that
features
such
as
trees,
treed
streets,
local
outdoor
gathering
places,
walkable
and
bikable,
neighborhoods
and
local
access
to
amenities
and
services
really
do
help
support
our
resiliency
and
walkable.
M
J
So,
as
I
mentioned,
the
city
map
now
looks
like
this,
and
it
is
based
on
what
we
call
transects
transects
are
concentric
circles,
starting
from
the
center
and
radiating
outward.
We
have
a
very
large
municipality.
The
geography
of
ottawa
is
about
40
of
prince
edward
island
and
we
have
to
get
each
part
right.
We
have
a
very
large
rural
area
which,
as
we
heard,
is
a
major
contributor
to
the
city
economy
and
the
policies
for
the
rural
area
need
to
get
the
rural
economy,
rural
development,
rural
15-minute,
neighborhoods
and
villages,
rural
economic
diversification.
J
They
have
to
get
those
things
right.
The
interface
of
all
the
portions
and
context
of
ottawa
within
the
single
official
plan
is
our
unique
opportunity
as
an
amalgamated
city,
and
we
have
a
responsibility
to
each
part
of
the
city.
The
suburban
transect,
which
you
see
there
is
outside
the
green
belt.
It
is
growing
and
it
is
also
slated
to
receive
major
investments
in
transit.
J
We
have
plans
to
to
ensure
that
new
neighborhoods
will
grow
from
the
get-go
as
good
walkable
50-minute
neighborhoods,
and
we
will
be
working
with
the
home
building
industry
to
continue
to
innovate
and
advance
plans
for
community
design.
J
The
outer
urban
transect
also
will
be
the
recipient
of
significant
transit
investments
and
is
targeted
for
growth
in
jobs
as
well,
as
you
know,
the
beginning
of
intensification
strategically
along
minor
corridors
and
new
main
streets
that
will
constitute
new
spines
for
this
area,
which
will
be
growing
in
the
next
25
years
and
for
the
inner
urban
and
downtown
core,
where
there
is
already
a
walkable
or
almost
walkable
environment.
J
The
official
plan
wants
to
solidify
that
and
provide
more
opportunities
for
people
to
live
in
these
areas
and
be
able
to
function
with
the
wide
choice
of
legitimate
mobility
options.
Next
slide,
please,
these
pictures
show
you
the
enormous
diversity
of
our
city.
We
have,
as
I
said,
a
rural
context
which
comprises
a
very
large
countryside
with
agricultural
areas
with
natural
resource
areas,
with
forests,
with
bogs
and
wetlands
with
villages
also
with
plenty
of
economic
opportunity
and
agri-tourism
opportunity.
We
want
to
get
those
right.
The
suburban
communities
of
ottawa
are
also
very
large
and
very
diverse.
J
They
were
developed
at
different
eras
and
they
will
continue
to
represent
different
paradigms
of
development.
J
The
green
belt
is
unique
to
ottawa.
It
is
recognized
as
its
own
transect
because
it
does
divide
the
urban
area
between
an
inside
and
an
outside
part,
and
it
has
its
own
policies
because
again,
there's
a
very
large
diversity
of
things
and
uses
that
are
going
on
in
the
green
belt.
And
then
you
have
the
outer
urban,
the
inner
urban
and
the
downtown
core
each
their
own
context,
each
with
their
own
needs,
each
with
their
own
policy
goals
and
objectives,
and
each
at
a
different
stage
of
evolution.
J
J
One
of
the
things
that
we
have
done
is
changed
the
mapping
of
what
we
call
the
evolving
overlay.
The
evolving
overlay
sends
signals
to
the
locations
where
we
have
matched
transit
investment
hubs,
corridors,
including
minor
corridors,
as
the
places
where
we
want
to
see
emerge.
The
conditions
of
15-minute
neighborhoods,
the
evolving
overlay
is
in
a
way,
a
skeleton
that
that
starts
to
show
where
the
elements
of
15
minute
neighborhoods
are
seen
as
emerging
over
the
next
25
years.
J
Again,
we
are
talking
about
a
slow
and
gradual
emergence,
but
this
is
a
tool
which,
if
we
didn't
have
it
would
guarantee
that
nothing
would
change,
and
this
is
a
plan
that
wants
to
talk
about
not
not
whether
we
should
have
change,
but
how?
How
do
we
guide
change?
How
do
we
guide
it
properly?
How
do
we
guide
it
gently
and
how
do
we
guide
it
in
a
way
that
is
consistent
with
the
context
based
on
transects
next
slide?
Please.
J
We
will
be
hearing
through
these
next
few
days,
but
affordability
of
housing
and
affordability
of
housing
is
something
that
has
been
at
the
core
of
our
concerns.
The
official
plan,
of
course,
is
one
of
the
main
documents
that
talks
about
how
and
where
housing
should
be
built.
One
of
the
main
things
that
the
city
can
do
is
to
enable
greater
flexibility
and
an
adequate
supply
and
diversity
of
options
for
housing
throughout
the
city
we
have
often
you
know
heard
that
intensification
is
only
concentrated
in
a
few
downtown.
J
Neighborhoods
intensification
is
a
principle
in
and
of
itself.
It
means
the
city
builds
rebuilds
and
reinterprets
its
neighborhoods
with
the
passage
of
time,
and
it's
something
that
that's
happened
in
cities
for
centuries.
J
J
We
have
new
policies
aimed
at
transitional
and
alternative
or
shared
housing
for
households
that
need
those
types
of
accommodation
and
we
introduce
policies
that
will
set
the
stage
for
inclusionary
zoning,
which
maps
in
a
schedule
in
the
official
plan,
what
we
call
the
protected
major
transit
station
areas
where
the
city
will
be
able
to
apply
inclusionary
zoning
next
slide.
Please.
J
We've
heard
through
consultation-
and
it's
been
at
the
core
of
our
planning
interest
in
and
priorities
in
ottawa
for
a
very
long
time,
not
just
for
this
official
plan
about
the
urban
forest,
about
green
space
with
parks,
we
have
increased
the
target
for
the
for
forest
canopy
to
40
percent
in
the
existing
official
planet.
It's
30.
J
We
have
policies
that
are
very
strong
about
growth,
development
and
intensification,
not
compromising
the
urban
forest
canopy
and
actually
increasing
it,
nurturing
it
protecting
it,
and
we
have
innovative
policies
that
would
open
the
door
to
the
co-location
of
parks
and
facilities
so
that
we
make
good
use
of
land
where
we
have
facilities
within
parks
such
as
district
parks
and
community
centers,
which
can
be
very
successful,
co-locations
and
good
uses
of
land.
In
other
words,
we
want
to
be
smart
about
being
a
green
city
but
being
a
walkable
city.
At
the
same
time,
next
slide.
J
There
were
numerous
secondary
plans
that
would
carry
were
carried
forward
into
amalgamation
back
in
2001
from
the
former
municipalities.
They
they
were
still
in
the
books.
They
are
still
in
the
books.
The
council
mandate
that
we
had
as
staff
was
to
review
all
of
them,
and
you
know
between
the
secondary
plans,
tod
plans
community
design
plans.
There
were
83
documents
that
we
revised
or
reviewed.
J
We
did
make
changes
in
response
to
public
feedback
and
we
can
answer
questions
on
that.
In
total,
we
had
28
secondary
plans
that
are
being
carried
forward
and
in
the
case
of
some
of
the
secondary
plans
that
are
not
being
carried
forward,
some
of
the
key
policies
from
those
secondary
plans
are
still
carried
forward,
but
as
area
specific
policies
and
those
are
in
volume
2c
right
now,
as
we
speak,
we
have
seven
new
secondary
plans
in
progress
and
we've
had
requests
for
21
more
which
we
will
have
to
prioritize
in
future
work
plans.
J
Also,
a
lot
of
people
are
aware
that
we
do
something
called
community
design
plans.
Those
are
not
adopted
under
the
planning
act,
they're
adopted
by
council,
but
they're,
not
statutory
and
just
to
put
people's
minds
at
ease
those
that
are
in
place
stay
in
place.
We
did
not
touch
any
of
them.
Some
of
them,
however,
were
elevated
to
secondary
plant
status,
notably
in
the
rural
area.
Next
slide,
please
so
members
of
committees,
the
staff
report,
that's
in
front
of
you-
has
11
recommendations
I'll
just
quickly
go
through
them
recommendations.
J
One
and
two
are
to
receive
documents.
Regarding
consultation,
resolution
of
council
ministry
of
municipal
affairs,
housing
housing
comments,
transition
framework,
a
financial
report
update
this
is
the
the
revised
hempstead
report
and
the
modeling
of
the
growth
management
strategy
that
I
alluded
to
a
few
minutes
ago.
J
Recommendation
3
our
staff
recommended
changes
to
reflect
needed
corrections
that
we
have
been
catching
thanks
to
public
feedback
thanks
to
feedback
from
members
of
council.
Thanks
to
feedback
from
stakeholders,
recommendations,
four
and
five
are
to
adopt
the
new
official
plan,
its
secondary
plans,
its
area,
specific
policies
and
annexes
recommendation.
J
Six
is
a
complete
work
plan,
annex
that
outlines
the
work
that
will
need
to
be
done
not
just
by
the
planning
department,
but
perhaps
also
by
other
service
areas
and
departments,
to
fully
implement
the
official
plan
post
approval
recommendation
seven
is
to
repeal
annexes
to
the
current
official
plan.
Once
the
ministry
approves
the
new
official
plan.
J
Recommendation
nine
is
to
approve
the
memorandum
of
understanding
for
the
taewin
community
and
recommendations,
10
and
11
address
files
that
are
currently
with
with
the
ontario
land
tribunal
at
hearings.
Next,
slides.
J
I
want
to
touch
on
monitoring
and
implementation.
Monitoring
is
also
something
that
we've
heard
a
lot
of
feedback
about.
There
will
be
a
separate
staff
report
for
monitoring
of
the
official
plan
that
will
be
submitted
to
these
joint
committees
after
adoption.
There's
a
few
reasons
for
that.
First,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
working
from
a
fully
adopted
official
plan
with
any
changes
that
council
may
elect
to
make
to
the
document.
J
We
also
want
to
assemble
the
indicators
across
many
city
departments,
because,
as
we've
mentioned,
this
is
an
official
plan
for
the
entire
city
and
the
entire
municipality
as
well.
This
belongs
to
all
the
departments
of
the
municipality,
and
so
we
want
indicators
from
across
all
city
departments
that
have
a
stake
in
how
the
city
grows.
J
Some
elements
are
not
quantifiable.
You
want
to
take
the
time
to
give
council
a
package
that
will
allow
the
tracking
of
how
we're
doing,
based
on
other
things
and
numbers,
and
also
the
frequency
of
reporting,
may
vary
by
indicators.
Some
data
is
available
every
year.
Some
comes
every
five
years.
