►
Description
Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee - Meeting of 3ebruary 2022
Agenda and supporting documents available at www.ottawa.ca/agendas
A
A
Like
to
read
my
statement,
this
is
a
public
meeting
to
consider
the
proposed
comprehensive
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
amendments
listed
as
item
one
to
four
on
today's
agenda.
For
the
item
just
mentioned,
only
those
who
make
auto
submissions
today
or
written
submissions
before
the
amendment
are
adopted
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
ontario
land
tribunal.
A
In
addition,
the
applicant
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
ontario
land
tribunal.
If
council
does
not
adopt
an
amendment
within
90
days
of
recipient
of
the
application
for
zoning
and
120
days
for
official
plan
amendment
to
submit
written
comment
on
these
amendments
prior
to
their
consideration
by
city
council
on
february
9,
please
email
or
call
the
committee
or
council
coordinator,
so
folks
obviously
we're
having
our
meeting
on
on
zoom.
We
all
know
the
zoom
rules
and
regulation.
By
now.
B
A
Thank
you
kelly,
okay,
so
declaration
of
interest
see
none
confirmation
of
minutes
minus
28
meeting
of
second
december
2021
of
the
agriculture
and
rural
affair
committee.
Can
we
confirm
the
minutes?
Okay.
Thank
you.
Item
number.
One
is
zoning
by
law,
amendment
for
2256
and
2220
burnt
land
road
in
west
carter.
In
march,
the
report
recommendation
item
one
that
the
agricultural
rural
affair
committee
recommend
council
approve
an
amendment
to
zoning
by
law,
2008-250.
A
2256
burnt
land
road
for
the
purpose
of
rezoning,
the
land
from
agricultural
zone
ag-1
to
agriculture
zone
subzone,
5
ag5
prohibit
residential
use
on
the
retain
farmland,
as
detailed
in
document.
2..
Item
number
2
that
the
agricultural
rural
affair
committee
approved
the
consultation
details.
Section
of
this
report
be
included
as
a
part
of
the
brief
explanation
in
the
summary
of
written
and
oral
public
submission
on
the
item.
B
A
A
B
A
Thank
you
item
number.
Two
also
is
a
similar
item.
Number
two
is
zoning
bylaw
amendment
four,
forty,
four,
four:
three
with
fulton
road.
The
report
recommendation
that
the
agricultural
and
rural
affairs
committee
recommend
council
approve
an
amendment
to
the
zoning
by-law
2008-250
for
part
of
4443
with
hilton
road
for
the
proposed
for
of
re-zoning
the
land
from
agriculture
zone
ag
to
agriculture
zone
subzone,
5
85
to
prohibit
residential
uses
on
their
retained
farmland,
as
dictated
in
document
2
item
number
2.
The
agriculture
and
rural
affairs
committee
approved
the
consultation
details.
A
A
The
existing
official
class
schedule,
a
as
detailed
in
document
2
onto
scheduled
b9
rural
transact
of
the
new
official
plan
and
item
number
2
that
the
agriculture
and
rural
affairs
committee
approved
the
consultation
details.
Section
of
this
report
be
included
as
a
part
of
a
brief
explanation
in
the
summary
of
of
written
and
rural
public
submission.
A
A
A
A
2008-250
for
part
of
42
20
upper
dwyer
road
for
the
purpose
of
free
zoning,
their
land
from
agricultural
zone
a.g
the
agricultural
zone,
subzone
4
ag4
to
prohibit
residential
uses
on
the
retained
farmland
as
detail.
In
document
two
item
number
two:
that
the
agriculture
and
rural
affairs
committee
approved
the
consultation
details.
Section
of
this
report
be
included
as
a
part
of
the
brief
explanation
in
the
summary
or
of
written
and
oral
public
submission
to
be
prepared
by
the
office
of
the
truth.
A
So
we
have
no
in-camera
items,
but
we
do
have
two
motions:
one
I'll
be
moving
myself
and
that
and
but
we
need
to
wave
the
rule
to
to
deal
with
it
today.
So
we
have
two
motions,
one
from
myself
and
one
from
councillor
moffat.
I
believe
yes,
so
on
a
first
motion
is:
can
we
wait
the
rules
and
that's
for
2023
appointment
with
the
conservation
of
authority
boards
of
director,
and
I
think
kali
already
shared
the
resolution.
A
I
think
councillor
moffat,
council,
deroz
myself
and
many
of
you.
We
sit
on
conservation
authority
and
and
we've
seen
that
change.
But
let
me
read
the
motion:
it's
prepared
by
staff,
be
it
resolve
that
the
rules
of
procedure,
while
we
did
this,
whereas
the
conservation
authority
asked
now
require
that
minimum
of
70
of
the
of
their
board
of
director
must
be
elected.
Official,
representing
municipalities
within
the
watershed.
A
But
the
city
of
ottawa
represents
a
significant
proportion
of
the
land
area
as
covered
by
rideau
valley
conservation
authority,
the
mississippi
valley
conservation
authority
and
the
south
nation
conservation
authority
and,
as
such,
italy
would
require
a
very
large
proportion
of
council.