We
will
put
that
package
together
and
in
terms
of
implementation
in
document.
11
of
your
package
is
a
work
plan
annex
as
I
said,
that
outlines
implementation
work
required,
and
we
can
answer
questions
about
that
document.
J
But
there
are
other
bylaws
policies,
guidelines,
procedures
that
the
city
has
which
will
need
tweaks
and
changes
to
fully
implement
the
official
plan
as
well.
We
want
to
put
together
a
public
education
and
awareness
campaign
on
the
new
official
plan,
not
only
here
internally
for
our
colleagues
but
externally
as
well.
Next
slide.
J
I
would
like
to
now
ask
our
general
manager,
mr
willis,
to
make
a
few
concluding
remarks.
Thank
you.
C
So
chairs
and
members
of
committee,
it's
it's
a
privilege
to
bring
this
report
for
you
today.
It's
not
every
day
we
bring
a
report
of
this
magnitude
to
committee
and
council
for
consideration.
C
First
of
all,
I
want
to
thank
alain
don
and
the
dedicated
op
team
people
from
all
kinds
of
different
professional
backgrounds
and
interests
and
specializations
for
their
passion,
their
hard
work,
their
creativity,
their
problem,
solving
they're,
listening
they're,
making
changes
based
on
ideas
and
they've
done
an
enormous
amount
of
work
in
the
last
couple
years,
and
this
has
been
an
intense
pace
and
I
I
really
compliment
them
for
their
diligence
and
and
really
commitment
to
building
a
better
city.
C
I
want
to
thank
charmaine
and
our
business
and
technical
support
services
team
for
their
outreach
and
engagement,
work
and
and
and
chairs.
There
is
a
lot
of
work
that
a
lot
of
unsung
heroes
that
are
do
work
behind
the
scenes
that
you
would
not
interact
with.
There
are
people
from
charmaine's
team
who
support
the
the
logistics
of
consultation,
help
you
on
motions,
do
graphic
arts
to
make
our
documents
more
understandable.
C
Do
web
postings,
accessibility
and
translation
elements
too,
and
all
of
that
is
necessary
to
make
this
process
work,
and
I
want
to
thank
them
because
they
put
in
long
hours
as
well.
I
appreciate
the
efforts
of
all
of
my
colleagues
and
senior
leadership
team
in
putting
some
of
their
staff
forward
to
assist
us
in
this
project.
Not
all
planning
in
the
city
of
ottawa
is
done
in
the
planning
department.
We
have
support
from
all
of
the
other
departments
and
I'm
very
very
thankful,
the
support
they
provide
to
us
in
getting
this
project
done.
C
It's
it's
a
it's
a
document
we,
our
department
project,
manages,
but
it's
a
document
of
the
whole
organization,
and
I
think
my
colleagues
for
their
support.
I
have
a
special
thanks
to
dr
vera
etches
and
the
planners
at
ottawa,
public
health.
You
know,
I
I
told
some
of
you
the
story
that
when
I
first
arrived
at
the
city
and
joined
the
job,
I
had
a
coffee
with
dr
livy,
who
is
dr
hatch's
predecessor,
who
was,
I
think,
somewhat
disconcerted.
C
The
fact
that
public
health
and
planning
didn't
talk
to
each
other
very
well
and
then,
when
dr
etches
came
on
board
and
she
and
I
had
our
first
meeting,
we
sat
down
and
we
came
up
with
this
wild
idea
that
why
don't
we
embed
public
health
planners
in
the
official
planned
team
and
she
lived
up
to
that
commitment.
C
She
she
did
that
for
us,
and
I
think
we
are
the
first
major
city
in
canada
ever
to
even
try
that
and
despite
the
enormous
work
that
dr
etches
has
done
in
the
biggest
public
health
emergency
of
a
lifetime,
she
has
always
been
a
faithful
supporter
of
our
work.
We
need
to
do
on
this
plan.
I
thank
her
for
being
a
true
partner
in
this
and
I
think
we've
done
something
different
than
any
canadian
city.
C
In
doing
that,
council
asked
us
to
create
an
ambassador's
working
group
of
people
from
all
kinds
of
backgrounds
and
and
different
groups
who
traditionally
weren't
consulted
in
traditional
public
meeting
processes.
That
was
a
council
direction
and
it
was
an
outstanding
idea
and
it
has
worked
beautifully,
and
I
thank
all
the
members,
the
ambassador's
working
group,
for
bringing
that
diversity
of
ideas
and
opinions
to
the
table,
and
it's
such
a
good
idea
that
the
department
would
like
to
continue
to
use
this
ambassador's
group
of
versions
of
it
in
the
future
to
inform
further
planning
efforts.
C
You
know
it's
it's
very
hard
to
find
consensus
on
every
issue
when
you're
dealing
with
competing
aspirations,
but
people
from
urban,
suburban
rural
groups
have
all
made
a
constructive
effort
in
this
process
to
suggest
improvements
to
what
we're
putting
forward.
You
know,
debate
on
the
remaining
issues
that
council
will
do
is
healthy
and
good
for
a
city
of
a
million
people,
that's
growing
to
a
million
and
a
half.
C
We
all
want
to
define
how
to
build
the
most
livable
mid-sized
city
in
north
america,
and
that
is
council's
role
to
set
that
strategic
direction
and
staff
is
here
to
provide
you
support
and
advice
in
the
coming
days
and
give
you
our
best
advice
possible.
But
the
decision
is
councils,
and
I
I
hope,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
council
can
walk
away
with
some
pride
in
what
we've
accomplished
and
some
satisfaction
that
we
have
definitely
put.
As
ls
said,
the
21st
century
official
plan
in
place.
C
At
the
end
of
the
day,
you
know
this
is
a
community-built
plan
in
many
ways
and
it's
it's
supported
by,
as
I
said,
experts
from
different
professional
backgrounds,
but
it
does
reflect
the
attitudes
that
are
very
ottawa
specific.
This
is
not
something
we've
lifted
from
another
city
and
just
dropped
here
we
have
built
an
ottawa
version
of
an
official
plan
at
the
end
of
the
day.
C
A
D
Far
as
speakers
it
looks
backwards
right
now,
probably
I
don't
know
no.
A
A
Good
so
zoom
is,
is
magic
and
it's.
What
you
think
is
backwards
is
not.
J
A
Fairly
pivotal
in
that
in
that
endeavor
all
right,
so
our
first
speaker
is
chief
wendy,
jocko
lynn,
clutches
chief
richard
soarer,
bob
kraft,
chick
with
piccolo
kanagan
algonquin,
first
nations.
Our
second
speaker
is
cindy
robert
walker
and
our
third
speaker
is
jim
hunton.
So
first
up
I'll
have
five
minutes.
I
think
yes,
they
all
they'll
have
five
minutes
each.
A
Gentleman
is
not
speaking:
okay,
it
doesn't
give
you
15
minutes,
just
because
he's
not
sure.
Okay,
so
do
we
have
chief
jocko
and
then
lucia.
D
D
D
Taewyn
reminds
us
that
we
are
home
in
our
traditional
territory
and
assures
us
that
we
can
rebuild
our
meaningful
presence
on
these
lands
and
within
the
social
fabric
of
the
city.
Algonquin,
history,
culture
and
voice
have
been
a
foundational
element
of
the
consultation
planning,
design
and
development
of
taiwan.
D
D
It
has
been
remarkable
to
be
part
of
the
creation
of
this
station
for
taiwan.
I
hope
you
will
agree
that
this
is
an
exciting
opportunity
to
behold
to
to
be
bold
action
on
reconciliation
here
in
ottawa,
so
because
I
only
have
limited
time.
I
would
now
like
to
introduce
richard
store,
algonquin
negotiation
representative
for
the
bonus
year,
algonquin
smith,
rich.
Thank
you
merci
for
giving
me
this
time
to
make
this
presentation
to
you
today.
Migrants.
F
Our
history,
culture
and
voice
will
be
the
foundational
elements
in
the
consultation
planning,
designing
and
development
of
taiwan,
creating
a
community
in
this
city
that
the
algonquins
can
truly
call
home.
This
is
a
significant
step
towards
realizing
our
rightful
place
as
participants
in
the
affairs
of
our
own
traditional
territory.
Here
in
ontario,
taywin
will
also
help
ottawa
accommodate
future
population
growth,
while
preserving
ottawa's
greenbelt
and
protecting
valuable
agricultural
lands
within
the
city.
F
Easy
access
to
nature
will
also
be
a
defining
characteristic
of
life
in
taiwan.
This
is
an
opportunity
for
the
algonquin
people
to
be
more
fully
integrated
into
the
social
fabric
of
this
city.
It
is
also
an
opportunity
to
help
shape
what
reconciliation
and
indigenous
revitalization
looks
like
in
the
nation's
capital,
but
thank
you
for
your
time.
I
would
like
to
introduce
lynn
clutches
the
august
negotiation
representative
for
ottawa.
D
M
Technical
problems
again,
thank
you
for
for
having
us
today.
Taiwan
will
be
a
community
rooted
in
our
respect
for
the
earth
that
has
been
said,
as
well
as
respect
for
how
to
live
our
lives
in
a
good
way.
Centuries
of
colonial
policies
have
made
us
virtually
invisible
in
our
own
land
land
that
we've
been
the
traditional
caretakers
of
for
thousands
of
years.
M
The
teachings
of
the
seven
grandfathers
are
guiding
principles
for
how
to
live
our
lives
in
a
respectful
and
sacred
manner
to
all
living
things.
They
are
a
set
of
lessons
on
human
conduct,
towards
others,
towards
ourselves
and
towards
the
earth.
Wisdom,
love,
respect,
bravery,
honesty,
humility
and
truth.
These
principles
are
what
was
traditionally
and
still
is
to
this
day
needed
in
order
for
communities
to
survive
and
thrive.
M
M
Taiwan
will
be
a
vibrant
and
diverse
place
that
builds
community
and
individual
capacity
that
learns
from
and
celebrates
the
land.
Elements
of
this
vision
include
green
space,
a
focus
on
algonquin
culture
in
all
design
elements
and
gathering
spaces
to
learn
from
our
elders
and
ensure
our
stories
and
culture
continue.
M
D
Good
morning
everybody
I
just
before
I
started,
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
I
end
up
like
I.
The
work
that
you
guys
are
doing
is
unbelievable,
and
you
know
what
I
I
understand
that
you're
gonna
be
in
a
long
meeting
and
we
we
went
through
that-
and
it's
very
sometimes
very
painful,
but
you
know
keeping
an
open
heart
and
open
mind
and
open
years
really
helps
out
now.
So
today
I
want
to
talk
about
the
truth
and
reconciliation
committee.
D
D
There
are
also
calls
to
co-develop
with
individual
indigenous
communities,
a
strategy
to
eliminate
employment
gaps,
develop
culturally
appropriate
educational
opportunities
for
indigenous
families
and
to
recognize
the
values
of
indigenous
healing
practices.
Above
all,
these
calls
are
also
about
creating
new
relationships
based
on
principles
of
mutual
recognition,
mutual
respect
and
shared
responsibilities
for
maintaining
those
relationships
in
the
future.
D
N
Thank
you
so
much
bob
good
morning,
joint
shares,
moffett
and
el
shantiri
and
members
of
the
joint
committee.
My
name
is
cindy
rotenberg
walker.
I
am
an
urban
planner
and
a
partner
at
urban
strategies
where
I've
led
a
wide
range
of
urban
planning
and
community
design
projects
for
more
than
30
years.
N
N
It
will
be
transit,
oriented
from
the
start
and
well
connected
within
providing
options
for
people
to
walk
and
cycle
everywhere.
They
need
to
go.
It
will
be
a
fundamentally
different
kind
of
community
than
ottawa
has
seen
to
date,
more
integrated
explicitly
with
nature
denser
a
more
broad
mix
of
uses.
A
wider
range
of
housing
forms
right
from
the
start.
It
will
demonstrate
excellence
in
planning
consistency
with
provincial
policy
and
will
literally
embody
the
five
big
moves
of
your
new
official
plan.
N
Since
this
matter
was
last
before
council.
In
february,
the
tawan
team
have
been
working
collaboratively
with
your
city
staff,
both
in
the
planning
and
engineering
departments,
to
draft
annex
10
to
the
new
official
plan
that
you
see,
which
outlines
the
full
range
of
studies
that
will
be
required
to
ultimately
define
taewin.
N
As
committee
members
will
know,
city
staff
have
identified
the
preliminary
land
area
for
taewin.
In
your
new
official
plan,
this
land
area
will
be
the
area
that
is
studied
ultimately
leading
to
a
definition
of
the
final
445
developable
hectares
that
will
constitute
hate
that
will
constitute
taiwan.
These
will
be
in
addition
to
the
600
hectare,
natural
heritage,
land
trust
that
was
previously
mentioned.
N
The
taiwan
owners
are
fully
committed
to
paying
for
taiwan,
services
and
infrastructure.
Annex
12
in
the
new
official
plan
that
you
have
before
you
outlines
the
funding
principles,
the
mechanisms
and
the
process
that
will
be
secured
through
a
formal
memorandum
of
understanding
ultimately
signed
with
the
city
of
ottawa.
N
Our
team
is
very
excited
to
be
at
this
important
milestone
today,
but
they
are.
We
are
at
the
very
beginning
of
the
process.
There
is
much
work
ahead,
including
all
of
the
work
that
I
had
already
identified,
beginning
with
the
analysis
of
site
conditions
and
concluding
with
council
approval
of
a
secondary
plan.
N
N
A
All
right,
thank
you
all
for
your
presentation,
joint
presentation.
We
can
now
that's
that's
the
last
of
the
delegations
on
taywin,
so
we'll
have
you
collectively
receive
any
questions
that
we
might
have
from
members
of
council
members
of
committee?
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
members
counseling
as
well.
So
if
you
have
any
questions
for
the
allegation,
please
raise
your
hand
if
not
move.
L
L
Yeah
I'll
try
not
to
yell
today.
Thank
you
chair.
Thank
you
for
the
presentation
from
all
of
you,
I'm
hoping
to
go
through
a
few
different
issues
on
the
proposal
in
the
area
that
is
proposed
to
be
developed.
There
is
a
natural
heritage
system
which
is
not
supposed
to
be
developed
and
in
the
official
plan.
N
Through
you
joint
chairs,
I
would
be
happy
to
answer
counselor
monard's
question.
We
are
familiar
with
the
word
change
that
you
are
referencing.
There
were
a
couple
of
points
of
important
clarification,
first
being
that
the
land
that
has
been
identified
on
schedule,
c17
for
study
for
the
future
taewin
community
is
not
part.
It
does
not
interact
with
the
natural
heritage
system.
It
is
entirely
outside
of
the
designated
natural
heritage
system.
N
The
conversation
in
terms
of
exchanging
the
word,
I'm
sorry
I'm
having
a
mental
gap,
but
it's,
I
think,
prohibited
to
avoid
it.
Something
to
that
effect
is
really
in
recognition
of
the
kind
of
process
the
city
of
ottawa
has
always
gone
through,
and
this
would
apply
only
to
future
urban
expansion
beyond
what
we
are
currently
discussing
today,
and
it
is
essentially
a
recognition
that
a
natural
heritage
system
has
been
identified
to
date
on
the
basis
only
of
aerial
photography.
N
It
has
not
been
truth
on
the
ground,
as
we
like
to
say
in
the
profession,
and
so
the
word
change
simply
allows
city
staff,
in
some
cases,
provincial
staff,
the
opportunity
to
receive
more
up-to-date
and
accurate
information
regarding
the
actual
conditions
on
the
ground
and
to
make
decisions
about
what
is
best
for
the
system
as
a
whole.
That's
I
think
the
very
important
piece
that
ottawa
staff
are
bringing
forward
is
to
think
about
your
natural
heritage
system
as
a
system.
L
Okay,
and
was
it
tagret
taywin
proposal
that
requested
the
word
change
to
city
staff.
L
Okay
good
to
know,
thank
you
very
much,
I'm
trying
to
get
a
better
sense
of
the
timeline,
because,
obviously
the
way
the
deal
is
in
front
of
us
now
there
are
concerns,
did
did
taggart
reach
out
to
the
aoo
realty
corporation,
or
was
it
the
realty
corporation
that
reached
out
to
tag
where
taggart?
First
on
on
the
deal.
N
Through
you
joint
chairs,
I
believe
that's
a
question
that
either
chief
jocko
or
ms
guccier
should
respond
to.
M
I
can
take
that
one.
It
was
the
algonquins
able
to
acquire
the
land
who
reached
out
to
tiger
company.
L
I
just
want
to
be
clear
before
you
owned
the
provincial
lands
that
you
had
bought
at
fair
market
value
you
reached
out
to
taggart,
or
was
it
taggart
that
reached
out
to
you
in
advance
of
that?
I
just
I'm
not
clear
on
the
answer.
M
Well,
you
know
neither
am
I
but,
but
in
answering
your
question,
I'm
wondering
why,
or
is
this
a
common
kind
of
question
that
you
would
ask
developers
about
their
private
business
deal,
and
so
at
this
point
I
think
the
question
is
misplaced
and
I
think
the
question
should
be.
Do
you
have
the
right
to
ask
it.
L
I,
if
you
know
me,
I
do
ask
questions
often
because
you
know
the
financial
aspects
of
deals
come
up
all
the
time
in
our
committee
and
that's
really
why
they
do
they
do
so.
L
I
guess
I
guess
the
reason
why
I'm
asking
it
now
chair
is
because
of
how
this
was
presented
to
committee
originally,
and
it
was
that
the
ao
realty
corporation
had
reached
out
to
taggart
in
late
2017,
and
I
just
want
to
confirm
some
of
those
details,
because
this
way,
the
way
this
was
presented
to
us
was
that
it
was
strictly
the
aoo
realty
corp
uplifting
these
lands.
Initially,
we
didn't
have
tiger
present
as
part
of
it
in
the
january
25th.
L
I
believe
it
was
discussion,
so
I'm
trying
to
understand
how
this
came
about.
It
was
a
walk
on
motion,
so
I
I
want
to
go
back
to
it
to
make
sure
we're
making
the
right
decision
here.
So.
A
A
As
part
of
previous
deliberations
and
a
motion
from
council,
I
believe
in
2018
that
directed
staff
to
consider
a
new
community
as
part
of
their
official
plan.
So
so
there
were.
There
were
some
some
comments
in
prior
to
that
that
led
to
why
staff
would
have
explored
that
in
the
first
place
in
there
and
they
report
the
only
significant
change
in
january
was
that
committee
decided
to
bring
it
forward
now,
rather
than
wait
for
the
five
years,
but
I
believe
ms
kuching
has
answered
the
question
on
on
ownership.
A
I
would
ask
politely
that
you
move
to
to
questions
pertaining
to
the
official
plan
that
we
have
in
front
of
us.
L
I
I
will
thank
you,
chair,
and
I
agree
with
the
analysis
of
the
sequence
of
events
previously
that
it
was
included
in
a
staff
report.
But,
as
you
know,
it
went
significantly
further
than
what
staff
recommendations
were
at
the
time
and
it
was
spoken
to
as
a
form
of
reconciliation
in
order
to
go
further
and
and
that
there
the
mayor's
comments
previously
that
if
this
is
any
developer,
we
wouldn't
really
be
able
to
do
this.
But
obviously
that's
not
the
case.
So.
D
Object
here
just
to
be
clear:
ao
approached
taggart
so.
L
Thank
you.
That's
helpful.
Thank
you.
Chief
jocko,
that's
very
helpful
and
any
straightforward
discussion
we
could
have
would
be
very,
very
helpful
and
did
you
own
lands
at
the
time
in
this
area,
when
you
reached
out
to
taggart
in
late
2017.
M
If
I
can
answer
that,
one,
the
aoo
all
along
in
the
treaty
negotiations,
have
been
assessing
pieces
of
land
that
we
could
acquire
through
the
treaty
we
had,
we
have
had
a
land
budget
as
it
were.
M
Land
became
a
available
through
the
regular
disposition
of
properties
that
the
governments
have
to
go
through,
which
is
to
offer
it
first
to
the
algonquins
or
or
the
indigenous
group
in
situ.
So
the
algonquins
had
the
opportunity
and
we
needed
partner
it's
as
simple
as
that
we
needed
a
partner
because,
as
you
know,
our
land
claim
has
not
been
finalized,
so
basically
our
assets
are
only
potential
so
other
than
that
again
I
come
back
to
I
come
back
to
my
question.
To
you
in
the
first
place
is
and
to
answer.
M
L
I
appreciate
that
and
no
question
on
confidence
whatsoever
here.
It
is
more
about
the
following
question
is:
do
you
think
taggart
would
have
had
lands
included
inside
the
urban
boundary
in
an
area
where
staff
were
recommending
against
including
lands.
L
If
it
were
not
for
the
aoo
realty
corporation.
A
A
L
Move
on
to
the
question
right
I'll
move
on
to
other
questions
chair,
we
were
told
to
approve
these
lands
for
expansion,
even
though
it
went
against
the
city's
own
criteria,
and
we
were
told
that
we
were
to
do
that
because
it
was
going
to
benefit
ao.
M
Well
individually,
that
depends.
It
depends
on
what
we
are
able
to
accomplish
with
our
treaty
and
with
our
investments.
So
the
idea
being
that
as
a
nation
in
ontario-
and
I
know
this
is
a
controversial
concept
that
we
will
in
fact
have
programming
and
we
will
have
cultural
building
and
we
will
have
a
rebirth
of
a
nation.