Member
to
sit
on
one
of
the
conservation
authority
board,
whereas
section
14,
subsection,
1
2
of
the
conservation
authority
act,
allowed
municipality
to
apply
to
the
minister
to
allow
a
municipality
to
have
less
than
70
percent
representation,
thereby
allowing
a
council
to
appoint
citizen
members.
A
Therefore,
be
it
resolve
that
the
agriculture
and
rural
affair
committee
recommend
council
request
the
mayor
and
the
city
clerk
on
behalf
of
council
to
make
an
application
under
the
conservation
authority
act
to
have
less
than
70
representation
of
the
tree
conservation
authority
board.
So
some
of
us
basically
we're
going
to
need,
I
think,
for
mississippi
five
councillors
and
south
nation
five
and
I
think
rito
would
require
five.
A
A
B
In
the
time
since
amalgamation,
the
rbca
board
has
only
had
two
counselors
regularly
attend,
not
be
on
it,
but
actually
regularly
attend
the
meetings
and
that's
janet
stavinga
and
myself,
there's
been
other
counselors
on
the
board,
but
they
don't
show
up,
and
we
have
five
appointed
members
and
they're
there
regularly
they're
there
diligently
they
do
the
work
we
have.
You
know
two
city
appointees
on
the
executive
committee
at
the
rvca
board,
ann
robinson
and
peter
leno
too,
is
the
current
chair.
B
The
previous
vice
chair
was
at
hand
another
city
of
ottawa
appointee,
so
we've
had
very
active
city
of
ottawa
appointees
on
there
and
it's
important
to
have
that
representation
on
there.
That's
why
it's
designed
that
way
we're
providing
some
balance
and
when
it
comes
to
we
mean
we
fund
91
percent
of
their
entire
budget
at
the
rvca
just
from
city
of
ottawa,
taxpayers
alone,
so
ensuring
that
we
have
proper
representation
knowing
full
well
that
five
counselors
aren't
showing
up
every
every
month.
B
We
just
know
that
I
mean,
and
it's
it's
different
for
some
of
these
smaller
municipalities,
where
they
only
have
one
representative,
in
fact,
every
other
municipality
in
the
rita
valley
conservation
authority.
Watershed
only
has
one
representative
and
the
city
of
auto
has
six,
which
just
signifies
the
exact,
the
sheer
magnitude
of
the
rvc
within
ottawa.
So
it's
important
that
this,
this
element
of
the
conservation
authorities
act
makes
no
sense.
B
I
don't
know
why
they
changed
it
to
this.
Maybe
they
were
getting
some
lobbying
from
smaller
municipalities
somewhere
in
southern
ontario,
but
when
it
comes
to
ottawa,
this
little
caveat
of
the
of
the
changes
to
the
act
in
the
last
couple
years.
It
do
not,
they
do
not
make
sense.
So
this
exemption
is
is
important,
and
I
hope
that
we
can
achieve
this
so
that
the
board
can
keep
on
doing
and
work
and
representing
ottawa
properly.
B
A
B
Thank
you.
So
I'm
sure
many
of
you
had
municipal
concurrence
applications
for
cellular
towers
in
the
past.
This
is
one
of
those
except
it
lapsed.
So
the
municipal
concurrence
lapsed
before
you
know.
I
think
it
was
what
the
three
year
the
three
year
period,
that
they
had
it's
in
the
it's
in
the
motion.
So
but
there's
no
mechanism
to
extend
at
the
staff
level
so
in
order
for
the
applicant
to
continue
on
they'd
have
to
go
right
back
to
the
start
and
reapply.
Yet
this
application
has
not
changed
at
all.
B
So
the
the
motion
before
us
is
simply
to
provide
that
extension
and
allow
them
more
time
so
we'd
extend
it
by
24
months,
lapsing
on
december
21st
2023,
because
it
did
already
lapse.
It
lapsed
back
in
in
december,
so
the
therefore
be
resolving
the
municipal
concurrence
for
the
proposed
intense
system
at
41,
18,
william
mchugh
and
road,
be
extended
by
24
months
lapsing
on
21st
december
2023..
A
A
A
This
court
will
now
convene
for
the
second
sitting
of
the
court
of
revision
under
section
46
of
the
drainage
act.
No
appeal
has
been
received
by
the
clerk
any
owner
of
lands
assessed
under
the
engineers
report,
who
has
not
provided
written
notice
of
appeal
to
the
clerk
in
advance
of
this
hearing
should
identify
themselves
with
the
clerk
assistant
at
this
time.
With
the
request
to
be
heard.
A
This
is
the
second
meeting
for
this
court
provision.
We
have
not
received
any
appeal
nodes
for
this
project
and
the
deadline
for
submitting
an
appeal
has
passed.
It
is
my
understanding
that
no
one
has
registered
to
speak
on
this
item,
so
that
should
ask
in
case
if
anybody
wants
to
speak
about
this
one
and.
A
A
A
Thank
you
very
much
on
now
with
the
pros.
I
believe
the
second
step
will
be
working
with
our
legal
for
preparation
afflicting
decision
of
the
court
revision.
So
with
that,
we
adjourn
the
court's
revision
and
if
nothing
else
will
adjourn
as
of
course
thank
you
very
much
folks
and
have
a
great
day.
We
did
great.