M
L
Okay
and
in
terms
of
where
the
land
is
located,
see
councilor
kitts
has
has
questions
and
directly
related
to
to
her
ward,
in
terms
of
where
they're
located
in
ottawa
and
building
a
sustainable
community
are.
Are
you
concerned
about
additional
costs
from
building
as
a
result
of
leader
play
the
the
transportation
issues
that
staff
had
pointed
out?
Initially,
the
concerns
around
transit
access
to
those,
even
though
there
may
be
a
deal
in
place
with
the
city?
L
M
N
Think
you
could
maybe
take
it
out,
I'm
happy
to
take
that
through
your
joint
chairs.
You
have
a
number
of
concepts
that
you've
introduced:
counselor
menard.
We
have
no
concerns
whatsoever
about
whether
this
is
a
sustainable
and
appropriate
location
to
create
a
new
community.
N
One
of
the
things
that
is
most
telling
to
me
is
that
this
was
always
intended
to
be
ottawa's.
Fourth,
suburban
community
outside
of
the
greenbelt,
so
in
fact
it
is
actually
the
missing
piece
in
your
urban
structure.
N
N
So
a
very
logical
place
for
growth
really
just
had
to
wait
its
time.
The
other
piece
that
you've
asked
is:
will
it
be
transit
supportive?
Absolutely
that's
a
clear
commitment
on
behalf
of
the
aoo
and
taggart
to
make
this
a
transit,
supportive
community,
truly
from
its
first
design
perspective
again,
not
an
opportunity
that
I
believe
exists
in
ottawa
today
and
you've
been
very
successfully
through
the
excellent
work
of
your
team.
Working
to
reurbanize
the
city
around
the
transit
system,
taiwan
will
be
built
to
support,
transit
and
all
forms
of
active
transportation.
N
From
its
inception,
I
apologize
if
I've
missed
any
of
the
other
things
that
you
raised,
but
we
have
no
oh
soils.
I
believe
that
we
are
on
record
on
a
number
of
occasions
through
the
professional
engineers
who
are
associated
with
the
tawin
team,
but
also
well
known
across
the
city
of
ottawa,
who
can
provide
reference
to
a
whole
number.
I
believe
there
are
about
half
a
dozen
other
ottawa
communities
who
have
very
similar
soil
conditions
where
a
community
development
has
already
taken
place.
Taiwan
is
no
different.
L
N
I'm
not
sure
if
I
quite
follow,
but
I
want
just
to
clarify
the
comment
based
on
your
earlier
question
is
really
about
refinement
of
the
boundaries
of
the
natural
heritage
system.
N
It
is
not
about
wholesale
changes
to
the
more
development
on
that
land,
so
the
taiwan
studies
that
I
mentioned
that
are
articulated
in
annex
10
of
the
official
plan
and
which
terms
of
reference
for
are
now
being
discussed
between
both
the
city
teams
and
the
taiwan
team
will
be
extensive,
very,
very
comprehensive
in
terms
of
documenting
all
of
the
characteristics,
be
they
natural
or
other
on
the
tawan
lands.
N
Today
that
our
intention,
as
you
have
heard
from
the
algonquins
of
ontario
and
myself,
is
that
this
will
be
a
community
that
is
knit
into
nature
in
a
way
that
we
have
not.
I
will
take
a
partial
blame
for
this
as
a
professional
planner
that
we
have
not
done
well
in
the
creation
of
our
communities
for
a
long
long
time.
So
we
are
looking
at
the
world's
best
precedents.
L
Thank
you,
chair
I'll
I'll
leave
it
there.
A
All
right,
thank
you.
I
will
just
add
one
little
piece
on
that
that
I
think
might
be
helpful
for
members
of
committee.
It's
likely
not
something
that
the
delegate
would
raise,
but
the
land
in
question
the
natural
heritage
systems,
land
that
is
land
that
is
currently
designated
as
unevaluated
wetlands.
A
If
you
look
at
our
our
mapping
program,
those
lands
will
actually
be
evaluated
under
the
ontario
wetland
evaluation
system
by
the
city,
and
any
reports
on
that
would
be
submitted
to
the
ministry
of
natural
resources
and
forestry
for
consideration,
especially
civic
and
wetlands,
so
the
psw
designation
would
carry
much
heavier
weight
than
our
natural
systems.
Designation
and
the
psw
would
then
inform
any
future
decisions
on
expansion
of
lands
in
that
area.
C
It's
interesting
because
we're
we're
not
we're
giving
a
lot
of
scrutiny
to
this
area
that
we
call
the
taywin
lands
and
we
should
be
there
we're
category
three
and
it's
they
we've
already
identified
in
previous
conversations
over
the
past
few
months,
the
the
risk
I'm
glad
to
see
in
the
report,
annex
10
and
nx
12
that
addressed
many
of
the
concerns
that
I
and
and
other
counselors
had
around
mitigating
some
of
those
risks
and
ensuring
that
taewin
does
pay
for
taywin.
C
I
guess
what
I'm
struggling
with
and
I'd
like
to
hear
from
the
delegation
is:
how
do
you
get
to
that
critical
mass
of
population
to
actually
create
a
complete
community?
How
do
you
get
the
shops
and
services
built
there
to
serve
people?
How
do
you
get
schools
to
be
built
there?
How
do
you
get
workplaces
there
that
that
ensures
that
this
is
a
complete
community?
C
What's
what's
your
plan
around,
you
know
in
the
in
the
early
going
down
the
road
when
this
is
a
fully
built
out
community
and
there's
there's
ten
thousand
twenty
thousand
people
who
might
be
living
there?
It's
different,
but
I
have
a
real
hard
time
seeing
how
this
will
be
a
walkable
or
transit
oriented
community
in
the
first
first
few
decades
of
it.
So
how
do
you?
How
do
you
achieve
that
critical
mass.
N
I'm
happy
to
take
a
start
at
that
through
the
joint
chairs.
If
wendy
and
lynn
are
fine
with
that,
so
counselor
excellent
question,
and
I
understand
that
it's
something
that
has
not
been
your
experience
to
date.
I
think
that
one
of
the
things
that
in
a
suburban
community
setting,
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
is-
and,
of
course
again
I
want
just
to
emphasize,
because
it
is
the
absolute
truth
that
we
don't
have
the
specific
answers
yet
for
what
taiwan
is
going
to
look
like.
N
That
is
a
process
that
we
will
all
go
through
together
over
many
years
of
consultation
and
engagement
at
a
technical
level
at
a
community
visioning
level.
But
the
simple
answer
to
your
question:
is
the
owners
group
have
made
a
commitment
to
fund
transit
from
day
one
which
means
that
the
mix
of
uses
and
the
densities
of
development
need
to
support
it.
Otherwise
it
won't
be.
It
will
be
a
complete
cost,
as
opposed
to
something
that
riders
can
contribute
to.
N
It
is
also
we've
been
said
before
and
I'll
just
say
again
that
the
overall
character
and
and
density
of
the
development
will
be
different
from
anything
that
you
have
seen
to
date.
There
will
be
homes
on
the
ground
as
well
as
homes
in
multi-floor
buildings,
but
they
will
be
on
a
much
more
compact
footprint
so
that
the
population
densities
from
the
very
beginning
will
be
higher.
N
N
One
of
the
other
key
things
that
that
is
key
here
is
mixed-use
buildings,
again,
not
something
that
ottawa
has
seen
a
lot
of
yet,
but
is
definitely
starting
to,
and
will
more
and
more
under
this
very
bold
official
plan
that
you
have
in
place,
which
is
that
you
build
the
mix
of
uses
in
from
inception.
You
don't
build
the
residential
first
and
then
wait
for
some
future
time
where
the
commercial
comes.
N
You
reference
schools,
you
know,
of
course,
as
you
know,
schools,
the
school
planning
process
is
integrated
with,
but
parallel
to
the
community
planning
process,
and
so
all
I
can
say
there
is
in
the
normal
course
of
events.
Appropriate
locations
for
schools
will
be
located
very
interestingly,
I'm
involved
with
a
project
here
in
toronto,
where
we
are
integrating
elementary
schools
for
both
the
public
and
the
catholic
board
right
into
the
base
of
future
apartment
buildings.
I'm
sharing
a
public
park
in
front
of
them.
N
C
Okay,
thank
you
for
that.
If
I
could
dig
into
one
piece,
you
said
there
multi-floor
buildings,
previous
counselor
council,
menard,
asked
about
soil
conditions.
Do
soil
conditions
limit
the
height
of
buildings
that
you
can
build
here
or
how
do
they
affect
the
the
height
of
potential
buildings
here.
N
I
will
be
frank-
I
am
not
a
soil
engineer,
so
all
I
can
do
is
provide
you
with
the
information
from
the
experts
on
our
team,
who
have
been
clear
that
the
answer
to
that
is
no.
There
are
different
construction
techniques
required,
but
they
are
very
similar
to,
for
instance,
what
is
happening
across
the
toronto
waterfront
sorry
to
keep
using
toronto
examples,
but
it's
just
that
next
kind
of
level
of
development
that
we're
all
speaking
about
here
where
the
soils
are
very
wet
and
not
stable.
It's
that
it
is
not
an
unknown
thing.
C
And
the
last
thing
I
wanted
to
ask
was
about
affordability.
A
lot
of
the
taywin
pays
for
taywin
hinges
on
area
specific
charges,
development
charges
which
would
seem
to
shock
the
the
cost
of
building
homes.
So
talk
to
me
about
affordability
and
and
how
you
can
mitigate
well
talk
to
me
about
affordability,.
N
Okay,
I'll
start
in
terms
of
the
way
in
which
you
discussed
it,
which
is
about
servicing
affordability.
N
Our
team
included
at
the
time
of
the
original
vision
included
work
done
by
altus,
who,
of
course,
are
very
active
in
the
city
and
they
prepared
a
kind
of
conceptual
again
knowing
that
taewyn
has
not
been
planned
yet,
but
a
conceptual
estimate
of
what
the
area
specific
development
charge
might
be
and
without
getting
into
the
details,
because
I
I
promise
you,
I
can't
quote
them
in
detail,
but
the
point
is
that,
because
of
the
existing
trunk,
sewer
and
and
other
infrastructure
that
is
already
at
taywin's
doorstep
as
a
starting
place
because
of
the
more
compact,
intense
and
mixed-use
form
of
development
that
is
proposed,
there
is
tremendous
servicing
efficiency
in
terms
of
the
costs.
N
Also
being
able
to
provide
a
plan
for
a
community
holistically
at
scale
gives
us
the
opportunity
to
think
about
very
cost
and
energy
effective
systems.
District
energy
is
entirely
possible
here.
You
know,
so
there
are
all
kinds
of
ways
that
we
will
be
able
to
be
more
efficient
and
is
the
norm.
N
So
what
that
means
is
that
the
savings
in
terms
of
those
conventional
servicing
costs
and
I'll
also
just
put
it
out
there
that
we're
going
to
be
working
with
your
staff
to
try
to
be
efficient
about
public
infrastructure
as
well
the
size
of
streets.
You
know
about
sharing,
as
I
mentioned,
between
parks
and
in
schools
to
the
extent
that's
possible,
all
of
it
just
to
be
efficient
so
that
the
costs
can
be
contained
and
then
easily
transferred
over
to
funding
that
transit.
That
has
been
committed
to
at
the
very
beginning.
A
All
right,
thank
you.
You
have
a
couple
more
counselors
for
questions.
I
will
just
say
that
the
next
three
speakers
on
the
list-
because
I
didn't
do
this
before
the
next
two
speakers
on
the
list-
are
sally
thompson,
lucia
morales
and
ken
holmes.
But
of
course
we
still
have
questions
to
to
this
delegation.
I
just
wanted
to
to
cue
that
up,
so
they
can
be
prepared.
Catherine,
kids,
cancer,
kids,.
O
Thank
you,
chair
good
question.
So
far
from
my
colleagues,
councilor
monarch
touched
on
this,
but
but
just
to
be
clear,
there
were
a
couple
different
news
reports
recently
about
the
different
land
holdings
in
the
staff
recommended
taiwan
area,
and
I
did
see
your
your
op-ed
yesterday
in
the
season
could,
could
you
speak
to
to
how
much
of
the
land
will
benefit
the
algonquins
of
ontario
specifically,
and
do
you
have
any
concerns
with
the
land?
That's
included
in
the
staff
recommended
boundary.
N
M
Working
yeah,
okay
I'll,
give
it
a
whirl.
So
what
you're
wondering
is,
let
me
get
it
clear
because,
as
you
were
asking
I
was
thinking,
wendy
was
going
to
answer
it,
so
he
didn't
pay
really
close
attention.
So
what
you're
wondering
is
if
the
change
in
the
in
the
in
the
situation
on
the
land
piece,
you
think
it's
going
to
affect
us
we're
in
a
full
partnership
deal
with
with
with
taggart.
So
I
don't.
Please
ask
your
question
again:
thanks
all.
O
Right
so
so
the
the
staff
recommended
boundary
incl.
There
was
reports
recently
that
the
algonquins
of
ontario
don't
own
the
land
or
a
large
portion
of
the
land,
that's
in
the
boundary.
So
I
was
hoping
someone
could
speak
to
how
much
of
the
land
that's
included,
will
benefit
the
algonquins
of
ontario
and
do
the
algonquins
have
any
concerns
with
the
land
that
is
included
in
the
staff
recommended
boundary?
M
All
the
lands
that
are
part
of
the
of
the
building
are
part
of
the
whole
partnership.
We
will
profit
from
all
of
those,
so
any
lands
owned
by
taggart
and
or
the
algonquins
are
part
of
the
partnership.
And
again
I
I
ask
you.
O
Anyway,
absolutely
you
do.
I
just
there's
been
conflicting
news
reports.
You
know
I
spoke
to
to
reading
chief
jocko's
editorial
yesterday,
so
I
just
wanted
to
sort
of
clarify
if
there
were
any
concerns
on
your
part.
There
are
no.
D
Sorry
I
had
to
step
away
I'm
being
distracted
here,
I'm
actually
in
british
columbia.
So
I
do
apologize
and
just
to
reiterate
what
lynn
has
said:
the
lands
are
owned
by
taggart
and
the
ao
jointly
so
make
lunch.
O
Building
off
my
colleagues
questions,
I
did
want
to
quickly
ask
about
the
soils
as
well.
I
will
have
questions
to
staff
on
this,
but
what
I'm
understanding
is
from
your
preliminary
studies?
The
soils
aren't
unlike
clay
soils
that
are
found
elsewhere
in
the
city
cindy.
I
know
you
just
said
you're,
not
an
expert
in
soils,
but
so
you
may
not
be
able
to
answer
this,
but
are
you
aware
of
any
sort
of
specific
mitigation
measures
that
you
envision
will
will
need
to
be
implemented
to
build
the
density,
you're
seeking.
N
You're
right
counselor
again,
I'm
not
an
expert.
All
I
can
do
is
share
with
you,
the
information
that
that
I
have
seen
and,
of
course,
we're
happy
to
provide
more
detailed
information
to
the
committee.
Should
that
be
of
of
importance
to
you,
but
essentially
at
lower
scale
of
density
development.
I
don't
believe
there
are
any
special
provisions
that
are
required.
N
It
is
only
when
you
get
to
multi-story
development.
There
is,
then
a
requirement
to
do
something
which
we've
all
heard
as
they
happen,
where
they
drive
piles,
which
are
basically
just
steel
tubes
into
the
ground
to
hit
a
more
stable
soil,
and
then
those
become
the
structure
for
the
new
building.
But
what
I
can
tell
you
is
that
is
a
practice
that
has
happened
in
ottawa.
It
is
a
practice
that
happens
all
kinds
of
other
locations,
so
it
is
not
there.
I
everything
about
taylor
is
special
except
in
some
ways.
N
The
soils
is
not
a
special
thing.
It
is
not
a
unique
constraint.
O
Okay,
thank
you.
I
have
the
same
question
as
counselor
gower
about
cost
and
servicing
it's
gonna
be
a
long
day,
so
I'll
just
leave
it
there
and
just
for
residents
that
may
be
listening.
I
know
the
community
has
a
lot
of
questions
about
timing
servicing
consultation.
I
think
the
bulk
of
those
questions
are
better
directed
to
staff,
so
I
will
be
asking
them
when
we
get
there,
but
I
don't.
O
B
Thank
you
very
much.
Oh,
I
thought
there
was
no
one
here
coming.
I
I'm
just
gonna
say
to
to
chief.
Thank
you
so
much
for
being
the
head
of
the
delegation
and
for
for
your
op-ed
yesterday,
and
perhaps
maybe
I
should
apologize
for
some
of
the
the
treatment
you've
been
receiving
in
some
of
the
media
and
some
of
the
the
name
calling
I
I
have
to
tell
you
it's
hurtful
to
to
hear
someone
call
it
someone
fake
something.
B
D
Yeah,
thank
you
for
your
kind
words.
Nonetheless,
I
appreciate
that.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
N
Through
you,
joint
shares,
councilor
leeper
again,
as
stated
previously.
This
is
not
my
area
of
training
and
expertise.
All
I
can
do
is
refer
back
to
the
material
that
has
already
been
submitted
to
the
city,
which
indicates
that
the
door
by
door
charge
in
taiwan
will
not
be
significantly
different
from
other
greenfield
community
communities.
The
money
will
simply
be
spent
differently,
so
we
do
not
have
any
concerns
about
the
ability
to
create
an
affordable,
inclusive
community
that
offers
a
range
of
housing
choices
at
taywin.
D
Oh
thank
you,
mr
chair,
for
you
I
just
wanna
this
morning
I
wanna
thank
chief
joko
and
miss
clutier
and,
of
course,
cindy.
I
know
this
stay
when
most
of
it
is
on
the
adjacent
boundary
between
myself
and
construct.
I
wanna
thank
them.
They're
being.
F
L
F
A
Thank
you,
councillor,
roose
and
interesting
enough
finishing
on
you
this
this
land
all
moves
in
to
ward
20
following
the
next
election,
with
the
ward
boundary
review
that
we
just
approved
so.
I
A
L
D
Exactly
maybe
to
you,
it
was
not.
You
know
portrayed
that
way,
but
to
others
in
the
the
gallery.
Perhaps
it
was
thank
you.
A
Understood,
I
think
we
all
need
to
be
sometimes
mindful
that
sometimes
we
say
things
that
we
don't
necessarily
mean
I've
been
guilty
of
this
myself
say
things:
ask
questions
in
a
certain
way.
We
don't
necessarily
mean
offense,
but
some
sometimes
those
who
hear
it
can
be
offended
by
it,
and
I
think
we
always
have
to
be
mindful.
A
Man,
cindy
chi
choco
appreciate
your
time
here,
mr
craft
chick
and
mr
zor
as
well.
Okay.
So
our
next
delegation
is
sally
thompson
with
city
for
all
women
initiative
and
sally
will
be
followed
by
lucia
morales
and
ken
holmes.
A
E
Okay,
I've
written
my
comments,
so
I'm
just
going
to
read
them
so
that
I
stay
on
topic
just
a
minute.
Please,
okay,
so
my
name
is
sally
thomas,
not
thompson.
Just
for
the
records
t-h-o-m-a-s,
not
thompson.
Thank.
A
You
I'm.
E
Speak,
I'm
speaking
on
behalf
of
cali
I'd
like
to
talk
about
the
important
role
cooperative
housing
can
play
in
the
city's
efforts
to
achieve
certain
equity
measures.
First
of
all,
I'd
like
to
take
a
moment
to
share
with
you
that
without
co-op
housing
I
would
not
be
able
to
afford
to
live
here
and
despite
its
challenges,
I
love
it
here.
E
E
Pool
piles
in
it
provides
marginalized
communities,
dignity
of
choice,
mixed
income
level
housing,
as
well
as
the
opportunity
opportunity
to
design
inclusionary
zoning.
As
you
can
imagine,
people
with
disabilities
face
the
additional
challenge
of
finding
accessible
housing.
Inclusionary
zoning
allows
for
someone
with
a
disability
to
move
into
a
space
previously
occupied
by
someone
without
a
disability.
E
These
things
alone
allow
for
people
of
all
socioeconomic
backgrounds
to
live
work
and
play
together.
New
canadians,
just
starting
out,
also
tend
to
have
multiple
generations
living
in
one
home.
Co-Ops
tend
to
be
multi-unit
dwellings
which
address
intensification
of
targets
set
out
by
the
city
and
can
also
have
the
ability
to
achieve
more
15-minute,
neighborhoods,
encouraging
business
and
infrastructure.
E
A
All
right,
thank
you.
Counselor
cavanaugh
has
a
question
for
you,
ms
thomas
and
sorry
for
the
name.
I
had
it
wrong
on
my
sheet,
so
apologize
for
that
for
that
council.
P
Thank
you
very
much
sally
for
coming
out
today
and
and
raising
these
important
issues.
I
appreciate
it
and
I
think
you'll
note
that
in
the
official
plan
that
housing
was
considered
to
be
the
most
important
issue
under
the
gender
equity
section
and
and
for
good
reason,
and
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
you
brought
forward
the
issue
of
co-op
housing,
it's
something
that
I
feel
very
passionate
about
too
I've
lived
in
it
and
it
was.
It
was
very
successful.
P
I
think
that
it
would
be
great
to
have
more.
I
I
can
ask
questions
about
that
later
to
staff,
but
in
terms
of
affordable
housing
that
that
is
a
that
is
a
big
goal
as
well
like
we
overall
do.
Are
you
specifying
cooperative
housing
within
affordable
housing
because
it
tends
to
right
now
our
affordable
housing?
We
get
through
developments
that
are
up
there
and
then
a
certain
amount
is
affordable
housing
unless
it's
deep,
affordable
housing.
P
E
So
what
I'm
saying
is
that
in
my
co-op
there's
a
there's
mixed
levels
of
income,
I'm
in
rent
gear
to
income,
housing
and
I'm
on
odsp,
so
my
rent
is
low,
but
there
are
people
paying
for
market
rent
here.
Yeah
and
I
don't
know
the
percentages
offhand,
I'm
not
privy
to
that
inspiration.
But
but
that's
that
that's
what
has
allowed
me
to
live
here
for
30
years.
P
Got
it,
and
so
it's
possible
that
that
could
come
in
other
forms.
Cooperative
housing
was
funded
federal
by
the
federal
government
years
ago,
and
it
kind
of
it
didn't
get
funded
as
much
recently,
but
there,
for
example,
och,
is
moving
forward
on
on
mixed
housing.
Is
that
sort
of
what
you're,
seeing
too
like,
for
example,
rochester
heights
and
those
kinds
of,
is
that
the
kind
of
development
you
think
is
worthwhile
for
the
future.
P
E
P
Now
I
appreciate
that
perspective
and
I
say,
as
I
said
I
I
lived
in
it
myself
with
small
kids
way
back
so,
and
it
was
wonderful.
So
I
I
appreciate
that
we
can
ask
questions
about
that
later.
It's
it's
one
of
those
matters
of
levels
of
government
who
who
get
get
it
going,
but
I
think
it
is
important
aspect
to
raise.
Thank
you
very
much
sally.
A
Q
Thank
you.
My
name
is
lucia
morales
and
I'm
a
civic
engagement
coordinator
at
cowie.
As
an
organization
we've
been
supporting
the
people's
official
plan
coalition
and
together
with
pop
we've
drafted,
16
motions,
cowie,
helped
draft
emotions
on
deeply
affordable
housing
and
equity
and
inclusion.
I'm
speaking
here
today,
not
only
in
my
professional
role
but
as
a
concerned
resident
I'm
originally
from
guatemala,
and
I
have
first-hand
experience
of
what
poor
urban
planning
can
lead
to.
Q
Guatemala
city
is
in
part
a
product
of
poor
urban
planning,
and
this
has
had
detrimental
impacts
to
residents
seen
an
inadequate
urban
infrastructure.
I'm
also
a
geographer,
and
my
research
has
focused
on
making
inclusive,
safe
and
equitable
cities,
and
I'm
worried
that
ottawa
will
have
a
similar
fate
to
guatemala
city,
and
this
shouldn't
be
the
case.
Planning
can
either
reinforce
existing
social
and
spatial
inequities
or
it
can
work
to
counter
them
by
dismantling
systemic
barriers
to
promote
equity,
inclusion
and
justice
is
part
of
working
towards
a
more
just
city.
Q
These
are
political
choices
and
we
hope
that
council
will
make
the
right
ones.
Drafting
a
new
official
plan
should
be
exciting
because
it
means
there's
an
opportunity
to
think
of
creative
and
innovative
ways
to
address
a
diverse
range
of
people's
current
needs
with
foresight.
The
current
plan,
however,
is
myopic
in
scope,
and
it
will
benefit
the
few
at
the
expense
of
the
many.
Q
There
are
numerous
cities
that
are
going
beyond
beyond
just
looking
at
land
use
and
are
placing
social
justice,
equity
and
inclusion
at
the
forefront
of
as
frameworks
for
their
official
and
master
plans.
Examples
include
portland,
denver,
barcelona
and
vancouver
and
in
this
province,
toronto
is
making
similar
strides.
Q
Q
Currently,
markets
continue
to
be
prioritized
and
are
seen
as
the
only
response
to
housing
to
food
to
transportation,
and
these
have
been
detrimental
to
the
ottawa
community
writ
large.
So
we
need
to
see
several
changes.
First,
we
need
to
see
goals
articulated
with
a
strong
social
and
economic
justice
lens
that
are
accompanied
by
clear
and
measurable
targets.
This
is
key
as
it
helps
keep
the
city
accountable.
Q
Second,
we
must
see
a
more
holistic
approach
and
a
more
integrated
approach
of
equity
and
inclusion.
Barcelona
here
again
is
a
great
example,
as
it's
pivoted
its
focus
to
look
more
at
equity,
social
infrastructure
and
neighborhoods.
Third,
we
live
in
a
city
with
a
self-declared,
affordable,
housing
emergency.
Q
Q
The
plan
also
needs
to
use
the
gender
and
intersectional
lens
to
accommodate
racialized
gender,
diverse
and
disabled
groups
number
four:
it's
crucial
that
the
concept
of
15-minute
neighborhoods,
which
everyone's
so
keen
on
to
be
clearly
defined
and
to
integrate
deeply
affordable,
housing,
social
infrastructure
and
other
urban
justice
issues
like
access
to
affordable
and
culturally
appropriate
food,
rather
than
treating
foods,
food
security
and
housing,
for
example,
solely
as
a
retail
issue.
Q
Five,
the
city
should
identify
municipal
land
to
locate
or
co-locate,
affordable
housing
and
social
infrastructure
like
child
care,
coupled
with
anti-displacement
measures,
we
voiced
our
concern
before
at
the
lack
of
proactive
policies
dealing
with
equity
and
inclusion,
because
the
plan
as
it
is
right
now
is
a
recipe
for
gentrification
and
gentrified.
Neighborhoods
are
not
complete
communities,
so
we'd.
L
Q
See
a
plan
that
includes
deeply
affordable
housing
targets
specific
to
50-minute
neighborhoods,
to
make
sure
that
gentrification
doesn't
lead
to
the
displacement
of
anyone,
but
especially
marginalized
and
low-income
individuals.
So
we
need
a
better
path
forward.
Significant
changes
must
be
drafted
so
that
we
have
a
truly
livable,
equitable
and
inclusive
city.
Thank
you.
A
P
Thank
you
very
much
lucia.
I
appreciate
your
perspective
on
this
and
in
terms
of
what
other
cities
are
doing.
It's
very
much
appreciated.
I
guess
one
of
the
issues
is
the
definition
of
affordable
housing
and
where
it
goes
and
and
how
we
implement
it.
I
guess
I
as
a
new
counselor,
I
was
kind
of
surprised
to
find
out.
Affordable
housing
was
so
broad,
a
definition
and
and
that
one
size
doesn't
fit
all
because
of
our
city
being
rather
wealthy
overall,
and
we
also
need
deep,
affordable
housing.
Q
Absolutely
this
is
important.
I
I
know
the
city
doesn't
have
an
exact
definition
and
because,
like
you
mentioned,
ottawa
is
special
in
that
the
the
population
given
who
works
here,
because
a
lot
of
federal
workers
are
here.
The
median
income
which
is
typically
used
is
too
high,
and
this
isn't
accurate
for
people
living.
Q
You
know
ow
recipients
or
dsp
recipients,
anyone
living
on
minimum
wage.
So
it's
important
and
crucial
to
include
this
in
something
like
the
official
plan
and
for
the
city
to
have
an
accurate
definition
of
this.
P
Yeah
and
and
the
fact
that
we
need
to
spread
it
around
I.e,
have
mixed
mixed
housing
so
that
the
example
of
sally
gabe
of
co-op
housing
that
type
of
thing
where
we
we
blend
housing
in
together
rather
than
having
it
in
one.
You
know
one
big
pack
of
houses
versus
you
know
so
that
all
income
levels
are
mixed.
Is
that
what
you're?
Looking
at
as
well?
Yes,.
Q
Absolutely
when,
when
you
have
in
zoning,
when
you
have
diversity,
you
know
if
it's
one
bedroom,
two
bedroom,
how
dense
can
it
be?
This
also
brings
a
different
diversity,
but
again
the
cost
is
important,
so
making
sure
that
maybe
even
community
benefits
we've
been
pushing
for
community
benefits
as
well.
These
are
important
so
that
we
have
it
written
as
a
contract.
What
we're
looking
for
and
another
thing
that
we
are
very
keen
on
is
seeing
deeply
affordable
in
perpetuity
and
not
just
for
20
years
for
15
years.
Q
D
Thank
you
thanks,
chair
thanks,
lucia
for
coming
out.
Some
of
my
questions
were
covered
by
councillor
kavanaugh,
but
just
in
terms
of
and
I'm
gonna
have
some
some
questions
for
staff
later
on
around
the
affordable
housing
component
of
of
the
plan-
and
I
agree
with
you
in
terms
of
you
know,
complete
communities
and
what
that
means,
and
it
really
does
mean
everything
from
deep
affordability.
D
You
know
working
up
to
a
low
market
rent
market
rent-
I
don't
like
using
you-
know,
30
of
average
median
family
income,
because
it's
far
too
high,
but
something
that's
deeply
affordable,
obviously
cannot
be
more
than
30
of
your
of
your
income,
so
really
want
to
make
sure
that
we
we
we
get
that
into
the
plan
correctly.
D
Because
that's
you
know
our
this
plan
needs
to
fit
into
the
provincial
policy
statement,
and
then
it
is
that
overarching
that
overarching
document
you
know
that
everything
else
falls
falls
out
to.
So
you
want
to
get
it
right.
So
I
just
want
to
ask
you.
You
know
from
your
work
with
callie
and
your
conversations
in
that
broader
community
of
people,
thinking
about
equity
and,
and
you
know,
housing
and
how
that
fits
in.
What
do
you
see
as
how
would
you
define
a
complete
community
in
terms
of
you
know?
D
Who
lives
there
like?
Is
it
10
15
affordable?
Is
it
20
deeply
another
20
at
you
know,
because
we
we
can't.
We
can't
compel
family
size
units,
but
what
we
can
do
is
make
things
affordable
for
families.
So
I
just
wonder
within
the
the
the
broader
community,
what
some
of
the
thinking
is
around
in
terms
of
how
mixed
income
breaks
down
at
what
what
the
community
thinks
is
kind
of
that
fair
breakdown
for
mixed
income.
Q
So
I
cannot
speak
on
behalf
of
of
the
entire
community,
but
personally,
in
my
experience
and
what
I
see
you
know,
what
sally
mentioned
is
great,
because
you
get
a
diversity
of
incomes
that
this
means
personally
again
that
you
get
exposed
to
a
variety
of
people.
Bringing
having
diverse
communities
is
beneficial
to
everyone,
so
siloed
communities
having
wealthier
silos
having
lower
income
silos,
I
think,
isn't
necessarily
ideal.
So
a
number
I
can't
provide,
but
I
am
personally
very
much
for
mixing
it
up.
Q
D
Fair
enough,
fair
enough,
thank
you
thank
you
for
coming
out,
and
those
are
questions
that
we
will
be
posing
to
staff
to
make
sure
that
what
we
have
embedded
here
is
going
to
work
for
you
know
decades.
Thank
you.
L
Thanks
very
much
chair
thanks,
lucia
for
being
here
and
to
sally
as
well
for
delegating
I
wanted
to
ask
you
about
the
mechanics
of
this
and
next
steps,
because
I
know
you
said
you
mentioned
you're
working
with
the
people's
official
plan.
Folks
and
there's
been
obviously
a
lot
of
good
work
to
look
at
changes
because
at
the
end
of
the
day,
this
is
not
the
planning
department's
plan.
It's
not
developer's
plan.
It's!
It
is
the
city
of
ottawa's
plan.
L
L
I
want
to
make
sure
that
the
the
points
that
you've
raised,
because
I've
seen
one
motion
on
on
equity
and
inclusion
that
I
believe
has
been
drafted,
but
I
I
just
want
to
know
from
you
in
terms
of
mechanism-
are
there
others
are
there
other
points
that
that
you're,
not
seeing
potentially
in
that
draft
motion
that
you
want
us
to
bring
forward?
L
What
can
we
do
to
help
ensure
that
the
people
that
you're
advocating
for
which
likely
very
much
less
consulted
in
during
the
plan
as
they
always
are
throughout
any
any
consultation
in
the
city?
What
what
is
it
that
we
can
do
to
help
make
sure
that
those
those
points
are
made
and
motions
come
forward
to
reflect
those
those
pieces
in
the
plan.
Q
Thank
you.
That's
a
great
question.
I
the
motions
right
now
that
counselors
have
that
we've
drafted
are
pretty
accurate
on
on
things.
We
absolutely
need
to
see.
We
can
recommend
a
lot
of
more
changes,
but
these
are
our
absolute
kind
of
these
definitely
need
to
be
in
there
in
some
way
or
form.
But
you
know
besides
counselor
support.
If
counselors
would
like
to
meet
with
us,
we
can
or
you
know
our
membership
or
we
can
facilitate
those
conversations
so
we're
happy
to.
Q
I
know
the
time
frame
is
short
now,
but
we're
happy
to
do
that
and
in
terms
of
the
rest
of
the
pop
motions
you'll
be
hearing
from
a
lot
of
us
today.
So
you'll
get
lots
of
details
on
that,
but
from
us
I
think
we
got
it
it's
on
there
and
if
you
would
like
to
meet
more
with
residents
for
further
input,
we're
happy
to
facilitate
that.
L
Okay,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
motion's
not
getting
cut
up
and
that
it
is
implemented
in
full,
and
I
know
cancer
king
has
a
kavanaugh
have
been
working
on
it,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
reflective
of
what
you're
asking
for,
because,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
it's
your
plan.
So
thank
you.
R
Thank
you
chair
and
thank
you
for
your
delegation
and,
as
my
colleagues
around
the
table
have
mentioned
both
councilor
menard
and
councillor
kavanaugh.
We
are
working
on
elements
to
really
attempt
to
enhance
the
the
focus
on
equity
and
to
really
drive
the
fact
that
there
should
be,
in
my
estimation,
an
estimation
of
many
people
across
the
city,
a
a
declaration
that
really
emphasizes
social
equity.
So
I
was
wondering
if
you
could
speak
to
that.
R
That's
that's
an
area
we
are
examining
in
terms
of
some
of
the
amendments
to
the
official
plan,
the
idea
that
we
we
really
state
that
social
equity
is
central
to
the
development
of
a
fair
and
equitable
city,
and
we
start
to
really
tie
in
things
that
I've
heard
over
the
course
of
this
term
around
ensuring
that
we
have
proper
investments
in
housing,
economic
development
and
health
outcomes
that
are
geared
to
all,
which
is
what
I
think
you've
been
you've
been
talking
about,
and
some
of
the
things
that
we
want
to
do
is
ensure
that
there
is
a
direct
tie
to
high
quality,
affordable
housing,
specifically
for
new
immigrants,
for
indigenous
people
for
black
and
racialized
people.
R
So
I
I
think
we
hear
that
your
vision
is
is
trying
to
integrate
all
these
elements
and
have
them
come
together.
I
was
wondering
if
you
could
speak
a
little
bit
more
to
that,
especially
around
the
social
equity
component
and
seeing
how
those
elements
can
be
tied
to
all
the
things
that
that
the
city
undertakes.
Q
Absolutely
so
first,
I
I
want
to
acknowledge
that
there's
often
pushback
and
saying
well,
this
is
a
land
use
plan
like
what
does
land
use.
What
does
planning
have
to
do
with
equity
and
inclusion,
and
that
again
is
very
myopic?
It
has
everything
to
do
with
it.
If
this
is
our
plan
for
a
future
city,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
things
that
haven't
occurred.
Q
You
know
the
concepts
of
redlining
in
the
united
states
or
without
going
too
far
in
halifax.
Those
still
have
repercussions
today.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
things
don't
happen
like
that
again
and
that
our
marginalized
and
underrepresented
communities
have
a
say
and
have
a
secure
future,
whether
that
means
having
access
to
affordable
housing.
Q
Again,
we
have
a
housing
crisis,
it's
not
just
affordable
housing,
but
it's
the
fact
that,
more
than
before
and
more
because
of
the
pandemic
as
well,
we
have
people
that
can't
access
a
home,
and
the
fact
that
this
is
still
even
a
discussion
is
is
so
hard
to
do
so.
Q
I
think
it's
critical
that
council,
you
know,
continues
to
really
listen
and
meaningfully
consult
the
community
and
and
create
a
city
that
isn't
just
for
you
know
the
usual
few,
the
same
few
that
we
see
you
know
people
that
live
in
the
wealthier
areas
that
don't
have
to
worry
about
putting
food
on
the
table
that
don't
have
to
worry
about
paying
for
transit.
Q
We
live
in
a
city
with
one
of
the
most
expensive
transit
systems
in
north
america,
so
taking
your
kids
having
to
go
to
your
medical
appointments
if
you're
on
odsp,
if
you're
on
ow
this
is
super
difficult
to
do
so
we
want
to
make
sure
we're
creating
a
city
that
that
meets
the
needs
and
basic
needs
and
demands
for
folks
on
low
income,
but
also
for
everyone,
so
that
we
can
have
a
livable
city
like
counselors,
are
proposing
how
the
planning
department
is
proposing
a
livable
city,
but
one
that
we
can
also.
Q
You
know,
go
for
work
for
play
and
for
everything.
So
I
know
I'm
taking
a
lot
of
time.
But
if,
if
you
look
at
the
motion,
we
we
have
suggested
what
we
absolutely
need
to
see
and
and
we
we
have
one
for
housing
specifically
and
we
have
the
one
for
equity
and
inclusion,
but
I
think
having
the
voices
and
the
representation
of
underrepresented
folks
that
are
marginalized
and
we
don't
see
or
hear
from
often
is
super
super
important.
I
I
don't
know
if
I
answered
your
question
no.
R
You
have,
I
really
do
appreciate
your
input,
because
we
want
you
to
know
that
we
are
listening,
that
we
do
see
a
need
for
direct
links
to
social
equity.
Really,
in
our
estimation,
that
really
means
equity
of
opportunity.
Equity
of
outcome
for
all
residents
in
the
city
and
the
inputs
that
you
have
provided
cowie,
as
well
as
through
motions
to
us,
is
very,
is
very
helpful.
We've
been
listening
through
different
processes
at
the
city
through
the
establishment
of
an
anti-racism
secretariat.
R
Many
of
my
colleagues
are
are
working
on
budget
consultations
and
my
office
will
have
a
budget
consultation
specifically
for
racialized,
indigenous
and
black
communities.
So
we
we
want
to
ensure
that
we
bring
this
vision
of
equity
because
we
want
to
break
vicious
cycles.
We
we
want
to
ensure
that
people
have
access
to
better
housing
in
the
city,
have
access
to
better
jobs,
and
you
know
it's
it's
a
vicious
cycle.
People
don't
have
access
to
these
opportunities,
so
then
they
don't
get
access
to
to
proper
housing.
R
A
Thank
you
councillor,
king,
thank
you,
miss
browns
for
being
here
today,
so
we
had
a
bit
of
a
change.
Our
next
two
speakers
are
not
present.
The
next
speaker
was
to
be
ken
holmes.
We
have
his
submission.
You
can
read
it
in
the
the
shared
folder
that
we
have
access
to
all
of
us,
the
speaker
after
that
was
katie.
Burkholder
with
alliance.
10,
homelessness
and
katie
will
also
not
be
speaking
this
morning.
A
Unfortunately,
so
we
would
move
on
then,
and
so
that
I
didn't
preface
it
earlier,
but
we'll
move
on
then
to
our
eighth
speaker,
elizabeth
mcallister,
with
the
manor
community
association
following
this
mcallister
we're
going
to
go
to
we
in
counselor
series
opening
comments.
He
mentioned
the
12
30
break,
so
we
will
do
a
break
after
this
mcallister
and
then
we'll
come
back
in
which
we
will
have
mary
wong,
laura
and
paul
goodkey.
G
Thank
you
councillor,
moffat,
like
others
here
today
we
see
challenges
and
opportunities
in
the
new
official
plan.
Three
issues
are
of
importance
to
my
community:
first
protect
the
downtown
core
and
urban
neighborhood
interurban
neighborhood
communities
from
inter-provincial
truck
traffic.
G
G
It
is
a
very
mixed
community,
with
all
types
of
housing,
publicly,
cooperatively
and
privately
owned.
We
are
four
kilometers
away
from
the
lrt
station
and
not
served
by
frequent
transit
service.
A
redevelopment
plan
for
a
35
acre
massive
intensification
project
is
already
before
the
city
and
it
will
protect
deeply
affordable
housing
for
current
residents.
G
Next
slide,
please,
by
adding
an
inner
urban
transact
to
the
relocation
of
inter-provincial
track
traffic
away
from
the
downtown
core.
We
are
protecting
whole
ranges
of
inner
city
communities
that
will
be
intensely
intensified.
Spreading
traffic
truck
traffic
from
one
intensified
residential
neighborhood
to
another
does
not
solve
the
problem
and
creates
new
ones.
In
fact,
both
mayor
watson
and
joban
are
publicly
against
the
kettle
island
bridge.
Often
deaths
often
heard
to
be
the
crossing
of
choice,
which
is
in
manor
park.
G
G
G
We
see
hemlock
being
designated
a
minor
corridor,
whereas
island
park,
which
experiences
much
of
the
same
issues
and
leads
to
a
bridge,
is
not
so.
We
are
uncomfortable
with
delegated
authorities
set
out
in
this
in
this
on
this
slide
to
allow
staff
to
make
these
delegations
without
public
oversight
next
slide.
Please.
G
G
Banner
park
is
well
served
in
access
to
shops,
medical
and
other
services
on
beechwood,
saint
laurent
and
montreal
road,
less
than
less
than
20
minutes
walk
away
some
much
closer.
This
precludes
the
need
for
hemlock
to
be
designated
as
a
minor
corridor
to
allow
commercial
development
next
slide.
Please,
a
secondary
plan
could
reflect
our
vision
that
hemlock
and
san
lorenzo
align
with
op
goals
such
as
active
transportation,
climate
resilience,
protecting
green
spaces
and
livability,
and
it
could
address
increasing
traffic
and
speeding,
especially.
G
Side,
nine,
please
next
slide
a
picture,
that's
not
the
deadline.
A
picture
is
worth
a
thousand
backless
and
is
worth
a
thousand
words.
We
can
request
equally
that
north
hemlock,
sorry
that
north
center
on
not
be
designated
as
minor
corridor.
It
does
not
connect
with
any
other
neighborhood.
It
has
never
been
identified
as
a
transit
corridor
or
classified
it
is
an
interior
road
or
a
regional
road.
A
residential
150
meter,
evolving
overlay
is
just
not
suitable
for
a
residential
neighborhood.
This
is
not
banker.
G
Bronson
last
slide
manor
park
will
exceed
expectations
for
intensification
and
we
we
can't
forget
it
is
a
means
to
achieve
a
more
sustainable
city.
Intensification
is
not
an
end.
Our
residents
are
scared.
That's
the
word
I
hear
the
most
fearful
of
losing
deeply
affordable
housing
of
not
being
able
to
age
in
place.
G
Many
young
people
are
afraid
of
losing
their
recent
investments
in
homes
and
condos
all
are
fearful
of
losing
our
material,
our
mature
candidate
canopy.
We
urge
you
to
plan
with
our
community
because
quality
intensification
is
possible.
We
support
the
fca
and
community
collective
submissions.
Please
read
the
latter,
it
will
help
you.
Thank
you.
So
much.
A
R
Thank
you
chair
and
thank
you,
elizabeth
for
the
wonderful
deputation
that
you
provided
on
behalf
of
manor
park
and
and
also
for
the
work
that
you
do.
I
I'd
like
to
acknowledge
that,
especially
with
the
community
collective,
it's
not
just
planning
issues
that
you
bring
to
us.
You
bring
the
holistic
scale
of
of
considerations,
including
around
social
service
investments
across
the
board.
R
So
we're
we're
really
appreciative
of
the
work
that
that
you've
done,
and
in
that
vein,
you
know
it
is
important
to
to
really
look
at
the
the
wider
spectrum.
R
I
know
that
often
community
associations
are
accused
of
simply
being
a
nimbi,
and
I
know
that
that's
not
the
case
being
a
former
community
association
president
myself
often
what
people
are
responding
to
is
the
pace
of
development,
the
type
of
development.
So
I
was
just
wondering
if
you
could
briefly
talk
to
that
in
the
context
of
of
hemlock
and
saint
laurent
and
and
what
the
potential
of
unmitigated
types
of
development
without
proper
planning
and
without
a
community
proper
community
consultation,
looks
like.
G
Well,
I
would
say
that
manor
park
is
a
very
inclusive
community
and
we've
worked
very
hard
to
over
the
last
five
years
to
bring
a
poverty
reduction
plan
to
our
neighborhood.
We
have
37
percent
child
poverty
in
manor
park.
We
have
tried
hard
to
have
our
parks
updated,
but
we're
told
there's
no
money.
We've
had
tried
hard
to
have
dangerous,
intersections,
fixed
and
we're
told
there's
no
money.
G
So
we're
concerned
that
the
plan
will
offer
in
very
rapid
intensification
because
it
allows
permission
it
doesn't.
We
are
not
in
charge.
The
city
is
not
in
charge
of
saying
who
can
build
where
this
will
be
intensification
done
developer
by
developer
building
by
building,
so
without
there
being
a
european
approach
of
a
city
in
charge
of
sort
of
designing.
What
a
community
should
look
like
giving
developers,
options
for
building
materials,
lamp
posts,
how
they
treat
sidewalks
and
so
on.
G
We're
very
concerned
that
we're
going
to
have
a
mishmash
of
development
and
one
that,
based
on
our
experience,
is
not
attentive
to
what
is
special
about
manor
park,
which
is
this
mix
of
middle
and
upper
class,
and
people
living
in
dire
poverty
as
raz
chetty
and
robert
putnam
have
strongly
recommended.
You
need
that
mix.
That
is
how
children
break
the
cycle
of
poverty,
so
we're
very
anxious
to
keep
what
you
may
think
is
the
nimby
part
of
our
park.
But
those
are
the
mentors.
Those
are
the
soccer
coaches,
those
are
the
hockey
coaches.
G
One
of
them
got
me
out.
I've
been
driving
syrian
kids
to
hockey
for
three
or
four
years
now
and
so
have
about
20
others
and
we've
had
a
leading
covid
plan
led
by
my
sister
organization,
the
manor
park
community
council
that
got
our
neighbors
out
and
many
of
whom
have
been
shocked
by
the
level
of
poverty
in
our
in
our
award.
G
So,
with
regard
to
saint
laurent,
north
and
hemlock,
we're
very
worried
that
intensification
as
planned
on
those
in
those
neighborhoods
will
start
to
crack
the
sense
of
community
and
the
balance
that
we
have
between
middle
middle
class,
and,
I
should
say,
middle
income
and
lower
income
residents.
It
will
be
the
beginning
of
what
we
are
afraid
of
will
be
more
isolation
in
terms
of
hemlock.
G
We
are
worried
that
commercial
buildings
along
that
varied
strip
of
land,
where
the
buses
compete
with
the
site.
The
cyclists,
which
compete
with
cars
and
baby
carriages
on
the
sidewalks,
and
we
have
two
bus
stops
now,
where
literally
mothers
are
let
out
on
the
street
with
their
baby
carriages
on
the
street,
because
there's
no
crosswalk
and
they
have
to
go
across
so
adding
more
congestion
to
that
street
is
very
disconcerting
and
more
congestion
would
come
from
six
six
story:
houses
and
cars,
stopping
and
starting
people
coming
in
and
out
of
commercial
buildings.
G
G
G
We
would
like
to
see
more
effective
traffic
safety
and
calming
mechanisms
there
improved
bicycle
lanes
for
the
tens
of
thousands
of
cyclists
that
go
up
and
down
that
street
per
year
and
retention
of
the
the
the
tree
canopy
and
clear
setbacks
from
the
sidewalk
that
will
ensure
us
the
protection
of
existing
mature
trees
and
the
protection
of
this
four
spaces.
Beautiful
green
space
is
part
of
our
national
heritage
toronto
talks
about
in
their
opi
about
protecting
beauty.
G
This
is
a
beautiful
area
and
they're
called
parks
for
a
reason
rockland
park
manor
park
during
covid,
we
had
hundreds
of
people.
I
would
have
cars
pull
up
in
my
driveway
and
I
would
welcome
them
and
ask
where
they
were
from
constantly
from
other
parts
of
the
city
coming
to
walk
on
our
safe
streets
under
tree
cover.
G
In
my
international
development
background,
I've
worked
at
the
at
the
international
level
on
environment
and
I'm
not
convinced
that
allowing
development
that
goes
from
that
will
cut
down.
Allow
removal
of
our
mature
tree
cover
is
environmentally
sound
decision.
I
feel
like
we're
the
lungs
of
the
community
and
furthermore,
we
don't
talk
often
about
but
a
huge
problem
with
this
with
our
challenge
of
this
plan
will
be
the
deconstruction
and
construction
waste
and
the
burden
that
places
on
our
environment,
and
that
is
not
even
discussed
in
the
garbage
plan.
G
That's
a
provincial
responsibility,
I
am
told,
and
yet
other
cities
in
toronto
have
a
plan
to
ensure
better
waste
management
in
this
deconstruction
on
on
sandleron.
To
answer
specifically,
your
question:
counselor
king
sandlerong
at
that
end
is
a
very
residential
street.
There
are
seven
small
businesses.
G
So
we
don't
see
the
need
to
expand
and
I
I
could
show
you
a
picture
I
wish
I
could.
I
took
it
out
of
my
slideshow
of
what's
planned
now,
which
has
been
very
high,
originally
15
story
to
10
stories.
I
think
that's
going
down
to
nine
in
a
plan
that's
developed
already
before
the
city,
I
must
say,
with
a
developer
with
whom
so.
R
G
Yes,
as
long
as
it
is
a
we
feel
like,
we
are
equal
partner
with
the
city
and
deciding
what
the
the
changes
should
be.
We
recognize
our
responsibilities
as
a
park
as
a
community
to
align
with
the
official
plan,
and
I
think
certainly
we
will
be
doing
that
thanks
to
the
35-acre
development
and
another
large
development
on
its
way.
But
we
we
would
like
to
preserve
the
the
safe
quiet
and
a
very
healthy
and
inclusive
community,
while
enabling
the
intensification-
and
perhaps
a
secondary
plan,
is
yes.
G
R
I
would
definitely
concur
with
you
and
if
the
chair
would
indulge
me
just
one
more
line
of
question
and
questions
around
the
bridge,
do
you
agree
that
trucks
need
to
be
removed
from
the
downtown
core.
G
In
fact,
the
city
had
already
decided
some
time
ago
that
it
would
support
a
tunnel,
and
the
city
had
agreed.
The
provincial
government
had
agreed
and
we
were
about
to
start
an
environmental
assessment,
and
instead
the
federal
government
decided
against
making
its
contribution
to
that
assessment
and
it
died
and
they've
gone
in
favor
of
two
plans
that
have
been
widely
discredited,
both
technically
and
in
terms
of
not
taking
into
consideration.
R
No
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
chair
to
ask
elizabeth
questions.
I
know
she's
the
outgoing
president
of
of
the
manor
park
association,
so
I
just
want
to
really
say
kudos
for
all
the
work
that
you've
done
and
all
the
work,
especially
around
covered
relief
in
our
in
our
communities,
in
conjunction
with
other
community
associations
in
the
ward.
So
thank
you
so
much
chad,
chair.
A
Right,
thank
you.
Councillor
jimmy
had
his
hand
up,
but
did
I
touch
on
your
you're.
I
You're
reading
my
mind
co-chair,
I
was
just
actually
going
to
point
that
out.
So
thank
you.
A
That's
what
I
do,
I
saw
your
hand
go
up,
I'm
like
I'm
just
going
to
say
what
he
did
say.
Okay,
so
thank
you!
It's
12
44!
Now
I
did
promise.
We
did
promise
we'd,
take
a
break
at
12,
30.,
ralston
removed
that
ability
for
us,
so
we're
just
gonna
keep
going
right.
No,
I'm
still
so
we're
gonna
go
for
take
a
break.
We
can
come
back
at
1
10..
So
back
at
110,
with
mary
wong,
followed
by
laura
shantz
and
paul
goodkey.